1016万例文収録!

「不相当」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(10ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > 不相当の意味・解説 > 不相当に関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

不相当の部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 473



例文

第五百十六条 裁判所は、特別清算開始の命令があった場合において、債権者の一般の利益に適合し、かつ、担保権の実行の手続等(清算株式会社の財産につき存する担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産に対して既にされている一般の先取特権その他一般の優先権がある債権に基づく強制執行の手続をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の申立人に当な損害を及ぼすおそれがないものと認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権者若しくは株主の申立てにより又は職権で、相当の期間を定めて、担保権の実行の手続等の中止を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 516 In cases where the court issues an order to commence special liquidation, the court may, in response to a petition by the liquidators, Company Auditors, creditors or shareholders or ex officio, prescribing a reasonable period of time, order the suspension of procedures to enforce a security interest if the court finds that it suits the general interests of the creditors and those who petitioned for the procedures to enforce the security interest (hereinafter in this article referring to procedures to enforce the security interest the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company) are not likely to suffer undue loss.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条 使用者が就業規則の変更により労働条件を変更する場合において、変更後の就業規則を労働者に周知させ、かつ、就業規則の変更が、労働者の受ける利益の程度、労働条件の変更の必要性、変更後の就業規則の内容の相当性、労働組合等との交渉の状況その他の就業規則の変更に係る事情に照らして合理的なものであるときは、労働契約の内容である労働条件は、当該変更後の就業規則に定めるところによるものとする。ただし、労働契約において、労働者及び使用者が就業規則の変更によっては変更されない労働条件として合意していた部分については、第十二条に該当する場合を除き、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 10 In cases where an employer changes the working conditions by changing the rules of employment, if the employer informs the worker of the changed rules of employment, and if the change to the rules of employment is reasonable in light of the extent of the disadvantage to be incurred by the worker, the need for changing the working conditions, the appropriateness of the contents of the changed rules of employment, the status of negotiations with a labor union or the like, or any other circumstances pertaining to the change to the rules of employment, the working conditions that constitute the contents of a labor contract shall be in accordance with such changed rules of employment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to any portion of the labor contract which the worker and the employer had agreed on as being the working conditions that are not to be changed by any change to the rules of employment, except in cases that fall under Article 12.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 第一項の規定による当該共同教育課程を編成する学科に係る大学別専任教員数(前項の規定により当該学科に足する数の専任教員を置くときは、当該専任教員の数を加えた数)が、当該学科の種類に応じ、別表第一イの表の下欄(保健衛生学関係(看護学関係)にあつては、中欄)に定める専任教員の数の八割に相当する数又は別表第一ロの表の収容定員三六〇人までの場合の専任教員数の欄の数(以下これらをこの項において「最小大学別専任教員数」という。)に満たないときは、前二項の規定にかかわらず、当該学科に係る専任教員の数は、最小大学別専任教員数以上とする。例文帳に追加

(3) When the number of full-time teachers of respective university for departments organizing said inter-university curricula prescribed in paragraph (1) (when the deficient number of full-time teachers are appointed to a department as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the number obtained by adding said full-time teachers) does not reach 80% of the number of required full-time teachers prescribed in the right-hand column of table (a) of Appended Table 1 (prescribed in the middle column of the same table, for health-related departments (nursing science-related departments)), or the number indicated in the column of the number of full-time teachers in the case of faculties with admission capacity up to 360 students in table (b) of Appended Table 1 (hereinafter these numbers shall be referred to as the "minimum number of full-time teachers by university" in this paragraph), the number of full-time teachers for said department shall not be below the minimum number of full-time teachers by university.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 指定紛争解決機関は、第一項の申立てを第二項の規定により選任した紛争解決委員(以下この条及び次条第一項において単に「紛争解決委員」という。)による紛争解決手続に付するものとする。ただし、紛争解決委員は、当該申立てに係る当事者である加入銀行の顧客が当該銀行業務関連紛争を適切に解決するに足りる能力を有する者と認められることその他の事由により紛争解決手続を行うのに適当でないと認めるとき、又は当事者が当な目的でみだりに第一項の申立てをしたと認めるときは、紛争解決手続を実施しないものとし、紛争解決委員が当該申立てを受託紛争解決機関における紛争解決手続に相当する手続に付することが適当と認めるときは、指定紛争解決機関は、受託紛争解決機関に紛争解決手続の業務を委託するものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) A Designated Dispute Resolution Organization shall have the application under paragraph (1) proceed into Dispute Resolution Procedures carried out by the Dispute Resolution Mediators appointed under paragraph (2) (hereinafter simply referred to as the "Dispute Resolution Mediators" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article); provided, however, that in cases where the Dispute Resolution Mediators find that it is not appropriate to carry out the Dispute Resolution Procedures on the grounds that it is acceptable to recognize the customer of the Member Bank who is a Party to said application as a person who has sufficient ability to properly resolve the Dispute Related to Banking Services or on any other grounds, or find that the Parties have filed the application under paragraph (1) for improper purposes and without reason, they shall not implement the Dispute Resolution Procedures, and when the Dispute Resolution Mediators find it appropriate to have the application proceed into procedures equivalent to the Dispute Resolution Procedures to be conducted by an Entrusted Dispute Resolution Organization, the Designated Dispute Resolution Organization shall entrust the operations of Dispute Resolution Procedures to an Entrusted Dispute Resolution Organization.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

当初は京阪本線森小路駅(現在の千林駅に相当)から支線を分岐させて、新京阪線上新庄駅予定地から南へ延長した路線に赤川で合流させ、城東線(後の大阪環状線)桜ノ宮駅・天満駅を経由して梅田まで延伸し、同地に総合ターミナル駅を作ろうという構想(天神橋駅開業後に京阪本線は野江駅分岐、新京阪線は天神橋駅からの延伸に計画変更し、1932年に断念、1942年に免許失効。京阪梅田線も参照)を打ち出したが、城東線の高架化が関東大震災復興工事優先投資の方針から遅れることになったため、梅田延伸に関して高架化に伴う跡地の利用を考えていた京阪では、この新線は当面は実現可能と考えて、代替地を探すことにした。例文帳に追加

The initial plan was as follows: bifurcate a feeder line from Morishoji Station on the Keihan Main Line (corresponding to the current Senbayashi Station); at Akagawa, connect it with the line proceeding from the project site of Kami-shinjo Station to the south, and then extend the line to Umeda Station via Sakuranomiya Station and Tenma Station on the Joto Line (later Osaka Loop Line); at Umeda Station, construct a general terminal station (after the inauguration of Tenjinbashi Station; subsequently, the plan was changed to bifurcate the Keihan Main Line at Noe Station and extend the Shinkeihan Line from Tenjinbashi Station, but the plan was abandoned in 1932 and the license lapsed in 1942 (see also the section on the Keihan Umeda Line); however, since the elevation of the Joto Line was postponed due to the investment policy that prioritized the reconstruction of the Great Kanto Earthquake, Keihan, which had anticipated extending the line up to Umeda Station by making use of the site of the Joto Line once it was elevated, decided to look for an alternate site, based on the perspective that this new line project wouldn't be feasible for some time.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス


例文

一点だけ留意しておかなくてはならないのは、こういった中期的な規制の再構築・規制の強化という課題と同時に、今現在、足下で金融市場・金融システムが相当混乱している、そのことが実体経済にも悪影響を及ぼし世界同時況のような様相を呈している、この実体経済の悪化が跳ね返ってまた金融セクターの健全性を損なう、こういった状況にあるのも事実でございますので、中期的な規制の再構築という課題への取組みが、足下におけるこの厳しい状況を更に悪化させるというようなことにならないように、気をつけながら進めていかなくてはいけないと、こういうことかと思います。例文帳に追加

One thing we should keep in mind is that while we face the task of rebuilding the framework of regulation and strengthening regulation in the medium term, the financial markets and the financial system are in a state of great turmoil now, producing a negative impact on the real economy and triggering something like a global recession, and the deterioration of the real economy has in turn undermined the soundness of the financial sector. Therefore, we must tackle the medium-term task of rebuilding the framework of regulation in ways to prevent this effort from leading to further deterioration of the severe situation we face now.  - 金融庁

足利銀行が平成15年11月に債務超過となって一時国有化された時に、ちょうど私はやはり大臣をやっており、鮮明にこのことを覚えているわけですが、その当時は地元ではこれからの地域金融がどうなっていくのか安であったり、大きな課題を抱えていたわけですが、その後足利銀行がこの4年数ヶ月の中で、新経営陣の下で経営に関する計画を策定して、全行員一丸になって、相当給料を減らしたり、ボーナスを返上したり、そしてまた、中小企業に対する非常に丁寧な融資や抜本的な経営改革の推進を行い、経営改善の実現ができたのではないかと思っており、その成果はご案内のとおり、数字にもきちんと表れているところだと思っています。例文帳に追加

When Ashikaga Bank fell into the state of negative net worth and was nationalized in November 2003, I was serving as minister, and I have a vivid memory of that incident. At that time, the people in the bank's service area were worried about the future of financing there and faced a huge challenge. However, Ashikaga Bank has made institution-wide efforts, such as sharply reducing salaries and suspending bonus payments, over the past four years and several months, according to the management plan adopted by the new management team. At the same time, the bank provided loans to small- and medium-size companies in a conscientious manner and implemented drastic management reforms, and I believe that these measures have led to improved management, with the improvement reflected clearly in the bank's financial results.  - 金融庁

(3) 当事者間に契約が存在しない場合,産業財産登録庁は,一方の当事者の書面による請求により,かつ,両当事者を審理した後,実施権者が支払うべき妥当な対価の額を決定するものとし,又はその結果,決定した金額が明らかに適当であることを示す事実が生じた若しくは生じることを知る場合は,当該金額を変更するものとする。また,産業財産登録庁が決定した対価を変更する請求は,以前に対価の額を決定してから1年の期間後に限り実施することができる。対価の額を決定し又は変更する請求は,相当する手数料を納付した場合に限り検討される。例文帳に追加

(3) In the absence of agreement between the parties, the Registry of Industrial Property, at the written request of one of the parties and after having heard both parties, shall fix a reasonable amount for the remuneration to be paid by the licensee or shall modify it if subsequent facts have occurred or have become known which show that the amount fixed is obviously insufficient. Requests for modification of the remuneration fixed by the Registry of Industrial Property may only be made after a period of one year has elapsed since it was previously fixed. Any request to fix or modify the remuneration shall only be taken into consideration if the corresponding fee has been paid. - 特許庁

(1) 本法に従い,裁判所は,服申立人による申立てに基づき,次に掲げる理由により,商標が登録された商品のいずれについても,登録簿からの商標の削除を命ずることができる。 (a) 商標は,登録出願人側の善意で,それらの商品について自らが使用するという意図を持 たず登録された場合、又は,第35条(1)に基づき関係会社もしくは関係登録使用者により登録された場合であって,当該出願の1月より前に,それらの商品に関して登録所有者若しくは当該商標の登録使用者による当該商標に関する善意の使用が相当期間ない場合,又は, (b) 当該出願の1月前まで当該商標が登録商標であった期間が連続3年以上経過しており,その期間それらの商品について,当該商標の登録所有者若しくは登録使用者による善意の使用がない場合例文帳に追加

(1) Subject to this Act, the Court may, on application by a person aggrieved, order that a trade mark be removed from the Register in respect of any of the goods in respect of which it is registered, on the ground - (a) that the trade mark was registered without an intention in good faith on the part of the applicant for registration that it should be used in relation to those goods by him or, if it was registered under Section 35(1) by the corporation or registered user concerned and that there has in fact been no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods by the registered proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark for the time being earlier than one month before the application; or (b) that, up to one month before the application, a continuous period of not less than three years had elapsed during which the trade mark was a registered trade mark and during which there was no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods by the registered proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark for the time being. - 特許庁

例文

4. 組合員が本組合に対する出資の履行を怠った場合、無限責任組合員は、当該出資の履行を怠った組合員以外の組合員に対し、かかる履行のなされた出資金額に相当する分だけ、当該出資の履行を怠った組合員以外の組合員に対し、無限責任組合員からの[ ]日前までの書面による通知に従い、無限責任組合員が指定した日までに、かかる金額を第8 条第3 項から第7 項までの規定に従い按分した額につき、本組合への出資を行うよう求めることができる。但し、各組合員は、自己の出資未履行金額を超えて出資を求められることはないものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) If any Partner fails to make a contribution to the Partnership, the General Partner may require all of the non-defaulting Partners, by giving [__] days prior written notice, to make pro rata contributions of the amount of such unpaid contribution pursuant to the provisions of Article 8(3) to (7) no later than the date designated by the General Partner; provided that no non-defaulting Partner will be required to make contribution that exceeds its Unpaid Capital Commitment.  - 経済産業省

例文

AD協定第8.1条において、価格約束に基づく価格の引き上げに際して、ダンピングマージンに相当する額よりも少ない額の価格の引き上げが国内産業に対する損害を除去するために十分である場合には、当該価格の引き上げの額は、その少ない額であることが望ましいとされている。これは、AD協定第9.1条の"レッサー・デューティー・ルール"と類似のコンセプトであるが、価格約束を対象としたものである。AD措置の目的は、ダンピングによる損害の影響を除去するに限定されるべきであり、損害を除去するために必要な額を超えた価格の引き上げを伴う価格約束は適切であることを問題として提起。例文帳に追加

Article 8.1 stipulates that it would be advisable that the price increase shall be lower than the margin of dumping if such increase is adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. This concept is analogous to thelesser duty ruleof Article 9.1 of the Antidumping Agreement, but applicable, exclusively, to price undertakings. As the objective of such a measure should be limited to eliminating the injurious effect of the dumping, wouldn’t it be inappropriate to have a level of price undertaking that implies a price increase higher than necessary to remove the injury?  - 経済産業省

ロ この法律、担保付社債信託法(明治三十八年法律第五十二号)、金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律(昭和十八年法律第四十三号)、商品取引所法、投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律、宅地建物取引業法(昭和二十七年法律第百七十六号)、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律(昭和二十九年法律第百九十五号)、割賦販売法(昭和三十六年法律第百五十九号)、海外商品市場における先物取引の受託等に関する法律(昭和五十七年法律第六十五号)、貸金業の規制等に関する法律(昭和五十八年法律第三十二号)、特定商品等の預託等取引契約に関する法律(昭和六十一年法律第六十二号)、商品投資に係る事業の規制に関する法律(平成三年法律第六十六号)、動産特定共同事業法、資産の流動化に関する法律、金融業者の貸付業務のための社債の発行等に関する法律(平成十一年法律第三十二号)、信託業法(平成十六年法律第百五十四号)その他政令で定める法律又はこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に違反し、罰金の刑(これに相当する外国の法令による刑を含む。)に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から五年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(b) a person who has been punished by a fine (including a punishment under laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to this) for violating provisions of this Act, the Secured Debenture Trust Act (Act No. 52 of 1905), the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution (Act No. 43 of 1943), the Commodity Exchange Act, the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act (Act No. 176 of 1952), the Act on Regulation of Receiving of Capital Subscription, Deposits, and Interest Rates, etc. (Act No. 195 of 1954), the Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961), the Act on Assumption of Entrustment, etc. of Futures Trading in Foreign Commodities Market (Act No. 65 of 1982), the Act on Controls, etc. on Money Lending (Act No. 32 of 1983), the Act on Deposit, etc. Transaction Agreement of Specified Commodities, etc. (Act No. 62 of 1986), the Act on Regulation of Business Pertaining to Commodity Investment (Act No. 66 of 1991), the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act, the Act on the Securitization of Assets, the Act on Issuance, etc. of Bonds for Financial Corporations' Loan Business (Act No. 32 of 1999), the Trust Business Act (Act No. 154 of 2004), or other Acts specified by a Cabinet Order, or laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to these Acts, and for whom five years have not passed since the day when the execution of the punishment terminated or he/she became free from the execution of the punishment;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

24 法第六十八条の八十九第一項の規定の適用がある場合における法人税法施行令第百五十五条の八の規定の適用については、同条第一項及び第二項中「の額の合計額」とあるのは「の額の合計額(租税特別措置法第六十八条の八十九第一項(連結法人の国外支配株主等に係る負債の利子等の課税の特例)の規定により損金の額に算入されない金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した残額)」と、「第一号に掲げる金額の」とあるのは「第一号に掲げる金額(租税特別措置法第六十八条の八十九第一項の規定により損金の額に算入されない金額がある場合には、租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の百十三第一項第一号(連結法人の国外支配株主等に支払う負債の利子等の損金算入額の計算)(同条第九項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。)に規定する平均負債残高超過額に相当する金額(同条第二項の規定により同条第一項の規定を読み替えて適用する場合にあつては、同条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する同号に規定する総負債平均負債残高超過額に相当する金額)を控除した残額)の」とする。例文帳に追加

(24) With respect to the application of the provisions of Article 155-8 of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act in the case where the provisions of Article 68-89(1) of the Act apply, the term "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities prescribed in the said paragraph to be paid for the relevant business year" in Article 155-8(1) of the said Order shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities prescribed in the said paragraph to be paid for the relevant business year (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-89(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable by Consolidated Corporations to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc.) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such sum shall be the remaining amount after deducting the said amount);" the term "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities that a domestic corporation set forth in the said paragraph pays for the business year set forth in the said paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities that a domestic corporation set forth in the said paragraph pays for the business year set forth in the said paragraph (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-89(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable by Consolidated Corporations to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc.) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such sum shall be the remaining amount after deducting the said amount);" the term "the amount listed in item (i)" in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount listed in item (i) (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-89(1) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the amount equivalent to the amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities prescribed in Article 39-113(1)(i) (Calculation of the Amount of Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable by Consolidated Corporations to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc. to be Excluded from Deductible Expenses) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (including the cases where it is applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (9) of the said Article) (in the case where the provisions of paragraph (1) of the said Article are applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article, after deducting the amount equivalent to the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities prescribed in the said item which is applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article))."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十一条 行政事件訴訟法(昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号)第十二条第四項の規定により同項に規定する特定管轄裁判所に開示決定等の取消しを求める訴訟又は開示決定等に係る服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定の取消しを求める訴訟(次項及び附則第二項において「情報公開訴訟」という。)が提起された場合においては、同法第十二条第五項の規定にかかわらず、他の裁判所に同一又は同種若しくは類似の行政文書に係る開示決定等又はこれに係る服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定に係る抗告訴訟(同法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟をいう。次項において同じ。)が係属しているときは、当該特定管轄裁判所は、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は同法第十二条第一項から第三項までに定める裁判所に移送することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 21 (1) In the case a lawsuit demanding the rescission of a Disclosure Decision, etc. or the rescission of a determination or decision regarding the objection to a Disclosure Decision, etc. (referred to as an "Information Disclosure Lawsuit" in the following paragraph and in paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions) is brought to the court of special jurisdiction prescribed in the provision of Article 12, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962), if, notwithstanding the provision of Article 12, paragraph 5 of the same Act, an appeal lawsuit ( which means an appeal lawsuit prescribed in Article3, paragraph 1 in the same Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph.) against a Disclosure Decision etc. regarding the same, the same type of or similar Administrative Documents or against a determination or decision regarding the objection against such a Disclosure Decision etc., is pending in another court, the said court of special jurisdiction may, when it finds it reasonable in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, the addresses of witnesses who shall be examined, characteristics common to the points at issue or the evidence, and other circumstances, may in response to a petition or on its own authority transfer the whole lawsuit or a part of it to the other court or a court prescribed Article 12, paragraphs 1 to 3 of the same Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七条の二 事業者が、当な取引制限又は当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定若しくは国際的契約で次の各号のいずれかに該当するものをしたときは、公正取引委員会は、第八章第二節に規定する手続に従い、当該事業者に対し、当該行為の実行としての事業活動を行つた日から当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間(当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。以下「実行期間」という。)における当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額(当該行為が商品又は役務の供給を受けることに係るものである場合は、当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した購入額)に百分の十(小売業については百分の三、卸売業については百分の二とする。)を乗じて得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。ただし、その額が百万円未満であるときは、その納付を命ずることができない。例文帳に追加

Article 7-2 (1) In case any entrepreneur effects an unreasonable restraint of trade or enters into an international agreement or an international contract containing such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade, and such act falls under any of the following items, the Fair Trade Commission shall order the said entrepreneur, pursuant to the procedures as provided for in Section II of Chapter VIII, to pay to the national treasury a surcharge of an amount equivalent to an amount calculated by multiplying the sales amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order (in the case that the said act is pertaining to the receipt of supply of goods or services, the purchase amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order), for the period from the date on which the entrepreneur effected the business activities constituting the said act to the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued (in case such period exceeds three years, the period shall be the three years preceding the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued; hereinafter referred to as "period of implementation") by ten percent (three percent in case of retail business, or two percent in case of wholesale business); provided, however, that in case the amount thus calculated is less than one million yen, the Commission shall not order the payment of such a surcharge.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

五 この法律、金融商品取引法、会社法、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律(平成十八年法律第四十八号)、投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律(昭和二十六年法律第百九十八号)、宅地建物取引業法(昭和二十七年法律第百七十六号)、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律(昭和二十九年法律第百九十五号)、割賦販売法(昭和三十六年法律第百五十九号)、貸金業法(昭和五十八年法律第三十二号)、特定商品等の預託等取引契約に関する法律(昭和六十一年法律第六十二号)、商品投資に係る事業の規制に関する法律(平成三年法律第六十六号)、動産特定共同事業法(平成六年法律第七十七号)、金融業者の貸付業務のための社債の発行等に関する法律(平成十一年法律第三十二号)、信託業法、信託法若しくはこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に違反し、又は民事再生法(平成十一年法律第二百二十五号)第二百五十五条、第二百五十六条、第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで若しくは第二百六十二条の罪、外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律(平成十二年法律第百二十九号)第六十五条、第六十六条、第六十八条若しくは第六十九条の罪、破産法(平成十六年法律第七十五号)第二百六十五条、第二百六十六条、第二百六十八条から第二百七十二条まで若しくは第二百七十四条の罪、刑法(明治四十年法律第四十五号)第二百四条、第二百六条、第二百八条、第二百八条の三、第二百二十二条若しくは第二百四十七条の罪、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律(大正十五年法律第六十号)の罪若しくは暴力団員による当な行為の防止等に関する法律(平成三年法律第七十七号)第四十六条、第四十七条、第四十九条若しくは第五十条の罪を犯し、罰金の刑(これに相当する外国の法令による刑を含む。)に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受けることがなくなった日から三年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(v) a person who has been sentenced to a fine (including a punishment under the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent thereto) for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the Companies Act, the Act on General Incorporated Associations and General Incorporated Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006), the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations (Act No. 198 of 1951), the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act (Act No. 176 of 1952), the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates (Act No. 195 of 1954), the Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961), the Money Lending Business Act (Act No. 32 of 1983), the Act on Deposit, etc. Transaction Agreements of Specified Commodities, etc. (Act No. 62 of 1986), the Act on Regulation of Business Pertaining to Commodity Investment (Act No. 66 of 1991), the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act (Act No. 77 of 1994), the Act on Issuance, etc. of Bonds for Financial Corporations' Loan Business (Act No. 32 of 1999), the Trust Business Act, the Trust Act, or the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to these Acts, or for having committed a crime prescribed in Article 255, Article 256, Article 258 to Article 260 inclusive, or Article 262 of the Civil Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 225 of 1999), Article 65, Article 66, Article 68, or Article 69 of the Act on Recognition of and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Procedures (Act No. 129 of 2000), Article 265, Article 266, Article 268 to Article 272 inclusive or Article 274 of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No. 75 of 2004), Article 204, Article 206, Article 208, Article 208-3, Article 222, or Article 247 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), the Act on Punishment of Violent Acts (Act No. 60 of 1926), or Article 46, Article 47, Article 49, or Article 50 of the Act on Prevention of Illegal Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (Act No. 77 of 1991), and for whom three years have yet to elapse since the date on which the execution of the sentence was completed or since the date on which he/she ceased to be subject to the execution of such sentence;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員(平成十五年四月一日から平成十八年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第二項において「特別会員」という。)に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合(当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。)には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用(特定業務に要したものに限る。)の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。例文帳に追加

(2) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2006 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Special Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

30 法第六十六条の五第一項の規定の適用がある場合における法人税法施行令第二十二条の規定の適用については、同条第一項及び第二項中「の額の合計額」とあるのは「の額の合計額(租税特別措置法第六十六条の五第一項(国外支配株主等に係る負債の利子等の課税の特例)の規定により損金の額に算入されない金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した残額)」と、「第一号に掲げる金額の」とあるのは「第一号に掲げる金額(租税特別措置法第六十六条の五第一項の規定により損金の額に算入されない金額がある場合には、租税特別措置法施行令(昭和三十二年政令第四十三号)第三十九条の十三第一項第一号(国外支配株主等に支払う負債の利子等の損金算入額の計算)(同条第九項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。)に規定する平均負債残高超過額に相当する金額(同条第二項の規定により同条第一項の規定を読み替えて適用する場合にあつては、同条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する同号に規定する総負債平均負債残高超過額に相当する金額)を控除した残額)の」と、同条第三項中「合計額(以下」とあるのは「合計額(租税特別措置法第六十六条の五第一項の規定により損金の額に算入されない金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した残額。以下」と、「同条第四項第一号」とあるのは「法第二十三条第四項第一号」とする。例文帳に追加

(30) With respect to the application of the provisions of Article 22 of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act in the case where the provisions of Article 66-5(1) of the Act shall apply, the term "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities prescribed in the said paragraph to be paid for the relevant business year" in Article 22(1) of the said Order shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities prescribed in the said paragraph to be paid for the relevant business year (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-5(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc.) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such sum shall be the remaining amount after deducting the said amount);" the term "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities that a domestic corporation set forth in the said paragraph pays for the business year set forth in the said paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sum of the amount of interest on liabilities that a domestic corporation set forth in the said paragraph pays for the business year set forth in the said paragraph (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-5(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc.) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such sum shall be the remaining amount after deducting the said amount);" the term "the amount listed in item (i)" in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount listed in item (i) (where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-5(1) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, such amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the amount equivalent to the amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities prescribed in Article 39-13(1)(i) (Calculation of the Amount of Interest on Liabilities, etc. Payable to Foreign Controlling Shareholders, etc. to be Excluded from Deductible Expenses) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Cabinet Order No. 43 of 1957) (including the cases where it is applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (9) of the said Article) (in the case where the provisions of paragraph (1) of the said Article are applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article, after deducting the amount equivalent to the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities prescribed in the said item which is applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article));" the term "(hereinafter referred to as the 'sum of" in paragraph (3) of the said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "(where there is any amount that shall not be included in deductible expenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-5(1) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the remaining amount after deducting the said amount; hereinafter referred to as the 'sum of"; and the term "paragraph (4)(i) of the said Article" in the said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 23(4)(i) of the Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第一条の二の十三 政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構(第二百六十五条の三十七第一項に規定する生命保険契約者保護機構をいう。以下この条、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において同じ。)がその会員(平成十五年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第一項において「特定会員」という。)に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合(当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。)には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用(政令で定める業務(次項、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において「特定業務」という。)に要したものに限る。)の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 1-2-13 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (referring to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation set forth in Article 265-37, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereafter in this Article, as well as in the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) by 31 March 2003 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Specified Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the activities to be specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Specified Activities" in the following paragraph, the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) within the amount prescribed by the budget.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十三条 自動車(第三項に規定するものを除く。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の所有者は、当該自動車が最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録(道路運送車両法第四条の規定による自動車登録ファイルへの登録をいう。以下同じ。)を受けるとき(同法第三条に規定する軽自動車(同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車を除く。)にあっては当該自動車が最初の自動車検査証の交付(同法第六十条第一項又は第七十一条第四項の規定による自動車検査証の交付をいう。以下同じ。)を受けるとき、同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車にあっては当該自動車が最初の車両番号の指定(同法第九十七条の三第一項の規定による車両番号の指定をいう。以下同じ。)を受けるとき)までに、当該自動車に係る再資源化等料金(次の表の上欄に掲げる自動車の区分に応じ、それぞれ当該自動車に係る特定再資源化等物品を第二十一条の規定により引き取るべき自動車製造業者等が第三十四条第一項の規定により公表した同表の中欄に掲げる料金(当該自動車製造業者等が存しない場合又は当該自動車製造業者等を確知することができない場合(次項各号において「製造業者存在の場合」という。)にあっては、指定再資源化機関が第百八条第一項の規定により公表した同表の下欄に掲げる料金)をいう。第三項において同じ。)に相当する額の金銭を再資源化等預託金として資金管理法人に対し預託しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 73 (1) The owner of a Vehicle (except for those prescribed in Paragraph 3; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and the next paragraph) shall deposit with the Deposit Management Entity as a Recycling, etc. a deposit in an amount equivalent to the Recycling, etc. Fee for said Vehicle (the fee indicated in the middle column of the following Table made public pursuant to the provisions of Article 34, Paragraph 1 by the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc., which has to collect the Parts Specified for Recycling, etc. relating to said Vehicle pursuant to the classification of the Vehicle indicated in the upper column of the same Table (when there is no Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. or when the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. cannot be notified (referred to in each of the following items as "When There is No Manufacturer"; the same shall apply hereinafter); the fee indicated in the lower column made public by the Designated Recycling Organization as prescribed in Article 108, Paragraph 1); the same shall apply in Paragraph 3) by the time said Vehicle has been first registered in the Vehicle Registration File (referred to as registration in Vehicle Registration File pursuant to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 4; the same shall apply hereinafter), for a light Vehicle prescribed in Article 3 of the same Act (except for Vehicles outside the scope of the inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act) when the initial vehicle inspection certificate for said Vehicle (referred to as a delivery of vehicle inspection certificates provided in Article 60, Paragraph 1 or Article 71, Paragraph 4 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) has been delivered, for light Vehicles which are outside the scope of inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act, when the Vehicle number of the Vehicle has been initially designated (indicated as a designation of Vehicle number as prescribed in Article 97-3, Paragraph 1 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter in Paragraph 3).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

五 この法律、信託法、信託業法、金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律、金融商品取引法、商品取引所法(昭和二十五年法律第二百三十九号)、宅地建物取引業法、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律(昭和二十九年法律第百九十五号)、割賦販売法(昭和三十六年法律第百五十九号)、海外商品市場における先物取引の受託等に関する法律(昭和五十七年法律第六十五号)、貸金業法(昭和五十八年法律第三十二号)、特定商品等の預託等取引契約に関する法律(昭和六十一年法律第六十二号)、商品投資に係る事業の規制に関する法律(平成三年法律第六十六号)、動産特定共同事業法(平成六年法律第七十七号)、資産の流動化に関する法律(平成十年法律第百五号)、金融業者の貸付業務のための社債の発行等に関する法律(平成十一年法律第三十二号)、会社法若しくは一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律(平成十八年法律第四十八号)若しくはこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に違反し、又は民事再生法(平成十一年法律第二百二十五号)第二百五十五条、第二百五十六条、第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで若しくは第二百六十二条の罪、外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律(平成十二年法律第百二十九号)第六十五条、第六十六条、第六十八条若しくは第六十九条の罪、破産法(平成十六年法律第七十五号)第二百六十五条、第二百六十六条、第二百六十八条から第二百七十二条まで若しくは第二百七十四条の罪、刑法(明治四十年法律第四十五号)第二百四条、第二百六条、第二百八条、第二百八条の三、第二百二十二条若しくは第二百四十七条の罪、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律(大正十五年法律第六十号)の罪若しくは暴力団員による当な行為の防止等に関する法律(平成三年法律第七十七号)第四十六条、第四十七条、第四十九条若しくは第五十条の罪を犯し、罰金の刑(これに相当する外国の法令による刑を含む。)に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から五年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(v) A person who has been sentenced to pay a fine (including a punishment under the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent thereto) for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Trust Act, the Trust Business Act, the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the Commodity Exchange Act (Act No. 239 of 1950), the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act, the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits, and Interest Rates, etc. (Act No. 195 of 1954), the Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961), the Act on Assumption of Entrustment, etc. of Futures Trading in the Foreign Commodities Market (Act No.65 of 1982), the Money Lending Business Act (Act No. 32 of 1983), the Act on Deposit, etc. Transaction Agreements of Specified Commodities, etc. (Act No. 62 of 1986), the Act on Regulation of Business Pertaining to Commodity Investment (Act No. 66 of 1991), the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act (Act No. 77 of 1994), the Act on Securitization of Assets (Act No. 105 of 1998), the Act on Issuance, etc. of Bonds for Financial Corporations' Loan Business (Act No. 32 of 1999), the Companies Act, or the Act on General Incorporated Associations and General Incorporated Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006), for having violated the provisions of the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to those Acts, or for having committed a crime prescribed in Article 255, Article 256, Article 258 through Article 260, and Article 262 of the Civil Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 225 of 1999), Article 65, Article 66, Article 68, and Article 69 of the Act on Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Procedures (Act No. 129 of 2000), Article 265, Article 266, Article 268 through Article 272, and Article 274 of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No. 75 of 2004), Article 204, Article 206, Article 208, Article 208-3, Article 222, and Article 247 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), the Act on the Punishment of Violent Acts (Act No. 60 of 1926), Article 46, Article 47, Article 49, and Article 50 of the Act on Prevention of Illegal Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (Act No. 77 of 1991), and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the day on which the execution of sentence was complete or since the sentence has become no longer applicable.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八条の三 第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号(当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。)又は第二号(当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。)の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者(事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。)に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者(次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者(当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)、第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで(表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務)、第三百五十八条(第一項第二号を除く。)(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第三百六十条第一項(株主による取締役の行為の差止め)、第三百六十一条(取締役の報酬等)及び第三百六十五条第二項(競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限)の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS