「may not」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(236ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 66 (1) In cases where a Type 2 Specific Purpose Company changes its articles of incorporation, if any damages are likely to be caused to the Preferred Equity Members, said change to the articles of incorporation shall not become effective unless approved at a general meeting of said Preferred Equity Members (in cases where there are two or more classes of Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are likely to incur damages as a result of the changes to the articles of incorporation, the general meeting for each such class of Preferred Equity pertaining to such Preferred Equity Members) in addition to the resolution under Article 150; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there are no Preferred Equity Members who may exercise their voting rights at said general meeting. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条　第二種特定目的会社が定款の変更をする場合において、優先出資社員に損害を及ぼすおそれがあるときは、当該定款の変更は、第百五十条の規定による決議のほか、当該優先出資社員を構成員とする総会（当該定款の変更が損害を及ぼすおそれのある優先出資社員に係る優先出資の種類が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の種類別に区分された優先出資に係る優先出資社員を構成員とする各総会）の承認がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該総会において議決権を行使することができる優先出資社員が存しない場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 211 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired and before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc., the court shall make an order of simplified rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where a holder of filed rehabilitation claim who holds a claim that accounts for three-fifths or more of the value, as determined by the court, of total claims held by holders of filed rehabilitation claims has, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3. 例文帳に追加

第二百十一条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申立てがあったときは、簡易再生の決定（再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。）をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申立ては、届出再生債権者の総債権について裁判所が評価した額の五分の三以上に当たる債権を有する届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四章第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 217 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. the court shall make an order of consensual rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims and a procedure for adopting a resolution on a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where all holders of filed rehabilitation claims have, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3. 例文帳に追加

第二百十七条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申立てがあったときは、同意再生の決定（再生債権の調査及び確定の手続並びに再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案の決議を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。）をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申立ては、すべての届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四章第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 247 (1) Where the court makes an order of commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each bankruptcy claim filed in the bankruptcy proceedings to be stayed pursuant to the provision of Article 39(1), the number of denied/disputed bankruptcy claims prescribed in the main clause of Article 125(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, whether or not any liquidating distribution will be made through the bankruptcy proceedings, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making said order of commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, to the effect that rehabilitation creditors who hold rehabilitation claims that have been filed as bankruptcy proceedings in said bankruptcy proceedings (excluding claims that have been filed as preferred bankruptcy claims prescribed in Article 98(1) of said Act and claims for fine, etc. prescribed in Article 97(vi) of said Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not be required to file proofs of such rehabilitation claims. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十七条　裁判所は、再生手続開始の決定をする場合において、第三十九条第一項の規定により中止することとなる破産手続において届出があった破産債権の内容及び原因、破産法第百二十五条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある破産債権の数、当該破産手続における配当の有無その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、再生債権であって当該破産手続において破産債権としての届出があったもの（同法第九十八条第一項に規定する優先的破産債権である旨の届出があった債権及び同法第九十七条第六号に規定する罰金等の請求権を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する再生債権者は当該再生債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 253 (1) Where the court (meaning a judge or panel of judges in charge of the bankruptcy case; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following Article) makes an order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or in paragraph (3) of said Article, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each rehabilitation claim as well as the amount of the voting right as filed in the rehabilitation proceedings that are closed, the number of denied/disputed rehabilitation claims prescribed in the main clause of Article 105(1), whether or not any right will be modified by a rehabilitation plan and the content of such modification, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making said order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, to the effect that bankruptcy creditors who hold bankruptcy claims that have been filed as rehabilitation claims in said rehabilitation proceedings (excluding claims for fine, etc. arising prior to the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not be required to file proofs of such bankruptcy claims. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十三条　裁判所（破産事件を取り扱う一人の裁判官又は裁判官の合議体をいう。次項において同じ。）は、前条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定をする場合において、終了した再生手続において届出があった再生債権の内容及び原因並びに議決権の額、第百五条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある再生債権の数、再生計画による権利の変更の有無及び内容その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、破産債権であって当該再生手続において再生債権としての届出があったもの（再生手続開始前の罰金等を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する破産債権者は当該破産債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In case where the designation pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article has been effected and notice made pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of the same Article (including cases where the designation shall be deemed to have been effected pursuant to the provision of paragraph (6) of the same Article. The same shall apply to the following paragraph and paragraph (6)), if the obligations of a patent professional corporation which it has become to bear to its client in connection with a designated case may not be fully performed with the assets of the patent professional corporation, the designated members (including persons who were previously designated members. Hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall be jointly and severally liable for performance of the obligations, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where such obligations are proved to have been caused by a reason which arose after the withdrawal of relevant designated members. 例文帳に追加

４　前条第一項の規定による指定がされ、同条第四項の規定による通知がされている場合（同条第六項の規定により指定したものとみなされる場合を含む。次項及び第六項において同じ。）において、指定事件に関し依頼者に対して負担することとなった特許業務法人の債務をその特許業務法人の財産をもって完済することができないときは、第一項の規定にかかわらず、指定社員（指定社員であった者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）が、連帯してその弁済の責めに任ずる。ただし、脱退した指定社員が脱退後の事由により生じた債務であることを証明した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In cases where a business operator or an agent of a business operator enters into a consumer contract which includes the provisions referred to in Articles 8 - 10 (excluding the provisions of consumer contracts in item (v) of para. (1) of Article 8 which fall under each item of para. (2) of the same article. The same shall apply to the following paragraphs) with many unspecified consumers, and manifests or is likely to manifest the intention to offer or accept such contracts, qualified consumer organizations may demand against such business operators or their agent to stop or prevent such acts, the disposal of or the removal of materials used for such acts or other necessary measures to stop or prevent such acts; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the provisions of such consumer contracts shall not be made void by any laws other than the Civil Code and the Commercial Code. 例文帳に追加

３　適格消費者団体は、事業者又はその代理人が、消費者契約を締結するに際し、不特定かつ多数の消費者との間で第八条から第十条までに規定する消費者契約の条項（第八条第一項第五号に掲げる消費者契約の条項にあっては、同条第二項各号に掲げる場合に該当するものを除く。次項において同じ。）を含む消費者契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示を現に行い又は行うおそれがあるときは、その事業者又はその代理人に対し、当該行為の停止若しくは予防又は当該行為に供した物の廃棄若しくは除去その他の当該行為の停止若しくは予防に必要な措置をとることを請求することができる。ただし、民法及び商法以外の他の法律の規定によれば当該消費者契約の条項が無効とされないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) If, in ordering an investigation and a report of the results thereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Investigation, etc." in this paragraph) regarding a circumstance of soil contamination by a Designated Hazardous Substance, as described in paragraph (1) of this article, the prefectural governor can not make it clear without negligence to whom the governor orders to conduct the Investigation, etc. and recognizes it would be seriously incompatible with the public interest to leave such situation, then the governor may himself conduct such investigation at the expense of the primarily responsible person. In such case, the governor shall post a public notice fixing a reasonable period of time and stating that the Investigation, etc. be conducted during such fixed period, and that if it is not conducted during the fixed period, the governor will conduct the investigation himself. 例文帳に追加

２　都道府県知事は、前項の土壌の特定有害物質による汚染の状況の調査及びその結果の報告（以下この項において「調査等」という。）を命じようとする場合において、過失がなくて当該調査等を命ずべき者を確知することができず、かつ、これを放置することが著しく公益に反すると認められるときは、その者の負担において、当該調査を自ら行うことができる。この場合においては、相当の期限を定めて、当該調査等をすべき旨及びその期限までに当該調査等をしないときは、当該調査を自ら行う旨を、あらかじめ、公告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When a Report on Implementing Delivery After Collection to be made by the entity making the Report on Implementing Collection in Paragraph 1 has not been received even after the period of time specified by ordinance of the competent minister has elapsed after the notification indicated in Paragraph 1 has been made as specified by ordinance of the competent minister, the Information Management Entity shall report to the governor without delay that there is likely that the End-of-Life Vehicles, etc. may not be collected or delivered as is appropriate in addition to the name or designation of the entity making the Report on Implementing Collection, the Vehicle number of the End-of-Life Vehicles, etc. (when these are Parts Specified for Recycling, etc., the vehicle number of the End-of-Life Vehicles related to the Parts Specified for Recycling, etc.; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) and other matters specified by ordinance of the competent minister. 例文帳に追加

４　情報管理センターは、第一項の通知を行った後主務省令で定める期間を経過してもなお同項の引取実施報告を行った者が行うべき引取後引渡実施報告を受けないときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、当該使用済自動車等の引取り又は引渡しが適正に行われていないおそれがある旨及び当該引取実施報告を行った者の氏名又は名称、当該使用済自動車等の車台番号（特定再資源化等物品にあっては、当該特定再資源化等物品に係る使用済自動車の車台番号。次項において同じ。）その他の主務省令で定める事項を都道府県知事に報告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case referred to in paragraph (1), the court, if there are 1,000 or more known bankruptcy creditors and it finds it appropriate, may make an order not to give a notice to bankruptcy creditors under the provisions of paragraph (3)(i) of the following Article, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the main clauses of paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of said Article, and the provisions of the main clause of Article 33(3) and the main clause of Article 139(3) (in the case referred to in the main clause of Article 139(3), creditors with voting rights prescribed in the main clause of Article 139(3); the same shall apply in paragraph (2) of the following Article), and not to summon, on the date of a creditors meeting, bankruptcy creditors who filed proofs of bankruptcy claims pursuant to the provisions of Article 111, Article 112 or Article 114 (hereinafter referred to as "holders of filed bankruptcy claims"). 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の場合において、知れている破産債権者の数が千人以上であり、かつ、相当と認めるときは、裁判所は、次条第四項本文及び第五項本文において準用する同条第三項第一号、第三十三条第三項本文並びに第百三十九条第三項本文の規定による破産債権者（同項本文の場合にあっては、同項本文に規定する議決権者。次条第二項において同じ。）に対する通知をせず、かつ、第百十一条、第百十二条又は第百十四条の規定により破産債権の届出をした破産債権者（以下「届出をした破産債権者」という。）を債権者集会の期日に呼び出さない旨の決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) No Trust Company shall conduct the following transactions, except in cases where there are provisions to the effect that any of the following transactions are to be conducted and provisions on the outline of said transaction, in the terms of trust, or the case where the approval of the beneficiaries (in cases where a beneficiary has a trust manager or an agent at that time, including said trust manager or agent) has been obtained in advance, in writing or by Electromagnetic Means, by disclosing material facts relating to said transaction (excluding the case where there are provisions in the act of trust to the effect that said Trust Company may not conduct said transaction), which is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a case where conducting said transaction will not interfere with the protection of the beneficiaries: 例文帳に追加

２　信託会社は、信託行為において次に掲げる取引を行う旨及び当該取引の概要について定めがあり、又は当該取引に関する重要な事実を開示してあらかじめ書面若しくは電磁的方法による受益者（信託管理人又は受益者代理人が現に存する場合にあっては、当該信託管理人又は受益者代理人を含む。）の承認を得た場合（当該取引をすることができない旨の信託行為の定めがある場合を除く。）であり、かつ、受益者の保護に支障を生ずることがない場合として内閣府令で定める場合を除き、次に掲げる取引をしてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 789(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split on the Effective Day, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Absorption-type Company Split agreement, to request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Absorption-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第七百八十九条第一項第二号（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる吸収分割会社の債権者（第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第七百八十九条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、吸収分割契約において吸収分割後に吸収分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、吸収分割会社に対して、吸収分割会社が効力発生日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Stock Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split plan to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立株式会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Membership Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立持分会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 84 In cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Company with Class Shares, if there is a provision, as a feature of a certain class of shares to be issued as at the incorporation, to the effect that, with respect to the matter that is subject to the resolution of a shareholders' meeting, in addition to such resolution, the resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of such class of shares is required, such matter shall not become effective unless the resolution is made at a Class Organizational Meeting (meaning a meeting of Class Shareholders at Incorporation (as defined below) of a certain class of the Shares Issued at Incorporation. The same shall apply hereinafter.) constituted by the Class Shareholders at Incorporation (meaning the Shareholders at Incorporation of a certain class of Shares Issued at Incorporation. The same shall apply hereinafter in this Section.) of the Shares Issued at Incorporation of such class in addition to the resolution of the Organizational Meeting, consistently with the provisions of articles of incorporation; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where there exists no Class Shareholder at Incorporation who may exercise the votes at such Class Organizational Meeting. 例文帳に追加

第八十四条　設立しようとする株式会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、その設立に際して発行するある種類の株式の内容として、株主総会において決議すべき事項について、当該決議のほか、当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会の決議があることを必要とする旨の定めがあるときは、当該事項は、その定款の定めの例に従い、創立総会の決議のほか、当該種類の設立時発行株式の設立時種類株主（ある種類の設立時発行株式の設立時株主をいう。以下この節において同じ。）を構成員とする種類創立総会（ある種類の設立時発行株式の設立時種類株主の総会をいう。以下同じ。）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類創立総会において議決権を行使することができる設立時種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 100 (1) In cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Company with Class Shares, if it is intended to create, as a feature of a certain class of shares, any provision in the articles of incorporation with respect to the matters listed in item (iv) or item (vii) of Article 108(1) by amending the articles of incorporation, such amendment in the articles of incorporation shall not become effective unless a resolution is made at a Class Organizational Meeting constituted by the following Class Shareholders at Incorporation (in cases where there are two or more classes of Shares Issued at Incorporation relating to such Class Shareholders at Incorporation, referring to the respective Class Organizational Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders at Incorporation categorized by the class of such two or more classes of Shares Issued at Incorporation. The same shall apply hereinafter in this Article.); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder at Incorporation who may exercise his/her votes at such Class Organizational Meeting: 例文帳に追加

第百条　設立しようとする株式会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、定款を変更してある種類の株式の内容として第百八条第一項第四号又は第七号に掲げる事項についての定款の定めを設けるときは、当該定款の変更は、次に掲げる設立時種類株主を構成員とする種類創立総会（当該設立時種類株主に係る設立時発行株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の設立時発行株式の種類別に区分された設立時種類株主を構成員とする各種類創立総会。以下この条において同じ。）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類創立総会において議決権を行使することができる設立時種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 101 (1) In cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Company with Class Shares, if effecting any amendment in articles of incorporation with respect to any of the following matters is likely to cause detriment to the Class Shareholders at Incorporation of any class of Shares Issued at Incorporation, such amendment in the articles of incorporation shall not become effective unless a resolution is made at an Class Organizational Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders at Incorporation of the Shares Issued at Incorporation of such class (in cases where there are two or more classes of Shares Issued at Incorporation relating to such Class Shareholders at Incorporation, referring to the respective Class Organizational Meetings constituted by the Class Shareholders at Incorporation categorized by the class of such two or more classes of Shares Issued at Incorporation); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder at Incorporation who may exercise his/her votes at such Class Organizational Meeting: 例文帳に追加

第百一条　設立しようとする株式会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、次に掲げる事項についての定款の変更をすることにより、ある種類の設立時発行株式の設立時種類株主に損害を及ぼすおそれがあるときは、当該定款の変更は、当該種類の設立時発行株式の設立時種類株主を構成員とする種類創立総会（当該設立時種類株主に係る設立時発行株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の設立時発行株式の種類別に区分された設立時種類株主を構成員とする各種類創立総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類創立総会において議決権を行使することができる設立時種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with Board of Directors, only shareholders having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) not less than one hundredth (1/100) (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholders may demand the directors that the directors include certain matters in the purpose of the shareholders meeting. In such cases, that demand shall be submitted no later than eight weeks (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) prior to the day of the shareholders meeting. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権の百分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主に限り、取締役に対し、一定の事項を株主総会の目的とすることを請求することができる。この場合において、その請求は、株主総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までにしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 322 (1) In cases where a Company with Class Shares carries out an act listed in the following items, if it is likely to cause detriment to the Class Shareholders of any class of shares, such act shall not become effective unless a resolution is made at a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of the shares of such class (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, referring to the respective Class Meetings constituted by the Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares. The same shall apply hereinafter in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where there exists no Class Shareholder who may exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting: 例文帳に追加

第三百二十二条　種類株式発行会社が次に掲げる行為をする場合において、ある種類の株式の種類株主に損害を及ぼすおそれがあるときは、当該行為は、当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会。以下この条において同じ。）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 323 If, at a Company with Class Shares, there is a provision, as a feature of a certain class of shares, to the effect that, with respect to the matter that is subject to the resolution of the shareholders meeting (for a Company with Board of Directors, shareholders meeting or board of directors; and for a Company with Board of Liquidators provided for in Article 478(6), shareholders meeting or board of liquidators), in addition to such resolution, the resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of such class of shares is required, such matter shall not become effective unless the resolution is made at a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of the shares of such class in addition to the resolution of the shareholders meeting, board of directors or board of liquidators, consistently with the provisions of articles of incorporation; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where there exists no Class Shareholder who may exercise the votes at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

第三百二十三条　種類株式発行会社において、ある種類の株式の内容として、株主総会（取締役会設置会社にあっては株主総会又は取締役会、第四百七十八条第六項に規定する清算人会設置会社にあっては株主総会又は清算人会）において決議すべき事項について、当該決議のほか、当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会の決議があることを必要とする旨の定めがあるときは、当該事項は、その定款の定めに従い、株主総会、取締役会又は清算人会の決議のほか、当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) In the event that a prefectural governor acknowledges that a designated welfare service business operator for persons with disabilities does not satisfy the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 of Article 43 on employees' knowledge and skills and the number of employees, or does not operate business appropriately on designated welfare service pursuant to the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated welfare service business operators prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth paragraph 2 of the same Article, he/she may admonish such designated welfare service business operator with setting a time limit to comply with the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 of the same Article or to comply with the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated welfare service business operators for persons with disabilities prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 2 set forth in the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　都道府県知事は、指定障害福祉サービス事業者が、当該指定に係るサービス事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第四十三条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害福祉サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定障害福祉サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定障害福祉サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害福祉サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the event that a prefectural governor acknowledges that an establisher of designated support facilities does not satisfy the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 set forth in Article 44 on knowledge and skills and the number of the employees of the facilities pertaining to such designation and Nozominosono, or does not operate business appropriately on in-facility welfare service for persons with disabilities pursuant to the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated support facilities for persons with disabilities, or others prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 2 of the same Article, he/she may admonish such establisher of support facilities, etc. with setting a time limit to comply with the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 set forth in the same Article or to comply with the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated support facilities for persons with disabilities, or others prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 2 set forth in the same Article. 例文帳に追加

２　都道府県知事は、指定障害者支援施設等の設置者が、当該指定に係る施設及びのぞみの園の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第四十四条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害者支援施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な施設障害福祉サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定障害者支援施設等の設置者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害者支援施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the event that a prefectural governor acknowledges that a designated consultation support business operator does not satisfy the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 of Article 45 on knowledge and skills and the number of the employees of the consultation support places of business pertaining to such designation, or does not operate business appropriately on designated consultation support service pursuant to the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated consultation support business prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 2 of the same Article, he/she may admonish such designated consultation support business operator with setting a time limit to comply with the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 set forth in the same Article or to comply with the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated consultation support prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 2 of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

３　都道府県知事は、指定相談支援事業者が、当該指定に係る相談支援事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第四十五条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定相談支援の事業の運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定相談支援の事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定相談支援事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定相談支援の事業の運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 11 (1) Where a settlor has created a trust with the knowledge that it would harm the settlor's creditor, the creditor may, irrespective of whether or not the trustee had knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed, request the court for a rescission under the provisions of Article 424, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896), with the trustee as the defendant; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are any beneficiaries at the time, all or some of who had no knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries (meaning being designated as an initial beneficiary or new beneficiary after a change in the provisions of the terms of trust or as a result of the exercise of the right to designate or change a beneficiary prescribed in Article 89, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereinafter) or when they acquired beneficial interests. 例文帳に追加

第十一条　委託者がその債権者を害することを知って信託をした場合には、受託者が債権者を害すべき事実を知っていたか否かにかかわらず、債権者は、受託者を被告として、民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第四百二十四条第一項の規定による取消しを裁判所に請求することができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定（信託行為の定めにより又は第八十九条第一項に規定する受益者指定権等の行使により受益者又は変更後の受益者として指定されることをいう。以下同じ。）を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) The performance requirements for a breakwater in the place where there is a risk of serious impact on human lives, property, or socioeconomic activity, in consideration of its structure type, shall be such that the damage from tsunamis, accidental waves, Level 2 earthquake ground motions and/or other actions do not have a serious impact on the structural stability of the breakwater concerned with respect to the breakwater types even though the damage may impair the functions of the breakwater concerned. Provided, however, that as for the performance requirements for the breakwater which is required to protect the hinterland of the breakwater concerned from tsunamis, the damage due to tsunamis, Level 2 earthquake ground motions and/or other actions shall not adversely affect rehabilitation through minor repair works of the functions of the breakwater concerned. 例文帳に追加

三　当該防波堤の被災に伴い、人命、財産又は社会経済活動に重大な影響を及ぼすおそれのある防波堤の要求性能　構造形式に応じて、津波、偶発波浪、レベル二地震動等の作用による損傷等が、当該防波堤の機能が損なわれた場合であっても、当該防波堤の構造の安定に重大な影響を及ぼさないこと。ただし、津波から当該防波堤の背後地を防護する必要がある防波堤の要求性能にあっては、津波、レベル二地震動等の作用による損傷等が、軽微な修復による当該防波堤の機能の回復に影響を及ぼさないこと。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 36 (1) In the event that the employer has entered into a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace (in the case that such labor union is organized) or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such labor union is not organized) and has notified the relevant government agency of such agreement , the employer may, notwithstanding the provisions with respect to working hours stipulated in Articles 32 through 32-5 or Article 40 (hereinafter in this Article referred to as "working hours")or the provisions with respect to days off stipulated in the preceding Article(hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as "days off"), extend the working hours or have workers work on days off in accordance with the provisions of the said agreement; provided, however, that the extension of working hours for belowground labor and other work especially harmful to health as stipulated in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare shall not exceed 2 hours per day. 例文帳に追加

第三十六条　使用者は、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定をし、これを行政官庁に届け出た場合においては、第三十二条から第三十二条の五まで若しくは第四十条の労働時間（以下この条において「労働時間」という。）又は前条の休日（以下この項において「休日」という。）に関する規定にかかわらず、その協定で定めるところによつて労働時間を延長し、又は休日に労働させることができる。ただし、坑内労働その他厚生労働省令で定める健康上特に有害な業務の労働時間の延長は、一日について二時間を超えてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 81-4 (1) An appointer may employ a person, who retired pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-2, who retired after completing his/her service pursuant to the provision of the preceding Article, or who, among the persons who had retired before the mandatory retirement age, shall, after considering such matters as the length of service, etc., be dealt with in the same manner as those who retired at the mandatory retirement age by rules of the National Personnel Authority (hereinafter referred to as "a person who has mandatorily retired, etc.,"), or who retired pursuant to the provision of the Self-Defense Forces Act (Act No. 165 of 1954) and shall be dealt with in the same manner as a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. by rules of the National Personnel Authority (referred to as "a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. under the Self-Defense Forces Act" in the following paragraph), based on the previous performance on duty for selection, for a position requiring a full-time service, setting a term of office not exceeding one year, unless the person has not reached the mandatory retirement age pertaining to the government position concerned. 例文帳に追加

第八十一条の四　任命権者は、第八十一条の二第一項の規定により退職した者若しくは前条の規定により勤務した後退職した者若しくは定年退職日以前に退職した者のうち勤続期間等を考慮してこれらに準ずるものとして人事院規則で定める者（以下「定年退職者等」という。）又は自衛隊法（昭和二十九年法律第百六十五号）の規定により退職した者であつて定年退職者等に準ずるものとして人事院規則で定める者（次条において「自衛隊法による定年退職者等」という。）を、従前の勤務実績等に基づく選考により、一年を超えない範囲内で任期を定め、常時勤務を要する官職に採用することができる。ただし、その者がその者を採用しようとする官職に係る定年に達していないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 56-2 (1) In the case falling under any of the following items, a prefectural government and a municipal government may subsidize not more than three-quarters (3/4) of the amount of expenses spent for new construction (limited to new construction of child welfare institutions set up by social welfare corporations formed pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Social Welfare Act), repair, renovation, expansion or improvement (hereinafter referred to as "Construction, etc.") for child welfare institutions set up by persons other than the national, prefectural and municipal governments pursuant to the provision of Article 35 paragraph (4); provided, however, that the total amount of the amounts subsidized by the prefectural and municipal governments for any one child welfare institution shall not exceed three-quarters (3/4) of the expenses spent for Construction, etc. of said child welfare institution: 例文帳に追加

第五十六条の二　都道府県及び市町村は、次の各号に該当する場合においては、第三十五条第四項の規定により、国、都道府県及び市町村以外の者が設置する児童福祉施設について、その新設（社会福祉法第三十一条第一項の規定により設立された社会福祉法人が設置する児童福祉施設の新設に限る。）、修理、改造、拡張又は整備（以下「新設等」という。）に要する費用の四分の三以内を補助することができる。ただし、一の児童福祉施設について都道府県及び市町村が補助する金額の合計額は、当該児童福祉施設の新設等に要する費用の四分の三を超えてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 59 (1) When the prefectural governor finds necessary for the welfare of children with regard to an institution intended for any of the services provided in Articles 36 to 44 inclusive for which the notification set forth in Article 35 paragraph (iii) has not been made or the approval set forth in paragraph (iv) of the same Article has not been obtained (including institutions for which the approval as a child welfare institution has been rescinded pursuant to the provision of the preceding Article), the prefectural governor may request its establisher or manager to report the matters found necessary by the prefectural governor or cause said prefecture's official to enter any of its offices or facilities or to conduct necessary investigations or ask questions in relation to the facilities or operation of the institution. In this case, the prefectural governor shall make the official carry his/her certification for identification. 例文帳に追加

第五十九条　都道府県知事は、児童の福祉のため必要があると認めるときは、第三十六条から第四十四条までの各条に規定する業務を目的とする施設であつて第三十五条第三項の届出をしていないもの又は同条第四項の認可を受けていないもの（前条の規定により児童福祉施設の認可を取り消されたものを含む。）については、その施設の設置者若しくは管理者に対し、必要と認める事項の報告を求め、又は当該職員をして、その事務所若しくは施設に立ち入り、その施設の設備若しくは運営について必要な調査若しくは質問をさせることができる。この場合においては、その身分を証明する証票を携帯させなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to the business prescribed in the preceding paragraph, when an employer has stipulated that the average weekly working hours in a period not exceeding one month shall not exceed 44 hours in a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned where such a labor union exists or with a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace where no such labor union exists (including resolutions unanimously adopted by a labor-management, and resolutions unanimously adopted by all the members of a working hours reduction task force committee referred to in the provisions of Article 7 of the Shorter Working Hours Promotion Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the rules of employment, or the equivalent, the employer may have a worker work in excess of 44 hours in a specified week or in excess of 8 hours in a specified day in accordance with the stipulation, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 32 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

２　使用者は、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定（労使委員会における委員の五分の四以上の多数による決議及び労働時間等設定改善法第七条第一項の労働時間短縮推進委員会における委員の五分の四以上の多数による決議を含む。以下この条において同じ。）により、又は就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、一箇月以内の期間を平均し一週間当たりの労働時間が四十四時間を超えない定めをした場合においては、前項に規定する事業については同項の規定にかかわらず、その定めにより、特定された週において四十四時間又は特定された日において八時間を超えて、労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 4 (1) A Public Offering of Securities (including Specified Procedures Relating to Securities Issuance for Reorganization; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter and the following Chapter, except in Article 13 and Article 15(2) to (6)) or Secondary Distribution of Securities (excluding those falling under the category of General Solicitation for Securities Acquired by Qualified Institutional Investor as defined in the following paragraph, but including Specified Procedures Relating to Securities Delivery for Reorganization; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) may not be made unless the Issuer thereof has made a notification of Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases that fall under any of the following items: 例文帳に追加

第四条　有価証券の募集（特定組織再編成発行手続を含む。第十三条及び第十五条第二項から第六項までを除き、以下この章及び次章において同じ。）又は有価証券の売出し（次項に規定する適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘に該当するものを除き、特定組織再編成交付手続を含む。以下この項において同じ。）は、発行者が当該有価証券の募集又は売出しに関し内閣総理大臣に届出をしているものでなければ、することができない。ただし、次の各号のいずれかに該当するものについては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 42-5 A Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., with regard to his/her Investment Management Business (limited to the business of conducting the acts specified in Article 2(8)(xii); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), may not, for any reason, receive deposit of money or Securities from a customer or have a person specified by a Cabinet Order as a person closely related to the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. deposit the customer's money or Securities, except in cases where such act is conducted as Securities, etc. Management Business or other cases specified by a Cabinet Order; provided, however, that this shall not apply where said Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. conducts, with regard to his/her Investment Management Business, any of the acts listed in Article 2(8)(i) to (iv) on behalf of a customer, and such deposit is necessary for the settlement of the transaction conducted by means of such act. 例文帳に追加

第四十二条の五　金融商品取引業者等は、有価証券等管理業務として行う場合その他政令で定める場合を除くほか、その行う投資運用業（第二条第八項第十二号に掲げる行為を行う業務に限る。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）に関して、いかなる名目によるかを問わず、顧客から金銭若しくは有価証券の預託を受け、又は当該金融商品取引業者等と密接な関係を有する者として政令で定める者に顧客の金銭若しくは有価証券を預託させてはならない。ただし、当該金融商品取引業者等がその行う投資運用業に関し、顧客のために同項第一号から第四号までに掲げる行為を行う場合において、これらの行為による取引の決済のために必要なときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) A Financial Instruments Clearing Organization (excluding the cases where the Financial Instruments Clearing Organization is a Financial Instruments Exchange; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 156-13, Article 156-14 and Article 156-17(1)) may not conduct business other than Financial Instruments Obligation Assumption Service, etc. and business incidental thereto; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Financial Instruments Clearing Organization has obtained approval from the Prime Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, with regard to business related to Financial Instruments Obligation Assumption Service which is found to have no risk of hindering said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization from conducting Financial Instruments Obligation Assumption Service appropriately and certainly. 例文帳に追加

２　金融商品取引清算機関（金融商品取引清算機関が金融商品取引所である場合を除く。以下この条、第百五十六条の十三、第百五十六条の十四及び第百五十六条の十七第一項において同じ。）は、金融商品債務引受業等及びこれに附帯する業務のほか、他の業務を行うことができない。ただし、金融商品債務引受業に関連する業務で、当該金融商品取引清算機関が金融商品債務引受業を適正かつ確実に行うにつき支障を生ずるおそれがないと認められるものについて、内閣府令で定めるところにより、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The term a "Fact Concerning Launch of a Tender Offer, etc." or a "Fact Concerning Suspension of a Tender Offer, etc." as used in the preceding paragraph means a fact that Tender Offeror, etc. (or the organ of the Tender Offeror, etc. which is responsible for making decisions on the execution of the operations of the Tender Offeror, etc. in cases where the Tender Offeror, etc. is a juridical person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) decides to launch the Tender Offer, etc. or not to launch the Tender Offer, etc. that is decided to be launched in such a decision (limited to acts that have already been Publicized); provided, however, that this shall not apply to such a fact as is regarded under the criteria specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as one that may have only minor influence on investors' Investment Decisions. 例文帳に追加

２　前項に規定する公開買付け等の実施に関する事実又は公開買付け等の中止に関する事実とは、公開買付者等（当該公開買付者等が法人であるときは、その業務執行を決定する機関をいう。以下この項において同じ。）が、それぞれ公開買付け等を行うことについての決定をしたこと又は公開買付者等が当該決定（公表がされたものに限る。）に係る公開買付け等を行わないことを決定したことをいう。ただし、投資者の投資判断に及ぼす影響が軽微なものとして内閣府令で定める基準に該当するものを除く。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the Prime Minister is required to issue one or more decisions under paragraph (1) (limited to the cases where any fact specified in Article 178(1)(ii) has been found) or under preceding two paragraphs, if there is a final and binding court decision on the same case imposing a fine on a Respondent, he/she shall, in lieu of the amount specified in Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding two paragraphs, issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount derived by the following: deducting the amount specified in item (ii) from the amount specified in item (i), and then prorating the amount after said deduction in proportion to the Surcharge Amount Calculated for Respective Decision in relation to each fact pertaining to said one or more decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that when the amount listed in item (i) does not exceed the amount listed in item (ii), the Prime Minister may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding two paragraphs: 例文帳に追加

４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項（第百七十八条第一項第二号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。）又は前二項の規定により一以上の決定をしなければならないときであつて、同一事件について、被審人に対し、罰金の確定裁判があるときは、第百七十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は前二項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該一以上の決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じて按分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項若しくは第二項又は前二項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) When a certified public accountant or audit firm has made an audit certification for the statements on finance and accounting set forth in paragraph (1) and for the Internal Control Reports set forth in paragraph (2), if said audit certification falls under the provision of Article 30 or Article 34-21(2)(i) or (ii) of the Certified Public Accountants Act, or is otherwise wrongful, the Prime Minister may issue a decision not to accept whole or part of the Securities Registration Statements, Annual Securities Reports (including amendment reports thereof) or Internal Control Reports (including amendment reports thereof) with the audit certification made by said certified public accountant or audit firm to be submitted within a period not exceeding one year specified by the Prime Minister. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 例文帳に追加

６　公認会計士又は監査法人が第一項に規定する財務計算に関する書類及び第二項に規定する内部統制報告書について監査証明をした場合において、当該監査証明が公認会計士法第三十条又は第三十四条の二十一第二項第一号若しくは第二号に規定するものであるときその他不正なものであるときは、内閣総理大臣は、一年以内の期間を定めて、当該期間内に提出される有価証券届出書、有価証券報告書（その訂正報告書を含む。）又は内部統制報告書（その訂正報告書を含む。）で当該公認会計士又は監査法人の監査証明に係るものの全部又は一部を受理しない旨の決定をすることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 28-2 When a certified public accountant has provided the services set forth in Article 2(1) concerning the financial documents of a company or any other person, said certified public accountant (including a person who was formerly a certified public accountant) may not become an officer for nor take an equivalent position with said company or person nor a consolidated company, etc. thereof (meaning a person categorized by Cabinet Office Ordinance as one who prepares financial documents on a consolidated basis with said company or person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 34-11(1)(iii)) until the day on which the accounting period following that pertaining to said financial documents ends; provided, however, that this shall not apply if the approval of the Prime Minister has been obtained in a case where unavoidable circumstances are found regarding becoming an officer of or taking an equivalent position with said company or person or a consolidated company, etc. thereof or in any other case specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十八条の二　公認会計士が会社その他の者の財務書類について第二条第一項の業務を行つた場合には、当該公認会計士（公認会計士であつた者を含む。）は、当該財務書類に係る会計期間の翌会計期間の終了の日までの間は、当該会社その他の者又はその連結会社等（当該会社その他の者と連結して財務書類を作成するものとされる者として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条及び第三十四条の十一第一項第三号において同じ。）の役員又はこれに準ずるものに就いてはならない。ただし、当該会社その他の者又はその連結会社等の役員又はこれに準ずるものに就くことにつきやむを得ない事情があると認められるときその他の内閣府令で定める場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を得たときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 204 (1) When a public prosecutor has arrested a suspect upon an arrest warrant or has received a suspect who was arrested upon an arrest warrant (excluding such suspect as is referred in accordance with the preceding Article), he/she shall immediately inform the suspect of the essential facts of the suspected crime and the fact that the suspect may appoint defense counsel and then, giving the suspect an opportunity for explanation, he/she shall immediately release the suspect when he/she believes that it is not necessary to detain the suspect, or shall request a judge to detain the suspect within 48 hours of the suspect being placed under physical restraint when he/she believes that it is necessary to detain the suspect; provided, however, that when the public prosecutor has instituted prosecution during the time limitation, he/she shall not be required to request detention. 例文帳に追加

第二百四条　検察官は、逮捕状により被疑者を逮捕したとき、又は逮捕状により逮捕された被疑者（前条の規定により送致された被疑者を除く。）を受け取つたときは、直ちに犯罪事実の要旨及び弁護人を選任することができる旨を告げた上、弁解の機会を与え、留置の必要がないと思料するときは直ちにこれを釈放し、留置の必要があると思料するときは被疑者が身体を拘束された時から四十八時間以内に裁判官に被疑者の勾留を請求しなければならない。但し、その時間の制限内に公訴を提起したときは、勾留の請求をすることを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 316-26 (1) When the court deems that the public prosecutor has not disclosed the evidence which was to be disclosed pursuant to Article 316-14, paragraph (1) of Article 316-15 (including cases in which these provisions apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of Article 316-21) or paragraph (1) of Article 316-20 (including cases in which this provision applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5) of Article 316-22) or that the accused or his/her counsel has not disclosed the evidence which was to be disclosed pursuant to Article 316-18 (including cases in which this provision applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of Article 316-22), it shall, upon the request of the opponent, order the disclosure of evidence on a ruling. In this case, the court may, on a ruling, designate the time or the means of disclosure of the evidence or set appropriate conditions for the disclosure. 例文帳に追加

第三百十六条の二十六　裁判所は、検察官が第三百十六条の十四若しくは第三百十六条の十五第一項（第三百十六条の二十一第四項においてこれらの規定を準用する場合を含む。）若しくは第三百十六条の二十第一項（第三百十六条の二十二第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による開示をすべき証拠を開示していないと認めるとき、又は被告人若しくは弁護人が第三百十六条の十八（第三百十六条の二十二第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による開示をすべき証拠を開示していないと認めるときは、相手方の請求により、決定で、当該証拠の開示を命じなければならない。この場合において、裁判所は、開示の時期若しくは方法を指定し、又は条件を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a fire chief or fire station chief is unable to identify the owner, manager or possessor, who holds title, of an object that is found to be dangerous from a fire prevention perspective or an object that is found to be likely to hinder fire extinguishing activities, evacuation and other fire defense activities, and therefore unable to order these persons to take any necessary measures under the provision of the preceding paragraph, he/she may have his/her fire defense personnel take the measures listed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (iii) or item (iv) with regard to said object, at the expense of said person. In this case, the fire and fire station chief shall, in advance, set a reasonable time limit and give public notice to the effect that such measures should be implemented by said time limit and that if the measures have not been implemented by said time limit, his/her fire defense personnel will implement the measures; provided, however, that this shall not apply when it is found that there is an urgent necessity. 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、火災の予防に危険であると認める物件又は消火、避難その他の消防の活動に支障になると認める物件の所有者、管理者又は占有者で権原を有するものを確知することができないため、これらの者に対し、前項の規定による必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができないときは、それらの者の負担において、当該消防職員に、当該物件について第三条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる措置をとらせることができる。この場合においては、相当の期限を定めて、その措置を行うべき旨及びその期限までにその措置を行わないときは、当該消防職員がその措置を行うべき旨をあらかじめ公告しなければならない。ただし、緊急の必要があると認めるときはこの限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 217-23 In cases where, in a pretrial conference procedure, a time limit has been set as prescribed in Article 316-16, paragraph (2) of the Code (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-21, paragraph (4) of the Code), Article 316-17, paragraph (3) of the Code, Article 316-19, paragraph (2) of the Code (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-22, paragraph (4) of the Code), Article 316-21, paragraph (3) of the Code, or Article 316-22, paragraph (3) of the Code, if the court finds it to be appropriate to commence trial proceedings even when opinions or allegations have not been clarified or when the examination of evidence has not been requested by said time limit, it may close said pretrial conference procedure. 例文帳に追加

第二百十七条の二十三　裁判所は、公判前整理手続において法第三百十六条の十六第二項（法第三百十六条の二十一第四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三百十六条の十七第三項、第三百十六条の十九第二項（法第三百十六条の二十二第四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三百十六条の二十一第三項又は第三百十六条の二十二第三項に規定する期限を定めた場合において、当該期限までに、意見若しくは主張が明らかにされず、又は証拠調べの請求がされない場合においても、公判の審理を開始するのを相当と認めるときは、公判前整理手続を終了することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) A federation of cooperatives engaged in mutual aid activities pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), item (v) for which the total number of partner of its member cooperatives exceeds the standard specified by a Cabinet Order or which is engaged in the activities of the reinsurance of mutual aid liabilities or the retrocession of reinsurance liabilities borne by affiliate cooperatives in the course of mutual aid activities (hereinafter referred to as "specified federation of mutual aid associations") may not conduct activities other than mutual aid activities and the activities set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, and activities incidental thereto, and the activities prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the following paragraph, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1); provided, however, that this shall not apply when it has obtained the approval of an administrative agency pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. 例文帳に追加

４　第一項第五号の規定により共済事業を行う協同組合連合会であつてその会員たる組合の組合員の総数が政令で定める基準を超えるもの又はその所属員たる組合が共済事業を行うことによつて負う共済責任の再共済又は再共済責任の再再共済の事業を行うもの（以下「特定共済組合連合会」という。）は、同項の規定にかかわらず、共済事業及び同項第二号の事業並びにこれらに附帯する事業並びに次項において準用する第九条の二第六項に規定する事業のほか、他の事業を行うことができない。ただし、主務省令で定めるところにより、行政庁の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) If, three months after receiving a request for examination of the refusal to transmit the request for registration or transfer of registration in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 or the filing of objection in accordance with the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (1), the Japan Federation of Bar Associations has not made a ruling or a disposition as set forth in Article 14, paragraph (2), or if it has not effected the registration or transfer of registration in the roll of attorneys within three months of receiving the transmission of a request for registration or transfer of registration, it shall be deemed that the request for review or the filing of the objection has been rejected or the request for registration or transfer of registration has been refused, and the person who made such a request for review or filed such an objection or made such a request for registration or transfer of registration may institute a lawsuit pursuant to the preceding paragraph. 例文帳に追加

２　日本弁護士連合会が第十二条の規定による登録若しくは登録換えの請求の進達の拒絶についての審査請求若しくは第十四条第一項の規定による異議の申出を受けた後三箇月を経てもなお裁決若しくは第十四条第二項の処分をせず、又は登録若しくは登録換えの請求の進達を受けた後三箇月を経てもなお弁護士名簿に登録若しくは登録換えをしないときは、審査請求若しくは異議の申出をし、又は登録若しくは登録換えの請求をした者は、その審査請求若しくは異議の申出を棄却され、又は登録若しくは登録換えを拒絶されたものとみなし、前項の訴えを提起することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) A resident who has given notification on Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph shall not conduct the Conclusion of a Technology introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification before the expiration of 30 days from the day of acceptance of the notification by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business; provided, however, that when the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business find, before the expiration of the period, based on the kind of the technology or other matters, that the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification does not fall under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that requires examination pursuant to the provision of the next paragraph, he/she may shorten the period. 例文帳に追加

２　技術導入契約の締結等について前項の規定による届出をした居住者は、財務大臣及び事業所管大臣が当該届出を受理した日から起算して三十日を経過する日までは、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない。ただし、財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、その期間の満了前に当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等がその技術の種類その他からみて次項の規定による審査が必要となる技術導入契約の締結等に該当しないと認めるときは、当該期間を短縮することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム