1016万例文収録!

「ばいおげる」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(896ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > ばいおげるに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

ばいおげるの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 44794



例文

3 農薬(農薬取締法(昭和二十三年法律第八十二号)第一条の二第一項に規定する農薬をいう。次条において同じ。)、飼料の安全性の確保及び品質の改善に関する法律(昭和二十八年法律第三十五号)第二条第三項の規定に基づく農林水産省令で定める用途に供することを目的として飼料(同条第二項に規定する飼料をいう。)に添加、混和、浸潤その他の方法によつて用いられる物及び薬事法第二条第一項に規定する医薬品であつて動物のために使用されることが目的とされているものの成分である物質(その物質が化学的に変化して生成した物質を含み、人の健康を損なうおそれのないことが明らかであるものとして厚生労働大臣が定める物質を除く。)が、人の健康を損なうおそれのない量として厚生労働大臣が薬事・食品衛生審議会の意見を聴いて定める量を超えて残留する食品は、これを販売の用に供するために製造し、輸入し、加工し、使用し、調理し、保存し、又は販売してはならない。ただし、当該物質の当該食品に残留する量の限度について第一項の食品の成分に係る規格が定められている場合については、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(3) Food in which substances that are the ingredients of agricultural chemicals (meaning agricultural chemicals prescribed in Article 1-2, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Chemicals Control Act (Act No. 82 of 1948), hereinafter the same shall apply in the following Article), substances that are used by being added, mixed or infiltrated into feed (meaning feed prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Safety Assurance and Quality Improvement of Feed (Act No. 35 of 1953)) or are used by other methods for feed for the purpose of providing it for usage specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries based on Article 2, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and pharmaceutical products that are prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and are to be used for animals (including substances chemically generated from such substances and excluding substances that the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare specifies as clearly having no risk to human health) remain in a quantity exceeding the quantity that the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare specifies as having no risk to human health by hearing the opinions of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council shall not be produced, imported, processed, used, cooked, preserved, or sold for the purpose of marketing; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where standards concerning the ingredients of food under paragraph (1) have been established with regard to the residual limit of said substances in said food.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

稲作栽培で灌漑用水は稲の成育増収を計る上では施肥に次ぐ大切な管理事項で、これの対応の適否で雑草、病害に影響し農薬多用の原因となる、従来の農業用水は川を堰き止め、常に用水路に水を流し各自が自由に灌漑していた、近年治水の観点から堰体を撤去しポンプ揚水に変わった、施設管理費・電力費・設備償却費の減少を計るため揚水は日時を定めている、農家はこの時間帯に対応しなければならない、近年農家は収入の関係でほとんどが兼業農家でありこの止水作業が時間の関係で困難になり最適管理が出来ない、利水の経費を少しでも減らし米作のコストダウンを計らねばならない。例文帳に追加

To provide an automatic water-stopping device for saving useless water and time, and decreasing the cost of the device by solving a problem such that it is difficult to stop water optimally, since a water-stopping time zone is usually a working time after feeding water to paddies. - 特許庁

具体的に今の状況に点をつけるということよりは、この金融商品の販売、あるいは金融サービスの提供といったことをめぐって、当事者間で、金融サービスを提供する側、そしてそれを受ける側・購入する側、双方が最終的に十分な納得感を持って解決ができるような、そういう仕組み・取組みが定着するということが、いわば理想形であり、最終目標であるのだろうと思います。そういった姿としてどういう枠組みが我が国において最も現実的であり、かつ、持続的・継続的に効果を維持できるのか、といった心構えでこれから引き続き研究をしていくと、そういう今の気持ちでございます。例文帳に追加

Rather than giving scores to the current state of affairs, we should establish a framework that enables dispute settlement which provides sufficient satisfaction to both sides of the dispute, namely the provider of financial services and the consumer. This should be the ultimate goal. I think that we should continue our study on what kind of framework is the most realistic one that produces sustainable effects for Japan.  - 金融庁

また、金融機関の検査・監督に当たっては、立ち入り検査や日常の監督等により、法令違反や利用者保護上の問題が判明した場合に確認された事実と法令に基づいて、必要に応じて厳正な対処を行っておりまして、日本振興銀行についても同様な厳正な検査・監督の実施に努めてきたわけでございますが、当庁としては1回目、特に2回目の検査、これは非常に行政でございますから、やっぱり法律に基づいてきちっと適正にやっていかなければならないと。明確な法律違反のことがない限り、行政というのは恣意的なことはできないわけですよ。しかし、3回目の時はもうご存じのように、明確な法律違反のことがございますから、法律に基づいて、それからやっぱり法律と事実に基づいてやっていかなければいけないというのは、行政というのはそういうものですから、そういった意味で、何で最初から早くやらなかったのかというおしかりをいただくというのも、気持ちとしてはよく分かりますけれども、私は行政というものは、きちっと法に基づいて、客観的な事実に基づいて、きちっと指導をしていくもので、見込みだとか、恣意的な要請というのはできるだけあってはならないというふうに、私は行政(機関)の長としては思っております。それが法によって、法と事実によってきちっと行政をあずかる者の一つの大事な点だと、こう思っておりますが、そういった意味で、しかし結果としては破綻をしたわけでございますから、当庁としては、今回の教訓を生かして、引き続き金融システムの安定化に努めていきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

Furthermore, in the inspection and supervision of financial institutions, we take action in a stringent manner as necessary based on the confirmed facts pursuant to laws and regulations if violations of laws and regulations or problems in user protection are found as a result of on-site inspections, day-to-day supervision and other such activities. Likewise, we have endeavored to inspect and supervise the Incubator Bank of Japan in a stringent manner. The FSA had to properly conduct the first inspection and, in particular, the second inspection, according to law as an executive branch of government. Unless there is an obvious violation of law, an executive branch of government cannot take any arbitrary action. The third inspection, however, clearly revealed a violation of law as you know—what I am trying to tell you is that our action must be based on laws and facts. That is how an executive branch of government works. In that sense, although I can see at the emotional level why we are being criticized for not taking action earlier from the start, I believe as the head of an executive branch of government that regulation and supervision involves giving guidance based on objective facts in accordance with law, and should have as little room as possible for demands based on likelihood and arbitrariness. I believe this is an important quality for a person in charge of regulation and supervision based on laws and facts. Nevertheless, given that the Bank consequently failed, the FSA shall learn a lesson from this and continue to endeavor to stabilize the financial system.  - 金融庁

例文

2 商品取引所が前項の規定による承認を受けたときは、この法律の施行の際現に旧法第八十一条第三項の規定により当該商品取引所に預託されている特別清算負担金(施行日において商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所の清算参加者となった会員が預託しているものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。)は、新法第百八十条第一項の規定により商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所に預託されている清算預託金とみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) When a Commodity Exchange received approval pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, special clearing funds (limited to those deposited by a member who became a Clearing Participant of said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization as on the Effective Date, and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited with said Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, paragraph (3) of the Former Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing deposits deposited with said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization pursuant to the provisions of Article 180, paragraph (1) of the New Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

2 商品取引所が前項の規定による承認を受けたときは、この法律の施行の際現に旧法第八十一条第三項の規定により当該商品取引所に預託されている特別清算負担金(施行日において商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所の清算参加者となった会員が預託しているものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。)は、新法第百八十条第一項の規定により商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所に預託されている清算預託金とみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) When a Commodity Exchange received approval pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, special clearing funds (limited to those deposited by a member who became a Clearing Participant of said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization as on the Effective Date, and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited with said Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, paragraph 3 of the Old Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing deposits deposited with said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization pursuant to the provisions of Article 180, paragraph 1 of the New Act.  - 経済産業省

2 第十一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十三の三の規定による型式の承認(附則第六十条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認(旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十三の三の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。)を含む。)に係る移行特定ガス用品の販売又は表示については、第十一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特定ガス用品に係る附則第六十一条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十四第六項において準用する旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新ガス事業法第三十九条の三第一項及び第三十九条の四の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。例文帳に追加

(2) With respect to the sale or labeling of Specified Gas Equipment under Transition pertaining to the approval of model obtained under Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act prior to the enforcement of Article 11 (including the approval of model obtained in the cases where the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to Article 60, paragraph 1 or paragraph 3 of the Supplementary Provisions (excluding, however, those concerning Foreign Registered Manufacturers set forth in Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable notwithstanding the provisions of Article 39-3, paragraph 1 and Article 39-4 of the New Gas Business Act, for a period specified by a Cabinet Order under Article 61, paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions for the respective type of the Specified Gas Equipment under Transition from the date of enforcement of Article 11 or a period specified by a Cabinet Order under Article 39-10, paragraph 1 of the Old Gas Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 39-14, paragraph 6 of the Old Gas Business Act from the date of approval, whichever ends earlier.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 第一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第一項の規定による型式の承認(附則第四条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認(旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の二の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。)を含む。)に係る移行特別特定製品の販売又は表示については、第一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特別特定製品に係る附則第五条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第二項において準用する旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十五条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新消費生活用製品安全法第四条第一項及び第五条の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。例文帳に追加

(2) With regard to the sale or labeling of the special specified products under transition subject to approval of the type as prescribed in Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act which is in effect at the time of enforcement of Article 1 (including approval of the type obtained by deeming that the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the approval for a foreign registered manufacturer set forth in Article 32-2 of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 5 of the New Consumer Products Safety Act, until the expiration of the period specified by Cabinet Order provided for in Article 5, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions pertaining to the special specified products under transition starting from the date of enforcement of Article 1 or the expiration of a period specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 25, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 32-4, paragraph (2) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act starting from the date of said approval, whichever comes earlier.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百四十八条 経済産業大臣又は都道府県知事若しくは特定市町村の長は、この法律の施行に必要な限度において、その職員に、届出製造事業者、届出修理事業者、計量器の販売の事業を行う者、指定製造者、特殊容器輸入者、輸入事業者、計量士、登録事業者又は取引若しくは証明における計量をする者の工場、事業場、営業所、事務所、事業所又は倉庫に立ち入り、計量器、計量器の検査のための器具、機械若しくは装置、特殊容器、特定物象量が表記された特定商品、帳簿、書類その他の物件を検査させ、又は関係者に質問させることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 148 (1) The Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, the prefectural governor or the head of a specified municipality may, within the limit necessary for the enforcement of this Act, cause its officials to enter the factory, workplace, business office, administrative office, place of business or warehouse of a notifying manufacturing business operator, a notifying repair business operator, a person engaged in the business of sales of measuring instruments, a designated manufacturer, a special container importer, an import business operator, a certified measurer, a registered business operator or a person who performs measurements for the purpose of transactions or certifications to inspect its measuring instruments, instruments, machines or equipment for inspecting measuring instruments, special containers, specified commodities with the indication of the quantity of specified physical phenomena, books, documents and other materials, or to ask questions to people concerned.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第三十九条の十一 届出事業者は、その製造又は輸入に係る前条第一項のガス用品(同項ただし書の規定の適用を受けて製造され、又は輸入されるものを除く。)が特定ガス用品である場合には、当該特定ガス用品を販売する時までに、次の各号のいずれかに掲げるものについて、経済産業大臣の登録を受けた者の次項の規定による検査(以下「適合性検査」という。)を受け、かつ、同項の証明書の交付を受け、これを保存しなければならない。ただし、当該特定ガス用品と同一の型式に属する特定ガス用品について既に第二号に係る同項の証明書の交付を受けこれを保存している場合において当該証明書の交付を受けた日から起算して特定ガス用品ごとに政令で定める期間を経過していないとき又は同項の証明書と同等なものとして経済産業省令で定めるものを保存している場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 39-11 (1) A Notifying Manufacturer/Importer shall, if the Gas Equipment prescribed in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article that the Notifying Manufacturer/Importer manufactures or imports (excluding, however, that manufactured or imported pursuant to the proviso of the said paragraph) falls into the category of Specified Gas Equipment, before selling the Specified Gas Equipment, undergo an inspection prescribed in the next paragraph by a person registered by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry (hereinafter referred to as a "Conformity Inspection") with respect to the matters listed in the following items and obtain a certificate set forth in the said paragraph, and preserve such certificate; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the Notifying Manufacturer/Importer has already obtained and currently preserves a certificate set forth in the said paragraph pertaining to the matters listed in item 2 with respect to Specified Gas Equipment of the same model as that of the Specified Gas Equipment concerned, before the lapse of a period specified by a Cabinet Order for the respective category of Specified Gas Equipment from the day when the certificate was issued, or where the Notifying Manufacturer/Importer preserves any instrument specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as being equivalent to the certificate set forth in the said paragraph.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第九条 届出事業者は、その製造又は輸入に係る前条第一項の電気用品(同項ただし書の規定の適用を受けて製造され、又は輸入されるものを除く。)が特定電気用品である場合には、当該特定電気用品を販売する時までに、次の各号のいずれかに掲げるものについて、経済産業大臣の登録を受けた者の次項の規定による検査(以下「適合性検査」という。)を受け、かつ、同項の証明書の交付を受け、これを保存しなければならない。ただし、当該特定電気用品と同一の型式に属する特定電気用品について既に第二号に係る同項の証明書の交付を受けこれを保存している場合において当該証明書の交付を受けた日から起算して特定電気用品ごとに政令で定める期間を経過していないとき又は同項の証明書と同等なものとして経済産業省令で定めるものを保存している場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 9 (1) When the Electrical Appliances and Materials that are set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and manufactured or imported by a Notifying Supplier (excluding Electrical Appliances and Materials manufactured or imported through application of the proviso to said paragraph) are Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials, the Notifying Supplier shall, before their sale, have them inspected with respect to the following items (hereinafter referred to as a "Conformity Inspection") by an organization registered with the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph, and shall obtain and retain the certificate set forth in said paragraph; provided, however, that this shall not apply in the case where the certificate set forth in said paragraph pertaining to item (ii) has already been obtained and retained for a Specified Electrical Appliance and Material of the same product type as said Specified Electrical Appliance and Material and the period specified by Cabinet Order for each Specified Electrical Appliance and Material, calculated from the day on which said certificate was obtained, has not yet lapsed, or in the case where documentation specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as the equivalent of the certificate set forth in said paragraph is retained:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十二条 届出事業者は、その製造又は輸入に係る前条第一項の特定製品(同項ただし書の規定の適用を受けて製造され、又は輸入されるものを除く。)が特別特定製品である場合には、当該特別特定製品を販売する時までに、次の各号のいずれかに掲げるものについて、主務大臣の登録を受けた者の次項の規定による検査(以下「適合性検査」という。)を受け、かつ、同項の証明書の交付を受け、これを保存しなければならない。ただし、当該特別特定製品と同一の型式に属する特別特定製品について既に第二号に係る同項の証明書の交付を受けこれを保存している場合において当該証明書の交付を受けた日から起算して特別特定製品ごとに政令で定める期間を経過していないとき又は同項の証明書と同等なものとして主務省令で定めるものを保存している場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 12 (1) In cases where the specified products manufactured or imported by a notified business operator as set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (except for those manufactured or imported under the proviso to paragraph (1) of the preceding Article) fall under the category of special specified products, the notified business operator shall have any of the items listed below inspected in accordance with the following paragraph by a person registered with the competent minister (hereinafter referred to as a "conformity inspection"), and shall obtain and preserve the certification set forth in the same paragraph prior to the sale of said special specified products; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a certificate for item (ii) as described in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is issued and preserved with respect to said special specified products falling under the same type as that of the special specified products, and that the period provided for by Cabinet Order for the respective special specified products, commencing from the date of the issuance of said certificate or where an item provided for by the Ordinance of the competent ministry as being equivalent to the certificate as set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is preserved, has not elapsed:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1)第34条及び第35条の規定にかかわらず、譲渡又は移転の結果として、本法に基づくとその他の法律に基づくと問わず、同一の商品又は非常に類似している商標に関して、2名以上の排他的権利が使用に関して存在し、そのために誤認又は混同が生ずるおそれがある場合、商標は譲渡不能かつ移転不能とする。ただし、バングラデシュ国内で商標の商品又は役務を販売するため、又はバングラデシュ国外の同一市場にその商品又は役務を輸出するために譲渡された者が、排他的権利に課せられた制限により権利を行使できない場合は、譲渡又は移転は無効とみなされない。例文帳に追加

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in sections 34 and 35 where as a result of the assignment or transmission there would subsist, whether under this Act or any other law, exclusive rights in more than one of the persons concerned to the use, in relation to the same goods or and the trademarks be nearly same or resemble each other and for this reason people may be deceived or confused, then a trademark shall not be assignable or transmissible : Provided that an assignment or transmission shall not be deemed to be invalid if the persons assigned to sell the goods or services of a trademark within Bangladesh or to export the goods 31 or services to the same market outside Bangladesh can not exercise their rights for the limitations imposed upon the exclusive rights.  - 特許庁

平行配置された複数本の行線11が設けられた第1の基板10と、平行配置された複数本の列線21が設けられ、該列線21が行線11と交差するように第1の基板10と間隙を介して対向配置された第2の基板20と、行線11と列線21との各交差部に選択的に配置され、且つ対向する行線11と列線21間及び隣接する交差部間で移動可能な粒子30とを備えた記憶装置の製造方法であって、粒子30を交差部に配置するために、第1及び第2の基板を対向配置する前に、第1の基板10の行線形成面又は第2の基板20の列線形成面に向けて、粒子30を溶媒に分散させた状態の溶液を、電界が印加された供給口から液滴として吐出させる。例文帳に追加

In order to locate the particles 30 at the intersections, a solution with the particles 30 dispersed in a solvent is discharged as drips from a supply port with a potential applied toward a row line formed surface of the first substrate 10, or a column line formed surface of the second substrate 20 before the first and second substrates are located to face each other. - 特許庁

ライセンス許諾契約に関して(6)に定めた情報が,登録簿に記録されておらず又は公告されていないという事実は,第31条若しくは第32条の規定に従い,商標の有効性に関して異議申立をすること,又は商標の不使用に関して,第23条 (3)に定めた限定の適用を求めること(そのような場合は,第23条 (6)を適用するものとする),又は商標所有者により第28条 (2)の規定に基づいて開始された商標侵害訴訟に使用権者が参加する権利に対して異議申立をすること,又はライセンスが付与された商標についての不法使用によって生じた損害について,使用権者がその賠償を受ける権利に対して異議申立をすることの理由にはならない。例文帳に追加

The fact that the information about a licensing contract, as provided for in Paragraph 6 of this Article, is not recorded in the Register or is not published, does not constitute grounds for opposing the validity of a trademark pursuant to the provisions of Article 31 or 32 of this Law, or for applying the restrictions for non-use of a trademark as provided by Article 23, Paragraph 3 (in such cases Article 23, Paragraph 6 shall apply), or for opposing the right of a licensee to intervene in an action for trademark infringement initiated by the owner of the mark under the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 2, or for opposing the right of a licensee to receive compensation for the damages caused by unlawful use of the licensed trademark. - 特許庁

先般決定し公表し、現在パブリックコメントにかかっているということだと思いますが、自己資本比率規制の一部弾力化については、我が国にやや特有の事情と申しましょうか、典型的には我が国の銀行が株式へのエクスポージャーが相対的に大きい、その中で、我が国の株式市場において株価が非常にボラティリティが高くなってきている、その背景には海外の投資ファンド等の動きがある、ということで、結果的に、例えば東京証券取引所でPBR(株価純資産倍率)の平均値が1を下回るといったような、必ずしも合理的には理解しにくいような、そういう事態が出てきている、他方で有価証券の評価損というものが自己資本比率の計算上、ティア1(基本的項目)から控除されるという仕組みになっておりますので、その海外の投資ファンドの動きによって我が国の預金取扱金融機関の金融仲介能力というものが大きく振り回されて、仲介能力が損なわれるという、ここの因果関係をどこかで遮断するということが、我が国の経済全体の運営の上で必要性が極めて高いということで取られた臨時の措置ということでございます。例文帳に追加

The rule change regarding the capital adequacy ratio was recently decided and announced and is now in the public comment process. The partial introduction of flexibility into the capital adequacy ratio regulation reflects circumstances specific to Japan, as exemplified by Japanese banksrelatively large exposure to stocks. Behind the increasing volatility of Japanese stock prices are foreign investment fundsactivities, as a result of which we are now witnessing seemingly irrational events, such as the average PBR (price-to-book ratio) for stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange dropping below one. Meanwhile, valuation losses on securities holdings are required to be deducted from the Tier 1 capital in the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio. We have concluded that for the management of the Japanese economy, it is essential to prevent foreign investment fundsactivities from significantly affecting and undermining the financial intermediary function of Japanese deposit-taking financial institutions, so we have decided on this as an extraordinary measure.  - 金融庁

6 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ニに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

標章の登録は標章所有者に対して,第三者が合法的に登録標章の付された商品又はサービスを宣伝し,販売の申出若しくはそれら商品又はサービスの存在又は利用可能性を知らせるためにそれら標章を使用すること及び登録標章の付された商品に使用できる部品や付属品の使用適性や互換性を知らせるためにそれら標章を使用することを禁止する権利を与えるものではない。ただし,そのような使用は誠実になされなければならず,かつ公衆への情報提供目的に限定され,かつ関係商品の製造企業に関して公衆の誤認若しくは混同を生じさせる可能性の高いものであってはならない。例文帳に追加

Registration of the mark shall not confer on the owner thereof the right to prohibit a third party from using the mark to advertise legitimately marked goods or services, offer them for sale or mention the existence or availability thereof, or from using the mark to indicate the compatibility or suitability of spare parts or accessories that can be used with goods bearing the registered mark, provided that such use is made in good faith, is confined to the purpose of informing the public and is not liable to mislead or confuse it as to the corporate origin of the goods concerned. - 特許庁

二 当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合 当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数(当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。)に公開買付価格(前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。)から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格(市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。)を控除した金額を乗じた額例文帳に追加

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

日本人の洋装化が一段と進んだこと、敗戦で軍隊で強制されていたことの嫌悪感から旧文化が否定される風潮になったこと、日本の工業化の進展で農村部から都市部に人口の移動が起こり、核家族化が進行して「褌祝」の私的祭事に象徴される褌継承の文化が断絶したこと、女性の社会進出で家事が簡略化されて自家で縫製する機会がなくなったこと、製造販売する業者も少なく店頭に並ばず、入手性に難があったこと、ブリーフ、トランクス等の新しい下着が廉価で出現して、機能性だけでなくファッション性のある下着が若者を中心に普及したことなどである。例文帳に追加

(1) Western clothes became more popular than ever in Japan; (2) there brought about a tendency to deny the previous culture because of the loss of the war, and, to make the matter worse, the fundoshi was something the military forced them to wear; (3) because of the advancement of industrialization, people moved from agricultural communities to urban areas to change the traditional family form to a nuclear family, and thus it made it hard to continue the culture in which wearing fundoshi was often symbolically celebrated as a rite of passage to be a grown-up man; (4) as women were encouraged to participate in society, household chores were simplified and thus the time for sewing fundoshi at home became limited; (5) manufacturers of fundoshi were practically decreased and it made it hard for people to get fundoshi at stores; and (6) new types of undergarments, such as a brief type and a trunks type of underpants, appeared at low prices, those functional, and were seen fashionable, undergarments became popular mainly among young people.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

世銀に対しては、このような途上国への悪影響を最小限に抑えるべく、これまで民間資金が主役となってきた途上国への資金の流れを、どのように世銀や地域開銀が代替していくことができるか、また萎縮する民間資金に対して世銀グループとしてどのような触媒機能を果たせるか、例えばMIGAの保証をもっと弾力的に活用することはできないのか、IFCの民間資金に対するレバレッジを増加させる方法はないかなどについて、既存の枠組みにとらわれず、様々な案を積極的かつ創造的に検討することを期待します。例文帳に追加

Such credit tightening will further risk resource mobilization to develop social safety nets that provide support for the lives of the poor.Should the effects of the financial market turmoil spill over to real economy, causing significant slow down in global economic growth, developing countries may experience reduction of exports, deceleration of growth, and increase in unemployment, and thus ruin their past efforts toward economic development.To minimize such adverse effects on developing countries, we expect the Bank to actively and creatively consider various possible options, without being constrained by the existing frameworks, by asking: how can the World Bank and the Regional Development Banks compensate for the decline in private capital flows that have been the primary funding source for developing countries? What kind of catalytic roles can the World Bank Group play in bolstering withered private capital flows? Such options could include more flexible use of guarantees by the MIGA and possible enhancement of IFC’s function to leverage private capital.  - 財務省

一 ウイルス(ワクチンを除く。)であって、アフリカ馬疫ウイルス、アフリカ豚コレラウイルス、エボラウイルス、黄熱ウイルス、オーエスキー病ウイルス、オムスク出血熱ウイルス、オロポーチウイルス、キャサヌール森林病ウイルス、牛疫ウイルス、狂犬病ウイルス、クリミアーコンゴ出血熱ウイルス、口蹄疫ウイルス、サル痘ウイルス、小反芻獣疫ウイルス、水胞性口炎ウイルス、西部ウマ脳炎ウイルス、セントルイス脳炎ウイルス、ダニ媒介性脳炎ウイルス、チクングニヤウイルス、跳躍病ウイルス、テッシェン病ウイルス、デング熱ウイルス、痘瘡ウイルス、東部ウマ脳炎ウイルス、トリインフルエンザウイルス(H五又はH七のH抗原を有するものに限る。)、豚コレラウイルス、ニパウイルス、日本脳炎ウイルス、ニューカッスル病ウイルス、肺及び腎症候性出血熱ウイルス、ハンターンウイルス、ブタエンテロウイルス九型、フニンウイルス、ブルータングウイルス、ベネズエラウマ脳炎ウイルス、ヘンドラウイルス、ポテト・アンデアン・ラテント・チモウイルス、ポテト・スピンドル・チュバー・ウィロイド、ホワイトポックスウイルス、ポワッサンウイルス、マチュポウイルス、マールブルグウイルス、マレー渓谷脳炎ウイルス、南アメリカ出血熱、ヤギ痘ウイルス、羊痘ウイルス、ラッサ熱ウイルス、ランピースキン病ウイルス、リフトバレー熱ウイルス、リンパ球性脈絡髄膜炎ウイルス又はロシオウイルス例文帳に追加

(i) Viruses (excluding vaccines): the African horse sickness virus, the African swine fever virus, the Ebola virus, the yellow fever virus, Aujeszky's disease virus, the Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus, the Oropouche virus, the Kyasanur Forest disease virus, the cattle plague virus, the rabies virus, the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, the foot-and-mouth disease virus, the monkeypox virus, the peste des petits ruminants virus, the vesicular stomatitis virus, the western equine encephalitis virus, the Saint Louis encephalitis virus, the tick-borne encephalitis virus, the Chikungunya virus, the louping ill virus, the Teschen disease virus, the dengue fever virus, the smallpox virus, the eastern equine encephalitis virus, the avian influenza virus (limited to those having the H5 or H7 H antigen), the swine fever virus, the Nipah virus, the Japanese encephalitis virus, the Newcastle disease virus, the hemorrhagic fever virus with pulmonary and renal syndromes, the Hantaan virus, porcine enterovirus type 9, the Junin virus, the blue tongue virus, the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, the Hendra virus, the potato Andean latent tymovirus, the potato spindle tuber viroid, the white pox virus, the Powassan virus, the Machupo virus, the Marburg virus, the Murray Valley encephalitis virus, the South American hemorrhagic fever, the goat pox virus, the sheep pox virus, the Lassa fever virus, the lumpy skin disease virus, the Rift Valley fever virus, the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, or the Rocio virus  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国が全面的に所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国が全面的に所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行(投資銀行を含む。)(ii)保険会社(iii)登録を受けた証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場における債券の発行又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該居住者と第九条1(a)又は(b)にいう関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備又は物品の販売の一環として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合例文帳に追加

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: (a) the interest is beneficially owned by that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that other Contracting State; (b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that other Contracting State; (c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank (including an investment bank); (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a registered securities dealer; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 percent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50percent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the resident a relationship described in subparagraph (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; (d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund; or (e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a part of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of equipment or merchandise.  - 財務省

3 2の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行(ii)保険会社(iii)証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場において発行された債券又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該企業と第九条1(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備、物品の販売又は役務の提供の結果として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合例文帳に追加

3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: a) the interest is beneficially owned by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution owned by that Government; b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution owned by that Government; c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank; (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a securities company; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 per cent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50 per cent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the enterprise a relationship described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund; or e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a consequence of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of any equipment, merchandise or service.  - 財務省

2の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が全面的に所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が全面的に所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行(ii)保険会社(iii)証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場において発行された債券又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該居住者と第九条1(a)又は(b)にいう 関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金又は年金計画であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金又は年金計画が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備又は物品の販売の一環として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合例文帳に追加

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: (a) the interest is beneficially owned by the Government of that other Contracting State, apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that Government; (b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that Government; (c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank; (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a securities dealer; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 per cent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50 percent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the resident a relationship described in subparagraphs (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9 of this Convention; (d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund or pension scheme that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund or pension scheme; or (e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a part of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of equipment or merchandise.  - 財務省

3 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) 何人かがある条約国又は所定の外国において商標の保護出願をした場合は,その者若しくはその者の法律上の代表者又は譲受人は,当該出願の出願日及び出願を行った国を明記した書面を所定期間内に提出した後,自己の商標に関する当該登録出願に関して優先権を享受する権限を有し,当該商標のマレーシアでの登録出願について,前記条約国又は場合により所定の外国における保護出願日と同一の出願日が付与されるものとする。ただし,次に従うことを条件とする。 (a) 登録出願が,当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国での保護出願の日から6月以内に行われること。保護出願が2以上の条約国又は所定の外国でなされた場合は,前記の6月の期間は,それら複数出願中の最先のものがなされた日から起算するものとする。 (b) 出願人が,当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国の国民若しくは住民又は法律に基づき設立された一般法人であること,及び (c) 本条の如何なる規定も,当該商標の保護出願がマレーシアで行われた日より前に生じた当該商標の侵害行為その他の事由による損害について賠償を求める権利を当該商標の所有者に与えるものではないこと例文帳に追加

(1) Where any person has applied for protection of any trade mark in a Convention country or prescribed foreign country, such person or his legal representative or assignee, after furnishing a declaration within the prescribed time indicating the date of the application and the country in which it was made, shall in respect of the application for registration of his trade mark, be entitled to a right of priority and such application in Malaysia shall have the same date as the date of the application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be, subject to the following: (a) that the application for registration is made within six months from the date of application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and where an application for protection is made in more than one Convention country or prescribed foreign country, the period of six months referred to herein shall be reckoned from the date on which the earlier or earliest of those applications is made; (b) that the applicant shall be either a national or resident of, or a body corporate incorporated under the laws of, the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and (c) that nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of a trade mark to recover damages for infringements or any happening prior to the date on which the application for protection of the trade mark is made in Malaysia. - 特許庁

洛西バスターミナル-国道9号-西本願寺前-京都駅八条口-国道1号-京都南IC-名神高速道路-京滋バイパス-第二京阪道路-枚方東インターチェンジ-国道307号-京阪枚方市駅北口-国道1号-摂津南インターチェンジ-近畿自動車道-中国自動車道-山陽自動車道-広島IC-国道54号祇園新道-中筋駅-広島バスセンター-中広出入口-広島高速4号線-沼田出入口(広島高速4号線)-五日市インターチェンジ-山陽自動車道-大竹インターチェンジ-大竹IC入口-国道2号-岩国駅前-国道2号-岩国インターチェンジ-山陽自動車道-玖珂インターチェンジ-熊毛インターチェンジ-徳山東インターチェンジ-国道2号-徳山駅前例文帳に追加

Rakusei Bus TerminalNational Highway 9 – Nishi-honganji-mae – Hachijo Exit of Kyoto StationNational Highway 1 – Kyoto-minami Interchange – Meishin ExpresswayKeiji Bypass – Daini Keihan-doro – Hirakata-higashi InterchangeNational Highway 307 – North Exit of Hirakata City Station of Keihan LineNational Highway 1 – Settsu-minami InterchangeKinki Expressway – Chugoku ExpresswaySanyo ExpresswayHiroshima InterchangeNational Highway 54 Gion-shinmichi – Nakasuji StationHiroshima Bus Center – Nakahiro Entrance/Exit – Hiroshima Expressway 4 – Numata Entrance/Exit of Hiroshima Expressway – Itsukaichi InterchangeSanyo ExpresswayOtake InterchangeOtake Interchange EntranceNational Highway 2 – Iwakuni StationNational Highway 2 – Iwakuni InterchangeSanyo Expressway – Kuga Interchange – Kumage Interchange – Tokuyama-higashi InterchangeNational Highway 2 – Tokuyama Station  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

2 保険業法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項(保険募集の制限)の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百八十三条(所属保険会社等の賠償責任)の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店(組合の委託を受けて、当該組合のために共済契約の締結の代理又は媒介を行う者であつて、当該組合の役員又は使用人でないものをいう。以下同じ。)並びにその役員及び使用人が行う当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百九十四条(顧客に対する説明)の規定は共済契約の募集を行う共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店並びにその役員及び使用人について、同法第二百九十五条(自己契約の禁止)の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百条(禁止行為)の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合及びその共済代理店(これらの者の役員及び使用人を含む。)について、同法第三百五条(立入検査等)、第三百六条(業務改善命令)及び第三百七条第一項第三号(登録の取消し等)の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百九条(保険契約の申込みの撤回等)の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合に対し共済契約の申込みをした者又は共済契約者が行う共済契約の申込みの撤回又は解除について、同法第三百十一条(検査職員の証票の携帯及び提示等)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第三百五条の規定による立入り、質問又は検査をする職員について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号、第二百九十四条第三号、第二百九十五条第二項、第三百条第一項第七号及び第九号並びに第三百九条第一項第一号、第二項、第三項、第五項及び第六項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項中「損害保険会社(外国損害保険会社等を含む。以下この編において同じ。)」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合」と、「次条の登録を受けた損害保険代理店」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出がなされた共済代理店」と、「損害保険代理店である」とあるのは「共済代理店である」と、同条第二項中「次条又は第二百八十六条の登録を受けて」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出を行って」と、同法第三百条第一項中「次条に規定する特定保険契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同項第八号中「特定関係者(第百条の三(第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。次条において同じ。)に規定する特定関係者及び第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者のうち、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等を子会社とする保険持株会社及び少額短期保険持株会社(以下この条及び第三百一条の二において「保険持株会社等」という。)、当該保険持株会社等の子会社(保険会社等及び外国保険会社等を除く。)並びに保険業を行う者以外の者をいう。)」とあるのは「子会社等(中小企業等協同組合法第六十一条の二第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。)」と、同条第二項中「第四条第二項各号、第百八十七条第三項各号又は第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「定款又は中小企業等協同組合法第九条の六の二第一項に規定する共済規程若しくは同法第二十七条の二第三項に規定する火災共済規程」と、同法第三百五条及び第三百六条中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、同法第三百七条第一項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、「次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消し、又は」とあるのは「第三号に該当するときは、」と、「業務の全部若しくは一部」とあるのは「共済契約の募集」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (2) (Restriction on Insurance Solicitation) of the Insurance Business Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 283 (Liability for Compensation of the Insurance Company Concerned, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities carried out by officers or employees of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and by any mutual aid agent (which means a person who acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding mutual aid contracts for a cooperative under entrustment by said cooperative, and who is not an officer nor an employee of said cooperative; the same shall apply hereinafter) of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and officers or employees of said mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 294 (Explanations to Customers) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officers and employees of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, any mutual aid agent of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and officers and employees of said mutual aid agent, carrying out solicitation of mutual aid contracts; the provisions of Article 295 (Prohibition of Self-Contract) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 300 (Prohibited Acts) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and any mutual aid agent thereof (including their officers and employees) carrying out mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 305 (On-Site Inspections, etc.), Article 306 (Order to Improve Business Operations), and Article 307, paragraph (1), item (iii) (Rescission of Registration, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 309 (Revocation of Applications for Insurance Contracts, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation or cancellation of an offer for a mutual aid contract by a person who has filed an offer with a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or by a mutual aid contractor; and the provisions of Article 311 (Carrying and Presenting of Identification Cards by Inspection Officials) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officials who enter, question, and inspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 305 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 294, item (iii), Article 295, paragraph (2), Article 300, paragraph (1), item (vii) and item (ix), and Article 309, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the phrase "a casualty insurance company (including a foreign casualty insurance company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities"; the phrase "a casualty insurance agent registered under the following Article" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "a mutual aid agent notified under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "which is a casualty insurance agent" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "which is a mutual aid agent"; the phrase "by obtaining registration under the following Article or Article 286" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "by giving the notification under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "provided insurance contract prescribed in the following Article" in Article 300, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "person having a specified relationship (which means any person having a specified relationship as prescribed in Article 103 [including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in the following Article] or any person having a special relationship as prescribed in Article 194, who is not an insurance holding company or a small-sum, short term insurance holding company (hereinafter referred to as an 'insurance holding company, etc.' in this Article and Article 301-2) for which said insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc. is a subsidiary company, nor a subsidiary company (excluding an insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc.) of said insurance holding company, etc., nor a person engaged in insurance business)" in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (viii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "subsidiary company, etc. (which means a subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 61-2, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act)"; the phrase "documents listed in the items of Article 4, paragraph (2), items of Article 187, paragraph (3) or items of Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 300, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the articles of association, or mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 9-6-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act, or fire mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (3) of the same Act"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 305 and Article 306 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the phrase "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under any of the following items, may rescind the registration set forth in Article 276 or Article 286, or may" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under item (iii), may"; and the phrase "all or part of the operations" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation of mutual aid contracts."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十条の十五 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)、第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで(表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務)、第三百五十八条(第一項第二号を除く。)(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第三百六十条第一項(株主による取締役の行為の差止め)、第三百六十一条(取締役の報酬等)及び第三百六十五条第二項(競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限)の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ロに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合)及び第八百七十八条第一項(裁判の効力)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内(公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内)」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二(排除措置)、第二十条(不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置)、第二十五条(無過失損害賠償責任)、第二十六条(損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効)及び第八章第二節(手続)(第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。)の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条(不公正な取引方法の禁止)の規定に違反する行為(事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号(事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止)の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為)と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項(排除措置命令)中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五(事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付)中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一(行政手続法の適用除外)中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章(第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。)」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 会社法第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条(新株発行の無効判決の効力)の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条(株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力)の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合)及び第八百七十八条第一項(裁判の効力)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 会社法第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)及び第九百三十七条第三項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条(新株発行の無効判決の効力)の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合)及び第八百七十八条第一項(裁判の効力)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ロに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合)及び第八百七十八条第一項(裁判の効力)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内(公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内)」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百七十一条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十三条(第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。)(合併の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第十五号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第六十七条第一項(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで(議事録)及び第三百十六条第一項(株主総会に提出された資料等の調査)の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の三十六 会社法第四百二十五条(第一項第二号、第四項後段及び第五項を除く。)(責任の一部免除)、第四百二十六条(第四項を除く。)(取締役等による免除に関する定款の定め)、第四百二十七条(責任限定契約)、第四百二十八条(取締役が自己のためにした取引に関する特則)及び第四百三十条(役員等の連帯責任)の規定は、相互会社の役員等の損害賠償責任について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、「第四百二十四条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十四」と、同法第四百二十五条第一項中「決議」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条第二項に規定する決議」と、同法第四百二十六条第二項中「についての取締役の同意を得る場合及び当該責任の免除に関する」とあるのは「に関する」と、同条第五項中「総株主(第三項の責任を負う役員等であるものを除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数(第三項の責任を負う役員等である社員の数を除く。)の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)」と、同法第四百二十七条第五項中「第四百二十五条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「第四百二十五条第四項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-36 The provisions of Article 425 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii), the second sentence of paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Partial Exemption from Liability), Article 426 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Provisions of Articles of Incorporation on Exemption by Directors), Article 427 (Contracts for Limitation of Liability), Article 428 (Special Provision on Transactions Carried Out by Director for Himself/Herself) and Article 430 (Joint and Several Liabilities of Officers, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability for damages of the Officers, etc. of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Article 423, paragraph (1)" and "Article 424" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 53-34 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "resolution" in Article 425, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the resolution set forth in Article 62, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "the consent of directors with respect to exemption from liability under the provisions of the articles of incorporation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph (limited to exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers) is to be obtained, and to the cases where a proposal regarding such exemption from liability" in Article 426, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a proposal regarding the exemption of liability pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under that paragraph (limited to the exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers)"; the term "shareholders having not less than three hundredths (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders (excluding Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3))" in Article 426, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership (excluding the number of members who are Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3)) of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act)"; and the term "Article 425, paragraphs (4) and (5)" in Article 427, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first sentence of Article 425, paragraph (4)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(資産流動化法第七十六条第一項(資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

5 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ロに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合)及び第八百七十八条第一項(裁判の効力)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS