| 意味 | 例文 |
Making Timeの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 5667件
Article 61 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing the day on which the person died falls in any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the table in Article 58, paragraph (1) corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year containing the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance, as insurance benefits, to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims. 例文帳に追加
第六十一条 政府は、当分の間、障害年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害年金の額（当該障害年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害年金に係る障害年金前払一時金の額（当該障害年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が第五十八条第一項の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害年金差額一時金を支給する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加
(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁
A summary of an application for registration referred to in paragraph 26(2)(b) of the Act shall include the following information, where applicable: (a) the name and address of the registered owner at the time of registration of the trade-mark; (b) the trade-mark and any disclaimer with respect to that trade-mark; (c) the wares and services in respect of which registration of the trade-mark has been requested and, in the case of a proposed trade-mark, in respect of which the declaration of use of the trade-mark in Canada required by subsection 40(2) of the Act has been filed; (d) the number of the application for registration; (e) the date of filing of the application and, where priority is claimed, the date of the priority filing of the application; (f) the date or dates of first use of the trade-mark in Canada; (g) the date or dates of first making known of the trade-mark in Canada; and (h) the country of origin of the applicant or the applicant’s predecessor in title and the name of a country other than Canada in which the trade-mark has been used. 例文帳に追加
法律第26条(2)(b)にいう登録出願の要約には，該当する場合は，次の情報を含めなければならない。 (a) その商標の登録時の登録所有者の名称及び住所 (b) その商標及びその商標に関する何らかの権利の部分放棄 (c) 商標登録が請求された商品及びサービス，並びに使用予定商標の場合は，法律第40条(2)により要求されるカナダでのその商標の使用開始の宣言書が提出された商品及びサービス (d) 登録出願番号 (e) 出願日，更に優先権が主張される場合は，その出願の優先日 (f) その商標がカナダで最初に使用された日又は時期 (g) その商標がカナダで最初に公知となった日又は時期，並びに (h) 出願人又はその前権利者の本国，及びその商標が使用されていたカナダ以外の国 - 特許庁
(1) Notwithstanding anything in any rule of law, an invention made by an employee shall, as between him and his employer, be taken to belong to his employer for the purposes of this Act and all other purposes if -- (a) the invention was made in the course of the normal duties of the employee or in the course of duties falling outside his normal duties, but specifically assigned to him, and the circumstances in either case were such that an invention might reasonably be expected to result from the carrying out of his duties; or (b) the invention was made in the course of the duties of the employee and, at the time of making the invention, because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising from the nature of his duties he had a special obligation to further the interests of the employer's undertaking.例文帳に追加
(1) 如何なる法規の如何なる規定にも拘らず，従業者により行われる発明は，同人とその使用者との間では，次の場合は，本法の適用上及び他のすべての目的で，当該使用者に帰属すると解される。 (a) 当該発明が当該従業者の通常の職務の過程又は同人の通常の職務外であるが特別に同人に割り当てられた職務の過程で行われ，かつ，何れの場合の状況も同人の職務遂行の結果として発明が期待されて当然であった場合，又は (b) 当該発明が当該従業者の職務の過程で行われ，かつ，当該発明が行われた時点で，当該従業者の職務の性質上及び同人の職務の性質から生じる特定の責任により，同人に当該使用者の事業の利益を促進する特別の義務があった場合 - 特許庁
Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Act due to its relevance to a country set forth in appended table 1 of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため法第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
The initial plan was as follows: bifurcate a feeder line from Morishoji Station on the Keihan Main Line (corresponding to the current Senbayashi Station); at Akagawa, connect it with the line proceeding from the project site of Kami-shinjo Station to the south, and then extend the line to Umeda Station via Sakuranomiya Station and Tenma Station on the Joto Line (later Osaka Loop Line); at Umeda Station, construct a general terminal station (after the inauguration of Tenjinbashi Station; subsequently, the plan was changed to bifurcate the Keihan Main Line at Noe Station and extend the Shinkeihan Line from Tenjinbashi Station, but the plan was abandoned in 1932 and the license lapsed in 1942 (see also the section on the Keihan Umeda Line); however, since the elevation of the Joto Line was postponed due to the investment policy that prioritized the reconstruction of the Great Kanto Earthquake, Keihan, which had anticipated extending the line up to Umeda Station by making use of the site of the Joto Line once it was elevated, decided to look for an alternate site, based on the perspective that this new line project wouldn't be feasible for some time. 例文帳に追加
当初は京阪本線森小路駅（現在の千林駅に相当）から支線を分岐させて、新京阪線上新庄駅予定地から南へ延長した路線に赤川で合流させ、城東線（後の大阪環状線）桜ノ宮駅・天満駅を経由して梅田まで延伸し、同地に総合ターミナル駅を作ろうという構想（天神橋駅開業後に京阪本線は野江駅分岐、新京阪線は天神橋駅からの延伸に計画変更し、1932年に断念、1942年に免許失効。京阪梅田線も参照）を打ち出したが、城東線の高架化が関東大震災復興工事優先投資の方針から遅れることになったため、梅田延伸に関して高架化に伴う跡地の利用を考えていた京阪では、この新線は当面は実現不可能と考えて、代替地を探すことにした。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
Answering the question just posed to the Minister as to whether there is any specific deal with respect to establishing a Japan Desk or making an MOU, there is not yet a specific agreement that JBIC has entered into with any local financial institution, etc. overseas. As JBIC itself does not have much contact with mid-to-large companies and SMEs located in Japan, the initial step will be for (Japanese) regional financial institutions to comprehend the needs of those mid-to-large companies and SMEs and then JBIC will, based on the needs thus grasped, move on to make a decision in the capacity of JBIC as to which local financial institution, etc. to enter into an MOU with. An agreement being an agreement, however, an MOU will be made naturally as a result of negotiation with the prospective party to it and other actions will then follow, including establishing a Japan Desk and sending staff members of the regional financial institution in the capacity of JBIC staff members. While I suspect that it will take some time before any MOU is entered into between JBIC and a local financial institution, etc., my guess is that the process of sending regional financial institution staff members to JETRO could happen a little earlier. 例文帳に追加
先ほど大臣へのご質問の中に、ジャパンデスク設置、MOUの締結について、具体的な話があるかということでしたが、JBICはまだ具体的に海外の地場金融機関等とMOUを締結したことはありません。JBIC自身は必ずしも日本国内の中堅・中小企業との関係はあまりありませんので、まずは、（本邦）地域金融機関がこの中堅・中小企業のニーズを把握した上で、そのニーズを踏まえて、JBICとして、特にどこの地場金融機関等とMOUを締結するのかを決めますが、相手がある話ですから交渉の結果、MOU締結がなされれば、そこでジャパンデスクを設置して、地域金融機関の職員をJBICの職員として派遣するという段取りになると思います。ですから、JBICと地場金融機関等との間のMOU締結には少し時間がかかるとは思いますが、JETROに地域金融機関の職員を派遣することについては、少し早めにできるのではないかと思います。 - 金融庁
(3) A condition or term of a contract or licence shall not be void by virtue of this section if -- (a) at the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence, the supplier or licensor was willing to supply the product, or grant a licence to work the invention, as the case may be, to the person supplied or the licensee, on reasonable terms specified in the contract or licence and without any such condition or term as is mentioned in subsection (1); and (b) the person supplied or the licensee is entitled under the contract or licence to relieve himself of his liability to observe the condition or term on giving to the other party 3 months' notice in writing, and subject to payment to that other party of such compensation (being, in the case of a contract to supply, a lump sum or rent for the residue of the term of the contract and, in the case of a licence, a royalty for the residue of the term of the licence) as may be determined by an arbitrator appointed by the Minister.例文帳に追加
(3) 契約又はライセンスの条件は，次の場合は，本条により無効とされない。 (a) 契約の成立又はライセンスの許諾の時点で，当該供給者又は実施許諾者が契約又はライセンスに指定する適切な条件により，かつ，(1)にいうような条件なしに，当該製品の供給又は場合により当該発明実施のライセンス許諾を，供給を受ける者又は実施権者に行う意思があった場合，及び (b) 供給を受ける者又は実施権者が当該契約又はライセンスに基づいて，相手方に書面をもって3月の予告通知を行い，かつ，大臣により任命された仲裁人により決定される補償金の当該相手方への支払(供給契約の場合は，当該契約の残余期間分及びライセンスの場合は，当該ライセンスの残余期間分のロイヤルティの一括払又は定期分割払)を行った上で，当該条件を遵守する義務を免れる場合 - 特許庁
Article 2 (1) A person making a former notification (referring to the act of notification pertaining to acquisition of Japanese nationality by a child acknowledged by a father or mother not falling under children having acquired the status of a child born in wedlock through the marriage of the father and mother and their acknowledgment provided in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Nationality Act prior to revision by this Act pursuant to the provisions of said paragraph before the day of enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as "enforcement date"); the same shall apply hereinafter) falling under the requirements (except for notification to the Minister of Justice; the same shall apply in the supplementary provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)) provided in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Nationality Act after revision by this Act (referred to as the "New Act" in the supplemental provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)), if said paragraph applies (except for a person who was once a Japanese citizen) at the time of said former notification, may acquire Japanese nationality through notification to the Minister of Justice within three years of the enforcement date. 例文帳に追加
第二条 従前の届出（この法律の施行の日（以下「施行日」という。）前にこの法律による改正前の国籍法第三条第一項の規定によるものとしてされた同項に規定する父母の婚姻及びその認知により嫡出子たる身分を取得した子に該当しない父又は母が認知した子による日本の国籍の取得に係る届出の行為をいう。以下同じ。）をした者で、当該従前の届出の時においてこの法律による改正後の国籍法（附則第四条第一項において「新法」という。）第三条第一項の規定の適用があるとするならば同項に規定する要件（法務大臣に届け出ることを除く。附則第四条第一項において同じ。）に該当するものであったもの（日本国民であった者を除く。）は、施行日から三年以内に限り、法務大臣に届け出ることによって、日本の国籍を取得することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
As I repeatedly say, it is true that a higher capital adequacy figure may appear to imply security at a glance, but it can also lead to a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection practices, as we experienced 10 years ago. Back then, even healthy companies went under. As a Diet member of the ruling party in a ministerial post, I was faced firsthand with the confusion that prevailed in the Japanese economy at that time. It was in 1997 that the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went under and Yamaichi Securities failed, soon ushering in what would be called the "Financial Diet Session." The Basel meeting is attended by 27 countries and, for all of them, a higher ratio figure, which does provide peace of mind and security, is at the same time not necessarily better in that light. As making a capital adequacy ratio too high can lead to a credit crunch and oppressive debt collection and hence a shrinking economy, we are hoping to maintain a good balance in view of all those factors. We are determined to make our point in the new requirement debate, keeping in mind where we stand as a country that actually experienced a financial crisis 10 years ago. 例文帳に追加
私は何回も申しますように、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど確かに一見安全に見えますけれども、それだと、よく我々10年前に経験したように、貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起こるわけでございますから、あのとき健全な企業まで、健全に近い企業まで倒産をしたというようなことがございますし、日本の経済が混乱したということは10年前私も、何度も申し上げます、与党の国会議員として、私が閣僚のときに、1997年か98年でございますが、北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一證券が破綻するという時代で、その後が金融国会でございましたから、身をもって体験しておりますから、やはりそこら辺は安心・安定という、これはこの金融機関あるいは金融システム、基本的にG20の世界でございますし、このバーゼルの会議は27カ国出ていますけれども、そういった意味の安心・安全ということと同時に、余り数値だけ高ければ高いほどいいわけではない。そこは余り高くしますと、今さっき言ったように、今度は貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起きて経済そのものが縮小するわけでございますから、そこら辺をきちんとバランスを持ってやっていきたいというふうに思っておりまして、そういった意味のことを、新規制が我々の立場、10年前に金融危機を実際に経験して、そういった立場もきちんと踏まえながら主張をしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁
I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. 例文帳に追加
特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。 - 金融庁
Although a follow-up team for business legislation is not usually created immediately after the establishment of the legislation, I believed it was necessary to create the Amended Money Lending Business Act Follow-up Team. Given that there are sound borrowers, in addition to the fact that there is a relatively large number of borrowers who tend to be in tough circumstances in society and in hardship, we decided to create a team to follow up on them. We are currently making efforts to raise awareness of the amended Money Lending Act, as well as conducting various surveys on the impact of the amended Money Lending Act. We are also considering conducting various interviews in the industry. At this stage, we believe it is necessary to properly follow up on them and take necessary and swift action in response to the findings. In general terms, my understanding is that the environment is extremely tough for consumers at this time, so we are committed to having the Team follow up on them properly. 例文帳に追加
今のところ、ご存じのように、改正貸金業フォローアップチームを、これはもう私は何回も申し上げましたように、私が、これはもうぜひ作る必要があるということで、法律を作ってすぐ、この業法のフォローアップチームなんて作ることは、普通そういうことはないのでございますけれども、健全な借り手がおられるし、どちらかというと社会的に厳しい、困窮されておられる方々が比較的多いという事実もございまして、こういうフォローアップチームを作らせていただいたわけでございまして、今のところ改正貸金業法に関する周知徹底も今やっておりますし、この影響について色々やっておりますし、また、この業界からも色々なヒアリングをしようというようなことを考えておりますが、今のところ、こういったきちっとフォローアップして、必要な対応、速やかな対応をしていかねばならないと思っていますが、今、一般論として申し上げることでは、今の時点ではこういった大変厳しい消費者、厳しい環境というのは認識しておりますけれども、このフォローアップチームをしっかりやっていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁
I have been informed that all of Takefuji's loans are personal loans, of which approximately 10% are for individuals running their own businesses. I might also add that even after corporate rehabilitation procedures commence, borrowers should continue making repayments on agreed-on terms. I indeed commented on borrowers in my previous press conference but, at this point in time, I cannot make any clear reference as to any impact on SMEs, micro-enterprises and so on, except that, from the viewpoint of providing smooth financing for individuals, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) did request government-affiliated financial institutions and private financial institutions nationwide, through competent authorities and financial organizations, to respond attentively to any requests for financing consultation and other matters brought from Takefuji customers and anyone else with concerns. Having been requested by the FSA, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is in the process of taking relevant steps, including setting up special sections to serve SMEs, in response to Takefuji's filing for corporate reorganization proceedings. 例文帳に追加
武富士の貸付はすべて個人向け貸付でありまして、大体約1割ぐらいが自営業を営んでいる個人であるというふうに聞いております。また、会社更生手続が開始されても、借り手においては、約定どおり返済を行っていただくことになるということでございまして、私もこの前ぶら下がり（取材）で借り手の方のことを申し上げましたが、現時点では、中小・零細企業等への影響については確たることは申し上げられないけれども、いずれにしても、金融庁といたしましては、関係省庁や金融関係団体を通じて、政府系金融機関及び全国の民間金融機関に関して、個人向け金融の円滑化の観点から、当社の利用者等からの融資の相談等にきめ細かく対応するように要請を行ったところでございまして、当庁からの要請を受けて、経済産業省においては、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立ての影響を受けて、中小企業者を対象として特別窓口を設置する等の措置を講じていただいておるところでございます。 - 金融庁
Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加
第二十七条の二十六 金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加
２ 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(12) Where a person (excluding the corporations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Corporation Tax Act, specified book-entry transfer institution, etc., foreign intermediary and any other person specified by a Cabinet Order) makes, for the first time since April 1, 1999, entries or records under the book-entry transfer system with regard to specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (meaning specified short-term government or company bonds, principal-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in Article 90(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., and coupon-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in paragraph (3) of the said Article for which separate trading of principal and interest prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article has been conducted pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in the person's account that will be or has been established with a specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (meaning a [1] book-entry transfer institution prescribed in Article 2(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., [2] an institution that shall be deemed to be the said book-entry transfer institution pursuant to the provision of Article 48 of the said Act, and [3] a specified account management institution (meaning a specified account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(ii)) and specified indirect account management institution (meaning a specified indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(iii)), with each of which the said book-entry transfer institution (including an institution that shall be deemed as such) has established an account in accordance with the operational rules prescribed in Article 3(1)(v) of the said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or established with a foreign intermediary (meaning a foreign indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(viii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign indirect account management institution") and a foreign further indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(vii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign further indirect account management institution"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), via a business office, etc. (meaning a business office, etc. prescribed in Article 5-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. or an overseas business office, etc. (meaning a business office or any other office of a foreign intermediary which is located outside Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) of the said foreign intermediary, such person shall, upon making the first entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (limited to those made in the said account; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), submit a written notice stating the person's name and address (or any other place specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance in the case where the person does not have an address in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the person makes the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system, or submit such a written notice via the foreign intermediary through which the person makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) and the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.), to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution: the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. In this case, such person who submits the said written notice shall present a copy of the person's certificate of residence, certificate of registered matters of the corporation and any other document specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph to paragraph (18) as "identification documents") to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted (excluding the case where the said written notice is submitted via the said foreign intermediary; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or to the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted, and the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry-transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted or the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted shall confirm, by the said identification documents, the name and address stated in the said written notice. 例文帳に追加
１２ 平成十一年四月一日以後最初に特定振替機関等（社債等の振替に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する振替機関及び同法第四十八条の規定により当該振替機関とみなされる者並びに当該振替機関（当該みなされる者を含む。）の同法第三条第一項第五号に規定する業務規程の定めるところにより口座の開設を受けた特定口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第二号に規定する特定口座管理機関をいう。）及び特定間接口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第三号に規定する特定間接口座管理機関をいう。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は外国仲介業者（第五条の二第五項第八号に規定する外国間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国間接口座管理機関」という。）及び同項第七号に規定する外国再間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国再間接口座管理機関」という。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に開設され、又は開設されている口座において当該特定振替機関等の営業所等（第五条の二第一項に規定する営業所等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等（外国仲介業者の国外にある営業所又は事務所をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を通じて特定振替国債等（特定短期公社債並びに社債等の振替に関する法律第九十条第二項に規定する分離元本振替国債及び財務省令で定めるところにより同条第一項に規定する元利分離が行われた同条第三項に規定する分離利息振替国債をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の振替記載等を受ける者（法人税法別表第一に掲げる法人、特定振替機関等、外国仲介業者その他の政令で定めるものを除く。）は、その者の氏名又は名称及び住所（国内に住所を有しない者にあつては、財務省令で定める場所。以下この条において同じ。）その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した告知書を、その最初に振替記載等（当該口座においてされるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）を受ける際、その振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し、又はその振替記載等を受ける外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該外国仲介業者及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関）及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）を経由して当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該告知書の提出をする者は、当該告知書の提出（当該外国仲介業者を経由して提出する場合を除く。以下この項において同じ。）をする特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長にその者の住民票の写し、法人の登記事項証明書その他の政令で定める書類（以下この項から第十八項までにおいて「確認書類」という。）を提示しなければならないものとし、当該告知書の提出を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長は、当該告知書に記載されている氏名又は名称及び住所を当該確認書類により確認しなければならないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved. |
| 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。 |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
