「filed」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(158ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 6 With regard to the application of respective revised acts after the date of enforcement of this Act, permissions given and other dispositions imposed or other acts committed pursuant to the provisions of respective acts prior to the revision before the enforcement of this Act (with regard to the provisions listed in the items of Article 1 of the Supplementary Provisions, the respective provisions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the next article) (hereinafter referred to as the "Dispositions and Other Acts" in this article), or applications for permission, etc. filed or other acts committed pursuant to the provisions of respective acts prior to the revision at the time of the enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Applications and Other Acts" in this article), for which the administrative matters are to be conducted by a different person on the date of enforcement of this Act, shall be deemed to be the Dispositions and Other Acts or the Applications and Other Acts committed pursuant to the corresponding provisions of the respective revised acts, except those prescribed in the provisions of Articles 2 to 5 inclusive of the Supplementary Provisions and in the provisions concerning transitional measures in the respective revised acts (including orders based thereon). 例文帳に追加

第六条　この法律（附則第一条各号に掲げる規定については、当該各規定。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の施行前に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされた許可等の処分その他の行為（以下この条において「処分等の行為」という。）又はこの法律の施行の際現に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされている許可等の申請その他の行為（以下この条において「申請等の行為」という。）でこの法律の施行の日においてこれらの行為に係る行政事務を行うべき者が異なることとなるものは、附則第二条から前条までの規定又は改正後のそれぞれの法律（これに基づく命令を含む。）の経過措置に関する規定に定めるものを除き、この法律の施行の日以後における改正後のそれぞれの法律の適用については、改正後のそれぞれの法律の相当規定によりされた処分等の行為又は申請等の行為とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 58 (1) In the case where the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister permissions a specified fishery or approves business commencement of the designated fishery, he/she shall decide and publicly notify, for said designated fishery in advance, the numbers of boats to be permissioned or to be approved on business commencement by gross tonnage or the numbers of boats by gross tonnage and by fishing area or by fishing period (the numbers of mother ships by gross tonnage or the numbers of mother ships by gross tonnage and by fishing area or by fishing period, and the numbers of boats by type of the self-navigating boats belonging to the same fleet as each mother ship and by gross tonnage, in the case of the mother ship type fishery) and the periods during which the application for a permission or an approval of business commencement should be filed, considering the number of the persons who operate said specified fishery, managements and other circumstances, to such an extent that the protection of reproduction of aquatic animals and plants, fisheries adjustment and other public interest will not be impaired, excluding the cases pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), Article 55 and Article 59. 例文帳に追加

第五十八条　農林水産大臣は、指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可をする場合には、第五十五条第一項及び第五十九条の規定による場合を除き、当該指定漁業につき、あらかじめ、水産動植物の繁殖保護又は漁業調整その他公益に支障を及ぼさない範囲内において、かつ、当該指定漁業を営む者の数、経営その他の事情を勘案して、その許可又は起業の認可をすべき船舶の総トン数別の隻数又は総トン数別及び操業区域別若しくは操業期間別の隻数（母船式漁業にあつては、母船の総トン数別の隻数又は総トン数別及び操業区域別若しくは操業期間別の隻数並びに各母船と同一の船団に属する独航船等の種類別及び総トン数別の隻数）並びに許可又は起業の認可を申請すべき期間を定め、これを公示しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) In the case where an application for a permission or an approval of business commencement has been filed pursuant to the provision of item (i) or item (ii) with respect to a mother ship type fishery, a person who had been granted a permission or an approval of business commencement and has discontinued the use of a previous mother ship or a previous one of self-navigating boats in said mother ship type fishery or has encountered the loss or sinking of a previous mother ship or a previous one of self-navigating boats and therefore experienced the cease of the validity of the permission or the approval of business commencement with respect to the mother ship type fishery pertaining to the self-navigating boats belonging to the same fleet as the previous mother ship or pertaining to the mother ship belonging to the same fleet as the previous one of the self-navigating boats, files an application for a permission or an approval of business commencement with respect to another one of the self-navigating boats, or another mother ship, as the one of the self-navigating boats belonging to the same fleet as the mother ship pertaining to said application or as the mother ship belonging to the same fleet as the self-navigating boats pertaining to said application, in lieu of the one of the self-navigating boats or the mother ship pertaining to said permission or approval of business commencement. 例文帳に追加

四　母船式漁業について第一号又は第二号の規定により許可又は起業の認可が申請された場合において、従前の母船若しくは独航船等を当該母船式漁業に使用することを廃止し、又は従前の母船若しくは独航船等が滅失し若しくは沈没したため従前の母船と同一の船団に属する独航船等又は従前の独航船等と同一の船団に属する母船に係る母船式漁業の許可又は起業の認可がその効力を失つたことにより、その許可又は起業の認可を受けていた者が、当該許可若しくは起業の認可に係る独航船等若しくは母船又はこれらに代えて他の独航船等若しくは母船を当該申請に係る母船と同一の船団に属する独航船等又は当該申請に係る独航船等と同一の船団に属する母船として許可又は起業の認可を申請したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 178 Those who have any objection against the following determinations may file applications for ruling with the Environmental Dispute Coordination Commission: permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 because the case falls under the provision of Article 35 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); disposition of decrease of mining areas or mining lease areas, or rescission of mining right or mining lease right pursuant to the provision of Article 53 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to Article 87); and permission or non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 106, or use or expropriation pursuant to the provision of the Compulsory Purchase of Land Act that is applied under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 107. However, as for permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21, such applications may be filed only in the case where the provision of Article 35 is violated. 例文帳に追加

第百七十八条　第二十一条第一項（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）の許可、第三十五条（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）に規定する場合に該当することを理由とする第二十一条第一項の不許可、第五十三条（第八十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による鉱区若しくは租鉱区の減少の処分若しくは鉱業権若しくは租鉱権の取消し、第百六条第一項の許可若しくは不許可又は第百七条第一項の規定により適用される土地収用法の規定による土地の使用若しくは収用に関する裁決に不服がある者は、公害等調整委員会に対して裁定の申請をすることができる。ただし、第二十一条第一項の許可については、第三十五条の規定に違反することを理由とする場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) by reason of the fact that the person having the right to obtain a patent has exhibited the invention at an exhibition held by the Government or a local public entity (hereinafter referred to as the "Government, etc."), an exhibition held by those who are not the Government, etc. where such exhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, an international exhibition held in the territory of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention or a member of the World Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby to hold such an exhibition, or an international exhibition held in the territory of a state which is neither of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention nor a member of the World Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby where such exhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, paragraph (1) shall also apply for the purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent application which has been filed by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any of those items. 例文帳に追加

３　特許を受ける権利を有する者が政府若しくは地方公共団体（以下「政府等」という。）が開設する博覧会若しくは政府等以外の者が開設する博覧会であつて特許庁長官が指定するものに、パリ条約の同盟国若しくは世界貿易機関の加盟国の領域内でその政府等若しくはその許可を受けた者が開設する国際的な博覧会に、又はパリ条約の同盟国若しくは世界貿易機関の加盟国のいずれにも該当しない国の領域内でその政府等若しくはその許可を受けた者が開設する国際的な博覧会であつて特許庁長官が指定するものに出品することにより、第二十九条第一項各号の一に該当するに至つた発明も、その該当するに至つた日から六月以内にその者がした特許出願に係る発明についての同条第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第一項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-10 (1) Where a registered trademark (hereinafter in this article referred to as a "registered trademark based on international registration") pertaining to the request for territorial extension which is deemed to have been an application for trademark registration pursuant to Article 68-9(1) (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as an "international application for trademark registration") is identical with the registered trademark prior to the trademark registration (except registered trademarks based on international registration, hereinafter referred to in this article as a "registered trademark based on national registration") and the designated goods or designated services pertaining to the registered trademark based on international registration overlap with the designated goods or designated services based on national registration, and further the holder of trademark right of the registered trademark based on international registration is identical with the holder of trademark right of the registered trademark based on national registration, the international application for trademark registration shall be deemed to have been filed on the date of filing of the application for trademark registration pertaining to the registered trademark based on national registration to the extent of the scope which is overlapping. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の十　前条第一項の規定により商標登録出願とみなされた領域指定（以下この章において「国際商標登録出願」という。）に係る登録商標（以下この条において「国際登録に基づく登録商標」という。）がその商標登録前の登録商標（国際登録に基づく登録商標を除く。以下この条において「国内登録に基づく登録商標」という。）と同一であり、かつ、国際登録に基づく登録商標に係る指定商品又は指定役務が国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る指定商品又は指定役務と重複している場合であつて、国際登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標権者と国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標権者が同一であるときは、国際商標登録出願はその重複している範囲については、国内登録に基づく登録商標に係る商標登録出願の日にされていたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) The filing of a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent for a suit, a petition for challenge, a petition for assumption of a suit, a petition for an order to limit the persons who may make a request for inspection, etc. of a part of a case record in which a relevant secret is stated or recorded to the parties, a petition for revocation of such an order, the filing of an objection to a disposition by a court clerk, a petition for a disposition of a collection of evidence prior to the filing of an action, a petition for preservation of evidence prior to the filing of an action, an objection to a judicial decision by an authorized judge or commissioned judge, an objection to a final judgment in an action on bills and notes or an action on checks, or an objection to a final judgment in an action on a small claim, or a petition for a judicial decision to order a stay, the commencement, or a continuation of compulsory execution or order a revocation of a disposition of execution, which is to be filed under the provisions of said Code 例文帳に追加

イ　民事訴訟法の規定による特別代理人の選任の申立て、弁護士でない者を訴訟代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、忌避の申立て、訴訟引受けの申立て、秘密記載部分の閲覧等の請求をすることができる者を当事者に限る決定を求める申立て、その決定の取消しの申立て、裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、訴えの提起前における証拠収集の処分の申立て、訴えの提起前における証拠保全の申立て、受命裁判官若しくは受託裁判官の裁判に対する異議の申立て、手形訴訟若しくは小切手訴訟の終局判決に対する異議の申立て、少額訴訟の終局判決に対する異議の申立て又は同法の規定による強制執行の停止、開始若しくは続行を命じ、若しくは執行処分の取消しを命ずる裁判を求める申立て - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) A Designated Dispute Resolution Organization shall have the application under paragraph (1) proceed into Dispute Resolution Procedures carried out by the Dispute Resolution Mediators appointed under paragraph (2) (hereinafter simply referred to as the "Dispute Resolution Mediators" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article); provided, however, that in cases where the Dispute Resolution Mediators find that it is not appropriate to carry out the Dispute Resolution Procedures on the grounds that it is acceptable to recognize the customer of the Member Bank who is a Party to said application as a person who has sufficient ability to properly resolve the Dispute Related to Banking Services or on any other grounds, or find that the Parties have filed the application under paragraph (1) for improper purposes and without reason, they shall not implement the Dispute Resolution Procedures, and when the Dispute Resolution Mediators find it appropriate to have the application proceed into procedures equivalent to the Dispute Resolution Procedures to be conducted by an Entrusted Dispute Resolution Organization, the Designated Dispute Resolution Organization shall entrust the operations of Dispute Resolution Procedures to an Entrusted Dispute Resolution Organization. 例文帳に追加

４　指定紛争解決機関は、第一項の申立てを第二項の規定により選任した紛争解決委員（以下この条及び次条第一項において単に「紛争解決委員」という。）による紛争解決手続に付するものとする。ただし、紛争解決委員は、当該申立てに係る当事者である加入銀行の顧客が当該銀行業務関連紛争を適切に解決するに足りる能力を有する者と認められることその他の事由により紛争解決手続を行うのに適当でないと認めるとき、又は当事者が不当な目的でみだりに第一項の申立てをしたと認めるときは、紛争解決手続を実施しないものとし、紛争解決委員が当該申立てを受託紛争解決機関における紛争解決手続に相当する手続に付することが適当と認めるときは、指定紛争解決機関は、受託紛争解決機関に紛争解決手続の業務を委託するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) For inventions among those claimed in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the earlier application contains a priority claim under that paragraph or Article 8(1) of the Utility Model Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including its mutatis mutandis Application under Article 11(1) of the Utility Model Act), excluding any inventions disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the earlier application is based), the said patent application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29, the main clause of Article 29-2, Articles 30(1) to (3), 39(1) to (4), 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1), 104 (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 65(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 184-10(2)))and 126(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Articles 17-2(6) and 134-2(5)) of the Patent Act, Articles 7(3) and 17 of the Utility Model Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), and Article 29, 33-2(1) and 33-3(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act) of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959 ). 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願に係る発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（当該先の出願が同項若しくは実用新案法第八条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（同法第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された発明を除く。）についての第二十九条、第二十九条の二本文、第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第三十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十九条第二項第二号、第七十二条、第七十九条、第八十一条、第八十二条第一項、第百四条（第六十五条第五項（第百八十四条の十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百二十六条第五項（第十七条の二第六項及び第百三十四条の二第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、同法第七条第三項及び第十七条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第一項及び第三十三条の三第一項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該特許出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Articles 6 to 9, 11 to 16, 17(3) and 17(4), 18 to 24 and 194 (procedures) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for trademark registration, an application for defensive mark registration, any petitions or any other procedures pertaining to trademark registration or defensive mark registration. In this case, the portion "file a request for the examination of an application" in Article 6(1)(i) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "file an opposition to registration," the portion "an adverse party files a petition for a trial or retrial" in Article 7(4) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an opposition to registration in relation to the trademark right or the right based on defensive mark registration is filed or a trial or retrial is filed by an adverse party," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 9 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 14 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder" in Article 17(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder; (ii)-2 where, pertaining to the procedures, the registration fee under Article 40(2) of the Trademark Act or the registration fee (including the registration surcharge due and payable pursuant to Article 43(1) or 43(2) of the Trademark Act) payable at the time of application for registration of renewal pursuant to Article 41-2(2) of the Trademark Act is not paid," the portion "not amendable" in Article 18-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "not amendable (except cases filing under any of the items in Article 5-2(1) of the Trademark Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(1) of the Trademark Act))," the term "trial" in Article 23(1) and 24 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "examination and decision on an opposition to registration, trial" and the term "trial" in Article 194(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "opposition to registration, trial." 例文帳に追加

２　特許法第六条から第九条まで、第十一条から第十六条まで、第十七条第三項及び第四項、第十八条から第二十四条まで並びに第百九十四条（手続）の規定は、商標登録出願、防護標章登録出願、請求その他商標登録又は防護標章登録に関する手続に準用する。この場合において、同法第六条第一項第一号中「出願審査の請求」とあるのは「登録異議の申立て」と、同法第七条第四項中「相手方が請求した審判又は再審」とあるのは「その商標権若しくは防護標章登録に基づく権利に係る登録異議の申立て又は相手方が請求した審判若しくは再審」と、同法第九条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項若しくは第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十四条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十七条第三項中「二　手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。」とあるのは「二　手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。二の二　手続について商標法第四十条第二項の規定による登録料又は同法第四十一条の二第二項の規定により更新登録の申請と同時に納付すべき登録料（商標法第四十三条第一項又は第二項の規定により納付すべき割増登録料を含む。）を納付しないとき。」と、同法第十八条の二第一項中「できないもの」とあるのは「できないもの（商標法第五条の二第一項各号（同法第六十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に該当するものを除く。）」と、同法第二十三条第一項及び第二十四条中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての審理及び決定、審判」と、同法第百九十四条第一項中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申立て、審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When the applicant can credibly show that he has been prevented by exceptional circumstances from submitting in due time the declarations prescribed in subsection (1), the Patent Office shall grant said applicant a reasonable extension of the time limit. The time limit should not be prolonged beyond the date of issuance of the decision to grant a patent. If by this date the aforesaid preventative circumstances still exist, the Patent Office shall grant another extension. Six months before expiration of the time limit, the Patent Office shall notify the patentee that the patent will lapse if he does not submit the prescribed declarations within six months of service of the notification. Up to the time of the decision to grant a patent, the contents of an application may be amended on condition that the scope of the subject matter of the application is not extended; however, until a request for examination is filed (Section 44), only the correction of obvious mistakes, the removal of defects pointed out by the Examining Section or amendments to claims shall be admissible. No rights may be derived from amendments which extend the scope of the subject matter of the application. 例文帳に追加

(2) 出願人が，(1)に規定された宣言を適時に提出することを異常な事情によって妨げられた旨を，納得させるように証明することができるときは，特許庁は，出願人に対して適正な期間延長を許可しなければならない。この期間延長は，特許付与の決定の発出日を超えてはならない。この日まで阻害事由が継続しているときは，特許庁は，追加の延長を許可する。その期限の到来より 6月前に，特許庁は，特許所有者に対し，特許所有者がその通知の送達から 6月以内に所定の宣言を提出しないときは，特許は消滅する旨を通告する。 特許を付与すべき旨の決定が行われるときまでは，出願の内容は，出願の対象の範囲を拡大しないことを条件として，補正することができる。ただし，審査請求(第 44条)が提出されるまでは，明白な誤りの訂正，審査課によって指摘された不備の除去又はクレームの補正のみが容認される。出願の対象の範囲を拡大する補正からは，如何なる権利も導き出すことができない。 - 特許庁

(1) If during an examination under section 29(5) or (6), the Examiner is of the opinion that -- (a) the description, claims, or drawings are so unclear, or the claims are so inadequately supported by the description, that no meaningful opinion can be formed on -- (i) the novelty or inventive step of the claimed invention; or (ii) whether the claimed invention is capable of industrial application; (b) the invention defined in any claim -- (i) does not appear novel; (ii) does not appear to involve an inventive step; or (iii) does not appear to be capable of industrial application; (c) the conditions specified in sections 13 and 25(4) and (5) have not been complied with; (d) the application discloses -- (i) any additional matter referred to in section 84(1); or (ii) any matter extending beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed; or (e) a claim relates to an invention in respect of which no search has been completed, and he has decided not to carry out the examination in respect of that claim, the Examiner shall notify the Registrar in writing of that opinion and shall state fully the reasons for his opinion.例文帳に追加

(1) 第29条(5)又は(6)に基づく審査中に，審査官が次の意見の何れかを有するに至った場合は，審査官は，当該意見を書面で登録官に通知するとともに，当該意見を有するに至った理由を詳細に述べなければならない。 (a) 発明の説明，クレーム若しくは図面が極めて不明瞭であるか，又はクレームを裏付ける発明の説明が極めて不十分であるために， (i) クレームされた発明の新規性若しくは進歩性，又は (ii) クレームされた発明が産業上利用可能であるか否か， について有意義な意見を形成することが不可能である。 (b) クレームにおいて限定された発明は， (i) 新規でないと認められ， (ii) 進歩性を有していないと認められ，又は (iii) 産業上利用可能でないと認められる。 (c) 第13条並びに第25条(4)及び(5)に定める条件が満たされていない。 (d) 当該出願は，次の事項を開示している。 (i) 第84条(1)にいう追加の事項，又は (ii) 出願時での当該特許出願において開示していた事項を超える事項 (e) クレームが調査の完了していない発明に関するものであることから，審査官が当該クレームに関して審査を実行しない旨を決定した。 - 特許庁

(5) For the purposes of section 86(3) and (6), where an English translation of the application or any amendment of the application is required, the translation -- (a) shall exclude the request and abstract unless -- (i) the applicant expressly requests the Registrar to proceed earlier than the expiry of the period prescribed in paragraph (1); and (ii) the application has not been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty; (b) shall include any textual matter in the drawings in a form which complies with rule 49.5(d) of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty; (c) where a title has been established by the International Searching Authority under rule 37.2 of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty which differs from the title included in the application as originally filed, shall include the former title in place of the latter; and (d) may exclude any textual matter contained in a sequence listing forming part of the description if such textual matter complies with rule 12.1(d) of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty and the description complies with rule 5.2(b) of those Regulations.例文帳に追加

(5) 第86条(3)及び(6)の適用上，出願又は出願の補正書の英語翻訳文が要求される場合において，当該翻訳文には， (a) (i) 出願人が登録官に対し，(1)に定める期間の満了よりも早期に手続を開始することを明確に請求しており，かつ (ii) 出願が特許協力条約に従って公開されていない場合， を除いて，当該請求及び要約を含めないものとし， (b) 特許協力条約に基づく規則の第49規則5(d)に従った様式による図面中の字句部分を含めるものとし， (c) 特許協力条約に基づく規則の第37規則2に基づいて国際調査機関が原出願に記載された名称とは異なる名称を設定した場合は，当該新名称の代わりに旧名称を含めるものとし，かつ (d) 説明の一部を形成する配列一覧に含まれる字句部分については，当該字句部分が特許協力条約に基づく規則の第12規則1(d)を遵守し，かつ，当該説明が同規則の第5規則2(b)を遵守する場合は，これを除外することができる。 - 特許庁

(3) The national phase of the application begins -- (a) when the prescribed period expires, provided -- (i) where the application has been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty in a language other than English, and the application is not in English, an English translation of the application has been filed at the Registry; and (ii) the prescribed fee has been paid, by the applicant; or (b) when the applicant expressly requests the Registrar to proceed earlier with the national phase of the application, pays the prescribed fee and complies with any of the following sub-paragraphs which is applicable: (i) where, at the time of the request, the application has not been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty, file at the Registry -- (A) a copy of the application; and (B) if the copy is not in English, an English translation of the application; (ii) where, at the time of the request, the application has been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty in a language other than English, and the application is not in English, file at the Registry an English translation of the application.例文帳に追加

(3) 出願の国内段階は，次の時の何れかに開始する。 (a) 所定の期間の満了時。ただし， (i) 出願が英語以外の言語により特許協力条約に従って公開され，かつ，出願が英語によるものでない場合は，出願人が出願の英語翻訳文を登録局に提出したこと，及び (ii) 所定の手数料を納付したこと， を条件とする。 (b) 出願人が，登録官に対して出願の国内段階の手続を早期に進めるよう明確に請求し，所定の手数料を納付し，かつ，次の項のうち該当する何れかを満たした時 (i) 当該請求の時点で出願が特許協力条約に従って公開されていない場合に，登録局に次のものを提出すること (A) 当該出願の謄本，及び (B) 当該謄本が英語によるものでないときは，当該出願の英語翻訳文 (ii) 当該請求の時点で当該出願が英語以外の言語により特許協力条約に従って公開されており，かつ，当該出願が英語によるものでない場合に，当該出願の英語翻訳文を登録局に提出すること - 特許庁

(4) An application for conversion shall be considered filed on the filing date granted to it as a Community trademark application and, if it claimed priority or age, it shall benefit from these rights. Moreover, the application for conversion shall be processed in the same way as a national trademark application. Nevertheless, if the application for conversion refers to a Community trademark already registered, it shall be granted the status of a national trademark without further procedure, and the provisions of Article 22(4) shall apply, apart from the fact that, owing to renunciation, failure to renew or any other cause attributable to its owner, a pronouncement has been pending as regards the substance of any reason for invalidity or lapse capable of affecting the protection of the trademark in Spain, in which case it shall be processed as a national trademark application. No appeal based on the existence of absolute or relative prohibitions may be lodged against the direct grant agreement provided for in this paragraph, but such an appeal may be based on failure to satisfy the requirements for the valid conversion or direct grant of the Community trademark applied for.例文帳に追加

(4) 変更請求は，共同体商標出願として付与された出願日に提出されたとみなされ，優先権又は経過年数が主張されている場合は，これらの権利を享受するものとする。更に，変更請求は国内商標出願と同様に処理される。ただし，変更の請求対象が既に登録された共同体商標に言及する場合は，更なる手続なく，国内商標の地位が付与され，第22条(4)の規定が適用されるが，放棄，不更新又は商標所有者に起因するその他の理由により，決定がスペインにおける保護に影響を与える可能性のある無効又は失効の理由の実質に関して係属しているという事実は除くものとし，この場合は，当該請求は国内商標出願として処理される。本項に定める直接付与の合意に対しては，絶対的又は相対的禁止事由の存在を根拠として審判請求することができないが，当該審判請求は，有効な変更の要件又は申請した共同体商標を直接付与する要件を充足しないことを根拠として行うことができる。 - 特許庁

(a) within the six months following the entry into force of this Law, business signs which are in force may be renewed for a period of seven years beginning on the said entry into force. The application for such renewal shall be accompanied by proof of payment of 50 per cent of the renewal fee provided for in schedule 1.8(a) of the Annex, for a single class. Where the renewal of a business sign includes only municipalities located in a single Autonomous Community, the renewal application shall be filed with the competent bodies of said Community, which shall be responsible for ruling on it and recording the event, without prejudice to the timely notification to the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, within a period of five days, of both the filing of the renewal application and the ruling, for the purposes of the appropriate register entry. At the request of the competent Autonomous Community bodies, the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office shall issue copies of these business sign files. The fees to be paid for the renewal of these titles shall be collected by the competent Autonomous Communities and shall be paid in the manner provided for by those Communities;例文帳に追加

(a) 本法の施行後6月以内に効力を有する事業標識は，当該施行後7年の期間において更新することができる。当該更新の申請書には，単一の類について付録の附則1.8(a)に規定の更新手数料の50％の納付の証拠を添付するものとする。事業標識の更新が単一自治州に所在する自治体のみを含む場合は，更新申請書は当該自治州の所轄官庁に提出するものとし，当該所轄官庁は，適切な登録簿への記入を目的として，5日の期間内にスペイン特許商標庁に対し更新申請書の提出及び規律の双方を適時に報告することを害することなく，これを規律し，かつ事由を記録することを担当するものとする。自治州の所轄官庁による請求により，スペイン特許商標庁はこれら事業標識についてのファイルの写しを発行する。これらの名称の更新のために納付すべき手数料は，所轄自治州によって回収され，当該自治州が規定する方法により納付されるものとする。 - 特許庁

In respect of an application other than a PCT national phase application, for the purposes of subsection (1), (a) the time is the 15-month period after the filing date of the application or, if a request for priority has been made in respect of the application, the 15-month period after the earliest filing date of any previously regularly filed application on which the request for priority is based; and (b) the requirements are that (i) the abstract, the description, the claims and the drawings comply with sections 68 to 70, and (ii) the application contain the information and documents listed below: (A) a petition complying with section 77, (B) a declaration complying with section 3 of Form 3 of Schedule I to the Rules, either included in the petition or submitted as a separate document, (C) an abstract, (D) a sequence listing complying with subsection 111(1) if a sequence listing is required by that subsection, (E) a claim or claims, (F) any drawing referred to in the description, (G) an appointment of a patent agent if required by section 20, (H) an appointment of an associate patent agent if required by section 21, and (I) an appointment of a representative if required by section 29 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

PCT国内段階出願以外の出願に関しては，(1)の適用上，次の通りとする。 (a) 当該期間は，当該出願の出願日の後15月，又は当該出願に関して優先権主張がされた場合は，当該優先権の基礎である先に正規にされた出願の最先の出願日の後15月の期間であり，及び (b) 当該要件は，次の通りとする。 (i) 第68条から第70条までを遵守すべき要約，詳細な説明，クレーム，及び図面，並びに (ii) 下記の情報及び書類を含むべき出願書類 (A) 第77条を遵守する願書 (B) 願書に含めるか又は別の書類として提出するか何れかの，附則Iの様式3第3項目を遵守する宣言書 (C) 要約 (D) 配列一覧が第111条(1)により要求される場合は，同条を遵守する配列一覧 (E) 1又は2以上のクレーム (F) 詳細な説明において言及の何らかの図面 (G) 第20条により要求される場合は，特許代理人の選任 (H) 第21条により要求される場合は，複代理人の選任，及び (I) 法律第29条により要求される場合は，代理人の選任 - 特許庁

Article 249 (1) Where a petition for grant of discharge is filed and an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings under the provision of Article 216(1) is made, an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings made under the provision of Article 217(1) has become final and binding or an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings under the provision of Article 220(1) is made, until a judicial decision on said petition becomes final and binding, it is not allowed to, against the bankrupt's property, enforce compulsory execution, provisional seizure or provisional disposition based on a bankruptcy claim, or exercise of a general statutory lien or auction by reason of a right of retention (excluding a right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act) as intended to secure a bankruptcy claim (hereinafter referred to as "compulsory execution based on a bankruptcy claim, etc." in this Article), to file a petition for assets disclosure procedure based on a bankruptcy claim or to enforce a procedure for collection of national tax delinquency against the bankrupt's property, and any procedure for compulsory execution, etc. based on a bankruptcy claim already initiated against the bankrupt's property and assets disclosure procedure based on a bankruptcy claim already initiated against the bankrupt shall be stayed. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十九条　免責許可の申立てがあり、かつ、第二百十六条第一項の規定による破産手続廃止の決定、第二百十七条第一項の規定による破産手続廃止の決定の確定又は第二百二十条第一項の規定による破産手続終結の決定があったときは、当該申立てについての裁判が確定するまでの間は、破産者の財産に対する破産債権に基づく強制執行、仮差押え若しくは仮処分若しくは破産債権を被担保債権とする一般の先取特権の実行若しくは留置権（商法又は会社法の規定によるものを除く。）による競売（以下この条において「破産債権に基づく強制執行等」という。）、破産債権に基づく財産開示手続の申立て又は破産者の財産に対する破産債権に基づく国税滞納処分はすることができず、破産債権に基づく強制執行等の手続で破産者の財産に対して既にされているもの及び破産者について既にされている破産債権に基づく財産開示手続は中止する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 194-6 (1) The matters related to consultation between the Prime Minister and the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries or the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, notices to be given to the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and other procedures in cases where, under the provisions of this Act, the Prime Minister establishes a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order) or issues an order or other disposition (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a notification (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order) or application for registration has been filed with the Prime Minister, with respect to the business to conduct the following acts in relation to the rights which fall under any of the categories specified in Article 2(2)(i), (ii), (v) or (vi) and also fall under the categories of rights specified by a Cabinet Order as rights in a commodity investment defined by Article 2(1) of the Act on Control for Business Pertaining to Commodity Investment or rights in investment to be conducted by way of acquisition (including production), transfer or use of the goods which have substantial price volatility or the goods for which estimation of profit generated from the use thereof is difficult or by way of having such goods used, shall be specified by a Cabinet Order: 例文帳に追加

第百九十四条の六　この法律の規定により、第二条第二項第一号、第二号、第五号若しくは第六号に掲げる権利であつて、商品投資に係る事業の規制に関する法律第二条第一項に規定する商品投資その他価格の変動が著しい物品若しくはその使用により得られる収益の予測が困難な物品の取得（生産を含む。）をし、譲渡をし、使用をし、若しくは使用をさせることにより運用することを目的とするものとして政令で定めるものに該当するものに係る次に掲げる行為を行う業務に関し、内閣総理大臣が内閣府令（政令で定めるものに限る。）を定め、若しくは内閣総理大臣が命令その他の処分（政令で定めるものに限る。）を行う場合又は内閣総理大臣に対し届出（政令で定めるものに限る。）若しくは登録の申請があつた場合における農林水産大臣又は経済産業大臣との協議、これらに対する通知その他の手続については、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 222-13 In cases where a suspect whose financial resources (meaning the financial resources prescribed in Article 36-2 of the Code; the same shall apply in Article 280-3, paragraph (1)) are equal to or greater than the base amount (meaning the base amount prescribed in Article 36-3, paragraph (1) of the Code; the same shall apply in Article 280-3, paragraph (1)) files a request as set forth in Article 350-3, paragraph (1) of the Code, the bar association to which requests as set forth in Article 31-2, paragraph (1) of the Code are to be filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 37-3, paragraph (2) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 350-3, paragraph (2) of the Code shall be a bar association within the jurisdictional district of the district court with jurisdiction over the location of the public prosecutor's office to which the public prosecutor who is making a confirmation as set forth in Article 350-2, paragraph (3) of the Code is assigned, and the district court to which said bar association is to give notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 37-3, paragraph (3) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 350-3, paragraph (2) of the Code shall be the district court with jurisdiction over the location of said public prosecutor's office. 例文帳に追加

第二百二十二条の十三　その資力（法第三十六条の二に規定する資力をいう。第二百八十条の三第一項において同じ。）が基準額（法第三十六条の三第一項に規定する基準額をいう。第二百八十条の三第一項において同じ。）以上である被疑者が法第三百五十条の三第一項の請求をする場合においては、同条第二項において準用する法第三十七条の三第二項の規定により法第三十一条の二第一項の申出をすべき弁護士会は法第三百五十条の二第三項の確認を求めた検察官が所属する検察庁の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄区域内に在る弁護士会とし、当該弁護士会が法第三百五十条の三第二項において準用する法第三十七条の三第三項の規定により通知をすべき地方裁判所は当該検察庁の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where an application for the approval under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article has been filed in which case the term of existence of a Commodity Exchange (in the case of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the term of existence as an Incorporated Commodity Exchange) or the expiration date of a Commodity Market is stated in the articles of incorporation, the competent minister shall, in lieu of the criterion set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii), consider the criterion under the same paragraph to be that there will be no shortfall in the volume of transactions for carrying out Futures Transactions of the Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index pertaining to the application fairly and smoothly and that, in light of the status of the transactions of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., survival of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions through a merger or the establishment of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions by a merger does not or is not likely to cause extreme hindrance to the production and distribution of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., and he/she shall apply such criterion and the criteria under items (iii) and (iv) of the same paragraph by making a determination for said term of existence or for the period until said expiration date. 例文帳に追加

３　主務大臣は、商品取引所の存続期間（株式会社商品取引所にあつては、株式会社商品取引所としての存続期間）又は商品市場の開設期限が定款に記載され、又は記録されている前条第一項の認可の申請があつた場合においては、第一項第二号の基準に代えて、申請に係る上場商品又は上場商品指数の先物取引を公正かつ円滑にするために十分な取引量が見込まれないことその他上場商品構成物品等の取引の状況に照らし、当該先物取引をする商品取引所が合併により存続すること又は当該先物取引をする商品取引所を合併により設立することが当該上場商品構成物品等の生産及び流通に著しい支障を及ぼし、又は及ぼすおそれがあることに該当しないことを同号の基準とし、当該基準並びに同項第三号及び第四号の基準の適用は、当該存続期間又は開設期限までの間について判断して行うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837 through Article 840, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (b) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the issue of Investment Equity after the establishment of an Investment Corporation, and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 through Article 877, and Article 878, paragraph (1) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition filed under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, respectively. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の成立後における投資口の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで及び第八百七十八条第一項の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 150 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836 through Article 839, Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv) and the proviso to paragraph (2)), Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the merger of Investment Corporations, and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5), Article 870 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xv)), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (iv)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875, and Article 876 of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition filed under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百五十条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) and the preceding paragraph shall apply only where the resident has filed a final return form for the year prescribed in paragraph (1) or has continued to file the said final return form as well as final return forms for the subsequent years from the year following the said year until the year in which the resident seeks the application of the provision of the preceding paragraph, and the resident has stated, in his/her final return form for the year prescribed in paragraph (1) as well as final return forms for the said subsequent years, the deduction of the deductible amounts pursuant to the provision of the said paragraph or the preceding paragraph, and attached thereto a written statement concerning the said deductible amounts as well as the calculation of the amount of dividend income pertaining to the amount of dividend, etc. to be received from the specified foreign subsidiary company or affiliated foreign company and the amount of miscellaneous income pertaining to the taxable retained income to be included in the resident's gross income, both of which are prescribed in paragraph (1) and the preceding paragraph. In this case, the amount to be deducted pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph shall be limited to the amount stated as such amount to be deducted. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項又は前項の規定は、第一項に規定する年分の確定申告書を提出し、又は当該確定申告書及びその翌年分以後前項の規定の適用を受けようとする年分までの各年分の確定申告書を連続して提出している場合であつて、その提出する第一項に規定する年分の確定申告書又は当該各年分の確定申告書に、それぞれ同項又は前項の規定による控除を受ける金額についてのその控除に関する記載があり、かつ、当該金額並びに第一項又は前項に規定する特定外国子会社等又は外国関係会社から受ける配当等の額に係る配当所得の金額及び課税対象留保金額に係る雑所得の金額の計算に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、適用する。この場合において、第一項又は前項の規定により控除される金額は、当該金額として記載された金額に限るものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 48-4 (1) An applicant of an International Utility Model Registration Application filed in a foreign language (hereinafter referred to as a "Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language" shall submit to the Commissioner of the Patent Office Japanese translations of the description, scope of claims, drawings (the descriptive text in such drawings only), and the abstract, as provided in Article 3(2) of the Treaty, as of the international application date as provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as "International Application Date") within the period from the priority date under Article 2 (xi) of the Treaty (hereinafter referred to as "Priority Date") to two years and six months (hereinafter referred to as "Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents") therefrom; provided, however, that the applicant of a Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language who has submitted the document under paragraph (1) of the following Article during the period from two months before the expiration of the Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents to the expiry date thereof (excluding the case where the said translations have been submitted prior to the submission of the said documents) may submit the said translations within two months from the date of submission of the said document (hereinafter referred to as "Special Time Limit for the Submission of Translations"). 例文帳に追加

第四十八条の四　外国語でされた国際実用新案登録出願（以下「外国語実用新案登録出願」という。）の出願人は、条約第二条（ｘｉ）の優先日（以下「優先日」という。）から二年六月（以下「国内書面提出期間」という。）以内に、前条第一項に規定する国際出願日（以下「国際出願日」という。）における条約第三条（２）に規定する明細書、請求の範囲、図面（図面の中の説明に限る。）及び要約の日本語による翻訳文を、特許庁長官に提出しなければならない。ただし、国内書面提出期間の満了前二月から満了の日までの間に次条第一項に規定する書面を提出した外国語実用新案登録出願（当該書面の提出の日以前に当該翻訳文を提出したものを除く。）にあつては、当該書面の提出の日から二月（以下「翻訳文提出特例期間」という。）以内に、当該翻訳文を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 29 A person who, without knowledge of a design in an application for design registration, created a design identical or similar to the said design, or a person who, without knowledge of a design in an application for design registration, learned of the design from a person who created a design identical or similar to the said design, and has been working the design or a design similar thereto or preparing for the working of the design or a design similar thereto in Japan at the time of the filing of the application for design registration (where the application for design registration is deemed to have been filed at the time of submission of the written amendment of proceedings under Article 9-2 or 17-3(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57(1)), at the time of filing the original application or the written amendment of proceedings), shall have a non-exclusive license on the design right, only to the extent of the design and the purpose of such business worked or prepared. 例文帳に追加

第二十九条　意匠登録出願に係る意匠を知らないで自らその意匠若しくはこれに類似する意匠の創作をし、又は意匠登録出願に係る意匠を知らないでその意匠若しくはこれに類似する意匠の創作をした者から知得して、意匠登録出願の際（第九条の二の規定により、又は第十七条の三第一項（第五十条第一項（第五十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により、その意匠登録出願が手続補正書を提出した時にしたものとみなされたときは、もとの意匠登録出願の際又は手続補正書を提出した際）現に日本国内においてその意匠又はこれに類似する意匠の実施である事業をしている者又はその事業の準備をしている者は、その実施又は準備をしている意匠及び事業の目的の範囲内において、その意匠登録出願に係る意匠権について通常実施権を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 46 (1) Where a taxpayer has suffered a considerable loss of property due to earthquake, flood, wind, lightning, fire or other similar natural disaster, if any of the taxpayer's national tax falls under any of the following and is payable within one year from the day on which the taxpayer suffered such loss, the district director of the tax office (in cases where the director-general of a customs house or the regional commissioner of a Regional Taxation Bureau collects national taxes pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to Article 43, paragraph (1), or paragraph (3) or paragraph (4) of said Article, or Article 44, paragraph (1) (Competent Agency for Collection of National Taxes), the director-general or the regional commissioner; hereinafter referred to as the "district director of the tax office, etc." in this Chapter) may, based on an application filed by the taxpayer within two months from the day on which such disaster ended, grant a grace period for payment of the national tax in whole or in part for up to one year from the due date for payment (in the case of a withholding tax for which no notice of tax due has been given, its statutory due date for payment) (in the case of the national tax set forth in item (iii), the such grace period shall be specified by Cabinet Order), as provided for by Cabinet Order: 例文帳に追加

第四十六条　税務署長（第四十三条第一項ただし書、第三項若しくは第四項又は第四十四条第一項（国税の徴収の所轄庁）の規定により税関長又は国税局長が国税の徴収を行う場合には、その税関長又は国税局長。以下この章において「税務署長等」という。）は、震災、風水害、落雷、火災その他これらに類する災害により納税者がその財産につき相当な損失を受けた場合において、その者がその損失を受けた日以後一年以内に納付すべき国税で次に掲げるものがあるときは、政令で定めるところにより、その災害のやんだ日から二月以内にされたその者の申請に基づき、その納期限（納税の告知がされていない源泉徴収による国税については、その法定納期限）から一年以内の期間（第三号に掲げる国税については、政令で定める期間）を限り、その国税の全部又は一部の納税を猶予することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 155 The provisions specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 81-3(1) (Inclusion in Gross Profits or Deductible Expenses of the Amount of Individual Gross Profits or Individual Deductible Expenses) of the Act in the case of calculating the amount of individual gross profits prescribed in the said paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "amount of individual gross profits" in this Chapter) shall be those of Article 26(2) (Exclusion from Gross Profits of Refund of Foreign Tax), Article 28 (Inclusion in Gross Profits of Foreign Tax of Foreign Subsidiary Companies to be Deducted from Corporation Tax) and Article 61-13 (Adjustment of Profits and Losses of Transactions between Consolidated Corporations in the Business Year, etc. Prior to Company Split, etc.) of the Act, and the provisions specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 81-3(1) of the Act in the case of calculating the amount of individual deductible expenses prescribed in the said paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "amount of individual deductible expenses" in this Chapter) shall be those of Article 40 (Exclusion from Deductible Expenses of Income Tax to be Deducted from Corporation Tax), Article 41 (Exclusion from Deductible Expenses of Foreign Tax to be Deducted from Corporation Tax), Articles 57 through 58 (Carryover, etc. of Loss in the Business Year when Blue Return Form Has Been Filed) and Article 61-13 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

第百五十五条　法第八十一条の三第一項（個別益金額又は個別損金額の益金又は損金算入）に規定する個別益金額（以下この章において「個別益金額」という。）を計算する場合における同項に規定する政令で定める規定は法第二十六条第二項（外国税額の還付金の益金不算入）、第二十八条（法人税額から控除する外国子会社の外国税額の益金算入）及び第六十一条の十三（分割等前事業年度等における連結法人間取引の損益の調整）とし、同項に規定する個別損金額（以下この章において「個別損金額」という。）を計算する場合における同項に規定する政令で定める規定は法第四十条（法人税額から控除する所得税額の損金不算入）、第四十一条（法人税額から控除する外国税額の損金不算入）、第五十七条から第五十八条まで（青色申告書を提出した事業年度の欠損金の繰越し等）及び第六十一条の十三とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property: 例文帳に追加

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 160 (1) In the case of an application of respective Acts after amendment on and after the enforcement date of this Act, any disposition or any other act with respect to any approval, etc. which has been made in accordance with the provisions of respective Acts before amendment before the enforcement of this Act (or of the provisions of each item of Article 1 of the supplementary provisions; hereinafter the same in this Article and Article 163 of the supplementary provisions) (such disposition or act is hereinafter in this Article referred to as an "act of disposition, etc.") or any application for any approval, etc. or other act which, by the time of the enforcement of this Act, has been filed in accordance with the provisions of the respective Acts before amendment (such application or act is hereinafter in this Article referred to as an "act of application, etc.") shall, excluding those subject to the application of the provisions of Article 2 through the preceding Article of the supplementary provisions or to the provisions concerning transitional measures stipulated in respective Acts (including any order thereof), be deemed to be an act of disposition, etc. or an act of application, etc. which has been made in accordance with the equivalent provisions of respective Acts after amendment, if administrative affairs pertaining to the act of disposition, etc. or the act of application are performed by a different person on the enforcement date of this Act. 例文帳に追加

第百六十条　この法律（附則第一条各号に掲げる規定については、当該各規定。以下この条及び附則第百六十三条において同じ。）の施行前に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされた許可等の処分その他の行為（以下この条において「処分等の行為」という。）又はこの法律の施行の際現に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされている許可等の申請その他の行為（以下この条において「申請等の行為」という。）で、この法律の施行の日においてこれらの行為に係る行政事務を行うべき者が異なることとなるものは、附則第二条から前条までの規定又は改正後のそれぞれの法律（これに基づく命令を含む。）の経過措置に関する規定に定めるものを除き、この法律の施行の日以後における改正後のそれぞれの法律の適用については、改正後のそれぞれの法律の相当規定によりされた処分等の行為又は申請等の行為とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) When the notification has been filed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3), the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency shall give a public notice of the trade name or name, and the location of the head office or principal office or the domicile, of the person who made said notification, the period during which the person who made said notification is to be regarded as falling under the category of a Qualified Institutional Investor (meaning the period as prescribed in paragraph (5)), and, if the person who has made said notification made such notification as a person who falls under paragraph (1), item (xxiii), sub-item (b) or, item (xxiv), sub-item (b) it shall be published to that effect in Official Gazette until March 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from January 1 until one month thereafter; until June 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from April 1 until one month thereafter; until September 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from July 1 until one month thereafter; or until December 1 of the year in which the date of the notification falls in cases where said notification was made during the period from October 1 until one month thereafter. 例文帳に追加

８　金融庁長官は、第三項の規定により届出が行われたときは、当該届出が一月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の三月一日までに、四月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の六月一日までに、七月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の九月一日までに及び十月一日から一月を経過する日までの間に行われた場合はその日の属する年の十二月一日までに、当該届出を行った者の商号、名称又は氏名、本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在地又は住所、適格機関投資家に該当する期間（第五項に規定する期間をいう。）及び当該届出を行った者が第一項第二十三号ロ又は第二十四号ロに該当するものとして届出を行った者である場合にはその旨を官報に公告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) in a case when an appointment as service provider as set forth in paragraph (1) was filed for Communal Daily Long-Term Care for a Dementia Patient, Daily Life Long-Term Care for a Person Admitted to a Community-Based Specified Facility, or Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid, when it is determined that the total capacity of users of said Community-Based Service in said Municipality or in the area including the location of the Business Office pertaining to said application (which means an area provided by said Municipality pursuant to the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (2), item (i); herein referred to as "Daily Activities Area" in this item) has been reached or is it determined that said total number will be exceeded by the appointment as service provider pertaining to said application for the total capacity of necessary users for said Community-Based Service in said Municipality or said Daily Activities Area provided by Municipal Insured Long-Term Care Service Plan provided by said Municipality pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, or when it is determined that it is likely to cause problems with the accomplishment of said Municipal Insured Long-Term Care Service Plan. 例文帳に追加

四　認知症対応型共同生活介護、地域密着型特定施設入居者生活介護又は地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護につき第一項の申請があった場合において、当該市町村又は当該申請に係る事業所の所在地を含む区域（第百十七条第二項第一号の規定により当該市町村が定める区域とする。以下この号において「日常生活圏域」という。）における当該地域密着型サービスの利用定員の総数が、同条第一項の規定により当該市町村が定める市町村介護保険事業計画において定める当該市町村又は当該日常生活圏域の当該地域密着型サービスの必要利用定員総数に既に達しているか、又は当該申請に係る事業者の指定によってこれを超えることになると認めるとき、その他の当該市町村介護保険事業計画の達成に支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Articles 824, 826, 868 (1), 870 (limited to portions pertaining to item (xiii)), main text of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to portions pertaining to item (iv)), main text of Article 873, Articles 875, 876, 904 and 937 (1) (limited to portions pertaining to item (iii) (b)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to orders to dissolve patent professional corporations; and the provisions of Articles 825, 868 (1), 870 (limited to portions pertaining to item (ii)), 871, 872 (limited to portions pertaining to items (i) and (iv)), 873, 874 (limited to portions pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)), 875, 876, 905 and 906 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of assets of patent professional corporations in cases where a petition set forth in Article 824 (1) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, has been filed. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第八百二十四条、第八百二十六条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条、第八百七十六条、第九百四条及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）の規定は特許業務法人の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条、第八百七十六条、第九百五条及び第九百六条の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特許業務法人の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where an application for the approval under paragraph 1 of the preceding Article has been filed in which case the term of existence of a Commodity Exchange (in the case of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the term of existence as a Incorporated Commodity Exchange) or the expiration date of a Commodity Market is stated in the articles of incorporation, the competent minister shall, in lieu of the criterion set forth in paragraph 1, item 2, consider the criterion under the same paragraph to be that there will be no shortfall in the volume of transactions for carrying out Futures Transactions of the Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index pertaining to the application fairly and smoothly and that, in light of the status of the transactions of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., survival of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions through a merger or the establishment of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions by a merger does not or is not likely to cause extreme hindrance to the production and distribution of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., and he/she shall apply such criterion and the criteria under items 3 and 4 of the same paragraph by making a determination for said term of existence or for the period until said expiration date. 例文帳に追加

３ 主務大臣は、商品取引所の存続期間（株式会社商品取引所にあつては、株式会社商品取引所としての存続期間）又は商品市場の開設期限が定款に記載され、又は記録されている前条第一項の認可の申請があつた場合においては、第一項第二号の基準に代えて、申請に係る上場商品又は上場商品指数の先物取引を公正かつ円滑にするために十分な取引量が見込まれないことその他上場商品構成物品等の取引の状況に照らし、当該先物取引をする商品取引所が合併により存続すること又は当該先物取引をする商品取引所を合併により設立することが当該上場商品構成物品等の生産及び流通に著しい支障を及ぼし、又は及ぼすおそれがあることに該当しないことを同号の基準とし、当該基準並びに同項第三号及び第四号の基準の適用は、当該存続期間又は開設期限までの間について判断して行うものとする。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 4 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (ii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act; (iii) the process for the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-2, paragraph 3 of the Act; (iv) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger inherited from the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger through an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters recorded in a written or Electromagnetic Record which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act (excluding the contents of the Absorption-Type Merger contract); (vi) the date of the registration of the change set forth in Article 147, paragraph 1 of the Act; (vii) in addition to that listed in the preceding items, important matters concerning the Absorption-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の二第四項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一吸収合併の効力が生じた日 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第 百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 三吸収合併存続会員商品取引所における法第百四十四条の二第三項において準用する 法第百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 四吸収合併により吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所から承 継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 五法第百四十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所が備え置いた書面 又は電磁的記録に記載又は記録がされた事項（吸収合併契約の内容を除く。）六法第百四十七条第一項の変更の登記をした日 七前各号に掲げるもののほか、吸収合併に関する重要な事項 - 経済産業省

Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3)(hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin" or in the patent bulletin under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加

実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面(同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された考案又は発明(その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。)と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。 - 特許庁

As for responsibility, protection of deposits (fixed-amount protection) and assignment of responsibility are basically unrelated. Nevertheless, as I stated last week, Mr. Kimura became a consultant to FSA when Mr. Takenaka served as Minister for Financial Services and filed an application form for the Incubator Bank of Japan after he resigned from the post and established the Bank while Mr. Takenaka was in office. Given that banking businesses are licensed businesses, and financial businesses are highly public in nature, this is an extremely serious matter as a nation. Sound and robust financial businesses are necessary for sound companies as well as for sound management and economy. As financial businesses are licensed businesses that are not to be taken lightly, it is extremely regrettable that it failed in about six and a half years. As I stated before, now that the DICJ has full control of the Bank, we intend to pursue its criminal and/or civil liability in an appropriate manner according to law. 例文帳に追加

そしてまた、責任についてはどうかということでございますが、預金の保護（定額保護）と責任追及とは基本的には関係のないことでございますが、しかし、私が先週も申し上げましたように、これは竹中平蔵さんのときに、金融庁の顧問に木村剛さんがなられて、やめた後、日本振興銀行の設立のお願い書を出して、そして、竹中平蔵さんのときに銀行の設立が、これはもうよくご存じのように、銀行業というのは免許業で、（金融業は）公共性の強いものでございますから、国家としても大変重たいものであり、健全な企業、あるいは健全な経営・経済のためには、非常に健全で強力な金融業が必要であるということは、もう皆さんよくお分かりでございます。（金融業は）免許業でございまして、重たいものでございますから、そういった意味でも、私はこういったことが６年半ぐらいで破綻をしたということは大変遺憾なことだと、残念なことだと思っていますが、私がこの前申しましたように、今預金保険機構が全部経営権を握っているわけでございますから、法に沿って刑事上の責任、あるいは民事上の責任をきちっと追及していこうと思っております。 - 金融庁

The Office shall revoke the trade mark in a proceeding started at the request of a third person - if the trade mark has not been properly used within the continuous period of 5 years for goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered, and there are no proper reasons for non-use; the use which commenced or which was resumed following 5 years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed; if by the consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor the trade mark has become the common name in the trade for products or services for which it is registered; if the trade mark after the date of its registration in consequence of the use made of it by the proprietor or with his consent in respect of the goods or services for which it is registered, the trade mark is liable to mislead the public, particularly as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of those goods or services. 例文帳に追加

庁は，次の何れかの場合，第三者の請求に基づき開始された手続において商標登録の取消決定を行うことができる。登録商標がその対象とする商品又はサービスについて過去5年内に適正に使用されておらずかつかかる不使用について正当な理由が存在しないこと。登録商標の不使用が5年間継続した後で取消請求の提起される前3月内に開始され又は再開された使用は，当該使用の開始若しくは再開の準備が当該登録商標の取消請求がなされるであろうことを商標所有者が知った後に始めてなされた場合は，なかったものとみなされる。登録商標の所有者による履行若しくは不履行の結果として，当該商標がその登録における対象である製品若しくはサービスについての一般名称となっている場合。登録日後に商標がその対象である商品若しくはサービスについて所有者により又は所有者の同意の下に使用された結果として，特にそれら商品若しくはサービスの性質，品質又は原産地に関して，公衆の誤解を生じさせる虞が生じていること。 - 特許庁

(1) A request under section 108 for information relating to any patent or application for a patent may be made as to -- (a) the date that the reports or information, as the case may be, referred to in section 30(2) were received by the Registrar; (b) when the specification of a patent or application for a patent was published; (c) when an application for a patent was withdrawn, was treated as having been withdrawn, was treated as having been abandoned, was refused or was treated as having been refused; (d) whether a renewal fee was not paid within the period prescribed for the purposes of section 36(2); (e) whether a renewal fee was paid within the 6 months referred to in section 36(3); (f) when a patent has ceased to have effect and/or an application for restoration of a patent was filed; (g) when an entry was made in the register or an application was made for the making of such entry; (h) when any application or request was made or action taken involving an entry in the register or advertisement in the journal, if the nature of the application, request or action is specified in the request; (i) when any document may be inspected in accordance with rule 93 or 94; and (j) such other particulars referred to in any patent or application for a patent as the Registrar may in any particular case allow.例文帳に追加

(1) 特許又は特許出願に関する情報の第108条に基づく請求は，次の事項について行うことができる。 (a) 登録官が第30条(2)にいう報告又は場合により情報を受領した日 (b) 特許明細書又は特許出願が公開された時 (c) 特許出願が取り下げられ，取り下げられたものとして取り扱われ，放棄されたものとして取り扱われ，拒絶され又は拒絶されたものとして取り扱われた時 (d) 更新手数料が第36条(2)適用上の所定の期間内に納付されなかったか否か (e) 更新手数料が第36条(3)にいう6月の期間内に納付されたか否か (f) 特許が失効した時及び／又は特許回復申請書が提出された時 (g) ある記入が登録簿になされた時又は当該記載を求める申請が行われた時 (h) 登録簿への記入又は公報における公示を伴うような申請，請求又は行為がなされた時(ただし，当該申請，請求又は行為の内容が当該請求書に明記されている場合) (i) 規則93及び規則94に従ってある書類の閲覧ができる時，並びに (j) その他，特許又は特許出願において言及される事項であって特定の場合につき登録官が認めるもの - 特許庁

Article 5-2 (1) When there is a request from the victim, etc. (which means the victim, his or her legal representative or his or her spouse, lineal relative or sibling if the victim has died or suffers serious physical or mental conditions; the same shall apply hereinafter) of a juvenile protection case as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii) or from the attorney at law appointed by the victim, etc. for inspection or copying of the records on the juvenile protection case (except those collected by the family court exclusively for its determination on need for protection of the Juvenile and those created or collected by family court probation officer that contribute to the family court's determination on the need for protection of the Juvenile) retained by the court pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court after the ruling prescribed by Article 21 has been made, the court shall authorize the applicant to inspect or copy the records, except when the court finds the request of inspection or copying has been filed on unjustifiable grounds or the court finds it inappropriate to permit inspection or copying in light of the impact on the sound development of the Juvenile, the nature of the case, the status of investigation, hearing, or other circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第五条の二　裁判所は、第三条第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる少年に係る保護事件について、第二十一条の決定があつた後、最高裁判所規則の定めるところにより当該保護事件の被害者等（被害者又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹をいう。以下同じ。）又は被害者等から委託を受けた弁護士から、その保管する当該保護事件の記録（家庭裁判所が専ら当該少年の保護の必要性を判断するために収集したもの及び家庭裁判所調査官が家庭裁判所による当該少年の保護の必要性の判断に資するよう作成し又は収集したものを除く。）の閲覧又は謄写の申出があるときは、閲覧又は謄写を求める理由が正当でないと認める場合及び少年の健全な育成に対する影響、事件の性質、調査又は審判の状況その他の事情を考慮して閲覧又は謄写をさせることが相当でないと認める場合を除き、申出をした者にその閲覧又は謄写をさせるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 306(3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting), Article 307 (Determination by the Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 306(4) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "a shareholders meeting" in Article 307(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a general meeting of members," the term "the shareholders" in Article 307(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第三百七条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業（以下「銀行代理業」という。）を営んでいる者（次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。）は、施行日から起算して三月間（当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間）は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省