1016万例文収録!

「effect on」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(304ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > effect onに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

effect onの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 15203



例文

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え)、第八百三十四条(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで(担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力)、第八百四十三条(第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。)(合併の無効判決の効力)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第十五号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Quarterly Securities Reports, and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Quarterly Securities Report and amendment report thereof contain fake statements on important matters or lack statements of important matters to be stated or of important matters necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6)" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Quarterly Securities Report (meaning a Quarterly Securities Report set forth in Article 24-4-7(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 11(1) and Article 22)"; the part "during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect," in Article 7 shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "the person making the notification" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the term "the amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amendment report"; the terms "the person submitting them" and "the amendment " in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the part "submit the amendment and may, when it is found necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to submit an amendment report"; the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report and amendment reports"; the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(4)"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

4 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は四半期報告書について、第二十二条の規定は四半期報告書及びその訂正報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「四半期報告書(第二十四条の四の七第一項又は第二項(これらの規定を同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による四半期報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。)」と、「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「四半期報告書又はその訂正報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の四の七第四項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Semiannual Securities Reports and Extraordinary Reports, and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Semiannual Securities Report and Extraordinary Report thereof contain fake statements on important matters or lack statements of important matters or of important matters necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6)" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Semiannual Securities Report (meaning a Semiannual Securities Report set forth in Article 24-5(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(3)); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22) or an Extraordinary Report (meaning an Extraordinary Report set forth in Article 24-5(4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22)"; the part "during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect," in Article 7 shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "the person making the notification" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report"; the term "the amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amendment report"; the terms "the person submitting them" and "the amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report"; the part "submit the amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to submit an amendment report"; the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report, or amendment reports therefor"; and the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(5)". 例文帳に追加

5 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は半期報告書及び臨時報告書について、第二十二条の規定は半期報告書及び臨時報告書並びにこれらの訂正報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「半期報告書(第二十四条の五第一項(同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する半期報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。)又は臨時報告書(第二十四条の五第四項に規定する臨時報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。)」と、「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書若しくはこれらの訂正報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の五第五項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13 (1) Concerning research results related to technologies of an incorporated administrative agency (referring to an Incorporated Administrative Agency as stipulated in Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies) (Act No.103 of 1999) that is an entity conducting work related to testing and research (hereinafter referred to as a "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency"), a person who has received assignment of patent right or the right to receive a patent related to said research result owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency, and who is engaged in the operation of transferring said research results (hereinafter "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency Technology Transfer Operations") to private business operators who intend to utilize those research results, through assignment, establishment of exclusive licenses of patent rights obtained based on said patent right itself or right to receive said patent or otherwise, may apply to the Minister having jurisdiction over said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies and receive an accreditation to the effect that the operation of that person conforms to all of the following items. 例文帳に追加

第十三条 独立行政法人(独立行政法人通則法(平成十一年法律第百三号)第二条第一項に規定する独立行政法人をいう。)であって試験研究に関する業務を行うものとして政令で定めるもの(以下「試験研究独立行政法人」という。)における技術に関する研究成果について、当該研究成果に係る試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権又は特許を受ける権利の譲渡を受け、当該特許権又は当該特許を受ける権利に基づいて取得した特許権についての譲渡、専用実施権の設定その他の行為により、当該研究成果の活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業(以下「試験研究独立行政法人技術移転事業」という。)を行う者は、当該試験研究独立行政法人を所管する大臣に申請して、その事業が次の各号のいずれにも適合している旨の認定を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

Article 522 (1) If the court finds it necessary after the commencement of special liquidation considering the status of the assets of a Liquidating Stock Company, it may effect the disposition ordering that the matters listed below be investigated by investigators (hereinafter in Article 533 referred to as "Investigation Order") in response to a petition by liquidators, Company Auditors, creditors who have claims equivalent to one tenth or more of the total amount of the claims of creditors that have stated their claims and other creditors known to the Liquidating Stock Company, or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or ex officio: 例文帳に追加

第五百二十二条 裁判所は、特別清算開始後において、清算株式会社の財産の状況を考慮して必要があると認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権の申出をした債権者その他清算株式会社に知れている債権者の債権の総額の十分の一以上に当たる債権を有する債権者若しくは総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主の申立てにより又は職権で、次に掲げる事項について、調査委員による調査を命ずる処分(第五百三十三条において「調査命令」という。)をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

(i) an act of making an offer or promise or having a third party make an offer or promise to a customer or any person designated by a customer, with regard to sales and purchase or other transactions of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article), to the effect that if the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) incurs any loss or shortfall in the predetermined amount of profit from the relevant Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article), property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party in order to compensate or make up for the whole or part of such loss or shortfall; 例文帳に追加

一 有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)につき、当該有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)について顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)に損失が生ずることとなり、又はあらかじめ定めた額の利益が生じないこととなつた場合には自己又は第三者がその全部又は一部を補てんし、又は補足するため当該顧客又は第三者に財産上の利益を提供する旨を、当該顧客又はその指定した者に対し、申し込み、若しくは約束し、又は第三者に申し込ませ、若しくは約束させる行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40-2 (1) Where 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2), he/she may terminate the Multilevel Marketing Contract (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor' act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1)). 例文帳に追加

第四十条の二 連鎖販売加入者は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後(連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が第三十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後)においては、将来に向かつてその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a seller concludes a Specified Right Sales Contract, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate the Specified Right Sales Contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (3) (if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 1 of this article, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry referred to in the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph). 例文帳に追加

3 販売業者が特定権利販売契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者は、第四十二条第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後(その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、当該販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後)においては、その特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given. 例文帳に追加

第二条 この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法(以下「新銀行法」という。)第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業(以下「銀行代理業」という。)を営んでいる者(次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。)は、施行日から起算して三月間(当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間)は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom. 例文帳に追加

特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

例文

As I commented last week, a consumer loan market that offers small, unsecured, unguaranteed loans is, in my view, something that society needs after all. In that sense, I do not think that there will be any urgent need to review the Money Lending Act as a result of Takefuji's filing for the commencement of corporate reorganization proceedings. However, given the existence of a market that I have just mentioned, and the fact that the multiple-debt problem developed into a very serious problem, the recent revision to the Money Lending Act, which represents a fundamental and comprehensive step to address the issue that includes lowering upper interest-rate limits and introducing a cap on the total amount of borrowing, was enacted with unanimous support from all parties. After I assumed office, the FSA has been working, mainly in its Revised Money Lending Act Follow-Up Team, to follow up on the situation after the revised Money Lending Act took full effect, including any moves made by money lending businesses. 例文帳に追加

私は大変時宜を得た質問だと思っています。私もこの前、先週申し上げたように、やはり少額、無担保、無保証と、この消費者金融の市場というのはご存じのようにあるのです。やはり社会的に必要な部分だと私は思っていまして、そういった意味で、今度、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立てにより、貸金業法の見直しが直ちに必要になるとは考えていませんけれども、今申し上げましたようなマーケットがあるのは事実でございますし、そういった意味で、今度の改正貸金業法というのは、上限金利もご存じのように引き下げやら、総量規制の導入など、多重債務問題ということが大変大きな問題になりまして、これは全党一致でこの法律ができ上がって、抜本的かつ総合的な対策を講じたわけでございますが、私になって、当庁としては、改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを中心に、貸金業者の動向を含めた改正貸金法の完全施行後の状況をフォローアップしてまいっております。 - 金融庁

(1) Without affecting the operation of Section 13, the registration of a person as a registered user - (a) may be varied by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, with respect to the goods for which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, the registration has effect; or (b) may be extended by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, for such period not exceeding three years, as the Registrar thinks fit, but such period shall not extend beyond the date of expiration of the current registration of the trade mark; or (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of the registered proprietor or of the registered user; or (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of a person on the ground - (i) that the registered user has used the trade mark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause, or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; or (ii) that the registered proprietor or the registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration; or (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested.例文帳に追加

(1) 第13条の運用に影響を与えることなく,登録使用者としての人の登録は次に掲げることができる。 (a) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,当該登録が効力を有する商品,当該登録が効力を有するための条件又は制約について,変更することができる。又は, (b) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,登録官として適切と考える3年を超えない期間で延長することできるが,その期間は当該商標の現在の登録期間の満了日を超えて延長してはならない。又は (c) 登録官は,登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき,登録を抹消することができる。又は, (d) 登録官は,次に掲げる理由に基づき,ある者の申請を抹消することができる。 (i) 登録使用者が許可された使用方法以外の方法で,若しくは誤認又は混同を招く,又はそのおそれのある方法で商標を使用したこと,又は, (ii) 登録所有者又は登録使用者が登録出願にとって重要な事実を偽って伝えた又は開示しなかった,若しくは事情が登録の日から著しく変化したこと,又は, (iii) 当該登録は,出願人がその履行に利害関係を有する契約により出願人に付与される権利を考慮して登録は認められるべきではなかったこと - 特許庁

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

2 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書(以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。)について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書(第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。)」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in item 2 and item 3 of Article 142 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) when the whole or part of the shares of stock, etc. (which means shares of stock, etc. prescribed in Article 142, item 2 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) issued for a member of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the provisions of the articles of incorporation of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (iii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) the contents of accounting documents, etc. pertaining to the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the contents of a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. (which means extraordinary accounting documents, etc. set forth in Article 2, paragraph 3, item 13 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in (c)) as an extraordinary closing day (which means an extraordinary closing day prescribed in Article 441, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が株式会社 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び三号に掲げる事項についての定め(当該定めがない場合 にあっては、当該定めがないこと)の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等(法第百四十二条第二 号に規定する株式等をいう。以下同じ。)の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商 品取引所の株式であるときは、当該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款の定め 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等の内容(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸 収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表の内容)ロ最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日。ハにおいて同じ。)後の日を臨時決算日(会社法第四百 四十一条第一項に規定する臨時決算日をいう。以下同じ。)(二以上の臨時決算日 がある場合にあっては、最も遅いもの)とする臨時計算書類等(会社法施行規則 第二条第三項第十三号の臨時計算書類等をいう。以下同じ。)があるときは、当該 臨時計算書類等の内容 ハ最終事業年度の末日後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収 合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたと きは、その内容(法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併 の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっ - 87 - ては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。)四 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所(清算会員商品取引所を除く。)において最終事業年 度の末日(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立 の日)後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容(法第百四 十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新 たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末 日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。)五吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 (法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収 合併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。)の履 行の見込みの有無に関する事項 六法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変更 が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

2 新銀行法第十三条第二項(新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額(同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等(同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows, in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in the respective items of Article 56-2 (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business - 84 - year (for a Member Commodity Exchange, the final business year in the case where approval under Article 68 of the Act was received for Settlement Related Documents, etc. prescribed in Article 66, paragraph 1 of the Act pertaining to the respective business years, and for an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the final business year prescribed in Article 2, item 24 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the sharing of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger - 85 - (excluding Member Commodity Exchanges which clear the account pursuant to the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item 1 and item 3) of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act) (hereinafter such Member Commodity Exchange shall be referred to as a "Clearing Member Commodity Exchange"), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (v) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が会員商品 取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一 第五十六条の二各号に掲げる事項についての定め(当該定めがない場合にあっては、 当該定めがないこと)の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併存続会員商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度(会員商品取引所にあっては各事業年度に係る法第六十六条第一項 に規定する決算関係書類等につき法第六十八条の承認を受けた場合における当該 各事業年度のうち最も遅いものとし、株式会社商品取引所にあっては会社法第二 条第二十四号に規定する最終事業年度とする。以下同じ。)に係る財産目録、貸借 対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成された損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続会員商 品取引所の成立の日)後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸 収合併存続会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたとき は、その内容(法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の 効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあって は、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。) 三吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所(法第七十七条第一項において準用する会社法第四百 七十五条(第一号及び第三号を除く。)の規定により清算をする会員商品取引所(以 下「清算会員商品取引所」という。)を除く。)において最終事業年度の末日(最終事 業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日)後に重要な 財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状 況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容(法第百四十四条第四項の会 員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度 が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象 の内容に限る。)四吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の債務(法第 百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併につ いて異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。)の履行の見込 みに関する事項 五法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変 更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

Article 2 (1) When conducting a split (hereinafter referred to as "absorption-type split " or "incorporation-type split "; the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Part 5, Chapters III and V of the Companies Act, a company (this shall mean a stock company or a limited liability company; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall, on or before the notice deadline date notify the following workers in writing of whether or not there are any provisions in the split contract, etc. (absorption-type split contract (absorption-type split contract as provided in Article 757 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of absorption-type split; and incorporation-type split plan (incorporation-type split plan as provided in Article 762, paragraph 1 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of incorporation-type split; the same shall apply hereinafter) concerned to the effect that the successor company, etc. (successor company in absorption-type split , in the cases of absorption- type split provided in Article 757 of the Act; and incorporated company in incorporation-type split , in the cases of incorporation-type split provided in Article 763 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) will succeed to the labor contracts that the company and workers concerned have entered into, and of the deadline date for filing an objection provided in Article 4, paragraph 3, and any other matters provided by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: 例文帳に追加

第二条 会社(株式会社及び合同会社をいう。以下同じ。)は、会社法第五編第三章及び第五章の規定による分割(吸収分割又は新設分割をいう。以下同じ。)をするときは、次に掲げる労働者に対し、通知期限日までに、当該分割に関し、当該会社が当該労働者との間で締結している労働契約を当該分割に係る承継会社等(吸収分割にあっては同法第七百五十七条に規定する吸収分割承継会社、新設分割にあっては同法第七百六十三条に規定する新設分割設立会社をいう。以下同じ。)が承継する旨の分割契約等(吸収分割にあっては吸収分割契約(同法第七百五十七条の吸収分割契約をいう。以下同じ。)、新設分割にあっては新設分割計画(同法第七百六十二条第一項の新設分割計画をいう。以下同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)における定めの有無、第四条第三項に規定する異議申出期限日その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を書面により通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 4 (1) A person who wishes to create or import and make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms or other persons who wish to make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms must stipulate regulations for said Type 1 Use for each type of living modified organism (hereinafter referred to as "Type 1 Use Regulations"), and must obtain the approval of the competent minister for the same, provided, however, that this shall not apply when wishing to make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms which, by virtue of their properties or other features, are designated by the competent minister as organisms that clearly cause no Adverse Effect on Biological Diversity due to Type 1 Use (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Living Modified Organisms"), or when wishing to make Type 1 Use as stipulated in Type 1 Use Regulations for which the approval of the competent minister has been obtained under the provisions of this paragraph or Article 9 paragraph (1) [or, in the case of Type 1 Use Regulations that have been altered by the competent minister under the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9 paragraph (4)), said Type 1 Use Regulations after alteration], or in other cases stipulated in the ordinance of the competent ministries. 例文帳に追加

第四条 遺伝子組換え生物等を作成し又は輸入して第一種使用等をしようとする者その他の遺伝子組換え生物等の第一種使用等をしようとする者は、遺伝子組換え生物等の種類ごとにその第一種使用等に関する規程(以下「第一種使用規程」という。)を定め、これにつき主務大臣の承認を受けなければならない。ただし、その性状等からみて第一種使用等による生物多様性影響が生じないことが明らかな生物として主務大臣が指定する遺伝子組換え生物等(以下「特定遺伝子組換え生物等」という。)の第一種使用等をしようとする場合、この項又は第九条第一項の規定に基づき主務大臣の承認を受けた第一種使用規程(第七条第一項(第九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に基づき主務大臣により変更された第一種使用規程については、その変更後のもの)に定める第一種使用等をしようとする場合その他主務省令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 11 (1) In cases where a Securities Registration Statement contains any fake statements on important matters, when the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may, with regard to said Securities Registration Statement, or other statements submitted under Article 5(1), Shelf Registration Statements submitted under Article 23-3(1) or Shelf Registration Supplements submitted under Article 23-8(1) by the person who submitted said Securities Registration Statement during the period within one year from the day when the person submitted said Securities Registration Statement, order the suspension of effect of the notification or of the Shelf Registration pertaining to the Shelf Registration Statement or the Shelf Registration Supplements, or extend the period stipulated in Article 8(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-5(1)), for the period that he/she considers appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 例文帳に追加

第十一条 内閣総理大臣は、有価証券届出書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載がある場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該有価証券届出書又はその届出者がこれを提出した日から一年以内に提出する第五条第一項に規定する届出書若しくは第二十三条の三第一項に規定する発行登録書若しくは第二十三条の八第一項に規定する発行登録追補書類について、届出者に対し、公益又は投資者保護のため相当と認められる期間、その届出の効力若しくは当該発行登録書若しくは当該発行登録追補書類に係る発行登録の効力の停止を命じ、又は第八条第一項(第二十三条の五第一項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する期間を延長することができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notification to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

2 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係(他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の二分の一以上に相当する議決権(社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。)を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。)を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) If it is proved either . (a) that there is a well known and established use of the word or words as the name or description of the article or substance by a person or persons carrying on a trade therein, not being use in relation to goods connected in the course of trade with the proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark or, in the case of certification trade mark goods certified by the proprietor; (b) that the artic1e or substance was formerly manufactured under a patent, that a period of two years after the cesser of the patent has elapsed and that the word is or words are the only practicable name or description of the article of substance; or (c) that there is a well known and established use of the word or words as the name or description of some service by a person or persons providing services which include that service, not being use in relation to services the provision of which the proprietor or registered user of the trade mark is connected to in the course of trade, [Ins. Act A881] subsection (3) shall have effect.例文帳に追加

(2) 次の何れかが証明された場合は,(3)が適用されるものとする。 (a) 前項に該当する物品又は物質の名称若しくは説明として当該物品又は物質の取引を行う者によって使用される1若しくは複数の語の使用が確立され周知となっている場合において,当該使用が,当該商標の所有者又は登録使用者と業として関係する商品についての使用でなく,また当該商標が証明商標であるときは,その所有者が証明する商品についての使用でもないこと (b) 当該物品又は物質が過去において特許に基づいて製造されており,その特許の失効後2年の期間が経過しており,かつ,1若しくは複数の語が当該物品又は物質の唯一の実際的名称又は説明であること,又は (c) あるサービスの名称若しくは説明として当該サービスを含むサービスを提供している者によってなされる1若しくは複数の語の使用が確立され周知となっている場合において,その使用が,当該商標の所有者又は登録使用者が業として関係しているサービスの提供に関しての使用でないこと[法律A881による挿入] - 特許庁

(6) The provisions of subsection (5) shall cease to have effect with regard to any registered user of a trade mark . (a) if the trade mark ceases to be a registered trade mark for any reason; (b) if the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered are subsequently limited so as to exclude any or all of the goods or services in respect of which the registration of the registered user has been made; (c) if the registered proprietor ceases to exercise control over the use of the trade mark and over the quality of the goods or services provided by the registered user concerned in relation to that trade mark; (d) at the date of expiration of the last registration of the trade mark unless a fresh application under subsection (2) accompanies any application for renewal of the registration of that trade mark; (e) at the date of any assignment or transmission of the registered trade mark, unless and until the devolution of title is recorded on the Register in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the subsequent proprietor of the registered trade mark makes a fresh application under subsection (2).例文帳に追加

(6) (5)は,次の場合は,何れの商標の登録使用者についても効力を失う。 (a) 当該商標が何らかの理由で登録商標でなくなった場合 (b) 当該商標の登録に係る商品又はサービスが登録後に制限され,登録使用者の登録の対象であった商品又はサービスの全部又は一部が除外されることになった場合 (c) 登録所有者が,当該商標の使用について及び当該商標の登録使用者が提供する商品又はサービスの質について管理を行わなくなった場合 (d) 当該商標の最終登録満了日において,(2)に基づく新たな申請が当該商標の登録更新申請を伴っていない場合 (e) 当該登録商標の譲渡又は移転の日において,権原の移転が本法の規定に従って登録簿に登録されていない場合は,それが登録されるまで,また,当該登録商標の後の所有者が(2)に基づく新たな申請をしていない場合は,それがされるまで - 特許庁

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph 1 or Article 148, paragraph 1 of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notice to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

2 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係(他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の二分の一以上に相当する議決権(社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。)を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。)を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 4 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (ii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act; (iii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-2, paragraph 3 of the Act; (iv) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger inherited from the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger through an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters recorded in a written or Electromagnetic Record which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act (excluding the contents of the Absorption-Type Merger contract); (vi) the date of the registration of the change set forth in Article 147, paragraph 1 of the Act; (vii) in addition to that listed in the preceding items, important matters concerning the Absorption-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の二第四項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一吸収合併の効力が生じた日 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第 百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 三吸収合併存続会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条の二第三項において準用する 法第百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 四吸収合併により吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所から承 継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 五法第百四十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所が備え置いた書面 又は電磁的記録に記載又は記録がされた事項(吸収合併契約の内容を除く。)六法第百四十七条第一項の変更の登記をした日 七前各号に掲げるもののほか、吸収合併に関する重要な事項 - 経済産業省

The method specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-7, paragraph 1, item 2 of the Act shall be the method in which the amount of the net assets of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is deemed to be the amount obtained by subtracting the amount listed in item 7 from the total of the amounts listed in items 1 to 6 inclusive as on the calculation date (which means the Absorption-Type Merger contract day [in the case where the calculation date which is different from the Absorption-Type Merger contract day is specified (limited to during the period between said Absorption-Type Merger contract day and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect) by said contract, said date]) (in the case where said obtained amount is less than five million yen, the amount shall be five million yen): (i) the amount of capital; (ii) the amount of capital reserve; (iii) the amount of profit reserve; (iv) the amount of surplus prescribed in Article 446 of the Company Act; (v) the amount pertaining to valuation/translation difference as of the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger); (vi) the book value of the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock; (vii) the total amount of a persons own shares and the book value of the rights to - 101 - subscribe for new shares of stock. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の七第一項第二号に規定する主務省令で定める方法は、算定基準日(吸 収合併契約を締結した日(当該吸収合併契約により当該吸収合併契約を締結した日と異な る時(当該吸収合併契約を締結した日後から吸収合併の効力が生ずる時までの間の時に限 る。)を定めた場合にあっては、当該時)をいう。以下この条において同じ。)における第 一号から第六号までに掲げる額の合計額から第七号に掲げる額を減じて得た額(当該額が 五百万円を下回る場合にあっては、五百万円)をもって吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所 の純資産額とする方法とする。一資本金の額 二資本準備金の額 三利益準備金の額 四会社法第四百四十六条に規定する剰余金の額 五最終事業年度の末日(最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会社 商品取引所の成立の日)における評価・換算差額等に係る額 六新株予約権の帳簿価額 七自己株式及び自己新株予約権の帳簿価額の合計額 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-11, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (ii) the process of the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act; (iii) the process of the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 144 of the Act (with regard to paragraph 3 of the same Article, limited to the part where Article 797, paragraphs 5 to 7 inclusive of the Company Act is applied mutatis mutandis) and Article 144-10, paragraphs 1 to 5 inclusive of the Act; (iv) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger inherited from the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger through an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters recorded in a written or Electromagnetic Record which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act (excluding the contents of the Absorption-Type Merger contract); (vi) the date of the registration of the change set forth in Article 147, paragraph 2 of the Act; (vii) in addition to those listed in the preceding items, important matters concerning the Absorption-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の十一第一項に規定する主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とす る。 一吸収合併の効力が生じた日 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第 百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所における法第百四十四条の(同条第三項について は、会社法第七百九十七条第五項から第七項までを準用する部分に限る。)及び第百 四十四条の十第一項から第五項までの規定による手続の経過 四吸収合併により吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所か ら承継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 五法第百四十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所が備え置いた書面 又は電磁的記録に記載又は記録がされた事項(吸収合併契約の内容を除く。)六法第百四十七条第二項の変更の登記をした日 七前各号に掲げるもののほか、吸収合併に関する重要な事項 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-19, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which the Incorporation-Type Merger came into effect; (ii) the process of procedures pursuant to the provisions of the following (a) or (b), according to classification listed in said (a) or (b): (a) a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger: the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act; (b) an Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger: the provisions of Article 144-15, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 of the Act (limited to the part where Article 806, paragraphs 5 to 7 inclusive of the Company Act are applied mutatis mutandis), Article 144-16, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 of the Act (limited to the part where Article 808, paragraphs 5 to 7 inclusive of the Company Act are applied mutatis mutandis), and Article 144-10, paragraphs 1 to 5 inclusive of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act; (iii) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger inherited from the Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger through an Incorporation-Type Merger; (iv) in addition to those listed in the preceding three items, important matters concerning the Incorporation-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の十九第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一新設合併の効力が生じた日 二次のイ又はロに掲げる区分に応じ、当該イ又はロに定める規定による手続の経過 イ新設合併消滅会員商品取引所法第百四十四条の三第五項において準用する法第 百二十四条の規定 ロ新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所法第百四十四条の十五第一項及び第二項(会 社法第八百六条第五項から第七項までを準用する部分に限る。)、法第百四十四条 の十六第一項及び第二項(会社法第八百八条第五項から第七項までを準用する部 分に限る。)並びに法第百四十四条の十七において準用する法第百四十四条の十第 一項から第五項までの規定 三新設合併により新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所が新設合併消滅商品取引所から承 継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 四前三号に掲げるもののほか、新設合併に関する重要な事項 - 経済産業省

(18) For the purpose of applying the provision of Part II, Chapter X, Section 2 of the New Insurance Business Act to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the term "In the case set forth in paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc." and the term "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.," in Article 250, paragraph (4) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc. (Act No. 38 of 2005).)" and "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (including the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of that Act.)," respectively; the term "The Insurance Company, etc., set forth in paragraph (1)" and the term "the purpose of the meeting" in Article 254, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), the Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider (referring to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph.).)" and "the purpose of the meeting; the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, etc. shall, on the date of issue of the merger agreements, make public notice to the effect that contracts that contain said Modifications of Contract Conditions have been issued." 例文帳に追加

18 特定少額短期保険業者に対する新保険業法第二編第十章第二節の規定の適用については、新保険業法第二百五十条第四項中「第一項の場合において、保険会社等」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等(保険業法等の一部を改正する法律(平成十七年法律第三十八号)附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を除く。)」と、「外国保険会社等」とあるのは「外国保険会社等(同法附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を含む。)」と、新保険業法第二百五十四条第三項中「第一項の保険会社等は、」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等(特定少額短期保険業者(保険業法等の一部を改正する法律附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を除く。)にあっては」と、「目的となっている旨を」とあるのは「目的となっている旨を、特定少額短期保険業者にあっては合併契約書の作成日において、当該契約条件の変更を含む合併契約書が作成された旨を、それぞれ」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8 (1) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to patent rights or utility model rights (hereinafter referred to as "Patent Rights, etc.") or the right to receive a patent or the right to receive a utility model registration (limited to patent applications filed prior to the partial enforcement date (excluding patent applications pertaining to the division, etc. of a patent application prior to the partial enforcement date) or utility model registration applications filed prior to the partial enforcement date (excluding the utility model registration application pertaining to the division etc. of a utility model registration application prior to the partial enforcement date); hereinafter referred to as "Rights to Receive Patent, etc.") or Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the right to receive said patent, these rights being owned by the State and pertaining to research results related to technologies of national universities and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person (in paragraph 3 referred to as a "National University Related Certified Business Operator") who has received the accreditation of paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Business Operators prior to its revision pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, (hereinafter referred to as the "Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act"), the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6, paragraph 8 and paragraph 10 of the same Article 12, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6, paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to the same paragraphs shall have effect even on or after the date of partial enforcement. 例文帳に追加

第八条 第七条の規定による改正前の大学等における技術に関する研究成果の民間事業者への移転の促進に関する法律(以下「旧大学等技術移転促進法」という。)第十二条第一項の認定を受けた者(第三項において「国立大学関係認定事業者」という。)が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた国立大学における技術に関する研究成果に係る国有の特許権若しくは実用新案権(以下「特許権等」という。)若しくは特許を受ける権利若しくは実用新案登録を受ける権利(一部施行日前にした特許出願(一部施行日前の特許出願の分割等に係る特許出願を除く。)又は一部施行日前にした実用新案登録出願(一部施行日前の実用新案登録出願の分割等に係る実用新案登録出願を除く。)に係るものに限る。以下「特許を受ける権利等」という。)又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第四項、第六項、第八項及び第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日以後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5 (1) The Heads of Ministries and Agencies etc. shall, when there is a demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, perform the necessary investigation if it is possible to impose disciplinary actions based on the National Public Service Act and the Local Public Service Act, upon the employees involved in said bid rigging etc. Such action shall mean dismissal, suspension of duties, a cut in salary, or warning and other sanctions in the case of specified corporations (excluding specified incorporated administrative agencies - meaning incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 103 of 1999); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) and excluding specified local incorporated administrative agencies - meaning specified local incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on Local Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 118 of 2003); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph). Provided, however, that the Heads of Ministries and Agencies, heads of specified incorporated administrative agencies or heads of specified local incorporated administrative agencies, in cases where they do not have the appointive power of the said employees (including cases where the appointive power of the said employees was assigned), it shall suffice if the notification was made to the person with appointive power (including the person who was assigned the appointive power of the said employees; hereinafter referred to as "appointer") to the effect that the demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, was received. 例文帳に追加

第五条 各省各庁の長等は、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあったときは、当該入札談合等関与行為を行った職員に対して懲戒処分(特定法人(特定独立行政法人(独立行政法人通則法(平成十一年法律第百三号)第二条第二項に規定する特定独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。)及び特定地方独立行政法人(地方独立行政法人法(平成十五年法律第百十八号)第二条第二項に規定する特定地方独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を除く。)にあっては、免職、停職、減給又は戒告の処分その他の制裁)をすることができるか否かについて必要な調査を行わなければならない。ただし、当該求めを受けた各省各庁の長、地方公共団体の長、特定独立行政法人の長又は特定地方独立行政法人の理事長が、当該職員の任命権を有しない場合(当該職員の任命権を委任した場合を含む。)は、当該職員の任命権を有する者(当該職員の任命権の委任を受けた者を含む。以下「任命権者」という。)に対し、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあった旨を通知すれば足りる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent. 例文帳に追加

権利者であって,その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの,又は窃取による被害者は,特許出願人に対し,特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は,権利者は,特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は,第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として,特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に,訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは,当該被害者は,その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は,特許所有者が,特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し,提供し,市販し若しくは使用し,又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること,又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に,本法の施行領域内での使用のために,その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し,市販し若しくは使用し,又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること - 特許庁

Article 108-4 A registered employee organization may become a juridical person by notifying the National Personnel Authority to this effect. The provisions of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) and of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act (Act No.14 of 1898) concerning juridical persons as provided for in Article 34 of the Civil Code (except for Article 35, paragraph 2 of Article 38, Article 56, Article 67, Article 71, paragraph 3 of Article 77, Article 84, Article 84-2 and paragraph 1, item 4 of and paragraph 2 of Article 84-3 of the Civil Code, and Article 122-2 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the juridical person referred to in this Article. In this case, the term "the competent government agency" and the term "articles of incorporation" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "the National Personnel Authority" and "the constitution" respectively, and, further, the term "permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1, item 4 of Article 46 of the Civil Code, the term "permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1, item 4 of Article 68 of the Civil Code, the term "decision on commencement of bankruptcy proceedings and rescission of permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1 of Article 77 of the Civil Code, and the term "permit" in Article 120 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "notifying of its incorporation as a juridical person," "registration," "decision on commencement of bankruptcy proceedings" and "certificate of acceptance of notifying of incorporation as a juridical person," respectively. 例文帳に追加

第百八条の四 登録された職員団体は、法人となる旨を人事院に申し出ることにより法人となることができる。民法(明治二十九年法律第八十九号)及び非訟事件手続法(明治三十一年法律第十四号)中民法第三十四条に規定する法人に関する規定(同法第三十五条、第三十八条第二項、第五十六条、第六十七条、第七十一条、第七十七条第三項、第八十四条、第八十四条の二並びに第八十四条の三第一項第四号及び第二項並びに非訟事件手続法第百二十二条ノ二を除く。)は、本条の法人について準用する。この場合においては、これらの規定中「主務官庁」とあるのは「人事院」と、「定款」とあるのは「規約」と読み替えるほか、民法第四十六条第一項第四号中「設立の許可」とあるのは「法人となる旨の申出」と、同法第六十八条第一項第四号中「設立の許可」とあるのは「登録」と、同法第七十七条第一項中「破産手続開始の決定及び設立の許可の取消し」とあるのは「破産手続開始の決定」と、非訟事件手続法第百二十条中「許可書」とあるのは「法人ト為ル旨ノ申出ノ受理証明書」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) The provision revising Article 96 paragraph (1), the provision adding a new Article after Article 100, and the provisions revising Article 101, Article 102 paragraphs (4) and (5), Article 109, Article 109-2, Article 110, Article 121, Article 123, Article 130 paragraph (3), Article 138, Article 179 paragraph (1), Article 207, Article 225, Article 231-2, Article 234 paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 237 paragraph (3), Article 238 paragraph (1), Article 238-2 paragraph (2), Article 238-4, Article 238-5, Article 263-3 and Article 314 paragraph (1), and the provisions of Articles 22 and 32 of these Supplementary Provisions, the provision of Article 37 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 33 paragraph (3) of the Local Public Enterprise Act (Act No. 292 of 1952), the provision of Article 47 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 5-29 of the Old Act on Special Provisions of the Merger of Municipalities (Act No. 6 of 1965) to the effect that the provision of said Article 5-29 shall remain effective pursuant to the provision of Article 2 paragraph (6) of the supplementary provisions of the same Act, and the provision of Article 51 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 47 of the Act on Special Provisions of the Merger of Municipalities (Act No. 59 of 2004): The date specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding 1 year from the day of promulgation. 例文帳に追加

二 第九十六条第一項の改正規定、第百条の次に一条を加える改正規定並びに第百一条、第百二条第四項及び第五項、第百九条、第百九条の二、第百十条、第百二十一条、第百二十三条、第百三十条第三項、第百三十八条、第百七十九条第一項、第二百七条、第二百二十五条、第二百三十一条の二、第二百三十四条第三項及び第五項、第二百三十七条第三項、第二百三十八条第一項、第二百三十八条の二第二項、第二百三十八条の四、第二百三十八条の五、第二百六十三条の三並びに第三百十四条第一項の改正規定並びに附則第二十二条及び第三十二条の規定、附則第三十七条中地方公営企業法(昭和二十七年法律第二百九十二号)第三十三条第三項の改正規定、附則第四十七条中旧市町村の合併の特例に関する法律(昭和四十年法律第六号)附則第二条第六項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされる同法第五条の二十九の改正規定並びに附則第五十一条中市町村の合併の特例等に関する法律(平成十六年法律第五十九号)第四十七条の改正規定 公布の日から起算して一年を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) Where a Service Provider concludes a Specified Continuous Service Contract, the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate said contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) (if the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph). 例文帳に追加

第四十九条 役務提供事業者が特定継続的役務提供契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者は、第四十二条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後(その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、役務提供事業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、当該役務提供事業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後)においては、将来に向かつてその特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract. 例文帳に追加

第五十八条 業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方(その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。)は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき(相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき)を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This means that we are struggling hard to make ends meet and, as everyone well realizes, international meetings have become extremely important in the world of finance since the Lehman crisis, because it is now indeed a very critical global issue to decide how to harmonize on an international scale a given country's domestic economic trends or the financial condition, or economic condition, that it has traditionally been situated in. Therefore, what has to be done on an international scale must be done properly in the form of policy coordination or as G20 initiatives, as otherwise no effect could be expected in an era of increasing globalization in finance or the economy that we live in now, and each country is equally struggling to achieve that end, which explains why there are so many international meetings. That is, as you see, the situation we have now, and I also happened to hear just yesterday in connection with this subject that our Office of International Affairs is in serious shortage of labor, a fact that stands in contrast to such critical importance of the FSA, to which a mere 22 billion yen is given as its budget, and the extremely significant role that financial policies play in an economy. As I have just said, though, now is a very important and delicate period of time both internationally and domestically and we are accordingly charged with a weighty responsibility. Seeing as the FSA is a public office with labor costs representing its main spending category, I did emphatically asked that attention should be paid to that point and, actually, similar comments were also made by the National Police Agency and the Ministry of Justice, both of them being ministries with a hefty payroll as well. In the case of the FSA, it is not really my particular intention to make a case to represent an interest of the FSA, but the fact still remains that it is in charge of a very important field. 例文帳に追加

ということで非常に苦労しておりますし、そういった皆様方もよくお分かりのように、金融というのはリーマン・ショック以来、国際的な会議というのは非常に重要でございまして、国内の景気の動向、あるいはその国が置かれた伝統的な金融の状態、あるいは経済の状態、それを国際的にどうハーモナイズするかということが非常に世界的な大事な問題でございまして、国際でやるべきところはきちっと協調政策、G20でやっていかねば、なかなかこういった金融のグローバル化、あるいは経済のグローバル化の時代に効果がございませんから、その辺を非常に苦労を各国やっておられるわけでございますから、国際会議というのは実は非常に多いのでございますし、ご存じ、その中で国際室の昨日もたまたま話を聞きますと、非常に国際室の人手が足らないという話を聞きまして、そういった非常に大事な金融庁、予算は220億で少ないのですけれども、極めて経済の中で果たす金融政策は大事でございまして、それが今も申し上げましたけれども、国際的にも国内的にも非常に大事な難しい時期でもございまして、それゆえに責任が重たいわけでございますが、そういった中で、なかなか人件費を主とした役所でございますから、そのことはぜひ考慮していただきたいということをこれは実は警察庁も法務省もそういうことを申されまして、これも人件費が多い省ですから、特に金融庁の場合は何も私は省益を代表して言う気はございませんが、現実にこれは非常に大事な分野でございます。 - 金融庁

A Danish patent application shall state: (i) the applicant's name or firm name, postal address and, if the applicant is not represented by an agent, his telephone and fax number, if any, and, if the applicant is represented by an agent, the latter's name or firm name, postal address and telephone and fax number, if any, (ii) the inventor's name and postal address, (iii) a brief and factual title of the claimed invention, (iv) if the patent is applied for by several applicants jointly, and those applicants are not represented by an agent, whether one of them shall be authorised to receive communications from the Patent Authority on behalf of all the applicants, since otherwise the applicant mentioned first shall automatically receive communications from the Patent Authority on behalf of all the applicants, (v) if the application comprises the deposit of a sample of biological referred to in section 8a(1) of the Patents Act, information to that effect, (vi) if the patent is applied for by someone other than the inventor, the applicant's title to the invention, and that the inventor has been informed of the filing of an application for a patent for the invention, cf. section 8(4) of the Patents Act, and (vii) the documents accompanying the application. 例文帳に追加

デンマーク特許出願には,次の事項を記載しなければならない。 (i) 出願人の名称又は企業名,郵便宛先,並びに代理人を選任していない場合は出願人の電話番号及びファックス番号(該当するものがある場合),また,出願人が代理人を選任している場合は代理人の名称又は事務所名,郵便宛先並びに電話番号及びファックス番号(該当するものがある場合) (ii) 発明者の名称及び郵便宛先 (iii) クレームされた発明の簡潔な,かつ,事実に即した名称 (iv) 1の特許が複数の出願人によって共同で出願される場合において,それらの者が1人の代理人によって代表されていないときは,出願人中の1人が全員の代理として特許商標庁からの通信を受ける権限を付与されるか否か。そうでない場合は,頭書の出願人が出願人全員の代理として特許当局からの通信を自動的に受領することになるからである。 (v) 出願が特許法第8a条(1)にいう生物学的材料の試料の寄託を含んでいる場合は,その旨の情報 (vi) 発明者以外の者が特許出願をする場合は,発明に対する出願人の権原,及び発明者がその発明に対する特許出願について通告されていること(特許法第8条(4)参照),及び (vii) 出願に添付する書類 - 特許庁

(1) Without prejudice to the provision of section 51 of this Act. the registration of a person as a registered user- (a) may be varied by Registrar as regards the goods or services in respect of which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, if has effect, on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor of the trademark; (b) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor or of the registered user or of any other registered user of the trademark; (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person on any of the following grounds, namely :- (i) that the Registered user has used the trademark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the Registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, which if accurately represented or disclosed would have justified the refusal of the application for registration of the Registered user; (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; (iv) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would have justified the refusal of an application for registration of the registered user; (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar in respect of any goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the trademark is no longer Registered; (e) may be cancelled by the Registrar of his own motion or on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person, on the ground that any stipulation in the agreement between the Registered proprietor and the registered user regarding the quality of the goods or services in relation to which the trademark is to be used is either no being enforced or is not being complied with. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法51条の規定を妨げず、登録使用権者としての登録は次に掲げとおりとする。(a)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者が所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、関連の当該商品若しくは役務について、又はその前提となる条件又は制限が有効であれば当該条件についても変更することができる。(b)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者若しくは登録使用権者又はその他任意の登録使用権者の所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(c)登録官は、次に掲げる理由のいずれかにより、何人であれ所定の方式で書面による請求を行った場合、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(i)登録使用権者が許諾された使用以外の方法で、又は誤認若しくは混同を招くかそのおそれのあるような方法で、当該商標を使用したこと(ii)所有者又は登録使用権者が登録出願にとって重要な事実、それが正確に表明又は開示されていれば当該登録使用権者の登録申請拒絶が正当とされたであろう事実を偽って表明し、又は開示しなかったこと(iii)当該登録は、出願人がその実施に利害を有する契約の観点から当該登録により出願人に付与される権利を考慮すると設定されるべきではなかったこと(iv)出願日であったら登録使用権者の登録を求める出願の拒絶が正当化されていたであろう態様で、登録日以後に事情の変更があったこと(d)登録官は、すでに商標が登録されていない商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき取り消すことができる。(e)登録官は、職権により、又は何人かにより所定の方式で書面の請求があれば、当該商標が使用されるはずの商品若しくは役務の品質に関する登録所有者と登録使用権者間の合意規定が発効していない、又は遵守されていないことを理由として、取り消すことができる。 - 特許庁

Article 1 This Act shall come into effect as from the date to be specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding six months from the day of promulgation; provided, however, that the provision revising Article 285-4, Article 285-5, paragraph (2), Article 285-6, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 290, paragraph (1) and Article 293-5, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code in Article 1, and the provision revising Article 23, paragraph (3) and Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act (Act No. 42 of 1923) in Article 6 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 39-3, paragraph (3) and Article 40-2, paragraph (1) of the Shoko Chukin Bank Act (Act No. 14 of 1936) in Article 7 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 132 of 1947) in Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 53, paragraph (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 10 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 56, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) in Article 11 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding an Article after Article 5-5 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative (Act No. 183 of 1949) and revising Article 12, paragraph (1) of that Act in Article 12 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Shipowners Mutual Insurance Association Act (Act No. 177 of 1950) in Article 13 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 55-3, paragraph (3) and Article 57, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act (Act No. 238 of 1951) in Article 16 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 61, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act (Act No. 227 of 1953) in Article 18 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 17-2, paragraph (3) of the Banking Act (Act No. 59 of 1981) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 23 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision of Article 26 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding a paragraph to Article 15 of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995), revising Article 55, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 102, paragraph (1) and Article 112-2, paragraph (3) of that Act, deleting Article 112-2, paragraph (4) of that Act, revising Article 115, paragraph (2), Article 118, paragraph (1), Article 119 and Article 199 of that Act and deleting Article 59, paragraph (2) and Article 90, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions to that Act in Article 27 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 7, paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Measures for the Commercial Code on the Procedure of Cancellation of Shares (Act No. 55 of 1997) in Article 29 of the Supplementary Provisions and the provision revising Article 101, paragraph (1) and Article 102, paragraph (3) of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies (Act No. 105 of 1998) in Article 31 of the Supplementary Provisions shall come into effect as from 1 April 2000. 例文帳に追加

第一条 この法律は、公布の日から起算して六月を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日から施行する。ただし、第一条中商法第二百八十五条ノ四、第二百八十五条ノ五第二項、第二百八十五条ノ六第二項及び第三項、第二百九十条第一項並びに第二百九十三条ノ五第三項の改正規定並びに附則第六条中農林中央金庫法(大正十二年法律第四十二号)第二十三条第三項及び第二十四条第一項の改正規定、附則第七条中商工組合中央金庫法(昭和十一年法律第十四号)第三十九条ノ三第三項及び第四十条ノ二第一項の改正規定、附則第九条中農業協同組合法(昭和二十二年法律第百三十二号)第五十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十条中証券取引法(昭和二十三年法律第二十五号)第五十三条第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第十一条中水産業協同組合法(昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号)第五十六条第一項の改正規定、附則第十二条中協同組合による金融事業に関する法律(昭和二十四年法律第百八十三号)第五条の五の次に一条を加える改正規定及び同法第十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十三条中船主相互保険組合法(昭和二十五年法律第百七十七号)第四十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十六条中信用金庫法(昭和二十六年法律第二百三十八号)第五十五条の三第三項及び第五十七条第一項の改正規定、附則第十八条中労働金庫法(昭和二十八年法律第二百二十七号)第六十一条第一項の改正規定、附則第二十三条中銀行法(昭和五十六年法律第五十九号)第十七条の二第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第二十六条の規定、附則第二十七条中保険業法(平成七年法律第百五号)第十五条に一項を加える改正規定、同法第五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百十二条第一項並びに第百十二条の二第三項の改正規定、同条第四項を削る改正規定、同法第百十五条第二項、第百十八条第一項、第百十九条及び第百九十九条の改正規定並びに同法附則第五十九条第二項及び附則第九十条第二項を削る改正規定、附則第二十九条中株式の消却の手続に関する商法の特例に関する法律(平成九年法律第五十五号)第七条第二項の改正規定並びに附則第三十一条中特定目的会社による特定資産の流動化に関する法律(平成十年法律第百五号)第百一条第一項及び第百二条第三項の改正規定は、平成十二年四月一日から施行する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

3 新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項(新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等(同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額(同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社(以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。)若しくはその子会社等(新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社(以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。)若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社(以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。)が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to Patent Rights, etc. or the Rights to Receive Patent, etc. or the Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the Right to Receive Patent, etc., these rights being owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency (hereinafter referred to simply as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency") and pertaining to research results related to technologies of said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person who has received an accreditation pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act (limited to persons who conduct the operation of transferring research results related to technologies of Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies prescribed in the same paragraph to private business operators who intend to utilize these research results; in the next paragraph referred to as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency-Related Certified Business Operators "), the provisions of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 in the same Article, the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of Article 12 in the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 2 of same Article, the provisions of paragraph 10 of Article 12 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 3 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to same paragraph shall remain in effect, even after the partial effective date. 例文帳に追加

2 旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第一項の認定を受けた者(同項に規定する試験研究独立行政法人(以下単に「試験研究独立行政法人」という。)における技術に関する研究成果についてその活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業を行う者に限る。次項において「試験研究独立行政法人関係認定事業者」という。)が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた試験研究独立行政法人における技術に関する研究成果に係る当該試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権等若しくは特許を受ける権利等又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第二項及び第三項の規定、同条第二項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定並びに旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第三項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Such action will minimise the effect on the orderly functioning of the institution, including the payment and settlement functions. 例文帳に追加

スウィープ口座とは預金口座の決済機能を維持しつつ資金の効率的運用を図るため、口座残高が一定額を超えた場合に超過額を自動的に安全性及び換金性の高い金融商品(MMF等)の購入に充てるサービス、預金保険により保護される金額を超える資金が自動的に振り替えられるようにすれば、預金保険制度で保護されない資金を破綻に伴うリスクから遮断することが可能である。しかしながら、現に提供されているサービスについては振替頻度が毎営業日でない等、決済機能を保護するためのものと位置付けることは適当ではない。証券総合口座とは有価証券投資に充てられる資金以外の余資を安全性及び換金性の高い投資信託(MRF)で自動運用するサービスを提供する口座をいう。必要に応じ、即日中の払い出しのみならず、クレジットカード決済等にも利用することができることから、金融機関の預金口座に代替する決済機能を有するものとされている。ただし、MRFが安全性の高いものであるとはいえ、元本保証商品ではないことから、決済機能の安定確保策に位置付けることは適当ではない。早期発見・早期是正を基本とし、金融機関が破綻した場合に債務超過の程度が極力小さい段階で迅速に処理することができれば、決済等の金融機能に与える影響を最小限に止めることができるとの考え方が示されており、金融機関破綻時の決済機能の安定確保においてもこの考え方が基本であることについては、ここで改めて確認しておきたい。 - 金融庁

The application shall furthermore indicate: a request for priority under section 16 of the Designs Act and information in pursuance of sections 5 and 7 if the applicant claims priority, the name or company name of an agent and the agent's mailing address, if the applicant is represented by an agent, together with a power of attorney except where a power of attorney is unnecessary because the agent is a solicitor or a trademark or patent agent entitled to represent the applicant in relation to the Patent and Trademark Office, the name of the designer, including the design group or company, and the designer's mailing address, if a request is being made for registration of one or more designers in the design register, cf. section 13of the Designs Act, information as to who shall be authorized to receive notification from the Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of all applicants, if design registration is applied for by several persons acting jointly and they are not represented by an agent, a statement of the period for which publication of registration should be deferred, if the applicant requests deferment under section 18, last sentence, of the Designs Act, a statement to the effect that the design shall be registered in color if protection is to include the design in color. 例文帳に追加

出願には更に,次に掲げる事項を表示しなければならない。出願人が優先権を主張する場合は,意匠法第16条の規定に基づく優先権の請求並びに本規則第5条及び第7条の規定による情報,出願人が代理人によって代理されている場合は,代理人の名称又は会社名及び代理人の郵便宛先,並びに委任状。ただし,委任状については,代理人が特許商標庁に対して,出願人を代表する権限を有する弁護士(solicitor)又は商標代理人若しくは特許代理人であるという理由により,委任状が不要である場合を除く。1又は2以上のデザイナー(訳注:創作者と思われる)を意匠登録簿に登録することを請求する場合は(意匠法第13条(4)参照),デザイナー(デザイン・グループ又はデザイン会社を含む。)の名称及びデザイナーの郵便宛先,意匠登録が,共同で行動する複数の者によって出願され,それらの者が1の代理人によって代理されていない場合は,特許商標庁からの通知を出願人全員を代表して受領する権限を付与されている者についての情報,出願人が,意匠法第18条最終文の規定に基づく延期を請求する場合は,登録に関する公告の延期を求める期間についての陳述,保護の対象が色彩付の意匠である場合は,その意匠が色彩付で登録されるべき旨の陳述。 - 特許庁

Prior art shall consist of: (a) Everything made available to the public by means of a written or oral disclosure, by use, or in any other way, before the filing date or the priority date of the application claiming the invention. Prior use which is not present in the Philippines, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot form part of the prior art if such prior use is not disclosed in printed documents or in any tangible form. (b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility model, or industrial design registration, published under Sec. 44 of IP CODE, filed or effective in the Philippines, with a filing or priority date that is earlier than the filing or priority date of the application: Provided, That the application which has validly claimed the filing date of an earlier application under Section 31 of IP CODE, shall be prior art with effect as of the filing date of such earlier application: Provided further, That the applicant or the inventor identified in both applications are not one and the same, (Sec. 24, IP CODE): Where two or more applications are independently filed with respect to the same invention, and the later applications are filed before the first application or earlier application is published, the whole contents of the first or earliest filed application published in accordance with Sec. 44, IP CODE on or after the filing date or priority date of the later filed application shall be novelty destroying with respect to the later filed application.例文帳に追加

先行技術は,次のものからなる。 (a)書面又は口頭による開示により,実施により,又はその他の方法で,発明を主張する出願の出願日又は優先日の前に公衆の利用に供されているすべてのもの。フィリピンにおけるものでない先使用は,外国で普及していても,当該先使用が印刷文書又は有形の形式で開示されていない場合は,先行技術の一部を構成することができない。 (b)IP法第44条に基づき公開され,フィリピンにおいて出願され又は効力を有し,かつ,当該出願の出願日又は優先日より前の出願日又は優先日を有する特許出願,実用新案登録又は意匠登録の全内容。ただし,IP法第31条に基づいて先の出願の出願日を正当に主張する出願は,当該先の出願日において有効な先行技術であるものとし,かつ,双方の出願の出願人 又は発明者が同一でないことを条件とする。(IP法第24条) 2以上の出願が同一の発明に関して独立して出願され,後の出願が最先の出願又は先の出願が公開される前に出願された場合は,後の出願の出願日又は優先日以後にIP法第44条に基づき公開された先の又は最先の出願の全内容は,後の出願の新規性を損なうものとする。 - 特許庁

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条 連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方(その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。)は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日(その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品(施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。)の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。)から起算して二十日を経過したとき(連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき)を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条 第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法(以下「新銀行法」という。)第十三条第一項(第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法(以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。)第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法(以下「新信用金庫法」という。)第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法(以下「新労働金庫法」という。)第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律(以下「新協金法」という。)第六条において準用する場合(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。)を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等(同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の額が信用供与等限度額(同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行(新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、長期信用銀行(新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会(新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。)(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。)の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会(労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条 会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項(剰余金の配当等に関する責任)の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条(株主に対する求償権の制限等)の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条(買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任)の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項(欠損が生じた場合の責任)の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度(その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度)に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial." 例文帳に追加

第五十六条 特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで(審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用)の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS