「Implementation Provisions」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(5ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(3) In the case that the Third Party who was granted an opportunity to submit a written opinion pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs submits a written opinion manifesting the intention of opposition to disclosure of the information concerning the Third Party, the head of the Administrative Organ, when making a Disclosure Decision, shall place at least two weeks between the day of the Disclosure Decision and the day that disclosure will be implemented. In this case, upon making the Disclosure Decision the head of the Administrative Organ shall immediately notify the Third Party who submitted the written opinion (referred to as a "Written Opposition Opinion" in Articles 42 and 43) in writing to the effect that the Disclosure Decision was made and the grounds for its decision, and the date of implementation of disclosure. 例文帳に追加

３　行政機関の長は、前二項の規定により意見書の提出の機会を与えられた第三者が当該第三者に関する情報の開示に反対の意思を表示した意見書を提出した場合において、開示決定をするときは、開示決定の日と開示を実施する日との間に少なくとも二週間を置かなければならない。この場合において、行政機関の長は、開示決定後直ちに、当該意見書（第四十二条及び第四十三条において「反対意見書」という。）を提出した第三者に対し、開示決定をした旨及びその理由並びに開示を実施する日を書面により通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13-3-2 (1) When a Bank, Bank Agent for which said Bank serves as a Principal Bank, Parent Financial Institution, etc. or Subsidiary Financial Institution, etc. of said Bank conducts any transaction, the Bank shall, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, properly manage the information on the business conducted by said Bank, Bank Agent for which said Bank serves as a Principal Bank or a Subsidiary Financial Institution, etc. of said Bank (limited to Banking, Bank Agency Services and any other business specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance) and establish a system for properly supervising the status of implementation of said business or taking any other measures necessary so that the interests of the customer of said business will not be unjustly impaired. 例文帳に追加

第十三条の三の二　銀行は、当該銀行、当該銀行を所属銀行とする銀行代理業者又は当該銀行の親金融機関等若しくは子金融機関等が行う取引に伴い、当該銀行、当該銀行を所属銀行とする銀行代理業者又は当該銀行の子金融機関等が行う業務（銀行業、銀行代理業その他の内閣府令で定める業務に限る。）に係る顧客の利益が不当に害されることのないよう、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該業務に関する情報を適正に管理し、かつ、当該業務の実施状況を適切に監視するための体制の整備その他必要な措置を講じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) where the necessary measures ordered under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, paragraph (1) of the following Article, Article 8, paragraph (3) or paragraph (4), Article 8-2, paragraph (3), Article 8-2-5, paragraph (3) or Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) have not been implemented at all or have not been fully implemented, or such measures should be implemented by a certain time limit but the implementation thereof is not expected to be completed by said time limit, and for these reasons, the fire chief or fire station chief still finds the position, structure, equipment or the status of the management of the property under fire prevention measures to be dangerous from a fire prevention perspective, finds them to be likely to hinder fire extinguishing activities, evacuation and other fire defense activities, or finds that they will endanger human life once a fire occurs; or 例文帳に追加

一　前条第一項、次条第一項、第八条第三項若しくは第四項、第八条の二第三項、第八条の二の五第三項又は第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項の規定により必要な措置が命ぜられたにもかかわらず、その措置が履行されず、履行されても十分でなく、又はその措置の履行について期限が付されている場合にあつては履行されても当該期限までに完了する見込みがないため、引き続き、火災の予防に危険であると認める場合、消火、避難その他の消防の活動に支障になると認める場合又は火災が発生したならば人命に危険であると認める場合 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The contractor set forth in paragraph (1) through (5) and the workers set forth in the preceding paragraph, shall follow the instructions given by the specified principal employer, etc., set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 31, the principal employers, etc., set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 31-2 or paragraph (1) of Article 30-3, the orderer set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 31 or Article 31-2, and the orderer or contractors set forth in paragraph (1) through (5), with a view to ensuring the implementation of the measures under the provisions of paragraph (1) or 4 of Article 30-3, or paragraph (1) of Article 31, or Article 31-2, or paragraph (1) through (5). 例文帳に追加

７　第一項から第五項までの請負人及び前項の労働者は、第三十条第一項の特定元方事業者等、第三十条の二第一項若しくは第三十条の三第一項の元方事業者等、第三十一条第一項若しくは第三十一条の二の注文者又は第一項から第五項までの請負人が第三十条第一項若しくは第四項、第三十条の二第一項若しくは第四項、第三十条の三第一項若しくは第四項、第三十一条第一項、第三十一条の二又は第一項から第五項までの規定に基づく措置の実施を確保するためにする指示に従わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body issues a certification of type (certification of type prescribed in Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of a type (including the method to verify that each terminal equipment conforms to the type) of terminal equipment, the provisions of Article 57 through Article 59, Article 60 paragraph (1), Article 61, Article 62 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Article 166 paragraph (3) and Article 167 paragraph (4) and paragraph (6) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the certification of type as a certification of type issued by a registered approval body and the person who has obtained the certification of type from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a certification of type from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" in Article 60 paragraph (1) item (v) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　登録外国適合性評価機関が端末機器の設計（当該設計に合致することの確認の方法を含む。）について設計認証（電気通信事業法第五十六条第一項に規定する設計認証をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該設計認証を登録認定機関がした設計認証と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による設計認証を受けた者を登録認定機関による設計認証を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十七条から第五十九条まで、第六十条第一項、第六十一条、第六十二条第二項及び第三項、第百六十六条第三項並びに第百六十七条第四項及び第六項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第六十条第一項第五号中「登録認定機関」とあるのは、「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 83-3 The provisions of paragraph (2) and (3) of Article 75-2, and of Article 75-3 through Article 75-12 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the work of the designated consultant examination institutions and consultant examination affairs provided for in the preceding article. In this case, "the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 and Article 75-12 shall be read as "the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare"; "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 read as "Article 83-2"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6" in paragraph (2) of Article 75-4 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of consultant examination affairs "; "giving a decision as to whether the applicant has knowledge and capability necessary for a license holder" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-5 as "formulating and marking examination questions for industrial safety consultant examinations and industrial health consultant examinations"; "license examiner" in the same article and Article 75-8 as "consultant examiner"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of the following Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 75-5 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of the consultant examination affairs "; "examination affairs (hereinafter in this Article and Article 75-11, paragraph (2), item (iv) referred to as the ' examination affair rules')" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6 as "procedure rules"; "the examination affair rules" in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the same Article and item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 75-11 as "the procedure rules relating to the implementation of consultant examination affairs". 例文帳に追加

第八十三条の三　第七十五条の二第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の三から第七十五条の十二までの規定は、前条の規定による指定、指定コンサルタント試験機関及びコンサルタント試験事務について準用する。この場合において、第七十五条の二第三項及び第七十五条の十二中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「厚生労働大臣」と、第七十五条の二第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条の二」と、第七十五条の四第二項中「第七十五条の六第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の五第一項中「免許を受ける者として必要な知識及び能力を有するかどうかの判定」とあるのは「労働安全コンサルタント試験又は労働衛生コンサルタント試験の問題の作成及び採点」と、同条及び第七十五条の八中「免許試験員」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験員」と、第七十五条の五第四項中「次条第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の六第一項中「規程（以下この条及び第七十五条の十一第二項第四号において「試験事務規程」という。）」とあるのは「規程」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の十一第二項第四号中「試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The party who has demanded the injunction must compensate the party against whom the injunction is issued as well as the alleged infringer for the damage caused by the implementation of the injunction and for any other cost resulting from the case, if the action referred to in Section 38(1) is rejected or ruled inadmissible, or if the processing of the case is removed from the cause list because the plaintiff has abandoned his action or failed to arrive to the court. The same applies if the injunction is withdrawn under paragraph 3 or lapses under paragraph 4. When an action is brought for compensation for damage and cost, the provisions of Chapter 7, Section 12, of the Code of Judicial Procedure apply. 例文帳に追加

差止命令を要求した当事者は，差止命令発出の対象となった当事者及び侵害者とされている者に対して，差止命令の実行により生じた損害及び当該事から生じたその他の費用を補償しなければならない。ただし，このことは，第38条第1段落にいう訴訟が却下されるか若しくは認容し得ない旨決定された場合，又は原告が訴訟を放棄したか若しくは裁判所に出頭しなかったために当該事件が事件目録から抹消された場合に限る。差止命令が第3段落に基づいて取り下げられたか又は第4段落に基づいて失効した場合も同様とする。損害及び費用の補償に関して訴訟が提起された場合は，裁判手続法第7章第12条の規定が適用される。 - 特許庁

(3) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 31 and Article 32 of the new Act for implementation of the mutual recognition within the period between the date of enforcement of this Act and the previous day of the effective date, in Article 31 paragraph (1), the term "Article 69 paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 51 paragraph (1)", the term "Article 53 paragraph (2)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 50 paragraph (2)", the term "Article 52 paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 paragraph (1)", the term "Article 86 paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68 paragraph (1)" and the term "Article 62 paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 50-10 paragraph (1)" ; in Article 32, the term "Article 52 paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 paragraph (1)." 例文帳に追加

３　この法律の施行の日から施行日の前日までの間における新相互承認実施法第三十一条及び第三十二条の規定の適用については、第三十一条第一項中「第六十九条第一項」とあるのは「第五十一条第一項」と、「第五十三条第二項」とあるのは「第五十条第二項」と、「第五十二条第一項」とあるのは「第四十九条第一項」と、「第八十六条第一項」とあるのは「第六十八条第一項」と、「第六十二条第一項」とあるのは「第五十条の十第一項」と、第三十二条中「第五十二条第一項」とあるのは「第四十九条第一項」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 (1) When the Minister of Finance finds that if capital transactions (excluding those falling under specified capital transactions prescribed in Article 24, paragraph 1) by a resident or non-resident are conducted without any restrictions, it will cause a situation that prevents Japan from sincerely fulfilling obligations under treaties and other international agreements Japan has signed or from making its contribution to international efforts for achieving international peace, which will make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this Act, or when a cabinet decision set forth in Article 10, paragraph 1 has been made, he/she may impose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, on a resident or non-resident who intends to commit the capital transactions, the obligation to obtain permission for implementation of the capital transactions. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条　財務大臣は、居住者又は非居住者による資本取引（第二十四条第一項に規定する特定資本取引に該当するものを除く。）が何らの制限なしに行われた場合には、我が国が締結した条約その他の国際約束を誠実に履行することを妨げ、若しくは国際平和のための国際的な努力に我が国として寄与することを妨げることとなる事態を生じ、この法律の目的を達成することが困難になると認めるとき又は第十条第一項の閣議決定が行われたときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該資本取引を行おうとする居住者又は非居住者に対し、当該資本取引を行うことについて、許可を受ける義務を課することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body issues a certification of construction type (certification of construction type prescribed in Article 38-24 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of a construction type (including the method to verify that each equipment conforms to the type) of specified radio equipment, the provisions of Article 38-25 through Article 38-27, Article 38-28 paragraph (1), Article 38-29 and Article 38-30 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the certification of construction type as a certification of construction type issued by a registered certification body and the person who has obtained the certification of construction type from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a certification of construction type from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" in Article 38-28 paragraph (1) item (v) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　登録外国適合性評価機関が特定無線設備の工事設計（当該工事設計に合致することの確認の方法を含む。）について工事設計認証（電波法第三十八条の二十四第一項に規定する工事設計認証をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該工事設計認証を登録証明機関がした工事設計認証と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による工事設計認証を受けた者を登録証明機関による工事設計認証を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の二十五から第三十八条の二十七まで、第三十八条の二十八第一項、第三十八条の二十九並びに第三十八条の三十第二項及び第三項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の二十八第一項第五号中「登録証明機関」とあるのは、「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case that an entrepreneur is ordered to pay a surcharge pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1, the term "ten percent" appearing in paragraph 1 shall be "eight percent," the term "three percent" shall be "two point four percent", the term "two percent" shall be "one point six percent", the term "four percent" in the preceding paragraph shall be "three point two percent", the term "one point two percent" shall be "one percent", and the term "one percent" shall be "zero point eight percent" if the said entrepreneur had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph) by the day one month prior to the date when the measure listed in item 4 of paragraph 1 of Article 47 or the measure as provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 102 was first made in relation to the case pertaining to the said violation (hereinafter referred to as "investigation start date" in this Article) (if the said measure is not made, the day one month prior to the date when the said entrepreneur received the notice pertaining to the said violation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5 of Article 49, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 6 of Article 50 after deemed replacement (hereinafter referred to as "advance notice" in next paragraph and paragraph 7). 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の規定により課徴金の納付を命ずる場合において、当該事業者が、当該違反行為に係る事件について第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分又は第百二条第一項に規定する処分が最初に行われた日（以下この条において「調査開始日」という。）の一月前の日（当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について第五十条第六項において読み替えて準用する第四十九条第五項の規定による通知（次項及び第七項において「事前通知」という。）を受けた日の一月前の日）までに当該違反行為をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為に係る実行期間が二年未満である場合に限る。）であるときは、第一項中「百分の十」とあるのは「百分の八」と、「百分の三」とあるのは「百分の二・四」と、「百分の二」とあるのは「百分の一・六」と、前項中「百分の四」とあるのは「百分の三・二」と、「百分の一・二」とあるのは「百分の一」と、「百分の一」とあるのは「百分の〇・八」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) The term "mutual recognition agreements" as used in this Act means international agreements, including treaties, which Japan and other parties have concluded to mutually accept the results (including marks and certificates of the results; the same shall apply in paragraph (3) and paragraph (4)) of conformity assessment procedures (any procedures to determine whether specified equipment fulfills relevant technical requirements set out in the applicable laws and regulations of respective parties (laws and regulations on the specified equipment and public notices and other administrative provisions issued by the authorities of the respective parties; the same shall apply in Article 3 paragraph (1)); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and for which taking steps pursuant to this Act to ensure the proper implementation of the agreement is necessary as specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律において「相互承認協定」とは、我が国が締結する条約その他の国際約束のうち、我が国と我が国以外の締約国が、適合性評価手続（特定の機器が各締約国の関係法令等（特定の機器に関する法令及びその運用に関し各締約国の当局が発する告示その他の定めをいう。次条第一項において同じ。）に定める技術上の要件に適合しているかどうかを決定するための手続をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の結果（当該結果の表示及び証明書を含む。第三項及び第四項において同じ。）を相互に受け入れることを内容とするものであって、その適確な実施を確保するためこの法律に基づく措置を講ずることが必要なものとして政令で定めるものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. has been repealed or has become invalid, an agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities has been abolished, or a Municipal Ordinance that establishes transitional measures as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as the "Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures" in this paragraph) has been repealed or has become invalid, and as a result, a specified factory has ceased to be subject to the rules established by said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. (when a Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures has been established, said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures), with regard to such specified factory, a notification which was made, under Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 7, paragraph (1), or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Factory Location Act, or Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act for Partial Revision of the Act on Investigation of Factory Location, etc., to the head of a municipality who is specified to carry out affairs pertaining to the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities related to said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. or affairs pertaining to a specified factory set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article related to said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures (excluding the head of a designated city set forth in Article 252-19, paragraph (1) of the Local Autonomy Act), prior to the date of repeal or invalidity of said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc., the date of the abolition of said agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities, and the date of repeal or invalidity of said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures, respectively, shall be deemed to have been made to the prefectural governor pertaining to the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities related to said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc., after the respective date of repeal, abolition, or invalidity (hereinafter referred to as the "specified date" in this Article); provided, however, that with regard to said notification, for which any disposition of a recommendation, an order to change matters related to a recommendation, or reduction of a period to restrict implementation has not been rendered as on the specified date, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable to such recommendation, order to change matters related to a recommendation, or reduction of a period to restrict implementation. 例文帳に追加

３　緑地面積率等条例の廃止若しくは失効、同意企業立地重点促進区域の廃止又は前条第一項の規定により経過措置を定める条例（以下この項において「経過措置条例」という。）の廃止若しくは失効により、当該緑地面積率等条例（経過措置条例が定められている場合にあっては、当該経過措置条例）で定めた準則の適用を受けないこととなった特定工場について、それぞれ当該緑地面積率等条例の廃止若しくは失効の日、当該同意企業立地重点促進区域の廃止の日又は当該経過措置条例の廃止若しくは失効の日前に当該緑地面積率等条例に係る同意企業立地重点促進区域に係る事務又は当該経過措置条例に係る同条第一項の特定工場に係る事務を行うものとされた市町村の長（地方自治法第二百五十二条の十九第一項の指定都市の長を除く。）にされた工場立地法第六条第一項、第七条第一項若しくは第八条第一項又は工場立地の調査等に関する法律の一部を改正する法律附則第三条第一項の規定による届出は、それぞれの廃止又は失効の日（以下この条において「特定日」という。）以後においては、当該緑地面積率等条例に係る同意企業立地重点促進区域に係る都道府県の知事にされたものとみなす。ただし、当該届出であって特定日において勧告、勧告に係る事項を変更すべき旨の命令又は実施の制限の期間の短縮の処理がされていないものについての勧告、勧告に係る事項を変更すべき旨の命令又は実施の制限の期間の短縮については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-21-2 (1) When a Bank which is the Subsidiary Company of a Bank Holding Company, the Bank Agent for which said Bank which is the Subsidiary Company of said Bank Holding Company serves as a Principal Bank, or the Parent Financial Institution, etc. or Subsidiary Financial Institution, etc. of said Bank Holding Company conducts any transaction, the Bank Holding Company shall, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, properly manage the information on business conducted by said Bank which is the Subsidiary Company of said Bank Holding Company, said Bank Agent for which said Bank which is the Subsidiary Company of said Bank Holding Company serves as a Principal Bank, or a Subsidiary Financial Institution, etc. of said Bank (limited to Banking, Bank Agency Services and any other business specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance) and establish a system for properly supervising the status of implementation of said business or taking any other measures necessary so that the interests of the customer of said business will not be unjustly impaired. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の二十一の二　銀行持株会社は、その子会社である銀行、当該銀行持株会社の子会社である銀行を所属銀行とする銀行代理業者又は当該銀行持株会社の親金融機関等若しくは子金融機関等が行う取引に伴い、当該銀行持株会社の子会社である銀行、当該銀行持株会社の子会社である銀行を所属銀行とする銀行代理業者又は当該銀行持株会社の子金融機関等が行う業務（銀行業、銀行代理業その他の内閣府令で定める業務に限る。）に係る顧客の利益が不当に害されることのないよう、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該業務に関する情報を適正に管理し、かつ、当該業務の実施状況を適切に監視するための体制の整備その他必要な措置を講じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the competent minister finds that if service transactions between a resident and a non-resident (excluding those pertaining to Specified Technology prescribed in paragraph 1, item 1 and those which fall under the conclusion of a technology introduction contract, etc. prescribed in Article 30, paragraph 1) or transactions related to the buying and selling of goods involving the movement of goods between foreign states (excluding those prescribed in paragraph 1, item 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "Service Transactions, etc.") are conducted without any restrictions, it will cause a situation that prevents Japan from sincerely fulfilling obligations under the treaties and other international agreements it has signed or from making its contribution to international efforts for achieving international peace, which will make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this Act, or when a cabinet decision set forth in Article 10, paragraph 1 has been made, he/she may impose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, on a resident who intends to conduct the Service Transactions, etc., the obligation to obtain permission for the implementation of the Service Transactions, etc. 例文帳に追加

４　主務大臣は、居住者が非居住者との間で行う役務取引（第一項第一号に規定する特定技術に係るもの及び第三十条第一項に規定する技術導入契約の締結等に該当するものを除く。）又は外国相互間の貨物の移動を伴う貨物の売買に関する取引（第一項第二号に規定するものを除く。）（以下「役務取引等」という。）が何らの制限なしに行われた場合には、我が国が締結した条約その他の国際約束を誠実に履行することを妨げ、若しくは国際平和のための国際的な努力に我が国として寄与することを妨げることとなる事態を生じ、この法律の目的を達成することが困難になると認めるとき又は第十条第一項の閣議決定が行われたときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該役務取引等を行おうとする居住者に対し、当該役務取引等を行うことについて、許可を受ける義務を課することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Subsidized Company may employ electromagnetic means (the means specified by the Minister based on the provisions of Article 26-4, Paragraph 1 of the Budget Execution Act. The same shall apply hereinafter) for the application for the Subsidy pursuant to paragraph 1 of the preceding article, the withdrawal of the application pursuant to Article 7, the application for approval for change of plan pursuant to Article 9, Paragraph 1, the notification of conclusion of a contract pertaining to the implementation pursuant to Article 10, Paragraph 2, the application for approval for assignment or transfer of the rights pursuant to Article 11, Paragraph 1, an Accident Report pursuant to Article 12, a Progress Report pursuant to Article 13, a Project Result Report pursuant to Article 14, Paragraph 1 or Paragraph 2, the request for payment pursuant to Article 16, Paragraph 2, a report after determination of the amount of tax deductions for taxable purchase for consumption tax, etc. pursuant to Article 17, Paragraph 1, or the application for approval for asset disposal pursuant to Article 20, Paragraph 3 (hereinafter referred to as “Application for the Subsidy, etc.”). 例文帳に追加

補助事業者は、前条第１項の規定に基づく交付の申請、第７条の規定に基づく申請の取下げ、第９条第１項の規定に基づく計画変更の申請、第１０条第２項の規定に基づく実施契約締結の届出、第１１条第１項の規定に基づく権利の譲渡若しくは承継の承諾の申請、第１２条の規定に基づく事故の報告、第１３条の規定に基づく状況報告、第１４条第１項若しくは第２項の規定に基づく実績報告、第１６条第２項の規定に基づく支払請求、第１７条第１項の規定に基づく消費税等仕入控除税額の額の確定に伴う報告又は第２０条第３項の規定に基づく処分の承認申請（以下「交付申請等」という。）については、電磁的方法（適正化法第２６条の４第１項の規定に基づき大臣が定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）により行うことができる。 - 経済産業省

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

Article 31 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 86 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act as a person to approve conformity with the technical standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 52 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity approval (technical standards conformity approval prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) in respect of the terminal equipment (terminal equipment prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act, provided that such terminal equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (2), Article 54, Article 55 paragraph (1), Article 62 paragraph (1), Article 166 paragraph (2) and Article 167 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity approval as a technical standards conformity approval issued by a registered approval body (registered approval body prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity approval from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity approval from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 53 paragraph (2) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十一条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電気通信事業法第五十二条第一項の総務省令で定める技術基準に適合している旨の認定を行う者として同法第八十六条第一項の総務省令で定める事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が端末機器（同法第五十三条第一項に規定する端末機器をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合認定（同条第一項に規定する技術基準適合認定をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合認定を登録認定機関（同条第一項に規定する登録認定機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合認定と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者を登録認定機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十三条第二項、第五十四条、第五十五条第一項、第六十二条第一項、第百六十六条第二項並びに第百六十七条第一項、第二項及び第五項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第五十三条第二項中「登録認定機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business listed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act as a person to certify that radio equipment conforms to the technical standards prescribed in Chapter III of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity certification (technical standards conformity certification prescribed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of the specified radio equipment (specified radio equipment prescribed in the same paragraph, provided that such radio equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 38-7 paragraph (1), Article 38-20 paragraph (1), Article 38-21 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 38-22 paragraph (1), Article 38-23 paragraph (1) and Article 38-30 paragraph (1) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity certification as a technical standards conformity certification issued by a registered certification body (registered certification body prescribed in Article 38-5 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity certification from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity certification from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 38-7 paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十三条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電波法第三章に定める技術基準に適合している旨の証明を行う者として同法第三十八条の二第一項に掲げる事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が特定無線設備（同項に規定する特定無線設備をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合証明（同法第三十八条の二第一項に規定する技術基準適合証明をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合証明を登録証明機関（同法第三十八条の五第一項に規定する登録証明機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合証明と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者を登録証明機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の七第一項、第三十八条の二十第一項、第三十八条の二十一第一項及び第二項、第三十八条の二十二第一項、第三十八条の二十三第一項並びに第三十八条の三十第一項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の七第一項中「登録証明機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of paragraphs (1), (3) and (4) of Article 16, paragraph (1) of Article 19, paragraph (1) of Article 20 and Article 21 of the Act of Extradition shall be applied mutatis mutandis to the implementation of extradition pursuant to the order provided for in paragraph (1) above. The following terms shall be deemed to be replaced as follows: "the order of surrender provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 14" in paragraph (1) of Article 16 in the same act and the "direction for surrender of a fugitive as provided for in paragraph (1) or (5) of Article 17" in paragraph (1) of Article 20 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the order provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the full name of the fugitive, the name of the offense for which extradition is requested, the name of the requesting state, the place of surrender, the time limit of surrender and the date of issue" in paragraph (4) of Article 16 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the full name and age of the incoming sentenced person as defined in item (ix) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "incoming sentenced person"), the name of the sentencing state as defined in item (vii) of Article 2 of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"), the name of the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in item (xi) of Article 2 of the same act, the term of the foreign punishment imposed, and the date and place of surrender"; "paragraph (3) of Article 16" in paragraph (1) of Article 19 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (3) of Article 16 of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the requesting state" in paragraph (1) of Article 19, paragraph (1) of Article 20, and Article 21 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sentencing state"; "the fugitive" in paragraph (1) of Article 20 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the incoming sentenced person"; "paragraph (1) of Article 20" and "the fugitive" in Article 21 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 20 of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons" and the "incoming sentenced person", respectively. 例文帳に追加

４　逃亡犯罪人引渡法第十六条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項並びに第二十一条の規定は、第一項の命令により送還をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第十六条第一項中「第十四条第一項の規定による引渡の命令」とあり、及び同法第二十条第一項中「第十七条第一項又は第五項の規定による逃亡犯罪人の引渡の指揮」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第一項の命令」と、同法第十六条第四項中「逃亡犯罪人の氏名、引渡犯罪名、請求国の名称、引渡の場所、引渡の期限及び発付の年月日」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第九号の受入受刑者（以下「受入受刑者」という。）の氏名、年齢、同法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）の名称、同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪の名称、同法第二条第一号の外国刑の刑期、引渡日及び引渡しの場所」と、同法第十九条第一項中「第十六条第三項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第四項の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第十六条第三項」と、同法第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項及び第二十一条中「請求国」とあるのは「裁判国」と、同法第二十条第一項中「示して逃亡犯罪人の」とあるのは「示して受入受刑者の」と、「逃亡犯罪人を」とあるのは「受入受刑者を」と、同法第二十一条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第四項の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第二十条第一項」と、「逃亡犯罪人」とあるのは「受入受刑者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) When the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry finds that if specified capital transactions by a resident (meaning capital transactions listed in Article 20, item 2 (including those specified by Cabinet Order as transactions equivalent to item 2 of the said article pursuant to the provision of item 12 of the said article), which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts committed by a person who imports or exports goods directly accompanying the import or export of the goods, or which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts pertaining to the transfer of the mining right, industrial property right or other right equivalent thereto or establishment of the right to use these rights (excluding those specified by Cabinet Order as capital transactions to settle short-term international commercial transactions)), are conducted without any restrictions, it will cause a situation that prevents Japan from sincerely fulfilling obligations under the treaties and other international agreements it has signed or from making its contribution to international efforts for achieving international peace, which will make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this Act, or when a cabinet decision set forth in Article 10, paragraph 1 has been made, he/she may impose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, on a person who intends to commit the specified capital transactions, the obligation to obtain permission for the implementation of the specified capital transactions. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　経済産業大臣は、居住者による特定資本取引（第二十条第二号に掲げる資本取引（同条第十二号の規定により同条第二号に準ずる取引として政令で定めるものを含む。）のうち、貨物を輸出し、又は輸入する者が貨物の輸出又は輸入に直接伴つてする取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの及び鉱業権、工業所有権その他これらに類する権利の移転又はこれらの権利の使用権の設定に係る取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの（短期の国際商業取引の決済のための資本取引として政令で定めるものを除く。）をいう。以下同じ。）が何らの制限なしに行われた場合には、我が国が締結した条約その他の国際約束を誠実に履行することを妨げ、若しくは国際平和のための国際的な努力に我が国として寄与することを妨げることとなる事態を生じ、この法律の目的を達成することが困難になると認めるとき又は第十条第一項の閣議決定が行われたときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該特定資本取引を行おうとする居住者に対し、当該特定資本取引を行うことについて、許可を受ける義務を課することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3). 例文帳に追加

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム