1016万例文収録!

「せんじゅん」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(890ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > せんじゅんに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

せんじゅんの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 44471



例文

次のものは,特許所有者の排他権の侵害とみなされない。 (1) 外国籍の輸送手段(航海,河川,航空,陸上及び宇宙)の構造又は機能における特許によって保護された工業所有権の主題を含む手段の適用であって,その輸送手段がキルギス共和国領域に一時的又は偶発的に滞在し,その輸送手段の必要のために使用されることを条件としてのもの。当該行為は,その輸送手段がキルギス共和国の輸送手段の所有者に同一の権利を与える国の自然人又は法人に属する場合は,特許所有者の排他権の侵害とみなされない。 (2) 工業所有権の主題を含む物品をもって科学研究又は実験を行うこと (3) 緊急時(自然災害,大災害,大事故)における当該手段の適用。これには特許所有者に事後的に相応の補償を伴う。 (4) 特許によって保護された工業所有権の主題を含む手段の適用であって,当該手段が特許所有者によって供与された権利に順じて適法に経済的転用に導入される場合のもの。この場合は,特許された工業所有権の主題を含む又は特許された方法の実施によって製造された手段を特許所有者の許可に基づいて取得する者は,再許可を得ることなく,この手段を実施又は処分する権利を有するが,ただし,別段の定がある場合はこの限りでない。例文帳に追加

The following is not recognized as an infringement of the exclusive right of the patent owner: (1) application of the means containing objects of industrial property protected by patents in the construction or during exploitation of transport facilities (sea-going, river, air, land and cosmic) of other countries under condition that said facilities temporarily or accidentally stay in the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic and are used for the needs of transport facility. Such actions shall not be considered as an infringement of the exclusive right of the patent owner if transport facilities belong to natural persons or legal entities of the countries that provide the same rights to the owners of transport facilities of the Kyrgyz Republic; (2) conducting scientific research or an experiment with an article containing an object of industrial property; (3) application of such means during emergency situation (natural calamities, catastrophes, big accidents) with subsequent payment of a commensurate compensation to the patent owner; (4) application of means containing objects of industrial property protected by patents if these means are introduced into an economic turnover in a legal way in compliance with the rights granted by a patent owner. In this case the person who under the permission of the patent owner acquires a mean containing patented object of an industrial property or manufactured with the use of the patented method, shall have the right to use or dispose this mean without additional permission, unless otherwise is provided by the agreement. - 特許庁

標章登録の取消申請は,次のように行うことができる。 (a)IP法に基づく標章の登録日から5年以内 (b)当該登録標章が,登録に係わる商品若しくはサービス又はその一部について普通名称になっているか放棄されている場合,当該登録が不正に若しくはIP法の規定に反して得られた場合,又は登録人により若しくは登録人の許可を得て当該登録標章が商品若しくはサービスの出所を偽って表示するように使用されている場合は,いつでも。当該登録標章が当該商品又はサービスの一部のみについて普通名称になっている場合は,当該一部の商品又はサービスについてのみ取消申請をすることができる。登録標章は,ある独特の商品若しくはサービスの名称としても又はある独特の商品若しくはサービスを特定するためにも使用されているということのみを理由としては,商品又はサービスの普通名称であるとはみなさない。登録標章が当該標章を使用している商品又はサービスの普通名称になっているか否かを決定するに当たっては,購入者の購入の動機ではなく,関係する公衆にとっての当該標章の主要な意味が基準になるものとする。購入者の動機に関する証拠は認められない。 (c)登録商標所有者が正当な理由なく3年以上継続してフィリピンにおいて当該標章を使用しなかったか又はライセンスによりフィリピンにおいて使用させることをしなかった場合は,いつでも。例文帳に追加

