「dismissed」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(20ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 42 (1) The earlier application on which a priority claim is based under Article 41(1) shall be deemed to have been withdrawn when one year and three months has lapsed from the filing date of the earlier application; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where the earlier application has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, where the examiner's decision or trial decision on the earlier application has become final and binding, where the registration establishing a utility model right under Article 14(2) of the Utility Model Act with respect to the earlier application has been effected or where all priority claims based on the earlier application have been withdrawn. 例文帳に追加

第四十二条　前条第一項の規定による優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願は、その出願の日から一年三月を経過した時に取り下げたものとみなす。ただし、当該先の出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されている場合、当該先の出願について査定若しくは審決が確定している場合、当該先の出願について実用新案法第十四条第二項に規定する設定の登録がされている場合又は当該先の出願に基づくすべての優先権の主張が取り下げられている場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) Where a patent application has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed after the laying open of the patent application, or where the examiner's decision or a trial decision refusing the patent application has become final and binding, or where the patent right has been deemed never to have existed from the beginning under Article 112(6) (except in the case where it is further found that the patent right is deemed to have existed from the beginning under Article 112-2(2)), or where, with exception of cases coming under the proviso to Article 125, a trial decision to the effect that the patent is to be invalidated has become final and binding, the right to claim under paragraph (1) shall be deemed never to have been established from the beginning. 例文帳に追加

４　出願公開後に特許出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されたとき、特許出願について拒絶をすべき旨の査定若しくは審決が確定したとき、第百十二条第六項の規定により特許権が初めから存在しなかつたものとみなされたとき（更に第百十二条の二第二項の規定により特許権が初めから存在していたものとみなされたときを除く。）、又は第百二十五条ただし書の場合を除き特許を無効にすべき旨の審決が確定したときは、第一項の請求権は、初めから生じなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 9 (1) An Earlier Application on which a priority claim is based under Article 8(1) shall be deemed to have been withdrawn when one year and three months has lapsed from the filing date of said Earlier Application; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where an Earlier Application has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, where the examiner's decision or trial decision on an Earlier Application has become final and binding, where the registration establishing a Utility Model Right under Article 14(2) with respect to an Earlier Application has been effected or where all priority claims based on an Earlier Application have been withdrawn. 例文帳に追加

第九条　前条第一項の規定による優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願は、その出願の日から一年三月を経過した時に取り下げたものとみなす。ただし、当該先の出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されている場合、当該先の出願について査定若しくは審決が確定している場合、当該先の出願について第十四条第二項に規定する設定の登録がされている場合又は当該先の出願に基づくすべての優先権の主張が取り下げられている場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where an application for design registration has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, or where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that an application for design registration is to be refused has become final and binding, the application for design registration shall, for the purpose of the preceding two paragraphs, be deemed never to have been filed; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that the application for design registration is to be refused has become final and binding on the basis that the latter sentence of the preceding paragraph is applicable to said application for design registration. 例文帳に追加

３　意匠登録出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されたとき、又は意匠登録出願について拒絶をすべき旨の査定若しくは審決が確定したときは、その意匠登録出願は、前二項の規定の適用については、初めからなかつたものとみなす。ただし、その意匠登録出願について前項後段の規定に該当することにより拒絶をすべき旨の査定又は審決が確定したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The right to claim under paragraph (1) shall be deemed never to have arisen in any of the following cases: where an application for trademark registration is abandoned, withdrawn or dismissed; where an examiner's decision or a trial decision to the effect that an application for trademark registration is to be refused becomes final and binding; where a ruling to rescind a trademark under Article 43-3(2) becomes final and binding; or where, excluding the cases falling under the proviso to Article 46-2(1), a trial decision to the effect that a trademark registration is to be invalidated becomes final and binding. 例文帳に追加

４　商標登録出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されたとき、商標登録出願について拒絶をすべき旨の査定若しくは審決が確定したとき、第四十三条の三第二項の取消決定が確定したとき、又は第四十六条の二第一項ただし書の場合を除き商標登録を無効にすべき旨の審決が確定したときは、第一項の請求権は、初めから生じなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a taxpayer has appointed a tax agent pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, he/she shall notify the district director of the tax office having jurisdiction over the place of payment of the national tax pertaining to said tax agent (if a tax agent has been appointed to administer only affairs concerning the consumption tax, etc. on goods received from a bonded area, the director-general of the customs house having jurisdiction over the place of tax payment of the consumption tax, etc.). The same shall apply where a taxpayer has dismissed his/her tax agent. 例文帳に追加

２　納税者は、前項の規定により納税管理人を定めたときは、当該納税管理人に係る国税の納税地を所轄する税務署長（保税地域からの引取りに係る消費税等に関する事項のみを処理させるため、納税管理人を定めたときは、当該消費税等の納税地を所轄する税関長）にその旨を届け出なければならない。その納税管理人を解任したときも、また同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 20 When filing an action for the revocation of the original administrative disposition by joining it, pursuant to the provision of the first sentence of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, with an action for the revocation of an administrative disposition on appeal that has dismissed a request for an administrative review of the original administrative disposition, it shall not be required to obtain consent from the defendant in the action for the revocation of the original administrative disposition, notwithstanding the provision of Article 16, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and when an action for the revocation of the original administrative disposition is thus filed, it shall be deemed, with regard to compliance with the statute of limitations, to have been filed at the time of the filing of the action for the revocation of an administrative disposition on appeal. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　前条第一項前段の規定により、処分の取消しの訴えをその処分についての審査請求を棄却した裁決の取消しの訴えに併合して提起する場合には、同項後段において準用する第十六条第二項の規定にかかわらず、処分の取消しの訴えの被告の同意を得ることを要せず、また、その提起があつたときは、出訴期間の遵守については、処分の取消しの訴えは、裁決の取消しの訴えを提起した時に提起されたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

However, when Kintsune passed away, Michiie claimed without permission that it was the will of Kintsune and became Kanto moshitsugi (liaison with the east) (However, there is also a theory that he was assigned to the kanto moshitsugi post with Kintsune as 'the father of the shogun'), dismissed his second son Yoshizane (Michiie and Yoshizane were on bad terms, and Yoshizane was disowned by his father), and promoted his favored Sanetsune ICHIJO as the Kanpaku (He was reassigned to be Sessho after Emperor Gofukakusa ascended to the throne). 例文帳に追加

だが、公経が死去すると、道家は勝手に公経の遺言と称して関東申次の職を継承（ただし、公経の生前から「将軍の実父」として公経とともに関東申次の職務にあたっていたとする説もある）し、さらに次男の良実を排除して（道家と良実は不仲で、良実は父から義絶されていた）、寵愛する息子の一条実経を関白として擁立する（後深草天皇即位後は摂政に転じる）。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

However, Michiie was dismissed from the Kanto Moshitsugi position (taken over by Saneuji SAINJI, who was the son of Kintsune) and Sanetsune from Sessho post since Yoritsune was involved with a conspiracy hatched by Mitsutoki NAGOE which happened immediately after and Imperial Prince Masanari (he was the Imperial Prince of Emperor Gotoba and was exiled to the Tajima Province after the Jokyu Rebellion), whom Michiie was close to, tried to ascended to the throne while he being granted a temporary return to Kyoto by getting rid of Gosagain (Retired Emperor Gosaga) and Emperor Gofukakusa. 例文帳に追加

更に直後に起きた名越光時らの陰謀に頼経が関与していた事に対する連座に加えて、道家が親しくしていた雅成親王（後鳥羽天皇の皇子で承久の乱後但馬国に流されていた）が幕府によって一時帰京を許された折に、後嵯峨院と後深草天皇を排して同親王を皇位に就けようとしていたとする容疑によって、道家は関東申次の職を罷免（公経の子・西園寺実氏に交代）され、実経も摂政を罷免させられた。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Related to this issue, insisting that the income has decreased, the work conditions have worsened, and the number of traffic accidents has increased due to relaxation of the taxi regulations, four taxi drivers of corporate taxi companies in Osaka Prefecture brought a lawsuit against the nation, demanding revoking the approval and license for increase in the number of taxis and for reduce in taxi fares, and demanding damages of about a half million yen per person, with the Osaka District Court in October 2005; however, the Osaka District Court dismissed the lawsuit on March 25, 2009, saying that people cannot say excess of supply and extreme decrease in drivers' income were due to the relaxation of the taxi regulations. 例文帳に追加

この問題に関連して、大阪府内の法人タクシーの運転手4人が、規制緩和による過度な増車等によって収入が低下し、労働条件の悪化と交通事故の増加を招いたなどとして、増車・運賃値下げの許認可取り消しと、1人当たり約50万円の損害賠償を国に対し求める訴訟を、2005年10月に大阪地方裁判所に起こしたが、同地裁は2009年3月25日に、「規制緩和があったからといって、供給過多や極端な運転手の給与水準の低下があったとは認められない」として、訴えを棄却した。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Okuma served as the Minister of the Treasury from October 25, 1873 to February 28, 1880, but he had effectively been the highest officer of the Ministry of Treasury since he assumed the post of senior assistant minister of the Ministry of Treasury upon the launch of the modern Ministry of Treasury on August 15, 1869, therefore he continued to be in charge of the Ministry of Treasury and the Japanese financial policy until he was dismissed as the councilor during a conference in the presence of the Emperor on October 11, 1881 (Political Change of 1881), however his resignation as the Minister of the Treasury was because an agreement to serve exclusively as a councilor was reached by 'Proposal to Separate Councilor and Minister' promoted by Hirobumi ITO (a successor Minister of the Treasury was Tsunetami SANO, Okuma's direct subordinate). 例文帳に追加

大隈の大蔵卿在任時期は1873年10月25日‐1880年2月28日であるが、実際には1869年8月15日（旧暦明治2年7月8日(旧暦)）に近代大蔵省創立とともに大蔵大輔に就任して以来事実上の大蔵省の最高責任者であり、大蔵卿退任も伊藤博文が進めた「参議・省卿分離案」によって参議専念の合意が成立したこと（後任大蔵卿佐野常民は大隈直系）によるもので、実際には1881年10月11日の御前会議による参議免官（明治14年の政変）まで大蔵省及び日本財政の責任者であった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

On December 21, 1196, chugu (Palace of the Empress) Ninshi KUJO was expelled from kokyu (empress's residence) and on the 23rd of the same month, kanpaku Kanezane KUJO was dismissed and was replaced by Motomichi KONOE; Takayosho ICHIJO, whose mother was the sister of Yoritomo, Bomon hime, was appointed as sangi, Kintsune SAIONJI, the husband of Bomon hime's daughter, was appointed as Kurodo no to (Head Chamberlain), and on the 24th of the same month, Jien, the head priest of the Tendai sect of Buddhism, was ordered to stay inside the residence, and FUJIWARA no Kanefusa, the Grand Minister, was reshuffled (both Jien and Kanefusa were both Kanezane's younger brother-uterine). 例文帳に追加

翌建久7年（1196年）の11月23日に中宮九条任子が後宮から退去させられ、同月25日関白九条兼実が罷免され、近衛基通が関白に、頼朝の妹・坊門姫を母とする一条高能が参議に、坊門姫の娘を妻とする西園寺公経が蔵人頭にそれぞれ任じられ、同月26日に天台座主慈円が籠居を命じられ、太政大臣藤原兼房(太政大臣)も更迭された（慈円・兼房はともに兼実の同母弟）。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

It was news to me but, basically, the JHF was formally the Government Housing Loan Corporation. This relates to a major trend five years ago that was represented by the shift from public to private and reflected an initiative to move policy-based finance to private hands. I have just talked about Lehman Brothers and a very major trend that existed before, which favored "private" and dismissed everything "public," but that trend has been fixed a little bit on a worldwide scale since the Lehman Brothers crisis as if to seek the best balance between public and private, as I mentioned repeatedly. 例文帳に追加

初めて聞かせていただきましたが、基本的にあれは昔住宅金融公庫というのがございまして、官から民へという大きな5年前の流れの中で、政策金融は基本的にできるものは全部民に移そうという話でしたが、今さっき私がリーマン・ブラザーズの話をしましたけれども、一切官のものはだめで、「民だ、民だ」という非常に大きな流れがありましたけれども、そこら辺リーマン・ブラザーズ以来、少しそこら辺が私は何回も官と民とベストバランス、そういうふうに少し世界中揺り戻しがある。 - 金融庁

If the person who filed the first application or his successor in title has filed a subsequent application with the same authority, relating to the same invention, the subsequent application may be cited as a basis for priority, provided that at the time of filing of the later application the earlier application was withdrawn, dismissed, or rejected without having become available to the public and without there being any rights subsisting, and had not served as a basis for priority. 例文帳に追加

最初の先行出願を行った出願人又はその権原承継人が同一の考案に関して同一の当局に後続の出願を行った場合は，後続の出願時に先の出願が公衆の利用に供されることなくまた如何なる権利も残すことなく既に取下，却下若しくは拒絶されておりその結果優先権の根拠性を欠いている場合に限り，後続の出願を優先権の基礎とすることができる。 - 特許庁

If the person making the first application, or his or her successor in title, has filed with the same authority a later application relating to the same design, the later application may be invoked as the basis of priority provided that, at the time of filing, the earlier application has been withdrawn, dismissed or rejected, and the documents filed in the case have not become available to the public, and has not left outstanding any right based upon it and has not served as a basis for priority. 例文帳に追加

最初の出願をした者又はその権原承継人が同一の意匠に関して後の出願を同一の当局にした場合は，後の出願は，出願時に先の出願が取り下げられ，却下され又は拒絶され，かつ，当該事件において提出された書類が公衆の利用に供されていないこと，及び当該先の出願に基づく権利が何ら残っておらず，かつ，当該先の出願が優先権の根拠として役立っていないことを条件として，優先権の根拠として主張することができる。 - 特許庁

Where an application for a patent or a utility model registration has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, or where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that a patent application is to be refused has become final and binding, the application for a patent or a utility model registration shall, for the purpose of paragraphs (1) to (4), be deemed never to have been filed; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that the patent application is to be refused has become final and binding on the basis that the latter sentence of paragraph (2) or (4) is applicable to the said patent application. 例文帳に追加

特許出願若しくは実用新案登録出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されたとき、又は特許出願について拒絶をすべき旨の査定若しくは審決が確定したときは、その特許出願又は実用新案登録出願は、第一項から前項までの規定の適用については、初めからなかつたものとみなす。ただし、その特許出願について第二項後段又は前項後段の規定に該当することにより拒絶をすべき旨の査定又は審決が確定したときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁

Where an application for a patent or a utility model registration has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, or where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that a patent application is to be refused has become final and binding, the application for a patent or a utility model registration shall, for the purpose of paragraphs (1) to (4), be deemed never to have been filed; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where the examiner's decision or trial decision to the effect that the patent application is to be refused has become final and binding on the basis that the latter sentence of paragraph (2) or (4) is applicable to the said patent application. 例文帳に追加

特許出願若しくは実用新案登録出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されたとき、又は特許出願について拒絶をすべき旨の査定若しくは審決が確定したときは、その特許出願又は実用新案登録出願は、第一項から前項までの規定の適用については、初めからなかったものとみなす。ただし、その特許出願について第二項後段又は前項後段の規定に該当することにより拒絶をすべき旨の査定又は審決が確定したときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁

(6) If- (a) the action is dismissed or discontinued, or if the Court decides that the relevant registered trade mark was not infringed by the importation of the seized goods; and (b) a defendant to the infringement action satisfies the Court that he has suffered loss or damage as a result of the seizure of the goods, the Court may order the objector to pay compensation in such amount as the Court thinks fit to that defendant.例文帳に追加

(6)次の場合，すなわち， (a)訴訟が却下若しくは中止される場合，又は裁判所が関連する登録商標は差押商品の輸入によって侵害されなかったと決定する場合，及び (b)侵害訴訟の被告が，商品の差押の結果として損失又は損害を被ったことを裁判所に納得させた場合は，裁判所は，異議申立人に対して，裁判所が適当と認める金額の賠償を被告に支払うよう命令することができる。 - 特許庁

(5) If . (a) the action is dismissed or discontinued, or if the Court decides that the relevant registered trade mark was not infringed by the importation of the seized goods; and (b) a defendant to the action for infringement satisfies the Court that he has suffered loss or damage as a result of the seizure of the goods, the Court may order the applicant to pay compensation in such amount as the Court thinks fit to that defendant. If the Court orders that seized goods are to be forfeited, the goods shall be disposed of in the manner as directed by the Court.例文帳に追加

(5) 次の場合は，裁判所は，申請人に対して，裁判所が適当と判断する金額を被告に賠償するよう命じることができる。 (a) 当該訴訟が棄却され若しくは取り下げられた場合，又は関係する登録商標は押収商品の輸入によって侵害されてはいなかったと裁判所が判断し，かつ (b) 当該訴訟の被告が，商品押収の結果として損失又は損害を被ったことを裁判所に認めさせた場合 押収した商品が没収されるべきことを裁判所が命じた場合は，当該商品は，裁判所が指示する方法で処分されるものとする。 - 特許庁

An appeal against the final decision of the registration authority in a trademark case may be made by the applicant if the decision was unfavorable to him or if the case was dismissed. An appeal against a final decision taken by the registration authority concerning an opposition filed against the registration may be lodged by the losing party. Even if the person who filed the opposition withdraws his appeal, the case may be examined if there are special reasons for doing so. 例文帳に追加

商標事件における特許庁の最終決定が出願人にとって不利であるか又は事件が却下された場合は，出願人は，当該最終決定に対して審判請求を行うことができる。登録に対する異議申立に関し特許庁が行った最終決定に対しては，不利な決定を受けた者が審判請求をすることができる。異議申立人がその審判請求を取り下げた場合においても，特段の理由が存在する場合は，当該案件を審理することができる。 - 特許庁

The same shall apply where the other patent application no longer meets the substantive requirements for division of application and therefore the application concerned and the other patent application are no longer deemed to have been filed simultaneously, due to any amendment made to the other patent application after a notice under Article 50bis was given to the application concerned. The determination on an amendment, the approach to an application where an amendment is dismissed, and the approach to an application where an amendment is accepted shall be subject to the respective provisions of 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 in Section 2 of "Part IX Procedure of Examination" replacing the phrase "final notice of reasons for refusal" with "first notice of reasons for refusal given along with a notice under Article 50bis." 例文帳に追加

補正の検討、補正を却下する場合の出願の取扱い、及び補正を却下せずに受け入れた場合の出願の取扱いは、「最後の拒絶理由通知」を「第50条の2の通知が併せてなされた最初の拒絶理由通知」と読み替えた上で、それぞれ「第Ⅸ部審査の進め方」の「第2節6.2補正の検討」、「第2節6.3補正を却下する場合の出願の取扱い」、「第2節6.4補正を却下せず受け入れた場合の出願の取扱い」に従う。 - 特許庁

Where it was appropriate at least either to give a notice under Article 50bis or to give the "final notice of reasons for refusal," the determination on an amendment, the approach to an application where an amendment is dismissed, and the approach to an application where an amendment is accepted shall be subject to the respective provisions of 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 in Section 2 of "Part IX Procedure of Examination" replacing the phrase "final notice of reasons for refusal" with "final notice of reasons for refusal given along with a notice under Article 50bis." 例文帳に追加

第50条の2の通知を行ったこと又は「最後の拒絶理由通知」としたことの少なくともいずれか一方が適当であった場合の補正の検討、補正を却下する場合の出願の取扱い、補正を却下せず受け入れた場合の出願の取扱いは、「最後の拒絶理由通知」を「第50条の2の通知が併せてなされた最後の拒絶理由通知」と読み替えた上で、それぞれ「第Ⅸ部審査の進め方」の「第2節6.2補正の検討」、「第2節6.3補正を却下する場合の出願の取扱い」、「第2節6.4補正を却下せず受け入れた場合の出願の取扱い」に従う。 - 特許庁

If a written correction of mistranslation submitted in response to the final notice of reasons for refusal does not satisfy the requirements under Articles 17bis(4) to (6), such an amendment is to be dismissed. 例文帳に追加

最後の拒絶理由通知等に応答する誤訳訂正書が、第17条の2第4～6項の要件を満たさない場合は補正却下されることとなるが、通常の日本語出願においても、一の補正事項が補正の要件を満たしていない場合はこの補正を含む補正書全体が却下されるのと同様に、誤訳訂正書中に第17条の2第4～6項の要件を満たさない補正事項がある場合は、一般補正で対応可能な補正事項も含めて、誤訳訂正書全体が補正却下される点に留意が必要である。 - 特許庁

When an amendment is made in response to the final notice of reasons for refusal, etc., the examiner shall determine whether or not the amendment should be dismissed after confirming that it has been appropriate to make the notice the final notice of reasons for refusal or to give a notice under Article 50bis, following "Part IX: Procedure of Examination, (i) A regular amendment to the description, claims or drawings to add a new matter beyond the translation (Article 17bis(3)). 例文帳に追加

最後の拒絶理由通知等に対して補正がされたときは、「第Ⅸ部審査の進め方6.1」又は「第Ⅴ部第1章第2節第50条の2の通知4.2」に従って、最後の拒絶理由通知とすること又は第50条の2の通知を行うことが適当であったことを確認した後、当該補正について却下すべきものであるか否かを判断する。明細書、特許請求の範囲及び図面についての一般補正であって翻訳文新規事項を追加するもの(第17条の2第3項)。 - 特許庁

Article 275 (1) In cases where a Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. resigns or is dismissed, the Trust Company, etc. that served as said Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Fiduciary Trust Company, etc." in this Article) shall, without delay, prepare an inventory of assets and a balance sheet pertaining to the trust property, and shall gain approval thereof at a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting. In this case, with regard to application of the provisions of Article 77(2) of the Trust Act, the phrase "a beneficiary (in cases where there is a trust administrator, the trust administrator; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) approves the Accounting set forth in the preceding paragraph" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "approval of the inventory of assets and balance sheet set forth in Article 275(1) of the Act on Securitization of Assets is gained at the Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting." 例文帳に追加

第二百七十五条　受託信託会社等が辞任し、又は解任された場合には、当該受託信託会社等であった信託会社等（以下この条において「前受託信託会社等」という。）は、遅滞なく、信託財産に係る財産目録及び貸借対照表を作成し、権利者集会の承認を受けなければならない。この場合において、信託法第七十七条第二項の規定の適用については、同項中「受益者（信託管理人が現に存する場合にあっては、信託管理人。次項において同じ。）が前項の計算」とあるのは、「権利者集会が資産の流動化に関する法律第二百七十五条第一項の財産目録及び貸借対照表」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Where, after a document that certifies the filing of a petition for exercise of security interest set forth in paragraph (1) was submitted, the petition for exercise of security interest has been withdrawn or dismissed without prejudice, the document shall be deemed to have never been submitted. The same shall apply where the procedure for exercise of a security interest set forth in said paragraph is revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 63 of the Civil Execution Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 188 of said Act or Article 129 of said Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 192 of said Act (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to said Act and other laws and regulations concerning a procedure for compulsory execution). 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の担保権の実行の申立てをしたことを証する書面が提出された後に、当該担保権の実行の申立てが取り下げられ、又は却下された場合には、当該書面は提出されなかったものとみなす。民事執行法第百八十八条において準用する同法第六十三条又は同法第百九十二条において準用する同法第百二十九条（これらの規定を同法その他強制執行の手続に関する法令において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により同項の担保権の実行の手続が取り消された場合も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an accounting auditor, and the provisions of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who resigned as the accounting auditor and a person dismissed as the accounting auditor pursuant to the provisions of Article 340(1), respectively. In such cases, "on the election or dismissal, or resignation of accounting advisors at the shareholders meeting" in paragraph (1) shall be read as "on the election, dismissal or refusal of reelection, or resignation of accounting auditors, by attending the shareholders meeting," and in paragraph (2), "after the resignation" shall be read with "after the dismissal or resignation," and "the fact of the resignation and the reason thereof" shall be read with "the fact of the resignation and the reason thereof, or opinions on the dismissal." 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の規定は会計監査人について、第二項及び第三項の規定は会計監査人を辞任した者及び第三百四十条第一項の規定により会計監査人を解任された者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第一項中「株主総会において、会計参与の選任若しくは解任又は辞任について」とあるのは「会計監査人の選任、解任若しくは不再任又は辞任について、株主総会に出席して」と、第二項中「辞任後」とあるのは「解任後又は辞任後」と、「辞任した旨及びその理由」とあるのは「辞任した旨及びその理由又は解任についての意見」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Fair Trade Commission shall, if a hearing request regarding the payment order has been made (excluding the cases where the said hearing request is dismissed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 66; the same shall apply in the following paragraph), promptly demand, after a decision on the said hearing request has been made, payment of the surcharge pertaining to the said payment order and if there is an arrearage charge pursuant to the provisions of the next paragraph, the arrearage charge, by serving a written demand designating a deadline therefor, excluding the cases where the said payment order is rescinded in its entirety pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 66; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the said surcharge and arrearage charge are paid in their entirety by the date when a transcript of the written decision in regard to the hearing request regarding the said payment order was served. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、納付命令について審判請求がされたとき（第六十六条第一項の規定により当該審判請求が却下された場合を除く。次項において同じ。）は、公正取引委員会は、当該審判請求に対する審決をした後、同条第三項の規定により当該納付命令の全部を取り消す場合を除き、速やかに督促状により期限を指定して当該納付命令に係る課徴金及び次項の規定による延滞金があるときはその延滞金の納付を督促しなければならない。ただし、当該納付命令についての審判請求に対する審決書の謄本が送達された日までに当該課徴金及び延滞金の全部が納付されたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In addition to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it is required that an employee organization, in order to qualify for and maintain its registration, be formed exclusively by officials other than those provided for in paragraph 5 of the preceding Article. However, this shall not preclude an employee organization from retaining in its membership those that have been officials other than those provided for in the same paragraph and who have been dismissed against their will or subject to dismissal in a disciplinary action, and for whom a period of one year has not elapsed since the day following the date of their dismissal, or who have entered an appeal or filed a lawsuit against such disposition, , in accordance with applicable law, within the said one-year period but the judgment or decision, or court judgment thereon is still pending, nor shall it preclude an employee organization from having in its membership those who are currently its officers. 例文帳に追加

４　前項に定めるもののほか、職員団体が登録される資格を有し、及び引き続いて登録されているためには、前条第五項に規定する職員以外の職員のみをもつて組織されていることを必要とする。ただし、同項に規定する職員以外の職員であつた者でその意に反して免職され、若しくは懲戒処分としての免職の処分を受け、当該処分を受けた日の翌日から起算して一年以内のもの又はその期間内に当該処分について法律の定めるところにより不服申立てをし、若しくは訴えを提起し、これに対する裁決若しくは決定又は裁判が確定するに至らないものを構成員にとどめていること、及び当該職員団体の役員である者を構成員としていることを妨げない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 83 In the application of Article 7, a person who has been prohibited from practicing pursuant to the prior Accountant Law (Keirishi-ho, Act No.31 of 1927) shall be deemed to have had his/her registration as a certified public accountant revoked from the register of certified public accountants as a result of such disciplinary action, a person whose license was revoked pursuant to the prior Tax Accountants Law (Zeimu-dairishi-ho, Act No.46 of 1942) shall be deemed to have had his/her registration as a tax accountant revoked as a result of such disciplinary action, and a person who has been dismissed from his/her office as a government official under the order of the disciplinary action for public officials (Imperial Ordinance No. 63 of 1899) shall be deemed to have been discharged from his/her office as a public officer as a result of such disciplinary action. 例文帳に追加

第八十三条　第七条の規定の適用については、従前の計理士法（昭和二年法律第三十一号）の規定により業務の禁止の処分を受けた者は、懲戒の処分により公認会計士の登録を抹消された者とみなし、従前の税務代理士法（昭和十七年法律第四十六号）の規定により税務代理士の許可を取り消された者は、懲戒の処分により税理士の登録を取り消されたものとみなし、官吏懲戒令（明治三十二年勅令第六十三号）により免官の処分を受けた者は、公務員であつて懲戒の処分により免職された者とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 Any person or his/her successor who actually mines uranium ore or thorium ore prior to the enforcement of this Act may continue to mine them for three months from the day of enforcement of this Act as the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. In the case where such person or his/her successor files an application for creation of mining right for uranium ore or thorium ore in the digging area concerned, the same shall apply to such application area until the application is dismissed, a notice of non-permission is received, the permission ceases to be effective under the provisions of Article 43 of the Mining Act, or the creation of mining right is registered. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現にウラン鉱若しくはトリウム鉱を掘採している者又はその承継人は、この法律の施行の日から三月間は、従前の例によりその掘採を継続することができる。この法律の施行の日から三月以内に当該掘採者又はその承継人が当該掘採区域についてウラン鉱又はトリウム鉱を目的とする鉱業権の設定の出願をした場合において、出願の却下若しくは不許可の通知を受けるまで、鉱業法第四十三条の規定によつて許可がその効力を失うまで、又は鉱業権の設定の登録があるまで、当該出願の区域について、また同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Any person who has been dismissed, prior to the enforcement of this Act, as an officer of a designated registration agency as prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (1) of the Former Act on Layout-Design of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits or as a person who implements the affairs of the registration of establishment, etc. as prescribed in Article 31, paragraph (2) of the Former Act on Layout-Design of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits, subject to the order under Article 37 of the Former Act on Layout-Design of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits, and for whom two years have not yet elapsed since the date of such dismissal, or any juridical person such person is supposed to carry out business on behalf thereof as an officer, shall be deemed, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 29 and Article 41 of the New Act on Layout-Design of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits, to fall under Article 29, item (ii) or item (iv) of the New Act on Layout-Design of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits. 例文帳に追加

３　この法律の施行前に旧半導体集積回路法第三十七条の規定による命令により旧半導体集積回路法第二十八条第一項に規定する指定登録機関の役員若しくは旧半導体集積回路法第三十一条第二項に規定する登録事務実施者を解任され、解任の日から二年を経過しない者又はその者がその業務を行う役員となっている法人は、新半導体集積回路法第二十九条及び第四十一条の規定の適用については、新半導体集積回路法第二十九条第二号又は第四号に該当するものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In relation to information management, you recently imposed a fine on and issued a business suspension order against a certified public accountant involved in an insider trading case. At the same time, an employee of a major securities company who allegedly provided insider information to the accountant was dismissed by the company. Under Article 51 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the FSA may take an administrative action even in the absence of an illegal act if necessary to protect investors. Could you tell us what administrative action the FSA is planning to take against this major securities company? 例文帳に追加

その情報管理に関連することではありますが、先般、公認会計士のインサイダー取引に関連しまして、当該会計士に対して課徴金と業務停止の処分を出されたかと思います。これと同時に、インサイダー情報を会計士に提供していたとされる大手証券会社の社員も、懲戒解雇という処分を会社から出されました。金融商品取引法には、法令違反がなくても投資家保護の観点などから、必要な場合には行政処分を発動できるという第51条の規定がありますが、この大手証券会社に対する今後の行政対応を金融庁としてはどう考えていらっしゃるのか、伺えればと思います。 - 金融庁

(a) Dismissal for failure to prosecute. -- If the petitioner/opposer does not appear at the time and place designated in the Notice of Pre-trial Conference or a Notice of Hearing or in a subsequent order, or failed to prosecute his case for an unreasonable length of time, or fail to comply with these Regulations or any order of the Bureau, the petition or notice of opposition, as the case may be, may be dismissed for failure to prosecute and judgment rendered for the respondent to recover his costs from the petitioner/opposer, provided, however, that the Bureau may cancel the patent or trademark registration where it finds evidence independent of the petitioner’s submission. Within fifteen days after receipt of the Order of Dismissal, the petitioner/opposer may file a motion to set aside such order if his failure to appear was by reason of fraud, accident, mistake or excusable negligence.例文帳に追加

(a)遂行を怠ったことによる却下 申請人／異議申立人が，審理前協議の通知若しくは聴聞の通知又はその後の命令に指定された時及び場所に出頭しなかった場合，不当に長い期間にわたって自己の事件の遂行を怠った場合，又は本規則若しくは局の命令を遵守しない場合は，申請又は場合により異議申立は，遂行を怠ったことにより却下することができ，かつ，被申請人はその費用を申請人／異議申立人から回収することができる旨の判決を言い渡すことができる。ただし，局は，申請人の提出と無関係に証拠を発見した場合は，特許又は商標登録を取り消すことができる。却下命令の受領後15日以内に，申請人／異議申立人は，出頭しなかったことが不正を受けたこと，事故，錯誤又は免責される過失による場合は，当該命令の取消を求める申立を行うことができる。 - 特許庁

If the person making the first application, or his successor in title, has filed with the same authority a later application relating to the same design, the later application may be invoked as the basis of priority provided that, at the time of filing, the earlier application had been withdrawn, dismissed or rejected and the documents filed in the case had not become available to the public, and has not left outstanding any right based upon it and has not served as a basis for priority. Where priority is accepted on the basis of the later application, the earlier application may no longer be invoked as grounds for priority. 例文帳に追加

最初の出願を行った出願人又はその権原承継人が同一特許当局に対して同一の意匠に関する後の出願を行った場合は，当該後の出願を優先権の基礎として援用することができる。ただし，その出願時において，先の出願が既に取下，却下若しくは拒絶されており，かつ，その事件において提出された書類が公衆の利用に供されていなかったこと，先の出願に基づく如何なる権利も残っておらず，かつ，先の出願が優先権の基礎として機能していないことを条件とする。当該後の出願を基礎として優先権が容認された場合は，先の出願は，もはや優先権の根拠として援用することができない。 - 特許庁

(1) A Board of Appeal shall render decisions in the composition of 1. one legal member as presiding judge and two technical members, in cases under Sections 23(4) and 50(1) and (2); 2. one technical member as presiding judge, two further technical members and one legal member in those cases a) in which an application was rejected, b) in which an opposition was dismissed as inadmissible, c) pursuant to Section 61(1), sentence 1, and Section 64(1), d) pursuant to Section 61(2) as well as e) pursuant to Sections 130, 131 and 133;3. one legal member as presiding judge, an additional legal member and a technical member in cases pursuant to Section 31(5); 4. three legal members in all other cases. 例文帳に追加

(1) 審判部は，次の構成によって決定を行う。 1. 第23条(4)並びに第50条(1)及び(2)に基づく事件に関しては，裁判長としての1の法律的構成員，及び 2の技術的構成員 2. 次の事件に関しては，裁判長としての 1の技術的構成員，更に 2の技術的構成員及び 1の法律的構成員 a) 出願が拒絶された事件b) 異議申立が容認できないものとして却下された事件c) 第61条(1)第1文及び第64条(1)による事件 d) 第 61条(2)による事件，及びe) 第130条，第131条及び第133条による事件 3. 第 31条(5)による事件に関しては，裁判長としての 1の法律的構成員，更に追加の 1の法律的構成員及び 1の技術的構成員 4. 他の全ての事件に関しては，3の法律的構成員 - 特許庁