「in the issue」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(70ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 167-14 The provisions of Articles 146 to 152, Articles 155 to 158, Article 164(5) and (6), and Article 165 (excluding item (iii) and item (iv)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to execution against a claim relating to an action on small claim. In this case, the term "execution court" in Article 146, Article 155(3) and Article 156(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "court clerk," the phrase "issue an order of seizure" in Article 146(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make a disposition of seizure," the term "order of seizure" in Article 147(1), Article 148(2), Article 150 and Article 155(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition of seizure," the phrase "claim pertaining to a seizure" in Article 147(1) and Article 148(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "monetary claim pertaining to a seizure," the phrase "an order of seizure is issued" in Article 149 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a disposition of seizure is made," the phrase "an order to revoke an order of seizure" in Article 164(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an order to revoke an order of seizure or a disposition by a court clerk to revoke a disposition of seizure," and the term "liquidating distribution, etc." in Article 165 (including the title of the Article) shall be deemed to be replaced with "delivery of payment money." 例文帳に追加

第百六十七条の十四　第百四十六条から第百五十二条まで、第百五十五条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十四条第五項及び第六項並びに第百六十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）の規定は、少額訴訟債権執行について準用する。この場合において、第百四十六条、第百五十五条第三項及び第百五十六条第三項中「執行裁判所」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」と、第百四十六条第一項中「差押命令を発する」とあるのは「差押処分をする」と、第百四十七条第一項、第百四十八条第二項、第百五十条及び第百五十五条第一項中「差押命令」とあるのは「差押処分」と、第百四十七条第一項及び第百四十八条第一項中「差押えに係る債権」とあるのは「差押えに係る金銭債権」と、第百四十九条中「差押命令が発せられたとき」とあるのは「差押処分がされたとき」と、第百六十四条第五項中「差押命令の取消決定」とあるのは「差押処分の取消決定若しくは差押処分を取り消す旨の裁判所書記官の処分」と、第百六十五条（見出しを含む。）中「配当等」とあるのは「弁済金の交付」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. 例文帳に追加

特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 36 The provisions of Article 16, paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), Article 19, paragraph (1), Article 20, paragraph (1) and Article 21 of the Act of Extradition (Act No. 68 of 1953) shall be applied mutatis mutandis to the surrender of an outgoing sentenced person to an administering state pursuant to the order provided for in Article 34, paragraph (2). In this case, the following terms shall be deemed to be replaced as follows: "the order of surrender provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 14" in Article 16, paragraph (1) of the Act of Extradition and "the direction for surrender of a fugitive as provided for in paragraph (1) or (5) of Article 17" Article 20, paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the order provided for in Article 34, paragraph (2) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the full name of the fugitive, the name of the offense for which extradition is requested, the name of the requesting state, the place of surrender, the time limit for surrender and the date of issue" in Article 16, paragraph (4) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the full name, age and nationality of the outgoing sentenced person provided for in Article 2, item (x) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "outgoing sentenced person"), the name of the administering state in Article 2, item (viii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "administering state"), the name of the offense that is the premise of the outgoing transfer provided for in Article 2, item (xii) of the same act, the name and term of punishment imposed, and the date and place of surrender"; "paragraph (3) of Article 16" in Article 19, paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16, paragraph (3) of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of Article 36 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "the requesting state" in Article 19, paragraph (1), Article 20, paragraph (1) and Article 21 in the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the administering state"; "the fugitive" in Article 20, paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the outgoing sentenced person"; "paragraph (1) of Article 20" and "the fugitive" in Article 21 of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 20, paragraph (1) of the Act of Extradition applied mutatis mutandis by the provisions of Article 36 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons" and "the outgoing sentenced person", respectively. 例文帳に追加

第三十六条　逃亡犯罪人引渡法（昭和二十八年法律第六十八号）第十六条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項並びに第二十一条の規定は、第三十四条第二項の命令により送出受刑者を執行国に引き渡す場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第十六条第一項中「第十四条第一項の規定による引渡の命令」とあり、及び同法第二十条第一項中「第十七条第一項又は第五項の規定による逃亡犯罪人の引渡の指揮」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十四条第二項の命令」と、同法第十六条第四項中「逃亡犯罪人の氏名、引渡犯罪名、請求国の名称、引渡の場所、引渡の期限及び発付の年月日」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第十号の送出受刑者（以下「送出受刑者」という。）の氏名、年齢、国籍、同法第二条第八号の執行国（以下「執行国」という。）の名称、同法第二条第十二号の送出移送犯罪の名称、刑名、刑期、引渡日及び引渡しの場所」と、同法第十九条第一項中「第十六条第三項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十六条の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第十六条第三項」と、同法第十九条第一項、第二十条第一項及び第二十一条中「請求国」とあるのは「執行国」と、同法第二十条第一項中「示して逃亡犯罪人の」とあるのは「示して送出受刑者の」と、「逃亡犯罪人を」とあるのは「送出受刑者を」と、同法第二十一条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第三十六条の規定により準用される逃亡犯罪人引渡法第二十条第一項」と、「逃亡犯罪人」とあるのは「送出受刑者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As you know, DPJ President and Prime Minister Kan and (PNP) Chief Kamei had a leader meeting the day following the day Prime Minister Kan assumed office, I believe, during which a decision to form a coalition was made. As I happened to be the Secretary General back then, I was also present at this meeting to witness, as I have explained, President Kan and Chief Kamei reach an agreement on creating an alternative to the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which had been set up for the previous three-party coalition to coordinate their policies. This has not been done because everyone got a little busy in preparation for the election, as I have just talked about. Another point is that members of the PNP, being one of the parties in the coalition, have naturally raised voices requesting strongly that views of the party be reflected in the coalition. It is therefore not so much about the ceiling debate, although there are, of course, voices raised on the subject of ceilings, as it is simply natural that a coalition government should need to coordinate policies. That is what I reminded Prime Minister Kan of today, and he responded by saying that it is a matter of fact and telling Policy Research Committee Chair and Minister of State Gemba to create a proper system for it. While I did have a talk with Mr. Gemba later on, this is an issue between parties and I am sure that it will accordingly be handled properly, as it should be, by the Chief, or Secretary General or Policy Research Committee Chair of our party. 例文帳に追加

それはご存じのように、菅代表、総理と亀井（国民新党）代表との話し合いでも、これは総理大臣になった次の日でしたか、党首会談をやりましたね。そして、連立を組むということに決定したわけでございますが、そのとき私はたまたま幹事長でしたから、党首会談に同席させていただいておりまして、そのときも今さっき言いましたように、それまでは3党でしたから、基本政策閣僚会議というのが3党の政策のすり合わせでございましたが、そういったものにかわるものをつくろうということを菅代表と亀井代表と合意しておりまして、そういった意味で、これは今さっき話したような選挙で少しみんなお互いに忙しくなりましたので、やっておりませんし、また我が党内のこれはいろいろ当然連立政権でございますから、党内の意見も連立政権与党として反映したいという強い当然意見がございますので、そこら辺を踏まえてシーリングということよりも、シーリングにも当然意見があると思いますが、連立政権ですから、当然政策のすり合わせというのは、これは当然のことでございますから、そのことを改めて今日菅総裁に申し上げて、菅総理からも当然のことだし、きちっと玄葉政調会長、国務大臣にそのことをきちっとシステムをつくるようにということで、玄葉さんとあと話しましたけれども、党と党との話でもございますから、当然党首、あるいは幹事長、政調会長が我が党におりますから、そこら辺できちっとやっていこうといくというふうに思っていますよ。 - 金融庁

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

My focus will be on the post-global-financial-crisis G8 and G20 including China, India and Brazil, as mentioned earlier. The reality is that G8 alone can no longer cover the global economy. There is also Basel III. Populous countries undergoing extremely rapid development such as China, India and Brazil have joined G20 with significant power. China, being Japan’s neighbor, has been the Japan’s biggest import and export partner in the past three years. For China, Japan is the third biggest export destination, behind the United States and EU, ranked first and second, respectively, so Japan and China are in a strategic, mutually beneficial relationship. In that sense, especially when it comes to the issue of finance, the financial sector is extremely globalized; the impact of the financial sector on the global economy is instant. China is the leading holder of U.S. Treasury securities, followed by Japan. With some 60 trillion yen of public spending, China is booming, as you may be well aware, although some people have suggested that a bubble may be forming. 例文帳に追加

重視していることは、もう今さっきの話にもございましたように、リーマン・ショックの後、G8、それからG20にありまして、中国、インド、ブラジル、そういったところも加わっていただきますし、G8だけではもう世界の経済をカバーでき得ないというような実態が皆さん方よくお分かりのようにあるわけでございまして、色々な、バーゼルIIIだって、G20でまさに中国、インド、ブラジル、そういった今、非常に発展の速度の速い人口の多い国といいますか、そういったことがまさに世界の大きな力を持って参加してきたわけでございますから、中国は日本の隣でございますし、日本から言えばここ3年間としては、輸出輸入ナンバーワンは中国になっていると思いますし、中国からとっても、輸出のナンバーワンはアメリカ、2番目がEU、3番目は日本でございますからね、大変、日本と中国というのは戦略的互恵関係にあるということもございますし、そういった意味で、特に金融の問題については、もうご存じのように非常に金融はグローバル化したというか、まさに瞬時に金融の影響というのは世界経済に影響を及ぼすわけでございますから、アメリカの国債を一番たくさん持っているのは中国でございまして、2番目が日本でございますし。まさに中国というのは８、９％の、リーマン・ショックのときに一旦落ちましたけれども、また60兆円ぐらいの財政出動をして、中国の景気が非常にいいということを皆さん方はよくお分かりだと思いますけれども、しかし、どうも少しバブル気味だというようなご意見もございますので、そこら辺も中国人民銀行の行長さん、バーナンキさんにしても、アメリカに適する人でございますが、それに温家宝首相をはじめ、国務院の経済担当の副総理がおられまして、そういった方が中心でやるわけでございますが、当然銀行監督あるいは証券の監督、保険の監督といった（金融当局の）方もお会いをさせていただく等、色々な私も非常に期待をさせていただいております。 - 金融庁

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7; (ii) when all or part of the Incorporated Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger issue the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock, matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 8 and item 9 of the Act (including the provisions that specify that the number and the amount of the money of the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger which are to be issued to the holders of the rights to subscribe for the whole or part of new shares of stock shall be zero); (iii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final - 106 - business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of - 107 - Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (v) the following matters concerning said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (b) when the final business year does not exist at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vii) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の十二第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。 一法第百四十三条第一項第六号及び第七号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関 する事項 二新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の全部又は一部が新株予約権を発行しているとき は、法第百四十三条第一項第八号及び第九号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該事項 についての定めとして、全部又は一部の新株予約権の新株予約権者に対して交付する 新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の新株予約権の数及び金銭の額を零と定めた場合に おける当該定めを含む。）の相当性に関する事項 三他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社及び清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下 この号において同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等又は財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表と ともに作成された損益計算書（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合 併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表）の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅株 式会社商品取引所の成立の日）後の日を臨時決算日（二以上の臨時決算日がある 場合にあっては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等があるときは、当該臨時 計算書類等の内容 ハ他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない 場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処 分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に 重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の十二第一 項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の 日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新た な最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。）四 他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社又は清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が 会社法第四百九十二条第一項（法第七十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。） の規定により作成した貸借対照表 五当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所（清算株式会社を除く。以下この号において 同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年 度がない場合にあっては、当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日）後 に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第 百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合 にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）ロ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度がないときは、当該 新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表 六新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履 行の見込みに関する事項 七法第百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後、前各号に掲げる 事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百八十三条　商業登記法（昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号）第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条から第二十七条まで（登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第三十四条（会社の商号の登記）、第四十四条、第四十五条（会社の支配人の登記）、第四十六条（第四項を除く。）（添付書面の通則）、第四十七条第一項（設立の登記）、第四十八条から第五十五条まで（支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記）、第六十四条（株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記）、第七十一条（解散の登記）、第七十三条から第七十五条まで（清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記）及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで（第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役（委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム