「ゆずいた」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(37ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第二十九条　登録を受けた者（以下「登録認証機関」という。）が当該登録に係る事業の全部を譲渡し、又は登録認証機関について相続、合併若しくは分割（当該登録に係る事業の全部を承継させるものに限る。）があつたときは、その事業の全部を譲り受けた者又は相続人（相続人が二人以上ある場合において、その全員の同意により事業を承継すべき相続人を選定したときは、その者。以下同じ。）、合併後存続する法人若しくは合併により設立した法人若しくは分割によりその事業の全部を承継した法人は、その登録認証機関の地位を承継する。例文帳に追加

Article 29 (1) In case an accredited person (hereinafter referred to as the "Accredited Certification Body") has assigned all of its businesses pertaining to said Accreditation or in case an inheritance, merger or split of an Accredited Certification Body (limited cases where of all of the business related to the relevant Accreditation is being succeeded to) has occurred, the assignee or heir of all of such businesses (in case there are two or more heirs, if an heir to inherit the business was selected according to an agreement of all the heirs, that heir; the same shall apply hereinafter), or the judicial person surviving the merger, or the judicial person founded after the merger, or the judicial person which has succeeded all of its businesses due to the split shall succeed to the position of the Accredited Certification Body.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　特定貨物自動車運送事業の譲渡し又は特定貨物自動車運送事業者について合併、分割（当該事業を承継させるものに限る。）若しくは相続があったときは、当該事業を譲り受けた者又は合併後存続する法人（特定貨物自動車運送事業者たる法人と特定貨物自動車運送事業を経営しない法人の合併後存続する特定貨物自動車運送事業者たる法人を除く。）若しくは合併により設立された法人、分割により当該事業を承継した法人若しくは相続人は、第一項の許可に基づく権利義務を承継する。例文帳に追加

(7) In the event of a transfer of a special motor truck transportation business or merger, split (limited to the event in which the said business is to be succeeded) or inheritance of the special motor truck transportation business operator, the transferee of the said business or the juridical person that would continue after the merger (excluding a juridical person that is a special motor truck transportation business operator and a juridical person that is a special motor truck transportation business operator and will continue after the merger with a juridical person that does not manage the special motor truck transportation business) or the juridical person established by merger or the juridical person or the inheritor that succeeded to the said business by split shall succeed to the rights and obligation based on the permission given in paragraph (1).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) 本条(3)，(4)及び(5)に基づいて，次に掲げる各号の場合，営業権を伴わない登録商標の譲渡は無効である。 (a) 当該商標がパプアニューギニア国内において譲渡人又は前権利者により善意に使用されたことがない場合，又は， (b) 実質的に同一の又は混同を生じるほど類似する商標が，譲渡後も譲渡人によりその他の商品に継続して使用され，かつ以下の条件をみたす場合 (i) それらの商品及び譲渡人との間に取引上の関係が存在すること，及び (ii) それらの商品が (A) 譲渡された商標に関する商品と同一の内容を有すること，又は (B) 譲渡人及び譲受人による各自の商品への当該商標の使用により，公衆が誤認混同するおそれがある内容を有すること例文帳に追加

(2) Subject to Subsections (3), (4) and (5) an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill is invalid if - (a) the trade mark was not at any time in use in good faith in Papua New Guinea by the assignor or his predecessor in title; or (b) a substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark continues to be used by the assignor, after the assignment in relation to other goods, where - (i) there exists a connection in the course of trade between those goods and the assignor; and (ii) those goods are - (A) of the same description as those in respect of which the trade mark has been assigned; or (B) of such a description that the public is likely to be deceived by the use of the trade mark by the assignor and assignee on their respective goods. - 特許庁

第二承継銀行への事業譲渡後においては、預金保険機構が金融（整理）管財人として、また不良債権を譲り受けたRCC（整理回収機構）、これは預金保険機構の100％子会社で、このRCCにも引き続き必要があれば、刑事上、民事上の責任を追及する権限がございますが、それが回収業務を進める中で日本振興銀行の旧経営陣等の責任追及を引き続き厳格に行っていくという本質は変わりません。民間への譲渡先が決まるわけではなく、あくまでブリッジバンクでございまして、RCCに行く分もありますから、8か月間ルールというのもあると聞いておるわけです。そういったことで、そこで責任追及が終わるというわけではないと思っています。例文帳に追加

After the transfer of the business operations of Incubator Bank of Japan to the Second Bridge Bank of Japan, DIC, as the financial receiver, will have the right to pursue criminal and civil responsibility, while Resolution and Collection Corporation (RCC), which is a fully owned subsidiary of DIC, will also continue to have the same right as the receiver of non-performing assets. There is no change in the principle that the responsibility of the former management team and other people concerned will be pursued during the process of loan collection. That decision concerns the transfer of business operations to the Second Bridge Bank, not the sale to a private company, and some operations will be transferred to RCC. I am also aware of the so-called eight-month rule. Therefore, the pursuit of responsibility will not end there.  - 金融庁

何人かが条約国又は国家群，国家同盟又は政府間機関の構成国である条約国において商標の登録出願をし，かつ，その者又はその者の法律上の代表者若しくは譲受人が，当該条約国又は国家群，国家同盟又は政府間機関の構成国である条約国における出願日の後6月以内にインドにおける商標の登録出願をした場合において，その商標が本法により登録を受けたときは，その商標については，当該条約国又は国家群，国家同盟又は政府間機関の構成国である条約国における出願日をもって登録されるものとし，かつ，本法の適用上，その日を登録日とみなす。例文帳に追加

Where a person has made an application for the registration of a trade mark in a convention country or country which is a member of a group of countries or union of countries or Inter-Governmental Organization and that person, or his legal representative or assignee, makes an application for the registration of the trade mark in India within six months after the date on which the application was made in the convention country or country which is a member of a group of countries or union of countries or Inter-Governmental Organization, the trade mark shall, if registered under this Act, be registered as of the date on which the application was made in the convention country or country which is a member of a group of countries or union of countries or Inter-Governmental Organization and that date shall be deemed for the purposes of this Act to be the date of registration.  - 特許庁

７　信用協同組合等は、第二項の事業の全部又は一部の譲受けにより契約（その契約に関する業務が銀行法（昭和五十六年法律第五十九号）第二条第二項（定義等）に規定する行為に係るものであるものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）に基づく権利義務を承継した場合において、その契約が、信用協同組合等の事業に関する法令により、当該信用協同組合等の行うことができない業務に属するものであるとき、又は当該信用協同組合等について制限されているものであるときは、その契約で期限の定めのあるものは期限満了まで、期限の定めのないものは承継の日から一年以内の期間に限り、その契約に関する業務を継続することができる。例文帳に追加

(7) In the case where a credit cooperative, etc. has succeeded to the rights and obligations based on a contract (limited to one where the operations related to said contract pertain to acts prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) [Definitions, etc.] of the Banking Act [Act No. 59 of 1981]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as a result of the receipt of a transfer of all or part of the activities under paragraph (2), if such contract falls under the category of operations that cannot be carried out by the credit cooperative, etc. or is restricted for the credit cooperative, etc. due to a law or regulation concerning the activities of the credit cooperative, etc., the credit cooperative, etc. may continue the operations related to said contract until the expiration of the specified period if a period has been specified by the contract, and for a period not exceeding one year from the date of succession if no such period has been specified by the contract.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　前二項に定めるもののほか、地方公共団体は、第五項の規定により行政財産の貸付けを受けた選定事業者が特定民間事業に係る特定施設（特定施設を利用する権利を含む。以下この項において同じ。）を譲渡しようとする場合において、必要があると認めるときは、地方自治法第二百三十八条の四第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該行政財産を、その用途又は目的を妨げない限度において、当該特定施設を譲り受けようとする者（当該選定事業に係る公共施設等の管理者等が当該公共施設等の管理に関し適当と認める者に限る。）に貸し付けることができる。例文帳に追加

(7) In addition to the leases prescribed in preceding two paragraphs, in the case where an Appointed Business Operator who has leased administrative asset pursuant to with the paragraph (5) of this article is to transfer the Specified Facility used for the Specified Private Project (including the right to utilize the Specified Facility; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the local government may, when it finds necessary, lease the administrative asset to the person who is to acquire the Specified Facility (provided that the person is recognized by the Administrator of Public Facility etc. pertaining to the Selected Project to be appropriate for administration of the Public Facility etc), notwithstanding the provision of the paragraph (1) of Article 238-4 of the Local Government Act to the extent that the lease does not prevent the original usage or purpose of the asset.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

（大田南畝「寛政十年戊午江戸人別」『一話一言』巻26(1820年)山下重民「江戸市街統計一班」『江戸会雑誌』1冊（2号）pp.18–26（1889年）勝海舟「江戸人口小記」「正徳ヨリ弘化迄江戸町数人口戸数」『吹塵録』（1890年）小宮山綏介「府内の人口」『江戸旧事考』2巻pp.19–23（1891年）『日本財政経済史料』9巻pp.1210–1243（1922年）柚木重三、堀江保蔵「本邦人口表」『経済史研究』7号pp.188–210（1930年）幸田成友「江戸の町人の人口」『社会経済学会誌』8巻（1号）pp.1–23（1938年）鷹見安二郎江戸の人口の研究」『全国都市問題会議』第7回1（本邦都市発達の動向と其の諸問題上）pp.59–83（1940年）高橋梵仙『日本人口史之研究』三友社（1941年）関山直太郎『近世日本の人口構造』吉川弘文館（1958年）南和男『幕末江戸社会の研究』吉川弘文館（1978年）より作成。例文帳に追加

Sources: Nanbo OTA, 'Kansei 10 nen, Bogo, Edonin betsu' from vol. 26 of "Ichiwa Ichigen" (1820); Shigetami YAMASHITA, 'Edo shigai Tokei Ippan' from vol.1 (pp. 18-26) of "Edokai zasshi" (1889); Kaishu KATSU, 'Edo Jinko Shoki' from "Suijinroku" (1890); Yasusuke KOMIYAMA, 'Funai no Jinko' from vol. 2 (pp. 19–23) of "Edo kyujiko" (1891) and vol. 9 (pp. 1210–1243) of "Nihon Zaise Keizai Shiryo" (1922); Juzo YUZUKI and Yasuzo HORIE, 'Honpo jinko hyo' from vol. 7 (pp. 188–210) of "Keizaishi Kenkyu" (1930); Shigetomo KODA, 'Edo no Chonin no Jinko' from vol. 8 (pp. 1–23) of "Shakai Keizai gakkaishi" (1938); Yasujiro TAKAMI, 'Edo no Jinko no Kenkyu' from the 7th conference (pp. 59–83) of "Zenkoku Toshi Mondai kaigi" (1940); Bonsen TAKAHASHI, "Nihon Jinkoshi no Kenkyu" from Sanyusha publishing (1941), Naotaro SEKIYAMA, "Kinsei Nihon no Jinko Kozo" published by Yoshikawa Kobunkan Inc. (1958); Kazuo MINAMI, "Bakumatsu Edo Shakai no Kenkyu" published by Yoshikawa Kobunkan Inc. (1978).  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

３　前二項に定めるもののほか、国は、第一項の規定により行政財産の貸付けを受けた選定事業者が特定民間事業に係る特定施設（特定施設を利用する権利を含む。以下この項において同じ。）を譲渡しようとする場合において、必要があると認めるときは、国有財産法第十八条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該行政財産を、その用途又は目的を妨げない限度において、当該特定施設を譲り受けようとする者（当該選定事業に係る公共施設等の管理者等が当該公共施設等の管理に関し適当と認める者に限る。）に貸し付けることができる。例文帳に追加

(3) In addition to the leases prescribed in preceding two paragraphs , in the case where an Appointed Business Operator who has leased administrative property in accordance with the paragraph (1) of this article is to transfer the Specified Facility (including the right to utilize the Specified Facility; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the national government may lease, when it finds necessary, the administrative asset to the person who is to acquire the Specified Facilities (provided that the person is recognized by the Administrator of Public Facility etc. pertaining to the said Selected Project to be appropriate for administration of the Public Facility etc.) notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 18 of the National Property Act, to the extent that the lease does not prevent the original use or purpose of the asset.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

新しい手数料構造は、融資制度全体を通じてより整合的なインセンティブを確立し、民間資本へのアクセスを促し、長期の利用を防ぎ、ＩＭＦ資金への不適切な大規模アクセスを防止し、従ってより効率的な利用に寄与するようなものでなければならない。全ての非譲許的融資制度について、その金利は、ＩＭＦの融資を受けている期間の長さに応じて段階的に引き上げるべきである。融資の規模が一定限度を超える時には、割増手数料を上乗せする可能性についても検討されるべきである。更に、ＩＭＦ融資に継続的に依存する国に対しては、ＩＭＦは融資の前提条件をより厳密に適用するとともに、ＩＭＦ資金の融資限度を制限するべきである。例文帳に追加

The new pricing structure should establish more consistent incentives across facilities, encourage access to private capital, discourage prolonged use of, and deter inappropriate large scale access to IMF resources, thus contributing to their more efficient use. For all non-concessional facilities, the interest rate should increase on a graduated basis the longer countries have IMF resources outstanding. The possibility of adding a premium when the scale of financing goes beyond certain thresholds should be explored. In addition, for countries that continuously resort to IMF facilities, the IMF should make more intensive use of prior actions and limit access to its resources.  - 財務省

第百九十八条　会社法第八条（会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止）の規定は外国相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条（自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任）の規定は外国相互会社の名称について、同法第一編第三章第一節（会社の使用人）の規定は外国相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節（第十八条を除く。）（会社の代理商）の規定は外国相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章（第二十四条を除く。）（事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等）の規定は外国相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、第五十四条、第五十四条の二並びに第五十四条の三第一項及び第四項の規定は外国相互会社の帳簿その他の資料について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 198 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. which is likely to be mistaken for a company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a trade name or name which is likely to be mistaken for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use Its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the name of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 2 (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in a transaction for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter IV (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Foreign Mutual Company has assigned its business or acquired any business or operation; and the provisions of Article 54, Article 54-2 and Article 54-3, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the books and other materials of a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第三条第二項から第四項まで及び前条の規定は、前項の規定により携帯音声通信事業者が譲渡時本人確認を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、第三条第二項から第四項までの規定中「相手方」とあるのは「譲受人等」と、同条第二項及び第四項中「本人確認」とあるのは「譲渡時本人確認」と、「第十一条第一号」とあるのは「第十一条第二号」と、同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第五条第一項」と、前条第一項中「本人確認」とあるのは「譲渡時本人確認」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4) and of the preceding paragraph shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the cases of identification confirmation at the time of transfer confirmed by the mobile voice communications carrier in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, the "counterparty" in Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4) shall be read as "transferee, etc."; "identification confirmation" in Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4) shall be read as "identification confirmation at the time of transfer" and "Article 11 item (i)" in said paragraphs shall be read as "Article 11 item (ii)"; "paragraph (1)" in Article 11 paragraph (3) shall be read as "Article 5 paragraph (1)"; and "identification confirmation" in Article 4 paragraph (1) shall be read as "identification confirmation at the time of transfer".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ドーハ閣僚宣言（パラ6）にあるとおり、環境保護と持続可能な開発の促進の観点に留意する必要がある。このような観点から、我が国としては、同閣僚宣言（パラ31）に基づく環境関連の物品の市場アクセス拡大については、関係各国と協力して、対象になる環境にやさしい品目のリストづくりを検討していく用意がある。当然のことながら、これらのリストに基づく譲許は、交渉結果全体の中で評価されるべきである。また、同様の見地から、地球規模の環境問題及び有限天然資源の持続的利用の観点を踏まえて対応すべき品目については、その市場アクセスを検討する際に特別の配慮が必要である。この点については、更なる提案を行う。例文帳に追加

It is necessary to pay due attention to the protection of environment and the promotion of sustainable development, as is provided in Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. From this viewpoint, Japan, in collaboration with other Members, is prepared to work out a list of environmental goods for their improved market access, in accordance with Paragraph 31 of the Doha Declaration. Concessions to be made out of the list are to be evaluated as part of the overall results of the negotiations. From the same viewpoint as above, special consideration should be given, in the course of market access negotiation, to the goods which have to be appropriately addressed in terms of global environment issues and the sustainable use of exhaustible natural resources. In this regard, Japan intends to make a proposal specifically on this point.  - 経済産業省

ドーハ閣僚宣言（パラ６）にあるとおり、環境保護と持続可能な開発の促進の観点に留意し、議論を進める必要がある。このような観点から、我が国としては、同閣僚宣言（パラ３１）に基づく環境関連の物品の市場アクセス拡大については、対象とすべき環境物品の考え方及びリストをAnnexIIのとおり提案する。当然のことながら、本リストに基づく譲許は、交渉結果全体の中で評価されるべきである。また、同様の見地から、地球規模の環境問題及び有限天然資源の持続的利用の観点を踏まえて対応すべき品目については、その市場アクセスを検討する際に特別の配慮が必要である。この点については、本提案の付属文書として、今後更なる提案を行う。例文帳に追加

It is necessary to proceed the discussion, paying due attention to the protection of the environment and the promotion of sustainable development, as is provided in Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. From this viewpoint, Japan proposes a list of environmental goods for improved market access, in accordance with Paragraph 31 of the Doha Declaration. In this context, suggested thought on coverage and the list is attached (Annex II). Concessions to be made out of the list are to be evaluated as part of the overall results of the negotiations. From this same viewpoint, special consideration should be given, in the course of market access negotiations, to goods which have to be appropriately addressed in terms of global environment issues and the sustainable use of exhaustible natural resources. In this regard, Japan intends to make a specific proposal on this point as part of this proposal.  - 経済産業省

第十三条　銀行の同一人（当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）に対する信用の供与等（信用の供与、又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、当該銀行の自己資本の額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下この条において「信用供与等限度額」という。）を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割（二以上の株式会社又は合同会社が共同してする新設分割をいう。第十六条の三第四項第四号及び第五十二条の二十二第一項において同じ。）若しくは吸収分割をし、又は事業を譲り受けたことにより銀行の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 13 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (hereinafter in this Article referring to those specified by a Cabinet Order) by a Bank to one person (including other persons who has a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order with that person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of the Bank's equity capital by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc." in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the Prime Minister has given the approval in the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as a result of a Merger, of Joint Incorporation-Type Split (meaning an Incorporation-Type Split that two or more stock companies or limited liability companies effect jointly; the same shall apply in Articles 16-3(4)(iv) and 52-22(1)) or absorption-type split or of transfer of another person's business by a person who takes granting of credit, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の六　第二十四条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者（貸金業者を除く。以下この条において同じ。）が貸付けに係る契約に基づく債権を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに第二十四条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者の貸付けに係る契約に基づく債権の譲渡があつた場合における当該債権を譲り受けた者について、第二十四条の二第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者が保証業者と貸付けに係る契約について保証契約を締結する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二並びに第二十一条の規定は保証業者が貸金業を営む者との間でその貸付けに係る契約についてした保証に基づく求償権、当該貸金業を営む者の当該貸付けに係る契約若しくはその保証契約に基づく債務の弁済に係る求償権若しくは当該弁済による代位に係る債権又はこれらの保証債権（以下この条において「保証等に係る求償権等」という。）を取得した場合における当該保証等に係る求償権等を取得した保証業者について、第二十四条の三第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者が貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済を他人に委託する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二並びに第二十一条の規定は貸金業を営む者の委託を受けて当該貸金業を営む者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済をした者が当該債務の弁済に係る求償権若しくは当該弁済による代位に係る債権又はこれらの保証債権（以下この条において「受託弁済に係る求償権等」という。）を取得した場合（保証業者が当該貸付けの契約に係る保証等に係る求償権等を取得した場合を除く。）における当該弁済をした者について、第二十四条の四第一項の規定は保証業者が保証等に係る求償権等を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに第二十四条の四第一項の規定は保証等に係る求償権等の譲渡があつた場合における当該保証契約に係る求償権等を譲り受けた者について、前条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者の委託を受けて当該貸金業を営む者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済をした者が受託弁済に係る求償権等（保証業者が取得した当該貸付けの契約に係る保証等に係る求償権等を除く。）を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに前条第一項の規定は受託弁済に係る求償権等の譲渡があつた場合における当該受託弁済に係る求償権等を譲り受けた者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 24-6 Article 24, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business (excluding Money Lenders; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) assigns to any other person the claims under a loan contract; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and Article 24, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an assignee of the claims under the loan contract of a person who engages in the Money Lending Business in the case of assignment thereof; Article 24-2, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business concludes a guarantee contract in relation to a loan contract with a Guarantee Business Operator; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, and Article 21 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Guarantee Business Operator who has acquired the right to obtain reimbursement under a guarantee which the Guarantee Business Operator has provided to the person who engages in the Money Lending Business in relation to such person's loan contract, the right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to the performance of obligations under the loan contract of the person who engages in the Money Lending Business or the guarantee contract therefor, claims related to the subrogation by such performance, or guarantee claims related thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc." in this Article); Article 24-3, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business entrusts to any other person the performance of obligations under the Contract for a Loan; Article 20, paragraph (1) and (2), Article 20-2, and Article 21 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who, based on entrustment from a person who engaged in the Money Lending Business, has made performance of the obligations under the Contract for a Loan of said person who engages in the Money Lending Business and who has acquired the right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to the performance of obligations or claims related to the subrogation by such performance, or guarantee claims related thereto (hereinafter referred to as the "Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment" in this Article) (excluding the cases where a Guarantee Business Operator has acquired the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to the Guarantee, etc. in relation to the Contract for a Loan); Article 24-4, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Guarantee Business Operator assigns to any other person the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc.; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and Article 24-4, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an assignee of a right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to a guarantee contract in the case of assignment of the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to the Guarantee, etc.; paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who, based on entrustment from a person who engages in the Money Lending Business, has made performance of the obligations under the loan contract of such person who engages in the Money Lending Business, assigns to any other person the Right to Obtain Reimbursement, etc. Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment (excluding the Right to Obtain Reimbursement, etc. Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc. under the Contract for a Loan acquired by the Guarantee Business Operator); and Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the assignee of the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment in the case of assignment thereof. In this case, necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十一条　会社法第八条（会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止）の規定は相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条（自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任）の規定は相互会社について、同法第一編第三章第一節（会社の使用人）の規定は相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節（第十八条を除く。）（会社の代理商）の規定は相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章（第二十四条を除く。）（事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等）の規定は相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第十条（支配人）中「会社（外国会社を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「相互会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 21 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. Which is Likely to be Mistaken for a Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a misleading trade name or any other name that might evoke a Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Section 2 of said Chapter (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in transactions for a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Chapter IV of said Part (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company either assigns its business, or takes over any business or operation, respectively. In this case, the term "Company (including a Foreign Company, hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 10 (Manager) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

連合王国，又はその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおいて意匠保護を出願している者，又はその法律上の代表者若しくは譲受人は，単独か他人との共同かを問わず，本法による前記意匠の登録が他の出願人に優先し，かつ，場合に応じて，連合王国，又はその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおける出願と同一日付を有する旨を主張する権利を有する。ただし，次に掲げる事項を前提とする。(a) 当該出願が，連合王国，又は場合に応じてその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおける意匠保護の出願から6月以内にされること (b) 本条における何れの事項も，当該意匠がインドにおいて実際に登録される日より前に発生した盗用に対する賠償金を回収する権利を意匠所有者に付与するものではないこと例文帳に追加

Any person who has applied for protection for any design in the United Kingdom or any of other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, or his legal representative or assignee shall, either alone or jointly with any other person, be entitled to claim that the registration of the said design under this Act shall be in priority to other applicants and shall have the same date as the date of the application in the United Kingdom or any of such other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, as the case may be: Provided that- (a) the application is made within six months from the application for protection in the United Kingdom or any of such other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, as the case may be; and (b) nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of the design to recover damages for piracy of design happening prior to the actual date on which the design is registered in India. - 特許庁

そして、鉄道施設の完成後、京都高速鉄道が日本鉄道建設公団から25年間の分割払いで鉄道施設を譲り受け、京都市交通局に貸与し、京都市交通局が醍醐～二条間を一体的に運営することになり、1987年4月1日の国鉄分割民営化によって、それまでの「地方鉄道法」が廃止され、新たに「鉄道事業法」が施行されたことによって、京都市交通局が醍醐～御陵間と三条京阪～二条間の第一種鉄道事業者、御陵～三条京阪間の第二種鉄道事業者となり、京都高速鉄道が御陵～三条京阪間の第三種鉄道事業者となったことから、京阪電気鉄道も第二種鉄道事業者という経営形態が確立されたため、京津線の御陵～三条間の旅客営業を廃止せず、京都市交通局とともに京都高速鉄道から鉄道施設を借り受け、同区間の地下化、ルート変更する形で旅客営業を継続してはどうかと再検討されたが、諸経費などの絡みで既定方針どおりとなった。例文帳に追加

After the subway facilities were completed, Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., bought the subway facilities from the Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation using a 25-year installment plan in order to lend them to the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau, which would in turn operate the section between Daigo and Nijo integrally, and accordingly the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau became a Type I Railway Business Operator for the sections between Daigo and Misasagi and between Sanjo-keihan and Nijo, as well as a Type II Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan, while Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., became a Type Ⅲ Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan based on the Railway Business Act, which had taken effect after the abolishment of the old local railway law when Japanese National Railways was split and privatized on April 1, 1987, whereby Keihan Electric Railway was also positioned as a Type II Railway Business Operator; therefore, the idea of continuing passenger services in the section between Misasagi and Sanjo on the Keishin Line, borrowing the subway facilities from Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., in cooperation with Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau to underground and change the route of the relevant section was re-examined; however, the parties involved decided to follow the established policy due to overhead expenses.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

第百六十六条　次の各号に掲げる者（以下この条において「会社関係者」という。）であつて、上場会社等に係る業務等に関する重要事実（当該上場会社等の子会社に係る会社関係者（当該上場会社等に係る会社関係者に該当する者を除く。）については、当該子会社の業務等に関する重要事実であつて、次項第五号から第八号までに規定するものに限る。以下同じ。）を当該各号に定めるところにより知つたものは、当該業務等に関する重要事実の公表がされた後でなければ、当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る売買その他の有償の譲渡若しくは譲受け又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「売買等」という。）をしてはならない。当該上場会社等に係る業務等に関する重要事実を次の各号に定めるところにより知つた会社関係者であつて、当該各号に掲げる会社関係者でなくなつた後一年以内のものについても、同様とする。例文帳に追加

Article 166 (1) A person listed in any of the following items (hereinafter referred to as a "Corporate Insider" in this Article) who has come to know a Material Fact Pertaining to Business or Other Matters of a Listed Company, etc. (in the case of a Corporate Insider pertaining to a Subsidiary Company of the Listed Company, etc. (excluding a person who falls under the category of Corporate Insider pertaining to the Listed Company, etc.), limited to any Material Fact Pertaining to Business or Other Matters of the Subsidiary Company that are listed in items (5) to (8) of the following paragraph; the same shall apply hereinafter) in a manner as prescribed in the respective items shall not make sales or purchase, other types of transfer for value or acceptance of such transfer for value, or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase, etc." in this Article) of Specified Securities, etc. pertaining to the Listed Company, etc. before the material facts pertaining to business or other matters are Publicized. The same shall apply for one year to a Corporate Insider who comes to know a Material Fact Pertaining to Business or Other Matters of the Listed Company, etc. in a manner as prescribed in any of the following items even after he/she ceased to be a Corporate Insider listed in the items:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　銀行は、子会社対象会社のうち、第一項第一号から第十一号まで又は第十三号に掲げる会社（従属業務（第二項第一号に掲げる従属業務をいう。以下この項及び第七項において同じ。）又は銀行業に付随し、若しくは関連する業務として内閣府令で定めるものを専ら営む会社（従属業務を営む会社にあつては、主として当該銀行の営む業務のためにその業務を営んでいる会社に限る。）を除く。以下この条及び次条第四項第一号において「子会社対象銀行等」という。）を子会社としようとするときは、第三十条第一項から第三項まで又は金融機関の合併及び転換に関する法律（昭和四十三年法律第八十六号）第五条第一項（認可）の規定により合併、会社分割又は事業の譲受けの認可を受ける場合を除き、あらかじめ、内閣総理大臣の認可を受けなければならない。例文帳に追加

(4) A Bank shall, when it intends to make a Company Eligible for Subsidiary Company which falls under any of categories listed in items (i) to (xi) inclusive and (xiii) of paragraph (1) (excluding that which exclusively engages in Dependent Business (meaning Dependent Business defined in paragraph(2)(i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraph (7)) or business specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that being incidental or related exclusively to Banking Business (in case of a company which engages in Dependent Business, limited to that engages in it mainly for business operated by the Bank); such a Company Eligible for Subsidiary Company shall be referred to as a "Bank, etc. Eligible for Subsidiary Company" in this Article and paragraph (4) item (i) of the following Article) become its Subsidiary Company, obtain authorization therefor from the Prime Minister in advance, except when an authorization for merger, company split or receiving transfer of business from other company is to be obtained pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) to (3) inclusive of Article 30 of this Act or Article 5(1) (Authorization) of Act on Financial Institutions' Merger and Conversion (Act No. 86 of 1968).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第三条第二項から第四項まで、第四条及び前条第一項の規定は、第一項の規定により媒介業者等が譲渡時本人確認を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、第三条第二項から第四項までの規定中「携帯音声通信事業者」とあるのは「媒介業者等」と、「相手方」とあるのは「譲受人等」と、同条第二項及び第四項中「本人確認」とあるのは「譲渡時本人確認」と、「第十一条第一号」とあるのは「第十一条第二号」と、同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第五条第一項」と、第四条第一項中「本人確認を行ったとき」とあるのは「第六条第一項の規定により媒介業者等が譲渡時本人確認を行ったとき」と、「本人確認に関する事項」とあるのは「譲渡時本人確認に関する事項」と、前条第一項中「携帯音声通信事業者」とあるのは「媒介業者等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4), Article 4 and paragraph (1) of the preceding article shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in the case of identification at the time of transfer confirmed by an intermediary agency, etc. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of this article. In this case, "mobile voice communications carrier" appearing in Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4) shall be read as "intermediary agency, etc." and the "counterparty" in Article 3 paragraphs (2) through (4) shall be read as "transferee, etc."; "identification confirmation" in Article 3 paragraphs (2) and (4) shall be read as "identification confirmation at the time of transfer" and "Article 11 item (i)" in Article 3 paragraphs (2) and (4) shall be read as "Article 11 item (ii)"; "paragraph (1)" in Article 3 paragraph (3) shall be read as "Article 5 paragraph (1)"; "when identification confirmation is performed" in Article 4 paragraph (1) shall be read as "when identification confirmation at the time of transfer is performed by an intermediary agency, etc. in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 paragraph (1)"; "matters regarding the identification" in Article 4 paragraph (1) shall be read as "matters regarding the identification at the time of transfer"; and "mobile voice communications carrier" in paragraph (1) of the preceding article shall be read as "intermediary agency, etc.".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。例文帳に追加

Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks.  - 特許庁

第二十七条の二　その株券、新株予約権付社債券その他の有価証券で政令で定めるもの（以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一（第四項を除く。）において「株券等」という。）について有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない発行者の株券等につき、当該発行者以外の者が行う買付け等（株券等の買付けその他の有償の譲受けをいい、これに類するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。以下この節において同じ。）であつて次のいずれかに該当するものは、公開買付けによらなければならない。ただし、新株予約権を有する者が当該新株予約権を行使することにより行う株券等の買付け等及び株券等の買付け等を行う者がその者の特別関係者（第七項第一号に掲げる者のうち内閣府令で定めるものに限る。）から行う株券等の買付け等その他政令で定める株券等の買付け等は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 27-2 (1) As for Shares, bonds with share option and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc." in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11 (excluding Article 27-30-11(4))) for which their Issuer is required to submit Annual Securities Reports, Purchase, etc. (meaning purchase or other type of acceptance of transfer for value of Share Certificates, etc. and including acts specified by a Cabinet Order as being similar to such acceptance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) of them shall be made by means of a Tender Offer, if the Purchase, etc. is made by a person other than the Issuer and falls under any of the categories listed in the following items; provided, however, that this shall not apply to Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. conducted as exercise of share option by the holder thereof, Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. from Persons in Special Relationship with the person conducting Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc.(limited to such persons specified in item (i) of paragraph (7) and specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) or other Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. so specified by a Cabinet Order:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件例文帳に追加

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case. - 特許庁

第二百十一条　第百四十二条の規定は外国保険会社等を全部又は一部の当事者とする日本における事業の譲渡又は譲受けについて、第七章第三節の規定は外国保険会社等がその日本における業務及び財産の管理の委託をする場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第百四十四条第二項中「当該管理の委託をする保険会社（以下この節において「委託会社」という。）及び受託会社」とあるのは「受託会社」と、第百四十六条第二項中「本店又は主たる事務所」とあるのは「同項の日本における主たる店舗」と、同条第三項中「、第十九条」とあるのは「及び第十九条」と、「及び第四十六条（添付書面の通則）（これらの規定を第六十七条」とあるのは「（これらの規定を第二百十六条第一項」と、第百四十八条第三項中「保険業法第百四十四条第二項に規定する委託会社」とあるのは「日本における業務及び財産の管理の委託をした保険業法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等」と、同条第四項中「保険業法第百四十四条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第二百十一条において準用する同法第百四十四条第一項」と、第百四十九条第一項中「委託会社及び受託会社」とあるのは「受託会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 211 The provision of Article 142 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a transfer or acquisition of business in Japan involving a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. or foreign insurance companies, etc.; and the provisions of Chapter VII, Section 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. has entrusted the administration of its business and property in Japan. In this case, the term "both the Insurance Company entrusting the administration business (hereinafter referred to as "Entrusting Company" in this Section) and the Entrusted Company" in Article 144, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Entrusted Company"; the term "head office or principal office" in Article 146, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal branch in Japan set forth in that paragraph"; the term ", Article 19" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and Article 19," the term "and Article 46 (General Rules on Attached Documents) of the Commercial Registration Act (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 67)" in Article 146, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "(including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 216, paragraph (1)"; the term "Entrusting Company set forth in Article 144, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" in Article 148, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the Insurance Business Act that has entrusted the administration of its business and property in Japan"; the term "Article 144, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" in Article 148, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 144, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 211 of that Act;" and the term "both the Entrusting Company and the Entrusted Company" in Article 149, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Entrusted Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) 何人かがある条約国又は所定の外国において商標の保護出願をした場合は，その者若しくはその者の法律上の代表者又は譲受人は，当該出願の出願日及び出願を行った国を明記した書面を所定期間内に提出した後，自己の商標に関する当該登録出願に関して優先権を享受する権限を有し，当該商標のマレーシアでの登録出願について，前記条約国又は場合により所定の外国における保護出願日と同一の出願日が付与されるものとする。ただし，次に従うことを条件とする。 (a) 登録出願が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国での保護出願の日から6月以内に行われること。保護出願が2以上の条約国又は所定の外国でなされた場合は，前記の6月の期間は，それら複数出願中の最先のものがなされた日から起算するものとする。 (b) 出願人が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国の国民若しくは住民又は法律に基づき設立された一般法人であること，及び (c) 本条の如何なる規定も，当該商標の保護出願がマレーシアで行われた日より前に生じた当該商標の侵害行為その他の事由による損害について賠償を求める権利を当該商標の所有者に与えるものではないこと例文帳に追加

(1) Where any person has applied for protection of any trade mark in a Convention country or prescribed foreign country, such person or his legal representative or assignee, after furnishing a declaration within the prescribed time indicating the date of the application and the country in which it was made, shall in respect of the application for registration of his trade mark, be entitled to a right of priority and such application in Malaysia shall have the same date as the date of the application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be, subject to the following: (a) that the application for registration is made within six months from the date of application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and where an application for protection is made in more than one Convention country or prescribed foreign country, the period of six months referred to herein shall be reckoned from the date on which the earlier or earliest of those applications is made; (b) that the applicant shall be either a national or resident of, or a body corporate incorporated under the laws of, the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and (c) that nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of a trade mark to recover damages for infringements or any happening prior to the date on which the application for protection of the trade mark is made in Malaysia. - 特許庁

第五十二条の二十二　銀行持株会社又はその子会社等（当該銀行持株会社の子会社（内閣府令で定める会社を除く。）その他の当該銀行持株会社と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の同一人（当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）に対する信用の供与等（信用の供与又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、合算して、当該銀行持株会社及びその子会社等の自己資本の純合計額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下この条において「銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額」という。）を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割若しくは吸収分割をし、又は営業を譲り受けたことにより銀行持株会社又はその子会社等の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 52-22 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (meaning granted credit, or contributed funds specified by a Cabinet Order as a contribution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) by a Bank Holding Company or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies of the Bank Holding Company (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and other persons who have a special relationship with the Bank Holding Company specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to one person (including other persons who have a special relationship with said person specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the total net amount of the equity capital of the Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (hereinafter the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company" in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as a result of a Merger, Joint Incorporation-Type Split or absorption-type split involving said person, or of transfer of another person's business to said person, or by other unavoidable reasons specified by a Cabinet Order, and the Prime Minister has given approval for such excess amount of granting of credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

受理されて記録されるためには，譲渡証は，次の通りでなければならない。 (a)書面によるものとし，英語又はフィリピン語以外の言語による場合は，当該書類に英語の翻訳文を添付しなければならない。 (b)公証人，又は宣誓を司り，その他の公証行為を行う権限を有するその他の上級職員の面前で確認を受け，当該公証人その他の上級職員の署名及び公印によって認証を受けなければならない。 (c)譲受人がフィリピンに住所を有していない場合は，フィリピンに居住する代理人の選任書を添付しなければならない。 (d)当該特許又は出願に関して錯誤がないように，関係する特許証を番号及び日付で特定し，特許に記載された特許権者の名称及び発明の名称を示さなければならない。特許出願の場合は，出願番号及び出願日を記載し，出願書類に記載された出願人の名称及び発明の名称も示さなければならない。ただし，出願書類の作成と同時に又はその後に出願書類が提出される前若しくは出願番号が確定する前に譲渡証を作成する場合は，出願書類の作成日及び出願人の名称並びに発明の名称により，当該出願を適切に特定しなければならない。 (e)所定の記録及び公告手数料を納付しなければならない。例文帳に追加

To be acceptable for recording, the assignment: (a) Must be in writing and if in a language other than English or Filipino, the document must be accompanied by an English translation; (b) Must be acknowledged before a notary public or other officer authorized to administer oaths and perform other notarial acts, and be certified under the hand and official seal of the said notary or other officer; (c) Must be accompanied by an appointment of a resident agent, if the assignee is not domiciled in the Philippines; (d) So that there can be no mistake as to the patent or application intended, must identify the letters patent involved by number and date, giving the name of the patentee and the title of the invention as set forth in the patent; in the case of an application for patent, the application number and filing date of the application should be stated, giving also the name of the applicant, and the title of the invention, set forth in the application, but if an assignment is executed concurrently with or subsequent to the execution of the application but before the application is filed, or before its application number is ascertained, it should adequately identify the application, by its date of execution and name of the applicant, and the title of the invention; and (e) Must be accompanied by the required recordal and publication fees. - 特許庁

第十四条　第四条及び第八条の規定並びに第五条、第六条及び第九条から前条までの規定中債権の譲渡に係る部分は、法人が債権を目的として質権を設定した場合において、当該質権の設定につき債権譲渡登記ファイルに記録された質権の設定の登記（以下「質権設定登記」という。）について準用する。この場合において、第四条の見出し並びに同条第一項、第二項及び第四項並びに第十条第一項第一号及び第二号中「債権の譲渡」とあるのは「質権の設定」と、第四条第一項中「譲渡の登記」とあるのは「質権の設定の登記」と、同項から同条第三項までの規定中「債権の債務者」とあるのは「質権の目的とされた債権の債務者」と、同条第一項及び第八条第五項中「民法第四百六十七条」とあるのは「民法第三百六十四条の規定によりその規定に従うこととされる同法第四百六十七条」と、第四条第二項及び第四項、第五条第一項及び第二項、第六条、第八条の見出し並びに同条第四項及び第五項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第三項並びに第十二条第二項中「債権譲渡登記」とあるのは「質権設定登記」と、第四条第二項中「その譲渡」とあるのは「その質権の設定」と、同項から同条第四項まで、第五条第二項、第八条第二項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項、第十一条第二項第一号及び第四号並びに第十二条第三項中「譲渡人」とあるのは「質権設定者」と、第四条第二項から第四項まで、第八条第二項、第四項及び第五項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項並びに第十一条第二項第一号中「譲受人」とあるのは「質権者」と、第五条第一項中「第七条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項」とあり、第六条第一号中「次条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項」とあるのは「第十四条において準用する第八条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項の規定」と、第五条第二項及び第六条第二号中「第十二条第一項及び第三項並びに第十三条第一項」とあるのは「第十四条第一項において準用する第十二条第一項及び第三項並びに第十三条第一項の規定」と、第八条第二項中「債権譲渡登記は」とあるのは「質権設定登記は」と、同項第二号及び第五号並びに第九条第二項第一号中「債権譲渡登記の」とあるのは「質権設定登記の」と、第八条第二項第二号中「登記原因及びその日付」とあるのは「登記原因及びその日付並びに被担保債権の額又は価格」と、同項第三号及び第四号、同条第三項第一号、第四項及び第五項、第十条第一項第三号及び第三項並びに第十一条第二項第一号、第三号及び第四号中「譲渡に係る債権」とあるのは「質権の目的とされた債権」と、第八条第二項第三号中「譲渡する」とあるのは「目的として質権を設定する」と、同条第四項及び第五項中「譲渡をし」とあるのは「質権を設定し」と、同項中「同法第四百六十七条」とあるのは「同法第三百六十四条の規定によりその規定に従うこととされる同法第四百六十七条」と、第九条第二項及び第十条第二項中「債権譲渡登記に」とあるのは「質権設定登記に」と、同項第一号中「債権譲渡登記を」とあるのは「質権設定登記を」と、第十一条第二項中「債権の譲渡に」とあるのは「質権の設定に」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 14 (1) The provisions of Article 4 and Article 8, and such parts of the provisions of Article 5, Article 6, and Article 9 to the preceding Article that pertain to the assignment of a claim, shall apply, in case where a juridical person has created a pledge on a claims, to a registration of creation of pledge recorded in a claim assignment registration file with regard to the creation of said pledge (hereinafter referred to as a "Registration of Creation of Pledge"). In this case: in the title of Article 4 and paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of said Article, and Article 10, paragraph (1), item (i) and item (ii), the phrase "assignment of (a/the) claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creation of (a/the) pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (1), the phrase "registration of assignment" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) to paragraph (3), the phrase "obligor of the claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "obligor of the claim on which the pledge is created"; in Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 8, paragraph (5), the term "Article 467 of the Civil Code" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 467 of the Civil Code, which shall govern pursuant to the provision of Article 364 of said Code"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 5, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 6, the title of Article 8 and paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of said Article, Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 12, paragraph (2), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (2), the phrase "such assignment" shall be deemed to be replaced with "such creation of pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) to paragraph (4), Article 5, paragraph (2), Article 8, paragraph (2), Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i) and item (iv), and Article 12, paragraph (3), the term "assignor" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pledgor"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) to paragraph (4), Article 8, paragraph (2), paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1), and Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i), the term "assignee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pledgee"; the phrase "Article 7 to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2)" in Article 5, paragraph (1), and the phrase "the following Article to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2)" in Article 6, item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 8 to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2), which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 14"; in Article 5, paragraph (2) and Article 6, item (ii), the phrase "Article 12, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 13, paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 12, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 13, paragraph (1), which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 14, paragraph (1)"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (ii) and item (v) and Article 9, paragraph (2), item (i), the phrase "registration regarding the registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "registration regarding the Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (ii), the phrase "the cause of registration regarding the registration of assignment of claims and the date thereof" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cause of registration regarding the Registration of Creation of Pledge and the date thereof, and the amount or value of the claim secured"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iii) and item (iv), Article 8, paragraph (3), item (i), paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 10, paragraph (1), item (iii) and paragraph (3), and Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i), item (iii) and item (iv), the term "assigned claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "claim on which the pledge is created"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iii), the phrase "assigning a claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creating a pledge on a claim"; in Article 8, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), the phrase "further assigned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "further created a pledge on"; in Article 8, paragraph (5), the phrase "Article 467 of the Civil Code" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 467 of the Civil Code, which shall govern pursuant to the provision of Article 364 of said Code"; in Article 9, paragraph (2) and Article 10, paragraph (2), the phrase "pertaining to the registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pertaining to the Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 10, paragraph (2), item (i), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; and in Article 11, paragraph (2), the phrase "assignment of a claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creation of a pledge."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム