「security」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(451ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(viii) a document evidencing that a company consolidated through consolidation-type merger has given the public notice and the notices under Article 810, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act) (with regard to a stock company or a limited liability company which, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, has given a public notice by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by method of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act), that the public notice was given by such method), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such consolidation-type merger; 例文帳に追加

八　新設合併消滅会社において会社法第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公告及び催告（同法第八百十条第三項（同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした株式会社又は合同会社にあつては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該新設合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) Where Policyholders or other creditors raise objections within the period under paragraph (2), item (iii), the Stock Company in paragraph (1) shall make payment or provide equivalent security to such policyholders or other creditors, or entrust equivalent property to a trust company, etc. (referring to a trust company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) (Definitions) of the Trust Business Act (Act No. 154 of 2004); the same shall apply hereinafter) or financial institution carrying on trust business (referring to a financial institution approved under Article 1, paragraph (1) (Authorization of Trust Business) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions (Act No. 43 of 1943)); the same shall apply hereinafter) for the purpose of ensuring that such Policyholders or other creditors receive the payment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the reduction of the capital, etc. poses no risk of harming the interest of such Policyholders or other creditors. 例文帳に追加

４　保険契約者その他の債権者が第二項第三号の期間内に異議を述べたときは、第一項の株式会社は、当該保険契約者その他の債権者に対し、弁済し、若しくは相当の担保を提供し、又は当該保険契約者その他の債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として信託会社等（信託会社（信託業法（平成十六年法律第百五十四号）第二条第二項（定義）に規定する信託会社をいう。以下同じ。）及び信託業務を営む金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律（昭和十八年法律第四十三号）第一条第一項（信託業務の認可）の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。）をいう。以下同じ。）に相当の財産を信託しなければならない。ただし、当該資本金等の額の減少をしても当該保険契約者その他の債権者を害するおそれがないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vi) "Employment Placement Dispatching" means a type of Worker Dispatching in which employment placement is carried out or is prepared to be carried out by a person who has received license under paragraph (1) of Article 5, (hereinafter referred to as a "business operator of a general dispatching undertaking") or a person who has submitted a written notice pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as a "business operator of a specified dispatching undertaking"), either before or after the commencement of the provision of Worker Dispatching services, with regard to the Dispatched Worker(s) pertaining to said Worker Dispatching and the person(s) receiving the provision of Worker Dispatching services pertaining to said Dispatched Worker(s) (hereinafter referred to as the "client(s)" in this item), after having received license or submitted a written notice pursuant to the provisions of the Employment Security Act and other Acts, and shall include dispatching through said job introduction where the employment of said Dispatched Worker(s) by said client(s) is agreed upon between said Dispatched Worker(s) and said client(s) prior to the conclusion of the provision of said Worker Dispatching services. 例文帳に追加

六　紹介予定派遣　労働者派遣のうち、第五条第一項の許可を受けた者（以下「一般派遣元事業主」という。）又は第十六条第一項の規定により届出書を提出した者（以下「特定派遣元事業主」という。）が労働者派遣の役務の提供の開始前又は開始後に、当該労働者派遣に係る派遣労働者及び当該派遣労働者に係る労働者派遣の役務の提供を受ける者（以下この号において「派遣先」という。）について、職業安定法その他の法律の規定による許可を受けて、又は届出をして、職業紹介を行い、又は行うことを予定してするものをいい、当該職業紹介により、当該派遣労働者が当該派遣先に雇用される旨が、当該労働者派遣の役務の提供の終了前に当該派遣労働者と当該派遣先との間で約されるものを含むものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) A person who has been sentenced to a penalty for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Companies Act or the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation (Act No. 48 of 2006), or for having committed: a crime under Article 197 (Crime of False Statement in Securities Registration Report, etc.), Article 197-2, items (i) to (x) inclusive or (xiii) (Crime of Solicitation of Securities by Unregistered Agents. etc.), Article 198, item (viii) (Crime of Violating Prohibition Order or Order for Suspension by Court), Article 199 (Crime of Refusal of Reporting, etc.), Article 200, items (i) to (xii) inclusive or item (xxi) (Crime of Non-Submission of Correction Report, etc.), Article 203, paragraph (3) (Bribery of Officer or Staff of Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc.) or Article 205, items (i) to (vi) inclusive, item (xvi) or (xx) (Crime of Non-Submission of Written Notice, etc. on Specified Solicitation, etc.) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act; a crime under Article 549 (Crime of Fraudulent Reorganization), Article 550 (Crime of Giving Security, etc. to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 552 to 555 inclusive (Crime of Refusal to Report or Undergo Investigation, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc.) or Article 557 (Bribery) of the Act on Special Measures, etc. concerning Reorganization Proceedings for Financial Institutions, etc. (Act No. 95 of 1996); a crime under Article 255 (Crime of Fraudulent Rehabilitation), Article 256 (Crime of Giving Security to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 258 to 260 inclusive (Crime of Refusal to Report or Undergo Investigation, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Supervising Commissioner, etc.) or Article 262 (Bribery) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 225 of 1999); a crime under Article 65 (Crime of Refusal of Reporting or Investigation, etc.), Article 66 (Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Recognition Trustee, etc.), Article 68 (Bribery) or Article 69 (Crime of Disposition or Export of Property without Permission) of the Act on Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Procedures (Act No. 129 of 2000); a crime under Article 265 (Crime of Fraudulent Bankruptcy), Article 266 (Crime of Giving Security to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 268 to 272 inclusive (Crime of Refusal of Explanation or Investigation, etc., Crime of Refusing to Disclose Important Property, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Refusal of Explanation in Hearing, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Bankruptcy Trustee, etc.), or Article 274 (Bribery) of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No. 75 of 2004), for whom two years have not elapsed since the day on which the execution of the sentence was completed or the sentence ceased to be applied; or 例文帳に追加

三　この法律、会社法若しくは一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）の規定に違反し、又は金融商品取引法第百九十七条（有価証券届出書虚偽記載等の罪）、第百九十七条の二第一号から第十号まで若しくは第十三号（有価証券の無届募集等の罪）、第百九十八条第八号（裁判所の禁止又は停止命令違反の罪）、第百九十九条（報告拒絶等の罪）、第二百条第一号から第十二号まで、第二十号若しくは第二十一号（訂正届出書の不提出等の罪）、第二百三条第三項（金融商品取引業者等の役職員に対する贈賄罪）若しくは第二百五条第一号から第六号まで、第十九号若しくは第二十号（特定募集等の通知書の不提出等の罪）の罪、金融機関等の更生手続の特例等に関する法律（平成八年法律第九十五号）第五百四十九条（詐欺更生罪）、第五百五十条（特定の債権者等に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第五百五十二条から第五百五十五条まで（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第五百五十七条（贈賄罪）の罪、民事再生法（平成十一年法律第二百二十五号）第二百五十五条（詐欺再生罪）、第二百五十六条（特定の債権者に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、監督委員等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第二百六十二条（贈賄罪）の罪、外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律（平成十二年法律第百二十九号）第六十五条（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪）、第六十六条（承認管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）、第六十八条（贈賄罪）若しくは第六十九条（財産の無許可処分及び国外への持出しの罪）の罪若しくは破産法（平成十六年法律第七十五号）第二百六十五条（詐欺破産罪）、第二百六十六条（特定の債権者に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第二百六十八条から第二百七十二条まで（説明及び検査の拒絶等の罪、重要財産開示拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、審尋における説明拒絶等の罪、破産管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第二百七十四条（贈賄罪）の罪を犯し、刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又はその執行を受けることがなくなった日から二年を経過しない者 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(e) The filing of a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 186, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a right of retention under the Commercial Law under the provisions of Article 192, paragraph (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for a grant of discharge under the provisions of Article 248, paragraph (1) of said Act or a petition for the restoration of rights under the provisions of Article 256, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, a petition for revocation of an order for a stay of execution or a petition for the revocation of a provisional mandatory order or a provisional injunctive order under the provisions of the Administrative Case Litigation Act, a request under the provisions of Article 27-20 of the Labor Union Act (Act No. 174 of 1949), a petition under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (3) or Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent under the provisions of the proviso to Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Labor Tribunal Act, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of civil execution proceedings under the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc., a petition under the provisions of Article 15-6 of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations, a petition under the provisions of Article 39, paragraph (1) of the Personal Status Litigation Act (Act No. 109 of 2003), a motion under the provisions of Article 105-4, paragraph (1) or Article 105-5, paragraph (1) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959), a petition under the provisions of Article 114-6, paragraph (1) or Article 114-7, paragraph (1) of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), or a petition under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993) 例文帳に追加

ホ　破産法第百八十六条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第百九十二条第三項の規定による商事留置権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第二百四十八条第一項の規定による免責許可の申立て若しくは同法第二百五十六条第一項の規定による復権の申立て、民事再生法第百四十八条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、行政事件訴訟法の規定による執行停止決定の取消しの申立て、若しくは仮の義務付け若しくは仮の差止めの決定の取消しの申立て、労働組合法（昭和二十四年法律第百七十四号）第二十七条の二十の規定による申立て、配偶者からの暴力の防止及び被害者の保護に関する法律第十六条第三項若しくは第十七条第一項の規定による申立て、労働審判法第四条第一項ただし書の規定による弁護士でない者を代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律第七条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による民事執行の手続の停止若しくは続行を命ずる裁判を求める申立て、家事審判法第十五条の六の規定による申立て、人事訴訟法（平成十五年法律第百九号）第三十九条第一項の規定による申立て、特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第百五条の四第一項若しくは第百五条の五第一項の規定による申立て、著作権法（昭和四十五年法律第四十八号）第百十四条の六第一項若しくは第百十四条の七第一項の規定による申立て又は不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項の規定による申立て - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) For the Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security, the amount of insurance to cover the damage of the Owner of General Ship listed in item 1 of paragraph 1 (The damage to the Owner of General Ship other than listed in the respective items of the said paragraph may be included.) or the amount for which the performance of the obligations of damages is secured shall not be less than the Amount of Limit of Liability in the case where the said Owner of General Ship can limit the liability pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, Article 3 of the Act on Limitation of Liability for each General Ship pertaining to the Contract (Hereinafter referred in this Article as "the Amount of Limit of Liability") and the amount of insurance to cover the damage of the Owner of General Ship listed in item 2 of paragraph 1 or the amount for which the payment of cost required for removing the said general ship or taking other measures is secured shall not be less than the amount equivalent to the Amount of Limit of Liability for each General Ship pertaining to the Contract. 例文帳に追加

３　保障契約は、当該契約において一般船舶所有者等の第一項第一号に掲げる損害（同項各号に掲げる損害以外の一般船舶所有者等に生ずる損害を含むことができる。）をてん補するための保険金額又は賠償の義務の履行が担保されている額が、当該契約に係る一般船舶ごとに、責任制限法第三条第一項の規定に基づき当該一般船舶所有者等がその責任を制限することができる場合における責任の限度額（以下この条において「責任限度額」という。）に満たないものであつてはならず、かつ、当該契約において一般船舶所有者等の第一項第二号に掲げる損害をてん補するための保険金額又は当該一般船舶の撤去その他の措置に要する費用の支払が担保されている額が、当該契約に係る一般船舶ごとに、責任限度額に相当する額に満たないものであつてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) Concerted business carried out by a Non-Life Insurance Company with another Non-Life Insurance Company (including foreign non-life insurance companies, etc.) with regard to businesses which are specific to the aviation Insurance Business (meaning the business of underwriting insurance of which the purpose is to insure aircraft (including rockets; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or cargo transported by aircraft, or insurance concerning liability for the compensation of damage caused by an aircraft accident; including the business pertaining to the underwriting of insurance concerning the injuries of those on board the aircraft), nuclear Insurance Business (meaning the business of underwriting insurance of which the purpose is to insure a nuclear facility, or insurance concerning liability for the compensation of damage caused by an accident at a nuclear facility), automobile damage liability Insurance Business pursuant to the Automobile Liability Security Act (Act No. 97 of 1955), or the business related to the earthquake insurance contract prescribed in the Act on Earthquake Insurance (Act No. 73 of 1966); and 例文帳に追加

一　航空保険事業（航空機（ロケットを含む。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは航空機により運送される貨物を保険の目的とする保険又は航空機の事故により生じた損害を賠償する責任に関する保険の引受けを行う事業をいい、航空機搭乗中の者の傷害に関する保険の引受けに係る事業を含む。）、原子力保険事業（原子力施設を保険の目的とする保険又は原子力施設の事故により生じた損害を賠償する責任に関する保険の引受けを行う事業をいう。）、自動車損害賠償保障法（昭和三十年法律第九十七号）の規定に基づく自動車損害賠償責任保険事業又は地震保険に関する法律（昭和四十一年法律第七十三号）に規定する地震保険契約に関する事業の固有の業務につき損害保険会社が他の損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。）と行う共同行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 131(2) (Presumption of Rights) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Preferred Equity Security, and the provisions of Article 132(1) and (2) (Stating or Recording of Matters to Be Stated in Shareholder Registry Not Requested by Shareholders) and Article 133 (Stating or Recording of Matters to Be Stated in Shareholder Registry at Request of Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Preferred Equity of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "shareholders" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member" and "Preferred Equity Members" respectively, the phrase "Matters to be Stated in the Shareholder Registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in the items of Article 43(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholder registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member Registry," the term "shares" in Article 131(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity," and the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 132(1)(iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)." 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第百三十一条第二項（権利の推定等）の規定は優先出資証券について、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第二項（株主の請求によらない株主名簿記載事項の記載又は記録）並びに第百三十三条（株主の請求による株主名簿記載事項の記載又は記録）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「株主名簿記載事項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第四十三条第一項各号に掲げる事項」と、「株主名簿」とあるのは「優先出資社員名簿」と、同法第百三十一条第二項中「株式」とあるのは「優先出資」と、同法第百三十二条第一項第三号中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己優先出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己優先出資をいう。）」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

11) In the case referred to in paragraph (8) and the preceding paragraph, the voting rights held by a company or an individual voting right holder shall not include any voting rights pertaining to Shares, etc. held in the form of trust property pertaining to a monetary or security trust (limited to cases where the settlor or the beneficiary may exercise voting rights or may instruct to the company or the holders of the voting rights) and any other voting rights specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, but shall include any voting rights of the Shares, etc. which are held as trust property and of which the other company or the person holding voting rights of the Bank may, as a settlor or beneficiary, make exercise or may give instructions on the exercise (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and any voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147(1) or Article 148(1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001 例文帳に追加

１１　第八項又は前項の場合において、会社又は議決権の保有者が保有する議決権には、金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る信託財産として所有する株式等に係る議決権（委託者又は受益者が行使し、又はその行使について当該会社若しくは当該議決権の保有者に指図を行うことができるものに限る。）その他内閣府令で定める議決権を含まないものとし、信託財産である株式等に係る議決権で、当該会社又は当該議決権の保有者が委託者若しくは受益者として行使し、又はその行使について指図を行うことができるもの（内閣府令で定める議決権を除く。）及び社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含むものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Programs provided in the core X Consortiumdistribution include: a terminal emulator, xterm; a window manager, twm;a display manager, xdm; a console redirect program, xconsole; a mail interface,xmh; a bitmap editor, bitmap; resource listing/manipulation tools, appres,editres; access control programs, xauth, xhost, and iceauth; user preferencesetting programs, xrdb, xcmsdb, xset, xsetroot, xstdcmap, and xmodmap;clocks, xclock and oclock; a font displayer, (xfd; utilities for listinginformation about fonts, windows, and displays, xlsfonts, xwininfo, xlsclients,xdpyinfo, xlsatoms, and xprop; screen image manipulation utilities, xwd,xwud, and xmag; a performance measurement utility, x11perf; a font compiler,bdftopcf; a font server and related utilities, xfs, fsinfo, fslsfonts,fstobdf; an X Image Extension exerciser, xieperf; a display server andrelated utilities, Xserver, rgb, mkfontdir; remote execution utilities,rstart and xon; a clipboard manager, xclipboard; keyboard description compilerand related utilities, xkbcomp, xkbprint, xkbbell, xkbevd, xkbvleds, andxkbwatch; a utility to terminate clients, xkill; an optimized X protocolproxy, lbxproxy; a firewall security proxy, xfwp; a proxy manager to controlthem, proxymngr; a utility to find proxies, xfindproxy; Netscape NavigatorPlug-ins, libxrx.so and libxrxnest.so; an RX MIME-type helper program, xrx;and a utility to cause part or all of the screen to be redrawn, xrefresh.Many other utilities, window managers, games, toolkits, etc. 例文帳に追加

X コンソーシアムがコアの配布物として提供しているプログラムは以下を以下に示す:端末エミュレータ、\\fIxterm\\fP;ウィンドウマネージャ、\\fItwm\\fP;ディスプレイマネージャ、\\fIxdm\\fP;コンソールリダイレクトプログラム、\\fIxconsole\\fP;メールインターフェース、\\fIxmh\\fP;ビットマップエディタ、\\fIbitmap\\fP;リソース列挙/操作ツール、\\fIappres\\fP, \\fIeditres\\fP;アクセス制御プログラム、\\fIxauth\\fP, \\fIxhost\\fP, と \\fIiceauth\\fP;ユーザ環境設定プログラム、\\fIxrdb\\fP, \\fIxcmsdb\\fP,\\fIxset\\fP, \\fIxsetroot\\fP, \\fIxstdcmap\\fP, \\fIxmodmap\\fP;時計、 \\fIxclock\\fP と \\fIoclock\\fP;フォント表示、(\\fIxfd\\fP;フォント、ウィンドウとディスプレイの情報表示ユーティリティ、\\fIxlsfonts\\fP, \\fIxwininfo\\fP, \\fIxlsclients\\fP,\\fIxdpyinfo\\fP, \\fIxlsatoms\\fP, と \\fIxprop\\fP;スクリーン画像操作ユーティリティ、 \\fIxwd\\fP, \\fIxwud\\fP, と \\fIxmag\\fP;性能測定ユーティリティ、 \\fIx11perf\\fP;フォントコンパイラ、 \\fIbdftopcf\\fP;\\fIfslsfonts\\fP, \\fIfstobdf\\fP;フォントサーバと関連ユーティリティ、 \\fIxfs\\fP, \\fIfsinfo\\fP, \\fIfslsfonts\\fP, \\fIfstobdf\\fP;X Image 拡張実行プログラム, \\fIxieperf\\fP;\\fImkfontdir\\fP;ディスプレイサーバと関連ユーティリティ、\\fIXserver\\fP, \\fIrgb\\fP, \\fImkfontdir\\fP;リモート実行ユーティリティ、 \\fIrstart\\fP と \\fIxon\\fP;クリップボードマネージャ、 \\fIxclipboard\\fP;\\fIxkbwatch\\fP;キーボード構成記述コンパイラと関連ユーティリティ、 \\fIxkbcomp\\fP, \\fIxkbprint\\fP, \\fIxkbbell\\fP, \\fIxkbevd\\fP, \\fIxkbvleds\\fP, と \\fIxkbwatch\\fP;クライアント停止ユーティリティ、 \\fIxkill\\fP; 最適化 X プロトコルプロキシ、 \\fIlbxproxy\\fP;ファイアウォールセキュリティプロキシ、 \\fIxfwp\\fP;プロキシを制御するプロキシマネージャ、 \\fIproxymngr\\fP;プロキシを発見するユーティリティ、 \\fIxfindproxy\\fP;Netscape Navigator のプラグイン, \\fIlibxrx.so\\fP と \\fIlibxrxnest.so\\fP;RX MIME 型用の補助プログラム、 \\fIxrx\\fP;スクリーンの全てもしくは一部を再描画するユーティリティ、 \\fIxrefresh\\fP 。 - XFree86

(viii) a document evidencing that a splitting company in absorption-type company split has given the public notice and the notices under Article 789, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act) (in cases where, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, a public notice by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by method of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 789, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), that the public notice was given by such method (in the cases excluding where separate notices are not required to be given pursuant to the provision of Article 789, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act, that the public notice and the notices were given)), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such absorption-type company split; and 例文帳に追加

八　吸収分割会社において会社法第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公告及び催告（同法第七百八十九条第三項（同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした場合にあつては、これらの方法による公告（同法第七百八十九条第三項の規定により各別の催告をすることを要しない場合以外の場合にあつては、当該公告及び催告））をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該吸収分割をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(viii) a document evidencing that a splitting company in incorporation-type company split has given the public notice and the notices under Article 810, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act) (in cases where, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, a public notice has been given by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by means of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), that the public notice was given by such method (in the cases excluding where separate notices are not required to be given pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act, that the public notice and the notices were given)), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such incorporation-type company split; and 例文帳に追加

八　新設分割会社において会社法第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公告及び催告（同法第八百十条第三項（同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした場合にあつては、これらの方法による公告（同法第八百十条第三項の規定により各別の催告をすることを要しない場合以外の場合にあつては、当該公告及び催告））をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該新設分割をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 A written application for registration of a change resulting from an absorption-type merger of a cooperative shall have attached, in addition to a document proving the change to matters listed in the items of Article 84, paragraph (2), a document proving that public notice or notice under the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-4, paragraph (4) and to Article 63-5, paragraph (6) (in the case of a cooperative which has given public notice by the method of public notice set forth in Article 33, paragraph (4), item (ii) or item (iii) in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association under the provisions of the same paragraph, in addition to giving public notice in an official gazette, pursuant to the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-4, paragraph (4) and to Article 63-5, paragraph (6), public notice by these methods) has been given, and, if any obligee has stated an objection, the fact that a payment has been made or equivalent security has been provided to said obligee or equivalent property has been entrusted for the purpose of having such obligee receive the payment, or the fact that the absorption-type merger carries no risk of harming said obligee, and a certificate of the registered matters of the cooperative dissolved as a result of the absorption-type merger (excluding one whose principal office is located within the jurisdictional district of the relevant registry office). 例文帳に追加

第百二条　組合の吸収合併による変更の登記の申請書には、第八十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項の変更を証する書面のほか、第六十三条の四第四項及び第六十三条の五第六項において準用する第五十六条の二第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第六十三条の四第四項及び第六十三条の五第六項において準用する第五十六条の二第三項の規定により公告を官報のほか第三十三条第四項の規定による定款の定めに従い同項第二号又は第三号に掲げる公告方法によつてした組合にあつては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し、弁済し、若しくは相当の担保を提供し、若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該吸収合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面並びに吸収合併により消滅する組合（当該登記所の管轄区域内に主たる事務所があるものを除く。）の登記事項証明書を添付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102-2 A written application for registration of formation by a consolidation-type merger of cooperatives shall have attached, in addition to the documents specified in Article 98, paragraph (2), item (i), a document proving that public notice or notice under the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-6, paragraph (4) (in the case of a cooperative which has given public notice by the method of public notice set forth in Article 33, paragraph (4), item (ii) or item (iii) in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association under the provisions of the same paragraph, in addition to giving public notice in an official gazette, pursuant to the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-6, paragraph (4), public notice by these methods) has been given, and, if any obligee has stated an objection, the fact that a payment has been made or equivalent security has been provided to said obligee or equivalent property has been entrusted for the purpose of having such obligee receive the payment, or the fact that the consolidation-type merger carries no risk of harming said obligee, and certificates of the registered matters of the cooperatives dissolved as a result of the consolidation-type merger (excluding those whose principal offices are located within the jurisdictional district of the relevant registry office). 例文帳に追加

第百二条の二　組合の新設合併による設立の登記の申請書には、第九十八条第二項第一号に定める書面のほか、第六十三条の六第四項において準用する第五十六条の二第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第六十三条の六第四項において準用する第五十六条の二第三項の規定により公告を官報のほか第三十三条第四項の規定による定款の定めに従い同項第二号又は第三号に掲げる公告方法によつてした組合にあつては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し、弁済し、若しくは相当の担保を提供し、若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該新設合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面並びに新設合併により消滅する組合（当該登記所の管轄区域内に主たる事務所があるものを除く。）の登記事項証明書を添付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business have received a notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, when he/she finds it necessary to examine whether or not the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that is likely to cause any of the following situations (limited to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a member state of a multilateral treaty or other international agreement on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., which is specified by Cabinet Order and to which Japan has acceded (hereinafter referred to as the "Treaty, etc." in this paragraph), and which is free from the obligations pursuant to the Treaty, etc. in regard to removal of restrictions on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., and the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a state other than member states to the Treaty, etc. which would be free from the obligations if the state was a member state of the Treaty, etc. (referred to as the "Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to National Security, etc." in paragraphs 4 and 5)), he/she may extend the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification shall not be conducted up to four months from the day of acceptance of the notification. 例文帳に追加

３　財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、第一項の規定による届出があつた場合において、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等が次に掲げるいずれかの事態を生ずるおそれがある技術導入契約の締結等（我が国が加盟する技術導入契約の締結等に関する多数国間の条約その他の国際約束で政令で定めるもの（以下この項において「条約等」という。）の加盟国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等で技術導入契約の締結等に関する制限の除去について当該条約等に基づく義務がないもの及び当該条約等の加盟国以外の国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等でその国が当該条約等の加盟国であるものとした場合に当該義務がないこととなるものに限る。次項及び第五項において「国の安全等に係る技術導入契約の締結等」という。）に該当しないかどうかを審査する必要があると認めるときは、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間を、当該届出を受理した日から起算して四月間に限り、延長することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires - “authorised officer” means - (a) a proper officer of customs as defined under the Customs Act 1967; or (b) any officer appointed by the Minister by notification in the Gazette to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred and imposed on an authorised officer by this Part; “counterfeit trade mark goods” means any goods, including packaging, bearing without authorisation a trade mark which is identical with or so nearly resembles the trade mark validly registered in respect of such goods, or which cannot be distinguished in its essential aspects from such a trade mark, and which infringes the rights of the proprietor of the trade mark under this Act; “goods in transit” means goods imported, whether or not landed or transshipped within Malaysia, which are to be carried to another country either by the same or another conveyance; “import” means to bring or cause to be brought into Malaysia by whatever means; “retention period”, in relation to seized goods, means - (a) the period specified in a notice given under section 70G in respect of the goods; or (b) if the period has been extended under section 70G, that period so extended; “security” means any sum of money in cash; “seized goods” means goods seized under section 70D.例文帳に追加

この部においては，文脈上別段の解釈を必要としない限り， 「権限ある公務員」とは， (a) 1967年関税法において定義されている本来の税関職員，又は (b) この部において権限ある公務員に与えられる権限を行使し，かつ，課される義務を履行すべき者として官報における告示により大臣に任命される公務員をいう。 「偽造商標商品」とは，ある商品について適法に登録されている商標と同一の若しくは類似する，又は当該商標と本質的部分において区別し得ない商標であって，本法に基づく当該商標の所有者の権利を侵害するものが，許可なく付されている商品(包装を含む。)をいう。 「通過商品」とは，マレーシアにおいて陸揚げされるか否か又は積み替えられるか否かを問わず，同一の輸送手段によるか又は別の輸送手段によって他国に運ばれる予定で一時的にマレーシアに搬入される商品をいう。 「輸入」とは，輸送手段如何を問わずマレーシアに運び込む又は運び込ませることをいう。 「留置期間」とは，押収された商品に関して， (a) 第70G条に基づき与えられる通知において指定される期間，又は (b) 第70G条に基づきその期間が延長された場合は，その延長された期間をいう。 「担保」とは，何らかの金額の現金をいう。 「押収商品」とは，第70D条に基づき押収された商品をいう。 - 特許庁

(5) The provision of Article 37, paragraph (2) of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where a notification has been made as prescribed in the preceding paragraph; the provisions of Article 5-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 5-4, Article 39, Article 41, paragraph (2), Article 48-3, Article 48-4, Article 50, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and Article 51-2 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to persons who make a notification as prescribed in the preceding paragraph to be engaged in labor recruitment for persons in charge of training; the provision of Article 40 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the payment of compensation for persons who make a notification as prescribed in the preceding paragraph to be engaged in labor recruitment for persons in charge of training; and the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where authority is exercised as prescribed in Article 50, paragraph (2) of the same Act which is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant in this paragraph. In this case, the term "the person who intends to conduct the labor recruitment" in Article 37, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person who makes a notification as prescribed in Article 26-6, paragraph (4) of the Human Resources Development Promotion Act and intends to be engaged in labor recruitment for persons in charge of training as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article;" and the term "may order the abolition of the businesses of the labor recruitment concerned or order" in Article 41, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "may order." 例文帳に追加

５　職業安定法第三十七条第二項の規定は前項の規定による届出があつた場合について、同法第五条の三第一項及び第三項、第五条の四、第三十九条、第四十一条第二項、第四十八条の三、第四十八条の四、第五十条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十一条の二の規定は前項の規定による届出をして訓練担当者の募集に従事する者について、同法第四十条の規定は同項の規定による届出をして訓練担当者の募集に従事する者に対する報酬の供与について、同法第五十条第三項及び第四項の規定はこの項において準用する同条第二項に規定する職権を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十七条第二項中「労働者の募集を行おうとする者」とあるのは「職業能力開発促進法第二十六条の六第四項の規定による届出をして同条第一項に規定する訓練担当者の募集に従事しようとする者」と、同法第四十一条第二項中「当該労働者の募集の業務の廃止を命じ、又は期間」とあるのは「期間」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 37 paragraph 2 of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the notification prescribed in the provision of the preceding paragraph is made; the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 5-3, Article 5-4, Article 39, Article 41 paragraph 2, Article 48-3, Article 48-4, Article 50 paragraphs 1 and 2, and Article 51-2 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an entity that engages in recruitment of workers by making a notification referred to in the provisions of the preceding paragraph; the provisions of Article 40 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the payment of remuneration to an entity that engages in recruitment of workers by making a notification referred to in the provisions of the same paragraph; and the provisions of Article 50 paragraphs 3 and 4 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where an administrative agency exercises official authority referred to in paragraph 2 of the same Article, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "an entity that intends to carry out labor recruitment" in Article 37 paragraph 2 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an entity that intends to engage in recruitment of workers by making a notification referred to in Article 53 paragraph 4 of the Act on the Welfare of Workers Who Take Care of a Child or a Family Member, Including Child Care and Family Care Leave," and the term "order to abolish recruitment business with regard to said workers, or period" in Article 41 paragraph 2 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "period." 例文帳に追加

５　職業安定法第三十七条第二項の規定は前項の規定による届出があった場合について、同法第五条の三第一項及び第三項、第五条の四、第三十九条、第四十一条第二項、第四十八条の三、第四十八条の四、第五十条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十一条の二の規定は前項の規定による届出をして労働者の募集に従事する者について、同法第四十条の規定は同項の規定による届出をして労働者の募集に従事する者に対する報酬の供与について、同法第五十条第三項及び第四項の規定はこの項において準用する同条第二項に規定する職権を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十七条第二項中「労働者の募集を行おうとする者」とあるのは「育児休業、介護休業等育児又は家族介護を行う労働者の福祉に関する法律第五十三条第四項の規定による届出をして労働者の募集に従事しようとする者」と、同法第四十一条第二項中「当該労働者の募集の業務の廃止を命じ、又は期間」とあるのは「期間」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions then in force shall remain applicable to public notice and notification in the case of any payment made under Article 309, paragraph (1) of the Former Commercial Code (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Former Commercial Code or any other Act), any resolution adopted under Article 64, paragraph (1) or Article 67, paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Companies Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 3, any security interest exercised by an Entrusted Company pursuant to the provision of Article 82, paragraph (1) of the Secured Bond Trust Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 5, any payment made under Article 139-5, paragraph (1) of the Former Investment Trust Act, any payment made under Article 111, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Liquidation of Assets prior to the revision by the provision of Article 20, any resolution adopted under Article 10-17, paragraph (1) or (7) of the Act for the Promotion of the Creation of New Businesses prior to the revision by the provision of Article 21, or any payment made under Article 111, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies prior to the revision by the provision of Article 1 of the Act for Partial Revision of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies, etc. prior to the revision by the provision of Article 24, which shall remain in force pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions to that Act, prior to the enforcement of this Act. 例文帳に追加

２　この法律の施行前に、旧商法第三百九条第一項（旧商法又は他の法律において準用する場合を含む。）の弁済がされた場合、第三条の規定による改正前の有限会社法第六十四条第一項若しくは第六十七条第一項の決議をした場合、第五条の規定による改正前の担保附社債信託法第八十二条第一項の規定により受託会社が担保権を実行した場合、旧投信法第百三十九条の五第一項の弁済がされた場合、第二十条の規定による改正前の資産の流動化に関する法律第百十一条第一項の弁済がされた場合、第二十一条の規定による改正前の新事業創出促進法第十条の十七第一項若しくは第七項の決議をした場合又は第二十四条の規定による改正前の特定目的社会による特定資産の流動化に関する法律等の一部を改正する法律附則第二条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされる同法第一条の規定による改正前の特定目的会社による特定資産の流動化に関する法律第百十一条第一項の弁済がされた場合における公告及び通知については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) The application shall be published in the IPO Gazette together with a search document established by or on behalf of the Office citing any document or documents that reflect prior art, after the expiration of eighteen months(18) from the filing date or priority date. However, the applicant may request for the early publication of his application provided that the: 1. applicant submits a written waiver of the a) abovementioned 18-month period, and b) establishment of a search report; 2. publication shall not be earlier than six (6) months from filing date; and 3. required fee for early publication is paid in full. (b) The application will not be published if it has been finally refused or withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn before the termination of the technical preparation for publication. (c) The application to be published shall contain the bibliographic data, any drawing as filed and the abstract. (d) The Office shall communicate to the applicant the date and other information regarding the publication of the application and draw his attention to the period within which the request for substantive examination must be filed. (e) After publication of a patent application, any interested party may inspect the application documents filed with the Office. (f) The Director General, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Trade and Industry, may prohibit or restrict the publication of an application, if in his opinion, to do so would be prejudicial to the national security and interests of the Republic of the Philippines. (Sec. 44, IP CODE)例文帳に追加

(a)出願は，出願日又は優先日から18月が経過した後に，庁により又は庁のために作成された調査書類であって，先行技術の記載がある文献を引用したものと共に，IPO公報において公開する。 ただし，次の条件で，出願人はその出願を早期公開するよう申請することができる。 (1)出願人が書面により次に掲げるものを放棄すること (a)上記の18月の期間，及び (b)調査報告の作成。 (2)出願日から6月より早期の公開でないこと，及び (3)早期公開の手数料が全額納付されていること。 (b)出願は，公開のための技術的な準備が終了する前に最終的に拒絶されたか又は取り下げられたか若しくは取り下げられたものとみなされる場合は，公開されない。 (c)公開される出願には，書誌事項，提出された図面，及び要約が含まれる。 (d)庁は，出願の公開に関して日付その他の情報を出願人に通知すると共に，実体審査請求を行わなければならない期間について注意を喚起する。 (e)特許出願の公開の後，利害関係人は，庁に提出された出願書類を閲覧することができる。 (f)長官は，出願を公開することがフィリピン共和国の国家の安全及び利益を害することになると認める場合は，通商産業大臣の承認を得ることを条件として，出願の公開を禁止し又は制限することができる。(IP法第44条) - 特許庁

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is critical – while peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the land – while they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずＧ20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 316 (1) When an incorporator, a Director at Establishment, a Company Auditor at Establishment, a director, an accounting advisor or member to perform the duties thereof, a company auditor, an accounting auditor or member to perform the duties thereof, a liquidator, a liquidator's agent, a director appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Remedies Act, a person to perform the duties on behalf of a company auditor or representative director, a person to temporarily perform the duties of director, accounting advisor, company auditor or representative director as prescribed in Article 302(1)(v), a person to temporarily perform the duties of liquidator or Representative Liquidator as prescribed in Article 302(2)(iii), a person to temporarily perform the duties of accounting auditor as prescribed in Article 308(1)(iii), an inspector, a supervisor, an examiner, the Administrator of a Specified Equity Member Registry or Administrator of a Preferred Equity Member Registry, the Administrator of the Specified Bond Registry, the Specified Bond Administrator, the Specified Bond Administrator to succeed to the administration of Specified Bonds, the Representative Specified Bondholder or Resolution Administrator, the trustee of a Specific Purpose Trust, the Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder for a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting, the Specified Trust Administrator or person specified by a resolution made at a Beneficiary Security Holders' Meeting under the provisions of Article 246(1) of a Specific Purpose Company falls under any of the following items, such person shall be subject to a non-criminal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however that this shall not apply when such acts should be made subject to a criminal punishment: 例文帳に追加

第三百十六条　特定目的会社の発起人、設立時取締役、設立時監査役、取締役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、清算人、清算人代理、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された取締役、監査役若しくは清算人の職務を代行する者、第三百二条第一項第五号に規定する一時取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは代表取締役の職務を行うべき者、同条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を行うべき者、第三百八条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、監督委員、調査委員、特定社員名簿管理人若しくは優先出資社員名簿管理人、特定社債原簿管理人、特定社債管理者、事務を承継する特定社債管理者、代表特定社債権者若しくは決議執行者、特定目的信託の受託者、権利者集会の代表権利者若しくは特定信託管理者又は第二百四十六条第一項の規定に基づき権利者集会の決議により定められた者は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the theme “Active Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects of “Active Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society” in Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.”例文帳に追加

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会（ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society）が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、｢国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会｣での議論成果に留意する。 - 厚生労働省

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) A mark or part of a mark shall not be registered as a trade mark . (a) if the use of which is likely to deceive or cause confusion to the public or would be contrary to law; (b) if it contains or comprises any scandalous or offensive matter or would otherwise not be entitled to protection by any court of law; (c) if it contains a matter which in the opinion of the Registrar is or might be prejudicial to the interest or security of the nation; [Ins. Act A881] (d) if it is identical with or so nearly resembles a mark which is well-known in Malaysia for the same goods or services of another proprietor; [Ins. Act A1078] (e) if it is well-known and registered in Malaysia for goods or services not the same as to those in respect of which registration is applied for: Provided that the use of the mark in relation to those goods or services would indicate a connection between those goods or services and the proprietor of the well-known mark, and the interests of the proprietor of the well-known mark are likely to be damaged by such use; [Ins. Act A1078] (f) if it contains or consists of a geographical indication with respect to goods not originating in the territory indicated, if use of the indication in the mark for such goods in Malaysia is of such a nature as to mislead the public as to the true place of origin of the goods; or [Ins. Act A1078] (g) if it is a mark for wines which contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying wines, or is a mark for spirits which contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying spirits, not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question. [Ins. Act A1078]例文帳に追加

(1) 標章又は標章の一部が次の何れかに該当するときは，商標として登録されない。 (a) その使用が公衆に誤認若しくは混同を生じさせる虞を伴い又は法律に違反することになるとき (b) それが中傷的若しくは侮辱的な事項を含むか又はそのような事項で構成され，又はその他裁判所の保護を受けるのに適格でないとき (c) それが，登録官の判断において，国の利益又は安全を害し若しくは害する虞のある事項を含むとき［法律A881による挿入］ (d) それが，同一の商品又はサービスについて，マレーシアにおいて周知の他の所有者の標章と同一か又はそれに極めて類似するとき［法律A1078による挿入］ (e) それが，登録出願に係るものと同じでない商品又はサービスについて，マレーシアにおいて周知でありかつ登録されているとき。ただし，登録出願に係る商品又はサービスに関する標章の使用がそれら商品又はサービスと当該周知商標の所有者との間の関係を示唆し，そのような使用により当該所有者の利益が害される虞があることを条件とする。［法律A1078による挿入］ (f) それが，表示された領域を原産地としない商品に係る地理的表示を含むか又はそのような表示で構成されている場合において，マレーシアで当該商品についての標章中にその地理的表示を使用することが当該商品の真の原産地に関して公衆に誤解を生じさせる虞があるとき［法律A1078による挿入］ (g) それがぶどう酒を特定する地理的表示を含むか若しくはそのような表示で構成されているぶどう酒についての標識であるか又は蒸留酒を特定する地理的表示を含むか若しくはそのような表示で構成されている蒸留酒についての標識であるが，当該ぶどう酒又は蒸留酒がそのような地理的表示により表示される地を原産地としていないとき［法律A1078による挿入］ - 特許庁

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business. 例文帳に追加

２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加