「Funds」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(73ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(1) When a Member, etc. (limited to a Member, etc. who is a Clearing Participant in the case of completing settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, item 2 or 3; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) has caused damage to another Member, etc. or a Commodity Clearing Organization as a result of default of liabilities arising from Transactions on a Commodity Market, the damaged Member, etc. or Commodity Clearing Organization shall, with regard to the guarantee funds for the Commodity Market pertaining to said transactions and the clearing margin for said transactions (limited to that for transactions based on the Member, etc.'s own account) of the Member, etc. who has caused the damage, have the right to receive payment in preference over other creditors. 例文帳に追加

１ 会員等（第百五条第二号又は第三号に掲げる方法による決済を行う場合にあつては、清算参加者である会員等に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が商品市場における取引に基づく債務の不履行により他の会員等又は商品取引清算機関に損害を与えたときは、その損害を受けた会員等又は商品取引清算機関は、その損害を与えた会員等の当該取引に係る商品市場についての信認金及び当該取引についての取引証拠金（自己の計算による取引についてのものに限る。）について、他の債権者に先立つて弁済を受ける権利を有する。 - 経済産業省

(2) When a Commodity Exchange received approval pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, special clearing funds (limited to those deposited by a member who became a Clearing Participant of said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization as on the Effective Date, and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited with said Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, paragraph 3 of the Old Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing deposits deposited with said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization pursuant to the provisions of Article 180, paragraph 1 of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

２ 商品取引所が前項の規定による承認を受けたときは、この法律の施行の際現に旧法第八十一条第三項の規定により当該商品取引所に預託されている特別清算負担金（施行日において商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所の清算参加者となった会員が預託しているものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、新法第百八十条第一項の規定により商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所に預託されている清算預託金とみなす。 - 経済産業省

(7) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 295, paragraph 1 (limited to the part pertaining to item 1) in the case where a Consignor Protection Membership Corporation filed an application for registration under Article 293 of the New Act and an application for approval for succession from the Association of Compensation Funds simultaneously pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 3, "shall be" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be (with regard to an application for registration filed along with an application for approval pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, paragraph 3 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act for Partial Revision of the Commodity Exchange Act [Act No. 43 of 2004], calculation shall be done including assets and liabilities held by the Association of Compensation Fund pertaining to said application for approval, if the competent minister intends to grant said approval)." 例文帳に追加

７ 委託者保護会員制法人が第三項の規定により新法第二百九十三条の登録の申請及び補償基金協会からの承継の認可の申請を同時に行った場合における新法第二百九十五条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定の適用については、同号中「であること」とあるのは、「であること（商品取引所法の一部を改正する法律（平成十六年法律第四十三号）附則第十九条第三項の規定により認可の申請が併せてされた登録の申請にあつては、主務大臣が当該認可をしようとする場合には、当該認可の申請に係る補償基金協会の資産及び負債を含めて算定するものとする。）」とする。 - 経済産業省

(ii) Subscription for shares, share options (excluding those attached to bonds with share option), or Bonds with Share Options, etc. (meaning Bonds with Share Options, etc. as defined in Article 5, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Investment Business Corporation Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item and in the following paragraph), and the holding of the shares, the share options (including the shares issued or transferred through the exercise of the share options), or the Bonds with Share Options, etc. (including the shares issued or transferred through the exercise of the share options attached to the Bonds with Share Options, etc.) pertaining to such subscription, which have been issued by a stock company with stated capital exceeding 300,000,000 yen that is a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Operator being a Certified Research and Development Business Operator or a Supervisory Business Operator in order to raise the funds required for the purpose of engaging in Research and Development Business or Supervisory Business according to a Certified Research and Development Business Plan or a Certified Supervisory Business Plan. 例文帳に追加

二 認定研究開発事業者又は認定統括事業者である中小企業者のうち資本金の額が三億円を超える株式会社が認定研究開発事業計画又は認定統括事業計画に従って研究開発事業又は統括事業を行うために必要とする資金の調達を図るために発行する株式、新株予約権（新株予約権付社債に付されたものを除く。）又は新株予約権付社債等（中小企業投資育成株式会社法第五条第一項第二号に規定する新株予約権付社債等をいう。以下この号及び次項において同じ。）の引受け及び当該引受けに係る株式、新株予約権（その行使により発行され、又は移転された株式を含む。）又は新株予約権付社債等（新株予約権付社債等に付された新株予約権の行使により発行され、又は移転された株式を含む。）の保有 - 経済産業省

SMEs as well as large enterprises are finding it increasingly important to make use of intellectual property (IP), such as technological inventions and business know-how, to maintain and develop their businesses. However, as SMEs find it more difficult than large enterprises to secure sufficient knowledge, human resources, and funds to protect their IP, developing systematized support resources to help businesses overcome business challenges and protect their IP against infringements and as part of strategic overseas development have become important priorities. SMEs will therefore be furnished with wide-ranging support, including the establishment of a one-stop consultation service and subsidies to defray the cost of IP-related applications in other countries. 例文帳に追加

技術上の発明や営業上のノウハウ等の知的財産を活用することは、大企業のみならず中小企業においても、企業の維持・発展を図る上で、ますます重要となっている。しかしながら、中小企業は、大企業と比べて自らの知的財産を保護するための十分な知識や人材、資金を持つことが困難であるため、企業経営における課題に対し一貫して支援する体制の整備や、戦略的な海外展開、知的財産権侵害に対応するための知的財産保護等が重要な課題となっている。このため、中小企業に対し、ワンストップ相談窓口の設置や外国出願にかかる費用の助成を始めとする幅広い支援を実施する。 - 経済産業省

In the following sections, we examine the following methods of reducing the asymmetry of information in SME finance and facilitating the provision of funds to SMEs: (1) relationship banking to ease the asymmetry of information by collecting qualitative information ("soft information")10) through continuing long-term business relations; (2) use of credit scoring models to estimate the probability of bankruptcy by calculating the "quality of a borrower" statistically from population data; and (3) asset-based lending (lending backed by assets) by lending according to the value of assets, such as accounts receivable and inventories, regarding which there is no serious asymmetry of information, where asymmetry of information is less serious than it is in simply assessing borrowers themselves.例文帳に追加

次節以降では、この中小企業金融において存在する「情報の非対称性」を緩和し中小企業への円滑な資金調達が行われるための手法として、〔1〕長期の継続的な取引による定性情報（いわゆるソフトインフォメーション10）の収集により、情報の非対称性を緩和するリレーションシップレンディング、〔2〕借り手の質等を母集団となるデータから統計的に算出した倒産確率によって推定するクレジットスコアリングモデル、〔3〕借り手自体より、情報の非対称性の深刻でない売掛金、在庫といった資産の価値に基づいて融資を行う、アセットベーストレンディング（資産担保貸出）について検証していく11。 - 経済産業省

When hedging exchange risks, we generally employ derivative transactions, including forward exchange contract, currency swaps, and currency options. However, possible measures for Japanese companies to apply for reducing exchange risks include (i) introduction of common currency or a common currency basket system; (ii) internationalization of the yen; and (iii) introduction of a currency basket system for each country, as examined in Section 1 of Chapter III. As for (i) introduction of common currency or a common currency basket system, it is currently too early31 because of the presence of economic gaps within the region, limited synchronization with economic conditions, and the presence of constraints in transferring labor force and funds within the region. Regarding (ii), the internationalization of the yen is hardly underway in reality.例文帳に追加

一般的な為替リスクヘッジ手段としては、先物予約や、通貨スワップ、通貨オプションなどのデリバティブ取引があるが、そもそも我が国企業の域内の為替リスクを低減させる手段としては、第３章第１節で見た、①共通通貨・共通通貨バスケットの導入、②円の国際化、③各国毎の通貨バスケット導入、が考えられるが、まず①の共通通貨・共通通貨バスケットの導入については域内経済格差の存在、景気連動の同期性が少ないこと、域内の労働、資本の移動の制約の存在から現時点ではあまりに時期尚早31である。②の円の国際化については、現実的には円の国際化は進んでいるとは言い難い。 - 経済産業省

Reasons why the flow of capital to emerging countries such as countries in the Asian Pacific and Latin America has recovered favorably include:- Lower level of uncertainty about the future economic situation after more countries observed the global economy bottoming out due to unprecedented economic stimulus policies implemented by various countries. - Concerns about a liquidity crisis in the markets were dispelled as a result of a bold injection of funds to raise liquidity by central banks. - The difference in growth rates between developed countries and emerging countries since around spring 2009 has expanded. - Predictions have grown stronger that developed nations will continue to hold a low interest policy for the long term. Because of these reasons, investor‟s risk preferences have rebounded since spring 2009 and this is believed to be because of prompt investment in emerging countries.例文帳に追加

アジア・太平洋、中南米など新興国への資金流入が順調に回復したのは、―各国による前例のない景気刺激策によって世界経済の底入れ観測が拡がり、景気の先行きの不確実性が低下したこと、―中央銀行による大胆な流動性供給の結果、市場から「流動性危機」への不安が払拭されたこと、―2009年春頃から、先進国と新興国の成長率格差が拡大したこと、―先進国において低金利の長期化への予測が強まったこと、等の理由により、2009年春以降、投資家のリスク選好が回復し、新興国への投資が促されたため、と考えられている。 - 経済産業省

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 148 (1) A Municipality, in order to promote fiscal stabilization of Long-Term Care Insurance, with regard to financial resources for the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits pertaining to a Municipality that provides an ordinance based on Article 43, paragraph (3), Article 44, paragraph (6), Article 45, paragraph (6), Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 56, paragraph (6), Article 57, paragraph (6), shall be the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, as a Municipality may not undertake measures promulgated by said ordinance; the same shall apply in the following paragraph), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects, the disbursements necessary for payment of Fiscal Stability Funds contribution, and the expense necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project among those disbursements to be imposed by a special account concerning said Long-Term Care Insurance, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, in cooperation with other Municipalities based on an adjustment rate of insurance premiums, may conduct a project to provide adjustments mutually among Municipalities (hereinafter referred to as "Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project" in this Article and the following Article). 例文帳に追加

第百四十八条　市町村は、介護保険の財政の安定化を図るため、その介護保険に関する特別会計において負担する費用のうち介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用（第四十三条第三項、第四十四条第六項、第四十五条第六項、第五十五条第三項、第五十六条第六項又は第五十七条第六項の規定に基づき条例を定めている市町村に係る当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用については、当該条例による措置が講じられないものとして政令で定めるところにより算定した当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用とする。次項において同じ。）、地域支援事業に要する費用、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の財源について、政令で定めるところにより、他の市町村と共同して、調整保険料率に基づき、市町村相互間において調整する事業（以下この条及び次条において「市町村相互財政安定化事業」という。）を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 18-2 With regard to loans related to an equipment fund lending business prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Act on Equipment Installation Support for Small Enterprises (Act No. 115 of 1956) which is conducted by a lending institution prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (4) of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as a "lending institution" in this Article) by receiving loans pertaining to a business to lend equipment installation funds to small enterprises prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the same Act (hereinafter such lending business shall be referred to as an "equipment fund lending business" in this Article) and which pertains to facilities equipped or licenses for programs (meaning licenses for programs prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the same Act) acquired by a small enterprise, etc. prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the same Act, in accordance with the approved plan for establishing new business facilities or making a business innovation, the amount of loans related to an equipment fund lending business that can be lent to one borrower shall be within two-thirds of the amount that a lending institution finds to be necessary, per facility or license for one program, notwithstanding the provision of Article 4, paragraph (2) of the same Act. 例文帳に追加

第十八条の二　小規模企業者等設備導入資金助成法（昭和三十一年法律第百十五号）第三条第一項に規定する小規模企業者等設備導入資金貸付事業に係る貸付金の貸付けを受けて同法第二条第四項に規定する貸与機関（以下この条において「貸与機関」という。）が行う同法第二条第五項に規定する設備資金貸付事業（以下この条において「設備資金貸付事業」という。）に係る貸付金であって、承認企業立地計画又は承認事業高度化計画に従って同法第二条第一項に規定する小規模企業者等が設置する設備又は取得するプログラム使用権（同条第七項に規定するプログラム使用権をいう。）に係るものについては、同法第四条第二項の規定にかかわらず、一の借主に対して貸し付けることができる設備資金貸付事業に係る貸付金の金額は、一の設備又は一のプログラム使用権につき、貸与機関が必要と認めた金額の三分の二に相当する額以内の額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 203 (1) In cases where an Officer or official of a Financial Instruments Business Operator (in cases where said Financial Instruments Business Operator is a foreign juridical person, an Officer refers to a Representative Person in Japan and an Officer who is stationed at a business office or office established in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), an Officer or official of an Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2), or Financial Instruments Exchange (an Officer includes a provisional director, provisional auditor, and provisional executive officer), or a representative person (including, in cases where there is an office in Japan, an Officer stationed at said office) or official in Japan of a Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange has accepted, requested or promised bribes with regard to his/her duties (in the case of an Officer or official of a Financial Instruments Business Operator, limited to duties pertaining to businesses of a Financial Instruments Business Operator that received entrustment of an Investor Protection Funds under the provisions of Article 79-50(1)), he/she shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than five years. 例文帳に追加

第二百三条　金融商品取引業者の役員（当該金融商品取引業者が外国法人である場合には、国内における代表者及び国内に設ける営業所又は事務所に駐在する役員。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは職員、認可金融商品取引業協会若しくは第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会若しくは金融商品取引所の役員（仮理事及び仮監事並びに仮取締役、仮執行役及び仮監査役を含む。）若しくは職員又は外国金融商品取引所の国内における代表者（国内に事務所がある場合にあつては、当該事務所に駐在する役員を含む。）若しくは職員が、その職務（金融商品取引業者の役員若しくは職員にあつては、第七十九条の五十第一項の規定により投資者保護基金の委託を受けた金融商品取引業者の業務に係る職務に限る。）に関して、賄賂を収受し、又はその要求若しくは約束をしたときは、五年以下の懲役に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(9) For the time being, the State may, within the scope of the budget, provide a loan without interest of an amount equivalent to the amount that the State may subsidize pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) (in the case where any law or ordinance stipulates otherwise with regard to the proportion of subsidy by the State under these provisions, they shall include the provisions of said law or ordinance that stipulates otherwise; the same shall apply hereinafter) to a prefecture (in the case where the affairs under Article 74, paragraph (1), which are to be processed by a prefecture, are to be processed by a designated city, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), this shall include said designated city, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraphs (12) to (14) of the Supplementary Provisions) for the funds to be allocated to the expenses subsidized by said prefecture for the establisher of a public assistance facility other than said prefecture, with regard to a repair, renovation or expansion of a public assistance facility of which expenses may be subsidized by the State pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) and which falls under Article 2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Promotion of Social Infrastructure Development Through Use of Proceeds from Sale of the Stock of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987). 例文帳に追加

９　国は、当分の間、都道府県（第八十四条の二第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第七十四条第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び附則第十二項から第十四項までにおいて同じ。）に対し、第七十五条第二項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる保護施設の修理、改造又は拡張で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、都道府県以外の保護施設の設置者に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第七十五条第二項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) Where the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (b) from the amount listed in (a) is equivalent to or less than the amount listed in (c): The amount obtained by calculating the amount of expenses listed in the items of paragraph (15) which the said domestic corporation pays for the relevant business year to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. (meaning a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. prescribed in Article 66-5(4)(i) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and a fund provider, etc. (meaning a fund provider, etc. prescribed in item (ii) of the said paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) related to the said domestic corporation (such expenses shall be limited to what is to be paid, in the case prescribed in item (ii) or item (iii) of paragraph (13), when the interest on liabilities pertaining to the funds set forth in those items is included in the taxable income (meaning the taxable income prescribed in Article 66-5(4)(ix) of the Act; the same shall apply in (b)) of the person who is to receive payment of the said interest; such amount of expenses shall be referred to as the "amount of guarantee charge, etc. for the taxable income" in the next item) and then multiplying the said amount of expenses by the ratio obtained by dividing the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (c) from the amount listed in (a) (such remaining amount shall be referred to as the "amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities" in the next item and the next paragraph) by the amount listed in (b): 例文帳に追加

一　イに掲げる金額からロに掲げる金額を控除した残額がハに掲げる金額以下である場合　当該内国法人が当該事業年度において当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等（法第六十六条の五第四項第一号に規定する国外支配株主等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）及び資金供与者等（同項第二号に規定する資金供与者等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に支払う第十五項各号に掲げる費用（第十三項第二号又は第三号に規定する場合において、これらの号の資金に係る負債の利子が当該利子の支払を受ける者の課税対象所得（法第六十六条の五第四項第九号に規定する課税対象所得をいう。ロにおいて同じ。）に含まれるときに、支払うものに限る。）の金額（次号において「課税対象所得に係る保証料等の金額」という。）に、イに掲げる金額からハに掲げる金額を控除した残額（次号及び次項において「平均負債残高超過額」という。）をロに掲げる金額で除して得た割合を乗じて計算した金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) Where the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (b) from the amount listed in (a) is equivalent to or less than the amount listed in (c): The amount obtained by calculating the amount of expenses listed in the items of paragraph (14) which the said consolidated corporation pays for the relevant consolidated business year to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. (meaning a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. prescribed in Article 68-89(4)(i) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and a fund provider, etc. (meaning a fund provider, etc. prescribed in item (ii) of the said paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) related to the said consolidated corporation (such expense shall be limited to what is to be paid, in the case prescribed in item (ii) or item (iii) of paragraph (13), when the interest on liabilities pertaining to the funds set forth in those items is included in the taxable income (meaning the taxable income prescribed in Article 68-89(4)(ix) of the Act; the same shall apply in (b)) of the person who is to receive payment of the said interest; such amount of expenses shall be referred to as the "amount of guarantee charge, etc. for the taxable income" in the next item) and then multiplying the said amount of expenses by the ratio obtained by dividing the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (c) from the amount listed in (a) (such remaining amount shall be referred to as the "amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities" in the next item and the next paragraph) by the amount listed in (b): 例文帳に追加

一　イに掲げる金額からロに掲げる金額を控除した残額がハに掲げる金額以下である場合　当該連結法人が当該連結事業年度において当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等（法第六十八条の八十九第四項第一号に規定する国外支配株主等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）及び資金供与者等（同項第二号に規定する資金供与者等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に支払う第十四項各号に掲げる費用（第十三項第二号又は第三号に規定する場合において、これらの号の資金に係る負債の利子が当該利子の支払を受ける者の課税対象所得（法第六十八条の八十九第四項第九号に規定する課税対象所得をいう。ロにおいて同じ。）に含まれるときに、支払うものに限る。）の金額（次号において「課税対象所得に係る保証料等の金額」という。）に、イに掲げる金額からハに掲げる金額を控除した残額（次号及び次項において「平均負債残高超過額」という。）をロに掲げる金額で除して得た割合を乗じて計算した金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 11-4 Those specified by Cabinet Order as prescribed in Article 22-2, paragraph (1) of the Act shall be the beneficiaries of trust contracts prescribed in Article 20, item (i) or (iv) of the Act (excluding those pertaining to workers' property accumulation savings contracts, etc., workers' property accumulation benefit contracts prescribed in Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Promotion of Workers' Property Accumulation, workers' property accumulation fund contracts prescribed in Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of the said act, asset management contracts prescribed in Article 65, paragraph (3) of the Defined-Benefit Corporate Pension Act (Act No. 50 of 2001), contracts listed in the items of Article 65, paragraph (1) of the said Act which are concluded by corporate pension funds pursuant to the provision of Article 66, paragraph (1) of the said Act and trust contracts prescribed in Article 66, paragraph (2) of the said act, protective trust contracts concluded pursuant to the provision of Article 51, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Transfer of Corporate Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001), asset management contracts prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (2) of the Defined Contribution Pension Act (Act No. 88 of 2001), or other contracts specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance. 例文帳に追加

第十一条の四　法第二十二条の二第一項に規定する政令で定める者は、法第二十条第一号又は第四号に規定する信託契約の受益者（勤労者財産形成貯蓄契約等、勤労者財産形成促進法第六条の二第一項に規定する勤労者財産形成給付金契約、同法第六条の三第一項に規定する勤労者財産形成基金契約、確定給付企業年金法（平成十三年法律第五十号）第六十五条第三項に規定する資産管理運用契約、企業年金基金が同法第六十六条第一項の規定により締結する同法第六十五条第一項各号に掲げる契約及び同法第六十六条第二項に規定する信託の契約、社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第五十一条第一項の規定により締結する加入者保護信託契約、確定拠出年金法（平成十三年法律第八十八号）第八条第二項に規定する資産管理契約その他財務省令で定める契約に係るものを除く。）とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph and in the cases where any of the following items apply, a Money Lender shall, when conducting an investigation under the provisions of paragraph (1), have the Individual Customer submit or provide Withholding Records (meaning withholding records as provided in Article 226, paragraph (1) of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and Article 13-3, paragraph (3)) or other documents or Electromagnetic Records containing or in which are recorded the matters that disclose the income or profits or other financial resources of an individual customer who is a person seeking funds (hereinafter referred to as an "Individual Customer" in this Section) as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and that have been submitted or provided by the Individual Customer; provided, however, that this shall not apply if the Money Lender has already received the Individual Customer's Withholding Records or other documents or Electromagnetic Records containing or in which are recorded the matters that disclose the income or profits or other financial resources of the Individual Customer as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance: 例文帳に追加

３　貸金業者は、前項の場合において、次の各号に掲げる場合のいずれかに該当するときは、第一項の規定による調査を行うに際し、資金需要者である個人の顧客（以下この節において「個人顧客」という。）から源泉徴収票（所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）第二百二十六条第一項に規定する源泉徴収票をいう。以下この項及び第十三条の三第三項において同じ。）その他の当該個人顧客の収入又は収益その他の資力を明らかにする事項を記載し、又は記録した書面又は電磁的記録として内閣府令で定めるものの提出又は提供を受けなければならない。ただし、貸金業者が既に当該個人顧客の源泉徴収票その他の当該個人顧客の収入又は収益その他の資力を明らかにする事項を記載し、又は記録した書面又は電磁的記録として内閣府令で定めるものの提出又は提供を受けている場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

From around noon today, I am scheduled to receive a briefing from the FSA staff on the double loan problem. Numerous questions have been asked about the double loan problem at the Budget Committee and I have replied to some of them. Forgive me for mentioning this over and over again, but basically, the FSA is responsible for inspecting and supervising private financial institutions. In principle, the financial source of private financial institutions is deposits entrusted by individuals - savings in the case of Japan Post Bank - and those funds must be repaid with interest in principle. Therefore, we will use the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions to increase capital. Under the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, we will not pursue the responsibility of managers nor will we demand the setting of efficiency targets. As this is a once-in-a-millennium tsunami, the government needs to do its utmost to appropriately deal with it, rather than pursuing the responsibility of managers. In that sense, financial institutions should take appropriate actions in the Tohoku region. 例文帳に追加

今日昼から、その二重ローンの話を、実は事務局から話を受けるようになっていますが、これは何度も私が申し上げましたように、二重ローンの問題、二重債務の問題、これは何回も予算委員会で質問をいただきまして、私も答弁させていただきましたが、繰り返しになって恐縮ですけれども、金融庁といたしましては、基本的に民間金融機関の検査・監督でございまして、民間金融機関というのは、原則としてお人様から預かった預金が原資でございまして、あるいは、ゆうちょ銀行であれば貯金でございますが、これに当然一定の利子をつけてお返しするというのが原理・原則でございますから、できるだけ、この金融機能強化法によって自己資本を増すと。そのために、経営者の努力の瑕疵は問わないと、あるいは色々な効率性・能率性の努力目標は求めないということが金融機能強化法でございますが、これは千年に一遍の津波でございますから、経営者の責任というよりも、国家を挙げてきちっと対処することが必要でございます。私はそういった意味で、きちっと金融機関が東北地方は対処すべきだというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

Having gone off on a tangent a bit, let's get back: This is a temporary measure, legislation that expires at the end of March 2011 to cover the calendar year end and the fiscal year end twice when there is greater demand for funds among SMEs. As to whether or not we will postpone the expiration of the Act, we will take all factors into consideration, such as the improvement status of the Japanese economy and cash flows of SMEs and the prospects for next fiscal year onwards, and the progress made in financial institutions' financial facilitation efforts, conduct interviews with various parties as just pointed out, and conduct studies by taking into account the possibility of the postponement of its expiration, as I stated previously. As the yen is strong at the moment, the situation is extremely tough especially for SMEs. As I stated earlier, the SME Financing Facilitation Act was created based on projections that the economy should recover substantially in about two years, so with this in mind, we will conduct studies while considering the postponement of its expiration as a possibility. 例文帳に追加

少し話が横にいきましたけれども、これは臨時の措置でございまして、私は何度も申しましたように、中小企業等の資金需要が高まる年末、年度末の2回ずつ含めることができるように、来年3月末までの時限法としているところでございますが、同法の期間を延長するかどうかについては、今後、我が国経済及び中小企業との資金繰りの改善状況や来年度以降の見通し、金融機関の金融円滑化に向けた取り組みの進捗状況などを総合的に勘案し、色々なところからヒアリング、今お話がございました、ご指摘があったようにさせていただきまして、延長を視野に入れつつ、今後検討していきたいと、この前の答弁どおりでございます。今、円高でございまして、非常に中小企業は特に厳しいわけでございますから、先般も申し上げましたように、大体2年ぐらい経ったら経済が結構回復するのではないかという予測のもとで、中小企業金融円滑化法案をつくらせていただきましたが、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、延長を視野に入れつつ、今後検討してまいりたいというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

As for the second question regarding what I currently think about such consumer finance companies, generally speaking, my understanding is that although the current business climate for consumer finance companies is harsh, there is still much healthy demand for funds in the consumer finance market. According to one theory I have heard, there are about 15 million users of consumer finance. As there are, of course, sound borrowers in that sense, some financial institutions in other industries such as banks are making aggressive efforts in the field of consumer finance, and in banks and other financial institutions in foreign countries, consumer finance has become a significant business segment. Bearing this in mind, Japan's consumer finance market is a promising market, and moneylenders are expected to take on a significant role in this market. Accordingly, the FSA hopes that moneylenders will become a significant player in the consumer finance market through their own management efforts, according to the objectives of the amended Money Lending Act. 例文帳に追加

同時にまた、この消費者金融について、今どう思うのかという後段の質問がございましたが、一般論として申し上げれば、現下の消費者、金融業者の経営状態は厳しいものだというふうに認識をいたしておりますが、しかしながら、消費者金融市場においては、引き続き多くの健全な資金需要が存在しております。一説によると、1,500万人の方ぐらいが利用しているという話もお聞きいたしておりますが、そういった意味で健全な借り手というのも当然おられるわけでございますから、銀行等の他業態の金融機関においても、消費者金融の分野に積極的に取り組んでいるところもございますし、また諸外国の銀行等においても、消費者金融が重要な業務分野となってきております。そういったことを踏まえて、我が国の消費者金融市場も将来的に期待されるマーケットであり、その中において、貸金業者も重要な役割を担っていくというふうに考えておりまして、金融庁といたしましても、改正貸金業法の趣旨にのっとり、貸金業者が自らの経営努力も相まって、消費者金融市場において重要な担い手となっていることを期待いたしております。 - 金融庁

However, I am aware of the current problems, which is why I created the Follow-up Team. It is because the problems affect the very core of financial businesses. I have repeatedly stated that in the financial sector, the soundness of banks is - that is, sound and robust banks are - required for the progress of sustainable companies and a sustainable economy from a global perspective as reflected in Basel III. At the same time, we are talking about politics here, so I believe it is necessary to have both a bird's-eye view as well as a bug's-eye view. While the soundness of global banks is important, a bug's-eye view of everyday life at the individual level is equally important. As I am from a town in Kitakyushu, which is home to many SMEs and microenterprises, I am well aware of and know first-hand how desperately emergency funds are needed when there is no income to pay for year-end bonuses due to the bankruptcy of a microenterprise. I believe it is extremely important for monetary policy to adopt such a bug's-eye view and fill the gap. 例文帳に追加

ただし、今の問題意識は私も持っておりまして、やはりフォローアップチームを作っておりまして、そこら辺も非常に金融業の基本にかかわるところでございまして、やっぱりどういうふうな、私は率直に言えば改正貸金業法をやらせていただいたのですが、そういったことは非常に、やっぱり金融は、まさにバーゼル III で世界的な視野でも銀行の健全性、そしてなおかつ、私は何度も申しますように、持続可能な企業、あるいは持続可能な経済の発展のために、健全で強力な銀行が必要だと、こういうことを私は何回も申し上げましたように、同時にやっぱり政治ですから、私は鳥の目と虫の目が必要だということを私は基本的に思っておりまして、そういった世界的な、世界のグローバルな銀行の健全性も大事だけれども、一人ひとりの虫の目、生活に関する、やはりどうしても、私なんかは中小零細企業の町の北九州出身ですから、小さい零細企業は倒産して、年末のボーナスのお金が入ってこなくなったから、もう本当にぜひつなぎ資金が必要だというニーズがあるということをよく知っていますし、よく経験させていただいていますから、そういった虫の目も考えて、しっかりそこら辺を補完的にきちっと、非常に私は金融政策のそれが大事なことだと思います。 - 金融庁

Argentina will work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) adequately criminalising terrorist financing and addressing the remaining deficiencies with regard to the criminalisation of money laundering (Special Recommendation II and Recommendation 1); (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures for the confiscation of funds related to money laundering and identifying and freezing terrorist assets (Recommendation 3 and Special Recommendation III); (3) enhancing financial transparency (Recommendation 4); (4) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit and improving suspicious transaction reporting requirements (Recommendation 13, Special Recommendation IV and Recommendation 26); (5) implementing an adequate AML/CFT supervisory programme for all financial sectors (Recommendations 17, 23 and 29); (6) improving and broadening CDD measures for the non-banking or non-foreign exchange sectors (Recommendation 5); and (7) establishing appropriate channels for international co-operation and ensuring effective implementation (Recommendation 36, Recommendation 40 and Special Recommendation V). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①テロ資金供与の適切な犯罪化及び資金洗浄の犯罪化に関し残存する欠陥への対応（特別勧告Ⅱ及び勧告１）、②資金洗浄に関連する資金を没収するための適切な手続きの履行の構築及びテロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（勧告３及び特別勧告Ⅲ）、③金融の透明性の強化（勧告４）、④完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の構築と、疑わしい取引の届出の提出要件の改善（勧告１３、特別勧告Ⅳ及び勧告２６）、⑤全ての金融セクターに対する、十分な資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策監督プログラムの履行（勧告１７、２３及び２９）、⑥非銀行業又は非外国為替業における顧客管理措置の改善及び拡大（勧告５）及び⑦国際協力のための適切なチャンネルの構築及び効果的な履行の確保（勧告３６、４０及び特別勧告Ⅴ）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するため、アクションプランの実施への取組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-22 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (meaning granted credit, or contributed funds specified by a Cabinet Order as a contribution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) by a Bank Holding Company or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies of the Bank Holding Company (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and other persons who have a special relationship with the Bank Holding Company specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to one person (including other persons who have a special relationship with said person specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the total net amount of the equity capital of the Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (hereinafter the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company" in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as a result of a Merger, Joint Incorporation-Type Split or absorption-type split involving said person, or of transfer of another person's business to said person, or by other unavoidable reasons specified by a Cabinet Order, and the Prime Minister has given approval for such excess amount of granting of credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の二十二　銀行持株会社又はその子会社等（当該銀行持株会社の子会社（内閣府令で定める会社を除く。）その他の当該銀行持株会社と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の同一人（当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）に対する信用の供与等（信用の供与又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、合算して、当該銀行持株会社及びその子会社等の自己資本の純合計額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下この条において「銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額」という。）を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割若しくは吸収分割をし、又は営業を譲り受けたことにより銀行持株会社又はその子会社等の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(xiii) When he/she, in violation of Article 17, paragraph (2) or (4) (including the cases where the provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4)), Article 70, paragraph (2) or (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-7, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-12)), Article 77, paragraph (4), Article 88, paragraph (2)or (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20)), Article 137, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (including the cases where the provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 270-4, paragraph (9)), Article 270-4, paragraph (9) and Article 272-29), Article 165-7, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-12), Article 165-17, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20), Article 165-24, paragraph (2) or (4), Article 173-4, paragraph (2) or (4) Article 240-12, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, Article 251, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 270-4, paragraph (9)), Article 255, paragraph (1), or Article 255-4, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, has reduced the amount of capital or reserves or withdrawn from depreciation reserve for redemption of funds, has made an Entity Conversion, established a General Meeting of Policyholders, transferred an insurance contract, conducted a merger, split a company, amended the contract conditions prescribed in Article 240-2, paragraph (1), or amended the contract conditions prescribed in Article 250, paragraph (1); 例文帳に追加

十三　第十七条第二項若しくは第四項（これらの規定を第五十七条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七十条第二項若しくは第四項（第百六十五条の七第四項（第百六十五条の十二において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）、第七十七条第四項、第八十八条第二項若しくは第四項（第百六十五条の十七第四項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）、第百三十七条第一項から第三項まで（これらの規定を第二百十条第一項（第二百七十条の四第九項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二百七十条の四第九項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十五条の七第二項（第百六十五条の十二において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十五条の十七第二項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十五条の二十四第二項若しくは第四項、第百七十三条の四第二項若しくは第四項、第二百四十条の十二第一項から第三項まで、第二百五十一条第一項（第二百七十条の四第九項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二百五十五条第一項又は第二百五十五条の四第一項から第三項までの規定に違反して、資本金若しくは準備金の額の減少若しくは基金償却積立金の取崩し、組織変更、保険契約者総代会の設置、保険契約の移転、合併、会社分割、第二百四十条の二第一項に規定する契約条件の変更又は第二百五十条第一項に規定する契約条件の変更をしたとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-23 (1) A holder of the Target Securities (including the Securities listed in Article 2(1)(xix) indicating the Options pertaining to said Target Securities (limited to the Options which cause a person who has exercised said Options to acquire a position as a buyer in the sales or purchase of the Target Securities pertaining to said Options) and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those which indicate the rights pertaining to said Target Securities) whose issuer is a juridical person which is an issuer (with regard to the Securities specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11(4), except for Article 27-30(2)) of share certificates, bonds with share option and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Securities Related to Share Certificates" in this paragraph) that are listed on a Financial Instruments Exchange (including the Securities Related to Share Certificates specified by a Cabinet Order as those of which the state of distribution can be regarded as being equivalent to said Securities) (such Securities shall be hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Share Certificates, etc." in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11(4)), and whose Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. pertaining to said Share Certificates, etc. exceeds 5% (such holder shall be hereinafter referred to as a "Large Volume Holder" in this Chapter) shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, submit to the Prime Minister a report that contains the matters related to the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc., matters related to the funds for the acquisition, purposes of holding and any other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (such report shall be hereinafter referred to as "Reports of Possession of Large Volume"), within five days from the date on which such person has come to be a Large Volume Holder (Sundays and other holidays specified by a Cabinet Order shall not be included for the purpose of counting days; the same shall apply in Article 27-25(1) and Article 27-26); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where there is no increase in the total number of the Share Certificates, etc. held set forth in paragraph (4) or to any other case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十三　株券、新株予約権付社債券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「株券関連有価証券」という。）で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの（流通状況がこれに準ずるものとして政令で定める株券関連有価証券を含む。）の発行者である法人が発行者（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者。第二十七条の三十第二項を除き、以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一第四項において同じ。）である対象有価証券（当該対象有価証券に係るオプション（当該オプションの行使により当該行使をした者が当該オプションに係る対象有価証券の売買において買主としての地位を取得するものに限る。）を表示する第二条第一項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の当該対象有価証券に係る権利を表示するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一第四項において「株券等」という。）の保有者で当該株券等に係るその株券等保有割合が百分の五を超えるもの（以下この章において「大量保有者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、株券等保有割合に関する事項、取得資金に関する事項、保有の目的その他の内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「大量保有報告書」という。）を大量保有者となつた日から五日（日曜日その他政令で定める休日の日数は、算入しない。第二十七条の二十五第一項及び第二十七条の二十六において同じ。）以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、第四項に規定する保有株券等の総数に増加がない場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

1. For the purposes of this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires: a) the term “Japan”, when used in a geographical sense, means all the territory of Japan, including its territorial sea, in which the laws relating to Japanese tax are in force, and all the area beyond its territorial sea, including the seabed and subsoil thereof, over which Japan has sovereign rights in accordance with international law and in which the laws relating to Japanese tax are in force; b) the term “the Netherlands” means the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that is situated in Europe, including its territorial sea and any area beyond the territorial sea within which the Netherlands, in accordance with international law, exercises jurisdiction or sovereign rights; c) the terms “a Contracting State” and “the other Contracting State” mean Japan or the Netherlands, as the context requires; d) the term “tax” means Japanese tax or Netherlands tax, as the context requires; e) the term “person” includes an individual, a company and any other body of persons; f) the term “company” means any body corporate or any entity that is treated as a body corporate for tax purposes; g) the term “enterprise” applies to the carrying on of any business; h) the terms “enterprise of a Contracting State” and “enterprise of the other Contracting State” mean respectively an enterprise carried on by a resident of a Contracting State and an enterprise carried on by a resident of the other Contracting State; i) the term “international traffic” means any transport by a ship or aircraft operated by an enterprise of a Contracting State, except when the ship or aircraft is operated solely between places in the other Contracting State; j) the term “competent authority” means: (i) in the case of Japan, the Minister of Finance or his authorised representative; and (ii) in the case of the Netherlands, the Minister of Finance or his authorised representative; k) the term “national” means: (i) in the case of Japan, any individual possessing the nationality of Japan, any juridical person created or organised under the laws of Japan and any organisation without juridical personality treated for the purposes of Japanese tax as a juridical person created or organised under the laws of Japan; and (ii) in the case of the Netherlands, any individual possessing the nationality of the Netherlands and any legal person, partnership or association deriving its status as such from the laws in force in the Netherlands; l) the term “business” includes the performance of professional services and of other activities of an independent character; and m) the term “pension fund” means any person that: (i) is established and regulated as such under the laws of a Contracting State; (ii) is operated principally to administer or provide old age, disability or survivor’s pensions, retirement benefits or other similar remuneration or to earn income for the benefit of other pension funds; and (iii) is exempt from tax in that Contracting State with respect to income derived from the activities described in clause (ii). 例文帳に追加

１この条約の適用上、文脈により別に解釈すべき場合を除くほか、(a)「日本国」とは、地理的意味で用いる場合には、日本国の租税に関する法令が施行されているすべての領域（領海を含む。）及びその領域の外側に位置する区域であって、日本国が国際法に基づき主権的権利を有し、かつ、日本国の租税に関する法令が施行されているすべての区域（海底及びその下を含む。）をいう。(b)「オランダ」とは、オランダ王国のうちヨーロッパに位置する部分（領海及びその領海の外側に位置する区域であって、オランダが国際法に基づき管轄権又は主権的権利を行使する区域を含む。）をいう。(c)「一方の締約国」及び「他方の締約国」とは、文脈により、日本国又はオランダをいう。(d)「租税」とは、文脈により、日本国の租税又はオランダの租税をいう。(e)「者」には、個人、法人及び法人以外の団体を含む。(f)「法人」とは、法人格を有する団体又は租税に関し法人格を有する団体として取り扱われる団体をいう。(g)「企業」は、あらゆる事業の遂行について用いる。(h)「一方の締約国の企業」及び「他方の締約国の企業」とは、それぞれ一方の締約国の居住者が営む企業及び他方の締約国の居住者が営む企業をいう。「国際運輸」とは、一方の締約国の企業が運用する船舶又は航空機による運送（他方の締約国内の地点の間においてのみ運用される船舶又は航空機による運送を除く。）をいう。(j)「権限のある当局」とは、次の者をいう。(i)日本国については、財務大臣又は権限を与えられたその代理者(ii)オランダについては、財務大臣又は権限を与えられたその代理者(k)「国民」とは、次の者をいう。(i)日本国については、日本国の国籍を有するすべての個人、日本国の法令に基づいて設立され、又は組織されたすべての法人及び法人格を有しないが日本国の租税に関し日本国の法令に基づいて設立され、又は組織された法人として取り扱われるすべての団体(ii)オランダについては、オランダの国籍を有するすべての個人及びオランダにおいて施行されている法令によってその地位を与えられたすべての法人、組合又は団体(l)「事業」には、自由職業その他の独立の性格を有する活動を含む。(m)「年金基金」とは、次の(i)から(iii)までに掲げる要件を満たす者をいう。(i)一方の締約国の法令に基づいて設立され、かつ、規制されること。(ii)主として、老齢年金、障害年金若しくは遺族年金、退職手当その他これらに類する報酬を管理し、若しくは給付すること又は他の年金基金の利益のために所得を取得することを目的として運営されること。(iii) (ii)に規定する活動に関して取得する所得につき当該一方の締約国において租税を免除されること。 - 財務省