「裁判」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(219ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　第五十五条第三項から第五項までの規定は第一項の規定による決定について、同条第六項の規定は第一項又はこの項において準用する同条第五項の申立てについての裁判について、同条第七項の規定はこの項において準用する同条第五項の規定による決定について、同条第八項及び第九項並びに第五十五条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定（第五十五条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。）について、第五十五条第十項の規定は第一項の申立て又は同項の規定による決定（同条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。）の執行に要した費用について、第八十三条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定（第五十五条第一項第三号に掲げる保全処分及び公示保全処分を命ずるものに限る。）の執行がされた場合について準用する。この場合において、第五十五条第三項中「債務者以外の占有者」とあるのは、「債務者及び不動産の所有者以外の占有者」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 55(3) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (6) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision on the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (7) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (8) and paragraph (9) of said Article and Article 55-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(i)), the provisions of Article 55(10) shall apply mutatis mutandis to expenses required for the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or execution of an order under the provisions of said paragraph (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in paragraph (1)(i) of said Article), the provisions of Article 83-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (limited to an order granting the temporary restraining order and the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(iii)) has been executed. In this case, the phrase "possessor other than the obligor" in Article 55(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "possessor who is neither the obligor nor the owner of real property."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

商標が登録されたサービスに関して，(a) 香港において利用でき又は受けられるサービス，又は香港外の国又は地域で利用できるサービスに関する商標の不使用に関する限り，(1)(b)の事項が示される場合，及び (b) ある者が，香港において利用でき又は受けられるサービス，又は香港外の国又は地域で利用できるサービスに関する使用に効力が及ぶ登録に基づき，そのサービスに関して同一又は酷似する商標を登録することを第22条に基づき許可された場合，又は裁決機関が当該人に当該商標のそのような登録を適正に許可することができるという意見の場合は，裁決機関は，当該人による裁判所への申請，又は申請人の選択で，かつ，第80条の規定に従うことを条件とする登録官への申請に基づいて，登録の効力を前記の使用に及ばなくさせることを保証するために適切と認める制限を，冒頭の商標の登録に賦課することができる。例文帳に追加

Where in relation to any services in respect of which a trade mark is registered-- (a) the matters referred to in subsection (1)(b) are shown so far as regards non-use of the trade mark in relation to services for use or available for acceptance in Hong Kong, or for use in a country, territory or place outside Hong Kong; and (b) a person has been permitted under section 22 to register an identical or nearly resembling trade mark in respect of those services under a registration extending to use in relation to services for use or available for acceptance in Hong Kong or for use in that country, territory or place, or the tribunal is of opinion that he might properly be permitted so to register such a trade mark, on application by that person to the Court or, at the option of the applicant and subject to section 80, to the Registrar, the tribunal may impose on the registration of the first-mentioned trade mark such limitations as the tribunal thinks proper for securing that the registration shall cease to extend to such use as last aforesaid.  - 特許庁

本規則の適用上， 「法」とは，発明特許制度改正に関する1992年7月20日法を意味する。 「手数料に関する規則」とは，発明特許及び補充的保護証明書について徴収すべき手数料及び料金並びにそれらの納付方法を定めたルクセンブルク大公国の規則を意味する。 「規則(CEE)第1768/92号」とは，医薬についての補充的保護証明書の設定に関する1992年6月18日付欧州共同体理事会規則第1768/92号を意味する。 「庁」とは，パリ条約及び特許に関する国内法令の執行を所管する国家知的財産庁を意味する。 「登録簿」とは，庁に備え付けの特許の登録簿を意味する。 「職業代理人」とは，法第85条に定義された職業代理人登録名簿に名称を掲載された者，及びルクセンブルク裁判所に対する弁護士会名簿に掲載された弁護士を意味する。 「技術書類」とは，法第19条(1)(b)，(c)，(d)及び(e)に掲げた書類を意味する。 「証明書」とは，1992年6月18日付欧州共同体理事会規則(CEE)第1768/92号によって設定された，医薬についての補充的保護証明書を意味する。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of this regulation: - “Law” means the law of July 20, 1992, amending the system of patents of invention; - “Regulation relating to the fees” means the regulation(s) of Luxembourg fixing fees and payments to be collected regarding the patents of invention and supplementary protection certificates as well as the methods of payment; - “Regulations (CEE) No. 1768/92” means Regulations (CEE) No. 1768/92 of the European Community Council of June 18, 1992, concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicine; - “Service” means the National Intellectual Property Service, acting in compliance of the Paris Convention and of the national legislation on patents; - “Register” means the patent register maintained by the Service; - “Professional representative” means any person registered by name in the Register of professional representatives as defined in Article 85 of the Law, as well as the attorneys registered in the membership list of attorneys for the Luxembourg courts; - “Technical documents” means the documents referred to in Article 19, paragraph 1, letters (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Law. - “Certificate” means the supplementary protection certificate for medicine instituted by the Regulations (CEE) No. 1768/92 of the European Community Council of June 18, 1992. - 特許庁

(1) 本条及び第57条に従うことを条件として，裁判所は，不服を有する者の申請により，次の何れかを理由として，ある登録商標をその登録に係る商品又はサービスの何れかに関して登録簿から抹消すべき旨の命令を発することができる。 (a) 当該商標が，その登録出願人の側において，又は第26条(1)に基づく登録の場合は，関係の一般法人若しくは登録使用者の側において，それらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標を使用する善意の意図がないにも拘らず登録され，かつ，当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者が，当該申請の日の1月前までに，それらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標の善意の使用を実際に行っていないこと，又は (b) 申請の日の1月前に至るまで連続して3年以上，当該商標が登録されているにも拘らず当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者がそれらの商品又はサービスに関して当該商標の善意の使用を行っていないこと［法律A881による改正］例文帳に追加

(1) Subject to this section and to section 57, the Court may, on application by a person aggrieved, order a trade mark to be removed from the Register in respect of any of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered on the ground . (a) that the trade mark was registered without an intention in good faith, on the part of the applicant for registration or, if it was registered under subsection (1) of section 26, on the part of the body corporate or registered user concerned, to use the trade mark in relation to those goods or services and that there has in fact been no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods or services by the registered proprietor or registered user of the trade mark for the time being up to the date one month before the date of the application; or (b) that up to one month before the date of the application a continuous period of not less than three years had elapsed during which the trade mark was a registered trade mark and during which there was no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods or services by the registered proprietor or registered user of the trade mark for the time being. [Am. Act A881] - 特許庁

(2) 当該規則においては，(1)の一般原則を害することなく，特に，次に掲げる事項の全部又は一部について定めることができる。 (a) 書類の送達を含む本法律に基づく手続(裁判所における手続又はそれに関連する事項を除く。)を規制すること (b) 商標の登録に関する商品又はサービスを分類すること (c) 商標又はその他の書類を複製し又はそれらの複製を要求すること (d) 大臣が適当と認める方法で商標又はその他の書類の写しを公開し，かつ販売又は配布すること及びそれらを規制すること (e) 本法の適用上必要とされる事項又は事柄に関して納付すべき手数料を定めること［法律A881による置換］ (ea) 代理人の登録及び資格を規制すること［法律A881による挿入］ (f) 本法に明示的に規定されているか否かを問わず，ただし，本法の何れの規定にも違反しないように，各商標局において実行される商標業務に関する事項を一般的に規制すること例文帳に追加

(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), such regulations may provide for all or any of the following: (a) to regulate the practice (other than that relating to proceedings before the Court or connected therewith) under this Act including service of documents; (b) to classify goods or services for the purpose of registration of trade marks; (c) to make or require duplication of trade marks or other documents; (d) to secure and regulate the publishing and selling or distributing in such manner as the Minister may think fit of copies of trade marks and other documents; (e) to prescribe the fees to be paid in respect of any matter or thing required for the purposes of this Act; [Subs. Act A881] (ea) to provide for the registration and qualifications of agents; [Ins. Act A881] (f) to regulate generally on matters pertaining to the business of trade marks carried on in any trade marks office whether or not specially prescribed under this Act but so as not to be inconsistent with any of the provisions of this Act. - 特許庁

218.2本章の規定に基づく訴訟においては， (a)著作権は，被告が当該著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて争わない場合は，当該訴訟が関連する当該著作物その他の対象物に存続しているものと推定する。 (b)著作権の存続が立証される場合において，原告が当該著作権の権利者であることを主張し，かつ，被告がその主張について争わないときは，原告が当該著作権の権利者であるものと推定する。 (c)被告が，善意ではなく，訴訟に関連する著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて又はその著作物その他の対象物における著作権の権利者の問題について争い，それによって手続に不必要な費用又は遅延を生じさせる場合は，裁判所は，訴訟に関する被告のための費用は認められないこと及び被告が相手方に生じさせる費用は被告が相手方に支払うことを指示することができる。例文帳に追加

218.2. In an action under this Chapter: (a) Copyright shall be presumed to subsist in the work or other subject matter to which the action relates if the defendant does not put in issue the question whether copyright subsists in the work or other subject matter; and (b) Where the subsistence of the copyright is established, the plaintiff shall be presumed to be the owner of the copyright if he claims to be the owner of the copyright and the defendant does not put in issue the question of his ownership. (c) Where the defendant, without good faith, puts in issue the questions of whether copyright subsists in a work or other subject matter to which the action relates, or the ownership of copyright in such work or subject matter, thereby occasioning unnecessary costs or delay in the proceedings, the court may direct that any costs to the defendant in respect of the action shall not be allowed by him and that any costs occasioned by the defendant to other parties shall be paid by him to such other parties. - 特許庁

(1)登録商標は、不服を申し立てる何人によっても、次に掲げるいずれかの理由により、高等裁判所又は登録官に対して所定の方式で申請が行われると、登録されている商品又は役務について登録簿から削除することができる。(a)当該商標は当該商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき出願人本人により又は第41条の規定が適用される場合は当該会社により使用されるべきとの登録出願人の誠実かつ真正の意図によらずして登録されたものであり、申請日1月以前までに、それらの商品又は役務に関する商標の所有者による当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用が実際に存しないとき。(b)申請日1月前までに、当該商標が登録されて連続5年以上が経過しており、その間に現に当該商標を所有する者によるそれらの商品又は役務に関する当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用がないとき。例文帳に追加

(1) A registered trademark may be taken off the Register in respect of any of the goods or services, in respect of which it is registered on application made in the prescribed manner by any person aggrieved to the High Court Division or the Registrar, on the ground either- (a) that the trademark was registered without any bona-fide intention on the part of the applicant for registration that it should be used in relation to those goods or services, as the case may be, by him or, in a case to which the provisions of section 41 apply, by the company concerned, and that there has in fact, been no bona-fide use of the trademark, in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being up to a date one month before the date of the 35 application; or (b) that up to a date one month before the date of the application, a continuous period of 5 (five) years or longer elapsed during which the trademark was registered and during which there was no bona-fide use thereof in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being (2) The Tribunal shall not refuse an application submitted under sub-section (1) except where- (a) the applicant has been permitted under section 10 to register an identical or nearly resembling trademark in respect of the goods or services; or (b) where the Tribunal is of opinion that there has been, before the relevant date or during the relevant period, bona-fide use of the trademark by any proprietor thereof for the time being in relation to goods or services.  - 特許庁

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。例文帳に追加

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007).  - 経済産業省

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三十三条（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社の定款に前項各号に掲げる事項についての記載又は記録があるときの検査役による当該事項の調査について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第八項中「その設立時発行株式の引受けに係る意思表示を取り消す」とあるのは「その職を辞する」と、同条第十項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあり、並びに同項第二号及び第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同項第一号中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「同号」と、同条第十一項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の十第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33 (Election of Inspector of Matters Described or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedure of Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to investigation by an inspector on any of the matters listed in the items of the preceding paragraph where the Article of incorporation of a Mutual Company include any description or record on the matter. In this case, the term "rescind his/her manifestation of intention relating to subscription for the relevant Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33, paragraph (8) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "resign from his/her office;" the term "Article 28, items (i) and (ii)" in paragraph (10), item (i) and the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in items (ii) and (iii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act," the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in Article 33, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that item," and the terms "Article 38, paragraph (1)"and "paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article" in Article 33, paragraph (11), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent, Method of Acts of Bond Managers, Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Manager, Resignation of Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation, Dismissal of Bond Managers, Succession to Bond Manager's Administration of Bonds), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a bond administrator. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "this Act" in Article 710, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 702" in Article 711, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-6 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十六条　第十八条の規定（第五十三条の二第一項第三号の改正規定（「第百九十七条第一項第一号から第四号まで若しくは第七号若しくは第二項」を「第百九十七条」に、「第百九十八条第一号から第十号まで、第十八号若しくは第十九号（有価証券の無届募集等の罪）」を「第百九十七条の二第一号から第十号まで若しくは第十三号（有価証券の無届募集等の罪）、第百九十八条第八号（裁判所の禁止又は停止命令違反の罪）」に改める部分に限る。）に限る。）による改正後の保険業法（以下この項において「新保険業法」という。）第五十三条の二第一項第三号（新保険業法第五十三条の五第一項、第五十三条の二十六第四項及び第百八十条の四第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、第一条の規定による改正前の証券取引法第百九十七条第一項第一号から第四号まで若しくは第七号若しくは第二項又は第百九十八条第一号から第十号まで、第十八号若しくは第十九号の規定（附則第二百十八条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるこれらの規定を含む。）に違反し、刑に処せられた者は、第一条の規定による改正後の証券取引法第百九十七条、第百九十七条の二第一号から第十号まで若しくは第十三号又は第百九十八条第八号の規定に違反し、刑に処せられたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 196 (1) With regard to the applications of the provision of Article 53-2, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Revised Insurance Business Act (hereinafter referred to as the New Insurance Business Act in this paragraph) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of Article 53-5, paragraph (1), Article 53-26, paragraph (4), and Article 180-4, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act) pursuant to the provision of Article 18 (limited to the revised provision in Article 53-2, paragraph (1), item (iii) (limited to the segments that revise "Article 197, paragraph (1), items (i) to (iv) inclusive or item (vii) or paragraph (2)" to "Article 197", and "Article 198, items (i) to (x) inclusive, item (xviii) or (xix) (Crime of Solicitation of Securities by Unregistered Agents, etc)" to "Article 197-2, items (i) to (x) inclusive or item (xiii) (Crime of Solicitation of Securities by Unregistered Agents. etc), Article 198, item (viii) (Crime of Violating Prohibition Order or Order for Suspension by Court)", any person who has violated Article 197, paragraph (1), items (i) to (iv) inclusive, or item (vii), paragraph (2) or Article 198, items (i) to (x) inclusive, item (xviii) or (xix) of the prerevised Securities and Exchange Act pursuant to the provision of Article 1 (including these provisions where the provisions then in force remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 218 of the Supplementary Provisions) and who has been punished shall be deemed to have violated Article 197, Article 197-2, items (i) to (x) inclusive or item (xiii), or Article 198, item (viii) of the revised Securities and Exchange Act pursuant to the provision of Article 1, and to have been punished.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十八条　会社法第百八十条（第二項第三号及び第三項を除く。）（株式の併合）、第百八十一条（株主に対する通知等）、第百八十二条（効力の発生）、第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の特定出資の併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第百八十条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第百八十一条中「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録特定出資質権者」と、同法第百八十二条及び第二百三十五条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十八条において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 38 The provisions of Article 180 (excluding paragraph (2)(iii) and paragraph (3)) (Consolidation of Shares), Article 181 (Notices to Shareholders), Article 182 (Effectuation), Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Specified Equity. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 180(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Registered Pledgees of the Shares" in Article 181 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Specified Equity," the term "shareholders" in Article 182 and Article 235(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Members," the term "number" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債」、「社債権者」、「社債発行会社」及び「社債権者集会」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債」、「特定社債権者」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「特定社債権者集会」と、同法第七百九条第二項中「第七百五条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to Article 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent; Method of Acts of Bond Managers; Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers; Resignation of Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation; Dismissal of Bond Managers), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bond Administrator. In this case, the terms "Bonds," "bondholder," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bondholders meeting" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds," "Specified Bond Holders," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bond Holders' Meeting" respectively, the term "paragraph (1) of Article 705" in Article 709(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 711(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　信託法第百三条第四項から第八項まで（受益権取得請求）、第百四条（受益権の価格の決定等）、第二百六十二条（第五項を除く。）（信託に関する非訟事件の管轄）、第二百六十三条（信託に関する非訟事件の手続の特例）及び第二百六十四条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の受益権の買取りの請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百三条第四項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と、「受益者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項に規定する受益証券の権利者」と、同条第五項中「官報による公告」とあるのは「公告」と、同条第六項中「第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項」と、「受益権の内容」とあるのは「元本持分（種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分）」と、同条第八項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 103(4) to (8) inclusive (Demand for the Acquisition of a Beneficial Interest), Article 104 (Valuation of a Beneficial Interest, etc.), Article 262 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), Article 263 (Special Provisions on Procedure in Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), and Article 264 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the demand that a beneficial interest be purchased as set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in Article 103(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the "Asset Securitization Act")," the term "beneficiaries" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holder prescribed in Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "public notice in an official gazette" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice," the phrase "paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal relating to each class)," the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in paragraph (8) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。例文帳に追加

They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph.  - 特許庁

(1) 特許庁及び連邦特許裁判所に対する手続における書類の送達については，次の事項に従うことを条件として，行政訴訟における送達に関する法律の規定が適用される。1. 書留郵便による送達の受取が，法律によって定められている理由なしに拒絶された場合でも，送達は行われたものとみなされる2. 国外に居住しており，かつ，第 25条の要件に反して，ドイツにおける代理人を指名していない名宛人に対する送達は，郵便局から郵送される書留郵便をもって行うことができる。この規定は，名宛人であって，同人自身が第 25条(2)の意味においてドイツにおける代理人である者に対しても適用される。民事訴訟法第 184条(2)第 1文及び第 4文が準用される。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。例文帳に追加

(1) Regarding service of documents in proceedings before the Patent Office, the provisions of the Law on Service in Administrative 77 Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: If acceptance of service by registered letter is refused without such grounds as are provided by law, service shall nevertheless be deemed to have been effected; 2. Service to an addressee who resides abroad and who has not, contrary to the requirement of Section 25, appointed a German representative may be effected by registered letter mailed from a post office. The same shall apply to addressees who are themselves German representatives within the terms of Section 25(2). Section 184(2), sentences 1 and 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis; 3. For the purposes of service upon holders of certificates of representation (Section 177 of the Patent Attorney Regulations [Patentanwaltsordnung]), Section 5(4) of the Law on Service in Administrative Procedures shall apply mutatis mutandis; 4. Documents may be served on addressees for whom a mail box has been installed at the Patent Office also by depositing the documents in the mail box of the addressee. A written statement regarding the deposit shall be made in the files of the case. The time of the deposit shall be recorded on the document. Service shall be deemed to have been effected on the third day after deposit in the mail box.  - 特許庁

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること例文帳に追加

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents.  - 特許庁

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十六条の四　会社法第二百七条（金銭以外の財産の出資）、第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）、第二百十三条（第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。）（出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主（組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。）を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条　被害者（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫（被害者の生命又は身体に対し害を加える旨を告知してする脅迫をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を受けた者に限る。以下この章において同じ。）が、配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者からの更なる身体に対する暴力（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。第十二条第一項第二号において同じ。）により、配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者から受ける身体に対する暴力（配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。同号において同じ。）により、その生命又は身体に重大な危害を受けるおそれが大きいときは、裁判所は、被害者の申立てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者。以下この条、同項第三号及び第四号並びに第十八条第一項において同じ。）に対し、次の各号に掲げる事項を命ずるものとする。ただし、第二号に掲げる事項については、申立ての時において被害者及び当該配偶者が生活の本拠を共にする場合に限る。例文帳に追加

Article 10 (1) In cases where a victim (limited to a victim who has been subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. (intimidation through announcing an intention to inflict harm on the life or body of a victim; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) by a spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) who has been subjected to bodily harm by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to renewed bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in Article 12, paragraph 1, item 2) or where a victim who has been subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in the same item), the court shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse (including the former spouse in cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 12, paragraph 1, items 3 and 4, and Article 18, paragraph 1) and order the matters listed below the following items in order to prevent harm to the victim's life or body. The matters listed in item 2, however, shall only be applied to cases where the victim and the spouse in question are still living together at the time of the petition:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ホ　破産法第百八十六条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第百九十二条第三項の規定による商事留置権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第二百四十八条第一項の規定による免責許可の申立て若しくは同法第二百五十六条第一項の規定による復権の申立て、民事再生法第百四十八条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、行政事件訴訟法の規定による執行停止決定の取消しの申立て、若しくは仮の義務付け若しくは仮の差止めの決定の取消しの申立て、労働組合法（昭和二十四年法律第百七十四号）第二十七条の二十の規定による申立て、配偶者からの暴力の防止及び被害者の保護に関する法律第十六条第三項若しくは第十七条第一項の規定による申立て、労働審判法第四条第一項ただし書の規定による弁護士でない者を代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律第七条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による民事執行の手続の停止若しくは続行を命ずる裁判を求める申立て、家事審判法第十五条の六の規定による申立て、人事訴訟法（平成十五年法律第百九号）第三十九条第一項の規定による申立て、特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第百五条の四第一項若しくは第百五条の五第一項の規定による申立て、著作権法（昭和四十五年法律第四十八号）第百十四条の六第一項若しくは第百十四条の七第一項の規定による申立て又は不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項の規定による申立て例文帳に追加

(e) The filing of a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 186, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a right of retention under the Commercial Law under the provisions of Article 192, paragraph (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for a grant of discharge under the provisions of Article 248, paragraph (1) of said Act or a petition for the restoration of rights under the provisions of Article 256, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, a petition for revocation of an order for a stay of execution or a petition for the revocation of a provisional mandatory order or a provisional injunctive order under the provisions of the Administrative Case Litigation Act, a request under the provisions of Article 27-20 of the Labor Union Act (Act No. 174 of 1949), a petition under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (3) or Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent under the provisions of the proviso to Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Labor Tribunal Act, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of civil execution proceedings under the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc., a petition under the provisions of Article 15-6 of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations, a petition under the provisions of Article 39, paragraph (1) of the Personal Status Litigation Act (Act No. 109 of 2003), a motion under the provisions of Article 105-4, paragraph (1) or Article 105-5, paragraph (1) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959), a petition under the provisions of Article 114-6, paragraph (1) or Article 114-7, paragraph (1) of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), or a petition under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993)  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム