「10 代」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(60ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

１０　第一項第一号の規定にかかわらず、別表第三第十一号ハに掲げる食品及び同表第十二号に掲げる作物である食品以外の食品及び添加物にあつては、製造者の住所及び氏名並びに製造者が厚生労働大臣に届け出た製造所固有の記号（アラビア数字、ローマ字、平仮名若しくは片仮名又はこれらの組合せによるものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は販売者の住所、氏名及び販売者である旨並びに製造者及び販売者が連名で厚生労働大臣に届け出た製造者の製造所固有の記号の記載をもつて製造所所在地及び製造者の氏名の表示に代えることができ、同表第十一号ハに掲げる食品及び同表第十二号に掲げる作物である食品にあつては、製造所又は加工所の所在地及び製造者又は加工者の氏名の表示を省略することができる。例文帳に追加

(10) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), item (i), for food listed in item 11., (c) of appended table 3, food other than food of farm products listed in item 12. of the same table, and additives, the location of the production facility and the name of the producer may be replaced by indicating the address and name of the producer and the marks unique to the production facility which the producer has notified to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to marks made in Arabic numerals, Roman letters, Hiragana, Katakana, or a combination thereof; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or the address and name of the seller, the fact that he/she is the seller, and the marks unique to the producer's production facility which the producer and the seller have notified to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare in their joint names. For food listed in item 11., (c) of the same table and food of farm products listed in item 12. of the same table, the location of the production or processing facility and the name of the producer of processor do not have to be indicated.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　経済産業大臣は、令別表第一の二の項（一）、（三）、（四）、（九）、（十八）から（二十六）まで、（三十三）、（四十七）若しくは（五十）、三の項（二）、四の項（六）若しくは（十五）、五の項（一）から（三）まで、（五）若しくは（七）から（十九）まで、六の項（一）、七の項（十八）から（二十一）まで、九の項（三）、一〇の項（三）若しくは（十四）、一四の項（一）若しくは（二）若しくは一五の項（一）から（三）までに掲げる貨物の輸出の許可又は令別表第二の一九、二〇若しくは三五の二の項の中欄に掲げる貨物の輸出の承認をする場合において当該輸出の許可又は承認を申請しようとする者に、当該貨物についての試験機関又は研究機関の代表者及び輸出の許可又は承認の申請をしようとする者の署名のある成分表二通又は化学分析表二通の提出を求めることができる。例文帳に追加

(3) The Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may, in giving export permission for goods listed in row 2 (i), (iii), (iv), (ix), (xviii) to (xxvi) inclusive, (xxxiii), (xlvii) or (l), row 3 (ii), row 4 (vi) or (xv), row 5 (i) to (iii) inclusive, (v) or (vii) to (xix) inclusive, row 6 (i), row 7 (xviii) to (xxi) inclusive, row 9 (iii), row 10 (iii) or (xiv), row 14 (i) or (ii), or row 15 (i) to (iii) inclusive of Appended Table 1 of the Order, or export approval for goods listed in the middle columns of row 19, row 20 or row 35-2 of Appended Table 2 of the Order, request a person who intends to apply for said permission or approval to submit two sets of a list of ingredients or two sets of a chemical analysis report signed by a representative of a laboratory or research institute regarding said goods and the person who intends to apply for export permission or approval.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　前項の場合において、第十条第二項（第八号の二に係る部分に限る。）及び次章の規定並びにこれらの規定に係る第九章の規定の適用については、外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行の主たる営業所及びその外国における支店その他の営業所（以下この項において「外国銀行外国営業所」と総称する。）は、一の外国銀行とみなし、当該外国銀行支店が行う当該外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行の外国銀行外国営業所とその顧客の取引の仲介（外国銀行の業務の代理又は媒介に相当するものとして内閣府令で定めるものに限る。）は、当該一の外国銀行の業務の媒介とみなし、当該取引の仲介に係る外国銀行外国営業所は、当該外国銀行支店が当該一の外国銀行の業務の媒介の委託を受ける旨の契約の相手方とみなす。例文帳に追加

(3) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (2) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (viii)-2) and the provisions of the following Chapter as well as the provisions of Chapter IX pertaining to these provisions, a principal business office of a Foreign Bank to which the Branch Office of the Foreign Bank belongs and branch offices and other business offices in the relevant foreign state (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Business Offices in the Home State") shall be deemed as a single Foreign Bank, the intermediation for transactions between the Business Offices in the Home State of a Foreign Bank to which the Branch Office of the Foreign Bank belongs to be conducted by said Branch Office of the Foreign Bank and its customer (limited to intermediation specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as that equivalent to the agency or intermediation for the business activities of a Foreign Bank) shall be deemed as an intermediation for the business activities of the single Foreign Bank, and the Business Offices in the Home State related to the intermediation for the transaction shall be deemed as a counterparty to the contract for the Branch Office of the Foreign Bank to accept the entrustment of intermediation for the business activities of the single Foreign Bank.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

この頃、本土では、薩摩の意見も取り入れ、文久2年（1862年）7月に松平慶永が政事総裁職、徳川慶喜が将軍後見職となり（文久の幕政改革）、閏8月に会津藩主松平容保が京都守護職、桑名藩主松平定敬が京都所司代となって、幕権に回復傾向が見られる一方、文久3年（1863年）5月に長州藩の米艦砲撃事件、8月に奈良五条の天誅組の乱と長州への七卿落ち（八月十八日の政変）、10月に生野の変など、開港に反対する攘夷急進派が種々の抵抗をして、幕権の失墜をはかっていた。例文帳に追加

At this time, in July 1862, Yoshinaga MATSUDAIRA became the president of political affairs, and Yoshinobu TOKUGAWA became the Shogun-kokenshoku officer (reformation of shogunate administration in Bunkyu) that took in Satsuma's opinion; also, on the main island, in an intercalary year on August, Katamori MATSUDAIRA of the lord of the Aizu domain attained the title of Kyoto Shugoshoku, and Sadaaki MATSUDAIRA of the lord of the Kuwana domain became Kyoto Shoshidai (the local governor of Kyoto), and the power of the Bakufu (feudal government) was showing an inclination to reconstruction, however in May 1863, the Choshu domain caused an incident in that gunfire at a North American ship was discharged and the Tenchugumi-no-ran War at Nara Gojo, and the seven nobles outrunning to Choshu (Coups of August eighteenth) occurred in August, and Ikuno-no-Hen (Conspiracy of Ikuno) occurred in October, and also the radical Joi (those who held to the principle of excluding foreigners) group, which was against opening the port, provided resistance several times to thward the plans of the domain.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

よくご存じのように、小泉さんの時代に、もう何もかも官はやめて、全部民が良いのだといって、行き過ぎたところも率直に言ってありますから、今は、政策によっての見直しが修正点であります。例えば、一部を言えば、タクシーの規制緩和、これは当時、規制緩和をやりました。そうすると、もうご存じのように、10年間で運転手の収入が、大体、平均3分の2になっています。それから、やはり競争が激しくなりますから、働かなければいけない。しかし、実際には3分の2の所得になって、勤務時間が1.2倍になる。非常に嫌なことでございますけれども、タクシーの運転手はプロです。しかし、事故率が2倍になっています。これは、あまりにも行き過ぎだということで、自由民主党の政権の時だったと思いますが、少し行き過ぎた規制緩和を是正するような法律を作りました。例文帳に追加

As you know well, frankly speaking, privatization went too far during the Koizumi era, based on the idea that public-sector institutions should be entirely abolished and everything should be taken over by the private sector. Now, we are making revisions on a policy-by-policy basis. For example, the deregulation of the taxi industry is a case in point. In the Koizumi era, this industry was deregulated. As a result, a taxi driver’s income fell by a third over a 10-year period, as you may know. In addition, due to increased competition, taxi drivers must work harder. However, their income fell by a third while their working hours increased 20%. Very regrettably, the accident rate for taxi drivers, who are professional drivers, has doubled. As deregulation went too far, a law intended to correct excessive deregulation was enacted while the LDP was in power as the governing party, as I remember it.  - 金融庁

私にとりましては、あるいは日本にとりましては、今回の危機は「100年に一度」ではなくて、「10年で2度目」でございます。ご案内のように、我が国は、1990年代の末に深刻な金融危機を経験したわけでございまして、私に言わせれば、日本にとっては、前回の危機の方がより深刻であったと思います。前回の危機は、日本自身が作ったバブルでございますし、銀行がそのバブルの生成に深く関与していたということでございます。錯綜した債権・債務関係が生じ、その中には「飛ばし」と呼ばれるような形もございました。不良債権問題というのは、借り手の側から見れば過剰債務問題ということでもございました。こういうことで、いわば内生的に発生した危機、内生的な危機であったと思います。例文帳に追加

For me, or for Japan, this is the second crisis in a decade, rather than a once in a century crisis. As you know, Japan experienced a serious financial crisis in the late 1990s, and in my opinion, the previous crisis was more serious than the current one. The previous crisis resulted from the economic bubble created by Japan itself. Banks were deeply involved in the creation of the bubble. Complicated webs of credit-debt relationship, including an arrangement called “tobashi,” were formed. From the viewpoint of borrowers, the bad-loan problem was a problem of excessive debts. In this sense, that crisis was an internally-generated one.  - 金融庁

ご存じのように金融の自己資本についても、高ければ高いほどいいというものではございません。日本は10年前に皆さん方も経験したように、自己資本比率で非常に貸し渋り貸しはがしが起こりまして、私も当時は与党の国会議員でございましたが、大変苦労をいたしましたので。しかし、同時に、金融の安定性ということも非常に大事でございましたから、そこら辺をマクロ経済学、あるいは経済の活性化、持続可能な経済と、まさに持続可能な経済には安定した健全な金融機関が必要であるということは、皆さん方よくご存じでございますが、そこら辺をどの辺で世界的に調和をしていくかということは、非常に大事な、今、世界史的な大問題でございまして、G8、G20で話を詰めておりますけれども、そういった大事な時期に、私に言わせれば21世紀の最も節目の時代にアメリカに行かせていただきまして、大変にいい勉強をさせていただきました。例文帳に追加

As you know, just because a financial institution has more capital does not mean it is better. In Japan, many credit crunch and credit withdrawal cases arose due to the capital adequacy ratio issue a decade ago, as you and I experienced. I was a Diet member of the ruling party at the time and struggled a great deal with it. At the same time, however, financial stability is also extremely important. In macroeconomics, or to stimulate the economy and attain a sustainable economy, it is necessary to have stable and sound financial institutions, as you are well aware. The question of how global harmonization in this field can be achieved has now become a critical issue at a level that has world historical significance, and is being discussed extensively at G8 and G20. My visit to the United States at such a significant point in time, or in my words, at the biggest juncture of the 21st century, was highly informative.  - 金融庁

それからもう1点は身近な話でございますけれども、私は政治家というのは鳥の目と虫の目が大事だと思っております。両方です。やはり本当に身近な虫の目もないと、民主主義国家において政治は駄目だと、私は25年させていただいて、そう思っておりまして。「虫の目」と言ったらおしかりいただくかもしれませんけれども、やはり改正貸金業法の（完全施行）後、こんなことは明治以来、多分、例がないと思うのですが、施行したすぐ後に改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを作りました。これは1,500万人の方が貸金業を利用しておられる中で、全会一致で多重債務者を防ごうという法律を作ったわけでございます。特にこの10年間、デフレの中で1世帯当たり100万円、所得が減ったわけでございますから、そういった時代において、現実に色々な一人一人の生活の本当にうめき声やため息が聞こえてくるわけでございます。例文帳に追加

Another point that I would like to make is closer to home. In my opinion, it is critical for a politician to have a bird's eye and an insect's eye – both of these. Having been a politician for 25 years, I feel that it is imperative that politics in a democratic nation have an insect's eye to really look at things up close. I might get a disapproving look if I use the expression "an insect's eye" in this context but, right after the Amended Money Lending Business Act came into full force, we established the Amended Money Lending Business Act Follow-Up Team, which was in all likelihood an unprecedented move since the Meiji era. While 15 million people use services of the money lending industry, we enacted, with unanimous support, a law designed to prevent multiple debtors from being generated. As the level of per-household income dropped by one million yen amid deflation notably in the past ten years, we hear, and really hear, suffering voices and sighs of people in various forms of livelihood hardships attributable to those difficult times.  - 金融庁

偽造商標が使用されている又は登録商標が偽って使用されている商品又は物を販売のため又は取引もしくは製造のいずれかの目的のために輸入，販売又は展示するもしくは所有する者は何人も，本条でいう犯罪行為に対しすべての適切な事前の注意を払った上で，当該の時に，当該標章の真性を疑う理由を一切有しておらず，当該起訴により又は当該起訴の代わりになされた要求を受け，自己に当該商品又は物を与えた者に関するすべての情報を自己の権限において提供したこと，又は，善意で行動したこと，以上のことを証明する場合を除き，犯罪をなし，有罪判決により5年以下の禁固もしくは偽造商標が使用されている又は登録商標が偽って使用されている商品又は物それぞれにつき，10，000米ドル以下の罰金(合計100，000米ドル以下)，又はその両方を科せられる。例文帳に追加

Any person who imports, sells or exposes or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture any goods or thing to which a counterfeit trade mark has been applied or to which a registered trade mark has been falsely applied, unless he proves that ? having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence under this section, he had, at the relevant time, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the mark and on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecution, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons from whom he obtained the goods or thing; or he had acted innocently, is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, a fine not exceeding $10,000 for each goods or thing to which the counterfeit trade mark has been applied or the registered trade mark has been falsely applied (but not to exceed in the aggregate $100,000), or both.  - 特許庁

登録商標が不正に適用された商品を，(a)取引若しくは製造の目的でシンガポールに輸入する者， (b)販売する若しくは販売のために申し出る若しくは陳列する者，又は (c)取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は， (i)本条に基づく違反に対してすべての合理的な注意を講じており，主張される違反の時点で標章の真正さを疑う理由がなく，訴追により若しくはこの代わりになされた請求に基づき，その商品を入手した者に関するすべての情報を自己の権限において与えたこと，又は (ii)善意で行為したこと，を証明しない限り有罪とし，商標が不正に適用された商品又は事物ごとに1万ドル以下(ただし，総額で10万ドル以下)の罰金若しくは5年以下の拘禁に処し又はこれを併科する。例文帳に追加

Any person who- (a) imports into Singapore for the purpose of trade or manufacture; (b) sells or offers exposes for sale; or (c) has in his possession for the purpose of trade or manufacture, any goods to which a registered trade mark is falsely applied shall, unless he proves that- (i) having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence under this section, he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the mark and on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecution, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons from whom he obtained the goods; or (ii) he had acted innocently, be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 for each goods or thing to which the trade mark is falsely applied (but not exceeding in the aggregate $100,000) or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to both. - 特許庁

第3章で述べるように、最近は開業率の低下傾向が続いている中で依然多くの開業者が雇用創出等で重要な役割を果たしていること、特に異業種での経験を活かして他業種に参入し多くの雇用を創出している開業者も見られること、この10年間を見ると中堅世代の流入が減少したことを主因として自営業主が100万人以上減少していること、自営業減少の主因はデフレと対雇用者比での所得低下（開業リスク上昇）によるものであり自営業層への流入を抑制するような政府規制等によるものでないこと、規模間の上昇・下降は多く見られ自営業の中でも中長期的には法人化が進んでいること等は、自営業が閉じられた階層ではなく、参入障壁の低さと活発な競争を背景として、多数の参入、退出、規模移動が行われているとの見方と整合的である。例文帳に追加

The self-employed are not a closed class: as we shall see in Chapter 3, the still large numbers of people entering self-employment despite the recent continuing downward trend in the entry rate are playing an important part in creating jobs; entrepreneurs utilizing their experience in one industry to enter another are creating particularly many jobs; over the past decade, the number of self-employed business owners has declined by more than one million due to the outflow of middleaged entrepreneurs; the principal causes of the decline in self-employment are deflation and the decline in incomes compared with those of employed persons (increasing entry risk), and not government regulations curbing entry to the ranks of the self-employed; and businesses move frequently between size categories, with self-employed businesses increasingly incorporating in the medium and long-term. This is consistent with the position that, due to the low barriers to entry and active competition, entries, withdrawals and size movements are common. - 経済産業省

しかしながら、感染症のみならず、がん、認知症等に対するワクチンへの期待が寄せられ、世界のワクチン需要は向 10 年で現在の 3 倍以上と予測される中、このままでは日本は世界の競争に乗り遅れてしまう。「ワクチン産業ビジョン」を強力に推進することにより、ワクチン開発の新しいターゲットを、アルツハイマー等の疾患の予防・治療、がん等の疾患の予防・治療、新たな小児・成人・高齢者感染症の予防、新型インフルエンザ対策等とし、これまでの注射による古典的な予防接種技術のみならず、効率的培養法、抗原タンパク製造法等の新しい生産・製剤化技術の開発及びその臨床評価により、経鼻等の新投与経路によるワクチンやさらに効果的なワクチンとしてＤＮＡワクチンの開発につながる次世代ワクチン開発研究を推進する必要がある。（2008 年度～）例文帳に追加

Nevertheless, hopes are gathering for vaccines for disorders such as cancer and dementia as well as for infections, and the global demand for vaccines is estimated to at least treble the current level in the next ten years. If this situation persists, Japan will be left behind in the global competition. The 'Vaccine Industry Vision' should be pushed ahead to allow new vaccine development targets to be set, including the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's and similar disorders, the prevention and treatment of cancer and similar disorders, the prevention of new infectious diseases in adults and the elderly and the fight against new types of influenza. Second-generation vaccine research should be promoted whereby, in addition to conventional injection-based inoculation techniques, the development and clinical evaluation of new production and pharmaceutical techniques, such as efficient culture methods and antigen protein manufacturing processes, leads to the development of vaccines with transnasal or other new routes of administration and also of effective DNA vaccines. (Fiscal 2008 ~ ) - 厚生労働省

６　会社法第二編第四章第十節第三款（委員会の運営）の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の四の八　第二十四条の四の二の規定は、前条第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により四半期報告書を提出する場合及び同条第四項において読み替えて準用する第七条、第九条第一項又は第十条第一項の規定により訂正報告書を提出する場合について準用する。この場合において、第二十四条の四の二第一項中「有価証券報告書の記載内容」とあるのは「四半期報告書（その訂正報告書を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の記載内容」と、「有価証券報告書等に代えて外国会社報告書」とあるのは「四半期報告書に代えて外国会社四半期報告書」と、「当該外国会社報告書」とあるのは「当該外国会社四半期報告書」と、同条第二項中「有価証券報告書と併せて」とあるのは「四半期報告書と併せて」と、同条第六項中「第二十四条の四の二第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による確認書」とあるのは「第二十四条の四の八において読み替えて準用する第二十四条の四の二第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による確認書」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 24-4-8 (1) Article 24-4-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Quarterly Securities Report is submitted under paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3)) and where an amendment report is submitted under Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 24-4-7(4). In this case, the terms "a Foreign Company Report," "Foreign Company Reports are submitted instead of Annual Securities Reports, etc." and "statements contained in the Annual Securities Report" in Article 24-4-2(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Foreign Company Quarterly Securities Report," "Foreign Company Quarterly Securities Reports are submitted instead of Quarterly Securities Report" and "statements contained in the Quarterly Securities Report (including amendment reports therefor; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," respectively; the term "together with an Annual Securities Report" in Article 24-4-2(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "together with a Quarterly Securities Report"; the part "a Confirmation Letter to be submitted under Article 24-4-2(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(4)) or Article 24-4-2(4))" in Article 24-4-2(6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Confirmation Letter to be submitted under Article 24-4-2(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(4)) or Article 24-4-2(4)) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 24-4-8"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の五の二　第二十四条の四の二の規定は、前条第一項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により半期報告書を提出する場合及び同条第五項において読み替えて準用する第七条、第九条第一項又は第十条第一項の規定により訂正報告書を提出する場合について準用する。この場合において、第二十四条の四の二第一項中「有価証券報告書の記載内容」とあるのは「半期報告書（その訂正報告書を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の記載内容」と、「有価証券報告書等に代えて外国会社報告書」とあるのは「半期報告書に代えて外国会社半期報告書」と、「当該外国会社報告書」とあるのは「当該外国会社半期報告書」と、同条第二項中「有価証券報告書と併せて」とあるのは「半期報告書と併せて」と、同条第六項中「第二十四条の四の二第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による確認書」とあるのは「第二十四条の五の二において読み替えて準用する第二十四条の四の二第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による確認書」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 24-5-2 (1) Article 24-4-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Semiannual Securities Report is submitted under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(3)) and where an amendment report is submitted under Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 24-5(5). In this case, the terms "a Foreign Company Report," "Foreign Company Reports are submitted instead of Annual Securities Reports, etc." and "statements contained in the Annual Securities Report" in Article 24-4-2(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Foreign Company Semiannual Securities Report," "Foreign Company Semiannual Securities Reports are submitted instead of Semiannual Securities Report" and "statements contained in the Semiannual Securities Report (including amendment reports therefor; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," respectively; the term "together with an Annual Securities Report" in Article 24-4-2(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "together with an Semiannual Securities Report"; the part "a Confirmation Letter to be submitted under Article 24-4-2(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(4)) or Article 24-4-2(4))" in Article 24-4-2(6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Confirmation Letter to be submitted under Article 24-4-2(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-2(4)) or Article 24-4-2(4)) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 24-5-2"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ニ　第十条第一項の規定により第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第四十四条第一項の規定により第三条の免許を取り消され、第四十五条第一項の規定により第七条第一項の登録、第五十条の二第一項の登録若しくは第五十二条第一項の登録を取り消され、第五十条の二第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第五十四条第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第五十九条第一項の規定により第五十三条第一項の免許を取り消され、第六十条第一項の規定により第五十四条第一項の登録を取り消され、若しくは第八十二条第一項の規定により第六十七条第一項の登録を取り消された場合、担保付社債信託法第十二条の規定により同法第三条の免許を取り消された場合、若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第十条の規定により同法第一条第一項の認可を取り消された場合又はこの法律、担保付社債信託法若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許、登録若しくは認可を取り消された場合、若しくは当該免許、登録若しくは認可の更新を拒否された場合において、その取消しの日前三十日以内にその法人の取締役若しくは執行役、会計参与若しくはこれらに準ずる者又は国内における代表者（第五十三条第二項に規定する国内における代表者をいう。）であった者でその取消しの日から五年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(d) in regard to a juridical person for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of Article 10(1), whose license under Article 3 has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 44(1), whose registration under Article 7(1), Article 50-2(1), or Article 52(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 45(1), for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50-2(2) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54(2) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, whose license under Article 53(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 59(1), whose registration under Article 54(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 60(1), or whose registration under Article 67(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 82(1), or in regard to a juridical person whose license under Article 3 of the Secured Bonds Trust Act has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 12 of that Act, whose authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of that Act, or whose license, registration, or authorization of the same kind which was obtained in a foreign state has been rescinded or for whom the renewal of said license, registration, or authorization has been refused pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the foreign state that are equivalent to this Act, the Secured Bonds Trust Act, or the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions, a person who, within thirty days prior to the rescission, was a director or executive officer, accounting advisor, or a person equivalent thereto, or who was a representative of the relevant juridical person in Japan (which means a Representative in Japan as prescribed in Article 53(2)) and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the date of rescission;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条　同意基本計画（第五条第二項第四号に掲げる事項が定められているものに限る。）において定められた同項第三号に規定する区域（以下「同意企業立地重点促進区域」という。）の存する市町村は、同意企業立地重点促進区域における製造業等（工場立地法第二条第三項に規定する製造業等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に係る工場又は事業場の緑地（同法第四条第一項第一号に規定する緑地をいう。以下この条において同じ。）及び環境施設（同法第四条第一項第一号に規定する環境施設をいう。以下この条において同じ。）のそれぞれの面積の敷地面積に対する割合に関する事項（以下この条において「緑地面積率等」という。）について、条例で、次項の基準の範囲内において、同法第四条第一項の規定により公表され、又は同法第四条の二第一項の規定により定められた準則に代えて適用すべき準則を定めることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 10 (1) Municipalities having a zone prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (2), item (iii) that is designated in the agreed basic plan (limited to one that provides for matters listed in Article 5, paragraph (2), item (iv)) (hereinafter such zone shall be referred to as the "agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities") may establish applicable rules, in lieu of rules that have been publicized as prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Factory Location Act or rules that have been established as prescribed in Article 4-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act, in Municipal Ordinances, within the scope of the standards set forth in the following paragraph, with regard to matters concerning the ratio against the total site area of factories or workplaces pertaining to manufacturing industries, etc. (meaning manufacturing industries, etc. prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of respective areas of green spaces (meaning green spaces prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and environmental facilities (meaning environmental facilities prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) therein (hereinafter such matters shall be referred to as "green space-area ratios etc." in this Article) in the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条　動物（哺乳類、鳥類又は爬虫類に属するものに限り、畜産農業に係るもの及び試験研究用又は生物学的製剤の製造の用その他政令で定める用途に供するために飼養し、又は保管しているものを除く。以下この節及び次節において同じ。）の取扱業（動物の販売（その取次ぎ又は代理を含む。次項において同じ。）、保管、貸出し、訓練、展示（動物との触れ合いの機会の提供を含む。次項において同じ。）その他政令で定める取扱いを業として行うことをいう。以下「動物取扱業」という。）を営もうとする者は、当該業を営もうとする事業所の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事（地方自治法（昭和二十二年法律第六十七号）第二百五十二条の十九第一項の指定都市（以下「指定都市」という。）にあつては、その長とする。以下この節、第二十五条第一項及び第二項並びに第四節において同じ。）の登録を受けなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 10 (1) A person who intends to engage in a business that handles animals (such animals shall be limited to mammals, birds, and reptiles, and shall exclude those pertaining to livestock farming and those being cared for or kept in order to be provided for use in testing and research, use in manufacturing biological preparations, or for other uses specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section and the following Section) (such business shall include selling [including acting as an intermediary or agent therefor; the same shall apply in the following paragraph], keeping, lending, training, exhibiting [including the provision of opportunities for contact with animals; the same shall apply in the following paragraph] or other handling specified by a Cabinet Order with regard to animals; hereinafter referred to as the "animal handling business") shall receive registration from the prefectural governor having jurisdiction over the location of the place of business where the person intends to engage in said business (in the case of a designated city set forth in Article 252-19(1) of the Local Autonomy Act [Act No. 67 of 1947] [hereinafter referred to as the "designated city"], the mayor of said designated city; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section, Article 25(1) and (2) and Section 4).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二条　法第十条第二項（第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取得し、又は所有する株式に関する報告をしようとする者は、国内の会社にあつては様式第四号による報告書、外国会社にあつては様式第五号による報告書一通を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、合併又は分割をすることにより、議決権保有割合が法第十条第二項（第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の政令で定める数値を超えることとなる場合において、法第十五条第二項（第三項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公正取引委員会に届け出ることとされている合併に関する計画又は法第十五条の二第二項（第五項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公正取引委員会に届け出ることとされている共同新設分割に関する計画若しくは法第十五条の二第三項（第五項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公正取引委員会に届け出ることとされている吸収分割に関する計画において当該株式に関する事項を記載したときは、その合併に関する計画又は共同新設分割に関する計画若しくは吸収分割に関する計画を届け出ることをもつて当該株式に関する報告書の提出に代えることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 2 (1) A person who files a report on shares acquired or held pursuant to the provision in paragraph 2, Article 10 of the Act (including mutatis mutandis application pursuant to paragraph 3) shall submit to the Fair Trade Commission a written report using Form No. 4 if it is a company in Japan or a written report using Form No. 5 if it is a foreign company; provided, however, that when a merger or a split results in the ratio of voting rights held exceeding the level specified by the Cabinet Order prescribed in paragraph 2, Article 10 of the Act (including mutatis mutandis application pursuant to paragraph 3) and when information on the shares is stated in the plan with respect to a merger to be submitted to the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to the provision in paragraph 2, Article 15 of the Act (including mutatis mutandis application pursuant to paragraph 3), in the plan with respect to a joint incorporation-type split to be submitted to the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to the provision in paragraph 2, Article 15-2 of the Act (including mutatis mutandis application pursuant to paragraph 5) or in the plan with respect to an absorption-type split to be submitted to the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to the provision in paragraph 3, Article 15-2 of the Act (including mutatis mutandis application pursuant to paragraph 5), submission of the written report on the shares may be replaced by filing of a notification of the plan with respect to the merger, the joint incorporation-type split or the absorption-type split.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１ 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条（第二号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。）、第八十一条（第三号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。）、第八十二条及び第八十三条の規定は、第百三十九条第二項第一号に掲げる場合における合併による会員商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称及び主たる事務所」と、同法第八十条第四号中「資本金の額」とあるのは「出資の総額」と、同条第五号 及び同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同法第八十条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意（定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続）があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併をする会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十一条中「次の書面」とあるのは「次の書面及び代表権を有する者の資格を証する書面」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意（定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続）があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十二条第二項から第四項まで及び第八十三条中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(1) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items 2, 6, 9 and 10), Article 81 (excluding items 3, 6, 9 and 10), Article 82 and Article 83 of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Member Commodity Exchanges upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 139, paragraph 2, item 1. In this case, the phrase "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office," the phrase "amount of stated capital" in Article 80, item 4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total amount of contribution," the term "head office" in item 5 of the same Article and Article 81, item 5 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an absorption-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in Article 80, item 7 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange implementing an Absorption-Type Merger," the phrase "the following documents" in Article 81 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replace with "the following documents and a document proving the qualification of the person having the representation power," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an incorporation-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item 7 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger," the term "the head office" in Article 82, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive and Article 83 of th same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 経済産業省

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。例文帳に追加

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects.  - 金融庁

5. 我々は、一次産品価格の潜在的な過度の変動の影響についての懸念を議論し、我々の代理に対し、国際機関と協働して、根底にある動きと、こうした趨勢が消費国と生産国双方に与える課題について我々に報告し、可能性のある対応策の検討を求めた。我々は、この変動が食糧安全保障に与える影響に留意しつつ、途上国の農業セクターへの長期的な投資の必要性を改めて表明した。我々は、石油データイニシアティブ共同機構（JODI oil）の質、適時性及び信頼性を高めるための IEF、IEA 及び OPEC による中間報告を歓迎し、最終報告で詳述されるこれらの提言を実施するための戦略について更に取り組むことを求める。1 月 24 日にリヤドで開催されたシンポジウムに基づき、我々は、IEF が 2011 年 2 月 22 日の次の会合において、産消対話を改善するための具体的な戦略を提供することを奨励する。首脳の要請を受け、我々は、IMF 及びIEF 並びに IEA、GECF 及び OPEC に対し、石油の価格変動に関する G20 の作業をガスと石炭に拡大するための具体的な提言を2011 年 10 月までに策定することを求める。我々は、次回会合において、以下の報告を議論することを期待している：価格報告機関に関する IEF、IEA、OPEC 及び IOSCO の報告、現在関連する国際機関によって作業が行われている食糧安全保障に関する中間報告、及び、特に、透明性を強化し、市場の濫用に対処するための商品デリバティブ市場の規制・監督に関する IOSCO の提言及びFSB の次のステップの検討。例文帳に追加

5. We discussed concerns about consequences of potential excessive commodity price volatility and asked our deputies to work with international organizations and to report back to us on the underlying drivers and the challenges posed by these trends for both consumers and producers and consider possible actions. Keeping in mind the impact of this volatility on food security, we reiterated the need for long-term investment in the agricultural sector in developing countries. We welcomed the interim report by the IEF, IEA and OPEC to improve the quality, timeliness and reliability of the Joint Organization Data Initiative Oil (JODI oil) and call for further work on strategies to implement these recommendations to be detailed in their final report. Building on the Riyadh symposium held on January 24th, we encourage the IEF to provide concrete strategies to improve the producer-consumer dialogue at its next meeting on February 22nd 2011. Following our Leaders' request, we call on the IMF and IEF, as well as IEA, GECF and OPEC, to develop by October 2011 concrete recommendations to extend the G20's work on oil price volatility to gas and coal. We look forward to discussing at our next meeting the report of IEF, IEA, OPEC and IOSCO on price reporting agencies as well as the interim report on food security currently being undertaken by the relevant international organizations, and IOSCO's recommendations, and the FSB's consideration of next steps, on regulation and supervision of commodity derivatives markets notably to strengthen transparency and address market abuses.  - 財務省

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。）、第七編第二章第四節並びに第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。）並びに第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設立時取締役、設立時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店（第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店）」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ホ　破産法第百八十六条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第百九十二条第三項の規定による商事留置権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第二百四十八条第一項の規定による免責許可の申立て若しくは同法第二百五十六条第一項の規定による復権の申立て、民事再生法第百四十八条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、行政事件訴訟法の規定による執行停止決定の取消しの申立て、若しくは仮の義務付け若しくは仮の差止めの決定の取消しの申立て、労働組合法（昭和二十四年法律第百七十四号）第二十七条の二十の規定による申立て、配偶者からの暴力の防止及び被害者の保護に関する法律第十六条第三項若しくは第十七条第一項の規定による申立て、労働審判法第四条第一項ただし書の規定による弁護士でない者を代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律第七条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による民事執行の手続の停止若しくは続行を命ずる裁判を求める申立て、家事審判法第十五条の六の規定による申立て、人事訴訟法（平成十五年法律第百九号）第三十九条第一項の規定による申立て、特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第百五条の四第一項若しくは第百五条の五第一項の規定による申立て、著作権法（昭和四十五年法律第四十八号）第百十四条の六第一項若しくは第百十四条の七第一項の規定による申立て又は不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項の規定による申立て例文帳に追加

(e) The filing of a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 186, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a right of retention under the Commercial Law under the provisions of Article 192, paragraph (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for a grant of discharge under the provisions of Article 248, paragraph (1) of said Act or a petition for the restoration of rights under the provisions of Article 256, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, a petition for revocation of an order for a stay of execution or a petition for the revocation of a provisional mandatory order or a provisional injunctive order under the provisions of the Administrative Case Litigation Act, a request under the provisions of Article 27-20 of the Labor Union Act (Act No. 174 of 1949), a petition under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (3) or Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent under the provisions of the proviso to Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Labor Tribunal Act, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of civil execution proceedings under the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc., a petition under the provisions of Article 15-6 of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations, a petition under the provisions of Article 39, paragraph (1) of the Personal Status Litigation Act (Act No. 109 of 2003), a motion under the provisions of Article 105-4, paragraph (1) or Article 105-5, paragraph (1) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959), a petition under the provisions of Article 114-6, paragraph (1) or Article 114-7, paragraph (1) of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), or a petition under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993)  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

総督は次の事項に関し規則を制定することができる: (a) 特許出願の様式及び記載事項 (b) 特許登録簿及びその索引の様式に関する事項 (c) 特許権に関する譲渡，移転，権利の部分放棄，判決又はその他の書類の登録に関する事項 (d) 本法律により発行する証明書の様式及びその記載事項 (e) 本法律又は本法律に基づいて制定された規則に従って特許出願の提出若しくは他の手続を取ることに関し，又は長官若しくは特許庁において雇用された者により提供される役務若しくは施設の利用に関し課される手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (f) 特許出願を維持するため若しくは特許付与により得られた権利を維持するための手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (g) 時期及び方法を含む所定の手数料の納付，かかる手数料の追納の場合に課する追加手数料，並びに既に納付した手数料の全部又は一部を還付する場合の状況に関する事項 (h) カナダと他の国との間に存在する条約，協定，取決め又は約定の条件の実施に関する事項 (i) 本法律中の如何なる規定にも拘らず，随時の改正，修正及び変更を含めて，1970年6月19日にワシントンで作成され，カナダが締約国である特許協力条約の実施に関する事項 (j) 特許代理人登録簿における個人及び事務所の名称の記入，維持，抹消に関する事項。これには登録簿に個人又は事務所の名称を記入し維持する前にその個人又は事務所が満たさなければならない資格及び条件に関する事項を含む。 (j.1) 第8.1条に基づく書類，情報又は手数料の提出に関する事項。これには次のものを含む。 (i) 同条に基づいて電子的又は他の方式で提出することができる書類，情報又は手数料 (ii) かかる提出をすることのできる者及びこれに類する者，及び (iii) 長官が受領したとみなす時点 (j.2) 第8.2条に基づいて書類又は情報を記入又は記録することに関する事項 (j.3) 特許出願を取り下げる方法を規定する事項，及び第10条(4)及び(5)の適用上，優先権主張若しくは特許出願の取下をその日以前に行うべき日又はその日を決定する方法を規定する事項 (j.4) 次のものを含む優先権主張に関する事項 (i) 優先権主張をすべき期間 (ii) 第28.4条(2)にいう事項を長官に届け出る方式及び期間 (iii) 優先権主張を支持するために提出すべき書類，及び (iv) 優先権主張の取下 (j.5) 第35条(1)に基づいて出願審査の請求及びその所定の手数料の納付をすべき時期に関する事項 (j.6) 第38.1条の適用上，生物材料の寄託に関する事項 (j.7) 特許出願の一部として提出された明細書又は図面の補正の方法に関する事項 (j.8) 状況により正当化されると長官が納得した場合は，所定の条件に従うことを条件として，本法律により又はそれに基づいて何らかの事柄をするために定められた時期を延長する権限を長官に付与することに関する事項 (k) 本法律の何れかの条項に従って規定すべきその他の事項を規定することに関する事項，及び (l) 本法律の目的を達成するため，又は長官及びその他の特許庁の職員が本法律を適切に施行するのを確保するために必要な一般的事項例文帳に追加

The Governor in Council may make rules or regulations (a) respecting the form and contents of applications for patents; (b) respecting the form of the Register of Patents and of the indexes thereto; (c) respecting the registration of assignments, transmissions, disclaimers, judgments or other documents relating to any patent; (d) respecting the form and contents of any certificate issued pursuant to this Act; (e) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that may be charged in respect of the filing of applications for patents or the taking of other proceedings under this Act or under any rule or regulation made pursuant to this Act, or in respect of any services or the use of any facilities provided thereunder by the Commissioner or any person employed in the Patent Office; (f) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that shall be paid to maintain in effect an application for a patent or to maintain the rights accorded by a patent; (g) respecting the payment of any prescribed fees including the time when and the manner in which such fees shall be paid, the additional fees that may be charged for the late payment of such fees and the circumstances in which any fees previously paid may be refunded in whole or in part; (h) for carrying into effect the terms of any treaty, convention, arrangement or engagement that subsists between Canada and any other country; (i) for carrying into effect, notwithstanding anything in this Act, the Patent Cooperation Treaty done at Washington on June 19, 1970, including any amendments, modifications and revisions made from time to time to which Canada is a party; (j) respecting the entry on, the maintenance of and the removal from the register of patent agents of the names of persons and firms, including the qualifications that must be met and the conditions that must be fulfilled by a person or firm before the name of the person or firm is entered thereon and to maintain the name of the person or firm on the register; (j.1) respecting the submission of documents, information or fees under section 8.1, including (i) the documents, information or fees that may be submitted in electronic or other form under that section, (ii) the persons or classes of persons by whom they may be submitted, and (iii) the time at which they are deemed to be received by the Commissioner; (j.2) respecting the entering or recording of any document or information under section 8.2; (j.3) prescribing the manner in which an application for a patent may be withdrawn and, for the purposes of subsections 10(4) and (5), prescribing the date, or the manner of determining the date, on or before which a request for priority or an application for a patent must be withdrawn; (j.4) respecting requests for priority, including (i) the period within which priority must be requested, (ii) the manner in which and period within which the Commissioner must be informed of the matters referred to in subsection 28.4(2), (iii) the documentation that must be filed in support of requests for priority, and (iv) the withdrawal of requests for priority; (j.5) respecting the time within which requests for examination must be made and prescribed fees must be paid under subsection 35(1); (j.6) respecting the deposit of biological material for the purposes of section 38.1; (j.7) respecting the manner in which amendments may be made to specifications or drawings furnished as part of an application for a patent; (j.8) authorizing the Commissioner to extend, subject to any prescribed terms and conditions, the time fixed by or under this Act for doing anything where the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances justify the extension; (k) prescribing any other matter that by any provision of this Act is to be prescribed; and (l) generally, for carrying into effect the objects and purposes of this Act or for ensuring the due administration thereof by the Commissioner and other officers and employees of the Patent Office.  - 特許庁

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十七条の三十の六　電子開示手続又は任意電子開示手続を行う者は、これらの手続を開示用電子情報処理組織を使用して行つた場合（磁気ディスクの提出によりこれらの手続を行つた場合を含む。）には、第六条（第十二条、第二十三条の十二第一項、第二十四条第七項、第二十四条の二第三項、第二十四条の四の二第五項（第二十四条の四の八第一項及び第二十四条の五の二第一項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の四の三第二項（第二十四条の四の八第二項及び第二十四条の五の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の四の四第五項、第二十四条の四の五第二項、第二十四条の四の七第五項及び第二十四条の五第六項（これらの規定を第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の六第三項並びに第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の七第四項（同条第六項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）及び第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の三第四項（第二十七条の八第六項（第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の十一第四項、第二十七条の十三第三項並びに第二十七条の二十二の二第二項及び第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の十第九項（同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第十三項（同条第十四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の二十二の二第四項（同条第八項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十七条の二十七（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、これらの規定により金融商品取引所又は政令で定める認可金融商品取引業協会に提出し、又は送付しなければならないものとされている書類の写しに代えて、当該書類の写しに係る第二十五条第一項各号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）若しくは第二十七条の二十七（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に記載すべき事項（第二十七条の二十八第三項（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分を除く。）をこれらの者に通知するものとする。ただし、第二十五条第四項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分については、通知しないことができる。例文帳に追加

Article 27-30-6 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 6 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 12, Article 23-12(1), Article 24(7), Article 24-2(3), Article 24-4-2(5) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-8(1) and Article 24-5-2(1)), Article 24-4-3(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-8(2) and Article 24-5-2(2)), Article 24-4-4(5), Article 24-4-5(2), Article 24-4-7(5) and Article 24-5(6) (including the cases where the provisions referred to above are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), Article 24-6(3) and Article 27)), Article 24-7(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-7(6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) and Article 27), Article 27-3(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-8(6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)), Article 27-11(4), Article 27-13(3) and Article 27-22-2(2) and(3)), Article 27-10, paragraph (9) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(10)) and paragraph (13) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(14)), Article 27-22-2(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(8)), or Article 27-27 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)), a person who conducts Electronic Disclosure Procedures or Discretionary Electronic Disclosure Procedures shall, when he/she has conducted said procedures by the use of the Electronic Data Processing System for Disclosure (including the cases where he/she has conducted said procedures by submission of Magnetic Disks), in lieu of copies of the documents which shall be submitted or sent to a Financial Instruments Exchange, or Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association specified by a Cabinet Order pursuant to the provisions referred to above, notify them of the information (excluding the parts that shall not be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 27-28(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)) to be contained in the documents listed in each item of Article 25(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or the documents prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) or Article 27-27 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)), pertaining to the copies of said documents; provided, however, that the person may elect not to notify the part which shall not be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十九条　第九十七条、第九十七条の二第一項及び第二項、第九十八条、第九十九条第一項、第二項及び第四項から第六項まで、第百条並びに第百条の二の規定は外国保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第九十九条第三項及び第七項から第十項までの規定は外国生命保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第百一条から第百五条までの規定は外国損害保険会社等が他の損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。）との間で行う共同行為について、第七条の二、第百九条、第百十条第一項及び第三項、第百十一条第一項及び第三項から第六項まで、第百十二条、第百十四条から第百十八条まで並びに第百二十条から第百二十二条までの規定は外国保険会社等について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十七条第一項中「第三条第二項」とあるのは「第百八十五条第二項」と、第九十九条第六項中「相互会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社」と、同条第八項中「第百三十三条若しくは第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条若しくは第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、「第百三十三条又は第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条又は第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、同条第九項中「第百十一条第一項及び第二項」とあるのは「第百九十九条において準用する第百十一条第一項」と、第百九条中「事業年度」とあるのは「日本における事業年度」と、第百十条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、第百十一条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、同項及び同条第四項中「本店又は主たる事務所及び支店又は従たる事務所その他これらに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における支店その他これに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」と、同条第六項中「当該保険会社及びその子会社等の業務」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等の日本における業務」と、第百十二条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「内閣府令で定めるところにより、内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第二項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「日本において内閣府令」と、第百十四条第一項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「日本における保険契約者」と、第百十五条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「価格変動準備金」とあるのは「日本において価格変動準備金」と、同条第二項中「株式等」とあるのは「日本における株式等」と、第百十六条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「責任準備金」とあるのは「日本において責任準備金」と、同条第二項中「長期の」とあるのは「日本における長期の」と、同条第三項中「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、第百十七条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「支出として」とあるのは「支出として日本において」と、「支払備金」とあるのは「日本において支払備金」と、第百十八条第一項中「内閣府令で定める保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約のうち内閣府令で定めるもの」と、「設けなければならない」とあるのは「日本において設けなければならない」と、第百二十条第一項中「生命保険会社及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する損害保険会社」とあるのは「外国生命保険会社等及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する外国損害保険会社等」と、「は、取締役会において保険計理人」とあるのは「の日本における代表者は、当該外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「保険料の算出方法」とあるのは「日本において締結する保険契約に係る保険料の算出方法」と、同条第二項及び第三項中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、第百二十一条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「取締役会」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における代表者」と、第百二十二条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「当該保険会社」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 199 The provisions of Article 97, Article 97-2, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 98, Article 99, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) to (6), Article 100 and Article 100-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 99, paragraphs (3) and (7) to (10) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 101 to 105 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a concerted activity carried out by a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. with another Non-Life Insurance Company (including a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc.); and the provisions of Article 7-2, Article 109, Article 110, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 111, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) to (6) inclusive, Article 112, Article 114 to 118 inclusive, and Article 120 to 122 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 3, paragraph (2)" in Article 97, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (2)"; the term "Mutual Company" in Article 99, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "In the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act"; the term "Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act"; the term "Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (2)" in Article 99, paragraph (9) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199"; the term "business year" in Article 109 shall be deemed to be replaced with "business year in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property" in Article 110, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property" in Article 111, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "its head office or principal office and its branch offices or secondary offices, or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch office of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "business and property of the Insurance Company and its Subsidiary Company, etc." in Article 111, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "business and property of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the term "owns" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "owns in Japan"; the term ", pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "set aside as a reserve" in Article 112, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "set aside in Japan as a reserve;" the term "Policyholders" in Article 114, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders in Japan"; the terms "within its portfolio" and "set aside as price fluctuation reserve" in Article 115, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within its portfolio in Japan" and "set aside in Japan as price fluctuation reserve," respectively; the term "Shares, etc." in Article 115, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shares, etc. in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts" and "set aside a certain amount of money" in Article 116, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan" and "set aside in Japan a certain amount of money," respectively; the term "funding the policy reserve" in Article 116, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "funding in Japan the policy reserve"; the term "insurance contract" in Article 116, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts," "as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims" in Article 117, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan," "in Japan as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims in Japan," respectively; the terms "insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create" in Article 118, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create in Japan," respectively; the terms "board of directors," "Life Insurance Company or a Non-Life Insurance Company meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary" and "method of calculating insurance premiums" in Article 120, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "representative person," "Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc. or a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan" and "method of calculating the insurance premiums applicable to the insurance contracts concluded in Japan," respectively; the term "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan" respectively; the terms "actuary," "each accounting period," and "board of directors" in Article 121 shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," "each accounting period of the business year in Japan" and "representative person of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," respectively; and the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 122 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan", respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム