「ほっこく」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(14ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

このほか、情報共有を目的として、東北電力、東京電力、中部電力、北陸電力、中国電力、日本原子力発電、電源開発、東芝、日立GEニュークリア・エナジーによって2006年4月に「BWR事業者協議会」が、北海道電力、関西電力、四国電力、九州電力、日本原子力発電、三菱重工業、三菱電機によって2005年10月に「PWR事業者連絡会」が結成されている。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of sharing information, Japan BWR Owners Group was formed by Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. Chubu Electric Power Co, Inc. Hokuriku Electric Power Co. , the Chugoku Electric Power Co. , Inc. the Japan Atomic Power Company, Electric Power Development Co.　Toshiba, and Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy in April, 2006, and Japan PWR Owners Group was set up by Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc. the Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. Shikoku Electric Power Co. , Inc. Kyushu Electric Power Co. , Inc. the Japan Atomic Power Company, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation in October, 2005. - 経済産業省

地域ブロック別に、1999年度からの10年間の県内総生産に占める公的資本形成の構成比変化と地域の就業者増加率、地域の就業者数に占める建設業就業者割合の変化との関係をプロットしてみると、公的資本形成の減少が、3 大都市圏に比べ北海道、東北、四国といった地域ブロックにおける就業者の減少に大きな影響を及ぼしたことがわかる（第１７図） 。例文帳に追加

By plotting the relationship between the changes in the composition ratio of public capital formation to the grossprefectural product and the changes in the regional increase rate of the employed and the ratio of the number ofworkers in the construction industry to the number of workers in the region, we can see that the decrease of publiccapital formation had a more profound effect on the decrease of the number of workers in the regional blocksincluding Hokkaido, Tohoku and Shikoku, than the 3 major urban regions, i.e. South Kanto, Kinki and Tokai(Figure 17). - 厚生労働省

第四条　次に掲げる船舶又は航空機（以下それぞれ「外国から来航した船舶」又は「外国から来航した航空機」という。）の長（長に代つてその職務を行う者を含む。以下同じ。）は、検疫済証又は仮検疫済証の交付（第十七条第二項の通知を含む。第九条を除き、以下同じ。）を受けた後でなければ、当該船舶を国内（本州、北海道、四国及び九州並びに厚生労働省令で定めるこれらに附属する島の区域内をいう。以下同じ。）の港に入れ、又は当該航空機を検疫飛行場以外の国内の場所（港の水面を含む。）に着陸させ、若しくは着水させてはならない。ただし、外国から来航した船舶の長が、検疫を受けるため当該船舶を第八条第一項に規定する検疫区域若しくは同条第三項の規定により指示された場所に入れる場合若しくは次条ただし書第一号の確認を受けた者の上陸若しくは同号の確認を受けた物若しくは第十三条の二の指示に係る貨物の陸揚のため当該船舶を港（第八条第一項に規定する検疫区域又は同条第三項の規定により指示された場所を除く。）に入れる場合又は外国から来航した航空機の長が、検疫所長（検疫所の支所又は出張所の長を含む。以下同じ。）の許可を受けて当該航空機を着陸させ、若しくは着水させる場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 4 The master or aircraft captain (including a person who fulfills a duty on behalf of them. The same shall apply hereinafter) of a marine vessel or aircraft listed below (hereinafter called as "vessel from abroad" or "aircraft from abroad" respectively) shall not put such a vessel into port in Japan (into Honshu, Hokkaido, Shikoku, Kyushu, or their neighboring islands, as specified by an Ordinance of the Health, Labour and Welfare Ministry. The same shall apply hereinafter), nor shall such aircraft land on the ground or on the enter waters, including waters in the ports, in Japan except quarantine airports, before a quarantine certificate or a provisional quarantine certificate (including notices listed in Article 17-2. The same shall apply hereinafter except Article 9) is delivered; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the master of a marine vessel from abroad puts the vessel into a quarantine area specified in Article 8-1 or any area specified by Article 8-3 in order to go through quarantine, or puts the vessel into port (except the quarantine area specified by Article 8-1 or any area specified by Article 8-3) in order to allow a person prescribed in Item 1 of the provisions of the following article to come ashore or unload cargo pursuant to the instructions in Article 13-2, or the aircraft captain of the aircraft from abroad lands an aircraft land or a marine vessel enters waters with the permission of the quarantine station chief (including a chief of quarantine station's branch office or field office. The same shall apply hereinafter).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十三条　都市計画区域について定められる都市計画（区域外都市施設に関するものを含む。次項において同じ。）は、国土形成計画、首都圏整備計画、近畿圏整備計画、中部圏開発整備計画、北海道総合開発計画、沖縄振興計画その他の国土計画又は地方計画に関する法律に基づく計画（当該都市について公害防止計画が定められているときは、当該公害防止計画を含む。第三項において同じ。）及び道路、河川、鉄道、港湾、空港等の施設に関する国の計画に適合するとともに、当該都市の特質を考慮して、次に掲げるところに従つて、土地利用、都市施設の整備及び市街地開発事業に関する事項で当該都市の健全な発展と秩序ある整備を図るため必要なものを、一体的かつ総合的に定めなければならない。この場合においては、当該都市における自然的環境の整備又は保全に配慮しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 13 (1) City plans stipulated for city planning areas (including those concerning out-of-area facilities; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) shall conform to the National Spatial Plan, the National Capital Region Development Plan, the Kinki Region Development Plan, the Chubu Region Development Plan, the Hokkaido Comprehensive Development Plan, the Okinawa Promotion Plan and any other plans based on Acts concerning national plans or regional plans (including pollution prevention plans if they have been stipulated for said cities; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and national plans for roads, rivers, railways, ports, airports and other facilities; and they must, in consideration of the said city's characteristics, uniformly and comprehensively stipulate matters concerning land use, urban facility construction and urban development projects required for the sound and orderly development of said cities in accordance with the following provisions. In such cases, consideration must be given to the improvement in preservation of the natural environment in said cities.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七条　国土交通大臣は、特定の地域において一般貨物自動車運送事業の供給輸送力（以下この条において単に「供給輸送力」という。）が輸送需要量に対し著しく過剰となっている場合であって、当該供給輸送力が更に増加することにより、第三条の許可を受けた者（以下「一般貨物自動車運送事業者」という。）であってその行う貨物の運送の全部又は大部分が当該特定の地域を発地又は着地とするものの相当部分について事業の継続が困難となると認めるときは、当該特定の地域を、期間を定めて緊急調整地域として指定することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 7 (1) When the supplied transportation capacity of general motor truck transportation business (hereinafter in this Article referred to as the "supply transportation capacity") is considerably excessive against the transportation demand in a specified area and further addition to the said supply transportation capacity would cause the situation in which continuation of whole or part of the business concerning a significant part of the freight transportation that departs from or arrive at the said specified area by the person who has been granted the permission given in Article 3 (hereinafter referred to as "general motor truck transportation business operator") is found to be difficult, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism may designate the said specified area as an emergency adjustment area for a specified period.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百三十六条　新保険業法第二百五十九条に規定する保険契約者保護機構（以下「機構」という。）の発起人及び会員になろうとする保険会社（外国保険会社等及び免許特定法人を含む。）は、施行日前においても、新保険業法第二百六十一条から第二百六十三条まで、第二百六十五条から第二百六十五条の三まで、第二百六十五条の五、第二百六十五条の七、第二百六十五条の十二、第二百六十五条の十三、第二百六十五条の十五から第二百六十五条の十七まで、第二百六十五条の三十及び第二百六十五条の三十四並びに新保険業法附則第一条の四の規定の例により、定款の作成、創立総会の開催その他機構の設立に必要な行為、機構への加入に必要な行為及び機構の設立の日を含む事業年度の業務の運営に必要な行為をすることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 136 (1) An Insurance Company (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. or a Licensed Specified Juridical Person) that intends to become an incorporator or a member of the Policyholders Protection Corporation prescribed in Article 259 of the Current Insurance Business Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation") may, prior to the Effective Date, proceed with the preparation of the articles of incorporation, the holding of sessions of the Organizational Meeting and other acts necessary for incorporating the Corporation, necessary acts for participating in the Corporation, and necessary acts for business for the business year to which belongs the date of incorporation of the Corporation, as prescribed in Article 261 to 263 inclusive, Article 265 to 265-3 inclusive, Article 265-5, Article 265-7, Article 265-12, Article 265-13, Article 265-15 to 265-17 inclusive, Article 265-30 and Article 265-34 of the Current Insurance Business Act, and Article 1-4 of the Supplementary Provisions to the Current Insurance Business Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

大変難しい、1時間くらいかかりそうな質問をされてしまいましたが、日本のバブル崩壊以降の一連の流れと今回米国に端を発した金融の混乱を比べてみると、やはりスピードと広がりというのが明らかに違うと感じておりまして、日本の場合バブルの崩壊から山一（山一證券）、拓銀（北海道拓殖銀行）の破綻であったり公的な資金の投入、これまで大体７年のスパンがかかっているわけでありますけれど、アメリカにおきましては昨年の夏にサブプライム・ローンの問題が顕在化しまして、その後大手の投資銀行の破綻であったり、公的資金の導入とこういうことまで一年弱ということですから、相当そのスピード感というのが早くなっているなと、率直に申し上げてこの1か月位を考えますと私が想定していたスピード以上のスピードでいろんな物事が進んでいる、とこんなふうに感じております。例文帳に追加

If we compare the sequence of events after the bursting of Japan’s economic bubble with the evolution of the financial turmoil that has begun in the United States, it is obvious that the current crisis is spreading further and quicker. It took about seven years from the bursting of Japan’s economic bubble to the bankruptcies of Yamaichi (Yamaichi Securities Co.) and “Takugin” (Hokkaido Takushoku Bank) and the injection of public funds into banks. In the United States, things have been happening very rapidly: the subprime mortgage problem came to the surface in the summer of 2007, then major investment banks collapsed and the use of public funds was decided in less than one year. Frankly speaking, things have been happening over the past month or so more quickly than I expected. Also, I think that the pace and extent of the current and past crises are different.  - 金融庁

何回も申し上げましたように、（私は、）1997年日本の金融危機で、北海道拓殖銀行、山一證券、その次の年は日債銀、（日本）長期信用銀行が破綻したときの橋本内閣の閣僚でございまして、本当に健全な強い銀行、言うなれば自己資本の高い銀行で海外業務をするときは8％、国内銀行は4％という基準が当時あったわけでございますが、自己資本比率の高い銀行ほど一般的に安全でございますけれども、そうなると貸し剥がし・貸し渋りというのが起こります。これは瑕疵担保条項のこともございましたが、金融危機のときに、私の地元の北九州市の駅前にある大きなデパートが2つほど破綻いたしまして、私は北九州市出身ですから、まさに銀行の健全性と実体経済の影響ということを、身をもって勉強したつもりでございます。そんなことも、この前ラガルドさんにも、またノワイエさんにも申し上げてきました。例文帳に追加

As I mentioned several times, I was a member of the Hashimoto Cabinet when Hokkaido Takushoku Bank and Yamaichi Securities failed in 1997 as a result of a financial crisis, and when Nippon Credit Bank and Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan failed in 1998. At that time, banks engaging in overseas business were required to have a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8%, and banks focusing on domestic business were required to have a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 4%. Generally speaking, the higher capital adequacy ratio a bank has, the more sound it is. However, if it goes too far, a credit crunch will occur. During the financial crisis, two big department stores located in front of the railway station in my hometown of Kitakyushu failed-a loan buyback provision was also a factor behind this-, and thus, I learned first-hand about the soundness of banks and the impact on the real economy. I related my experiences like this to Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Noyer.  - 金融庁

原子力安全・保安院は、高経年化プラントへの対応を充実強化するために、産業界、学会、政府機関の間で、国内外の技術情報を共有し、有効に活用するために原子力安全基盤機構の中に技術情報調整委員会を発足させ、また、日本原子力学会の下に、原子力安全・保安院、原子力安全基盤機構、大学、研究機関、電力事業者、原子力プラントメーカー、エンジニアリング会社等が参加した特別委員会を設置して、2004年7月から、2005年3月にかけて高経年化対策及び軽水炉の長寿命安全運転に対するロードマップを整備した。例文帳に追加

Moreover, NISA launched the Coordination Committee on Technical Information in JNES, in order to reinforce the measures for aged plants, and in order to share domestic and overseas technical information for effective utilization among the industrial world, academic and governmental institutions. Furthermore, JNES established an ad-hoc committee that consists of NISA, universities, research organizations, electric utilities, nuclear plant manufacturers, plant engineering companies, etc. under the Atomic Energy Society of Japan. From July 2004 through March 2005, the ad-hoc committee had prepared a road map on measures for aging management and long life-time safe operation of light water reactors. - 経済産業省

第九百七十六条　発起人、設立時取締役、設立時監査役、設立時執行役、取締役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、執行役、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、清算人、清算人代理、持分会社の業務を執行する社員、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された取締役、監査役、執行役、清算人若しくは持分会社の業務を執行する社員の職務を代行する者、第九百六十条第一項第五号に規定する一時取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を行うべき者、同条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を行うべき者、第九百六十七条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、監督委員、調査委員、株主名簿管理人、社債原簿管理人、社債管理者、事務を承継する社債管理者、代表社債権者、決議執行者、外国会社の日本における代表者又は支配人は、次のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 976 When an incorporator, Director at Incorporation, Company Auditor at Incorporation, Executive Officer at Incorporation, director, accounting advisor or member who is to perform the duties thereof, company auditor, executive officer, accounting auditor or member who is to perform the duties thereof, liquidator, liquidator's agent, member who executes the business of a Membership Company, person to perform duties on behalf of a director, company auditor, executive officer, liquidator or partner who executes the business of a Membership Company who has been appointed based on a provisional disposition order under the provisions of Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Remedies Act, person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a director, accounting advisor, company auditor, Representative Director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 960(1)(v), person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a liquidator or representative liquidator prescribed in paragraph (2)(iii) of that Article, person who is temporarily to perform the duties of an accounting auditor prescribed in Article 967(1)(iii), inspector, supervisor, investigator, Administrator of the Shareholder Registry, manager of the Bond Registry, bond manager, bond manager to succeed to the administration of the bonds, representative bondholder, Resolution Administrator, Foreign Company's representative in Japan or manager falls under any one of the following items, such person shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when such act should be made subject to a criminal punishment:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は何回も申しますように、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど確かに一見安全に見えますけれども、それだと、よく我々10年前に経験したように、貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起こるわけでございますから、あのとき健全な企業まで、健全に近い企業まで倒産をしたというようなことがございますし、日本の経済が混乱したということは10年前私も、何度も申し上げます、与党の国会議員として、私が閣僚のときに、1997年か98年でございますが、北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一證券が破綻するという時代で、その後が金融国会でございましたから、身をもって体験しておりますから、やはりそこら辺は安心・安定という、これはこの金融機関あるいは金融システム、基本的にG20の世界でございますし、このバーゼルの会議は27カ国出ていますけれども、そういった意味の安心・安全ということと同時に、余り数値だけ高ければ高いほどいいわけではない。そこは余り高くしますと、今さっき言ったように、今度は貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起きて経済そのものが縮小するわけでございますから、そこら辺をきちんとバランスを持ってやっていきたいというふうに思っておりまして、そういった意味のことを、新規制が我々の立場、10年前に金融危機を実際に経験して、そういった立場もきちんと踏まえながら主張をしていきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

As I repeatedly say, it is true that a higher capital adequacy figure may appear to imply security at a glance, but it can also lead to a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection practices, as we experienced 10 years ago. Back then, even healthy companies went under. As a Diet member of the ruling party in a ministerial post, I was faced firsthand with the confusion that prevailed in the Japanese economy at that time. It was in 1997 that the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went under and Yamaichi Securities failed, soon ushering in what would be called the "Financial Diet Session." The Basel meeting is attended by 27 countries and, for all of them, a higher ratio figure, which does provide peace of mind and security, is at the same time not necessarily better in that light. As making a capital adequacy ratio too high can lead to a credit crunch and oppressive debt collection and hence a shrinking economy, we are hoping to maintain a good balance in view of all those factors. We are determined to make our point in the new requirement debate, keeping in mind where we stand as a country that actually experienced a financial crisis 10 years ago.  - 金融庁

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.  - 金融庁

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百三十三条　保険会社等の発起人、設立時取締役、設立時執行役、設立時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行う社員、清算人、第百四十四条第一項（第二百七十二条の三十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する受託会社、保険管理人、保険調査人、会社法第五百二十五条第一項（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の清算人代理、同法第五百二十七条第一項（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の監督委員、同法第五百三十三条（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の調査委員、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された取締役、執行役、監査役若しくは清算人の職務を代行する者、第三百二十二条第一項第六号若しくは会社法第九百六十条第一項第五号に規定する一時取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を行うべき者、第三百二十二条第二項第三号若しくは同法第九百六十条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を行うべき者、第三百二十八条第一項第三号若しくは同法第九百六十七条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、株主名簿管理人、社債原簿管理人、社債管理者、事務を承継する社債管理者、代表社債権者、決議執行者若しくは支配人、外国保険会社等の日本における代表者、清算人、第二百十一条において準用する第百四十四条第一項に規定する受託会社、保険管理人、保険調査人若しくは支配人、免許特定法人及び引受社員を日本において代表する者、外国保険会社等と第百九十条第三項の契約を締結した者、免許特定法人と第二百二十三条第三項の契約を締結した者若しくは少額短期保険業者と第二百七十二条の五第三項の契約を締結した者、機構の役員、保険議決権大量保有者（保険議決権大量保有者が保険議決権大量保有者でなくなった場合における当該保険議決権大量保有者であった者を含み、保険議決権大量保有者が法人（第二条の二第一項第一号に掲げる法人でない団体を含む。第六十五号及び第七十一号を除き、以下この項において同じ。）であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、保険主要株主若しくは少額短期保険主要株主（保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主が保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主でなくなった場合における当該保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主であった者を含み、保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、特定主要株主若しくは特定少額短期主要株主（特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主が保険会社等の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなった場合における当該特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主であった者を含み、特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、保険持株会社若しくは少額短期保険持株会社（保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社が保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社でなくなった場合における当該保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社であった会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人又は特定持株会社若しくは特定少額短期持株会社（特定持株会社又は特定少額短期持株会社が保険会社等を子会社とする持株会社でなくなった場合における当該特定持株会社又は特定少額短期持株会社であった会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人、業務を執行する社員若しくは清算人は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 333 (1) In the case where an incorporator of an Insurance Company, etc., director at the time of its incorporation, executive officer at the time of its incorporation, company auditor at the time of its incorporation, director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, accounting auditor or a member who shall carry out its duties, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2)), insurance administrator, insurance inspector, liquidator representative set forth in Article 525, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), supervising committee member set forth in Article 527, paragraph (1) of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), examination committee member set forth in Article 533 of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), acting director, executive officer, company auditor or liquidator who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Relief Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (1), item (vi) or Article 960, paragraph (1), item (v) of the Companies Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary liquidator or Representative Liquidator prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (2), item (iii) or Article 960, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the same Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary accounting auditor prescribed in Article 328, paragraph (1), item (iii) or Article 967, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the same Act, inspector, administrator of shareholder registry, administrator of bond registry, bond administrator, bond administrator who is succeeding the affairs, representative bondholder, resolution executor or manager, a Representative Person in Japan of a foreign Insurance Company, etc, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 211, insurance administrator, insurance inspector or manager, any person who represents a license Specified Juridical Person and subscription member in Japan, any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 190, paragraph (3) with a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 223, paragraph (3) with a license Specified Juridical Person or any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 272-5, paragraph (3) with a small sum short-term insurer, officer of Policyholders protection corporation, Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights (when the Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights is a juridical person (including organizations that are not juridical persons listed in Article 2-2, paragraph (1), item (i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph except for items (lxv) and (lxxi)), its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former large holders of insurance voting rights in the case where large holders of insurance voting rights are no longer large holders of insurance voting rights), insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder (when the insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former insurance major shareholders or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider in the case where Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholders are no longer Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider), Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company (when the Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company in the case where Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company are no longer holders of the voting rights of an Insurance Company, etc. which amount to not less than the Major Shareholder Threshold), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager or liquidator of an Insurance Holding Company or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies), or the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager, member who executes the business or liquidator of a Specified Holding Company or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer holding companies of which an Insurance Company, etc. is a Subsidiary Company) falls under any of the following items, he/she shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when a punishment shall be given for the act:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム