「えきだ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(752ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

３　居住者が行おうとする一の特定資本取引が、法第二十四条第一項及び第二項の規定のそれぞれに基づき第一項の規定により指定をされた特定資本取引の二以上に該当する場合において、当該居住者が、その行おうとする一の特定資本取引について同条第三項の規定に基づき同条第一項及び第二項の規定による許可の申請を併せて行おうとするときは、当該居住者は、当該許可の申請がこれらの規定により許可を受ける義務が課された特定資本取引に係るものであることを明らかにした上で、経済産業省令で定める手続により、申請するものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Where one specified capital transaction that a resident intends to conduct falls under two or more kinds of specified capital transactions designated pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) based on Article 24, paragraph (1) or (2) of the Act, when the resident intends to file, pursuant to paragraph (3) of the said Article, an application for permission as prescribed in the provision of paragraphs (1) and (2) of the said Article in block in regard to the one specified capital transaction that he/she intends to conduct, the resident shall file the application through procedures specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, after clarifying that the application for permission pertains to the specified capital transaction for which the obligation to obtain permission has been imposed pursuant to these provisions.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十五条　法第二十二条の二第二項（法第二十二条の三において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により在留資格の取得を申請しようとする外国人のうち同条第四項に規定する永住許可の申請をしようとするものは、別記第三十四号様式による申請書一通並びに第二十二条第一項及び前条第二項に掲げる書類及びその他参考となるべき資料各一通を地方入国管理局に出頭して提出しなければならない。この場合においては、第二十二条第一項ただし書の規定を準用する。例文帳に追加

Article 25 (1) Among foreign nationals who seek to apply for the acquisition of status of residence pursuant to the provisions of Article 22-2, paragraph (2) of the Immigration Control Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22-3 of the Immigration Control Act), any foreign national who seeks to apply for permission for permanent residence as prescribed in Article 22-2, paragraph (4) of the Immigration Control Act shall appear at a regional immigration bureau and submit a written application pursuant to Appended Form 34, a copy of each of the documents listed in Article 22, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and a copy of each of any other reference materials. In this case, the provisions of the proviso to Article 22, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私が今さっき言いましたように、既存債務でも、どうしても津波で流れた工場の機械だとか、それは金融機関が少し債務免除してあげたいなと思っても、それは金融機関に資本力の強化がありませんと、要するに債務を減免してやったり、場合によったら、それはあくまでケース・バイ・ケースで民間金融機関の経営者の判断でございますけれども、それは客観的にしにくいというようなことになるわけでございますから、やはり資本を強化すれば、ニューマネーのそういった既存債務の減免、あるいは場合によったら放棄だとか、そういう幅が広がるわけですから、そういう意味で金融機能強化法というのをずっとやらせていただいておるのです。例文帳に追加

Even if a financial institution wants to forgive a loan on a factory machine swept away by the tsunami, it may not be able to do so unless its capital base is strengthened. Although this is up to managers of private financial institutions to decide on a case-by-case basis, if the capital base is strengthened, reducing or forgiving existing debts may be added to the range of available options.  - 金融庁

すみません、振興銀行なのですけれども、振興銀行を認可した当時は、たしか竹中（元）大臣で、その下に金融改革プログラムを作る会議か何かを設置して、委員の人、数人でそれをやった会議の中に木村剛さんが入っていて、その会議が一切非公開だったのですよね。非公開の中で、そのプログラムの中に中小企業専門の銀行を新設するみたいな話が出て、それがポッと、結果的には出てきたわけです。その前にあったのはセブン銀行、さっき大臣がおっしゃったように、そういう銀行だったのですが、そこら辺の異業種参入に関しては、非常に厳しい参入ガイドラインを金融庁が作ったのだけれども、全く違う形態の銀行ができることに関しては、そのガイドラインをきちんと作るという作業は、あまりなかったと僕は記憶しております。例文帳に追加

On the topic of the Incubator Bank of Japan, a conference was established to prepare a financial reform program under (former) Minister Mr. Takenaka at the time when the Incubator Bank of Japan was given approval, and Mr. Kimura was one of several members of this conference. None of the meetings have been disclosed to the public. In these closed meetings, the topic of creating a new bank dedicated to SMEs had come up in discussions in the context of the program, and then, consequently, such a bank emerged. While Seven Bank existed before that, the FSA had established extremely tough guidelines for businesses in other industries to enter the banking business. However, from what I remember, not much work was done to establish proper guidelines for creating a completely different type of bank.  - 金融庁

一方の締約国の居住者は、適格者に該当せず、かつ、４の規定に基づき第七条、第十条３、第十一条３又は第十三条に定める所得、利得又は収益についてこれらの規定により認められる特典を受ける権利を有する場合に該当しないときにおいても、他方の締約国の権限のある当局が、当該他方の締約国の法令又は行政上の慣行に従って、当該一方の締約国の居住者の設立、取得又は維持及びその業務の遂行がこれらの規定により認められる特典を受けることをその主たる目的の一つとするものでないと認定するときは、これらの規定により認められる特典を受けることができる。例文帳に追加

A resident of a Contracting State that is neither a qualified person nor entitled under paragraph 4 to the benefits granted by the provisions of Article 7; of paragraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; or of Article 13 with respect to an item of income, profits or gains described in those paragraphs or Articles shall, nevertheless, be granted such benefits if the competent authority of the other Contracting State determines, in accordance with its domestic law or administrative practice, that the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of such resident and the conduct of its operations are considered as not having the obtaining of such benefits as one of the principal purposes.  - 財務省

一方の締約国の居住者は、適格者に該当せず、かつ、３及び５の規定に基づき第七条、第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得、利得又は収益についてこれらの規定により認められる特典を受ける権利を有する場合に該当しないときにおいても、他方の締約国の権限のある当局が、当該締約国の法令又は行政上の慣行に従って、当該居住者の設立、取得又は維持及びその業務の遂行がこれらの規定により認められる特典を受けることをその主たる目的の一つとするものでないと認定するときは、これらの規定により認められる特典を受けることができる。例文帳に追加

A resident of a Contracting State that is neither a qualified person nor entitled under paragraph 3 or 5 of this Article to the benefits granted by the provisions of Article 7; of paragraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; or of Articles 12, 13 or 21 of this Convention with respect to an item of income, profit or gain described in those paragraphs or Articles shall, nevertheless, be granted such benefits if the competent authority of the other Contracting State determines, in accordance with its domestic law or administrative practice, that the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of such resident and the conduct of its operations did not have as one of the principal purposes the obtaining of such benefits.  - 財務省

KIPOは、「実施当時の技術常識を参酌して、事実から直接導き出される事項も、公然実施をされた発明の認定の基礎とすることができる」、「出願日と刊行物の発行日が同日の場合には、特許出願時点が刊行物の発行時点以降であるという事実が明白な場合を除き、その出願発明は新規性が喪失されず、特許法第29条第1項第2号を適用しない」、及び「論文の頒布時点は、その内容が論文審査の前に公開された場所で発表されたものでない限り、最終論文審査を経て大学の図書館等に入庫され、又は不特定の者に配布された時点を頒布時期とする」と規定している。例文帳に追加

KIPO states that “the matters directly derivable from the facts in view of the common general knowledge as of the working can also be a basis for the finding of a publicly worked invention,” “In the case where the filing date of a patent application is the same as the date of the publication, the claimed invention does not lose novelty under the Article 29 paragraph (1) subparagraph (ii) of the Patent Act, except when the filing time of application is clearly after the time of publication,” and “The time of publication for a thesis is being when the thesis is distributed to an unspecific person in public or enters into university libraries after the final thesis examination, except when the contents of the thesis are announced in an open space before the final thesis examination.”  - 特許庁

ベルギー又は欧州共同体加盟国の居住者である自然人であって，本条の施行日前に，外国で慣習的，かつ満足すべき方法で，次の者として活動を行っていたことを証明できる者は，当該活動の内，最大2年までは，それをベルギーにおいて行っていたものと認めることができる。欧州共同体加盟国の中央工業所有権官庁が承認する特許の分野での独立的代理人，欧州共同体加盟国に設立された企業の特許部を所管する者，前記の者の1人についての特許の分野における有資格の協力者，又はベルギーを当事国とする国際協定の結果として設立された政府機関の特許事項責任者。例文帳に追加

Any natural person resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities who can prove that he has acted in a habitual and satisfactory manner abroad, prior to the date of entry, into force of this Article as, either an independent representative in the field of patents approved by the central industrial property service of a Member State of the European Communities, or as a responsible person in the patent department of an enterprise established in one of the Member States of those Communities, or the qualified collaborator in the field of patents of one of the above-mentioned persons, or a member, responsible for matters concerning patents, of an intergovernmental organization set up as a result of an international agreement to which Belgium is party, may have up to a maximum of two years of such activity recognized as if it had been exercised in Belgium.  - 特許庁

商標の不使用を理由として失効を求める訴訟において，商標の所有者は，当該商標が第39条に従い使用されていること又は不使用を正当化する理由が存在することを立証するものとする。商標は，第39条にいう5年の期間の満了から失効を求める申請提出時までの間に当該商標の実効的使用が開始されたか又は再開された場合は，失効を宣言することができない。ただし，失効を求める申請に先立つ3月の期間内の使用の開始又は再開については，その期間が不使用の連続5年の期間の満了時の前でない日に始まる場合で，失効を求める申請が提出される可能性を当該所有者が知得した後に使用の開始又は再開の準備が行われたときは，これを考慮しない。例文帳に追加

In an action for lapse for failure to use a trademark, the owner of the trademark shall demonstrate that the trademark has been used in accordance with Article 39 or that causes exist justifying the lack of use. The trademark may not be declared lapsed if, in the interval between the expiry of the five-year period to which Article 39 refers and the filing of the application for lapse, effective use of the trademark has begun or has resumed; nevertheless, the start or resumption of use within a period of three months prior to the application for lapse being filed shall not, where that period begins on a date not prior to the expiry of the uninterrupted five-year period of non-use, be taken into account if the preparations for the said start or resumption are made after the owner becomes aware that the application for lapse might be filed. - 特許庁

(3) 前項に含まれない商標及び商号であって，その付与が公告されている，又はその最後の更新が1988年商標法の規定に基づいて出願されたが，原子核安全理事会により提供されるサービスについての手数料及び公定料金に関する法律(法律No.14/1999)の施行前であったものは，本法の施行後に行われた初回更新まで，対応する5年ごとの手数料の納付を条件とするが，失効の罰則付きとする。これらの目的で，第2回の5年の期間の納付期日は原登録出願の出願日の5周年月の末日とし，対応する納付は納付期日に先立つ3月以内又は当該期日の翌月に行うものとする。例文帳に追加

3. Trademarks and trade names not included in the preceding paragraph the grant of which has been published, or the last renewal of which has been applied for under the terms of the 1988 Law on Trademarks, but prior to the entry into force of Law 14/1999 on Fees and Public Prices for Services Provided by the Nuclear Safety Council, shall be subject, up to the first renewal made following the entry into force of this Law, to payment of the corresponding five-year fees, on pain of lapse. For these purposes, the expiry date of the second five-year term shall be the last day of the month in which the fifth anniversary of the filing date of the original registration application falls, and the corresponding payment shall be made within the three months preceding the expiry date or in the month following said date. - 特許庁

何人かが，他人に付与された特許に係る主題を，第52条(7)の意味での訂正された翻訳文についての通告が特許登録簿に記入される前に，自己の事業において又はその事業のために誠実に既に製造若しくは利用しており，又はそれを製造若しくは利用する同人の意図の履行を開始しているときは，その特許に拘らず，当該人は引続き，第53条(1)にいう行為を履行する権利を有する。ただし，当該行為が特許所有者の排他権を侵害しないことを条件とし，その権利はこの場合は，先の欠陥のあるオランダ語翻訳文に含まれていた特許明細書のクレーム，その解釈のために使用される明細書及び図面の内容によって決定される。例文帳に追加

A party who, in good faith, has already manufactured or applied or commenced implementation of his intention to manufacture or apply, in or for his business, the subject matter in respect of which a European patent has been granted to another party before the date on which a notification of a corrected translation within the meaning of Article 52(7) has been entered in the patent register shall, notwithstanding the patent, continue to have the right to perform the acts referred to in Article 53(1) insofar as such acts do not infringe the patent holder’s exclusive right, which right in this case will be determined by the content of the claims in the patent specification and the description and drawings intended for the interpretation thereof contained in the earlier, defective translation into Dutch. - 特許庁

(2) (1)に拘らず，本法施行の前後を問わず，営業権を伴わずになされる登録商標の譲渡は，当該商標が当該譲渡に先立つ何れかの時期に譲渡人又はその前権利者によってマレーシアで誠実に使用されたことがない場合は，効力を有さない。ただし，これは次の場合は適用されないものとする。 (a) 当該商標が，設立予定の一般法人に譲渡する意図をもって登録され，実際に当該一般法人に譲渡されている場合，又は (b) 当該商標が，ある者を登録使用者としてこれに使用させる意図をもって登録され，実際にその者が商標の登録から6月以内に当該商標の登録使用者として登録され，かつ，その期間内にその者が当該商標を使用している場合例文帳に追加

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill whether before or after the commencement of this Act is invalid if the trade mark has not at any time before the assignment been in use in good faith in Malaysia by the assignor or his predecessor in title except that this subsection does not apply where - (a) the trade mark was registered with the intention that it shall be assignable to a body corporate yet to be formed and the trade mark has been assigned; or (b) the trade mark was registered with the intention that a person shall be permitted to use it as a registered user and such registered user has been registered in respect of the trade mark within six months after the registration of the trade mark and has used that trade mark within that period. - 特許庁

(5) 願書に表示された代理人が代理人登録簿に記録された工業意匠有資格者であるが第8条(2)及び(4)に基づいて作成された委任状により委任を受けていない者であること，第1項目による登録簿に記録されていない者であること又は所定の委任状を有さない第8条(2)にいう特許専門家であることが証明される場合は，方式審査官は，出願人又は代理人に対し，(3)にいう期間内に瑕疵を補正するよう促す。意匠法第5条(2)にいう義務的代理の場合に瑕疵が除去されない場合は，方式審査官は，手続停止の決定を行う。出願人がブルガリア共和国に恒久的住居又は主たる営業所を有する場合は，手続は継続し，通信は出願人に宛てられる。例文帳に追加

(5) Where it is established that the representative as indicated in the request is an industrial design qualified person recorded in the Register of Representatives, who however is not authorized by a power of attorney drawn up in accordance with Art. 8(2) and (4), or a person who is not recorded in the register as per item 1, or a patent specialist as per Art. 8(2) lacking the prescribed power of attorney, the formal examiner invites the applicant or his representative to remedy the deficiencies within the term as per paragraph (3). If deficiencies are not eliminated in cases of obligatory representation as per Art. 5(2) of the Law on Industrial Designs, the formal examiner takes a decision to discontinue the proceedings. Where the applicant has his permanent residence or principal place of business in the Republic of Bulgaria, the proceedings go on, correspondence being addressed to the applicant.  - 特許庁

複数の送信者（８０）から発信された電子情報を受信するサーバー１０が、前記電子情報に含まれる特定の情報を選択し、その内容に応じた行動を促すコメント含むレポートを作成し、これを予め設定された送付先へ送信する経営情報処理システムにおいて、前記受信サーバー１０が、電子情報受信ステップと、送信者判定ステップと、受信回数判定ステップと、受信回数に基づく第１の優先順位決定ステップと、予め情報に関する重要度が付与されたキーワード群から、受信情報に含まれるキーワードを検索するステップと、前記重要度に基づく第２の優先順位決定ステップと、前記第１及び第２の優先順位に基づくコメント作成ステップと、前記コメントを含むレポート作成ステップを含む。例文帳に追加

The management information processing system comprises a server 10, which receives the electronic information from a plurality of senders (80), selects a specified information contained in the electronic information, generates a report including a comment to expedite actions in response to contents of the report, and transmits the report to a designated delivery address. - 特許庁

３ 会員等は、前項の規定により同項の特別担保金について弁済を受け、なお不足があるときは、他の会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金について、その特別担保金の額に応じて、他の債権者に先立つて弁済を受ける権利を有する。ただし、その不足する額に、その会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金の額の同項に規定する取引の相手方たる会員等以外の会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金の総額に対する割合を乗じて得た額をその不足する額から控除した残額の範囲内に限る。例文帳に追加

(3) When a Member, etc. receives payment with regard to a special deposit for default pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if the amount is still insufficient, the Member, etc. shall have the right to receive payment in preference over other creditors with regard to the special deposit for default for said Commodity Market deposited by other Members, etc., in accordance with the amount of such special deposit for default; provided, however, that this shall be limited within the scope of an amount that remains after deducting from such shortfall an amount obtained by multiplying such shortfall by the percentage of the amount of the special security amount for said Commodity Market deposited by the Member, etc. to the total amount of the special deposit for default for said Commodity Market deposited by Members, etc. other than the Member, etc. who is the counterparty to the transactions prescribed in the same paragraph.  - 経済産業省

一当該受託契約に基づく取引（第二条第八項第四号に掲げる取引にあつては、同号の権利を行使することにより成立する同号イからハまでに掲げる取引）の額（当該受託契約に係る上場商品構成物品又は上場商品指数に係る商品指数ごとに商品取引所の定める取引単位当たりの価額に、当該受託契約に基づく取引の数量を乗じて得た額をいう。）が、当該取引について顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金、委託証拠金、取次証拠金又は清算取次証拠金（次号において「取引証拠等」という。）の額に比して著しく大きい旨例文帳に追加

(i) The fact that the amount of the transaction based on said Consignment Contract (in the case of a transactions set forth in Article 2, paragraph 8, item 4, it shall be any transaction set forth in (a) to (c) inclusive of the same item which is closed by exercising the right under the same item) (such amount means an amount obtained by multiplying the value per transaction unit specified by the Commodity Exchange for each of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. or each Commodity Index pertaining to the Listed Commodity Index pertaining to said Consignment Contract by the volume of transaction based on said Consignment Contract) is extremely high in comparison to the amount of the clearing margin, customer margin, intermediation margin or clearing intermediation margin (referred to as the "Clearing Margin, etc." in the following item) to be deposited by the customer for said transaction  - 経済産業省

法第百七十三条第三項の主務省令で定める書類は、次に掲げるものとする。一商品取引債務引受業を所掌する組織及び人員配置を記載した書面 二商品取引債務引受業の開始後三年間における収支の見込みを記載した書面 三会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 四清算参加者の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載 した書面 五清算参加者が承認の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純 資産額に関する調書 六商品取引債務引受業において電子情報処理組織を使用する場合には、当該電子情報 処理組織の概要、設置場所、容量及び保守の方法並びに当該電子情報処理組織に異 常が発生した場合の対処方法を記載した書類例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 173, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows:(i) a document stating the organization which has jurisdiction over the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts and its appointment of personnel; (ii) a document stating the estimated income for the three years after the commencement of the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (iv) a document stating the names or trade names of the Clearing Participants, and the addresses of the principal offices or head offices; (v) a record prepared by the Clearing Participants according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application and pertaining to such persons’ net assets; (vi) in the case where an electronic data processing system is used for the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts, a document stating the outline, installation location, capacity, and maintenance system of said electronic data processing system, and the process for responding in the event of the failure of said electronic data processing system.  - 経済産業省

三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書例文帳に追加

(iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval;  - 経済産業省

第六十七条　会社法第七編第四章第一節（第九百七条を除く。）（総則）の規定並びに商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条から第二十七条まで（登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十一条（営業又は事業の譲渡の際の免責の登記）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第四十四条から第四十六条まで（会社の支配人の登記、添付書面の通則）、第四十七条第一項及び第三項（設立の登記）、第四十八条から第五十五条まで（支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記）並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第二十七条中「商号」とあるのは「商号又は名称」と、「営業所（会社にあつては、本店。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「係る営業所」とあるのは「係る主たる事務所」と、同法第四十六条第二項中「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、総代会）」と、同条第三項中「会社法第三百十九条第一項（同法第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第三百七十条（同法第四百九十条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「保険業法第四十一条第一項において準用する会社法第三百十九条第一項又は保険業法第五十三条の十六若しくは第百八十条の十五において準用する会社法第三百七十条」と、「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「会社法第四百十六条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第四項」と、同法第四十八条から第五十三条までの規定中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 67 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) (General provisions) of the Companies Act, and the provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, etc., Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc., Delivery, etc. of Certificate of Registered Matters,, Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters, etc. for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party Concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17 to 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration, Documents to Be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application, Submission of Seal, Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar, Dismissal of Application, Registration After Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 31 (Registration of Discharge in Assigning Operation or business), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Article 44 to 46 inclusive (Registration of Company Managers, General Rules for Attached Documents), Article 47, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to 55 inclusive (Registration at Location of Branch Offices, Registration of Relocation of Head Office, Registration of Change of Directors, etc., Registration of Change of Persons to Temporarily Carry Out Duties of Accounting Auditor), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion Without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Exclusion from Application of Act on Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "trade name," "business office (or, in a company, head office; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "business office pertaining to" in Article 27 of the latter Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade name or name," "principal office" and "principal office pertaining to," respectively; the term "shareholders meeting or class shareholders meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "General Meeting of members (or General Meeting, where the company has such meeting)"; the terms "Article 319, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 325 of the Companies Act) or Article 370 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 490, paragraph (5) of that Act) of the Companies Act" and "shareholders meeting or class shareholder meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 319, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act, or Article 370 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 or 180-15 of the Insurance Business Act" and "General Meeting of members", respectively; the term "Article 416, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 46, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-30, paragraph (4) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the terms "head office" and "branch offices" in the provisions of Article 48 to 53 inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office" and "secondary offices," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十条の十一　その年分以前の各年分の所得税について前条第一項の規定の適用を受ける居住者に係る特定外国法人につき第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる事実が生じた場合又は当該居住者に係る外国関係法人（当該特定外国法人から法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の支払（第二号に定める金額の同号に掲げる交付を含む。）を受けた外国関係法人のうち政令で定めるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）につき第三号に掲げる事実が生じた場合において、これらの号に規定する金額のうちに、その者に係る課税対象留保金額から充てられたものとして政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この条において「課税済配当等の額」という。）が含まれているときは、その課税済配当等の額に相当する金額は、政令で定めるところにより、その者のこれらの事実の生じた日の属する年分の特定外国法人又は外国関係法人から受ける剰余金の配当等の額（所得税法第二十五条第一項の規定により当該特定外国法人又は当該外国関係法人からの剰余金の配当等とみなされるものの金額を含む。以下この条及び次条において「配当等の額」という。）に係る配当所得の金額又は前条第一項の規定によりその総収入金額に算入されることとなる課税対象留保金額に係る雑所得の金額の計算上控除する。例文帳に追加

Article 40-11 (1) Where an event listed in item (i) or item (ii) has occurred with regard to a specified foreign corporation related to a resident who is subject to the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article with respect to its income tax for the relevant year and each year before the relevant year, or where an event listed in item (iii) has occurred with regard to an affiliated foreign corporation (limited to an affiliated foreign corporation that has received, from the said specified foreign corporation, payment of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such payment shall include the delivery listed in item (ii) of the amount specified in the said item (ii)), which is specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) that is related to the said resident, if the amount prescribed in each item contains any amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as being appropriated from the taxable retained income pertaining to the resident (such amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "taxed amount of dividend, etc."), the amount equivalent to the taxed amount of dividend, etc. shall, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, be deducted when calculating the amount of dividend income pertaining to the amount of dividend of surplus, etc. to be received by the resident from the specified foreign corporation or foreign affiliated corporation for the year that includes the day on which the relevant event has occurred (including any amount that shall be deemed to be dividend of surplus, etc. from the said specified foreign corporation or the said affiliated foreign corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 25(1) of the Income Tax Act; hereinafter referred to in this Article and the next Article as the "amount of dividend, etc." ) or calculating the amount of miscellaneous income pertaining to the taxable retained income to be included in the resident's gross income pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八十五条　会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百九十七条第四項（株主による招集の請求）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項又は第二項の規定による社員総会の招集の請求があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百九十七条第四項中「第一項の規定による請求をした株主」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項の規定による請求をした特定社員又は同条第二項の規定による請求をした優先出資社員」と、同項第一号及び第二号中「第一項の規定による請求」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項又は第二項の規定による請求」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 297(4) (Demand for Calling of Meeting by Shareholders), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions of Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the request that a general meeting of members be called is made pursuant to paragraph (1) or paragraph (2). In this case, the phrase "the shareholders who made the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Equity Members who made the request pursuant to Article 53(1) of the Asset Securitization Act or the Preferred Equity Members who made the request pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article" and the phrase "the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4)(i) and (ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the request pursuant to the provisions of Article 53(1) or (2) of the Asset Securitization Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第三十条第四項の場合において、同項のすべての労働者の数が厚生労働省令で定める数以上であるとき（第十五条第一項又は第三項の規定により統括安全衛生責任者を選任しなければならないときを除く。）　は、当該指名された事業者で建設業に属する事業の仕事を行うものは、当該場所において行われる仕事に係る請負契約を締結している事業場ごとに、これらの労働者に関し、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所で行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、厚生労働省令で定める資格を有する者のうちから、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、店社安全衛生管理者を選任し、その者に、当該事業場で締結している当該請負契約に係る仕事を行う場所における第三十条第一項各号の事項を担当する者に対する指導その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を行わせなければならない。この場合においては、当該指名された事業者及び当該指名された事業者以外の事業者については、前項の規定は適用しない。例文帳に追加

(2) In the case provided for by paragraph (4) of Article 30, where the number of workers exceeds the number provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the said paragraph (excluding work sites where an overall safety and health controller must be appointed under the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 15), the specified employer who carries out a construction industry project shall appoint a site safety and health supervisor from among persons holding the qualifications provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each site contracted for work in order to prevent industrial accidents as a result of the work carried out by workers at the same site, and have that person supervise the one in charge of the provisions of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and other matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare at the said work site where the contracted work is executed. In this case, the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not apply to the specified employer or any other employer.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第二種監視化学物質につき、第二条第八項の試験成績その他当該第二種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第二種監視化学物質が同条第三項第一号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第二種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により人の健康に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第二種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第二種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 24 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (i) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to human health through environmental pollution if said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests under paragraph (8) of Article 2 and other available knowledge concerning said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十四条　法第十九条の規定による届出をしようとする者は、法第五条第二項第四号に掲げる事項の変更の届出にあつては当該変更に係る事実のあつた日の翌日から起算して三十日以内に、同号に掲げる事項以外の事項の変更の届出にあつては当該変更に係る事実のあつた日の翌日から起算して十日以内に、第十一条第二項に規定する書類のうち当該変更事項に係る書類を添えて、特定労働者派遣事業変更届出書（様式第十号）を厚生労働大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、届出者が当該変更に係る法第十一条第一項の規定による届出をした際に、法人にあつては第一条の二第二項第一号イからハまでに掲げる書類のうち当該変更事項に係る書類、個人にあつては同項第二号イに掲げる書類のうち当該変更事項に係る書類を添付したときは、当該書類を添付することを要しない。例文帳に追加

Article 14 (1) A person who intends to make a notification pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 of the Act shall submit a written notice of changes to a specified worker dispatching undertaking (Form 10) to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, along with documents related to said changed matters out of the documents prescribed in paragraph (2) of Article 11, within 30 days from the day following the day on which the fact pertaining to said changes occurred in the case of making a notification of changes listed in item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 5 of the Act, and within ten days from the day following the day on which the fact pertaining to said changes occurred in the case of making a notification of changes other than those listed in the same item; provided, however, that when a notifier has, on the occasion of making a notification under paragraph (1) of Article 11 of the Act with regard to said changes, attached documents related to said changed matters out of the documents listed in (a) to (c) of item (i) of paragraph (2) of Article 1-2 in the case of a juridical person, or documents related to said changed matters out of the documents listed in (a) of item (ii) of the same paragraph in the case of an individual, said documents are not required.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ただし、担当者の話を聞くと、1回目の検査のときは協力的だったのだけれども、2回目の検査のときは非常に非協力的になって、本当に向こうはある意味専門家ですから、日本銀行におった方でございますし、ですから大変検査で苦労されたという話を聞きまして、3回目は同じ陣容で非常に考えて行って、普通は3ヵ月か6ヵ月の検査ですが、非常に強い決意で検査をして、そして結局検査忌避ということになったわけでございますが、行政でございますから、ご存じのように法律と事実に基づいてやっていかないと、そこはやはり行政ですから、公平、それから法律を守る、そしてやはり事実に基づいて業務改善命令、あるいは業務停止命令を出すということは基本的に必要でございますから、そこら辺の苦労もあったということもご理解いただきたいと思いますが、しかし今言われたこも国民感情としてもよく分かりますので、私はやはり大臣でございますから、そういったことしっかり念頭に入れつつやらせていただきたいと思っております。例文帳に追加

That said, according to the staff in charge, the Incubator Bank of Japan was cooperative in the first inspection but extremely uncooperative in the second inspection. Mr. Kimura is in a sense truly a specialist, having worked at the Bank of Japan. I have been told that the staff in charge had an extremely tough time in the inspection. The third inspection was conducted with the same lineup after extensive consideration with a strong sense of commitment, where it would normally take three to six months. In the end, the Bank was deemed to have been evading inspections. Being an executive branch of government, our operations must be based on laws and facts, as you are well aware. Basically, it is necessary to ensure fairness, abide by laws and issue business improvement orders or business suspension orders based on facts, so I hope you understand that difficulties were involved in the process. However, what you said is indeed understandable in the context of public sentiment, so I intend to properly fulfill my duty as Minister with that in mind.  - 金融庁

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三十三条（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社の定款に前項各号に掲げる事項についての記載又は記録があるときの検査役による当該事項の調査について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第八項中「その設立時発行株式の引受けに係る意思表示を取り消す」とあるのは「その職を辞する」と、同条第十項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあり、並びに同項第二号及び第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同項第一号中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「同号」と、同条第十一項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の十第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33 (Election of Inspector of Matters Described or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedure of Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to investigation by an inspector on any of the matters listed in the items of the preceding paragraph where the Article of incorporation of a Mutual Company include any description or record on the matter. In this case, the term "rescind his/her manifestation of intention relating to subscription for the relevant Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33, paragraph (8) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "resign from his/her office;" the term "Article 28, items (i) and (ii)" in paragraph (10), item (i) and the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in items (ii) and (iii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act," the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in Article 33, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that item," and the terms "Article 38, paragraph (1)"and "paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article" in Article 33, paragraph (11), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent, Method of Acts of Bond Managers, Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Manager, Resignation of Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation, Dismissal of Bond Managers, Succession to Bond Manager's Administration of Bonds), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a bond administrator. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "this Act" in Article 710, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 702" in Article 711, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-6 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十八条　会社法第百八十条（第二項第三号及び第三項を除く。）（株式の併合）、第百八十一条（株主に対する通知等）、第百八十二条（効力の発生）、第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の特定出資の併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第百八十条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第百八十一条中「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録特定出資質権者」と、同法第百八十二条及び第二百三十五条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十八条において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 38 The provisions of Article 180 (excluding paragraph (2)(iii) and paragraph (3)) (Consolidation of Shares), Article 181 (Notices to Shareholders), Article 182 (Effectuation), Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Specified Equity. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 180(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Registered Pledgees of the Shares" in Article 181 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Specified Equity," the term "shareholders" in Article 182 and Article 235(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Members," the term "number" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債」、「社債権者」、「社債発行会社」及び「社債権者集会」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債」、「特定社債権者」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「特定社債権者集会」と、同法第七百九条第二項中「第七百五条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to Article 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent; Method of Acts of Bond Managers; Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers; Resignation of Bond Managers; Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation; Dismissal of Bond Managers), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bond Administrator. In this case, the terms "Bonds," "bondholder," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bondholders meeting" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds," "Specified Bond Holders," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bond Holders' Meeting" respectively, the term "paragraph (1) of Article 705" in Article 709(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 711(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十六条の四　会社法第二百七条（金銭以外の財産の出資）、第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）、第二百十三条（第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。）（出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主（組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。）を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十三条　会社法第八百二十四条（会社の解散命令）、第八百二十六条（官庁等の法務大臣に対する通知義務）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百四条（法務大臣の関与）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条（会社の財産に関する保全処分）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）並びに第九百五条及び第九百六条（会社の財産に関する保全処分についての特則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特定目的会社の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 163 The provisions of Article 824 (Dissolution Order for a Company), Article 826 (Duty of a Government Agency, etc. to Give Notice to the Minister of Justice), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 904 (Participation of the Minister of Justice), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by Juridical Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution order for a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 825 (Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 905 (Special Provisions on a Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), and Article 906 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of properties of a Specific Purpose Company in cases where a petition under Article 824(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article has been filed. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第七百九十一条（第一項第一号及び第三項を除く。）（吸収分割又は株式交換に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等）の規定は組織変更株式交換を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第三百九条第二項（各号を除く。）（株主総会の決議）、第三百二十四条第二項（各号を除く。）（種類株主総会の決議）及び第五編第五章第二節第二款第一目（第七百九十五条第四項第一号及び第二号、第七百九十六条第三項第一号ロ、第七百九十九条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百条並びに第八百一条第一項、第二項、第三項第一号及び第二号並びに第五項を除く。）（株式会社の手続）の規定は組織変更株式交換完全親会社について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第七百九十八条第二項の規定による申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 791 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Related to Absorption-Type Split or Share Exchange) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share exchange on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding all items) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding all items (Resolution of Class Meetings) and Part V, Chapter V, Section 2, Subsection 2, Division 1 (excluding Article 795, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii), Article 796, paragraph (3), item (i), (b), Article 799, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 800, Article 801, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 801, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), and Article 801, paragraph (5)) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company for Share Exchange on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 798, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

しかし、危難失踪で1年間といったら、5千人以上の方が本当に胸の痛む思いでございますが、今まだ行方不明でございまして、それで危難失踪で1年というのはちょっと長すぎますので、これは金融庁の局長が非常に頑張っていただきまして、法務省、これは生きるか死ぬかという生死は法務省ですから、法務省と大変激しい交渉をやらせていただきまして、これは3か月だったかな、3か月で簡素な市町村に対する届出によって、死亡の確認ができるというふうになりまして、そんなことを目に見えないことでございますが、いわゆる生保のセールスレディの方もご遺族と一緒にご遺体安置所なんかをどんどん回っていただいておりまして、私は医者ですから、よくああいうご遺体にお会いするという、普通慣れてない方といいますか、我々は本職が医者でございますけれども、いかに精神的ショックを受けられるかということは、私はよく分かりますので、そこまでしてセールスレディの方がやっていただいているという話をよく聞きますので、そういった意味で、私は金融の分野はまさに金融機関、いつかお話ししたと思いますが、宮城県石巻商工信用組合、4日間、連絡が付かなかったのですけれども、ろうそくをつけながら、きちっと人にお金を貸したということをやっていただいておりまして、そういう意味では私は本当に各金融機関、生損保、あるいは証券会社、あるいはそういったいろいろな各関係、金融関係の方に本当に官民一体で未曾有の震災に取り組んでいただいたということは感謝いたしておりますけれども、まだまだ、十分と、そんなに決してのぼせ上がっておりません。例文帳に追加

Regrettably, more than 5,000 people are still missing, and one year is too long a time to wait for the adjudication of disappearance due to emergency. Therefore, the FSA's director-general in charge held very tough negotiations with the Ministry of Justice, which is responsible for matters related to the certification of the death of missing people. As a result, it has been agreed to allow the death of missing people to be certified three months after their disappearance based on a notification submitted to municipal governments through a simplified procedure. While an arrangement like that is made behind the scenes, life insurance sales women are going from mortuary to mortuary with the relatives of missing people. As I am a doctor by profession, I know well what a great mental shock it is for ordinary people to see the body of a person killed in a disaster like that, but insurance sales women are going as far as to do that. As I told you previously, Ishinomaki Shoko Shinkumi, which could not be contacted for four days after the earthquake, continued to provide loans, with employees working by candle light. In that sense, I am very grateful to various people in the financial sector, including financial institutions, life and non-life insurance companies and securities companies, for dealing with the unprecedented earthquake and tsunami disaster through private-public collaboration. However, I am not so complacent as to believe that we have done enough.  - 金融庁

各制御部で行っている、「第１入力部から伝票の各項目のデータを取り入れて、取り入れた伝票の各項目をチェックし、承認が必要な伝票のデータを第１通信制御部から伝票承認装置に伝送し、該伝票承認装置から伝送されてくる承認された伝票のデータを第１通信制御部を介して受け取り、第１出力部より出力する」こと、及び「伝票入力作成装置から送られてきた承認が必要な伝票のデータを第２通信制御部から受信し、その受信した伝票データに基づいて当該伝票を表示出力し、承認するか承認しないかの承認データを第２入力部より入力し、その承認データを含む伝票のデータを第２通信制御部から伝票入力作成装置に伝送すること」、はソフトウエアにより実現される内容であるが、これらは、伝票の事務処理の手順に上記のコンピュータ技術(a)(b)(e)を適用することにより、当業者が直ちに導き出すことができるものである。例文帳に追加

Functions executed in each control modules which "obtains the data of each item on the invoice from the first input module, checks each item on the invoice data obtained, transmits the invoice data requiring approval from the first communication control module to the invoice approval device, receives the approved invoice data transmitted from the invoice approval device via the first communication control module, and outputs from the first output module" and "receives via the second communication control module the invoice data requiring approval transmitted from the invoice input preparation device, inputs the approval data to be approved or disapproved from the second input module, and transmits the invoice data including the approval data from the second communication control module to the invoice preparation device" are realized by software, but can be directly derivable by a parson skilled in the art by applying said computer technologies (a), (b) and (e) to invoice processing procedure.  - 特許庁

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条及び第七百四十条第三項を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項（社債権者集会の決議の執行）中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の七第一項から第三項までの規定並びに同法第六十一条の七第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項（債権者の異議手続の特則）中「第四百四十九条、第六百二十七条、第六百三十五条、第六百七十条、第七百七十九条（第七百八十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百八十九条（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百九十九条（第八百二条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第八百十条（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「保険業法第五十七条第四項において準用する同法第十七条（第一項ただし書を除く。）の規定並びに同法第八十八条及び第百六十五条の十七（同法第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715 and Article 740, paragraph (3)) (Bondholders' Meeting), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Payment, etc by Bond-Issuing Company.), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (x) to (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "under Article 705, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737, paragraph (2) (Execution of Resolutions of Bondholders' Meetings) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of Article 61-7, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act, and the provisions of Articles 708 and 709 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-7, paragraph (8) of that Act"; and the term "the provisions of Article 449, Article 627, Article 635, Article 670, Article 779 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 781), Article 789 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 793), Article 799 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 802) or Article 810 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 813)" in Article 740, paragraph (1) (Special provisions on objection procedures for creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4) of that Act, and Articles 88 and 165-17 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20 of that Act) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.  - 金融庁

５　会社法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は清算相互会社の代表清算人について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）の規定は民事保全法（平成元年法律第九十一号）第五十六条（法人の代表者の職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記の嘱託）に規定する仮処分命令により選任された清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人の職務を代行する者について、会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号ロ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は清算相互会社の一時代表清算人の職務を行うべき者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies) and Article 351 (Measures when Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provision of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 (Commission of Registration of Provisional Disposition for Stay of Execution of Duties by Representative of Juridical Person, etc.) of the Civil Provisional Relief Act to act for a liquidator or the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidator(s) or Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (b) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who should carry out the duties of the temporary Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム