「may not」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(247ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(1) The Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act 1951 [Act 215], the Patents Ordinance of Sarawak [Sarawak Cap. 61], the Registration of United Kingdom Patents Ordinance of Sabah [Sabah Cap. 124] and the Patents (Rights of Government) Act 1967 [Act 53 of 1967] are repealed: [Am. Act A648: s.36] Provided that: (a) any subsidiary legislation made under the repealed laws shall in so far as such subsidiary legislation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act continue in force and have effect as if it had been made under this Act and may be repealed, extended, varied or amended accordingly; (b) any appointment made under the repealed laws or subsidiary legislation made thereunder shall continue in force and have effect as if it had been made under this Act unless the Minister otherwise directs; (c) any certificate or grant issued or made, in respect of a patent, under the repealed laws and in force immediately prior to the coming into force of this Act shall remain in force - (i) so long as the original patent remains in force in the United Kingdom; or (ii) until the expiration of twenty years from the date of application, whichever is the earlier.[Subs. Act A863: s.45]例文帳に追加

(1)\\1951年連合王国特許登録法［法律215］，サラワクの特許条例［サラワクCap.61］，サバの連合王国特許登録条例［サバCap.124］及び1967年特許(政府の権利)法［1967年法律53］は，廃止する。［法律A648:s.36による改正］ただし，(a)廃止された法律に基づいて制定された従属法令は，それらが本法の規定に矛盾しない場合は，引き続き効力を有するものとし，かつ，本法に基づいて制定されたものとして効力を有するものとし，かつ，そのようなものとして廃止，延長，変更又は改正することができる。(b)廃止された法律又はそれに基づいて制定された従属法令に基づいて行われた任命は，大臣が別段の指示をした場合を除き，引き続き効力を有するものとし，かつ，本法に基づいて行われたものとしての効力を有するものとする。(c)特許に関して，廃止された法律に基づいて発行又は作成され，本法の施行直前において効力を有していた証明書又は付与書は，次に掲げる期限のうち，何れか早い方まで引き続き効力を有するものとする。(i)原特許が連合王国において効力を有している間，又は(ii)その出願日から20年の期間が満了するまで［法律A863:s.45による代替］ - 特許庁

(1) Subject to this section and to section 57, the Court may, on application by a person aggrieved, order a trade mark to be removed from the Register in respect of any of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered on the ground . (a) that the trade mark was registered without an intention in good faith, on the part of the applicant for registration or, if it was registered under subsection (1) of section 26, on the part of the body corporate or registered user concerned, to use the trade mark in relation to those goods or services and that there has in fact been no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods or services by the registered proprietor or registered user of the trade mark for the time being up to the date one month before the date of the application; or (b) that up to one month before the date of the application a continuous period of not less than three years had elapsed during which the trade mark was a registered trade mark and during which there was no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods or services by the registered proprietor or registered user of the trade mark for the time being. [Am. Act A881]例文帳に追加

(1) 本条及び第57条に従うことを条件として，裁判所は，不服を有する者の申請により，次の何れかを理由として，ある登録商標をその登録に係る商品又はサービスの何れかに関して登録簿から抹消すべき旨の命令を発することができる。 (a) 当該商標が，その登録出願人の側において，又は第26条(1)に基づく登録の場合は，関係の一般法人若しくは登録使用者の側において，それらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標を使用する善意の意図がないにも拘らず登録され，かつ，当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者が，当該申請の日の1月前までに，それらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標の善意の使用を実際に行っていないこと，又は (b) 申請の日の1月前に至るまで連続して3年以上，当該商標が登録されているにも拘らず当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者がそれらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標の善意の使用を行っていないこと［法律A881による改正］ - 特許庁

Sec.185 Fair Use of a Copyrighted Work 185.1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright. Decompilation, which is understood here to be the reproduction of the code and translation of the forms of the computer program to achieve the inter-operability of an independently created computer program with other programs may also constitute fair use. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use, the factors to be considered shall include: (a) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for non-profit education purposes; (b) The nature of the copyrighted work; (c) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (d) The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.例文帳に追加

第185条 著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用 185.1批評，論評，事件の報道，教室での使用のための複数の複製を含む授業，学問，研究その他類似の目的のための著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用は，著作権の侵害ではない。独立して創作されたコンピュータ・プログラムと他のコンピュータ・プログラムとの間で適時情報交換することができることを達成するためのコンピュータ・プログラムの形式のコード及びトランスレ－ションの複製であると理解されるデコンピレ－ション(decompilation)も，公正な使用である。具体的な事件において公正な使用であるか否かを決定するに当って考慮すべき要因には，次のものを含む。 (a)使用の目的及び特性。使用が商業的性質のものであるか否か又は非営利の教育上の目的の使用であるか否かを含む。 (b)著作権を有する著作物の性質 (c)著作権を有する著作物全体との関連における使用される部分の意義及び実質的価値 (d)著作権を有する著作物の潜在的市場における使用の効果又は同著作物の価値 - 特許庁

(1) An applicant, a patentee or the successor in title thereof who, as a result of an order under Section 50(1), refrains from using or ceases to use an invention patentable under Sections 1 to 5 for peaceful purposes shall have a claim to compensation, owing to the damages thereby incurred, against the Federal Republic if and to the extent that said party cannot reasonably be expected to bear the damages itself. When determining the extent to which said party can reasonably be expected to do so, account shall be taken, in particular, of the financial position of the injured party, the amount of expenditure incurred by said party for the invention or for acquiring title thereto, the degree of probability that the invention might have to be kept secret that could have been recognized by said party at the time the expenditure was incurred, and the profit derived by the injured party from another exploitation of the invention. The claim cannot be asserted until after a patent has been granted. Compensation may be claimed only after it has become due and for periods which shall not be shorter than one year. 例文帳に追加

(1) 出願人，特許所有者又はこれらの権原承継人が第 1条から第 5条までに基づいて特許を受けることができる発明を，第 50条(1)に基づく命令の結果として，平和目的で実施することを差し控え又は実施を停止した場合は，同人は，それによって同人に生じた損害に起因する補償を連邦に対して請求する権利を有するものとするが，ただし，当該当事者に対し，その損害自体を負担させることが合理的に見て期待できないことを条件とし，かつ，その程度に限る。その程度を判断するときは，特に，被害者の財務状況，発明のために又は発明に対する権原を取得するために当該当事者によって行われた支出の額，その支出が生じたときに，当該当事者によって認識されていた，発明の秘密保持が義務付けられる可能性の程度，及び被害者がその発明に係る他の実施から取得した利益が考慮される。この請求権は，特許が付与されるまでは主張することができない。補償は，支払うべきものとなった後，かつ，1年より短くない期間についてのみ請求することができる。 - 特許庁

(1) When an accused charge with an offence under section 73 or section 74 of this Act in relation to a registered trademark pleads that the registration of the trademarks is invalid, the following procedures shall be followed- (a) if the Magistrate is satisfied that such defense is prima facie tenable, he shall not proceed with the charge but shall adjourn the proceeding for three months from the date on which the plea of the accused is recorded to enable the accused to file an application before the High Court Division under this Act, for the rectification of the Register on the ground that the registration is invalid. (b) if the accused proves to the Magistrate that he has made such application within the time so limited or such further time as the Magistrate may for sufficient cause allow, the further proceedings in the prosecution shall be stayed by the Magistrate till the disposal of such application for rectification and of the appeal, if any, there from. (c) if within a period of three months or within such extended time as my be allowed by the Magistrate, the accused fails to apply to the High Court Division for rectification of the Register, the Magistrate shall proceed with the case as if the registration were valid. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法第73条又は第74条に基づき、登録された商標に関する罪の被疑者が、当該商標の登録が無効であることを主張する場合、次に掲げる手順に従う。(a)治安判事が、かかる抗弁が一見して明らかに支持できることを確信した場合、同判事は起訴を行わず、被疑者が当該登録の無効を理由として登録簿の是正を求める申立書を本法に基づき高等裁判所に提出できるよう、被疑者の抗弁が記録された日から3月間訴追手続きを中断する。(b)被疑者がそのような期限内に、又は治安判事が十分な根拠に基づき認める追加期間内に当該申立てを行ったことを治安判事に証明すると、当該訴追手続きは、是正を求める当該申立て及び不服申立てがあればそれが処理されるまで、さらなる手続きは治安判事により中断される。(c)3月以内又は治安判事が認める延長期間内に、被告の登録簿の是正を求める高等裁判所への申立てを怠る場合、治安判事は当該登録が有効であるかのように当該事件を進行させる。 - 特許庁

(A) Trade name of the futures commission merchant; (B) The fact that the merchant is a futures commission merchant; (C) The breakdown and total amount of consideration payable by customers under whatever titles including but not limited to commission, remuneration and expenses in connection with the consignment contract or, alternatively, the maximum amounts thereof, or the outline of their calculation method (if it is impossible to indicate them, that fact and the reasons thereof); (D) In the case of transactions which require the customers to deposit a clearing margin, etc., the amount thereof and its calculation method; (E) If the transaction amount under the consignment contract is significantly larger than that of the clearing margin, etc. to be deposited by customers for the transaction, that fact, and the ratio of such transaction amount to such clearing margin, etc. (if such calculation is impossible, that fact and the reasons thereof); (F) The fact that transactions under the consignment contract involve a risk of loss incurred by customers due to the fluctuations in the commodity market and, furthermore, that the amount of such loss may exceed that of the clearing margin, etc., and the reasons thereof; and (G) If the futures commission merchant is a member of the Commodity Futures Association of Japan, that fact and the name of the specific association. 例文帳に追加

①商品取引員の商号②商品取引員である旨③手数料、報酬、費用その他いかなる名称によるかを問わず、受託契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価の種類ごとの金額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要及び当該金額の合計額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要（これらの表示をすることができない場合にあっては、その旨及びその理由）④受託契約に関して顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等がある場合にあっては、その額又は計算方法⑤受託契約に基づく取引が、当該取引について顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等の額に比して著しく大きい旨及び当該取引の額の当該取引証拠金等の額に対する比率（当該比率を算出することができない場合にあっては、その旨及び理由）⑥商品市場における相場の変動により受託契約に基づく取引について顧客に損失が生ずることとなるおそれがあり、かつ、当該損失の額が取引証拠金等の額を上回ることとなるおそれがある旨及びその理由⑦商品取引員が商品先物取引協会に加入している場合にあっては、その旨及び当該商品先物取引協会の名称 - 経済産業省

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

The judgment for the Mark Lester case states that "A person who selected to engage in an occupation such as an actor may be considered as having given comprehensive consent to the disclosure of his/her name and image to public. Therefore, so far as such person is concerned, there would be much less need for protection of the aforementioned personal moral rights. Further, considering that gaining popularity is the essence of such an occupation, a person like an actor normally wishes to have his/her name and images widely disclosed to public and thus he/she will not, unlike ordinary people, generally suffer mental damages due to the disclosure of his/her name and images. Therefore, the actor etc. is entitled to claim for compensation of damages on the ground of his/her mental suffering due to the unauthorized utilization of his/her name or images only where the method, manner or purpose of utilization is detrimental to his/her occupational reputation, fame, and public image or where any other special circumstances exist (for example, where the actor sticks to the belief that his name or images should never utilized for product advertisements)." This case held that the portrait rights and privacy rights of celebrities are limited to a considerable extent. 例文帳に追加

マークレスター事件判決は、「俳優等の職業を選択した者は、もともと自己の氏名や肖像が大衆の前に公開されることを包括的に許諾したものであって、右のような人格的利益の保護は大幅に制限されると解し得る余地があるからである。それだけでなく、人気を重視するこれらの職業にあっては、自己の氏名や肖像が広く一般大衆に公開されることを希望若しくは意欲しているのが通常であって、それが公開されたからといって、一般市井人のように精神的苦痛を感じない場合が多いとも考えられる。以上のことから、俳優等が自己の氏名や肖像の権限なき使用により精神的苦痛を被ったことを理由として損害賠償を求め得るのは、その使用の方法、態様、目的等からみて、彼の俳優等としての評価、名声、印象等を毀損若しくは低下させるような場合、その他特段の事情が存する場合（例えば、自己の氏名や肖像を商品宣伝に利用させないことを信念としているような場合）に限定されるものというべきである。」として、著名人の場合には、肖像権・プライバシー権が一般人よりも大きく制限されることを認めた。 - 経済産業省

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省

(2) In the case where a Member, etc. or an Intermediary (which means a Member, etc. or an Intermediary prescribed in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) seeks to conclude a contract set forth in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act with a Bank, etc., he/she shall ensure that the contents thereof meet the following requirements: (i) on receipt of an instruction from a Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 9, the amount of the clearing margin pertaining to said instruction will be deposited with said Commodity Exchange for said Member, etc. or Intermediary; (ii) it is prohibited to set off debts of a Bank, etc. or claims for said Member, etc. or Intermediary based on said contract; (iii) the contract is valid for the period of three months or longer; (iv) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary may not cancel the contract or change the contents of the contract, except when he/she had received approval from the competent minister and a Commodity Exchange (limited to a Commodity Exchange which received a notification pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in advance; (v) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary shall notify the termination of the contract to a Commodity Exchange by one month prior to the day of termination. 例文帳に追加

２ 会員等又は取次者（法第百三条第七項に規定する会員等又は取次者をいう。以下この 条において同じ。）は、銀行等と法第百三条第七項の契約を締結しようとする場合には、 その内容を次に掲げる要件に適合するものとしなければならない。 一法第百三条第九項の規定による商品取引所の指示を受けたときは、当該会員等又は 取次者のために当該指示に係る額の取引証拠金が遅滞なく当該商品取引所に預託され るものであること。 二当該契約に基づく銀行等の債務と当該会員等又は取次者に対する債権を相殺するこ とを禁止するものであること。三三月以上の期間にわたって有効な契約であること。四会員等又は取次者は、あらかじめ主務大臣及び商品取引所（法第百三条第七項の規 定による届出を受けた商品取引所に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の承認を受け た場合を除き、契約の解除又は契約の内容の変更をすることができないものであるこ と。 五会員等又は取次者は、契約が終了する日の一月前までに、その旨を商品取引所に通 知をするものとすること。 - 経済産業省

Article 68 (1) With regard to an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is a Secondary Insured Person that can receive an insurance benefit, in a case when said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., has an obligatory insurance premium pursuant to the provisions of the Medical Insurance Acts (including national health insurance tax pursuant to the provisions of the Local Tax Act (Act No. 226 of 1950)) or when there is a remaining premium installments that was not paid by the deadline for payment (herein referred to as "Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc." in this paragraph and the following paragraph), except for a case said Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc., is due to a disaster or other special circumstance as determined by a Cabinet Order, a Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, may request said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to submit the Certificate of Insured Person and to enter on said Certificate of Insured Person that the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply and that the whole or a part of the payment of an insurance benefit shall be suspended (herein referred to as "Entry of Suspension of Insurance Benefit" in this Article). 例文帳に追加

第六十八条　市町村は、保険給付を受けることができる第二号被保険者である要介護被保険者等について、医療保険各法の定めるところにより当該要介護被保険者等が納付義務又は払込義務を負う保険料（地方税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百二十六号）の規定による国民健康保険税を含む。）又は掛金であってその納期限又は払込期限までに納付しなかったもの（以下この項及び次項において「未納医療保険料等」という。）がある場合においては、未納医療保険料等があることにつき災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認める場合を除き、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等に対し被保険者証の提出を求め、当該被保険者証に、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定を適用しない旨並びに保険給付の全部又は一部の支払を差し止める旨の記載（以下この条において「保険給付差止の記載」という。）をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case of paragraph (1) (limited to the cases where any fact specified in Article 178(1), item (iii) to (v) inclusive has been found), if there is a final and binding court decision on the same case which orders a Respondent confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), or collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), the Prime Minister shall, in lieu of the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1), or Article 175(1) or (2), issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount obtained by deducting the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision or the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision (in cases where confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) and collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) were ordered pursuant to said court decision, the sum of the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision and the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision; hereinafter referred to as the "Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc." in this paragraph), from the amount to be paid pursuant to paragraph (1); provided, however, that if the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1) or Article 175(1) or (2) does not exceed the Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under such provisions. 例文帳に追加

５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の場合（第百七十八条第一項第三号から第五号までに掲げる事実のいずれかがあると認める場合に限る。）において、同一事件について、被審人に対し、第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産の没収又は同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴の確定裁判があるときは、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額に代えて、当該額から当該裁判において没収を命じられた第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額又は当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額（当該裁判において同項各号に掲げる財産の没収及び同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴が命じられたときは、当該裁判において没収を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額及び当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額の合計額。以下この項において「没収等相当額」という。）を控除した額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額が、没収等相当額を超えないときは、これらの規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 7 (1) An administrative agency which has the authority to grant permission, authorization or confirmation for the new construction, extension, reconstruction, relocation, repair or remodeling of a building, for a change of intended purpose of a building or for use of a building, or a person delegated thereby, or a designated confirmation and inspection body which makes a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) (meaning a designated confirmation and inspection body prescribed in Article 77-21, paragraph (1) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may not grant said permission, authorization or confirmation or make a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, respectively, without the consent of the fire chief or fire station chief who has jurisdiction over the construction site or location of the building for which said permission, authorization or confirmation or a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act is sought; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the building for which a confirmation (including a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act) is sought is a residence (excluding a row house, apartment house and any other residence specified by Cabinet Order) within areas other than primary fire protection districts or secondary fire protection districts listed in Article 8, paragraph (1), item (v) of the City Planning Act (Act No. 100 of 1968) or where a building official makes a confirmation under the provision of Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87-2 of said Act. 例文帳に追加

第七条　建築物の新築、増築、改築、移転、修繕、模様替、用途の変更若しくは使用について許可、認可若しくは確認をする権限を有する行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は建築基準法（昭和二十五年法律第二百一号）第六条の二第一項（同法第八十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による確認を行う指定確認検査機関（同法第七十七条の二十一第一項に規定する指定確認検査機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該許可、認可若しくは確認又は同法第六条の二第一項の規定による確認に係る建築物の工事施工地又は所在地を管轄する消防長又は消防署長の同意を得なければ、当該許可、認可若しくは確認又は同項の規定による確認をすることができない。ただし、確認（同項の規定による確認を含む。）に係る建築物が都市計画法（昭和四十三年法律第百号）第八条第一項第五号に掲げる防火地域及び準防火地域以外の区域内における住宅（長屋、共同住宅その他政令で定める住宅を除く。）である場合又は建築主事が建築基準法第八十七条の二において準用する同法第六条第一項の規定による確認をする場合においては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The following shall not be registered: signs which are not marks within the meaning of Article 9(1) , marks which are devoid of any distinctive character; marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications that have become customary in the current language or in the established practices of the trade in the Republic of Bulgaria with respect to the goods or services filed for registration; marks which consist exclusively of signs designating the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, time or process of production of the goods or the manner of rendering of the services, or other characteristics of the goods or services; the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves; the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result; the shape which gives substantial value to the goods; marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality; marks which may deceive the consumers as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services; marks which consist of or include escutcheons, flags or other emblems of States party to the Paris Convention, or imitations thereof, as well as escutcheons, flags or other emblems or the full or abbreviated official names of international intergovernmental organizations; marks which consist of or include official control and warranty signs and stamps where such signs and stamps are used to mark identical or similar goods; marks which consist of or include the name or a representation of historical and cultural monuments of the Republic of Bulgaria, as specified by the Ministry of Culture; 例文帳に追加

次のものは，登録することができない：, 第9条(1)の意味での標章ではない標識 , 識別性を欠く標章 , 登録出願される商品又はサービスに関し，ブルガリア共和国における現行の言語又は確立された商慣行において慣習的となっている標識又は表示のみをもって構成される標章 , 標章であって，商品又はサービスに関する種類，品質，数量，用途，価額，原産地，商品生産の時期若しくは方法又はサービスの提供方法，又はその他の特徴を示す標識のみによって構成されるもの , 商品自体の性質に起因する形状 , 技術的効果を得るために必要な商品の形状 , 商品に対し実質的価値を与える形状 , 公の秩序及び承認された倫理基準に反する標章 , 商品又はサービスの内容，品質又は原産地について消費者に誤認させる虞がある標章 , 標章であって，パリ条約締約国の紋章，旗章若しくは他の記章又はそれらの模倣，並びに国際政府間機関の紋章，旗章その他の記章，完全な若しくは略式の公式名称によって構成されるか又はそれらを含むもの , 公的な管理及び保証のための標識及び証印から構成されるか又はそれらを含む標章であって，その標識及び証印が同一又は類似の商品を示すために使用されている場合 , 文化省によって指定されている，ブルガリア共和国の歴史的及び文化的記念物の名称又は表示によって構成されるか又はそれらを含む標章 - 特許庁

The Commissioner must cancel the registration of a person as a licensee of a trade mark in the case of registration as a licensee under section 83(1)(a), if the trade mark is no longer registered; or in the case of registration as a licensee under section 83(1)(b), if the application is withdrawn, abandoned, or rejected. The registration of a person as a licensee of a trade mark may be cancelled by the Commissioner if the Commissioner receives no advice within the time specified by the Commissioner that the relationship between the owner and the licensee of the trade mark described in section 83(1) is current; or on the written application in the prescribed manner of the owner or the licensee of the trade mark; or on the written application of any person on any of the following grounds: that the licensee has used the trade mark in a way that is not the permitted use; or deceives or confuses; or is likely to deceive or confuse: that the owner or the licensee misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration: that the registration should not have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which the applicant is interested.例文帳に追加

次に掲げる事情においては，局長は商標についての使用権者としての人の登録を抹消しなければならない。第83条(1)(a)に基づく使用権者としての登録の場合は，その商標がもはや登録されていないとき第83条(1)(b)に基づく使用権者としての登録の場合は，その出願が取り下げられ，放棄され又は拒絶されたとき次に掲げる事情においては，局長は商標についての使用権者としての人の登録を抹消することができる。局長が，第83条(1)に記載されている，商標の所有者と使用権者との間の関係が現存している旨の通知を，局長が指定した期間内に受領しなかったとき，又は商標の所有者又は使用権者からの所定の方法による書面の申請があったとき，又は次に掲げる理由の何れかに基づく何人かの書面による申請があったとき使用権者が商標を次に掲げる形態で使用したこと許可されていない方法，又は誤認又は混同を生じさせる方法，又は誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある方法所有者又は使用権者が登録出願において重大な事実の一部を不実表示したか若しくは開示しなかったこと，又は登録日以来事情が著しく変化していることその履行に申請人が利害関係を有する契約により申請人に付与された権利を考慮したとき，その登録は行われるべきでなかったこと - 特許庁

(1) A person who is interested in using a patented invention and is capable of doing so in the Republic of Estonia, may, upon refusal of the proprietor of the patent to grant a licence, file an action in court for acquiring a compulsory licence if: 1) the proprietor of the patent has not used the invention in the Republic of Estonia within three years after publication of the notice concerning the issue of the patent or within four years after filing a patent application, and in such case the term which ends later shall apply; (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 2) the proprietor of the patent does not use the invention in the extent which would correspond to the needs of the domestic market of the Republic of Estonia; 3) the patent hinders the use of another, technically advanced invention significant for the economy of the Republic of Estonia; 4) national defence, environmental protection, public health and othersignificant national interests of the Republic of Estonia require the use of the invention, including the need to use the invention in connection with a natural disaster or other emergency. 5) the patent hinders the grant of plant variety rights pursuant to the Plant Variety Rights Act (RT I 1998, 36/37, 553; 2000, 10, 56; 2001, 93, 565; 2002, 53, 336; 61, 375; 63, 387) or the use of a plant variety which is granted legal protection. (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 例文帳に追加

(1) エストニア共和国において特許発明を実施することに関心を有しており，かつ，その実施の能力を有する者は，特許所有者がライセンスを許諾しなかった場合は，強制ライセンスを取得するために訴訟を提起することができる。ただし，次に掲げる事情が存在していることを条件とする。 1) 特許所有者が，特許証発行に関する通知の公告から3年以内又は特許出願から4年以内のうち何れか遅く終了する期間内に，エストニア共和国において特許発明を実施していないこと (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) 2) 特許所有者が，エストニア共和国の国内市場の需要に見合う程度に特許発明を実施していないこと 3) エストニア共和国の経済にとって重要であって技術的に進歩した他の発明の実施をその特許が妨げていること 4) 国防，環境保護，公衆衛生及びその他エストニア共和国の重要な国益が，その発明の実施(自然災害又は他の緊急事態に関連する発明の実施を含む)を必要としていること 5) その特許が，植物品種権法(RT I 1998, 36/37, 553; 2000, 10, 56; 2001, 93, 565; 2002, 53, 336; 61, 375; 63, 387)による植物品種権の付与，又は法的保護が付与されている植物品種の実施を妨げていること (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) - 特許庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁

(2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business. 例文帳に追加

２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 115-16 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed by paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第百十五条の十六　市町村長は、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者が、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) Article 27-8(1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification, during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2) during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted" and "amendment report," respectively; the term "amendment" and the parts "the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with the provisions of this Section" and "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the amendment violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "the delivery and other settlement methods stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with Article 27-13(4) (excluding 27-13(4)(i)) and Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)" and "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made stated in the amendment contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the term "disposition under paragraph (3)"; and the part "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22(7)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively. 例文帳に追加

７　第二十七条の八第一項から第五項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする上場株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第四項（第一号を除く。）及び第二十七条の十三第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする上場株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第七項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　第四十四条の二（第三項後段を除く。）及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.151 Cancellation 151.1. A petition to cancel a registration of a mark under this Act may be filed with the Bureau of Legal Affairs by any person who believes that he is or will be damaged by the registration of a mark under this Act, as follows: (a) Within five years from the date of the registration of the mark under this Act. (b) At any time, if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered, or has been abandoned, or its registration was obtained fraudulently or contrary to the provisions of this Act, or if the registered mark is being used by, or with the permission of, the registrant so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used. If the registered mark becomes the generic name for less than all of the goods or services for which it is registered, a petition to cancel the registration for only those goods or services may be filed. A registered mark shall not be deemed to be the generic name of goods or services solely because such mark is also used as a name of or to identify a unique product or service. The primary significance of the registered mark to the relevant public rather than purchaser motivation shall be the test for determining whether the registered mark has become the generic name of goods or services on or in connection with which it has been used. (c) At any time, if the registered owner of the mark without legitimate reason fails to use the mark within the Philippines, or to cause it to be used in the Philippines by virtue of a license during an uninterrupted period of three years or longer.例文帳に追加

第151条 取消 151.1本法による標章の登録により損害を受けている又は損害を受けるであろうと考える者は，法律局に対して当該標章登録の取消の請求をすることができる。ただし，次の条件に従う。 (a)取消の請求は，本法に基づく当該標章の登録日から5年以内にしなければならない。 (b)取消の請求は，当該登録標章が登録に係る商品若しくはサ－ビス若しくはその一部について一般名称になっているか若しくは放棄されている場合，当該登録が不正に得られたか若しくは本法の規定に反してなされた場合，又は権利者により若しくは権利者の承認のもとに当該登録標章が商品若しくはサ－ビスの出所を偽って表示するように使用されている場合は，いつでもすることができる。登録標章が登録に係る商品又はサ－ビスの一部について一般名称になっている場合は，当該一部の商品又はサ－ビスについてのみ取消の請求をすることができる。登録標章は，当該標章がある独特の商品若しくはサ－ビスの名称としても又はある独特の商品若しくはサ－ビスを特定するためにも使用されているということのみを理由としては，商品又はサ－ビスの一般名称であるとはみなさない。登録標章が当該標章を使用している商品又はサ－ビスの一般名称になっているか否かを決定するに当たっては，購入者の購入の動機ではなく，関連する公衆にとっての当該標章の主要な意味が基準になる。 (c)取消の請求は，権利者が正当な理由なくして3年以上継続してフィリピンにおいて当該標章を使用しなかったか又はライセンスによりフィリピンにおいて使用させることをしなかった場合は，いつでもすることができる。 - 特許庁

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

Article 94 (1) The provisions of the main clause of Article 300, Article 303, paragraph (2), Article 304, the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1), Article 305, paragraph (4), Article 306 (excluding paragraph (2) and paragraph (4)), Article 307, Article 308 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), Article 310, and Article 313 through Article 318 (excluding paragraph (3)) inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investors' meeting. In this case, the term "the preceding Article" in the main clause of Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with a Board of Directors" in Article 303, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deleted, the phrase "the votes of all shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Issued Investment Equity," the phrase "or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholder" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "only shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Investors," the term "Shareholders" in the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Investors who continually held not less than one-hundredth (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)," the phrase "shareholders be notified of" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "(or, in cases where a notice pursuant to paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of Article 299 is to be given, such summary be specified or recorded in that notice)" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be stated or recorded in the notice under Article 91, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrases "who hold" and "the votes of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved in the shareholders meeting)" in Article 306, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "who continually held" and "the Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)" respectively, the term "the court" in Article 306, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (5), and paragraph (6), Article 307, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and Article 318, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 297, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 90, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 298 and Article 299" in Article 317 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第九十四条　会社法第三百条本文、第三百三条第二項、第三百四条、第三百五条第一項本文及び第四項、第三百六条（第二項及び第四項を除く。）、第三百七条、第三百八条（第一項ただし書を除く。）、第三百十条並びに第三百十三条から第三百十八条（第三項を除く。）までの規定は、投資主総会について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条本文中「前条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第三百三条第二項中「前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権」とあるのは「口数の投資口」と、「株主に限り」とあるのは「投資主は」と、同法第三百五条第一項本文中「株主は」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の一（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主は」と、「株主に通知すること（第二百九十九条第二項又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項又は第二項の通知に記載し、又は記録すること」と、同法第三百六条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権を有する」とあるのは「口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する」と、同条第一項、第三項、第五項及び第六項並びに同法第三百七条第一項及び第二項並びに第三百十八条第五項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第三百十条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条第三項において準用する第二百九十七条第一項及び第四項」と、同法第三百十七条中「第二百九十八条及び第二百九十九条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁

Article 67-2 The provisions of Article 940, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Period of Public Notice, etc. for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation on Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice May Not Be Carried Out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "annual general meeting of members (or annual general meeting, where the company has such meeting)," respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十七条の二　会社法第九百四十条第一項及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、相互会社が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十四条の七第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、定時総代会）」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第五十四条の七第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 940, paragraph (1) (excluding item (i)) and (3) (Period of Public Notice for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation of Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice may not be Carried out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "procedure" respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第九百四十条第一項（第一号を除く。）及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、外国保険会社等が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「手続」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 132-10 (1) In the case of a petition or any other statement to be filed or made in the procedures for civil suits (hereinafter referred to as a "petition, etc."), which shall be filed or made, pursuant to the provisions of this Code or other laws and regulations concerning such petition, etc., by means of a document, etc. (meaning a document, a transcript, extract, authenticated copy or duplicate of a document or a duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object on which information recognizable to human perception such as characters and shapes is stated; the same shall apply hereinafter) to the court specified by the Supreme Court (including one filed or made to the presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge or court clerk of such court), notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, the petition, etc. may be filed or made by means of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system wherein the computer (including input-output devices; the same shall apply hereinafter) used in the court is connected, by way of telecommunication lines, to the computer used by the person who files or makes the petition, etc. or person who receives a notice of a disposition under the provision of Article 399(1); the same shall apply in Article 397 to Article 401); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a petition, etc. on the demand procedure where a petition for demand for payment is filed or made by means of a document. 例文帳に追加

第百三十二条の十　民事訴訟に関する手続における申立てその他の申述（以下「申立て等」という。）のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。）をもってするものとされているものであって、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの（当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。）については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。）と申立て等をする者又は第三百九十九条第一項の規定による処分の告知を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。第三百九十七条から第四百一条までにおいて同じ。）を用いてすることができる。ただし、督促手続に関する申立て等であって、支払督促の申立てが書面をもってされたものについては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-3 (1) The Issuer of Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned may, if he/she satisfies requirements specified in Article 5(4) and the total issue price or the total distribution amount of the Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Amount of Issue") is 100 million yen or more, register Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities by submitting a document which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, state the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, including the period in which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Issue Period"), the kind of the Securities, the Planned Amount of Issue or the maximum amount of issue or distribution, and names of principal Financial Instruments Business Operators and/or Registered Financial Institutions which plan to underwrite the Securities (such document is hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement") to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 23-13(1) (limited to Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(1) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities) or where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation for Small Number of Investors defined in Article 23-13(3) (limited to Solicitation for Small Number of Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(3) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities). 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の三　有価証券の募集又は売出しを予定している当該有価証券の発行者で、第五条第四項に規定する者に該当するものは、当該募集又は売出しを予定している有価証券の発行価額又は売出価額の総額（以下「発行予定額」という。）が一億円以上の場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該募集又は売出しを予定している期間（以下「発行予定期間」という。）、当該有価証券の種類及び発行予定額又は発行若しくは売出しの限度額、当該有価証券について引受けを予定する金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関のうち主たるものの名称その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類（以下「発行登録書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出して、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しを登録することができる。ただし、その有価証券発行勧誘等が第二十三条の十三第一項に規定する適格機関投資家向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）及びその有価証券発行勧誘等が同条第三項に規定する少人数向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）を予定している場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-30-10 A Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports of a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures pertaining to the documents listed in Article 25(1), items (i) to (xi) inclusive (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or a Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports of a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures of the documents listed in Article 25(1)(xii) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), or a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures pertaining to the document prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) may, in lieu of the copies of the documents to be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or Article 27-14(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)), make available for public inspections the information (excluding the parts that shall not be made public for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27)) to be contained in the documents listed in each item of Article 25(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or the documents prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) pertaining to copies of such documents by means of indicating said information on the screen of an output device or by any other methods specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, in the cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. In this case, the person who has made said information available for public inspection shall be deemed to have made the copies of said documents available for public inspection. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の三十の十　第二十五条第一項第一号から第十一号まで（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者若しくは同項第十二号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者の提出子会社又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者は、内閣府令で定める場合には、第二十五条第二項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十七条の十四第二項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しなければならないものとされている書類の写しに代えて、当該書類の写しに係る第二十五条第一項各号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に記載すべき事項（第二十五条第四項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分を除く。）を出力装置の映像面に表示する方法その他の内閣府令で定める方法により公衆の縦覧に供することができる。この場合において、当該事項を公衆の縦覧に供した者は、当該書類の写しを公衆の縦覧に供したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 47-4 Works permitted to be reproduced pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 32, Article 33, paragraph (1) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of the same Article), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 36, paragraph (1), Article 37, paragraph (1) or (2), Article 39, paragraph (1), Article 40, paragraph (1) or (2), Article 4l, 42, 42-2, 46 or 47 (excluding, however, in cases involving the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 36, paragraph (1) or Article 42, reproductions of cinematographic works (including, in the case of works reproduced in cinematographic works, reproductions of such cinematographic works; the same shall apply below in this Article)) may be offered to the public by transferring ownership of the reproductions made pursuant to these provisions. The foregoing, however, shall not apply where the ownership of reproductions of Works made pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 41, 42 or 42-2 (excluding, however, in cases involving the provisions of Article 3l, item (i), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1) or Article 42, copies of cinematographic works) is transferred to the public for purposes other than those provided for in Article 31, item (i), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 41, 42 or 42-2. 例文帳に追加

第四十七条の四　第三十一条第一号、第三十二条、第三十三条第一項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条第一項、第三十六条第一項、第三十七条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十九条第一項、第四十条第一項若しくは第二項、第四十一条、第四十二条、第四十二条の二、第四十六条又は第四十七条の規定により複製することができる著作物は、これらの規定の適用を受けて作成された複製物（第三十一条第一号、第三十五条第一項、第三十六条第一項又は第四十二条の規定に係る場合にあつては、映画の著作物の複製物（映画の著作物において複製されている著作物にあつては、当該映画の著作物の複製物を含む。以下この条において同じ。）を除く。）の譲渡により公衆に提供することができる。ただし、第三十一条第一号、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十五条第一項、第四十一条、第四十二条又は第四十二条の二の規定の適用を受けて作成された著作物の複製物（第三十一条第一号、第三十五条第一項又は第四十二条の規定に係る場合にあつては、映画の著作物の複製物を除く。）を、第三十一条第一号、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十五条第一項、第四十一条、第四十二条又は第四十二条の二に定める目的以外の目的のために公衆に譲渡する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 25-3 (1) In the case that the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (ii) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment through environmental pollution if said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2) and any other available knowledge concerning said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第二十五条の三　経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第三種監視化学物質につき、第四条第七項（第四条の二第九項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する試験の試験成績その他当該第三種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第三種監視化学物質が第二条第三項第二号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第三種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第三種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第三種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（継続的に当該化学物質が摂取され、又はこれにさらされる場合における生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As I repeatedly say, it is true that a higher capital adequacy figure may appear to imply security at a glance, but it can also lead to a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection practices, as we experienced 10 years ago. Back then, even healthy companies went under. As a Diet member of the ruling party in a ministerial post, I was faced firsthand with the confusion that prevailed in the Japanese economy at that time. It was in 1997 that the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went under and Yamaichi Securities failed, soon ushering in what would be called the "Financial Diet Session." The Basel meeting is attended by 27 countries and, for all of them, a higher ratio figure, which does provide peace of mind and security, is at the same time not necessarily better in that light. As making a capital adequacy ratio too high can lead to a credit crunch and oppressive debt collection and hence a shrinking economy, we are hoping to maintain a good balance in view of all those factors. We are determined to make our point in the new requirement debate, keeping in mind where we stand as a country that actually experienced a financial crisis 10 years ago. 例文帳に追加