1153万例文収録!

「DECISION」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(404ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > DECISIONの意味・解説 > DECISIONに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

DECISIONを含む例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 20184



例文

Detention of goods bearing infringing sign If the chief executive considers that any imported goods that are in the control of the Customs may be goods to which a notice accepted under section 139 relates, those goods must be detained in the custody of the chief executive or any customs officer until the chief executive is served with an order made in proceedings under section 152 that the notice be discharged; or the chief executive is served with an order made in proceedings under section 152 that the goods be released; or any proceedings under section 153 in respect of those goods (including any appeal) are determined by a decision that the goods are not goods on or in physical relation to which an infringing sign is used that have been imported other than for private and domestic use; or any proceedings under section 153 in respect of those goods, including any appeal, are abandoned; or 10 working days have elapsed since notice was served under section 147 and the chief executive has not been served with notice of proceedings brought under section 153 by a person other than the importer or consignee.例文帳に追加

税関長が,税関の管理下にある輸入商品が第139条に基づいて受理された通知に関係する商品である可能性があると判断した場合は,それらの商品は,次に掲げる時まで,税関長又は税関職員の保管の下に留置されなければならない。税関長が,第152条に基づく手続において出された命令であって,通知は取り消されるべきであるとするものの送達を受ける時,又は税関長が,第152条に基づく手続において出された命令であって,商品の留置は解除されるべきであるとするものの送達を受ける時,又はそれらの商品に関する第153条に基づく法的手続(上訴を含む)が,個人としての及び家庭での使用以外の目的で輸入された商品が,侵害標識が商品上に又は商品との物質的関係において使用されている商品ではない旨の判決によって決定される時,又はそれらの商品に関する第153条に基づく法的手続が,上訴を含め,放棄される時,又は第147条に基づく通知が送達されてから10就業日が経過し,かつ,税関長が,輸入者又は荷受人以外によって第153条に基づいて提起された手続についての通知の送達を受けていない時 - 特許庁

Article 84 For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 19 in the case of a trust with two or more trustees, the phrase "Where a co-ownership interest in a specific property that belongs to a trustee is an interest in both the trust property and the trustee's own property" in paragraph (1) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Where a co-ownership interest in a specific property that belongs to a trustee is an interest in both the trust property and the trustee's own property, when there are two or more trustees for the trust pertaining to said trust property"; the term "trustee" in paragraph (1), item (ii) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "trustee whose own property includes the co-ownership interests"; the term "trustee" in paragraph (1), item (iii) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "trustee whose own property includes the co-ownership interests"; the term "trustee" in paragraph (2) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "trustee whose own property includes the co-ownership interests"; the phrase "Where a co-ownership interest in a specific property that belongs to a trustee is an interest in both the trust property and the trust property of another trust" in paragraph (3) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Where a co-ownership interest in a specific property that belongs to a trustee is an interest in both the trust property and the trust property of another trust, when there are two or more trustees for the trust pertaining to said trust property or such other trust"; in paragraph (3), item (iii) of the said Article, the term "trustee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trustee to whom the co-ownership interests for each trust property belong" and the phrase "based on a decision by the trustee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "based on an agreement between the trustees"; and in paragraph (4) of said Article, the term "item (ii)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "item (ii) and item (iii)." 例文帳に追加

第八十四条 受託者が二人以上ある信託における第十九条の規定の適用については、同条第一項中「場合には」とあるのは「場合において、当該信託財産に係る信託に受託者が二人以上あるときは」と、同項第二号中「受託者」とあるのは「固有財産に共有持分が属する受託者」と、同項第三号中「受託者の」とあるのは「固有財産に共有持分が属する受託者の」と、同条第二項中「受託者」とあるのは「固有財産に共有持分が属する受託者」と、同条第三項中「場合には」とあるのは「場合において、当該信託財産に係る信託又は他の信託財産に係る信託に受託者が二人以上あるときは」と、同項第三号中「受託者の」とあるのは「各信託財産の共有持分が属する受託者の」と、「受託者が決する」とあるのは「受託者の協議による」と、同条第四項中「第二号」とあるのは「第二号又は第三号」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)並びに第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I might add my personal comment, though – the action plan for the New Growth Strategy, which we developed recently, advocates growth of financial institutions themselves and it is therefore quite critical for various financial segments, including securities, to have as many trading activities as possible, which makes any potential impact on them from taxation quite significant. At the same time, there are the principles of simplicity, fairness and neutrality in taxation that we should bear in mind as I realize, from many years of my involvement in the area of taxation when I was with the ruling party, that this is the kind of area in taxation that is traditionally prone to general criticism as a tax break for the rich. That being the case, in the context of a growing consensus on international cooperation between nationseach of which has its own economic, financial, and fiscal policies and is faced with its own challenges in the wake of the Lehman crisis, and is also founded on its own economic, historical, and traditional qualitieswe are hoping to ultimately make a decision on how to add more vitality to financial and economic activities, bearing in mind the points that I have just made and incorporating, as a democratic nation, inputs from various people. 例文帳に追加

ただし、これからは私のコメントですが、税制でございますが、できるだけ今度の成長分野でも金融機関そのものの成長ということをうたっておりますし、できるだけ証券はじめ、証券税制についてもできるだけいろいろな金融が活発化することが非常に大事でございますが、それに与える税制の影響も非常に大きいわけでございますが、同時に税制というのは私も長い間税制の実務を与党のときにやらせていただきましたが、簡素・公平・中立というのもございまして、そういったことを踏まえつつ、特にこういう分野は昔から一般的に金持ち優遇税制だと、こういうご批判を受ける部分でもございますけれども、しかし同時に金融の活性化、経済の活性化をどういうふうにきちっと、民主国家でございますから、そしてなおかつ各国がリーマンショックの後それぞれの経済あるいは金融、財政政策、非常にある意味でいろいろな問題点を持ちながら各国、この前の大きな問題を抱えながら国際協調をしていこうというようなところでございますし、各国にはそれぞれの経済のやっぱり歴史と伝統もあるわけでございますから、そういったことも勘案しつつ、きちっと最終的にはいろんな人の意見を聞きながら判断をさせていただきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

例文

Article 24 (1) When the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry finds that if specified capital transactions by a resident (meaning capital transactions listed in Article 20, item 2 (including those specified by Cabinet Order as transactions equivalent to item 2 of the said article pursuant to the provision of item 12 of the said article), which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts committed by a person who imports or exports goods directly accompanying the import or export of the goods, or which are specified by Cabinet Order as transactions or acts pertaining to the transfer of the mining right, industrial property right or other right equivalent thereto or establishment of the right to use these rights (excluding those specified by Cabinet Order as capital transactions to settle short-term international commercial transactions)), are conducted without any restrictions, it will cause a situation that prevents Japan from sincerely fulfilling obligations under the treaties and other international agreements it has signed or from making its contribution to international efforts for achieving international peace, which will make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this Act, or when a cabinet decision set forth in Article 10, paragraph 1 has been made, he/she may impose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, on a person who intends to commit the specified capital transactions, the obligation to obtain permission for the implementation of the specified capital transactions. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条 経済産業大臣は、居住者による特定資本取引(第二十条第二号に掲げる資本取引(同条第十二号の規定により同条第二号に準ずる取引として政令で定めるものを含む。)のうち、貨物を輸出し、又は輸入する者が貨物の輸出又は輸入に直接伴つてする取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの及び鉱業権、工業所有権その他これらに類する権利の移転又はこれらの権利の使用権の設定に係る取引又は行為として政令で定めるもの(短期の国際商業取引の決済のための資本取引として政令で定めるものを除く。)をいう。以下同じ。)が何らの制限なしに行われた場合には、我が国が締結した条約その他の国際約束を誠実に履行することを妨げ、若しくは国際平和のための国際的な努力に我が国として寄与することを妨げることとなる事態を生じ、この法律の目的を達成することが困難になると認めるとき又は第十条第一項の閣議決定が行われたときは、政令で定めるところにより、当該特定資本取引を行おうとする居住者に対し、当該特定資本取引を行うことについて、許可を受ける義務を課することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

(5) The provisions of Article 55(3) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (6) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision on the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (7) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (8) and paragraph (9) of said Article and Article 55-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(i)), the provisions of Article 55(10) shall apply mutatis mutandis to expenses required for the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or execution of an order under the provisions of said paragraph (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in paragraph (1)(i) of said Article), the provisions of Article 83-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (limited to an order granting the temporary restraining order and the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(iii)) has been executed. In this case, the phrase "possessor other than the obligor" in Article 55(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "possessor who is neither the obligor nor the owner of real property." 例文帳に追加

5 第五十五条第三項から第五項までの規定は第一項の規定による決定について、同条第六項の規定は第一項又はこの項において準用する同条第五項の申立てについての裁判について、同条第七項の規定はこの項において準用する同条第五項の規定による決定について、同条第八項及び第九項並びに第五十五条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定(第五十五条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。)について、第五十五条第十項の規定は第一項の申立て又は同項の規定による決定(同条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。)の執行に要した費用について、第八十三条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定(第五十五条第一項第三号に掲げる保全処分及び公示保全処分を命ずるものに限る。)の執行がされた場合について準用する。この場合において、第五十五条第三項中「債務者以外の占有者」とあるのは、「債務者及び不動産の所有者以外の占有者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 138 With regard to any Policyholders Protection Fund as defined in Article 259, paragraph (2) of the Former Insurance Business Act in existence at the time when this Act enters into force (including a fund in the course of liquidation; referred to as "Policyholders Protection Fund" in the following Article to Article 141 inclusive of the Supplementary Provisions) that includes among its business participants (referring to the business participants prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (iv) of the Former Insurance Business Act), at the time when this Act enters into force, any Insurance Company to which the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply but for which no decision has been made to provide Financial Assistance (referring to the Financial Assistance prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (v) of the Former Insurance Business Act), the provisions of Article 259 to 270 inclusive of the Former Insurance Business Act and Article 105 of the Supplementary Provisions to the Former Insurance Business Act shall remain in force even after this Act enters into force, for a period to be specified by a Cabinet Order counting from the Effective Date. In this case, the term "Article 241" in Article 268, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Former Insurance Business Act, which shall remain in force, shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 241 of the Insurance Business Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 22 of the Act on Revision, etc. of Related Acts for the Financial System Reform (Act No. 107 of 1998)." 例文帳に追加

第百三十八条 この法律の施行の際現に存する旧保険業法第二百五十九条第二項に規定する保険契約者保護基金(清算中のものを含む。次条から附則第百四十一条までにおいて「保険契約者保護基金」という。)であって、この法律の施行の際現にその事業参加者(旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第四号に規定する事業参加者をいう。)の中にその資金援助(旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第五号に規定する資金援助をいう。)を行うことを決定していない前条第一項の規定の適用を受ける保険会社があるものについては、旧保険業法第二百五十九条から第二百七十条まで及び旧保険業法附則第百五条の規定は、この法律の施行後も、施行日から起算して政令で定める期間を経過する日までの間、なおその効力を有する。この場合において、なおその効力を有するものとされる旧保険業法第二百六十八条第一項第一号中「第二百四十一条」とあるのは、「金融システム改革のための関係法律の整備等に関する法律(平成十年法律第百七号)第二十二条の規定による改正前の保険業法第二百四十一条」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

3 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(iii) in the case where an officer or employee of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (limited to those conducted according to a certain plan, without depending on an individual investment decision, on an on-going basis, for which each officer or employee contributes less than one million yen at a time) jointly with another officer or employee of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (when said Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares other than those acquired based on the provisions of Article 156, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act [including cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 165, paragraph (3) of the same Act], limited to the case where the acquisition was consigned to a Financial Instruments Business Operator [which means the Financial Instruments Business Operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) (limited to one who is engaged in the Type I Financial Instruments Business prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (1) of the same Act); the same shall apply in the following Article and the Appended Table 4]), voting rights pertaining to the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange acquired or held by a person who has deposited the shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange which conducted said acquisition (excluding those that are deemed to be the voting rights personally acquired or held by said person who has deposited the shares, pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (3) [limited to the part pertaining to item (i)] of the Act); 例文帳に追加

三 株式会社商品取引所の役員又は従業員が当該株式会社商品取引所の他の役員又は従業員と共同して当該株式会社商品取引所の株式の取得(一定の計画に従い、個別の投資判断に基づかず、継続的に行われ、各役員又は従業員の一回当たりの拠出金額が百万円に満たないものに限る。)をした場合(当該株式会社商品取引所が会社法第百五十六条第一項(同法第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。)の規定に基づき取得した株式以外の株式を取得したときは、金融商品取引業者(金融商品取引法(昭和二十三年法律第二十五号)第二条第九項に規定する金融商品取引業者(同法第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者に限る。)をいう。次条及び別表第四において同じ。)に委託して行った場合に限る。)において当該取得をした株式会社商品取引所の株式を信託された者が取得し、又は所有する当該株式会社商品取引所の株式に係る議決権(法第八十六条第三項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)の規定により当該信託された者が自ら取得し、又は保有する議決権とみなされるものを除く。) - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

Article 83-3 The provisions of paragraph (2) and (3) of Article 75-2, and of Article 75-3 through Article 75-12 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the work of the designated consultant examination institutions and consultant examination affairs provided for in the preceding article. In this case, "the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 and Article 75-12 shall be read as "the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare"; "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 read as "Article 83-2"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6" in paragraph (2) of Article 75-4 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of consultant examination affairs "; "giving a decision as to whether the applicant has knowledge and capability necessary for a license holder" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-5 as "formulating and marking examination questions for industrial safety consultant examinations and industrial health consultant examinations"; "license examiner" in the same article and Article 75-8 as "consultant examiner"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of the following Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 75-5 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of the consultant examination affairs "; "examination affairs (hereinafter in this Article and Article 75-11, paragraph (2), item (iv) referred to as the ' examination affair rules')" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6 as "procedure rules"; "the examination affair rules" in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the same Article and item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 75-11 as "the procedure rules relating to the implementation of consultant examination affairs". 例文帳に追加

第八十三条の三 第七十五条の二第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の三から第七十五条の十二までの規定は、前条の規定による指定、指定コンサルタント試験機関及びコンサルタント試験事務について準用する。この場合において、第七十五条の二第三項及び第七十五条の十二中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「厚生労働大臣」と、第七十五条の二第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条の二」と、第七十五条の四第二項中「第七十五条の六第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の五第一項中「免許を受ける者として必要な知識及び能力を有するかどうかの判定」とあるのは「労働安全コンサルタント試験又は労働衛生コンサルタント試験の問題の作成及び採点」と、同条及び第七十五条の八中「免許試験員」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験員」と、第七十五条の五第四項中「次条第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の六第一項中「規程(以下この条及び第七十五条の十一第二項第四号において「試験事務規程」という。)」とあるのは「規程」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の十一第二項第四号中「試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

4 会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項(反対株主の株式買取請求)、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで(株式の価格の決定等)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)並びに第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As you know, DPJ President and Prime Minister Kan and (PNP) Chief Kamei had a leader meeting the day following the day Prime Minister Kan assumed office, I believe, during which a decision to form a coalition was made. As I happened to be the Secretary General back then, I was also present at this meeting to witness, as I have explained, President Kan and Chief Kamei reach an agreement on creating an alternative to the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which had been set up for the previous three-party coalition to coordinate their policies. This has not been done because everyone got a little busy in preparation for the election, as I have just talked about. Another point is that members of the PNP, being one of the parties in the coalition, have naturally raised voices requesting strongly that views of the party be reflected in the coalition. It is therefore not so much about the ceiling debate, although there are, of course, voices raised on the subject of ceilings, as it is simply natural that a coalition government should need to coordinate policies. That is what I reminded Prime Minister Kan of today, and he responded by saying that it is a matter of fact and telling Policy Research Committee Chair and Minister of State Gemba to create a proper system for it. While I did have a talk with Mr. Gemba later on, this is an issue between parties and I am sure that it will accordingly be handled properly, as it should be, by the Chief, or Secretary General or Policy Research Committee Chair of our party. 例文帳に追加

それはご存じのように、菅代表、総理と亀井(国民新党)代表との話し合いでも、これは総理大臣になった次の日でしたか、党首会談をやりましたね。そして、連立を組むということに決定したわけでございますが、そのとき私はたまたま幹事長でしたから、党首会談に同席させていただいておりまして、そのときも今さっき言いましたように、それまでは3党でしたから、基本政策閣僚会議というのが3党の政策のすり合わせでございましたが、そういったものにかわるものをつくろうということを菅代表と亀井代表と合意しておりまして、そういった意味で、これは今さっき話したような選挙で少しみんなお互いに忙しくなりましたので、やっておりませんし、また我が党内のこれはいろいろ当然連立政権でございますから、党内の意見も連立政権与党として反映したいという強い当然意見がございますので、そこら辺を踏まえてシーリングということよりも、シーリングにも当然意見があると思いますが、連立政権ですから、当然政策のすり合わせというのは、これは当然のことでございますから、そのことを改めて今日菅総裁に申し上げて、菅総理からも当然のことだし、きちっと玄葉政調会長、国務大臣にそのことをきちっとシステムをつくるようにということで、玄葉さんとあと話しましたけれども、党と党との話でもございますから、当然党首、あるいは幹事長、政調会長が我が党におりますから、そこら辺できちっとやっていこうといくというふうに思っていますよ。 - 金融庁

(5) The provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies) and Article 351 (Measures when Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provision of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 (Commission of Registration of Provisional Disposition for Stay of Execution of Duties by Representative of Juridical Person, etc.) of the Civil Provisional Relief Act to act for a liquidator or the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidator(s) or Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (b) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who should carry out the duties of the temporary Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

5 会社法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は清算相互会社の代表清算人について、同法第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)の規定は民事保全法(平成元年法律第九十一号)第五十六条(法人の代表者の職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記の嘱託)に規定する仮処分命令により選任された清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人の職務を代行する者について、会社法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号ロ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は清算相互会社の一時代表清算人の職務を行うべき者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)、第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで(表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務)、第三百五十八条(第一項第二号を除く。)(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第三百六十条第一項(株主による取締役の行為の差止め)、第三百六十一条(取締役の報酬等)及び第三百六十五条第二項(競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限)の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In accordance with alterations and additions made into this Law related to transition to unified protected document (patent) the following was established: (1) regarding applications for grant of preliminary patent of the Kyrgyz Republic for invention or industrial design, which were filed before entering into effect of the Law providing the transition to unified protected document (patent), the applicant has a right to submit a petition for granting of the patent of the Kyrgyz republic for invention or industrial design with the examination on the essence or for granting of the patent under applicant’s responsibility, provided that appropriate fees are paid. If the applicant does not take appropriate measures, the application shall be considered withdrawn; (2) regarding effective preliminary patents of the Kyrgyz Republic for invention or industrial design, which five-year-period since the date of application filing is not expired before entering into effect of the Law providing transition to unified protected document (patent), the owner of preliminary patent has a right to submit a petition on granting of the patent of the Kyrgyz Republic for invention or industrial design with examination on the essence. In case of absence of such petition, preliminary patent of the Kyrgyz Republic shall be reregistered as a patent of the Kyrgyz Republic under the applicant’s responsibility for residuary terms; (3) effective preliminary patents of the Kyrgyz Republic for invention or industrial design, which five-year-period since the date of application filing is expired before entering into effect of the Law providing transition to unified protected document (patent), shall be reregistered as patents of the Kyrgyz Republic under the applicant’s responsibility for residuary terms; (4) regarding applications for granting of the certificate of the Kyrgyz Republic for utility model filed before entering into effect of the Law providing transition to unified protected document (patent), the decision on granting of the patent of the Kyrgyz Republic for utility model is made, provided that all appropriate fees are paid; (5) effective certificates of the Kyrgyz Republic for utility models shall be reregistered as the patent of the Kyrgyz Republic for utility model.例文帳に追加

統一保護証書(特許)への移行に関し本法になされた変更及び追加に従って,次のとおり定められた。 (1) 発明又は意匠についてのキルギス共和国予備特許の付与出願であって,統一保護証書(特許)への移行を規定する法律の施行前になされたものについては,出願人は,実体審査付きの発明又は意匠についてのキルギス共和国特許の付与又は出願人の責任に基づく特許付与を申請する権利を有する。ただし,適正な手数料が納付されることを条件とする。出願人が該当する措置を取らない場合は,出願は取下とみなされる。 (2) 発明及び意匠のキルギス共和国の有効な予備特許であって,出願日以後5年の期間が統一保護証書(特許)への移行を規定する法律の施行前に満了していないものについては,予備特許の所有者は,実体審査付きの発明又は意匠についてのキルギス共和国特許の付与を申請する権利を有する。この申請がない場合は,キルギス共和国予備特許は,残余期間について出願人の責任に基づくキルギス共和国特許として再登録される。 (3) 発明又は意匠についてのキルギス共和国の有効な予備特許であって,出願日以後5年の期間が統一保護証書(特許)への移行を規定する法律の施行前に満了しているものは,残余期間について出願人の責任に基づくキルギス共和国特許として再登録される。 (4) 統一保護証書(特許)への移行を規定する法律の施行前になされた実用新案についてのキルギス共和国登録証の付与出願については,実用新案のキルギス共和国特許付与の決定がなされる。ただし,すべての適正な手数料が納付されることを条件とする。 (5) 実用新案の有効なキルギス共和国登録証は,実用新案のキルギス共和国特許として再登録される。 - 特許庁

Article 179 (1) The provisions of Article 499 to Article 503 inclusive (Public Notices to Creditors; Restrictions on Performance of Obligations; Performance of Obligations Relating to Conditional Claims; Restrictions on Distribution of Residual Assets Before Performance of Obligations; Exclusion from Liquidation), Article 507(1), (3), and (4) (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (ii), (iii), (viii), and (ix)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 928(1) and (3) (Registration of a liquidator), and Article 929 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Completion of Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "the settlement of accounts (or, in cases where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply, the settlement of accounts approved under that paragraph) to the shareholders meeting" in Article 507(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the settlement of accounts (those audited as prescribed in Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) at the general meeting of members," the phrase "A Liquidator (or, for a Company with Board of Liquidators, the liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 508(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十九条 会社法第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで(債権者に対する公告等、債務の弁済の制限、条件付債権等に係る債務の弁済、債務の弁済前における残余財産の分配の制限、清算からの除斥)、第五百七条第一項、第三項及び第四項(清算事務の終了等)、第五百八条(帳簿資料の保存)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号、第三号、第八号及び第九号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)、第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)、第九百二十八条第一項及び第三項(清算人の登記)並びに第九百二十九条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(清算結了の登記)の規定は、特定目的会社の清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百七条第三項中「決算報告(前項の規定の適用がある場合にあっては、同項の承認を受けたもの)を株主総会」とあるのは「決算報告(資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項に規定する監査を受けたもの)を社員総会」と、同法第五百八条第一項中「清算人(清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人)」とあるのは「清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(e) The filing of a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 186, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a right of retention under the Commercial Law under the provisions of Article 192, paragraph (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for a grant of discharge under the provisions of Article 248, paragraph (1) of said Act or a petition for the restoration of rights under the provisions of Article 256, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, a petition for revocation of an order for a stay of execution or a petition for the revocation of a provisional mandatory order or a provisional injunctive order under the provisions of the Administrative Case Litigation Act, a request under the provisions of Article 27-20 of the Labor Union Act (Act No. 174 of 1949), a petition under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (3) or Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent under the provisions of the proviso to Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Labor Tribunal Act, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of civil execution proceedings under the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc., a petition under the provisions of Article 15-6 of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations, a petition under the provisions of Article 39, paragraph (1) of the Personal Status Litigation Act (Act No. 109 of 2003), a motion under the provisions of Article 105-4, paragraph (1) or Article 105-5, paragraph (1) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959), a petition under the provisions of Article 114-6, paragraph (1) or Article 114-7, paragraph (1) of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), or a petition under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993) 例文帳に追加

ホ 破産法第百八十六条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第百九十二条第三項の規定による商事留置権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第二百四十八条第一項の規定による免責許可の申立て若しくは同法第二百五十六条第一項の規定による復権の申立て、民事再生法第百四十八条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、行政事件訴訟法の規定による執行停止決定の取消しの申立て、若しくは仮の義務付け若しくは仮の差止めの決定の取消しの申立て、労働組合法(昭和二十四年法律第百七十四号)第二十七条の二十の規定による申立て、配偶者からの暴力の防止及び被害者の保護に関する法律第十六条第三項若しくは第十七条第一項の規定による申立て、労働審判法第四条第一項ただし書の規定による弁護士でない者を代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律第七条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による民事執行の手続の停止若しくは続行を命ずる裁判を求める申立て、家事審判法第十五条の六の規定による申立て、人事訴訟法(平成十五年法律第百九号)第三十九条第一項の規定による申立て、特許法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号)第百五条の四第一項若しくは第百五条の五第一項の規定による申立て、著作権法(昭和四十五年法律第四十八号)第百十四条の六第一項若しくは第百十四条の七第一項の規定による申立て又は不正競争防止法(平成五年法律第四十七号)第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項の規定による申立て - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十三条(第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。)(合併の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第十五号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

8 会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項(指定買取人による買取りの通知)の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項(譲渡等承認請求の撤回)の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで(売買価格の決定)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第六号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第八十五条 会社法第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)、第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)及び第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条(表見代表取締役)の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条(忠実義務)及び第三百五十七条第一項(取締役の報告義務)の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the facts mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b) of the proviso to sub-section (1) are proved with respect to any words, then, - (a) for the purposes of any proceedings under section 51- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, the registration of the trademark, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question or any goods or services of the same description, shall be deemed to be an entry wrongly remaining in the Register; (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matter, the Tribunal, in deciding whether the trademark shall remain on the Register, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question of any goods or services of the same description, may, in case of a decision in favour of its remaining on the Register, require as a condition thereof that the proprietor shall disclaim any right to the exclusive use in relation to that article or substance or service and any goods or services of the same description, of such word or words : Provided that no disclaimer shall affect any rights of the proprietor of a trade except such as arise out of the registration of the trademark in respect of which the declaimer is made : (b) for the purposes of any other legal proceedings relating to the trademarks- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, all rights of the proprietor under this Act or any other law to the exclusive use of the trademark in relation to the article or substance or service in question or to any goods or services of the same description, or 29 (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matters, all such rights of the proprietor to the exclusive use of such word or words, in such relation as aforesaid, shall be deemed to have ceased on the date at which the use mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1) first become well-known and established, or at the expiration of the period of 2(two) years mentioned in clause (b) of sub-section (1). 例文帳に追加

(2)本条第(1)項但し書きの(a)又は(b)に述べる事実が任意の単語について立証された場合、そのときは次に掲げるとおりとする。(a)第51条に基づく手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、過誤により登録簿上に残存する記載とみなされる。(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、審判機関は、当該商標を登録に残すべきかどうかの判断に際し、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、登録簿にそれを残すことを支持する判断の場合、その条件として、所有者がその物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は、表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関して1個又は数個の当該単語に係る排他的使用権を放棄するよう求めることができる。ただし、当該権利放棄は、当該権利放棄がなされた当該商標登録に起因して生ずる取引を除き、所有者の取引に係る権利に何ら影響を与えない。(b)当該商標に関するその他の法的手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、本法、又は問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に係る商標の排他的使用に関するその他の法律に基づき、当該所有者のすべての権利、又は(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、かかる単語の排他的使用に関する所有者のすべての当該権利は、前述のような関係において、本条第(1)項の(a)に述べる使用が最初に周知となり定着するようになる日に、又は本条第(1)項の(b)に述べる2年の期間満了時に消滅するとみなされる。 - 特許庁

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七 会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節(第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。)(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)及び同法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項(責任追及等の訴え)中「株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)中「総株主(次に掲げる株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

4 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(資産流動化法第七十六条第一項(資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) With respect to the application of the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 32-2, Article 32-3, paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of Article 32-5, the proviso to paragraph (2) of Article 34, Article 36, paragraph (2) of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and paragraph (5) and the proviso to paragraph (6) of the following Article, in the event that the committee stipulated in paragraph (1) makes a decision by a majority of four fifths or more of the members regarding matters stipulated in paragraph (1) of Article 32-2 ,Article 32-3, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of Article 32-5, the proviso to paragraph (2) of Article 34, paragraph (1) of Article 36, paragraph (2) of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and paragraph (5) and the proviso to paragraph (6) of the following Article, the phrase "agreement with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace (in the case that such union is organized), or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such union is not organized)" in paragraph (1) of Article 32-2 shall be read as "agreement with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace (in the case that such union is organized), or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such union is not organized), or a resolution of the committee stipulated in paragraph (1) of Article 38-4 (hereinafter referred to as 'resolution' except in paragraph (1) of Article 106)", the phrase "written agreement" in Article 32-3, paragraphs (1) through 3 of Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of Article 32-5, the proviso to paragraph (2) of Article 34, paragraph (2) of Article 36, paragraph (2) of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and paragraph (5) and the proviso to paragraph (6) of the following Article shall be read as "written agreement or resolution", , the phrase "with the consent of either a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned (in the case that such labor union is organized) or a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace (in the case that such labor union is not organized)" in paragraph (2) of Article 32-4 shall be read as "with the consent of either a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned (in the case that such labor union is organized) or a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace (in the case that such labor union is organized), or based on a resolution", the phrases "notified the relevant government agency of the such agreement" and "in accordance with the provisions of the said agreement" in paragraph (1) of Article 36 shall be read respectively as "notified the relevant government agency of the such agreement or resolution" and "in accordance with the provisions of the said agreement or resolution", the phrases "or the person representing a majority of the workers who enter into the agreement stipulated in paragraph (1)" and "the said agreement" in paragraph (3) of Article 36 shall be read respectively as "or the person representing a majority of the workers who enter into the agreement stipulated in paragraph (1), or the committee members making the resolution stipulated in the said paragraph," and "the said agreement or resolution", and the phrase "or the person representing a majority of the workers who enter into the agreement stipulated in paragraph (1)" in paragraph (4) of Article 36 shall be read as "or the person representing a majority of the workers who enter into the agreement stipulated in paragraph (1), or the committee members making the resolution stipulated in the said paragraph". 例文帳に追加

5 第一項の委員会においてその委員の五分の四以上の多数による議決により第三十二条の二第一項、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の四第一項及び第二項、第三十二条の五第一項、第三十四条第二項ただし書、第三十六条第一項、第三十八条の二第二項、前条第一項並びに次条第五項及び第六項ただし書に規定する事項について決議が行われた場合における第三十二条の二第一項、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の四第一項から第三項まで、第三十二条の五第一項、第三十四条第二項ただし書、第三十六条、第三十八条の二第二項、前条第一項並びに次条第五項及び第六項ただし書の規定の適用については、第三条の二第一項中「協定」とあるのは「協定若しくは第三十八条の四第一項に規定する委員会の決議(第百六条第一項を除き、以下「決議」という。)」と、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の四第一項から第三項まで、第三十二条の五第一項、第三十四条第二項ただし書、第三十六条第二項、第三十八条の二第二項、前条第一項並びに次条第五項及び第六項ただし書中「協定」とあるのは「協定又は決議」と、第三十二条の四第二項中「同意を得て」とあるのは「同意を得て、又は決議に基づき」と、第三十六条第一項中「届け出た場合」とあるのは「届け出た場合又は決議を行政官庁に届け出た場合」と、「その協定」とあるのは「その協定又は決議」と、同条第三項中「又は労働者の過半数を代表する者」とあるのは「若しくは労働者の過半数を代表する者又は同項の決議をする委員」と、「当該協定」とあるのは「当該協定又は当該決議」と、同条第四項中「又は労働者の過半数を代表する者」とあるのは「若しくは労働者の過半数を代表する者又は同項の決議をする委員」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十二 会社法第四百十九条(第二項後段を除く。)(執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等)、第四百二十一条(表見代表執行役)及び第四百二十二条第一項(株主による執行役の行為の差止め)の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条(代表執行役)の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) The filing of an objection to a disposition of execution by the executing court, a petition seeking permission for the appointment of an agent set forth in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Execution Act, an objection to a disposition concerning a petition for a grant of a certificate of execution, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of a compulsory execution or ordering a revocation of a disposition of execution under the provisions of Article 36, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (2) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 47, paragraph (4) or Article 49, paragraph (5) of said Act, a demand for liquidation distribution by the executing court, a petition for a temporary restraining order on a sale under the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1) of said Act or for a revocation or change of such an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article, a petition for permission to pay rent on land, etc. in place of the obligor under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (3) or Article 64, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for an obligee effecting a seizure who has made a purchase offer under the provisions of Article 68-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for the highest purchase price offeror or the purchaser under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver real property under the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver the certificate of a vessel's nationality, etc. under the provisions of Article 115, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for the rescission of a compulsory auction procedure under the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission for navigation of a vessel under the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver seized property under the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) of said Act; an objection to a disposition of execution by a court clerk in the procedure of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a demand on a court clerk for liquidation distribution during the process of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a petition under the provisions of Article 167-15, paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition under the provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order prior to a commencement order for a secured real property auction under Article 187, paragraph (1) of said Act or for revocation of such an order under the provisions of Article 187, paragraph (4), or a petition for permission to commence an auction of movables as set forth in Article 190, paragraph (2) of said Act 例文帳に追加

ロ 執行裁判所の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、民事執行法第十三条第一項の代理人の選任の許可を求める申立て、執行文の付与の申立てに関する処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第三十六条第一項若しくは第三項の規定による強制執行の停止若しくは続行を命じ、若しくは執行処分の取消しを命ずる裁判を求める申立て、同法第四十一条第二項の規定による特別代理人の選任の申立て、同法第四十七条第四項若しくは第四十九条第五項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、執行裁判所に対する配当要求、同法第五十五条第一項の規定による売却のための保全処分若しくは同条第五項の規定によるその取消し若しくは変更の申立て、同法第五十六条第一項の規定による地代等の代払の許可を求める申立て、同法第六十二条第三項若しくは第六十四条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第六十八条の二第一項の規定による買受けの申出をした差押債権者のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十七条第一項の規定による最高価買受申出人若しくは買受人のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十八条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第八十三条第一項の規定による不動産の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十五条第一項の規定による船舶国籍証書等の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十七条第一項の規定による強制競売の手続の取消しの申立て、同法第百十八条第一項の規定による船舶の航行の許可を求める申立て、同法第百二十七条第一項の規定による差押物の引渡命令の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官に対する配当要求、同法第百六十七条の十五第三項の規定による申立て、同法第百七十二条第二項の規定による申立て、同法第百八十七条第一項の規定による担保不動産競売の開始決定前の保全処分若しくは同条第四項の規定によるその取消しの申立て又は同法第百九十条第二項の動産競売の開始の許可の申立て - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

3 会社法第六十七条第一項(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで(議事録)及び第三百十六条第一項(株主総会に提出された資料等の調査)の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第四編第三章(第七百十五条を除く。)(社債権者集会)、第七編第二章第七節(社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え)、第八百六十八条第三項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十四条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告(資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。)」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項(第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項(資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十九条 組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条(第一号及び第三号を除く。)、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項(各号列記以外の部分に限る。)、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条(株式会社の清算)、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条(非訟)並びに非訟事件手続法(明治三十一年法律第十四号)第四十条(検査をすべき者の選任の裁判)の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで(第三十六条の七第四項を除く。)、第四十条(第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。)、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役(取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会)」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

4 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで(他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止)、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで(第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。)(裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了)、第七編第二章第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三章第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)、同章第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)及び第九百三十八条(第六項を除く。)(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資(自己特定出資を除く。)の総口数の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資(自己優先出資を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(2) Article 27-2(2) to (6) inclusive, Article 27-3 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (1) and item (ii) of paragraph (2)), Article 27-4, Article 27-5 (limited to the non-itemized part thereof; the same shall apply in paragraph (5) and Article 27-22-3(5)), Articles 27-6 to 27-9 inclusive (excluding Article 27-8(6), (10) and (12)), Article 27-11 to 15 inclusive (excluding Article 27-11(4) and Article 27-13(3) and (4)(i)), Article 27-17, Article 27-18, Article 27-21(1) and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to Purchase, etc. conducted under the preceding paragraph by means of Tender Offer. In this case, the term "Share Certificates, etc." in these provisions (excluding Article 27-3(4) and the proviso to Article 27-11(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Listed Share Certificates, etc."; the term "Sales, etc. (meaning sales or other type of transfer for value; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Sales, etc."; the term "the following matters" in Article 27-3(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the matters listed in items (i) and (iii) below"; the part "period of Purchase, etc. (including the statement included in the public notice under the second sentence of the preceding paragraph)" in Article 27-3(2)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "period of Purchase, etc."; the part "The Tender Offeror, Persons in Special Relationship with the Tender Offeror (meaning Persons in Special Relationship as defined in Article 27-2(7); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), or other person concerned as specified by a Cabinet Order" in Article 27-3(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Tender Offeror or other person concerned as specified by a Cabinet Order"; the part "to the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any), and, if the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made fall under any of the categories listed in the following items, also send a copy of the Tender Offer Notification to the exchange or association specified in the following items for each kind of Share Certificates, etc. set forth in the respective items" in the first sentence of Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to the exchange or association specified in the following items for each kind of Securities set forth in the respective items, and also send a copy of the Tender Offer Notification to the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any"; the term "Share Certificates, etc." in the items of Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Listed Share Certificates, etc."; the part "lower the price for Purchase, etc. (excluding those implemented in cases where the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and the Tender Offer Notification state as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. that the price for Purchase, etc. may be lowered according to standards specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance if the Subject Company (meaning Subject Company defined in Article 27-10(1)) conducts share split or other act specified by a Cabinet Order.)" in Article 27-6(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "lower the price for Purchase, etc."; the part "the details of the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3))" in Article 27-6(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the details of the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc."; the part "any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3))" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc."; the part "the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order" in the proviso to Article 27-11(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Purchase, etc. of Listed Share Certificates, etc. conducted through the Tender Offer violates other laws and regulations or where there occurs any circumstances specified by a Cabinet Order as those involving the risk of violation of other laws and regulations"; the part "states any of the following as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification (with regard to the term specified in item (ii), limited to cases where the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate (meaning Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate as defined in Article 27-2(8)) of Share Certificates, etc. in possession by the Tender Offeror after the Tender Offer, or, in cases where there are Persons in Special Relationship as specified in Article 27-2(1)(i) with the Tender Offeror, the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate calculated by adding the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate of the Persons in Special Relationship as defined in Article 27-2(8) to that for the person who conducted the Purchase, etc.) will not exceed the rate specified by a Cabinet Order)" in Article 27-13(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "states the term specified in item (ii) below as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification"; the part ", the Subject Company's Position Statement and the Tender Offeror's Answer (including" in Article 27-14(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "(including"; the part ", Article 27-10(9) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(10)) and Article 27-10(13) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(14)) at" in Article 27-14(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "at"; the part ", Tender Offer Report, Subject Company's Position Statement or Tender Offeror's Answer" in Article 27-15(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Tender Offer Report"; the term "Tender Offeror, etc. and the Subject Company" in Article 27-15(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Tender Offeror"; and the term "Tender Offeror, Persons in Special Relationship with the Tender Offeror" in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Tender Offeror." 例文帳に追加

2 第二十七条の二第二項から第六項まで、第二十七条の三(第一項後段及び第二項第二号を除く。)、第二十七条の四、第二十七条の五(各号列記以外の部分に限る。第五項及び第二十七条の二十二の三第五項において同じ。)、第二十七条の六から第二十七条の九まで(第二十七条の八第六項、第十項及び第十二項を除く。)、第二十七条の十一から第二十七条の十五まで(第二十七条の十一第四項並びに第二十七条の十三第三項及び第四項第一号を除く。)、第二十七条の十七、第二十七条の十八、第二十七条の二十一第一項及び前条第一項の規定は、前項の規定により公開買付けによる買付け等を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(第二十七条の三第四項及び第二十七条の十一第一項ただし書を除く。)中「株券等」とあるのは「上場株券等」と、第二十七条の二第六項中「売付け等(売付けその他の有償の譲渡をいう。以下この章において同じ。)」とあるのは「売付け等」と、第二十七条の三第二項中「次に」とあるのは「第一号及び第三号に」と、同項第一号中「買付け等の期間(前項後段の規定により公告において明示した内容を含む。)」とあるのは「買付け等の期間」と、同条第三項中「公開買付者、その特別関係者(第二十七条の二第七項に規定する特別関係者をいう。以下この節において同じ。)その他政令で定める関係者」とあるのは「公開買付者その他政令で定める関係者」と、同条第四項前段中「当該公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者(当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。)に送付するとともに、当該公開買付けに係る株券等が次の各号に掲げる株券等に該当する場合には、当該各号に掲げる株券等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者」とあるのは「次の各号に掲げる当該公開買付けに係る上場株券等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者に送付するとともに、当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該公開買付者が発行者である株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者」と、同項各号中「株券等」とあるのは「上場株券等」と、第二十七条の五ただし書中「次に掲げる」とあるのは「政令で定める」と、第二十七条の六第一項第一号中「買付け等の価格の引下げ(公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付期間中に対象者(第二十七条の十第一項に規定する対象者をいう。)が株式の分割その他の政令で定める行為を行つたときは内閣府令で定める基準に従い買付け等の価格の引下げを行うことがある旨の条件を付した場合に行うものを除く。)」とあるのは「買付け等の価格の引下げ」と、同条第二項中「買付条件等の変更の内容(第二十七条の十第三項の規定により買付け等の期間が延長された場合における当該買付け等の期間の延長を除く。)」とあるのは「買付条件等の変更の内容」と、第二十七条の八第二項中「買付条件等の変更(第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。)」とあるのは「買付条件等の変更」と、第二十七条の十一第一項ただし書中「公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社(会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。)の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情(政令で定めるものに限る。)が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた」とあるのは「当該公開買付けにより当該上場株券等の買付け等を行うことが他の法令に違反することとなる場合又は他の法令に違反することとなるおそれがある事情として政令で定める事情が生じた」と、第二十七条の十三第四項中「次に掲げる条件を付した場合(第二号の条件を付す場合にあつては、当該公開買付けの後における公開買付者の所有に係る株券等の株券等所有割合(第二十七条の二第八項に規定する株券等所有割合をいい、当該公開買付者に同条第一項第一号に規定する特別関係者がある場合にあつては、当該特別関係者の所有に係る株券等の同条第八項に規定する株券等所有割合を加算したものをいう。)が政令で定める割合を下回る場合に限る。)」とあるのは「第二号に掲げる条件を付した場合」と、第二十七条の十四第一項中「、意見表明報告書及び対質問回答報告書(これらの」とあるのは「(その」と、同条第三項中「並びに第二十七条の十第九項(同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。)及び第十三項(同条第十四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定」とあるのは「の規定」と、第二十七条の十五第一項中「、公開買付報告書、意見表明報告書又は対質問回答報告書」とあるのは「又は公開買付報告書」と、同条第二項中「公開買付者等及び対象者」とあるのは「公開買付者等」と、前条第一項中「公開買付者若しくはその特別関係者」とあるのは「公開買付者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム




  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2026 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS