「to the effect that」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(175ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 24-2 (1) A Money Lender shall, in concluding a guarantee contract in relation to a loan contract with a Guarantee Business Operator, notify said Guarantee Business Operator to the effect that the provisions of Article 12-7, Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 16-3, Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), Article 18 through Article 22, Article 24-4, paragraph (1) and Article 24-6-10, paragraph (excluding, with regard to claims contained in mortgage securities prescribed in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Securities Act, the provisions of Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) and Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), and including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall apply to the acts conducted by the Guarantee Business Operator in relation to the guarantee contract, by a method specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の二　貸金業者は、保証業者と貸付けに係る契約について保証契約を締結するに当たつては、その保証業者に対し、その保証業者が当該保証契約に関してする行為について第十二条の七、第十六条の二第三項及び第四項、第十六条の三、第十七条（第六項を除く。）、第十八条から第二十二条まで、第二十四条の四第一項並びに第二十四条の六の十の規定（抵当証券法第一条第一項に規定する抵当証券に記載された債権については第十六条の二第三項及び第四項並びに第十七条（第六項を除く。）の規定を除き、これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）の適用がある旨を、内閣府令で定める方法により、通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph (1) of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); 例文帳に追加

イ　最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); 例文帳に追加

イ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当 該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生 じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早 い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することと なる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。） - 経済産業省

Article 373 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 369(1), in cases where a Company with Board of Directors (excluding a Company with Committees) falls under all of the following requirements, the board of directors may provide to the effect that the resolution of the board of directors on the matters listed in item (i) and item (ii) of Article 362(4) may be made, where the majority (in cases where a higher proportion is determined by the board of directors, such proportion or more) of three or more directors appointed in advance (hereinafter in this Chapter referred to as "Special Directors") who are entitled to participate in the vote are present, by the majority (in cases where a higher proportion is determined by the board of directors, such proportion or more) of such directors present: 例文帳に追加

第三百七十三条　第三百六十九条第一項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社（委員会設置会社を除く。）が次に掲げる要件のいずれにも該当する場合には、取締役会は、第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号に掲げる事項についての取締役会の決議については、あらかじめ選定した三人以上の取締役（以下この章において「特別取締役」という。）のうち、議決に加わることができるものの過半数（これを上回る割合を取締役会で定めた場合にあっては、その割合以上）が出席し、その過半数（これを上回る割合を取締役会で定めた場合にあっては、その割合以上）をもって行うことができる旨を定めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When a director or executive officer of a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those engaged in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) has taken up a position of director, accounting advisor (when an accounting advisor is a juridical person, a member who is supposed to conduct the duty; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), company auditor, or executive officer for another company (including the cases where a director, accounting advisor, company auditor, or executive officer of other company came to concurrently hold a position of director or executive officer for a Financial Instruments Business Operator), or he/she resigned from a position of director, accounting advisor, company auditor, or executive officer for another company, he/she shall notify to that effect to the Prime Minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

４　金融商品取引業者（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この項において同じ。）の取締役又は執行役は、他の会社の取締役、会計参与（会計参与が法人であるときは、その職務を行うべき社員。以下この項において同じ。）、監査役若しくは執行役に就任した場合（他の会社の取締役、会計参与、監査役又は執行役が金融商品取引業者の取締役又は執行役を兼ねることとなつた場合を含む。）又は他の会社の取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役を退任した場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨を内閣総理大臣に届け出なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 46 The provisions of Article 20, Article 33-5 and Article 41, paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where a labor union, etc. carries out a labor supply business pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article. In this case, in Article 20, paragraph 1, the phrase "Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "labor supply business providers" and the phrase "shall not introduce job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not supply workers," in paragraph 2 of said Article, the phrase "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited supply of workers" and the phrase "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall report to labor supply providers to such effect, and labor supply providers who receive said report shall not supply workers to said place of business," in the proviso to said paragraph, the term "introduction" shall be deemed to be replaced with "supply," and in Article 41, the phrase "the license provided for in the same paragraph" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the license provided for in said Article," the phrase "the businesses of the labor recruitment concerned" shall be deemed to be replaced with ""all or part of said labor supply business." 例文帳に追加

第四十六条　第二十条、第三十三条の五及び第四十一条第一項の規定は、労働組合等が前条の規定により労働者供給事業を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、第二十条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者供給事業者」と、「求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「労働者を供給してはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「労働者を無制限に供給する」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を労働者供給事業者に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた労働者供給事業者は、当該事業所に対し、労働者を供給してはならない」と、同項ただし書中「紹介する」とあるのは「供給する」と、第四十一条第一項中「同項の許可」とあるのは「同条の許可」と、「当該労働者の募集の業務」とあるのは「当該労働者供給事業の全部若しくは一部」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Regarding the revised Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which will be put into effect on December 17, I would like to confirm some points related to the flow of procedures from the application to the capital injection. Are you considering setting a deadline for accepting applications as the United States does under the TAAP (capital injection program) or screening applications as they come at random times? If the fund-raising situation at the end of the calendar and fiscal years is taken into consideration, I think that it may be reasonable to set a deadline. 例文帳に追加

金融機能強化法についてですが、17日施行ということで、今後のスケジュールというか、申請から注入に至るまでの流れみたいなものを確認しておきたいのですが、例えばアメリカのタープ（TARP、そのうちの資本注入プログラム）のようにある程度申請期限というものを区切った上で、そこまでの申請を求めるというふうな運用を考えておられるのか、そうではなく、五月雨式といいますか、（申請が）来る順々にそういった審査をしていくといったことを考えておられるのか、年末なり年度末の資金繰り等々考えますと、ある程度締切みたいなものを設けてやった方が合理的かなと思うのですが、その辺はいかがでしょうか。 - 金融庁

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) Claims shall be written -- (a) in 2 parts, the first part consisting of a statement indicating those technical features of the invention which are necessary in connection with the definition of the claimed subject-matter and which, in combination, appear to be part of the prior art and the second part preceded by the words “characterised in that”, “characterised by”, “wherein the improvement comprises”, or other words to the same effect, followed by a statement stating concisely the technical features which, in combination with the features stated in the first part, define the matter for which protection is sought; or (b) in a single statement containing a recitation of a combination of several elements or steps, or a single element or step, which defines the matter for which protection is sought.例文帳に追加

(8) クレームは， (a) 2の部分に分けて記載し，第1部分は，クレームする主題の限定に関して必要であり，かつ，組合せにより先行技術の一部と認められる当該発明の技術的特徴の記載をもって構成し，第2部分は，「……という点で特徴付けられる」，「……により特徴付けられる」，「当該改良を構成する……」などの語又はこれらと同じ趣旨の表現に始まって，第1部分において述べた特徴との組合せにより，保護請求事項を限定する技術的特徴を簡潔に述べた記載で続けるか，又は (b) 保護請求事項を限定する複数の要素若しくは工程の組合せ又は単一の要素若しくは工程に係る説明を含む単一の記載により構成する。 - 特許庁

(i) an act of making an offer or promise or having a third party make an offer or promise to a customer or any person designated by a customer, with regard to sales and purchase or other transactions of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article), to the effect that if the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) incurs any loss or shortfall in the predetermined amount of profit from the relevant Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article), property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party in order to compensate or make up for the whole or part of such loss or shortfall; 例文帳に追加

一　有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）につき、当該有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）について顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）に損失が生ずることとなり、又はあらかじめ定めた額の利益が生じないこととなつた場合には自己又は第三者がその全部又は一部を補てんし、又は補足するため当該顧客又は第三者に財産上の利益を提供する旨を、当該顧客又はその指定した者に対し、申し込み、若しくは約束し、又は第三者に申し込ませ、若しくは約束させる行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 217 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. the court shall make an order of consensual rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims and a procedure for adopting a resolution on a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where all holders of filed rehabilitation claims have, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3. 例文帳に追加

第二百十七条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申立てがあったときは、同意再生の決定（再生債権の調査及び確定の手続並びに再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案の決議を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。）をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申立ては、すべての届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四章第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-3 (1) A Money Lender shall, when he/she entrusts to any other person performance of obligations under the Money Lender's Contract for a Loan, except in cases where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article applies, notify such person to the effect that Article 12-7, Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 16-3, Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), Article 18 through Article 22, Article 24-5, paragraph (1), and Article 24-6-10, paragraph (excluding, with regard to claims contained in mortgage securities provided in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Securities Act, the provisions of Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), and including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall apply to acts conducted by said person in relation to said performance, in a manner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の三　貸金業者は、貸金業者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済を他人に委託するに当たつては、前条第一項の規定の適用がある場合を除き、その者に対し、その者が当該弁済に関してする行為について第十二条の七、第十六条の二第三項及び第四項、第十六条の三、第十七条（第六項を除く。）、第十八条から第二十二条まで、第二十四条の五第一項並びに第二十四条の六の十の規定（抵当証券法第一条第一項に規定する抵当証券に記載された債権については第十六条の二第三項及び第四項並びに第十七条（第六項を除く。）の規定を除き、これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）の適用がある旨を、内閣府令で定める方法により、通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40-2 (1) Where 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2), he/she may terminate the Multilevel Marketing Contract (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor' act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1)). 例文帳に追加

第四十条の二　連鎖販売加入者は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が第三十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後）においては、将来に向かつてその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Subject to the regulations, an application for the registration of an industrial design filed in Canada by any person who has, or whose predecessor in title has, previously regularly filed an application for the registration of the same industrial design in or for a foreign country has the same force and effect as the same application would have if filed in Canada on the date on which the application for the registration of the same industrial design was first filed in or for that foreign country, if (a) the application in Canada is filed within six months from the earliest date on which the foreign application was filed; and (b) the person requests priority in respect of the application filed in Canada in accordance with the regulations and complies with any other prescribed requirements. 例文帳に追加

(1) 規則に従うことを条件として，ある者がカナダにおいて行った工業意匠登録出願であって，その者又はその者の前権利者が外国において若しくは関して同一工業意匠の登録を先に正規に出願をしたものは，次の場合は，同一工業意匠の登録出願が当該外国において又は関して最初に行われた日にカナダにおいて出願された場合と同様な効力及び効果を有するものとする。 (a) 外国出願が行われた最先の日から6月以内にカナダにおいても出願し，かつ (b) 当該出願人がカナダにおける出願に関して規則に従って優先権を主張し，更にその他所定の要件を遵守している場合 - 特許庁

(4) In the case where a Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a company issuing classified shares, if the Shares, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the Absorption-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a general meeting of class shareholders consisting of class shareholders of the classes of shares set forth in Article 142, item (ii) (a) (limited to transfer restricted shares for which the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in Article 199, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act do not exist); provided, however, that this shall not apply if there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights present at said general meeting of class shareholders. 例文帳に追加

４　吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の株式であるときは、吸収合併は、第百四十二条第二号イの種類の株式（譲渡制限株式であつて、会社法第百九十九条第四項の定款の定めがないものに限る。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In the case where a Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a company issuing classified shares of stock, if the Shares of Stock, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the Absorption-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a general meeting of class shareholders consisting of class shareholders of the classes of shares of stock set forth in Article 142, item 2 (a) (limited to transfer restricted shares of stock for which the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in Article 199, paragraph 4 of the Company Act do not exist); provided, however, that this shall not apply if there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights present at said general meeting of class shareholders. 例文帳に追加

４ 吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の株式であるときは、吸収合併は、第百四十二条第二号イの種類の株式（譲渡制限株式であつて、会社法第百九十九条第四項 の定款の定めがないものに限る。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 経済産業省

(2) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to Patent Rights, etc. or the Rights to Receive Patent, etc. or the Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the Right to Receive Patent, etc., these rights being owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency (hereinafter referred to simply as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency") and pertaining to research results related to technologies of said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person who has received an accreditation pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act (limited to persons who conduct the operation of transferring research results related to technologies of Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies prescribed in the same paragraph to private business operators who intend to utilize these research results; in the next paragraph referred to as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency-Related Certified Business Operators "), the provisions of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 in the same Article, the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of Article 12 in the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 2 of same Article, the provisions of paragraph 10 of Article 12 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 3 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to same paragraph shall remain in effect, even after the partial effective date. 例文帳に追加

２　旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第一項の認定を受けた者（同項に規定する試験研究独立行政法人（以下単に「試験研究独立行政法人」という。）における技術に関する研究成果についてその活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業を行う者に限る。次項において「試験研究独立行政法人関係認定事業者」という。）が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた試験研究独立行政法人における技術に関する研究成果に係る当該試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権等若しくは特許を受ける権利等又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第二項及び第三項の規定、同条第二項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定並びに旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第三項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Panel issued its report on July 31, 2000, finding: (a) members imposing safeguards must consider factors raised by interested parties in addition to the factors listed in Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards; (b) there must be causal link in which imports on their own have caused serious injury; (c) when imports from specific countries are excepted from the measures because they are members of free trade agreements, the authority must determine whether increased imports from other countries have caused serious injury to the domestic industry; and (d) members imposing safeguard measures must make required notifications before the safeguard takes effect. The Panel therefore found that the US safeguard measures were inconsistent with Article XIX of the GATT and the Agreement on Safeguards.例文帳に追加

パネルは2000年７月31日に報告書を発出し、①セーフガード協定第４条２項に列挙されている要素の他、当事者から提出された事項についても検討しなければならない、②輸入が単独でも重大な損害を引き起こしたという関係にあることが必要である、③自由貿易協定などを理由として措置対象から除外する場合、それ以外の国からの輸入のみで重大な損害が発生したことを明らかにしなければならない、④発動前に所定の通報を行わなければならない等を理由として、本件セーフガード措置はGATT 第19条並びにセーフガード協定に違反している、と判断した。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-2 paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in the respective items of Article 56-2 (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof);(ii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an - 89 - Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-2, paragraph 3 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type - 90 - Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when changes have taken place to the matters listed in the preceding items during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の二第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。 一 第五十六条の二各号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合にあっては、 当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）についての次に掲げ る事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日 の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存す ることとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の 内容に限る。）三 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条第一 項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四吸収合併存続会員商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場 合にあっては、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重 大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響 を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日 の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存するこ ととなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。） 五吸収合併が効力を生じた日以後における吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の債務（法第 百四十四条の二第三項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収合 併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行 の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた 日までの間に、前各号に掲げる事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

Provision may be made by rules of court as to the service of notice on persons having an interest in the goods, material or articles, and any such person is entitled to appear in proceedings for an order under this section, whether or not he was served with notice; and to appeal against any order made, whether or not he appeared, and an order shall not take effect until the end of the period within which notice of an appeal may be given or, if before the end of that period notice of appeal has been given, until the final determination or abandonment of the proceedings on the appeal. 例文帳に追加

裁判所の規則により，商品，素材又は物品について利害関係を有する者について通知の送達に関する規定を定めることができるものとし，かつ，その者は，次の権利を有する。通知が送達されていたか否かに拘らず，本条に基づく命令を求める手続に参加する権利，及び，手続に参加していたか否かに拘らず，発せられた命令に対し上訴する権利。又，命令は，上訴の通知を行うことができる期間の終わりまでは，又は，その期限の末日前に上訴の通知が行われた場合は，当該上訴に関する手続の最終決定又は放棄までは，その効力を生じない。 - 特許庁

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 4 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (ii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act; (iii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-2, paragraph 3 of the Act; (iv) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger inherited from the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger through an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters recorded in a written or Electromagnetic Record which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act (excluding the contents of the Absorption-Type Merger contract); (vi) the date of the registration of the change set forth in Article 147, paragraph 1 of the Act; (vii) in addition to that listed in the preceding items, important matters concerning the Absorption-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の二第四項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一吸収合併の効力が生じた日 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第 百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 三吸収合併存続会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条の二第三項において準用する 法第百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 四吸収合併により吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所から承 継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 五法第百四十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所が備え置いた書面 又は電磁的記録に記載又は記録がされた事項（吸収合併契約の内容を除く。）六法第百四十七条第一項の変更の登記をした日 七前各号に掲げるもののほか、吸収合併に関する重要な事項 - 経済産業省

(9) A person carrying out a dispatching undertaking shall, when a worker under dispatching, who is engaged in dispatch work in an undertaking involving dust work and who is regularly engaged in dust work (excluding a worker whose classification for supervision of pneumoconiosis has been determined to be No. II, No. III or No. IV), has been diagnosed in a medical examination referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act (excluding one conducted by the person carrying out the client undertaking), as being affected by pneumoconiosis prescribed in item (i) of paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Pneumoconiosis Act (hereinafter referred to simply as "pneumoconiosis"), or as being suspected of having contracted pneumoconiosis, inform the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned to that effect, without delay. 例文帳に追加

９　派遣元の事業を行う者は、粉じん作業に係る事業における派遣就業に従事する派遣中の労働者で常時粉じん作業に従事するもの（じん肺管理区分が管理二、管理三又は管理四と決定された労働者を除く。）が労働安全衛生法第六十六条第一項又は第二項の健康診断（当該派遣先の事業を行う者の行うものを除く。）において、じん肺法第二条第一項第一号に規定するじん肺（以下単に「じん肺」という。）の所見があり、又はじん肺にかかつている疑いがあると診断されたときは、遅滞なく、その旨を当該派遣先の事業を行う者に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 31-2 (1) A person operating the business of manufacturing or importing any monitoring chemical substance, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance that has been publicly notified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 4 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2 and the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 5-2), any new chemical substance to which the confirmation under item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 3 or paragraph (4) of Article 4-2 pertains, or any chemical substance listed in the List of Existing Chemical Substances prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions that has been publicly notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall, when he/she has conducted tests pertaining to the items to be tested prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 or pertaining to the studies of hazardous properties prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 (including the cases in which knowledge equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests [limited to knowledge that is not publicly known] has been obtained) with regard to the substance subject to reporting he/she has manufactured or imported and if he/she has obtained, as a result thereof, knowledge specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment as one indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment to that effect and the details of said knowledge, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said person has obtained said knowledge as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 pertains and is reporting the details of said knowledge pursuant to these provisions: 例文帳に追加

第三十一条の二　監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質、第三条第一項第五号若しくは第四条の二第四項の確認に係る新規化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When the Prime Minister has decided to grant or refuse registration under Article 29 or Article 33-2, authorization under Article 30(1) or Article 31(6), registration of change under Article 31(4), approval under Article 35 (4), or approval under paragraph (3) or (4) of the preceding Article, attach conditions under the provisions of Article 30-2(1), or make disposition based on the provisions of Article 51, Article 51-2, Article 52(1) or (2), Article 52-2(1) or (2), Article 53, Article 54, Article 56-3, or paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, he/she shall notify to that effect in writing to the applicant or the Financial Instruments Business Operator. 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第二十九条若しくは第三十三条の二の登録、第三十条第一項若しくは第三十一条第六項の認可、第三十一条第四項の変更登録、第三十五条第四項の承認若しくは前条第三項若しくは第四項の承認をし、若しくはしないこととしたとき、第三十条の二第一項の規定により条件を付することとしたとき、又は第五十一条、第五十一条の二、第五十二条第一項若しくは第二項、第五十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項、第五十三条、第五十四条、第五十六条の三若しくは前条第二項の規定に基づいて処分をすることとしたときは、書面により、その旨を登録申請者又は金融商品取引業者等に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

A person shall not be eligible to be registered as a patent agent, if he - (i) has been adjudged by a competent court to be of unsound mind; (ii) is an undischarged insolvent; (iii) being a discharged insolvent, has not obtained from the court a certificate to the effect that his insolvency was caused by misfortune without any misconduct on his part; (iv) has been convicted by a competent court, whether within or outside India of an offence to undergo a term of imprisonment, unless the offence of which he has been convicted has been pardoned or unless on an application made by him, the Central Government has, by order in this behalf, removed the disability; (v) being a legal practitioner has been guilty of professional misconduct; or (vi) being a chartered accountant, has been guilty of negligence or misconduct. 例文帳に追加

ある者が次に該当するときは，特許代理人としての登録資格がないものとする。 (i) 管轄裁判所から心神喪失者である旨の宣告を受けたとき (ii) 債務弁済未了の破産者であるとき (iii) 債務弁済完了の破産者であって，その者の破産がその者の側に何らの不法行為がなく災難により生じたものである旨の証明書を裁判所から未だ取得していないとき (iv) インド国内又は国外を問わず管轄裁判所から，有期の拘禁刑をもって処罰されるべき犯罪について有罪判決を受けたとき。ただし，その者の有罪判決対象の犯罪が赦免された場合又はその者による申請に基づいて中央政府が本件についての命令により資格喪失を免除した場合は，この限りでない。 (v) 弁護士であって，業務上の違法行為について有罪の判決を受けたとき，又は (vi) 公認会計士であって，過失又は不法行為について有罪の判決を受けたとき - 特許庁

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 142, item 2 and item 3 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) the following matters concerning a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (b) when the final business year does not exist at the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 144-10, paragraph 1 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の五第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び第三号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場 - 97 - 合にあっては、当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）についての次に掲げ る事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日 のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が 存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事 象の内容に限る。） 三 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条第一 項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所において次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当 該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生 じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早 い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することと なる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。）ロ吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度がないときは、吸収合併 存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表 五吸収合併の効力が生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 （法第百四十四条の十第一項の規定により吸収合併について異議を述べることができ る債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生 じた日までの間に、前各号に掲げる事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the event that the per capita average monthly amount of ordinary wages payable in the period of January through March, April through June, July through September, or October through December, respectively (any such period being referred to hereinafter as a "quarter"), for the number of the prescribed working hours for a worker at the same workplace and engaged in the same type of work as the worker receiving compensation for absence from work pursuant to the preceding paragraph (or, for a workplace where less than 100 workers are ordinarily employed, the average monthly amount during the quarter per worker of compensation paid every month in the industry to which that workplace belongs, as provided in the Monthly Labor Survey compiled by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; hereinafter whichever amount applies shall be referred to as the "average compensation amount") exceeds 120 percent of the average compensation amount during the quarter in which the worker in question suffered the injury or illness in the engagement of the employment, or falls below 80 percent of that same amount, the employer shall adjust the amount of compensation for absence from work which is payable to the worker in question pursuant to the preceding paragraph in accordance with such rate of increase or decrease in the second quarter following the quarter in which the increase or decrease occurred; and the employer shall make compensation for absence from work of such adjusted amount from the first month of the quarter in which such adjustment takes effect. Thereafter, adjustment to the previously adjusted amount of compensation for absence from work shall be made in the same manner. 例文帳に追加

２　使用者は、前項の規定により休業補償を行つている労働者と同一の事業場における同種の労働者に対して所定労働時間労働した場合に支払われる通常の賃金の、一月から三月まで、四月から六月まで、七月から九月まで及び十月から十二月までの各区分による期間（以下四半期という。）ごとの一箇月一人当り平均額（常時百人未満の労働者を使用する事業場については、厚生労働省において作成する毎月勤労統計における当該事業場の属する産業に係る毎月きまつて支給する給与の四半期の労働者一人当りの一箇月平均額。以下平均給与額という。）が、当該労働者が業務上負傷し、又は疾病にかかつた日の属する四半期における平均給与額の百分の百二十をこえ、又は百分の八十を下るに至つた場合においては、使用者は、その上昇し又は低下した比率に応じて、その上昇し又は低下するに至つた四半期の次の次の四半期において、前項の規定により当該労働者に対して行つている休業補償の額を改訂し、その改訂をした四半期に属する最初の月から改訂された額により休業補償を行わなければならない。改訂後の休業補償の額の改訂についてもこれに準ずる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received the document referred to in Article 5 (or from the date of receipt of the document referred to in Article 4 where the Purchasing Party has received such document on an earlier date); however, if the Purchasing Party had not made Withdrawal/Rescission by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning Withdrawal/Rescission in violation of the provision of Article 6 (1), or due to being disturbed by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph 3 of the same article, it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received a document, which has been issued by the seller or the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Purchasing Party may make Withdrawal/Rescission with respect to said sales contract or Service Contract; 例文帳に追加

一　申込者等が第五条の書面を受領した日（その日前に第四条の書面を受領した場合にあつては、その書面を受領した日）から起算して八日を経過したとき。ただし、申込者等が、販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が第六条第一項の規定に違反して申込みの撤回等に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに申込みの撤回等を行わなかつた場合には、当該申込者等が、当該販売業者又は当該役務提供事業者が経済産業省令で定めるところにより当該売買契約又は当該役務提供契約の申込みの撤回等を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received the document referred to in Article 19 (or from the date of receipt of the document referred to in Article 18 where the Purchasing Party has received such document on an earlier date); however, if the Purchasing Party had not made Withdrawal/Rescission by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning Withdrawal/Rescission in violation of the provision of Article 21 (1), or due to being disturbed by the seller's or the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph 3 of the same article, it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the Purchasing Party received a document, which has been issued by the seller or the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Purchasing Party may make Withdrawal/Rescission with respect to said sales contract or Service Contract; 例文帳に追加

一　申込者等が第十九条の書面を受領した日（その日前に第十八条の書面を受領した場合にあつては、その書面を受領した日）から起算して八日を経過したとき。ただし、申込者等が、販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して申込みの撤回等に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに申込みの撤回等を行わなかつた場合には、当該申込者等が、当該販売業者又は当該役務提供事業者が経済産業省令で定めるところにより当該売買契約又は当該役務提供契約の申込みの撤回等を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業（以下「銀行代理業」という。）を営んでいる者（次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。）は、施行日から起算して三月間（当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間）は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Marks registered under Republic Act No. 166 shall remain in force and effect but shall be deemed to have been granted under the IP Code and shall be renewed within the time and manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations; provided, that marks whose registration have a remaining duration as of January 1, 1998 of more than six and one-half years shall be required to submit the declaration and evidence of actual use prescribed in these Regulations within one year following the tenth and fifteenth anniversaries of the registration or renewal registration under Republic Act No. 166; provided, further, that marks whose registrations have a remaining duration of six and one-half years or less may no longer be subject to the requirement of declaration and evidence of use but shall be renewed within the time and in the manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations and, upon renewal, shall be reclassified in accordance with the Nice Classification. The renewal shall be for a duration of ten years. Trade names and marks registered in the Supplemental Register under Republic Act No. 166 whose registration, including any renewal thereof, was subsisting as of January 1, 1998 shall remain in force but shall no longer be subject to renewal.例文帳に追加

共和国法律第166号に基づいて登録された標章は引き続き有効であるが，IP法に基づいて認められたものとみなされ，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新される。ただし，1998年1月1日現在でその登録の残存期間が6年半より長い標章は，共和国法律第166号に基づく登録又は更新登録の10周年日及び15周年日から1年以内に，本規則に定める実際の使用の宣言書及び証拠を提出しなければならない。ただし，その登録の残存期間が6年半以内である標章は，もはや使用の宣言書及び証拠の要件の対象とされないが，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新されるものとし，更新されれば，ニース分類に基づいて再分類される。更新は，10年とする。共和国法律第166号に基づいて補助登録簿に登録された商号及び標章であって，その登録が更新によるものを含め1998年1月1日時点で存続していたものは，引き続き有効であるが，もはや更新の対象ではない。 - 特許庁

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to the sale or labeling of the special specified products under transition subject to approval of the type as prescribed in Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act which is in effect at the time of enforcement of Article 1 (including approval of the type obtained by deeming that the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the approval for a foreign registered manufacturer set forth in Article 32-2 of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 5 of the New Consumer Products Safety Act, until the expiration of the period specified by Cabinet Order provided for in Article 5, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions pertaining to the special specified products under transition starting from the date of enforcement of Article 1 or the expiration of a period specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 25, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 32-4, paragraph (2) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act starting from the date of said approval, whichever comes earlier. 例文帳に追加

２　第一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第一項の規定による型式の承認（附則第四条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認（旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の二の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。）を含む。）に係る移行特別特定製品の販売又は表示については、第一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特別特定製品に係る附則第五条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第二項において準用する旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十五条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新消費生活用製品安全法第四条第一項及び第五条の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 42-2 The provisions of Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to labor recruitment. In this case, in paragraph 1 of said Article, the phrase "Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who conducts labor recruitment (excluding a person provided by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) and a commissioned recruiter (which means a commissioned recruiter provided in Article 39; the same shall apply in said paragraph)" and the phrase "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not conduct labor recruitment for work at a place of business," ; in paragraph 2 of said Article, the phrase "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited recruitment of workers" and the phrase "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall report to persons who conduct labor recruitment and commissioned recruiters to such effect, and persons who conduct labor recruitment and commissioned recruiters who receive said report shall not conduct labor recruitment for work at said place of business," and the term "introduction" in the proviso to said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "recruitment." 例文帳に追加

第四十二条の二　第二十条の規定は、労働者の募集について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者の募集を行う者（厚生労働省令で定める者を除く。次項において同じ。）及び募集受託者（第三十九条に規定する募集受託者をいう。同項において同じ。）」と、「事業所に、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「事業所における就業を内容とする労働者の募集をしてはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「労働者を無制限に募集する」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を労働者の募集を行う者及び募集受託者に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた労働者の募集を行う者又は募集受託者は、当該事業所における就業を内容とする労働者の募集をしてはならない」と、同項ただし書中「紹介する」とあるのは「募集する」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(xi) acts of assigning, delivering, displaying for the purpose of assignment or delivery, exporting or importing to all but specific persons (a) devices (including machines incorporating such devices) having the sole function of enabling the viewing of images or hearing of sounds, the running of programs, or the recording of images, sounds or programs which are restricted by technological restriction measures that are used in business to restrict all but said specific persons from viewing images or hearing sounds, running programs, or recording images, sounds or programs, by obstructing the effect of such technological restriction measures, or (b) data storage media or machines on which programs having only such function (including other types of programs combined with such programs) have been recorded, or the act of providing programs having only such function through an electric telecommunication line; 例文帳に追加

十一　他人が特定の者以外の者に影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録をさせないために営業上用いている技術的制限手段により制限されている影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録を当該技術的制限手段の効果を妨げることにより可能とする機能のみを有する装置（当該装置を組み込んだ機器を含む。）若しくは当該機能のみを有するプログラム（当該プログラムが他のプログラムと組み合わされたものを含む。）を記録した記録媒体若しくは記憶した機器を当該特定の者以外の者に譲渡し、引き渡し、譲渡若しくは引渡しのために展示し、輸出し、若しくは輸入し、又は当該機能のみを有するプログラムを電気通信回線を通じて提供する行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(18) For the purpose of applying the provision of Part II, Chapter X, Section 2 of the New Insurance Business Act to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the term "In the case set forth in paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc." and the term "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.," in Article 250, paragraph (4) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc. (Act No. 38 of 2005).)" and "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (including the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of that Act.)," respectively; the term "The Insurance Company, etc., set forth in paragraph (1)" and the term "the purpose of the meeting" in Article 254, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), the Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider (referring to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph.).)" and "the purpose of the meeting; the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, etc. shall, on the date of issue of the merger agreements, make public notice to the effect that contracts that contain said Modifications of Contract Conditions have been issued." 例文帳に追加

１８　特定少額短期保険業者に対する新保険業法第二編第十章第二節の規定の適用については、新保険業法第二百五十条第四項中「第一項の場合において、保険会社等」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等（保険業法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十七年法律第三十八号）附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を除く。）」と、「外国保険会社等」とあるのは「外国保険会社等（同法附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を含む。）」と、新保険業法第二百五十四条第三項中「第一項の保険会社等は、」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等（特定少額短期保険業者（保険業法等の一部を改正する法律附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を除く。）にあっては」と、「目的となっている旨を」とあるのは「目的となっている旨を、特定少額短期保険業者にあっては合併契約書の作成日において、当該契約条件の変更を含む合併契約書が作成された旨を、それぞれ」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) When the notification has been filed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3), the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency shall give a public notice of the trade name or name, and the location of the head office or principal office or the domicile, of the person who made said notification, the period during which the person who made said notification is to be regarded as falling under the category of a Qualified Institutional Investor (meaning the period as prescribed in paragraph (5)), and, if the person who has made said notification made such notification as a person who falls under paragraph (1), item (xxiii), sub-item (b) or, item (xxiv), sub-item (b) it shall be published to that effect in Official Gazette until March 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from January 1 until one month thereafter; until June 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from April 1 until one month thereafter; until September 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from July 1 until one month thereafter; or until December 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from October 1 until one month thereafter. 例文帳に追加

８　金融庁長官は、第三項の規定により届出が行われたときは、当該届出が一月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の三月一日までに、四月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の六月一日までに、七月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の九月一日までに及び十月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の十二月一日までに、当該届出を行った者の商号、名称又は氏名、本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在地又は住所、適格機関投資家に該当する期間（第五項に規定する期間をいう。）及び当該届出を行った者が第一項第二十三号ロ又は第二十四号ロに該当するものとして届出を行った者である場合にはその旨を官報に公告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Without prejudice to the provision of section 51 of this Act. the registration of a person as a registered user- (a) may be varied by Registrar as regards the goods or services in respect of which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, if has effect, on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor of the trademark; (b) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor or of the registered user or of any other registered user of the trademark; (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person on any of the following grounds, namely :- (i) that the Registered user has used the trademark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the Registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, which if accurately represented or disclosed would have justified the refusal of the application for registration of the Registered user; (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; (iv) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would have justified the refusal of an application for registration of the registered user; (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar in respect of any goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the trademark is no longer Registered; (e) may be cancelled by the Registrar of his own motion or on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person, on the ground that any stipulation in the agreement between the Registered proprietor and the registered user regarding the quality of the goods or services in relation to which the trademark is to be used is either no being enforced or is not being complied with. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法51条の規定を妨げず、登録使用権者としての登録は次に掲げとおりとする。(a)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者が所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、関連の当該商品若しくは役務について、又はその前提となる条件又は制限が有効であれば当該条件についても変更することができる。(b)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者若しくは登録使用権者又はその他任意の登録使用権者の所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(c)登録官は、次に掲げる理由のいずれかにより、何人であれ所定の方式で書面による請求を行った場合、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(i)登録使用権者が許諾された使用以外の方法で、又は誤認若しくは混同を招くかそのおそれのあるような方法で、当該商標を使用したこと(ii)所有者又は登録使用権者が登録出願にとって重要な事実、それが正確に表明又は開示されていれば当該登録使用権者の登録申請拒絶が正当とされたであろう事実を偽って表明し、又は開示しなかったこと(iii)当該登録は、出願人がその実施に利害を有する契約の観点から当該登録により出願人に付与される権利を考慮すると設定されるべきではなかったこと(iv)出願日であったら登録使用権者の登録を求める出願の拒絶が正当化されていたであろう態様で、登録日以後に事情の変更があったこと(d)登録官は、すでに商標が登録されていない商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき取り消すことができる。(e)登録官は、職権により、又は何人かにより所定の方式で書面の請求があれば、当該商標が使用されるはずの商品若しくは役務の品質に関する登録所有者と登録使用権者間の合意規定が発効していない、又は遵守されていないことを理由として、取り消すことができる。 - 特許庁

Article 24 The provisions of Article 20 of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Worker Dispatching Undertakings. In this case, in paragraph (1) of said Article, the term "The Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "The dispatching business operator prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 23 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter simply referred to as a "dispatching business operator")" and the term "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not carry out Worker Dispatching prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act (hereinafter simply referred to as "Worker Dispatching") (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of said strike or lock-out, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)"; in paragraph (2) of said Article, the term "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited Worker Dispatching", the term "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall notify the dispatching business operator to that effect, and the dispatching business operator, having received the notification, shall not carry out Worker Dispatching for the place of business concerned (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of the notification, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)", the term "workers normally employed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "workers (including workers having been engaged in work under Worker Dispatching arrangements) normally employed", and the term "the introduction of workers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provision of Worker Dispatching services". 例文帳に追加