「Implementation」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(105ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 24 (1) When the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry finds that if specified capital transactions by a resident (meaning capital transactions listed in Article 20, item 2 (including those specified by Cabinet Order as transactions equivalent to item 2 of the said article pursuant to the provision of item 12 of the said article), which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts committed by a person who imports or exports goods directly accompanying the import or export of the goods, or which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts pertaining to the transfer of the mining right, industrial property right or other right equivalent thereto or establishment of the right to use these rights (excluding those specified by Cabinet Order as capital transactions to settle short-term international commercial transactions)), are conducted without any restrictions, it will cause a situation that prevents Japan from sincerely fulfilling obligations under the treaties and other international agreements it has signed or from making its contribution to international efforts for achieving international peace, which will make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this Act, or when a cabinet decision set forth in Article 10, paragraph 1 has been made, he/she may impose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, on a person who intends to commit the specified capital transactions, the obligation to obtain permission for the implementation of the specified capital transactions. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　経済産業大臣は、居住者による特定資本取引（第二十条第二号に掲げる資本取引（同条第十二号の規定により同条第二号に準ずる取引として政令で定めるものを含む。）のうち、貨物を輸出し、又は輸入する者が貨物の輸出又は輸入に直接伴つてする取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの及び鉱業権、工業所有権その他これらに類する権利の移転又はこれらの権利の使用権の設定に係る取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの（短期の国際商業取引の決済のための資本取引として政令で定めるものを除く。）をいう。以下同じ。）が何らの制限なしに行われた場合には、我が国が締結した条約その他の国際約束を誠実に履行することを妨げ、若しくは国際平和のための国際的な努力に我が国として寄与することを妨げることとなる事態を生じ、この法律の目的を達成することが困難になると認めるとき又は第十条第一項の閣議決定が行われたときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該特定資本取引を行おうとする居住者に対し、当該特定資本取引を行うことについて、許可を受ける義務を課することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) In cases where a bank learns that its Capital Adequacy Ratio (which means the Non-Consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratio as prescribed in paragraph (7) of the preceding Article or the Consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratio as prescribed in paragraph (8) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) decreased lower than the range of the Capital Adequacy ratio pertaining to the categories in the tables in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the preceding Article under which said bank or said bank and its subsidiary company, etc. used to fall and submits without delay to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency a plan found to be reasonable to improve the Capital Adequacy Ratio certainly to exceed the range of the Capital Adequacy Ratio pertaining to the category of these tables to which said bank or said bank and its subsidiary, etc. correspond, then, an order in accordance with said category with regard to said bank, shall be an order listed in the category (except for exceptions from categories) in these tables corresponding to which is more than the Capital Adequacy Ratio of said bank or said bank and its subsidiary company, etc. and less than the Capital Adequacy Ratio to be expected after implementation of said plan; provided, however, that in cases where said plan is found to be unreasonable, with regard to said bank, an order pertaining to the categories of these tables to which said bank or said bank and its subsidiary company, etc. correspond shall be prescribed in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第二条　銀行が、その自己資本比率（前条第七項に規定する単体自己資本比率又は同条第八項に規定する連結自己資本比率をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が当該銀行又は当該銀行及びその子会社等が従前に該当していた前条第一項又は第二項の表の区分に係る自己資本比率の範囲を超えて低下したことを知った後、速やかに、その自己資本比率を当該銀行又は当該銀行及びその子会社等が該当するこれらの表の区分に係る自己資本比率の範囲を超えて確実に改善するための合理的と認められる計画を金融庁長官に提出した場合には、当該銀行について、当該区分に応じた命令は、当該銀行又は当該銀行及びその子会社等の自己資本比率以上で当該計画の実施後に見込まれる当該銀行又は当該銀行及びその子会社等の自己資本比率以下の自己資本比率に係るこれらの表の区分（非対象区分を除く。）に掲げる命令とする。ただし、当該計画が合理的でないことが明らかになった場合には、当該銀行について、当該銀行又は当該銀行及びその子会社等が該当するこれらの表の区分に係る命令は、同条第一項又は第二項のとおりとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body issues a certification of construction type (certification of construction type prescribed in Article 38-24 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of a construction type (including the method to verify that each equipment conforms to the type) of specified radio equipment, the provisions of Article 38-25 through Article 38-27, Article 38-28 paragraph (1), Article 38-29 and Article 38-30 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the certification of construction type as a certification of construction type issued by a registered certification body and the person who has obtained the certification of construction type from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a certification of construction type from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" in Article 38-28 paragraph (1) item (v) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　登録外国適合性評価機関が特定無線設備の工事設計（当該工事設計に合致することの確認の方法を含む。）について工事設計認証（電波法第三十八条の二十四第一項に規定する工事設計認証をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該工事設計認証を登録証明機関がした工事設計認証と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による工事設計認証を受けた者を登録証明機関による工事設計認証を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の二十五から第三十八条の二十七まで、第三十八条の二十八第一項、第三十八条の二十九並びに第三十八条の三十第二項及び第三項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の二十八第一項第五号中「登録証明機関」とあるのは、「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

On November 29, 2005 the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare published four notifications and two ministerial ordinances pursuant to Paragraph 3, Article 11, which was newly added to the Food Sanitation Law based on the Law to Partially Amend the Food Sanitation Law (Law No. 55, 2003):- Notification to specify uniform limit (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 497, 2005)- Notification to designate exempted substances (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 498, 2005)- Notification to partially revise the Specifications and Standards for Food, Food Additives, Etc. (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 499, 2005)- Notification to partially revise the Guidelines for the Implementation of Monitoring and Guidance Concerning Food Sanitation (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 495, 2005)- Ordinance to partially revise the Enforcement Regulations under the Food Sanitation Law (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No. 166, 2005)- Ordinance to partially revise the Ministerial Ordinance Concerning Compositional Standards, Etc. for Milk and Milk Products (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No.167, 2005) Notification No. 497 specifies a level as the amount unlikely to cause damage to human health that Paragraph 3, Article 11 of the Food Sanitation Law requires the Minister to set. Hereinafter the level is referred to as “uniform limit.”例文帳に追加

食品衛生法等の一部を改正する法律（平成１５年法律第５５号。以下「一部改正法」という。）による改正後の食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定については、食品衛生法等の一部を改正する法律の一部の施行期日を定める政令（平成１７年政令第３４５号）により、平成１８年５月２９日より施行されることとされたが、これに伴い、食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定により人の健康を損なうおそれのない量として厚生労働大臣が定める量を定める件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９７号。以下「一律基準告示」という。）、食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定により人の健康を損なうおそれのないことが明らかであるものとして厚生労働大臣が定める物質を定める件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９８号。以下「対象外物質告示」という。）、食品、添加物等の規格基準の一部を改正する件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９９号。以下「残留基準等告示」という。）、食品衛生法施行規則の一部を改正する省令（平成１７年厚生労働省令第１６６号）、乳及び乳製品の成分規格等に関する省令の一部を改正する省令（平成１７年厚生労働省令第１６７号）及び食品衛生に関する監視指導の実施に関する指針の一部を改正する件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９５号）が本日公布されたところである。 - 厚生労働省

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 31 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 86 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act as a person to approve conformity with the technical standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 52 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity approval (technical standards conformity approval prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) in respect of the terminal equipment (terminal equipment prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act, provided that such terminal equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (2), Article 54, Article 55 paragraph (1), Article 62 paragraph (1), Article 166 paragraph (2) and Article 167 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity approval as a technical standards conformity approval issued by a registered approval body (registered approval body prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity approval from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity approval from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 53 paragraph (2) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十一条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電気通信事業法第五十二条第一項の総務省令で定める技術基準に適合している旨の認定を行う者として同法第八十六条第一項の総務省令で定める事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が端末機器（同法第五十三条第一項に規定する端末機器をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合認定（同条第一項に規定する技術基準適合認定をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合認定を登録認定機関（同条第一項に規定する登録認定機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合認定と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者を登録認定機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十三条第二項、第五十四条、第五十五条第一項、第六十二条第一項、第百六十六条第二項並びに第百六十七条第一項、第二項及び第五項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第五十三条第二項中「登録認定機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business listed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act as a person to certify that radio equipment conforms to the technical standards prescribed in Chapter III of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity certification (technical standards conformity certification prescribed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of the specified radio equipment (specified radio equipment prescribed in the same paragraph, provided that such radio equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 38-7 paragraph (1), Article 38-20 paragraph (1), Article 38-21 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 38-22 paragraph (1), Article 38-23 paragraph (1) and Article 38-30 paragraph (1) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity certification as a technical standards conformity certification issued by a registered certification body (registered certification body prescribed in Article 38-5 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity certification from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity certification from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 38-7 paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十三条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電波法第三章に定める技術基準に適合している旨の証明を行う者として同法第三十八条の二第一項に掲げる事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が特定無線設備（同項に規定する特定無線設備をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合証明（同法第三十八条の二第一項に規定する技術基準適合証明をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合証明を登録証明機関（同法第三十八条の五第一項に規定する登録証明機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合証明と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者を登録証明機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の七第一項、第三十八条の二十第一項、第三十八条の二十一第一項及び第二項、第三十八条の二十二第一項、第三十八条の二十三第一項並びに第三十八条の三十第一項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の七第一項中「登録証明機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of paragraphs (1), (3) and (4) of Article 16, paragraph (1) of Article 19, paragraph (1) of Article 20 and Article 21 of the Act of Extradition shall be applied mutatis mutandis to the implementation of extradition pursuant to the order provided for in paragraph (1) above. The following terms shall be deemed to be replaced as follows: "the order of surrender provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 14" in paragraph (1) of Article 16 in the same act and the "direction for surrender of a fugitive as provided for in paragraph (1) or (5) of Article 17" in paragraph (1) of Article 20 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the order provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the full name of the fugitive, the name of the offense for which extradition is requested, the name of the requesting state, the place of surrender, the time limit of surrender and the date of issue" in paragraph (4) of Article 16 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the full name and age of the incoming sentenced person as defined in item (ix) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "incoming sentenced person"), the name of the sentencing state as defined in item (vii) of Article 2 of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"), the name of the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in item (xi) of Article 2 of the same act, the term of the foreign punishment imposed, and the date and place of surrender"; "paragraph (3) of Article 16" in paragraph (1) of Article 19 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (3) of Article 16 of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the requesting state" in paragraph (1) of Article 19, paragraph (1) of Article 20, and Article 21 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sentencing state"; "the fugitive" in paragraph (1) of Article 20 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the incoming sentenced person"; "paragraph (1) of Article 20" and "the fugitive" in Article 21 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 20 of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 39 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons" and the "incoming sentenced person", respectively. 例文帳に追加

４　逃亡犯罪人引渡法第十六条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項並びに第二十一条の規定は、第一項の命令により送還をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第十六条第一項中「第十四条第一項の規定による引渡の命令」とあり、及び同法第二十条第一項中「第十七条第一項又は第五項の規定による逃亡犯罪人の引渡の指揮」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第一項の命令」と、同法第十六条第四項中「逃亡犯罪人の氏名、引渡犯罪名、請求国の名称、引渡の場所、引渡の期限及び発付の年月日」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第九号の受入受刑者（以下「受入受刑者」という。）の氏名、年齢、同法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）の名称、同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪の名称、同法第二条第一号の外国刑の刑期、引渡日及び引渡しの場所」と、同法第十九条第一項中「第十六条第三項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第四項の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第十六条第三項」と、同法第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項及び第二十一条中「請求国」とあるのは「裁判国」と、同法第二十条第一項中「示して逃亡犯罪人の」とあるのは「示して受入受刑者の」と、「逃亡犯罪人を」とあるのは「受入受刑者を」と、同法第二十一条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十九条第四項の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第二十条第一項」と、「逃亡犯罪人」とあるのは「受入受刑者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3). 例文帳に追加

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council reported in response to the Minister's consultation by approving the proposed standard limits (February 24, 2012) <<Public announcement of survey results>> (10 most recent data announced)[332rd announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; results of measurements subsidized by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant; Hokkaido, Aomori Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Saitama Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Niigata Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Kyoto Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Hyogo Prefecture, Shimane Prefecture, Tokushima Prefecture, Ehime Prefecture, Kochi Prefecture, Yokohama-shi (city), Fujisawa-shi (city), Kanazawa-shi (city), Shizuoka-shi (city), Koto-ku (ward)/Tokyo, and Minato-ku (ward)/Tokyo (February 24, 2012) [333rd announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Aomori-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Sagamihara-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Shizuoka Prefecture, Shiga Prefecture, Kyoto-shi (city), Tokushima Prefecture, and Ehime Prefecture (February 27, 2012) [334th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Sapporo-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Toshima-ku (ward)/Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokosuka-shi (city), Fujisawa-shi (city), ― 45 ―Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Otsu-shi (city), Kyoto-shi (city), and Osaka Prefecture (February 28, 2012)[335th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Aomori Prefecture, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwaki-shi (city), Gunma Prefecture, Kashiwa-shi (city), Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Nagano Prefecture, Yamanashi Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Nagoya-shi (city), Osaka-shi (city), Kobe-shi (city), Tottori Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (February 29, 2012)[336th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Toyama Prefecture, Shizuoka Prefecture, Hamamatsu-shi (city), and Kyoto-shi (city) (March 1, 2012)[337th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Iwate Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Kawasaki-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Himeji-shi (city), Tottori Prefecture and Tokushima Prefecture (March 2, 2012)[338th announcement] Sapporo-shi (city), Iwate Prefecture, Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Minato-ku (ward)/Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokohama-shi (city), Sagamihara-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Hyogo Prefecture, Tottori Prefecture, Shimane Prefecture, and Ehime Prefecture (March 5, 2012) [339th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Yamagata Prefecture, Gunma Prefecture, Saitama-shi (city), Chiba Prefecture, Yokosuka-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Kanazawa-shi (city), Nagano Prefecture, Nagoya-shi (city), Kyoto-shi (city), Osaka Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (March 6, 2012) [340th announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Hokkaido, Iwate Prefecture, Akita Prefecture, Miyagi Prefecture, Yamagata Prefecture, Iwaki-shi (city), Gunma Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Tokyo, Kanagawa Prefecture, Fujisawa-shi (city), Niigata Prefecture, Niigata-shi (city), Kanazawa-shi (city), Shizuoka Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Osaka-shi (city), and Tottori Prefecture (March7, 2012)[341st announcement] The results of emergency monitoring surveys conducted in Fukushima Prefecture; Sendai-shi (city), Yamagata Prefecture, Ibaraki Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Niigata Prefecture, Niigata-shi (city), Yamanashi Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, Tottori Prefecture, and Shimane Prefecture (March 8, 2012)【The implementation status of surveys】 121,415 survey cases, out of which 1,168 cases exceeded the provisional regulation values (as of March 8, 2012)例文帳に追加

薬事食品衛生審議会から、基準値案を了承する答申（平成24年2月24日）≪検査結果の公表≫ （直近発表過去10回分）［第332報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、厚生労働科学研究費補助金による測定結果、北海道、青森県、秋田県、山形県、岩手県、宮城県、栃木県、群馬県、茨城県、千葉県、埼玉県、東京都、神奈川県、新潟県、愛知県、京都府、大阪府、兵庫県、島根県、徳島県、愛媛県、高知県、横浜市、藤沢市、金沢市、静岡市、江東区、港区（平成24年2月24日）［第333報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、青森市、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、千葉県、神奈川県、相模原市、新潟県、静岡県、滋賀県、京都市、徳島県、愛媛県（平成24年2月27日）［第334報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、札幌市、岩手県、秋田県、宮城県、茨城県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、豊島区、神奈川県、横須賀市、藤沢市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、大津市、京都市、大阪府（平成24年2月28日）［第335報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、青森県、岩手県、宮城県、山形県、いわき市、群馬県、柏市、東京都、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、長野県、山梨県、愛知県、名古屋市、大阪市、神戸市、鳥取県、島根県（平成24年2月29日）［第336報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、富山県、静岡県、浜松市、京都市（平成24年3月1日）［第337報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、岩手県、宮城県、山形県、茨城県、栃木県、群馬県、埼玉県、千葉県、東京都、神奈川県、川崎市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、姫路市、鳥取県、徳島県（平成24年3月2日）［第338報］札幌市、岩手県、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、群馬県、港区、神奈川県、横浜市、相模原市、新潟県、兵庫県、鳥取県、島根県、愛媛県（平成24年3月5日）［第339報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、山形県、群馬県、さいたま市、千葉県、横須賀市、新潟県、金沢市、長野県、名古屋市、京都市、大阪府、島根県（平成24年3月6日）［第340報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、北海道、岩手県、秋田県、宮城県、山形県、いわき市、群馬県、千葉県、東京都、神奈川県、藤沢市、新潟県、新潟市、金沢市、静岡県、愛知県、大阪府、大阪市、鳥取県（平成24年3月7日）［第341報］福島県での緊急モニタリング結果、仙台市、山形県、茨城県、神奈川県、新潟県、新潟市、山梨県、大阪府、鳥取県、島根県（平成24年3月8日）【検査実施状況】検査件数121,415件、うち暫定規制値超過1,168件（平成24年3月8日現在） - 厚生労働省