「Be Able to」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(234ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Stock Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split plan to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立株式会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Membership Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立持分会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63-3-2 (1) For the time being, with regard to a disabled child under Admission, etc. in any of the designated retarded child institutions, etc. specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as "Admittee" in this paragraph), when a prefectural government finds that welfare of the Admittee is likely to be impaired unless the Designated Institutional Support for him/her is continued, the prefectural government may, notwithstanding the provision of Article 24-2 paragraph (1), Article 24-6 paragraph (1), Article 24-7 paragraph (1) or Article 24-20 paragraph (1), continue to pay or provide Institutional Benefits for Disabled Children, etc. to said Admittee based on his/her application, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, until said Admittee becomes able to adapt him/herself to social life, even after he/she attains the age of 18; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said Admittee can receive the treatment and care services provided in Article 5 paragraph (5) of the Act on Self-reliance Support for Persons with Disabilities (hereinafter referred to as "Treatment and Care Services") or other support. 例文帳に追加

第六十三条の三の二　都道府県は、第二十四条の二第一項、第二十四条の六第一項、第二十四条の七第一項又は第二十四条の二十第一項の規定にかかわらず、当分の間、厚生労働省令で定める指定知的障害児施設等に入所等をした障害児（以下この項において「入所者」という。）について、引き続き指定施設支援を受けなければその福祉を損なうおそれがあると認めるときは、当該入所者が満十八歳に達した後においても、当該入所者からの申請により、当該入所者が社会生活に順応することができるようになるまで、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、引き続き障害児施設給付費等を支給することができる。ただし、当該入所者が障害者自立支援法第五条第五項に規定する療養介護（以下「療養介護」という。）その他の支援を受けることができる場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This is a rather difficult task, and as I have said over and over again, although it might be easy to restore the postal businesses, whose foundations were shaken by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their former status, that is not what we are going to do. As we are undertaking a grand project of considering how to make use of Japan Post, which we may say is the biggest in the world, for the benefit of the whole of Japan and the entire world, this is a rather challenging task. We are now seeking public opinions and advice from far and wide. We are undertaking this project in the hope of achieving it together with the people, as I have been saying. If you ask me whether our study is proceeding smoothly, I can only say that a plan like this does not take a clear shape until the very last moment. In any case, everyone is doing his part in his own position, so we will be able to set forth a direction by around the end of this month. 例文帳に追加

なかなか、これは大変な話で、何度も言っているように、小泉（元総理）さんがガタガタにしてしまった郵政事業をその前の姿に戻すというのであればわりと簡単かもしれませんが、そうではないのです。地域のため、また日本全体のため、世界のために、世界一と言っても良い日本郵政株式会社をどうしていくか、という一大事業でありますので、なかなか大変でありますけれども、現在、国民の方々の声を幅広く聞かせていただく、またアドバイスもいただく。そうした、国民の皆さん方と一体となった中でこの事業を成し遂げたいという、かねがね皆様方に申し上げているそうした方針で、現在、取り組んでおります。順調に行っているかどうかと言われると、こういうのは最後の最後にならないと、きちんとした形というのは作れないわけでありますが、それぞれの立場で頑張ってくれておりますので、大体、月末までには一つの方向性を出せるのではないかなと考えております。 - 金融庁

2. With regard to securities, savings, negotiable instruments, specified money in trust, and call loans which are objects of investment of trust property (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this item), the time period left to reach redemption or maturity (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining period" in this item) shall not exceed one year, and they shall be long-term investment securities (securities with one year or more period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) with the third or higher grade of the designated rating prescribed in item (i)-v of paragraph (4) of Article 9-4 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Disclosure of Corporate Affairs, etc. (Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance No. 5 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as "the designated rating" in this item) given by one or more specified rating organizations (the organizations prescribed in item (xiii-ii) of Article 1 of the said Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), short-term investment securities (securities with less-than-one year period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter in this item the same shall apply) with the second or higher of the specific rating given by the organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating. 例文帳に追加

（２）　信託財産の運用の対象となる有価証券、預金、手形、指定金銭信託及びコールローン（以下この号において「有価証券等」という。）は、償還又は満期までの期間（以下この号において「残存期間」という。）が一年を超えないものであつて、一以上の指定格付機関（企業内容等の開示に関する内閣府令（昭和四十八年大蔵省令第五号）第一条第十三号の二に規定する指定格付機関をいう。以下この号において同じ。）から同令第九条の四第四項第一号ホに規定する特定格付（以下この号において「特定格付」という。）のうち第三位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年以上の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年未満の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）又は証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたものであること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property: 例文帳に追加

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The juridical person who was established pursuant to the provision of Article 34 of the Civil Code and actually carries on the specified insurance business at the time when this Act enters into force and being listed in the items of paragraph (1) (excluding the person having the registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act; hereinafter referred to as "Transferred Juridical Person" in this Article.) can manage the business and property pertaining to the insurance contract that the person underwrote before the day of the Public-Interest Corporation Transfer Register or General Incorporated Association etc., Transfer Register (hereinafter, named generically as "Transfer Register" in this Article) notwithstanding the provision of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act for a period of one year counting from the day of the Transfer Register (or until the day of which the Prime Minister designates when he/she recognizes that there are compelling reasons not to be able to transfer the following insurance contract and the entrustment pertaining to the management of the business and property). 例文帳に追加

５　この法律の施行の際現に特定保険業を行っていた民法第三十四条の規定により設立された法人であって第一項各号に掲げるもの（新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録を受けている者を除く。以下この条において「移行法人」という。）は、公益法人移行登記又は一般社団法人等移行登記（以下この条において「移行登記」と総称する。）をした日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間（次項の保険契約の移転並びに保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理の委託を行うことができないことについて内閣総理大臣がやむを得ない事由があると認めるときは、内閣総理大臣の指定する日までの間）は、新保険業法第三条第一項の規定にかかわらず、移行登記をした日前に引き受けた保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are -- (a) a condition that -- (i) not later than the date of filing of the application, a culture of the micro-organism has been deposited with any international depositary authority which is able to furnish a sample of the micro-organism; and (ii) the name of the international depositary authority, the date when the culture was deposited and the accession number of the deposit are given in the specification of the application; and (b) a condition, in the case of an international application for a patent (Singapore) which is treated, by virtue of section 85 as a patent under the Act, or, as the case may be, an application for a patent under the Act, that the corresponding provisions of the Implementing Regulations to the Patent Co-operation Treaty have been complied with, and where a new deposit is made under paragraph 4, a further condition that the applicant or proprietor makes a new deposit in accordance with that paragraph.例文帳に追加

(2) (1)にいう条件は，次のとおりとする。 (a) (i) 当該出願の出願日までに，当該微生物の培養体が，その試料を提供することができる国際寄託当局に寄託されており，かつ (ii) 当該国際寄託当局の名称，当該培養体が寄託された日付及び当該寄託の受託番号が当該特許明細書に記載されていること，及び (b) 第85条により，法に基づく特許として取り扱われている国際特許出願(シンガポール)，又は場合により法に基づく特許出願の場合は，特許協力条約実施規則の対応する規定が満たされていること， 並びに，第4項に基づいて行われる再寄託の場合は，更に，当該特許の出願人又は所有者が同項に従って再寄託を行うこと - 特許庁

Consequently, the customer is able to grasp the current order state and articles can be provided in a fresh state; and the customer can order favorite articles with composure and the employee immediately answers to the customer's order.例文帳に追加

飲食店において、客が商品入力手段により商品データを入力すると、商品データの入力により商品の種類を判定し、商品表示手段のうちの一つを選択して、商品表示手段に商品データを送り、商品データが商品表示手段に表示されると、従業員又はロボットは表示に従い商品を作成し、商品完成後、商品を取次ぎ部に載置する又は客に提供した後、作業完了ボタンを押すことによって、次の商品を商品表示手段に表示する商品の注文システムであり、自分の現在の注文状況が把握できること、商品が新鮮な状態で提供できること、客は自分の好きな商品を気兼ねなく注文でき、従業員は客の注文にすぐに対応できること等の効果がある。 - 特許庁

Article 17 With regard to a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities that is subject to the main clause of Article 4(1) or the main clause of Article 4(2) or Already Disclosed Securities, a person who has another person acquire the Securities using a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) that contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement on important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, or a material that contains any false indication or misleading indication on important matters or lacks indication on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, shall be held liable to compensate damage sustained by the other person who acquires the Securities without knowing of the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the person liable for such damage proves that he/she did not know of, and was not able to know of even with reasonable care, the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication. 例文帳に追加

第十七条　第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文の規定の適用を受ける有価証券又は既に開示された有価証券の募集又は売出しについて、重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、若しくは記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の記載が欠けている第十三条第一項の目論見書又は重要な事項について虚偽の表示若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示があり、若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の表示が欠けている資料を使用して有価証券を取得させた者は、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であり、若しくは表示が欠けていることを知らないで当該有価証券を取得した者が受けた損害を賠償する責めに任ずる。ただし、賠償の責めに任ずべき者が、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であることを知らず、かつ、相当な注意を用いたにもかかわらず知ることができなかつたことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the cases where the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the shares, etc. of the Stock Company Incorporated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owning Parent Stock Company Incorporated through Share Transfer to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc., the Consolidation-type Merger or the Share Transfer shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

３　新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社又は株式移転設立完全親株式会社の株式等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等であるときは、当該新設合併又は株式移転は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4. Of the total asset value of the trust property, any securities, etc. (except national government bonds, government guaranteed bonds, and call loans with five or less days (except closed days of companies entrusted with the said securities investment trust that give loans) left to become due; hereinafter referred to as "the specific call loans" in this item) issued or dealt with by any one juridical person or other organ (hereinafter referred to as "juridical person, etc." in this item) that are long-term investment securities with the second or higher grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, short-term investment securities with the first grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating (hereinafter referred to as "the qualified securities, etc.") shall account for 5 percent or less of the values that form the basis of calculation of the total asset value of the trust property. 例文帳に追加

（４）　信託財産の総額のうちに、一の法人その他の団体（以下この号において「法人等」という。）が発行し、又は取り扱う有価証券等（国債証券、政府保証債及び返済までの期間（貸付けを行う当該証券投資信託の受託者である会社が休業している日を除く。）が五日以内のコールローン（以下この号において「特定コールローン」という。）を除く。）であつて、二以上の指定格付機関から特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券及び特定格付のうち第一位の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券並びに証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたもの（以下この号において「適格有価証券等」という。）の当該信託財産の総額の計算の基礎となつた価額の占める割合が、百分の五以下であること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When examining a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator, if the presiding judge finds that there is a risk that the body or property of these persons or their relatives may be harmed, threatened or confused and that the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator will not be able to give full testimony if his/her address or work place or other matters specifying the ordinary whereabouts of these persons are disclosed, the presiding judge may place limitations on questions concerning these matters; provided, however, that this shall not apply when limitations on the public prosecutor's examination may interfere considerably with proving the case, or when limitations on the examination by the accused or his/her counsel may substantially harm the defense of the accused. 例文帳に追加

２　裁判長は、証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人を尋問する場合において、証人、鑑定人、通訳人若しくは翻訳人若しくはこれらの親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあり、これらの者の住居、勤務先その他その通常所在する場所が特定される事項が明らかにされたならば証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人が十分な供述をすることができないと認めるときは、当該事項についての尋問を制限することができる。ただし、検察官のする尋問を制限することにより犯罪の証明に重大な支障を生ずるおそれがあるとき、又は被告人若しくは弁護人のする尋問を制限することにより被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(21) The term "In-Home Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means to establish a plan (herein referred to as an "In-Home Service Plan" in this paragraph, Article 115-38, paragraph (1), item (v), and the appended table to this Act) that provides the types and contents of Designated In-Home Service, etc. (herein referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph), the personnel in charge of said services to be used by an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, at the request of said Person Requiring Long-Term Care and in consideration of his or her mental and physical condition, surroundings, and the person's and his or her family's preferences, etc., in order for an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to be able to use appropriately the Designated In-Home Service as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, In-Home Service related to Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act, Community-Based Service related to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, and other necessary health and medical services or public aid services for performing daily activities at home (hereinafter referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph); the term also means to provide communication and coordination among Designated Providers of In-Home Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act and other person and to provide other conveniences in order to ensure provision of the Designated In-Home Service, etc., based on said In-Home Service Plan, and in a case when said In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care requires admission to a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or a Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care, the term means to introduce a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care and to provide other conveniences. The term "Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business to provide In-Home Long-Term Care Support. 例文帳に追加

２１　この法律において「居宅介護支援」とは、居宅要介護者が第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス又は特例居宅介護サービス費に係る居宅サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス又は特例地域密着型介護サービス費に係る地域密着型サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の居宅において日常生活を営むために必要な保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、当該居宅要介護者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要介護者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定居宅サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項、第百十五条の三十八第一項第五号及び別表において「居宅サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該居宅サービス計画に基づく指定居宅サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行い、並びに当該居宅要介護者が地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への入所を要する場合にあっては、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への紹介その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「居宅介護支援事業」とは、居宅介護支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(18) The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means that a person as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare among the personnel of a community general support center as prescribed in Article 115-39, paragraph (1) of this Act, with regard to a Person Requiring In-Home Support, considers said a Person's mental and physical condition, the present environment of said Person, the preferences, etc., of said Person Requiring In-Home Support and those of his or her family according to the request of said Person Requiring In-Home Support, and establishes a plan that stipulates the type and content of a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care Service, etc., that said Person will use, the personnel in charge of said services, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (herein referred to as "Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan" in this paragraph and the appended table) in order for the Person Requiring In-Home Support to be able to use appropriately those services as prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act that are of a Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Preventive Long-Term Care Service pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Preventive Service of Long-Term Care or services equivalent to said service, those services as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1) that are Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, or equivalent services to said service, or other health and medical services or public aid services contributing to prevention of long-term care (herein referred to as "Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc.") and that said personnel provide liaison and coordination among those who are a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act, those who are a Designated Person Providing Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1), and other personnel, and other convenience in order to ensure the provision of the Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc., based on said Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan. The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business that provides a Preventive Long-Term Care Support. 例文帳に追加

１８　この法律において「介護予防支援」とは、居宅要支援者が第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス又は特例介護予防サービス費に係る介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス又は特例地域密着型介護予防サービス費に係る地域密着型介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の介護予防に資する保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定介護予防サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、第百十五条の三十九第一項に規定する地域包括支援センターの職員のうち厚生労働省令で定める者が、当該居宅要支援者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要支援者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定介護予防サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項及び別表において「介護予防サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該介護予防サービス計画に基づく指定介護予防サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス事業者、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「介護予防支援事業」とは、介護予防支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

For example, when a chemical substance is described merely by its name or its chemical formula in a publication and the description does not show the manufacturing process clearly enough that a person skilled in the art is able to manufacture the substance on the basis of the common general knowledge as of the filing, the chemical substance is not included in "cited inventions"(Note that this does not mean that the claim violates the enablement requirement under Article 36(4)(i) where the publication is a patent application claiming the chemical substance as one of the alternatives described in the Markush form). Even though the prior art constitutes an incomplete expression or there is a defect in some of the prior art, it can be cited in assessing the novelty and the inventive step, when the person skilled in the art can readily understand the technical features of the claimed invention based on common technical knowledge or empirical rules. 例文帳に追加

したがって、例えば、刊行物に化学物質名又は化学構造式によりその化学物質が示されている場合において、当業者が本願出願時の技術常識を参酌しても、当該化学物質を製造できることが明らかであるように記載されていないときは、当該化学物質は「引用発明」とはならない（なお、これは、当該刊行物が当該化学物質を選択肢の一部とするマーカッシュ形式の請求項を有する特許文献であるとした場合に、その請求項が第36条第4項第1号の実施先行技術に不完全な表現が含まれるか又は一部の先行技術に瑕疵があったとしても、当業者が技術常識や経験則に基づき容易に発明の技術的特徴を理解することができる場合は、新規性及び進歩性を判断する際に引用することが可能である)。 - 特許庁