そのような複雑な行動が本能のみに由来するという主張はとうてい成り立たない。の英語

It cannot plausibly be argued that behaviour of such complexity derives entirely from instinct.

The reasons for this neglect are not hard to discover.

You have to be crazy to keep denying such an irrefutable truth!

Wanting to improve your expressiveness, but not wanting to express it is a contradiction from the beginning.

He's simply hopeless. He can't understand such simple things.

Actually that I bring a huge volume of reference material with me is a makeshift way of preventing people from disputing my case.

In fact, this does not seem to be true at all, except in a very trivial sense.

But this claim is emphatically not the one that Dennett is making.

Although the man's ideas are sound, because he can't express them well, he doesn't have a ghost of a chance of getting them accepted.

This statement-of-purpose essay has no consistency in how the points are laid out and gives a distracted impression.

a statement that is not literally false but that cleverly avoids an unpleasant truth

You should not easily trust a man of whose past know nothing.

Don't trust a man whose past you know nothing about.

Everyone loves to hear praise, but over-praise has the opposite effect of sounding insincere.

not expressing or given to expressing the truth

It is not unreasonable to think that these people were excluded from the community.

Granted that [Even if] your statement is true, it is no excuse for neglecting your duties.

It may sound idealistic, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's unrealistic.

The truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it, ignorance may deride it, malice may distort it, but there it is.

The bug was caused by an elementary error in programming constructs. Well, it was just a trivial error.

The severity of such marks can reveal whether or not any of these people were habitually engaged in hard labor.

The optimal formula which would encompass all these factors has not been proposed.

something which is believed unconditionally despite the fact that there are no real grounds for it

of words or propositions so related that both cannot be true and both cannot be false

What you say is no more than undergraduate theorizing. It is completely unrealistic.

We don't know why there's more matter than antimatter.

What am I supposed to say when he puts it so logically?

The statement, whether it may be true or false,―be it true or false,―does not concern us.

One is apt to think oneself faultless. State the facts as they are.

A slip of tongue will often lead us to unexpected results.