「明細書」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(67ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

３　第一項又は前項の規定は、第一項に規定する年分の確定申告書を提出し、又は当該確定申告書及びその翌年分以後前項の規定の適用を受けようとする年分までの各年分の確定申告書を連続して提出している場合であつて、その提出する第一項に規定する年分の確定申告書又は当該各年分の確定申告書に、それぞれ同項又は前項の規定による控除を受ける金額についてのその控除に関する記載があり、かつ、当該金額並びに第一項又は前項に規定する特定外国子会社等又は外国関係会社から受ける配当等の額に係る配当所得の金額及び課税対象留保金額に係る雑所得の金額の計算に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、適用する。この場合において、第一項又は前項の規定により控除される金額は、当該金額として記載された金額に限るものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) and the preceding paragraph shall apply only where the resident has filed a final return form for the year prescribed in paragraph (1) or has continued to file the said final return form as well as final return forms for the subsequent years from the year following the said year until the year in which the resident seeks the application of the provision of the preceding paragraph, and the resident has stated, in his/her final return form for the year prescribed in paragraph (1) as well as final return forms for the said subsequent years, the deduction of the deductible amounts pursuant to the provision of the said paragraph or the preceding paragraph, and attached thereto a written statement concerning the said deductible amounts as well as the calculation of the amount of dividend income pertaining to the amount of dividend, etc. to be received from the specified foreign subsidiary company or affiliated foreign company and the amount of miscellaneous income pertaining to the taxable retained income to be included in the resident's gross income, both of which are prescribed in paragraph (1) and the preceding paragraph. In this case, the amount to be deducted pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph shall be limited to the amount stated as such amount to be deducted.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十八条の四　外国語でされた国際実用新案登録出願（以下「外国語実用新案登録出願」という。）の出願人は、条約第二条（ｘｉ）の優先日（以下「優先日」という。）から二年六月（以下「国内書面提出期間」という。）以内に、前条第一項に規定する国際出願日（以下「国際出願日」という。）における条約第三条（２）に規定する明細書、請求の範囲、図面（図面の中の説明に限る。）及び要約の日本語による翻訳文を、特許庁長官に提出しなければならない。ただし、国内書面提出期間の満了前二月から満了の日までの間に次条第一項に規定する書面を提出した外国語実用新案登録出願（当該書面の提出の日以前に当該翻訳文を提出したものを除く。）にあつては、当該書面の提出の日から二月（以下「翻訳文提出特例期間」という。）以内に、当該翻訳文を提出することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 48-4 (1) An applicant of an International Utility Model Registration Application filed in a foreign language (hereinafter referred to as a "Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language" shall submit to the Commissioner of the Patent Office Japanese translations of the description, scope of claims, drawings (the descriptive text in such drawings only), and the abstract, as provided in Article 3(2) of the Treaty, as of the international application date as provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as "International Application Date") within the period from the priority date under Article 2 (xi) of the Treaty (hereinafter referred to as "Priority Date") to two years and six months (hereinafter referred to as "Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents") therefrom; provided, however, that the applicant of a Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language who has submitted the document under paragraph (1) of the following Article during the period from two months before the expiration of the Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents to the expiry date thereof (excluding the case where the said translations have been submitted prior to the submission of the said documents) may submit the said translations within two months from the date of submission of the said document (hereinafter referred to as "Special Time Limit for the Submission of Translations").  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十四条の十三　第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願（第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。）であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 184-13 For the purpose of the application of Article 29-2, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29-2 is an international patent application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48-3(2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application " under Article 29-2 of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in foreign language under Article 184-4(1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184-4(3) of this Act or Article 48-4(3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184-4(1)of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十八条の九　第三条の二に規定する他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願が国際実用新案登録出願又は特許法第百八十四条の三第二項の国際特許出願である場合における第三条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて」とあるのは「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願（第四十八条の四第三項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願を除く。）であつて」と、「発行又は」とあるのは「発行、」と、「若しくは出願公開」とあるのは「若しくは出願公開又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 48-9 For the purpose of the application of Article 3-2, in the case where another application for a utility model registration or patent application as provided in Article 3-2 is an International Utility Model Registration Application or an International Patent Application under Article 184-3(2) of the Patent Act, the term "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent" under Article 3-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent (excluding a Utility Model Registration Application in Foreign Language under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or a Patent Application in Foreign Language under Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 48-4(3) of this Act or Article 184-4(3) of the Patent Act," the term "the respective Article or for which" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective Article, for which," the term "the publication of the patent application has been effected" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the publication of the patent application has been effected, or international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the written application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願(第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。)であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of the application of Article 29bis, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29bis is an International Patent Application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48ter (2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application" under Article 29bis of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184quater (3) of this Act or Article 48quater (3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184quater (1) of this Act or Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act.  - 特許庁

第三条の二に規定する他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願が国際実用新案登録出願又は特許法第百八十四条の三第二項の国際特許出願である場合における第三条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて」とあるのは「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願(第四十八条の四第三項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願を除く。)であつて」と、「発行又は」とあるのは「発行、」と、「若しくは出願公開」とあるのは「若しくは出願公開又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of the application of Article 3bis, in the case where another application for a utility model registration or patent application as provided in Article 3bis is an International Utility Model Registration Application or an International Patent Application under Article 184ter (2) of the Patent Act, the term "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent" under Article 3bis shall be deemed to be replaced with "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent (excluding a Utility Model Registration Application in Foreign Language under Article 48quater (1) of this Act or a Patent Application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) of the Patent Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 48quater (3) of this Act or Article 184quater (3) of the Patent Act," the term "the respective Article or for which" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective Article, for which," the term "the publication of the patent application has been effected" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the publication of the patent application has been effected, or international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the written application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 48quater (1) of this Act or Article 184quater (1) of the Patent Act.  - 特許庁

ロ　当該非居住者又は外国法人が、当該振替地方債の利子の支払を受けるべき日の前日までに、その者の当該振替地方債に係る所有期間その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した書類（第八項及び第十七項において「振替地方債所有期間明細書」という。）を、当該特定振替機関等及び当該利子の支払をする者を経由し、又は当該適格外国仲介業者及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る特定振替機関等並びに当該利子の支払をする者を経由してイに規定する税務署長に提出していること。例文帳に追加

(b) The said nonresident or foreign corporation shall, no later than the day preceding the day on which he/she or it is to receive interest on the said book-entry transfer local government bonds, submit a document stating his/her or its holding period for the said book-entry transfer local government bonds and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance (referred to in paragraph (8) and paragraph (17) as "statement of the holding period of book-entry transfer local government bonds") to the district director prescribed in (a), via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. and the person who pays the said interest, or via the said qualified foreign intermediary, the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds, and the person who pays the said interest.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) 第38Aに基づく審査の間に審査官が次の意見を有する場合は，審査官は，当該意見を書面で登録官に通知し，かつ，その意見について理由を詳細に陳述する。 (a) 発明の説明，クレーム又は図面が不明瞭であるか，又は発明の説明によるクレームの裏付が極めて不十分であるために，次に関して有意義な意見を形成することができない。 (i) 当該クレームされた発明の新規性若しくは進歩性，若しくは (ii) 当該クレームされた発明は産業上の利用が可能であるか否か (b) 第13条並びに第25条(4)及び(5)の要件に掲げた条件が満たされていない。又は (c) 当該特許明細書が次のものを開示している。 (i) 第84条(1)にいう追加の事項，若しくは (ii) 出願時での当該特許出願において開示されている事項を超える事項例文帳に追加

(5) If during an examination under section 38A, the Examiner is of the opinion that -- (a) the description, claim or claims, or drawings are so unclear, or the claim or claims are so inadequately supported by the description, that no meaningful opinion can be formed on -- (i) the novelty or inventive step of the claimed invention; or (ii) whether the claimed invention is capable of industrial application; (b) the conditions specified in requirements of sections 13 and 25(4) and (5) have not been complied with; or (c) the specification of the patent discloses -- (i) any additional matter referred to in section 84(1); or (ii) any matter extending beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed, the Examiner shall notify the Registrar in writing of that opinion and shall state fully the reasons for his opinion. - 特許庁

(2) 第1項及び本項の適用上，当該通知を受領した時，又は当該国際寄託当局が国際寄託当局の役割を果たすこと若しくは当該当局として客観的かつ公平な方法で活動することを停止した時から3月以内に，出願人又は所有者が， (a) 当該寄託が未だ移転されていないときに当該再寄託を行う場合， (b) 再寄託した培養物が最初に寄託した微生物の培養物と同一ものである旨の宣言書を当該再寄託を行う国際寄託当局に提出する場合，並びに (c) 移転された寄託又は再寄託の受託番号及び該当するときは当該寄託を行った国際寄託当局の名称を表示する目的で，第31条又は場合により第38条に基づく明細書の補正を請求する場合は， 当該寄託は，常時利用可能であったものとして取り扱われる。例文帳に追加

(2) For the purposes of paragraph 1 and of this paragraph, the deposit shall be treated as always having been available if, within 3 months of the receipt of such notification or of the international depositary authority ceasing to perform the functions of an international depositary authority or to conduct its activities as such an authority in an objective and impartial manner, the applicant or proprietor -- (a) in a case where the deposit has not already been transferred, makes the new deposit; (b) furnishes to the international depositary authority with which the new deposit is made a declaration that the culture so deposited is of the same micro-organism as was the culture originally deposited; and (c) requests amendment of the specification under section 31 or 38, as the case may be, so as to indicate the accession number of the transferred or new deposit and, where applicable, the name of the international depositary authority with which the deposit has been made. - 特許庁

次に定める条件 (i) 実際の出願日までに，当該生物学的材料の試料(本条規則において「寄託物」という)が，当該生物学的材料の試料(本条規則において「試料」という)を提供することができる寄託機関に寄託されていること (ii) 寄託機関の名称及び寄託物の受託番号が出願の明細書に示されていること，及び (iii) 寄託物が出願人以外の者により寄託された場合において，寄託人の名称及び宛先が出願に記載されており，かつ，寄託人が出願人に対し，出願において当該寄託物に言及することを許可したこと及び本規則に基づいて寄託物が公衆の利用に供されることについて無条件かつ取消不能の同意を与えたことを長官に納得させる書類が提出されていること，及び例文帳に追加

a condition that; (i) not later than the actual filing date of the application, a sample (in this Rule referred to as the “deposit”) of the biological material concerned has been deposited in a depositary institution which is able to furnish a sample (in this Rule referred to as the “sample”) of the said biological material, (ii) the name of the depositary institution and the accession number of the deposit are given in the specification of the application, and (iii) where the deposit has been deposited by a person other than the applicant, the name and address of the depositor are stated in the application and a document is filed satisfying the Controller that the depositor has authorised the applicant to refer to the deposit in the application and has given his, her, their or its unreserved and irrevocable consent to the deposit being made available to the public in accordance with these Rules; and - 特許庁

(1)登録官は，特許出願の優先日又は出願日から18月が経過した後，かつ，所定の手数料の納付があったときは，次に掲げる事項を公衆の利用に供するようにしなければならない。 (a)出願人の名称，宛先及び説明並びに代理人があるときは，その名称及び宛先 (b)出願番号 (c)出願日及び優先権が主張されている場合は，優先日，先の出願の出願番号及び先の出願が行われた国の名称又は，先の出願が地域出願若しくは国際出願である場合は，その出願の対象である国及び出願が行われた官庁の名称 (d)出願の詳細であって，明細書，クレーム，(図面がある場合は)図面，及び出願の要約を含むもの，並びに(補正がある場合は)補正 (e)出願書類に示されている出願する権利に関わる変更及びライセンス契約への言及例文帳に追加

(1) The Registrar shall make available for public inspection after eighteen months from the priority date or filing date of a patent application and upon payment of the prescribed fee - (a) the name, address and description of the applicant and the name and address of his agent, if any; (b) the application number; (c) the filing date of the application and, if priority is claimed, the priority date, the number of the earlier application and the name of the State in which the earlier application was filed or where the earlier application is a regional or an international application, the name of the country or countries for which and the office at which it was filed; (d) the particulars of the application including the description, claim or claims, drawing or drawings, if any, and the abstract and any amendments to the application, if any; and (e) any change in ownership of the application and any reference to a licence contract appearing in the file relating to the application. - 特許庁

第二百七十二条の四十　第二百七十一条の二十三の規定は少額短期保険持株会社の事業年度について、第二百七十一条の二十四の規定は少額短期保険持株会社及びその子会社その他の当該少額短期保険持株会社と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある会社（以下この条において「子会社等」という。）の業務及び財産の状況を連結して記載した中間業務報告書及び業務報告書について、第二百七十一条の二十五第一項から第四項までの規定は少額短期保険持株会社及びその子会社等の業務及び財産の状況に関する事項として内閣府令で定めるものを当該少額短期保険持株会社及び当該子会社等につき連結して記載した説明書類について、同条第五項の規定は少額短期保険持株会社について、第二百七十一条の二十六の規定は少額短期保険持株会社の事業報告及び附属明細書の記載事項について、それぞれ準用する。例文帳に追加

Article 272-40 (1) The provision of Article 271-23 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business year of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company; the provision of Article 271-24 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an interim business report or business report describing in a consolidated manner the status of the business and property of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company, its subsidiary companies and any other company specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as having a special relationship with the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (hereinafter referred to as "Subsidiary Companies, etc." in this Article); the provisions of Article 271-25, paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of the business and property of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. in a consolidated manner with regard to the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies, etc.; the provision of Article 271-25, paragraph (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company; and the provision of Article 271-26 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the matters to be described in the business report and annexed detailed statements of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。例文帳に追加

This article refers to an invention claimed in a patent application that is identical to an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims, or drawings (in the case of a foreign-language application under Article 36bis (2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to another patent application or registration application of a utility model filed prior to the date that the said patent application was filed and published after the said patent application was filed in the patent gazette under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as “gazette containing the patent”) or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility Model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as “utility model bulletin”) describing matters provided for in each of the paragraph s of the respective Article or the publication of the patent application. In this case, a patent shall not be granted for the invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1).  - 特許庁

(1) 特許又は特許出願に関する情報の第108条に基づく請求は，次の事項について行うことができる。 (a) 登録官が第30条(2)にいう報告又は場合により情報を受領した日 (b) 特許明細書又は特許出願が公開された時 (c) 特許出願が取り下げられ，取り下げられたものとして取り扱われ，放棄されたものとして取り扱われ，拒絶され又は拒絶されたものとして取り扱われた時 (d) 更新手数料が第36条(2)適用上の所定の期間内に納付されなかったか否か (e) 更新手数料が第36条(3)にいう6月の期間内に納付されたか否か (f) 特許が失効した時及び／又は特許回復申請書が提出された時 (g) ある記入が登録簿になされた時又は当該記載を求める申請が行われた時 (h) 登録簿への記入又は公報における公示を伴うような申請，請求又は行為がなされた時(ただし，当該申請，請求又は行為の内容が当該請求書に明記されている場合) (i) 規則93及び規則94に従ってある書類の閲覧ができる時，並びに (j) その他，特許又は特許出願において言及される事項であって特定の場合につき登録官が認めるもの例文帳に追加

(1) A request under section 108 for information relating to any patent or application for a patent may be made as to -- (a) the date that the reports or information, as the case may be, referred to in section 30(2) were received by the Registrar; (b) when the specification of a patent or application for a patent was published; (c) when an application for a patent was withdrawn, was treated as having been withdrawn, was treated as having been abandoned, was refused or was treated as having been refused; (d) whether a renewal fee was not paid within the period prescribed for the purposes of section 36(2); (e) whether a renewal fee was paid within the 6 months referred to in section 36(3); (f) when a patent has ceased to have effect and/or an application for restoration of a patent was filed; (g) when an entry was made in the register or an application was made for the making of such entry; (h) when any application or request was made or action taken involving an entry in the register or advertisement in the journal, if the nature of the application, request or action is specified in the request; (i) when any document may be inspected in accordance with rule 93 or 94; and (j) such other particulars referred to in any patent or application for a patent as the Registrar may in any particular case allow. - 特許庁

実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面(同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された考案又は発明(その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。)と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。例文帳に追加

Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3)(hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin" or in the patent bulletin under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person.  - 特許庁

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願に係る発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（当該先の出願が同項若しくは実用新案法第八条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（同法第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された発明を除く。）についての第二十九条、第二十九条の二本文、第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第三十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十九条第二項第二号、第七十二条、第七十九条、第八十一条、第八十二条第一項、第百四条（第六十五条第五項（第百八十四条の十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百二十六条第五項（第十七条の二第六項及び第百三十四条の二第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、同法第七条第三項及び第十七条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第一項及び第三十三条の三第一項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該特許出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) For inventions among those claimed in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the earlier application contains a priority claim under that paragraph or Article 8(1) of the Utility Model Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including its mutatis mutandis Application under Article 11(1) of the Utility Model Act), excluding any inventions disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the earlier application is based), the said patent application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29, the main clause of Article 29-2, Articles 30(1) to (3), 39(1) to (4), 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1), 104 (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 65(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 184-10(2)))and 126(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Articles 17-2(6) and 134-2(5)) of the Patent Act, Articles 7(3) and 17 of the Utility Model Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), and Article 29, 33-2(1) and 33-3(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act) of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959 ).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

九　定款、社員総会、総代会、創立総会、取締役会、重要財産委員会、委員会、監査役会、保険契約者総会、保険契約者総代会、社債権者集会若しくは債権者集会の議事録、社員の名簿、会計帳簿、貸借対照表、損益計算書、事業報告、第五十四条の三第二項若しくは第百八十条の十七において準用する会社法第四百九十四条第一項の附属明細書、会計参与報告、監査報告、会計監査報告、決算報告、社債原簿、財産目録、事務報告又は第六十一条の五において準用する同法第六百八十二条第一項若しくは第六百九十五条第一項、第百六十五条の二第一項、第百六十五条の九第一項、第百六十五条の十三第一項、第百六十五条の十五第一項、第百六十五条の十九第一項若しくは第百六十五条の二十一第一項の書面若しくは電磁的記録に記載し、若しくは記録すべき事項を記載せず、若しくは記録せず、又は虚偽の記載若しくは記録をしたとき。例文帳に追加

(ix) When he/she has failed to state or record the matters required to be stated or recorded or made a false statement or record in the articles of incorporation, minutes of general meeting of members, General Meeting, Organizational Meeting, board of directors, committee on important property, Committees, board of company auditors, policyholders meeting, General Meeting of Policyholders, bondholders meeting or creditors meeting, roster of members, accounting books, balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report, annexed detailed statement of Article 494, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54-3, paragraph (2) or Article 180-17, accounting advisory report, audit report, accounting auditing report, statement of accounts, bond registry, inventory of property, business report, or document or electromagnetic record set forth in Article 682, paragraph (1) or Article 695, paragraph (1), Article 165-2, paragraph (1), Article 165-9, paragraph (1), Article 165-13, paragraph (1), Article 165-15, paragraph (1), Article 165-19, paragraph (1) or Article 165-21, paragraph (1) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-5;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

発明の明細書には，(a) その発明及び発明者が考えたその作用又は用途について正確かつ十分に記載し， (b) その発明が属するか又は極めて密接に関係する技術若しくは科学分野における熟練者が，それを製造し，組立てし，調合し又は使用することができる程度に，完全，明瞭，簡潔かつ正確な用語で，方法においては各種の工程について，また機械，製造物又は合成物においてはそれを組立てし，製造し，合成し若しくは使用する方法について明確に記載し， (c) 機械の場合は，機械の原理及び発明者がその原理の応用として考える最良の実施態様について説明し，また (d) 方法の場合は，その発明を他の発明から区別することができるように，もしあれば，種々の工程の必要な順序について説明しなければならない。例文帳に追加

The specification of an invention must (a) correctly and fully describe the invention and its operation or use as contemplated by the inventor; (b) set out clearly the various steps in a process, or the method of constructing, making, compounding or using a machine, manufacture or composition of matter, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it pertains, or with which it is most closely connected, to make, construct, compound or use it; (c) in the case of a machine, explain the principle of the machine and the best mode in which the inventor has contemplated the application of that principle; and (d) in the case of a process, explain the necessary sequence, if any, of the various steps, so as to distinguish the invention from other inventions.  - 特許庁

第36条第4項第1号は「発明の詳細な説明は、・・・その発明の属する技術の分野における通常の知識を有する者がその実施をすることができる程度に明確かつ十分に、記載しなければならない。」と規定されているが、これは、「その発明の属する技術分野において研究開発(文献解析、実験、分析、製造等を含む)のための通常の技術的手段を用い、通常の創作能力を発揮できる者(当業者)が、明細書及び図面に記載した事項と出願時の技術常識とに基づき、請求項に係る発明を実施することができる程度に、発明の詳細な説明を記載しなければならない」旨を意味するものである。例文帳に追加

Section 36 (4) (i) of the Patent Act states that "the detailed description of the invention shall be stated....in such a manner sufficiently clear and complete for the invention to be carried out by a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains." This means that "the detailed description of the invention shall be described in such a manner that a person who has ability to use ordinary technical means for research and development (including comprehension of document, experimentation, analysis and manufacture) and to exercise ordinary creativity in the art to which the invention pertains can carry out the claimed invention on the basis of matters described in the specification (excluding claims) and drawings taking into consideration the common general knowledge as of the filing."  - 特許庁

特許出願が生物学的材料の使用に言及している場合，又は当該材料が公衆の利用に供することができず，かつ，当該技術の熟練者による当該発明の実施が可能となるような方法により特許出願で説明することができない材料に言及している場合は，当該明細書には，生物学的材料寄託データ，すなわち，当該寄託の番号及び日付，特許手続上の微生物の寄託の国際承認に関するブダペスト条約第7条に従う国際寄託機関の名称及び宛先を含んでいなければならず，当該寄託は優先日までに行うものとする。例文帳に追加

Where the patent application refers to the use of biological material or to material such that is not available to the public and cannot be described in the patent application in such a way as to enable the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the art, the description shall contain the biological material deposit data--the number and date of the deposit and the name and address of the international depositary authority according to Article 7 of the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure, the deposit being made no later than the priority date.  - 特許庁

また、上記委任省令の運用においては、従来の技術と全く異なる新規な発想に基づき開発された発明又は試行錯誤の結果の発見に基づく発明等のように、もともと解決すべき課題が想定されていないと認められる場合には、解決しようとする課題の記載は求めないが、この場合には、明細書及び図面全体の記載並びに出願時の技術常識に基づいて、出願時まで未解決であった、その発明が解決しようとする技術上の課題を把握できない限り、解決しようとする課題はないこととなるので第 37 条第1 号の関係を有しない。例文帳に追加

Furthermore, in application of above-mentioned Ministerial Ordinance, if it is recognized that the problem to be solved was not envisaged as in case of an invention developed based on a new idea completely different from the prior art or based on the discovery resulted from try and error, the description of the problem to be solved is not mandatory. In this case, however, unless the unsolved technical problem to be solved by the invention as of the filing can be conceived based on the entire description of the specification and drawings taking into consideration the common general knowledge as of the filing, it is deemed that there is no relationship under Section 37(i) due to the lack of a problem to be solved.  - 特許庁

また、24℃と25℃の実施例が記載されている場合は、そのことをもって直ちに「24～25℃」の数値限定の補正が許されることにならないが、当初明細書等の記載全体からみて24～25℃の特定の範囲についての言及があったものと認められる場合(例えば、24℃と25℃が、課題・効果等の記載からみて、ある連続的な数値範囲の上限・下限等の境界値として記載されていると認められるとき)もある。このような場合は、実施例のない場合と異なり、数値限定の記載が当初からなされていたものと評価でき、新たな技術的事項を導入するものではないので、補正は許される。例文帳に追加

If examples of 24 degrees and 25 degrees are stated, this cannot be a direct basis for permitting an amendment of the numerical limitation of "24 to 25 degrees."However, it may be found that a specific scope of 24 to 25 degrees was referred to in light of the whole statement of the originally attached description, etc. (in cases where, for example, 24 degrees and 25 degrees are found to be stated as border values of upper limit and lower limit, etc. of ascertain consecutive numerical scope in light of the statement of the problem, effect, etc.). In this case, unlike cases of absence of an example, it can be evaluated that the numerical limitation was stated originally, and new technical matter is not introduced. The amendment is, therefore, permitted.  - 特許庁

補正前の特許請求の範囲の新規性･進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われたすべての発明及び補正後の特許請求の範囲のすべての発明が同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を有するかどうかを、明細書等の記載、出願時の技術常識及び補正前の拒絶理由通知で引用された先行技術に加えて、補正前に出願人に提示していなかった先行技術に基づいて判断できることとすると、拒絶理由通知を受けた出願人が補正を検討する際に、発明の特別な技術的特徴を変更する補正とならない範囲について十分に予測することができなくなる。例文帳に追加

If whether or not all of the inventions that were examined in terms of the requirements for patentability, such as novelty and inventive step, in the claims before the amendment and all of the inventions in the claims after the amendment have the same or corresponding special technical feature could be determined based on the prior art which have not been presented to the applicant before the amendment, in addition to description, etc., common general technical knowledge as of the filing and the prior art cited in a notice of reasons for refusal before the amendment, the applicant who has received the notice of reasons for refusal would not be able to sufficiently predict the scope of acceptable amendment which does not change any special technical features of the inventions when he/she considers an amendment to make.  - 特許庁

本事例では、肥料袋の開封装置の発明特定事項のつである「傾斜角度調節機構」について、当初の特許請求の範囲には、「角度保持手段と枢支手段からなる傾斜角度調節機構」と記載されており、当初明細書の発明の詳細な説明には、実施例として「樋と保定支柱との間に介装したアームにより構成される角度保持手段と樋を保定支柱に対して回動可能に枢支するピンにより構成される枢支手段からなる傾斜角度調節機構」と記載されている。すなわち、実施例の「樋を保定支柱に対して回動可能に枢支するピンにより構成される枢支手段」に対応して、当初の特許請求の範囲には、特定の構造に言及することなく、「枢支手段」と記載されている。例文帳に追加

Regarding a "mechanism for adjusting angles" as matters used to define the invention of the device for opening fertilizer bags, the original claim describes a "mechanism for adjusting the angle which is composed of a means for keeping the angle and a pivot means," and the detailed explanation of the invention of the originally attached description mentions a "mechanism for adjusting the angle composed of: a means for keeping the angle including the arm inserted between a chute and a retaining pole; and a pivot means including a pin rotationally pivoting the chute to the retaining pole," as a working example. While the working example explains a "pivot means including a pin rotationally pivoting the chute to the retaining pole," the original claim mentions a "pivot means" without describing its specific structure.  - 特許庁

(2) (1)にいう条件は，次のとおりとする。 (a) (i) 当該出願の出願日までに，当該微生物の培養体が，その試料を提供することができる国際寄託当局に寄託されており，かつ (ii) 当該国際寄託当局の名称，当該培養体が寄託された日付及び当該寄託の受託番号が当該特許明細書に記載されていること，及び (b) 第85条により，法に基づく特許として取り扱われている国際特許出願(シンガポール)，又は場合により法に基づく特許出願の場合は，特許協力条約実施規則の対応する規定が満たされていること， 並びに，第4項に基づいて行われる再寄託の場合は，更に，当該特許の出願人又は所有者が同項に従って再寄託を行うこと例文帳に追加

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are -- (a) a condition that -- (i) not later than the date of filing of the application, a culture of the micro-organism has been deposited with any international depositary authority which is able to furnish a sample of the micro-organism; and (ii) the name of the international depositary authority, the date when the culture was deposited and the accession number of the deposit are given in the specification of the application; and (b) a condition, in the case of an international application for a patent (Singapore) which is treated, by virtue of section 85 as a patent under the Act, or, as the case may be, an application for a patent under the Act, that the corresponding provisions of the Implementing Regulations to the Patent Co-operation Treaty have been complied with, and where a new deposit is made under paragraph 4, a further condition that the applicant or proprietor makes a new deposit in accordance with that paragraph. - 特許庁

(c) 当該特許が，第29条(2)(c)(ii)にいう対応する出願に関する所定の情報又は第29条(2)(d)(ii)にいう対応する国際出願に関する所定の情報を根拠として付与されていた場合は，何れかの時点で犯されたと申し立てられている侵害。ただし，侵害されたと申し立てられているクレーム(当該特許明細書中のもの)が， (i) 当該対応する出願又は場合により対応する国際出願に関する所定の情報に記載されているクレームであって， (ii) 新規性，進歩性(非自明性)及び産業上の利用性(有用性)の規準を満たすと認められるか否かを決定するために審査されたもの， の何れにも関係していない場合に限る。例文帳に追加

(c) where the patent was granted on the basis of the prescribed information relating to a corresponding application referred to in section 29(2)(c)(ii) or the prescribed information relating to a corresponding international application referred to in section 29(2)(d)(ii), in respect of any infringement alleged to have been committed at any time when any claim (in the specification of the patent) that is alleged to have been infringed is not related to any claim -- (i) which is set out in the prescribed information relating to the corresponding application or corresponding international application, as the case may be; and (ii) which has been examined to determine whether the claim appears to satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step (or non-obviousness) and industrial applicability (or utility). - 特許庁

(4) (1)(b)にいう理由に基づく特許の取消申請については，(a) 確認判決を求める訴訟において裁判所により，又は第47条に基づく付託に基づいて裁判所若しくは登録官により，当該特許を付与される権原があるか又は取消が求められた特許の明細書に含まれた事項の一部について特許を付与される権原があると認定された者に限り，これを行うことができ，かつ (b) 取消を求められた特許の付与の日に開始する2年の期間の終了後に当該訴訟が開始されたか又は当該付託が行われた場合は，当該特許の所有者として登録された者が，当該特許の同人への付与時又は移転時に，自己には当該特許を受ける権原がないことを知っていたことが立証されない限り，これを行うことができない。例文帳に追加

(4) An application for the revocation of a patent on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(b) -- (a) may only be made by a person found by the court in an action for a declaration or found by the court or the Registrar on a reference under section 47, to be entitled to be granted that patent or to be granted a patent for part of the matter comprised in the specification of the patent sought to be revoked; and (b) may not be made if that action was commenced or that reference was made after the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the grant of the patent sought to be revoked, unless it is shown that any person registered as a proprietor of the patent knew at the time of the grant or of the transfer of the patent to him that he was not entitled to the patent. - 特許庁

(1) 特許出願が， (a) 先の出願において，又は，既に付与された特許の明細書において開示された事項に関して出願されたものであり，かつ， (b) 本法に基づいて出願された先の出願，又は1977年連合王国特許法に基づいて出願された出願，若しくは連合王国が指定されて欧州特許条約に基づいて欧州特許庁に出願されて，出願日及び優先権の基礎とすることが求められる出願であって，出願時でのものにおいて，又は，出願時での当該特許出願において開示された事項を超える追加の事項が開示されるものであるときは， 第20条(3)若しくは第47条(4)若しくは特許法(Cap. 221, 1995 Ed.)第116条(6)に基づいて，又は第26条(11)にいうように，出願することはできるが，補正により当該追加事項を除去しない限り，手続を進めることは認められない。例文帳に追加

(1) An application for a patent which -- (a) is made in respect of matter disclosed in an earlier application, or in the specification of a patent which has been granted; and (b) discloses additional matter, that is, matter extending beyond that disclosed in the earlier application made under this Act or in the application made under the United Kingdom Patents Act 1977 or the application under the European Patent Convention designating the United Kingdom filed at the European Patent Office from which the filing date and right of priority is sought to be derived, as filed, or the application for the patent, as filed, may be filed under section 20(3) or 47(4) or section 116(6) of the Patents Act (Cap. 221, 1995 Ed.), or as mentioned in section 26(11), but shall not be allowed to proceed unless it is amended so as to exclude the additional matter. - 特許庁

政府は，次のことを授権される。 (a) 商標出願及び更新請求の電子様式での提出に係る細目規則を命令によって制定すること (b) 次の事項に関する細目規則を命令によって制定すること。すなわち，農産品及び食料品，蒸留酒及びぶどう酒の地理的表示の保護のための手続に関するもの，生産品の検査及びそれに関係する手続費用に関するもの，検査の過程で科せられることがある罰金の額に関するもの，規則110/2008/EC第20条及び規則479/2008/EC第51条に基づき保護が付与される蒸留酒及びぶどう酒の場合の，生産品明細書の提出に関するもの，生産品の市販及び生産について問題となる条件に関するもの，並びに地理的表示の使用禁止地域及び検査機関の指定に関するもの。例文帳に追加

The Government shall be authorized to: (a) establish by decree the detailed rules of filing trademark applications and requests for renewal in electronic form; (b) establish by decree the detailed rules concerning the procedure for the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs, spirit drinks as well as vine and wine products, concerning the inspection of products and the procedural costs related thereto, concerning the amounts of fines which may be imposed during inspection, and concerning the filing of the product specification in the case of spirit drinks and vine and wine products which are granted protection under Article 20 of Regulation 110/2008/EC and Article 51 of Regulation 479/2008/EC, and concerning the conditions in question for putting the product on the market and for production, as well as concerning the area of prohibition of the use of geographical indications and to designate the inspection authority or authorities. - 特許庁

何人かが，他人が行った特許出願の主題を，その出願日に，又はその出願人が第9条(1)若しくは欧州特許条約第87条に基づく優先権を有する場合は優先権出願の出願日に，オランダ又はオランダ領アンチル諸島において，自己の事業において又はその事業のために，既に製造し若しくは利用しており，又はそれを製造若しくは利用する同人の意図の履行を開始している場合は，当該人は，その特許に拘らず，第53条(1)にいう行為を継続する権利，すなわち，先使用に基づく権利を有する。ただし，同人の知識が，出願人が既に製造若しくは利用している事項，又は出願人の明細書，図面若しくはひな形から取得されているときは，この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Any party who, in the Netherlands or Netherlands Antilles, has already manufactured or applied or commenced implementation of his intention to manufacture or apply, in or for his business, the subject matter of a patent application filed by another party on the filing date thereof or, if the applicant has a right of priority under Article 9(1) or Article 87 of the European Patent Convention, on the filing date of the priority application, shall, notwithstanding the patent, continue to have the right to perform the acts referred to in Article 53(1), that right being based on prior use, unless his knowledge was obtained from matter already made or applied by the applicant or from the applicant’s descriptions, drawings or models. - 特許庁

(a) 発明が，(1)に記載した微生物以外の微生物の使用，変異又は培養を伴っており，かつ (b) 特許地域において関連技術に熟練した者が，その発明の実施を開始する前にその微生物試料を入手することなしには，当該発明を実施することを合理的に期待することができないと推定され，かつ (c) 当該微生物が，特許地域において関連技術に熟練した者にとって合理的に利用可能でない場合において，明細書は，当該微生物についての説明を必要とする限り，当該微生物に関する寄託要件が満たされているとき，かつ，そのときに限り，第40条(2)(a)の要件を満たしているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) Where: (a) an invention involves the use, modification or cultivation of a micro-organism, other than the micro-organism mentioned in subsection (1); and (b) a person skilled in the relevant art in the patent area could not reasonably be expected to perform the invention without having a sample of the micro-organism before starting to perform the invention; and (c) the micro-organism is not reasonably available to a person skilled in the relevant art in the patent area; the specification is to be taken to comply with paragraph 40(2)(a), so far as it requires a description of the micro-organism, if, and only if, the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro-organism.  - 特許庁

(i) 誤記又は明白な錯誤を訂正すること，又は (ii) 合法的異論の理由を除去すること。この場合は，異論が審査又は再審査の過程で又はその他でされるか否かを問わない。又は (iii) 前記以外の目的，及び (e) 誤記又は明白な錯誤を訂正するため又はその他の目的で登録簿における記入を補正することについての及びその補正に関連する規定を制定すること，及び (f) 誤記又は明白な錯誤を訂正するために特許を補正することについての及びその補正に関連する規定を制定すること，及び (g) 完全明細書についての要約の作成，提出及び公開についての及びそれらに関連する規定を制定すること，及び (h) 異議申立手続についての及びその手続に関連する規定を制定すること，及び (ha) 革新特許について，次の事項を含め，方式点検方法を設定すること例文帳に追加

(i) to correct a clerical error or obvious mistake; or (ii) to remove a lawful ground of objection, whether the objection is raised in the course of examination or re-examination or otherwise; or (iii) for any other purpose; and abe(e) making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and (f) making provision for and in relation to the amendment of a patent to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake; and (g) making provision for and in relation to the preparation, filing and publication of abstracts of complete specifications; and (h) making provision for and in relation to opposition proceedings; and (ha) setting out the formalities checking process for innovation patents including, in particular, the following matters:  - 特許庁

(2)特許の無効を請求する者が次に掲げる事由を証明したときは，裁判所は，それに係る特許を無効にしなければならない。(a)その特許において発明としてクレームされているものが，第12条の意味における発明でないこと，又は第13条若しくは第31条(1)に基づいて保護から除外されていること，又は第11条，第14条，第15条及び第16条の要件を遵守していないために特許を受けることができるものでないこと(b)明細書又はクレームが第23条の要件を遵守していないこと(c)クレームされている発明を理解するために必要な図面が提出されていないこと(d)その特許を受ける権利が，特許を付与された者に属していないこと，又は(e)不完全若しくは不正確な情報が第29A条(4)に基づいて，その特許の付与を受けた者又はその代理人によって登録官に故意に提供されたか，又は提供するようにされたこと［法律A863:s.32による挿入］例文帳に追加

(2) The Court shall invalidate the patent if the person requesting the invalidation proves - (a) that what is claimed as an invention in the patent is not an invention within the meaning of section 12 or is excluded from protection under section 13 or subsection 31(1) or is not patentable because it does not comply with the requirements of sections 11, 14, 15 and 16; (b) that the description or the claim does not comply with the requirements of section 23; (c) that any drawings which are necessary for the understanding of the claimed invention have not been furnished; (d) that the right to the patent does not belong to the person to whom the patent was granted; or (e) that incomplete or incorrect information has been deliberately provided or caused to be provided to the Registrar under subsection 29A(4) by the person to whom the patent was granted or by his agent. [Ins. Act A863: s.32] - 特許庁

原則として，各発明について1の図のみをIPO公報に表示することができる。発明の内容又はその具体的な改良点を説明するのに最も適した図面の部分を選択することが望ましく，IPO公報に明確に言及した図を思慮深く作成することにより最終的結果も良いものになる。ただし，これは，同時に，明細書において言及される図の1としても機能するものでなければならない。この目的のため，図は，製図者の判断により，平面図，正面図，断面図又は斜視図にする。図の各部は，特に縁取りをせず，かつ，区別することができるものにし，陰影はなるべく又は全く使用せず，主張する発明のみを例示するものであって，他の一切の要素を除外するものとする。適切に作成された場合は，省略又は変更なく用いるが，過度の微細さ，詰まり過ぎ又は細部の不要な精緻さを伴う場合は，IPO公報から除かれる。例文帳に追加

As a rule, only one view of each invention can be shown in the IPO Gazette illustrations. The selection of that portion of a drawing best calculated to explain the nature of the invention or its specific improvement would be facilitated and the final result improved by judicious execution of a figure with express reference to the IPO Gazette, but which must at the same time serve as one of the figures referred to in the specification. For this purpose the figure may be a plan, elevation, section, or perspective view, according to the judgment of the draftsman. All its parts should be especially open and distinct, with very little or no shading, and it must illustrate only the invention claimed, to the exclusion of all other details. When well executed, it will be used without curtailment or change, but any excessive fineness or crowding or unnecessary elaborateness of detail will necessitate its exclusion from the IPO Gazette. - 特許庁

実用新案登録の存続期間中は，何人も，所定の手数料を納付して，次の何れかの理由に基づき，実用新案登録の取消を局長に申請することができる。 (a)クレームされている考案が実用新案としての登録に適格でなく，登録性の要件を満たしていないこと。具体的には， (1)IP法第23条及び第24条に規定する通り新規でない場合 (2)IP法第27条に規定する通り産業上の利用性がない場合 (3)IP法第22条に規定する通り特許による保護から除外されている場合 (b)明細書及びクレームが所定の要件を遵守していないこと (c)考案の理解に必要な図面が提供されていないこと (d)実用新案登録の所有者が考案者又はその権原承継人でないこと (e)実用新案登録が原出願の内容を超えていること例文帳に追加

At any time during the term of the utility model registration, any person, upon payment of the required fee, may petition the Director to cancel the utility model registration on any of the following grounds: (a) That the claimed invention does not qualify for registration as a utility model and does not meet the requirements of registrability, in particular: (1) if it is not new as provided in Sections 23 and 24 of the IP Code; (2) if it is not industrially applicable as provided in Section 27 of the IP Code; or (3) if it is excluded from patent protection as provided in Section 22 of the IP Code. (b) That the description and the claims do not comply with the prescribed requirements; (c) That any drawing which is necessary for the understanding of the invention has not been furnished; (d) That the owner of the utility model registration is not the inventor or his successor in title; or (e) That the utility model registration extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed. - 特許庁

(5) 寄託培養試料が，もはや活性を有していないためか又は寄託機関がその試料をもはや交付できないための何れかによって，入手不能になった場合において，それが次のときは，入手可能性の中断とはみなさないものとする。 (a) 寄託機関又は庁の何れかによって特許出願人又は特許権者に対して当該中断が通知された日から起算して3月以内に，微生物の新規寄託が行われたとき (b) 特許出願又は特許についての明細資料を添付の上，微生物の新規寄託の受領書の写が新規寄託の日から起算して4月以内に，庁宛に送達されたとき 中断が培養試料の不活性化に起因した場合は，新規寄託については，原寄託を以前行った機関に対して，行わなければならない。その他の場合は，新規寄託を他の寄託機関に対して，行うことができる。 微生物の新規寄託には，新規に寄託される微生物が原寄託の対象のものと同じである旨証明した寄託当事者の署名入り宣誓書を添付しなければならない。例文帳に追加

5. If the deposited culture ceases to be available, either because it is no longer viable or because the authority of deposit is no longer in a position to deliver its sample, it is not considered to be the interruption of availability on the condition that: (a) a new deposit of the microorganism is made within a period of three months starting from the date on which the interruption was notified to the owner of the patent application or of the patent, either by the depositary authority or by the Service; (b) a copy of the receipt regarding the new deposit of the microorganism, accompanied with references to the patent application or to the patent, is sent to the Service within a period of four months starting from the date of the new deposit. If the interruption results from the non-viability of the culture, the new deposit shall be made with the authority that received the initial deposit; in other cases, it may be made with other empowered authority. A new deposit of the microorganism must be accompanied with a statement signed by the depositing party certifying that the microorganism subjected to the new deposit is the same as the one which was the object of the initial deposit. - 特許庁

(1)明細書は，次の通りとする。 (a)発明の関連する技術分野を明記する。 (b)発明の理解，調査報告の作成及び審査に有用であるとみられる背景技術を出願人が知る限り示し，かつ，当該技術を示す書類を引用するのが望ましい。 (c)技術的課題(それなりに明白に記載していなくても)及びその解決を理解することが可能な用語を用いて，主張する発明を開示し，かつ，背景技術の引用により発明の有利な効果を記載する。 (d)(もしあれば)図面中の図について簡単に説明する。 (e)図面がある場合は，図面の複数の図の簡単な説明を入れ，かつ，発明の詳細な説明では，図に示した発明のそれぞれの部分について，参照文字又は数字(後者が望ましい)を用いて言及する。 (f)適切な場合は例を用いて，もしあれば図面を参照して，主張する発明を実施する方法の少なくとも1を詳細に説明する。 (g)発明の説明又は内容から自明でない場合は，発明を産業で利用することができる方法を明白に示す。例文帳に追加

(1) The description shall: (a) Specify the technical field to which the invention relates; (b) Indicate the background art which, as far as known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful for understanding the invention, for drawing up the search report and for the examination, and, preferably, cite the documents reflecting such art; (c) Disclose the invention, as claimed, in such terms that the technical problem (even if not expressly stated as such) and its solution can be understood, and state any advantageous effects of the invention with reference to the background art; (d) Briefly describe the figures in the drawings, if any; (e) When there are drawings, there shall be a brief description of the several views of the drawings and the detailed description of the invention shall refer to its different parts, as shown in the views, by use of reference letters or numerals (preferably the latter); (f) Describe in detail at least one way of carrying out the invention claimed using examples where appropriate and referring to the drawings, if any; and (g) Indicate explicitly, when it is not obvious from the description or nature of the invention, the way in which the invention is capable of exploitation in industry. - 特許庁

第二十九条の二　特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 29-2 Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三条の二　実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という。)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) , the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "patent bulletin" or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1) ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

３　会社法第四百九十四条第二項及び第三項（貸借対照表等の作成及び保存）、第四百九十六条第一項及び第二項（貸借対照表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第四百九十七条（第一項各号を除く。）（貸借対照表等の定時株主総会への提出等）並びに第四百九十八条（貸借対照表等の提出命令）の規定は、第一項の貸借対照表及び事務報告並びにこれらの附属明細書について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十六条第一項中「前条第一項の規定の適用がある場合にあっては、監査報告を含む。」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項の監査を受けた監査報告を含む。」と、同項及び同法第四百九十七条中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第一項中「当該各号に定める貸借対照表及び事務報告」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項の監査を受けた貸借対照表及び事務報告」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 494(2) and (3) (Preparation and Retention of Balance Sheet), Article 496(1) and (2) (Keeping and Inspection of Balance Sheet), Article 497 (excluding the items of paragraph (1)) (Provision of Balance Sheet to Annual Shareholders Meeting), and Article 498 (Order to Submit Balance Sheet) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the balance sheet and administrative report and the annexed detailed statements thereof set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the phrase "(including, in cases where the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article apply, audit reports," in Article 496(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "(including audit reports audited under Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 496(1) and Article 497 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "annual general meeting of members," the phrase "the Balance Sheet and administrative reports provided for in each such item" in Article 497(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the balance sheet and administrative reports audited under Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十六条　前編第五章（居住者に係る申告、納付及び還付）の規定は、非居住者の総合課税に係る所得税についての申告、納付及び還付について準用する。この場合において、第百二十条第三項第三号（確定所得申告）中「又は」とあるのは「若しくは」と、「居住者」とあるのは「非居住者又は国内及び国外の双方にわたつて業務を行う非居住者」と、「源泉徴収票」とあるのは「源泉徴収票又は収入及び支出に関する明細書で財務省令で定めるもの」と、同条第四項中「業務を行う居住者」とあるのは「業務を国内において行う非居住者」と、第百四十三条（青色申告）中「業務を行なう」とあるのは「業務を国内において行う」と、第百四十四条（青色申告の承認の申請）及び第百四十七条（青色申告の承認があつたものとみなす場合）中「業務を開始した」とあるのは「業務を国内において開始した」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 166 The provisions of Part II, Chapter V (Filing of Return, Payment and Refund in the case of Residents) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the filing of a return, payment and refund of income tax in the case of comprehensive taxation on nonresidents. In this case, in Article 120(3)(iii) (Final Income Tax Return), the term "resident" shall be deemed to be replaced with "nonresident, or a nonresident who performs operations both in and outside Japan," and the term "withholding records" shall be deemed to be replaced with "withholding records, or detailed statements of revenue and expenditure specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" ; in Article 120(4), the phrase "resident who performs operations" shall be deemed to be replaced with "nonresident who performs operations in Japan" ; in Article 143 (Blue Return), the phrase "performs operations" shall be deemed to be replaced with "performs operations in Japan" ; Article 144 (Application for Approval of Filing Blue Return) and Article 147 (Case of Constructive Approval of Filing Blue Return), the phrase "commenced operations" shall be deemed to be replaced with "commenced operations in Japan."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム