The number of errors of fact in Arendt's book are considerably fewer than Abel implies.とは 意味・読み方・使い方

The number of errors of fact in Arendt's book are considerably fewer than Abel implies.

These figures don't lie.

They look the same upon looking at the analysis case, but when you compare it to the ion exchange cartridge, there is less sample water.

There are a number of methodological problems here, not to mention the inaccuracy of some of the results.

the buzz of excitement was so great that a formal denial was issued

We cannot deny that the low number of medical cases and the high standard deviation is effecting the results.

We have no data relating to the restenosis rate associated with the use of bare stents.

these mythological figures are described disparagingly as belonging `only to a story'

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

In this paper I limit the discussion on Emmet's 'dyad' style in his works in 1995.

In this paper I limit the discussion to Emmet's 'dyad' style in his works from 1995.

The books may be had here, but I doubt if there are enough copies of it.

But the recent study revealed that the size difference is smaller than previously estimated.

The difficulty with biography is that it is partly record and partly art.

Although its writer was clear, its written date was not clear.

the attraction of the book is precisely its narrowness of focus

Pencilled notes copy poorly on a fax.

What is shown in the above experiment is that the right hemisphere of the brain is not used at all.

As a university student, I read Capital far more closely [with far greater attention] than any other book.

Tom's translation is too focused on the rhythm of English translation, and ignores the nuances of the original.

The author's verbiage produced a document of mammoth size and microscopic import.

presenting factual incidents without gilding by fictions

The most credible hypothesis is the one that limits the number of elements in the domain T.

A most credible hypothesis is the one that limits the number of elements in the domain T.

Evidence that the above example is farfetched can be seen by comparing the total occurrences of component X.

Smith's approach differs greatly from others in that he did not take the affixation into consideration.

the student's essay failed to list several important citations

This is a very good book, though I say it myself.

the storyline is wildly unrealistic

It should be emphasized that Emmet's theory yielded a number of byproducts in the process of application.