「Act Against」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(16ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 79-58 (1) When an individual who is a General Customer has received a payment set forth in Article 79-56(1) pertaining to Claims Subject to Compensation that he/she holds against a Recognized Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those pertaining to Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the provision of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) and other laws and regulations concerning income tax shall apply by deeming that Securities pertaining to Claims Subject to Compensation (limited to part of said Claims Subject to Compensation which said Fund acquired by said payment) pertaining to said payment was transferred from said individual to the Fund which made said payment by the amount paid at the time of receipt of the payment. 例文帳に追加

第七十九条の五十八　一般顧客である個人が、認定金融商品取引業者に対して有する補償対象債権（有価証券に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）に係る第七十九条の五十六第一項の支払を受けたときは、その支払を受けた時に、その支払を受けた金額により、当該個人から当該支払をした基金に対し当該支払に係る補償対象債権（当該補償対象債権のうち当該支払をしたことにより当該基金が取得した部分に限る。）に係る有価証券の譲渡があつたものとみなして、所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）その他の所得税に関する法令の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ii) A juridical person in which a Recognized Futures Commission Merchant has a Controlling Interest (which means a relationship of holding voting rights that exceed fifty percent of the voting rights of All Shareholders, etc. of the other juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares or equity interest which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 228, paragraph (1), Article 235, paragraph (1), Article 239, paragraph (1) and Article 276 [limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)] of the same Act)], or a relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as that can substantially control business activities of said juridical person; the same shall apply in the following item 例文帳に追加

二　認定商品取引員が支配関係（他の法人の総株主等の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項（これらの規定を同法第二百二十八条第一項、第二百三十五条第一項、第二百三十九条第一項及び第二百七十六条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式又は持分に係る議決権を含む。）を保有している関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。次号において同じ。）を有する法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-2 Appeals under the Administrative Appeal Act (Act No. 160 of 1962) cannot be entered against instructions of prefectural animal health inspectors issued under the provisions of Article 14 paragraph 3, Article 16 paragraph 1, Article 19, Article 20 paragraph 2, Article 21 paragraph 1, Article 23 paragraph 1, Article 25 paragraph 1 or Article 26 paragraph 2 (including instructions under these provisions issued by animal quarantine officers under the provisions of Article 46 paragraph 1 or Article 48) and orders of prefectural governors issued under the provisions of Article 17 paragraph 1 or Article 26 paragraph 1 (including orders under these provisions issued by the Director General of the Animal Quarantine Service under the provisions of Article 46 paragraph 1). 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の二　第十四条第三項、第十六条第一項、第十九条、第二十条第二項、第二十一条第一項、第二十三条第一項、第二十五条第一項又は第二十六条第二項の規定による家畜防疫員の指示（第四十六条第一項又は第四十八条の規定により家畜防疫官が行うこれらの規定による指示を含む。）及び第十七条第一項又は第二十六条第一項の規定による都道府県知事の命令（第四十六条第一項の規定により動物検疫所長が行うこれらの規定による命令を含む。）については、行政不服審査法（昭和三十七年法律第百六十号）による不服申立てをすることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 11-2 (1) When the Director-General of the Japan Meteorological Agency finds a risk, based on the results of observations and research with regard to terrestrial phenomena, tremors and ground deformations, terrestrial magnetism, terrestrial electricity, hydrological phenomena, and surveys of land and water-areas concerning earthquakes, of the occurrence of a large-scale earthquake pertaining to the Areas for Intensified Measures against Earthquake Disasters prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Act on Special Measures for Large-scale Earthquakes (Act No. 73 of 1978), he/she shall, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, immediately report to the Prime Minister information concerning the earthquake at risk of occurring (including information concerning prediction of a potential tsunami caused by the earthquake event). 例文帳に追加

第十一条の二　気象庁長官は、地象、地動、地球磁気、地球電気及び水象の観測及び研究並びに地震に関する土地及び水域の測量の成果に基づき、大規模地震対策特別措置法（昭和五十三年法律第七十三号）第三条第一項に規定する地震防災対策強化地域に係る大規模な地震が発生するおそれがあると認めるときは、直ちに、政令で定めるところにより、発生のおそれがあると認める地震に関する情報（当該地震の発生により生ずるおそれのある津波の予想に関する情報を含む。）を内閣総理大臣に報告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) Where a patentee or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the patent right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the patentee or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the patentee or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the patentee or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the patentee or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the patentee or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　特許権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の特許権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、＜特許権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額＞を、特許権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、特許権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を特許権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The term "free-yen" in the caption of Article 23 shall be revised to "non-resident yen," the term "Non-resident Free-yen Account specified by Cabinet Order based on the provisions of Articles 27 to 30 inclusive (Restriction and prohibition concerning payment and claims)" in the said Article shall be revised to "account displayed in Japanese currency against a certified foreign exchange bank in Japan prescribed in Article 11 of the said Act (Arrangement on Business) for a non-resident prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1), item (vi) (Definitions) (hereinafter such bank shall be referred to as a "certified foreign exchange bank" in this Article and Article 28)," and the terms "prescribed in Article 11 of the said Act (Arrangement on Business)" and "(referred to as a "certified foreign exchange bank" in Article 28, paragraph (1))" shall be deleted. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の見出し中「自由円」を「非居住者円」に改め、同条中「第二十七条から第三十条まで（支払及び債権に関する制限及び禁止）の規定に基づく政令で定められた非居住者自由円勘定」を「第六条第一項第六号（定義）に規定する非居住者の本邦にある同法第十一条（業務上の取極）に規定する外国為替公認銀行（以下この条及び第二十八条において「外国為替公認銀行」という。）に対する本邦通貨をもつて表示される勘定」に改め、「同法第十一条（業務上の取決め）に規定する」及び「（第二十八条第一項において「外国為替公認銀行」という。）」を削る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

11) In the case referred to in paragraph (8) and the preceding paragraph, the voting rights held by a company or an individual voting right holder shall not include any voting rights pertaining to Shares, etc. held in the form of trust property pertaining to a monetary or security trust (limited to cases where the settlor or the beneficiary may exercise voting rights or may instruct to the company or the holders of the voting rights) and any other voting rights specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, but shall include any voting rights of the Shares, etc. which are held as trust property and of which the other company or the person holding voting rights of the Bank may, as a settlor or beneficiary, make exercise or may give instructions on the exercise (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and any voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147(1) or Article 148(1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001 例文帳に追加

１１　第八項又は前項の場合において、会社又は議決権の保有者が保有する議決権には、金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る信託財産として所有する株式等に係る議決権（委託者又は受益者が行使し、又はその行使について当該会社若しくは当該議決権の保有者に指図を行うことができるものに限る。）その他内閣府令で定める議決権を含まないものとし、信託財産である株式等に係る議決権で、当該会社又は当該議決権の保有者が委託者若しくは受益者として行使し、又はその行使について指図を行うことができるもの（内閣府令で定める議決権を除く。）及び社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含むものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The SME Financing Facilitation Act was put into force on the watch of former Minister for Financial Services Kamei following the severe impact of the Lehman Shock. As I have repeatedly mentioned, the Democratic Party of Japan, the Social Democratic Party, and the People's New Party proposed six common policy initiatives in the campaign for the elections to the House of Representatives that resulted in the change of government.The campaign pledges we made before the change of government included the enactment of an act to prevent the excessive tightening of credit against SMEs.I have always believed that financing focusing on SMEs is very important. 例文帳に追加

中小企業金融円滑化法については、極めて厳しいリーマンショックの後、亀井（前）大臣のときに制定させていただいた（法律で）、それから私が何回も言いますように、政権交代のときの衆議院選挙で、6つの共通政策というものを民主党と社民党と国民新党で出させていただきましたが、その政権交代した選挙の前の公約にも、この中小企業に対する「貸し渋り・貸しはがし防止法」を成立させるということが入っておったわけでございまして、やはり私も、中小企業を視点に置いた金融のあり方というのは非常に大事だと常々思っておりました。 - 金融庁

This also affected the real economy – for instance, production in Toyota's factory in Fukuoka Prefecture, my home prefecture, dropped by 40 percent two years ago and occurrences like that explain why Japan has been in the situation that it is in now since then. It was against this background that the Dodd-Frank Act was implemented in the U.S. And, at that very time of historical significance, I met with FRB Chairman Bernanke and Mr. Volcker. Under the Volcker Rule, commercial banks may engage in a high-risk, high-return business on demand from customers, but not for their own accounts. In my view, this is the very core of the new Dodd-Frank Act. This is another case of a significant sea change. It was by luck that I had an opportunity to visit the U.S. in those days in the capacity of the Minister for Financial Services. 例文帳に追加

そのことが実体経済にも影響を及ぼして、2年前、私の福岡県にもトヨタ自動車の工場がございますが、あそこの生産は4割落ちまして、それ以来、本当に日本だって、今、大変こういう立場になっているわけでございますが、そういった中でドッド・フランク法というのを作った。まさにそういった歴史的な時期に、FRBのバーナンキ議長、それからボルカーさん、ボルカー・ルールですね。これはご存じのように、商業銀行の中でハイリスク・ハイリターンのことを、お客様から頼まれたらおこなってもよいけれども、自己勘定でしてはいけないと。これは今度のドッド・フランク法の一番のコアの部分だと思います。これは非常に大きなコペルニクス的転換でございまして、しかし、そういった時代にたまたま金融（担当）大臣としてアメリカに行かせていただいた。 - 金融庁

As fairness before the law is a norm in Japan, I think that exempting from criminal prosecution the practice of lending at an interest rate higher than the upper limit under the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates (Shussi Hou) in a particular geographical area only – a concept at issue here – would go against the principle of fairness before the law. Since the current regulation under the amended Act, which the media covered extensively when it was established, is a legislative step supported unanimously by all parties to address the multiple-debt problem, as I point out repeatedly, creating any exemption designed to relax its enforcement could result in its social significance being compromised. It is on those grounds that we are in the process of formulating a statement in our second reply that it would be difficult, or not acceptable, to undertake the idea. 例文帳に追加

日本国はご存じのように、法の下の公正ということがございまして、一部の地域のみ、今お話がございました出資法の上限金利を上回るような貸付けを刑罰の対象から除外することは、法の公正に反するのではないかと考えております。現行の規制は、当時、マスコミが大変大きく取り上げていただきまして、この法律は、私が何回も言っているように、全党一致で多重債務問題への対処として設けられた法律でもございますから、例外的に緩和措置を講ずることは、社会的意義を損なうのではないか。そういった理由から、対応がなかなか難しいのではないか、対応不可だということを、2次回答において示しているところでございます。 - 金融庁

Does the Customer Explanation Manager, in accordance with internal rules concerning the representations used in materials for advertisement and solicitation (hereinafter referred to as the “Advertisements, etc.”), etc., subject the Advertisements etc. of Transactions and products to legal checks, etc. in advance and verify that there is no violation of the Banking Law, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the notification thereof, the Act concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and other relevant Laws as well as rules established by voluntary regulatory organizations and that the Advertisements etc. provide appropriate and sufficient explanations to customers, or does the Customer Explanation Manager have a person in charge of screening of Advertisements, etc. conduct such checks? 例文帳に追加

顧客説明管理責任者は、広告及び勧誘に用いる資料等における表示（以下「広告等」という。）に関する内部規程等に従い、取引又は商品に関する広告等について事前にリーガル・チェック等を受け、銀行法、金融商品取引法、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律及びその告示、不当景品類及び不当表示防止法その他の関係法令及び自主規制機関の規則等に反しないものとなっているか、また顧客に対する説明として十分かつ適切なものとなっているか確認し、又は広告審査担当者等に確認させる態勢を整備しているか。 - 金融庁

Does the Customer Explanation Manager, in accordance with internal rules concerning the representations used in materials for advertisement and solicitation (hereinafter referred to as the "Advertisements, etc."), etc., subject the Advertisements etc. of Transactions and products to legal checks, etc. in advance and verify that there is no violation of the Banking Law8, the Securities and Exchange Law, the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the notification thereof, the Act concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and other relevant Laws as well as rules established by voluntary regulatory organizations and that the Advertisements etc. provide appropriate and sufficient explanations to customers, or does the Customer Explanation Manager have a person in charge of screening of Advertisements, etc. conduct such checks?例文帳に追加

顧客説明管理責任者は、広告及び勧誘に用いる資料等における表示（以下「広告等」という。）に関する内部規程等に従い、取引又は商品に関する広告等について事前にリーガル・チェック等を受け、銀行法 11、金融商品取引法、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律及びその告示、不当景品類及び不当表示防止法その他の関係法令及び自主規制機関の規則等に反しないものとなっているか、また顧客に対する説明として十分かつ適切なものとなっているか確認し、又は広告審査担当者等に確認させる態勢を整備しているか。 - 金融庁

If seniority of a trade mark valid in Estonia is claimed for a registered Community trade mark or a Community trade mark which has been filed for registration on the basis of an earlier registered trade mark or the Madrid Protocol pursuant to Articles 34 and 35 of the Community Trade Mark Regulation, an action may be filed for the exclusive right of the proprietor of the trade mark to be declared invalid pursuant to § 52 of this Act or action against the proprietor of a trade mark for the exclusive right of the proprietor of the trade mark to be declared extinguished pursuant to § 53 of this Act even if the earlier trade mark has been deleted from the register due to refusal to renew the term or is surrendered by the proprietor. 例文帳に追加

エストニアにおいて有効な商標の先順位が，共同体商標規則第34条及び第35条により，先の登録商標又はマドリッド議定書に基づいて，登録共同体商標又は登録出願されている共同体商標について主張されている場合は，先の商標が期間更新の拒絶により登録簿から抹消されているか又は所有者により権利放棄されているときでも，第52条により商標所有者の排他権の無効宣言を求める訴訟を提起することができ，又は第53条により商標所有者を相手として，商標所有者の排他権の消滅宣言を求める訴訟を提起することができる。 - 特許庁

(1) Where an application has been made to the Commissioner for the grant of a patent, and it appears to the Commissioner that the invention which is the subject-matter of the application relates to the production or use of energy derived from the atomic nucleus or research into matters connected therewith he shall serve a notice in writing on the Minister of Defence to that effect, and may, notwithstanding anything in this Act or any other Act, omit or delay the doing of anything which he would otherwise be required to do in relation to the application, and give directions for prohibiting or restricting the publication of information with respect to the subject-matter of the application or the communication of that information to particular persons or classes of persons; and any person who contravenes any such direction commits an offence against this section.例文帳に追加

(1) 局長に特許出願がされる場合において，その出願の対象である発明が原子核から発生するエネルギーの生産若しくは使用又はこれに関連する事項の研究に係わると局長が認めるときは，局長は，書面でその旨の通知を国防大臣に送達しなければならず，また，本法その他の法律の規定に拘らず，本項の規定がなければ当該出願について実行しなければならない筈の何れの事項も実行することを省き又は延期することができ，更に，当該出願の対象に関する情報の公表又は特定の者若しくは特定部類に属する者に対するその情報の伝達を禁止し若しくは制限するために，指示を発することができるものとし，この指示に違反する者は，本条に違反する犯則者とする。 - 特許庁

In all legal proceedings relating to a trade mark registered in the Register (including applications under section 45) the original registration of the trade mark under this Act shall, after the expiration of seven years from the date thereof, be taken to be valid in all respects unless it is shown . (a) that the original registration was obtained by fraud; (b) that the trade mark offends against section 14; or (c) that the trade mark was not, at the commencement of the proceedings, distinctive of the goods or services of the registered proprietor, except that this section shall not apply to a trade mark registered under the repealed Ordinances and incorporated in the Register pursuant to subsection (3) of section 6 until after the expiration of three years from the commencement of this Act.例文帳に追加

登録簿に登録されている商標に関するあらゆる法的手続(第45条に基づく請求を含む。)において，本法に基づく商標の原登録は，登録日から7年が経過した後にはすべての点において有効なものとみなされる。ただし，次のことが明らかにされるときはこの限りでない。 (a) 原登録が詐欺により取得されたこと (b) 当該商標が第14条に違反すること，又は (c) 当該商標が，手続開始時において，その登録所有者の商品若しくはサービスについての識別性を欠いていたこと 本条は，廃止された法令に基づき登録された商標で第6条(3)により登録簿に組み込まれたものには，本法の施行後3年が経過するまでは適用されない。 - 特許庁

(1) Any person who finds that the right to a patent belongs to the person pursuant to § 12 of this Act may, after the publication of a patent application pursuant to the provisions of § 24 of this Act, file an action in court against the applicant or proprietor of the patent for recognition of the person’s rights. If the action is satisfied in the case of a patent application, the person has the right to continue applying for the patent in the person’s name, revoke the patent application and file a new patent application with the same filing date concerning the same invention or revoke the patent application. In the case of a patent, the person has the right to register the patent, unamended or subject to amendments, in the person’s name or revoke the patent. 例文帳に追加

(1) 特許を受ける権利が第12条により自己に属すると考える者は，特許出願が第24条の規定により公開された後，特許出願人又は特許所有者を相手として，当該人の権利の承認を求める訴訟を提起することができる。特許出願の場合に訴該人は，特許を補正しないままで若しくは補正して当該人の名義で登録する又は特許を取り消す権利を有する。 えが認められたときは，当該人は，当該人の名義で特許出願を継続する，特許出願を取り消して同一発明に関して同一出願日をもって新たな特許出願をする，又は特許出願の取消をする権利を有する。特許の場合は，当 - 特許庁

(1) Any person who, through no fault of his own, has been prevented from observing a time limit vis-a-vis the Patent Office or the Patent Court, the failure of observing it being detrimental to his rights according to the provisions of the law, shall, on request, have his rights reinstated. This provision shall not apply to the time limits 1. for filing an opposition (Section 59(1)) or for payment of the opposition fee (Section 6(1), sentence 1, of the Patent Cost Act), 2. allowed an opponent for filing an appeal [Beschwerde] against the maintenance of a patent (Section 73(2)) or for payment of the appeal fee (Section 6(1), sentence 1, of the Patent Cost Act) or 3. for filing patent applications for which a priority under Section 7(2) and Section 40 may be claimed. 例文帳に追加

(1) 何人も，自らの過失によらないで，特許庁又は連邦特許裁判所に対する期限の遵守を妨げられ，その不遵守が本法の規定による同人の権利を損なう場合は，請求により同人の権利を回復させることができる。この規定は，次の期限には適用されない。1. 異議申立の提出(第 59条(1))又は異議申立手数料の納付(特許費用法第 6条(1)第 1文)に関するもの 2. 特許の維持(第73条(2))に対する審判請求の提出又は審判請求手数料の納付(特許費用法第 6条(1)第 1文)に関して，異議申立人に許可されるもの，又は3. 第7条(2)及び第40条に基づく優先権を主張することができる特許出願に関するもの - 特許庁

(5) The term "Major Shareholder" set forth in paragraph (2)(ix) and (x) shall mean a person who holds not less than twenty-hundredths (in cases where there is any fact specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a one that is presumed to have a material influence on decisions about the company's finances and business policies, fifteen-hundredths) of the voting rights (including those pertaining to shares which cannot be asserted against an issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147(1) or Article 148(1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001), and excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance which have been specified in consideration of the condition of holding or other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Subject Voting Rights" in this Article and Article 17(1)) of all shareholders or investors of the company (for a stock company, excluding voting rights for shares which can be exercised only for part of the matters that can be resolved at a shareholder's meeting, but including voting rights for shares which are deemed to be held pursuant to the provisions of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act,; the same shall apply hereinafter). 例文帳に追加

５　第二項第九号及び第十号の「主要株主」とは、会社の総株主又は総出資者の議決権（株式会社にあっては、株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下同じ。）の百分の二十（会社の財務及び営業の方針の決定に対して重要な影響を与えることが推測される事実として内閣府令で定める事実がある場合には、百分の十五）以上の数の議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含み、保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定めるものを除く。以下この条及び第十七条第一項において「対象議決権」という。）を保有している者をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

iii) Relationship between a person who holds voting rights (including the voting rights of the shares or equity interests which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) [including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 228, paragraph (1), Article 235, paragraph (1), Article 239, paragraph (1) and Article 276 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii))] of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. [Act No. 75 of 2001]) that exceed fifty percent of the voting rights (in the case of a stock company, excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have the voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 19, item (ii)) of All Shareholders, etc. (which means all shareholders, all members or all contributors; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 19, item (ii)) of a juridical person (hereinafter such person shall be referred to as a "Controlling Shareholder, etc." in this Article) and said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "Controlled Juridical Person" in this Article 例文帳に追加

三　法人の総株主等（総株主、総社員又は総出資者をいう。以下この条及び第十九条第二号において同じ。）の議決権（株式会社にあつては、株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この条及び第十九条第二号において同じ。）の百分の五十を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項（これらの規定を同法第二百二十八条第一項、第二百三十五条第一項、第二百三十九条第一項及び第二百七十六条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式又は持分に係る議決権を含む。）を保有している者（以下この条において「支配株主等」という。）と当該法人（以下この条において「被支配法人」という。）との関係 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 7 (Elimination measures) (1) and (2) (including cases applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations) (2) and Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices) (2)), Article 8-2 (1) and (3), Article 20 (1), Article 70-13 (Urgent temporary suspension order or change or rescission thereof by court) (1) and Article 74 (Accusation and report on non-prosecution) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade shall not be applied to the fair competition code that has been authorized under paragraph (1), and to such acts of entrepreneurs or a trade association as have been done in accordance therewith. 例文帳に追加

５　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第七条第一項及び第二項（排除措置）（第八条の二第二項（事業者団体による既往の違反行為に対する措置）及び第二十条第二項（既往の不公正な取引方法に対する措置）において準用する場合を含む。）、第八条の二第一項及び第三項（事業者団体に対する排除措置）、第二十条第一項（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第七十条の十三第一項（裁判所の緊急停止命令又はその変更・取消し）並びに第七十四条（告発・不起訴処分の報告）の規定は、第一項の認定を受けた公正競争規約及びこれに基づいてする事業者又は事業者団体の行為には、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As many of the borrowers who use the cashing are presumably heavily indebted - in the first place, the amended Money Lending Act was enacted based on the unanimous agreement reached in the Diet among all political parties and parliamentary groups following the emergence of the multiple-debt problem - the FSA has issued an instruction for local Finance Bureaus and other organizations to strengthen the response of consultation counters related to multiple debts and other countermeasures against the multiple-debt problem and is cooperating with the Consumer Affairs Agency to warn against the use of the cashing. In the future, the FSA will continue to cooperate with relevant ministries and agencies in taking necessary measures. 例文帳に追加

金融庁といたしましても、現金化を利用する多くの者が、多額の債務に悩んでおられることが考えられるため、元々、貸金業法の改正というのは多重債務問題が引き金となって、国会で全党一致、全会派一致でできた法律でございますが、財務局をはじめとする多重債務相談窓口の対応強化の指示、多重債務対策としての取組を行っている他、消費者庁と連携して利用防止を呼びかける等の取組を行っているところでございます。金融庁といたしましても、今後とも関係省庁と連携して必要な対応を図ってまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

(1) A product that infringes a patent protected by this Act shall be subject upon import or export, upon the application of the right holder and upon his posting of security, to seizure by the customs authorities when infringement is obvious and if Council Regulation (EC) No. 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 Concerning Customs Action against Goods Suspected of Infringing Certain Intellectual Property Rights and the Measures to be Taken against Goods Found to Have Infringed Such Rights (OJ, L 196, p. 7), in the valid version, is not to be applied. This shall apply in trade with other Members States of the European Union as well as with the other contracting states of the European Economic Area Agreement only insofar as controls are carried out by the customs authorities. 例文帳に追加

(1) 本法に基づいて保護されている特許を侵害する製品が輸入又は輸出される場合において，権利所有者の申請及び保証金の供託があったときは，税関によって差し押さえられるものとするが，ただし，権利侵害が明白であること，及びそのときにおいて有効な条文による，「一定の知的所有権を侵害している疑いのある商品に対する税関の処置及び当該権利を侵害していると認定された商品に対してとられるべき措置」に関する 2003年 7月 22日の理事会規則(EC)No.1383/2003(OJ, L 196, p.7)が適用されないことを条件とする。この規定は，規制が税関によって行われる範囲において，欧州連合の他の加盟国及び欧州経済地域協定の他の締約国との取引に適用される。 - 特許庁

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows, in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in the respective items of Article 56-2 (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business - 84 - year (for a Member Commodity Exchange, the final business year in the case where approval under Article 68 of the Act was received for Settlement Related Documents, etc. prescribed in Article 66, paragraph 1 of the Act pertaining to the respective business years, and for an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the final business year prescribed in Article 2, item 24 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the sharing of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger - 85 - (excluding Member Commodity Exchanges which clear the account pursuant to the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item 1 and item 3) of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act) (hereinafter such Member Commodity Exchange shall be referred to as a "Clearing Member Commodity Exchange"), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (v) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が会員商品 取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一 第五十六条の二各号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合にあっては、 当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併存続会員商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度（会員商品取引所にあっては各事業年度に係る法第六十六条第一項 に規定する決算関係書類等につき法第六十八条の承認を受けた場合における当該 各事業年度のうち最も遅いものとし、株式会社商品取引所にあっては会社法第二 条第二十四号に規定する最終事業年度とする。以下同じ。）に係る財産目録、貸借 対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成された損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続会員商 品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸 収合併存続会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたとき は、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の 効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあって は、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。） 三吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（法第七十七条第一項において準用する会社法第四百 七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）の規定により清算をする会員商品取引所（以 下「清算会員商品取引所」という。）を除く。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事 業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な 財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状 況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会 員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度 が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象 の内容に限る。）四吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の債務（法第 百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併につ いて異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行の見込 みに関する事項 五法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変 更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(15) In the case prescribed in paragraph (12) and the preceding paragraph, the voting rights held by a company or a person who holds voting rights shall not include any voting rights pertaining to shares or equity interests held in the form of trust property pertaining to a monetary or securities trust (limited to cases where the settlor or the beneficiary may exercise the voting rights or may instruct the company or the holder of the voting rights on the exercise of such voting rights) or any of the voting rights specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, but shall include voting rights of the Shares or equity interests which are held as trust property and of which the other company or the person holding voting rights of the Insurance Company may, as a settlor or beneficiary, make exercise or may give instructions on the exercise(excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and any voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001). 例文帳に追加

１５　第十二項又は前項の場合において、会社又は議決権の保有者が保有する議決権には、金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る信託財産として所有する株式又は持分に係る議決権（委託者又は受益者が行使し、又はその行使について当該会社若しくは当該議決権の保有者に指図を行うことができるものに限る。）その他内閣府令で定める議決権を含まないものとし、信託財産である株式又は持分に係る議決権で、当該会社又は当該議決権の保有者が委託者若しくは受益者として行使し、又はその行使について指図を行うことができるもの（内閣府令で定める議決権を除く。）及び社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含むものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notification to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

２　商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係（他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の二分の一以上に相当する議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。）を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。）を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 29 (1) Where a holder of a utility model right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of said d utility model right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that constituted the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the holder or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "Assigned Quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the Assigned Quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第二十九条　実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の実用新案権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 39 (1) Where a holder of design right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damages sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the design right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damages sustained by the holder of such design right or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per each unit of article which would have been sold by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity" of articles) assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十九条　意匠権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の意匠権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、意匠権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、意匠権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、意匠権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を意匠権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 38 (1) Where a holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the trademark right or the exclusive right to use, and the infringer assigned the goods that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of goods which would have been sold by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity of goods assigned by the infringer (hereinafter referred to as the "Assigned Quantity"), the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use in light of the capability of the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use to use such goods; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of goods not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　商標権者又は専用使用権者が故意又は過失により自己の商標権又は専用使用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した商品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した商品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、商標権者又は専用使用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた商品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、商標権者又は専用使用権者の使用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、商標権者又は専用使用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を商標権者又は専用使用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph 1 or Article 148, paragraph 1 of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notice to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

２ 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係（他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の二分の一以上に相当する議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。）を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。）を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in item 2 and item 3 of Article 142 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) when the whole or part of the shares of stock, etc. (which means shares of stock, etc. prescribed in Article 142, item 2 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) issued for a member of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the provisions of the articles of incorporation of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (iii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) the contents of accounting documents, etc. pertaining to the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the contents of a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. (which means extraordinary accounting documents, etc. set forth in Article 2, paragraph 3, item 13 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in (c)) as an extraordinary closing day (which means an extraordinary closing day prescribed in Article 441, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が株式会社 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び三号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合 にあっては、当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等（法第百四十二条第二 号に規定する株式等をいう。以下同じ。）の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商 品取引所の株式であるときは、当該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款の定め 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等の内容（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸 収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表の内容）ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日。ハにおいて同じ。）後の日を臨時決算日（会社法第四百 四十一条第一項に規定する臨時決算日をいう。以下同じ。）（二以上の臨時決算日 がある場合にあっては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等（会社法施行規則 第二条第三項第十三号の臨時計算書類等をいう。以下同じ。）があるときは、当該 臨時計算書類等の内容 ハ最終事業年度の末日後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収 合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたと きは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併 の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっ - 87 - ては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）四 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）において最終事業年 度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立 の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四 十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新 たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末 日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）五吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 （法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収 合併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履 行の見込みの有無に関する事項 六法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変更 が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省

Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条　共助刑の執行に関しては、第十六条第一項第一号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を懲役に処せられた者と、同項第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を禁錮に処せられた者と、同項第一号の共助刑を懲役と、同項第二号の共助刑を禁錮とそれぞれみなして、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第二十九条、第三十一条から第三十三条まで及び第三十四条第一項、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条、第四百八十条から第四百八十二条まで、第四百八十四条から第四百八十九条まで、第五百二条から第五百四条まで及び第五百七条、少年法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十八号）第二条第一項、第二十七条第一項、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十一条、少年院法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十九号）第一条、第二条、第四条から第九条まで、第十条第一項、第十条の二、第十三条、第十四条第一項、第四項及び第五項、第十四条の二から第十六条まで、第十七条第二項、第十七条の二並びに第十七条の四から第十七条の六まで並びに更生保護法（平成十九年法律第八十八号）第三条、第四条第二項、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十六条、第二十三条から第三十条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条から第四十条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十二条第二項及び第三項、第五十三条第二項及び第三項、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条から第五十八条まで、第六十条から第六十五条まで、第七十五条から第七十七条まで、第八十二条、第八十四条から第八十八条まで並びに第九十一条から第九十八条までの規定を適用する。この場合において、刑法第二十八条中「三分の一」とあるのは「三分の一（国際受刑者移送法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）において同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪（以下「受入移送犯罪」という。）に係る確定裁判において言い渡された同法第二条第一号の外国刑（以下「外国刑」という。）の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、「十年」とあるのは「十年（裁判国において受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、同法第三十二条中「刑の言渡しが確定した後」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第十三条の命令により裁判国から引渡しを受けた後」と、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条中「二以上の」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑（以下「共助刑」という。）と」と、「その重いもの」とあり、及び「重い刑」とあるのは「共助刑」と、「他の刑」とあるのは「主刑」と、同法第四百八十条及び第四百八十二条中「刑の言渡をした裁判所に対応する検察庁」とあるのは「東京地方検察庁」と、同法第四百八十七条中「刑名」とあるのは「共助刑の種類」と、同法第五百二条中「裁判の執行を受ける者」とあるのは「共助刑の執行を受ける者」と、「言渡をした裁判所」とあるのは「東京地方裁判所」と、少年法第二十七条第一項中「保護処分の継続中、本人に対して有罪判決が確定した」とあり、及び同法第五十七条中「保護処分の継続中、懲役、禁錮又は拘留の刑が確定した」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者が保護処分の継続中である」とし、その他これらの規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 114 (1) In the case where the copyright holder, the holder of the right of publication or the holder of the neighboring rights (in this paragraph referred to below as "the copyright holder, etc.") asserts against a person who intentionally or negligently infringes upon the holder's copyright, right of publication or neighboring rights, as the case may be, a claim for compensation for damages sustained by said holder as a result of such infringement, and such infringer has transferred the ownership of the object made by way of such an act of infringement or has made a public transmission (including, in the case of an automatic public transmission, by making transmittable) constituting such an act of infringement, then the amount obtained by multiplying [(a)] the number of objects the ownership of which has been so transferred or the number of reproductions of works or performance, etc. made as a result of reception by the public of such public transmissions (in this paragraph referred to below as "the reception reproductions"), as the case may be (such number is in this paragraph referred to below as "the number transferred, etc."), by [(b)] the per unit profit of the objects (including reception reproductions) that the copyright holder, etc. could have sold had there been no such act of infringement, can be regarded as the amount of damages suffered by such copyright holder, etc., but only within the limit of the copyright holder's ability to sell or take other [similar] actions with respect to said objects. However, when there exist circumstances under which the copyright holder, etc. could not have sold such objects in such number corresponding, in whole or in part, to the number transferred, etc., then the amount corresponding to such number shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第百十四条　著作権者、出版権者又は著作隣接権者（以下この項において「著作権者等」という。）が故意又は過失により自己の著作権、出版権又は著作隣接権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為によつて作成された物を譲渡し、又はその侵害の行為を組成する公衆送信（自動公衆送信の場合にあつては、送信可能化を含む。）を行つたときは、その譲渡した物の数量又はその公衆送信が公衆によつて受信されることにより作成された著作物若しくは実演等の複製物（以下この項において「受信複製物」という。）の数量（以下この項において「譲渡等数量」という。）に、著作権者等がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物（受信複製物を含む。）の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、著作権者等の当該物に係る販売その他の行為を行う能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、著作権者等が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡等数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を著作権者等が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 252 (1) In the following cases concerning the rehabilitation debtor against whom bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, for the purpose of application of the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act (meaning the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, Article 71(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 72(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 160 (excluding paragraph (1)(i)), Article 162 (excluding paragraph (1)(ii)), Article 163(2), Article 164(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article), Article 166, and Article 167(2) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 170(2) of said Act); the same shall apply in paragraph (3)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc. (in cases where an order of dismissal with prejudice on the merits of a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of discontinuance of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of disconfirmation of the rehabilitation plan or an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan (limited to one based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings) becomes final and binding, this phrase refers to a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, petition for commencement of special liquidation in the proceedings for special liquidation that have ceased to be effective as a result of the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, or any act conducted by the rehabilitation debtor or his/her statutory agent or the rehabilitation debtor's director, executive officer or any other person equivalent thereto, which shall constitute the crime set forth in Article 265 of the Bankruptcy Act, and in cases where an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan, which is not based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings, becomes final and binding, said phrase refers to a petition for revocation of the rehabilitation plan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall be deemed to be a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings only where no petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings has been filed prior to said petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc: 例文帳に追加

第二百五十二条　破産手続開始前の再生債務者に関する次に掲げる場合における破産法の関係規定（破産法第七十一条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第七十二条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第百六十条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第百六十二条（第一項第二号を除く。）、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十六条並びに第百六十七条第二項（同法第百七十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定をいう。第三項において同じ。）の適用については、再生手続開始の申立て等（再生手続開始の申立ての棄却、再生手続廃止若しくは再生計画不認可の決定又は再生計画取消しの決定（再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくものに限る。）が確定した場合にあっては再生手続開始の申立て、再生手続開始によって効力を失った特別清算の手続における特別清算開始の申立て又は破産法第二百六十五条の罪に該当することとなる再生債務者、その法定代理人若しくは再生債務者の理事、取締役、執行役若しくはこれらに準ずる者の行為をいい、再生計画取消しの決定であって再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくもの以外のものが確定した場合にあっては再生計画取消しの申立てをいう。以下この項において同じ。）は、当該再生手続開始の申立て等の前に破産手続開始の申立てがないときに限り、破産手続開始の申立てとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vii) A Stock Company, etc. whose license under Article 3, paragraph (1) was rescinded pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134, whose registration under Article 272, paragraph (1) was canceled pursuant to the provision of Article 272-26, paragraph (1) or Article 272-27 or whose registration under Article 276 or 286 was canceled pursuant to the provision of Article 307, paragraph (1), or against which a similar type of license or registration under the relevant provision of a foreign law or regulation equivalent to this Act (including any permission or other administrative disposition similar to such license or registration) was canceled in the foreign state concerned, without five years having elapsed since the date of such cancellation; 例文帳に追加

七　第百三十三条若しくは第百三十四条の規定により第三条第一項の免許を取り消され、第二百七十二条の二十六第一項若しくは第二百七十二条の二十七の規定により第二百七十二条第一項の登録を取り消され、若しくは第三百七条第一項の規定により第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消された場合又はこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許若しくは登録（当該免許又は登録に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）を取り消された場合において、その取消しの日から五年を経過しない株式会社等 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is to protect the interests of consumers, and thereby contribute to the stabilization of and the improvement in the general welfare and life of the citizens and to the sound development of the national economy, in consideration of the discrepancy in quality and quantity of information and the negotiating power between consumers and business operators, by permitting a rescission of manifestation of intentions to offer or accept contracts made by consumers when they misunderstood or are distressed by certain acts of business operators, and nullifying any clauses, in part or in whole, that exempt the business operators from their liability for damages or otherwise that unfairly harm the interests of consumers, in addition to providing a right to qualified consumer organization to demand an injunction against business operators, etc. for the purpose of preventing the occurrence of or the spreading of damage to other consumers. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、消費者と事業者との間の情報の質及び量並びに交渉力の格差にかんがみ、事業者の一定の行為により消費者が誤認し、又は困惑した場合について契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示を取り消すことができることとするとともに、事業者の損害賠償の責任を免除する条項その他の消費者の利益を不当に害することとなる条項の全部又は一部を無効とするほか、消費者の被害の発生又は拡大を防止するため適格消費者団体が事業者等に対し差止請求をすることができることとすることにより、消費者の利益の擁護を図り、もって国民生活の安定向上と国民経済の健全な発展に寄与することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 186 (1) Where there exist any security interests (meaning a special statutory lien, pledge, mortgage, or a right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, against property that belongs to the bankruptcy estate, if it is in the common interests of bankruptcy creditors to cause said security interests to be extinguished by selling by private contract said property, a bankruptcy trustee may file a petition to the court for permission for the measure to sell by private contract the property and cause all security interests to be extinguished by paying to the court the amount of money specified in each of the following items for the cases listed in the respective items; provided, however, that this shall not apply if such measure would unduly harm the interest of the persons who hold the security interests in question: 例文帳に追加

第百八十六条　破産手続開始の時において破産財団に属する財産につき担保権（特別の先取特権、質権、抵当権又は商法若しくは会社法の規定による留置権をいう。以下この節において同じ。）が存する場合において、当該財産を任意に売却して当該担保権を消滅させることが破産債権者の一般の利益に適合するときは、破産管財人は、裁判所に対し、当該財産を任意に売却し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める額に相当する金銭が裁判所に納付されることにより当該財産につき存するすべての担保権を消滅させることについての許可の申立てをすることができる。ただし、当該担保権を有する者の利益を不当に害することとなると認められるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When receiving a deposit of clearing margins, based on the provisions of Article 179, paragraph (1) of the Act, from a Member, etc., an Intermediary, or a Clearing Intermediary (excluding cases where a Member, etc. carries out the transaction on the Commodity Market on his or her own account and where a Clearing Participant carries out the Commodity Clearing transaction on the account of the Member, etc. who consigned such transaction), a Commodity Clearing Organization shall consent to a person prescribed in the following items, respectively, holding a right to claim a return against said clearing margins (limited to within the scope of the amount of customer margins, intermediation margins, or clearing intermediation margins deposited by the person specified in said respective items) for the categories of cases set forth respectively in those items: 例文帳に追加

２　商品取引清算機関は、法第百七十九条第一項の規定に基づき会員等、取次者又は清算取次者から取引証拠金の預託を受けるとき（会員等が自己の計算において商品市場における取引を行う場合及び清算参加者がその委託をした会員等の計算において商品清算取引を行う場合を除く。）は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者が当該取引証拠金（当該各号に定める者が預託した委託証拠金、取次証拠金又は清算取次証拠金の額の範囲内に限る。）に対する返還請求権を有するものとしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 121 (1) In the event that a person who has violated this Act is an agent or other employee acting on behalf of the business operator of the enterprise, with respect to matters concerning workers at that enterprise, the fine under the relevant Article shall also be assessed against the business operator; provided, however, that this shall not apply in the event that the business operator has taken necessary measures to prevent such violation (In the event that the business operator is a juridical person, the representative thereof shall be deemed business operator; and in the event that the business operator is a minor or an adult ward who lacks the capacity regarding business of an adult, the statutory representative thereof shall be deemed business operator (if the statutory representative is a juridical person, the representative thereof). The same shall apply hereinafter in this Article.). 例文帳に追加

第百二十一条　この法律の違反行為をした者が、当該事業の労働者に関する事項について、事業主のために行為した代理人、使用人その他の従業者である場合においては、事業主に対しても各本条の罰金刑を科する。ただし、事業主（事業主が法人である場合においてはその代表者、事業主が営業に関し成年者と同一の行為能力を有しない未成年者又は成年被後見人である場合においてはその法定代理人（法定代理人が法人であるときは、その代表者）を事業主とする。次項において同じ。）が違反の防止に必要な措置をした場合においては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-11 (1) A Tender Offeror may not withdraw offers or cancel contracts pertaining to the Tender Offer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Withdrawal, etc. of Tender Offer") after having once made the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の十一　公開買付者は、公開買付開始公告をした後においては、公開買付けに係る申込みの撤回及び契約の解除（以下この節において「公開買付けの撤回等」という。）を行うことができない。ただし、公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社（会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。）の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情（政令で定めるものに限る。）が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The family court may appoint an attendant who is an attorney at law in a case of a Juvenile as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) who committed a crime listed in any of the items in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or in a case of a Juvenile as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (ii) who committed an act violating criminal laws and regulations concerning crimes listed in any of the items in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article for the Juvenile against whom the measures prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1), item (ii) has been implemented and who has no attendant who is an attorney at law if the court finds that participation of an attendant who is an attorney at law is needed for the hearing in light of the nature of the case, presence or absence of the Custodian and other circumstances. 例文帳に追加

２　家庭裁判所は、第三条第一項第一号に掲げる少年に係る事件であつて前条第一項各号に掲げる罪のもの又は第三条第一項第二号に掲げる少年に係る事件であつて前条第一項各号に掲げる罪に係る刑罰法令に触れるものについて、第十七条第一項第二号の措置がとられており、かつ、少年に弁護士である付添人がない場合において、事案の内容、保護者の有無その他の事情を考慮し、審判の手続に弁護士である付添人が関与する必要があると認めるときは、弁護士である付添人を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム