「保険の」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(135ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

４　第一項又は第二項の規定により支払方法変更の記載を受けた要介護被保険者等が、当該支払方法の変更の記載がなされている間に受けた指定居宅サービス、指定地域密着型サービス、指定居宅介護支援、指定施設サービス等、指定介護予防サービス、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス及び指定介護予防支援に係る居宅介護サービス費の支給、地域密着型介護サービス費の支給、居宅介護サービス計画費の支給、施設介護サービス費の支給、特定入所者介護サービス費の支給、介護予防サービス費の支給、地域密着型介護予防サービス費の支給、介護予防サービス計画費の支給及び特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給については、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定は適用しない。例文帳に追加

(4) With regard to the payment of an Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service Plan, Allowance for Long-Term Care Facility Service, Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan, and Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, pertaining to a Designated In-Home Service, Designated Community-Based Service, Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support, Designated Facility Service, etc., Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, and Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care that an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., who received an Entry of Change of Payment Method pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), receives during the period said Entry of Change of Payment Method remains on the Certificate of Insured Person, the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

そしてまた、責任についてはどうかということでございますが、預金の保護（定額保護）と責任追及とは基本的には関係のないことでございますが、しかし、私が先週も申し上げましたように、これは竹中平蔵さんのときに、金融庁の顧問に木村剛さんがなられて、やめた後、日本振興銀行の設立のお願い書を出して、そして、竹中平蔵さんのときに銀行の設立が、これはもうよくご存じのように、銀行業というのは免許業で、（金融業は）公共性の強いものでございますから、国家としても大変重たいものであり、健全な企業、あるいは健全な経営・経済のためには、非常に健全で強力な金融業が必要であるということは、もう皆さんよくお分かりでございます。（金融業は）免許業でございまして、重たいものでございますから、そういった意味でも、私はこういったことが６年半ぐらいで破綻をしたということは大変遺憾なことだと、残念なことだと思っていますが、私がこの前申しましたように、今預金保険機構が全部経営権を握っているわけでございますから、法に沿って刑事上の責任、あるいは民事上の責任をきちっと追及していこうと思っております。例文帳に追加

As for responsibility, protection of deposits (fixed-amount protection) and assignment of responsibility are basically unrelated. Nevertheless, as I stated last week, Mr. Kimura became a consultant to FSA when Mr. Takenaka served as Minister for Financial Services and filed an application form for the Incubator Bank of Japan after he resigned from the post and established the Bank while Mr. Takenaka was in office. Given that banking businesses are licensed businesses, and financial businesses are highly public in nature, this is an extremely serious matter as a nation. Sound and robust financial businesses are necessary for sound companies as well as for sound management and economy. As financial businesses are licensed businesses that are not to be taken lightly, it is extremely regrettable that it failed in about six and a half years. As I stated before, now that the DICJ has full control of the Bank, we intend to pursue its criminal and/or civil liability in an appropriate manner according to law.  - 金融庁

イ　学校教育法（昭和二十二年法律第二十六号）による大学（旧大学令（大正七年勅令第三百八十八号）による大学を含む。以下同じ。）又は高等専門学校（旧専門学校令（明治三十六年勅令第六十一号）による専門学校を含む。以下同じ。）における理科系統の正規の課程（職業能力開発促進法（昭和四十四年法律第六十四号）による職業能力開発総合大学校（職業能力開発促進法及び雇用促進事業団法の一部を改正する法律（平成九年法律第四十五号）による改正前の職業能力開発促進法による職業能力開発大学校及び職業能力開発促進法の一部を改正する法律（平成四年法律第六十七号）による改正前の職業能力開発促進法による職業訓練大学校を含む。）における長期課程（職業訓練法施行規則及び雇用保険法施行規則の一部を改正する省令（昭和六十年労働省令第二十三号）による改正前の職業訓練法施行規則の規定による長期指導員訓練課程を含む。）を含む。以下同じ。）を修めて卒業した者で、その後二年以上産業安全の実務に従事した経験を有するもの例文帳に追加

(a) A person who has completed and graduated from the regular course of science line of a university or a technical college accredited under the School Education Act (Act No. 26 of 1947) (including the long term course of the Human Resource Development and Promotion University accredited under the Human Resource Development and Promotion Act (Act No. 64 of 1969), the same shall apply hereinafter) and has business experiences having engaged in the industrial safety service for two years or longer thereafter.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

本ビジョン及び「革新的医薬品・医療機器創出のための５か年戦略」を強力に推進するため、厚生労働行政において、医薬品・医療機器の研究開発・実用化の促進や産業の国際競争力強化に係る体制を強化することとする。（2008 年度～） 医薬品産業が取り扱う医薬品は、国民の生命・健康に重大な影響を与え、医療保険財政との関わりも強いことから、一般の産業にもまして、高い倫理性、信頼性及び透明性が必要である。また、昨今、医薬品及び医薬品産業に対する国民の意識の変化が見られ、成長産業として政府の期待感が示されるなど、これまでになく医薬品産業に注目が集まっており、より一層の公正な企業行動、開かれた企業体質、企業倫理の遵守など、国民の信頼を裏切らないように努めることが求められている。行政としても、国民に世界最高水準の医薬品が迅速に提供されるよう、医薬品産業を支援するとともに、国民の視点に立った施策を進めていくことが必要である。例文帳に追加

To push ahead with this Vision and the 'Five-Year Strategy for the Creation of Innovative Drugs and Medical Devices' the Health, Labour and Welfare administration shall consolidate the framework for promoting drug and medical device research and commercialization and for enhancing the global competitiveness of the industry. (Fiscal 2008 ~ )ConclusionSince the drugs supplied by the drug industry have a major impact on the life and health of the nation and also have a bearing on medical insurance finances, an even higher level of ethics, reliability and transparency is called for from this industry than from industries in general. Further, the drug industry is now attracting unprecedented attention, as evidenced last year by the changes in the national perception of drugs and the industry and the expectations placed on it by the government as a growth industry. Greater political correctness in corporate behaviour, an open business structure, compliance with the code of practices and other efforts to maintain the trust of the public are called for. The government should also support the drug industry and implement public-focused policies to ensure the prompt delivery of world-leading drugs to the nation. - 厚生労働省

３　市町村は、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者、第四十六条第一項に規定する指定居宅介護支援事業者、介護保険施設、第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス事業者、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者又は第五十八条第一項に規定する指定介護予防支援事業者（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス事業者等」という。）が、偽りその他不正の行為により第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項又は第六十一条の二第四項の規定による支払を受けたときは、当該指定居宅サービス事業者等に対し、その支払った額につき返還させるほか、その返還させる額に百分の四十を乗じて得た額を支払わせることができる。例文帳に追加

(3) When a Designated In-Home Service Provider as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act; a Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1); a Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Provider as prescribed in Article 46, paragraph (1); a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance; a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1); a Designated Provider of Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1); or a Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (1) (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Designated In-Home Service Provider, etc." in this paragraph) receives a payment pursuant to the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), or Article 61-2, paragraph (4) by deception or other wrongful act, a Municipality may require said Designated In-Home Service Provider, etc., to return the amount paid, or to pay the amount obtained by multiplying 40 percent of the principal amount to be returned.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　地域密着型介護老人福祉施設（介護保険法第八条第二十項に規定する地域密着型介護老人福祉施設をいう。以下同じ。）、介護老人福祉施設又は介護老人保健施設（同条第二十五項に規定する介護老人保健施設をいう。以下同じ。）であつて第五十四条の二第一項の規定により指定を受けたもの（同条第二項の規定により同条第一項の指定を受けたものとみなされた地域密着型介護老人福祉施設及び介護老人福祉施設を含む。）において施設介護を受ける被保護者に対して生活扶助を行う場合の保護金品を前項に規定する者に交付することが適当でないときその他保護の目的を達するために必要があるときは、同項の規定にかかわらず、当該地域密着型介護老人福祉施設若しくは介護老人福祉施設の長又は当該介護老人保健施設の管理者に対して交付することができる。例文帳に追加

(4) In the case of providing livelihood assistance to a public assistance recipient who receives facility care services at a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly (which means a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (20) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly, or a long-term care health facility for the elderly (which means a long-term care health facility for the elderly prescribed in paragraph (25) of the same Article; the same shall apply hereinafter) that has been designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 54-2, paragraph (1) (including a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly or a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly that is deemed to have received the designation under paragraph (1) of the same Article pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the same Article), if it is not appropriate to deliver the public assistance benefit to a person prescribed in the preceding paragraph or if it is necessary for achieving the purpose of public assistance, the public assistance benefit may be delivered to the head of said community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly or long-term care welfare facility for the elderly, or to the manager of said long-term care health facility for the elderly, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十一条　会社法第七百七十七条（新株予約権買取請求）、第七百七十八条（新株予約権の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、組織変更をする株式会社が新株予約権を発行している場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第七百七十八条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「組織変更後持分会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社（保険業法第六十九条第四項第一号に規定する組織変更後相互会社をいう。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 71 The provisions of Article 777 (Demand for Purchase of Share Options), Article 778 (Determination on Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where the converting Stock Company has issued share options. In this case, the term "converted membership company" in Article 778, paragraph (1), Article 778, paragraph (2), and Article 778, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company (referring to a Converted Mutual Company as defined in Article 69, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二条　この法律の施行前に終了した営業年度について作成すべき監査報告書の記載事項に関しては、なお従前の例による。農林中央金庫、農業協同組合及び農業協同組合連合会、漁業協同組合、漁業協同組合連合会、水産加工業協同組合及び水産加工業協同組合連合会、信用協同組合及び信用協同組合連合会（中小企業等協同組合法（昭和二十四年法律第百八十一号）第九条の九第一項第一号の事業を行う協同組合連合会をいう。次条において同じ。）、信用金庫及び信用金庫連合会、労働金庫及び労働金庫連合会並びに相互会社（保険業法第二条第五項に規定する相互会社をいう。次条において同じ。）についての、この法律の施行前に終了した事業年度について作成すべき監査報告書の記載事項に関しても、同様とする。例文帳に追加

Article 2 With regard to matters described in audit reports to be prepared for the financial years that ended prior to the enforcement of this Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. The same shall apply to matters described in audit reports to be prepared for the business years that ended prior to the enforcement of this Act with regard to the Norinchukin Bank, Agricultural Cooperative Associations and Federations of Agricultural Cooperatives, Fisheries Cooperative Associations, Federations of Fisheries Cooperatives, Fish Processors' Cooperative Associations and Federations of Fish Processors' Cooperatives, Credit Cooperatives and Federations of Credit Cooperatives (referring to federations of cooperatives that carry on the business set forth in Article 9-9, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Act on the Cooperative Associations of Small and Medium Enterprises, etc. (Act No. 181 of 1949); the same shall apply in the following Article), Shinkin Banks and Federations of Shinkin Banks, Labor Banks and Federations of Labor Banks, and Mutual Companies (referring to Mutual Companies as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following Article).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七条　第百二十三条から第百二十五条までの規定は、外国保険会社等について準用する。この場合において、第百二十三条第一項中「第四条第二項第二号から第四号まで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第二号から第四号まで」と、第百二十四条第一号中「第四条第二項第二号及び第三号」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第二号及び第三号」と、「第五条第一項第三号イからホまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第三号イからホまで」と、同条第二号中「第四条第二項第四号」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第四号」と、「第五条第一項第四号イからハまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第四号イからハまで」と、第百二十五条中「第五条第一項第三号イからホまで又は第四号イからハまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第三号イからホまで又は第四号イからハまで」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 207 The provisions in Article 123 to 125 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), items (ii) to (iv) inclusive" in Article 123, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), items (ii) to (iv) inclusive," the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), items (ii) and (iii)" in Article 124, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), items (ii) and (iii)," the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive" in Article 124, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)," the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iv)" in the same Article, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), item (iv)," the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive" in the same Article, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)," and the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive or item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive" in Article 125 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive or item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　第一項第五号に規定する介護予防とは、介護保険法第八条の二第二項に規定する介護予防訪問介護、同条第三項に規定する介護予防訪問入浴介護、同条第四項に規定する介護予防訪問看護、同条第五項に規定する介護予防訪問リハビリテーション、同条第六項に規定する介護予防居宅療養管理指導、同条第七項に規定する介護予防通所介護、同条第八項に規定する介護予防通所リハビリテーション、同条第九項に規定する介護予防短期入所生活介護、同条第十項に規定する介護予防短期入所療養介護、同条第十一項に規定する介護予防特定施設入居者生活介護、同条第十二項に規定する介護予防福祉用具貸与、同条第十五項に規定する介護予防認知症対応型通所介護、同条第十六項に規定する介護予防小規模多機能型居宅介護及び同条第十七項に規定する介護予防認知症対応型共同生活介護並びにこれらに相当するサービスをいう。例文帳に追加

(5) Care prevention services prescribed in paragraph (1), item (v) means home-visit care services for care prevention prescribed in Article 8-2, paragraph (2) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act, home-visit bathing services for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (3) of the same Article, home-visit nursing for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, home-visit rehabilitation for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (5) of the same Article, in-home medical care management counseling for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (6) of the same Article, day care services for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (7) of the same Article, day rehabilitation for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (8) of the same Article, short-stay care services for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (9) of the same Article, short-stay medical care for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (10) of the same Article, care services for care prevention provided in specified facilities prescribed in paragraph (11) of the same Article, lending of welfare equipment for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (12) of the same Article, day care services for the elderly with dementia for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (15) of the same Article, small-scale and multifunctional in-home care services for care prevention prescribed in paragraph (16) of the same Article, and care services for care prevention provided in group homes for the elderly with dementia prescribed in paragraph (17) of the same Article, and any services equivalent thereto.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　前項第一号に規定する居宅介護とは、介護保険法第八条第二項に規定する訪問介護、同条第三項に規定する訪問入浴介護、同条第四項に規定する訪問看護、同条第五項に規定する訪問リハビリテーション、同条第六項に規定する居宅療養管理指導、同条第七項に規定する通所介護、同条第八項に規定する通所リハビリテーション、同条第九項に規定する短期入所生活介護、同条第十項に規定する短期入所療養介護、同条第十一項に規定する特定施設入居者生活介護、同条第十二項に規定する福祉用具貸与、同条第十五項に規定する夜間対応型訪問介護、同条第十六項に規定する認知症対応型通所介護、同条第十七項に規定する小規模多機能型居宅介護、同条第十八項に規定する認知症対応型共同生活介護及び同条第十九項に規定する地域密着型特定施設入居者生活介護並びにこれらに相当するサービスをいう。例文帳に追加

(2) In-home care services prescribed in item (i) of the preceding paragraph means home-visit care services prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (2) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act, home-visit bathing services prescribed in paragraph (3) of the same Article, home-visit nursing prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, home-visit rehabilitation prescribed in paragraph (5) of the same Article, in-home medical care management counseling prescribed in paragraph (6) of the same Article, day care services prescribed in paragraph (7) of the same Article, day rehabilitation prescribed in paragraph (8) of the same Article, short-stay care services prescribed in paragraph (9) of the same Article, short-stay medical care prescribed in paragraph (10) of the same Article, care services provided in specified facilities prescribed in paragraph (11) of the same Article, lending of welfare equipment prescribed in paragraph (12) of the same Article, nighttime home-visit care services prescribed in paragraph (15) of the same Article, day care services for the elderly with dementia prescribed in paragraph (16) of the same Article, small-scale and multifunctional in-home care services prescribed in paragraph (17) of the same Article, care services provided in group homes for the elderly with dementia prescribed in paragraph (18) of the same Article, and care services provided in community-based specified facilities prescribed in paragraph (19) of the same Article, and any services equivalent thereto.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十八条　政府は、当分の間、障害補償年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害補償年金の額（当該障害補償年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害補償年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害補償年金に係る障害補償年金前払一時金の額（当該障害補償年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が次の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害補償年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害補償年金差額一時金を支給する。例文帳に追加

Article 58 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability compensation pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability compensation pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability compensation pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing the day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing said day on which the person died falls on any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability compensation pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under the provision of said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the following table corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability compensation pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability compensation pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance as insurance benefits to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十一条　政府は、当分の間、障害年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害年金の額（当該障害年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害年金に係る障害年金前払一時金の額（当該障害年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が第五十八条第一項の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害年金差額一時金を支給する。例文帳に追加

Article 61 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing the day on which the person died falls in any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the table in Article 58, paragraph (1) corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year containing the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance, as insurance benefits, to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　前項の規定により第一項の指定を受けたものとみなされた地域密着型介護老人福祉施設に係る同項の指定は、当該地域密着型介護老人福祉施設について、介護保険法第七十八条の七の規定による同法第四十二条の二第一項本文の指定の辞退があつたとき、同法第七十八条の九の規定による同法第四十二条の二第一項本文の指定の取消しがあつたとき、又は同法第七十八条の十一において準用する同法第七十条の二第一項の規定により同法第四十二条の二第一項本文の指定の効力が失われたときは、その効力を失い、前項の規定により第一項の指定を受けたものとみなされた介護老人福祉施設に係る同項の指定は、当該介護老人福祉施設について、同法第九十一条の規定による同法第四十八条第一項第一号の指定の辞退があつたとき、同法第九十二条第一項若しくは第百十五条の二十九第六項の規定による同法第四十八条第一項第一号の指定の取消しがあつたとき、又は同法第八十六条の二第一項の規定により同法第四十八条第一項第一号の指定の効力が失われたときは、その効力を失う。例文帳に追加

(3) A designation under paragraph (1) pertaining to a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly that has been deemed to have received the designation under the same paragraph pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall lose its effect with regard to said community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly when a designation under the main clause of Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act has been declined pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-7 of the same Act, when a designation under the main clause of Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-9 of the same Act, or when the effect of a designation under the main clause of Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act has been lost pursuant to the provisions of Article 70-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 78-11 of the same Act, and a designation under paragraph (1) pertaining to a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly that has been deemed to have received the designation under the same paragraph pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall lose its effect with regard to said long-term care welfare facility for the elderly when a designation under Article 48, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act has been declined pursuant to the provisions of Article 91 of the same Act, when a designation under Article 48, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 92, paragraph (1) or Article 115-29, paragraph (6) of the same Act, or when the effect of a designation under Article 48, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act has been lost pursuant to the provisions of Article 86-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.  - 金融庁

６　会社法第二編第四章第十節第三款（委員会の運営）の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の二十一　会社法第二編第四章第八節第二款（運営）の規定は相互会社の監査役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百九十四条第二項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十四条第二項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第三項中「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第四項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-21 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 8, Subsection 2 (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of company auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 394, paragraph (2) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 394, paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 394, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)"; the term "and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 394, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 394, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七条　第二条の規定による改正後の児童福祉法（以下「新児童福祉法」という。）第七十二条第六項から第九項まで及び第十一項の規定は、国がこの法律の施行前に貸し付けた第二条の規定による改正前の児童福祉法第七十二条第一項及び第二項の貸付金についても、適用する。この場合において、新児童福祉法第七十二条第六項中「前各項」とあるのは「国の補助金等の整理及び合理化等に伴う国民健康保険法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十七年法律第二十五号）第二条の規定による改正前の児童福祉法（以下「旧児童福祉法」という。）第七十二条第一項及び第二項」と、同条第七項中「第一項から第五項まで」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第七十二条第一項及び第二項」と、同条第八項中「第一項」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第七十二条第一項」と、「第五十二条」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第五十二条」と、同条第九項中「第二項」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第七十二条第二項」と、「第五十六条の二第三項」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第五十六条の二第三項」と、同条第十一項中「第一項から第五項まで」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第七十二条第一項及び第二項」と、「前三項」とあるのは「旧児童福祉法第七十二条第八項及び第九項」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 7 The provisions of paragraphs (6) to (9) inclusive and Article 72 paragraph (11) of the Child Welfare Act revised pursuant to the provision of Article 2 of this Act (hereinafter referred to as "Revised Child Welfare Act") shall also apply to such loans set forth in Article 72 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Child Welfare Act prior to the revision pursuant to the provision of Article 2 of this Act that were, or will be, provided by the national government before the coming into force of this Act. In this case, the phrase "any of the preceding paragraphs" referred to in Article 72 paragraph (6) of the Revised Child Welfare Act shall be replaced with "Article 72 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Child Welfare Act prior to the revision pursuant to the provision of Article 2 of the Act for Partial Revision of the National Health Insurance Act, etc. based on Arrangement and Rationalization, etc. of the National Government Subsidies, etc. (Act No. 25 of 2005) (hereinafter referred to as "Old Child Welfare Act")", the phrase "paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive" referred to in paragraph (7) of the same Article shall be replaced with "Article 72 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Old Child Welfare Act", the phrases "paragraph (1)" and "Article 52" referred to in paragraph (8) of the same Article shall be replaced with "Article 72 paragraph (1) of the Old Child Welfare Act" and "Article 52 of the Old Child Welfare Act" respectively, the phrases "paragraph (2)" and "Article 56-2 paragraph (3)" referred to in paragraph (9) of the same Article shall be replaced with "Article 72 paragraph (2) of the Old Child Welfare Act" and "Article 56-2 paragraph (3) of the Old Child Welfare Act" respectively, the phrases "paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive" and "the preceding three paragraphs" referred to in paragraph (11) of the same Article shall be replaced with "Article 72 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Old Child Welfare Act" and "Article 72 paragraphs (8) and (9) of the Old Child Welfare Act" respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　第九条（商法第七条の改正規定に限る。）、第二十五条（投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律第二百五十一条第二十四号の改正規定に限る。）、第三十七条（金融機関の合併及び転換に関する法律第七十六条第七号の改正規定に限る。）、第四十九条（保険業法第十七条の六第一項第七号、第五十三条の十二第八項、第五十三条の十五、第五十三条の二十五第二項、第五十三条の二十七第三項、第五十三条の三十二、第百八十条の五第三項及び第四項並びに第百八十条の九第五項の改正規定に限る。）、第五十五条（資産の流動化に関する法律第七十六条第六項、第八十五条、第百六十八条第五項、第百七十一条第六項及び第三百十六条第一項第二十三号の改正規定に限る。）、第五十九条、第七十五条及び第七十七条（会社法目次の改正規定、同法第百三十二条に二項を加える改正規定、同法第二編第二章第三節中第百五十四条の次に一款を加える改正規定、同法第二編第三章第四節中第二百七十二条の次に一款を加える改正規定、同法第六百九十五条の次に一条を加える改正規定及び同法第九百四十三条第一号の改正規定を除く。）の規定　公布の日例文帳に追加

(i) Provisions of Article 9 (limited to the revised provision in Article 7 of the Commercial Code, Article 25 (limited to the revised provision in Article 251, item (xxiv) of Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations), Article 37 (limited to the revised provision in Article 76, item (vii) of Act on Financial Institutions' Merger and Conversion), Article 49 (limited to the revised provisions in Article 17-6, paragraph (1), item (vii), Article 53-12, paragraph (8), Article 53-15, Article 53-25, paragraph (2), Article 53-27, paragraph (3), Article 53-32, Article 180-5, paragraphs (3) and (4) as well as Article 180-9, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act), Article 55 (limited to the revised provisions in Article 76, paragraph (6), Article 85, Article 168, paragraph (5), Article 171, paragraph (6) and Article 316, paragraph (1), item (xxiii) of the Act on Liquidation of Assets), Article 59, Article 75 and Article 77 (excluding the provision which revises the table of contents in the Companies Act, the provision which adds two items in Article 132 of the same Act, the provision which adds Subsection 1 after Article 154 in the Part II Chapter II Section 3 in the same Act, the provision which adds after the Article 272 in Part II Chapter III Section 4 of the same Act, the provision which adds Article 1 after the Article 695 of the same Act and the revised provision in Article 943, item (i) of the same Act: the day of promulgation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

新しく日本損害保険協会の会長になられたということでございますが、当然、損保でございますからそれ相応の社会的役割があるわけでございますし、そういったことでやはり金融庁としても密接に連絡をとりながら、それぞれの損保各企業の業界の会長でございますから、それぞれこういった厳しい経済環境の中であるし、また国際的にも非常に2年前のリーマンショック以来、国際的な金融市場というのはなかなか一筋縄でいかないところがございまして、国内にも失業率5.2％、雇用調整助成金をもらっている人が100万人という厳しい雇用情勢があるし、一方、少し景気回復の足腰が少し整ってきたよという雰囲気もありますけれども、まだまだ一進一退でございますし、しかしご存じのようにギリシャショックなどが起きまして、G7あるいはG20で国際的な協調政策、その中でまた各国のそれぞれの経済のあり方というのはそれぞれの国によって当然違うわけでございますから、そういったことをG20の中でも共通の、特に金融でございますから国際性が非常に強い分野でもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながらきちっと損保会社を損保協会の会長さんとしてきちっと与えられた使命に責任を果たしていっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

He became the new chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan – well, being a non-life insurer naturally comes with the corresponding social role and, for that reason, the FSA is also eager to maintain close mutual contact. In the non-life insurance industry, participating businesses (non-life insurers) are all experiencing the severe economic conditions that have hit Japan. On an international front, the global financial market has also posed difficulties since the Lehman crisis two years ago. Domestically, we are also faced with grim employment conditions reflected in the fact that the unemployment rate is 5.2% and one million people are receiving the Employment Adjustment Subsidy. Although there are some signs that a path toward economic recovery is appearing, to a modest degree, we are still on a seesaw ride. As you know, events like the Greek crisis have made it necessary to seek international policy coordination in the G7 and G20 forums. Among other domains, the financial area particularly has a strong cross-border nature. On the other hand, the way a country's economy is run differs from one country to the next. I hope that he, in his capacity of chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan, will properly fulfill his responsibility for what non-life insurers have as their mission, with the points I've just made in mind.  - 金融庁

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。例文帳に追加

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.  - 金融庁

特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。例文帳に追加

I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts.　Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time.　Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment.　We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors.　In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet.　Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA.　In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery.　The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures.　At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation.  - 金融庁

第四十一条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第一条　この法律は、公布の日から起算して六月を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日から施行する。ただし、第一条中商法第二百八十五条ノ四、第二百八十五条ノ五第二項、第二百八十五条ノ六第二項及び第三項、第二百九十条第一項並びに第二百九十三条ノ五第三項の改正規定並びに附則第六条中農林中央金庫法（大正十二年法律第四十二号）第二十三条第三項及び第二十四条第一項の改正規定、附則第七条中商工組合中央金庫法（昭和十一年法律第十四号）第三十九条ノ三第三項及び第四十条ノ二第一項の改正規定、附則第九条中農業協同組合法（昭和二十二年法律第百三十二号）第五十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十条中証券取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第五十三条第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第十一条中水産業協同組合法（昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号）第五十六条第一項の改正規定、附則第十二条中協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（昭和二十四年法律第百八十三号）第五条の五の次に一条を加える改正規定及び同法第十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十三条中船主相互保険組合法（昭和二十五年法律第百七十七号）第四十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十六条中信用金庫法（昭和二十六年法律第二百三十八号）第五十五条の三第三項及び第五十七条第一項の改正規定、附則第十八条中労働金庫法（昭和二十八年法律第二百二十七号）第六十一条第一項の改正規定、附則第二十三条中銀行法（昭和五十六年法律第五十九号）第十七条の二第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第二十六条の規定、附則第二十七条中保険業法（平成七年法律第百五号）第十五条に一項を加える改正規定、同法第五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百十二条第一項並びに第百十二条の二第三項の改正規定、同条第四項を削る改正規定、同法第百十五条第二項、第百十八条第一項、第百十九条及び第百九十九条の改正規定並びに同法附則第五十九条第二項及び附則第九十条第二項を削る改正規定、附則第二十九条中株式の消却の手続に関する商法の特例に関する法律（平成九年法律第五十五号）第七条第二項の改正規定並びに附則第三十一条中特定目的会社による特定資産の流動化に関する法律（平成十年法律第百五号）第百一条第一項及び第百二条第三項の改正規定は、平成十二年四月一日から施行する。例文帳に追加

Article 1 This Act shall come into effect as from the date to be specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding six months from the day of promulgation; provided, however, that the provision revising Article 285-4, Article 285-5, paragraph (2), Article 285-6, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 290, paragraph (1) and Article 293-5, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code in Article 1, and the provision revising Article 23, paragraph (3) and Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act (Act No. 42 of 1923) in Article 6 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 39-3, paragraph (3) and Article 40-2, paragraph (1) of the Shoko Chukin Bank Act (Act No. 14 of 1936) in Article 7 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 132 of 1947) in Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 53, paragraph (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 10 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 56, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) in Article 11 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding an Article after Article 5-5 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative (Act No. 183 of 1949) and revising Article 12, paragraph (1) of that Act in Article 12 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Shipowners Mutual Insurance Association Act (Act No. 177 of 1950) in Article 13 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 55-3, paragraph (3) and Article 57, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act (Act No. 238 of 1951) in Article 16 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 61, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act (Act No. 227 of 1953) in Article 18 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 17-2, paragraph (3) of the Banking Act (Act No. 59 of 1981) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 23 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision of Article 26 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding a paragraph to Article 15 of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995), revising Article 55, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 102, paragraph (1) and Article 112-2, paragraph (3) of that Act, deleting Article 112-2, paragraph (4) of that Act, revising Article 115, paragraph (2), Article 118, paragraph (1), Article 119 and Article 199 of that Act and deleting Article 59, paragraph (2) and Article 90, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions to that Act in Article 27 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 7, paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Measures for the Commercial Code on the Procedure of Cancellation of Shares (Act No. 55 of 1997) in Article 29 of the Supplementary Provisions and the provision revising Article 101, paragraph (1) and Article 102, paragraph (3) of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies (Act No. 105 of 1998) in Article 31 of the Supplementary Provisions shall come into effect as from 1 April 2000.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(e)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)一方の締約国の政府、一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、日本銀行、オランダ中央銀行又は一方の締約国の政府若しくは一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体が直接若しくは間接に所有する者(c)法人であって、その主たる種類の株式が、公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるもの（当該株式が８(c)(iii)又は(iv)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録されるものである場合には、当該法人の事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所が、当該法人が居住者とされる締約国内にあるときに限る。）(d)次の(i)又(ii)はに規定する者のいずれかに該当する者(i)第四条１(b)又は(c)に規定する者（同条１(b)に規定する者にあっては、次の(aa)又は(bb)に規定する者のいずれかに該当する者に限る。）(aa)当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人である年金基金(bb)その基金の七十五パーセントを超えるものが、適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が拠出した基金である年金基金(ii)銀行、保険会社又は証券会社（その者が居住者とされる締約国の法令に基づいて設立され、かつ、規制されるものに限る。）(e)個人以外の者（(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が、議決権の五十パーセント以上に相当する株式その他の受益に関する持分を直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。）例文帳に追加

2. A resident of a Contracting State is a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) the Government of a Contracting State, any political subdivision or local authority thereof, the Bank of Japan, the Central Bank of the Netherlands or a person that is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Government of a Contracting State or a political subdivision or local authority thereof; c) a company, if the principal class of its shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges, provided that, if the shares are listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (iii) or (iv) of subparagraph c) of paragraph 8, the primary place of management and control of the company is in the Contracting State of which it is a resident; d) a person that is either: (i) a person as described in subparagraph b) or c) of paragraph 1 of Article 4, provided that in the case of a person described in subparagraph b) of that paragraph: (aa) as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of the person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; or (bb) more than 75 per cent of the contributions made to the person is derived from residents of either Contracting State which are qualified persons; or (ii) a bank, an insurance company or a securities company that is established and regulated as such under the laws of the Contracting State of which it is a resident; or e) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, shares or other beneficial interests representing at least 50 per cent of the voting power of the person. - 財務省

６　第一項から第四項までに規定する許可（以下この条及び次条において「代替許可」という。）があったときは、当該代替許可に係る事項について株主総会等、種類株主総会又は取締役会の決議があったものとみなす。この場合における第十六条第一項、第百三十六条の二第一項（第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）並びに第二百五十条第三項及び第五項の規定の適用については、第十六条第一項中「資本金又は準備金（以下この節において「資本金等」という。）の額の減少（減少する準備金の額の全部を資本金とする場合を除く。）の決議に係る株主総会（会社法第四百四十七条第三項（資本金の額の減少）又は第四百四十八条第三項（準備金の額の減少）に規定する場合にあっては、取締役会）の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「資本金又は準備金の額の減少（減少する準備金の額の全部を資本金とする場合を除く。）に係る第二百四十九条の二第一項の許可のあった日以後二週間以内の日」と、第百三十六条の二第一項中「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「保険契約の移転に係る第二百四十九条の二第一項又は第二項の許可のあった日以後二週間以内の日」と、第二百五十条第三項中「次項の公告」とあり、及び同条第五項中「前項の公告」とあるのは「第二百四十九条の二第八項の公告」とし、第百五十六条の二及び第二百五十条第四項の規定は、適用しない。例文帳に追加

(6) When the permissions prescribed in paragraph (1) to paragraph (4) inclusive (hereinafter referred to as "Replacement Permissions" in this Article and the following Article) have been obtained, it shall be deemed that a resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc., class meeting, or board of directors has been made concerning matters pertaining to said Replacement Permissions. With regard to the application of the provisions in Article 16, paragraph (1), Article 136-2, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29), and Article 250, paragraphs (3) and (5) in this case, the term "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting pertaining to the resolution on the reduction (excluding the cases where the whole of the amount by which the reserves are reduced is appropriated to the capital) of the capital or reserves (hereinafter referred to as "capital, etc." in this Section) (or, the date of the board of directors meeting where Article 447, paragraph (3) (Reductions in Amount of Capital) or Article 448, paragraph (3) (Reductions in Amount of Reserves) of the Companies Act applies)" in Article 60, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a date within two weeks from the date of receipt of the permission set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (1) pertaining to the reduction (excluding the cases where the whole of the amount by which the reserves are reduced is appropriated to the capital) of the capital or reserves," the term "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in Article 136, paragraph (1) in the preceding Article" in Article 136-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a date within two weeks from the date of receipt of the permission set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (1) or (2) pertaining to the transfer of insurance contracts," and the terms "the public notice set forth in the following paragraph" in Article 250, paragraph (3) and "the public notice set forth in the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the public notice set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (8)"; and the provisions of Article 156-2 and Article 250, paragraph (4) shall not apply.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二条　この法律の施行前に、第一条の規定による改正前の商法（以下この条において「旧商法」という。）第百四条第一項、第百三十六条第一項、第百四十条、第百四十一条、第二百四十七条第一項、第二百五十二条、第二百八十条ノ十五第一項、第三百六十三条第一項、第三百七十二条第一項、第三百七十四条ノ十二第一項、第三百七十四条ノ二十八第一項、第三百八十条第一項、第四百十五条第一項若しくは第四百二十八条第一項（これらの規定を旧商法又は他の法律において準用する場合を含む。）の訴えの提起があった場合、第六条の規定による改正前の農業協同組合法第七十三条の十四第一項の訴えの提起があった場合、第七条の規定による改正前の証券取引法第百一条の十五第一項の訴えの提起があった場合、第十三条の規定による改正前の投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律（次項において「旧投信法」という。）第九十四条第二項の訴えの提起があった場合、第十五条の規定による改正前の中小企業団体の組織に関する法律第百条の十六第一項の訴えの提起があった場合、第十八条の規定による改正前の金融先物取引法第三十四条の十八第一項の訴えの提起があった場合、第十九条の規定による改正前の保険業法第八十四条第一項の訴えの提起があった場合又は第二十三条の規定による改正前の中間法人法第二十二条第一項、第三十八条第二項若しくは第三項、第七十九条第一項、第九十五条第一項若しくは第百二十五条第一項の訴えの提起があった場合における公告については、なお従前の例による。例文帳に追加

Article 2 (1) The provisions then in force shall remain applicable to public notice in the case of any lawsuit filed under Article 104, paragraph (1), Article 136, paragraph (1), Article 140, Article 141, Article 247, paragraph (1), Article 252, Article 280-15, paragraph (1), Article 363, paragraph (1), Article 372, paragraph (1), Article 374-12, paragraph (1), Article 374-28, paragraph (1), Article 380, paragraph (1), Article 415, paragraph (1) or Article 428, paragraph (1) of the Commercial Code prior to the revision by the provision of Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as "Former Commercial Code" in this Article) (including the cases where those provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Former Commercial Code or any other Act), any lawsuit filed under Article 73-14, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperative Association Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 6, any lawsuit filed under Article 101-15, paragraph (1) of the Securities and Exchange Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 7, any lawsuit filed under Article 94, paragraph (2) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations prior to the revision by the provision of Article 13 (referred to as "Former Investment Trust Act" in the following paragraph), any lawsuit filed under Article 100-16, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Organization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Association prior to the revision by the provision of Article 15, any lawsuit filed under Article 34-18, paragraph (1) of the Financial Futures Trading Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 18, any lawsuit filed under Article 84, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 19, or any lawsuit filed under Article 22, paragraph (1), Article 38, paragraph (2) or (3), Article 79, paragraph (1), Article 95, paragraph (1) or Article 125, paragraph (1) of the Intermediate Companies Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 23, prior to the enforcement of this Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

重視していることは、もう今さっきの話にもございましたように、リーマン・ショックの後、G8、それからG20にありまして、中国、インド、ブラジル、そういったところも加わっていただきますし、G8だけではもう世界の経済をカバーでき得ないというような実態が皆さん方よくお分かりのようにあるわけでございまして、色々な、バーゼルIIIだって、G20でまさに中国、インド、ブラジル、そういった今、非常に発展の速度の速い人口の多い国といいますか、そういったことがまさに世界の大きな力を持って参加してきたわけでございますから、中国は日本の隣でございますし、日本から言えばここ3年間としては、輸出輸入ナンバーワンは中国になっていると思いますし、中国からとっても、輸出のナンバーワンはアメリカ、2番目がEU、3番目は日本でございますからね、大変、日本と中国というのは戦略的互恵関係にあるということもございますし、そういった意味で、特に金融の問題については、もうご存じのように非常に金融はグローバル化したというか、まさに瞬時に金融の影響というのは世界経済に影響を及ぼすわけでございますから、アメリカの国債を一番たくさん持っているのは中国でございまして、2番目が日本でございますし。まさに中国というのは８、９％の、リーマン・ショックのときに一旦落ちましたけれども、また60兆円ぐらいの財政出動をして、中国の景気が非常にいいということを皆さん方はよくお分かりだと思いますけれども、しかし、どうも少しバブル気味だというようなご意見もございますので、そこら辺も中国人民銀行の行長さん、バーナンキさんにしても、アメリカに適する人でございますが、それに温家宝首相をはじめ、国務院の経済担当の副総理がおられまして、そういった方が中心でやるわけでございますが、当然銀行監督あるいは証券の監督、保険の監督といった（金融当局の）方もお会いをさせていただく等、色々な私も非常に期待をさせていただいております。例文帳に追加

My focus will be on the post-global-financial-crisis G8 and G20 including China, India and Brazil, as mentioned earlier. The reality is that G8 alone can no longer cover the global economy. There is also Basel III. Populous countries undergoing extremely rapid development such as China, India and Brazil have joined G20 with significant power. China, being Japan’s neighbor, has been the Japan’s biggest import and export partner in the past three years. For China, Japan is the third biggest export destination, behind the United States and EU, ranked first and second, respectively, so Japan and China are in a strategic, mutually beneficial relationship. In that sense, especially when it comes to the issue of finance, the financial sector is extremely globalized; the impact of the financial sector on the global economy is instant. China is the leading holder of U.S. Treasury securities, followed by Japan. With some 60 trillion yen of public spending, China is booming, as you may be well aware, although some people have suggested that a bubble may be forming.  - 金融庁

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム