「may day」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(19ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 46 (1) Where a taxpayer has suffered a considerable loss of property due to earthquake, flood, wind, lightning, fire or other similar natural disaster, if any of the taxpayer's national tax falls under any of the following and is payable within one year from the day on which the taxpayer suffered such loss, the district director of the tax office (in cases where the director-general of a customs house or the regional commissioner of a Regional Taxation Bureau collects national taxes pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to Article 43, paragraph (1), or paragraph (3) or paragraph (4) of said Article, or Article 44, paragraph (1) (Competent Agency for Collection of National Taxes), the director-general or the regional commissioner; hereinafter referred to as the "district director of the tax office, etc." in this Chapter) may, based on an application filed by the taxpayer within two months from the day on which such disaster ended, grant a grace period for payment of the national tax in whole or in part for up to one year from the due date for payment (in the case of a withholding tax for which no notice of tax due has been given, its statutory due date for payment) (in the case of the national tax set forth in item (iii), the such grace period shall be specified by Cabinet Order), as provided for by Cabinet Order: 例文帳に追加

第四十六条　税務署長（第四十三条第一項ただし書、第三項若しくは第四項又は第四十四条第一項（国税の徴収の所轄庁）の規定により税関長又は国税局長が国税の徴収を行う場合には、その税関長又は国税局長。以下この章において「税務署長等」という。）は、震災、風水害、落雷、火災その他これらに類する災害により納税者がその財産につき相当な損失を受けた場合において、その者がその損失を受けた日以後一年以内に納付すべき国税で次に掲げるものがあるときは、政令で定めるところにより、その災害のやんだ日から二月以内にされたその者の申請に基づき、その納期限（納税の告知がされていない源泉徴収による国税については、その法定納期限）から一年以内の期間（第三号に掲げる国税については、政令で定める期間）を限り、その国税の全部又は一部の納税を猶予することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-2 (1) When the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare modifies the employment insurance rate within the scope of fifteen point five one-thousandth (15.5/1000) to seventeen point five one-thousandth (17.5/1000) inclusive (or seventeen point five one-thousandth (17.5/1000) to ninety point five one-thousandth (19.5/1000) inclusive in case of the businesses prescribed in the proviso to the same Article, paragraph (4) (excluding the businesses listed in item (iii) of the same paragraph), or eighteen point five one-thousandth (18.5/1000) to twenty point five one-thousandth (20.5/1000) inclusive in case of the businesses listed in such item) pursuant to the provision of Article 12, paragraph (5) of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance as revised by the provision of Article 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Collection Act" in this Article to Article 53-4 of the Supplementary Provisions), during the period up to and including the day preceding the day on which 50 days have elapsed from the first day of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007, he/she may prescribe that such modification should apply to the labor insurance premiums pertaining to the period on and after April 1, 2007. In this case, if the employment insurance rate has been modified pursuant to the provision of the same Article, paragraph (8), the term "fifteen point five one-thousandth (15.5/1000) to seventeen point five one-thousandth (17.5/1000) inclusive" in the first sentence shall be deemed to be replaced with "fifteen one-thousandth (15/1000) to seventeen one-thousandth (17/1000) inclusive", the term "seventeen point five one-thousandth (17.5/1000) to ninety point five one-thousandth (19.5/1000) inclusive" with "seventeen one-thousandth (17/1000) to ninety one-thousandth (19/1000) inclusive", and the term "eighteen point five one-thousandth (18.5/1000) to twenty point five one-thousandth (20.5/1000) inclusive" with "eighteen one-thousandth (18/1000) to twenty one-thousandth (20/1000) inclusive". 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の二　厚生労働大臣は、平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の初日から五十日を経過する日の前日までの間に、第七条の規定による改正後の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律（以下この条から附則第五十三条の四までにおいて「新徴収法」という。）第十二条第五項の規定に基づき、雇用保険率を千分の十五・五から千分の十七・五まで（同条第四項ただし書に規定する事業（同項第三号に掲げる事業を除く。）については千分の十七・五から千分の十九・五まで、同号に掲げる事業については千分の十八・五から千分の二十・五まで）の範囲内において変更したときは、当該変更を平成十九年四月一日以後の期間に係る労働保険料について適用するものとすることができる。この場合において、同条第八項の規定により雇用保険率が変更されているときは、前段中「千分の十五・五から千分の十七・五まで」とあるのは「千分の十五から千分の十七まで」と、「千分の十七・五から千分の十九・五まで」とあるのは「千分の十七から千分の十九まで」と、「千分の十八・五から千分の二十・五まで」とあるのは「千分の十八から千分の二十まで」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

O, Erin, mourn with grief and woeFor he lies dead whom the fell gangOf modern hypocrites laid low.He lies slain by the coward houndsHe raised to glory from the mire;And Erin's hopes and Erin's dreamsPerish upon her monarch's pyre.In palace, cabin or in cotThe Irish heart where'er it beIs bowed with woe--for he is goneWho would have wrought her destiny.He would have had his Erin famed,The green flag gloriously unfurled,Her statesmen, bards and warriors raisedBefore the nations of the World.He dreamed (alas, 'twas but a dream!)Of Liberty: but as he stroveTo clutch that idol, treacherySundered him from the thing he loved.Shame on the coward, caitiff handsThat smote their Lord or with a kissBetrayed him to the rabble-routOf fawning priests--no friends of his.May everlasting shame consumeThe memory of those who triedTo befoul and smear the exalted nameOf one who spurned them in his pride.He fell as fall the mighty ones,Nobly undaunted to the last,And death has now united himWith Erin's heroes of the past.No sound of strife disturb his sleep!Calmly he rests: no human painOr high ambition spurs him nowThe peaks of glory to attain.They had their way: they laid him low.But Erin, list, his spirit mayRise, like the Phoenix from the flames,When breaks the dawning of the day,The day that brings us Freedom's reign.And on that day may Erin wellPledge in the cup she lifts to JoyOne grief--the memory of Parnell. 例文帳に追加

パーネルは死んだ残忍な偽善者どもの手にかかり僕らの無冠の王は死んだ嘆く、嘆く、悲しみのエリン泥沼から引き上げてやった臆病な犬どもに彼は殺されたエリンの希望もエリンの夢もその君主の積みまきの上に滅びた御殿にあろうとも、小屋にあろうとも悲しみにひしがれるアイルランドの心その運命をもたらすはずの彼が逝ってしまったから彼あらば世界にエリンの名を知らしめ栄光の緑の旗をはためかせ政治家たち、詩人たち、戦士たちの立ち上がったものを彼は自由を夢見た悲しいかな、夢にすぎなかった偶像をつかもうとしたその時裏切りが彼と愛するものを引き離した恥を知れ、臆病者彼らの君主を襲い媚を売る聖職者衆に売り渡した卑劣漢ども永遠の恥辱よ、焼き尽くせ誇りをもって彼らをはねつけた人の高貴の名を汚し傷つけた者どもの記憶を最後まで気高く屈せずに倒れた強き人死が彼を今は亡きエリンの英雄たちと一つにした彼の眠りを乱す争いはなし！静かに彼は休む彼を栄光へと駆り立てる人としての苦悩も大望も今はない彼らは思い通り彼を殺したしかしエリンは望む、彼の魂よ炎から不死鳥のように舞い上がれとその日の夜の明ける時自由の御代が僕らにもたらされるその日、エリンよ、挙げよ喜びの杯を悲しみのためにパーネルの思い出のために - James Joyce『アイビーデイの委員会室』

(5) In cases of a lease pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) for a building used for a residence (limited to those pertaining to buildings having floor area (in the case where a part of the building is the object of the lease, the floor area of said part) of less than 200 square meters), when it becomes difficult for the building lessee to use the building as his/her principal residence due to an unavoidable circumstance such as a work-related transfer, the receiving of medical care, or the necessity of providing care to a relative, the building lessee may request to terminate the building lease. In this case, the building lease shall be terminated when one month has passed since the day of the request to terminate. 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の規定による居住の用に供する建物の賃貸借（床面積（建物の一部分を賃貸借の目的とする場合にあっては、当該一部分の床面積）が二百平方メートル未満の建物に係るものに限る。）において、転勤、療養、親族の介護その他のやむを得ない事情により、建物の賃借人が建物を自己の生活の本拠として使用することが困難となったときは、建物の賃借人は、建物の賃貸借の解約の申入れをすることができる。この場合においては、建物の賃貸借は、解約の申入れの日から一月を経過することによって終了する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The Prime Minister may order a person who became a Holder of Voting Rights of an Insurance Company which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more or a company or any other juridical person established as a Holder of Voting Rights of an Insurance Company which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more through any of the transactions or acts listed in the items of paragraph (1) without obtaining the authorization set forth in that paragraph or a person who remains as a Holder of Voting Rights of an Insurance Company which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more even after the Last Day of the Grace Period without obtaining the authorization set forth in the proviso to paragraph (2), to take necessary measures for becoming a person who is no longer a Holder of Voting Rights of the Insurance Company which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more. 例文帳に追加

４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の認可を受けずに同項各号に掲げる取引若しくは行為により保険会社の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者になった者若しくは保険会社の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者として設立された会社その他の法人又は第二項ただし書の認可を受けることなく猶予期限日後も保険会社の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者である者に対し、当該保険会社の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなるよう、所要の措置を講ずることを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 132-2 (1) Where a person who intends to file an action has given by means of a document, to the person who is to be the defendant in the action, an advance notice of filing of an action (hereinafter referred to as an "advance notice" in this Chapter), the person who has given the advance notice (hereinafter referred to as the "advance noticer" in this Chapter), within four months after the day on which the advance notice has been given, may specify a reasonable period and make an inquiry by means of a document to the person who has received the advance notice in order to request him/her to make a response by means of a document, before the filing of the action, with regard to the matters that would be obviously necessary for preparing allegations or proof should the action actually be filed; provided, however, that this shall not apply if the inquiry falls under any of the following items: 例文帳に追加

第百三十二条の二　訴えを提起しようとする者が訴えの被告となるべき者に対し訴えの提起を予告する通知を書面でした場合（以下この章において当該通知を「予告通知」という。）には、その予告通知をした者（以下この章において「予告通知者」という。）は、その予告通知を受けた者に対し、その予告通知をした日から四月以内に限り、訴えの提起前に、訴えを提起した場合の主張又は立証を準備するために必要であることが明らかな事項について、相当の期間を定めて、書面で回答するよう、書面で照会をすることができる。ただし、その照会が次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 132-3 (1) When a person who has received the advance notice (hereinafter referred to as a "recipient of advance notice" in this Chapter) has made a response to the advance notice by providing the advance noticer with a document stating the gist of his/her answers regarding the gist of the claim and the points of the dispute set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article that are stated in the document of the advance notice, the recipient of advance notice, within four months after the day on which the advance notice has been given, may specify a reasonable period and make an inquiry by means of a document to the advance noticer in order to request him/her to make a response by means of a document, before the filing of the action, with regard to the matters that would be obviously necessary for preparing allegations or proof should the action actually be filed. In this case, the provisions of the proviso to paragraph (1) of said Article and paragraph (2) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis. 例文帳に追加

第百三十二条の三　予告通知を受けた者（以下この章において「被予告通知者」という。）は、予告通知者に対し、その予告通知の書面に記載された前条第三項の請求の要旨及び紛争の要点に対する答弁の要旨を記載した書面でその予告通知に対する返答をしたときは、予告通知者に対し、その予告通知がされた日から四月以内に限り、訴えの提起前に、訴えを提起された場合の主張又は立証を準備するために必要であることが明らかな事項について、相当の期間を定めて、書面で回答するよう、書面で照会をすることができる。この場合においては、同条第一項ただし書及び同条第二項の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A member may request that the directors notify the other members (in cases where the notice set forth in Article 55(2) or (3) is given (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of the preceding Article), that the directors state or record in such notice) of the outline of the proposal which said member intends to submit with regard to a Matter to Be Voted Upon by Both Specified and Preferred Equity Members which is a subject matter for a general meeting of members by eight weeks prior (if a shorter period has been provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) to the day of the general meeting of members; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where said proposal is in violation of laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, or the articles of incorporation, or cases where three years have yet to elapse from the date on which, with regard to a proposal which was essentially identical to said proposal, affirmative votes from members holding at least one-tenth of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion has been provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all members (excluding members who could not exercise their voting rights on said proposal) were not obtained at a general meeting of members. 例文帳に追加

３　社員は、取締役に対し、社員総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までに、社員総会の目的である有議決権事項につき当該社員が提出しようとする議案の要領を社員に通知すること（第五十五条第二項又は第三項（前条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）を請求することができる。ただし、当該議案が法令、資産流動化計画若しくは定款に違反する場合又は実質的に同一の議案につき社員総会において総社員（当該議案につき議決権を行使することができない社員を除く。）の議決権の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の賛成を得られなかった日から三年を経過していない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 18 (1) When an order under Article 10, paragraph 1, item 2 has previously been issued and a repeated petition for an order under the same item has been filed on the grounds that the same fact of bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. that was the ground for the petition for the issued order, the court shall issue the order in question only when finding it necessary to reissue the order under the same item, by taking into consideration the fact that the victim who intends to move from the domicile that the victim shares as his/her main home with his/her spouse is unable to complete the move from the domicile within two months from the day the issued order comes into effect due to cause imputable to the victim himself/herself, or other circumstances. However, the court may choose not to issue the order when finding that the issuance of the order will cause extreme hindrance to the spouse's daily life. 例文帳に追加

第十八条　第十条第一項第二号の規定による命令が発せられた後に当該発せられた命令の申立ての理由となった身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫と同一の事実を理由とする同号の規定による命令の再度の申立てがあったときは、裁判所は、配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居から転居しようとする被害者がその責めに帰することのできない事由により当該発せられた命令の効力が生ずる日から起算して二月を経過する日までに当該住居からの転居を完了することができないことその他の同号の規定による命令を再度発する必要があると認めるべき事情があるときに限り、当該命令を発するものとする。ただし、当該命令を発することにより当該配偶者の生活に特に著しい支障を生ずると認めるときは、当該命令を発しないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 789(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split on the Effective Day, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Absorption-type Company Split agreement, to request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Absorption-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第七百八十九条第一項第二号（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる吸収分割会社の債権者（第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第七百八十九条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、吸収分割契約において吸収分割後に吸収分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、吸収分割会社に対して、吸収分割会社が効力発生日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Stock Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split plan to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立株式会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Membership Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立持分会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 831 (1) In the cases listed in the following items, a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth respectively in each such item is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meetings, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation) may, within three months from the day of resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc., claim revocation of the resolution by filing an action. The same shall apply to a person who becomes a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of a shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation) by rescission of such resolution: 例文帳に追加

第八百三十一条　次の各号に掲げる場合には、株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）は、株主総会等の決議の日から三箇月以内に、訴えをもって当該決議の取消しを請求することができる。当該決議の取消しにより取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）となる者も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with Board of Directors, only shareholders having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) not less than one hundredth (1/100) (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholders may demand the directors that the directors include certain matters in the purpose of the shareholders meeting. In such cases, that demand shall be submitted no later than eight weeks (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) prior to the day of the shareholders meeting. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権の百分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主に限り、取締役に対し、一定の事項を株主総会の目的とすることを請求することができる。この場合において、その請求は、株主総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までにしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In cases where the book value of the monies, etc. delivered by a Limited Liability Company to a partner by Contribution Refunds (hereinafter in this Subsection referred to as "Amount of Contribution Refunds") exceeds the amount of surplus as of the day when a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of paragraph (1) of Article 624 (in cases where the reduction in the stated capital under paragraph (1) of Article 626 is effected, hereinafter in this Subsection referring to the amount of surplus after such reduction), or the reduction in the value of partner's contributions in the preceding paragraph, whichever is lower, such Contribution Refunds cannot be effected. In such cases, the Limited Liability Company may reject the demand under the provisions of the first sentence of paragraph (1) of Article 624. 例文帳に追加

２　合同会社が出資の払戻しにより社員に対して交付する金銭等の帳簿価額（以下この款において「出資払戻額」という。）が、第六百二十四条第一項前段の規定による請求をした日における剰余金額（第六百二十六条第一項の資本金の額の減少をした場合にあっては、その減少をした後の剰余金額。以下この款において同じ。）又は前項の出資の価額を減少した額のいずれか少ない額を超える場合には、当該出資の払戻しをすることができない。この場合においては、合同会社は、第六百二十四条第一項前段の規定による請求を拒むことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 32-5 (1) With respect to workers employed in enterprises of which business categories are specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as having an amount of daily business which is often subject to wide fluctuations and given this forecast it would be difficult to fix daily working hours by rules of employment or the equivalent, and of which the number of regular employees is under the number specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of the Health, Labour and Welfare, the employer may, regardless of the provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 32, have workers work for up to ten hours per day, if there is a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace (in the case that such labor union is organized) or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such labor union is not organized). 例文帳に追加

第三十二条の五　使用者は、日ごとの業務に著しい繁閑の差が生ずることが多く、かつ、これを予測した上で就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより各日の労働時間を特定することが困難であると認められる厚生労働省令で定める事業であつて、常時使用する労働者の数が厚生労働省令で定める数未満のものに従事する労働者については、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定があるときは、第三十二条第二項の規定にかかわらず、一日について十時間まで労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 36 (1) In the event that the employer has entered into a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace (in the case that such labor union is organized) or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such labor union is not organized) and has notified the relevant government agency of such agreement , the employer may, notwithstanding the provisions with respect to working hours stipulated in Articles 32 through 32-5 or Article 40 (hereinafter in this Article referred to as "working hours")or the provisions with respect to days off stipulated in the preceding Article(hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as "days off"), extend the working hours or have workers work on days off in accordance with the provisions of the said agreement; provided, however, that the extension of working hours for belowground labor and other work especially harmful to health as stipulated in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare shall not exceed 2 hours per day. 例文帳に追加

第三十六条　使用者は、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定をし、これを行政官庁に届け出た場合においては、第三十二条から第三十二条の五まで若しくは第四十条の労働時間（以下この条において「労働時間」という。）又は前条の休日（以下この項において「休日」という。）に関する規定にかかわらず、その協定で定めるところによつて労働時間を延長し、又は休日に労働させることができる。ただし、坑内労働その他厚生労働省令で定める健康上特に有害な業務の労働時間の延長は、一日について二時間を超えてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 12-2 Where a person entitled to the right to receive insurance benefits in pension form has died, and despite the extinguishment of that right as a result of the death of said person, insurance benefits in pension form have been paid by mistake for a period from the month following the month containing the day of the death, if there are any insurance benefits payable to the person who is obliged to repay the debt pertaining to the claim for refund arising from such payment by mistake (hereinafter referred to as the "claim for refund" in this Article), the amount of money paid as said insurance benefits may be appropriated to the amount of the claim for refund arising from said payment by mistake, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 例文帳に追加

第十二条の二　年金たる保険給付を受ける権利を有する者が死亡したためその支給を受ける権利が消滅したにもかかわらず、その死亡の日の属する月の翌月以後の分として当該年金たる保険給付の過誤払が行われた場合において、当該過誤払による返還金に係る債権（以下この条において「返還金債権」という。）に係る債務の弁済をすべき者に支払うべき保険給付があるときは、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該保険給付の支払金の金額を当該過誤払による返還金債権の金額に充当することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to the business prescribed in the preceding paragraph, when an employer has stipulated that the average weekly working hours in a period not exceeding one month shall not exceed 44 hours in a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned where such a labor union exists or with a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace where no such labor union exists (including resolutions unanimously adopted by a labor-management, and resolutions unanimously adopted by all the members of a working hours reduction task force committee referred to in the provisions of Article 7 of the Shorter Working Hours Promotion Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the rules of employment, or the equivalent, the employer may have a worker work in excess of 44 hours in a specified week or in excess of 8 hours in a specified day in accordance with the stipulation, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 32 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

２　使用者は、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定（労使委員会における委員の五分の四以上の多数による決議及び労働時間等設定改善法第七条第一項の労働時間短縮推進委員会における委員の五分の四以上の多数による決議を含む。以下この条において同じ。）により、又は就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、一箇月以内の期間を平均し一週間当たりの労働時間が四十四時間を超えない定めをした場合においては、前項に規定する事業については同項の規定にかかわらず、その定めにより、特定された週において四十四時間又は特定された日において八時間を超えて、労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to workers in the business referred to in paragraph (1) who have been given the right to decide the starting and finishing time of work pursuant to the rules of employment or the equivalent, when an employer has stipulated the following items in a written agreement either with the labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned where such a labor union exists or with a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace where no such labor union exists, notwithstanding the provisions of the paragraph (1), the employer may have a worker work in excess of 44 hours in a week or in excess of 8 hours in a day, provided the average working hours per week for the period prescribed in the said agreement as the settlement period stipulated in item (ii) below do not exceed 44 hours: 例文帳に追加

３　使用者は、就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、その労働者に係る始業及び終業の時刻をその労働者の決定にゆだねることとした労働者については、当該事業場の労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定により、次に掲げる事項を定めたときは、その協定で第二号の清算期間として定められた期間を平均し一週間当たりの労働時間が四十四時間を超えない範囲内において、第一項に規定する事業については同項の規定にかかわらず、一週間において四十四時間又は一日において八時間を超えて、労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A Subject Company of a Tender Offer may, in lieu of the copies of the documents to be sent under the provision of Article 27-10(9) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(10)) to the Tender Offeror pertaining to the Tender Offer (in cases where, as of the day when the Tender Offeror has submitted the Subject Company's Position Statement (including the Amendment Reports thereof; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) pertaining to said Tender Offer, any person other than the Tender Offeror has already submitted the Tender Offer Notification relating to the Share Certificates, etc. of the issuer pertaining to said Tender Offer, including said person), provide the information to be contained in the Subject Company's Position Statement by means of the electronic data processing system or by other method specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, in the cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. In this case, the Subject of said Tender Offer shall be deemed to have sent the copy of said documents. 例文帳に追加

３　公開買付けに係る対象者は、内閣府令で定める場合には、第二十七条の十第九項（同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により当該公開買付けに係る公開買付者（当該公開買付けに係る意見表明報告書（その訂正報告書を含む。以下この項において同じ。）を提出した日において、当該公開買付者以外の者で既に当該公開買付けに係る発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。）に送付するものとされている書類の写しに代えて、当該意見表明報告書に記載すべき事項を電子情報処理組織を使用する方法その他の内閣府令で定める方法により提供することができる。この場合において、当該公開買付けに係る対象者は、当該書類の写しを送付したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 28-2 When a certified public accountant has provided the services set forth in Article 2(1) concerning the financial documents of a company or any other person, said certified public accountant (including a person who was formerly a certified public accountant) may not become an officer for nor take an equivalent position with said company or person nor a consolidated company, etc. thereof (meaning a person categorized by Cabinet Office Ordinance as one who prepares financial documents on a consolidated basis with said company or person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 34-11(1)(iii)) until the day on which the accounting period following that pertaining to said financial documents ends; provided, however, that this shall not apply if the approval of the Prime Minister has been obtained in a case where unavoidable circumstances are found regarding becoming an officer of or taking an equivalent position with said company or person or a consolidated company, etc. thereof or in any other case specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十八条の二　公認会計士が会社その他の者の財務書類について第二条第一項の業務を行つた場合には、当該公認会計士（公認会計士であつた者を含む。）は、当該財務書類に係る会計期間の翌会計期間の終了の日までの間は、当該会社その他の者又はその連結会社等（当該会社その他の者と連結して財務書類を作成するものとされる者として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条及び第三十四条の十一第一項第三号において同じ。）の役員又はこれに準ずるものに就いてはならない。ただし、当該会社その他の者又はその連結会社等の役員又はこれに準ずるものに就くことにつきやむを得ない事情があると認められるときその他の内閣府令で定める場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を得たときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Where the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business have extended the period in which inward direct investment, etc. is prohibited pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3, when he/she finds through examination pursuant to the said provision that inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 falls under Inward Direct Investment, etc. Pertaining to National Security, etc., he/she may recommend a person who has given notification of the inward direct investment, etc. to change the content pertaining to the inward direct investment, etc. or discontinue the inward direct investment, etc. pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order after hearing opinions of the Council on Customs, Tariff, Foreign Exchange and other Transactions; provided, however, the period for making the recommendation of the change or discontinuance shall be up to the expiration date of the period extended pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3 or 6, counting from the day of acceptance of the notification. 例文帳に追加

５　財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、第三項の規定により対内直接投資等を行つてはならない期間を延長した場合において、同項の規定による審査をした結果、第一項の規定による届出に係る対内直接投資等が国の安全等に係る対内直接投資等に該当すると認めるときは、関税・外国為替等審議会の意見を聴いて、当該対内直接投資等の届出をしたものに対し、政令で定めるところにより、当該対内直接投資等に係る内容の変更又は中止を勧告することができる。ただし、当該変更又は中止を勧告することができる期間は、当該届出を受理した日から起算して第三項又は次項の規定により延長された期間の満了する日までとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) A resident who has given notification on Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph shall not conduct the Conclusion of a Technology introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification before the expiration of 30 days from the day of acceptance of the notification by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business; provided, however, that when the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business find, before the expiration of the period, based on the kind of the technology or other matters, that the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification does not fall under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that requires examination pursuant to the provision of the next paragraph, he/she may shorten the period. 例文帳に追加

２　技術導入契約の締結等について前項の規定による届出をした居住者は、財務大臣及び事業所管大臣が当該届出を受理した日から起算して三十日を経過する日までは、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない。ただし、財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、その期間の満了前に当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等がその技術の種類その他からみて次項の規定による審査が必要となる技術導入契約の締結等に該当しないと認めるときは、当該期間を短縮することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Where the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business have extended the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. shall not be conducted pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3, when he/she finds through examination pursuant to the said paragraph that the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to a notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to National Security, etc., he/she may recommend a person who has given notification of the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. to change, in whole or in part, the provisions pertaining to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. or to discontinue it after hearing the opinions of the Council on Customs, Tariff, Foreign Exchange and other Transactions; provided, however, that the period for making the recommendation of the change or discontinuance shall be up to the expiration date of the period extended pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3 or 6, counting from the day of acceptance of the notification. 例文帳に追加

５　財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、第三項の規定により技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間を延長した場合において、同項の規定による審査をした結果、第一項の規定による届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等が国の安全等に係る技術導入契約の締結等に該当すると認めるときは、関税・外国為替等審議会の意見を聴いて、当該技術導入契約の締結等の届出をした者に対し、政令で定めるところにより、当該技術導入契約の締結等に係る条項の全部若しくは一部の変更又は中止を勧告することができる。ただし、当該変更又は中止を勧告することができる期間は、当該届出を受理した日から起算して第三項又は次項の規定により延長された期間の満了する日までとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 4 (1) With regard to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. Pertaining to a Notification Pursuant to the Provisions of the Old Act (limited to those which have been notified by a resident; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) for which the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. shall not be conducted prescribed in Article 29, paragraph 3 of the Old Act has not actually expired at the time of the enforcement of this Act, which falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that shall be reported pursuant to the provision of Article 29 of the New Act, a resident who has given the notification may conduct the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. on and after the Date of Enforcement, deeming that the period has expired on the previous day of the Date of Enforcement. In this case, a notification pertaining to the resident shall be deemed to be a report made pursuant to the provision of the main clause of the said article on the date of the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. 例文帳に追加

第四条　この法律の施行の際現に旧法第二十九条第三項に規定する技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間が満了していない旧法の規定による届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等（居住者が届け出たものに限る。次項において同じ。）で、新法第二十九条の規定により報告しなければならない技術導入契約の締結等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした居住者は、施行日以後当該技術導入契約の締結等をすることができる。この場合において、当該居住者に係る届出は、当該技術導入契約の締結等がされた日において同条本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to what is prescribed in the next paragraph, with regard to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. Pertaining to a Notification Pursuant to the Provisions of the Old Act, for which the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. shall not be conducted prescribed in Article 29, paragraph 3 of the Old Act has not expired (in cases where the period was extended pursuant to the provision of Article 30, paragraph 1 or 3 of the Old Act, the extended period) at the time of the enforcement of this Act, a non-resident who has given the notification may conduct the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. on and after the Date of Enforcement, deeming that the period has expired on the previous day of the Date of Enforcement. 例文帳に追加

３　次項に定めるものを除き、この法律の施行の際現に旧法第二十九条第三項に規定する技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間（旧法第三十条第一項又は第三項の規定により当該期間が延長された場合には、当該延長された期間）が満了していない旧法の規定による届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等（非居住者が届け出たものに限る。）については、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした非居住者は、施行日以後当該技術導入契約の締結等をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person making a former notification (referring to the act of notification pertaining to acquisition of Japanese nationality by a child acknowledged by a father or mother not falling under children having acquired the status of a child born in wedlock through the marriage of the father and mother and their acknowledgment provided in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Nationality Act prior to revision by this Act pursuant to the provisions of said paragraph before the day of enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as "enforcement date"); the same shall apply hereinafter) falling under the requirements (except for notification to the Minister of Justice; the same shall apply in the supplementary provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)) provided in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Nationality Act after revision by this Act (referred to as the "New Act" in the supplemental provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)), if said paragraph applies (except for a person who was once a Japanese citizen) at the time of said former notification, may acquire Japanese nationality through notification to the Minister of Justice within three years of the enforcement date. 例文帳に追加

第二条　従前の届出（この法律の施行の日（以下「施行日」という。）前にこの法律による改正前の国籍法第三条第一項の規定によるものとしてされた同項に規定する父母の婚姻及びその認知により嫡出子たる身分を取得した子に該当しない父又は母が認知した子による日本の国籍の取得に係る届出の行為をいう。以下同じ。）をした者で、当該従前の届出の時においてこの法律による改正後の国籍法（附則第四条第一項において「新法」という。）第三条第一項の規定の適用があるとするならば同項に規定する要件（法務大臣に届け出ることを除く。附則第四条第一項において同じ。）に該当するものであったもの（日本国民であった者を除く。）は、施行日から三年以内に限り、法務大臣に届け出ることによって、日本の国籍を取得することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 Any person or his/her successor who actually mines uranium ore or thorium ore prior to the enforcement of this Act may continue to mine them for three months from the day of enforcement of this Act as the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. In the case where such person or his/her successor files an application for creation of mining right for uranium ore or thorium ore in the digging area concerned, the same shall apply to such application area until the application is dismissed, a notice of non-permission is received, the permission ceases to be effective under the provisions of Article 43 of the Mining Act, or the creation of mining right is registered. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現にウラン鉱若しくはトリウム鉱を掘採している者又はその承継人は、この法律の施行の日から三月間は、従前の例によりその掘採を継続することができる。この法律の施行の日から三月以内に当該掘採者又はその承継人が当該掘採区域についてウラン鉱又はトリウム鉱を目的とする鉱業権の設定の出願をした場合において、出願の却下若しくは不許可の通知を受けるまで、鉱業法第四十三条の規定によつて許可がその効力を失うまで、又は鉱業権の設定の登録があるまで、当該出願の区域について、また同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) This Act shall come into force from the day of promulgation. However, the revised provision of paragraph (1) of Article 11 of Act on Real Estate Appraising and Valuation in Article 1 of this Act, the provisions of Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6, the revised provision of paragraph (1) of Article 107 of the Patent Act in Article 19 of this Act, the revised provision of paragraph (1) of Article 31 of the Utility Model Act in Article 20 of this Act, the revised provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 42 of the Design Act in Article 21 of this Act, the revised provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 40 of the Trademark Act in Article 22 of this Act, the revised provision of paragraph (2) of Article 5 of the Guide Interpreter Act in Article 28 of this Act, and the provisions of Articles 29 and 30 shall come into force as from May 1, 1978. 例文帳に追加

１　この法律は、公布の日から施行する。ただし、第一条中不動産の鑑定評価に関する法律第十一条第一項の改正規定、第二条、第三条、第五条及び第六条の規定、第十九条中特許法第百七条第一項の改正規定、第二十条中実用新案法第三十一条第一項の改正規定、第二十一条中意匠法第四十二条第一項及び第二項の改正規定、第二十二条中商標法第四十条第一項及び第二項の改正規定、第二十八条中通訳案内業法第五条第二項の改正規定並びに第二十九条及び第三十条の規定は、昭和五十三年五月一日から施行する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vi) In the case of a high intensity obstacle light(s) and medium intensity white obstacle light(s), the lit state shall be constantly maintained throughout every day (in the case of high intensity obstacle light(s) and medium intensity white obstacle light(s) pertaining to a supporting object(s) prescribed in paragraph (1) item (vii) of Article 127, and during the nighttime, the continued lighting is deemed unnecessary by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and the high intensity obstacle light(s) and medium intensity white obstacle light(s) pertaining to objects prescribed in said paragraph, item (xi), the lighting shall be limited to daytime.), while in the case of medium intensity red obstacle light(s) and low intensity obstacle light(s), the lit state shall be maintained during nighttime. Nevertheless, in the case where decorative lights, outdoor light projectors and other lighting facilities are lit and deemed acceptable as functional substitutes by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, said exceptional means may apply. 例文帳に追加

六　高光度航空障害灯及び中光度白色航空障害灯にあつては常時（第百二十七条第一項第七号に規定する支持物件に係る高光度航空障害灯及び中光度白色航空障害灯であつて、夜間において、その点灯を継続する必要がないと国土交通大臣が認めたもの並びに同項第九号に規定する物件に係る高光度航空障害灯及び中光度白色航空障害灯にあつては、昼間に限る。）、中光度赤色航空障害灯及び低光度航空障害灯にあつては夜間において、その点灯を継続すること。ただし、国土交通大臣がその機能を代替することができると認めた電飾、屋外投光器その他の照明設備を点灯している間は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(11) Where a person in charge of handling custody and payment receives the delivery of interest on specified foreign-issued company bonds, of which the person is entrusted with custody, on or after the day on which the person has received the delivery of interest pertaining to the interest recipient information of which the said person gave a notice to the person who pays interest on the said specified foreign-issued company bonds (limited to such information provided in the notice stating to the effect that Article 6(7)(i) of the Act shall apply; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), if the person in charge of handling custody and payment has confirmed that all persons who are to receive payment of the interest (excluding interest subject to the provisions of Article 3-3(3) or (6) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) to be delivered thereto fall under the category of nonresidents or foreign corporations, the said person in charge of handling custody and payment may omit to give a notice of interest recipient information pertaining to the interest to be delivered thereto. 例文帳に追加

１１　保管支払取扱者は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債につきその利子の支払をする者に対し通知をした利子受領者情報（法第六条第七項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する旨の通知に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）に係る利子の交付を受けた日後に当該特定民間国外債の利子の交付を受ける場合において、その交付を受ける利子（法第三条の三第三項又は第六項の規定の適用があるものを除く。以下この項において同じ。）の支払を受けるべき者がすべて非居住者又は外国法人であることの確認をしたときは、その交付を受ける利子に係る利子受領者情報の通知を省略することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(22) Where a person in charge of handling custody and payment receives the delivery of interest from specified foreign private bonds, of which the person is entrusted with custody, on or after the day on which the person has received the delivery of interest pertaining to the interest recipient information of which said person gave notice to the person who pays interest from said specified foreign private bonds (limited to such information provided in the notice stating to the effect that Article 6, paragraph (7), item (i) of the Act shall apply; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), if the person in charge of handling custody and payment has confirmed that all persons who are to receive payment of the interest (excluding interest subject to the provisions of Article 3-3, paragraph (3) or paragraph (6) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) to be delivered thereto fall under the category of nonresidents or foreign corporations, said person in charge of handling custody and payment may omit giving notice of the interest recipient information for the interest to be delivered thereto. 例文帳に追加

２２　保管支払取扱者は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債につきその利子の支払をする者に対し通知をした利子受領者情報（法第六条第七項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する旨の通知に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）に係る利子の交付を受けた日後に当該特定民間国外債の利子の交付を受ける場合において、その交付を受ける利子（法第三条の三第三項又は第六項の規定の適用があるものを除く。以下この項において同じ。）の支払を受けるべき者がすべて非居住者又は外国法人であることの確認をしたときは、その交付を受ける利子に係る利子受領者情報の通知を省略することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, a reassessment or determination, etc. of a national tax (including any additional tax and delinquent tax for default on a stamp tax related to the national tax) for which the taxpayer has evaded payment in whole or in part or has received a refund in whole or in part through deception or other wrongful means, and a reassessment of the amount of net loss, etc. stated in a tax return form in which the taxpayer has reported an overstatement of the amount of net loss, etc. that arose during the taxable period concerned through deception or other wrongful means (or if a reassessment has been made of said amount, the reassessed amount) may be made until seven years have elapsed from the due date or the day specified in the following items for the types of reassessment or determination, etc. listed respectively in said items: 例文帳に追加

５　偽りその他不正の行為によりその全部若しくは一部の税額を免れ、若しくはその全部若しくは一部の税額の還付を受けた国税（当該国税に係る加算税及び過怠税を含む。）についての更正決定等又は偽りその他不正の行為により当該課税期間において生じた純損失等の金額が過大にあるものとする納税申告書を提出していた場合における当該申告書に記載された当該純損失等の金額（当該金額に関し更正があつた場合には、当該更正後の金額）についての更正は、前各項の規定にかかわらず、次の各号に掲げる更正決定等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める期限又は日から七年を経過する日まで、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 172 (1) Where a nonresident prescribed in Article 169 (Tax Base) receives payment of pay or remuneration listed in Article 161(viii)(a) or (c) (Pay, etc. Arising from Work Carried out in Japan), and the provisions of Part IV, Chapter V (Withholding at Source of Income of Nonresidents or Corporations) do not apply to the said pay or remuneration, the nonresident shall, except where he/she may file a return form pursuant to the provision of the next Article, file a return form to the district director no later than March 15 of the year following the relevant year (in the case where the nonresident ceases to have his/her residence in Japan before that date, no later than the day on which he/she ceases to have residence), stating the following matters: 例文帳に追加

第百七十二条　第百六十九条（課税標準）に規定する非居住者が第百六十一条第八号イ又はハ（国内において行う勤務に基因する給与等）に掲げる給与又は報酬の支払を受ける場合において、当該給与又は報酬について次編第五章（非居住者又は法人の所得に係る源泉徴収）の規定の適用を受けないときは、その者は、次条の規定による申告書を提出することができる場合を除き、その年の翌年三月十五日（同日前に国内に居所を有しないこととなる場合には、その有しないこととなる日）までに、税務署長に対し、次に掲げる事項を記載した申告書を提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 173 (1) Where a nonresident prescribed in Article 169 (Tax Base) is subject to the provisions of Part IV, Chapter V (Withholding at Source of Income of Nonresidents or Corporations), with respect to the retirement allowance, etc. prescribed in Article 171 (Taxation on Retirement Income at the Taxpayer' Option) to be received thereby, and opts for taxation under the said Article with respect to the said retirement allowance, etc., the nonresident may, in order to receive a refund of income tax pertaining to the said retirement allowance, etc., file a return form to the district director on or after January 1 of the year following the relevant year (in the case where the total amount of the retirement allowance, etc. prescribed in Article 171 has been determined before that date, the day on which the total amount has been determined), stating the following matters: 例文帳に追加

第百七十三条　第百六十九条（課税標準）に規定する非居住者がその支払を受ける第百七十一条（退職所得についての選択課税）に規定する退職手当等につき次編第五章（非居住者又は法人の所得に係る源泉徴収）の規定の適用を受ける場合において、当該退職手当等につき同条の選択をするときは、その者は、当該退職手当等に係る所得税の還付を受けるため、その年の翌年一月一日（同日前に同条に規定する退職手当等の総額が確定した場合には、その確定した日）以後に、税務署長に対し、次に掲げる事項を記載した申告書を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) If the land provided for the use of arterial streets constituting city planning facilities or of such other important public facilities specified by Cabinet Order in urbanization promotion areas belongs to the State or local governments pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, the former owners (the persons who owned the relevant land as of the day of the public notice provided by Article 36 paragraph (3) ) may, unless otherwise agreed to in the consultation provided by Article 32 paragraph (2) in connection with the bearing of the expenses as the result of the relevant change of possession, request that the State or local governments to bear the amount of the expenses required for the acquisition of the relevant land, in whole or in part pursuant to the provision of Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　市街化区域内における都市計画施設である幹線街路その他の主要な公共施設で政令で定めるものの用に供する土地が前項の規定により国又は地方公共団体に帰属することとなる場合においては、当該帰属に伴う費用の負担について第三十二条第二項の協議において別段の定めをした場合を除き、従前の所有者（第三十六条第三項の公告の日において当該土地を所有していた者をいう。）は、国又は地方公共団体に対し、政令で定めるところにより、当該土地の取得に要すべき費用の額の全部又は一部を負担すべきことを求めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 20 (1) A specified business operator may, pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, undergo an investigation conducted by a person registered by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry (hereinafter referred to as a "registered investigation body") with regard to the energy consumption and other status of energy use in its factories, etc. (including the matters concerning efficiency in energy use and CO2 emissions from energy use) as well as the status of establishment, modification and abolition of energy-consuming facilities and other facilities relating to the rational use of energy (this investigation shall hereinafter be referred to as an "investigation for verification"); provided, however, that a specified business operator that has received instructions under Article 16, paragraph (1) shall not undergo an investigation for verification until three years have elapsed since the day when the instructions or recommendations were received. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　特定事業者は、経済産業省令で定めるところにより、その設置している工場等におけるエネルギーの使用量その他エネルギーの使用の状況（エネルギーの使用の効率及びエネルギーの使用に伴つて発生する二酸化炭素の排出量に係る事項を含む。）並びにエネルギーを消費する設備及びエネルギーの使用の合理化に関する設備の設置及び改廃の状況について、経済産業大臣の登録を受けた者（以下「登録調査機関」という。）が行う調査（以下「確認調査」という。）を受けることができる。ただし、第十六条第一項の規定による指示を受けた特定事業者は、当該指示又は勧告を受けた日から三年を経過した後でなければ、当該確認調査を受けることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 76 (1) A person who is responsible for making a report pursuant to the provision of Article 75, paragraph (5) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article may, pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, undergo an investigation conducted by a person registered by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (hereinafter referred to as a "registered building investigation body") with regard to the status of maintenance of the building pertaining to his/her report (hereinafter referred to as a "building investigation"); provided, however, that a person who has received recommendations under Article 75, paragraph (6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of the preceding Article) shall not undergo said Building Investigation until a period specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has elapsed since the day when said recommendations were received. 例文帳に追加

第七十六条　第七十五条第五項又は前条第三項の規定による報告をすべき者は、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、その報告に係る建築物の維持保全の状況について、国土交通大臣の登録を受けた者（以下「登録建築物調査機関」という。）が行う調査（以下「建築物調査」という。）を受けることができる。ただし、第七十五条第六項（前条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による勧告を受けた者は、当該勧告を受けた日から国土交通省令で定める期間を経過した後でなければ、当該建築物調査を受けることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The Prime Minister may order a person who became a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more or a company or any other juridical person established as a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more through any of the transactions or acts listed in each item of paragraph (1) without obtaining the authorization set forth in that paragraph or a person who remains as a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more even after the Last Day of the Grace Period without obtaining the authorization set forth in the proviso to paragraph (2), to take necessary measures for becoming a person who is no longer a holder of voting rights of the Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more. 例文帳に追加

４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の認可を受けずに同項各号に掲げる取引若しくは行為により銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者になつた者若しくは銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者として設立された会社その他の法人又は第二項ただし書の認可を受けることなく猶予期限日後も銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者である者に対し、当該銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなるよう、所要の措置を講ずることを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where the Money Lender has died, his/her heir (where there are two or more heirs and where an heir to succeed to the business has been selected by the consent of all heirs, said person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may continue to conduct the Money Lending Business for 60 days after the death of the decedent (if registration has been refused pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (1) within that period, the period up to the day when registration is refused). In the case where the heir has filed an application for registration under Article 3, paragraph (1) within that period and when such a period has elapsed, the same shall apply to the period until the registration or the refusal of the registration with regard to said filing is determined. In this case, with regard to the business conducted during said period, the heir shall be deemed to be the Money Lender. 例文帳に追加

３　貸金業者が死亡した場合においては、相続人（相続人が二人以上ある場合において、その全員の同意により事業を承継すべき相続人を選定したときは、その者。以下この条において同じ。）は、被相続人の死亡後六十日間（当該期間内に第六条第一項の規定による登録の拒否の処分があつたときは、その日までの間）は、引き続き貸金業を営むことができる。相続人がその期間内に第三条第一項の登録の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について登録又は登録の拒否の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。この場合において、これらの期間内の営業については、相続人を貸金業者とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Next, the Japanese subsidiary, Lehman Brothers Japan Inc., notified us on September 15 that it may become insolvent in the long term, so the FSA (Financial Services Agency) issued a business suspension order to the company on the same day. In addition, the company filed for civil rehabilitation procedures on September 16, and the start of the procedures was approved on September 19. I understand that the company will be managed in the future based on advice from its agents for the application of the bankruptcy procedures and its attorneys, as well as supervisors and lawyers appointed by the court to monitor its financial and business operations. 例文帳に追加

次に、日本拠点であるリーマン・ブラザーズ証券株式会社については、同社が長期的に見ると支払い不能に陥る恐れがあるという報告をしてまいりましたので、15日、同日ですけれども、金融庁から業務停止命令を発出したところでありますし、また翌日16日、同社から東京地方裁判所に対して民事再生手続きの開始を申し立て、19日に当該手続きの開始が決定されたということでありまして、今後の同社の経営は申立て代理人、同社の代理人弁護士や、監督員、裁判所の指名によって同社の財務、業務を監視する弁護士らの助言等を踏まえて行われるものと承知をいたしております。 - 金融庁

I have a question relating to the capital adequacy requirement for banks. At your press conferences and on other occasions, including at a press conference that was held the other day, you said that it was not necessary to apply strict regulations to financial institutions that do not operate internationally but concentrate on domestic operations and that a (temporary) drop below the required capital level would not become an issue to fuss about. While the minimum capital adequacy ratio is set at 8% under the Basel accord, Japan applies a minimum ratio of 4% to financial institutions concentrating on domestic operations instead of strictly applying the 8% requirement to them. Am I correct in understanding that what you meant was that such financial institutions' capital adequacy ratio may drop even below 4%? 例文帳に追加

銀行の自己資本規制の関係でお伺いしたいのですけれども、大臣は会見等々で、前回も、いわゆる「国際的な活動をしていない、国内だけで活動している（金融機関）、これは厳格な規制を当てはめる必要はない。それ（基準）を切ったからといってどうだこうだ言わない」と先日もおっしゃっていましたけれども、これは要するに、今でもいわゆるバーゼル規制の8％というところがありますけれども、それは、国内向けは既に厳格に当てはめていなくて、4％という違う基準を設けているのですけれども、その4（％）も下回っても構いません、ということですね。 - 金融庁