「最高裁判所」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(11ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第四条　この法律の規定により担保を立てるには、担保を立てるべきことを命じた裁判所又は保全執行裁判所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄区域内の供託所に金銭又は担保を立てるべきことを命じた裁判所が相当と認める有価証券（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第二百七十八条第一項に規定する振替債を含む。）を供託する方法その他最高裁判所規則で定める方法によらなければならない。ただし、当事者が特別の契約をしたときは、その契約による。例文帳に追加

Article 4 (1) Security shall be provided pursuant to the provisions of this Act by making a statutory deposit of money or of securities (including book-entry transfer bonds, etc. prescribed in Article 278, paragraph (1) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, Shares, etc.(Act No. 75 of 2001)) that are found to be reasonable by the court that has ordered the provision of security, to an official depository within the jurisdictional district of the district court having jurisdiction over the location of the court that has ordered the provision of security or the court of execution of a temporary restraining order, or by any other method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court; provided, however, that if the parties concerned have made a special contract, such contract shall prevail.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、第二項及び第三項の場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs (2) and (3). In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項まで（委員の解職等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、委員会設置会社の委員について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百一条第二項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十四第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive (Removal of Committee Members), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the committee members of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 401, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-24, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項までの規定並びに同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、執行役が欠けた場合又は定款で定めた執行役の員数が欠けた場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25, paragraph (2), and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company has no executive officer or any vacancy in the number of executive officers prescribed by the articles of incorporation. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第二百三十四条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第二項から第五項まで（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前二項の規定により組織変更をする相互会社の社員に株式を割り当てる場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 234, paragraph (1) (excluding all items) and (2) to (5) inclusive (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the allocation of shares to the members of a converting Mutual Company pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第七百八十五条第五項から第七項まで（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第七百八十六条（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の規定による請求について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 785, paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive (Right of Opposing Shareholders to Request Purchase of Shares), Article 786 (Determination of Value of Shares, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a request made under the preceding paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第七百八十七条第五項から第七項まで（新株予約権買取請求）、第七百八十八条（新株予約権の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の規定による請求について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 787, paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive (Right to Request Purchase of Share Options), Article 788 (Determination of Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a request made under the preceding paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項の規定による申立てについて、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号ホ及び第三号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前項の規定による第一項の清算人の解任の裁判について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under the preceding paragraph; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (e) and item (iii), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision on the dismissal of a liquidator under paragraph (1). In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十一条の二　会社法第二編第九章第一節第四款（債務の弁済等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十九条第一項（債権者に対する公告等）中「第四百七十五条各号」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条各号」と、同法第五百条第二項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 181-2 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 4 (Performance of Obligations), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "the items of Article 475" in Article 499, paragraph (1) (Public Notices to Creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180, item (i) or (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "court" in Article 500, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prime Minister"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十三条　会社法第五百七条（清算事務の終了等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百八条第一項中「第四百八十九条第七項各号」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第七項各号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 507 (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "the items of Article 489, paragraph (7)" in Article 508, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (7), item (i) or (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百七条　前条の規定により送達をすることができない場合には、裁判所書記官は、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める場所にあてて、書類を書留郵便又は民間事業者による信書の送達に関する法律（平成十四年法律第九十九号）第二条第六項に規定する一般信書便事業者若しくは同条第九項に規定する特定信書便事業者の提供する同条第二項に規定する信書便の役務のうち書留郵便に準ずるものとして最高裁判所規則で定めるもの（次項及び第三項において「書留郵便等」という。）に付して発送することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 107 (1) Where it is impossible to make a service pursuant to the provision of the preceding Article, a court clerk, for the cases listed in the following items, may send the document to the place specified in the respective items, by registered mail or services of correspondence delivery prescribed in Article 2(2) of the Act on Correspondence Delivery by Private Business Operators (Act No. 99 of 2002) that are provided by a general correspondence delivery operator prescribed in paragraph (6) of said Article or a specified correspondence delivery operator prescribed in paragraph (9) of said Article, which are specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as services equivalent to registered mail (hereinafter referred to as "registered mail, etc." in the following paragraph and paragraph (3)):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百九十八条　第百三十二条の十第一項本文の規定により電子情報処理組織を用いてされた支払督促の申立てに係る督促手続における支払督促に対し適法な督促異議の申立てがあったときは、督促異議に係る請求については、その目的の価額に従い、当該支払督促の申立ての時に、第三百八十三条に規定する簡易裁判所で支払督促を発した裁判所書記官の所属するもの若しくは前条の別に最高裁判所規則で定める簡易裁判所又はその所在地を管轄する地方裁判所に訴えの提起があったものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 398 (1) If a lawful objection to demand is made against a demand for payment issued through the demand procedure based on a petition for demand for payment that is filed by means of an electronic data processing system pursuant to the provision of the main clause of Article 132-10(1), with regard to the claim pertaining to the objection to demand, it shall be deemed that an action is filed, at the time of filing of the petition for demand for payment, with the summary court prescribed in Article 383 to which the court clerk who has issued the demand for payment belongs or a summary court specified separately by the Rules of the Supreme Court as set forth in the preceding Article or the district court that has jurisdiction over the location of either summary court, depending on the value of the subject matter of the claim.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四百条　指定簡易裁判所の裁判所書記官は、第百三十二条の十第一項本文の規定により電子情報処理組織を用いてされた支払督促の申立てに係る督促手続に関し、この法律その他の法令の規定により裁判所書記官が書面等の作成等（作成又は保管をいう。以下この条及び次条第一項において同じ。）をすることとされているものについては、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、書面等の作成等に代えて、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、当該書面等に係る電磁的記録の作成等をすることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 400 (1) With regard to a demand procedure based on a petition for demand for payment that is filed by means of an electronic data processing system pursuant to the provision of the main clause of Article 132-10(1), for which a court clerk shall be in charge of the preparation, etc. (meaning the preparation or retention; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) of a document, etc. pursuant to the provisions of this Act and other laws and regulations, notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, a court clerk of a designated summary court may conduct, in lieu of the preparation, etc. of a document, etc., preparation, etc. of an electromagnetic record pertaining to the document, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　前項の規定は、法第八十一条（他の法令による担保への準用）、第二百五十九条（仮執行の宣言）第六項（法において準用する場合を含む。）、第三百七十六条（仮執行の宣言）第二項及び第四百五条（担保の提供）第二項（他の法令において準用する場合を含む。）並びに他の法令において準用する法第七十六条（担保提供の方法）の最高裁判所規則で定める担保提供の方法について準用する。この場合において、前項第一号中「訴訟費用償還請求権」とあるのは「請求権」と、「確認するもので、確定判決」とあるのは「確認する確定判決若しくはこれ」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provision of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the method of providing security specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court set forth in Article 76 (Method of Providing Security)of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 81 (Application Mutatis Mutandis to Security Provided under Other Laws and Regulations), paragraph (6) of Article 259 (Declaration of Provisional Execution) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Code), paragraph (2) of Article 376 (Declaration of Provisional Execution) and paragraph (2) of Article 405 (Provision of Security) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to other laws and regulations) of the Code and any other laws and regulations. In this case, the phrase "right to reimbursement of court costs" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "claim" and the phrase "a document that confirms the existence of such right to reimbursement of court costs and has the same effect as a final and binding judgment" in said item shall be deemed to be replaced with "a final and binding judgment that confirms the existence of such right to reimbursement of court costs or a document that has the same effect as such judgment."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、第二項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a petition has been filed as prescribed in paragraph (2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十二条の四　家庭裁判所は、最高裁判所規則の定めるところにより第三条第一項第一号に掲げる少年に係る事件であつて次に掲げる罪のもの又は同項第二号に掲げる少年（十二歳に満たないで刑罰法令に触れる行為をした少年を除く。次項において同じ。）に係る事件であつて次に掲げる罪に係る刑罰法令に触れるもの（いずれも被害者を傷害した場合にあつては、これにより生命に重大な危険を生じさせたときに限る。）の被害者等から、審判期日における審判の傍聴の申出がある場合において、少年の年齢及び心身の状態、事件の性質、審判の状況その他の事情を考慮して、少年の健全な育成を妨げるおそれがなく相当と認めるときは、その申出をした者に対し、これを傍聴することを許すことができる。例文帳に追加

Article 22-4 (1) The family court may, pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court, permit, upon request, the victim, etc. to observe the proceedings on the date of the hearing of a case of a Juvenile as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) who committed a crime listed in any of the following items or for a case of a Juvenile as prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph (excluding any Juvenile under 12 years of age who committed an act violating laws and regulations of criminal nature; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) who committed an act violating criminal laws and regulations concerning crimes listed in any of the following items (limited to any act that caused serious danger to victim's life in either of said cases where the victim was injured) if the court found it appropriate and unlikely to hinder sound development of the Juvenile in light of the age of the Juvenile, emotional state, the nature of the case, status of the hearing and other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　委員は、弁護士、裁判官、検察官及び学識経験のある者の中から会長が委嘱する。但し、弁護士会の資格審査会においては、裁判官又は検察官である委員はその地の高等裁判所若しくは地方裁判所又は高等検察庁検事長若しくは地方検察庁検事正の推薦に基き、その他の委員はその弁護士会の総会の決議に基き、日本弁護士連合会の資格審査会においては、裁判官又は検察官である委員は最高裁判所又は検事総長の推薦に基き、その他の委員は日本弁護士連合会の総会の決議に基かなければならない。例文帳に追加

(3) The president of the Qualifications Screening Board shall appoint board members from among attorneys, judges, public prosecutors and academic experts; provided, however, that appointment of board members who are judges or prosecutors to the Qualifications Screening Board of a bar association shall be based upon the recommendations respectively of the High Court, the District Court, the superintendent public prosecutor of the High Public Prosecutors Office, or the chief public prosecutor of the District Public Prosecutors Office, located within the same jurisdiction, and the other members shall be appointed based on a resolution adopted at a general meeting of the bar association. The appointment of members who are judges or prosecutors to the Qualifications Screening Board of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations shall be based on the recommendations of the Supreme Court or the Prosecutor-General, and the other members shall be appointed based on a resolution adopted at a general meeting of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十条　民事訴訟法第九十八条第二項、第九十九条から第百三条まで、第百五条、第百六条、第百七条第一項（第二号及び第三号を除く。）及び第三項並びに第百九条（送達）の規定は、この法律又は前条の経済産業省令で定める書類の送達に準用する。この場合において、同法第九十八条第二項及び第百条中「裁判所書記官」とあるのは「特許庁長官の指定する職員又は審判書記官」と、同法第九十九条第一項中「郵便又は執行官」とあるのは「郵便」と、同法第百七条第一項中「場合には、裁判所書記官」とあるのは「場合及び審査に関する書類を送達すべき場合には、特許庁長官の指定する職員又は審判書記官」と、「最高裁判所規則」とあるのは「経済産業省令」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 190 Articles 98(2), 99 to 103, 105, 106, 107(1) (excluding items (ii) and (iii)), 107(3) and 109 (Service) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the service of documents as provided in this Act or Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "a court clerk" in Articles 98(2) and 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be deemed to be replaced with "an official designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office or a trial clerk", the term "mail or court enforcement officer" in Article 99(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "mail", the term "where ... the court clerk" in Article 107(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "where ... and where documents concerning the examination are to be served, an official designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office or a trial clerk" and the term "Supreme Court Rules" in Article 107(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十五条　この法律の規定により担保を立てるには、担保を立てるべきことを命じた裁判所（以下この項において「発令裁判所」という。）又は執行裁判所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄区域内の供託所に金銭又は発令裁判所が相当と認める有価証券（社債等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百二十九条第一項に規定する振替社債等を含む。）を供託する方法その他最高裁判所規則で定める方法によらなければならない。ただし、当事者が特別の契約をしたときは、その契約による。例文帳に追加

Article 15 (1) Security shall be provided pursuant to the provisions of this Act by making a statutory deposit of money or securities (including book-entry transfer company bonds, etc. prescribed in Article 129(1) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc. [Act No. 75 of 2001]) that are found to be reasonable by the court that has ordered the provision of security (hereinafter referred to as the "court issuing the order" in this paragraph) to an official depository within the jurisdictional district of the district court having jurisdiction over the location of the court issuing the order, or by any other method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court; provided, however, that if the parties concerned have made a special contract, such contract shall prevail.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　前項の規定による送達をすべき場合において、第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百六条の規定により送達をすることができないときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の住所、居所、営業所又は事務所にあてて、書類を書留郵便又は民間事業者による信書の送達に関する法律（平成十四年法律第九十九号）第二条第六項に規定する一般信書便事業者若しくは同条第九項に規定する特定信書便事業者の提供する同条第二項に規定する信書便の役務のうち書留郵便に準ずるものとして最高裁判所規則で定めるものに付して発送することができる。この場合においては、民事訴訟法第百七条第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。例文帳に追加

(4) In cases where a service is to be made under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if it is not possible to make the service pursuant to the provisions of Article 106 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, a court clerk may send the document to the domicile, residence, business office or office set forth in said paragraph by registered mail or services of correspondence delivery prescribed in Article 2(2) of the Act on Correspondence Delivery by Private Business Operators (Act No. 99 of 2002) that are provided by a general correspondence delivery operator prescribed in paragraph (6) of said Article or specified correspondence delivery operator prescribed in paragraph (9) of said Article, which are specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as services equivalent to registered mail. In this case, the provisions of Article 107(2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) 補充的保護については，欧州共同体の法律に別段の規定がされている場合を除き，本法の規定の内，出願人の権利(第 6条から第 8条まで)，特許の効力及びその例外(第 9条から第12条まで)，特許実施命令，強制ライセンス(第 13条，第 24条)，保護範囲(第 14条)，ライセンス及びその登録(第 15条，第 30条)，特許の消滅(第 20条)，無効(第 22条)，実施許諾用意(第 23条)，国内代理人(第 25条)，連邦特許裁判所及び連邦特許裁判所における手続(第65条から第 99条まで)，連邦最高裁判所における手続(第 100条から第 122a条まで)，権利回復(第 123条)，真実陳述義務(第 124条)，電子書類(第 125a条)，公用語，書類の送達及び法的扶助(第 126条から第 128条まで)，権利侵害(第 139条から第 141a条まで，第 142a条及び第 142b条)，訴訟の併合及び特許についての権利の主張(第 145条及び第 146条)に関するものが準用される。例文帳に追加

(2) Unless otherwise provided by the laws of the European Communities, the provisions of this Act concerning the entitlement of the applicant (Sections 6 to 8), the effects of the patent and exceptions thereto (Sections 9 to 12), the order to use the patent, and compulsory licenses (Sections 13, 24), scope of protection (Section 14), licenses and their registration (Sections 15, 30), lapse of the patent (Section 20), nullity (Section 22), willingness to grant licenses (Section 23), domestic representatives (Section 25), the Patent Court and proceedings before the Patent Court (Sections 65 to 99), proceedings before the Federal Court of Justice (Sections 100 to 122a), reinstatement (Section 123), obligation to abide by the truth (Section 124), electronic documents (Section 125a), the official language, service of documents and legal assistance (Sections 126 to 128), infringements (Sections 139 to 141a, 142a and 142b), concentration of actions and allegation of entitlement to a patent (Sections 145 and 146) shall apply mutatis mutandis to supplementary protection.  - 特許庁

(2) 既に控訴状に含まれているときを除き，控訴理由は連邦最高裁判所に対し書面をもって提出しなければならない。控訴理由書の提出期間は 3月とする。当該期間は，判決全文の送達日から，ただし，遅くとも，その言渡から 5月が経過するときから起算する。裁判長は，請求に基づき，期限延期を許可することができるが，ただし，相手方が承諾することを条件とする。相手方が承諾しない場合においては，期限は 1月を限度として延期することがきるが，ただし，裁判長が独自に，その延期によって訴訟が遅延しないと確信すること，又は控訴人が顕著な理由を示すことができることを条件とする。控訴人がこの期限内の適切な時期に裁判所ファイルを閲覧する許可を得ることができない場合において請求があったときは，裁判長はその期限をファイルが送付されてから 2月後まで延期することができる。例文帳に追加

(2) When not already contained in the notice of appeal, the grounds of the appeal shall be filed in a brief to the Federal Court of Justice. The time limit for submitting the grounds of appeal shall be three months. It shall commence on the date of service of the full text of the judgment, at the latest, however, upon expiry of five months after pronouncement. The time limit may be extended by the presiding judge upon request if the adversary should consent. If adversary should not consent, the time limit may be extended by up to one month if the presiding judge is independently convinced that the lawsuit will not be delayed by the extension or if the appellant can show significant grounds. If the appellant cannot be permitted inspection of the court files for an appropriate time period within this time limit, the presiding judge may extend, upon a request, the time limit by up to two months after the files have been forwarded.  - 特許庁

第八十五条　会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十三条　会社法第八百二十四条（会社の解散命令）、第八百二十六条（官庁等の法務大臣に対する通知義務）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百四条（法務大臣の関与）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条（会社の財産に関する保全処分）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）並びに第九百五条及び第九百六条（会社の財産に関する保全処分についての特則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特定目的会社の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 163 The provisions of Article 824 (Dissolution Order for a Company), Article 826 (Duty of a Government Agency, etc. to Give Notice to the Minister of Justice), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 904 (Participation of the Minister of Justice), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by Juridical Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution order for a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 825 (Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 905 (Special Provisions on a Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), and Article 906 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of properties of a Specific Purpose Company in cases where a petition under Article 824(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article has been filed. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十一条　会社法第七百七十七条（新株予約権買取請求）、第七百七十八条（新株予約権の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、組織変更をする株式会社が新株予約権を発行している場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第七百七十八条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「組織変更後持分会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社（保険業法第六十九条第四項第一号に規定する組織変更後相互会社をいう。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 71 The provisions of Article 777 (Demand for Purchase of Share Options), Article 778 (Determination on Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where the converting Stock Company has issued share options. In this case, the term "converted membership company" in Article 778, paragraph (1), Article 778, paragraph (2), and Article 778, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company (referring to a Converted Mutual Company as defined in Article 69, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の消却及び併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十条第三項において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と、同法第二百三十五条第一項中「数に一株」とあるのは「口数に一口」と、「合計数」とあるのは「合計口数」と、「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation and consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Preferred Equity. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "one share in the number" in Article 235(1) of Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit in the number of units," the term "shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百九十七条第四項（株主による招集の請求）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項又は第二項の規定による社員総会の招集の請求があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百九十七条第四項中「第一項の規定による請求をした株主」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項の規定による請求をした特定社員又は同条第二項の規定による請求をした優先出資社員」と、同項第一号及び第二号中「第一項の規定による請求」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項又は第二項の規定による請求」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 297(4) (Demand for Calling of Meeting by Shareholders), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions of Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the request that a general meeting of members be called is made pursuant to paragraph (1) or paragraph (2). In this case, the phrase "the shareholders who made the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Equity Members who made the request pursuant to Article 53(1) of the Asset Securitization Act or the Preferred Equity Members who made the request pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article" and the phrase "the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4)(i) and (ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the request pursuant to the provisions of Article 53(1) or (2) of the Asset Securitization Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第三百七条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 306(3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting), Article 307 (Determination by the Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 306(4) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "a shareholders meeting" in Article 307(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a general meeting of members," the term "the shareholders" in Article 307(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条の二　裁判所は、第三条第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる少年に係る保護事件について、第二十一条の決定があつた後、最高裁判所規則の定めるところにより当該保護事件の被害者等（被害者又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹をいう。以下同じ。）又は被害者等から委託を受けた弁護士から、その保管する当該保護事件の記録（家庭裁判所が専ら当該少年の保護の必要性を判断するために収集したもの及び家庭裁判所調査官が家庭裁判所による当該少年の保護の必要性の判断に資するよう作成し又は収集したものを除く。）の閲覧又は謄写の申出があるときは、閲覧又は謄写を求める理由が正当でないと認める場合及び少年の健全な育成に対する影響、事件の性質、調査又は審判の状況その他の事情を考慮して閲覧又は謄写をさせることが相当でないと認める場合を除き、申出をした者にその閲覧又は謄写をさせるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 5-2 (1) When there is a request from the victim, etc. (which means the victim, his or her legal representative or his or her spouse, lineal relative or sibling if the victim has died or suffers serious physical or mental conditions; the same shall apply hereinafter) of a juvenile protection case as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii) or from the attorney at law appointed by the victim, etc. for inspection or copying of the records on the juvenile protection case (except those collected by the family court exclusively for its determination on need for protection of the Juvenile and those created or collected by family court probation officer that contribute to the family court's determination on the need for protection of the Juvenile) retained by the court pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court after the ruling prescribed by Article 21 has been made, the court shall authorize the applicant to inspect or copy the records, except when the court finds the request of inspection or copying has been filed on unjustifiable grounds or the court finds it inappropriate to permit inspection or copying in light of the impact on the sound development of the Juvenile, the nature of the case, the status of investigation, hearing, or other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

93-A「TRIPS協定」に基づく特別強制ライセンスの発行手続 93-A.1 知的財産庁の長官は，衛生局長による書面による勧告に基づいて，申請の提出により，特許薬剤製品の輸入に関する特別強制ライセンスを付与する。本条にいう輸入に関する特別強制ライセンスとは，品質が優良で，かつ値段が合理的な薬品の取得を確保するための特別代替手続であり，その第一目的は国内消費を満たすことである。この場合，特許権者に対して，輸出又は輸入国は充分な報酬を支払らわなければならない。強制ライセンスには，実施権者が合理的措置を利用して本条に基づき輸入された薬剤製品の再輸出を阻止する条項を含まなければならない。 本条に基づく特別強制ライセンスの付与は，共和国法第8293号第100.4条及び第100.6条の例外として，速やかに実施しなければならない。 フィリピン最高裁判所を除き，いかなる裁判所も，仮差止命令又は仮処分又はそのほかの強制ライセンス付与を妨げる仮救済命令を発行することはできない。例文帳に追加

SEC.93-A. Procedures on Issuance of a Special Compulsory License under the TRIPS Agreement 93-A.1. The Director General of the Intellectual Property Office, upon the written recommendation of the Secretary of the Department of Health, shall, upon filing of a petition, grant a special compulsory license for the importation of patented drugs and medicines. The special compulsory license for the importation contemplated under this provision shall be an additional special alternative procedure to ensure access to quality affordable medicines and shall be primarily for domestic consumption: Provided, that adequate remuneration shall be paid to the patent owner either by the exporting or importing country. The compulsory license shall also contain a provision directing the grantee the license to exercise reasonable measures to prevent the re-exportation of the products imported under this provision. The grant of a special compulsory license under this provision shall be an exception to Sections 100.4 and 100.6 of Republic Act No. 8293 and shall be immediately executory. No court, except the Supreme Court of the Philippines, shall issue any temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction or such other provisional remedies that will prevent the grant of the special compulsory license. - 特許庁

２　会社法第三十三条（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社の定款に前項各号に掲げる事項についての記載又は記録があるときの検査役による当該事項の調査について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第八項中「その設立時発行株式の引受けに係る意思表示を取り消す」とあるのは「その職を辞する」と、同条第十項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあり、並びに同項第二号及び第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同項第一号中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「同号」と、同条第十一項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の十第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33 (Election of Inspector of Matters Described or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedure of Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to investigation by an inspector on any of the matters listed in the items of the preceding paragraph where the Article of incorporation of a Mutual Company include any description or record on the matter. In this case, the term "rescind his/her manifestation of intention relating to subscription for the relevant Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33, paragraph (8) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "resign from his/her office;" the term "Article 28, items (i) and (ii)" in paragraph (10), item (i) and the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in items (ii) and (iii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act," the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in Article 33, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that item," and the terms "Article 38, paragraph (1)"and "paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article" in Article 33, paragraph (11), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の二十一　会社法第二編第四章第八節第二款（運営）の規定は相互会社の監査役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百九十四条第二項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十四条第二項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第三項中「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第四項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-21 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 8, Subsection 2 (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of company auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 394, paragraph (2) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 394, paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 394, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)"; the term "and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 394, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 394, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第二編第四章第十節第三款（委員会の運営）の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent, Method of Acts of Bond Managers, Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Manager, Resignation of Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation, Dismissal of Bond Managers, Succession to Bond Manager's Administration of Bonds), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a bond administrator. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "this Act" in Article 710, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 702" in Article 711, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-6 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第七百九十一条（第一項第一号及び第三項を除く。）（吸収分割又は株式交換に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等）の規定は組織変更株式交換を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第三百九条第二項（各号を除く。）（株主総会の決議）、第三百二十四条第二項（各号を除く。）（種類株主総会の決議）及び第五編第五章第二節第二款第一目（第七百九十五条第四項第一号及び第二号、第七百九十六条第三項第一号ロ、第七百九十九条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百条並びに第八百一条第一項、第二項、第三項第一号及び第二号並びに第五項を除く。）（株式会社の手続）の規定は組織変更株式交換完全親会社について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第七百九十八条第二項の規定による申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 791 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Related to Absorption-Type Split or Share Exchange) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share exchange on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding all items) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding all items (Resolution of Class Meetings) and Part V, Chapter V, Section 2, Subsection 2, Division 1 (excluding Article 795, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii), Article 796, paragraph (3), item (i), (b), Article 799, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 800, Article 801, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 801, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), and Article 801, paragraph (5)) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company for Share Exchange on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 798, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は清算相互会社の代表清算人について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）の規定は民事保全法（平成元年法律第九十一号）第五十六条（法人の代表者の職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記の嘱託）に規定する仮処分命令により選任された清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人の職務を代行する者について、会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号ロ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は清算相互会社の一時代表清算人の職務を行うべき者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies) and Article 351 (Measures when Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provision of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 (Commission of Registration of Provisional Disposition for Stay of Execution of Duties by Representative of Juridical Person, etc.) of the Civil Provisional Relief Act to act for a liquidator or the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidator(s) or Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (b) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who should carry out the duties of the temporary Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十条の十五　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。）（運営）の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十八条　会社法第百八十条（第二項第三号及び第三項を除く。）（株式の併合）、第百八十一条（株主に対する通知等）、第百八十二条（効力の発生）、第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の特定出資の併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第百八十条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第百八十一条中「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録特定出資質権者」と、同法第百八十二条及び第二百三十五条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十八条において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 38 The provisions of Article 180 (excluding paragraph (2)(iii) and paragraph (3)) (Consolidation of Shares), Article 181 (Notices to Shareholders), Article 182 (Effectuation), Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Specified Equity. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 180(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Registered Pledgees of the Shares" in Article 181 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Specified Equity," the term "shareholders" in Article 182 and Article 235(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Members," the term "number" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債」、「社債権者」、「社債発行会社」及び「社債権者集会」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債」、「特定社債権者」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「特定社債権者集会」と、同法第七百九条第二項中「第七百五条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to Article 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent; Method of Acts of Bond Managers; Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers; Resignation of Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation; Dismissal of Bond Managers), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bond Administrator. In this case, the terms "Bonds," "bondholder," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bondholders meeting" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds," "Specified Bond Holders," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bond Holders' Meeting" respectively, the term "paragraph (1) of Article 705" in Article 709(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 711(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　信託法第百三条第四項から第八項まで（受益権取得請求）、第百四条（受益権の価格の決定等）、第二百六十二条（第五項を除く。）（信託に関する非訟事件の管轄）、第二百六十三条（信託に関する非訟事件の手続の特例）及び第二百六十四条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の受益権の買取りの請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百三条第四項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と、「受益者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項に規定する受益証券の権利者」と、同条第五項中「官報による公告」とあるのは「公告」と、同条第六項中「第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項」と、「受益権の内容」とあるのは「元本持分（種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分）」と、同条第八項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 103(4) to (8) inclusive (Demand for the Acquisition of a Beneficial Interest), Article 104 (Valuation of a Beneficial Interest, etc.), Article 262 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), Article 263 (Special Provisions on Procedure in Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), and Article 264 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the demand that a beneficial interest be purchased as set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in Article 103(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the "Asset Securitization Act")," the term "beneficiaries" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holder prescribed in Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "public notice in an official gazette" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice," the phrase "paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal relating to each class)," the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in paragraph (8) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百五十一条　第百四十七条並びに民事訴訟法第九十三条第一項（期日の指定）、第九十四条（期日の呼出し）、第百七十九条から第百八十一条まで、第百八十三条から第百八十六条まで、第百八十八条、第百九十条、第百九十一条、第百九十五条から第百九十八条まで、第百九十九条第一項、第二百一条から第二百四条まで、第二百六条、第二百七条、第二百十条から第二百十三条まで、第二百十四条第一項から第三項まで、第二百十五条から第二百二十二条まで、第二百二十三条第一項から第六項まで、第二百二十六条から第二百二十八条まで、第二百二十九条第一項から第三項まで、第二百三十一条、第二百三十二条第一項、第二百三十三条、第二百三十四条、第二百三十六条から第二百三十八条まで、第二百四十条から第二百四十二条まで（証拠）及び第二百七十八条（尋問等に代わる書面の提出）の規定は、前条の規定による証拠調べ又は証拠保全に準用する。この場合において、同法第百七十九条中「裁判所において当事者が自白した事実及び顕著な事実」とあるのは「顕著な事実」と、同法第二百四条及び第二百十五条の三中「最高裁判所規則」とあるのは「経済産業省令」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 151 Article 147 of this Act and Articles 93(1) (designation of date), 94 (summons on designated date), 179 to 181, 183 to 186, 188, 190, 191, 195 to 198, 199(1), 201 to 204, 206, 207, 210 to 213, 214(1) to 214(3), 215 to 222, 223(1) to 223(6), 226 to 228, 229(1) to 229(3), 231, 232(1), 233, 234, 236 to 238, 240 to 242 (evidence) and 278 (submission of document in lieu of examination, etc) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the examination and preservation of evidence under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "facts that are admitted by the party in court or that are obvious" in Article 179 of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "obvious facts", and the term "Supreme Court Rules" in Article 204 and 215-3 of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム