「責任がある」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(28ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

８　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、第五項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking payment under the provisions of Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5). In this case, the phrase "shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member, or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in paragraphs (3) to (5) and (7) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to actions for the return of benefits under paragraph (3). In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise right pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、前項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2), and (5) and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action demanding payment under Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less Than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

しかし、私は、そういうことを含めて論議することは何も決定することではございませんから、国民的な論議をさせて頂くということが政治の立場だと思っていますので、そういったことを含めて社会保障の一体改革と、無駄遣い、これは徹底的に排除する必要があります。霞が関の埋蔵金というのは色々ここ1～2年大きな問題になってきましたけれども、そんな無駄を徹底的に排除するのは、同時に新たな税制のあり方であると思います。イコール消費税ではないです。やっぱり色々なことを考えて国民新党の立場としても、政治家が責任を持ってやっていくということは必要だと思っていますので、そういった意味で、少し長くなりましたけれども、今、非常に大きなテーマですから、持続可能な社会保障と、自賠責の安心・安全ということを、万が一のときの安心・安全ですから、そういった意味で5,900億円オーバーフローしているのに（料率を）上げるのはけしからんというお叱りだろうと思いますけれども、そういう事情もこれ勘案して、ひとつご理解頂けないかなというのが私の率直な政治家としての思いです。例文帳に追加

Given that insurance is intended to cover accidents under those conditions and that insurance is affected by the accident rate, I think that if an increase in the premium rate is decided, it will be inevitable to accept it in light of the various circumstances.  - 金融庁

２　第三十条第四項の場合において、同項のすべての労働者の数が厚生労働省令で定める数以上であるとき（第十五条第一項又は第三項の規定により統括安全衛生責任者を選任しなければならないときを除く。）　は、当該指名された事業者で建設業に属する事業の仕事を行うものは、当該場所において行われる仕事に係る請負契約を締結している事業場ごとに、これらの労働者に関し、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所で行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、厚生労働省令で定める資格を有する者のうちから、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、店社安全衛生管理者を選任し、その者に、当該事業場で締結している当該請負契約に係る仕事を行う場所における第三十条第一項各号の事項を担当する者に対する指導その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を行わせなければならない。この場合においては、当該指名された事業者及び当該指名された事業者以外の事業者については、前項の規定は適用しない。例文帳に追加

(2) In the case provided for by paragraph (4) of Article 30, where the number of workers exceeds the number provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the said paragraph (excluding work sites where an overall safety and health controller must be appointed under the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 15), the specified employer who carries out a construction industry project shall appoint a site safety and health supervisor from among persons holding the qualifications provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each site contracted for work in order to prevent industrial accidents as a result of the work carried out by workers at the same site, and have that person supervise the one in charge of the provisions of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and other matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare at the said work site where the contracted work is executed. In this case, the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not apply to the specified employer or any other employer.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十五条の三　建設業に属する事業の元方事業者は、その労働者及び関係請負人の労働者が一の場所（これらの労働者の数が厚生労働省令で定める数未満である場所及び第十五条第一項又は第三項の規定により統括安全衛生責任者を選任しなければならない場所を除く。）において作業を行うときは、当該場所において行われる仕事に係る請負契約を締結している事業場ごとに、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所で行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、厚生労働省令で定める資格を有する者のうちから、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、店社安全衛生管理者を選任し、その者に、当該事業場で締結している当該請負契約に係る仕事を行う場所における第三十条第一項各号の事項を担当する者に対する指導その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を行わせなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 15-3 (1) Where the workers of a principal employer of a construction industry and the workers of a related contractor carry out work at one work site (excluding work sites where the number of such workers is less than that as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and work sites where an overall safety and health controller must be appointed under the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 15), the principal employer shall appoint a site safety and health supervisor from among persons holding the qualifications provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each site contracted for work in order to prevent industrial accidents as a result of the work carried out by workers at the same site, and have that person supervise the one in charge of the provisions of each item of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and other matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare at the said work site where the contracted work is executed.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　入札談合等関与行為を行った職員が予算執行職員等の責任に関する法律（昭和二十五年法律第百七十二号）第三条第二項（同法第九条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により弁償の責めに任ずべき場合については、各省各庁の長又は公庫等の長（同条第一項に規定する公庫等の長をいう。）は、第二項、第三項（第二項の調査に係る部分に限る。）、第四項（第二項の調査の結果の公表に係る部分に限る。）及び前項の規定にかかわらず、速やかに、同法に定めるところにより、必要な措置をとらなければならない。この場合においては、同法第四条第四項（同法第九条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）中「遅滞なく」とあるのは、「速やかに、当該予算執行職員の入札談合等関与行為（入札談合等関与行為の排除及び防止並びに職員による入札等の公正を害すべき行為の処罰に関する法律（平成十四年法律第百一号）第二条第五項に規定する入札談合等関与行為をいう。）に係る同法第四条第一項の調査の結果を添えて」とする。例文帳に追加

(6) In respect of cases where the employees involved in said bid rigging etc. are liable for damage under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 2, of the Act on the Responsibility of Government Employees who Execute the Budget (Act No. 172 of 1950) (including the case of application under the provisions of Article 9, paragraph 2, of the same Act mutatis mutandis), the Heads of Ministries and Agencies or the heads of government corporations (meaning the heads of government corporations stipulated in paragraph 1 of the same Article) shall, irrespective of the provisions of paragraph 2, paragraph 3 (limited to the part concerning the investigation of paragraph 2), paragraph 4 (limited to the part concerning the publication of the results of the investigation of paragraph 2) and the preceding subsection, paragraph, as provided for by the same Act, necessary measures promptly. In this case, "without delay" in Article 4, paragraph 4, of the same Act (including cases of application under Article 9, paragraph 2, of the same Act mutatis mutandis) shall read "promptly accompanied by the result of the investigation of Article 4, paragraph 1, of the Act concerning involvement in bid rigging etc. by the said government employees who execute the budget (meaning the involvement in bid rigging etc. stipulated in Article 2, paragraph 5, of the Act on Elimination and Prevention of Involvement in Bid Rigging etc. and Punishments for Acts of Employees that Harm Fairness of Bidding, etc. (Act No. 101 of 2002))."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

なお、他のチェックリストと同様、当該チェックリストの各チェック項目の水準の達成が金融機関に直ちに義務付けられるものではない。当該チェックリストの適用に当たっては、金融機関の規模や特性を十分に踏まえ、機械的・画一的な運用に陥らないよう配慮する必要がある。また、金融機関が経営判断で決すべき個別の与信判断の是非には介入しないよう留意する必要がある。したがって、当該チェックリストのチェック項目に記述されている字義どおりの対応が金融機関においてなされていない場合であっても、金融機関の業務の健全性及び適切性の観点からみて、金融機関の行っている対応が合理的なものであり、さらに、チェック項目に記述されているものと同様の効果がある、あるいは金融機関の規模や特性に応じた十分なものである、と認められるのであれば、不適切とするものではない。また、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理方針」、「金融円滑化管理規程」、「金融円滑化マニュアル」は、必ずしも明確に記載されるべき項目を全て包含する統一的な方針等を策定する必要はなく、複数の部門等において定められる複数の方針等において、定められていればよいことに留意する必要がある。さらに、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理責任者」が信用リスク理等他の部門の職員（管理者を含む。）を兼務することがあることに留意する必要がある。例文帳に追加

Even a case where a financial institution does not literally meet the requirement of a check item should not be regarded as inappropriate if the arrangements and procedures put in place by the institution are reasonable from the viewpoint of securing of the soundness and appropriateness of its business and are thus deemed as effectively meeting the requirement or as sufficient in light of the institution's scale and nature. For example, if a financial institution does not have a division described in the checklists of each system, the inspector should review, with due consideration for the institution's scale and nature, whether its organization is structured in a way to enable the execution of necessary functions and a check-and-balance system. In this regard, it is necessary for inspectors to sufficiently conduct hearings from and exchange opinions with financial institutions on the occasion of on-site inspections.  - 金融庁

平成１１年１２月の金融審議会答申を踏まえ、平成１２年の預金保険法改正により名寄せデータ整備の義務付け等、破綻処理の迅速化措置が講じられた。金融庁では、個別金融機関に対する検査・監督を通じてオペレーショナル・リスク、流動性リスク等の適切な管理態勢の確保を図るとともに、先般の金融機関のシステム障害発生を契機に責任体制の明確化等の措置を講じた。また、平成１４検査事務年度検査基本方針及び基本計画において、金融機関の経営におけるシステムの重要性に鑑み、システムリスク管理態勢の厳正な検証及びシステム統合リスクの拡大に対応した検査マニュアル別冊の作成等が盛り込まれた。日本銀行では、平成１４年度考査において、金融機関が多様化、複雑化する各種リスクに対応した機動的な管理体制の整備・拡充やその実効性向上に努めているかを確認することを基本的視点とし、決済・流動性リスク面では日常的な流動性リスク管理の適切性や資金繰り逼迫時を想定した緊急時対応等を、また、システム関連では、特に金融機関の経営統合や業務提携の際の対応の適切性等をそれぞれ確認することとしている。例文帳に追加

It is expected that the development of a new system in the bill clearing system and the domestic money transfer system will reduce the risks of financial institutions and contribute to the smooth completion of payments and settlements in the event of a failure of a financial institution.  - 金融庁

新しく日本損害保険協会の会長になられたということでございますが、当然、損保でございますからそれ相応の社会的役割があるわけでございますし、そういったことでやはり金融庁としても密接に連絡をとりながら、それぞれの損保各企業の業界の会長でございますから、それぞれこういった厳しい経済環境の中であるし、また国際的にも非常に2年前のリーマンショック以来、国際的な金融市場というのはなかなか一筋縄でいかないところがございまして、国内にも失業率5.2％、雇用調整助成金をもらっている人が100万人という厳しい雇用情勢があるし、一方、少し景気回復の足腰が少し整ってきたよという雰囲気もありますけれども、まだまだ一進一退でございますし、しかしご存じのようにギリシャショックなどが起きまして、G7あるいはG20で国際的な協調政策、その中でまた各国のそれぞれの経済のあり方というのはそれぞれの国によって当然違うわけでございますから、そういったことをG20の中でも共通の、特に金融でございますから国際性が非常に強い分野でもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながらきちっと損保会社を損保協会の会長さんとしてきちっと与えられた使命に責任を果たしていっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

He became the new chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan – well, being a non-life insurer naturally comes with the corresponding social role and, for that reason, the FSA is also eager to maintain close mutual contact. In the non-life insurance industry, participating businesses (non-life insurers) are all experiencing the severe economic conditions that have hit Japan. On an international front, the global financial market has also posed difficulties since the Lehman crisis two years ago. Domestically, we are also faced with grim employment conditions reflected in the fact that the unemployment rate is 5.2% and one million people are receiving the Employment Adjustment Subsidy. Although there are some signs that a path toward economic recovery is appearing, to a modest degree, we are still on a seesaw ride. As you know, events like the Greek crisis have made it necessary to seek international policy coordination in the G7 and G20 forums. Among other domains, the financial area particularly has a strong cross-border nature. On the other hand, the way a country's economy is run differs from one country to the next. I hope that he, in his capacity of chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan, will properly fulfill his responsibility for what non-life insurers have as their mission, with the points I've just made in mind.  - 金融庁

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization.  - 金融庁

ということで非常に苦労しておりますし、そういった皆様方もよくお分かりのように、金融というのはリーマン・ショック以来、国際的な会議というのは非常に重要でございまして、国内の景気の動向、あるいはその国が置かれた伝統的な金融の状態、あるいは経済の状態、それを国際的にどうハーモナイズするかということが非常に世界的な大事な問題でございまして、国際でやるべきところはきちっと協調政策、Ｇ20でやっていかねば、なかなかこういった金融のグローバル化、あるいは経済のグローバル化の時代に効果がございませんから、その辺を非常に苦労を各国やっておられるわけでございますから、国際会議というのは実は非常に多いのでございますし、ご存じ、その中で国際室の昨日もたまたま話を聞きますと、非常に国際室の人手が足らないという話を聞きまして、そういった非常に大事な金融庁、予算は220億で少ないのですけれども、極めて経済の中で果たす金融政策は大事でございまして、それが今も申し上げましたけれども、国際的にも国内的にも非常に大事な難しい時期でもございまして、それゆえに責任が重たいわけでございますが、そういった中で、なかなか人件費を主とした役所でございますから、そのことはぜひ考慮していただきたいということをこれは実は警察庁も法務省もそういうことを申されまして、これも人件費が多い省ですから、特に金融庁の場合は何も私は省益を代表して言う気はございませんが、現実にこれは非常に大事な分野でございます。例文帳に追加

This means that we are struggling hard to make ends meet and, as everyone well realizes, international meetings have become extremely important in the world of finance since the Lehman crisis, because it is now indeed a very critical global issue to decide how to harmonize on an international scale a given country's domestic economic trends or the financial condition, or economic condition, that it has traditionally been situated in. Therefore, what has to be done on an international scale must be done properly in the form of policy coordination or as G20 initiatives, as otherwise no effect could be expected in an era of increasing globalization in finance or the economy that we live in now, and each country is equally struggling to achieve that end, which explains why there are so many international meetings. That is, as you see, the situation we have now, and I also happened to hear just yesterday in connection with this subject that our Office of International Affairs is in serious shortage of labor, a fact that stands in contrast to such critical importance of the FSA, to which a mere 22 billion yen is given as its budget, and the extremely significant role that financial policies play in an economy. As I have just said, though, now is a very important and delicate period of time both internationally and domestically and we are accordingly charged with a weighty responsibility. Seeing as the FSA is a public office with labor costs representing its main spending category, I did emphatically asked that attention should be paid to that point and, actually, similar comments were also made by the National Police Agency and the Ministry of Justice, both of them being ministries with a hefty payroll as well. In the case of the FSA, it is not really my particular intention to make a case to represent an interest of the FSA, but the fact still remains that it is in charge of a very important field.  - 金融庁

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件例文帳に追加

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case. - 特許庁

G20でもG7でも、ご存じのように、アメリカでもドット・フランク法というのは、金融の規制を強化するという法律でございまして、基本的に金融の分野で極限までの規制緩和、そしてできるだけ政府の関与を少なくするのがよいというのが新保守主義でございましたから、私は世界の大宗において、アメリカのドット・フランク法が証明しているように、金融というのは、非常に影響が大きいですから、やはり必要な規制は必要なのだというのが、アメリカですら法律が通って、今、ドット・フランク法も、初めボルカー・ルールの細則を詰めているところでございまして、ヨーロッパの銀行も、イギリスはどちらかというと、ご存じのようにアメリカ型の金融に近いのですけれども、ドイツ、フランスはどちらかというと大陸型でございまして、手堅いと言ったらおかしいけれども、日本に似たような金融システムを持っておりますので、私は1点目の質問、新保守主義をという話でしたけれども、世界的にはかつての自由な、どんどん規制緩和で、もうどんな金融商品でもつくってもよい、そのかわり自分の会社で全部自己責任を持ちなさいよということが、一時代前は非常に世界を覆い尽くしまして、日本もそれに巻き込まれたところはあるのでございますけれども、やはり今、アメリカのウォール街ですら、非常にその辺が変わってきていると思っておりまして、そういう意味では、やはり一時の新保守主義の勢いに対する反省が各国であると思っております。例文帳に追加

Among the G-20 and G-7 countries, and even in the United States, the need for regulation has been recognized, as indicated by the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, which strengthens financial regulations, as opposed to neo-conservatism, which basically pursues the thorough deregulation of the financial sector and the minimization of government involvement. Following the enactment of that act, the United States is working out the details of regulations, including the Volcker Rule. As for European banks, U.K. banks are rather closer to the U.S. style of finance as you know, while Germany and France have continental financial systems, which are conservative, like the Japanese financial system. As to the first question, which concerned neo-conservatism, the mood around the world some time ago was such as to encourage financial institutions to create any type of financial product in exchange for accepting full self-responsibility, and Japan was no exception. However, now, the mood has changed very much even on Wall Street. In that sense, I think that countries have a feeling of contrition about the wave of neo-conservatism that swept through the world at one time.  - 金融庁

第四条　附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により特定保険業者が引き続き特定保険業を行う場合においては、当該特定保険業者を少額短期保険業者とみなして、新保険業法第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する新保険業法第百条の二から第百条の四までの規定、新保険業法第二百七十二条の十六第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十二から第二百七十二条の二十四までの規定並びに新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十五第一項、第二百七十二条の二十六及び第二百七十二条の二十七の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、新保険業法第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する新保険業法第百条の二中「確保するための措置」とあるのは「確保するための措置（内閣府令で定めるものに限る。）」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する新保険業法第百条の三中「取引又は行為をしてはならない。ただし、当該取引又は行為をすることにつき内閣府令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない」とあるのは「取引又は行為（内閣府令で定めるものに限る。）をしてはならない」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十四第一項中「第二百七十二条の二第二項第四号に掲げる書類に定めた事項」とあるのは「保険料の算出方法又は責任準備金の算出方法として定めた事項」と、「同号に掲げる書類に定めた事項」とあるのは「当該事項」と、同条第二項中「第二百七十二条の二第二項第二号から第四号までに掲げる書類に定めた事項」とあるのは「保険約款（これに相当するものを含む。）又は保険料の算出方法若しくは責任準備金の算出方法として定めた事項」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十六第一項中「次の各号」とあるのは「第一号及び第三号から第五号まで」と、「第二百七十二条第一項の登録を取り消す」とあるのは「業務の廃止を命ずる」と、同項第一号中「第二百七十二条の四第一項第一号から第四号まで、第七号」とあるのは「第二百七十二条の四第一項第七号」と、同項第三号中「小規模事業者でなくなったとき、その他法令」とあるのは「法令」と、同項第四号中「第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「保険約款（これに相当するものを含む。）」と、同条第二項中「取締役、執行役、会計参与又は監査役」とあるのは「役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」と、「第二百七十二条の四第一項第十号イからヘまでのいずれかに該当することとなったとき、法令」とあるのは「法令」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十七中「第二百七十二条第一項の登録を取り消す」とあるのは「業務の廃止を命ずる」と、新保険業法第三百三十三条第一項中「発起人、設立時取締役、設立時執行役、設立時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役」とあるのは「発起人、役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 4 (1) When the Specified Insurer continuously carries on a specified insurance business pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, such Specified Insurer shall be deemed as a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, and the provisions of Article 100-2 to 100-4 of the New Insurance Business Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2), Article 272-16, paragraph (1) and the provisions of Article 272-16, Article 272-22 to 272-24 of the New Insurance Business Act and the provisions of Article 272-25, paragraph (1), Article 272-26 and 272-27 of the New Insurance Business Act (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall be applied. In this case, the term "measure for securement" in Article 100-2 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "measure for securement (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)"; the term "the Specified Insurer shall not carry out any of the following transactions or acts: provided, however, this shall not apply where the Prime Minister has approved such transaction or act for any of the compelling reasons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 100-3 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Insurer shall not carry out any of the following transactions or acts (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)," the term "matters defined in the documents included in Article 272-2, paragraph (2), item (iv)" in Article 272-24, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters defined as part of the method of calculating insurance premiums or the method of calculating policy reserve," the term "matters defined in the documents included in that item" shall be deemed to be replaced with "such matters," the term "matters defined in the documents included in Article 272-2, paragraph (2), items (ii) to (iv)" in Article 272, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance clause (including those relevant to this) or matters defined as the method of calculating insurance premiums or the method of calculating policy reserve," the term "the following items" in Article 272-26, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "items (i) and (iii) to (v)," the term "rescind the registration according to Article 272, paragraph (1)"shall be deemed to be replaced with "order for abolishing of the business," the term "from Article 272-4, paragraph (1), items (i) to (iv), (vii)" in item (i) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 272-4, paragraph (1), item (vii)," the term "in the event that the Specified Insurer is no longer a small business, other laws and regulations" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations," the term "documents included in each of the items in Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in item (iv) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance clause (including those relevant to this)," the term "the director, executive officer, and accounting adviser or company auditor" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officer (including a representative persons or administrator of an association or foundation that is not a juridical person)," the term "laws and regulations in the event that it falls under any of the provisions in Article 272-4, paragraph (1), item (x), (a) to (f)" in Article 272, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations," the term "canceling registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1)" in Article 272-27 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with order for abolishing of the business"; and the term "the incorporator, director at the time of incorporation, the executive officer at the time of incorporation, the company auditor at the time of incorporation, the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or any member who is supposed to carry out such duties and the company auditor" in Article 333, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the incorporator, officer (including a representative person or administrator of an association or foundation that is not a juridical person)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私のほうから、今も、ちょっと事務方から連絡が入ったのですけれども、為替レートが、また今、85円50銭まで下がっているということなのですが、今日の閣僚懇で、まあ「閣僚懇の中身は言うな」ということらしいのですけれども、そうとばかりは言っていれないので申し上げるけれども、こうした急激な円高が起きているということについて、Ｇ20や国際会議が何度も開かれている中で、こうして為替レートが急速に、乱高下というよりも、一つのドル安というようなトレンドが急速に進んでいるという、そうした状況に対して、我が国自身がこれにどう対応するか、ということとあわせて、アメリカや国際社会に対してこれの対応を求めるべきではないか、ということを、私は、（藤井）財務大臣にもお話をいたしまして、また、菅副総理に対しても、経済財政政策の責任者なので、「こうした一つの、もう円高のトレンドというような状況が非常に急激な形で進んでいるときに、それに対しての経済財政運営、やはり、これは機動的にやっていくべきなので、そういうことに対して、この政権はきちんとやっていく必要があるんじゃないの」と、補正予算、来年度予算編成についても、「マニフェストを実現するということも大事だけれども、そうした国内の経済にきちんと対応していくという、そういうことをやるべきではないですか」ということを、私は、申し上げました例文帳に追加

Just now, I heard from my staff that the Yen has risen to the dollar up to 85.50 yen. At today’s informal meeting of cabinet ministers -- although we are supposed to refrain from talking about what is discussed at the meeting -- regarding this rapid rise of the yen, I told the Minister of Finance (Mr. Fujii) that we should consider how Japan should deal with the excessively volatile exchange rate movements, or I should say the rapid decline of the dollar, and we should also urge the United States and the international community to take action to deal with it. I also suggested to Deputy Prime Minister Kan, who is responsible for economic and fiscal policies, that the government should flexibly take economic and fiscal policy measures at a time when a trend like the yen’s rise is rapidly progressing. Regarding the compilation of the supplementary budget and the budget for the next fiscal year, I said that although it is important to implement the election manifesto, the government should take appropriate measures with regard to the (ailing) domestic economy  - 金融庁

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a)「国民」とは、次の者をいう　。　(b)日本国については、日本国の国籍に関する法律にいう日本国民インドについては、インドの国籍を有する者「法令」とは、次のものをいう　。　(c)2日本国については、次条１に掲げる日本国の年金制度に関する日本国の法律及び規則インドについては、次条２に掲げる法律及び規則「権限のある当局」とは、次のものをいう　。　(d)日本国については、次条１に掲げる日本国の年金制度を管轄する政府機関インドについては、海外インド人問題担当大臣「実施機関」とは、次のものをいう　。　(e)日本国については、次条１に掲げる日本国の年金制度の実施に責任を有する保険機関（その連合組織を含む　。　2インドについては、被用者積立基金機構「保険期間」とは、一方の締約国の法令による保険料納付期間及び当該法令において給付を受ける権(f)利の確立に際して考慮されるその他の期間をいう　。　ただし、社会保障に関する他の協定であってこの協定と同種のものにより、当該法令による給付を受ける権利を確立するために考慮することとされた期間は、含めない　。　3「給付」とは、一方の締約国の法令による年金その他の現金給付をいう　。　(g)２ この協定の適用上、この協定において定義されていない用語は、適用される法令において与えられている意味を有するものとする　。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of this Agreement:(a) The term “India” means the Republic of India;(b) The term “national” means,as regards Japan,a Japanese national within the meaning of the lawon nationality of Japan,as regards India,a person of Indian nationality;(c) The term “legislation” means,as regards Japan,the laws and regulations of Japan concerning theJapanese pension systems specified in paragraph 1of Article 2,as regards India,the laws and regulations specified in paragraph 2of Article 2;(d) The term “competent authority” means,as regards Japan,any of the Governmental organizations competentfor the Japanese pension systems specified inparagraph 1 of Article 2,as regards India,the Minister of Overseas Indian Affairs;2(e) The term “competent institution” means,as regards Japan,any of the insurance institutions, or anyassociation thereof, responsible for theimplementation of the Japanese pension systemsspecified in paragraph 1 of Article 2,as regards India,the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization(EPFO);(f) The term “period of coverage” means a period ofcontribution under the legislation of aContracting State and any other period taken intoaccount under that legislation for establishingentitlement to benefits,however, a period which shall be taken intoaccount, for the purpose of establishingentitlement to benefits under that legislation,pursuant to other agreements on social securitycomparable with this Agreement shall not beincluded; and(g) The term “benefit” means a pension or any othercash benefit under the legislation of aContracting State . - 厚生労働省

第三十四条の二十三　会社法第二百七条（第九項第一号を除く。）、第六百四条第三項、第六百二十条、第六百二十三条第一項、第六百二十五条から第六百三十六条まで、第六百六十条、第六百六十一条及び第六百六十五条の規定は、有限責任監査法人について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第二百七条第一項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号に掲げる事項を」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産を出資の目的として」と、「同号」とあるのは「当該金銭以外」と、同条第七項及び第九項第二号から第五号までの規定中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産」と、同条第八項中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、「その募集株式の引受けの申込み又は第二百五条の契約に係る意思表示」とあるのは「出資の申込み」と、同条第十項第一号中「取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役」とあるのは「社員」と、「支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「使用人」と、同項第二号中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六百四条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する前項」と、同法第六百三十一条第一項中「事業年度」とあるのは「会計年度」と、同法第六百三十二条第一項中「第六百二十四条第一項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項」と、同条第二項中「が、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「が、公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と、「は、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「は、同法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 34-23 (1) The provisions of Article 207 (excluding paragraph (9)(i)), Article 604(3), Article 620, Article 623(1), Articles 625 to 636 inclusive, Article 660, Article 661 and Article 665 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to limited liability audit corporations. In this case, the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," the phrase "the matters listed in Article 199(1)(iii)" in Article 207(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "property other than money as the object of capital contribution," the phrase "provided for in that item" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "other than money," the phrase "provided for in Article 199(1)(iii)" in paragraph (7) and paragraph (9)(ii) to (v) inclusive of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of property other than money," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in paragraph (8) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the phrase "his/her applications for subscription for Shares for Subscription, or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "his/her offer for capital contribution," the phrase "director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or executive officer," in paragraph (10)(i) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "partner," the phrase "employee including a manager" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 604(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "business year" in Article 631(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "fiscal year," the term "Article 624(1)" in Article 632(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the phrase "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and the phrase "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十九条　組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項（各号列記以外の部分に限る。）、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条（株式会社の清算）、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条（非訟）並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第四十条（検査をすべき者の選任の裁判）の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで（第三十六条の七第四項を除く。）、第四十条（第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会）」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十九条　第九十七条、第九十七条の二第一項及び第二項、第九十八条、第九十九条第一項、第二項及び第四項から第六項まで、第百条並びに第百条の二の規定は外国保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第九十九条第三項及び第七項から第十項までの規定は外国生命保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第百一条から第百五条までの規定は外国損害保険会社等が他の損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。）との間で行う共同行為について、第七条の二、第百九条、第百十条第一項及び第三項、第百十一条第一項及び第三項から第六項まで、第百十二条、第百十四条から第百十八条まで並びに第百二十条から第百二十二条までの規定は外国保険会社等について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十七条第一項中「第三条第二項」とあるのは「第百八十五条第二項」と、第九十九条第六項中「相互会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社」と、同条第八項中「第百三十三条若しくは第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条若しくは第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、「第百三十三条又は第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条又は第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、同条第九項中「第百十一条第一項及び第二項」とあるのは「第百九十九条において準用する第百十一条第一項」と、第百九条中「事業年度」とあるのは「日本における事業年度」と、第百十条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、第百十一条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、同項及び同条第四項中「本店又は主たる事務所及び支店又は従たる事務所その他これらに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における支店その他これに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」と、同条第六項中「当該保険会社及びその子会社等の業務」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等の日本における業務」と、第百十二条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「内閣府令で定めるところにより、内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第二項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「日本において内閣府令」と、第百十四条第一項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「日本における保険契約者」と、第百十五条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「価格変動準備金」とあるのは「日本において価格変動準備金」と、同条第二項中「株式等」とあるのは「日本における株式等」と、第百十六条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「責任準備金」とあるのは「日本において責任準備金」と、同条第二項中「長期の」とあるのは「日本における長期の」と、同条第三項中「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、第百十七条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「支出として」とあるのは「支出として日本において」と、「支払備金」とあるのは「日本において支払備金」と、第百十八条第一項中「内閣府令で定める保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約のうち内閣府令で定めるもの」と、「設けなければならない」とあるのは「日本において設けなければならない」と、第百二十条第一項中「生命保険会社及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する損害保険会社」とあるのは「外国生命保険会社等及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する外国損害保険会社等」と、「は、取締役会において保険計理人」とあるのは「の日本における代表者は、当該外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「保険料の算出方法」とあるのは「日本において締結する保険契約に係る保険料の算出方法」と、同条第二項及び第三項中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、第百二十一条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「取締役会」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における代表者」と、第百二十二条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「当該保険会社」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 199 The provisions of Article 97, Article 97-2, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 98, Article 99, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) to (6), Article 100 and Article 100-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 99, paragraphs (3) and (7) to (10) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 101 to 105 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a concerted activity carried out by a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. with another Non-Life Insurance Company (including a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc.); and the provisions of Article 7-2, Article 109, Article 110, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 111, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) to (6) inclusive, Article 112, Article 114 to 118 inclusive, and Article 120 to 122 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 3, paragraph (2)" in Article 97, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (2)"; the term "Mutual Company" in Article 99, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "In the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act"; the term "Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act"; the term "Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (2)" in Article 99, paragraph (9) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199"; the term "business year" in Article 109 shall be deemed to be replaced with "business year in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property" in Article 110, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property" in Article 111, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "its head office or principal office and its branch offices or secondary offices, or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch office of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "business and property of the Insurance Company and its Subsidiary Company, etc." in Article 111, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "business and property of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the term "owns" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "owns in Japan"; the term ", pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "set aside as a reserve" in Article 112, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "set aside in Japan as a reserve;" the term "Policyholders" in Article 114, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders in Japan"; the terms "within its portfolio" and "set aside as price fluctuation reserve" in Article 115, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within its portfolio in Japan" and "set aside in Japan as price fluctuation reserve," respectively; the term "Shares, etc." in Article 115, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shares, etc. in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts" and "set aside a certain amount of money" in Article 116, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan" and "set aside in Japan a certain amount of money," respectively; the term "funding the policy reserve" in Article 116, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "funding in Japan the policy reserve"; the term "insurance contract" in Article 116, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts," "as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims" in Article 117, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan," "in Japan as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims in Japan," respectively; the terms "insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create" in Article 118, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create in Japan," respectively; the terms "board of directors," "Life Insurance Company or a Non-Life Insurance Company meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary" and "method of calculating insurance premiums" in Article 120, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "representative person," "Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc. or a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan" and "method of calculating the insurance premiums applicable to the insurance contracts concluded in Japan," respectively; the term "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan" respectively; the terms "actuary," "each accounting period," and "board of directors" in Article 121 shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," "each accounting period of the business year in Japan" and "representative person of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," respectively; and the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 122 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan", respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十一条　法第百四十五条第一項（外国法人に対する準用）において準用する法第二編第一章第三節（内国法人の各事業年度の所得に対する法人税の申告、納付及び還付）の規定の適用に係る事項については、前編第一章第三節（内国法人の各事業年度の所得に対する法人税の申告、納付及び還付）の規定を準用する。この場合において、第三十一条第一項第二号（中間申告書の記載事項）、第三十二条第一項第二号（仮決算をした場合の中間申告書の記載事項）、第三十四条第一項第二号（確定申告書の記載事項）、第三十六条第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長申請書の記載事項）、第三十六条の二第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長の特例の申請書の記載事項）、第三十六条の三第二号（確定申告書の提出期限の延長の特例の取りやめの届出書の記載事項）及び第三十六条の四第二号（欠損金繰戻しの還付請求書の記載事項）中「代表者の氏名」とあるのは「代表者の氏名及び国内において行う事業又は国内にある資産の経営又は管理の責任者の氏名」と、第三十三条第二号（仮決算をした場合の中間申告書の添付書類）及び第三十五条第三号（確定申告書の添付書類）中「勘定科目内訳明細書」とあるのは「勘定科目内訳明細書（法第百四十二条（国内源泉所得に係る所得の金額の計算）に規定する国内源泉所得に係る所得の金額の計算に係る部分に限る。）」とそれぞれ読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 61 (1) With regard to matters concerning the application of the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 3 (Filing of Returns, Payment, and Refunds of Corporation Tax on a Domestic Corporation's Income for Each Business Year) of the Act that are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 145, paragraph (1) (Mutatis Mutandis Application to Foreign Corporations) of the Act, the provisions of Chapter I, Section 3 of the preceding Part (Filing of Returns, Payment, and Refunds of Corporation Tax on a Domestic Corporation's Income for Each Business Year) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the term "The name of its representative" in Article 31, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Interim Return Form), Article 32, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Interim Return Form in the Case of the Provisional Settlement of Accounts), Article 34, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in Final Return Form), Article 36, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Application Form for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), Article 36-2, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in an Application Form for Special Provisions for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), Article 36-3, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in a Written Notice for Canceling Special Provisions for Extending the Due Date for Filing a Final Return Form), and Article 36-4, item (ii) (Matters to Be Entered in Claim Form for a Refund by Carrying Back Losses) shall be deemed to be replaced with "The name of its representative and the name of the person responsible for the operation or management of its business in Japan or its assets in Japan"; and the term "statement classified by items of accounts" in Article 33, item (ii) (Documents to Be Attached to Interim Return Form in the Case of Provisional Settlement of Accounts) and Article 35, item (iii) (Documents to Be Attached to a Final Return Form) shall be deemed to be replaced with "statement classified by items of accounts (limited to the part concerning the calculation of the amount of income categorized as income from domestic sources prescribed in Article 142 (Calculation of the Amount of Income Categorized as Income from Domestic Sources) of the Act)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム