「over set」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(39ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(3) The provision of Article 125(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the assertion of an objection under the provision of paragraph (1) or the taking over of action under the provision of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 126(5) and (6) and the preceding Article shall apply to the cases referred to in the preceding two paragraphs. In this case, the phrase "the period set forth in paragraph (1)" in Article 126(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an unextendable period of one month from the last day of the ordinary period for investigation or special period for investigation for the denied/disputed bankruptcy claim or from the ordinary date of investigation or special date of investigation for said claim." 例文帳に追加

３　第百二十五条第二項の規定は第一項の規定による異議の主張又は前項の規定による受継について、第百二十六条第五項及び第六項並びに前条の規定は前二項の場合について準用する。この場合においては、第百二十六条第五項中「第一項の期間」とあるのは、「異議等のある破産債権に係る一般調査期間若しくは特別調査期間の末日又は一般調査期日若しくは特別調査期日から一月の不変期間」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 18 The provision of Article 43 of the New Act shall apply to the case where a Bank falls under the condition specified in Article 41(i) on or after the Effective Date and thereby the Prime Minister's license set forth in Article 4(1) loses its effect, and the case where a company other than a Bank, etc. succeeds to liabilities of any outstanding deposit or Installment Savings through Merger after the Effective Date, and the provisions then in force shall remain applicable to the competent minister's supervision over a company to which the provision of Article 26 of the Former Act applies at the time of the day before the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

第十八条　新法第四十三条の規定は、施行日以後に銀行が新法第四十一条第一号の規定に該当して新法第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許が効力を失つた場合及び施行日以後に銀行等以外の会社が合併により銀行の預金又は定期積金の債務を承継した場合について適用し、施行日の前日において旧法第二十六条の規定の適用を受けている会社に対する主務大臣の監督については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 280-2 (1) In cases where a detention warrant is deemed to have been issued against the suspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 45, item (vii) of the Juvenile Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 45-2 of said Act; the same shall apply in paragraph (1) of the following Article) the request set forth in Article 37-2, paragraph (1) of the Code shall be filed with the judge of the family court which issued the order set forth in Article 19, paragraph (2) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23, paragraph (3) of said Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (1) of the following Article) or in Article 20 of said Act, a judge of the district court which has jurisdiction over the location of the family court to which said judge is assigned, or a judge of the summary court in the same location as said district court (including the same location as a branch of said district court). 例文帳に追加

第二百八十条の二　少年法第四十五条第七号（同法第四十五条の二において準用する場合を含む。次条第一項において同じ。）の規定により被疑者に勾留状が発せられているものとみなされる場合における法第三十七条の二第一項の請求は、少年法第十九条第二項（同法第二十三条第三項において準用する場合を含む。次項及び次条第一項において同じ。）若しくは第二十条の決定をした家庭裁判所の裁判官、その所属する家庭裁判所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の裁判官又はその地方裁判所の所在地（その支部の所在地を含む。）に在る簡易裁判所の裁判官にこれをしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 25 (1) In case where a specified measuring instrument that is required to undergo a periodic inspection pursuant to the provision of Article 19, paragraph 1 has been inspected by a certified measurer specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry for each type of specified measuring instruments by the method specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry set forth in Article 23, paragraphs 2 and 3, within the period specified by the Cabinet Order set forth in Article 19, paragraph 1, item 3 prior to the day of the periodic inspection and bears an indication affixed by such certified measurer pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3, if a person using such specified measuring instrument has notified, prior to the day of the periodic inspection, the prefectural governor or the head of the specified municipality having jurisdiction over the location of his/her place of business of such fact, said specified measuring instrument shall not be required to undergo a periodic inspection notwithstanding the provisions of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第二十五条　第十九条第一項の規定により定期検査を受けなければならない特定計量器であって、その特定計量器の種類に応じて経済産業省令で定める計量士が、第二十三条第二項及び第三項の経済産業省令で定める方法による検査を実施期日前第十九条第一項第三号の政令で定める期間以内に行い、第三項の規定により表示を付したものについて、これを使用する者が、その事業所の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事又は特定市町村の長に実施期日までにその旨を届け出たときは、当該特定計量器については、同条の規定にかかわらず、当該定期検査を受けることを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 174 (1) When a person (hereinafter referred to as a "Violator" in this Article) has committed an Act of Violation on his/her own account (meaning a series of Sales and Purchase, etc. of Securities (which means the Sales and Purchase, etc. of Securities set forth in Article 159(2)) or making of an offer or entrustment therefor conducted in violation of Article 159(2)(i), that would fluctuate market prices of Listed Financial Instruments, etc. (meaning the Listed Financial Instruments, etc. in the same item; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities in an Over-the-Counter Securities Market; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the Prime Minister shall, in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the following Section, order said Violator to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty of an amount equivalent to the sum of the amount specified in each of the following items: 例文帳に追加

第百七十四条　自己の計算において違反行為（第百五十九条第二項第一号の規定に違反する取引所金融商品市場における上場金融商品等（同号に規定する上場金融商品等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は店頭売買有価証券市場における店頭売買有価証券の相場を変動させるべき一連の有価証券売買等（第百五十九条第二項に規定する有価証券売買等をいう。）又はその申込み若しくは委託等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）をした者（以下この条において「違反者」という。）があるときは、内閣総理大臣は、次節に定める手続に従い、当該違反者に対し、次の各号に掲げる額の合計額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The officers of the designated consultation support business operators entrusted pursuant to the provision of the second sentence of paragraph 2 (meaning employees, directors, or executive officers who execute business, or the equivalent thereof, including those recognized as having the same or greater influence over corporations as employees who execute business, directors, corporate officers, or the equivalent thereof, regardless of what titles they may have, such as counselor, consultant, etc.; the same shall apply hereinafter), or the persons who are prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in the preceding paragraph or the persons who used to be in such positions shall not disclose personal secrets obtained concerning such entrusted service without just cause. 例文帳に追加