The petition for cancellation of the registration of a mark may be filed: (a) Within five years from the date of registration of the mark under the IP Code; (b) at any time, if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered, or has been abandoned, or its registration was obtained fraudulently or contrary to the provisions of the IP Code, or if the registered mark is being used by, or with the permission of, the registrant so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used. If the registered mark becomes the generic name for less than all of the goods or services for which it is registered, a petition to cancel the registration for only those goods or services may be filed. A registered mark shall not be deemed to be the generic name of goods or services solely because such mark is also used as a name of or to identify a unique product or service. The primary significance of the registered mark to the relevant public rather than purchaser motivation shall be the test for determining whether the registered mark has become the generic name of goods or services on or in connection with which it has been used. Evidence on purchaser motivation shall not be admitted; (c) At any time, if the registered owner of the mark without legitimate reason fails to use the mark within the Philippines, or to cause it to be used in the Philippines by virtue of a license during an uninterrupted period of at least three years. - 特許庁

第百条の十七 会社法第四百九十二条第一項及び第三項、第五百七条(第二項を除く。)、第六百四十四条(第三号を除く。)、第六百四十七条第一項及び第四項、第六百五十条第二項、第六百五十五条第一項から第五項まで並びに第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条までの規定は、金融商品会員制法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十二条第一項中「清算人(清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人)」とあるのは「清算人」と、同項及び同法第五百七条第一項中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第四百九十二条第三項及び第五百七条第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「総会」と、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「金融商品取引法第百条第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第一項第一号中「業務を執行する社員」とあるのは「理事長及び理事」と、同項第三号中「社員(業務を執行する社員を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その社員)の過半数の同意によって定める」とあるのは「総会の決議によって選任された」と、同法第六百五十五条第三項中「互選」とあるのは「互選又は総会の決議」と、同条第四項中「業務を執行する社員」とあるのは「理事長又は理事」と、「社員を」とあるのは「理事長又は理事を定款において」と、「代表する社員が」とあるのは「代表する理事長及び理事(定款でその代表権を制限されている者を除く。)が」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める例文帳に追加

Article 100-17 (1) The provisions of Article 492(1) and (3), Article 507 (excluding paragraph (2)), Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Article 647(1) and (4), Article 650(2), Article 655(1) to (5) inclusive, and Articles 662 to 664 inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a dissolution and liquidation of a Financial Instruments Membership Corporation. In this case, the term "liquidators (or, for Companies with Board of liquidators, liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 492(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator"; the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in that paragraph and Article 507(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 492(3) and Article 507(3) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting"; the term "item (v) of Article 641" in Article 644(i) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 100(1)(iii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act,"; the term "A partner who executes the operations" in Article 647(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A president and a board member"; the term "prescribed by the consent of a majority of partners (or, if partners who execute the operations are provided for in the articles of incorporation, those partners)" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "appointed by the resolution of a general meeting"; the term "from among themselves" in Article 655(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "from among themselves or based on a resolution of a general meeting"; and the term "partners who execute the operations" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "president or board members,"; the term "if the partners that represent the Membership Company are already prescribed" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the president or the board members that represent the Membership Company are already prescribed in the articles of incorporation,"; and the term "such partners that represent" shall be deemed to be replaced with "such president or board member (excluding president or board member whose authority of representation is limited by the articles of incorporation) that represent"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二条の三十七 会社法第四百九十二条第一項及び第三項、第五百七条(第二項を除く。)、第六百四十四条(第三号を除く。)、第六百四十七条第一項及び第四項、第六百五十条第二項、第六百五十五条第一項から第五項まで並びに第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条までの規定は、自主規制法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十二条第一項中「清算人(清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人)」とあるのは「清算人」と、同項及び同法第五百七条第一項中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第四百九十二条第三項及び第五百七条第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「総会」と、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号に掲げる事由によって解散した場合及び破産手続開始の決定により解散した場合であって当該破産手続が終了していない場合を除く。」とあるのは「破産手続開始の決定により解散した場合であって当該破産手続が終了していない場合を除く。」と、同法第六百四十七条第一項第一号中「業務を執行する社員」とあるのは「理事長及び理事」と、同項第三号中「社員(業務を執行する社員を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その社員)の過半数の同意によって定める」とあるのは「総会の決議によって選任された」と、同法第六百五十五条第三項中「互選」とあるのは「互選又は総会の決議」と、同条第四項中「業務を執行する社員」とあるのは「理事長又は理事」と、「社員を」とあるのは「理事長又は理事を定款において」と、「代表する社員が」とあるのは「代表する理事長及び理事(定款でその代表権を制限されている者を除く。)が」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 102-37 (1) The provisions of Article 492(1) and (3), Article 507 (excluding paragraph (2)), Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Article 647(1) and (4), Article 650(2), Article 655(1) to (5) inclusive, and Articles 662 to 664 inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a dissolution and liquidation of a Self-Regulation Organization. In this case, the term "liquidators (or, for Companies with Board of liquidators, liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 492(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator"; the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in that paragraph and Article 507(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 492(3) and Article 507(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting,"; the term "excluding the cases where Membership Companies have dissolved on the grounds listed in item (v) of Article 641 and cases where Membership Companies have dissolved as a result of a ruling for commencement of bankruptcy procedures and such bankruptcy procedures have not ended" in Article 644(i) of the Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "excluding the cases where Membership Companies have dissolved as a result of a ruling for commencement of bankruptcy procedures and such bankruptcy procedures have not ended,"; the term "A partner who executes the operations" in Article 647(1)(i) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A president and a board member"; the term "prescribed by the consent of a majority of partners (or, if partners who execute the operations are provided for in the articles of incorporation, those partners)" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "appointed by the resolution of a general meeting"; the term "from among themselves" in Article 655(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "from among themselves or based on a resolution of a general meeting"; and the term "partners who execute the operations" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the president or board members,"; the term "if the partners that represent the Membership Company are already prescribed" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the president or the board members that represent the Membership Company are already prescribed in the articles of incorporation,"; and the term "such partners that represent" shall be deemed to be replaced with "such president or board member (excluding president or board member whose authority of representation is limited by the articles of incorporation) that represent"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

4 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで(他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止)、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで(第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。)(裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了)、第七編第二章第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三章第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)、同章第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)及び第九百三十八条(第六項を除く。)(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資(自己特定出資を除く。)の総口数の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資(自己優先出資を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

第百八十四条 会社法第二編第九章第二節(第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。)(特別清算)、第七編第二章第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三章第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)及び第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項(調査命令)中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項(監督委員の報酬等)中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項(事業の譲渡の制限等)中「第七章(第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。)」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条(清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告)中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の三十七 会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節(第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。)(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)及び同法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項(責任追及等の訴え)中「株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)中「総株主(次に掲げる株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百十九条 会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項(剰余金の配当等に関する責任)の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条(株主に対する求償権の制限等)の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条(買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任)の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項(欠損が生じた場合の責任)の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度(その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度)に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

5 第二百五十五条、第二百五十六条及び第二百五十八条並びに信託法第四十四条(受益者による受託者の行為の差止め)及び第八十五条第四項(受託者の責任等の特例)並びに会社法第三百八十五条第二項(監査役による取締役の行為の差止め)、第七百四条(社債管理者の義務)、第七百七条(特別代理人の選任)、第七百九条第一項(二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則)、第七百十条第一項(社債管理者の責任)、第七百十一条第一項前段及び第三項(社債管理者の辞任)並びに第七百十三条(社債管理者の解任)の規定は、特定信託管理者について準用する。この場合において、第二百五十六条第一項中「権利者集会において代表権利者を選任した場合は」とあるのは「受託信託会社等が特定信託管理者を定めたときは」と、第二百五十八条中「信託財産に関して負担する費用として」とあるのは「これについてあらかじめ特定目的信託契約に信託財産に関して負担する費用とする旨の定めがある場合を除き、」と、同法第三百八十五条第一項中「監査役設置会社の目的」とあるのは「特定目的信託の目的」と、「定款」とあるのは「特定目的信託契約」と、「監査役設置会社に著しい損害」とあるのは「信託財産に著しい損害」と、信託法第四十四条第一項中「信託行為」とあるのは「特定目的信託契約」と、会社法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律、特定目的信託契約」と、同法第七百十一条第一項前段及び第七百十三条中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 255, Article 256 and Article 258 of this Act, and the provisions of Article 44 (Cessation of a Trustee's Acts at the Demand of the Beneficiaries) and Article 85(4) (Special Provisions on Trustee Liability, etc.) of the Trust Act and the provisions of Article 385(2) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Company Auditors), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 (Appointment of Special Agent), Article 709(1) (Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers), Article 710(1) (Liability of Bond Manager), the first sentence of Article 711(1) and (3) (Resignation of Bond Managers), and Article 713 (Dismissal of Bond Managers) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specified Trust Administrator. In this case, the phrase "In cases where a Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder has been appointed at a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting," in Article 256(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In cases where the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. has appointed a Specified Trust Administrator," the phrase "as costs borne in relation to the trust property" in Article 258 shall be deemed to be replaced with "unless it has been provided under the Specific Purpose Trust Contract in advance that they shall be costs to be borne in relation to the trust property," the phrase "the purpose of the Company with Auditors" in Article 385(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the purpose of the Specific Purpose Trust," the term "articles of incorporation" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the phrase "substantial detriment to such Company with Auditors" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "substantial detriment to the trust property," the term "trust deed" in Article 44(1) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the term "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act, the Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the term "bond-issuing Company" in the first sentence of Article 711(1) and Article 713 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

3. 我々は、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長を達成するための全ての G20 メンバーによる協調した政策措置へのコミットメントを再確認する。我々の主要な優先的政策措置は、トロントでのコミットメントに沿った、各国の状況によって差別化された中期財健全化計画の実施、適切な金融政策の実現、根底にある経済のファンダメンタルズをよりよく反映した、為替レートの柔軟性の向上及び世界需要を維持し、潜在成長を増大させ、雇用創出を助け、世界的なリバランスに貢献する構造改革を含む。我々は、ソウル・サミット以降の進捗を議論し、多角的協調を強化することにより、過度の不均衡を縮小し経常収支を持続可能な水準で維持することの必要性を強調した。我々は、統合された 2 段階のプロセスを通じて、政策措置を必要とするような継続した大規模な不均衡に焦点を当てることを可能にする一連の項目に合意した。第 1段階に必要な作業を完了するため、我々の目標は、大規模な一次産品生産者を含む、国及び地域の状況を考慮する必要性を認識しつつ、4 月の次回会合までに、これらの項目それぞれを評価する参考となるガイドラインに合意することである。これらの参考となるガイドラインは、目標となるものではないが、以下の項目を評価するのに使用される: (i)公的債務と財政赤字、民間貯蓄率と民間債務、(ii)為替・財政・金融・その他の政策を十分に考慮しつつ、貿易収支、投資所得及び対外移転のネットフローから構成される対外バランス。我々はまた、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長のための枠組みを実施し、既に行ったコミットメントをモニターする 2011 年版の行動計画の策定へ向けた予定表を採択した。ソウルで合意したように、我々は、IMF に対し、相互評価プロセスの一部として、対外的な持続可能性と政策の一貫性確保に向けた進捗についての評価を 10 月の会合において提供することを求める。その際、我々はまた、合意されたガイドラインに基づく継続した大規模な不均衡の原因に関する分析によって情報を得て、行動計画を含む MAP に関する報告のレビューを行う。我々はまた、ソウルでのコミットメントを達成するためになされた進捗の評価をレビューする。例文帳に追加

3. We reaffirm our commitment to coordinated policy action by all G20 members to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Our main priority actions include implementing medium term fiscal consolidation plans differentiated according to national circumstances in line with our Toronto commitment, pursuing appropriate monetary policy, enhancing exchange rate flexibility to better reflect underlying economic fundamentals and structural reforms, to sustain global demand, increase potential growth, foster job creation and contribute to global rebalancing. We discussed progress made since the Seoul Summit and stressed the need to reduce excessive imbalances and maintain current account imbalances at sustainable levels by strengthening multilateral cooperation. We agreed on a set of indicators that will allow us to focus, through an integrated two-step process, on those persistently large imbalances which require policy actions. To complete the work required for the first step, our aim is to agree, by our next meeting in April, on indicative guidelines against which each of these indicators will be assessed, recognizing the need to take into account national or regional circumstances, including large commodity producers. While not targets, these indicative guidelines will be used to assess the following indicators: (i) public debt and fiscal deficits; and private savings rate and private debt (ii) and the external imbalance composed of the trade balance and net investment income flows and transfers, taking due consideration of exchange rate, fiscal, monetary and other policies. We also adopted a timetable for developing the 2011 action plan that will implement our Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and monitor the commitments already made. As agreed in Seoul, we call on the IMF to provide an assessment as part of the Mutual Assessment Process on progress towards external sustainability and consistency of policies at our October meeting. At that time, we will also review a report on the MAP including an action plan informed by the analysis on the root causes of persistently large imbalances based on the agreed guidelines. We will also review an assessment of progress made in meeting commitments made in Seoul.  - 財務省

例文

薬事食品衛生審議会から、基準値案を了承する答申(平成24年2月24日)≪検査結果の公表≫ (直近発表過去10回分)[第332報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、厚生労働科学研究費補助金による測定結果、北海道、青森県、秋田県、山形県、岩手県、宮城県、栃木県、群馬県、茨城県、千葉県、埼玉県、東京都、神奈川県、新潟県、愛知県、京都府、大阪府、兵庫県、島根県、徳島県、愛媛県、高知県、横浜市、藤沢市、金沢市、静岡市、江東区、港区(平成24年2月24日)[第333報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、青森市、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、千葉県、神奈川県、相模原市、新潟県、静岡県、滋賀県、京都市、徳島県、愛媛県(平成24年2月27日)[第334報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、札幌市、岩手県、秋田県、宮城県、茨城県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、豊島区、神奈川県、横須賀市、藤沢市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、大津市、京都市、大阪府(平成24年2月28日)[第335報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、青森県、岩手県、宮城県、山形県、いわき市、群馬県、柏市、東京都、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、長野県、山梨県、愛知県、名古屋市、大阪市、神戸市、鳥取県、島根県(平成24年2月29日)[第336報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、富山県、静岡県、浜松市、京都市(平成24年3月1日)[第337報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、岩手県、宮城県、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、埼玉県、千葉県、東京都、神奈川県、川崎市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、姫路市、鳥取県、徳島県(平成24年3月2日)[第338報]札幌市、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、群馬県、港区、神奈川県、横浜市、相模原市、新潟県、兵庫県、鳥取県、島根県、愛媛県(平成24年3月5日)[第339報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、山形県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、横須賀市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、名古屋市、京都市、大阪府、島根県(平成24年3月6日)[第340報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、岩手県、秋田県、宮城県、山形県、いわき市、群馬県、千葉県、東京都、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、新潟市、金沢市、静岡県、愛知県、大阪府、大阪市、鳥取県(平成24年3月7日)[第341報]福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、神奈川県、新潟県、新潟市、山梨県、大阪府、鳥取県、島根県(平成24年3月8日)【検査実施状況】検査件数121,415件、うち暫定規制値超過1,168件(平成24年3月8日現在)例文帳に追加

The Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council reported in response to the Minister's consultation by approving the proposed standard limits (February 24, 2012) <<Public announcement of survey results>> (10 most recent data announced)[332rd announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; results of measurements subsidized by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant; Hokkaido, Aomori Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Saitama Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Niigata Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Kyoto Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Hyogo Prefecture, Shimane Prefecture, Tokushima Prefecture, Ehime Prefecture, Kochi Prefecture, Yokohama-shi (city), Fujisawa-shi (city), Kanazawa-shi (city), Shizuoka-shi (city), Koto-ku (ward)/Tokyo, and Minato-ku (ward)/Tokyo (February 24, 2012) [333rd announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Aomori-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Sagamihara-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Shizuoka Prefecture, Shiga Prefecture, Kyoto-shi (city), Tokushima Prefecture, and Ehime Prefecture (February 27, 2012) [334th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Sapporo-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Toshima-ku (ward)/Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokosuka-shi (city), Fujisawa-shi (city), ― 45Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Otsu-shi (city), Kyoto-shi (city), and Osaka Prefecture (February 28, 2012)[335th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Aomori Prefecture, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwaki-shi (city), Gunma Prefecture, Kashiwa-shi (city), Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Nagano Prefecture, Yamanashi Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Nagoya-shi (city), Osaka-shi (city), Kobe-shi (city), Tottori Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (February 29, 2012)[336th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Toyama Prefecture, Shizuoka Prefecture, Hamamatsu-shi (city), and Kyoto-shi (city) (March 1, 2012)[337th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Kawasaki-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Himeji-shi (city), Tottori Prefecture and Tokushima Prefecture (March 2, 2012)[338th announcement] Sapporo-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Minato-ku (ward)/Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokohama-shi (city), Sagamihara-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Hyogo Prefecture, Tottori Prefecture, Shimane Prefecture, and Ehime Prefecture (March 5, 2012) [339th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Yamagata Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Yokosuka-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Nagoya-shi (city), Kyoto-shi (city), Osaka Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (March 6, 2012) [340th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Iwate Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwaki-shi (city), Gunma Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Niigata-shi (city), Kanazawa-shi (city), Shizuoka Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Osaka-shi (city), and Tottori Prefecture (March7, 2012)[341st announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Niigata Prefecture, Niigata-shi (city), Yamanashi Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Tottori Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (March 8, 2012)【The implementation status of surveys】 121,415 survey cases, out of which 1,168 cases exceeded the provisional regulation values (as of March 8, 2012) - 厚生労働省

第五十三条の三十六 会社法第四百二十五条(第一項第二号、第四項後段及び第五項を除く。)(責任の一部免除)、第四百二十六条(第四項を除く。)(取締役等による免除に関する定款の定め)、第四百二十七条(責任限定契約)、第四百二十八条(取締役が自己のためにした取引に関する特則)及び第四百三十条(役員等の連帯責任)の規定は、相互会社の役員等の損害賠償責任について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、「第四百二十四条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十四」と、同法第四百二十五条第一項中「決議」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条第二項に規定する決議」と、同法第四百二十六条第二項中「についての取締役の同意を得る場合及び当該責任の免除に関する」とあるのは「に関する」と、同条第五項中「総株主(第三項の責任を負う役員等であるものを除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数(第三項の責任を負う役員等である社員の数を除く。)の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)」と、同法第四百二十七条第五項中「第四百二十五条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「第四百二十五条第四項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-36 The provisions of Article 425 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii), the second sentence of paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Partial Exemption from Liability), Article 426 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Provisions of Articles of Incorporation on Exemption by Directors), Article 427 (Contracts for Limitation of Liability), Article 428 (Special Provision on Transactions Carried Out by Director for Himself/Herself) and Article 430 (Joint and Several Liabilities of Officers, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability for damages of the Officers, etc. of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Article 423, paragraph (1)" and "Article 424" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 53-34 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "resolution" in Article 425, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the resolution set forth in Article 62, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "the consent of directors with respect to exemption from liability under the provisions of the articles of incorporation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph (limited to exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers) is to be obtained, and to the cases where a proposal regarding such exemption from liability" in Article 426, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a proposal regarding the exemption of liability pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under that paragraph (limited to the exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers)"; the term "shareholders having not less than three hundredths (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders (excluding Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3))" in Article 426, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership (excluding the number of members who are Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3)) of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act)"; and the term "Article 425, paragraphs (4) and (5)" in Article 427, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first sentence of Article 425, paragraph (4)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第151条 取消 151.1本法による標章の登録により損害を受けている又は損害を受けるであろうと考える者は,法律局に対して当該標章登録の取消の請求をすることができる。ただし,次の条件に従う。 (a)取消の請求は,本法に基づく当該標章の登録日から5年以内にしなければならない。 (b)取消の請求は,当該登録標章が登録に係る商品若しくはサ-ビス若しくはその一部について一般名称になっているか若しくは放棄されている場合,当該登録が不正に得られたか若しくは本法の規定に反してなされた場合,又は権利者により若しくは権利者の承認のもとに当該登録標章が商品若しくはサ-ビスの出所を偽って表示するように使用されている場合は,いつでもすることができる。登録標章が登録に係る商品又はサ-ビスの一部について一般名称になっている場合は,当該一部の商品又はサ-ビスについてのみ取消の請求をすることができる。登録標章は,当該標章がある独特の商品若しくはサ-ビスの名称としても又はある独特の商品若しくはサ-ビスを特定するためにも使用されているということのみを理由としては,商品又はサ-ビスの一般名称であるとはみなさない。登録標章が当該標章を使用している商品又はサ-ビスの一般名称になっているか否かを決定するに当たっては,購入者の購入の動機ではなく,関連する公衆にとっての当該標章の主要な意味が基準になる。 (c)取消の請求は,権利者が正当な理由なくして3年以上継続してフィリピンにおいて当該標 章を使用しなかったか又はライセンスによりフィリピンにおいて使用させることをしなかった場合は,いつでもすることができる。例文帳に追加

Sec.151 Cancellation 151.1. A petition to cancel a registration of a mark under this Act may be filed with the Bureau of Legal Affairs by any person who believes that he is or will be damaged by the registration of a mark under this Act, as follows: (a) Within five years from the date of the registration of the mark under this Act. (b) At any time, if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered, or has been abandoned, or its registration was obtained fraudulently or contrary to the provisions of this Act, or if the registered mark is being used by, or with the permission of, the registrant so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used. If the registered mark becomes the generic name for less than all of the goods or services for which it is registered, a petition to cancel the registration for only those goods or services may be filed. A registered mark shall not be deemed to be the generic name of goods or services solely because such mark is also used as a name of or to identify a unique product or service. The primary significance of the registered mark to the relevant public rather than purchaser motivation shall be the test for determining whether the registered mark has become the generic name of goods or services on or in connection with which it has been used. (c) At any time, if the registered owner of the mark without legitimate reason fails to use the mark within the Philippines, or to cause it to be used in the Philippines by virtue of a license during an uninterrupted period of three years or longer. - 特許庁

第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)、第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで(表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務)、第三百五十八条(第一項第二号を除く。)(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第三百六十条第一項(株主による取締役の行為の差止め)、第三百六十一条(取締役の報酬等)及び第三百六十五条第二項(競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限)の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 前項の場合において、法第百九十条の許可(更新に係る許可を除く。)を受けた事業年度から三事業年度以内に積み立てられるべき商品取引責任準備金の金額は、同項第一号中「に事故率(当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故(第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。)による支払額(商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者(第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。)から商品市場における取引等(商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。)の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織(商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。)の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額(自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。)に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「当該いずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「当該相当する金額」と、「事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率」とあるのは「十万分の六」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該対価の額の合計額の十万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは、「の万分の三に相当する金額」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) In the cases set forth in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading to be accrued within three business years from the business year in which the license set forth in Article 190 of the Act (excluding a renewed license) was obtained, the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person with Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year," the phrase "such larger amount" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "such equivalent amount," the phrase "double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "0.006 percent," the phrase "an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item)," the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said transaction amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year," and the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.001 percent of said total sum of the consideration, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.03 percent of the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1)を制限することなく,同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し,本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して,又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して,制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること,及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に,宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として,本法に基づいて,宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために,かつ,それに関して規定を制定すること,及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること,及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること,及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で,登録簿への記入の補正のために,かつ,その補正に関連して規定を制定すること,及びある者に対し,本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を,登録官に付与すること,及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に,登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を,登録官に付与すること,及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず,1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること,及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し,出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を,登録官に付与すること,規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること,及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること,及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること,及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め,本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために,かつ,それに関連して規定を制定すること,及び当該期間の延長について定めること,及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に,必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること,及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて),1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること,及び本法又は規則の適用上,電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること,及び登録官に対し,登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する,公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること,及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること例文帳に追加

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents.  - 特許庁

5 会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで(第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。)(株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資(資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。)」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役(委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。)その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十九条 組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条(第一号及び第三号を除く。)、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項(各号列記以外の部分に限る。)、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条(株式会社の清算)、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条(非訟)並びに非訟事件手続法(明治三十一年法律第十四号)第四十条(検査をすべき者の選任の裁判)の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで(第三十六条の七第四項を除く。)、第四十条(第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。)、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役(取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会)」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の四十五の二 金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款(第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで(第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等)、第三十七条第一項第二号(広告等の規制)、第三十七条の二(取引態様の事前明示義務)、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項(契約締結前の書面の交付)、第三十七条の五(保証金の受領に係る書面の交付)、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項(書面による解除)、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二(禁止行為)、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項(損失補てん等の禁止)、第四十条の二(最良執行方針等)並びに第四十条の三(分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止)を除く。)(通則)の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定(同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。)中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等(銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者(銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。)の所属銀行(同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。)」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約(銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。)の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価(次項において「対価」という。)の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

法第百四十四条の十二第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。 一法第百四十三条第一項第六号及び第七号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関 する事項 二新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の全部又は一部が新株予約権を発行しているとき は、法第百四十三条第一項第八号及び第九号に掲げる事項についての定め(当該事項 についての定めとして、全部又は一部の新株予約権の新株予約権者に対して交付する 新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の新株予約権の数及び金銭の額を零と定めた場合に おける当該定めを含む。)の相当性に関する事項 三他の新設合併消滅商品取引所(清算株式会社及び清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下 この号において同じ。)についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等又は財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表と ともに作成された損益計算書(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合 併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表)の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅株 式会社商品取引所の成立の日)後の日を臨時決算日(二以上の臨時決算日がある 場合にあっては、最も遅いもの)とする臨時計算書類等があるときは、当該臨時 計算書類等の内容 ハ他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年度がない 場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日)後に重要な財産の処 分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に 重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容(法第百四十四条の十二第一 項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の 日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新た な最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。)四 他の新設合併消滅商品取引所(清算株式会社又は清算会員商品取引所に限る。)が 会社法第四百九十二条第一項(法第七十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。) の規定により作成した貸借対照表 五当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所(清算株式会社を除く。以下この号において 同じ。)についての次に掲げる事項 イ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年 度がない場合にあっては、当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日)後 に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容(法第 百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合 にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。)ロ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度がないときは、当該 新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表 六新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の債務(他の新設合併消滅商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。)の履 行の見込みに関する事項 七法第百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後、前各号に掲げる 事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項例文帳に追加

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7; (ii) when all or part of the Incorporated Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger issue the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock, matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 8 and item 9 of the Act (including the provisions that specify that the number and the amount of the money of the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger which are to be issued to the holders of the rights to subscribe for the whole or part of new shares of stock shall be zero); (iii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final - 106 - business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of - 107 - Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (v) the following matters concerning said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (b) when the final business year does not exist at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vii) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act, said new matters.  - 経済産業省

例文

第五十二条の四十五の二 金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款(第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで(第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等)、第三十七条第一項第二号(広告等の規制)、第三十七条の二(取引態様の事前明示義務)、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項(契約締結前の書面の交付)、第三十七条の五(保証金の受領に係る書面の交付)、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項(書面による解除)、第三十七条の七(指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等)、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二(禁止行為)、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項(損失補てん等の禁止)並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで(最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務)を除く。)(通則)の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定(同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。)中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等(銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者(銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。)の所属銀行(同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。)」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約(銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。)の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価(次項において「対価」という。)の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS