In effectの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 31340件
Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加
第四十条 連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方(その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。)は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日(その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品(施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。)の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。)から起算して二十日を経過したとき(連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき)を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加
3 新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項(新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等(同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額(同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社(以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。)若しくはその子会社等(新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社(以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。)若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社(以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。)が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加
2 新銀行法第十三条第二項(新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額(同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等(同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 48 (1) Where a Service Provider or a seller concludes a Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc., the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. may rescind such Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. in writing, except when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) or (3) (if the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. had not rescinded the Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's or the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning rescission of the Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's or the seller's act of intimidating the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider or the seller pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. may rescind said Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). 例文帳に追加
第四十八条 役務提供事業者又は販売業者が特定継続的役務提供等契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務提供受領者等は、第四十二条第二項又は第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき(特定継続的役務提供受領者等が、役務提供事業者若しくは販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者若しくは販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務提供受領者等が、当該役務提供事業者又は当該販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき)を除き、書面によりその特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) Without affecting the operation of Section 13, the registration of a person as a registered user - (a) may be varied by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, with respect to the goods for which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, the registration has effect; or (b) may be extended by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, for such period not exceeding three years, as the Registrar thinks fit, but such period shall not extend beyond the date of expiration of the current registration of the trade mark; or (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of the registered proprietor or of the registered user; or (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of a person on the ground - (i) that the registered user has used the trade mark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause, or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; or (ii) that the registered proprietor or the registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration; or (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested.例文帳に追加
(1) 第13条の運用に影響を与えることなく,登録使用者としての人の登録は次に掲げることができる。 (a) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,当該登録が効力を有する商品,当該登録が効力を有するための条件又は制約について,変更することができる。又は, (b) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,登録官として適切と考える3年を超えない期間で延長することできるが,その期間は当該商標の現在の登録期間の満了日を超えて延長してはならない。又は (c) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,登録を抹消することができる。又は, (d) 登録官は,次に掲げる理由に基づき,ある者の申請を抹消することができる。 (i) 登録使用者が許可された使用方法以外の方法で,若しくは誤認又は混同を招く,又はそのおそれのある方法で商標を使用したこと,又は, (ii) 登録所有者又は登録使用者が登録出願にとって重要な事実を偽って伝えた又は開示しなかった,若しくは事情が登録の日から著しく変化したこと,又は, (iii) 当該登録は,出願人がその履行に利害関係を有する契約により出願人に付与される権利を考慮して登録は認められるべきではなかったこと - 特許庁
Article 49 (1) Where a Service Provider concludes a Specified Continuous Service Contract, the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate said contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) (if the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph). 例文帳に追加
第四十九条 役務提供事業者が特定継続的役務提供契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者は、第四十二条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後(その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、役務提供事業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、当該役務提供事業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後)においては、将来に向かつてその特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first-mentioned person to be registered, or some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark - (a) bring any action against the first-mentioned person; and (b) obtain a declaration to effect that the threats are unjustifiable and an injunction against the continuance of the threats; and (c) recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first-mentioned person satisfies the court that the trade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark.例文帳に追加
(1) ある者が,回覧物若しくは公告その他の方法で,登録されている若しくは登録されていると最初に言及する者により主張される商標の侵害訴訟若しくは法的手続きで,又は他の何らかの類似法的手続きで人を脅す場合,被害者は,脅しをかけている者が当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるか否かにかかわらず,次に掲げる各号を行うことができる。 (a) 最初に言及する者に対して訴訟を起こすこと (b)脅しは不当であるという旨の宣言,及び,その脅しを続けることへの差止命令を取得すること,並びに (c) (該当する場合)自らが被った損害を回復すること。但し,最初に言及する者が,当該商標は登録されており,かつ,その法的手続きが脅かされた行為は当該商標の侵害をなす,又は脅かされれば侵害となるであろうことを裁判所に納得させた場合を除く。 - 特許庁
A person shall not be eligible to be registered as a patent agent, if he - (i) has been adjudged by a competent court to be of unsound mind; (ii) is an undischarged insolvent; (iii) being a discharged insolvent, has not obtained from the court a certificate to the effect that his insolvency was caused by misfortune without any misconduct on his part; (iv) has been convicted by a competent court, whether within or outside India of an offence to undergo a term of imprisonment, unless the offence of which he has been convicted has been pardoned or unless on an application made by him, the Central Government has, by order in this behalf, removed the disability; (v) being a legal practitioner has been guilty of professional misconduct; or (vi) being a chartered accountant, has been guilty of negligence or misconduct. 例文帳に追加
ある者が次に該当するときは,特許代理人としての登録資格がないものとする。 (i) 管轄裁判所から心神喪失者である旨の宣告を受けたとき (ii) 債務弁済未了の破産者であるとき (iii) 債務弁済完了の破産者であって,その者の破産がその者の側に何らの不法行為がなく災難により生じたものである旨の証明書を裁判所から未だ取得していないとき (iv) インド国内又は国外を問わず管轄裁判所から,有期の拘禁刑をもって処罰されるべき犯罪について有罪判決を受けたとき。ただし,その者の有罪判決対象の犯罪が赦免された場合又はその者による申請に基づいて中央政府が本件についての命令により資格喪失を免除した場合は,この限りでない。 (v) 弁護士であって,業務上の違法行為について有罪の判決を受けたとき,又は (vi) 公認会計士であって,過失又は不法行為について有罪の判決を受けたとき - 特許庁
(4) In cases where a Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger is a company with class shares, if all or part of shares of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger are shares with restriction on transfer, the Consolidation-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the shares with restriction on transfer (excluding the shares with restriction on transfer) (if there are two or more classes of shares pertaining to such class shareholders, the respective class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders categorized by each class of said two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights at said class shareholders meeting. 例文帳に追加
4 新設合併消滅株式会社金融商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社金融商品取引所の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社金融商品取引所の株式の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式であるときは、当該新設合併は、当該譲渡制限株式の割当てを受ける種類の株式(譲渡制限株式を除く。)の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会)の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 12 (1) Concerning research results related to the technologies of those national research and development institutes stipulated by Cabinet Orders (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Research and Development Institutes"), a person who has received assignment of nationally-owned patent right or right to receive a patent, or nationally-owned utility model right or right to receive registration of a utility model related to said research results, and who is engaged in the operation of transferring said research results to private business operators who intend to utilize these research results, through assignment or the establishment of exclusive licenses of patent, obtained based on said patent right itself or right to receive said patent, or utility model rights obtained based on the utility model right itself or right to receive registration of said utility model, or otherwise, may apply to the Minister having jurisdiction over the said Specified Research and Development Institute and receive an accreditation to the effect that the operation of that person conforms to all of the following items. 例文帳に追加
第十二条 国の試験研究機関であって政令で定めるもの(以下「特定試験研究機関」という。)における技術に関する研究成果について、当該研究成果に係る国有の特許権若しくは特許を受ける権利又は国有の実用新案権若しくは実用新案登録を受ける権利の譲渡を受け、当該特許権若しくは当該特許を受ける権利に基づいて取得した特許権又は当該実用新案権若しくは当該実用新案登録を受ける権利に基づいて取得した実用新案権についての譲渡、専用実施権の設定その他の行為により、当該研究成果の活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業を行う者は、当該特定試験研究機関を所管する大臣に申請して、その事業が次の各号のいずれにも適合している旨の認定を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 18 (1) When an order under Article 10, paragraph 1, item 2 has previously been issued and a repeated petition for an order under the same item has been filed on the grounds that the same fact of bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. that was the ground for the petition for the issued order, the court shall issue the order in question only when finding it necessary to reissue the order under the same item, by taking into consideration the fact that the victim who intends to move from the domicile that the victim shares as his/her main home with his/her spouse is unable to complete the move from the domicile within two months from the day the issued order comes into effect due to cause imputable to the victim himself/herself, or other circumstances. However, the court may choose not to issue the order when finding that the issuance of the order will cause extreme hindrance to the spouse's daily life. 例文帳に追加
第十八条 第十条第一項第二号の規定による命令が発せられた後に当該発せられた命令の申立ての理由となった身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫と同一の事実を理由とする同号の規定による命令の再度の申立てがあったときは、裁判所は、配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居から転居しようとする被害者がその責めに帰することのできない事由により当該発せられた命令の効力が生ずる日から起算して二月を経過する日までに当該住居からの転居を完了することができないことその他の同号の規定による命令を再度発する必要があると認めるべき事情があるときに限り、当該命令を発するものとする。ただし、当該命令を発することにより当該配偶者の生活に特に著しい支障を生ずると認めるときは、当該命令を発しないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
3 会社法第六十七条第一項(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで(議事録)及び第三百十六条第一項(株主総会に提出された資料等の調査)の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notification to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加
2 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係(他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の二分の一以上に相当する議決権(社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。)を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。)を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph 1 or Article 148, paragraph 1 of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notice to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加
2 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係(他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の二分の一以上に相当する議決権(社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。)を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。)を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 経済産業省
Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加
(1)を制限することなく,同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し,本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して,又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して,制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること,及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に,宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として,本法に基づいて,宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために,かつ,それに関して規定を制定すること,及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること,及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること,及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で,登録簿への記入の補正のために,かつ,その補正に関連して規定を制定すること,及びある者に対し,本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を,登録官に付与すること,及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に,登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を,登録官に付与すること,及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず,1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること,及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し,出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を,登録官に付与すること,規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること,及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること,及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること,及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め,本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために,かつ,それに関連して規定を制定すること,及び当該期間の延長について定めること,及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に,必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること,及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて),1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること,及び本法又は規則の適用上,電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること,及び登録官に対し,登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する,公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること,及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁
Article 23-8 (1) The Issuer, a person who engages in Secondary Distribution of Securities, an Underwriter, a Financial Instruments Business Operator or a Registered Financial Institution shall not have another person acquire Securities for which the Shelf Registration has been made for their Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, or sell such Securities to another person, through Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, unless the Shelf Registration has already come into effect and, for each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution, a document which states the total issue price or total distribution amount, conditions of issuance or distribution of the Securities or other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as "Shelf Registration Supplements") has been submitted to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance if the total issue price or total distribution amount of each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution is less than 100 million. 例文帳に追加
第二十三条の八 発行登録者、有価証券の売出しをする者、引受人、金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関は、発行登録によりあらかじめその募集又は売出しが登録されている有価証券については、当該発行登録がその効力を生じており、かつ、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しごとにその発行価額又は売出価額の総額、発行条件又は売出条件その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類(以下「発行登録追補書類」という。)が内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣に提出されていなければ、これを募集又は売出しにより取得させ、又は売り付けてはならない。ただし、有価証券の募集又は売出しごとの発行価額又は売出価額の総額が一億円未満の有価証券の募集又は売出しで内閣府令で定めるものについては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加
第百二条 第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法(以下「新銀行法」という。)第十三条第一項(第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法(以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。)第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法(以下「新信用金庫法」という。)第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法(以下「新労働金庫法」という。)第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律(以下「新協金法」という。)第六条において準用する場合(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。)を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等(同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の額が信用供与等限度額(同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行(新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、長期信用銀行(新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会(新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。)(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。)の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会(労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 65 In any of the following cases, the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager or liquidator of the Bank (including a company that had been said Bank in the case where the license from the Prime Minister set forth in Article 4(1) lost its effect as a result of the Bank falling under any of each item from Article 41(i) to (iii) inclusive), the representative person, agent or manager of the Foreign Bank, the Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights (including a person who had been a Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights in the case where the Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights became a person who is no longer a Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights and, when the Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights is a juridical person, etc. (meaning any juridical person and any organization without juridical personality specified in Article 3-2(1)(i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said juridical person, etc.), the Major Shareholder of the Bank (including a person who had been the Major Shareholder of Bank in the case where the major shareholder of the Bank became a person who is no longer a Major Shareholder of Bank and, when the Major Shareholder of Bank is a Juridical Person, etc., it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said juridical person, etc.), the Specified Major Shareholder (including a person who had been the Specified Major Shareholder in the case where the Specified Major Shareholder became a person who is no longer a holder of voting rights of the Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more and, when the Specifies Major Shareholder is a juridical person, etc., it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said juridical person, etc.), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager, or liquidator of the Bank Holding Company (including a company that had been the Bank Holding Company in the case where the Bank Holding Company became a company that is no longer a Bank Holding Company), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of the Specified Holding Company (including a company that had been the Specified Holding Company in the case where the Specified Holding Company became a company that is no longer a Holding Company having a Bank as its Subsidiary Company), or the Bank Agent (when the Bank Agent is a juridical person, it shall be the director, executive officer, auditor, director, inspector, representative person, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said Bank Agent) that has committed such act shall be punished by a fine of not more than one million yen: 例文帳に追加
第六十五条 次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、その行為をした銀行(銀行が第四十一条第一号から第三号までのいずれかに該当して第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許が効力を失つた場合における当該銀行であつた会社を含む。)の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人、外国銀行の代表者、代理人若しくは支配人、銀行議決権大量保有者(銀行議決権大量保有者が銀行議決権大量保有者でなくなつた場合における当該銀行議決権大量保有者であつた者を含み、銀行議決権大量保有者が法人等(法人及び第三条の二第一項第一号に掲げる法人でない団体をいう。以下この条において同じ。)であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人)、銀行主要株主(銀行主要株主が銀行主要株主でなくなつた場合における当該銀行主要株主であつた者を含み、銀行主要株主が法人等であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人)、特定主要株主(特定主要株主が銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなつた場合における当該特定主要株主であつた者を含み、特定主要株主が法人等であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人)、銀行持株会社(銀行持株会社が銀行持株会社でなくなつた場合における当該銀行持株会社であつた会社を含む。)の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人、特定持株会社(特定持株会社が銀行を子会社とする持株会社でなくなつた場合における当該特定持株会社であつた会社を含む。)の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人、業務を執行する社員若しくは清算人又は銀行代理業者(銀行代理業者が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、監査役、理事、監事、代表者、業務を執行する社員又は清算人)は、百万円以下の過料に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 16-7 Where the establishment or abolition of fire defense headquarters or a fire station or the abolition, creation, division or merger of or boundary change to a municipality has caused a municipality to have fire defense headquarters and a fire station(s) or to no longer have fire defense headquarters and a fire station(s) or caused a municipality to be involved in such abolition, creation, division or merger or boundary change, and this has led to the change of the administrative agency which shall have authority over the area of said municipality under the provisions of Article 11; Article 11-2; Article 11-4; Article 11-5, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2); Article 12, paragraph (2); Article 12-2 to Article 12-4; Article 12-6; Article 12-7, paragraph (2); Article 13, paragraph (2); Article 14-2, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3); Article 14-3; Article 16-3, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4); and the preceding Article; the effect of the permission or other disposition granted or made by the initial administrative agency or of the notification received by the initial administrative agency, and the special provisions for the application of the provisions of this Chapter shall be prescribed by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第十六条の七 消防本部若しくは消防署の設置若しくは廃止又は市町村の廃置分合若しくは境界変更があつたことにより、新たに消防本部及び消防署が置かれることとなつた市町村若しくは消防本部及び消防署が置かれないこととなつた市町村の区域又は当該廃置分合若しくは境界変更に係る市町村の区域に係る第十一条、第十一条の二、第十一条の四、第十一条の五第一項及び第二項、第十二条第二項、第十二条の二から第十二条の四まで、第十二条の六、第十二条の七第二項、第十三条第二項、第十四条の二第一項及び第三項、第十四条の三、第十六条の三第三項及び第四項並びに前条の規定による権限を有する行政庁に変更があつた場合における変更前の行政庁がした許可その他の処分又は受理した届出の効力その他この章の規定の適用に係る特例については、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加
第八条の三 第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号(不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。)又は第二号(不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。)の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者(事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。)に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者(次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者(当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) The Registrar may refuse to accept an application for the registration of a trade mark which contains or consists of any of the following marks or a mark so nearly resembling any of those marks as to be likely to be taken for that mark: - (a) the word or words “Patent”, “Patented”, “By Royal Letters Patent”, “Registered”, “Registered Design”, “Copyright”, “To counterfeit this is a forgery”, or a word or words or symbol or symbols to the like effect; (b) a representation of the Sovereign or of a member of the Royal Family; (c) a representation of (i) the Royal Arms, crests, armorial bearings, insignia or devices; or (ii) any of the Royal crowns; or (iii) the national flag of a part of the Queen’s dominions; or (d) the word “Royal” or any other word, or any letters or device, likely to lead persons to think that the applicant has or has had Royal or Government patronage or authority; (e) a representation of the National Flag, National Emblem, National Motto or National Seal or of the flag, emblem, motto or seal of a province; (f) a representation of the flag or emblem of a city or town or Local-level Government or of a statutory body or instrumentality in Papua New Guinea; (g) a mark prescribed as being, for the purposes of this section, a prohibited mark.例文帳に追加
(1) 登録官は,次に掲げる標章若しくはそれらの標章のいずれかにほぼ類似しており,その標章と取られる可能性のある標章を含む又はそれらから構成される商標登録出願を拒絶することができる。 (a) 「特許」,「特許権取得済」,「王室特許状による」,「登録済」,「登録意匠」,「著作権」,「これを改ざんすることは偽造です」という言葉又は同じ効果を有する記号 (b) 国王若しくは王室の一員の表示 (c) 次に掲げるものの表示 (i) 王室紋章,クレスト,紋章,記章若しくは意匠 (ii) 王冠のすべて,又は (iii) 女王陛下の領土の一部の国旗,又は (d) 出願人が王室若しくは政府の任命権若しくは権限を有する若しくは有していたと人に思わせる可能性のある「ロイヤル」又はその他の言葉若しくは文字若しくは意匠 (e) 国旗,国章,国の標語若しくは国の印章の表示,又は地方の旗,章,標語若しくは印章の表示 (f) 市町村等の地方自治体の旗若しくは章の表示,又は国家機関若しくはパプアニューギニア国内の下部機関の旗若しくは章の表示 (g) 本条の適用上,禁止標章として規定された標章 - 特許庁
An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent. 例文帳に追加
権利者であって,その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの,又は窃取による被害者は,特許出願人に対し,特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は,権利者は,特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は,第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として,特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に,訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは,当該被害者は,その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は,特許所有者が,特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し,提供し,市販し若しくは使用し,又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること,又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に,本法の施行領域内での使用のために,その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し,市販し若しくは使用し,又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること - 特許庁
A Danish patent application shall state: (i) the applicant's name or firm name, postal address and, if the applicant is not represented by an agent, his telephone and fax number, if any, and, if the applicant is represented by an agent, the latter's name or firm name, postal address and telephone and fax number, if any, (ii) the inventor's name and postal address, (iii) a brief and factual title of the claimed invention, (iv) if the patent is applied for by several applicants jointly, and those applicants are not represented by an agent, whether one of them shall be authorised to receive communications from the Patent Authority on behalf of all the applicants, since otherwise the applicant mentioned first shall automatically receive communications from the Patent Authority on behalf of all the applicants, (v) if the application comprises the deposit of a sample of biological referred to in section 8a(1) of the Patents Act, information to that effect, (vi) if the patent is applied for by someone other than the inventor, the applicant's title to the invention, and that the inventor has been informed of the filing of an application for a patent for the invention, cf. section 8(4) of the Patents Act, and (vii) the documents accompanying the application. 例文帳に追加
デンマーク特許出願には,次の事項を記載しなければならない。 (i) 出願人の名称又は企業名,郵便宛先,並びに代理人を選任していない場合は出願人の電話番号及びファックス番号(該当するものがある場合),また,出願人が代理人を選任している場合は代理人の名称又は事務所名,郵便宛先並びに電話番号及びファックス番号(該当するものがある場合) (ii) 発明者の名称及び郵便宛先 (iii) クレームされた発明の簡潔な,かつ,事実に即した名称 (iv) 1の特許が複数の出願人によって共同で出願される場合において,それらの者が1人の代理人によって代表されていないときは,出願人中の1人が全員の代理として特許商標庁からの通信を受ける権限を付与されるか否か。そうでない場合は,頭書の出願人が出願人全員の代理として特許当局からの通信を自動的に受領することになるからである。 (v) 出願が特許法第8a条(1)にいう生物学的材料の試料の寄託を含んでいる場合は,その旨の情報 (vi) 発明者以外の者が特許出願をする場合は,発明に対する出願人の権原,及び発明者がその発明に対する特許出願について通告されていること(特許法第8条(4)参照),及び (vii) 出願に添付する書類 - 特許庁
Article 8 (1) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to patent rights or utility model rights (hereinafter referred to as "Patent Rights, etc.") or the right to receive a patent or the right to receive a utility model registration (limited to patent applications filed prior to the partial enforcement date (excluding patent applications pertaining to the division, etc. of a patent application prior to the partial enforcement date) or utility model registration applications filed prior to the partial enforcement date (excluding the utility model registration application pertaining to the division etc. of a utility model registration application prior to the partial enforcement date); hereinafter referred to as "Rights to Receive Patent, etc.") or Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the right to receive said patent, these rights being owned by the State and pertaining to research results related to technologies of national universities and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person (in paragraph 3 referred to as a "National University Related Certified Business Operator") who has received the accreditation of paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Business Operators prior to its revision pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, (hereinafter referred to as the "Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act"), the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6, paragraph 8 and paragraph 10 of the same Article 12, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6, paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to the same paragraphs shall have effect even on or after the date of partial enforcement. 例文帳に追加
第八条 第七条の規定による改正前の大学等における技術に関する研究成果の民間事業者への移転の促進に関する法律(以下「旧大学等技術移転促進法」という。)第十二条第一項の認定を受けた者(第三項において「国立大学関係認定事業者」という。)が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた国立大学における技術に関する研究成果に係る国有の特許権若しくは実用新案権(以下「特許権等」という。)若しくは特許を受ける権利若しくは実用新案登録を受ける権利(一部施行日前にした特許出願(一部施行日前の特許出願の分割等に係る特許出願を除く。)又は一部施行日前にした実用新案登録出願(一部施行日前の実用新案登録出願の分割等に係る実用新案登録出願を除く。)に係るものに限る。以下「特許を受ける権利等」という。)又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第四項、第六項、第八項及び第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日以後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
| ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