４　第二項後段の規定により委託を受けた指定相談支援事業者等の役員（業務を執行する社員、取締役、執行役又はこれらに準ずる者をいい、相談役、顧問その他いかなる名称を有する者であるかを問わず、法人に対し業務を執行する社員、取締役、執行役又はこれらに準ずる者と同等以上の支配力を有するものと認められる者を含む。以下同じ。）若しくは前項の厚生労働省令で定める者又はこれらの職にあった者は、正当な理由なしに、当該委託業務に関して知り得た個人の秘密を漏らしてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 262 (1) Where a person who has filed a complaint or accusation regarding an offense set forth in Articles 193 to 196 of the Penal Code, Article 45 of the Subversive Activities Prevention Act (Act No. 240 of 1952), or Article 42 or 43 of the Act on Regulation of Organizations Which Have Committed Indiscriminate Mass Murder (Act No.147 of 1999) is dissatisfied with the disposition not to institute prosecution made by a public prosecutor, the complainant or accuser may request the district court which has jurisdiction over the location of the public prosecutors office to which that public prosecutor belongs to commit the case to a court for trial. 例文帳に追加

第二百六十二条　刑法第百九十三条から第百九十六条まで又は破壊活動防止法（昭和二十七年法律第二百四十号）第四十五条若しくは無差別大量殺人行為を行った団体の規制に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百四十七号）第四十二条若しくは第四十三条の罪について告訴又は告発をした者は、検察官の公訴を提起しない処分に不服があるときは、その検察官所属の検察庁の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所に事件を裁判所の審判に付することを請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 56-2-19 (1) The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism handles all or part of the Confirmation Services by himself/herself when a Registered Confirmation Agency has suspended all or part of the Confirmation Services with permission set forth in Article 56-2-11, when a Registered Confirmation Agency has been ordered to suspend all or part of the Confirmation Services pursuant to Article 56-2-15, or when a Registered Confirmation Agency has been unable to perform all or part of the Confirmation Services due to a natural disaster or other reasons, and when the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has judged it necessary to take over the Confirmation Services by himself/herself. 例文帳に追加

第五十六条の二の十九　国土交通大臣は、登録確認機関が第五十六条の二の十一の許可を受けて確認業務の全部若しくは一部を休止したとき、第五十六条の二の十五の規定により登録確認機関に対し確認業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じたとき、又は登録確認機関が天災その他の事由により確認業務の全部若しくは一部を実施することが困難となった場合において必要があると認めるときは、その確認業務の全部又は一部を自ら行うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) All persons who have performed the underwriting, etc. of the relevant foreign private bonds have, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, submitted a document stating to the effect that the requirement set forth in the preceding item has been satisfied during the performance of the offering or secondary distribution, etc. of all of the foreign private bonds for which the underwriting, etc. has been performed, as well as any other matters specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the competent district director with jurisdiction over the location of the head office or principal office of the person who issued said foreign private bonds (where said person who issued said foreign private bonds is a foreign corporation, the location of the foreign corporation's principal office in Japan), via said person who issued the bonds. 例文帳に追加

三　当該民間国外債の引受け等をしたすべての者が、財務省令で定めるところにより、当該引受け等をしたすべての民間国外債の募集又は売出し等が前号の要件を満たして行われた旨その他財務省令で定める事項を記載した書類を、当該民間国外債の発行をした者を経由して当該発行をした者の本店又は主たる事務所の所在地（当該発行をした者が外国法人である場合には、当該外国法人の国内にある主たる事務所の所在地）の所轄税務署長に提出したこと。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petitions for approval of resolutions set forth in Article 732 of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項において準用する同法第七百三十二条の決議の認可の申立てについて準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This is a rather difficult task, and as I have said over and over again, although it might be easy to restore the postal businesses, whose foundations were shaken by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their former status, that is not what we are going to do. As we are undertaking a grand project of considering how to make use of Japan Post, which we may say is the biggest in the world, for the benefit of the whole of Japan and the entire world, this is a rather challenging task. We are now seeking public opinions and advice from far and wide. We are undertaking this project in the hope of achieving it together with the people, as I have been saying. If you ask me whether our study is proceeding smoothly, I can only say that a plan like this does not take a clear shape until the very last moment. In any case, everyone is doing his part in his own position, so we will be able to set forth a direction by around the end of this month. 例文帳に追加

なかなか、これは大変な話で、何度も言っているように、小泉（元総理）さんがガタガタにしてしまった郵政事業をその前の姿に戻すというのであればわりと簡単かもしれませんが、そうではないのです。地域のため、また日本全体のため、世界のために、世界一と言っても良い日本郵政株式会社をどうしていくか、という一大事業でありますので、なかなか大変でありますけれども、現在、国民の方々の声を幅広く聞かせていただく、またアドバイスもいただく。そうした、国民の皆さん方と一体となった中でこの事業を成し遂げたいという、かねがね皆様方に申し上げているそうした方針で、現在、取り組んでおります。順調に行っているかどうかと言われると、こういうのは最後の最後にならないと、きちんとした形というのは作れないわけでありますが、それぞれの立場で頑張ってくれておりますので、大体、月末までには一つの方向性を出せるのではないかなと考えております。 - 金融庁

Article 108 (1) When a Member, etc. (limited to a Member, etc. who is a Clearing Participant in the case of completing settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, item (ii) or (iii); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) has caused damage to another Member, etc. or a Commodity Clearing Organization as a result of default of liabilities arising from Transactions on a Commodity Market, the damaged Member, etc. or Commodity Clearing Organization shall, with regard to the guarantee funds for the Commodity Market pertaining to said transactions and the clearing margin for said transactions (limited to that for transactions based on the Member, etc.'s own account) of the Member, etc. who has caused the damage, have the right to receive payment in preference over other creditors. 例文帳に追加

第百八条　会員等（第百五条第二号又は第三号に掲げる方法による決済を行う場合にあつては、清算参加者である会員等に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が商品市場における取引に基づく債務の不履行により他の会員等又は商品取引清算機関に損害を与えたときは、その損害を受けた会員等又は商品取引清算機関は、その損害を与えた会員等の当該取引に係る商品市場についての信認金及び当該取引についての取引証拠金（自己の計算による取引についてのものに限る。）について、他の債権者に先立つて弁済を受ける権利を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 398 (1) If a lawful objection to demand is made against a demand for payment issued through the demand procedure based on a petition for demand for payment that is filed by means of an electronic data processing system pursuant to the provision of the main clause of Article 132-10(1), with regard to the claim pertaining to the objection to demand, it shall be deemed that an action is filed, at the time of filing of the petition for demand for payment, with the summary court prescribed in Article 383 to which the court clerk who has issued the demand for payment belongs or a summary court specified separately by the Rules of the Supreme Court as set forth in the preceding Article or the district court that has jurisdiction over the location of either summary court, depending on the value of the subject matter of the claim. 例文帳に追加

第三百九十八条　第百三十二条の十第一項本文の規定により電子情報処理組織を用いてされた支払督促の申立てに係る督促手続における支払督促に対し適法な督促異議の申立てがあったときは、督促異議に係る請求については、その目的の価額に従い、当該支払督促の申立ての時に、第三百八十三条に規定する簡易裁判所で支払督促を発した裁判所書記官の所属するもの若しくは前条の別に最高裁判所規則で定める簡易裁判所又はその所在地を管轄する地方裁判所に訴えの提起があったものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liabilities for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(g)-2) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking rescission of a resolution set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十四条（第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ト（２）に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、前項の決議の取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) When a Member, etc. (limited to a Member, etc. who is a Clearing Participant in the case of completing settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, item 2 or 3; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) has caused damage to another Member, etc. or a Commodity Clearing Organization as a result of default of liabilities arising from Transactions on a Commodity Market, the damaged Member, etc. or Commodity Clearing Organization shall, with regard to the guarantee funds for the Commodity Market pertaining to said transactions and the clearing margin for said transactions (limited to that for transactions based on the Member, etc.'s own account) of the Member, etc. who has caused the damage, have the right to receive payment in preference over other creditors. 例文帳に追加

１ 会員等（第百五条第二号又は第三号に掲げる方法による決済を行う場合にあつては、清算参加者である会員等に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が商品市場における取引に基づく債務の不履行により他の会員等又は商品取引清算機関に損害を与えたときは、その損害を受けた会員等又は商品取引清算機関は、その損害を与えた会員等の当該取引に係る商品市場についての信認金及び当該取引についての取引証拠金（自己の計算による取引についてのものに限る。）について、他の債権者に先立つて弁済を受ける権利を有する。 - 経済産業省

(6) The right that a trustee has pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) with regard to expenses, etc. for the preservation, liquidation, or distribution of property that belongs to the trust property, which has been conducted in the common interest of creditors (limited to creditors who hold claims pertaining to the obligation covered by the trust property; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall, in the proceedings for execution or for the exercise of a security interest set forth in paragraph (4), prevail over the rights of other creditors (in cases where such expenses, etc. were not beneficial to all creditors, those who did not benefit from such expenses, etc. shall be excluded). In this case, said right has the same rank in the order of priority as a statutory lien prescribed in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code. 例文帳に追加

６　各債権者（信託財産責任負担債務に係る債権を有する債権者に限る。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の共同の利益のためにされた信託財産に属する財産の保存、清算又は配当に関する費用等について第一項の規定により受託者が有する権利は、第四項の強制執行又は担保権の実行の手続において、他の債権者（当該費用等がすべての債権者に有益でなかった場合にあっては、当該費用等によって利益を受けていないものを除く。）の権利に優先する。この場合においては、その順位は、民法第三百七条第一項に規定する先取特権と同順位とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

These Guidelines, which are based on the “Policies Concerning the Protection of Personal Information” decided by the Japanese Cabinet on the 2nd of April 2004 in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 7 of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No. 57 of 2003; hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and specify pursuant to Article 8 of the Act the necessary matters concerning the matters set forth by the Act, are formulated as practical guidelines to support the activities performed by entities and others to ensure the proper handling of personal information in sectors, over which the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry holds jurisdiction, and specific sectors (hereinafter referred to as “economic and industrial sectors”), in which the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry is designated as a competent minister pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Article 36 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

このガイドラインは、個人情報の保護に関する法律（平成１５年法律第５７号。以下「法」という。）第７条第１項に基づき平成１６年４月２日に閣議決定された「個人情報の保護に関する基本方針」（平成２０年４月一部変更）を踏まえ、また、法第８条に基づき法に定める事項に関して必要な事項を定め、経済産業省が所管する分野及び法第３６条第１項により経済産業大臣が主務大臣に指定された特定の分野（以下「経済産業分野」という。）における事業者等が行う個人情報の適正な取扱いの確保に関する活動を支援する具体的な指針として定めるものである。 - 経済産業省

Put simply, the issue of over-the-counter sales of life insurance by banks frequently came up on the agenda when I was a Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) member, which remained the case for a long time. Being providers of loans to a variety of businesses and individuals, banks are always in a very dominant bargaining position. Therefore, the significant worry was the possibility of the party in such a dominant bargaining position taking advantage of it for sales purposes – for instance, making a customer purchase a life or non-life insurance product by tying it to a promise to make a loan. It was for that reason that the 2007 amendment, which approved the insurance product sales by banks in a phased-in form, was passed only after steps for the prevention of harmful practices, including non-disclosed information protection, were set in place as a sort of firewall. 例文帳に追加

簡単に言えば、これは私も自由民主党にいたときから長い間、実は生命保険の銀行の窓口での販売、窓販ということはいつも論議になりまして、銀行というのはご存じのように融資をいろいろな企業、個人にもしていますから、非常に優越的地位にあるのですね。ですから、その優越的地位にある方がそれを商売のために利用して、例えばこれを融資してやるけれども、抱き合わせでこの生命保険に入れとか損害保険に入れということをするのではないかということが大変な問題点でしたから、ですから、そこをファイアーウォールと申しますか、そういう非公開情報保護措置等の弊害防止措置を講じた上で、要するに段階的に保険商品を取扱うことが認められたのが平成19年の改正だったというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 23 (1) An employer shall, pursuant to Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, take measures of shortening of working hours and other measures that facilitate a worker to take care of a child while continuing working, upon application from a worker (referred to as "Measures including Shortening of Working Hours" hereinafter in this paragraph and in paragraph 1 of the following Article), with regard to an employed worker who takes care of a child under one year of age (or one year and six months of age, in cases where said worker files an application set forth in Article 5 paragraph 3; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) but who does not take Child Care Leave, and shall also take measures equivalent to the system of Child Care Leave or Measures including Shortening of Working Hours, with regard to an employed worker who takes care of a child over one year of age and under three years of age. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条　事業主は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、その雇用する労働者のうち、その一歳（当該労働者が第五条第三項の申出をすることができる場合にあっては、一歳六か月。以下この項において同じ。）に満たない子を養育する労働者で育児休業をしないものにあっては労働者の申出に基づく勤務時間の短縮その他の当該労働者が就業しつつその子を養育することを容易にするための措置（以下この項及び次条第一項において「勤務時間の短縮等の措置」という。）を、その雇用する労働者のうち、その一歳から三歳に達するまでの子を養育する労働者にあっては育児休業の制度に準ずる措置又は勤務時間の短縮等の措置を講じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 19 (1) A person who uses, for measurements in statutory measurement units in conducting transactions or certifications, a specified measuring instrument specified by Cabinet Order (excluding those specified by Cabinet Order set forth in Article 16, paragraph 1 or Article 72, paragraph 2) which is deemed to be appropriate to be inspected on a regular basis pertaining to its performance and instrumental error in consideration of its structure, conditions for use, actual use status, etc. shall place the specified measuring instrument under a periodic inspection conducted by the prefectural governor (or the head of the specified municipality, if the person's place of business is located in such a specified municipality) having jurisdiction over the location of the person's place of business (or the person's domicile, if the person has no place of business; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the following specified measuring instruments: 例文帳に追加

第十九条　特定計量器（第十六条第一項又は第七十二条第二項の政令で定めるものを除く。）のうち、その構造、使用条件、使用状況等からみて、その性能及び器差に係る検査を定期的に行うことが適当であると認められるものであって政令で定めるものを取引又は証明における法定計量単位による計量に使用する者は、その特定計量器について、その事業所（事業所がない者にあっては、住所。以下この節において同じ。）の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事（その所在地が特定市町村の区域にある場合にあっては、特定市町村の長）が行う定期検査を受けなければならない。ただし、次に掲げる特定計量器については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 120 (1) With respect to a specified measuring instrument required to undergo a measurement certification inspection pursuant to the provisions of Article 116, paragraph 1, in the case where a certified measurer specified according to the type of specified measuring instruments by Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, has performed an inspection thereof by the method specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry set forth in Article 118, paragraphs 2 and 3 within the period specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and has affixed an indication pursuant to the provisions of Article 25, paragraph 3 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the following paragraph, said specified measuring instrument shall not be required to undergo a measurement certification inspection notwithstanding the provision of Article 116, paragraph 1, if the measurement certification business operator has notified the prefectural governor having jurisdiction over its place of business thereof. 例文帳に追加

第百二十条　第百十六条第一項の規定により計量証明検査を受けなければならない特定計量器であって、その特定計量器の種類に応じて経済産業省令で定める計量士が、第百十八条第二項及び第三項の経済産業省令で定める方法による検査を経済産業省令で定める期間内に行い、次項において準用する第二十五条第三項の規定により表示を付したものについて、その計量証明事業者がその事業所の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事にその旨を届け出たときは、当該特定計量器については、第百十六条第一項の規定にかかわらず、計量証明検査を受けることを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The court of the first instance with which an action set forth in paragraph (1) is filed, when it finds it necessary in order to avoid substantial detriment or delay in cases where the rehabilitation court's jurisdiction over the rehabilitation case is based on no provisions of laws or regulations other than the provision of Article 5(8) or (9) (including cases where the rehabilitation court has accepted the rehabilitation case transferred thereto pursuant to the provision of Article 7(iv) and the acceptance of the transferred case is based on no provision other than the provision of Article 7(iv) (b) or (c)), by its own authority, may transfer said action to the district court prescribed in Article 5(1) (or the district court prescribed in Article 5(2) if there is no such court that corresponds to the court prescribed in Article 5(1)), notwithstanding the provision of the preceding paragraph. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の訴えが提起された第一審裁判所は、再生裁判所が再生事件を管轄することの根拠となる法令上の規定が第五条第八項又は第九項の規定のみである場合（再生裁判所が第七条第四号の規定により再生事件の移送を受けた場合において、移送を受けたことの根拠となる規定が同号ロ又はハの規定のみであるときを含む。）において、著しい損害又は遅滞を避けるため必要があると認めるときは、前項の規定にかかわらず、職権で、当該訴えに係る訴訟を第五条第一項に規定する地方裁判所（同項に規定する地方裁判所がない場合にあっては、同条第二項に規定する地方裁判所）に移送することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to appointment of a special agent set forth in Article 707 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the resignation of a Specified Trust Administrator under Article 711(3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dismissal of a Specified Trust Administrator under Article 713 of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百七条の特別代理人の選任について、同法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百十一条第三項の特定信託管理者の辞任について、同法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百十三条の特定信託管理者の解任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) When making a calculation set forth in paragraph (1)(i), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Articles 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a consolidated final return form for the relevant business year set forth in Article 68-90(5) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the competent district director having jurisdiction over the consolidated parent corporation's place for tax payment finds that there was any compelling reason for the failure to attach detailed statements and the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第一号の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、当該各事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十第五項の連結確定申告書に当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、その添付がなかつたことについて連結親法人の納税地の所轄税務署長がやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、当該明細書の提出があつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

You were asked a very difficult question just now, so difficult that it would have taken an hour to make a proper reply. I also have some difficult questions: as the financial turmoil still continues, and in light of what has happened over the past two months, could you tell me in which direction you expect the capitalist economy that has been led by investment banks to go? Do you think it will undergo correction? And do you think that the business model of investment banks, which are subject to regulation by the FRB (Federal Reserve Board), will collapse? Also, do you think that this crisis will somewhat set back efforts to strengthen the competitiveness of Japanese financial institutions, although they are now going on the offensive? 例文帳に追加

金融の方でこの混乱の事態というのは、まだどういう収束を見せるのかというのは進行中ではあると思うのですが、この2か月間を振り返って、これまでアメリカの投資銀行というところが主に牽引する形で引っ張ってきたこの資本主義経済のあり方というか、こういうものが今後どういう方向になるのか、修正されるのか、あるいは投資銀行というのがこのようにして全部FRB（連邦準備制度理事会）の管轄下に入って、そういうモデルというのがもう崩壊していくのかどうか、位置付けというのがどういうことになるのか、なかなか難しいと思うのですがお聞かせいただきたいのと、あとその中で日本勢というのは逆に攻勢という形で出ていますけれども、一方でこのように金融の競争力を強化という流れに少し水をさされる形になるのかどうか、そのあたりの考えというのを聞かせていただけますでしょうか。 - 金融庁

(iii) For the workplace falling under the following categories, to appoint the necessary number of safety officers to always supervise the technical matters pertaining to the safety among those works set forth in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 10 of the Act during the operation of a production facilities unit designated by the Director of the Prefectural Labour Bureau having the jurisdiction over the district where the said workplace is located (hereinafter referred to as "Director of the competent Prefectural Labour Bureau"): (a) The workplace where, among the chemical facilities (meaning the chemical facilities listed in item (i) of Article 9-3 of the Enforcement Order of Industrial Safety and Health Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Order"), the same shall apply hereinafter), the one such as a reactor, etc., in which the exothermal reaction arises or due to the similar abnormal conditions that explosions, fires, etc. is possible to arise (due to excluding piping; hereinafter referred to as "special chemical facilities"); (b) The special chemical facilities designated by the Director of the competent Prefectural Labour Bureau (hereinafter referred to as "designated workplaces"). 例文帳に追加

三　化学設備（労働安全衛生法施行令（以下「令」という。）第九条の三第一号に掲げる化学設備をいう。以下同じ。）のうち、発熱反応が行われる反応器等異常化学反応又はこれに類する異常な事態により爆発、火災等を生ずるおそれのあるもの（配管を除く。以下「特殊化学設備」という。）を設置する事業場であつて、当該事業場の所在地を管轄する都道府県労働局長（以下「所轄都道府県労働局長」という。）が指定するもの（以下「指定事業場」という。）にあつては、当該都道府県労働局長が指定する生産施設の単位について、操業中、常時、法第十条第一項各号の業務のうち安全に係る技術的事項を管理するのに必要な数の安全管理者を選任すること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) Where a single foreign corporation or two or more foreign corporations intervene(s) between a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of the said other foreign corporation (excluding a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. set forth in the preceding item falling under the case listed in the said item) and a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the preceding paragraph and has(have) a linkage with them through holding the shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a "capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s)" in this item) (limited to the case where over 50 percent of the number or the amount of the issued shares, etc. of each of a capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) and the said foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. are held by a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the said paragraph or a capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) (such foreign corporation or capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) shall be limited to those over 50 percent of the number or the amount of whose issued shares, etc. are held by a foreign corporation listed in item (i) and item (ii) of the said paragraph or other capital contribution-related corporation(s))): The ratio of the number or the amount of the shares, etc. of the said other foreign corporation held by the said foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. out of the total issued shares, etc. of the said other foreign corporation (where there are two or more such foreign corporations which are shareholders, etc., the sum of the ratios calculated for each of them). 例文帳に追加

二　当該他の外国法人の株主等である外国法人（前号に掲げる場合に該当する同号の株主等である外国法人を除く。）と前項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人との間にこれらの者と株式等の所有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の外国法人（以下この号において「出資関連外国法人」という。）が介在している場合（出資関連外国法人及び当該株主等である外国法人がそれぞれその発行済株式等の百分の五十を超える数又は金額の株式等を同項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人又は出資関連外国法人（その発行済株式等の百分の五十を超える数又は金額の株式等が同項第一号及び第二号に掲げる外国法人又は他の出資関連外国法人によつて所有されているものに限る。）によつて所有されている場合に限る。）　当該株主等である外国法人の有する当該他の外国法人の株式等の数又は金額が当該他の外国法人の発行済株式等のうちに占める割合（当該株主等である外国法人が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の株主等である外国法人につきそれぞれ計算した割合の合計割合） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I believe that it has already been announced that the FSA conducted its first inspection in 2005, the second in 2007 and another one in May 2009, according to the administrative authorities. I hear that the bank was quite uncooperative in the inspections during the period between 2007 and 2009. Before that period, although the bank was not doing very well under the business model that it was then applying, I judge from my common sense as a politician that it was nevertheless toiling away in an honest and diligent fashion. From 2007 to 2009, however, the bank rapidly drifted into purchasing loan claims from money lending businesses or focusing on a certain set of companies belonging to its network of relationships, to the point of concentrating over 80 percent of its lending on them. In the light of that fact, I basically believe that this case did involve circumstances very different from those of normal banks, circumstances that are quite singular and are specific to the bank. 例文帳に追加

既に発表したと思っておりますが、行政当局から聞いていますと、第1回目は平成17年に、平成19年にまた2度目、平成21年5月に金融庁が検査いたしまして、平成19年から21年の間の時期、非常に検査に非協力的だったという話を聞いておりまして、それまではビジネスモデルに基づいて、経営状態はあまりよくなかったわけでございますけれども、私の政治家としての一般常識からいえば、まじめにこつこつやっておられたと思っておりますが、平成19年から21年の間に、非常に貸金業者から債権を買ったり、それから特定のネットワーク企業といったところに急速に傾いていった、まさに80％以上の貸出金を集中していったということで、そういった意味でも、やはり基本的に、さっき申し上げましたように非常に普通の銀行とは違って、この銀行特有の異常な事態があったと私は思っております。 - 金融庁

(4) The provisions of Article 103(4) to (8) inclusive (Demand for the Acquisition of a Beneficial Interest), Article 104 (Valuation of a Beneficial Interest, etc.), Article 262 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), Article 263 (Special Provisions on Procedure in Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), and Article 264 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the demand that a beneficial interest be purchased as set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in Article 103(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the "Asset Securitization Act")," the term "beneficiaries" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holder prescribed in Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "public notice in an official gazette" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice," the phrase "paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal relating to each class)," the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in paragraph (8) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　信託法第百三条第四項から第八項まで（受益権取得請求）、第百四条（受益権の価格の決定等）、第二百六十二条（第五項を除く。）（信託に関する非訟事件の管轄）、第二百六十三条（信託に関する非訟事件の手続の特例）及び第二百六十四条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の受益権の買取りの請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百三条第四項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と、「受益者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項に規定する受益証券の権利者」と、同条第五項中「官報による公告」とあるのは「公告」と、同条第六項中「第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項」と、「受益権の内容」とあるのは「元本持分（種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分）」と、同条第八項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Unless otherwise indicated, the following terms shall be understood as follows: (a) “Bureau” means the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the Intellectual Property Office; (b) “Chief Hearing Officer” means the officer within the Bureau who exercises immediate supervision over any Hearing Officer. His title or official designation may differ from the words “Chief Hearing Officer” depending on the structure of the Office; (c) “Court” means a court of general jurisdiction such as Regional Trial Court; (d) “Director” means the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs; (e) “Director General” means the head of the Intellectual Property Office; (f) “Hearing Officer” means the Officer within the Bureau authorized to exercise the functions of “Hearing Officer” in these Regulations. The title or official designation of such officers may differ from the words “Hearing Officers” depending on the structure of the Office; (g) “IP Code” means Republic Act No. 8293 otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines; (h) “Office” means the Intellectual Property Office; (i) “Regulations” means this set of rules and regulations and such Regulations as may be formulated by the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs and approved by the Director General.例文帳に追加

別段の定めがない限り，次の用語は，次のように解釈する。 (a)「局」とは，知的所有権庁の法務局をいう。 (b)「主任聴聞官」とは，局の上級職員であって，聴聞官を直接監督するものをいう。その役職又は正式な呼称は，庁の構成によっては，「主任聴聞官」の語と異なる場合がある。 (c)「裁判所」とは，地方裁判所等の一般管轄権を有する裁判所をいう。 (d)「局長」とは，法務局長をいう。 (e)「長官」とは，知的所有権庁の長をいう。 (f)「聴聞官」とは，局の上級職員であって，本規則において，「聴聞官」の職権を行使する権限を有するものをいう。当該職員の役職又は正式の呼称は，庁の構成によっては「聴聞官」の語と異なる場合がある。 (g)「IP法」とは，フィリピン知的財産法とも称する共和国法律第8293号をいう。 (h)「庁」とは，知的所有権庁をいう。 (i)「規則」とは，この一連の規則及び法務局長が作成し長官が承認する規則をいう。 - 特許庁

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 173, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows:(i) a document stating the organization which has jurisdiction over the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts and its appointment of personnel; (ii) a document stating the estimated income for the three years after the commencement of the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (iv) a document stating the names or trade names of the Clearing Participants, and the addresses of the principal offices or head offices; (v) a record prepared by the Clearing Participants according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application and pertaining to such persons’ net assets; (vi) in the case where an electronic data processing system is used for the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts, a document stating the outline, installation location, capacity, and maintenance system of said electronic data processing system, and the process for responding in the event of the failure of said electronic data processing system. 例文帳に追加

法第百七十三条第三項の主務省令で定める書類は、次に掲げるものとする。一商品取引債務引受業を所掌する組織及び人員配置を記載した書面 二商品取引債務引受業の開始後三年間における収支の見込みを記載した書面 三会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 四清算参加者の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載 した書面 五清算参加者が承認の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純 資産額に関する調書 六商品取引債務引受業において電子情報処理組織を使用する場合には、当該電子情報 処理組織の概要、設置場所、容量及び保守の方法並びに当該電子情報処理組織に異 常が発生した場合の対処方法を記載した書類 - 経済産業省

(i) With regard to a business cooperative, a minor business cooperative, or a federation of cooperatives (excluding one engaged in the activities set forth in Article 9-9, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (iii)), if its district does not extend beyond the district of a prefecture and the business required for partner as prescribed in the articles of association is not a business under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Finance nor a business under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (limited to one specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item and item (iv)), the administrative agency shall be the prefectural governor having jurisdiction over its principal office (hereinafter referred to as the competent prefectural governor), and if its district does not extend beyond the district of a prefecture and the business required for partner as prescribed in the articles of formation is a business under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Finance or a business under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and any other business, the administrative agency shall be the Minister of Finance or the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the competent prefectural governor, and if it does not fall under these conditions, the administrative agency shall be the competent minister of the business required for partner as prescribed in the articles of formation. 例文帳に追加

一　事業協同組合、事業協同小組合及び協同組合連合会（第九条の九第一項第一号又は第三号の事業を行うものを除く。）については、その地区が都道府県の区域を超えないものであつて、その組合員の資格として定款に定められる事業が財務大臣の所管に属する事業又は国土交通大臣の所管に属する事業（政令で定めるものに限る。以下この号及び第四号において同じ。）以外のものにあつては、その主たる事務所の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事（以下「管轄都道府県知事」という。）とし、その地区が都道府県の区域を超えないものであつて、その組合員の資格として定款に定められる事業が財務大臣の所管に属する事業又は国土交通大臣の所管に属する事業とその他の事業とであるものにあつては、財務大臣又は国土交通大臣及びその管轄都道府県知事とし、その他のものにあつては、その組合員の資格として定款に定められる事業の所管大臣とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 10 (1) A person who intends to engage in a business that handles animals (such animals shall be limited to mammals, birds, and reptiles, and shall exclude those pertaining to livestock farming and those being cared for or kept in order to be provided for use in testing and research, use in manufacturing biological preparations, or for other uses specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section and the following Section) (such business shall include selling [including acting as an intermediary or agent therefor; the same shall apply in the following paragraph], keeping, lending, training, exhibiting [including the provision of opportunities for contact with animals; the same shall apply in the following paragraph] or other handling specified by a Cabinet Order with regard to animals; hereinafter referred to as the "animal handling business") shall receive registration from the prefectural governor having jurisdiction over the location of the place of business where the person intends to engage in said business (in the case of a designated city set forth in Article 252-19(1) of the Local Autonomy Act [Act No. 67 of 1947] [hereinafter referred to as the "designated city"], the mayor of said designated city; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section, Article 25(1) and (2) and Section 4). 例文帳に追加

第十条　動物（哺乳類、鳥類又は爬虫類に属するものに限り、畜産農業に係るもの及び試験研究用又は生物学的製剤の製造の用その他政令で定める用途に供するために飼養し、又は保管しているものを除く。以下この節及び次節において同じ。）の取扱業（動物の販売（その取次ぎ又は代理を含む。次項において同じ。）、保管、貸出し、訓練、展示（動物との触れ合いの機会の提供を含む。次項において同じ。）その他政令で定める取扱いを業として行うことをいう。以下「動物取扱業」という。）を営もうとする者は、当該業を営もうとする事業所の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事（地方自治法（昭和二十二年法律第六十七号）第二百五十二条の十九第一項の指定都市（以下「指定都市」という。）にあつては、その長とする。以下この節、第二十五条第一項及び第二項並びに第四節において同じ。）の登録を受けなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 306(3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting), Article 307 (Determination by the Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 306(4) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "a shareholders meeting" in Article 307(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a general meeting of members," the term "the shareholders" in Article 307(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第三百七条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加

第三条　この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The subject of the financial regulatory reforms has already been a significant discussion topic in the past as well. I heard that during the Financial Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting held from October 22 to 23 in Gyeongju, the proposed capital adequacy requirement for banks and a new liquidity framework, which were drawn up in a recent meeting of the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, were welcomed along with the commitment to having them come into full force by the prescribed due date, and an endorsement was given to the policy framework, work processes and timelines proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking, one of the subordinate organs of the Financial Stability Board, with respect to the issue of addressing systematically important financial institutions (SIFIs) that you have just raised. The meeting accordingly agreed to give priority to this initiative as an agenda item of the G20 Summit. In that sense, implementing international financial regulatory reforms will contribute to an enhanced financial system and improved soundness of financial institutions in the medium to long term. In the meantime, it is also extremely important to, among other things, make the set of requirements a well-balanced one that fully takes into account differences between countries in terms of the actual operation of their financial systems and to implement it over time by, for instance, allowing an ample planning time in adequate consideration of any impact on the real economy - this is also an approach that Japan applies in attending the ongoing Summit meeting. 例文帳に追加

金融規制改革に関しましては、以前にも大きな話題になりました10月22日から23日は慶州でありました財務大臣・中央銀行総裁会議において、先般の中央銀行総裁・銀行監督当局長官との会合で作成された銀行の自己資本、それから流動性の新たな枠組みを歓迎し、期限内に完全に実施することにコミットすること、また今お話がございましたシステム上重要な金融機関（SIFIs）については、FSB（金融安定理事会）、この下部機関の一つにバーゼル銀行監督委員会がありますが、これが提案する政策の枠組み及び作業手順及び日程を承認することを聞いておりまして、G20サミットの議題として、そのことを優先することを合意したところでございまして、そういった意味で国際的な金融規制の改革については、中長期的に金融システムの強化及び金融機関の健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、各国の金融システムの実情の違いを十分に踏まえたバランスのとれたものにすること、実体経済への影響に十分配慮し、十分な計画期間を設けるなど、時間をかけて実施していくことなどが極めて重要であり、今回のサミットにおいてもこうした姿勢で臨んでいます。 - 金融庁

(4) The cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as provided by Article 32-3, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be, for the time being, in addition to the cases provided by Article 20, paragraph 2, the cases under which the fee of 670 yen (or 650 yen in case of a tax exempt business provider) for accepting the job application is collected upon acceptance of the job application of a job seeker for occupations pertaining to the entertainer set forth in the same paragraph, domestic helper (a person who provides general housekeeping businesses (limited to those provided at a house of an individual, dormitory or other equivalent facilities)), care-giving or nursing-assisting businesses for patients, invalids, etc. (limited to those provided at a hospital or other equivalent facility), person in charge of serving food (a person who provides table-coordinating, food-serving or waiting businesses, etc. following proper manners at a hotel, restaurant, hall, etc. serving foods by following proper menu (including the businesses necessary for organizing and storing the tools such as the tableware associated with such businesses)), cook (a person having the expertise and skills concerning the cooking, nutrition and sanitation and providing cooking businesses), modeling in the same paragraph or mannequin (a person having the expertise and advertising skills concerning the goods and providing such advertising businesses as the explanation, demonstration, etc. of various goods for stimulating the willingness to spend of the customers over-the-counter or at the exhibition (including the sales businesses)); provided, however, the amount shall be equivalent to the fees for three such cases per month if the number of the job applications accepted from the same job seeker exceeds three per month. 例文帳に追加

４　法第三十二条の三第二項の厚生労働省令で定めるときは、当分の間、第二十条第二項に規定するほか、同項の芸能家、家政婦（家政一般の業務（個人の家庭又は寄宿舎その他これに準ずる施設において行われるものに限る。）、患者、病弱者等の付添いの業務又は看護の補助の業務（病院等の施設において行われるものに限る。）を行う者）、配ぜん人（正式の献立による食事を提供するホテル、料理店、会館等において、正式の作法による食卓の布設、配ぜん、給仕等の業務（これらの業務に付随した飲食器等の器具の整理及び保管に必要な業務を含む。）を行う者）、調理士（調理、栄養及び衛生に関する専門的な知識及び技能を有し、調理の業務を行う者）、同項のモデル又はマネキン（専門的な商品知識及び宣伝技能を有し、店頭、展示会等において相対する顧客の購買意欲をそそり、販売の促進に資するために各種商品の説明、実演等の宣伝の業務（この業務に付随した販売の業務を含む。）を行う者）の職業に係る求職者から求職の申込みを受理した時以降六百七十円（免税事業者にあつては、六百五十円）の求職受付手数料を徴収するときとする。ただし、同一の求職者に係る求職の申込みの受理が一箇月間に三件を超える場合にあつては、一箇月につき三件分に相当する額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 55 (1) Where a registrar, in relation to a condominium unit with a registered right of site (meaning a condominium unit for which a right of site is registered; the same shall apply in Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 74, paragraph (2), and Article 76, paragraph (1)) for which there is a specified registration (meaning a registration of a right other than a registration of ownership, etc., which shall have the effect of a registration made relating to a right of site pursuant to the provision of Article 73, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), makes a registration of change of the registered right of site on the grounds that it has become possible to dispose of the registered right of site set forth in Article 44, paragraph (1), item (ix) separately from the proprietary elements owned by the unit owner, when he/she is provided with, in addition to the application information regarding the registration of change, information certifying that the registered holder of the right pertaining to the specified registration (in cases where the specified registration is a registration of a mortgage and mortgage securities have been issued, including the holder or endorser of the mortgage securities) has consented to cause the right pertaining to the specified registration to be extinguished, after the registration of change is made, for said condominium unit or the land on which the registered right of site existed (in cases where there is a registration concerning a third party's right established over said right pertaining to the specified registration, the information certifying that the third party has given consent must also be provided), he/she shall, as provided for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, make a registration to the effect that said right pertaining to the specified registration has been extinguished in relation to said condominium unit or land for which the consent has been given. 例文帳に追加

第五十五条　登記官は、敷地権付き区分建物（区分建物に関する敷地権の登記がある建物をいう。第七十三条第一項及び第三項、第七十四条第二項並びに第七十六条第一項において同じ。）のうち特定登記（所有権等の登記以外の権利に関する登記であって、第七十三条第一項の規定により敷地権についてされた登記としての効力を有するものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）があるものについて、第四十四条第一項第九号の敷地利用権が区分所有者の有する専有部分と分離して処分することができるものとなったことにより敷地権の変更の登記をする場合において、当該変更の登記の申請情報と併せて特定登記に係る権利の登記名義人（当該特定登記が抵当権の登記である場合において、抵当証券が発行されているときは、当該抵当証券の所持人又は裏書人を含む。）が当該変更の登記後の当該建物又は当該敷地権の目的であった土地について当該特定登記に係る権利を消滅させることを承諾したことを証する情報が提供されたとき（当該特定登記に係る権利を目的とする第三者の権利に関する登記がある場合にあっては、当該第三者が承諾したことを証する情報が併せて提供されたときに限る。）は、法務省令で定めるところにより、当該承諾に係る建物又は土地について当該特定登記に係る権利が消滅した旨を登記しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph." 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項（指定買取人による買取りの通知）の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項（譲渡等承認請求の撤回）の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで（売買価格の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム