「ひじえ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(245ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

3党合意、それからその以前の去年の8月16日に出した当面の選挙に当たっての共通政策、民主党、社民党、国民新党で出しましたが、あの中に、小泉さんがした過度の規制改革といいますか、過度の市場原理主義というのは非常に国民の生活に不安定をもたらしたといったことで、そこはこの連立政権の基本でございます。それから、その後選挙に勝たせて頂いても、きちっと3党合意において、そこは明記してあります。そういう線に則って、国民の色々な声があるということは良いことでございますし、また、検証委員会をつくらせて頂くということでございます。やはり日本というのは台風一過といいますか、台風は行ってしまったという、そういったことがあるとは申しませんけれども、やっぱりその度に大きなことはきちっと検証していくことが必要であるというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

DPJ, the Social Democratic Party and PNP together issued the three-party pact. This represents a common policy of the three parties issued on August 16 of last year in the run-up to the election. It was developed in the circumstances in which excessive regulatory reforms implemented by Mr. Koizumi, coupled with excessive market fundamentalism, had brought much instability to the lives of the Japanese people. That is the basic premise of this coalition government. Subsequently, after winning the election, we articulated the idea into the three-party pact. I find it a positive thing that the people are voicing various opinions in line with the cause. And we have made a decision to set up an inspection committee. I believe that it is necessary to properly inspect any significant incident on a case-by-case basis.  - 金融庁

この方の具体的な名前を出して恐縮なのですけれども、週刊ダイヤモンドの新年の合併号、12月25日号、クリスマス号で特別寄稿をし、これを書いていますので、今日ブログにも書かせていただきましたけれども、ぜひ、本当に私とぴったり合うとは、そんな大げさな大それたことは言いませんけれども、非常にこの文章に、金融担当大臣を半年した感想として共感いたしまして、そういった意味で、先ほど私は、人間の体と経済とを絡めて言いましたけれども、私が医者であることは40年変わりがない事実でございますし、金融担当大臣をさせて頂いたのもありがたい経験をさせていただきましたので、しっかりやっていきたいと思っております。例文帳に追加

I apologize for specifically naming him, but I wrote in my blog about a special article that he contributed in the New Year combined issue, or December 25 or special Christmas issue, of Diamond Weekly. I feel humble enough not to say that I share his exact same thought but, having served as the Minister for Financial Services for half a year, I highly sympathized with his article. In that sense, as I have just explained with an analogy between a human body and the economy as a doctor with 40 years in the profession, I appreciate the experience that I had by serving as the Minister for Financial Services and accordingly feel committed to continuing to work hard.  - 金融庁

なお、この貸出条件緩和債権につきましては、昨年11月7日に発表いたしました「貸出条件緩和債権に該当しない場合の取扱いの拡充」というものがあって、これは借り手企業の資金繰りや経営改善を図るために、金融機関が中小企業に対して貸出条件の緩和に柔軟に応じることができるように、恒久的な措置として講じたものでございまして、まさに我が国の実体経済が非常に悪くなっている中で、金融機関が実体経済における企業活動をサポートしていくという趣旨で講じられた措置でございまして、そういう形、あるいは目的で講じられた措置が前提になっているのは事実でございますが、トータルの信用コストなども含めた金融機関の財務状況をきちんと見ていくということが大事だと思います。例文帳に追加

Regarding restructured loans, a measure called "an expansion of criteria for treating loans as not equivalent to restructured loans" was announced on November 7 last year. This was adopted as a permanent measure to enable financial institutions to relax the lending terms for small and medium-size enterprises in order to improve their fund-raising and business conditions. This measure was taken so that financial institutions could support corporate activity amid the deterioration of Japan's real economy. While it is true that the financial results are based on the implementation of measures adopted for this purpose, I think that it is important to carefully watch the financial conditions of financial institutions, including the total credit costs.  - 金融庁

登録簿には各実用新案について次の事項を記載する。登録番号(登録証番号),登録日,実用新案登録の公報による公告の日,実用新案の名称,出願日及び適する場合は優先日，並びに出願番号,実用新案出願人の特定(人名又は社名)及び住所(本社所在地)，また代理人についてのそれら情報,実用新案の考案者の姓名及び住所,実用新案の所有者の特定(人名又は社名)及び住所(本社所在地)，また代理人についてのそれら情報,先使用者の権利,国際特許分類に基づく当該実用新案の分類,実用新案の譲渡,ライセンス,強制ライセンス登録期間の延長,登録の取消,保護の取消又は譲渡,保護の消滅。例文帳に追加

The following particulars for each utility model shall be entered in the Register: number of the registration (certificate); date of the registration; date of publication of the utility model registration in the Bulletin; title of the utility model; date of filing of the application and, where appropriate, date of priority and filing number of the application; identity of the applicant for the utility model (name of person or company) and address (headquarters) or of his representative; surname, first name and address of the author of the utility model; identity of the owner of the utility model (name of person or company) and address (headquarters) or of his representative; rights of prior user; classification of the utility model under the International Patent Classification; assignment of the utility model; licences; compulsory licence; extension of the term of registration; cancellation of the registration; revocation or assignment of protection; lapse of protection.  - 特許庁

(b) 第29条にいう対応する出願又は関係出願又は対応する国際出願に関する所定の情報を根拠として特許が付与された場合に， (i) 特許付与を求める所定の書類が提出され，特許付与に係る所定の手数料が納付された時の当該特許出願の少なくとも1のクレームが， (A) 対応する出願又は場合により対応する国際出願に関する所定の情報中に含まれているクレームであって， (B) 新規性，進歩性(若しくは非自明性)及び産業上の利用性(若しくは有用性)の基準を満たすと認められるか否かを決定するために審査されたもの， に関係していなかったこと，又は (ii) 対応する出願又は場合により対応する国際出願の審査官が，当該対応する出願又は場合により対応する国際出願の審査についての報告を作成する前に，関係先行技術のすべては考慮しなかったこと例文帳に追加

(b) where the patent was granted on the basis of any prescribed information relating to a corresponding application or corresponding international application referred to in section 29, that -- (i) at the time the prescribed documents for the grant of the patent were filed and the prescribed fee for the grant of the patent was paid, at least one claim in the application for the patent did not relate to any claim -- (A) which is set out in the prescribed information relating to the corresponding application or corresponding international application, as the case may be; and (B) which has been examined to determine whether the claim appears to satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step (or non-obviousness) and industrial applicability (or utility); or (ii) the Examiner of the corresponding application or corresponding international application, as the case may be, did not consider all the relevant prior art before preparing his report on the examination of the corresponding application or corresponding international application, as the case may be. - 特許庁

(1) 次の事項，すなわち， (a) 第56条に従って政府若しくは政府から書面により授権された者が行ったこと，又は (b) 政府の命令に従って， (i) 公共の非営利目的で，若しくは (ii) 国家の非常事態その他の緊急事態に際し， 特許発明に関して特許の所有者が，又は特許出願がされてなお係属中である発明に関して特許出願の所有者が行ったことについて， 本項が適用されるライセンス，譲渡又は協定の規定は，第60条，第61条及び第62条に従うことを条件として，当該規定が当該発明の実施若しくは当該発明に関するひな形，書類若しくは情報の使用を制限若しくは規制するか，又は当該実施若しくは使用に関する若しくはこれを参照して計算した支払を行うことを規定している限り，効力はない。例文帳に追加

(1) In relation to -- (a) anything done in accordance with section 56 by the Government or any party authorised in writing by the Government; or (b) anything done to the order of the Government -- (i) for a public non-commercial purpose; or (ii) for or during a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, by the proprietor of a patent in respect of the patented invention or by the proprietor of an application for a patent in respect of the invention for which the application has been filed and is still pending, the provisions of any licence, assignment or agreement to which this subsection applies shall, subject to sections 60, 61 and 62, be of no effect so far as those provisions restrict or regulate the working of the invention, or the use of any model, document or information relating to it, or provide for the making of payments in respect of, or calculated by reference to, such working or use. - 特許庁

第五十三条の三十二　会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百七十九条　会社法第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで（債権者に対する公告等、債務の弁済の制限、条件付債権等に係る債務の弁済、債務の弁済前における残余財産の分配の制限、清算からの除斥）、第五百七条第一項、第三項及び第四項（清算事務の終了等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号、第三号、第八号及び第九号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百二十八条第一項及び第三項（清算人の登記）並びに第九百二十九条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（清算結了の登記）の規定は、特定目的会社の清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百七条第三項中「決算報告（前項の規定の適用がある場合にあっては、同項の承認を受けたもの）を株主総会」とあるのは「決算報告（資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項に規定する監査を受けたもの）を社員総会」と、同法第五百八条第一項中「清算人（清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人）」とあるのは「清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 179 (1) The provisions of Article 499 to Article 503 inclusive (Public Notices to Creditors; Restrictions on Performance of Obligations; Performance of Obligations Relating to Conditional Claims; Restrictions on Distribution of Residual Assets Before Performance of Obligations; Exclusion from Liquidation), Article 507(1), (3), and (4) (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (ii), (iii), (viii), and (ix)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 928(1) and (3) (Registration of a liquidator), and Article 929 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Completion of Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "the settlement of accounts (or, in cases where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply, the settlement of accounts approved under that paragraph) to the shareholders meeting" in Article 507(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the settlement of accounts (those audited as prescribed in Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) at the general meeting of members," the phrase "A Liquidator (or, for a Company with Board of Liquidators, the liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 508(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

また、私は、郵政改革（担当）大臣でもございますから、ゴールドウェイ郵便規制委員会（委員長）、アメリカには70万人の国家公務員が郵政公社におりますが、これをきちっと規制する5人の委員がございまして、その委員長さんでございますゴールドウェイ郵便規制委員会の委員長さんとも話をさせていただきました。私も勉強させていただきましたけれども、アメリカの郵便というのは憲法上に郵便というのはきちっとやらねばならないというふうに書いてあるそうでございまして、これは独立戦争の後に最初に憲法をつくったときの憲法起草者の1人が郵便局長さんだったということもございまして、自由主義、あるいは民主主義の中には、情報がきちっと伝わることが大事だということで、郵便事業をきちっとやる国家における権利と義務といいますか、そういうことが憲法上の規則だということを初めて、私はゴールドウェイ委員長から勉強させていただきまして、そんなことを含めて米国の郵便改革の現状等について、なかなかアメリカの郵便も今こういった売り上げが落ちておりまして、それから不況もございまして、2年前のリーマン・ショックの影響もございまして、なかなか苦労しておりまして、そういった苦労話といいますか、いかにゴールドウェイ郵便規制委員会の委員長、5人の合議制のようでございますが、少しアメリカ郵政公社から値上げの話だとか、あるいは一部の郵便局は縮小したいと、こういった提案が来ているそうでございますが、それをどう判断するかということを今審議中でございまして、アメリカの郵便局には法律上、赤字でもつぶしてはいけないというような条項があるのですね。ということは、田舎の地域でも、経営上の理由だけで赤字だからということでつぶしてはならないという条項もございます。これはユニバーサルサービスというのが非常に厳格にアメリカは法律上の規定だそうでございますが、法律でも非常にそこら辺が厳しく、アメリカも立国の民主主義の精神として郵便事業というのは考えているわけでございますので、そういう話をさせていただいたわけでございます。例文帳に追加

In addition, I have obtained approval at today’s cabinet meeting to go on a business trip to China and Hong Kong starting today. During this trip, in Beijing, I will take part in the third high-level economic talks between Japan and China as one of the economic ministers.  - 金融庁

特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。例文帳に追加

I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts.　Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time.　Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment.　We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors.　In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet.　Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA.　In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery.　The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures.　At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation.  - 金融庁

８　会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項（指定買取人による買取りの通知）の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項（譲渡等承認請求の撤回）の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで（売買価格の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）及び第百九十二条から前条まで（判例の摘示、上告理由の記載の仕方、上告理由書の提出期間、上告理由を記載した書面の通数、補正命令、上告裁判所への事件送付及び上告理由書の送達）の規定は、上告受理の申立てについて準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条、第百八十九条及び第百九十四条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは「上告受理申立て通知書」と、第百八十九条第二項、第百九十五条及び前条中「被上告人」とあるのは「相手方」と、第百九十六条第一項中「第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）」とあるのは「第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal) and Article 192 to the preceding Article (Indication of Precedents; Matter in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated; Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal; Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal; Order to Correct; Sending of Case to Final Appellate Court; and Service of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187, Article 189 and Article 194 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal," the term "appellee of the final appeal" in paragraph (2) of Article 189, Article 195 and the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "opponent," and the phrase "Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code)" in paragraph (1) of Article 196 shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八十二条の十八　解散及び清算については、民法第七十三条、第七十五条、第七十六条及び第七十八条から第八十二条まで（法人の清算）並びに非訟事件手続法第三十五条第二項及び第三十七条から第四十条まで（法人の清算の監督）の規定を、清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十六条の三第一項、第三十七条第一項、第三十八条、第三十九条、第四十条第二項から第十項まで（第六項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第八十二条の十第一項及び第二項並びに民法第四十四条第一項（法人の不法行為能力）の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第七十五条中「前条」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第八十二条の十四」と、第三十八条第一項中「理事会において」とあるのは「監事に」と、同条第三項中「理事会」とあるのは「監事」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 82-18 (1) With regard to dissolution and liquidation, the provisions of Article 73, Article 75, Article 76, and Articles 78 to 82 (Liquidation of a Juridical Person) of the Civil Code and Article 35, paragraph (2) and Articles 37 to 40 (Supervision of Liquidation of a Juridical Person) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to the liquidator, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 36-3, paragraph (1), Article 37, paragraph (1), Article 38, Article 39, Article 40, paragraphs (2) to (10) (excluding paragraph (6)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 82-10, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of this Act and Article 44, paragraph (1) (Capacity of Juridical Person to Commit Tortious Acts) of the Civil Code shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, "the preceding Article" in Article 75 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 82-14 of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act," the phrase "at the council and obtain its" in Article 38, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to the auditors and obtain their," and the term "council" in paragraph (3) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "auditors."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

昨日もフランスの中央銀行の総裁が来まして、1時間近く大臣室でお会いして、夜はフランス大使館に行って歓迎レセプションにも出席させていただきましたが、フランスと日本とドイツというのは、バーゼル III において比較的、立場が似通っていますけれども、そういった中で若干、英国と米国が大き過ぎてつぶせないということが、当時懸念されましたが、SIFIsについては、色々とやるべきだという意見があるということは、知っておられると思いますが、いずれにいたしましても、グローバルなシステム上重要な金融機関、グローバルSIFIsの特定については、年度末までにバーゼルの委員会が、金融機関のシステム上の重要性の判定手法を暫定的にまとめて、来年初めに成案を得て、それから来年中頃までぐらいに、このFSB（金融安定理事会）と各国当局者は、G SIFIsすなわち非常にグローバルなシステム上重要な金融機関を特定するとの日程になっておりまして、我が国の金融機関の取り扱いにいたしましても、こうした作業の中で決まってくると思っております。例文帳に追加

It was also yesterday that I had a visit from the governor of the central bank of France and spoke with him in my office and, at night, I also attended a welcome reception at the French Embassy. France, Japan and Germany have a relatively similar position in relation to Basel III. Given that background, the "too big to fail" nature of U.K. and U.S. financial institutions generated a level of concern and some argue for the need to address the issue of SIFIs, as you surely know. In any case, the schedule for addressing the issue of determination of global SIFIs is that the Basel Committee will, by the end of this year, put together a draft approach for determining the degree of systematic importance of a financial institution, which is to be finalized by the beginning of the next year, and then the FSB and the authorities from the respective nations will identify global SIFIs (i.e., systematically important financial institutions that are highly global) by roughly the middle of the next year. How Japanese financial institutions will be treated in this regard will likely be determined in the course of those actions.  - 金融庁

６　前項の「徴収保険料額」とは、第一項第一号の事業に係る一般保険料の額のうち雇用保険率に応ずる部分の額（前条の規定により高年齢労働者を使用する事業の一般保険料の額を同条の規定による額とする場合には、当該一般保険料の額に第一項第一号に掲げる事業に係る高年齢者免除額（前条の規定により第十一条第一項の規定による額から減ずることとする額をいう。以下この項及び第三十条において同じ。）を加えた額のうち雇用保険率に応ずる部分の額から当該高年齢者免除額を減じた額）の総額と第一項第三号の事業に係る一般保険料の額の総額とを合計した額（以下この項及び第八項において「一般保険料徴収額」という。）から当該一般保険料徴収額に二事業率（千分の三・五の率（第四項第三号に掲げる事業については、千分の四・五の率）を雇用保険率で除して得た率をいう。同条第一項において同じ。）を乗じて得た額（第八項において「二事業費充当徴収保険料額」という。）を減じた額及び印紙保険料の額の総額の合計額をいう。例文帳に追加

(6) The term "amount of the collected insurance premiums" as used in the preceding paragraph shall mean the aggregate of the total of the stamp insurance premiums and the amount calculated by reducing, from the aggregate of the total of the portion corresponding to the employment insurance rate, among the amount of the general insurance premiums pertaining to the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) (or, in case of acknowledging the amount prescribed in the preceding Article as the amount of the general insurance premiums for the businesses employing older workers pursuant to the provision of the same Article, the amount calculated by reducing, from the portion corresponding to the employment insurance rate, among the aggregate of the amount of such general insurance premiums and the amount of the older worker exemptions (meaning the amount to be reduced, pursuant to the provision of the preceding Article, from the amount prescribed by Article 11, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and in Article 30) pertaining to the businesses listed in paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of such older worker exemptions) and the total of the amount of general insurance premiums pertaining to the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (iii) (hereinafter referred to as the "amount of collected general insurance premiums" in this paragraph and paragraph (8)), the amount obtained by multiplying such amount of collected general insurance premiums by the two-service rate (meaning the rate obtained by dividing the rate of three point five one-thousandth (3.5/1000) (or, in case of the businesses listed in paragraph (4), item (iii), the rate of four point five one-thousandth (4.5/1000)) by the employment insurance rate; the same shall apply in the same Article, paragraph (1)) (in paragraph (8) referred to as the "amount of collected insurance premiums for appropriation to two-service costs").  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私のほうから、今も、ちょっと事務方から連絡が入ったのですけれども、為替レートが、また今、85円50銭まで下がっているということなのですが、今日の閣僚懇で、まあ「閣僚懇の中身は言うな」ということらしいのですけれども、そうとばかりは言っていれないので申し上げるけれども、こうした急激な円高が起きているということについて、Ｇ20や国際会議が何度も開かれている中で、こうして為替レートが急速に、乱高下というよりも、一つのドル安というようなトレンドが急速に進んでいるという、そうした状況に対して、我が国自身がこれにどう対応するか、ということとあわせて、アメリカや国際社会に対してこれの対応を求めるべきではないか、ということを、私は、（藤井）財務大臣にもお話をいたしまして、また、菅副総理に対しても、経済財政政策の責任者なので、「こうした一つの、もう円高のトレンドというような状況が非常に急激な形で進んでいるときに、それに対しての経済財政運営、やはり、これは機動的にやっていくべきなので、そういうことに対して、この政権はきちんとやっていく必要があるんじゃないの」と、補正予算、来年度予算編成についても、「マニフェストを実現するということも大事だけれども、そうした国内の経済にきちんと対応していくという、そういうことをやるべきではないですか」ということを、私は、申し上げました例文帳に追加

Just now, I heard from my staff that the Yen has risen to the dollar up to 85.50 yen. At today’s informal meeting of cabinet ministers -- although we are supposed to refrain from talking about what is discussed at the meeting -- regarding this rapid rise of the yen, I told the Minister of Finance (Mr. Fujii) that we should consider how Japan should deal with the excessively volatile exchange rate movements, or I should say the rapid decline of the dollar, and we should also urge the United States and the international community to take action to deal with it. I also suggested to Deputy Prime Minister Kan, who is responsible for economic and fiscal policies, that the government should flexibly take economic and fiscal policy measures at a time when a trend like the yen’s rise is rapidly progressing. Regarding the compilation of the supplementary budget and the budget for the next fiscal year, I said that although it is important to implement the election manifesto, the government should take appropriate measures with regard to the (ailing) domestic economy  - 金融庁

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

しかし、危難失踪で1年間といったら、5千人以上の方が本当に胸の痛む思いでございますが、今まだ行方不明でございまして、それで危難失踪で1年というのはちょっと長すぎますので、これは金融庁の局長が非常に頑張っていただきまして、法務省、これは生きるか死ぬかという生死は法務省ですから、法務省と大変激しい交渉をやらせていただきまして、これは3か月だったかな、3か月で簡素な市町村に対する届出によって、死亡の確認ができるというふうになりまして、そんなことを目に見えないことでございますが、いわゆる生保のセールスレディの方もご遺族と一緒にご遺体安置所なんかをどんどん回っていただいておりまして、私は医者ですから、よくああいうご遺体にお会いするという、普通慣れてない方といいますか、我々は本職が医者でございますけれども、いかに精神的ショックを受けられるかということは、私はよく分かりますので、そこまでしてセールスレディの方がやっていただいているという話をよく聞きますので、そういった意味で、私は金融の分野はまさに金融機関、いつかお話ししたと思いますが、宮城県石巻商工信用組合、4日間、連絡が付かなかったのですけれども、ろうそくをつけながら、きちっと人にお金を貸したということをやっていただいておりまして、そういう意味では私は本当に各金融機関、生損保、あるいは証券会社、あるいはそういったいろいろな各関係、金融関係の方に本当に官民一体で未曾有の震災に取り組んでいただいたということは感謝いたしておりますけれども、まだまだ、十分と、そんなに決してのぼせ上がっておりません。例文帳に追加

Regrettably, more than 5,000 people are still missing, and one year is too long a time to wait for the adjudication of disappearance due to emergency. Therefore, the FSA's director-general in charge held very tough negotiations with the Ministry of Justice, which is responsible for matters related to the certification of the death of missing people. As a result, it has been agreed to allow the death of missing people to be certified three months after their disappearance based on a notification submitted to municipal governments through a simplified procedure. While an arrangement like that is made behind the scenes, life insurance sales women are going from mortuary to mortuary with the relatives of missing people. As I am a doctor by profession, I know well what a great mental shock it is for ordinary people to see the body of a person killed in a disaster like that, but insurance sales women are going as far as to do that. As I told you previously, Ishinomaki Shoko Shinkumi, which could not be contacted for four days after the earthquake, continued to provide loans, with employees working by candle light. In that sense, I am very grateful to various people in the financial sector, including financial institutions, life and non-life insurance companies and securities companies, for dealing with the unprecedented earthquake and tsunami disaster through private-public collaboration. However, I am not so complacent as to believe that we have done enough.  - 金融庁

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十九条　組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項（各号列記以外の部分に限る。）、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条（株式会社の清算）、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条（非訟）並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第四十条（検査をすべき者の選任の裁判）の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで（第三十六条の七第四項を除く。）、第四十条（第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会）」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　民法第八十二条及び第八十三条、非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項及び第四十条並びに会社法第六百四十四条（第三号を除く。）、第六百四十五条から第六百四十九条まで、第六百五十条第一項及び第二項、第六百五十一条第一項及び第二項（同法第五百九十四条の準用に係る部分を除く。）、第六百五十二条、第六百五十三条、第六百五十五条から第六百五十九条まで、第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条まで、第六百六十六条、第六百六十七条、第六百七十二条、第六百七十三条、第六百七十五条、第八百六十三条、第八百六十四条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条の規定は、監査法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第三項中「第六百四十一条第四号又は第七号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第五号若しくは第六号又は第二項」と、同法第六百五十八条第一項中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第六百七十三条第一項中「第五百八十条」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十の六」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 82 and Article 83 of the Civil Code, Article 35(2) and Article 40 of the Act of Procedures in Non-Contentious Matters (Act No. 14 of 1898), and Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Articles 645 to 649 inclusive, Article 650(1) and (2), Article 651(1) and (2) (excluding the portion pertaining to application mutatis mutandis of Article 594 of the same Act), Article 652, Article 653, Articles 655 to 659 inclusive, Articles 662 to 664 inclusive, Article 666, Article 667, Article 672, Article 673, Article 675, Article 863, Article 864, Article 868(1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution and liquidation of audit corporations. In this case, the term "Article 641(v)" in Article 644(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(iii) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Article 641(iv) or (vii)" in Article 647(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(v) or (vi) or Article 34-18(2) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 658(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," and the term "Article 580" in Article 673(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-10-6 of the Certified Public Accountants Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　民法第八十二条、非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項及び第四十条並びに会社法第六百四十四条（第三号を除く。）、第六百四十五条から第六百四十九条まで、第六百五十条第一項及び第二項、第六百五十一条第一項及び第二項（同法第五百九十四条の準用に係る部分を除く。）、第六百五十二条、第六百五十三条、第六百五十五条から第六百五十九条まで、第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条まで、第六百六十六条から第六百七十三条まで、第六百七十五条、第八百六十三条、第八百六十四条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条の規定は、弁護士法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第三項中「第六百四十一条第四号又は第七号」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第五号から第七号まで」と、同法第六百六十八条第一項及び第六百六十九条中「第六百四十一条第一号から第三号まで」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第一号又は第二号」と同法第六百七十条第三項中「第九百三十九条第一項」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十八第六項において準用する第九百三十九条第一項」と、同法第六百七十三条第一項中「第五百八十条」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の十五」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 82 of the Civil Code and Article 35, paragraph (2), Article 40 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act (Act No. 14 of 1898), Companies Act Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Articles 645 through 649, Article 650, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 651, paragraphs (1) and (2) (excluding portions relating to reference to Article 594), Article 652, Article 653, Articles 655 through 659, Articles 662 through 664, Articles 666 through 673, Article 675, Article 863, Article 864, Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (only with regard to items (ii) and (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (only with regard to item (iv)), Article 874 (only with regard to items (i) and (iv)), Article 875 and Article 876 shall apply mutatis mutandis to dissolution and liquidation of Legal Professional Corporations. In such a case, "Article 641, item (v)" as used in Article 644, item (i) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "Article 641, item (iv) or (vii)" as used in Article 647, paragraph (3) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), items (v) through (vii)" and "Article 641, items (i) through (iii)" as used in Article 668, paragraph (1) and Article 669 shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii)" and "Article 939, paragraph (1)" as used in Article 670, paragraph (3) shall be read as "Article 939, paragraph (1) as referred to in Attorney Act Article 30-28, paragraph (6)" and "Article 580" as used in Article 673, paragraph (1) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-15."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム