「Be there」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(362ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 68 (1) With regard to an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is a Secondary Insured Person that can receive an insurance benefit, in a case when said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., has an obligatory insurance premium pursuant to the provisions of the Medical Insurance Acts (including national health insurance tax pursuant to the provisions of the Local Tax Act (Act No. 226 of 1950)) or when there is a remaining premium installments that was not paid by the deadline for payment (herein referred to as "Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc." in this paragraph and the following paragraph), except for a case said Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc., is due to a disaster or other special circumstance as determined by a Cabinet Order, a Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, may request said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to submit the Certificate of Insured Person and to enter on said Certificate of Insured Person that the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply and that the whole or a part of the payment of an insurance benefit shall be suspended (herein referred to as "Entry of Suspension of Insurance Benefit" in this Article). 例文帳に追加

第六十八条　市町村は、保険給付を受けることができる第二号被保険者である要介護被保険者等について、医療保険各法の定めるところにより当該要介護被保険者等が納付義務又は払込義務を負う保険料（地方税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百二十六号）の規定による国民健康保険税を含む。）又は掛金であってその納期限又は払込期限までに納付しなかったもの（以下この項及び次項において「未納医療保険料等」という。）がある場合においては、未納医療保険料等があることにつき災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認める場合を除き、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等に対し被保険者証の提出を求め、当該被保険者証に、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定を適用しない旨並びに保険給付の全部又は一部の支払を差し止める旨の記載（以下この条において「保険給付差止の記載」という。）をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case of paragraph (1) (limited to the cases where any fact specified in Article 178(1), item (iii) to (v) inclusive has been found), if there is a final and binding court decision on the same case which orders a Respondent confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), or collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1), the Prime Minister shall, in lieu of the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1), or Article 175(1) or (2), issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount obtained by deducting the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision or the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision (in cases where confiscation of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) and collection of equivalent value of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) were ordered pursuant to said court decision, the sum of the amount equivalent to the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which confiscation was ordered pursuant to said court decision and the amount equivalent to the values of the properties listed in each item of Article 198-2(1) for which collection of equivalent value was ordered pursuant to said court decision; hereinafter referred to as the "Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc." in this paragraph), from the amount to be paid pursuant to paragraph (1); provided, however, that if the amount set forth in Article 173(1), Article 174(1) or Article 175(1) or (2) does not exceed the Amount Equivalent to Confiscated Properties, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under such provisions. 例文帳に追加

５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の場合（第百七十八条第一項第三号から第五号までに掲げる事実のいずれかがあると認める場合に限る。）において、同一事件について、被審人に対し、第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産の没収又は同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴の確定裁判があるときは、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額に代えて、当該額から当該裁判において没収を命じられた第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額又は当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額（当該裁判において同項各号に掲げる財産の没収及び同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴が命じられたときは、当該裁判において没収を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産に相当する額及び当該裁判において追徴を命じられた同項各号に掲げる財産の価額に相当する額の合計額。以下この項において「没収等相当額」という。）を控除した額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項又は第百七十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による額が、没収等相当額を超えないときは、これらの規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 131 With regard to airworthiness, noise level, engine emissions and aircrew qualification for the following aircraft, any certification, license, or other act, as well as any qualification certificate or other document thereof made by any foreign state to which the nationality of the said aircraft belongs (including any contracting state in cases where there is an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation between the said foreign state and any contracting state in which the owner of the said aircraft has the address), shall be regarded as aircraft registration certificate under Article 6, airworthiness certification under Article 10 paragraph (1), airworthiness certificate under paragraph (7) of the same article, competence certification under Article 22, competence certificate under Article 23, aviation medical certification under Article 31 paragraph (1), and aviation medical certificate under paragraph (2) of the same article, aviation English proficiency certification under Article 33 paragraph (1), or instrument flight certification under Article 34 paragraph (1), pursuant to the provision of Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, with regard to application of the provisions of Article 11 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 28 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 33 paragraph (1), Article 34 paragraph (1), Article 59, Articles 65 through 67, Article 92 paragraph (1), Article 134 paragraph (1), Article 143, or Article 150. 例文帳に追加

第百三十一条　次に掲げる航空機の耐空性、騒音及び発動機の排出物並びに航空機乗組員の資格について当該航空機が国籍を有する外国（当該外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する締約国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該締約国を含む。）が行つた証明、免許その他の行為及びこれらに係る資格証書その他の文書は、第十一条第一項若しくは第二項、第二十八条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十三条第一項、第三十四条第一項、第五十九条、第六十五条から第六十七条まで、第九十二条第一項、第百三十四条第一項、第百四十三条又は第百五十条の規定の適用については、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、第六条の航空機登録証明書、第十条第一項の規定による耐空証明、同条第七項の耐空証明書、第二十二条の規定による技能証明、第二十三条の技能証明書、第三十一条第一項の規定による航空身体検査証明、同条第二項の航空身体検査証明書、第三十三条第一項の規定による航空英語能力証明又は第三十四条第一項の規定による計器飛行証明とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) Where a single corporation or two or more corporations intervene(s) between a corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of a specially-related domestic corporation (excluding a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. set forth in the preceding item falling under the case listed in the said item and a corporation falling under the category of a specially-related shareholder, etc.) and a specially-related shareholder, etc. and has(have) a linkage with them through holding the shares, etc. (where the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. is a domestic corporation and the said intervening corporation(s) is a (are all) domestic corporation(s), excluding the said domestic corporation(s) and a corporation falling under the category of a specially-related shareholder, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "capital contribution-related corporation(s)" in this item) (limited to the case where 80 percent or more of the number or the amount of the issued shares, etc. of each of a capital contribution-related corporation(s) and the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. are held by a specially-related shareholder, etc. or a capital contribution-related corporation(s) (such specially-related shareholder, etc. or capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) shall be limited to those 80 percent or more of the number or the amount of whose issued shares, etc. are held by a specially-related shareholder, etc. or other capital contribution-related corporation(s))): The ratio of the number or the amount of the shares, etc. of the specially-related domestic corporation held by the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. out of the total issued shares, etc. of the said specially-related domestic corporation (where there are two or more such corporations which are shareholders, etc., the sum of the ratios calculated for each of them). 例文帳に追加

二　特殊関係内国法人の株主等である法人（前号に掲げる場合に該当する同号の株主等である外国法人及び特殊関係株主等に該当する法人を除く。）と特殊関係株主等との間にこれらの者と株式等の所有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の法人（当該株主等である法人が内国法人であり、かつ、当該一又は二以上の法人のすべてが内国法人である場合の当該一又は二以上の内国法人及び特殊関係株主等に該当する法人を除く。以下この号において「出資関連法人」という。）が介在している場合（出資関連法人及び当該株主等である法人がそれぞれその発行済株式等の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等を特殊関係株主等又は出資関連法人（その発行済株式等の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等が特殊関係株主等又は他の出資関連法人によつて所有されているものに限る。）によつて所有されている場合に限る。）　当該株主等である法人の有する特殊関係内国法人の株式等の数又は金額が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式等のうちに占める割合（当該株主等である法人が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の株主等である法人につきそれぞれ計算した割合の合計割合） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) Where a single foreign corporation or two or more foreign corporations intervene(s) between a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of the said other foreign corporation (excluding a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. set forth in the preceding item falling under the case listed in the said item) and a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the preceding paragraph and has(have) a linkage with them through holding the shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a "capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s)" in this item) (limited to the case where over 50 percent of the number or the amount of the issued shares, etc. of each of a capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) and the said foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. are held by a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the said paragraph or a capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) (such foreign corporation or capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) shall be limited to those over 50 percent of the number or the amount of whose issued shares, etc. are held by a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the said paragraph or other capital contribution-related corporation(s))): The ratio of the number or the amount of the shares, etc. of the said other foreign corporation held by the said foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. out of the total issued shares, etc. of the said other foreign corporation (where there are two or more such foreign corporations which are shareholders, etc., the sum of the ratios calculated for each of them). 例文帳に追加

二　当該他の外国法人の株主等である外国法人（前号に掲げる場合に該当する同号の株主等である外国法人を除く。）と前項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人との間にこれらの者と株式等の所有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の外国法人（以下この号において「出資関連外国法人」という。）が介在している場合（出資関連外国法人及び当該株主等である外国法人がそれぞれその発行済株式等の百分の五十を超える数又は金額の株式等を同項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人又は出資関連外国法人（その発行済株式等の百分の五十を超える数又は金額の株式等が同項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人又は他の出資関連外国法人によつて所有されているものに限る。）によつて所有されている場合に限る。）　当該株主等である外国法人の有する当該他の外国法人の株式等の数又は金額が当該他の外国法人の発行済株式等のうちに占める割合（当該株主等である外国法人が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の株主等である外国法人につきそれぞれ計算した割合の合計割合） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Furthermore, in the inspection and supervision of financial institutions, we take action in a stringent manner as necessary based on the confirmed facts pursuant to laws and regulations if violations of laws and regulations or problems in user protection are found as a result of on-site inspections, day-to-day supervision and other such activities. Likewise, we have endeavored to inspect and supervise the Incubator Bank of Japan in a stringent manner. The FSA had to properly conduct the first inspection and, in particular, the second inspection, according to law as an executive branch of government. Unless there is an obvious violation of law, an executive branch of government cannot take any arbitrary action. The third inspection, however, clearly revealed a violation of law as you know—what I am trying to tell you is that our action must be based on laws and facts. That is how an executive branch of government works. In that sense, although I can see at the emotional level why we are being criticized for not taking action earlier from the start, I believe as the head of an executive branch of government that regulation and supervision involves giving guidance based on objective facts in accordance with law, and should have as little room as possible for demands based on likelihood and arbitrariness. I believe this is an important quality for a person in charge of regulation and supervision based on laws and facts. Nevertheless, given that the Bank consequently failed, the FSA shall learn a lesson from this and continue to endeavor to stabilize the financial system. 例文帳に追加

また、金融機関の検査・監督に当たっては、立ち入り検査や日常の監督等により、法令違反や利用者保護上の問題が判明した場合に確認された事実と法令に基づいて、必要に応じて厳正な対処を行っておりまして、日本振興銀行についても同様な厳正な検査・監督の実施に努めてきたわけでございますが、当庁としては1回目、特に2回目の検査、これは非常に行政でございますから、やっぱり法律に基づいてきちっと適正にやっていかなければならないと。明確な法律違反のことがない限り、行政というのは恣意的なことはできないわけですよ。しかし、３回目の時はもうご存じのように、明確な法律違反のことがございますから、法律に基づいて、それからやっぱり法律と事実に基づいてやっていかなければいけないというのは、行政というのはそういうものですから、そういった意味で、何で最初から早くやらなかったのかというおしかりをいただくというのも、気持ちとしてはよく分かりますけれども、私は行政というものは、きちっと法に基づいて、客観的な事実に基づいて、きちっと指導をしていくもので、見込みだとか、恣意的な要請というのはできるだけあってはならないというふうに、私は行政（機関）の長としては思っております。それが法によって、法と事実によってきちっと行政をあずかる者の一つの大事な点だと、こう思っておりますが、そういった意味で、しかし結果としては破綻をしたわけでございますから、当庁としては、今回の教訓を生かして、引き続き金融システムの安定化に努めていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁

The owner of a national trade mark the application of which was filed in good faith before or which has a right of priority dated before the accession to the European Union, has the right to prohibit the use of the Community trade mark the effects of which have been extended to the territory of the Czech Republic based on the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union, if the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark and the goods and services covered by both trademarks are identical, or there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public because of the identity or similarity of the national trade mark and the Community trade mark and because of the identity or similarity of goods or services covered by the trademarks; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the national trade mark, or the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark or it is similar to the national trade mark, where the goods or services covered those trademarks are not identical or similar, if the national trade mark has a good reputation in the Czech Republic and if use of the Community trade mark would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the good reputation of the national trade mark. 例文帳に追加

チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入前に誠実に登録出願がなされた又はかかる加入前の日付の優先権を有する国内登録商標の所有者は，次の何れかの事由が存在する場合，チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入に基づき効力がチェコ共和国に拡張された共同体商標の使用を禁止する権利を有する。共同体商標が当該国内登録商標と同一であると共に，両商標が対象とする商品及びサービスが同一であること，当該の共同体商標と国内登録商標が同一若しくは類似しておりかつその両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスも同一若しくは類似していることによって公衆を誤認させる虞があること。かかる誤認の虞には，国内商標との関連性の虞を含む。共同体商標が当該国内商標と同一若しくは類似しているが両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスは同一でもなくまた類似もしていない場合において，当該国内商標がチェコ共和国内で定評を得ており当該共同体商標のチェコ共和国での使用がかかる国内商標の識別性若しくは評判を不当に利用するか又はこれを傷付けると認められること。 - 特許庁

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省

Article 40-10 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that accounts for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income referred to in the next Article as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the income of the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year: 例文帳に追加

第四十条の十　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分の当該居住者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 66-9-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の九の六　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-93-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a special relationship (meaning a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares or capital contributions that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "issued shares, etc."), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than a tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, etc. (meaning dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act) (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim prescribed in Article 66-9-6(1) vested in such shares or capital contributions (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "individually taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its consolidated income for the consolidated business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の九十三の六　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に特定関係（当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式又は出資を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係をいう。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び剰余金の配当等（法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配をいう。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式又は出資の第六十六条の九の六第一項に規定する請求権の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「個別課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該連結法人の各連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 64 (1) When the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare intends to specify cases having no risk to human health prescribed in the proviso of Article 6, item (ii) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis under Article 62, paragraphs (1) and (2)), intends to prohibit the sales under Article 7, paragraphs (1) to (3) or rescind the prohibition in whole or in part under paragraph (4) of the same Article, intends to establish, revise, or abolish the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 9, paragraph (1), intends to specify cases having no risk to human health prescribed in Article 10, intends to establish the criteria or standards pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis under Article 62, paragraphs (1) and (2)), intends to specify substances clearly having no risk to human health or the quantity of the substances having no risk to human health prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (3), intends to establish the criteria or standards pursuant to the provisions of Article 18, paragraph (1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis under Article 62, paragraphs (1) and (3)), intends to establish the criteria pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis under Article 62, paragraph (1)), intends to establish or revise the guidelines pursuant to the provisions of Article 22, paragraph (1), intends to establish or revise the imported food monitoring and guidance plan prescribed in Article 23, paragraph (1), or intends to establish the criteria pursuant to the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (1), he/she shall publicize the purpose, contents, and other necessary matters to canvass widely for citizens' opinions; provided, however, that this shall not apply when it is urgent for food sanitation hazards to be prevented and that there is no time canvass widely for citizens' opinions in advance. 例文帳に追加

第六十四条　厚生労働大臣は、第六条第二号ただし書（第六十二条第一項及び第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する人の健康を損なうおそれがない場合を定めようとするとき、第七条第一項から第三項までの規定による販売の禁止をしようとし、若しくは同条第四項の規定による禁止の全部若しくは一部の解除をしようとするとき、第九条第一項の厚生労働省令を制定し、若しくは改廃しようとするとき、第十条に規定する人の健康を損なうおそれのない場合を定めようとするとき、第十一条第一項（第六十二条第一項及び第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により基準若しくは規格を定めようとするとき、第十一条第三項に規定する人の健康を損なうおそれのないことが明らかである物質若しくは人の健康を損なうおそれのない量を定めようとするとき、第十八条第一項（第六十二条第一項及び第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により基準若しくは規格を定めようとするとき、第十九条第一項（第六十二条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により基準を定めようとするとき、第二十二条第一項に規定する指針を定め、若しくは変更しようとするとき、第二十三条第一項に規定する輸入食品監視指導計画を定め、若しくは変更しようとするとき、又は第五十条第一項の規定により基準を定めようとするときは、その趣旨、内容その他の必要な事項を公表し、広く国民の意見を求めるものとする。ただし、食品衛生上の危害の発生を防止するため緊急を要する場合で、あらかじめ広く国民の意見を求めるいとまがないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 167 (1) A person listed in any of the following items (hereinafter referred to as a "Person Concerned with Tender Offeror, etc." in this Article) who comes to know a Fact Concerning Launch of a Tender Offer, etc. (as defined below) by a person who intends to launch a Tender Offer under Article 27-2(1) (limited to cases where the main clause of said provision applies) or an act specified as equivalent thereto by a Cabinet Order or intends to launch a Tender Offer under Article 27-22-2(1) (hereinafter there are referred to as "Tender Offer, etc." in this Article) for Share Certificates, etc. provided in Article 27-2(1) that are listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or fall under the category of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities or Tradable Securities (hereinafter referred to as "Listed or Other Share Certificates, etc." in this Article) (such a person is hereinafter referred to as "Tender Offeror, etc." in this Article) or a Fact Concerning Suspension of Tender Offer, etc. by such Tender Offeror, etc. in a manner as prescribed in the respective items shall not make Purchase, etc. (meaning purchase of Regulated Share Certificates, etc. as defined below and Related Share Certificates, etc. as defined below (hereinafter referred to as "Share Certificates, etc." in this Article) and other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of Listed or Other Share Certificates, etc. pertaining to the Tender Offer, etc. or share certificates or bonds with share option issued by a company issuing such Listed or Other Share Certificates, etc. or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "Regulated Share Certificates, etc." in this Article) or Securities specified in Article 2(1)(xix) that indicate Options pertaining to Regulated Share Certificates, etc. or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "Related Share Certificates, etc." in this paragraph) in cases where he/she comes to know a Fact Concerning Launch of a Tender Offer, etc., and shall not make Sales, etc. (meaning sales of Share Certificates, etc. and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of Share Certificates, etc. pertaining to the Tender Offer, etc., in cases where he/she comes to know a Fact Concerning Suspension of a Tender Offer, etc., before the Fact Concerning Launch of a Tender Offer, etc. or the Fact Concerning Suspension of a Tender Offer, etc. is Publicized. The same shall apply for one year to a Person Concerned with Tender Offeror, etc. who comes to know a Fact Concerning Launch of a Tender Offer, etc. or a Fact Concerning Suspension of a Tender Offer, etc. in a manner as prescribed in any of the following items even after he/she ceased to be a Person Concerned with Tender Offeror, etc. listed in the items: 例文帳に追加

第百六十七条　次の各号に掲げる者（以下この条において「公開買付者等関係者」という。）であつて、第二十七条の二第一項に規定する株券等で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの、店頭売買有価証券若しくは取扱有価証券に該当するもの（以下この条において「上場等株券等」という。）の同項に規定する公開買付け（同項本文の規定の適用を受ける場合に限る。）若しくはこれに準ずる行為として政令で定めるもの又は上場株券等の第二十七条の二十二の二第一項に規定する公開買付け（以下この条において「公開買付け等」という。）をする者（以下この条において「公開買付者等」という。）の公開買付け等の実施に関する事実又は公開買付け等の中止に関する事実を当該各号に定めるところにより知つたものは、当該公開買付け等の実施に関する事実又は公開買付け等の中止に関する事実の公表がされた後でなければ、公開買付け等の実施に関する事実に係る場合にあつては当該公開買付け等に係る上場等株券等又は上場株券等の発行者である会社の発行する株券若しくは新株予約権付社債券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この条において「特定株券等」という。）又は当該特定株券等に係るオプションを表示する第二条第一項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「関連株券等」という。）に係る買付け等（特定株券等又は関連株券等（以下この条において「株券等」という。）の買付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）をしてはならず、公開買付け等の中止に関する事実に係る場合にあつては当該公開買付け等に係る株券等に係る売付け等（株券等の売付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）をしてはならない。当該公開買付け等の実施に関する事実又は公開買付け等の中止に関する事実を次の各号に定めるところにより知つた公開買付者等関係者であつて、当該各号に掲げる公開買付者等関係者でなくなつた後一年以内のものについても、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 69 (1) In a case when a Municipality issues a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care, a Renewal of Certification of Care Need, or Certification of Change of Condition of Need for Long-Term Care pursuant to the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (7) or Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 29, paragraph (2), a Certification of Needed Support, a Renewal of Certification of Needed Support, or a Certification of Change of Category of Needed Support Condition pursuant to the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (6) or Article 33-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33-2, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to simply as "Certification" in this paragraph) and there is a period when the right to collect an insurance premium has extinguished (which means a period calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order regarding the period when the right to collect an insurance premium pertaining to said period has been extinguished due to a legal proscription) with regard to an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is the Primary Insured Person pertaining to said Certification, a Municipality pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare shall enter on the Certificate of Insured Person of said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., in addition to the entry pursuant to the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (7), second sentence (including a case applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 28, paragraph (4) and Article 29, paragraph (2)), Article 30, paragraph (1), second sentence, Article 35, paragraph (4), second sentence, Article 32, paragraph (6), second sentence (including a case applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph (4) or Article 33-2, paragraph (2)), Article 33-3, paragraph (1), second sentence, Article 35, paragraph (2), second sentence, or paragraph (6) second sentence as pertaining to said Certification, that the amount of Long-Term Care Benefit, etc., (except for payment of an Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, Exceptional Allowance for an In-Home Long-Term Care Service Plan, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan, Exceptional Allowance for a Preventive Service Plan of Long-term care, Allowance for High-Cost Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for High-Cost Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, and Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Preventive Service of a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility) shall be reduced and that the Allowance for High-Cost Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for High-Cost Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility, and Exceptional Allowance for Long-Term Care Preventive Service of a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility shall not be paid, and the period that these measures are applicable (which means a period that a Municipality determines pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order according to the period during which the right to collect an insurance premium is extinguished; herein referred to as "Benefit Reduction Period" in this Article) (hereinafter said entry is referred to as "Entry of Benefit Reduction Amount, etc." in this Article), however, provided that this provision shall not apply to a case when it is determined that said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., suffers due to a disaster or other special circumstance provided by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十九条　市町村は、要介護認定、要介護更新認定、第二十九条第二項において準用する第二十七条第七項若しくは第三十条第一項の規定による要介護状態区分の変更の認定、要支援認定、要支援更新認定、第三十三条の二第二項において準用する第三十二条第六項若しくは第三十三条の三第一項の規定による要支援状態区分の変更の認定（以下この項において単に「認定」という。）をした場合において、当該認定に係る第一号被保険者である要介護被保険者等について保険料徴収権消滅期間（当該期間に係る保険料を徴収する権利が時効によって消滅している期間につき政令で定めるところにより算定された期間をいう。以下この項において同じ。）があるときは、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等の被保険者証に、当該認定に係る第二十七条第七項後段（第二十八条第四項及び第二十九条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十条第一項後段若しくは第三十五条第四項後段又は第三十二条第六項後段（第三十三条第四項及び第三十三条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十三条の三第一項後段若しくは第三十五条第二項後段若しくは第六項後段の規定による記載に併せて、介護給付等（居宅介護サービス計画費の支給、特例居宅介護サービス計画費の支給、介護予防サービス計画費の支給及び特例介護予防サービス計画費の支給、高額介護サービス費の支給及び高額介護予防サービス費の支給並びに特定入所者介護サービス費の支給、特例特定入所者介護サービス費の支給、特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給及び特例特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給を除く。）の額の減額を行う旨並びに高額介護サービス費及び高額介護予防サービス費並びに特定入所者介護サービス費、特例特定入所者介護サービス費、特定入所者介護予防サービス費及び特例特定入所者介護予防サービス費の支給を行わない旨並びにこれらの措置がとられる期間（市町村が、政令で定めるところにより、保険料徴収権消滅期間に応じて定める期間をいう。以下この条において「給付額減額期間」という。）の記載（以下この条において「給付額減額等の記載」という。）をするものとする。ただし、当該要介護被保険者等について、災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認めるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8. For the purposes of this Article: a) the term “principal class of shares” means the class or classes of shares of a company which in the aggregate represent a majority of the voting power of the company; b) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts of shares or trust certificates of shares; c) the term “recognised stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established by a Financial Instruments Exchange or an approved-type financial instruments firms association under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) any regulated market established in the Netherlands subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) under a license as meant in paragraph 1 of Article 5:26 of the Act on Financial Supervision (or its successor) of the Netherlands; (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mexico, Milan, New York, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Toronto and Vienna and the NASDAQ System; and (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities of the Contracting States agree to recognise for the purposes of this Article; d) the term “equivalent beneficiary” means: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information; (bb) that resident is a qualified person under the limitation on benefits provisions in that convention or, when there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2; and (cc) with respect to an item of income referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12, 13 or 20 that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of paragraph 2; e) the term “associated enterprises” means enterprises which have a relationship with each other as described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; and f) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by an enterprise from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues.例文帳に追加

８この条の規定の適用上、(a)「主たる種類の株式」とは、合計して法人の議決権の過半数を占める一又は二以上の種類の株式をいう。(b)「株式」には、株式の預託証券又は株式の信託受益証券を含む。(c)「公認の有価証券市場」とは、次のものをいう。(i)日本国の金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）に基づき設立された金融商品取引所又は認可金融商品取引業協会により設立された有価証券市場(ii)オランダの金融監督に関する法律第五条の二十六１（又は同法を承継する法律の関連規定）に規定する許可に基づき金融市場庁（又は同庁を承継する当局）による規制に従ってオランダにおいて設立された有価証券市場(iii)アイルランド証券取引所、ロンドン証券取引所、スイス証券取引所、ブリュッセル証券取引所、デュッセルドルフ証券取引所、フランクフルト証券取引所、ハンブルク証券取引所、香港証券取引所、ヨハネスブルク証券取引所、リスボン証券取引所、ルクセンブルク証券取引所、マドリード証券取引所、メキシコ証券取引所、ミラノ証券取引所、ニューヨーク証券取引所、パリ証券取引所、ソウル証券取引所、シンガポール証券取引所、ストックホルム証券取引所、シドニー証券取引所、トロント証券取引所、ウィーン証券取引所及びナスダック市場(iv)この条の規定の適用上、両締約国の権限のある当局が公認の有価証券市場として合意するその他の有価証券市場(d)「同等受益者」とは、次の(i)又は(ii)に規定するいずれかの者をいう。(i)この条約の特典が要求される締約国との間に租税に関する二重課税の回避及び脱税の防止のための条約（以下この条において「租税条約」という。）を有している国の居住者であって、次の(aa)から(cc)までに掲げる要件を満たすもの(aa)租税条約が実効的な情報の交換に関する規定を有すること。(bb)当該居住者が、租税条約における特典の制限に関する規定に基づき適格者に該当すること又は租税条約に当該規定がない場合には、租税条約に２の規定に相当する規定が含まれているとしたならば、当該居住者がその規定により適格者に該当するであろうとみられること。(cc)第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得に関し、当該居住者が、この条約の特典が要求されるこれらの規定に定める所得について租税条約の適用を受けたとしたならば、この条約に規定する税率以下の税率の適用を受けるであろうとみられること。(ii)２(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者(e)「関連企業」とは、第九条１(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有する企業をいう。(f)「総所得」とは、企業がその事業から取得する総収入の額から当該収入を得るために直接に要した費用の額を差し引いた残額をいう。 - 財務省

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 132, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of certifications issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document containing the reasons for and contents of entity conversion; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a foreign national: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) to (k) of the Act; (b) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document containing the history thereof, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (l) of the Act; (c) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after - 80 - Entity Conversion is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, a certificate of a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) or (b) of the Act, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) to (k) of the same item; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of the members which approved the entity conversion plan; (iv) Settlement Related Documents, etc. for the most recent business year; (v) a document proving the amount of the existing net assets; (vi) when issuing Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, paragraph 1 of the Act, the following documents: (a) a document proving an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion; (b) when making money the object of the contribution, a document stating that payment was made pursuant to the provisions of Article 131-3, paragraph 1 of the Act; (c) when making property other than money the object of the contribution, the following documents: 1. when an inspector has been appointed: a document containing the investigation report by said inspector and its annexed documents; 2. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 3 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document proving the market price of the Securities; 3. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 4 of the Company Act - 81 - as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document containing the certification prescribed in the same item and its annexed documents; 4. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 5 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: the account book stating the monetary claim set forth in the same item; (d) when there has been a court judgment on a report by an inspector: a transcript of said judgment; (vii) a document that states that a public notice or a notification under Article 124, paragraph 2 of the Act has been given; and when a creditor has made an objection, documents that state that the liabilities have been repaid or a reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor or reasonable property has been deposited in trust for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said entity conversion is not likely to harm said creditor;(viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) a document that contains major shareholders’ names, addresses or residences, nationalities and occupations (in the case where a shareholder is a juridical person or other organization, its trade name or name, the location of its head office or principal office, and the contents of its business), and the number of voting rights they hold. 例文帳に追加

法第百三十二条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明する 書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一組織変更の理由及び内容を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の 写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証 明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓 約する書面 ハ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の 住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しな い旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しない ことを誓約する書面 三組織変更計画を承認した会員総会の議事録 四直前事業年度の決算関係書類等 五現に存する純資産額を証する書面 六法第百二十九条第一項の規定により組織変更時発行株式を発行するときは、次に掲 げる書面 イ組織変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みを証する書面 ロ金銭を出資の目的とするときは、法第百三十一条の三第一項の規定による払込み があったことを証する書面 ハ金銭以外の財産を出資の目的とするときは、次に掲げる書面 （１） 検査役が選任されたときは、検査役の調査報告を記載した書面及びその附 属書類 （２） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第三号に掲 げる場合には、有価証券の市場価格を証する書面 （３） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第四号に掲 げる場合には、同号に規定する証明を記載した書面及びその附属書類 （４） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第五号に掲 げる場合には、同号の金銭債権について記載された会計帳簿 ニ検査役の報告に関する裁判があったときは、その謄本 七法第百二十四条第二項の規定による公告及び催告をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債 権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当 該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該組 織変更をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書類 九主要な株主の氏名、住所又は居所、国籍及び職業（株主が法人その他の団体である 場合には、その商号又は名称、本店又は主たる事務所の所在の場所及び営んでいる事 業の内容）並びに保有する議決権の数を記載した書面 - 経済産業省