1153万例文収録!

「liability」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(29ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > liabilityの意味・解説 > liabilityに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

liabilityを含む例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 1467



例文

(2) The provisions of Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xx)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (i)) (Commissioning of Registration by Juridical Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking the dissolution of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第八百三十四条(第二十号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号リに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の解散の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Therefore, the user and the operator are deemed to have agreed to the mode of use where the browser is so configured so that the user must, prior to writing his/her messages on the board, present his/her will to agree to the terms of use by clicking on a confirmation screen saying "The operator of this bulletin board holds the right to publish the messages on this board without notification after their modification whenever needed (whether or not to disclose the names of the writers as well as the text of the message is subject to the judgment of the operator). The writers on this board shall entitle the operator to use the messages for publication and discharge the operator from any liability for infringement of copyright and moral rights." It is still contentious whether a special agreement for the copyright holder not to exercise any moral rights is effective or not. 例文帳に追加

したがって、例えば、「本掲示板の管理者等は本掲示板に記載された書き込みを、校正上、必要な修正(投稿者名の表示・非表示を含む)を施した上で、予告なく出版することがあります。本掲示版に記載された書き込みに関する著作権及び著作者人格権に関し、出版に係る利用につき、本掲示版の管理者等に許諾するものとします。」という利用規程について同意画面が表示され、同意した場合に初めて書き込み画面にたどり着くような確認措置が講じられている場合には、当該利用形態についての合意の成立が認められると考えられる。 - 経済産業省

(4) In a case where a designation under the provisions of Article 34-10-4(1) has been made and a notice under the provisions of paragraph (4) of the same Article has been given (including the case where a designation is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of the same Article; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (6)), if an unlimited liability audit corporation is unable to pay fully with its assets the liabilities that are to be borne against an audit client company, etc. with regard to the designated attestation, designated partners (including persons who were formerly designated partners; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall be jointly and severally responsible for the payment, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where a withdrawn designated partner has proved that such liabilities have arisen from a cause which occurred after his/her withdrawal. 例文帳に追加

4 第三十四条の十の四第一項の規定による指定がされ、同条第四項の規定による通知がされている場合(同条第六項の規定により指定したものとみなされる場合を含む。次項及び第六項において同じ。)において、指定証明に関し被監査会社等に対して負担することとなつた無限責任監査法人の債務をその無限責任監査法人の財産をもつて完済することができないときは、第一項の規定にかかわらず、指定社員(指定社員であつた者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)が、連帯してその弁済の責任を負う。ただし、脱退した指定社員が脱退後の事由により生じた債務であることを証明した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where the district director of the tax office, etc. has granted a tax payment grace period, if property seized with regard to the national tax under the grace period yields natural fruit, securities, claims, or any incorporeal property, etc. as prescribed in Article 72, paragraph (1) (Seizure Procedure for Patent Rights, etc.) of the National Tax Collection Act, he/she may, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), execute the delinquent tax collection procedure upon such natural fruit or non-monetary property delivered by a third party obligor, etc. as prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (5), item (ii) (Limited Tax Liability of Mortgagee by Transfer) of said Act, and may appropriate any proceeds, etc. realized by conversion of such property into money as prescribed in Article 129, paragraph (1) (Principle of Distribution) of said Article for the national tax under a grace period. 例文帳に追加

3 税務署長等は、納税の猶予をした場合において、その猶予に係る国税につき差し押さえた財産のうちに天然果実を生ずるもの又は有価証券、債権若しくは国税徴収法第七十二条第一項(特許権等の差押手続)に規定する無体財産権等があるときは、第一項の規定にかかわらず、その取得した天然果実又は同法第二十四条第五項第二号(譲渡担保権者の物的納税責任)に規定する第三債務者等から給付を受けた財産で金銭以外のものにつき滞納処分を執行し、その財産に係る同法第百二十九条第一項(配当の原則)に規定する換価代金等をその猶予に係る国税に充てることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

Article 72 (1) The right of the State to collect a national tax (hereinafter referred to as the "right of collection of a national tax" in this Section) shall be extinguished by prescription if it is not exercised within five years from the statutory due date for payment of the national tax (in the case of a national tax to be paid based on a reassessment or determination, etc. set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) of the preceding Article, from the day on which the decision, etc. or the reassessment prescribed in said item was made; in the case of a national tax to be paid by reason of an overstatement of the tax amount equivalent to the amount of a refund based on a return form for a refund claim, as well as the expenses for the delinquent tax collection procedure, from the day on which the right of collection may be exercised for these taxes; and in the case of delinquent tax due to default on a stamp tax, from the day on which the tax liability was established; the same shall apply in paragraph (3) of the following Article). 例文帳に追加

第七十二条 国税の徴収を目的とする国の権利(以下この節において「国税の徴収権」という。)は、その国税の法定納期限(前条第一項第一号に掲げる更正決定等により納付すべきものについては、同号に規定する裁決等又は更正があつた日とし、還付請求申告書に係る還付金の額に相当する税額が過大であることにより納付すべきもの及び国税の滞納処分費については、これらにつき徴収権を行使することができる日とし、過怠税については、その納税義務の成立の日とする。次条第三項において同じ。)から五年間行使しないことによつて、時効により消滅する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

Article 215 Where income tax has been collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) (Withholding Liability) from a nonresident or foreign corporation who conducts, in Japan, a business prescribed in Article 161(ii) (Domestic Source Income) with respect to the consideration listed in the said item, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, it shall be deemed that with respect to the pay or remuneration listed in Article 161(viii)(a) or (c) that is to be paid from the consideration, for which income tax has been collected from the nonresident or foreign corporation, to a nonresident engaged in providing personal services for the said business for the provision of personal services, income tax has been collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) at the time of payment of the pay or remuneration. 例文帳に追加

第二百十五条 国内において第百六十一条第二号(国内源泉所得)に規定する事業を行う非居住者又は外国法人が同号に掲げる対価につき第二百十二条第一項(源泉徴収義務)の規定により所得税を徴収された場合には、政令で定めるところにより、当該非居住者又は外国法人が当該所得税を徴収された対価のうちから当該事業のために人的役務の提供をする非居住者に対してその人的役務の提供につき支払う第百六十一条第八号イ又はハに掲げる給与又は報酬について、その支払の際、同項の規定による所得税の徴収が行われたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The profit specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 161(i)-2 of the Act shall be the revenue from a business conducted in Japan under a partnership contract prescribed in Article 161(i)-2 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as a "partnership contract" in this paragraph), after deducting therefrom expenses pertaining to the revenue (including income tax collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) (Withholding Liability) of the Act with respect to the domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (xii) of the Act), which is distributed under the said partnership contract to the partners who hold the said partnership contract (including partners who held the said partnership contracts as well as those who hold or held the contract listed in item (iii) of the preceding paragraph). 例文帳に追加

2 法第百六十一条第一号の二に規定する政令で定める利益は、国内において同号に規定する組合契約(以下この項において「組合契約」という。)に基づいて行う事業から生ずる収入から当該収入に係る費用(同条第一号の三から第十二号までに掲げる国内源泉所得につき法第二百十二条第一項(源泉徴収義務)の規定により徴収された所得税を含む。)を控除したものについて当該組合契約を締結している組合員(当該組合契約を締結していた組合員並びに前項第三号に掲げる契約を締結している者及び当該契約を締結していた者を含む。)が当該組合契約に基づいて配分を受けるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 6-2 (1) Persons qualified to be limited liability partners of a Specified Partnership (meaning a Partnership other than a Partnership of which the Partnership Agreement includes a commitment to engage wholly or partly in the business of acquiring and holding unlisted shares (refers to shares that are neither listed on a share exchange prescribed in Article 2(16) of the Securities and Exchange Act nor registered on the registry of OTC traded securities prescribed in Article 75(1) of said act) issued by a business corporation that corresponds to a Specified SME, Etc.) or other business prescribed by Cabinet Order (referred to hereinafter as "the Business of acquiring shares, etc. of unlisted small or medium sized enterprises") shall be qualified institutional investors as defined in Article 2 (3) - 1 of said Act or other persons prescribed by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六条の二 特定組合(組合のうち、特定中小企業等に該当する株式会社の発行する未公開株式(証券取引法第二条第十六項に規定する証券取引所に上場されておらず、かつ、同法第七十五条第一項の店頭売買有価証券登録原簿に登録されていない株式をいう。)の取得及び保有その他の政令で定める事業(以下「中小未公開企業株式取得等事業」という。)の全部又は一部のみを営むことをその組合契約において約した組合以外のものをいう。以下同じ。)の有限責任組合員たる資格を有する者は、同法第二条第三項第一号に規定する適格機関投資家その他の政令で定める者とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 8 (Liability of Incorporators) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the terms "Article 28(i)" and "Article 33(2)" in Article 52(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 33(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the term "Article 33(10)(iii)" in Article 52(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(10)(iii) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "all shareholders" in Article 55 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members." 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第二編第一章第八節(発起人等の責任)の規定は、特定目的会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五十二条第二項中「第二十八条第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号」と、「第三十三条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三十三条第十項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第二項において準用する第三十三条第十項第三号」と、同法第五十五条中「総株主」とあるのは「総社員」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

Article 22 In the case where the cyclical use and disposal of circulative resources are recognized to cause obstacles to environmental conservation, the State shall take necessary measures to require the business operators that used, disposed of or discharged the circulative resources causing obstacles to environmental conservation to bear the expenses necessary for the appropriate treatment of the circulative resources, remove the obstacles to environmental conservation, and restore the affected environment to its original state. In this case, the State shall take necessary measures, including the creation of a fund to which business operators, etc. contribute, so that the costs may be covered even when the business operators concerned cannot bear such expenses owing to lack of financial resources, inability to determine liability, etc. 例文帳に追加

第二十二条 国は、循環資源の循環的な利用及び処分により環境の保全上の支障が生じると認められる場合において、当該環境の保全上の支障に係る循環資源の利用若しくは処分又は排出を行った事業者に対して、当該循環資源を適正に処理し、環境の保全上の支障を除去し、及び原状を回復させるために必要な費用を負担させるため、必要な措置を講ずるものとする。この場合において、当該事業者が資力がないこと、確知できないこと等により、当該事業者が当該費用を負担できないときにおいても費用を負担することができるよう、事業者等による基金の造成その他の必要な措置を講ずるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(4) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of pursuing the liability of members of the Self-Regulating Committee by a creditor of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange, and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a member of a Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company which has said Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange as its Subsidiary Company (meaning another company, the majority of whose voting rights of all shareholders or all members are held by the company. In this case, the other company, the majority of whose voting rights of all shareholders or all members are held by the company and its Subsidiary Company or Subsidiary Companies, or by the company's Subsidiary Company or Subsidiary Companies is deemed as a Subsidiary Company of the company; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Division 4 and Article 124(1)(ii)). 例文帳に追加

4 前項の規定は、当該株式会社金融商品取引所の債権者が自主規制委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び当該株式会社金融商品取引所を子会社(会社がその総株主又は総社員の議決権の過半数を保有する他の会社をいう。この場合において、会社及びその一若しくは二以上の子会社又は当該会社の一若しくは二以上の子会社がその総株主又は総社員の議決権の過半数を保有する他の会社は、当該会社の子会社とみなす。以下この条、第四目及び第百二十四条第一項第二号において同じ。)とする金融商品取引所持株会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるときについて準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Articles 668 to 671 inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the voluntary liquidation of unlimited liability audit corporations. In this case, the term "Article 641(i) to (iii) inclusive" in Article 668(1) and Article 669 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(i) or (ii) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 669 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," the term "that paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," and the term "Article 939(1)" in Article 670(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 939(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-20(6) of the Certified Public Accountants Act." 例文帳に追加

3 会社法第六百六十八条から第六百七十一条までの規定は、無限責任監査法人の任意清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百六十八条第一項及び第六百六十九条中「第六百四十一条第一号から第三号まで」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第一号又は第二号」と、同条中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同条第二項中「同項」とあるのは「前条第一項」と、同法第六百七十条第三項中「第九百三十九条第一項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十第六項において準用する第九百三十九条第一項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 939(1) (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 939(3), Article 940(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)), Article 940(3), Article 941, Article 946, Article 947, Article 951(2), Article 953 and Article 955 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where a limited liability audit corporation gives public notice under the provisions of Article 627(3) or Article 635(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1) of this Article. In this case, the term "trade name" in Article 946(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

4 会社法第九百三十九条第一項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第三項、第九百四十条第一項(第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第三項、第九百四十一条、第九百四十六条、第九百四十七条、第九百五十一条第二項、第九百五十三条並びに第九百五十五条の規定は、有限責任監査法人が第一項において準用する同法第六百二十七条第三項又は第六百三十五条第三項の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十六条第三項中「商号」とあるのは、「名称」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(9) The provisions of Article 829 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Absence of a New Share Issue, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Articles 836 to 838 inclusive (Order to Provide Security; Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(e)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of non-issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

9 会社法第八百二十九条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(新株発行等の不存在の確認の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十三号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十八条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)及び第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ホに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の不存在の確認の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provisions of Article 829 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Absence of a New Share Issue, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Articles 836 to 838 inclusive (Order to Provide Security; Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated) and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(e)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of non-issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

7 会社法第八百二十九条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(新株発行等の不存在の確認の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十三号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十八条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)及び第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ホに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の不存在の確認の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) In the event that a Share Held Company (meaning a business corporation, etc. (meaning a business corporation or a limited liability company. The same shall apply hereinafter in this clause, the following clause and clause (viii)) in which the Partnership holds shares, share options or Bond with Share Options, Etc., or an equity share pursuant to the three preceding clauses. The same shall apply hereafter.) ceases to exist as a result of a merger-acquiring and holding shares or equity shares allocated by the surviving company (meaning a business corporation, etc., that survives after the merger or a business corporation, etc., that is incorporated as a result of the merger, and is neither a Specified SME, Etc., nor a Share Held Company. The same shall apply in the following clause) or share options or Bond with Share Options, Etc., in respect of which the surviving company (limited to a business corporation) has assumed the obligation thereof; 例文帳に追加

四 株式等保有会社(前三号の規定により組合がその株式、新株予約権若しくは新株予約権付社債等又はその持分を保有している株式会社等(株式会社及び有限会社をいう。以下この号、次号及び第八号において同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)が合併により消滅する場合において、存続会社(合併後存続する株式会社等又は合併により設立する株式会社等であって、特定中小企業等及び株式等保有会社以外のものをいう。以下この号において同じ。)が当該合併に際して割り当てる株式若しくは持分又は存続会社(株式会社に限る。)がその義務を承継した新株予約権若しくは新株予約権付社債等の取得及び保有 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is to protect the interests of consumers, and thereby contribute to the stabilization of and the improvement in the general welfare and life of the citizens and to the sound development of the national economy, in consideration of the discrepancy in quality and quantity of information and the negotiating power between consumers and business operators, by permitting a rescission of manifestation of intentions to offer or accept contracts made by consumers when they misunderstood or are distressed by certain acts of business operators, and nullifying any clauses, in part or in whole, that exempt the business operators from their liability for damages or otherwise that unfairly harm the interests of consumers, in addition to providing a right to qualified consumer organization to demand an injunction against business operators, etc. for the purpose of preventing the occurrence of or the spreading of damage to other consumers. 例文帳に追加

第一条 この法律は、消費者と事業者との間の情報の質及び量並びに交渉力の格差にかんがみ、事業者の一定の行為により消費者が誤認し、又は困惑した場合について契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示を取り消すことができることとするとともに、事業者の損害賠償の責任を免除する条項その他の消費者の利益を不当に害することとなる条項の全部又は一部を無効とするほか、消費者の被害の発生又は拡大を防止するため適格消費者団体が事業者等に対し差止請求をすることができることとすることにより、消費者の利益の擁護を図り、もって国民生活の安定向上と国民経済の健全な発展に寄与することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The history of venture capital in Japan started with small and medium business investment and consultation companies founded by the government in 1963 (Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya SBICs). Since 1972, when private sector venture capitals started to grow, the industry has been expanding with development of legal and regulatory arrangements, such as the amendment of the Antitrust Act in its treatment of venture capitals (their relation to the clause prohibiting holding companies, etc.), and introduction of the system of limited liability partnership (LLP) for investment. SMRJ and the Development Bank of Japan (BDJ), together with private sector investors, are working aggressively for projects to form venture funds under the scheme of investment LLPs. They are working, you could say, to prime the pump to enable money to be injected from the private sector, and help more venture funds to be formed in Japan. 例文帳に追加

我が国のベンチャーキャピタルの歴史は、1963年に国が設立した中小企業投資育成会社(東京・大阪・名古屋)がその嚆矢となっている。また、その後、1972年から民間ベンチャーキャピタルが成長を始めた以降も、独占禁止法上の取扱い(持株会社の禁止との関係等)や投資事業有限責任組合制度の導入など、制度的な整備に伴ってベンチャーキャピタル産業が拡大してきたと言える。さらに、独立行政法人中小企業基盤整備機構や日本政策投資銀行は、民間投資家とともに投資事業有限責任投資組合方式のベンチャーファンドを組成する事業を積極的に展開しており、言わば、民間資金の呼び水機能を果たすものとして、我が国におけるベンチャーファンドの組成促進に貢献している。 - 経済産業省

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to Article 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent; Method of Acts of Bond Managers; Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers; Resignation of Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation; Dismissal of Bond Managers), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bond Administrator. In this case, the terms "Bonds," "bondholder," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bondholders meeting" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds," "Specified Bond Holders," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bond Holders' Meeting" respectively, the term "paragraph (1) of Article 705" in Article 709(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 711(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

8 会社法第七百三条(社債管理者の資格)、第七百四条(社債管理者の義務)、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで(特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継)、第八百六十八条第三項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第三号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、特定社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債」、「社債権者」、「社債発行会社」及び「社債権者集会」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債」、「特定社債権者」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「特定社債権者集会」と、同法第七百九条第二項中「第七百五条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 214 (1) Where a person listed in each of the following items, who satisfies the requirements specified by a Cabinet Order and who receives payment of domestic source income specified in the relevant item has obtained, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, a certificate issued by the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment, certifying that the person who receives the said payment satisfies the said requirements and that the domestic source income to be received falls under the category of domestic source income specified in the relevant item, and the person has presented the certificate to the person who pays the domestic source income, the person who makes payment, notwithstanding the provision of Article 212(1) (Withholding Liability), shall not be required to collect and pay income tax with respect to the domestic source income to be paid to the person who has presented the certificate while the certificate remains valid: 例文帳に追加

第二百十四条 次の各号に掲げる者で政令で定める要件を備えているもののうち当該各号に定める国内源泉所得の支払を受けるものが、政令で定めるところにより、当該支払を受けるものが当該要件を備えていること及びその支払を受けることとなる国内源泉所得が当該各号に定める国内源泉所得に該当することにつき納税地の所轄税務署長の証明書の交付を受け、その証明書を当該国内源泉所得の支払をする者に提示した場合には、その支払をする者は、その証明書が効力を有している間にその証明書を提示した者に対して支払う当該国内源泉所得については、第二百十二条第一項(源泉徴収義務)の規定にかかわらず、所得税を徴収して納付することを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The documents listed in the items of the preceding paragraph shall be attached to a written application for registration of change due to an absorption-type split carried out by a Stock Company, general Partnership company, limited Partnership company or limited liability company that is the succeeding company in an absorption-type split, in addition to the documents set forth in the following provisions of the Commercial Registration Act: Article 18, Article 19, Article 46, Article 85 (excluding the segment pertaining to the documents listed in item (iii) or (viii) of the same Article with regard to a Stock Insurance Company) (Registration of Company Split), Article 93 (General Rules on Attached Documents) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Articles 111 and 118 of that Act) and Article 109, paragraph (1) (excluding that segment in item (ii) pertaining to the documents listed in Article 85, item (viii) of that Act and including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (1) and Article 125 of that Act). 例文帳に追加

2 吸収分割承継会社である株式会社、合名会社、合資会社又は合同会社がする吸収分割による変更の登記の申請書には、商業登記法第十八条、第十九条、第四十六条、第八十五条(保険株式会社に係る同条第三号又は第八号に掲げる書面に係る部分を除く。)(会社分割の登記)、第九十三条(添付書面の通則)(同法第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。)及び第百九条第一項(第二号中同法第八十五条第八号に掲げる書面に係る部分を除き、同法第百十六条第一項及び第百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する書類のほか、前項各号に掲げる書類を添付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Judicial precedents finding liability for damages mostly concern cases where transactions were made in financial products or a long time has passed between the conclusion of the contract and the plaintiff's claim for damages. Judicial precedents in (ii) above are cases which ruled that a party had the right to terminate a contract, all concerning real estate transaction. These judicial precedents holds that a supplementary duty exists associated with the conclusion of a sales contract; which obligates the potential Vendor to inform the potential buyer of Important Matters, such as information about the surrounding environment, and as this is important information in deciding whether to conclude the sales contract, the buyer may terminate the sales contract where the Vendor has failed to perform his duty. In many cases where a buyer cannot use information property because no information about its operating environment was provided at the time the contract was concluded, the buyer may terminate the contract and demand a refund of the purchase price. 例文帳に追加

①の裁判例は、金融商品の取引や、契約締結後に長い期間が経過していた場合であり、損害賠償によるトラブル解決が求められたケースであったと考えられる。一方、②の裁判例はいずれも不動産取引のケースであって、契約締結前に売主が買主に周辺環境等の重要事項を提供することは、売買契約の締結に際しての当然の付随義務であり、これが売買契約を締結するか否かを決する上において重要な事柄である以上、当該義務違反をもって買主は売買契約の解除をなし得る、としたものである。動作環境が契約締結時に提供されなかったために、情報財が使用できないようなケースについては、買主は②の契約を解除して、支払済みの対価の返還を求めることが多いものと解される。 - 経済産業省

(3) A condition or term of a contract or licence shall not be void by virtue of this section if -- (a) at the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence, the supplier or licensor was willing to supply the product, or grant a licence to work the invention, as the case may be, to the person supplied or the licensee, on reasonable terms specified in the contract or licence and without any such condition or term as is mentioned in subsection (1); and (b) the person supplied or the licensee is entitled under the contract or licence to relieve himself of his liability to observe the condition or term on giving to the other party 3 months' notice in writing, and subject to payment to that other party of such compensation (being, in the case of a contract to supply, a lump sum or rent for the residue of the term of the contract and, in the case of a licence, a royalty for the residue of the term of the licence) as may be determined by an arbitrator appointed by the Minister.例文帳に追加

(3) 契約又はライセンスの条件は,次の場合は,本条により無効とされない。 (a) 契約の成立又はライセンスの許諾の時点で,当該供給者又は実施許諾者が契約又はライセンスに指定する適切な条件により,かつ,(1)にいうような条件なしに,当該製品の供給又は場合により当該発明実施のライセンス許諾を,供給を受ける者又は実施権者に行う意思があった場合,及び (b) 供給を受ける者又は実施権者が当該契約又はライセンスに基づいて,相手方に書面をもって3月の予告通知を行い,かつ,大臣により任命された仲裁人により決定される補償金の当該相手方への支払(供給契約の場合は,当該契約の残余期間分及びライセンスの場合は,当該ライセンスの残余期間分のロイヤルティの一括払又は定期分割払)を行った上で,当該条件を遵守する義務を免れる場合 - 特許庁

(viii) a document evidencing that a company absorbed in absorption-type merger has given the public notice and the notices under Article 789, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act) (in cases of a stock company or a limited liability company which, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, has given a public notice by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by method of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 789, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act), that the public notice was given by such method), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such absorption-type merger; 例文帳に追加

八 吸収合併消滅会社において会社法第七百八十九条第二項(第三号を除き、同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による公告及び催告(同法第七百八十九条第三項(同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした株式会社又は合同会社にあつては、これらの方法による公告)をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該吸収合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(viii) a document evidencing that a company consolidated through consolidation-type merger has given the public notice and the notices under Article 810, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act) (with regard to a stock company or a limited liability company which, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, has given a public notice by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by method of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act), that the public notice was given by such method), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such consolidation-type merger; 例文帳に追加

八 新設合併消滅会社において会社法第八百十条第二項(第三号を除き、同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による公告及び催告(同法第八百十条第三項(同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした株式会社又は合同会社にあつては、これらの方法による公告)をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該新設合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 31 As for the case of limitation of liability, if Tanker Oil Pollution Damage occurred in Japan, the case shall belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the district court which has jurisdiction for the place where the said Tanker Oil Pollution Damage occurred, and if Tanker Oil Pollution Damage occurred in Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone, the case shall belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the district court which has jurisdiction for the general venue of the Claimant of the Limited Claim or, if there is no such court, belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the district court determined by the Supreme Court. If the measures prescribed in item 6.(b) of Article 2 for the purpose of preventing the damage in Japan or in Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone are taken outside Japan or Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone and the damage did not occur in Japan and in Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone, the case shall belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the district court which has jurisdiction for the general venue of the person who took the measures or, if there is no such court, belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the district court determined by the Supreme Court. 例文帳に追加

第三十一条 責任制限事件は、本邦内においてタンカー油濁損害が生じたときは、当該タンカー油濁損害の生じた地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に、排他的経済水域内においてタンカー油濁損害が生じたときは、知れている制限債権者の普通裁判籍の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又はこの裁判所がないときは最高裁判所が定める地方裁判所の管轄に、本邦内又は排他的経済水域内における損害を防止するための第二条第六号ロに規定する措置が本邦及び排他的経済水域の外において執られ、かつ、本邦内及び排他的経済水域内において損害が生じなかつたときは、当該措置を執つた者の普通裁判籍の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又はこの裁判所がないときは、最高裁判所が定める地方裁判所の管轄に専属する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the cases set forth in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading to be accrued within three business years from the business year in which the license set forth in Article 190 of the Act (excluding a renewed license) was obtained, the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person with Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year," the phrase "such larger amount" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "such equivalent amount," the phrase "double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "0.006 percent," the phrase "an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item)," the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said transaction amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year," and the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.001 percent of said total sum of the consideration, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.03 percent of the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year." 例文帳に追加

2 前項の場合において、法第百九十条の許可(更新に係る許可を除く。)を受けた事業年度から三事業年度以内に積み立てられるべき商品取引責任準備金の金額は、同項第一号中「に事故率(当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故(第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。)による支払額(商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者(第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。)から商品市場における取引等(商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。)の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織(商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。)の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額(自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。)に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「当該いずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「当該相当する金額」と、「事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率」とあるのは「十万分の六」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該対価の額の合計額の十万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは、「の万分の三に相当する金額」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items (vi), (ix) and (x)) and Articles 81 to 83 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange and Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 136(2)(ii). In this case, the term "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the name or trade name, and the principal office or head office,"; the term "head office" in Article 80(v) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office,"; the term "when a Company Absorbed in an Absorption-Type Merger is a membership company, the document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedures under such provisions)" in Article 80(vii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning merger of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon an Absorption-Type Merger,"; the term "daily newspaper or Electronic Public Notice" in Article 80(viii) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "daily newspaper,"; the term "stock company or limited liability company" in Article 80(viii) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange,"; the term "head office" in Article 81(v) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the office or head office,"; the term "when a company extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger is a membership company, the documents proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedures under such provisions)" in Article 81(vii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger,"; the term "stock company or limited liability company" in Article 81(viii) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange or Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange,"; and the term "the head office of the company extinguished upon Consolidation-Type Merger" in Article 83(2) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office and head office of the Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon Consolidation-Type Merger,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条(第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)及び第八十一条から第八十三条までの規定は、第百三十六条第二項第二号に掲げる場合における合併による会員金融商品取引所及び株式会社金融商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称又は商号及び主たる事務所又は本店」と、同法第八十条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併消滅会員金融商品取引所の合併総会の議事録」と、同条第八号中「日刊新聞紙又は電子公告」とあるのは「日刊新聞紙」と、「株式会社又は合同会社」とあるのは「会員金融商品取引所」と、同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所又は本店」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員金融商品取引所の合併総会の議事録」と、同条第八号中「株式会社又は合同会社」とあるのは「会員金融商品取引所又は株式会社金融商品取引所」と、同法第八十三条第二項中「新設合併消滅会社の本店」とあるのは「新設合併消滅金融商品取引所の主たる事務所及び本店」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 255, Article 256 and Article 258 of this Act, and the provisions of Article 44 (Cessation of a Trustee's Acts at the Demand of the Beneficiaries) and Article 85(4) (Special Provisions on Trustee Liability, etc.) of the Trust Act and the provisions of Article 385(2) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Company Auditors), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 (Appointment of Special Agent), Article 709(1) (Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers), Article 710(1) (Liability of Bond Manager), the first sentence of Article 711(1) and (3) (Resignation of Bond Managers), and Article 713 (Dismissal of Bond Managers) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specified Trust Administrator. In this case, the phrase "In cases where a Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder has been appointed at a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting," in Article 256(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In cases where the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. has appointed a Specified Trust Administrator," the phrase "as costs borne in relation to the trust property" in Article 258 shall be deemed to be replaced with "unless it has been provided under the Specific Purpose Trust Contract in advance that they shall be costs to be borne in relation to the trust property," the phrase "the purpose of the Company with Auditors" in Article 385(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the purpose of the Specific Purpose Trust," the term "articles of incorporation" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the phrase "substantial detriment to such Company with Auditors" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "substantial detriment to the trust property," the term "trust deed" in Article 44(1) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the term "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act, the Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the term "bond-issuing Company" in the first sentence of Article 711(1) and Article 713 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

5 第二百五十五条、第二百五十六条及び第二百五十八条並びに信託法第四十四条(受益者による受託者の行為の差止め)及び第八十五条第四項(受託者の責任等の特例)並びに会社法第三百八十五条第二項(監査役による取締役の行為の差止め)、第七百四条(社債管理者の義務)、第七百七条(特別代理人の選任)、第七百九条第一項(二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則)、第七百十条第一項(社債管理者の責任)、第七百十一条第一項前段及び第三項(社債管理者の辞任)並びに第七百十三条(社債管理者の解任)の規定は、特定信託管理者について準用する。この場合において、第二百五十六条第一項中「権利者集会において代表権利者を選任した場合は」とあるのは「受託信託会社等が特定信託管理者を定めたときは」と、第二百五十八条中「信託財産に関して負担する費用として」とあるのは「これについてあらかじめ特定目的信託契約に信託財産に関して負担する費用とする旨の定めがある場合を除き、」と、同法第三百八十五条第一項中「監査役設置会社の目的」とあるのは「特定目的信託の目的」と、「定款」とあるのは「特定目的信託契約」と、「監査役設置会社に著しい損害」とあるのは「信託財産に著しい損害」と、信託法第四十四条第一項中「信託行為」とあるのは「特定目的信託契約」と、会社法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律、特定目的信託契約」と、同法第七百十一条第一項前段及び第七百十三条中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) Damage caused within the territory (including territorial sea. The same shall apply to item vii-2.(a) and item 2 of paragraph 1 of Article 39-5) of a Contracting State of the Liability Convention or within the Exclusive Economic Zone, etc. by the pollution (limited to the pollution by the Oil loaded as cargo or by the Bunker Oil (including the Oil that is left in the cargo hold and the other places in the Tanker prescribed by an ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and mixture which is including a said Oil and which prescribed by an ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) resulting from the escape or discharge of Oil from a Tanker (as for the Tanker capable of carrying cargo other than Oil in bulk, it is limited to the Tanker used for transporting Oil in bulk and while the cargo holds have not been cleaned to the degree so that no oil may be left after they were used for transportation of Oil in bulk, the Tanker being used for transportation of cargo other than Oil in bulk and the ships navigating without any cargo). 例文帳に追加

イ タンカー(ばら積みの油以外の貨物の海上輸送をすることができるタンカーにあつては、ばら積みの油の輸送の用に供しているもの並びにばら積みの油の輸送の用に供した後当該タンカーのすべての貨物艙内に当該油が残留しない程度にその貨物艙を洗浄するまでの間において、ばら積みの油以外の貨物の輸送の用に供しているもの及び貨物を積載しないで航行しているものに限る。)から流出し、又は排出された油による汚染(貨物として積載されていた油又は燃料油(当該油が貨物艙内その他の国土交通省令で定めるタンカー内の場所に残留したもの及び当該油を含む混合物で国土交通省令で定めるものを含む。)による汚染に限る。)により生ずる責任条約の締約国の領域(領海を含む。第七号の二イ及び第三十九条の五第一項第二号において同じ。)内又は排他的経済水域等内における損害 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The General Partner may not engage in any business that is the same or similar to that of the Partnership nor operate or manage any other partnership, company or other entity whose business purposes are the same or similar to those of the Partnership (a “Successor Fund”) as a general partner, unlimited liability member, director or manager or in a similar capacity, until the earlier of (i) the time at which the sum of the Investment Amount and the amounts of Capital Contributions appropriated to the expenses of the Partnership and the management fees reaches [___]% of the total Capital Commitments of all Partners or (ii) the expiration of the Commitment Period, except where the relevant act is approved by (i) [___]% or more of the members of the Advisory Board or (ii) the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [___]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. 例文帳に追加

2. 無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)投資総額並びに本組合の費用及び管理報酬にあてられた出資履行金額の合計額が総組合員の出資約束金額の合計額の[ ]分の[ ]に達する時、又は(ⅱ)出資約束期間の満了時のいずれか早い時までの間は、本組合の事業と同種又は類似の事業を行うこと、及び本組合の事業と同種又は類似の事業を目的とする他の組合、会社又はその他の団体(以下「承継ファンド」という。)の無限責任組合員、ジェネラル・パートナー、無限責任社員、取締役又は業務執行者その他これらに類似する役職として当該団体の管理及び運営を行うことができないものとする。但し、(ⅰ)諮問委員会の委員の[ ]分の[ ]以上がかかる行為を承認した場合又は(ⅱ)総有限責任組合員の出資口数の[ ]分の[ ]以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員がかかる行為を承認した場合はこの限りではない。 - 経済産業省

Article 21 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. Which is Likely to be Mistaken for a Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a misleading trade name or any other name that might evoke a Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Section 2 of said Chapter (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in transactions for a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Chapter IV of said Part (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company either assigns its business, or takes over any business or operation, respectively. In this case, the term "Company (including a Foreign Company, hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 10 (Manager) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条 会社法第八条(会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止)の規定は相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条(自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任)の規定は相互会社について、同法第一編第三章第一節(会社の使用人)の規定は相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節(第十八条を除く。)(会社の代理商)の規定は相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章(第二十四条を除く。)(事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等)の規定は相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第十条(支配人)中「会社(外国会社を含む。以下この編において同じ。)」とあるのは「相互会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

6 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ニに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 198 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. which is likely to be mistaken for a company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a trade name or name which is likely to be mistaken for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use Its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the name of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 2 (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in a transaction for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter IV (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Foreign Mutual Company has assigned its business or acquired any business or operation; and the provisions of Article 54, Article 54-2 and Article 54-3, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the books and other materials of a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百九十八条 会社法第八条(会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止)の規定は外国相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条(自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任)の規定は外国相互会社の名称について、同法第一編第三章第一節(会社の使用人)の規定は外国相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節(第十八条を除く。)(会社の代理商)の規定は外国相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章(第二十四条を除く。)(事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等)の規定は外国相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、第五十四条、第五十四条の二並びに第五十四条の三第一項及び第四項の規定は外国相互会社の帳簿その他の資料について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 The provisions of Article 267 to 268-3 inclusive (Lawsuit to Hold Directors Accountable) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 (Exemption from Liability of, and Representative Action against Incorporators) of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act shall apply to any lawsuit filed by members on or after the Effective Date under Article 267, paragraph (1) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act or under Article 267, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act; with regard to any lawsuit filed by members before the Effective Date under Article 57, paragraph (1) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41 of the Former Act or under Article 267, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (2) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41 of the Former Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条 新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条(発起人に対する責任の免除及び代表訴訟)において準用する同法第二百六十七条から第二百六十八条ノ三まで(取締役の責任を追及する訴え)の規定は、施行日以後に社員が新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条において準用する同法第二百六十七条第一項の訴えの提起を請求する場合又は新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条において準用する同法第二百六十七条第三項の訴えを提起する場合について適用し、施行日前に社員が旧法第四十一条において準用する旧法第五十七条第一項の訴えの提起を請求した場合又は旧法第四十一条において準用する旧法第五十七条第二項において準用する商法第二百六十七条第三項の訴えを提起した場合については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking payment under the provisions of Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5). In this case, the phrase "shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member, or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in paragraphs (3) to (5) and (7) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

8 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、第五項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第五号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ニに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to actions for the return of benefits under paragraph (3). In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise right pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

6 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2), and (5) and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action demanding payment under Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less Than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、前項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (hereinafter in this Article referring to those specified by a Cabinet Order) by a Bank to one person (including other persons who has a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order with that person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of the Bank's equity capital by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc." in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the Prime Minister has given the approval in the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as a result of a Merger, of Joint Incorporation-Type Split (meaning an Incorporation-Type Split that two or more stock companies or limited liability companies effect jointly; the same shall apply in Articles 16-3(4)(iv) and 52-22(1)) or absorption-type split or of transfer of another person's business by a person who takes granting of credit, etc. 例文帳に追加

第十三条 銀行の同一人(当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)に対する信用の供与等(信用の供与、又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。)の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、当該銀行の自己資本の額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額(以下この条において「信用供与等限度額」という。)を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割(二以上の株式会社又は合同会社が共同してする新設分割をいう。第十六条の三第四項第四号及び第五十二条の二十二第一項において同じ。)若しくは吸収分割をし、又は事業を譲り受けたことにより銀行の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As for responsibility, protection of deposits (fixed-amount protection) and assignment of responsibility are basically unrelated. Nevertheless, as I stated last week, Mr. Kimura became a consultant to FSA when Mr. Takenaka served as Minister for Financial Services and filed an application form for the Incubator Bank of Japan after he resigned from the post and established the Bank while Mr. Takenaka was in office. Given that banking businesses are licensed businesses, and financial businesses are highly public in nature, this is an extremely serious matter as a nation. Sound and robust financial businesses are necessary for sound companies as well as for sound management and economy. As financial businesses are licensed businesses that are not to be taken lightly, it is extremely regrettable that it failed in about six and a half years. As I stated before, now that the DICJ has full control of the Bank, we intend to pursue its criminal and/or civil liability in an appropriate manner according to law. 例文帳に追加

そしてまた、責任についてはどうかということでございますが、預金の保護(定額保護)と責任追及とは基本的には関係のないことでございますが、しかし、私が先週も申し上げましたように、これは竹中平蔵さんのときに、金融庁の顧問に木村剛さんがなられて、やめた後、日本振興銀行の設立のお願い書を出して、そして、竹中平蔵さんのときに銀行の設立が、これはもうよくご存じのように、銀行業というのは免許業で、(金融業は)公共性の強いものでございますから、国家としても大変重たいものであり、健全な企業、あるいは健全な経営・経済のためには、非常に健全で強力な金融業が必要であるということは、もう皆さんよくお分かりでございます。(金融業は)免許業でございまして、重たいものでございますから、そういった意味でも、私はこういったことが6年半ぐらいで破綻をしたということは大変遺憾なことだと、残念なことだと思っていますが、私がこの前申しましたように、今預金保険機構が全部経営権を握っているわけでございますから、法に沿って刑事上の責任、あるいは民事上の責任をきちっと追及していこうと思っております。 - 金融庁

(8) The provisions of Article 11 (Business Deposit), Articles 22 to 31 inclusive (Entrustment of Trust Business, Liability of Trust Company Pertaining to Entrustment of Trust Business, Conduct Rules Pertaining to Underwriting of Trust, Application mutatis mutandis of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, Explanation of Contents of Trust Contract, Written Issuance at Conclusion of Trust Contract, Issuance of Report on Trust Property Situation, Duty of Loyalty of Trust Company, etc., Conduct Rules Pertaining to Trust Property, Change of Important Trust, etc., Explanation of Reimbursement of Costs, etc. or Scope of Advance Payment, etc., Special Measures for Public Notice of Trusts, and Debt Set-off Pertaining to Trust Property), Article 42 (Inspection, etc.), and Article 49 (Dismissal Procedure in the Case of Rescission, etc. of License, etc.) of the Trust Business Act and Article 6 (Conclusion of Trust Contract on Loss Compensation, etc.) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Life Insurance Company carries out the Insurance Claim Trust Business pursuant to the provision of paragraph (3). In this case, the phrases listed in the middle column of the following table in the provisions of the Trust Business Act listed in the left column of the table shall be deemed to be replaced with the phrases listed in the right column of the table. 例文帳に追加

8 信託業法第十一条(営業保証金)、第二十二条から第三十一条まで(信託業務の委託、信託業務の委託に係る信託会社の責任、信託の引受けに係る行為準則、金融商品取引法の準用、信託契約の内容の説明、信託契約締結時の書面交付、信託財産状況報告書の交付、信託会社の忠実義務等、信託財産に係る行為準則、重要な信託の変更等、費用等の償還又は前払の範囲等の説明、信託の公示の特例、信託財産に係る債務の相殺)、第四十二条(立入検査等)及び第四十九条(免許等の取消し等の場合の解任手続)並びに金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第六条(損失の補てん等を行う旨の信託契約の締結)の規定は、生命保険会社が第三項の規定により保険金信託業務を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、次の表の上欄に掲げる信託業法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、同表の下欄に掲げる字句と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 69, Article 70, Article 80, and Article 81, paragraph (1) and Article 81, paragraph (5) (Execution of Duty by Several Trustees, Appointment of Trustee Representatives, Duty of Care, and Advance Payment of Costs and Compensation of a Trustee) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act and the provisions of Article 78 (Liability for Damages with regard to Acts of Representative Persons) of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall apply mutatis mutandis to Insurance Administrators and the Company Being Managed, respectively. In this case, the term "permission of a court" in Article 69, paragraph (1) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "approval of the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in Article 70 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," the term "permission of a court" in paragraph (2) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Approval of the Prime Minister," the term "court" in Article 81, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," and the term "representative directors and other representative persons" in Article 78 of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrators." 例文帳に追加

6 会社更生法第六十九条、第七十条、第八十条並びに第八十一条第一項及び第五項(数人の管財人の職務執行、管財人代理の選任、注意義務並びに費用の前払及び報酬)の規定は保険管理人について、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)の規定は被管理会社について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、会社更生法第六十九条第一項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第七十条中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、同条第二項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第八十一条第一項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第五項中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条中「代表理事その他の代表者」とあるのは「保険管理人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) When conducting a split (hereinafter referred to as "absorption-type split " or "incorporation-type split "; the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Part 5, Chapters III and V of the Companies Act, a company (this shall mean a stock company or a limited liability company; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall, on or before the notice deadline date notify the following workers in writing of whether or not there are any provisions in the split contract, etc. (absorption-type split contract (absorption-type split contract as provided in Article 757 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of absorption-type split; and incorporation-type split plan (incorporation-type split plan as provided in Article 762, paragraph 1 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of incorporation-type split; the same shall apply hereinafter) concerned to the effect that the successor company, etc. (successor company in absorption-type split , in the cases of absorption- type split provided in Article 757 of the Act; and incorporated company in incorporation-type split , in the cases of incorporation-type split provided in Article 763 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) will succeed to the labor contracts that the company and workers concerned have entered into, and of the deadline date for filing an objection provided in Article 4, paragraph 3, and any other matters provided by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: 例文帳に追加

第二条 会社(株式会社及び合同会社をいう。以下同じ。)は、会社法第五編第三章及び第五章の規定による分割(吸収分割又は新設分割をいう。以下同じ。)をするときは、次に掲げる労働者に対し、通知期限日までに、当該分割に関し、当該会社が当該労働者との間で締結している労働契約を当該分割に係る承継会社等(吸収分割にあっては同法第七百五十七条に規定する吸収分割承継会社、新設分割にあっては同法第七百六十三条に規定する新設分割設立会社をいう。以下同じ。)が承継する旨の分割契約等(吸収分割にあっては吸収分割契約(同法第七百五十七条の吸収分割契約をいう。以下同じ。)、新設分割にあっては新設分割計画(同法第七百六十二条第一項の新設分割計画をいう。以下同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)における定めの有無、第四条第三項に規定する異議申出期限日その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を書面により通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater (in cases where the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading that has already been accrued [in cases where a specific amount of money is used under the provisions of Article 221, paragraph (2) of the Act, the amount after deducting said amount; the same shall apply in the following item] is less than ten million yen, the amount obtained by adding, to such larger amount, an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater); 例文帳に追加

イ 各事業年度における法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引(自己の計算による取引及びホに掲げる取引を除く。)の取引金額に事故率(当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故(第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。)による支払額(商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者(第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。)から商品市場における取引等(商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。)の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織(商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。)の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額(自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。)に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。)を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額(既に積み立てられた商品取引責任準備金の金額(法第二百二十一条第二項の規定により使用された金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した金額。次号において同じ。)が千万円に満たない場合には、当該いずれか大きい金額に、千万円から当該商品取引責任準備金の金額、及びロからチまでに掲げる金額を控除した金額を事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率で除して計算した金額(当該計算した金額が当該事業年度の取引金額を超える場合には、当該事業年度の当該取引金額。以下この号において同じ。)に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額を加算した金額) - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) When providing credit to a small- or medium-size company, does the institution conduct credit management operations including credit rating management with due consideration for the overall status of the company's corporate management in light of the nature of small- and medium-size companies in general, such as their vulnerability to the economic cycle and their liability to fall into the status of having excess debt due to one-time factors.例文帳に追加

(ⅱ)中小・零細企業等に対する与信に関しては、総じて景気の影響を受けやすく、一時的な要因により債務超過に陥りやすいといった中小・零細企業等の経営・財務面の特性を踏まえ、与信先の経営実態を総合的に勘案した信用格付等の与信管理を行っているか。(ⅲ)スコアリング・モデルを用いたビジネスローン等について延滞が発生した場合に、経営改善の方策に係る協議に応じることなく、機械的に債権回収や債権売却を行っていないか。また、ビジネスローン等からの撤退等に当たっては、債務者の置かれた状況を斟酌し、必要に応じて代替的な資金供給手段を検討しているか。(ⅳ)担保割れが生じた際に、合理的な理由なく、直ちに回収や金利の引上げを行っていないか。(ⅴ)経営改善支援先については、経営改善計画の進捗状況を適切に把握し、必要に応じて経営相談・経営指導等を行う等、経営改善に向けた働きかけを行っているか。(ⅵ)短期貸付の更新継続をしている貸出金(手形貸付を含む。)について、更なる借換えを行えば貸出条件緩和債権に該当する場合、安易に顧客の要望を謝絶することなく、適切に経営改善計画等の策定支援等を行っているか。(ⅶ)債務者が大部で精緻な経営改善計画等を策定していないことを理由に、貸付条件の変更等の申込みを謝絶していないか。 - 金融庁

Article 144 The provisions of Article 68 (Credit for Income Tax in the case of Domestic Corporations) shall apply mutatis mutandis in the case where a foreign corporation receives, in each business year, payment of domestic source income listed in each item of Article 141 (Tax Base of Corporation Tax in the case of Foreign Corporations) for the category of foreign corporation listed in the relevant item, on which income tax shall be imposed pursuant to the provisions of the Income Tax Act (excluding a dividend, etc. listed in Article 161(v) of the said Act (Dividend, etc. Received from Domestic Corporations) and which is specified by a Cabinet Order). In this case, the phrase "amount of income tax" in Article 68(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amount of income tax (in the case of income tax collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) of the Income Tax Act (Withholding Liability Regarding Income of Nonresidents or Foreign Corporations) with respect to the consideration listed in Article 161(ii) of the said Act (Domestic Source Income), the amount equivalent to a salary, remuneration or pension listed in Article 161(viii) of the said Act that shall be deemed, pursuant to the provision of Article 215 of the said Act (Special Provisions for Withholding at Source of Salary, etc. Paid to Nonresidents for Providing Personal Services), to have been collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) of the said Act shall be deducted)"; the phrase "interest and dividend, etc." in Article 68(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the relevant domestic source income." 例文帳に追加

第百四十四条 第六十八条(内国法人に係る所得税額の控除)の規定は、外国法人が各事業年度において第百四十一条各号(外国法人に係る法人税の課税標準)に掲げる外国法人の区分に応じ当該各号に掲げる国内源泉所得で所得税法 の規定により所得税を課されるもの(同法第百六十一条第五号 (内国法人から受ける配当等)に掲げる配当等で政令で定めるものを除く。)の支払を受ける場合について準用する。この場合において、第六十八条第一項中「所得税の額」とあるのは「所得税の額(所得税法第百六十一条第二号 (国内源泉所得)に掲げる対価につき同法第二百十二条第一項 (非居住者又は外国法人の所得に係る源泉徴収義務)の規定により徴収された所得税については、その額のうち、同法第二百十五条 (非居住者の人的役務の提供による給与等に係る源泉徴収の特例)の規定により同項 の規定による徴収が行われたものとみなされる同法第百六十一条第八号 に掲げる給与、報酬又は年金に対応する部分の金額を除く。)」と、同条第二項 中「利子及び配当等」とあるのは「当該国内源泉所得」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions then in force shall remain applicable to public notice and notification in the case of any payment made under Article 309, paragraph (1) of the Former Commercial Code (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Former Commercial Code or any other Act), any resolution adopted under Article 64, paragraph (1) or Article 67, paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Companies Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 3, any security interest exercised by an Entrusted Company pursuant to the provision of Article 82, paragraph (1) of the Secured Bond Trust Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 5, any payment made under Article 139-5, paragraph (1) of the Former Investment Trust Act, any payment made under Article 111, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Liquidation of Assets prior to the revision by the provision of Article 20, any resolution adopted under Article 10-17, paragraph (1) or (7) of the Act for the Promotion of the Creation of New Businesses prior to the revision by the provision of Article 21, or any payment made under Article 111, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies prior to the revision by the provision of Article 1 of the Act for Partial Revision of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies, etc. prior to the revision by the provision of Article 24, which shall remain in force pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions to that Act, prior to the enforcement of this Act. 例文帳に追加

2 この法律の施行前に、旧商法第三百九条第一項(旧商法又は他の法律において準用する場合を含む。)の弁済がされた場合、第三条の規定による改正前の有限会社法第六十四条第一項若しくは第六十七条第一項の決議をした場合、第五条の規定による改正前の担保附社債信託法第八十二条第一項の規定により受託会社が担保権を実行した場合、旧投信法第百三十九条の五第一項の弁済がされた場合、第二十条の規定による改正前の資産の流動化に関する法律第百十一条第一項の弁済がされた場合、第二十一条の規定による改正前の新事業創出促進法第十条の十七第一項若しくは第七項の決議をした場合又は第二十四条の規定による改正前の特定目的社会による特定資産の流動化に関する法律等の一部を改正する法律附則第二条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされる同法第一条の規定による改正前の特定目的会社による特定資産の流動化に関する法律第百十一条第一項の弁済がされた場合における公告及び通知については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

3 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄及び移送)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで(弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等(株主、取締役又は清算人(監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人)をいう。以下この節において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム




  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2026 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS