「Even in the case of」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(283ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(3) Even when a Futures Commission Merchant has withdrawn from a Consumer Protection Fund to which it belongs (excluding the case of withdrawal pursuant to the provisions of Article 278), the Futures Commission Merchant shall be liable to pay as a Burden Charge an amount calculated by said Consumer Protection Fund pursuant to the provisions of the market rules as an amount of the costs that should be borne by said withdrawn Futures Commission Merchant out of the amount of the costs required for the business conducted by said Consumer Protection Fund for any Futures Commission Merchant which has fallen under any of the items of Article 303, paragraph (1) or any of the items of paragraph (3) (limited to the business set forth in Article 269, paragraph (3), item (i) and item (ii)) before said Futures Commission Merchant withdrew from said Consumer Protection Fund. 例文帳に追加

３　商品取引員は、その所属する委託者保護基金を脱退した場合（第二百七十八条の規定により脱退した場合を除く。）においても、当該商品取引員が当該委託者保護基金を脱退するまでに第三百三条第一項各号又は第三項各号のいずれかに該当することとなつた商品取引員のために当該委託者保護基金が行う業務（第二百六十九条第三項第一号及び第二号に掲げる業務に限る。）に要する費用のうち、当該脱退した商品取引員の負担すべき費用の額として業務規程で定めるところにより当該委託者保護基金が算定した額を負担金として納付する義務を負う。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Even when a Futures Commission Merchant has withdrawn from a Consignor Protection Fund to which it belongs (excluding the case of withdrawal pursuant to the provisions of Article 278), the Futures Commission Merchant shall be liable to pay as a Burden Charge an amount calculated by said Consignor Protection Fund pursuant to the provisions of the market rules as an amount of the costs that should be borne by said withdrawn Futures Commission Merchant out of the amount of the costs required for the business conducted by said Consignor Protection Fund for any Futures Commission Merchant which has fallen under any of the items of Article 303, paragraph 1 or any of the items of paragraph 3 (limited to the business set forth in Article 269, paragraph 3, item 1 and item 2) before said Futures Commission Merchant withdrew from said Consignor Protection Fund. 例文帳に追加

３ 商品取引員は、その所属する委託者保護基金を脱退した場合（第二百七十八条の規定により脱退した場合を除く。）においても、当該商品取引員が当該委託者保護基金を脱退するまでに第三百三条第一項各号又は第三項各号のいずれかに該当することとなつた商品取引員のために当該委託者保護基金が行う業務（第二百六十九条第三項第一号及び第二号に掲げる業務に限る。）に要する費用のうち、当該脱退した商品取引員の負担すべき費用の額として業務規程で定めるところにより当該委託者保護基金が算定した額を負担金として納付する義務を負う。 - 経済産業省

If no appeal or motion for reconsideration is filed within the time provided in these Regulations, the Director shall forthwith cause the entry of the judgment or final order in the appropriate Register of the Office. The date of finality of the judgment or final order shall be deemed to be the date of its entry. The record shall contain the dispositive part of the judgment or final order and shall be signed by the Director, with a certificate that such judgment or final order has become final and executory. If no appeal or motion for reconsideration has been filed on time, the judgment or final order rendered by the Director or the Director General, as the case may be, becomes final and executory, and should immediately be caused to be entered by the Director. To ensure this action the prevailing party should file a motion for the entry (and execution, if proper) of the judgment. The date of entry is the starting point of the six months period for filing a petition of relief, as well as the five years period of prescription of judgments. This rule corrects the erroneous practice of entering the judgment or final order long after it had become final and executory. Even if the physical act of entering the judgment or final order is done after it had become final and executory, the date when it became final and executory shall be deemed the date of its entry.例文帳に追加

本規則に定める期間内に上訴又は再審理申立が提出されなかった場合は，局長は，直ちに，当該判決又は最終命令を庁の適切な登録簿に記入させる。判決又は最終命令の確定日は，その記入日とする。記録には，判決又は最終命令による決定の内容を記載し，局長が署名し，当該判決又は最終命令が確定した旨の証明書を添えるものとする。 期限内に上訴又は再審理申立がされなかった場合は，局長又は場合により長官が言い渡した判決又は最終命令が確定するものとし，局長は，直ちにこれを記入させなければならない。この処分を確実にするために，勝訴当事者は，判決の記入(及び適切な場合は執行)を申し立てる。記入日に，救済を求める申立のための6月間及び判決の時効に係る5年間が開始する。 本条規則は，判決又は最終命令が確定してからこれを記入するまでの期間が長くなるという誤った慣行を是正するものである。判決又は最終命令を記入するという物理的な行為がこれらの確定後になされるとしても，これらが確定した日をこれらの記入日とみなす。 - 特許庁

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

(2) In cases where a person listed in any of the items of the preceding paragraph has acquired or purchased Securities for which, at the time of the issuance thereof, Solicitation of an Offer to Acquire (meaning the Solicitation of Offers to Acquire as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the Act, and including Procedures Related to the Issuance of Securities During a Reorganization as prescribed in Article 2-2, paragraph (2) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply except in Article 13, paragraph (2)) was made to any Qualified Institutional Investor that is excluded from being a counterparty to said Solicitation of Offers to Acquire pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (3), item (i) of the Act in cases where that item applies, or for which, at the time of the issuance thereof, the Solicitation of an Offer to Acquire fell under the case specified in Article 2, paragraph (3), item (ii), sub-item (a) or Article 2-2, paragraph (4), item (ii), sub-item (a) of the Act (excluding cases where the disclosure prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (7) of the Act has been made with regard to said Securities, cases where the person is a person who falls under any of items (i) to (xiv) inclusive or items (xvi) to (xxvi) inclusive of the preceding paragraph and who has already been designated under the proviso to that paragraph, cases where the person is a person who falls under item (xv) of that paragraph and whose designation under the proviso to that paragraph has already been cancelled, or cases where the person is a person who falls under any of items (ix), (xvii), (xix) or (xxi) to (xxvi) inclusive of that paragraph and for whom the period prescribed in paragraph (5) has elapsed, at the time of said acquisition or purchase), even when the person is a person who falls under any of items (i) to (xiv) inclusive or items (xvi) to (xxvi) inclusive of the preceding paragraph and who has been designated under the proviso to that paragraph, even when the person is a person who falls under item (xv) of that paragraph and whose designation under the proviso to that paragraph has already been canceled, or even when the person is a person who falls under items (ix), (xvii), (xix) or (xxi) to (xxvi) inclusive of that paragraph and for whom the period prescribed in paragraph (5) has elapsed, if offers to sell and the solicitation of offers to buy said Securities are to be made, the person shall be deemed to be a person who falls under the category of a Qualified Institutional Investor, and the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (2) of the Act shall apply thereto. 例文帳に追加

２　その発行の際にその取得勧誘（法第二条第三項に規定する取得勧誘をいい、法第二条の二第二項に規定する組織再編成発行手続を含む。第十三条第二項を除き、以下同じ。）が法第二条第三項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する場合における同号の規定により当該取得勧誘の相手方から除かれる適格機関投資家を相手方として行うもの又は同項第二号イ若しくは法第二条の二第四項第二号イに掲げる場合に該当するものであった有価証券を前項各号に掲げる者が取得し又は買い付けた場合（当該取得又は買付けの際に、当該有価証券に関して法第四条第七項に規定する開示が行われている場合又はその者が前項第一号から第十四号まで若しくは第十六号から第二十六号までに掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を既に受けていた者であった場合、同項第十五号に掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を既に解除されていた者であった場合若しくは同項第九号、第十七号、第十九号若しくは第二十一号から第二十六号までに掲げる者について第五項に規定する期間を経過している場合を除く。）には、その者が前項第一号から第十四号まで若しくは第十六号から第二十六号までに掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を受けた場合、同項第十五号に掲げる者で同項ただし書の指定を解除された場合又は同項第九号、第十七号、第十九号若しくは第二十一号から第二十六号までに掲げる者について第五項に規定する期間を経過した場合においても、当該有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘を行う場合には適格機関投資家に該当する者とみなして法第四条第二項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Still, this will be rather troublesome if not thought out carefully. While it is already quite difficult to forecast outcomes even in the case of domestic investment, widening the scope overseas would come with concerns about exchange fluctuations and would lead to a variety of other issues. That said, I still agree in general with what Minister Haraguchi is saying. I agree because it will be great if the money of Japan Post Bank or Japan Post Insurance, which is collected within Japan, can be managed well so that it can contribute to the well-being of people all around the world, rather than to the pursuit of the well-being of us Japanese alone. I hope that Japan's postal services will grow fast to develop such capacity. 例文帳に追加

しかし、これもやり方を考えないとなかなか大変ですよね。国内投資だってなかなか見通せないところを「外国まで」ということになってくると、為替変動の問題だってありますし、いろいろな問題が出てくるのですよね。そういう中で、しかし、私は、原口（総務）大臣の言っていることは賛成ですよ。我々、日本人だけが幸せになれれば良いというのではなくて、世界中の人たちが幸せになっていくために、国内で集めたゆうちょ（銀行）のお金なり、かんぽ（生命保険）のそういうものがうまく運用されていくのであれば、これは良い話ですから。私は、そういうことをやれるような日本郵政に早く成長してもらいたいと思います。なかなか大変だろうと思います。 - 金融庁

Chief- Justice Johnson has observed, in the leading case, that it may have its probable foundation in the idea that where direct proof is absent as to both the fact of the death and of criminal violence capable of producing death, no evidence can rise to the degree of moral certainty that the individual is dead by criminal intervention, or even lead by direct inference to this result; and that, where the fact of death is not certainly ascertained, all inculpatory circumstantial evidence wants the key necessary for its satisfactory interpretation, and cannot be depended on to furnish more than probable results. 例文帳に追加

かつてジョンソン最高裁判事も、当法廷の先例となる判例で、死亡という結果、死を招くような犯罪行為という原因、その両方について直接証拠を欠く場合、他にいかなる証拠を持ってしても、犯罪行為によって被害者が死亡したという事実を、確実性を持って立証するにはいたらず、また、このことを推論することさえできないのであるとこう述べておられます。そしてその状況においては、被害者死亡という事実を確証することはできず、被疑者有罪とするようなあらゆる状況証拠はその推論が拠って立つ根拠を失い、被疑者の罪を論ずるに当たって必要な要点を提示することはできないとも言っておられます。 - Melville Davisson Post『罪体』

In relation to information management, you recently imposed a fine on and issued a business suspension order against a certified public accountant involved in an insider trading case. At the same time, an employee of a major securities company who allegedly provided insider information to the accountant was dismissed by the company. Under Article 51 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the FSA may take an administrative action even in the absence of an illegal act if necessary to protect investors. Could you tell us what administrative action the FSA is planning to take against this major securities company? 例文帳に追加

その情報管理に関連することではありますが、先般、公認会計士のインサイダー取引に関連しまして、当該会計士に対して課徴金と業務停止の処分を出されたかと思います。これと同時に、インサイダー情報を会計士に提供していたとされる大手証券会社の社員も、懲戒解雇という処分を会社から出されました。金融商品取引法には、法令違反がなくても投資家保護の観点などから、必要な場合には行政処分を発動できるという第51条の規定がありますが、この大手証券会社に対する今後の行政対応を金融庁としてはどう考えていらっしゃるのか、伺えればと思います。 - 金融庁

With reference to Articles 6 (Income from Real Property), 7 (Business Profits), 21 (Other Income) and 22(Source of Income) of the Convention:It is understood that nothing in these Articles shall prevent a Contracting State from applying its domestic tax law in the case where income is derived by a resident of that Contracting State from real property situated in that Contracting State, even where such a resident carries on business in the other Contracting State through a permanent establishment situated therein and the real property is effectively connected with such permanent establishment. 例文帳に追加

条約第六条（不動産所得）、第七条（事業利得）、第二十一条（その他の所得）及び第二十二条（所得の源泉）の規定に関し、一方の締約国の居住者が当該一方の締約国内に存在する不動産から所得を取得する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者が他方の締約国内において当該他方の締約国内にある恒久的施設を通じて事業を行い、かつ、当該不動産が当該恒久的施設と実質的な関連を有するものであるときであっても、これらの条の規定は、当該一方の締約国が当該所得についてその租税に関する法令を適用することを妨げるものではないことが了解される。 - 財務省

In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom. 例文帳に追加

特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 23-14 (1) With regard to Securities already-issued in a foreign State (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those equivalent to such Securities, among solicitations of an application to sell or purchase such Securities, those exempted from application of the main clause of Article 4(1) (hereinafter referred to as "Solicitation for Small Number of Investors for Foreign Securities)" in this Article) shall be made by clearly indicating that the conditions specified by a Cabinet Order as those necessary to reduce the likelihood that the Securities will be transferred from any person who purchased them to a large number of persons are imposed on sales of the Securities; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities and to cases where the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in order to qualify sales of Securities as those which will not impair the public interest or protection of investors even if such conditions are not imposed thereon, including the requirement that the total amount of the sales of the Securities must be less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, which may not be more than 100 million yen, are satisfied. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の十四　外国で既に発行された有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他これに準ずるものとして政令で定める有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘で、第四条第一項本文の規定の適用を受けないもの（以下この条において「海外発行証券の少人数向け勧誘」という。）は、当該有価証券がその買付者から多数の者に譲渡されるおそれを少なくするために必要な条件として政令で定める条件が当該有価証券の売付けに付されることを明らかにして、しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合、当該有価証券の売付けの総額が一億円を超えない範囲内で内閣府令で定める金額未満である場合その他当該有価証券の売付けに当該条件を付さなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定める要件を満たす場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 138 With regard to any Policyholders Protection Fund as defined in Article 259, paragraph (2) of the Former Insurance Business Act in existence at the time when this Act enters into force (including a fund in the course of liquidation; referred to as "Policyholders Protection Fund" in the following Article to Article 141 inclusive of the Supplementary Provisions) that includes among its business participants (referring to the business participants prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (iv) of the Former Insurance Business Act), at the time when this Act enters into force, any Insurance Company to which the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply but for which no decision has been made to provide Financial Assistance (referring to the Financial Assistance prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (v) of the Former Insurance Business Act), the provisions of Article 259 to 270 inclusive of the Former Insurance Business Act and Article 105 of the Supplementary Provisions to the Former Insurance Business Act shall remain in force even after this Act enters into force, for a period to be specified by a Cabinet Order counting from the Effective Date. In this case, the term "Article 241" in Article 268, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Former Insurance Business Act, which shall remain in force, shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 241 of the Insurance Business Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 22 of the Act on Revision, etc. of Related Acts for the Financial System Reform (Act No. 107 of 1998)." 例文帳に追加

第百三十八条　この法律の施行の際現に存する旧保険業法第二百五十九条第二項に規定する保険契約者保護基金（清算中のものを含む。次条から附則第百四十一条までにおいて「保険契約者保護基金」という。）であって、この法律の施行の際現にその事業参加者（旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第四号に規定する事業参加者をいう。）の中にその資金援助（旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第五号に規定する資金援助をいう。）を行うことを決定していない前条第一項の規定の適用を受ける保険会社があるものについては、旧保険業法第二百五十九条から第二百七十条まで及び旧保険業法附則第百五条の規定は、この法律の施行後も、施行日から起算して政令で定める期間を経過する日までの間、なおその効力を有する。この場合において、なおその効力を有するものとされる旧保険業法第二百六十八条第一項第一号中「第二百四十一条」とあるのは、「金融システム改革のための関係法律の整備等に関する法律（平成十年法律第百七号）第二十二条の規定による改正前の保険業法第二百四十一条」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where Regulated Securities issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the items of paragraph (1). In this case, the term "excluding Regulated Securities" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "limited to Regulated Securities"; the term "the company shall" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company (if said Securities are so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) shall"; the terms "the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company, other important matters concerning the company's assets"; the term "for each business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each of the periods of time specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance for the Regulated Securities (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Period" in this Article)"; the term "that business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that Specified Period"; the part "the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Regulated Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below"; the part "or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year is fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "; and"; the part "share certificates, Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)"; the part "if the number of its holders on the last day of that business year or on the last day of any of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order (or, in case of Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the number of its holders on the last day of that business year is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the number of its holders on the last day of the Specified Period is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order"; the term "issued Securities" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "issued Regulated Securities"; the term "Securities issued" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Regulated Securities issued"; the term "a company" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a company (if said Regulated Securities are Securities so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)"; the term "the main clause of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the main clause of paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5)"; the term "business year" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Period"; the term "the day on which the Securities came" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day on which the Regulated Securities came"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　前各項の規定は、特定有価証券が第一項各号に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合について準用する。この場合において、同項本文中「有価証券の発行者である会社」とあるのは「有価証券の発行者である会社（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「特定有価証券を除く」とあるのは「特定有価証券に限る」と、「事業年度ごと」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、内閣府令で定める期間（以下この条において「特定期間」という。）ごと」と、「当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産の経理の状況その他資産」と、「当該事業年度」とあるのは「当該特定期間」と、同項ただし書中「当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券が第四号」と、「及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに」とあるのは「及び」と、同項第四号中「株券、第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」とあるのは「第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」と、「当該事業年度又は当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度のいずれかの末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上（当該有価証券が同項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該事業年度の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上）」とあるのは「当該特定期間の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上」と、第二項中「有価証券の」とあるのは「特定有価証券の」と、第三項中「第一項本文」とあるのは「第五項において準用する第一項本文」と、「発行者」とあるのは「発行者（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「有価証券が」とあるのは「特定有価証券が」と、「その該当することとなつた日」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、その該当することとなつた日」と、「事業年度」とあるのは「特定期間」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is critical – while peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the land – while they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずＧ20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case.例文帳に追加

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件 - 特許庁

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Even a case where a financial institution does not literally meet the requirement of a check item should not be regarded as inappropriate if the arrangements and procedures put in place by the institution are reasonable from the viewpoint of securing of the soundness and appropriateness of its business and are thus deemed as effectively meeting the requirement or as sufficient in light of the institution's scale and nature. For example, if a financial institution does not have a division described in the checklists of each system, the inspector should review, with due consideration for the institution's scale and nature, whether its organization is structured in a way to enable the execution of necessary functions and a check-and-balance system. In this regard, it is necessary for inspectors to sufficiently conduct hearings from and exchange opinions with financial institutions on the occasion of on-site inspections. 例文帳に追加

なお、他のチェックリストと同様、当該チェックリストの各チェック項目の水準の達成が金融機関に直ちに義務付けられるものではない。当該チェックリストの適用に当たっては、金融機関の規模や特性を十分に踏まえ、機械的・画一的な運用に陥らないよう配慮する必要がある。また、金融機関が経営判断で決すべき個別の与信判断の是非には介入しないよう留意する必要がある。したがって、当該チェックリストのチェック項目に記述されている字義どおりの対応が金融機関においてなされていない場合であっても、金融機関の業務の健全性及び適切性の観点からみて、金融機関の行っている対応が合理的なものであり、さらに、チェック項目に記述されているものと同様の効果がある、あるいは金融機関の規模や特性に応じた十分なものである、と認められるのであれば、不適切とするものではない。また、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理方針」、「金融円滑化管理規程」、「金融円滑化マニュアル」は、必ずしも明確に記載されるべき項目を全て包含する統一的な方針等を策定する必要はなく、複数の部門等において定められる複数の方針等において、定められていればよいことに留意する必要がある。さらに、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理責任者」が信用リスク理等他の部門の職員（管理者を含む。）を兼務することがあることに留意する必要がある。 - 金融庁

Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム