「その場合は」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(974ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

ハ　出資契約等及び当該投資一任契約において、当該金融商品取引業者等は、金融商品取引業等に関する内閣府令（平成十九年内閣府令第五十二号）第百二十八条第一号若しくは第三号又は第百二十九条第一項第一号若しくは第三号に掲げる行為に該当するものを除き、個別の取引ごとにすべての対象権利者に当該取引の内容及び当該取引を行おうとする理由の説明（（２）において「取引説明」という。）を行い、当該すべての対象権利者の同意（次に掲げる事項のすべての定めがある場合において行う取引にあっては、（１）の同意を含む。）を得なければ自己、その取締役若しくは執行役又はその運用を行う他の運用財産（法第三十五条第一項第十五号に規定する運用財産をいう。）との間における取引を行うことを内容とした運用（（１）及び（２）において「自己取引等」という。）を行うことができない旨の定めがあること。例文帳に追加

(c) that it is provided in the Investment Contract, etc. and said Discretionary Investment Contract that said Financial Instruments Specialist, etc. shall not make an investment with the intention of conducting a transaction for itself or with any of its directors or executive officers, or a transaction between an Investment Property and another Investment Property it manages (meaning an Investment Property as defined in Article 35, paragraph (1), item (xv) of the Act) (referred to as "Transactions for Itself, etc." in 1. and 2.) unless said Financial Instruments Specialist, etc., with regard to each transaction, gives an explanation on the contents of said transaction and the reasons for conducting said transaction (referred to as a "Explanation of the Transaction" in 2.) to all of the Subject Right Holders and obtains the consent (including the consent prescribed in 1., for a transaction conducted in cases where all of the matters listed in the following sub-items are provided) from all of said Subject Right Holders, except for that which falls under any of the acts listed in Article 128, item (i) or (iii), or Article 129, paragraph (1), item (i) or (iii) of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Services, etc. (Cabinet Office Ordinance No. 52 of 2007);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十八条の六　市町村長は、遊休土地転換利用促進地区に関する都市計画についての第二十条第一項（第二十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による告示の日の翌日から起算して二年を経過した後において、当該遊休土地転換利用促進地区内の土地を所有している者のその所有に係る土地（国土利用計画法（昭和四十九年法律第九十二号）第二十八条第一項の規定による通知に係る土地及び国又は地方公共団体若しくは港務局の所有する土地を除く。）が次に掲げる要件に該当すると認めるときは、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、当該土地の所有者（当該土地の全部又は一部について地上権その他の政令で定める使用又は収益を目的とする権利が設定されているときは、当該権利を有している者及び当該土地の所有者）に当該土地が遊休土地である旨を通知するものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 58-6 (1) Mayors of municipalities shall, if it is deemed that land (excluding land pertaining to notification pursuant to the provision of Article 28 paragraph (1) of the National Land Utilization Act (Act No. 92 of l974) and land owned by the State, local governments and port authorities) belonging to owners of land within the relevant unused land use promotional areas conforms to the following conditions after two years elapse counting from the day after public notice is given pursuant to the provision of Article 20 paragraph (1) concerning city plans relating to unused land use promotion areas(including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 21 paragraph (2)), notify the relevant landowners (when surface rights and/or other rights aimed at securing the use or appropriation of all or part of the said land as specified by Cabinet Order are fixed, then these right holders and the relevant landowners) that the relevant land is unused land pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第一項第二号、第二項第二号ロ及び前項第一号ロに規定する書面を交付する者（以下この条において「書面交付者」という。）は、第一項第二号、第二項第二号ロ及び前項第一号ロに規定する書面の交付に代えて、第七項で定めるところにより、当該書面の交付を受けるべき者（以下この条において「書面被交付者」という。）の同意を得て、当該書面に記載すべき事項（以下この条において「転売制限情報」という。）を電子情報処理組織を使用する方法その他の情報通信の技術を利用する方法であって次に掲げるもの（以下この条において「電磁的方法」という。）により提供することができる。この場合において、書面交付者は、当該書面を交付したものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(4) A person who delivers a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), paragraph (2), item (ii), sub-item (b), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "Deliverer" in this Article) may, in lieu of the delivery of the document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), paragraph (2), item (ii), sub-item (b), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph, provide information that should be included in said document (hereinafter referred to as "Information on a Restriction on Resale" in this Article) by a method using an Electronic Data Processing System or a method using other information communications technology, as listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "Electromagnetic Means" in this Article) by gaining the consent of a person who is to receive said document (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient" in this Article), pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7). In this case, the Deliverer shall be deemed to have delivered said document:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条　政府は、この法律の施行後五年を経過した場合において、第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）、第二条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）及び第四条の規定による改正後の保険業法（以下「新保険業法」という。）の施行状況、銀行業及び保険業を取り巻く社会経済情勢の変化等を勘案し、新銀行法第二条第十三項に規定する銀行持株会社、新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社及び新保険業法第二条第十六項に規定する保険持株会社に係る制度について検討を加え、必要があると認めるときは、その結果に基づいて所要の措置を講ずるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 10 Where five years have elapsed from the enforcement of this Act, the Government shall, taking into consideration the status of enforcement of the Banking Act revised by the provision of Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Current Banking Act"), the Long-Term Credit Bank Act revised by the provision of Article 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Current Long-Term Credit Bank Act") and the Insurance Business Act revised by the provision of Article 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Current Insurance Business Act"), and changing socioeconomic conditions surrounding the banking and Insurance Businesses, among other factors, review the systems pertaining to the bank holding companies prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (13) of the Current Banking Act, the Long Term Credit Bank holding companies prescribed in Article 16-4, paragraph (1) of the Current Long-Term Credit Bank Act and the insurance holding companies prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Current Insurance Business Act, and when it finds it necessary, take required measures based on its findings.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十三条　政府は、この法律の施行後五年を経過した場合において、新銀行法、新長期信用銀行法及び新保険業法の施行状況、銀行業及び保険業を取り巻く社会経済情勢の変化等を勘案し、新銀行法第二条第十項に規定する銀行主要株主、新長期信用銀行法第十六条の二の二第五項に規定する長期信用銀行主要株主及び新保険業法第二条第十四項に規定する保険主要株主に係る制度について検討を加え、必要があると認めるときは、その結果に基づいて所要の措置を講ずるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 23 Where five years have elapsed after the enforcement of this Act, the Government shall, taking into consideration the status of enforcement of the Current Banking Act, the Current Long-Term Credit Bank Act and the Current Insurance Business Act, and changing socioeconomic conditions surrounding the banking and insurance businesses, among other factors, review the systems pertaining to Bank Major Shareholders as defined in Article 2, paragraph (10) of the Current Banking Act, Long-Term Credit Bank Major Shareholders as defined in Article 16-2-2, paragraph (5) of the Current Long-Term Credit Bank Act and Major Shareholders of Insurance Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (14) of the Current Insurance Business Act, and when it finds it necessary, take required measures based on its findings.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

七　前号に規定する期間内に第百十三条の規定による指定の辞退があった場合において、当該療養病床病院等の開設者が、同号の通知の日前六十日以内に当該指定の辞退に係る法人（当該指定の辞退について相当の理由がある法人を除く。）の役員若しくはその開設した療養病床病院等の管理者又は当該指定の辞退に係る法人でない療養病床病院等（当該指定の辞退について相当の理由があるものを除く。）の管理者であった者で、当該指定の辞退の日から起算して五年を経過しないものであるとき。例文帳に追加

(vii) in a case when a decline of appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 113 is duly provided by notification within the period provided in the preceding paragraph, when an Organizer of said Sanatorium Ward Hospital, etc., is or was an Officer of a juridical person pertaining to said decline of appointment (except for a juridical person that has a reasonable basis for said abolishment) or a manager of the established Sanatorium Ward Hospital, etc., or is or was a Manager of a Sanatorium Ward Hospital, etc., that is not a juridical person pertaining to decline of said appointment as service provider (except for a person that has a reasonable basis for said abolishment) within sixty days prior to the date of notification as set forth in the same item, and five years have not elapsed from the date of said decline of appointment as service provider;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　第三十条第一項第二号の業務及びこれに附帯する業務（以下「民事法律扶助事業」という。）に関し、民事法律扶助事業の実施に係る援助の申込み及びその審査の方法に関する事項、同号イ及びハに規定する立替えに係る報酬及び実費の基準並びにそれらの償還に関する事項並びに同号ロ及びニに規定する報酬及び実費に相当する額の支払に関する事項。この場合において、当該報酬は、民事法律扶助事業が同号に規定する国民等を広く援助するものであることを考慮した相当な額でなければならない。例文帳に追加

(i) With respect to the business under item (ii) of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and business incidental to it (hereinafter collectively referred to as "civil legal aid business"), matters pertaining to offers for civil legal aid and methods for judgment thereof, matters pertaining to the criteria for the remuneration and other actual costs for the lending provided by (a) and (c) of the said item and their reimbursement, and matters pertaining to the payment of an amount equivalent to the remuneration and other actual costs provided by (b) and (d) of the said item. In this case, the amount of the remuneration shall be a reasonable one that takes into account the purpose of the civil legal aid business, which is to provide broad support to citizens, etc. as provided by the same items.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百七十四条　会計参与は、取締役と共同して、計算書類（第四百三十五条第二項に規定する計算書類をいう。以下この章において同じ。）及びその附属明細書、臨時計算書類（第四百四十一条第一項に規定する臨時計算書類をいう。以下この章において同じ。）並びに連結計算書類（第四百四十四条第一項に規定する連結計算書類をいう。第三百九十六条第一項において同じ。）を作成する。この場合において、会計参与は、法務省令で定めるところにより、会計参与報告を作成しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 374 (1) Accounting advisors shall prepare, jointly with the directors, the Financial Statements (referring to the Financial Statements provided for in Article 435(2). The same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter) and the supplementary schedules thereof, the Temporary Financial Statements (referring to the Temporary Financial Statements provided for in Article 441(1). The same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter) as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements (referring to the Consolidated Financial Statements provided for in Article 444(1). The same shall apply in Article 396(1)). In such cases, the accounting advisors shall prepare accounting advisor's report pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　当該上場会社等が前項の規定により請求した場合においては、当該特定組合等の財産をもつて当該特定組合等の当該請求に係る債務その他の債務を完済することができなかつたときに限り、当該上場会社等は、同項の利益を生じた時における当該特定組合等の各組合員（投資事業有限責任組合の有限責任組合員及び有限責任事業組合の組合員並びにこれらに類する者として内閣府令で定める者を除く。）に対し、当該特定組合等の債務について当該各組合員が負う責任に応じて、当該利益（同項の規定により提供された利益の額を控除した額に限る。）を当該上場会社等に提供すべきことを請求することができる。例文帳に追加

(4) Where the Listed Company, etc. makes a request under the preceding paragraph, and only if the debt arising from said request or other debt of the Specified Partnerships, etc. cannot be repaid in full by the assets of the Specified Partnerships, etc., the Listed Company, etc. may request each person who was a partner of the Specified Partnerships, etc., at the time when the profits referred to in said paragraph have accrued (excluding limited partners of Investment LPS and partners of Limited Liability Partnership and persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as similar to these persons), to provide the Listed Company, etc. with the profits (to the extent of the amount that remains after deducting the amount of the profits already provided to the Listed Company, etc. under said paragraph) in proportion to the liability of each partner for the debt of the Specified Partnerships, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　内閣総理大臣は、会社その他の者の同一の会計期間に係る財務書類の二以上の証明について前項の決定（第三十一条の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）をしなければならない場合には、同条第一項の規定による額に代えて、それぞれの決定に係る事実について同項の規定により計算した額（以下この項及び次項において「個別決定ごとの算出額」という。）のうち最も高い額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。例文帳に追加

(2) The Prime Minister shall, in the case where he/she must render a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 31-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) for two or more attestations of financial documents pertaining to the same accounting period of a company or any other person, render a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the highest of the amounts calculated pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph for the facts pertaining to the respective decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "amounts calculated for the individual decisions" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) in accordance with said amounts calculated for the individual decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　内閣総理大臣は、会社その他の者の同一の会計期間に係る財務書類の二以上の証明について第一項の決定（第三十四条の二十一の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）をしなければならない場合には、同条第一項の規定による額に代えて、それぞれの決定に係る事実について同項の規定により計算した額（以下この項及び次項において「個別決定ごとの算出額」という。）のうち最も高い額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。例文帳に追加

(4) The Prime Minister shall, in the case where he/she must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 34-21-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) on two or more attestations of financial documents pertaining to the same accounting period of a company or any other person, render a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the highest of the amounts calculated pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph for the facts pertaining to the respective decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "amounts calculated for the individual decisions" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) in accordance with said amounts calculated for the individual decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　前項の組合のうち第四十条の二第一項の規定により会計監査人の監査を要するものが子会社その他当該組合と主務省令で定める特殊の関係にある者（以下「子会社等」という。）を有する場合には、当該組合は、毎事業年度、前項の説明書類のほか、当該組合及び当該子会社等の業務及び財産の状況に関する事項として主務省令で定めるものを当該組合及び当該子会社等につき連結して記載した説明書類を作成し、当該組合の事務所に備え置き、公衆の縦覧に供しなければならない。例文帳に追加

(2) In the case where a cooperative set forth in the preceding paragraph that requires an audit by an accounting auditor pursuant to the provisions of Article 40-2, paragraph (1) is a subsidiary or one having a special relationship as specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry with said cooperative (hereinafter referred to as "subsidiary company, etc."), said cooperative shall, each business year, prepare, in addition to the explanatory documents set forth in the preceding paragraph, explanatory documents stating the matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as those concerning the status of the operations and property of said cooperative and said subsidiary company, etc. in a consolidated manner for said cooperative and said subsidiary company, etc., keep them at the offices of said cooperative, and provide them for public inspection.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２６　当該内国法人が法人税法第二条第六号に規定する公益法人等又は人格のない社団等である場合における法第六十六条の五第四項第六号に規定する純資産に対する持分として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額及び同項第七号に規定する純資産の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額は、第十九項から前項までの規定にかかわらず、当該内国法人の当該事業年度に係る自己資本の額に、当該事業年度終了の日における総資産の価額のうちに占めるその営む法人税法第二条第十三号に規定する収益事業に係る資産の価額の割合を乗じて計算した金額とする。例文帳に追加

(26) The amount calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order as the interest on a domestic corporation's net assets prescribed in Article 66-5(4)(vi) of the Act and the amount calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of net assets prescribed in item (vii) of the said paragraph, where the said domestic corporation is a corporation in the public interest, etc. prescribed in Article 2(vi) of the Corporation Tax Act or an association or foundation without juridical personality, shall be, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (19) to the preceding paragraph, the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of equity capital for the relevant business year of the said domestic corporation by the ratio of the value of assets for the profit-making business prescribed in Article 2(xiii) of the Corporation Tax Act conducted by the said domestic corporation out of the value of the total assets on the final day of the relevant business year.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　居住者が行おうとする一の特定資本取引が、法第二十四条第一項及び第二項の規定のそれぞれに基づき第一項の規定により指定をされた特定資本取引の二以上に該当する場合において、当該居住者が、その行おうとする一の特定資本取引について同条第三項の規定に基づき同条第一項及び第二項の規定による許可の申請を併せて行おうとするときは、当該居住者は、当該許可の申請がこれらの規定により許可を受ける義務が課された特定資本取引に係るものであることを明らかにした上で、経済産業省令で定める手続により、申請するものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Where one specified capital transaction that a resident intends to conduct falls under two or more kinds of specified capital transactions designated pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) based on Article 24, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, when the resident intends to file, pursuant to paragraph (3) of the said Article, an application for permission as prescribed in the provision of paragraphs (1) and (2) of the said Article in block in regard to the one specified capital transaction that he/she intends to conduct, the resident shall file the application through procedures specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, after clarifying that the application for permission pertains to the specified capital transaction for which the obligation to obtain permission has been imposed pursuant to these provisions.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

先ほども申しましたように、バブル崩壊後の1990年代とか、2000年代初頭に比べますと、保有している不良債権・不良資産というものも減ってきていて、自己資本というものも充実をしてきているという中で今回のグローバルな金融市場の混乱、その影響としての株価の急激な下落という状況に直面しているということでございますので、こういった市場の混乱に対する耐久力というのを我が国自身の1990年代等の経験に照らした場合、安定性というのは随分改善してきている中での状況ということで、耐久力は以前に比べてかなり改善してきているということなのだと思っております。例文帳に追加

As I said earlier, Japanese financial institutions have begun to be confronted with the current global financial market turmoil and the resultant stock price plunge at a time when their bad loans and bad assets have decreased compared with the 1990s, after the bursting of the bubble, and the early 2000s, while their capital has increased. In light of our experiences of the 1990s, I believe that their resilience against market turmoil like this has considerably improved.  - 金融庁

一方の締約国において租税を課された当該一方の締約国の企業の利得を他方の締約国が１の規定により当該他方の締約国の企業の利得に算入して租税を課する場合において、当該一方の締約国の権限のある当局が、その算入された利得が、双方の企業の間に設けられた条件が独立の企業の間に設けられたであろう条件であったとしたならば当該他方の締約国の企業の利得となったとみられる利得であることにつき当該他方の締約国の権限のある当局との間で合意するときは、当該一方の締約国は、当該利得に対して当該一方の締約国において課された租税の額について適当な調整を行う。例文帳に追加

Where a Contracting State includes, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article, in the profits of an enterprise of that Contracting State - and taxes accordingly - profits on which an enterprise of the other Contracting State has been charged to tax in that other Contracting State and the competent authority of that other Contracting State agrees that the profits so included are profits which would have accrued to the enterprise of the first-mentioned Contracting State if the conditions made between the two enterprises had been those which would have been made between independent enterprises, then that other Contracting State shall make an appropriate adjustment to the amount of the tax charged therein on those profits.  - 財務省

一方の締約国において租税を課された当該一方の締約国の企業の利得を他方の締約国が当該他方の締約国の企業の利得に算入して租税を課する場合において、当該一方の締約国が、その算入された利得が、双方の企業の間に設けられた条件が独立の企業の間に設けられたであろう条件であったとしたならば当該他方の締約国の企業の利得となったとみられる利得であることにつき当該他方の締約国との間で合意するときは、当該一方の締約国は、当該利得に対して当該一方の締約国において課された租税の額について適当な調整を行う。例文帳に追加

Where a Contracting State includes in the profits of an enterprise of that Contracting State ( and taxes accordingly ) profits on which an enterprise of the other Contracting State has been charged to tax in that other Contracting State and that other Contracting State agrees that the profits so included are profits which would have accrued to the enterprise of the first-mentioned Contracting State if the conditions made between the two enterprises had been those which would have been made between independent enterprises, then that other Contracting State shall make an appropriate adjustment to the amount of the tax charged therein on those profits.  - 財務省

さらに、被用者が次の(i)から(iv)までに掲げる要件を満たす場合には、二重課税を回避するため、ストックオプションの行使の時に当該被用者が居住者とならない締約国は、当該利益のうち当該被用者が勤務を当該締約国内において行った期間中当該ストックオプションの付与から行使までの期間に関連する部分についてのみ租税を課することができることが了解される。(i)当該被用者が、その勤務に関して当該ストックオプションを付与されたこと。(ii)当該被用者が、当該ストックオプションの付与から行使までの期間中両締約国内において勤務を行ったこと。(iii)当該被用者が、当該行使の日において勤務を行っていること。(iv)当該被用者が、両締約国の法令に基づき両締約国において当該利益について租税を課されることになること。例文帳に追加

It is further understood that where an employee: (i) has been granted a stock option in the course of an employment; (ii) has exercised that employment in both Contracting States during the period between grant and exercise of the option; (iii) remains in that employment at the date of the exercise; and (iv) under the domestic law of the Contracting States, would be taxable in both Contracting States in respect of such benefits, then, in order to avoid double taxation, a Contracting State of which, at the time of the exercise of the option, the employee is not a resident may tax only that proportion of such benefits which relates to the period or periods between grant and exercise of the option during which the individual has exercised the employment in that Contracting State.  - 財務省

本研究会のテーマである国債の金利の推定にあたっては、市場で観察される国債の価格情報が重要な要素となる。しかしながら、現在の我が国の国債市場においては、銘柄数が多いことや投資家の選好等の要因から、国債価格が個別銘柄の需給の影響を受けているケースも散見されている。このため、市場で観察される国債価格情報をそのままモデル化した場合、イールドカーブの形状が時々の銘柄の選好を織り込み歪んだものとなるおそれもあり、「投資家・納税者双方にとって不利とならない適切な条件」を求めるという本研究会の主旨に必ずしも合致しないことが想定された。例文帳に追加

In order to estimate the government bond interest rate, which is the theme of this committee, the price of the JGBs observed in the market constitutes one of the most important information. However, in the present JGB market, it is occasionally seen that the bond prices of individual issues are influenced by the demand/supply condition due to the great number of issues and investors’ preferences and other factors. Should the JGB price information observed in the market be used directly for modeling, it is feared that the shape of the yield curve may be distorted reflecting the investors’ appetites for specific issues from time to time. Consequently, it may not fit to our purpose of the “appropriate conditions posing no disadvantages to both investors and taxpayers.”  - 財務省

(1)第45条第(6)項に別段の定めがある場合を除き、次に掲げる文書は所定の条件に従い商標登録局において公衆の縦覧に供する。(a)登録簿及び登録簿の一切の記載の根拠となる書類(b)商標の登録に対するすべての異議申立書、登録官への補正申請書、これに対するすべての意見書、及びすべての宣誓供述書又は登録官への手続きにおいて当事者らが提出したすべての書類(c)第61条に基づき付託されたすべての規約、及び第65条に基づくかかる規約変更のためのすべての申請書(d)第115条に定める索引(e)官報の告示により政府が定めるその他の書類例文帳に追加

(1) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (6) of section 45, the following documents shall, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, be open to public inspection at the Trademarks Registry- (a) the Register, and any document upon which any entry in the Register in based; (b) every notice of opposition to the registration of a trademark, application for rectification before the Registrar, counter-statement thereto, and any affidavit or document filed by the parties in any proceedings before the Registrar; (c) all regulations deposited under section 61 and all applications under section 65 for varying such regulations; (d) the indexes mentioned in section 115; and (e) such other documents as the Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, specify.  - 特許庁

２　第三十条第二項から第四項まで、第三十二条の七第一項及び第二項、第三十二条の八第一項、第三十二条の九第二項、第三十二条の十並びに第三十二条の十二から第三十二条の十六までの規定は、前項の届出をして行う無料の職業紹介事業及び同項の届出をした地方公共団体について準用する。この場合において、第三十条第二項中「前項の許可を受けようとする者」とあるのは「第三十三条の四第一項の届出をしようとする地方公共団体」と、同項及び同条第三項中「申請書」とあるのは「届出書」と、第三十二条の九第二項中「前項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「前項第二号」と、第三十二条の十三中「手数料に関する事項、苦情」とあるのは「苦情」と、第三十二条の十六第二項中「、職業紹介に関する手数料の額その他」とあるのは「その他」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 30, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive, Article 32-7, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, Article 32-8, paragraph 1, Article 32-9, paragraph 2, Article 32-10, and Articles 32-12 to 32-16 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the free employment placement business conducted after giving the notification set forth in the preceding paragraph and the local public entity that has given the notification provided for in said paragraph. In this case, the phrase "A person who intends to obtain the license set forth in the preceding paragraph" in Article 30, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "A local public entity that intends to give the notification provided for in Article 33-4, paragraph 1," the term "written application" in said paragraph and paragraph 3 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice," the phrase "item 2 or item 3 of the preceding paragraph" in Article 32-9, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "item 2 of the preceding paragraph," the phrase "matters concerning fees, matters concerning complaints" in Article 32-13 shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters concerning complaints," and the phrase "the amount of fees concerning employment placement, and other matters" in Article 32-16, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第二十七条の三第四項並びに第二十七条の八第一項から第六項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の三第四項中「発行者（当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。）」とあるのは「発行者」と、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の十三第四項及び第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第四項まで」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第一項から第四項まで」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Article 27-3(4) and Article 27-8(1) to (6) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the part "the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any)" in Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Issuer"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification," "submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5)," "submitted" and "amendment report"; the terms "amendment," "the Terms of Purchase, etc.," "the provisions of this Section," "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc.," and "violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "delivery and other settlement methods," "Article 27-13(4) and (5)," "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made," and "contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5)," respectively; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the parts "disposition under paragraph (3)" and "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively; and the terms "amendment" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ということで非常に苦労しておりますし、そういった皆様方もよくお分かりのように、金融というのはリーマン・ショック以来、国際的な会議というのは非常に重要でございまして、国内の景気の動向、あるいはその国が置かれた伝統的な金融の状態、あるいは経済の状態、それを国際的にどうハーモナイズするかということが非常に世界的な大事な問題でございまして、国際でやるべきところはきちっと協調政策、Ｇ20でやっていかねば、なかなかこういった金融のグローバル化、あるいは経済のグローバル化の時代に効果がございませんから、その辺を非常に苦労を各国やっておられるわけでございますから、国際会議というのは実は非常に多いのでございますし、ご存じ、その中で国際室の昨日もたまたま話を聞きますと、非常に国際室の人手が足らないという話を聞きまして、そういった非常に大事な金融庁、予算は220億で少ないのですけれども、極めて経済の中で果たす金融政策は大事でございまして、それが今も申し上げましたけれども、国際的にも国内的にも非常に大事な難しい時期でもございまして、それゆえに責任が重たいわけでございますが、そういった中で、なかなか人件費を主とした役所でございますから、そのことはぜひ考慮していただきたいということをこれは実は警察庁も法務省もそういうことを申されまして、これも人件費が多い省ですから、特に金融庁の場合は何も私は省益を代表して言う気はございませんが、現実にこれは非常に大事な分野でございます。例文帳に追加

This means that we are struggling hard to make ends meet and, as everyone well realizes, international meetings have become extremely important in the world of finance since the Lehman crisis, because it is now indeed a very critical global issue to decide how to harmonize on an international scale a given country's domestic economic trends or the financial condition, or economic condition, that it has traditionally been situated in. Therefore, what has to be done on an international scale must be done properly in the form of policy coordination or as G20 initiatives, as otherwise no effect could be expected in an era of increasing globalization in finance or the economy that we live in now, and each country is equally struggling to achieve that end, which explains why there are so many international meetings. That is, as you see, the situation we have now, and I also happened to hear just yesterday in connection with this subject that our Office of International Affairs is in serious shortage of labor, a fact that stands in contrast to such critical importance of the FSA, to which a mere 22 billion yen is given as its budget, and the extremely significant role that financial policies play in an economy. As I have just said, though, now is a very important and delicate period of time both internationally and domestically and we are accordingly charged with a weighty responsibility. Seeing as the FSA is a public office with labor costs representing its main spending category, I did emphatically asked that attention should be paid to that point and, actually, similar comments were also made by the National Police Agency and the Ministry of Justice, both of them being ministries with a hefty payroll as well. In the case of the FSA, it is not really my particular intention to make a case to represent an interest of the FSA, but the fact still remains that it is in charge of a very important field.  - 金融庁

第二十九条の二　特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 29-2 Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という。)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) , the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "patent bulletin" or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1) ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.  - 特許庁

３　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第三十一条の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る会社その他の者の財務書類の証明と同一の会計期間に係る当該会社その他の者の他の財務書類の証明について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、同条第一項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。例文帳に追加

(3) In the case where the Prime Minister must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 31-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph, if he/she must render one or more decisions on the attestation of financial documents of a company or any other person (hereinafter referred to as the "new decision" in this paragraph) pertaining to the same accounting period as the attestation of financial documents of said company or any other person concerning one or more decisions that have already been rendered pursuant to paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "existing decision" in this paragraph), the Prime Minister shall render, as the new decision, a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the amount resulting from deducting the amount set forth in item (ii) from the amount set forth in item (i) in accordance with the amounts calculated for the individual decisions on the facts pertaining to the respective new decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that the Prime Minister may not order payment of a surcharge under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph when the amount set forth in item (i) does not exceed the amount set forth in item (ii):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第三十四条の二十一の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る会社その他の者の財務書類の証明と同一の会計期間に係る当該会社その他の者の他の財務書類の証明について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、同条第一項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。例文帳に追加

(5) In the case where the Prime Minister must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 34-21-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph, if he/she must render one or more decisions on the attestation of financial documents of a company or any other person (hereinafter referred to as the "new decision" in this paragraph) pertaining to the same accounting period as the attestation of financial documents of said company or any other person concerning one or more decisions that have already been rendered pursuant to paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "existing decision" in this paragraph), the Prime Minister shall render, as the new decision, a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the amount resulting from deducting the amount set forth in item (ii) from the amount set forth in item (i) in accordance with the amounts calculated for the individual decisions on the facts pertaining to the respective new decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that the Prime Minister may not order payment of a surcharge under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph when the amount set forth in item (i) does not exceed the amount set forth in item (ii):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　都道府県知事は、第一項の許可又は第二項の許可（入所定員の増加に係るものに限る。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の申請があった場合において、当該申請に係る施設の所在地を含む区域（第百十八条第二項第一号の規定により当該都道府県が定める区域とする。）における介護老人保健施設の入所定員の総数が、同条第一項の規定により当該都道府県が定める都道府県介護保険事業支援計画において定めるその区域の介護老人保健施設の必要入所定員総数に既に達しているか、又は当該申請に係る施設の開設若しくは入所定員の増加によってこれを超えることになると認めるとき、その他の当該都道府県介護保険事業支援計画の達成に支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めるときは、第一項の許可又は第二項の許可を与えないことができる。例文帳に追加

(5) In a case when an approval as set forth in paragraph (1) and an approval as set forth in paragraph (2) (limited to those pertaining to increase of the maximum number of persons who may be admitted to the facility; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) is applied, the prefectural governor, when it is determined that total number of maximum number of persons who may be admitted to Long-Term Care Health Facility in the area (which means an area provided by said prefecture pursuant to the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (2), item (i)) including the location of facility pertaining to said application has already reached the total number of necessary number of persons who may be admitted to the Long-Term Care Health Facility in the area as prescribed by the Prefectural Insured Long-Term Care Support Project Plan provided by said prefecture pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, or will exceed said total number by establishment of the facility pertaining to said application or increase the maximum number of persons who may be admitted to the facility, or when it is determined that it is likely to cause problems with accomplishment of said Prefectural Insured Long-Term Care Support Project Plan, may not provide an approval as set forth in paragraph (1) or an approval as set forth in paragraph (2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第百五十七条第二項、第百五十八条第二項、第百六十条及び前条第一項並びに行政不服審査法第十四条第三項及び第四項、第十五条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第二十一条、第三十四条第一項、第二項及び第六項、第三十五条から第三十七条まで、第三十九条、第四十条第一項から第五項まで、第四十一条第一項、第四十二条、第四十三条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十五条の規定は、再審査の申請について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十四条第二項中「審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で」とあるのは「職権で」と、同法第四十二条第三項中「掲示し、かつ、その旨を官報その他の公報又は新聞紙に少なくとも一回掲載して」とあるのは「掲示して」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 157, paragraph (2) of Article 158, Article 160, and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article of this Act, and the provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) of Article 14, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 15, Article 21, paragraphs (1), (2), and (6) of Article 34, Articles 35 to 37 inclusive, Article 39, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive under Article 40, paragraph (1) of Article 41, Article 42, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 43, and Article 55 of the Administrative Appeal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the reclaim for review. In this case, the phrase "upon request of the applicant of the request for review or ex officio" in paragraph (2) of Article 34 under said Act shall be read as "ex officio" ; the phrase "by both posting the notice on a bulletin board and publishing in the official gazette or other official bulletin or in a newspaper at least once" in paragraph (3) of Article 42 under said Act shall be read as "by posting the notice on a bulletin board," and additional technicalities requiring alternative readings shall be provided for by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

二　国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が非関連者に対して当該棚卸資産を販売した対価の額（以下この号において「再販売価格」という。）から、当該再販売価格にイに掲げる金額のロに掲げる金額に対する割合（再販売者が当該棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この号において「比較対象取引」という。）と当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が当該棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合）を乗じて計算した金額に当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の販売のために要した販売費及び一般管理費の額を加算した金額を控除した金額をもつて当該国外関連取引の対価の額とする方法例文帳に追加

(ii) The method which uses, as the amount of consideration for a foreign affiliated transaction, the remaining amount of consideration gained by the purchasing side of inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction for having sold the said inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter such amount of consideration shall be referred to as the "resale price" in this item) after deducting the amount obtained by multiplying the said resale price by the ratio of the amount listed in (a) against the amount listed in (b) (where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a transaction in which a reseller has sold the same or similar inventory assets as the said inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this item) and a transaction in which the purchasing side of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction sold the inventory assets to a non-affiliated person, by the ratio after making a necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity) and then adding the selling expenses and general administrative expenses needed for the sale of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　再生計画認可の決定の確定時までに弁済期が到来する住宅資金貸付債権の元本（再生債務者が期限の利益を喪失しなかったとすれば弁済期が到来しないものを除く。）及びこれに対する再生計画認可の決定の確定後の住宅約定利息（住宅資金貸付契約において定められた約定利率による利息をいう。以下この条において同じ。）並びに再生計画認可の決定の確定時までに生ずる住宅資金貸付債権の利息及び不履行による損害賠償　その全額を、再生計画（住宅資金特別条項を除く。）で定める弁済期間（当該期間が五年を超える場合にあっては、再生計画認可の決定の確定から五年。第三項において「一般弁済期間」という。）内に支払うこと。例文帳に追加

i) Principal of a home loan claim that will become due by the time when an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding (excluding one that will not become due by that time if the rehabilitation debtor does not forfeit the benefit of time) and agreed interest on home loan (meaning an interest at an agreed interest rate under the home loan contract; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to be accrued from such principal after an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding, as well as interest on a home loan claim to be accrued and any damages for default to be incurred by the time when an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding: These claims shall be paid in full within the payment period specified in a rehabilitation plan (excluding special clauses on home loan) (or within five years after an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding if said period exceeds five years; referred to as the "general period for payment" in paragraph (3)  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ハ　当該個人が公務員等（国家公務員法（昭和二十二年法律第百二十号）第二条第一項に規定する国家公務員（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第二項に規定する特定独立行政法人及び日本郵政公社の役員及び職員を除く。）、独立行政法人等の役員及び職員、地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第二条に規定する地方公務員並びに地方独立行政法人の役員及び職員をいう。）である場合において、当該情報がその職務の遂行に係る情報であるときは、当該情報のうち、当該公務員等の職及び当該職務遂行の内容に係る部分例文帳に追加

(c) In the case that the said individual is a Public Officer, etc. (national public officers prescribed in Article 2, paragraph 1 of the National Public Officer Act [Act No. 120 of 1947] [excluding officers and employees of the specified incorporated administrative agencies prescribed in Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agency (Act No. 103 of 1999) and of the Japan Post], officers and employees of Incorporated Administrative Agencies, etc., local public officers prescribed in Article 2 of the Local Public Officer Act [Act No. 261 of 1950], and officers and employees of Local Incorporated Administrative Agencies) and when the said information is one pertaining to the performance of his or her duties, the portion of the said information pertaining to the job of the said Public Officer, etc. and the substance of the said performance of duties  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

受信機から送信機に対して、色空間ＬａｂでのＪＰＥＧ符号化情報の受信機能の有無、色空間Ｌａｂでのフルカラー情報の受信機能の有無、色空間Ｌａｂでの一画素情報の拡張ビット数の受信機能の有無、色空間Ｌａｂでのオプションサブサンプリングの受信機能の有無、色空間Ｌａｂでの非標準照射光の受信機能の有無、色空間Ｌａｂでの非標準ガミュート範囲の受信機能の有無、及び色空間ｓＹＣＣでの受信機能の有無を通知し、送信機において色空間ｓＹＣＣでの送信が選択された場合、ＪＰＥＧ符号化情報の受信機能、色空間Ｌａｂでのフルカラー情報の受信機能及び色空間ｓＹＣＣでの受信機能が有りであれば、送信機は、カード３０に記憶しているＪＰＥＧファイル情報をそのまま受信機に送信する。例文帳に追加

When the transmitter selects the transmission in the color space sYCC and the receiver has the reception function of JPEG coding information, the reception function of the full color information in the color space Lab and the reception function in the color space sYCC, the transmitter transmits JPEG file information stored in a card 30 to the receiver without any modification. - 特許庁

高速炉の１次冷却系入口部に取り付けられている１次冷却材温度計１０と、その計測サンプリング部１２と、１次冷却材温度計の温度応答を補正する１次遅れ補正部１４と、１次冷却材温度計の位置から配管及び高速炉下部プレナム部を冷却材が流れる時間を補正するむだ時間補正部１６と、現在の１次冷却材温度からむだ時間経過後の高速炉出力を予測計算する高速炉出力計算部１８と、予測計算した核出力を基準として設けた上下限閾値と、核計装２０の信号を計測サンプリング部２２で採取した核計装信号とを比較して前記閾値を超えたか否かを判定する比較処理部２４と、核計装信号が前記閾値を超えた場合に閾値超過を報知する表示部２６を有する。例文帳に追加

It also comprises a comparison processor 24 for comparing the upper and the lower threshold placed on the basis of the predicted nuclear output with a nuclear instrumentation signal sampled from the signal of a nuclear instrumentation with a measurement sampling part 22 to judge whether or not it exceeds the thresholds and a display 26 for notifying the excess of the threshold in the case that the nuclear instrumentation signal exceeds the threshold. - 特許庁

第二十一条　行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第十二条第四項の規定により同項に規定する特定管轄裁判所に開示決定等の取消しを求める訴訟又は開示決定等に係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定の取消しを求める訴訟（次項及び附則第二項において「情報公開訴訟」という。）が提起された場合においては、同法第十二条第五項の規定にかかわらず、他の裁判所に同一又は同種若しくは類似の行政文書に係る開示決定等又はこれに係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定に係る抗告訴訟（同法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟をいう。次項において同じ。）が係属しているときは、当該特定管轄裁判所は、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は同法第十二条第一項から第三項までに定める裁判所に移送することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 21 (1) In the case a lawsuit demanding the rescission of a Disclosure Decision, etc. or the rescission of a determination or decision regarding the objection to a Disclosure Decision, etc. (referred to as an "Information Disclosure Lawsuit" in the following paragraph and in paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions) is brought to the court of special jurisdiction prescribed in the provision of Article 12, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962), if, notwithstanding the provision of Article 12, paragraph 5 of the same Act, an appeal lawsuit ( which means an appeal lawsuit prescribed in Article3, paragraph 1 in the same Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph.) against a Disclosure Decision etc. regarding the same, the same type of or similar Administrative Documents or against a determination or decision regarding the objection against such a Disclosure Decision etc., is pending in another court, the said court of special jurisdiction may, when it finds it reasonable in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, the addresses of witnesses who shall be examined, characteristics common to the points at issue or the evidence, and other circumstances, may in response to a petition or on its own authority transfer the whole lawsuit or a part of it to the other court or a court prescribed Article 12, paragraphs 1 to 3 of the same Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者が保険契約の移転を行う場合においては、当該特定保険業者を少額短期保険業者とみなして、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第二編第七章第一節の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同条において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役）」とあるのは「役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」と、新保険業法第三百三十三条第一項中「発起人、設立時取締役、設立時執行役、設立時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役」とあるのは「発起人、役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(7) When the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business executes transfer of the insurance contract pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, such Specified Insurer shall be deemed as a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the provisions of Part II, Chapter VII, Section 1 of the New Insurance Business Act (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall be applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act. In this case, the term "Transferor Company and Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transferee Company," the terms "The directors (or in a company with Committees, executive officers)" and "two weeks before of the date of Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officers (including representative persons or administrators of an association or foundation that is not a juridical person)" and "the date of preparation of the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "Transfer Agreement" in this Section)," respectively; the term "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transfer Agreement and other," the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Affected Policyholders," the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of the creation of Transfer Agreement," the term "the incorporator, the director at the incorporation, the executive officer at the incorporation, the company auditor at the incorporation, the director, the executive officer, the accounting advisor or the member who is supposed to carry out such duties and the company auditor" in Article 333, paragraph (1) in the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officer"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十八条の十　前条第一項の規定により商標登録出願とみなされた領域指定（以下この章において「国際商標登録出願」という。）に係る登録商標（以下この条において「国際登録に基づく登録商標」という。）がその商標登録前の登録商標（国際登録に基づく登録商標を除く。以下この条において「国内登録に基づく登録商標」という。）と同一であり、かつ、国際登録に基づく登録商標に係る指定商品又は指定役務が国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る指定商品又は指定役務と重複している場合であつて、国際登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標権者と国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標権者が同一であるときは、国際商標登録出願はその重複している範囲については、国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標登録出願の日にされていたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 68-10 (1) Where a registered trademark (hereinafter in this article referred to as a "registered trademark based on international registration") pertaining to the request for territorial extension which is deemed to have been an application for trademark registration pursuant to Article 68-9(1) (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as an "international application for trademark registration") is identical with the registered trademark prior to the trademark registration (except registered trademarks based on international registration, hereinafter referred to in this article as a "registered trademark based on national registration") and the designated goods or designated services pertaining to the registered trademark based on international registration overlap with the designated goods or designated services based on national registration, and further the holder of trademark right of the registered trademark based on international registration is identical with the holder of trademark right of the registered trademark based on national registration, the international application for trademark registration shall be deemed to have been filed on the date of filing of the application for trademark registration pertaining to the registered trademark based on national registration to the extent of the scope which is overlapping.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

パネルは2000年７月31日に報告書を発出し、①セーフガード協定第４条２項に列挙されている要素の他、当事者から提出された事項についても検討しなければならない、②輸入が単独でも重大な損害を引き起こしたという関係にあることが必要である、③自由貿易協定などを理由として措置対象から除外する場合、それ以外の国からの輸入のみで重大な損害が発生したことを明らかにしなければならない、④発動前に所定の通報を行わなければならない等を理由として、本件セーフガード措置はGATT 第19条並びにセーフガード協定に違反している、と判断した。例文帳に追加

The Panel issued its report on July 31, 2000, finding: (a) members imposing safeguards must consider factors raised by interested parties in addition to the factors listed in Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards; (b) there must be causal link in which imports on their own have caused serious injury; (c) when imports from specific countries are excepted from the measures because they are members of free trade agreements, the authority must determine whether increased imports from other countries have caused serious injury to the domestic industry; and (d) members imposing safeguard measures must make required notifications before the safeguard takes effect. The Panel therefore found that the US safeguard measures were inconsistent with Article XIX of the GATT and the Agreement on Safeguards. - 経済産業省

第三条の二　実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業に関しては、当該派遣先の事業を行う者を当該派遣中の労働者を使用する事業者と、当該派遣中の労働者を当該派遣先の事業を行う者に使用される労働者とみなして、労働安全衛生法第十一条、第十四条から第十五条の三まで、第十七条、第二十条から第二十七条まで、第二十八条の二から第三十条の三まで、第三十一条の三、第三十六条（同法第三十条第一項及び第四項、第三十条の二第一項及び第四項並びに第三十条の三第一項及び第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。）、第四十五条（第二項を除く。）、第五十七条の三から第五十七条の五まで、第五十九条第三項、第六十条、第六十一条第一項、第六十五条から第六十五条の四まで、第六十六条第二項前段及び後段（派遣先の事業を行う者が同項後段の政令で定める業務に従事させたことのある労働者（派遣中の労働者を含む。）に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第三項、第四項（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段並びに第三項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）並びに第五項（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項並びに第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第六十六条の三（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項、第四項並びに第五項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第六十六条の四、第六十八条、第七十一条の二、第九章第一節並びに第八十八条から第八十九条の二までの規定並びに当該規定に基づく命令の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第二十九条第一項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律若しくはこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）又は同条第十項の規定若しくは同項の規定に基づく命令の規定」と、同条第二項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律若しくはこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）又は同条第十項の規定若しくは同項の規定に基づく命令の規定」と、同法第三十条第一項第五号及び第八十八条第七項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）」と、同法第六十六条の四中「第六十六条第一項から第四項まで若しくは第五項ただし書又は第六十六条の二」とあるのは「第六十六条第二項前段若しくは後段（派遣先の事業を行う者が同項後段の政令で定める業務に従事させたことのある労働者（労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者を含む。）に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第三項、第四項（第六十六条第二項前段及び後段並びに第三項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）又は第五項ただし書（第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項並びに第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(3) With regard to a client undertaking to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, the provisions of Article 11, Articles 14 to 15-3 inclusive, Article 17, Articles 20 to 27 inclusive, Articles 28-2 to 30-3 inclusive, Article 31-3, Article 36 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30, paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30-2, and paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30-3), Article 45 (excluding paragraph (2)), Articles 57-3 to 57-5 inclusive, paragraph (3) of Article 59, Article 60, paragraph (1) of Article 61, Articles 65 to 65-4 inclusive, the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to workers whom a person carrying out a client undertaking has caused to be engaged in work specified by a Cabinet Order referred to in the second sentence of the same paragraph (including workers under dispatching); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), paragraph (3) of Article 66, paragraph (4) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraph (3) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and paragraph (5) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraphs (3) and (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), Article 66-3 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), Article 66-4, Article 68, Article 71-2, Section 1 of Chapter 9, Articles 88 to 89-2 inclusive of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and the provisions of orders based on the provisions concerned (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply, by deeming the person carrying out said client undertaking to be a business operator employing the workers under dispatching, and by deeming the workers under dispatching concerned to be workers employed by the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned. In this case, the term "the provisions of this Act or Order issued thereunder" in paragraph (1) of Article 29 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders issued based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act)"), or the provisions of paragraph (10) of the same Article or orders based on the provisions of the same paragraph"; the term "the provisions of this Act or Order issued thereunder" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders issued based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act), or the provisions of paragraph (10) of the same Article or orders based on the provisions of the same paragraph"; the term "this Act and the provisions of ordinances based thereon" in item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and in paragraph (7) of Article 88 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act)"; and the term "paragraph (1) through (4) of Article 66, proviso in paragraph (5) or Article 66-2" in Article 66-4 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first sentence or the second sentence of paragraph (2) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to workers whom a person carrying out a client undertaking has caused to be engaged in the work specified by a Cabinet Order referred to in the second sentence of the same paragraph (including workers under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), paragraph (3) of Article 66, paragraph (4) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 66; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or the proviso to paragraph (5) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of Article 66)".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十条の九　新設合併（法第百四十一条の新設合併をいう。以下第六十条の十一までにおいて同じ。）により新設合併設立会員商品取引所が承継する財産（以下「新設合併対象財産」という。）（新設合併取得会員商品取引所（新設合併消滅会員商品取引所のうち、一の会員商品取引所の有する財産に付された新設合併直前の帳簿価額を当該財産に付すべき新設合併設立会員商品取引所における帳簿価額とすべき場合における当該一の会員商品取引所をいう。以下同じ。）の財産を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の全部の取得原価を新設合併対価（新設合併に際して新設合併設立会員商品取引所が新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する財産をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の時価その他当該新設合併対象財産の時価を適切に算定する方法をもって測定することとすべき場合において、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、当該各号に定める額とする。ただし、新設合併契約により次項の規定によるものと定めたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 60-9 (1) In the case where the acquisition costs of the entire property that a Member Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger acquired by succession as the result of a Consolidation-Type Merger (which refers to a Consolidation-Type Merger prescribed in Article 141 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter until Article 60-11) (hereinafter referred to as the "Property subject to a Consolidation-Type Merger") (excluding the property of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through a Consolidation-Type Merger [which means a single Member Commodity Exchange in the case where the book value immediately prior to a Consolidation-Type Merger for the property held by such single Member Commodity Exchange should be used as the book value of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger for said property; the same shall apply hereinafter]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the acquisition costs of such property are to be measured by a method calculating the current market value of the Consideration of the Consolidation-Type Merger (which means property delivered to Members of a Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger by the Member Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger at the time of the Consolidation-Type Merger; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and other current market values of said Property subject to a Consolidation-Type Merger, the amounts set forth in the following items for the Member Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger shall be the amounts set forth in said respective items; provided, however, that this shall not apply if it is determined that such amounts are to be prescribed pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph by the Consolidation-Type Merger contract:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十二条の二　第二十条の規定は、労働者の募集について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者の募集を行う者（厚生労働省令で定める者を除く。次項において同じ。）及び募集受託者（第三十九条に規定する募集受託者をいう。同項において同じ。）」と、「事業所に、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「事業所における就業を内容とする労働者の募集をしてはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「労働者を無制限に募集する」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を労働者の募集を行う者及び募集受託者に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた労働者の募集を行う者又は募集受託者は、当該事業所における就業を内容とする労働者の募集をしてはならない」と、同項ただし書中「紹介する」とあるのは「募集する」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 42-2 The provisions of Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to labor recruitment. In this case, in paragraph 1 of said Article, the phrase "Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who conducts labor recruitment (excluding a person provided by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) and a commissioned recruiter (which means a commissioned recruiter provided in Article 39; the same shall apply in said paragraph)" and the phrase "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not conduct labor recruitment for work at a place of business," ; in paragraph 2 of said Article, the phrase "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited recruitment of workers" and the phrase "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall report to persons who conduct labor recruitment and commissioned recruiters to such effect, and persons who conduct labor recruitment and commissioned recruiters who receive said report shall not conduct labor recruitment for work at said place of business," and the term "introduction" in the proviso to said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "recruitment."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第三十条第二項から第四項まで、第三十一条、第三十二条、第三十二条の四、第三十二条の五、第三十二条の六第二項、第三項及び第五項、第三十二条の七から第三十二条の十まで並びに第三十二条の十二から第三十二条の十六までの規定は、第一項の許可を受けて行う無料の職業紹介事業及び同項の許可を受けた者について準用する。この場合において、第三十条第二項中「前項の許可」とあり、第三十一条中「前条第一項の許可」とあり、並びに第三十二条、第三十二条の四第一項、第三十二条の五、第三十二条の六第五項、第三十二条の八第二項及び第三十二条の九第一項中「第三十条第一項の許可」とあるのは「第三十三条第一項の許可」と、第三十二条の六第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第三十三条第三項」と、第三十二条の十三中「手数料に関する事項、苦情」とあるのは「苦情」と、第三十二条の十六第二項中「、職業紹介に関する手数料の額その他」とあるのは「その他」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 30, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive, Article 31, Article 32, Article 32-4, Article 32-5, Article 32-6, paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 5, Articles 32-7 to 32-10 inclusive, and Articles 32-12 to 32-16 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the free employment placement business conducted under the license provided for in paragraph 1 and the person who obtained said license. In this case, the phrase "the license set forth in the preceding paragraph" in Article 30, paragraph 2, the phrase "the license provided for in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article" in Article 31, and the phrase "the license provided for in Article 30, paragraph 1" in Article 32, Article 32-4, paragraph 1, Article 32-5, Article 32-6, paragraph 5, Article 32-8, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the license provided for in Article 33, paragraph 1," the phrase "preceding paragraph" in Article 32-6, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, paragraph 3," the phrase "matters concerning fees, matters concerning complaints" in Article 32-13 shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters concerning complaints," the phrase "the amount of fees concerning employment placement, and other matters" in Article 32-16, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム