「CASES」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(381ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(4) The Insurance Company, etc., set forth in paragraph (1) shall suspend all of its business (excluding the business of payment of Covered Insurance Claims and business related to the cancellation of specified Covered Insurance Contracts) from the Time of Public Notice as set forth in the preceding paragraph, excluding the case where, already at the Time of Public Notice, the suspension of all of its business has been ordered pursuant to the provision of Article 241, paragraph (1) or all of its business has been suspended pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of Article 245 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (2)), the main clause of Article 250, paragraph (5), the main clause of this paragraph, or the main clause of Article 255-2, paragraph (3); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a portion of its business in the case that the Prime Minister has found it necessary that the portion of business not be suspended pursuant to a report from that Insurance Company, etc. 例文帳に追加

４　第一項の保険会社等は、前項の公告の時において既に、第二百四十一条第一項の規定により業務の全部の停止を命ぜられ、又は第二百四十五条本文（第二百五十八条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二百五十条第五項本文、この項本文若しくは第二百五十五条の二第三項本文の規定によりその業務の全部を停止している場合を除き、当該公告の時から、その業務の全部（補償対象保険金支払業務及び特定補償対象契約解約関連業務を除く。）を停止しなければならない。ただし、当該保険会社等の申出により、その業務の一部を停止しないことについて、内閣総理大臣が必要があると認めた場合には、当該業務の一部については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 137 (1) The provisions of Article 265-2, paragraph (2) and Article 265-3, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply to any Insurance Company (including any Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), in cases where the Prime Minister, pursuant to the provision of Article 241 of the Former Insurance Business Act, has issued an order for suspension of all or part of its business (or, for a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., its business in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the transfer of insurance contracts or consultation on merger (or, for a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., consultation on the transfer of insurance contracts in Japan), or has rendered a disposition ordering the administration of its business and property (or, for a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., its property located in Japan; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by an insurance administrator, at the time when this Act enters into force. 例文帳に追加

第百三十七条　この法律の施行の際現に保険会社（外国保険会社等を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）が旧保険業法第二百四十一条の規定により内閣総理大臣から業務（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における業務。以下この条において同じ。）の全部若しくは一部の停止、保険契約の移転若しくは合併の協議（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における保険契約の移転の協議）の命令又は保険管理人による業務及び財産（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本に所在する財産。次項において同じ。）の管理を命ずる処分を受けている場合には、当該保険会社については、新保険業法第二百六十五条の二第二項及び第二百六十五条の三第一項の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) When an Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care is provided Designated In-Home Service (limited to a case when said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care has notified the Municipality to receive Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support pursuant to the provisions of Article 46, paragraph (4) in advance, that said Designated In-Home Service is subject to said Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support and other cases as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) by a Designated In-Home Service Provider, the Municipality may pay expenses required for said Designated In-Home Service that said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care should pay to said Designated In-Home Service Provider on behalf of said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to said Designated In-Home Service Provider within the specified limit of the amount that shall be paid to said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care as Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service. 例文帳に追加

６　居宅要介護被保険者が指定居宅サービス事業者から指定居宅サービスを受けたとき（当該居宅要介護被保険者が第四十六条第四項の規定により指定居宅介護支援を受けることにつきあらかじめ市町村に届け出ている場合であって、当該指定居宅サービスが当該指定居宅介護支援の対象となっている場合その他の厚生労働省令で定める場合に限る。）は、市町村は、当該居宅要介護被保険者が当該指定居宅サービス事業者に支払うべき当該指定居宅サービスに要した費用について、居宅介護サービス費として当該居宅要介護被保険者に対し支給すべき額の限度において、当該居宅要介護被保険者に代わり、当該指定居宅サービス事業者に支払うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) When an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care receives Designated Community-Based Service from a Designated Community-Based Service Provider (limited to a case when said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care notifies the Municipality regarding the receiving of Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support pursuant to the provision of Article 46, paragraph (4) in advance, and a case when said Designated Community-Based Service is subject to said Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support, or other cases as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare), the Municipality may pay the expenses required for said Designated Community-Based Service that are to be paid to said Designated Community-Based Service Provider by said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care on behalf of said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care within the limit of the amount to be paid to said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care as an Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service. 例文帳に追加

６　要介護被保険者が指定地域密着型サービス事業者から指定地域密着型サービスを受けたとき（当該要介護被保険者が第四十六条第四項の規定により指定居宅介護支援を受けることにつきあらかじめ市町村に届け出ている場合であって、当該指定地域密着型サービスが当該指定居宅介護支援の対象となっている場合その他の厚生労働省令で定める場合に限る。）は、市町村は、当該要介護被保険者が当該指定地域密着型サービス事業者に支払うべき当該指定地域密着型サービスに要した費用について、地域密着型介護サービス費として当該要介護被保険者に対し支給すべき額の限度において、当該要介護被保険者に代わり、当該指定地域密着型サービス事業者に支払うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The resolution for approval under the preceding paragraph shall be made by at least a two-thirds majority of the votes of Preferred Equity Members attending the general meeting, where those Preferred Equity Members who are in attendance hold the majority of the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are likely to incur damages as a result of the changes to the articles of incorporation as referred to in that paragraph (in cases where said resolution is to be made at each general meeting for Preferred Equity Members who hold Preferred Equity which is categorized into two or more classes, the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are the members of the relevant general meeting of each such class). In this case, it shall not be precluded for the articles of incorporation to provide to the effect that the assent of at least a certain number of Preferred Equity Members is required, nor shall it be precluded for them to provide any other conditions in addition to the relevant conditions for a resolution. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による承認の決議は、同項の定款の変更が損害を及ぼすおそれのある優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の総口数（当該決議が二以上の種類別に区分された優先出資に係る優先出資社員を構成員とする各総会において行われる場合には、当該種類別の各総会の構成員たる優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の口数）の過半数に当たる優先出資を有する優先出資社員が出席し、かつ、その議決権の三分の二以上に当たる多数をもって行わなければならない。この場合においては、当該決議の要件に加えて、一定の数以上の優先出資社員の賛成を要する旨その他の要件を定款で定めることを妨げない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 162 (1) In the following cases, where there are unavoidable reasons, Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members or all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members and Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members) respectively, or Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or the issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity) may demand the dissolution of a Specific Purpose Company by filing an action: 例文帳に追加

第百六十二条　次に掲げる場合において、やむを得ない事由があるときは、総特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員若しくは優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数若しくは発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資若しくは優先出資を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員は、訴えをもって特定目的会社の解散を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to the provisions in the preceding paragraph, it is necessary for the State, local governments, business operators, and citizens to properly divide their respective roles in order to undertake in a proper and smooth manner the cyclical use of products, containers, etc. which have become circulative resources. In cases in which the roles of any particular business operators are deemed important in establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society from the viewpoint of such considerations as the design and selection of raw materials for products, containers, etc. and the collection, etc. of products, containers, etc. that have become circulative resources, pursuant to the Basic Principles, the business operators undertaking the manufacture, sale, etc. of these products, containers, etc. are themselves responsible for collecting or delivering, or undertaking the proper cyclical use of, these products, containers, etc. which have become circulative resources, as their responsibility within the division of roles. 例文帳に追加

３　前項に定めるもののほか、製品、容器等であって、これが循環資源となった場合におけるその循環的な利用を適正かつ円滑に行うためには国、地方公共団体、事業者及び国民がそれぞれ適切に役割を分担することが必要であるとともに、当該製品、容器等に係る設計及び原材料の選択、当該製品、容器等が循環資源となったものの収集等の観点からその事業者の果たすべき役割が循環型社会の形成を推進する上で重要であると認められるものについては、当該製品、容器等の製造、販売等を行う事業者は、基本原則にのっとり、当該分担すべき役割として、自ら、当該製品、容器等が循環資源となったものを引き取り、若しくは引き渡し、又はこれについて適正に循環的な利用を行う責務を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

iv) By way of allowing a person who receives the disclosure to copy information to a file stored on a computer (including input-output devices; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) used by said person through use of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system connecting a computer used by the competent minister and a computer used by the person who receives the disclosure through an electric telecommunication line) (limited to cases where a request for disclosure has been made via an electronic data processing system prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Use of Information and Communications Technologies for Administrative Procedures (Act No. 151 of 2002) as prescribed in said paragraph): 100 yen per case plus 240 yen each for every 0.5 MB (in the case of allowing such person to copy all information recorded in the file for the fiscal year for which a request for disclosure has been made, 100 yen per case plus 880 yen each for every 200 MB 例文帳に追加

四　電子情報処理組織（主務大臣の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下この号において同じ。）と開示を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。）を使用して開示を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに複写させる方法（行政手続等における情報通信の技術の利用に関する法律（平成十四年法律第百五十一号）第三条第一項の規定により同項に規定する電子情報処理組織を使用して開示請求があった場合に限る。）　一件につき百円に〇・五メガバイトまでごとに二百四十円（開示請求に係る年度のファイル記録事項のすべてを複写させる場合にあっては、二百メガバイトまでごとに八百八十円）を加えた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) In cases where a person alleging that his right was infringed by distribution of information via a specified telecommunications filed a petition that said specified telecommunications service provider take measures to prevent said information infringing his right (hereinafter referred to as "infringing information") from being transmitted (hereinafter in this item referred to as "transmission prevention measures"), indicating the infringing information and the allegedly infringed right and the reason why said person insists on said infringement (hereinafter in this item referred to as "infringing information, etc.") and where said specified telecommunications service provider provided such infringing information, etc. to the sender of said infringing information and inquired the sender if said sender agrees with implementing said transmission prevention measures, where said specified telecommunications service provider has not received any notice from said sender indicating his disagreement with implementation of said transmission prevention measures after seven days from the day of said inquiry to said sender. 例文帳に追加

二　特定電気通信による情報の流通によって自己の権利を侵害されたとする者から、当該権利を侵害したとする情報（以下「侵害情報」という。）、侵害されたとする権利及び権利が侵害されたとする理由（以下この号において「侵害情報等」という。）を示して当該特定電気通信役務提供者に対し侵害情報の送信を防止する措置（以下この号において「送信防止措置」という。）を講ずるよう申出があった場合に、当該特定電気通信役務提供者が、当該侵害情報の発信者に対し当該侵害情報等を示して当該送信防止措置を講ずることに同意するかどうかを照会した場合において、当該発信者が当該照会を受けた日から七日を経過しても当該発信者から当該送信防止措置を講ずることに同意しない旨の申出がなかったとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 4 paragraph (2) to paragraph (7), Article 5 and the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the approval in paragraph (1), the provisions of Article 6 to a person who has obtained the approval in paragraph (1) (or, when that person does not have an address in Japan, the Domestic Administrator pertaining to that person), and the provisions of Article 7 to Type 1 Use Regulations approved under the provisions of paragraph (1). In these cases, the term "Name and address" in Article 4 paragraph (2) item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Name and address of the person who wishes to obtain the approval in Article 9 paragraph (1) and, when that person does not have an address (or, in the case of a corporation, its main office) in Japan, of a person appointed under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the same Article", and the term "Article 4 paragraph (1)" in Article 7 paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 9 paragraph (1)". 例文帳に追加

４　第四条第二項から第七項まで、第五条及び前条の規定は第一項の承認について、第六条の規定は第一項の承認を受けた者（その者が本邦内に住所を有する者以外の者である場合にあっては、その者に係る国内管理人）について、第七条の規定は第一項の規定により承認を受けた第一種使用規程について準用する。この場合において、第四条第二項第一号中「氏名及び住所」とあるのは「第九条第一項の承認を受けようとする者及びその者が本邦内に住所（法人にあっては、その主たる事務所）を有する者以外の者である場合にあっては同条第二項の規定により選任した者の氏名及び住所」と、第七条第一項中「第四条第一項」とあるのは「第九条第一項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 96 (1) The provision of Article 40 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a request made by a provisional administrator, the provisions of Article 47, Article 50 and Article 51 shall apply mutatis mutandis where a provisional administration order is issued, the provisions of Article 74(2), Article 75, Article 76, Article 79, Article 80, Article 82 to Article 85, Article 87(1) and (2) and Article 90(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional administrator, and the provisions of Article 87(1) and (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional administrator representative. In these cases, the phrase "public notice under the provision of Article 32(1)" in Article 51 shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the provision of Article 92(1)," and the phrase "successor bankruptcy trustee" in Article 90(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "successor provisional administrator or a bankruptcy trustee." 例文帳に追加

第九十六条　第四十条の規定は保全管理人の請求について、第四十七条、第五十条及び第五十一条の規定は保全管理命令が発せられた場合について、第七十四条第二項、第七十五条、第七十六条、第七十九条、第八十条、第八十二条から第八十五条まで、第八十七条第一項及び第二項並びに第九十条第一項の規定は保全管理人について、第八十七条第一項及び第二項の規定は保全管理人代理について準用する。この場合において、第五十一条中「第三十二条第一項の規定による公告」とあるのは「第九十二条第一項の規定による公告」と、第九十条第一項中「後任の破産管財人」とあるのは「後任の保全管理人、破産管財人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 186 (1) Where there exist any security interests (meaning a special statutory lien, pledge, mortgage, or a right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, against property that belongs to the bankruptcy estate, if it is in the common interests of bankruptcy creditors to cause said security interests to be extinguished by selling by private contract said property, a bankruptcy trustee may file a petition to the court for permission for the measure to sell by private contract the property and cause all security interests to be extinguished by paying to the court the amount of money specified in each of the following items for the cases listed in the respective items; provided, however, that this shall not apply if such measure would unduly harm the interest of the persons who hold the security interests in question: 例文帳に追加

第百八十六条　破産手続開始の時において破産財団に属する財産につき担保権（特別の先取特権、質権、抵当権又は商法若しくは会社法の規定による留置権をいう。以下この節において同じ。）が存する場合において、当該財産を任意に売却して当該担保権を消滅させることが破産債権者の一般の利益に適合するときは、破産管財人は、裁判所に対し、当該財産を任意に売却し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める額に相当する金銭が裁判所に納付されることにより当該財産につき存するすべての担保権を消滅させることについての許可の申立てをすることができる。ただし、当該担保権を有する者の利益を不当に害することとなると認められるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry is unable to ascertain the domicile or residence, or the location of the business office or office, of a person to which a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) shall be given, he/she may designate the specified capital transactions that are prohibited or that require permission, after clarifying, by a public notice instead of a notice pursuant to the provision of the said paragraph, a person who is prohibited from conducting, in whole or in part, the specified capital transactions or obliged to obtain permission for conducting the specified capital transactions. In this case, with regard to the application of the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs in the cases where the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry has given the public notice, the terms "preceding paragraph" and "notice" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding paragraph and paragraph (4)" and "public notice," respectively, and the terms "paragraph (1)" and "notice to a person who has been prohibited or obliged to obtain permission" in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) and the following paragraph" and "public notice," respectively. 例文帳に追加

４　経済産業大臣は、第一項の規定による通知をすべき者の住所若しくは居所又は営業所若しくは事務所の所在地が確知できないときは、同項の規定による通知に代えて、告示により、特定資本取引を行うことについて、その全部若しくは一部を禁止し、又は許可を受ける義務を課する者を明らかにした上で、その禁止をし、又は許可を受けなければならない特定資本取引を指定することができる。この場合において、経済産業大臣が当該告示を行つたときにおける前二項の規定の適用については、第二項中「前項」とあるのは「前項及び第四項」と、「通知」とあるのは「告示」と、前項中「第一項」とあるのは「第一項及び次項」と、「その禁止をし、又は許可を受ける義務を課した者に対する通知」とあるのは「告示」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The period in which inward direct investment, etc. is prohibited pursuant to the provision of Article 27, paragraph (3) or paragraph (6) of the Act is extended by serving a document entered with said extension of the period to the domicile or residence or business office of the person who should receive such service, through service by mail or via correspondence delivery service prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Correspondence Delivery by Private Business Operators (Act No. 99 of 2004) conducted by an ordinary correspondence delivery business prescribed in paragraph (6) of the same Article or a specified correspondence delivery business prescribed in paragraph (9) of the same Article (hereinafter referred to as "mail, etc." in this Article and Article 5), or through personal delivery service; provided, however, that in the cases where the foreign investor gave said notification of inward direct investment, etc. through an agent who is a resident, such document shall be served to the domicile or residence or business office of said agent. 例文帳に追加

７　法第二十七条第三項又は第六項の規定による対内直接投資等を行つてはならない期間の延長は、郵便若しくは民間事業者による信書の送達に関する法律（平成十四年法律第九十九号）第二条第六項に規定する一般信書便事業者若しくは同条第九項に規定する特定信書便事業者による同条第二項に規定する信書便（以下この条及び第五条において「郵便等」という。）による送達又は交付送達により、その送達を受けるべきものの住所、居所又は営業所に当該延長の期間を記載した文書を送達して行う。ただし、外国投資家が居住者である代理人により当該対内直接投資等の届出をしている場合には、当該代理人の住所、居所又は営業所に送達するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to transactions or acts pertaining to any application or notification that has been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, paragraph (1), Article 12, paragraph (1), Article 13, paragraph (1), Article 13-2 or Article 13-3 of the Act on Foreign Capital prior to abolition by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Act on Foreign Capital [Act No. 163 of 1950] shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Old Foreign Capital Act") at the time of enforcement of this Order, the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Act on Foreign Capital, the Ordinance Specifying the Cases of Acquisition of Shares or Equity by Foreign Investors that Are Deemed to be Investment Activities and the Ordinance Specifying the Scope of Affairs to be Handled by the Bank of Japan Pursuant to the Provisions of the Act on Foreign Capital prior to abolition by this Order (said Ordinance for Enforcement of the Act on Foreign Capital shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Old Ordinance for Enforcement") shall remain in force even after the enforcement of this Order. 例文帳に追加

３　この命令の施行の際現に外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による廃止前の外資に関する法律（昭和二十五年法律第百六十三号。以下「旧外資法」という。）第十条、第十一条第一項、第十二条第一項、第十三条第一項、第十三条の二又は第十三条の三の規定によりされている申請又は届出に係る取引又は行為については、この命令による廃止前の外資に関する法律施行規則（以下「旧施行規則」という。）、外国投資家が株式又は持分を取得する場合のうち資産の運用にあたるものを定める省令及び外資に関する法律の規定により日本銀行に取り扱わせる事務の範囲を定める省令は、この命令の施行後においても、なお効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the shareholders meeting of a Bank passes a resolution for transferring the whole of its business or for acquiring the whole of the other's business (or, in the case where a Bank acquires the whole of the other's business not through the resolution required by Article 467(1) (Approvals of Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provision of Article 468 (Cases where Approval of Assignment of Business is not Required) of that Act, where its board of directors passes a resolution for acquiring such business or its executive officers decide to acquire such business), the Bank shall, within two weeks from the day of the resolution or decision, make public notice, in the official gazette, of the gist of the resolution or the decision and to the effect that any creditors who have any objection to the transfer of the whole of its business or acquisition of the whole of the other's business ought to file an objection within a specified period of time, and shall give notice of the same separately to each known creditor other than Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order, if any. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議（会社法第四百六十八条（事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合）の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項（事業譲渡等の承認等）の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定）がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also apply in cases where the abolition of Dispute Resolution, etc. of a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization has been authorized under Article 52-83, paragraph (1) or the designation under Article 52-62, paragraph (1) has been rescinded under Article 52-84, paragraph (1) and there is a Dispute Related to Banking Services for which Dispute Resolution Procedures had been implemented as of the day of authorization or rescission, when the Party to the Dispute Related to Banking Services that had filed an application for Dispute Resolution Procedures files an action for the claims which were the subject matter of the Dispute Resolution Procedures within one month from the day on which said Party received the notice under Article 52-83, paragraph (3) or Article 52-84, paragraph (3) or the day on which the Party came to know of the authorization or rescission whichever comes earlier. 例文帳に追加

２　指定紛争解決機関の紛争解決等業務の廃止が第五十二条の八十三第一項の規定により認可され、又は第五十二条の六十二第一項の規定による指定が第五十二条の八十四第一項の規定により取り消され、かつ、その認可又は取消しの日に紛争解決手続が実施されていた銀行業務関連紛争がある場合において、当該紛争解決手続の申立てをした当該銀行業務関連紛争の当事者が第五十二条の八十三第三項若しくは第五十二条の八十四第三項の規定による通知を受けた日又は当該認可若しくは取消しを知つた日のいずれか早い日から一月以内に当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-3 (1) A Money Lender shall, when he/she entrusts to any other person performance of obligations under the Money Lender's Contract for a Loan, except in cases where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article applies, notify such person to the effect that Article 12-7, Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 16-3, Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), Article 18 through Article 22, Article 24-5, paragraph (1), and Article 24-6-10, paragraph (excluding, with regard to claims contained in mortgage securities provided in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Securities Act, the provisions of Article 16-2, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 17 (excluding paragraph (6)), and including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall apply to acts conducted by said person in relation to said performance, in a manner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の三　貸金業者は、貸金業者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済を他人に委託するに当たつては、前条第一項の規定の適用がある場合を除き、その者に対し、その者が当該弁済に関してする行為について第十二条の七、第十六条の二第三項及び第四項、第十六条の三、第十七条（第六項を除く。）、第十八条から第二十二条まで、第二十四条の五第一項並びに第二十四条の六の十の規定（抵当証券法第一条第一項に規定する抵当証券に記載された債権については第十六条の二第三項及び第四項並びに第十七条（第六項を除く。）の規定を除き、これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）の適用がある旨を、内閣府令で定める方法により、通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The Prime Minister or prefectural governor may, when he/she intends to issue orders under Article 24-6-4 or rescind a registration under Article 24-6-4, paragraph (1) or Article 24-6-5, paragraph (1), hear the opinions of the Commissioner-General of the National Police Agency or the Chief of Police with regard to the existence or absence of Grounds Requiring the Statement of Opinions or facts in violation of the provisions of Article 12-5, Article 21, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24, paragraph (2), Article 24-2, paragraph (2), Article 24-3, paragraph (2), Article 24-4, paragraph (2), and Article 24-5, paragraph (2)), Article 24, paragraph (3), Article 24-2, paragraph (3), or Article 24-3, paragraph (3) (such a fact shall be referred to as a "Fact Requiring the Statement of Opinions" in the following Article). 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣又は都道府県知事は、第二十四条の六の四の規定による命令又は同条第一項若しくは第二十四条の六の五第一項の規定による登録の取消しをしようとするときは、意見陳述事由又は第十二条の五、第二十一条第一項（第二十四条第二項、第二十四条の二第二項、第二十四条の三第二項、第二十四条の四第二項及び第二十四条の五第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条第三項、第二十四条の二第三項若しくは第二十四条の三第三項の規定に違反する事実（次条において「意見陳述事実」という。）の有無について、内閣総理大臣にあつては警察庁長官、都道府県知事にあつては警察本部長の意見を聴くことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the Company intends to invite subscribers to new shares to be issued (hereinafter referred to as "invitation for subscription") or intends to deliver shares (except the Company's own shares possessed by the Company (hereinafter referred to as "own shares")) upon exchange of shares, the Company shall obtain authorization of the Minister. The same shall apply to cases where the Company intends to invite subscribers to new bonds with a right to subscribe for new shares stipulated in Article 238 paragraph (1) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005) (limited to rights attached to bonds with a right to subscribe for new shares. Referred to as "invitation of a right to subscribe for new shares" in paragraph (2) of the following article and Article 23 item (iii)) or intends to deliver rights attached to bonds with a right to subscribe for new shares (except the Company's own bonds with a right to subscribe for new shares possessed by the Company (referred to as "own bonds with a right to subscribe for new shares" in Article 23 item (iii))) upon exchange of shares 例文帳に追加

２　会社は、その発行する株式を引き受ける者の募集（以下「新株募集」という。）をしようとするとき又は株式交換に際して株式（会社が有する自己の株式（以下「自己株式」という。）を除く。）の交付をしようとするときは、総務大臣の認可を受けなければならない。会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第二百三十八条第一項に規定する募集新株予約権（新株予約権付社債に付されたものに限る。次条第二項及び第二十三条第三号において「募集新株予約権」という。）を引き受ける者の募集をしようとするとき又は株式交換に際して新株予約権付社債（会社が有する自己の新株予約権付社債（第二十三条第三号において「自己新株予約権付社債」という。）を除く。）の交付をしようとするときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In cases where it makes the "ratio of voting rights of foreign nationals, etc." reach or exceed one-third to register or record all shares on the Company's shareholders list pursuant to the provisions of Article 152 paragraph (1) or paragraph (8) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001), by those persons listed in any of the items in the preceding paragraph who are the shareholders pertaining to the notice as provided for under Article 151 paragraph (1) or paragraph (8) of the same act, the Company shall not register on its substantial shareholders list, notwithstanding the provisions of the same paragraph, those shares except such shares which may be registered in the manner stipulated in the applicable Ordinance of MIC by which only part of such shares are entered on its substantial shareholders list so that the "ratio of voting rights of foreign nationals, etc." does not reach or exceed one-third. 例文帳に追加

２　会社は、社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百五十一条第一項又は第八項の規定による通知に係る株主のうちの前項各号に掲げる者が各自有する株式のすべてについて同法第百五十二条第一項の規定により株主名簿に記載し、又は記録することとした場合に外国人等議決権割合が三分の一以上となるときは、外国人等議決権割合が三分の一以上とならないように当該株式の一部に限つて実質株主名簿に記載し、又は記録する方法として総務省令で定める方法に従い記載し、又は記録することができる株式以外の株式については、同項の規定にかかわらず、同項の規定による実質株主名簿の記載又は記録をしてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The IMF (2008) lists the following three risks as being faced by the economies of Central and Eastern European countries: (a) the risk of Western European banks withdrawing finance to Central and Eastern European countries in order to compensate the losses arising from the US subprime mortgage problem, or, faced with rising capital costs and risk spreads, reducing the capital or tightening their loan conditions for Central and Eastern Europe; (b) the risk of rapid declines in international competitiveness or decreases in investments from overseas due to wages rising in excess of the rate of productivity growth, or, in cases where much of the finance has been invested in the housing market in the form of mortgages, of credit risks being reviewed as a consequence of a shrinking housing market; and (c) presuming that much of the funds flowing into Central and Eastern Europe are the funds of oil-producing countries and primary commodity exporters, the risk of these funds drying up as the world economy slows.例文帳に追加

IMF（2008）では、中・東欧諸国経済が抱える3つのリスクとして、①米国サブプライム住宅ローン問題の損失を補填するために西欧の銀行が中・東欧諸国向け融資を引き上げたり、資本コストやリスク・スプレッドの上昇に直面した西欧の銀行が、中・東欧向け融資を縮小したり、融資条件を厳格化するリスク、②生産性上昇率を上回って賃金が上昇することで国際競争力が急速に低下し、海外からの投資が減少したり、融資の多くが住宅ローンの形で住宅市場に投資されているようなケースで、住宅市場の縮小によって信用リスクの見直しが行われるリスク、③中・東欧に流入する資金の多くが、産油諸国や一次産品輸出者の資金と推測される中、世界経済が減速して、これら資金の流入が枯渇するリスクを挙げている。 - 経済産業省

In Japan, isobutane is used as a refrigerant instead of fluorocarbon refrigerants. Isobutane is flammable, and so there are many precautions taken to prevent accidents. For instance, refrigerator piping which used to be welded, has been changed to a seamless pipe to prevent gas leakages. Moreover, defroster heaters, which used to be in singlelayer tubes, are now in double-layer tubes, so that surface temperatures never get higher than the combustion point. These forward technologies support the use of nonfluorocarbon. For other refrigeration equipment, such as convenience store show cases, non-fluorocarbon products using carbon dioxide are already in practical use. Also, non-fluorocarbon, energy-efficient automatic vending machines are now in use on the street all over this country. Most of these non-fluorocarbon equipment are recently put in practical use, so they are not wide-spread yet. However, the government is promoting the technical development and installation of non-fluorocarbon facilities and equipment with financial incentives. 例文帳に追加

日本では冷媒フロンの替わりにイソブタンを使用。可燃性ガスのイソブタンは、漏れると発火する危険性があるため、安全性を確保するための様々な工夫を行ってきました。従来溶接していた冷却器の配管は、イソブタンの漏洩を防ぐため繋ぎ目を無くしました。更に、１枚のガラス管に入れていた霜取りヒーターを二重のガラス管の中に入れることによって、表面温度をイソブタンの発火点より低く抑え発火を防ぐなど、高い技術力を駆使しノンフロン化に成功したのです。他の冷凍空調機器では、コンビニにおけるショーケースでも、二酸化炭素を冷媒としたノンフロン製品が実用化されており、また、自動販売機にも、ノンフロン・省エネ機があります。これらのノンフロン機器は、まだ一部が実用化されたばかりでその普及はこれからですが、国の補助を用い、ノンフロンの施設や設備の技術開発や導入等の促進がされています。 - 経済産業省

Especially among venture capitals and start-ups, a majority say listing that examination has gotten much tougher than a few years ago. Issues that have gotten tougher include the internal control system checks, links for to antisocial organizations, and scrutiny of business plans. All these are important, but checking for relationships to antisocial groups is pointed out as an increasingly urgent problem and JASDAQ mentions it explicitly as one of its delisting criteria, and other exchanges are also putting forth more efforts to tackle the problem. Some say, on the other hand, there are cases where start-ups are required to develop a internal control system they are unable to put in effect, where an unclear definition or range of antisocial organizations to be examined, puts them to trouble in deciding specifically what they must do, or where an exchange that demands excessive feasibility in business plans refuses even a reasonable degree of future uncertainties about growth when such uncertainties are present for start-ups, by their very nature. 例文帳に追加

特に審査が強化されたと言われる項目としては、内部管理体制、反社会的勢力との関係、事業計画の合理性等が挙げられている。いずれも審査が重要な項目であることは事実であり、特に反社会的勢力との関係については、近年問題の深刻化が指摘されていることから、ＪＡＳＤＡＱにおいては上場廃止基準に明記する等、各取引所ともに一層重点的な取り組みがなされているところである。他方、こうした事項について、ベンチャー企業には事実上整備しえない内部管理組織の整備を求められる場合、調査対象となる反社会的勢力の定義・範囲がはっきりせず対応に苦慮する場合、事業計画の合理性を求める余り、ベンチャー企業の成長性に伴う将来の不確実性が十分に認められない場合等もあると言われている。 - 経済産業省

(d) A person whose permission under Article 9 or license under Article 78 or Article 167, Article 190, paragraph 1 or permission under Article 332, paragraph 1 or Article 342, paragraph 1 has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 159, paragraph 1 or 2, Article 186, paragraph 1 or 2, Article 235, paragraph 3, Article 236, paragraph 1 or Article 340, paragraph 1 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 345) and for whom five years have not lapsed from the day of the rescission, or a person whose similar permission or license in a foreign state obtained pursuant to the laws and regulations of said foreign state which are equivalent to this Act (including registration and other administrative dispositions similar to said permission or license; referred to as a "Permission, etc." in (f)) has been rescinded and for whom five years have not lapsed from the day of the rescission 例文帳に追加

ニ第百五十九条第一項若しくは第二項、第百八十六条第一項若しくは第二項、第二百三十五条第三項若しくは第二百三十六条第一項若しくは第三百四十条第一項（第三百四十五条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により第九条若しくは第七十八条、第百六十七条、第百九十条第一項若しくは第三百三十二条第一項若しくは第三百四十二条第一項の許可を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過しない者又はこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種の許可（当該許可に類する登録その他の行政処分を含む。ヘにおいて「許可等」という。）を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過しない者 - 経済産業省

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(22) Where a nonresident or foreign corporation makes, for the first time, entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding interest-bearing book-entry transfer national government bonds in the account pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system covered by a confirmation concerning book-entry transfer local government bonds or the account pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system covered by a confirmation concerning short-term national government bonds, etc., or submits a written application prescribed in Article 5-2(10) of the Act pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (10) of the said Article with regard to interest-bearing book-entry transfer national government bonds (hereinafter referred to as a "written application for a change of book-entry transfer national government bonds" in this paragraph, paragraph (24) and paragraph (25)), in terms of the said entries and records under the book-entry transfer system or submission, the fact that the identification documents set forth Article 5-2(9) of the Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (12) of the said Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have been presented pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (9) of the said Article with regard to a confirmation concerning book-entry local government bonds or that the identification documents set forth in Article 41-12(12) of the Act have been presented pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (12) of the said Article with regard to a confirmation concerning short-term national government bonds, etc. (including the cases where the identification documents set forth in Article 26-18(5) have been presented pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of the said Article) shall be deemed to mean that the document specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 5-2(9) of the Act has been presented pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (9) of the said Article, and the fact that a confirmation concerning the said book-entry transfer local government bonds or a confirmation concerning the said short-term national government bonds, etc. has been provided shall be deemed to mean that a confirmation has been provided pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, respectively; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the name and address entered in a written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds or a written application for a change of book-entry transfer national government bonds to be submitted by the said nonresident or foreign corporation are inconsistent with the name and address of the said nonresident or foreign corporation for which a confirmation concerning the said book-entry transfer local government bonds or a confirmation concerning the said short-term national government bonds, etc. has been provided. 例文帳に追加

２２　非居住者又は外国法人が、振替地方債に係る確認に係る振替記載等に係る口座若しくは短期国債等に係る確認に係る振替記載等に係る口座において最初に利付振替国債の振替記載等を受ける場合又は利付振替国債に係る法第五条の二第十項の規定による同項に規定する申告書（以下この項、第二十四項及び第二十五項において「振替国債異動申告書」という。）の提出をする場合には、当該振替記載等又は提出については、振替地方債に係る確認に係る同条第九項（同条第十二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による同条第九項の確認書類の提示又は短期国債等に係る確認に係る法第四十一条の十二第十二項の規定による同項の確認書類の提示（第二十六条の十八第五項の規定による同項の確認書類の提示を含む。）をもつて法第五条の二第九項の規定による同項の政令で定める書類の提示があつたものと、当該振替地方債に係る確認又は当該短期国債等に係る確認をもつて同項の規定による確認があつたものと、それぞれみなす。ただし、当該非居住者又は外国法人が提出をする振替国債非課税適用申告書又は振替国債異動申告書に記載された氏名又は名称及び住所が当該振替地方債に係る確認又は当該短期国債等に係る確認がされた当該非居住者又は外国法人の氏名又は名称及び住所と異なるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph." 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) Should the person entitled to dispose of the product object to the seizure, the customs authorities shall inform the applicant thereof without delay. The applicant shall declare to the customs authorities without delay whether he will maintain the application under subsection (1) in respect of the seized product. 1. If the applicant withdraws his application, the customs authorities shall lift the seizure without delay. 2. If the applicant maintains his application and submits an enforceable court decision ordering the impounding of the seized product or limitation of the right to dispose thereof, the customs authorities shall take the necessary measures. Where neither of the cases referred to in nos. 1 and 2 are applicable, the customs authorities shall lift the seizure after expiry of two weeks after service of the notification to the applicant under the first sentence; should the applicant show that a court decision according to no. 2 has been requested, but has not yet been received, the seizure shall be maintained for a further two weeks at the most. 例文帳に追加

(4) 製品の処分権者が差押に対して異議を唱えた場合は，税関は，申請人にこれについて遅滞なく通知する。申請人は，税関に対して，同人が，差し押さえられた製品に関する(1)に基づく申請を維持するか否かを，遅滞なく宣言しなければならない。 1. 申請人がその申請を取り下げたときは，税関は，遅滞なく差押を解除する。 2. 申請人がその申請を維持し，かつ，申請人が差押製品の保管又は製品に係る処分権の制限を命じる執行可能な裁判所決定を提出したときは，税関は必要な措置を講ずる。1.又は 2.の何れにも該当しない場合は，税関は，第 1文に基づく申請人への通告の送達から2週間の期間の満了後に差押を解除する。申請人が，2.による裁判所決定を請求しているが，未だそれを受領していないことを証明したときは，差押が維持されるものとし，その期間は，最長で 2週間とする。 - 特許庁

However, we must strike a balance. It would be wrong to depend excessively on taxpayer money. In the case of a profitable project, if the private sector can undertake it on its own, it will generate decent profits and create new jobs, even without the involvement of DBJ. However, in Kyushu, projects of a public nature are carried out entirely at the national government’s expense. In such a case, the public nature is very strong. However, compared with in Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya, it is very difficult, or even impossible, for the private sector to generate profits in Kyushu. Still, from the viewpoint of convenience for local communities and residents, policy-based finance is necessary. I believe that if a fixed low interest rate is available, a project can be carried out without losses even though profitability may be lower than in Tokyo and Osaka. I know of many such cases and what I have said is based on this knowledge. 例文帳に追加

しかし、そうはいっても、そこでやはりバランスというものがあります。だから、過度に税金でやるというのもいけませんし、利益が上がることは、（日本）政策（銀行）が関与しなくても、民間だけでしっかりやって頂ければ立派に利益が上がって、雇用も増えると私はそう思っています。だけれども、やはり九州では、公共性のあるものであれば、全額国費です。そうすると、非常に公共性が高いのです。しかし、民間で行なうと、東京、大阪、名古屋では採算がとれるけれども、九州では非常にとりにくい、あるいはとれない。しかし、やはり地域の利便、その地域の国民を考えれば、やはり政策（金融）というものが必要であり、金利も長期固定の金利であれば、それを基にして、やはり東京、大阪ほど利益は上がらないけれども、何とか赤字にならなくてやっていけるということを、たくさんのプロジェクトで私は見てきましたから、そういう意味で私は申し上げているのです。 - 金融庁

Major national newspapers have written about the growing prominence of problems arising from the division into five companies. In that sense, the shelving of the postal reform bill undermines the people’s interests, and the size of post offices to be rebuilt in the disaster areas will depend on the fate of the bill. As was pointed out by some newspaper article or other, business sections such as the general affairs and planning sections can be unified into one if the three postal businesses are merged into one. However, if the five-way division is maintained, large post offices, such as the one in Ishinomaki, may need four separate office spaces to accommodate general affairs and accounting staff in some cases. You have written news articles about the struggle to plan for the future and rebuild post offices destroyed by the disaster, and I strongly hope that Diet deliberations will be quickly conducted 例文帳に追加

この大震災の中で、5分社化の弊害が非常に顕著になってきたということは、全国の有力紙にも書いてありますように、そういった意味で、この郵政改革関連法案の棚ざらしは国民利益にも反しており、将来どうなるかによって、今回、被災した郵便局等の再建する郵便局の規模も変わってきますので、どこかの新聞記事にも書いていましたように、総務部とか企画室というのは、3事業一体になれば一つでいいのです。ところが、5分社化のままであれば、総務だとか経理だとか、石巻郵便局程度の大きいところは、場合によっては四つ（室を）とらなければいけませんから、そんなことでも、なかなか将来設計、被災をされた郵便局の再建にも、苦労しているという記事を皆様方は書いておられましたけれども、まさにそういったことを、私から強く、まさに速やかな審議を強くお願いしたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

One lesson provided by the current global financial crisis that is gradually becoming a consensus is that financial business that generates added value by creating several layers of securities from the underlying assets, which may be called financial engineering for the sake of financial business, is not necessarily desirable. Although products thus created may play a significant role in some cases, it is not necessarily desirable for the general public. In short, the recognition is spreading around the world that the role that the financial sector is supposed to play is to properly support the real economy, ensure optimal allocation of resources from the perspective of the entire national economy and facilitate and strengthen this process. In this sense, I hope that the Japanese financial industry will make efforts to provide high-quality services that properly meet the needs of households and companies. 例文帳に追加

今回のグローバルな金融危機の中で、一つ教訓として共有されつつある認識としては、金融のための金融と申しましょうか、金融商品、金融の仕組みの上に、三重、四重に金融商品を作って、見かけ上、何か付加価値がついているかのような、そういう金融業というものは、本来必ずしも望ましいとは言えない、大きな役割を果たすケースもございますけれども、必ずしも一般的には望ましいことではない、つまり、実体経済をきちんと支える、国民経済全体として見て最適な資源配分を実現する、そのプロセスを円滑化し強化する、こういう役割が金融セクターに期待されているのだという認識が今グローバルにも広まりつつあるのだろうと思っております。そういう意味では、家計や企業の金融サービスに対するニーズ、これをしっかり踏まえた質の高い金融サービスが提供されるように、ぜひ日本の金融業の皆さんにもご努力をいただきたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

As you know, just because a financial institution has more capital does not mean it is better. In Japan, many credit crunch and credit withdrawal cases arose due to the capital adequacy ratio issue a decade ago, as you and I experienced. I was a Diet member of the ruling party at the time and struggled a great deal with it. At the same time, however, financial stability is also extremely important. In macroeconomics, or to stimulate the economy and attain a sustainable economy, it is necessary to have stable and sound financial institutions, as you are well aware. The question of how global harmonization in this field can be achieved has now become a critical issue at a level that has world historical significance, and is being discussed extensively at G8 and G20. My visit to the United States at such a significant point in time, or in my words, at the biggest juncture of the 21st century, was highly informative. 例文帳に追加

ご存じのように金融の自己資本についても、高ければ高いほどいいというものではございません。日本は10年前に皆さん方も経験したように、自己資本比率で非常に貸し渋り貸しはがしが起こりまして、私も当時は与党の国会議員でございましたが、大変苦労をいたしましたので。しかし、同時に、金融の安定性ということも非常に大事でございましたから、そこら辺をマクロ経済学、あるいは経済の活性化、持続可能な経済と、まさに持続可能な経済には安定した健全な金融機関が必要であるということは、皆さん方よくご存じでございますが、そこら辺をどの辺で世界的に調和をしていくかということは、非常に大事な、今、世界史的な大問題でございまして、G8、G20で話を詰めておりますけれども、そういった大事な時期に、私に言わせれば21世紀の最も節目の時代にアメリカに行かせていただきまして、大変にいい勉強をさせていただきました。 - 金融庁

Article 123 The provisions of Articles 113, 118, 120, and 121 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the visits received by an inmate sentenced to death having the status as an unsentenced person. In this case, the phrase "under the following items" in paragraph (1) of Article 113 shall be read as "under the following items (limited to (b) under item (i) in the case of a visit by a defense counsel., etc.)" ; the phrase "hinder adequate pursuance of correctional treatment for the sentenced person" in (d) under item (ii) of said paragraph shall be read as "cause destruction of evidence" ; the phrase "the next Section" in paragraph (1) of Article 120 shall be read as "the next Section and where receiving visit is not permitted by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure" ; the phrase "receive the visit" in paragraph (2) of said Article shall be read as "receive the visit except the cases where it is not permitted by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure" ; and the term "visit" in Article 121 shall be read as "visit (except those by a defense counsel, etc.)." 例文帳に追加

第百二十三条　第百十三条、第百十八条、第百二十条及び第百二十一条の規定は、未決拘禁者としての地位を有する死刑確定者の面会について準用する。この場合において、第百十三条第一項中「各号のいずれか」とあるのは「各号のいずれか（弁護人等との面会の場合にあっては、第一号ロに限る。）」と、同項第二号ニ中「受刑者の矯正処遇の適切な実施に支障」とあるのは「罪証の隠滅の結果」と、第百二十条第一項中「場合」とあるのは「場合及び刑事訴訟法の定めるところにより許されない場合」と、同条第二項中「ときは」とあるのは「ときは、刑事訴訟法の定めるところにより許されない場合を除き」と、第百二十一条中「面会に」とあるのは「面会（弁護人等との面会を除く。）に」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 54 (1) In the event that the person with disabilities, etc. pertaining to the application set forth in the preceding paragraph needs to receive medical expenses for services and supports for persons with disabilities in the light of the person's conditions of physical disabilities or mental disorders, if the person is appropriate to the standard prescribed in the Cabinet Order as considering income status of such persons with disabilities or other family members of households to which the person with disabilities belongs or the conditions of the medical treatment, a municipality etc. shall conduct grant approval per kind of medical care for services and supports for persons with disabilities prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; unless such person with disabilities, etc. can receive medical care of the kind prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare among medical care for services and supports for persons with disabilities pursuant to the provisions of Act on Relief to Wounded and Sick Retired Soldiers (Act No. 168 of 1963) or Act on Medical Care and Treatment for Persons Who Have Caused Serious Cases Under the Condition of Insanity (Act No. 110 of 2003). 例文帳に追加

第五十四条　市町村等は、前条第一項の申請に係る障害者等が、その心身の障害の状態からみて自立支援医療を受ける必要があり、かつ、当該障害者等又はその属する世帯の他の世帯員の所得の状況、治療状況その他の事情を勘案して政令で定める基準に該当する場合には、厚生労働省令で定める自立支援医療の種類ごとに支給認定を行うものとする。ただし、当該障害者等が、自立支援医療のうち厚生労働省令で定める種類の医療を、戦傷病者特別援護法（昭和三十八年法律第百六十八号）又は心神喪失等の状態で重大な他害行為を行った者の医療及び観察等に関する法律（平成十五年法律第百十号）の規定により受けることができるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 18 Notwithstanding the preceding Article, where a claim arises from a tort involving injury to life, body or property of others, caused by a defect in a product (meaning a thing produced or processed; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) that is delivered, against a producer (meaning a person who has produced, processed, imported, exported, distributed or sold a product in the course of trade; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or a person who has provided a representation on the product in a manner which allows the others to recognize such person as its producer (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Producer, etc." in this Article), the formation and effect of such claim shall be governed by the law of the place where the victim received the delivery of the product; provided, however, that if the delivery of the product at said place was ordinarily unforeseeable, the law of the principal place of business of the Producer, etc. (in cases where the Producer, etc. has no place of business, the law of his/her habitual residence) shall govern. 例文帳に追加

第十八条　前条の規定にかかわらず、生産物（生産され又は加工された物をいう。以下この条において同じ。）で引渡しがされたものの瑕疵により他人の生命、身体又は財産を侵害する不法行為によって生ずる生産業者（生産物を業として生産し、加工し、輸入し、輸出し、流通させ、又は販売した者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は生産物にその生産業者と認めることができる表示をした者（以下この条において「生産業者等」と総称する。）に対する債権の成立及び効力は、被害者が生産物の引渡しを受けた地の法による。ただし、その地における生産物の引渡しが通常予見することのできないものであったときは、生産業者等の主たる事業所の所在地の法（生産業者等が事業所を有しない場合にあっては、その常居所地法）による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities (excluding that falling under the category of Secondary Distribution of Securities set forth in item (iv) of paragraph (1), but including a General Solicitation for Securities Acquired by Qualified Institutional Investor (excluding those falling under the category of Secondary Distribution of Securities) and Procedures Relating to Securities Delivery for Reorganization; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter and the following Chapter, except in the following paragraph and paragraph (5) of this Article, Article 13 and Article 15(2) to (6)) to be made to shareholders (including preferred equity investors provided in the Act on Preferred Equity Investment) who are stated or recorded in the shareholder registry (including the preferred equity investor registry provided in the Act on Preferred Equity Investment) on a certain date, the notification for the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution under the preceding two paragraphs shall be made twenty five days prior to the day on which the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution is to be made; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the Issue Price or distribution price of the Securities or other factors. 例文帳に追加

３　有価証券の募集又は売出し（第一項第四号に掲げる有価証券の売出しを除くものとし、適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘（有価証券の売出しに該当するものを除く。）及び特定組織再編成交付手続を含む。次項及び第五項、第十三条並びに第十五条第二項から第六項までを除き、以下この章及び次章において同じ。）が一定の日において株主名簿（優先出資法に規定する優先出資者名簿を含む。）に記載され、又は記録されている株主（優先出資法に規定する優先出資者を含む。）に対し行われる場合には、当該募集又は売出しに関する前二項の規定による届出は、その日の二十五日前までにしなければならない。ただし、有価証券の発行価格又は売出価格その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4-2 (1) A company which is required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) (including those which have submitted Annual Securities Reports under Article 23-3(4); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) shall, if the Securities issued by the company are those listed in Article 24(1)(i) or the company is otherwise required by a Cabinet Order, submit, together with an Annual Securities Report (or a Foreign Company Report in cases where Foreign Company Reports are submitted instead of Annual Securities Reports, etc. defined in Article 24(8) under Article 24(8)), a letter confirming that, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, statements contained in the Annual Securities Report are appropriate under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and Related Regulations (hereinafter referred to as a "Confirmation Letter" in this Article and the following Article). 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四の二　第二十四条第一項の規定による有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社（第二十三条の三第四項の規定により当該有価証券報告書を提出した会社を含む。次項において同じ。）のうち、第二十四条第一項第一号に掲げる有価証券の発行者である会社その他の政令で定めるものは、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該有価証券報告書の記載内容が金融商品取引法令に基づき適正であることを確認した旨を記載した確認書（以下この条及び次条において「確認書」という。）を当該有価証券報告書（第二十四条第八項の規定により同項に規定する有価証券報告書等に代えて外国会社報告書を提出する場合にあつては、当該外国会社報告書）と併せて内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-11 (1) A Tender Offeror may not withdraw offers or cancel contracts pertaining to the Tender Offer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Withdrawal, etc. of Tender Offer") after having once made the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の十一　公開買付者は、公開買付開始公告をした後においては、公開買付けに係る申込みの撤回及び契約の解除（以下この節において「公開買付けの撤回等」という。）を行うことができない。ただし、公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社（会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。）の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情（政令で定めるものに限る。）が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 62 (1) A Foreign Securities Broker (including those whose business is closely related to Securities-Related Business and those which are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or a person who conducts Investment Advisory Business or Investment Management Business in a foreign state (excluding persons registered under Article 29 or Article 33-2; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall, when it intends to establish a representative office or any other institution in Japan for the purposes of collection or provision of information regarding the securities market and the market of financial indicator of the Securities, or to conduct other business related to financial instruments business, etc. which are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (including the cases where said Foreign Securities Broker intends to conduct said business in the institution established for other purposes), notify the contents of said business, the location of said facility and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance to the Prime Minister in advance. 例文帳に追加

第六十二条　外国証券業者（有価証券関連業と密接な関係を有する業を行う者で内閣府令で定めるものを含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は外国で投資助言業務若しくは投資運用業を行う者（第二十九条又は第三十三条の二の登録を受けた者を除く。以下この条において同じ。）は、有価証券及び有価証券に係る金融指標の市場に関する情報の収集及び提供その他金融商品取引等に関連のある業務で内閣府令で定めるものを行うため、国内において駐在員事務所その他の施設を設置しようとする場合（他の目的をもつて設置している施設において当該業務を行おうとする場合を含む。）には、あらかじめ、当該業務の内容、当該施設の所在の場所その他内閣府令で定める事項を内閣総理大臣に届け出なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Article 29 shall not apply to cases where the Independent Administrative Agency Japan Housing Finance Agency, Japan Finance Corporation for Small and Medium Enterprise or Japan Finance Corporation for Municipal Enterprises (referred to as the "Agency, etc." in the following paragraph) is engaged in sales of the rights indicated by the securities listed in Article 2(1)(xiv) or the securities listed in Article 2(1)(xvii) (limited to those having a nature of the securities listed in item (xiv) of said paragraph) or in sales of rights listed in Article 2(2)(i) or (ii), pursuant to Article 22 of the Act on Independent Administrative Agency Japan Housing Finance Agency (Act No. 82 of 2005), Article 25-4(1) of the Act on Japan Finance Corporation for Small and Medium Enterprise (Act No. 138 of 1953) or Article 26-3(1) of the Act on Japan Finance Corporation for Municipal Enterprises (Act. No. 83 of 1957) (referred to as the "Sales of Trust Beneficial Rights" in the following paragraph). 例文帳に追加

３　独立行政法人住宅金融支援機構、中小企業金融公庫又は公営企業金融公庫（次項において「機構等」という。）が、独立行政法人住宅金融支援機構法（平成十七年法律第八十二号）第二十二条、中小企業金融公庫法（昭和二十八年法律第百三十八号）第二十五条の四第一項又は公営企業金融公庫法（昭和三十二年法律第八十三号）第二十六条の三第一項の規定による第二条第一項第十四号に掲げる有価証券若しくは同項第十七号に掲げる有価証券（同項第十四号に掲げる有価証券の性質を有するものに限る。）に表示される権利又は同条第二項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる権利の販売（次項において「信託受益権の販売」という。）を行う場合には、第二十九条の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 173 (1) When a person, in violation of the provision of Article 158, has caused a fluctuation of market prices of Securities, etc. by disseminating unfounded rumors or trading by fraudulent means (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of Violation" in this paragraph), and if said person, based on the market prices so fluctuated, has had the Securities acquired through public offering pertaining to said Securities, etc., or has conducted sales and purchase or other transactions of Securities in relation to said Securities, etc. or Derivative Transactions pertaining to said Securities, etc., on his/her own account and within one month from the date of the Act of Violation, the Prime Minister shall, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the following Section, order said person to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount prescribed in the following items in accordance with the categories listed in such items (in cases where said person falls under all of the following items, the total of the amount specified in each of the relevant items): 例文帳に追加

第百七十三条　第百五十八条の規定に違反して、風説を流布し、又は偽計を用い、当該風説の流布又は偽計（以下この項において「違反行為」という。）により有価証券等の相場を変動させ、当該変動させた相場により、自己の計算において、当該違反行為が行われた日から一月以内に当該有価証券等に係る有価証券の募集により当該有価証券を取得させ、又は当該有価証券等に係る有価証券の売買その他の取引若しくはデリバティブ取引をした者があるときは、内閣総理大臣は、次節に定める手続に従い、その者に対し、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める額（次の各号のいずれにも該当する場合は、当該各号に定める額の合計額）に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the Prime Minister is required to issue one or more decisions under paragraph (1) (limited to the cases where any fact specified in Article 178(1)(ii) has been found) or under preceding two paragraphs, if there is a final and binding court decision on the same case imposing a fine on a Respondent, he/she shall, in lieu of the amount specified in Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding two paragraphs, issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount derived by the following: deducting the amount specified in item (ii) from the amount specified in item (i), and then prorating the amount after said deduction in proportion to the Surcharge Amount Calculated for Respective Decision in relation to each fact pertaining to said one or more decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that when the amount listed in item (i) does not exceed the amount listed in item (ii), the Prime Minister may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding two paragraphs: 例文帳に追加

４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項（第百七十八条第一項第二号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。）又は前二項の規定により一以上の決定をしなければならないときであつて、同一事件について、被審人に対し、罰金の確定裁判があるときは、第百七十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は前二項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該一以上の決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じて按分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項若しくは第二項又は前二項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム