「"may not"」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(94ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 23-14 (1) With regard to Securities already-issued in a foreign State (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those equivalent to such Securities, among solicitations of an application to sell or purchase such Securities, those exempted from application of the main clause of Article 4(1) (hereinafter referred to as "Solicitation for Small Number of Investors for Foreign Securities)" in this Article) shall be made by clearly indicating that the conditions specified by a Cabinet Order as those necessary to reduce the likelihood that the Securities will be transferred from any person who purchased them to a large number of persons are imposed on sales of the Securities; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities and to cases where the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in order to qualify sales of Securities as those which will not impair the public interest or protection of investors even if such conditions are not imposed thereon, including the requirement that the total amount of the sales of the Securities must be less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, which may not be more than 100 million yen, are satisfied. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の十四　外国で既に発行された有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他これに準ずるものとして政令で定める有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘で、第四条第一項本文の規定の適用を受けないもの（以下この条において「海外発行証券の少人数向け勧誘」という。）は、当該有価証券がその買付者から多数の者に譲渡されるおそれを少なくするために必要な条件として政令で定める条件が当該有価証券の売付けに付されることを明らかにして、しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合、当該有価証券の売付けの総額が一億円を超えない範囲内で内閣府令で定める金額未満である場合その他当該有価証券の売付けに当該条件を付さなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定める要件を満たす場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When the Prime Minister is required to issue a decision under paragraph (1) (limited to the decision pertaining to Article 178(1)(ii)) or a decision under the preceding paragraph, if he/she needs to issue one or more decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "New Decision" in this paragraph) in relation to the Ongoing Disclosure Documents for the same Business Year Subject to Disclosure as the Business Year Subject to Disclosure for the Ongoing Disclosure Documents pertaining to the one or more decisions already issued under paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "Prior Decision" in this paragraph), he/she shall, with regard to said New Decision, issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount derived by the following: deducting the amount specified in item (ii) from the amount specified in item (i), and then prorating such amount after deduction in proportion to the Surcharge Amount Calculated for Respective Decision in relation to the fact pertaining to the respective New Decision pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, in lieu of the amount set forth in Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding paragraph; provided, however, that when the amount listed in item (i) does not exceed the amount listed in item (ii), he/she may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding paragraph: 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第百七十八条第一項第二号に係るものに限る。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりなされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る継続開示書類と同一の記載対象事業年度に係る継続開示書類について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、第百七十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じて按分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項若しくは第二項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the case where the Prime Minister must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 31-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph, if he/she must render one or more decisions on the attestation of financial documents of a company or any other person (hereinafter referred to as the "new decision" in this paragraph) pertaining to the same accounting period as the attestation of financial documents of said company or any other person concerning one or more decisions that have already been rendered pursuant to paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "existing decision" in this paragraph), the Prime Minister shall render, as the new decision, a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the amount resulting from deducting the amount set forth in item (ii) from the amount set forth in item (i) in accordance with the amounts calculated for the individual decisions on the facts pertaining to the respective new decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that the Prime Minister may not order payment of a surcharge under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph when the amount set forth in item (i) does not exceed the amount set forth in item (ii): 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第三十一条の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る会社その他の者の財務書類の証明と同一の会計期間に係る当該会社その他の者の他の財務書類の証明について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、同条第一項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case where the Prime Minister must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 34-21-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph, if he/she must render one or more decisions on the attestation of financial documents of a company or any other person (hereinafter referred to as the "new decision" in this paragraph) pertaining to the same accounting period as the attestation of financial documents of said company or any other person concerning one or more decisions that have already been rendered pursuant to paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "existing decision" in this paragraph), the Prime Minister shall render, as the new decision, a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the amount resulting from deducting the amount set forth in item (ii) from the amount set forth in item (i) in accordance with the amounts calculated for the individual decisions on the facts pertaining to the respective new decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that the Prime Minister may not order payment of a surcharge under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph when the amount set forth in item (i) does not exceed the amount set forth in item (ii): 例文帳に追加

５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第三十四条の二十一の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る会社その他の者の財務書類の証明と同一の会計期間に係る当該会社その他の者の他の財務書類の証明について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、同条第一項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) A business cooperative or a minor business cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (which mean activities where the cooperative receives a payment of mutual aid premiums from its partner and any other mutual aid contractors, and delivers mutual aid money on the occurrences of mutual aid incidents and which are specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as those for which the protection of partner and any other mutual aid contractors needs to be secured in light of the amount of mutual aid money and other matters; the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), item (iii) whose total number of partner exceeds the standard specified by a Cabinet Order, or a business cooperative engaged in the activities of the reinsurance of mutual aid liabilities or the retrocession of reinsurance liabilities borne by member cooperatives in the course of mutual aid activities (hereinafter referred to as "specified mutual aid association") may not conduct activities other than mutual aid activities and activities incidental thereto and the activities prescribed in the preceding paragraph, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1); provided, however, that this shall not apply when the cooperative has obtained the approval of an administrative agency pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第三号の規定により共済事業（組合員その他の共済契約者から共済掛金の支払を受け、共済事故の発生に関し、共済金を交付する事業であつて、共済金額その他の事項に照らして組合員その他の共済契約者の保護を確保することが必要なものとして主務省令で定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）を行う事業協同組合若しくは事業協同小組合であつてその組合員の総数が政令で定める基準を超えるもの又は組合員たる組合が共済事業を行うことによつて負う共済責任の再共済若しくは再共済責任の再再共済の事業を行う事業協同組合（以下「特定共済組合」という。）は、同項の規定にかかわらず、共済事業及びこれに附帯する事業並びに前項に規定する事業のほか、他の事業を行うことができない。ただし、主務省令で定めるところにより、行政庁の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) A cooperative (excluding a credit cooperative and a federation of cooperatives engaged in the activities set forth in Article 9-9, paragraph (1)) whose total number of members (members of the member cooperatives in the case of a federation of cooperatives) exceeds the standard specified by a Cabinet Order shall have at least one auditor who is not a member of said cooperative nor an officer or employee of a member juridical person of said cooperative, and who has not served as a director or employee of said cooperative nor a director, accounting advisor (when the accounting advisor is a juridical person, a member of the company who is in the position of performing such duties), executive officer or employee of a subsidiary company of the cooperative (which means a company for which the cooperative owns a majority of voting rights [excluding the voting rights pertaining to the shares whose voting rights may not be exercised for all the matters that are subject to resolution at the shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights pertaining to the shares which shall be deemed to have the voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act] of all shareholders [including all members of the company]; hereinafter the same shall apply) during the five years preceding the assumption of his/her office. 例文帳に追加

６　組合員（協同組合連合会にあつては、会員たる組合の組合員）の総数が政令で定める基準を超える組合（信用協同組合及び第九条の九第一項第一号の事業を行う協同組合連合会を除く。）は、監事のうち一人以上は、当該組合の組合員又は当該組合の組合員たる法人の役員若しくは使用人以外の者であつて、その就任の前五年間当該組合の理事若しくは使用人又はその子会社（組合が総株主（総社員を含む。）の議決権（株主総会において決議することができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。）の過半数を有する会社をいう。以下同じ。）の取締役、会計参与（会計参与が法人であるときは、その職務を行うべき社員）、執行役若しくは使用人でなかつたものでなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 59 (1) Where a seller makes an application for a sales contract and sends goods pertaining to such application to a person other than the person who made an application for a sales contract in the case the seller has received such application or the purchaser in the case the seller has concluded a sales contract (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchasing Party" in this paragraph) or makes to the Purchasing Party an application for a sales contract on goods other than the goods pertaining to the relevant sales contract and sends the goods pertaining to such application to the Purchasing Party, the seller may not claim return of the sent goods if the person who received the sent goods does not consent to accepting the application and the seller does not take back the goods before the day on which 14 days have passed from the date of sending the goods (if the person who received the sent goods has requested the seller to take back such goods, and said day comes after the day on which seven days have passed from the date of such request, it shall be the day on which seven days have passed from the date of the request). 例文帳に追加

第五十九条　販売業者は、売買契約の申込みを受けた場合におけるその申込みをした者及び売買契約を締結した場合におけるその購入者（以下この項において「申込者等」という。）以外の者に対して売買契約の申込みをし、かつ、その申込みに係る商品を送付した場合又は申込者等に対してその売買契約に係る商品以外の商品につき売買契約の申込みをし、かつ、その申込みに係る商品を送付した場合において、その商品の送付があつた日から起算して十四日を経過する日（その日が、その商品の送付を受けた者が販売業者に対してその商品の引取りの請求をした場合におけるその請求の日から起算して七日を経過する日後であるときは、その七日を経過する日）までに、その商品の送付を受けた者がその申込みにつき承諾をせず、かつ、販売業者がその商品の引取りをしないときは、その送付した商品の返還を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加

第三条　この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

It is a document that lodged a very outright criticism against the fact that excessive competition policies implemented by Mr. Koizumi, or Mr. Takenaka, led to a considerable loss of Japan's social stability, including the so-called safety nets. As Policy Research Committee Chair (of the PNP), I wrote that point at the very beginning of the six items in the common policy platform, which was put together in the run-up to the election, and I also articulated in writing that even after the change of government, Mr. Koizumi's excessive competition policies had substantially damaged various social safety nets or regional economies. Further still, the three-party agreement spelled out that the per-household income level dropped by one million yen in the course of ten years during which the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was in power. While I may not use expressions as sharp as those of (PNP) Chief Kamei, I am still intending to take a firm stance, keeping in mind the original intention behind the change of government, in addition to the points I've just made. 例文帳に追加

これは、民主党、当時社民党、国民新党でございまして、どちらにも小泉さん、あるいは竹中さんの行われた過度の競争政策によって、日本のいわゆるセーフティネットをはじめ、非常に社会の安定性が失われたということを、本当に真っ向から批判した文書でございまして、たまたま私は（国民新党の）政調会長でございましたから、選挙の前の6日間の当面の共通政策6つの中でも一番最初にそのことが書いてありまして、なおかつ政権が交代した後もそのことをきちっと小泉さんの過度の競争政策と申しますか、それが非常に社会のいろいろなセーフティネット、あるいは地域の経済、そういったことを傷めたということを明記してありますし、なおかつ当時自由民主党の政権でしたか、10年間で1世帯当たり100万円の所得が減ったということもきちっと3党合意には明記してありますし、そういったことを踏まえて、私も亀井（国民新党）党首ほど表現は厳しくはないかと思いますけれども、きちっとそういった原点を踏まえて政権交代の原点を踏まえてしっかりやっていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

This concerns the issue of whether you can expect ordinary investors to have accurate knowledge regarding such products. It also concerns how sales activity is conducted, so we are considering all these issues. This is a complicated field. Some derivatives are like creating something from nothing. To put it simply, it is like, if I may say so, gambling. This has nothing to do with trading actual goods. In a betting game that used to be popular, we placed a bet as to whether the serial number of the next train would be an odd or even number. This is somewhat like that game, and transactions could be made without any relation to the real economy. If the parties involved in such transactions alone are to be affected, it may not be so problematic. However, as the scale of transactions has grown, the entire economy could be affected if the deals implode. So, we cannot just say, “We don't care if you suffer losses, as you have done the OTC(over-the-counter) deal with each side understanding the risk.” Therefore, we are considering all these issues. 例文帳に追加

だから、いろいろ、これは一般投資家が、その商品にとって正確な知識を持ち得るかどうかというようなことも一つあるでしょうね。そういうことを含めての営業のやり方もあるだろうし、だから、全般について、今、検討しているところなので。だから、この世界は難しいのですよ。「虚」が「虚」を生んでいるような世界があるでしょう。簡単に言うと、言葉は悪いですけど、博打場みたいなところがありますね。実態的な取引と関係ない形で、こんなことを言ったらおかしいけれども、昔、電車が来たら、次に来るのが奇数番号か偶数かということで賭けていたでしょう。それと似たような、実態とは縁のない形での取引がされる危険性があるし、いろいろな、そういう物事を捕まえてはやる。これは、お互いだけだったら何ということはないかもしれない。それでも、やはり取引がでかくなってしまった場合、それが破裂してしまった場合は、経済全体に影響が起きる場合があるので、「相対取引で、お互い納得づくで勝手に商品を取引していたので、損しようが関係ない」といってしまえない面もあるわけでしょう。だから、そういうことを含めて、今、検討しているという最中です。 - 金融庁

Unless otherwise provided by this Act, third parties may not use without the consent of the proprietor of the trade mark in the course of trade any sign which is identical with the trade mark for goods or services which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered; any sign where because of its identity with or similarity to the trade mark and because of the identity or similarity of the goods or services to which the trade mark and that sign are affixed, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, including the likelihood of association between the sign and the trade mark; any sign identical with or similar to the trade mark for goods or services which are not similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, where the trade mark has a good reputation in the Czech Republic and where the use of that sign would without due course take advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the good reputation of the trade mark. 例文帳に追加

本法に別段の規定がない限り，第三者は，商標所有者の同意を得ることなく，取引の過程で次に掲げる行為を行ってはならない。登録商標と同一の標識を当該登録商標の対象である商品又はサービスと同一の商品又はサービスについて使用すること，標識が登録商標と同一であるか若しくは類似しかつ両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスが同一であるか若しくは類似する故に，公衆を誤認させる虞がある場合(公衆に登録出願された標識と登録商標との関係についての誤解を生じさせる虞がある場合を含む。)におけるかかる標識の使用，標識が対象とする商品若しくはサービスが当該標識と同一若しくは類似の商標の対象である商品若しくはサービスと類似していないものの，かかる商標がチェコ共和国において定評を得ており，標識の使用が正当な理由なしに当該商標の評判を利用するか又は先の商標の識別性を侵害するものであると認められる場合におけるかかる標識の使用。 - 特許庁

(2) if the mark has become misleading or contrary to law and order or morality since it was registered or became established. A trademark registration shall be invalidated if the trademark has not been used for the last five years and the proprietor is unable to give a proper reason for the non-use. Use of a trademark with the proprietor’s consent shall be considered equivalent to use by the proprietor. Invalidation of a registration may not be sought, however, if the trademark has been used after the expiry of a five-year period of non-use but before the request for invalidation. In such case any use of the trademark that occurred during the three months preceding the request for invalidation shall not be considered if the preparations for use commenced only after the proprietor became aware that a request for invalidation might be filed. If the ground for invalidation of a registration concerns only some of the goods for which the trademark has been registered, the registration will be invalidated only in respect of those goods. 例文帳に追加

(2) 商標がその登録時又は確立時から後に誤認を生じさせるようになったか又は法律若しくは公序良俗に反するものとなった場合 登録商標が過去5年間使用されておらず，かつ，所有者がその不使用について正当な理由を提示することができない場合は，当該商標の登録は無効とされる。所有者の同意を得た上での商標の使用は，所有者自身による使用と同等であるとみなされる。ただし，5年間の不使用期間が経過したが登録無効の請求がある前に当該商標が使用された場合は，登録無効を請求することはできない。無効の請求前3月以内に行われた当該商標の使用は，当該使用の準備が無効請求の行われることを所有者が知った後に開始された場合は，考慮されないものとする。 登録無効の理由が，商標が登録された商品の一部について存在するに過ぎない場合は，登録は，それらの商品についてのみ無効とされる。 - 特許庁

(6) The General Partner may not engage in transactions with the Partnership for itself or any third party; provided, however, that [, (A)] the General Partner may engage in any transaction [as set forth in the following items] where such transaction is approved by (i) [___]% or more of the members of the Advisory Board or (ii) the Limited Partnersholding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [___]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners [and, (B) the General Partner may engage in any transaction other than those set forth in the following items where the General Partner may offer, in advance, to the Advisory Board or the Limited Partners an opportunity to express their opinions or provide advice]. If the General Partner requests for such an approval [or offers such an opportunity to express opinions or provide advice], the General Partner shall provide a prior written notice of details of the related transaction to the members of the Advisory Board or the Limited Partners. [The General Partner shall not be bound by any opinion or advice expressed or provided by any member of the Advisory Board or any Limited Partner under this paragraph.] 例文帳に追加

6. 無限責任組合員は、自己又は第三者のために本組合と取引をすることができない。但し、［次に掲げる取引については、］(ⅰ)諮問委員会の委員の［ ］分の［ ］以上がかかる取引を承認した場合又は(ⅱ)総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員がかかる取引を承認した場合［、また、次に掲げる取引以外の取引については、事前に諮問委員会又は有限責任組合員に意見陳述又は助言の提供の機会を与えた場合、］無限責任組合員は、自己又は第三者のために本組合と取引をすることができる。無限責任組合員は、かかる承認を求める場合［又は意見陳述若しくは助言の機会を与える場合]には、諮問委員会の委員又は有限責任組合員に対し、あらかじめ書面により当該取引の内容を通知するものとする。[なお、無限責任組合員は、本項に基づく諮問委員会の委員又は有限責任組合員の意見又は助言に拘束されるものではない。] - 経済産業省

(2) In the case where a Member, etc. or an Intermediary (which means a Member, etc. or an Intermediary prescribed in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) seeks to conclude a contract set forth in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act with a Bank, etc., he/she shall ensure that the contents thereof meet the following requirements: (i) on receipt of an instruction from a Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 9, the amount of the clearing margin pertaining to said instruction will be deposited with said Commodity Exchange for said Member, etc. or Intermediary; (ii) it is prohibited to set off debts of a Bank, etc. or claims for said Member, etc. or Intermediary based on said contract; (iii) the contract is valid for the period of three months or longer; (iv) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary may not cancel the contract or change the contents of the contract, except when he/she had received approval from the competent minister and a Commodity Exchange (limited to a Commodity Exchange which received a notification pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in advance; (v) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary shall notify the termination of the contract to a Commodity Exchange by one month prior to the day of termination. 例文帳に追加

２ 会員等又は取次者（法第百三条第七項に規定する会員等又は取次者をいう。以下この 条において同じ。）は、銀行等と法第百三条第七項の契約を締結しようとする場合には、 その内容を次に掲げる要件に適合するものとしなければならない。 一法第百三条第九項の規定による商品取引所の指示を受けたときは、当該会員等又は 取次者のために当該指示に係る額の取引証拠金が遅滞なく当該商品取引所に預託され るものであること。 二当該契約に基づく銀行等の債務と当該会員等又は取次者に対する債権を相殺するこ とを禁止するものであること。三三月以上の期間にわたって有効な契約であること。四会員等又は取次者は、あらかじめ主務大臣及び商品取引所（法第百三条第七項の規 定による届出を受けた商品取引所に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の承認を受け た場合を除き、契約の解除又は契約の内容の変更をすることができないものであるこ と。 五会員等又は取次者は、契約が終了する日の一月前までに、その旨を商品取引所に通 知をするものとすること。 - 経済産業省

Article 67-2 The provisions of Article 940, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Period of Public Notice, etc. for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation on Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice May Not Be Carried Out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "annual general meeting of members (or annual general meeting, where the company has such meeting)," respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十七条の二　会社法第九百四十条第一項及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、相互会社が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十四条の七第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、定時総代会）」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第五十四条の七第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 940, paragraph (1) (excluding item (i)) and (3) (Period of Public Notice for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation of Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice may not be Carried out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "procedure" respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第九百四十条第一項（第一号を除く。）及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、外国保険会社等が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「手続」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 59(3)(ii) and (4) and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "rehabilitation case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a rehabilitation case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第五十九条第三項第二号及び第四項並びに第百二十七条の二第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「再生事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての再生手続開始の申立ては、親法人の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について再生事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての再生手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-13 (1) A person (limited to a person who is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) shall, when he/she makes a Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors (meaning a Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. which is made to Qualified Institutional Investors who are excluded under the provision of Article 2(3)(i) from the number of persons to which the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was made in cases where the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. falls under the category of Solicitations for Acquisition specified by Article 2(3)(i), or which falls under the category of Solicitations for Acquisition specified by Article 2(3)(ii)(a) or Article 2-2(4)(ii)(a); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or makes a Solicitation for Delivery of Existing Securities, etc. which is for Securities to which a Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors was made and is exempted from application of the main clause of Article 4(2) (collectively referred to as "Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors, etc." in the following paragraph), notify the solicited persons of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, including the fact that the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. made for the Securities falls under any of the categories of Solicitation for Acquisition listed in the following items (limited to Securities acquired by Qualified Institutional Investors who are excluded under the provision of Article 2(3)(i) from the number of persons to which the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was made in cases where the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. falls under the category of Solicitations for Acquisition specified by Article 2(3)(i)) and therefore the notification under Article 4(1) has not been made for the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities and to cases where the Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors, etc. is made for Securities of which the total issue price was or is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, which may not be more than 100 million yen: 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の十三　適格機関投資家向け勧誘（有価証券発行勧誘等のうち、第二条第三項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する場合における同号の規定により当該有価証券発行勧誘等の相手方から除かれる適格機関投資家を相手方として行うもの又は同項第二号イ若しくは第二条の二第四項第二号イに掲げる場合に該当するものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）又はこれに係る有価証券の有価証券交付勧誘等で第四条第二項本文の規定の適用を受けないもの（次項において「適格機関投資家向け勧誘等」という。）を行う者（内閣府令で定める者に限る。）は、当該有価証券の有価証券発行勧誘等が次に掲げる場合に該当するものであつた有価証券（第一号に掲げる場合にあつては、第二条第三項第一号の規定により当該有価証券発行勧誘等の相手方から除かれた適格機関投資家が取得した有価証券に限る。）の有価証券発行勧誘等に該当することにより当該有価証券発行勧誘等に関し第四条第一項の規定による届出が行われていないことその他の内閣府令で定める事項を、その相手方に対して告知しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合及び発行価額の総額が一億円を超えない範囲内で内閣府令で定める金額未満である適格機関投資家向け勧誘に係る有価証券について行う場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case of paragraph (1) (limited to the cases where any fact specified in Article 178(1), item (iii) to (v) inclusive has been found), if there is a final and binding court decision on the same case which orders a Respondent confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), or collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), the Prime Minister shall, in lieu of the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1), or Article 175(1) or (2), issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount obtained by deducting the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision or the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision (in cases where confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) and collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) were ordered pursuant to said court decision, the sum of the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision and the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision; hereinafter referred to as the "Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc." in this paragraph), from the amount to be paid pursuant to paragraph (1); provided, however, that if the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1) or Article 175(1) or (2) does not exceed the Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under such provisions. 例文帳に追加

５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の場合（第百七十八条第一項第三号から第五号までに掲げる事実のいずれかがあると認める場合に限る。）において、同一事件について、被審人に対し、第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産の没収又は同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴の確定裁判があるときは、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額に代えて、当該額から当該裁判において没収を命じられた第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額又は当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額（当該裁判において同項各号に掲げる財産の没収及び同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴が命じられたときは、当該裁判において没収を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額及び当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額の合計額。以下この項において「没収等相当額」という。）を控除した額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額が、没収等相当額を超えないときは、これらの規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 7 (1) An administrative agency which has the authority to grant permission, authorization or confirmation for the new construction, extension, reconstruction, relocation, repair or remodeling of a building, for a change of intended purpose of a building or for use of a building, or a person delegated thereby, or a designated confirmation and inspection body which makes a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) (meaning a designated confirmation and inspection body prescribed in Article 77-21, paragraph (1) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may not grant said permission, authorization or confirmation or make a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, respectively, without the consent of the fire chief or fire station chief who has jurisdiction over the construction site or location of the building for which said permission, authorization or confirmation or a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act is sought; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the building for which a confirmation (including a confirmation under the provision of Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of said Act) is sought is a residence (excluding a row house, apartment house and any other residence specified by Cabinet Order) within areas other than primary fire protection districts or secondary fire protection districts listed in Article 8, paragraph (1), item (v) of the City Planning Act (Act No. 100 of 1968) or where a building official makes a confirmation under the provision of Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87-2 of said Act. 例文帳に追加

第七条　建築物の新築、増築、改築、移転、修繕、模様替、用途の変更若しくは使用について許可、認可若しくは確認をする権限を有する行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は建築基準法（昭和二十五年法律第二百一号）第六条の二第一項（同法第八十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による確認を行う指定確認検査機関（同法第七十七条の二十一第一項に規定する指定確認検査機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該許可、認可若しくは確認又は同法第六条の二第一項の規定による確認に係る建築物の工事施工地又は所在地を管轄する消防長又は消防署長の同意を得なければ、当該許可、認可若しくは確認又は同項の規定による確認をすることができない。ただし、確認（同項の規定による確認を含む。）に係る建築物が都市計画法（昭和四十三年法律第百号）第八条第一項第五号に掲げる防火地域及び準防火地域以外の区域内における住宅（長屋、共同住宅その他政令で定める住宅を除く。）である場合又は建築主事が建築基準法第八十七条の二において準用する同法第六条第一項の規定による確認をする場合においては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract. 例文帳に追加

第五十八条　業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方（その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。）は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき（相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the theme “Active Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects of “Active Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society” in Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.”例文帳に追加

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会（ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society）が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、｢国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会｣での議論成果に留意する。 - 厚生労働省

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　第四十四条の二（第三項後段を除く。）及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Article 27-3(4) and Article 27-8(1) to (6) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the part "the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any)" in Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Issuer"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification," "submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5)," "submitted" and "amendment report"; the terms "amendment," "the Terms of Purchase, etc.," "the provisions of this Section," "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc.," and "violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "delivery and other settlement methods," "Article 27-13(4) and (5)," "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made," and "contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5)," respectively; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the parts "disposition under paragraph (3)" and "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively; and the terms "amendment" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

３　第二十七条の三第四項並びに第二十七条の八第一項から第六項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の三第四項中「発行者（当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。）」とあるのは「発行者」と、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の十三第四項及び第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第四項まで」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第一項から第四項まで」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) Article 27-8(1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification, during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2) during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted" and "amendment report," respectively; the term "amendment" and the parts "the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with the provisions of this Section" and "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the amendment violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "the delivery and other settlement methods stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with Article 27-13(4) (excluding 27-13(4)(i)) and Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)" and "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made stated in the amendment contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the term "disposition under paragraph (3)"; and the part "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22(7)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively. 例文帳に追加

７　第二十七条の八第一項から第五項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする上場株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第四項（第一号を除く。）及び第二十七条の十三第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする上場株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第七項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 94 (1) The provisions of the main clause of Article 300, Article 303, paragraph (2), Article 304, the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1), Article 305, paragraph (4), Article 306 (excluding paragraph (2) and paragraph (4)), Article 307, Article 308 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), Article 310, and Article 313 through Article 318 (excluding paragraph (3)) inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investors' meeting. In this case, the term "the preceding Article" in the main clause of Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with a Board of Directors" in Article 303, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deleted, the phrase "the votes of all shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Issued Investment Equity," the phrase "or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholder" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "only shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Investors," the term "Shareholders" in the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Investors who continually held not less than one-hundredth (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)," the phrase "shareholders be notified of" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "(or, in cases where a notice pursuant to paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of Article 299 is to be given, such summary be specified or recorded in that notice)" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be stated or recorded in the notice under Article 91, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrases "who hold" and "the votes of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved in the shareholders meeting)" in Article 306, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "who continually held" and "the Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)" respectively, the term "the court" in Article 306, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (5), and paragraph (6), Article 307, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and Article 318, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 297, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 90, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 298 and Article 299" in Article 317 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第九十四条　会社法第三百条本文、第三百三条第二項、第三百四条、第三百五条第一項本文及び第四項、第三百六条（第二項及び第四項を除く。）、第三百七条、第三百八条（第一項ただし書を除く。）、第三百十条並びに第三百十三条から第三百十八条（第三項を除く。）までの規定は、投資主総会について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条本文中「前条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第三百三条第二項中「前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権」とあるのは「口数の投資口」と、「株主に限り」とあるのは「投資主は」と、同法第三百五条第一項本文中「株主は」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の一（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主は」と、「株主に通知すること（第二百九十九条第二項又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項又は第二項の通知に記載し、又は記録すること」と、同法第三百六条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権を有する」とあるのは「口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する」と、同条第一項、第三項、第五項及び第六項並びに同法第三百七条第一項及び第二項並びに第三百十八条第五項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第三百十条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条第三項において準用する第二百九十七条第一項及び第四項」と、同法第三百十七条中「第二百九十八条及び第二百九十九条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加