「time effect」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(83ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

the use by a person of a trade mark - (i) in relation to goods connected in the course of trade with the proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark if, as to those goods or a bulk of which they form part, the registered proprietor or the registered user conforming to the permitted use has applied the trade mark and has not subsequently removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trade mark; or (ii) in relation to services to which the proprietor of such mark or of a registered user conforming to the permitted use has applied the mark, where the purpose and effect of the use of the mark is to indicate, in accordance with the fact, that those services have been performed by the proprietor or a registered user of the mark; 例文帳に追加

何人かによる商標の使用であって，(i) 商標の所有者又は登録使用者と取引上関係がある商品について，登録所有者又は許諾された使用方法に従う登録使用者がその商品又はそれが一部を構成しているものに関して商標を適用し，かつ，その後それを抹消若しくは削除しなかったか，又はいつでも当該商標の使用に明示的若しくは黙示的に同意していた場合 (ii) 前記商標の所有者又は許諾された使用方法に従う登録使用者が商標を適用したサービスについて，当該商標使用の目的及び効果が，それらのサービスが所有者又は登録使用者により実施されたことを，事実に従い表示することである場合 - 特許庁

(2) When the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the prefectural governor or the Port Management Body, intending to order necessary steps to be taken pursuant to the provisions of Article 40-2 paragraph (1), Article 41 paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph, is unable to identify the party to whom the orders are to be given without negligence on his/her part, he/she may take necessary measures by himself/herself or have the party designated or commissioned take necessary measures. In this case, public notice shall be given in advance to the effect that the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the prefectural governor or Port Management Body, or the party designated or commissioned will take necessary measures if such measures are not taken within a reasonably set period of time. 例文帳に追加

２　第四十条の二第一項、第四十一条第一項又は前項の規定により必要な措置をとることを命じようとする場合において、過失がなくて当該措置を命ずべき者を確知することができないときは、国土交通大臣、都道府県知事又は港湾管理者は、当該措置を自ら行い、又はその命じた者若しくはその委任した者にこれを行わせることができる。この場合においては、相当の期限を定めて、当該措置を行うべき旨及びその期限までに当該措置を行わないときは、国土交通大臣、都道府県知事若しくは港湾管理者又はその命じた者若しくは委任した者が当該措置を行う旨を、あらかじめ、公告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 184-20 (1) Where a refusal under Article 25(1)(a) of the Treaty or a declaration under Article 25(1)(a) or (b) of the Treaty has been made by the receiving Office under Article 2(xv) of the Treaty, or a finding under Article 25(1)(a) of the Treaty has been made by the International Bureau under Article 2(xix) of the Treaty in relation to an international application (a patent application only) which specifies Japan as a designated State under Article 4(1)(ii) of the Treaty, the applicant of the international application under Article 2(vii) of the Treaty may make a request to the effect that the Commissioner of the Patent Office shall render a decision under Article 25(2)(a) of the Treaty in accordance with Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry within the time limit provided in Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 例文帳に追加

第百八十四条の二十　条約第二条（ｖｉｉ）の国際出願の出願人は、条約第四条（１）（ｉｉ）の指定国に日本国を含む国際出願（特許出願に係るものに限る。）につき条約第二条（ｘｖ）の受理官庁により条約第二十五条（１）（ａ）に規定する拒否若しくは同条（１）（ａ）若しくは（ｂ）に規定する宣言がされ、又は条約第二条（ｘｉｘ）の国際事務局により条約第二十五条（１）（ａ）に規定する認定がされたときは、経済産業省令で定める期間内に、経済産業省令で定めるところにより、特許庁長官に同条（２）（ａ）に規定する決定をすべき旨の申出をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 48-16 (1) Where a refusal under Article 25(1)(a) of the Treaty or a declaration under Article 25(1)(a) or (b) of the Treaty has been made by the receiving Office as defined in Article 2(xv) of the Treaty, or a finding under Article 25(1)(a) of the Treaty has been made by the International Bureau as defined in Article 2(xix) of the Treaty in relation to an international application as defined in Article 2 (vii) of the Treaty (limited to an application for a utility model registration) which specifies Japan as a designated State under Article 4(1)(ii) of the Treaty, the applicant of the international application may make a request to the effect that the Commissioner of the Patent Office shall render a decision under Article 25(2)(a) of the Treaty in accordance with an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry within the time limit provided in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 例文帳に追加

第四十八条の十六　条約第二条（ｖｉｉ）の国際出願の出願人は、条約第四条（１）（ｉｉ）の指定国に日本国を含む国際出願（実用新案登録出願に係るものに限る。）につき条約第二条（ｘｖ）の受理官庁により条約第二十五条（１）（ａ）に規定する拒否若しくは同条（１）（ａ）若しくは（ｂ）に規定する宣言がされ、又は条約第二条（ｘｉｘ）の国際事務局により条約第二十五条（１）（ａ）に規定する認定がされたときは、経済産業省令で定める期間内に、経済産業省令で定めるところにより、特許庁長官に同条（２）（ａ）に規定する決定をすべき旨の申出をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 180 (1) The interest specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 138(vi) (Domestic Source Income) of the Act shall be the interest on the following claims for which the period between the day of their occurrence and the day on which the obligation shall be performed (for claims for which such period is scheduled to be extended substantially by the renewal of the period or in any other ways (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal, etc. of the period" in this paragraph), the said extended period; hereinafter referred to as the "performance period" in this paragraph) does not exceed six months (including claims during the original performance period before the renewal, etc. of the period in the case where the performance period of the claims, whose original performance period at the time of coming into effect did not exceed six months, has come to exceed six months by the renewal, etc. of the period): 例文帳に追加

第百八十条　法第百三十八条第六号（国内源泉所得）に規定する政令で定める利子は、次に掲げる債権のうち、その発生の日からその債務を履行すべき日までの期間（期間の更新その他の方法（以下この項において「期間の更新等」という。）により当該期間が実質的に延長されることが予定されているものについては、その延長された当該期間。以下この項において「履行期間」という。）が六月をこえないもの（その成立の際の履行期間が六月をこえなかつた当該債権について期間の更新等によりその履行期間が六月をこえることとなる場合のその期間の更新等が行なわれる前の履行期間における当該債権を含む。）の利子とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 72 (1) If any project executor intends to defer the procedures for expropriation or use pursuant to the provision of Article 31 of the Compulsory Purchase of Land Act applied pursuant to the provision of Article 69, they shall, at the time when he/she intends to obtain the approval or recognition pursuant to the provisions of Article 59 or Article 63 paragraph (1), submit a written petition containing statements to that effect and description of the bounds of the project site, for which the procedures for expropriation or use are to be deferred pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. In this case, the bounds of the project site for which the procedures are to be deferred shall be indicated on the drawings listed in Article 60 paragraph (3) item (i) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63 paragraph (2)). 例文帳に追加

第七十二条　施行者は、第六十九条の規定により適用される土地収用法第三十一条の規定によつて収用又は使用の手続を保留しようとするときは、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、第五十九条又は第六十三条第一項の規定による認可又は承認を受けようとする際、その旨及び手続を保留する事業地の範囲を記載した申立書を提出しなければならない。この場合においては、第六十条第三項第一号（第六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる図面に手続を保留する事業地の範囲を表示しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 81 (1) The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, prefectural governors, or the heads of designated cities, etc. may, with respect to any person falling under any of the following items, to the extent necessary for city planning, revoke permission, approval, or recognition given pursuant to the provisions of this Act (excluding those pertaining to decision or change of city plans; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), alter it, suspend its effect, change its conditions or attach new conditions to it, or order such persons to discontinue the construction or other activities, or set reasonable time limits and order such persons to rebuild, move or remove buildings and other structures or objects (hereinafter referred to as "structures etc." in this Article), or to take some other measures necessary for rectifying the violations: 例文帳に追加

第八十一条　国土交通大臣、都道府県知事又は指定都市等の長は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する者に対して、都市計画上必要な限度において、この法律の規定によつてした許可、認可若しくは承認（都市計画の決定又は変更に係るものを除く。以下この条において同じ。）を取り消し、変更し、その効力を停止し、その条件を変更し、若しくは新たに条件を付し、又は工事その他の行為の停止を命じ、若しくは相当の期限を定めて、建築物その他の工作物若しくは物件（以下この条において「工作物等」という。）の改築、移転若しくは除却その他違反を是正するため必要な措置をとることを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Inasmuch as the candle produces water, and this gas comes out of the water, let us see what this gives us by the same process of combustion that the candle went through when it burnt in the atmosphere; and for that purpose I am going to put the lamp under this apparatus, in order to condense whatever may arise from the combustion within it In the course of a short time you will see moisture appearing in the cylinder, and you will get the water running down the side; and the water from this hydrogen flame will have absolutely the same effect upon all our tests, being obtained by the same general process as in the former case. 例文帳に追加

ロウソクは水をつくるし、この気体が水から出てくるんなら、ロウソクが大気中で燃えたのと同じ燃焼プロセスで、なにが出てくるかを見てみましょう。で、このためには、ランプをこんな装置の下に置いてみましょう [と講師は、漏斗をひっくり返してそこに横向きの太い試験管をつなげたような装置をとりだして、燃える水素をその漏斗の下のところに置いた] 。これで、燃焼から出てきたものはすべて、この円筒の中に凝集されることになります。　 ちょっと待つだけで、この円筒に湿気が見られるようになります。やがて水がその中をつたい落ちはじめます。そしてこの水素の炎から得られる水は、各種の試験すべてに対してまったく同じ反応を示します。これまでと同じ、一般的なプロセスで得られたものだからです。 - Michael Faraday『ロウソクの科学』

Marks registered under Republic Act No. 166 shall remain in force and effect but shall be deemed to have been granted under the IP Code and shall be renewed within the time and manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations; provided, that marks whose registration have a remaining duration as of January 1, 1998 of more than six and one-half years shall be required to submit the declaration and evidence of actual use prescribed in these Regulations within one year following the tenth and fifteenth anniversaries of the registration or renewal registration under Republic Act No. 166; provided, further, that marks whose registrations have a remaining duration of six and one-half years or less may no longer be subject to the requirement of declaration and evidence of use but shall be renewed within the time and in the manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations and, upon renewal, shall be reclassified in accordance with the Nice Classification. The renewal shall be for a duration of ten years. Trade names and marks registered in the Supplemental Register under Republic Act No. 166 whose registration, including any renewal thereof, was subsisting as of January 1, 1998 shall remain in force but shall no longer be subject to renewal.例文帳に追加

共和国法律第166号に基づいて登録された標章は引き続き有効であるが，IP法に基づいて認められたものとみなされ，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新される。ただし，1998年1月1日現在でその登録の残存期間が6年半より長い標章は，共和国法律第166号に基づく登録又は更新登録の10周年日及び15周年日から1年以内に，本規則に定める実際の使用の宣言書及び証拠を提出しなければならない。ただし，その登録の残存期間が6年半以内である標章は，もはや使用の宣言書及び証拠の要件の対象とされないが，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新されるものとし，更新されれば，ニース分類に基づいて再分類される。更新は，10年とする。共和国法律第166号に基づいて補助登録簿に登録された商号及び標章であって，その登録が更新によるものを含め1998年1月1日時点で存続していたものは，引き続き有効であるが，もはや更新の対象ではない。 - 特許庁

(i) if the Limited Partner reasonably determines that the contribution under the Capital Call Notice for such Portfolio Investment probably will result in its violation of any law, rule or regulation or its internal investment policies (limited to those policies that it has notified the General Partner of at the time of its admission to the Partnership) or any other material adverse effect on it and such Limited Partner requests that the General Partner discharge it from the obligation to make such contribution; provided that the Limited Partner shall (I)(a) give a written notice of its request under item (i) of this paragraph and (b) submit an opinion of legal counsel (such legal counsel and contents of its opinion shall be reasonably satisfactory to the General Partner and address the Limited Partner’s determination under item (i) of this paragraph), to the General Partner within [__] days from receipt of the Capital Call Notice (or any later date as the General Partner determines in its discretion), and (II) provide any other information regarding the probability of a material adverse effect as the General Partner reasonably requests; or 例文帳に追加

① 当該有限責任組合員が、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る追加出資請求通知において示された出資をなすことが、当該有限責任組合員に対し、法令又は投資に関する内部規則（但し、本組合加入時に無限責任組合員に通知されたものに限る。）の違反その他の重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性があると合理的に判断し、無限責任組合員に対して出資義務の免除を請求した場合。但し、当該有限責任組合員が出資義務を免れるためには、当該有限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)無限責任組合員に対し、当該追加出資請求通知の到達の日から［ ］日以内（又はその後の日で無限責任組合員がその裁量により決定する日まで）に、(1)本項第①号に基づく請求を行う旨書面により通知し、(2)法律顧問の意見書（当該法律顧問及び意見書の内容は無限責任組合員が合理的に満足できるもので、本項第①号に定める趣旨の、有限責任組合員の判断に関するものでなければならない。）を提出し、かつ、(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が合理的に要求する、当該重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性についてのその他の情報を提供しなければならない。 - 経済産業省

Article 283 (1) The interest specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 161(vi) (Domestic Source Income) of the Act shall be the interest on the following claims for which the period between the day of their occurrence and the day on which the obligation shall be performed (for claims for which such period is scheduled to be extended substantially by the renewal of the period or in other ways (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal, etc. of the period" in this paragraph), the said extended period; hereinafter referred to as the "performance period" in this paragraph) does not exceed six months (including claims during the original performance period before the renewal, etc. of the period in the case where the performance period of the claims, whose original performance period at the time of coming into effect did not exceed six months, has come to exceed six months by the renewal, etc. of the period): 例文帳に追加

第二百八十三条　法第百六十一条第六号（国内源泉所得）に規定する政令で定める利子は、次に掲げる債権のうち、その発生の日からその債務を履行すべき日までの期間（期間の更新その他の方法（以下この項において「期間の更新等」という。）により当該期間が実質的に延長されることが予定されているものについては、その延長された当該期間。以下この項において「履行期間」という。）が六月をこえないもの（その成立の際の履行期間が六月をこえなかつた当該債権について期間の更新等によりその履行期間が六月をこえることとなる場合のその期間の更新等が行なわれる前の履行期間における当該債権を含む。）の利子とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment have received a request under the preceding paragraph, if they find that the new chemical substance to which said request pertains falls under item (vi) of said paragraph at the time of making a determination under item (i) of the preceding Article, they shall, notwithstanding the provisions of said paragraph, make a determination as to which of the following items said new chemical substance falls under, in lieu of a determination to the effect that it falls under item (vi) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, based on already available knowledge on the composition, properties, etc., of the new chemical substance to which said request pertains, within three months from the date of receipt of a notification under item (i) of Article 3, and shall notify the result thereof to the person who has made the request under the preceding paragraph; in this case, the provisions of paragraph (2) of said Article shall not apply: 例文帳に追加

２　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、前項の申出があつた場合において、前条第一項の判定に際してその申出に係る新規化学物質が同項第六号に該当すると認めるときは、同項の規定にかかわらず、第三条第一項の届出を受理した日から三月以内に、前条第一項第六号に該当する旨の判定を行うことに代えて、その申出に係る新規化学物質について既に得られているその組成、性状等に関する知見に基づいて、その新規化学物質が次の各号のいずれに該当するかを判定し、その結果を前項の申出をした者に通知しなければならない。この場合においては、同条第二項の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the rehabilitation debtor has submitted a proposed rehabilitation plan that specifies special clauses on home loan and it has resulted in any of the cases set forth in the items of paragraph (2), the provision of paragraph (2) shall also apply to an objection made in an investigation of rehabilitation claims, by the time specified in the respective items, by a rehabilitation creditor who holds a home loan claim prescribed in Article 198(1) and does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for said home loan claim or by a guarantee company that does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for a right of exoneration based on the guarantee for the debt for a home loan claim. In this case, the person who has made such objection shall not be subject to the effect of the relevant statements in the schedule of rehabilitation creditors that shall be the same as a final and binding judgment under the provisions of Article 104(3) and Article 180(2). 例文帳に追加

４　再生債務者により住宅資金特別条項を定めた再生計画案が提出され、かつ、第二項各号のいずれかに該当することとなったときは、当該各号に定める時までに第百九十八条第一項に規定する住宅資金貸付債権を有する再生債権者であって当該住宅資金貸付債権以外に再生債権を有しないもの又は保証会社であって住宅資金貸付債権に係る債務の保証に基づく求償権以外に再生債権を有しないものが再生債権の調査において述べた異議についても、第二項と同様とする。この場合においては、当該異議を述べた者には、第百四条第三項及び第百八十条第二項の規定による確定判決と同一の効力は、及ばない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a report (hereinafter referred to in this article as "Report on Implementing Collection after Delivery") pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 7, Paragraph 10 or Paragraph 13 is to be made by the entity (hereinafter referred to in this article simply as "Person Taking Delivery") taking delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicles reported on in the Report on Implementing Delivery within a period of time specified by ordinance of the competent minister after the report (in the report pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 9 or Paragraph 11, this does not apply to delivery to Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles. Hereinafter referred to in this article as "Report on Implementing Delivery") pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8, Paragraph 9, Paragraph 11 or Paragraph 12 was received, the Information Management Entity shall notify the person making the Report on Implementing Delivery to this effect without delay. 例文帳に追加

２　情報管理センターは、第八十一条第二項、第四項、第六項、第八項、第九項、第十一項又は第十二項の規定による報告（同条第九項又は第十一項の規定による報告にあっては、解体自動車全部利用者への引渡しに係るものを除く。以下この条において「引渡実施報告」という。）を受けた後主務省令で定める期間内に、当該引渡実施報告により報告された使用済自動車等の引渡しを受ける者（以下この条において単に「引渡しを受ける者」という。）が行うべき同条第三項、第七項、第十項又は第十三項の規定による報告（以下この条において「引渡後引取実施報告」という。）を受けないときは、遅滞なく、その旨を当該引渡実施報告を行った者に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the shareholders meeting of a Bank passes a resolution for transferring the whole of its business or for acquiring the whole of the other's business (or, in the case where a Bank acquires the whole of the other's business not through the resolution required by Article 467(1) (Approvals of Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provision of Article 468 (Cases where Approval of Assignment of Business is not Required) of that Act, where its board of directors passes a resolution for acquiring such business or its executive officers decide to acquire such business), the Bank shall, within two weeks from the day of the resolution or decision, make public notice, in the official gazette, of the gist of the resolution or the decision and to the effect that any creditors who have any objection to the transfer of the whole of its business or acquisition of the whole of the other's business ought to file an objection within a specified period of time, and shall give notice of the same separately to each known creditor other than Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order, if any. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議（会社法第四百六十八条（事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合）の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項（事業譲渡等の承認等）の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定）がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Articles 17 to 21, Article 22 and Article 23 shall apply mutatis mutandis to Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities for which Shelf Registration has been made. In this case, the term "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1)" in Article 17 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-12(2) (including Reference Documents referenced therein)"; the terms "a Securities Registration Statement contains" and "the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 18(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shelf Registration Documents, an Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4, Article 23-9(1) or Article 23-10(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-10(5)) (hereinafter referred to as an "Amended Shelf Registration Statement"), or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached thereto or Reference Documents referenced in any of the foregoing (hereinafter referred to as "Shelf Registration Documents, etc.") contain" and "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing," respectively; the term "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) contains" in Article 18(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) (including Reference Documents referenced therein) contains"; the terms "the Securities Registration Statement" and "the Prospectus" in Article 19(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents" and "the Prospectus (including Reference Documents referenced therein)," respectively; the terms "the Securities Registration Statement," "the Prospectus contains" and "Article 10(1) or Article 11(1)" and the part "from the time when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities comes into effect" in Article 20 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents," "the Prospectus (including Reference Documents referenced therein) contains," "Article 23-10(3) or Article 23-11(1)" and "from the time when the Shelf Registration Supplements relating to the Shelf Registration which was made for the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution and already came into effect are submitted," respectively; the term "a Securities Registration Statement contains" in the non-itemized part of Article 21(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shelf Registration Documents contain"; the term "the Securities Registration Statement" in item (i) and (iii) of Article 21(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing"; the term "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) contains" of Article 21(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) (including Reference Documents referenced therein)"; the terms "a Securities Registration Statement" and "the Securities Registration Statement" of Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents contain" and "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing," respectively; the parts "a notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities was made and has come into effect," "Article 10(1) or Article 11(1)," "the Securities Registration Statement" and "the notification" of Article 23 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the fact that a Shelf Registration has come into effect and Shelf Registration Supplements relating thereto are submitted (in the case of Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities referred to in Article 23-8(2), the fact that the Shelf Registration therefor has come into effect)," "Article 23-10(3) or Article 23-11(1)," "the Shelf Registration Documents" and "the Shelf Registration," respectively. 例文帳に追加

５　第十七条から第二十一条まで、第二十二条及び第二十三条の規定は、発行登録を行つた有価証券の募集又は売出しについて準用する。この場合において、第十七条中「第十三条第一項の目論見書」とあるのは「第二十三条の十二第二項において準用する第十三条第一項の目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）」と、第十八条第一項中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類、第二十三条の四、第二十三条の九第一項若しくは第二十三条の十第一項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による訂正発行登録書（以下「訂正発行登録書」という。）又は発行登録追補書類及びその添付書類並びにこれらの書類に係る参照書類（以下「発行登録書類等」という。）のうちに」と、「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、同条第二項中「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、第十九条第二項中「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と、「目論見書」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）」と、第二十条中「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と、「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、「第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた時」とあるのは「発行登録の効力が生じており、かつ、それに係る発行登録追補書類が提出された時」と、「第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項」とあるのは「第二十三条の十第三項又は第二十三条の十一第一項」と、第二十一条第一項各号列記以外の部分中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類等のうちに」と、同項第一号及び第三号中「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、同条第三項中「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類等のうちに」と、「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、第二十三条中「第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出があり、かつ、その効力が生じたこと」とあるのは「発行登録の効力が生じており、かつ、それに係る発行登録追補書類が提出されたこと（第二十三条の八第二項の有価証券の募集又は売出しにあつては、発行登録の効力が生じていること。）」と、「第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項」とあるのは「第二十三条の十第三項若しくは第二十三条の十一第一項」と、「当該届出」とあるのは「当該発行登録」と、「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

to refuse an application that does not meet the minimum filing requirements under subsection 24(2); or to make or refuse to make a determination under section 29; or to refuse an application under section 30 for a design application to proceed in the person's name; or to refuse to register a design under section 43; or to refuse to publish a design under section 59; or to prohibit or restrict the publication of information about the subject matter of a design application under section 108; or to refuse an application under section 137 for an extension of time. If a decision mentioned in subsection (2) is made and a written notice of the decision is given to a person whose interests are affected by the decision, the notice must include a statement to the effect that an application may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 for review of the decision. 例文帳に追加

第24条(2)に基づいて最低出願要件を満たさない出願を拒絶すること，又は第29条に基づいて決定を行うこと又は行うことを拒絶すること，又は第30条に基づいて意匠出願をその者の名義で進める申請を拒絶すること，又は第43条に基づいて意匠の登録を拒絶すること，又は第59条に基づいて意匠の公告を拒絶すること，又は第108条に基づいて意匠出願の対象となる事項について情報の公表を禁止し又は制限すること，又は第137条に基づいて期間延長の申請を拒絶すること，又は(1)に記載した決定がなされ，その決定によって自己の利害に影響を受ける者に対して，その決定について書面による通知を送付するときは，その通知には，当該決定についての再審理を求める申請を，1975年行政不服審判所法に基づいて行政不服審判所に対してすることができる旨の陳述を記載しなければならない。 - 特許庁

(2) With regard to the sale or labeling of the special specified products under transition subject to approval of the type as prescribed in Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act which is in effect at the time of enforcement of Article 1 (including approval of the type obtained by deeming that the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the approval for a foreign registered manufacturer set forth in Article 32-2 of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 5 of the New Consumer Products Safety Act, until the expiration of the period specified by Cabinet Order provided for in Article 5, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions pertaining to the special specified products under transition starting from the date of enforcement of Article 1 or the expiration of a period specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 25, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 32-4, paragraph (2) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act starting from the date of said approval, whichever comes earlier. 例文帳に追加

２　第一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第一項の規定による型式の承認（附則第四条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認（旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の二の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。）を含む。）に係る移行特別特定製品の販売又は表示については、第一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特別特定製品に係る附則第五条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第二項において準用する旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十五条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新消費生活用製品安全法第四条第一項及び第五条の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received the document referred to in Article 5 (or from the date of receipt of the document referred to in Article 4 where the Purchasing Party has received such document on an earlier date); however, if the Purchasing Party had not made Withdrawal/Rescission by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning Withdrawal/Rescission in violation of the provision of Article 6 (1), or due to being disturbed by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph 3 of the same article, it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received a document, which has been issued by the seller or the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Purchasing Party may make Withdrawal/Rescission with respect to said sales contract or Service Contract; 例文帳に追加

一　申込者等が第五条の書面を受領した日（その日前に第四条の書面を受領した場合にあつては、その書面を受領した日）から起算して八日を経過したとき。ただし、申込者等が、販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が第六条第一項の規定に違反して申込みの撤回等に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに申込みの撤回等を行わなかつた場合には、当該申込者等が、当該販売業者又は当該役務提供事業者が経済産業省令で定めるところにより当該売買契約又は当該役務提供契約の申込みの撤回等を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received the document referred to in Article 19 (or from the date of receipt of the document referred to in Article 18 where the Purchasing Party has received such document on an earlier date); however, if the Purchasing Party had not made Withdrawal/Rescission by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning Withdrawal/Rescission in violation of the provision of Article 21 (1), or due to being disturbed by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph 3 of the same article, it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received a document, which has been issued by the seller or the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Purchasing Party may make Withdrawal/Rescission with respect to said sales contract or Service Contract; 例文帳に追加

一　申込者等が第十九条の書面を受領した日（その日前に第十八条の書面を受領した場合にあつては、その書面を受領した日）から起算して八日を経過したとき。ただし、申込者等が、販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して申込みの撤回等に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに申込みの撤回等を行わなかつた場合には、当該申込者等が、当該販売業者又は当該役務提供事業者が経済産業省令で定めるところにより当該売買契約又は当該役務提供契約の申込みの撤回等を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, if the plan for the building is not in violation of the provisions of any Acts or any order or prefectural/municipal ordinance thereunder (if a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent in cases where a building official or designated confirmation and inspection body makes a confirmation pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (4) or Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87, paragraph (1) of said Act) for the construction, major repair (meaning a major repair as set forth in Article 2, item (xiv) of said Act), major remodeling (meaning major remodeling as set forth in Article 2, item (xv) of said Act) of a building set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of said Act or for a change of intended purpose of such building, or makes a confirmation for the construction of a building as set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (iii) of said Act, the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning the building standards specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 6, paragraph (1) of said Act as applied by replacing the relevant terms and phrases pursuant to the provision of Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of said Act shall be excluded), the fire chief or fire station chief shall give consent within three days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in the case falling under Article 6, paragraph (1), item (iv) of said Act or within seven days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in other cases, and give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect. In this case, the fire chief or fire station chief, when he/she finds any grounds on which he/she cannot give consent, shall give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect by such time limit. 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、前項の規定によつて同意を求められた場合において、当該建築物の計画が法律又はこれに基づく命令若しくは条例の規定（建築基準法第六条第四項又は第六条の二第一項（同法第八十七条第一項の規定によりこれらの規定を準用する場合を含む。）の規定により建築主事又は指定確認検査機関が同法第六条の三第一項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる建築物の建築、大規模の修繕（同法第二条第十四号の大規模の修繕をいう。）、大規模の模様替（同法第二条第十五号の大規模の模様替をいう。）若しくは用途の変更又は同項第三号に掲げる建築物の建築について確認する場合において同意を求められたときは、同項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第六条第一項の政令で定める建築基準法令の規定を除く。）で建築物の防火に関するものに違反しないものであるときは、同法第六条第一項第四号に係る場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から三日以内に、その他の場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から七日以内に同意を与えて、その旨を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。この場合において、消防長又は消防署長は、同意することができない事由があると認めるときは、これらの期限内に、その事由を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40-2 (1) Where 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2), he/she may terminate the Multilevel Marketing Contract (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor' act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1)). 例文帳に追加

第四十条の二　連鎖販売加入者は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が第三十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後）においては、将来に向かつてその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to holding of Shares, etc. (meaning Shares, etc. as defined by Article 2(7) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a domestic company (meaning domestic company as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank and/or its Subsidiary Companies of which the total number exceeds the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. (meaning the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, the provision of Article 16-3 of the New Banking Act shall apply to such holding of Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company by deeming that the Bank and/or the Subsidiary Companies acquire, on that day, the Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company in excess of the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. by a cause provided by the main clause of Article 16-3(2) of the New Banking Act. 例文帳に追加

７　新銀行法第十六条の三第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新銀行法第二条第七項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新銀行法第十六条の三第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している銀行又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業（以下「銀行代理業」という。）を営んでいる者（次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。）は、施行日から起算して三月間（当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間）は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 The provisions of Article 20 of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Worker Dispatching Undertakings. In this case, in paragraph (1) of said Article, the term "The Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "The dispatching business operator prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 23 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter simply referred to as a "dispatching business operator")" and the term "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not carry out Worker Dispatching prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act (hereinafter simply referred to as "Worker Dispatching") (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of said strike or lock-out, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)"; in paragraph (2) of said Article, the term "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited Worker Dispatching", the term "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall notify the dispatching business operator to that effect, and the dispatching business operator, having received the notification, shall not carry out Worker Dispatching for the place of business concerned (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of the notification, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)", the term "workers normally employed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "workers (including workers having been engaged in work under Worker Dispatching arrangements) normally employed", and the term "the introduction of workers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provision of Worker Dispatching services". 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　職業安定法第二十条の規定は、労働者派遣事業について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第二十三条第一項に規定する派遣元事業主（以下単に「派遣元事業主」という。）」と、「事業所に、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「事業所に関し、労働者派遣法第二条第一号に規定する労働者派遣（以下単に「労働者派遣」という。）（当該同盟罷業又は作業所閉鎖の行われる際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「無制限に労働者派遣がされる」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を派遣元事業主に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた派遣元事業主は、当該事業所に関し、労働者派遣（当該通報の際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、「使用されていた労働者」とあるのは「使用されていた労働者（労働者派遣に係る労働に従事していた労働者を含む。）」と、「労働者を紹介する」とあるのは「労働者派遣をする」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) Where a Service Provider concludes a Specified Continuous Service Contract, the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate said contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) (if the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph). 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　役務提供事業者が特定継続的役務提供契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者は、第四十二条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、役務提供事業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、当該役務提供事業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、将来に向かつてその特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a seller concludes a Specified Right Sales Contract, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate the Specified Right Sales Contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (3) (if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 1 of this article, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry referred to in the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph). 例文帳に追加

３　販売業者が特定権利販売契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者は、第四十二条第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、当該販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、その特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 48 (1) Where a Service Provider or a seller concludes a Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc., the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. may rescind such Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. in writing, except when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) or (3) (if the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. had not rescinded the Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's or the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning rescission of the Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's or the seller's act of intimidating the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider or the seller pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. may rescind said Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). 例文帳に追加

第四十八条　役務提供事業者又は販売業者が特定継続的役務提供等契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務提供受領者等は、第四十二条第二項又は第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき（特定継続的役務提供受領者等が、役務提供事業者若しくは販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者若しくは販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務提供受領者等が、当該役務提供事業者又は当該販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This means that we are struggling hard to make ends meet and, as everyone well realizes, international meetings have become extremely important in the world of finance since the Lehman crisis, because it is now indeed a very critical global issue to decide how to harmonize on an international scale a given country's domestic economic trends or the financial condition, or economic condition, that it has traditionally been situated in. Therefore, what has to be done on an international scale must be done properly in the form of policy coordination or as G20 initiatives, as otherwise no effect could be expected in an era of increasing globalization in finance or the economy that we live in now, and each country is equally struggling to achieve that end, which explains why there are so many international meetings. That is, as you see, the situation we have now, and I also happened to hear just yesterday in connection with this subject that our Office of International Affairs is in serious shortage of labor, a fact that stands in contrast to such critical importance of the FSA, to which a mere 22 billion yen is given as its budget, and the extremely significant role that financial policies play in an economy. As I have just said, though, now is a very important and delicate period of time both internationally and domestically and we are accordingly charged with a weighty responsibility. Seeing as the FSA is a public office with labor costs representing its main spending category, I did emphatically asked that attention should be paid to that point and, actually, similar comments were also made by the National Police Agency and the Ministry of Justice, both of them being ministries with a hefty payroll as well. In the case of the FSA, it is not really my particular intention to make a case to represent an interest of the FSA, but the fact still remains that it is in charge of a very important field. 例文帳に追加

ということで非常に苦労しておりますし、そういった皆様方もよくお分かりのように、金融というのはリーマン・ショック以来、国際的な会議というのは非常に重要でございまして、国内の景気の動向、あるいはその国が置かれた伝統的な金融の状態、あるいは経済の状態、それを国際的にどうハーモナイズするかということが非常に世界的な大事な問題でございまして、国際でやるべきところはきちっと協調政策、Ｇ20でやっていかねば、なかなかこういった金融のグローバル化、あるいは経済のグローバル化の時代に効果がございませんから、その辺を非常に苦労を各国やっておられるわけでございますから、国際会議というのは実は非常に多いのでございますし、ご存じ、その中で国際室の昨日もたまたま話を聞きますと、非常に国際室の人手が足らないという話を聞きまして、そういった非常に大事な金融庁、予算は220億で少ないのですけれども、極めて経済の中で果たす金融政策は大事でございまして、それが今も申し上げましたけれども、国際的にも国内的にも非常に大事な難しい時期でもございまして、それゆえに責任が重たいわけでございますが、そういった中で、なかなか人件費を主とした役所でございますから、そのことはぜひ考慮していただきたいということをこれは実は警察庁も法務省もそういうことを申されまして、これも人件費が多い省ですから、特に金融庁の場合は何も私は省益を代表して言う気はございませんが、現実にこれは非常に大事な分野でございます。 - 金融庁

Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十六　金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁

Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract. 例文帳に追加

第五十八条　業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方（その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。）は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき（相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム