「かんそんしょう」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(341ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第百十二条の二　前条第四項若しくは第五項の規定により消滅したものとみなされた特許権又は同条第六項の規定により初めから存在しなかつたものとみなされた特許権の原特許権者は、その責めに帰することができない理由により同条第一項の規定により特許料を追納することができる期間内に同条第四項から第六項までに規定する特許料及び割増特許料を納付することができなかつたときは、その理由がなくなつた日から十四日（在外者にあつては、二月）以内でその期間の経過後六月以内に限り、その特許料及び割増特許料を追納することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 112-2 (1) Where the original patentee of the patent right which was deemed to have been extinguished under Article 112(4) or 112(5), or which was deemed never to have existed under Article 112(6), was unable to pay the patent fees and the patent surcharge under paragraphs (4) to (6) of Article 112 within the time limit for late payment of the patent fees under Article 112(1), due to reasons not attributable to the original patentee, the original patentee may make a late payment of the patent fees and the surcharge within 14 days (where overseas resident, within two months) from the date on which the reasons ceased to exist, but not later than six months following the expiration of the said time limit.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十三条の二　前条第四項の規定により消滅したものとみなされた実用新案権又は同条第五項の規定により初めから存在しなかつたものとみなされた実用新案権の原実用新案権者は、その責めに帰することができない理由により同条第一項の規定により登録料を追納することができる期間内に同条第四項又は第五項に規定する登録料及び割増登録料を納付することができなかつたときは、その理由がなくなつた日から十四日（在外者にあつては、二月）以内でその期間の経過後六月以内に限り、その登録料及び割増登録料を追納することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 33-2 (1) Where the original holder of a utility model right which was deemed to have been extinguished under Article 33(4), or which was deemed never to have existed under Article 33(5), was unable to pay the registration fees and the registration surcharge under Article 33(4) or (5) within the time limit for late payment of the registration fees under Article 33(1), due to reasons not attributable to him/her, he/she may make a late payment of the registration fees and the surcharge within 14 days (in the case of an overseas resident, within two months) from the date on which the reasons ceased to exist, but not later than six months following the expiration of the said time limit.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十七条　国内登録検査機関は、毎事業年度経過後三月以内に、その事業年度の財産目録、貸借対照表及び損益計算書又は収支計算書並びに事業報告書（これらのものが電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他の人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）で作成され、又はその作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録を含む。次項及び第六十条第二号において「財務諸表等」という。）を作成し、五年間事業所に備え置かなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 37 (1) A Domestic Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies shall prepare an inventory of property, a balance sheet, and a profit and loss statement or income and expenditures account statement, as well as an operating statement (including electromagnetic records in the case where such documents are prepared in the form of electromagnetic records (records prepared by electronic means, magnetic means or any other means that cannot be recognized by human perception, which are used for information processing by computer; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or in the case where electromagnetic records are prepared in place of records in paper form; hereinafter referred to as "Financial Statements, etc." in the next paragraph and Article 60, item (ii)) within three months from the end of each business year, and shall keep them in its place of business for five years.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十五条　放送事業者及び有線放送事業者（以下この条及び第九十七条第一項において「放送事業者等」という。）は、第九十一条第一項に規定する権利を有する者の許諾を得て実演が録音されている商業用レコードを用いた放送又は有線放送を行つた場合（営利を目的とせず、かつ、聴衆又は観衆から料金を受けずに、当該放送を受信して同時に有線放送を行つた場合を除く。）には、当該実演（第七条第一号から第六号までに掲げる実演で著作隣接権の存続期間内のものに限る。次項から第四項までにおいて同じ。）に係る実演家に二次使用料を支払わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 95 (1) When a broadcasting organization or wire-broadcasting organization (below in this Article and in Article 97, paragraph (1) referred to as "broadcasting organization, etc.") broadcasts or wire-broadcasts using commercial phonograms incorporating a sound recording of the [subject] performance, which sound recording has been made with the authorization of the person entitled to the right as provided for in Article 91, paragraph (1) (excluding when for non-profit-making purposes and if no fees are charged to the audience or spectators and the wire-broadcasts is made simultaneously with reception of such broadcasts), it shall pay secondary use fees to the performer of said performance (only, however, to the extent of the duration of the neighboring rights for performances provided for in Article 7, items (i) to (vi); the same shall apply in the next paragraph through paragraph (4)).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十条　登録製造時等検査機関は、毎事業年度経過後三月以内に、その事業年度の財産目録、貸借対照表及び損益計算書又は収支決算書並びに事業報告書（その作成に代えて電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他の人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下同じ。）の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録を含む。次項及び第百二十三条第一号において「財務諸表等」という。）を作成し、五年間事務所に備えて置かなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 50 (1) The registered manufacturing inspection, etc., agency shall, within three months after the end of each business year, prepare a list of properties, a balance sheet and a profit-and-loss statement or a settlement of accounts statement, and a business report (referred to as "financial statements, etc." in the following paragraph and in Article 123), concerning that business year, and shall keep them for five years in its office. These include those electromagnetically recorded (the data that are recorded electronically, magnetically or by other method that cannot be recognize by human sense, and that are used for processing by using a computer. This definition applies hereinafter in this Article).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条　国内登録検査機関は、毎事業年度経過後三月以内に、その事業年度の財産目録、貸借対照表及び損益計算書又は収支計算書並びに事業報告書（これらのものが電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他の人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）で作成され、又はその作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録を含む。次項及び第六十一条第二号において「財務諸表等」という。）を作成し、五年間事業所に備え置かなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 24 (1) Within three months after the conclusion of each business year, a domestically registered conformity inspection body shall prepare an inventory of assets, balance sheet and profit and loss statement or statement of receipts and disbursement, as well as a business report for the relevant business year (including electromagnetic records (records made by an electronic form, a magnetic form, or any other form not recognizable to human perception, which is used in information processing by computers; the same shall apply in this Article) if their electromagnetic records are prepared or if electromagnetic records are prepared instead of those documents; hereinafter referred to as "financial statements, etc." in the following paragraph and Article 61, item (ii)), and shall maintain such records in its place of business for five years.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十七条　登録調査機関は、毎事業年度経過後三月以内に、その事業年度の財産目録、貸借対照表及び損益計算書又は収支計算書並びに事業報告書（これらのものが電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）で作成され、又はその作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録を含む。次項及び第九十九条第二号において「財務諸表等」という。）を作成し、五年間事業所に備え置かなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 47 (1) A registered investigation body shall, within three months after the end of each business year, prepare a property inventory, balance sheet, profit and loss statement or income and expenditure statement and business report (in the case where these documents are prepared as electromagnetic records (which means records produced by an electronic device, magnetic device or any other device not recognizable to human sense, which are used for information processing by a computer; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or electromagnetic records are prepared instead of preparing the documents, such electromagnetic records shall be included; these documents shall hereinafter be referred to as "financial statements, etc." in the following paragraph and Article 99, item (ii)) and keep them in its place of business for five years.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十五条の二　第一種特定建築物以外の特定建築物（以下「第二種特定建築物」という。）の新築（住宅事業建築主が第二種特定建築物である特定住宅を新築する場合を除く。）若しくは政令で定める規模以上の改築又は建築物の政令で定める規模以上の増築（前条第一項第一号に規定する増築を除く。）をしようとする者（以下「第二種特定建築主」という。）は、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、当該建築物の設計及び施工に係る事項のうち当該建築物の外壁、窓等を通しての熱の損失の防止及び当該建築物に設ける空気調和設備等に係るエネルギーの効率的利用のための措置に関するものを所管行政庁に届け出なければならない。これを変更しようとするときも、同様とする。例文帳に追加

Article 75-2 (1) A person who intends to construct a new specified building other than a Type 1 specified building (hereinafter referred to as a "Type 2 specified building") (excluding the cases where a residential construction client constructs a new specified residence categorized as a Type 2 specified building), or reconstruct a building beyond the size specified by a Cabinet Order or extend a building beyond the scale specified by a Cabinet Order (excluding the extension prescribed in paragraph (1), item (i) of the preceding Article) (such person shall hereinafter be referred to as a "Type 2 specified construction client") shall, pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, notify the administrative agency with jurisdiction of the measures to prevent heat loss through exterior walls, windows, etc. of said building and to realize the efficient utilization of energy for air conditioning systems, etc. installed in said building with respect to the matters concerning designing and construction of said building. The same shall apply where such person intends to revise the measures.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十四条の二　登録機関は、毎事業年度経過後三月以内に、その事業年度の財産目録、貸借対照表及び損益計算書又は収支計算書並びに事業報告書（これらのものが電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他の人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）で作成され、又はその作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録を含む。次項、次条第二項及び第五十七条において「財務諸表等」という。）を作成し、五年間事業所に備え置かなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 34-2 (1) A registration agency shall, within three months after the end of each business year, prepare a list of property, a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement or a settlement of accounts and a business report for each business year (in the case where these documents are prepared as electromagnetic records (meaning records produced by an electronic device, magnetic device or any other device not recognizable to human senses, which are used for information processing by a computer; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or electromagnetic records prepared instead of preparing the documents, such electromagnetic records shall be included; these documents shall hereinafter be referred to as "financial statements, etc." in the following paragraph, paragraph (2) of the following Article and Article 57) and keep them in its place of business for five years.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

入門当初から鐡胤は薄々感じ取っていたが、父篤胤の幽冥・死後の世界の研究は、失われて埋没され、そして封印された古代信仰の雛形を元の姿に復元させる為の学問であり、其の為に古道の道に足を踏み入れて幽冥の存在を立証しようと試みていた事も知悉していたが、文政3年頃に知友屋代弘賢を通じ下谷長者町の博学の好事家山崎美成を介在して、後に父のもとを訪ねてきた異境を往来すると言う仙童寅吉の姿形を目の当たりに見て、父篤胤が唱える幽冥界の実在をしかと確認し、以後は自らも寸暇を惜しみ、不可解な奇譚の情報やその他の幽冥関連の資料類の蒐集に没頭する事になる。例文帳に追加

Since entering the school, Kanetane knew that his teacher Atsutane studied mysterious things and the underworld to restore the ancient belief which had been lost or sealed up, besides Kanetane understood that Atsutane tried to prove the existence of mysterious things by Kodo; about 1820, by Yoshinari YAMAZAKI, a learned amateur living in Shitayachoja-machi and an acquaintance of Kanetane's friend Hirokata YASHIRO, Kanetane was introduced to Sendo Torakichi, who could come and go freely to the underworld, then Kanetane became convinced of the existence of the underworld, and began to put in serious efforts to collect information of mysterious stories and materials of such things.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

一方の締約国の居住者が法人の株式又は組合若しくは信託財産の持分の譲渡によって取得する収益に対しては、その法人、組合又は信託財産の資産の価値の五十パーセント以上が第六条に規定する不動産であって他方の締約国内に存在するものにより直接又は間接に構成される場合に限り、当該他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。ただし、当該譲渡に係る株式又は持分と同じ種類の株式又は持分（以下「同種の株式等」という。）が公認の有価証券市場において取引され、かつ、当該一方の締約国の居住者及びその特殊関係者が所有する同種の株式等の数が同種の株式等の総数の五パーセント以下である場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of shares in a company or of interests in a partnership or trust may be taxed in the other Contracting State where the shares or the interests derive at least 50 per cent of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property referred to in Article 6 and situated in that other Contracting State unless the relevant class of the shares or the interests is traded on a recognised stock exchange and the resident and persons related or connected to that resident own in the aggregate 5 per cent or less of that class of the shares or the interests.  - 財務省

一方の締約国の居住者が法人の株式又は組合若しくは信託財産の持分の譲渡によって取得する収益に対しては、当該法人、組合又は信託財産の資産の価値の五十パーセント以上が第六条に規定する不動産であって他方の締約国内に存在するものにより直接又は間接に構成される場合に限り、当該他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。ただし、当該譲渡に係る株式又は持分と同じ種類の株式又は持分（以下「同種の株式等」という。）が第二十二条７(c)に規定する公認の有価証券市場において取引され、かつ、当該一方の締約国の居住者及びその特殊関係者が保有し、又は所有する同種の株式等の数が同種の株式等の総数の五パーセント以下である場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of shares in a company or of an interest in a partnership or trust may be taxed in the other Contracting State where the shares or the interest derive at least 50 per cent of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property referred to in Article 6of this Convention and situated in that other Contracting State unless the relevant class of the shares or the interest is traded on a recognised stock exchange specified in subparagraph (c) of paragraph 7 of Article 22 of this Convention and the resident and persons related or connected to that resident hold or own in the aggregate 5per cent or less of that class of the shares or the interest  - 財務省

一方の締約国の居住者が、他方の締約国の居住者である法人（その資産の価値の五十パーセント以上が当該他方の締約国内に存在する不動産により直接又は間接に構成される法人に限る。)の株式その他同等の権利の譲渡によって取得する収益に対しては、当該他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。ただし、当該譲渡に係る株式と同じ種類の株式が第二十二条５(b)に規定する公認の有価証券市場において取引され、かつ、当該一方の締約国の居住者及びその特殊関係者の所有する当該種類の株式の数が当該種類の株式の総数の五パーセント以下である場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of shares or other comparable rights in a company that is a resident of the other Contracting State and that derives at least 50 percent of its value directly or indirectly from real property situated in that other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State, unless the relevant class of shares is traded on a recognized stock exchange specified in subparagraph (b) of paragraph 5 of Article 22 and the resident, and persons related thereto, own in the aggregate 5percent or less of that class of shares.  - 財務省

２一方の締約者の居住者が法人の株式又は組合若しくは信託財産の持分の譲渡によって取得する収益に対しては、その法人、組合又は信託財産の資産の価値の五十パーセント以上が第六条に規定する不動産であって他方の締約者内に存在するものにより直接又は間接に構成される場合には、当該他方の締約者において租税を課することができる。ただし、当該譲渡に係る株式又は持分と同じ種類の株式又は持分（以下「同種の株式等」という。）が公認の有価証券市場において取引され、かつ、当該一方の締約者の居住者及びその特殊関係者が所有する同種の株式等の数が同種の株式等の総数の五パーセント以下である場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

2. Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting Party from the alienation of shares in a company or of interests in a partnership or trust may be taxed in the other Contracting Party where the shares or the interests derive at least 50 per cent of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property referred to in Article 6 and situated in that other Contracting Party, unless the relevant class of the shares or the interests is traded on a recognised stock exchange and the resident and persons related or connected to that resident own in the aggregate 5 per cent or less of that class of the shares or the interests.  - 財務省

２一方の締約国の居住者が法人の株式又は組合若しくは信託財産の持分の譲渡によって取得する収益に対しては、当該法人、組合又は信託財産の資産の価値の五十パーセント以上が第六条に規定する不動産であって他方の締約国内に存在するものにより直接又は間接に構成される場合には、当該他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。ただし、当該譲渡に係る株式又は持分と同じ種類の株式又は持分（以下「同種の株式等」という。）が第二十一条８に規定する公認の有価証券市場において取引され、かつ、当該一方の締約国の居住者及びその特殊関係者が所有する同種の株式等の数が同種の株式等の総数の五パーセント以下である場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

2. Gains derived by a resident of a Contracting State from the alienation of shares in a company or of interests in a partnership or trust may be taxed in the other Contracting State where the shares or the interests derive at least 50 per cent of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property referred to in Article 6 and situated in that other Contracting State, unless the relevant class of the shares or the interest is traded on a recognised stock exchange specified in subparagraph c) of paragraph 8 of Article 21 and the resident and persons related or connected to that resident own in the aggregate 5 per cent or less of that class of the shares or the interests.  - 財務省

反応槽内の気相部分における各モノマーの臨界温度、臨界圧力、およびそれぞれの組成比からＰｅｎｇ−Ｒｏｂｉｎｓｏｎ式を用いて算出した臨界定数の換算温度が０．９５以上、換算圧力が０．８０以上の条件下で行なわれる、バッチ式共重合法による含フッ素エラストマーの製造方法であって、一般式：Ｒｆ・Ｉｘ（ただし、式中、Ｒｆは炭素数１〜１６の飽和もしくは不飽和のフルオロ炭化水素基またはクロロフルオロ炭化水素基であり、ｘはＲｆの結合手の数であって、１以上４以下の整数である）の存在下に、少なくとも１種のフルオロオレフィンを含むエチレン性不飽和化合物を共重合させる。例文帳に追加

Ethylenic unsaturated compounds containing at least one kind of fluoro-olefin are copolymerized in the presence of general formula: Rf×I_x (wherein, Rf is a 1-16C saturated or unsaturated fluorohydrocarbon group or chlorofluorohydrocarbon group; x is the number of the bonding arms of Rf and an integer of not less than 1 and not more than 4). - 特許庁

計画経済期には中国経済において圧倒的な地位を占めていた国有企業は、改革・開放を経て、工業生産総額に占めるシェアを大幅に低下させており、また、国有企業全体に占める赤字企業の比率は上昇している状況である。1980年代半ばから本格的に実施されてきた国有企業改革は、結局、国有企業の経営状況の改善をもたらさなかったと言える。この背景として、競争激化と国有企業自体の抱える構造的な負担が挙げられる。また、現在、大多数の国有企業は民営化の方向に向かいつつあるが、特に、株式会社への改組・上場が行われた大型国有企業に関し、大きく2つのコーポレート・ガバナンス上の問題が存在する。1つは、ガバナンスを効かせる主体に関する問題であり、もう１つは、近年の資本市場の動きに併せて整備されてきた会計制度が抱える問題である。例文帳に追加

The market share of state-owned enterprises, which were dominant in the period of the planned economy,has dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and open has dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and openhas dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and open involves the issue of a main body seeking corporate governance, the other issue concerns accounting systems that are adjusted to harmonize with recent trends in the capital market. - 経済産業省

２　保険業法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項（保険募集の制限）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百八十三条（所属保険会社等の賠償責任）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店（組合の委託を受けて、当該組合のために共済契約の締結の代理又は媒介を行う者であつて、当該組合の役員又は使用人でないものをいう。以下同じ。）並びにその役員及び使用人が行う当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百九十四条（顧客に対する説明）の規定は共済契約の募集を行う共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店並びにその役員及び使用人について、同法第二百九十五条（自己契約の禁止）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百条（禁止行為）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合及びその共済代理店（これらの者の役員及び使用人を含む。）について、同法第三百五条（立入検査等）、第三百六条（業務改善命令）及び第三百七条第一項第三号（登録の取消し等）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百九条（保険契約の申込みの撤回等）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合に対し共済契約の申込みをした者又は共済契約者が行う共済契約の申込みの撤回又は解除について、同法第三百十一条（検査職員の証票の携帯及び提示等）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第三百五条の規定による立入り、質問又は検査をする職員について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号、第二百九十四条第三号、第二百九十五条第二項、第三百条第一項第七号及び第九号並びに第三百九条第一項第一号、第二項、第三項、第五項及び第六項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項中「損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合」と、「次条の登録を受けた損害保険代理店」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出がなされた共済代理店」と、「損害保険代理店である」とあるのは「共済代理店である」と、同条第二項中「次条又は第二百八十六条の登録を受けて」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出を行って」と、同法第三百条第一項中「次条に規定する特定保険契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同項第八号中「特定関係者（第百条の三（第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。次条において同じ。）に規定する特定関係者及び第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者のうち、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等を子会社とする保険持株会社及び少額短期保険持株会社（以下この条及び第三百一条の二において「保険持株会社等」という。）、当該保険持株会社等の子会社（保険会社等及び外国保険会社等を除く。）並びに保険業を行う者以外の者をいう。）」とあるのは「子会社等（中小企業等協同組合法第六十一条の二第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。）」と、同条第二項中「第四条第二項各号、第百八十七条第三項各号又は第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「定款又は中小企業等協同組合法第九条の六の二第一項に規定する共済規程若しくは同法第二十七条の二第三項に規定する火災共済規程」と、同法第三百五条及び第三百六条中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、同法第三百七条第一項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、「次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消し、又は」とあるのは「第三号に該当するときは、」と、「業務の全部若しくは一部」とあるのは「共済契約の募集」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (2) (Restriction on Insurance Solicitation) of the Insurance Business Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 283 (Liability for Compensation of the Insurance Company Concerned, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities carried out by officers or employees of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and by any mutual aid agent (which means a person who acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding mutual aid contracts for a cooperative under entrustment by said cooperative, and who is not an officer nor an employee of said cooperative; the same shall apply hereinafter) of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and officers or employees of said mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 294 (Explanations to Customers) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officers and employees of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, any mutual aid agent of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and officers and employees of said mutual aid agent, carrying out solicitation of mutual aid contracts; the provisions of Article 295 (Prohibition of Self-Contract) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 300 (Prohibited Acts) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and any mutual aid agent thereof (including their officers and employees) carrying out mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 305 (On-Site Inspections, etc.), Article 306 (Order to Improve Business Operations), and Article 307, paragraph (1), item (iii) (Rescission of Registration, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 309 (Revocation of Applications for Insurance Contracts, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation or cancellation of an offer for a mutual aid contract by a person who has filed an offer with a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or by a mutual aid contractor; and the provisions of Article 311 (Carrying and Presenting of Identification Cards by Inspection Officials) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officials who enter, question, and inspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 305 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 294, item (iii), Article 295, paragraph (2), Article 300, paragraph (1), item (vii) and item (ix), and Article 309, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the phrase "a casualty insurance company (including a foreign casualty insurance company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities"; the phrase "a casualty insurance agent registered under the following Article" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "a mutual aid agent notified under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "which is a casualty insurance agent" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "which is a mutual aid agent"; the phrase "by obtaining registration under the following Article or Article 286" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "by giving the notification under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "provided insurance contract prescribed in the following Article" in Article 300, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "person having a specified relationship (which means any person having a specified relationship as prescribed in Article 103 [including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in the following Article] or any person having a special relationship as prescribed in Article 194, who is not an insurance holding company or a small-sum, short term insurance holding company (hereinafter referred to as an 'insurance holding company, etc.' in this Article and Article 301-2) for which said insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc. is a subsidiary company, nor a subsidiary company (excluding an insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc.) of said insurance holding company, etc., nor a person engaged in insurance business)" in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (viii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "subsidiary company, etc. (which means a subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 61-2, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act)"; the phrase "documents listed in the items of Article 4, paragraph (2), items of Article 187, paragraph (3) or items of Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 300, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the articles of association, or mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 9-6-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act, or fire mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (3) of the same Act"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 305 and Article 306 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the phrase "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under any of the following items, may rescind the registration set forth in Article 276 or Article 286, or may" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under item (iii), may"; and the phrase "all or part of the operations" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation of mutual aid contracts."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

九　定款、社員総会、総代会、創立総会、取締役会、重要財産委員会、委員会、監査役会、保険契約者総会、保険契約者総代会、社債権者集会若しくは債権者集会の議事録、社員の名簿、会計帳簿、貸借対照表、損益計算書、事業報告、第五十四条の三第二項若しくは第百八十条の十七において準用する会社法第四百九十四条第一項の附属明細書、会計参与報告、監査報告、会計監査報告、決算報告、社債原簿、財産目録、事務報告又は第六十一条の五において準用する同法第六百八十二条第一項若しくは第六百九十五条第一項、第百六十五条の二第一項、第百六十五条の九第一項、第百六十五条の十三第一項、第百六十五条の十五第一項、第百六十五条の十九第一項若しくは第百六十五条の二十一第一項の書面若しくは電磁的記録に記載し、若しくは記録すべき事項を記載せず、若しくは記録せず、又は虚偽の記載若しくは記録をしたとき。例文帳に追加

(ix) When he/she has failed to state or record the matters required to be stated or recorded or made a false statement or record in the articles of incorporation, minutes of general meeting of members, General Meeting, Organizational Meeting, board of directors, committee on important property, Committees, board of company auditors, policyholders meeting, General Meeting of Policyholders, bondholders meeting or creditors meeting, roster of members, accounting books, balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report, annexed detailed statement of Article 494, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54-3, paragraph (2) or Article 180-17, accounting advisory report, audit report, accounting auditing report, statement of accounts, bond registry, inventory of property, business report, or document or electromagnetic record set forth in Article 682, paragraph (1) or Article 695, paragraph (1), Article 165-2, paragraph (1), Article 165-9, paragraph (1), Article 165-13, paragraph (1), Article 165-15, paragraph (1), Article 165-19, paragraph (1) or Article 165-21, paragraph (1) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-5;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) (2)に基づく記入が特許に関して行われた場合は， (a) 当該特許に基づくライセンスについては，当該記入が行われた後はいつでも，合意により定めるか，又は合意のないときは登録官が当該特許の所有者若しくは当該ライセンスを必要とする者の申請に基づいて定める条件により，何人もこれを受ける権原を当然の権利として有し， (b) 登録官は，当該記入をする前に当該特許に基づいてライセンスを許諾された所有者による申請により，当該ライセンスを前記のように定められた条件による実施許諾用意のライセンスに代えるべき旨を命ずることができ， (c) 当該特許の侵害手続において，被告が前記のような条件に基づくライセンスを受けると約束した場合は，被告に対する差止命令は認められず，かつ，被告から回収することができる損害賠償(もしあれば)の額は，当該ライセンスが前記の条件で最先の侵害より前に付与されたならば被告が実施権者として支払うべきであった額の2倍を超えてはならず，かつ (d) 当該特許に関し当該記入の日後に納付するべき更新手数料は，当該記入が行われなかったとした場合に納付するべき手数料の半額とする。例文帳に追加

(3) Where an entry under subsection (2) is made in respect of a patent -- (a) any person shall, at any time after the entry is made, be entitled as of right to a licence under the patent on such terms as may be settled by agreement or, in default of agreement, by the Registrar on the application of the proprietor of the patent or the person requiring the licence; (b) the Registrar may, on the application of the holder of any licence granted under the patent before the entry was made, order the licence to be exchanged for a licence of right on terms so settled; (c) if, in proceedings for infringement of the patent, the defendant undertakes to take a licence on such terms, no injunction shall be granted against him and the amount (if any) recoverable against him by way of damages shall not exceed twice the amount which would have been payable by him as licensee if such a licence on those terms had been granted before the earliest infringement; and (d) the renewal fee payable in respect of the patent after the date of the entry shall be half the fee which would be payable if the entry had not been made. - 特許庁

第六十九条　市町村は、要介護認定、要介護更新認定、第二十九条第二項において準用する第二十七条第七項若しくは第三十条第一項の規定による要介護状態区分の変更の認定、要支援認定、要支援更新認定、第三十三条の二第二項において準用する第三十二条第六項若しくは第三十三条の三第一項の規定による要支援状態区分の変更の認定（以下この項において単に「認定」という。）をした場合において、当該認定に係る第一号被保険者である要介護被保険者等について保険料徴収権消滅期間（当該期間に係る保険料を徴収する権利が時効によって消滅している期間につき政令で定めるところにより算定された期間をいう。以下この項において同じ。）があるときは、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等の被保険者証に、当該認定に係る第二十七条第七項後段（第二十八条第四項及び第二十九条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十条第一項後段若しくは第三十五条第四項後段又は第三十二条第六項後段（第三十三条第四項及び第三十三条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十三条の三第一項後段若しくは第三十五条第二項後段若しくは第六項後段の規定による記載に併せて、介護給付等（居宅介護サービス計画費の支給、特例居宅介護サービス計画費の支給、介護予防サービス計画費の支給及び特例介護予防サービス計画費の支給、高額介護サービス費の支給及び高額介護予防サービス費の支給並びに特定入所者介護サービス費の支給、特例特定入所者介護サービス費の支給、特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給及び特例特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給を除く。）の額の減額を行う旨並びに高額介護サービス費及び高額介護予防サービス費並びに特定入所者介護サービス費、特例特定入所者介護サービス費、特定入所者介護予防サービス費及び特例特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給を行わない旨並びにこれらの措置がとられる期間（市町村が、政令で定めるところにより、保険料徴収権消滅期間に応じて定める期間をいう。以下この条において「給付額減額期間」という。）の記載（以下この条において「給付額減額等の記載」という。）をするものとする。ただし、当該要介護被保険者等について、災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認めるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 69 (1) In a case when a Municipality issues a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care, a Renewal of Certification of Care Need, or Certification of Change of Condition of Need for Long-Term Care pursuant to the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (7) or Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 29, paragraph (2), a Certification of Needed Support, a Renewal of Certification of Needed Support, or a Certification of Change of Category of Needed Support Condition pursuant to the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (6) or Article 33-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33-2, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to simply as "Certification" in this paragraph) and there is a period when the right to collect an insurance premium has extinguished (which means a period calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order regarding the period when the right to collect an insurance premium pertaining to said period has been extinguished due to a legal proscription) with regard to an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is the Primary Insured Person pertaining to said Certification, a Municipality pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare shall enter on the Certificate of Insured Person of said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., in addition to the entry pursuant to the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (7), second sentence (including a case applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 28, paragraph (4) and Article 29, paragraph (2)), Article 30, paragraph (1), second sentence, Article 35, paragraph (4), second sentence, Article 32, paragraph (6), second sentence (including a case applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph (4) or Article 33-2, paragraph (2)), Article 33-3, paragraph (1), second sentence, Article 35, paragraph (2), second sentence, or paragraph (6) second sentence as pertaining to said Certification, that the amount of Long-Term Care Benefit, etc., (except for payment of an Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, Exceptional Allowance for an In-Home Long-Term Care Service Plan, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan, Exceptional Allowance for a Preventive Service Plan of Long-term care, Allowance for High-Cost Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for High-Cost Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, and Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Preventive Service of a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility) shall be reduced and that the Allowance for High-Cost Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for High-Cost Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, and Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Preventive Service of a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility shall not be paid, and the period that these measures are applicable (which means a period that a Municipality determines pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order according to the period during which the right to collect an insurance premium is extinguished; herein referred to as "Benefit Reduction Period" in this Article) (hereinafter said entry is referred to as "Entry of Benefit Reduction Amount, etc." in this Article), however, provided that this provision shall not apply to a case when it is determined that said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., suffers due to a disaster or other special circumstance provided by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

二　第九十六条第一項の改正規定、第百条の次に一条を加える改正規定並びに第百一条、第百二条第四項及び第五項、第百九条、第百九条の二、第百十条、第百二十一条、第百二十三条、第百三十条第三項、第百三十八条、第百七十九条第一項、第二百七条、第二百二十五条、第二百三十一条の二、第二百三十四条第三項及び第五項、第二百三十七条第三項、第二百三十八条第一項、第二百三十八条の二第二項、第二百三十八条の四、第二百三十八条の五、第二百六十三条の三並びに第三百十四条第一項の改正規定並びに附則第二十二条及び第三十二条の規定、附則第三十七条中地方公営企業法（昭和二十七年法律第二百九十二号）第三十三条第三項の改正規定、附則第四十七条中旧市町村の合併の特例に関する法律（昭和四十年法律第六号）附則第二条第六項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされる同法第五条の二十九の改正規定並びに附則第五十一条中市町村の合併の特例等に関する法律（平成十六年法律第五十九号）第四十七条の改正規定　公布の日から起算して一年を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日例文帳に追加

(ii) The provision revising Article 96 paragraph (1), the provision adding a new Article after Article 100, and the provisions revising Article 101, Article 102 paragraphs (4) and (5), Article 109, Article 109-2, Article 110, Article 121, Article 123, Article 130 paragraph (3), Article 138, Article 179 paragraph (1), Article 207, Article 225, Article 231-2, Article 234 paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 237 paragraph (3), Article 238 paragraph (1), Article 238-2 paragraph (2), Article 238-4, Article 238-5, Article 263-3 and Article 314 paragraph (1), and the provisions of Articles 22 and 32 of these Supplementary Provisions, the provision of Article 37 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 33 paragraph (3) of the Local Public Enterprise Act (Act No. 292 of 1952), the provision of Article 47 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 5-29 of the Old Act on Special Provisions of the Merger of Municipalities (Act No. 6 of 1965) to the effect that the provision of said Article 5-29 shall remain effective pursuant to the provision of Article 2 paragraph (6) of the supplementary provisions of the same Act, and the provision of Article 51 of these Supplementary Provisions revising Article 47 of the Act on Special Provisions of the Merger of Municipalities (Act No. 59 of 2004): The date specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding 1 year from the day of promulgation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

加盟国は、世界経済の成長及び発展にとってサービスの貿易の重要性が増大していることを認め、透明性及び漸進的な自由化を確保しつつサービスの貿易を拡大することを目的として、また、すべての参加国の経済成長及び開発途上国の発展を促進する手段として、サービスの貿易に関する原則及び規則の多角的枠組みを設定することを希望し、すべての参加国の利益を互恵的な基礎の上に増進し、かつ、権利及び義務の全体的な均衡を確保することを目的として引き続き行われる多角的交渉のラウンドを通じ、国家の政策目的に十分な考慮を払いつつ、漸進的かつ早期に一層高い水準のサービスの貿易の自由化を達成することを希望し、国家の政策目的を実現するため自国の領域内におけるサービスの提供に関して規制を行い又は新たな規制を導入する権利を有すること及びサービスの規制に係る発展の程度に関して国の間に存在する不均衡にかんがみ開発途上国にはこの権利を行使する必要が特にあることを認め、特に開発途上国の国内のサービスに関する能力並びにその効率性及び競争力を強化することにより、開発途上国のサービスの貿易への参加の増大及びサービスの輸出の拡大を促進することを希望し、後発開発途上国の特別な経済的事情並びにこれらの国の開発上、貿易上及び資金上のニーズにかんがみ、後発開発途上国が重大な困難を有することに特に留意して、ここに、次のとおり協定する。例文帳に追加

Members, Recognizing the growing importance of trade in services for the growth and development of the world economy; Wishing to establish a multilateral framework of principles and rules for trade in services with a view to the expansion of such trade under conditions of transparency and progressive liberalization and as a means of promoting the economic growth of all trading partners and the development of developing countries; Desiring the early achievement of progressively higher levels of liberalization of trade in services through successive rounds of multilateral negotiations aimed at promoting the interests of all participants on a mutually advantageous basis and at securing an overall balance of rights and obligations, while giving due respect to national policy objectives; Recognizing the right of Members to regulate, and to introduce new regulations, on the supply of services within their territories in order to meet national policy objectives and, given asymmetries existing with respect to the degree of development of services regulations in different countries, the particular need of developing countries to exercise this right; Desiring to facilitate the increasing participation of developing countries in trade in services and the expansion of their service exports including, inter alia, through the strengthening of their domestic services capacity and its efficiency and competitiveness; Taking particular account of the serious difficulty of the least-developed countries in view of their special economic situation and their development, trade and financial needs; Hereby agree as follows: - 経済産業省

第五条　第二条第一項第一号から第九号まで又は第十五号に掲げる不正競争（同項第四号から第九号までに掲げるものにあっては、技術上の秘密（秘密として管理されている生産方法その他の事業活動に有用な技術上の情報であって公然と知られていないものをいう。）に関するものに限る。）によって営業上の利益を侵害された者（以下この項において「被侵害者」という。）が故意又は過失により自己の営業上の利益を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、被侵害者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、被侵害者の当該物に係る販売その他の行為を行う能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、被侵害者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を被侵害者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 5 (1) Where a person whose business interests have been infringed by unfair competition listed in items 1 to 9 or item 15 of Article 2(1) (with regard to the unfair competition listed in items 4 to 9 of the same paragraph, only unfair competition that involves a technical secret [which means a manufacturing method or other technical information useful for business activities that is kept secret and not publicly known]) (hereinafter referred to as the "infringed person" in this paragraph) claims damages caused by such an infringement from a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed such business interests, and where the infringer has sold or otherwise transferred the articles constituting the act of infringement, the quantity of the articles sold or transferred (hereinafter referred to as the "transferred quantity" in this paragraph) multiplied by the amount of profit per unit of the articles that the infringed person could have sold in the absence of the infringement may be deemed as the amount of damages suffered by the infringed person, provided it does not exceed the amount attainable by the infringed person's capability to sell or conduct other acts concerning said articles. However, where there are any circumstances that would have prevented the infringed person from selling the quantity of articles equivalent to all or part of the transferred quantity, an amount corresponding to the quantity relevant to such circumstances shall be deducted.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　前項の介護予防サービス費等種類支給限度基準額は、介護予防サービス及び地域密着型介護予防サービスの種類ごとに、同項に規定する厚生労働省令で定める期間における当該介護予防サービス及び地域密着型介護予防サービスの要支援状態区分に応じた標準的な利用の態様、当該介護予防サービス及び地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る第五十三条第二項各号及び第五十四条の二第二項各号の厚生労働大臣が定める基準等を勘案し、当該介護予防サービス及び地域密着型介護予防サービスを含む介護予防サービス等区分に係る第一項の介護予防サービス費等区分支給限度基準額（第三項の規定に基づき条例を定めている市町村にあっては、当該条例による措置が講じられた額とする。）の範囲内において、市町村が条例で定める額とする。例文帳に追加

(5) The base amount of maximum benefit by payment type of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc., as set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be the amount that a Municipality stipulates by ordinance, by type of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care and Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, after considering the type of standard use that is according to each Category of Needed Support Condition, of said Preventive Service of Long-Term Care and Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care during the period as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as prescribed in the same paragraph, standards determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in each item of Article 53, paragraph (2) and each item of Article 54-2, paragraph (2) pertaining to said Preventive Service of Long-Term Care and Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc., within the base amount of maximum benefit by payment category of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc., as set forth in paragraph (1) pertaining to the categories of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc., that include said Preventive Service of Long-Term Care and Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care (said base amount, with regard to the Municipality that provides an ordinance pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3), shall be the amount by which measures pursuant to the provisions of said municipal ordinance are undertaken).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　第三十三条並びに第五十九条第八項本文及び第十項の規定は創立総会について、会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定（これらの規定中監査役に係る部分を除く。）は創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同項中「会社の本店（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店）」とあるのは、「会員商品取引所の主たる事務所（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、主たる事務所及び当該登記に係る従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 33 and Article 59, paragraph (8), main clause and paragraph (10) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an organizational meeting, and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i) (e)) of the Companies Act (excluding the part pertaining to auditors) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaration of nonexistence or nullity of or an action for rescission of a resolution of an organizational meeting. In this case, the phrase "the head office (in the case prescribed in item (i) (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 930, paragraph (2) have been registered according to said resolution, the head office and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office of the Member Commodity Exchange (in the case prescribed in item (i) (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 24, paragraph (2) of the Commodity Exchange Act have been registered according to said resolution, the principal office and the secondary office pertaining to said registration)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に特定される抵触が，1989年10月1日前にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「先の出願」と称する)と，その日以後にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「後の出願」と称する)との間に存在し，かつ (a) 後の出願が，カナダが締約国である特許に関する条約又は協定に定める条件に従って保護を受ける権利を有する者であって，同一発明を記載した特許出願を条約，協定又は法律によりカナダ国民に同様な保護を与える他の国において若しくはその国に対して先に正規にした者により行われ， (b) 後の出願が，その先に正規にされた出願の後12月以内に行われ，(c) 後の出願の出願人が，その先に正規にされた出願に基づいて該当出願につき優先権主張を行い，また (d) 先の出願が当該先に正規にされた出願の後に行われた場合は， 先の発明日を有する出願人が特許を受けることができるものとし，これらの出願は，1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に従って取り扱い，かつ，処理しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Where a conflict, as defined in section 43 as it read immediately before October 1, 1989, exists between an application for a patent in Canada filed before October 1, 1989 (the “earlier application”) and an application for a patent in Canada filed on or after that date (the “later application”) and (a) the later application is filed by a person who is entitled to protection under the terms of any treaty or convention relating to patents to which Canada is a party and who has previously regularly filed in or for any other country that by treaty, convention or law affords similar protection to citizens of Canada an application for a patent describing the same invention, (b) the later application is filed within twelve months after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, (c) the applicant in the later application has made a request for priority in respect of that application on the basis of the previously regularly filed application, and (d) the earlier application is filed after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, the applicant having the earlier date of invention shall be entitled to a patent and the applications shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with section 43, as it read immediately before October 1, 1989.  - 特許庁

(1) 出願日から4年以内又は特許付与に関する通知が公告された日から3年以内に特許発明がラトビア共和国において実施されなかったか又は十分に実施されなかった場合は，何人も，本法及び裁判所の判決に従って当該特許発明を実施する許可(強制ライセンス)を自己に付与すべき旨の請求を伴う申請を行政裁判所に対して行うことができる。特許所有者が当該発明を実施しなかったこと又は十分に実施しなかったことについて根拠のある理由が存在することを裁判所に証明した場合は，この規定は適用されない。(2) 生物工学的発明の特許所有者が，植物品種に係る先の権利を侵害することなしには当該発明を実施することができない場合は，当該人は，前記の権利により保護されている当該植物品種の実施のための強制ライセンスを申請して，裁判所が定める補償金を当該植物の品種の所有者に支払うことができる。当該ライセンスが付与された場合は，植物品種の所有者は，保護されている発明の実施に係る根拠のある要件を伴うクロスライセンスを受ける資格を有する。例文帳に追加

(1) If within four years after filing date of application or within three years after the date when the notification regarding the grant of a patent was published, the patented invention has not been used or has been used in an insufficient amount in the Republic of Latvia, any person may submit to the administrative court an application with a request to provide a permit (compulsory licence) to it to use the patented invention in conformity with this Law and court judgement. This provision shall not be applied if the proprietor of the patent proves to the court that there have been substantiated reasons for the failure to use or insufficient use of the invention. - 特許庁

８ 第三十三条並びに第五十九条第八項本文及び第十項の規定は創立総会について、会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定（これらの規定中監査役に係る部分を除く。）は創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同項中「会社の本店（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店）」とあるのは、「会員商品取引所 Member Commodity Exchangeの主たる事務所（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、主たる事務所及び当該登記に係る従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 33 and Article 59, paragraph 8, main clause and paragraph 10 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an organizational general meeting, and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to items 16 and 17), Article 835, paragraph 1, Article 836, paragraphs 1 and 3, Article 837, Article 838, Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph 1 (limited to the part pertaining to item 1 (e)) of the Company Act (excluding the part pertaining to auditors) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaration of nonexistence or nullity of or an action for rescission of a resolution of an organizational general meeting. In this case, the phrase "the head office (in the case prescribed in item 1 (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 930, paragraph 2 have been registered according to said resolution, the head office and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office of the Member Commodity Exchange (in the case prescribed in item 1 (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 24, paragraph 2 of the Commodity Exchange Act have been registered according to said resolution, the principal office and the secondary office pertaining to said registration)."  - 経済産業省

第六十一条　法第百四十五条第一項（外国法人に対する準用）において準用する法第二編第一章第三節（内国法人の各事業年度の所得に対する法人税の申告、納付及び還付）の規定の適用に係る事項については、前編第一章第三節（内国法人の各事業年度の所得に対する法人税の申告、納付及び還付）の規定を準用する。この場合において、第三十一条第一項第二号（中間申告書の記載事項）、第三十二条第一項第二号（仮決算をした場合の中間申告書の記載事項）、第三十四条第一項第二号（確定申告書の記載事項）、第三十六条第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長申請書の記載事項）、第三十六条の二第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長の特例の申請書の記載事項）、第三十六条の三第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長の特例の取りやめの届出書の記載事項）及び第三十六条の四第二号（欠損金繰戻しの還付請求書の記載事項）中「代表者の氏名」とあるのは「代表者の氏名及び国内において行う事業又は国内にある資産の経営又は管理の責任者の氏名」と、第三十三条第二号（仮決算をした場合の中間申告書の添付書類）及び第三十五条第三号（確定申告書の添付書類）中「勘定科目内訳明細書」とあるのは「勘定科目内訳明細書（法第百四十二条（国内源泉所得に係る所得の金額の計算）に規定する国内源泉所得に係る所得の金額の計算に係る部分に限る。）」とそれぞれ読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 61 (1) With regard to matters concerning the application of the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 3 (Filing of Returns, Payment, and Refunds of Corporation Tax on a Domestic Corporation's Income for Each Business Year) of the Act that are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 145, paragraph (1) (Mutatis Mutandis Application to Foreign Corporations) of the Act, the provisions of Chapter I, Section 3 of the preceding Part (Filing of Returns, Payment, and Refunds of Corporation Tax on a Domestic Corporation's Income for Each Business Year) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the term "The name of its representative" in Article 31, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Interim Return Form), Article 32, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Interim Return Form in the Case of the Provisional Settlement of Accounts), Article 34, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in Final Return Form), Article 36, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Application Form for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), Article 36-2, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Application Form for Special Provisions for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), Article 36-3, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in a Written Notice for Canceling Special Provisions for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), and Article 36-4, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in Claim Form for a Refund by Carrying Back Losses) shall be deemed to be replaced with "The name of its representative and the name of the person responsible for the operation or management of its business in Japan or its assets in Japan"; and the term "statement classified by items of accounts" in Article 33, item (ii) (Documents to Be Attached to Interim Return Form in the Case of Provisional Settlement of Accounts) and Article 35, item (iii) (Documents to Be Attached to a Final Return Form) shall be deemed to be replaced with "statement classified by items of accounts (limited to the part concerning the calculation of the amount of income categorized as income from domestic sources prescribed in Article 142 (Calculation of the Amount of Income Categorized as Income from Domestic Sources) of the Act)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十八条　業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方（その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。）は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき（相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。例文帳に追加

Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１２　法第六十六条の八第一項に規定する内国法人に係る特定外国子会社等又は当該内国法人に係る外国関係会社につき同項各号に掲げる事実が生じた日を含む当該内国法人の事業年度において同項の規定により当該内国法人の当該事業年度の所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入された同項に規定する課税済留保金額（同条第二項及び第三項の規定により当該課税済留保金額とみなされたものを含む。）がある場合において、その損金の額に算入された当該課税済留保金額のうちに法第六十六条の七第一項の規定により当該内国法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第六十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているとき、又は法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定により当該内国法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているときは、当該計算の基礎となつた当該内国法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額又は当該計算の基礎となつた当該内国法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額は、当該事業年度終了の日において減額されたものとみなす。この場合において、同法第六十九条第十項中「うち第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び租税特別措置法第六十六条の七第一項（内国法人における特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「減額された場合（」とあるのは「減額された場合（租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の十八第十二項（特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国法人税額の計算等）の規定により減額されたものとみなされた場合又は」と、「うち同条第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち同条第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び同法第六十八条の九十一第一項（連結法人における特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「同条第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項まで」として、同項の規定を適用する。例文帳に追加

(12) In the case where there is any taxed amount of retained income prescribed in Article 66-8(1) of the Act (including the amount deemed to be the taxed amount of retained income pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the said Article) that was included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of income for the relevant business year of a domestic corporation prescribed in Article 66-8(1) of the Act, pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, in the business year of the domestic corporation including the day on which any of the events listed in the items of the said paragraph occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, or an affiliated foreign company related to the said domestic corporation, when the said taxed amount of retained income included in deductible expenses includes the amount of foreign corporation tax on the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, and which consists of taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 69(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, or that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, and which consists of individually taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 81-15(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said taxable retained income or the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said individually taxable retained income shall be deemed to have been reduced on the final day of the relevant business year. In this case, the provisions of Article 69(10) of the said Act shall apply by replacing the terms in the said paragraph as follows: the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 66-7(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Domestic Corporations) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" the term "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (in the case where the reduction is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 39-18(12) (Calculation, etc. of Foreign Corporation Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation; or" the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article, and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 68-91(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Consolidated Corporations) of the said Act, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" and the term "paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 81-15(1) to (3)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１２　法第六十八条の九十二第一項に規定する連結法人に係る特定外国子会社等又は当該連結法人に係る外国関係会社につき同項各号に掲げる事実が生じた日を含む当該連結法人の連結事業年度において同項の規定により当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入された同項に規定する個別課税済留保金額（同条第二項及び第三項の規定により当該個別課税済留保金額とみなされたものを含む。）がある場合において、その損金の額に算入された当該個別課税済留保金額のうちに法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているとき、又は法第六十六条の七第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第六十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているときは、当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額又は当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額は、当該連結事業年度終了の日において減額されたものとみなす。この場合において、同法第八十一条の十五第十項中「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び租税特別措置法第六十八条の九十一第一項（連結法人における特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「減額された場合（」とあるのは「減額された場合（租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の百十八第十二項（特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国法人税額の計算等）の規定により減額されたものとみなされた場合又は」と、「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び同法第六十六条の七第一項（内国法人における特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「同条第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第六十九条第一項から第三項まで」として、同項の規定を適用する。例文帳に追加

(12) In the case where there is any individually taxed amount of retained income prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act (including the amount deemed to be the individually taxed amount of retained income pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the said Article) that was included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of consolidated income for the relevant consolidated business year of a consolidated corporation prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act, pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, in the consolidated business year of the consolidated corporation including the day on which any of the events listed in the items of the said paragraph occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, or an affiliated foreign company related to the said consolidated corporation, when the said individually taxed amount of retained income included in deductible expenses includes the amount of foreign corporation tax on the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, and which consists of individually taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 81-15(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, or that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, and which consists of taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 69(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said individually taxable retained income or the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said taxable retained income shall be deemed to have been reduced on the final day of the relevant consolidated business year. In this case, the provisions of Article 81-15(10) of the said Act shall apply by replacing the terms in the said paragraph as follows: the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 68-91(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Consolidated Corporations) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" the term "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (in the case where the reduction is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 39-118(12) (Calculation, etc. of Foreign Corporation Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, or;" the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article, and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 66-7(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Domestic Corporations) of the said Act, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" and the term "paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 69(1) to (3)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

三　消滅相互会社又は吸収合併存続相互会社にあっては、第百六十五条の十七第二項第三号（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）の期間内に異議を述べた保険契約者の数が第百六十五条の十七第四項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）において準用する第八十八条第六項（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合（以下この号において単に「第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の保険契約者の総数の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面又はその者の第百六十五条の十七第四項において準用する第八十八条第六項の内閣府令で定める金額が第百六十五条の十七第四項において準用する第八十八条第六項の金額の総額の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面例文帳に追加

(iii) For an extinct Mutual Company or Absorbing Mutual Company, a document certifying that the number of the Policyholders who raised their objections within the period set forth in Article 165-17, paragraph (2), item (iii) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20) has not exceeded one fifth of the total number of Policyholders set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) (including the cases where it is applied with relevant changes in interpretation pursuant to the provision of Article 255, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as "The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2)"in this item); hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth of such total number), or a document certifying that the amount of credits specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) as belonging to such Policyholders has not exceeded one fifth (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth) of the total amount set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許若しくは特許出願の主題である発明が出願日前又は優先権が主張された場合は当該出願の優先日前に，政府の何れかの大臣により適法に書類に記録され，又は当該大臣により若しくはその代理で審理された場合(当該発明が関連する特許出願人又は特許所有者により直接又は間接に連絡されていなかった場合)は，政府の何れかの大臣又は当該大臣が書面で授権した幹部職員，一般職員若しくは代理人は，記録され又は審理された当該発明については，当該出願又は特許の存在に拘らず，当該特許出願人又は当該特許所有者に対しロイヤルティ若しくはその他の支払なしにアイルランドの国の事業のために，これを使用することができる。また，当該大臣の意見により，当該出願人若しくは場合に応じて特許所有者に対し当該発明を記録した書類又は当該発明についての審理の証拠を開示することが公共の利益を害する筈のときは，当該開示については，当該出願人若しくは特許所有者の代理で又は相互に合意する独立の専門家に秘密裡にこれを諮問することができる。例文帳に追加

Where an invention which is the subject of any patent or application for a patent has, before the date of filing, or, where priority is claimed, the priority date of the application, been duly recorded in a document by, or been tried by or on behalf of any Minister of the Government (such invention not having been communicated directly or indirectly by the applicant for or the proprietor of the relevant patent), any Minister of the Government or such of his officers, servants or agents as may be authorized in writing by him, may use the invention so recorded or tried for the service of the State free of any royalty or other payment to the applicant for or the proprietor of the patent, notwithstanding the existence of the application or patent, and, if in the opinion of such Minister the disclosure to the applicant or the proprietor, as the case may be, of the document recording the invention or the evidence of the trial thereof would be detrimental to the public interest, such disclosure may be made confidentially to counsel on behalf of such applicant or proprietor or to any independent expert mutually agreed upon.  - 特許庁

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十九条　附則第三条の規定により新法第三条第五項の損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる旧法の免許を受けた保険会社及び附則第七十二条の規定により新法第百八十五条第五項の外国損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる附則第二条の規定による廃止前の外国保険事業者に関する法律（以下「旧外国保険事業者法」という。）第二条第一項に規定する外国保険事業者（以下この条において「旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等」という。）がこの法律の施行の際現に他の旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等と行っている旧法第十二条ノ三各号（旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる協定、契約その他の共同行為（以下この条において「共同行為」という。）については、当該共同行為に係るすべての旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等が施行日から起算して三月以内に大蔵省令で定めるところにより大蔵大臣に届出をした場合に限り、施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間は、旧法第十二条ノ三から第十二条ノ七まで（旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）は、なおその効力を有する。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) With regard to those Agreements, contracts and other concerted activities (hereinafter referred to as "Concerted Activities" in this Article) listed in the items of Article 12-3 of the Former Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Act on Foreign Insurance Business Operators to be repealed under Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act")) which have been entered into by the time when this Act enters into force by those Insurance Companies Licensed under the Former Act which shall be deemed to have obtained the non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions and those foreign insurance business operators prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Operators Act (hereinafter referred to as "Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act" in this Article) which shall be deemed to have obtained the foreign non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 185, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 72 of the Supplementary Provisions, with other Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act, the provisions of Article 12-3 to 12-7 inclusive of the Former Act (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act) (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall remain in force for a period of two years counting from the Effective Date, provided that all of the Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act involved in the Concerted Activities have notified the Minister of Finance pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance within three months from the Effective Date.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ものづくり基盤技術は、我が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を支えることにより、生産の拡大、貿易の振興、新産業の創出、雇用の増大等国民経済のあらゆる領域にわたりその発展に寄与するとともに、国民生活の向上に貢献してきた。また、ものづくり基盤技術に係る業務に従事する労働者は、このようなものづくり基盤技術の担い手として、その水準の維持及び向上のために重要な役割を果たしてきた。我らは、このようなものづくり基盤技術及びこれに係る業務に従事する労働者の果たす経済的社会的役割が、国の存立基盤を形成する重要な要素として、今後においても変わることのないことを確信する。しかるに、近時、就業構造の変化、海外の地域における工業化の進展等による競争条件の変化その他の経済の多様かつ構造的な変化による影響を受け、国内総生産に占める製造業の割合が低下し、その衰退が懸念されるとともに、ものづくり基盤技術の継承が困難になりつつある。このような事態に対処して、我が国の国民経済が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を通じて今後とも健全に発展していくためには、ものづくり基盤技術に関する能力を尊重する社会的気運を醸成しつつ、ものづくり基盤技術の積極的な振興を図ることが不可欠である。ここに、ものづくり基盤技術の振興に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進するため、この法律を制定する。例文帳に追加

By way of supporting the development of the manufacturing industry, which is Japan's fundamental industry, core manufacturing technology has contributed to the development of all areas of the national economy such as expansion of production, promotion of trade, creation of new industries, and increase in employment, and has contributed to improving the lives of the citizenry. In addition, workers engaged in operations pertaining to core manufacturing technology have played an important role in maintaining and improving the level of the technology in their capacity as supporters of such core manufacturing technology. We believe that the economic and social role of such core manufacturing technology and workers who engage in operations pertaining thereto will continue to be an important element in the foundation of the existence of the State in the future. Recently, however, due to changes in the employment structure, changes in competitive conditions resulting from factors like the progress of industrialization overseas, and other diverse and structural changes in the economy, the share of the manufacturing industry in Japan's gross domestic product has fallen, and concerns about a decline in the industry have grown, and the smooth succession of core manufacturing technology is becoming difficult. In order to deal with such a situation and to maintain the sound development of Japan's national economy through the development of the manufacturing industry, which is a fundamental to the State, that the active promotion of core manufacturing technology is indispensable, while a social tendency to respect abilities related to core manufacturing technology is enhanced. We hereby establish this Act so as to drive forward measures for the promotion of core manufacturing technology in a comprehensive and organized manner.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。例文帳に追加

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects.  - 金融庁

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。例文帳に追加

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion.  - 金融庁