| 意味 | 例文 (999件) |
is Effectedの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 1231件
Using this lead frame, wire bonding is effected to the extension lines of the comb ends between the chip component and a semiconductor elements by removing the common cut piece of the lead frame after molding, thereby allowing the individual comb ends to serve as input/output terminals.例文帳に追加
一体して切断可能な直線状の共通切断片と、共通切断片からフレーム内部に略直角方向に延在された同一棒状をなす複数のくし型形状端と、各くし型形状端の延長線上に電極パッドが配置できるように形成された部品搭載領域とを有するリードフレームを用い、くし型形状端の延長線上で、チップ部品と半導体素子とのワイヤーボンディングを行い、モールド後にリードフレームの共通切断片を除去することによって、各くし型形状端を入出力用端子とした。 - 特許庁
In such a hot-water heating device, the opening and closing operation of the feed water valve 10 is effected intermittently to control the pouring amount of hot-water into the tank 3 so as to be within the capacity of the tank 3.例文帳に追加
暖房用の温水を循環させる循環路２と、該循環路２には温水を貯留するタンク３と、温水を循環させるポンプ４とを備え、該タンク３には所定の低水位以上を検出する低水位検出手段６と、該低水位より高くかつ必要量の暖房循環水が貯えられた状態の所定の高水位以上を検知する高水位検出手段７とを備え、該タンク３に給水するための給水弁１０とを備えた温水暖房装置１において、給水弁１０の開閉動作を断続的に行い、タンク３内への注入量をタンクのオーバーフロー性能以内に制御する温水暖房装置。 - 特許庁
(3) Among inventions disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the earlier application contains a priority claim under the said paragraph or Article 8(1) of the Utility Model Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the patent Act (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of the Utility Model Act), excluding any inventions disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claim for a patent or utility model registration or drawing) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the earlier application is based), the laying open of application or the bulletin containing the Utility Model pertaining to the earlier application shall be deemed to have been effected or issued at the time when the patent gazette containing patent or the laying open of application pertaining to the said patent application was issued or effected, and the main clause of Article 29-2 of the patent Act or Article 3-2 of the Utility Model Act shall apply. 例文帳に追加
３ 第一項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面（外国語書面出願にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（当該先の出願が同項若しくは実用新案法第八条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（同法第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された発明を除く。）については、当該特許出願について特許掲載公報の発行又は出願公開がされた時に当該先の出願について出願公開又は実用新案掲載公報の発行がされたものとみなして、第二十九条の二本文又は同法第三条の二本文の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(ix) transactions through which technology designed to be used with a certain program is provided simultaneously when such program is provided (except for programs and other technology specified by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry in a public notice) and where the minimum technology necessary for the installation, operation, maintenance and repair of said program is provided to the other party of the transactions concerning said program or the users (limited to transactions through which such technology is provided on and after the date on which the permission for service transactions was granted or the date on which the contract for the provision of the program was effected, whichever date comes later); provided, however, that among said technology, the provision of technology for maintenance or repair shall be excluded when it falls under any of (a) to (c) below: 例文帳に追加
九 プログラムの提供に付随して提供される使用に係る技術（プログラム及び経済産業大臣が告示で定めるものを除く。）であって、当該プログラムのインストール、操作、保守又は修理のための必要最小限のものを当該プログラムの取引の相手方又は需要者に対して提供する取引（役務取引の許可を受けた日又はプログラムの提供契約の発効した日のいずれか遅い日以降に提供されるものに限る。）。ただし、当該技術のうち、保守又は修理に係る技術の提供については、次のいずれかに該当するものを除く。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 240-7 (1) From two weeks prior to the date the resolution shall be made as set forth in Article 240-5, paragraph (1) (in the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., the date the decision was made concerning the Modification of Contract Conditions) until the date of issue of the public notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 240-13, paragraph (1), the Insurance Company shall keep a document or electromagnetic records describing or recording the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, such as the reason why the Modification of Contract Conditions is inevitable, the details of the Modification of Contract Conditions, a forecast of the business and property situation after the Modification of Contract Conditions is effected, matters regarding funding and the handling of debts against creditors apart from Insurance Policyholders, etc., and matters regarding management responsibility (in cases where there is a policy pursuant to the provisions of Article 240-5, paragraph (4), including the contents of the policy), at the company's business offices and other offices (in the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., branch offices, etc. pursuant to the provisions of Article 185, paragraph (1)). 例文帳に追加
第二百四十条の七 保険会社は、第二百四十条の五第一項の決議を行うべき日の二週間前（外国保険会社等にあっては、契約条件の変更についての決定を行った日）から第二百四十条の十三第一項の規定による公告の日まで、契約条件の変更がやむを得ない理由、契約条件の変更の内容、契約条件の変更後の業務及び財産の状況の予測、基金及び保険契約者等以外の債権者に対する債務の取扱いに関する事項、経営責任に関する事項その他の内閣府令で定める事項（第二百四十条の五第四項に規定する方針がある場合にあっては、その方針の内容を含む。）を記載し、又は記録した書面又は電磁的記録を各営業所又は各事務所（外国保険会社等にあっては、第百八十五条第一項に規定する支店等）に備え置かなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Insurance Company shall attach the documents specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, such as documents showing the reason why the Modification of Contract Conditions is inevitable, documents showing a forecast of the business and property situation after the Modification of Contract Conditions is effected, documents showing matters regarding funding and the handling of debts against creditors other than Insurance Policyholders, etc., and documents showing matters related to management responsibility (in cases where there is a policy pursuant to the provisions set forth in Article 240-5, paragraph (4), including documents showing the content of the policy). Moreover, the Insurance Company shall attach a supplementary note to the effect said persons who are Policyholders Subject to Modify who have an objection should raise their objections within a set period of time. 例文帳に追加
２ 前項の場合においては、契約条件の変更がやむを得ない理由を示す書類、契約条件の変更後の業務及び財産の状況の予測を示す書類、基金及び保険契約者等以外の債権者に対する債務の取扱いに関する事項を示す書類、経営責任に関する事項を示す書類その他の内閣府令で定める書類（第二百四十条の五第四項に規定する方針がある場合にあっては、その方針の内容を示す書類を含む。）を添付し、変更対象契約者で異議がある者は、一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を、前項の書面に付記しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 162 (1) In the following cases, where there are unavoidable reasons, Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members or all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members and Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members) respectively, or Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or the issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity) may demand the dissolution of a Specific Purpose Company by filing an action: 例文帳に追加
第百六十二条 次に掲げる場合において、やむを得ない事由があるときは、総特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員若しくは優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数若しくは発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資若しくは優先出資を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員は、訴えをもって特定目的会社の解散を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 34-2 (1) With respect to development activities executed by the State or prefectures, designated cities, etc. or administrative processing municipalities; partial affairs associations, wide area local public bodies, total affairs associations, office affairs associations in which prefectures, designated cities, etc. or administrative processing municipalities participate, or port authorities; or local development corporations for which prefectures, designated cities, etc. or administrative processing municipalities are establishing bodies (hereinafter referred to as "Prefectures, etc.") within city planning areas or quasi city planning areas (excluding development activities listed in respective items of Article 29 paragraph (1)) or within areas outside city planning areas or quasi city planning areas (excluding development activities whose scale is smaller than that specified by Cabinet Order under paragraph (2) of said Article and development activities listed in respective items of said paragraph), the development permission shall be deemed to have been granted when the consultation between the relevant State agencies or the Prefectures, etc. and prefectural governors is effected. 例文帳に追加
第三十四条の二 国又は都道府県、指定都市等若しくは事務処理市町村、都道府県、指定都市等若しくは事務処理市町村がその組織に加わつている一部事務組合、広域連合、全部事務組合、役場事務組合若しくは港務局若しくは都道府県、指定都市等若しくは事務処理市町村が設置団体である地方開発事業団（以下「都道府県等」という。）が行う都市計画区域若しくは準都市計画区域内における開発行為（第二十九条第一項各号に掲げる開発行為を除く。）又は都市計画区域及び準都市計画区域外の区域内における開発行為（同条第二項の政令で定める規模未満の開発行為及び同項各号に掲げる開発行為を除く。）については、当該国の機関又は都道府県等と都道府県知事との協議が成立することをもつて、開発許可があつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 55 (1) In calling a general meeting of members of a Type 1 Specific Purpose Company or a general meeting of members of a Type 2 Specific Purpose Company for which a Matter to Be Voted Upon by Specified Equity Members Alone has been made the subject, the directors shall send a notice to each of the Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all of the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) by two weeks prior (in cases other than those where the matters listed in Article 54(1)(iii) or (iv) are prescribed, one week prior (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period)) to the day of the general meeting of members. 例文帳に追加
第五十五条 第一種特定目的会社の社員総会又は第二種特定目的会社の無議決権事項のみを会議の目的とする社員総会を招集するには、取締役は、社員総会の日の二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めた場合以外の場合にあっては、一週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））前までに、各特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。以下この条において同じ。）に対してその通知を発しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 515 (1) If an order to commence special liquidation is issued, petition cannot be filed for commencement of bankruptcy procedures, or for compulsory execution, provisional attachment or provisional disposition against the assets of a Liquidating Stock Company, or for property disclosure procedures (hereinafter in this paragraph limited to those in response to a petition under paragraph (1) of Article 197 of the Civil Execution Act (Act No. 4 of 1979)), and the bankruptcy procedures (limited to those for which a ruling to commence bankruptcy procedures has not yet been handed down), the compulsory execution, provisional attachment or provisional disposition procedures already effected against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company and property disclosure procedures shall be suspended; provided, however, that this shall not apply with respect to the compulsory execution, provisional attachment or provisional disposition or property disclosure procedures pursuant to general liens and other claims that have general priority. 例文帳に追加
第五百十五条 特別清算開始の命令があったときは、破産手続開始の申立て、清算株式会社の財産に対する強制執行、仮差押え若しくは仮処分又は財産開示手続（民事執行法（昭和五十四年法律第四号）第百九十七条第一項の申立てによるものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）の申立てはすることができず、破産手続（破産手続開始の決定がされていないものに限る。）、清算株式会社の財産に対して既にされている強制執行、仮差押え及び仮処分の手続並びに財産開示手続は中止する。ただし、一般の先取特権その他一般の優先権がある債権に基づく強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分又は財産開示手続については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
that the registered user has used the trade mark otherwise than in accordance with the agreement under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 49 or in such way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for registration which if accurately represented or disclosed would not have justified the registration of the registered user; (iii) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would not have justified registration of the registered user; (iv) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; 例文帳に追加
すなわち， (i) 登録使用者が，第49条(1)(a)による契約書に従う以外の方法，又は誤認若しくは混同を生じ若しくは生じる虞がある方法によりその商標を使用したこと (ii) 所有者又は商標使用者が，登録申請の重要事項について，真実の表示をし又は開示をしたとすれば登録使用者の登録が当然拒絶されていた筈のところを，不実表示をし，又はそれの開示をしなかったこと (iii) 登録使用者の登録以来状況の変更があり，その登録の取消申請時においてはその登録を正当化できない程になったこと (iv) 登録申請人が当事者になっている契約によりその者に与えられた権利に鑑みて，その登録がされるべきでなかったこと - 特許庁
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) –(a) any subsidiary legislation made under the repealed laws shall in so far as such subsidiary legislation is not inconsistent with the provisionsof this Act continue in force and have effect as if it had been made under this Act and may be repealed, extended, varied or amended accordingly;(b) any appointment made under the repealed laws or subsidiary legislationmade under the repealed laws shall continue in force and have effect asif it had been made under this Act unless the Minister otherwise directs; (c) any registration protected under the repealed laws and in forceimmediately prior to the coming into force of this Act shall, subject to the terms, conditions and the period of validity specified in the registration, continue in force and have the like effect as if it had been effected under this Act, but any extension thereafter shall be in accordance with subsection 50(2).例文帳に追加
(2) (1)に拘らず，次に掲げるとおりとする。(a) 廃止法に基づいて制定された下位法は，本法の規定に反していない限り，効力を継続し，本法に基づいて制定されたものとして効力を有し，かつ，そのようなものとして廃止，延長，変更又は改正することができる。(b) 廃止法又は廃止法に基づいて制定された下位法に基づいてなされた任命は効力を継続し，大臣が別段の指示を行わない限り，本法に基づいてなされたものとしての効力を有する。(c) 廃止法に基づいて保護され，かつ，本法の施行直前に有効であった登録は，当該登録に規定された条件及び有効期限に従うことを条件として，効力を継続し，本法に基づいてなされたものとしての効力を有する。ただし，その後の延長は，第50条(2)に従うものとする。 - 特許庁
Section 1a(1) shall not be effected thereby. Should the patentee or a third party with the consent of patentee put biological material possessing certain characteristics owing to the invention on the market within the territory of a Member State of the European Union or in a contracting state of the European Economic Area Agreement and should further biological material be produced from this biological material by multiplication or propagation, the effects of Section 9 shall not come into force if the propagation of the biological material was the reason why this was put on the market. This shall not apply if the material produced by this means is used thereafter for a further multiplication or propagation. 例文帳に追加
特許所有者又は特許所有者の同意を得た第三者が発明に起因する特定の特性を有する生物学的材料を欧州連合の加盟国又は欧州経済地域協定の締約国の領域内にある市場に投入する場合で，かつ，この生物学的材料から生殖又は繁殖の方法で更なる生物学的材料が生産される場合において，これが市場に投入された理由がその生物学的材料の増殖であるときは，第 9条の効力は生じないものとする。この規定は，この方法によって生産された材料がその後，更なる生殖又は繁殖のために使用される場合は，適用されない。 - 特許庁
Article 7-2 (1) In case any entrepreneur effects an unreasonable restraint of trade or enters into an international agreement or an international contract containing such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade, and such act falls under any of the following items, the Fair Trade Commission shall order the said entrepreneur, pursuant to the procedures as provided for in Section II of Chapter VIII, to pay to the national treasury a surcharge of an amount equivalent to an amount calculated by multiplying the sales amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order (in the case that the said act is pertaining to the receipt of supply of goods or services, the purchase amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order), for the period from the date on which the entrepreneur effected the business activities constituting the said act to the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued (in case such period exceeds three years, the period shall be the three years preceding the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued; hereinafter referred to as "period of implementation") by ten percent (three percent in case of retail business, or two percent in case of wholesale business); provided, however, that in case the amount thus calculated is less than one million yen, the Commission shall not order the payment of such a surcharge. 例文帳に追加
第七条の二 事業者が、不当な取引制限又は不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定若しくは国際的契約で次の各号のいずれかに該当するものをしたときは、公正取引委員会は、第八章第二節に規定する手続に従い、当該事業者に対し、当該行為の実行としての事業活動を行つた日から当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。以下「実行期間」という。）における当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額（当該行為が商品又は役務の供給を受けることに係るものである場合は、当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した購入額）に百分の十（小売業については百分の三、卸売業については百分の二とする。）を乗じて得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。ただし、その額が百万円未満であるときは、その納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 65 (1) The main clause of Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members set forth in Article 56(1) (excluding a general meeting of members which adopts a Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 152(1)) and the provisions of Article 310 (Proxy Voting), and Article 313(1) and (3) (Diverse Exercise of Votes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of voting rights of the members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholders" in Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (excluding members who may not exercise their voting rights on all of the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members)," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 310(2) and (5) to (7) inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 55(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(3) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "the shares" in Article 313(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Equity or Preferred Equity," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第六十五条 会社法第三百条本文（招集手続の省略）の規定は第五十六条第一項の社員総会（第百五十二条第一項に規定する計画変更決議を行う社員総会を除く。）について、同法第三百十条（議決権の代理行使）並びに第三百十三条第一項及び第三項（議決権の不統一行使）の規定は特定目的会社の社員の議決権の行使について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条中「株主」とあるのは「社員（当該社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない社員を除く。）」と、同法第三百十条第二項及び第五項から第七項までの規定中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十五条第三項（資産流動化法第五十六条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）」と、同法第三百十三条第三項中「株式」とあるのは「特定出資又は優先出資」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) A person who wishes to use the invention after the declaration has been recorded shall notify the patentee of his intention. Notification shall be deemed to have been effected if it has been dispatched by registered mail to the person recorded in the Register as patentee or to the registered representative thereof or authorized party for service (Section 25). A statement of how the invention is to be used shall have to be given in the notification. After such notification, the notifying person shall be entitled to use the invention in the manner stated. Said person shall beobliged, at the end of every calendar quarter, to provide the patentee with the particulars of the use that has been made and to pay compensation therefor. If said person fails to meet this obligation in due time, the person recorded in the Register as patentee may grant said notifying person a reasonable extension of time and, if the extension of time expires without result, may prohibit further use of the invention. 例文帳に追加
(3) 宣言が記録された後にその発明を実施することを希望する者は，その意思を特許所有者に通知しなければならない。通知が書留郵便をもって，登録簿に特許所有者として記録されている者又はその登録代理人(以下「登録代理人」と表記する)又は送達に関して委任されている者(第 25条)(以下「送達代理人」と表記する)に発送されたときは，通知が行われたとみなす。通知には，発明の実施方法についての陳述を記載しなければならない。当該通知の後，通知をした者は，陳述した方法で発明を実施することができる。当該人は，各四半期の終了時に，行った実施の明細を特許所有者に提供し，また，それについての補償を支払う義務を負う。当該人がこの義務を適時に履行しないときは，特許所有者として登録簿に記録されている者は，当該通知をした者に対して合理的な延長期間を認めることができ，また，延長期間が成果なく満了したときは，発明のその後の実施を禁止することができる。 - 特許庁
Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3)(hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin" or in the patent bulletin under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加
実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面(同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された考案又は発明(その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。)と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。 - 特許庁
Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加
第八条の三 第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
The Commissioner must cancel the registration of a person as a licensee of a trade mark in the case of registration as a licensee under section 83(1)(a), if the trade mark is no longer registered; or in the case of registration as a licensee under section 83(1)(b), if the application is withdrawn, abandoned, or rejected. The registration of a person as a licensee of a trade mark may be cancelled by the Commissioner if the Commissioner receives no advice within the time specified by the Commissioner that the relationship between the owner and the licensee of the trade mark described in section 83(1) is current; or on the written application in the prescribed manner of the owner or the licensee of the trade mark; or on the written application of any person on any of the following grounds: that the licensee has used the trade mark in a way that is not the permitted use; or deceives or confuses; or is likely to deceive or confuse: that the owner or the licensee misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration: that the registration should not have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which the applicant is interested.例文帳に追加
次に掲げる事情においては，局長は商標についての使用権者としての人の登録を抹消しなければならない。第83条(1)(a)に基づく使用権者としての登録の場合は，その商標がもはや登録されていないとき第83条(1)(b)に基づく使用権者としての登録の場合は，その出願が取り下げられ，放棄され又は拒絶されたとき次に掲げる事情においては，局長は商標についての使用権者としての人の登録を抹消することができる。局長が，第83条(1)に記載されている，商標の所有者と使用権者との間の関係が現存している旨の通知を，局長が指定した期間内に受領しなかったとき，又は商標の所有者又は使用権者からの所定の方法による書面の申請があったとき，又は次に掲げる理由の何れかに基づく何人かの書面による申請があったとき使用権者が商標を次に掲げる形態で使用したこと許可されていない方法，又は誤認又は混同を生じさせる方法，又は誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある方法所有者又は使用権者が登録出願において重大な事実の一部を不実表示したか若しくは開示しなかったこと，又は登録日以来事情が著しく変化していることその履行に申請人が利害関係を有する契約により申請人に付与された権利を考慮したとき，その登録は行われるべきでなかったこと - 特許庁
(3) Among devices disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the Earlier Application or the laying open of the Earlier Application shall be deemed to have been issued or effected at the time when the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the said application for a utility model registration was issued, and the main clause of Article 3-2 of the Utility Model Act or Article 29-2of the Patent Act shall apply. 例文帳に追加
３ 第一項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に記載された考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が第一項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）については、当該実用新案登録出願について実用新案掲載公報の発行がされた時に当該先の出願について実用新案掲載公報の発行又は出願公開がされたものとみなして、第三条の二本文又は同法第二十九条の二本文の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
４ 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 29-2 Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加
第二十九条の二 特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 184-13 For the purpose of the application of Article 29-2, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29-2 is an international patent application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48-3(2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application " under Article 29-2 of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in foreign language under Article 184-4(1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184-4(3) of this Act or Article 48-4(3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184-4(1)of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act." 例文帳に追加
第百八十四条の十三 第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願（第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。）であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加
第三条の二 実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁
Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁
(1) Without affecting the operation of Section 13, the registration of a person as a registered user - (a) may be varied by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, with respect to the goods for which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, the registration has effect; or (b) may be extended by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, for such period not exceeding three years, as the Registrar thinks fit, but such period shall not extend beyond the date of expiration of the current registration of the trade mark; or (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of the registered proprietor or of the registered user; or (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of a person on the ground - (i) that the registered user has used the trade mark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause, or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; or (ii) that the registered proprietor or the registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration; or (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested.例文帳に追加
(1) 第13条の運用に影響を与えることなく，登録使用者としての人の登録は次に掲げることができる。 (a) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，当該登録が効力を有する商品，当該登録が効力を有するための条件又は制約について，変更することができる。又は， (b) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，登録官として適切と考える3年を超えない期間で延長することできるが，その期間は当該商標の現在の登録期間の満了日を超えて延長してはならない。又は (c) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，登録を抹消することができる。又は， (d) 登録官は，次に掲げる理由に基づき，ある者の申請を抹消することができる。 (i) 登録使用者が許可された使用方法以外の方法で，若しくは誤認又は混同を招く，又はそのおそれのある方法で商標を使用したこと，又は， (ii) 登録所有者又は登録使用者が登録出願にとって重要な事実を偽って伝えた又は開示しなかった，若しくは事情が登録の日から著しく変化したこと，又は， (iii) 当該登録は，出願人がその履行に利害関係を有する契約により出願人に付与される権利を考慮して登録は認められるべきではなかったこと - 特許庁
Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) , the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "patent bulletin" or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1) ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という。)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁
For the purpose of the application of Article 29bis, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29bis is an International Patent Application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48ter (2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application" under Article 29bis of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184quater (3) of this Act or Article 48quater (3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184quater (1) of this Act or Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act. 例文帳に追加
第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願(第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。)であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 特許庁
(1) Without prejudice to the provision of section 51 of this Act. the registration of a person as a registered user- (a) may be varied by Registrar as regards the goods or services in respect of which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, if has effect, on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor of the trademark; (b) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor or of the registered user or of any other registered user of the trademark; (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person on any of the following grounds, namely :- (i) that the Registered user has used the trademark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the Registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, which if accurately represented or disclosed would have justified the refusal of the application for registration of the Registered user; (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; (iv) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would have justified the refusal of an application for registration of the registered user; (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar in respect of any goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the trademark is no longer Registered; (e) may be cancelled by the Registrar of his own motion or on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person, on the ground that any stipulation in the agreement between the Registered proprietor and the registered user regarding the quality of the goods or services in relation to which the trademark is to be used is either no being enforced or is not being complied with. 例文帳に追加
(1)本法51条の規定を妨げず、登録使用権者としての登録は次に掲げとおりとする。(a)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者が所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、関連の当該商品若しくは役務について、又はその前提となる条件又は制限が有効であれば当該条件についても変更することができる。(b)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者若しくは登録使用権者又はその他任意の登録使用権者の所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(c)登録官は、次に掲げる理由のいずれかにより、何人であれ所定の方式で書面による請求を行った場合、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(i)登録使用権者が許諾された使用以外の方法で、又は誤認若しくは混同を招くかそのおそれのあるような方法で、当該商標を使用したこと(ii)所有者又は登録使用権者が登録出願にとって重要な事実、それが正確に表明又は開示されていれば当該登録使用権者の登録申請拒絶が正当とされたであろう事実を偽って表明し、又は開示しなかったこと(iii)当該登録は、出願人がその実施に利害を有する契約の観点から当該登録により出願人に付与される権利を考慮すると設定されるべきではなかったこと(iv)出願日であったら登録使用権者の登録を求める出願の拒絶が正当化されていたであろう態様で、登録日以後に事情の変更があったこと(d)登録官は、すでに商標が登録されていない商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき取り消すことができる。(e)登録官は、職権により、又は何人かにより所定の方式で書面の請求があれば、当該商標が使用されるはずの商品若しくは役務の品質に関する登録所有者と登録使用権者間の合意規定が発効していない、又は遵守されていないことを理由として、取り消すことができる。 - 特許庁
Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第三百条の二 金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約（保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等（保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。）、外国保険会社等（同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）又は保険仲立人（同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲立人をいう。）」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人（保険募集人（保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。）を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 (999件) |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
