「purchased」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(52ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Concretely, when a commodity related to commodity information is purchased after outputting and displaying this commodity information to a user as a result of collation of the output history of commodity information stored as log information with the purchase history corresponding thereto by the store server device, it can be analogized that this commodity information contributed to the user's purchasing action, and the usefulness thereof can be verified as the effect of the commodity information.例文帳に追加

具体的には、店舗サーバ装置は、ログ情報として格納された商品情報の出力履歴とそれに対応する購入履歴とを照合して、その結果、例えば、商品情報が利用者に出力表示された後に、その商品情報にかかる商品が購入されていれば、商品情報が利用者の購入行動に寄与したものと類推することができ、商品情報の効果として、その有益性を検証することができる。 - 特許庁

The system comprises a storage device 5 holding a own company's store database 12 including store location information and repairable article information; a user database 13 including user location information and user purchased article information; a maintenance database 14 with seasonal index data, indicating the quantity of maintenance requests for each article at each season in a year described therein; output devices 8a, 8b; and an arithmetic unit 9.例文帳に追加

販売店所在情報と販売店で修理可能な商品情報を含む自社販売店データベース１２と、ユーザ所在情報とユーザ購入商品情報を含むユーザデータベース１３と、年間の各時期における各商品に対するメンテナンス需要の多さを示す季節指数データが記述されているメンテナンスデータベース１４とを保持する記憶装置５と、出力装置８ａ、８ｂと、演算装置９とを備えている。 - 特許庁

A judicial precedent exists on point. The case involved a consumer who purchased an item from a tenant shop in a supermarket. The court ruled that since the supermarket fostered an appearance that the shop was operated by the supermarket, by concluding a tenancy agreement with the shop, the company operating the supermarket was as legally responsible as a person who permits another person to use his name, by the analogical application mutatis mutandis of Article 14 of the Commercial Code (Judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan, 1st Petty Bench, November 30, 1995, p.2972 of Minshu Vol.49-9). 例文帳に追加

この点、参考となる裁判例として、スーパーマーケットに出店しているテナントと買物客との取引に関して、出店契約を締結することにより営業主体がスーパーマーケットであると誤認するのもやむを得ない外観を作出したことに関与したという理由から、商法第１４条の類推適用により、スーパーマーケットの経営会社が名板貸人と同様の責任を負うとしたものがある（最高裁平成７年１１月３０日第一小法廷判決・民集４９巻９号２９７２頁）。 - 経済産業省

Firstly, under special circumstances, the cybermall operator may be liable for tort and/or for breach of duty of care regarding customers (breach of contractual obligations which derives from the cybermall service agreement). A typical example is in the case where the cybermall operator is aware of the frequent occurrence of serious accidents arising from defective products sold by the cyber shop. Yet it unreasonably neglects the issue for a long time, and consequently a customer who purchased the same products incurs damages arising from similar accidents. 例文帳に追加

第一に、重大な製品事故の発生が多数確認されている商品の販売が店舗でなされていることをモール運営者が知りつつ、合理的期間を超えて放置した結果、当該店舗から当該商品を購入したモール利用者に同種の製品事故による損害が発生した場合のような特段の事情がある場合には、不法行為責任又はモール利用者に対する注意義務違反（モール利用契約に付随する義務違反）に基づく責任を問われる可能性がある。 - 経済産業省

How the parties actually intended to conclude the agreement, either by method (i) or (ii), will be determined according to various factors including general knowledge on transactions in information property (for example, was the buyer aware that the packaged software he purchased could not legally be used absent his consent to the license agreement?). However, the intention of the parties will likely be interpreted as concluding the Primary Agreement (ii), if the necessity to conclude a license agreement is clearly stated on the outside of the medium package in a form easily identifiable to the user or if the store has verbally explained the need to conclude the license agreement. 例文帳に追加

①と②のどちらの契約と解されるかは、情報財取引に関する一般的な認識等様々な事情（例えば、購入の対象であるパッケージソフトウェアはライセンス契約を締結しないと使用できないことについての購入者の認識等）を総合考慮して決定されるものであるが、少なくとも、ユーザーが通常認識し得るような形態で媒体の外箱（パッケージ）にライセンス契約締結の必要性が明示されている場合や、販売店がライセンス契約締結の必要性について口頭で説明している場合であれば、②の提供契約と解される可能性が高い。 - 経済産業省

It is not reasonable that the product cannot be returned simply because the package states that the product is non-returnable. Instead, the user cannot return a product only when he specifically agreed to the non-returnable clause; e.g., he purchased the product after agreeing to the non-returnable clause which the store explained to him verbally and explicitly or indicated such clause which was plainly visible outside of the product package. 例文帳に追加

単に返品不可の特約が明示されていることのみを理由として返品を認めないと解することは相当でなく、不同意の場合であっても返品できないことについて個別同意があったと認められる場合、例えば、返品ができない旨が販売店から口頭で説明されたり、媒体の外箱に明らかに認識できるような形態で明示されていた場合において、これに同意の上、代金を支払った場合に限り、ライセンス契約に不同意であることを理由として返品することができないものと解される。 - 経済産業省

Angel taxation in Japan, however, is only used for a small amount of investment. In 2006, the favorable tax treatment only applied to angel investments of a little less than 1,300 million yen. Even in 2005, when the all-time record was set, it failed to reach 2,500 million yen. Especially, recent records show investments the angel taxation appears to fluctuate just in line with changes in prices in the stock market. The linkage is believed to take place because the treatment of investment being deterred for the year when the equities are purchased (mentioned above in (a)) is linked to gains realized in the year from sale of stocks. 例文帳に追加

しかしながら、日本のエンジェル税制の利用状況は低調にとどまっている。本税制を利用したエンジェル投資は１８年度１３億円弱にとどまっており、過去最高を記録した平成１７年度においても２５億円弱に過ぎない。特に近年のエンジェル税制の利用実績を見ると、株式市場の株価動向に連動した動きを見せているが、これは、投資時点の投資額繰延措置（上記a））が当該年の株式譲渡益額とリンクしているためと考えられる。 - 経済産業省

In order to further facilitate the protection of receivables and financing by building subcontractors, etc., factoring companies were requested to actively fulfill their guarantee obligations under the Subcontracting Receivables Protection Support Program, whose purpose is to assist the protection of receivables held by building subcontractors and similar enterprises. Receivables for construction work in the affected regions and the removal of waste caused by the disaster (disposal of debris, etc.) were also freshly purchased, and receivables for removal of waste caused by the disaster in affected areas and for hire purchase, lease, and rental of construction machinery were added to the scope of protection. 例文帳に追加

下請建設企業等の債権保全及び資金調達の円滑化を一層図るため、下請建設企業等の有する債権の保全を促進する下請債権保全支援事業について、ファクタリング会社に対し保証債務の履行の積極対応を要請する一方、被災地における工事及び災害廃棄物の撤去等（がれきの処理等）に係る債権の買取りを新たに実施するとともに、被災地域における災害廃棄物の撤去等及び建設機械の割賦販売・リース・レンタルに係る債権を保証対象に追加した。 - 経済産業省

We agree and consider products “DRC conflict free” if, when the conflict minerals contained in those products are purchased and transported through the supply chain from the mine to the issuer, those conflict minerals do not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries, even if some point in that supply chain subsequently becomes controlled by an armed group.例文帳に追加

我々は、たとえ後にそのサプライチェーンのどこかが武装集団の支配下に入ったとしても、製品に含まれる紛争鉱物が鉱山から発行人までのサプラインチェーンを通して購入および輸送されたときに、それらの紛争鉱物が対象国における武装集団の直接間接の資金源になっていない、またはこれらに利益をもたらすものでないならば、それらの製品は「DRCコンフリクト・フリー」であるということに同意する。 - 経済産業省

Regarding the background for this statistical incongruity, BIS points out that (1) data provided by countries accepting capital do not include offshore trading, and accordingly, external assets purchased by OPEC countries tend to be underestimated, (2)mutual external investment among oil producing countries has become active, and (3) part of oil money may have flowed into hedge funds, etc. which have played an important role in international capital movement in recent years but for which information disclosure to investment customers is not obligatory.例文帳に追加

こうした統計上の不整合の背景について、BISでは、①受入国側のデータではオフショアでの取引が含まれておらず、OPEC諸国の購入した対外資産が過小評価される傾向があること、②産油国における相互の対外投資が活発化していること、③近年、国際資本移動において重要な役割を果たしている一方で、投資顧客に関する情報開示義務のないヘッジファンド等にオイルマネーの一部が流れている可能性があること、を指摘している。 - 経済産業省

But a range of problems exist regarding the disposal of nonperforming loans using AMCs. First, moral hazard may occur among the state-owned commercial banks or state-owned business corporations if the management’s responsibility is not fully pursued for the business slump. Secondly, some AMCs are seen to have trouble sufficiently recovering cash from the bad loans they have purchased, although the disposal of such loans has been halfway through at the commercial banks. The third problem is that although AMCs must have been in the red with their Debt-Equity Swap (DES) making little headway, which parties would finally shoulder the bad loans is not clarified.例文帳に追加

しかしながら、AMCによる不良債権の処理については、①十分な経営責任の追及がなされない場合、国有商業銀行及び国有企業のモラルハザードを助長するおそれがあること、②不良債権処理が約半分程度進む中で、現金回収率の低いAMCが見られること、③債務の株式化（DES、Debt Equity Swap）がうまくいかずAMC自体が赤字化している可能性が高い中、最終的な負担者が明らかにされていないこと、等の問題点が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省

(5) The normal profit margin specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-88(2)(i)(b) of the Act shall be the ratio of the amount of gross profits gained by a person who purchased the same or similar inventory assets as those for a foreign affiliated transaction prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "foreign affiliated transaction" in this Article) from a person who is not in a special relationship (meaning a special relationship prescribed in the said paragraph) (hereinafter such person who is not in such special relationship shall be referred to as a "non-affiliated person" through to paragraph (7) and such person who purchased such inventory assets shall be referred to as a "reseller" in this paragraph and paragraph (7)(ii)) through a transaction to sell the said same or similar inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this paragraph) (such gross profits shall mean the amount obtained by deducting the sum of the costs of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction from the total revenue arising from the sale of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction) against the sum of the said revenue; provided, however, that where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a comparison purpose transaction and a transaction in which the purchasing side of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction sold the inventory assets to a non-affiliated person, such normal profit margin shall be the ratio after making the necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity. 例文帳に追加

５　法第六十八条の八十八第二項第一号ロに規定する政令で定める通常の利益率は、同条第一項に規定する国外関連取引（以下この条において「国外関連取引」という。）に係る棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を、特殊の関係（同項に規定する特殊の関係をいう。）にない者（以下第七項までにおいて「非関連者」という。）から購入した者（以下この項及び第七項第二号において「再販売者」という。）が当該同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この項において「比較対象取引」という。）に係る当該再販売者の売上総利益の額（当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の販売による収入金額の合計額から当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の原価の額の合計額を控除した金額をいう。）の当該収入金額の合計額に対する割合とする。ただし、比較対象取引と当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が当該棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The purchase under the preceding paragraph shall be made in such a way that the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. under the preceding paragraph is purchased based on the request of the creditor pertaining to the Right to Insurance Claim, etc., within the period during which all payments pertaining to the insurance contract are suspended, at the amount of the insurance claim of the Covered Insurance Contract and of other benefits, multiplied by the rate specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance by taking into consideration what is the kind of that Covered Insurance Contract, the expected interest rate, other content, the time when the insured event pertaining to that request took place, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase Amount"); provided, however, that the Participating Corporation shall, in the case that it called for the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. pertaining to the purchase and when the amount which was collected from the calling deducted by the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance as the cost of said purchase exceeds the Purchase Amount pertaining to said purchase, pay this excess amount to the creditor pertaining to said Right to Insurance Claim, etc. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の買取りは、保険契約に係る支払のすべてを停止している期間内に、前項の保険金請求権等を、その保険金請求権等に係る債権者の請求に基づいて、補償対象契約の保険金その他の給付金の額に当該補償対象契約の種類、予定利率その他の内容、当該請求に係る保険事故が発生した時期等を勘案して内閣府令・財務省令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下「買取額」という。）で買い取ることにより行うものとする。ただし、加入機構は、その買取りに係る保険金請求権等の回収をした場合において、当該回収によって得た金額から当該買取りに要した費用として内閣府令・財務省令で定めるものの額を控除した金額が、当該買取りに係る買取額を超えるときは、その超える部分の金額を当該保険金請求権等に係る債権者に対して支払うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-3 The Corporation may conclude with a bank whose purposes include the management and disposition of assets purchased from a Bankrupt Insurance Company, etc. (referring to the Bankrupt Insurance Company set forth in Article 260, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in Article 1-3 of the Supplementary Provisions), Succeeding Insurance Company (referring to the Succeeding Insurance Company set forth in Article 260, paragraph (6)) or Liquidating Insurance Company (referring to the Liquidating Insurance Company set forth in Article 265-28, paragraph (2), item (iii); the same shall apply in Article 1-2-5, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Supplementary Provisions); the same shall apply in Article 1-2-5, paragraph (4) and Article 1-2-7, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions) (hereinafter referred to as "Asset Management and Collection Business") an agreement regarding the Asset Management and Collection Business (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"), and conduct the following activities to implement the Agreement: 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の三　機構は、破綻保険会社等（破綻保険会社（第二百六十条第二項に規定する破綻保険会社をいう。附則第一条の三において同じ。）、承継保険会社（第二百六十条第六項に規定する承継保険会社をいう。）又は清算保険会社（第二百六十五条の二十八第二項第三号に規定する清算保険会社をいう。附則第一条の二の五第一項第三号において同じ。）をいう。同条第四項及び附則第一条の二の七第一項において同じ。）から買い取った資産の管理及び処分を行うこと（以下「資産管理回収業務」という。）を目的の一つとする一の銀行と資産管理回収業務に関する協定（以下「協定」という。）を締結し、並びに当該協定を実施するため、次に掲げる業務を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-3 (1) The person who is required under the main clause of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article to make Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. by means of Tender Offer provided for by Article 27-2(1) (hereinafter referred to as the "Tender Offer" in this Section) shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, make a public notice of the purpose of the Tender Offer, the price for Purchase, etc., the Number of Share Certificates, etc. Planned to be Purchased (meaning the number of shares in the case of share certificates, or the number of shares calculated by converting Securities other than share certificates into shares pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance in the case of Securities other than share certificates; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), the period of Purchase, etc. and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the Tender Offer. In this case, when the period of Purchase, etc. is shorter than the period specified by a Cabinet Order, to the effect that the period of Purchase, etc. may be extended under Article 27-10(3) shall be clearly indicated in the public notice. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の三　前条第一項本文の規定により同項に規定する公開買付け（以下この節において「公開買付け」という。）によつて株券等の買付け等を行わなければならない者は、政令で定めるところにより、当該公開買付けについて、その目的、買付け等の価格、買付予定の株券等の数（株券については株式の数を、その他のものについては内閣府令で定めるところにより株式に換算した数をいう。以下この節において同じ。）、買付け等の期間その他の内閣府令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。この場合において、当該買付け等の期間が政令で定める期間より短いときは、第二十七条の十第三項の規定により当該買付け等の期間が延長されることがある旨を当該公告において明示しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In this case involving the Ashikaga Bank, the scheme for special crisis management was implemented, also under the Deposit Insurance Act, and all deposits were protected in full as a result. The total amount of deposits was, if my memory is correct, 4 trillion yen in the case of the Ashikaga Bank, while it is 400 billion yen – one tenth, that is – in the case before us of the Incubator Bank. In that sense, what caused the failure of the Incubator Bank of Japan is the very skewed makeup of the borrowers of the bank, as I have just mentioned. While the total deposits (of the Incubator Bank of Japan) amount to a little more than 400 billion yen and consist of approximately 29,000 accounts, over 80 percent of them, or approximately 350 billion yen, were concentrated with 120 companies belonging to its network of relationships, as it were. Its purchases of loan claims from money lending businesses in recent years were also among the causes, as you must know well. Additionally, the Bank allegedly purchased claims from businesses like SFCG, which was formerly known as Shoko Fund. 例文帳に追加

これは、確か預入金額も、足利銀行の場合は4兆円、この振興銀行の場合は4,000億円でございまして10分の1でございますから、そういった意味でも、今般、日本振興銀行が経営破綻した原因は、今さっき申し上げましたように、（日本振興銀行の）全預金額が4,000億円ちょっと、預金件数は2万9,000件ぐらいだったと思いますが、そのうち80％強、3,500億円程度を120社のネットワーク企業と申しますか、そういった方に非常に不自然に集中していたことや、近年貸金業者からの債権買取りもあったということは、皆様方、よくご存じだと思いますし、それからまた、SFCG、旧商工ファンドでございますけれども、そういったところからも債権を買い取っておられたというとこでございました。 - 金融庁

Before each shipment of any quantity of a product manufactured under an authorization, the holder of the authorization must, within fifteen days before the product is exported, provide to each of the following a notice, by certified or registered mail, specifying the quantity to be exported, as well as every known party that will be handling the product while it is in transit from Canada to the country or WTO Member to which it is to be exported: (a) the patentee or each of the patentees, as the case may be; (b) the country or WTO Member named in the authorization; and (c) the person or entity that purchased the product to which the authorization relates. 例文帳に追加

許可に基づいて製造された各製品の出荷の前に，許可の所有者は，製品が輸出される前15日以内に，次に掲げる者の各々に，輸出される数量を指定する配達証明郵便又は書留郵便で通知を提供しなければならず，また，当該製品がカナダから輸出先である国又は世界貿易機関加盟国へ移送される間に当該製品を取り扱う予定の既知のすべての当事者にも併せて通知しなければならない: (a) 特許権者又は場合により各特許権者 (b) 許可に指定された国又は世界貿易機関加盟国 (c) 許可が係わる製品を購入した人又は団体 - 特許庁

Specifically, there seem to be three such stages: (i) the domestic professional and business services industry has not yet matured, so service functions are handled internally or services are not used (“internal creation stage”); (ii) the professional and business services industry has developed, and some internal services functions are outsourced domestically or services functions that had not existed are purchased from the professional and business services industry (“domestic outsourcing stage”); (iii) the professional and business services industry has matured and become saturated, foreign direct investment has progressed, and service functions are procured offshore from affiliates and other businesses (“offshore outsourcing stage,” competition in the domestic professional and business services industry progresses during this stage).例文帳に追加

すなわち、①国内の対事業所サービス業が未熟なため、サービス機能を事業所で内生するか、またはサービスが利用されていない段階（「内生段階」）、②対事業所サービス業が発展し、事業所が内部のサービス機能の一部を国内でアウトソーシングするか、これまで有していなかったサービス機能を対事業所サービス業から購入する段階（「国内アウトソーシング段階」）、③さらに、対事業所サービス業が成熟化・飽和化していくとともに、対外直接投資が進み、サービス機能を関連会社も含めて海外から調達するようになる段階（「オフショア・アウトソーシング段階」、この段階では国内の対事業所サービス業では競合が進む。）という３段階を考えることができる。 - 経済産業省

Similarly, any of the following acts on its own will not be sufficient to serve as a basis for the operator's liability, because the operator does not give any opinion on the quality of the products in the following cases: (i) to indicate that "this product sells well"; (ii) simply to indicate the "ranking" such as the "top 3 for the former half of this year" of products or cyber shops, based on the data, such as the sum of sales proceeds or a popularity votes from customers; or (iii) simply to show a customer the products relating to his/her preference and/or products which he/she has purchased based on the total purchase transactions records, etc. without stating the operator's opinions on their quality. 例文帳に追加

同様に、よく売れている商品に「売れ筋」と表示すること、売上高やモール利用者による人気投票結果等のデータに基づいた商品や店舗の「ランキング」、「上半期ベスト３」などを単に表示すること、モール利用者の購買履歴等に基づき、個々のモール利用者に対して、当該モール利用者の嗜好や購入商品等に関連する商品等を当該商品の品質等に関する判断を含まない形で単に表示することも、そのことのみでは商品等の品質等に関してモール運営者の判断を示すものではなく、上記の責任を基礎づけるものではないと考えられる。 - 経済産業省

(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, a Limited Partner shall be prohibited from transferring its status as a Partner that it has acquired or purchased to any Disqualified Investor. In respect of a status as a Partner acquired upon its issuance by a Limited Partner which is a Qualified Institutional Investor, such Limited Partner and any successor to such Limited Partner’s status as a Partner shall be prohibited from transferring its status as a Partner to any person other than a Qualified Institutional Investor. In respect of a status as a Partner acquired upon its issuance by a Limited Partner which is not a Qualified Institutional Investor, such Limited Partner and any successor to such Limited Partner’s status as a Partner shall be prohibited from transferring its status as a Partner, unless such status is transferred in its entirety. 例文帳に追加

5. 前各項の規定にかかわらず、有限責任組合員は、その取得又は買付けに係る組合員たる地位を不適格投資家に対して譲渡することが禁止される。適格機関投資家である有限責任組合員がその発行に応じて取得した組合員たる地位については、当該有限責任組合員及びその後当該組合員たる地位を承継した有限責任組合員は、当該組合員たる地位を適格機関投資家以外の者に対して譲渡することが禁止される。また、適格機関投資家以外の者である有限責任組合員がその発行に応じて取得した組合員たる地位については、当該有限責任組合員及びその後当該組合員たる地位を買付けた有限責任組合員は当該組合員たる地位を一括して譲渡する場合以外に譲渡することが禁止される。 - 経済産業省

Article 23-14 (1) With regard to Securities already-issued in a foreign State (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those equivalent to such Securities, among solicitations of an application to sell or purchase such Securities, those exempted from application of the main clause of Article 4(1) (hereinafter referred to as "Solicitation for Small Number of Investors for Foreign Securities)" in this Article) shall be made by clearly indicating that the conditions specified by a Cabinet Order as those necessary to reduce the likelihood that the Securities will be transferred from any person who purchased them to a large number of persons are imposed on sales of the Securities; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities and to cases where the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in order to qualify sales of Securities as those which will not impair the public interest or protection of investors even if such conditions are not imposed thereon, including the requirement that the total amount of the sales of the Securities must be less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, which may not be more than 100 million yen, are satisfied. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の十四　外国で既に発行された有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他これに準ずるものとして政令で定める有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘で、第四条第一項本文の規定の適用を受けないもの（以下この条において「海外発行証券の少人数向け勧誘」という。）は、当該有価証券がその買付者から多数の者に譲渡されるおそれを少なくするために必要な条件として政令で定める条件が当該有価証券の売付けに付されることを明らかにして、しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合、当該有価証券の売付けの総額が一億円を超えない範囲内で内閣府令で定める金額未満である場合その他当該有価証券の売付けに当該条件を付さなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定める要件を満たす場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where a Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. has been rescinded pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, if the Service Provider or the seller sells, acts as an agent for sale, or mediates the sale of the goods specified by a Cabinet Order as goods that need to be purchased by the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. upon offering of Specified Continuous Services (hereinafter referred to as "Related Goods" in this chapter and Article 66 (2)), the provision of the preceding paragraph shall also apply to the contract pertaining to the sales of said goods (hereinafter referred to as a "Sales Contract on Related Goods" in this and the following articles). However, this does not apply when, in spite of receiving the document referred to in Article 42 (2) or (3), the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. had used or consumed in whole or in part such Related Goods as specified by a Cabinet Order as goods of which the value is likely to decline significantly through their use or partial consumption (except where the Service Provider or the seller had induced the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. to use or consume in whole or in part said goods). 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除があつた場合において、役務提供事業者又は販売業者が特定継続的役務の提供に際し特定継続的役務提供受領者等が購入する必要のある商品として政令で定める商品（以下この章及び第六十六条第二項において「関連商品」という。）の販売又はその代理若しくは媒介を行つている場合には、当該商品の販売に係る契約（以下この条及び次条において「関連商品販売契約」という。）についても、前項と同様とする。ただし、特定継続的役務提供受領者等が第四十二条第二項又は第三項の書面を受領した場合において、関連商品であつてその使用若しくは一部の消費により価額が著しく減少するおそれがある商品として政令で定めるものを使用し又はその全部若しくは一部を消費したとき（当該役務提供事業者又は当該販売業者が当該特定継続的役務提供受領者等に当該商品を使用させ、又はその全部若しくは一部を消費させた場合を除く。）は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 103(4) to (8) inclusive (Demand for the Acquisition of a Beneficial Interest), Article 104 (Valuation of a Beneficial Interest, etc.), Article 262 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), Article 263 (Special Provisions on Procedure in Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), and Article 264 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the demand that a beneficial interest be purchased as set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in Article 103(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the "Asset Securitization Act")," the term "beneficiaries" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holder prescribed in Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "public notice in an official gazette" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice," the phrase "paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal relating to each class)," the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in paragraph (8) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　信託法第百三条第四項から第八項まで（受益権取得請求）、第百四条（受益権の価格の決定等）、第二百六十二条（第五項を除く。）（信託に関する非訟事件の管轄）、第二百六十三条（信託に関する非訟事件の手続の特例）及び第二百六十四条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の受益権の買取りの請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百三条第四項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と、「受益者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項に規定する受益証券の権利者」と、同条第五項中「官報による公告」とあるのは「公告」と、同条第六項中「第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項」と、「受益権の内容」とあるのは「元本持分（種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分）」と、同条第八項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In cases where a person listed in any of the items of the preceding paragraph has acquired or purchased Securities for which, at the time of the issuance thereof, Solicitation of an Offer to Acquire (meaning the Solicitation of Offers to Acquire as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the Act, and including Procedures Related to the Issuance of Securities During a Reorganization as prescribed in Article 2-2, paragraph (2) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply except in Article 13, paragraph (2)) was made to any Qualified Institutional Investor that is excluded from being a counterparty to said Solicitation of Offers to Acquire pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (3), item (i) of the Act in cases where that item applies, or for which, at the time of the issuance thereof, the Solicitation of an Offer to Acquire fell under the case specified in Article 2, paragraph (3), item (ii), sub-item (a) or Article 2-2, paragraph (4), item (ii), sub-item (a) of the Act (excluding cases where the disclosure prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (7) of the Act has been made with regard to said Securities, cases where the person is a person who falls under any of items (i) to (xiv) inclusive or items (xvi) to (xxvi) inclusive of the preceding paragraph and who has already been designated under the proviso to that paragraph, cases where the person is a person who falls under item (xv) of that paragraph and whose designation under the proviso to that paragraph has already been cancelled, or cases where the person is a person who falls under any of items (ix), (xvii), (xix) or (xxi) to (xxvi) inclusive of that paragraph and for whom the period prescribed in paragraph (5) has elapsed, at the time of said acquisition or purchase), even when the person is a person who falls under any of items (i) to (xiv) inclusive or items (xvi) to (xxvi) inclusive of the preceding paragraph and who has been designated under the proviso to that paragraph, even when the person is a person who falls under item (xv) of that paragraph and whose designation under the proviso to that paragraph has already been canceled, or even when the person is a person who falls under items (ix), (xvii), (xix) or (xxi) to (xxvi) inclusive of that paragraph and for whom the period prescribed in paragraph (5) has elapsed, if offers to sell and the solicitation of offers to buy said Securities are to be made, the person shall be deemed to be a person who falls under the category of a Qualified Institutional Investor, and the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (2) of the Act shall apply thereto. 例文帳に追加

２　その発行の際にその取得勧誘（法第二条第三項に規定する取得勧誘をいい、法第二条の二第二項に規定する組織再編成発行手続を含む。第十三条第二項を除き、以下同じ。）が法第二条第三項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する場合における同号の規定により当該取得勧誘の相手方から除かれる適格機関投資家を相手方として行うもの又は同項第二号イ若しくは法第二条の二第四項第二号イに掲げる場合に該当するものであった有価証券を前項各号に掲げる者が取得し又は買い付けた場合（当該取得又は買付けの際に、当該有価証券に関して法第四条第七項に規定する開示が行われている場合又はその者が前項第一号から第十四号まで若しくは第十六号から第二十六号までに掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を既に受けていた者であった場合、同項第十五号に掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を既に解除されていた者であった場合若しくは同項第九号、第十七号、第十九号若しくは第二十一号から第二十六号までに掲げる者について第五項に規定する期間を経過している場合を除く。）には、その者が前項第一号から第十四号まで若しくは第十六号から第二十六号までに掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を受けた場合、同項第十五号に掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を解除された場合又は同項第九号、第十七号、第十九号若しくは第二十一号から第二十六号までに掲げる者について第五項に規定する期間を経過した場合においても、当該有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘を行う場合には適格機関投資家に該当する者とみなして法第四条第二項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム