「where between」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(211ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(b) If the worker makes an invention in connection with his professional activity within the enterprise or through use of means or information provided by the enterprise, the employer shall have the right to assume ownership of the invention or to reserve to himself a right of use thereof within a period of 90 days from the time at which the existence of the invention became known to him. Where the employer assumes ownership of an invention or reserves to himself a right of use thereof, the worker shall have the right to adequate compensation according to the industrial and economic importance of the invention, due account being taken of the means or information provided by the enterprise and the contributions by the worker that enabled him to make the invention. In the absence of agreement between the parties, the amount of the compensation shall be set by the judge specialized in civil matters according to the rules of the most summary procedure.例文帳に追加

(b) 従業者がその所属する企業における自己の職務活動に関連して又は所属企業の提供する施設若しくは情報を利用して発明を行った場合は，使用者は，発明の存在を知った時から90日以内に当該発明の所有権を自己に帰属させるか又は発明のライセンスを留保することができる。使用者が発明の所有権を自己のものとするか又はライセンスを留保した場合は，発明を行った従業者は，企業側が提供してくれた手段若しくは情報の重要性及び自己が発明を行う上でなされた使用者の寄与度に適正な考慮を払って決定される，当該発明の産業的及び経済的な重要性に応じた十分な額の報酬を受ける権利を有する。当事者間に合意が存在しない場合は，報酬の金額は最略式手続の規則に従い民事専門裁判官が決定する。 - 特許庁

(4) Where, on an application to the Commissioner for the grant of a patent, a notice has been served under subsection (1) of this section and 6 months have elapsed from the date of the service of that notice without the service of a notice under subsection (2) of this section in relation to that application, any person who has, before the date of the application, incurred expense or done work in connection with the discovery or development of the invention concerned shall be entitled to be paid such compensation in respect of that expense or work as the Minister of Defence may, with the approval of the Minister of Finance, determine, and the compensation shall not in any case be less than the amount of the expense reasonably so incurred, and the amount of that expense shall, in default of agreement between the Minister of Defence and that person, be settled by arbitration:例文帳に追加

(4) 局長への特許出願について(1)の規定に基づいて通知が送達された場合において，前記出願に関し(2)の規定に基づく通知が送達されることなく，その通知の送達日から6月が経過するときは，前記出願の出願日前に当該発明の発見又は開発に関連して費用を負担し又は労力を費やした者は何人も，当該費用又は労力について国防大臣が財務大臣の承認を得て決定する補償金の支払を受ける権利を有する。この補償金は，合理的な負担額と認められる費用額以上のものとし，その額は，国防大臣と前記の者との間で合意に至らないときは，仲裁手続により定めるものとする。 - 特許庁

Not with standing anything contained in sub-section (1), where- an applicant has agreed in writing that on the grant to him of a patent he will assign it to another party or to a joint applicant and refuses to proceed with the application, or disputes arise between joint applicants as to proceeding with an application, the Registrar, if he is satisfied of the existence of such agreement or, in any other case, that any joint applicant or applicants ought to be allowed to proceed alone, may direct that such other party or joint applicant or applicants may proceed with the application accordingly and may grant a patent to him or them, as the case may be: 例文帳に追加

第(1)項の規定にかかわらず、出願人が、自己に対する特許の付与に関し、当該特許を他の当事者又は共同出願人に譲渡することを書面で合意しており、出願の手続きを進めることを拒否するとき、又は、出願の手続きを進めることにつき共同出願人の間で紛争が生ずるとき、登録官は、かかる合意が存在するとの心証を得るか、又はその他の場合で単独の又は複数の共同出願人だけで手続を続行することが認められるべきとの心証を得る場合、そのような他の当事者又は単独の若しくはは複数の共同出願人がしかるべく出願を進めることができるよう、かつ、場合に応じて、その者(ら)に特許を付与するよう指示することができる。 - 特許庁

(3) Where an application for registration of a trade mark is made before 1st July 2004, if the trade mark (a) is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark; and (b) is to be registered for goods or services which are not similar to those for which the earlier trade mark is protected, The later trade mark shall not be registered if- (i) the earlier trade mark is well known in Singapore; (ii) use of the later trade mark in relation to the goods or services for which the later trade mark is sought to be registered would indicate a connection between those goods or services and the proprietor of the earlier trade mark; (iii) there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public because of such use; and (iv) the interests of the proprietor of the earlier trade mark are likely to be damaged by such use.例文帳に追加

(3)商標登録出願が2004年7月1日より前になされ，当該商標が， (a)先の商標と同一又は類似のもの，及び (b)先の商標の保護の対象である商品又はサービスとは類似しない商品又はサービスについて登録しようとする後の商標は， 次の場合は登録されない。すなわち，(i)先の商標がシンガポールで周知である場合 (ii)後の商標の登録を求める商品又はサービスに関する後の商標の使用が，その商品又はサービスと先の商標の所有者との関係を示すと思われる場合 (iii)当該使用を理由に，公衆の側に混同を生じる虞がある場合，及び (vi)先の商標の所有者の利益が当該使用により損なわれる虞がある場合 - 特許庁

(4) Subject to subsection (5), where an application for registration of a trade mark is made on or after 1st July 2004, if the whole or an essential part of the trade mark is identical with or similar to an earlier trademark, the later trade mark shall not be registered if — (a) the earlier trade mark is well known in Singapore; and (b) use of the later trade mark in relation to the goods or services for which the later trade mark is sought to be registered — (i) would indicate a connection between those goods or services and the proprietor of the earlier trade mark, and is likely to damage the interests of the proprietor of the earlier trade mark; or (ii) if the earlier trade mark is well known to the public at large in Singapore — (A) would cause dilution in an unfair manner of the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark; or (B) would take unfair advantage of the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark.例文帳に追加

(4)(5)に従うことを条件として，2004年7月1日又はその以降に提出された登録出願において，商標の全体又はその重要な部分が先の商標と同一又は類似する場合は，後の商標は，次の場合において登録されない。 (a)先の商標がシンガポールにおいて周知であり，かつ (b)後の商標が使用する商品若しくはびサービスは， (i)先の商標の所有者とこれらの商品，サービス間の関係を示すことができ，且つ先の商標の所有者の利益を損害する虞がある場合，又は (ii)先の商標がシンガポールで公衆にとって周知である場合は，(A)不正な方法で先の商標の識別的な特徴を希釈させる，又は， (B)不正に先の商標の識別的な特徴を利用する。 - 特許庁

(3) Subject to subsections (6) and (7), the proprietor of a well known trade mark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Singapore, in the course of trade and without the proprietor’s consent, of any trade mark which, or an essential part of which, is identical with or similar to the proprietor’s trade mark, in relation to any goods or services, where the use of the trade mark — (a) would indicate a connection between those goods or services and the proprietor, and is likely to damage the interests of the proprietor; or (b) if the proprietor‘s trade mark is well known to the public at large in Singapore — (i) would cause dilution in an unfair manner of the distinctive character of the proprietor’s trade mark; or (ii) would take unfair advantage of the distinctive character of the proprietor’s trade mark.例文帳に追加

(3)(6)及び(7)の規定に従うことを条件として，周知商標の所有者は，商品又はサービスに関して，全部又はその重要な部分が自己の商標と同一又は類似の商標を使用することが次の場合は，すなわち，(a)その商品又はサービスと周知商標の所有者との関係を示す可能性があり，かつ，当該所有者の利益を害する虞ががある場合は，又は(b)当該所有者の商標がシンガポールにおいて国民全体に知られている場合には，(i)当該所有者の商標の識別性のある特徴を不当な方法で損なう可能性がある場合は，又は (ii)当該所有者の商標の識別性のある特徴を不当に利用する可能性がある場合は，その商標を業として自己の同意なくシンガポールにおいて使用することを差止命令により禁止する権利を有する。 - 特許庁

(4) Subject to subsections (6) and (7), the proprietor of a well known trade mark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Singapore without the proprietor’s consent of any business identifier which, or an essential part of which, is identical with or similar to the proprietor’s trade mark, where the use of the business identifier — (a) would indicate a connection between the business in respect of which it is used and the proprietor, and is likely to damage the interests of the proprietor; or (b) if the proprietor’s trade mark is well known to the public at large in Singapore — (i) would cause dilution in an unfair manner of the distinctive character of the proprietor’s trade mark; or (ii) would take unfair advantage of the distinctive character of the proprietor’s trade mark.例文帳に追加

(4)(6)及び(7)の規定に従うことを条件として，周知商標の所有者は，全部又はその重要な部分が自己の商標と同一又は類似の事業標章を使用することが次の場合は，すなわち， (a)それが使用される事業と周知商標の所有者との関係を示す可能性があり，かつ，当該所有者の利益を害する虞ががある場合は，又は (b)当該所有者の商標がシンガポールおいて国民全体に知られている場合には，(i)当該所有者の商標の識別性のある特徴を不当な方法で損なう可能性がある場合は，又は (ii)当該所有者の商標の識別性のある特徴を不当に利用する可能性がある場合は，その事業標章を業として自己の同意なくシンガポールにおいて使用することを差止命令により禁止する権利を有する。 - 特許庁

(2) Independently of the transfer of all or part of an enterprise, a trademark and an application therefor may be transferred, used as a guarantee or be the subject of other real rights, licenses, purchase options, seizures or other measures resulting from the enforcement procedure, for all or part of the goods or services for which they are registered or applied for, and entered in the Register of Trademarks, without prejudice to the other legal business by which the right to a trademark is likely to be affected. In cases where a movable property mortgage is set up, the mortgage shall be governed by its specific provisions and shall be entered in Section Four of the Register of Movable Property, and said entry shall be notified to the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office for the purposes of inclusion in the Register of Trademarks. For these purposes, both Registers shall be coordinated so that charges on trademarks entered or mentioned in the Registers shall be communicated between them by telematic means.例文帳に追加

(2) ある事業の全部又は一部の譲渡とは別に，商標及びその出願は譲渡され，保証として用いることができ，又はそれが登録され若しくは出願され，商標登録簿に記入された商品又はサービスの全部若しくは一部についてのその他の物権，ライセンス，購入選択権，差押又は執行手続に起因するその他の措置の対象とすることができる。ただし，これは，商標に対する権利が影響を受ける可能性のあるその他の法的取引を害するものではない。動産抵当権が設定される場合は，当該抵当権はその特定の規定に準拠し，動産登録簿第4部に記入されるものとし，当該記入は商標登録簿に含める目的でスペイン特許商標庁に通知されるものとする。これらの目的で，両方の登録簿が調整されて，各登録簿に登録又は言及された商標に関する担保権について，テレマティクス手段で相互に伝達されるものとする。 - 特許庁

In an action for lapse for failure to use a trademark, the owner of the trademark shall demonstrate that the trademark has been used in accordance with Article 39 or that causes exist justifying the lack of use. The trademark may not be declared lapsed if, in the interval between the expiry of the five-year period to which Article 39 refers and the filing of the application for lapse, effective use of the trademark has begun or has resumed; nevertheless, the start or resumption of use within a period of three months prior to the application for lapse being filed shall not, where that period begins on a date not prior to the expiry of the uninterrupted five-year period of non-use, be taken into account if the preparations for the said start or resumption are made after the owner becomes aware that the application for lapse might be filed.例文帳に追加

商標の不使用を理由として失効を求める訴訟において，商標の所有者は，当該商標が第39条に従い使用されていること又は不使用を正当化する理由が存在することを立証するものとする。商標は，第39条にいう5年の期間の満了から失効を求める申請提出時までの間に当該商標の実効的使用が開始されたか又は再開された場合は，失効を宣言することができない。ただし，失効を求める申請に先立つ3月の期間内の使用の開始又は再開については，その期間が不使用の連続5年の期間の満了時の前でない日に始まる場合で，失効を求める申請が提出される可能性を当該所有者が知得した後に使用の開始又は再開の準備が行われたときは，これを考慮しない。 - 特許庁

(1) In the absence of any provisions to the contrary in any contract of employment or for the execution of work, the rights to a patent for an invention made in the performance of such contract of employment or in the execution of such work shall be deemed to accrue to the employer, or the person who commissioned the work, as the case may be: Provided that where the invention acquires an economic value much greater than the parties could reasonably have foreseen at the time of concluding the contract of employment or for the execution of work, as the case may be, the inventor shall be entitled to equitable remuneration which may be fixed by the Court in the absence of agreement between the parties.例文帳に追加

(1)雇用契約又は業務遂行契約に別段の規定がない場合は，その雇用契約の履行又はその業務の遂行によって行われた発明に関して特許を受ける権利は，使用者又は場合により業務委託者に属するとみなす。 ただし，その発明が，雇用契約又は場合により業務遂行契約が締結されたときに当事者が合理的に予想することができたものよりも遥かに大きな経済的価値を獲得した場合は，発明者は，公正な報酬を受ける権利を有するものとし，当事者間に合意が成立しない場合は，裁判所がその報酬を定めることができる。 - 特許庁

(2) Subject to Subsections (3), (4) and (5) an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill is invalid if - (a) the trade mark was not at any time in use in good faith in Papua New Guinea by the assignor or his predecessor in title; or (b) a substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark continues to be used by the assignor, after the assignment in relation to other goods, where - (i) there exists a connection in the course of trade between those goods and the assignor; and (ii) those goods are - (A) of the same description as those in respect of which the trade mark has been assigned; or (B) of such a description that the public is likely to be deceived by the use of the trade mark by the assignor and assignee on their respective goods.例文帳に追加

(2) 本条(3)，(4)及び(5)に基づいて，次に掲げる各号の場合，営業権を伴わない登録商標の譲渡は無効である。 (a) 当該商標がパプアニューギニア国内において譲渡人又は前権利者により善意に使用されたことがない場合，又は， (b) 実質的に同一の又は混同を生じるほど類似する商標が，譲渡後も譲渡人によりその他の商品に継続して使用され，かつ以下の条件をみたす場合 (i) それらの商品及び譲渡人との間に取引上の関係が存在すること，及び (ii) それらの商品が (A) 譲渡された商標に関する商品と同一の内容を有すること，又は (B) 譲渡人及び譲受人による各自の商品への当該商標の使用により，公衆が誤認混同するおそれがある内容を有すること - 特許庁

When shifting from a first state to a second state where a potential difference between the first power line and the second power line is greater than that in the first state, the first transistor is driven by the first driving circuit in a first term, and the first transistor is driven by the second driving circuit in a subsequent second term.例文帳に追加

第１回路ブロックと、前記第１回路ブロックに接続される第１電源線及び第２電源線と、前記第１電源線と第１電位を供給する第１電位点とを接続するための第１トランジスタと、前記第１トランジスタのゲートに接続される第１駆動回路と、前記第１駆動回路より駆動力の大きい第２駆動回路とを有し、第１の状態から前記第１の状態よりも前記第１電源線と前記第２電源線の間の電位差が大きい第２の状態へ遷移する場合に、第１の期間において前記第１トランジスタを前記第１駆動回路によって駆動し、その後第２の期間において前記第１トランジスタを前記第２駆動回路によって駆動する。 - 特許庁

The radius of at least one of the nip rolls 1, 1 is set to about 15 mm-35 mm and a distance D between a plane including the axial lines of the pair of nip rolls 1, 1 and a point where the first deriving part 5a releases the elastic member X is set to be about ≤30 mm.例文帳に追加

２枚のウェブＷ１，Ｗ２を挟み込むと共に、２枚のウェブＷ１，Ｗ２の間に弾性部材Ｘを挟み込む一対のニップロール１，１と、ニップロール１，１の回転中心となる軸線Ｈに平行に移動可能な第１移動部材５と、第１移動部材５に形成され、２枚のウェブＷ１，Ｗ２が挟まれる上流において２枚のウェブＷ１，Ｗ２の間に少なくとも１つの弾性部材Ｘを導出する第１導出部５ａとを備え、ニップロール１，１のうちの少なくとも一方のニップロールの半径が約１５mm〜約３５mmに設定され、一対のニップロール１，１の軸線を含む平面と、第１導出部５ａが弾性部材Ｘをリリースする点との距離Ｄを、約３０mm以下に設定する。 - 特許庁

This kitchen module comprises: the kitchen counter which is formed in an approximately L-shape to have first and second portions elongated in first and second directions almost orthogonal to each other, respectively; an eye-level cabinet which is provided on the corner of the kitchen counter; and an extension where a top plate of the kitchen counter is extended out in a joint between the first and second portions.例文帳に追加

略直交する第１及び第２の方向にそれぞれ延在する第１の部分と第２の部分とを有する略Ｌ字形状に形成されてなるキッチンカウンタと、 前記キッチンカウンタのコーナー部の上に設けられるアイレベルキャビネットと、 前記第１の部分と前記第２の部分との接続部において、前記キッチンカウンタの天板がせり出した延出部と、 を備え、 前記アイレベルキャビネットの前面のコーナー面と前記延出部の前縁とが略平行に設けられ、 前記キッチンカウンタの上において前記延出部を含むように調理スペースが設けられ、かつ前記キッチンカウンタの奥行に対する前記調理スペースの奥行の割合が４０％から８０％であることを特徴とするシステムキッチン。 - 特許庁

Japan and India are strengthening their cooperative relationship. In August 2007, the then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe visited New Delhi, India, for talks with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The two leaders issued the ”Joint Communique between the Government of Japan and the Government of the Republic of India on Strengthening Cooperation in Environmental Conservation and Energy Security,” in which both the parties expressed their intention to engage in efforts to (1) establish a flexible, fair, and effective global framework after 2013 for fighting global warming where all countries participate and (2) join other international collaborative initiatives. They also announced concrete plans to work together to promote initiatives on energy saving, energy efficiency, and clean energy.例文帳に追加

インドとの間においても、2007年8月、安倍内閣総理大臣（当時）がニューデリーを訪問し、インドのマンモハン・シン首相との「日本国政府とインド共和国政府による環境保護及びエネルギー安全保障における協力の強化に関する共同声明」において、両首脳が、すべての国が参加する温暖化対策のための2013年以降の柔軟、公正かつ実効的なグローバルな枠組み及び国際的な協調行動への決意や、省エネルギー・エネルギー効率、クリーン・エネルギーに関し、具体的協力を推進すること等を表明するなど、協力関係の強化に向けた取組を進めている。 - 経済産業省

(2) In the case where the effective date of the Act for Partial Revision of the Penal Code, etc. for Coping with Internationalization and Organization of Crimes and Advancement of Information Processing (Act No. of 2006) comes after the Effective Date, with regard to the application of the provisions of item 62 of the appended table of the Act on Punishment of Organized Crimes and Control of Crime Proceeds (Act No. 136 of 1999; referred to as the "Organized Crime Punishment Act" in the following paragraph) during the period between the Effective Date and the day preceding the effective date of the same Act, "the crime set forth in Article 157 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Intermediate Corporation Act (Act No. 49 of 2001)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the crime set forth in Article 334 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Act Concerning General Corporations and General Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006)." 例文帳に追加

２ 犯罪の国際化及び組織化並びに情報処理の高度化に対処するための刑法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十八年法律第号）の施行の日が施行日後となる場合には、施行日から同法の施行の日の前日までの間における組織的な犯罪の処罰及び犯罪収益の規制等に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百三十六号。次項において「組織的犯罪処罰法」という。）別表第六十二号の規定の適用については、同号中「中間法人法（平成十三年法律第四十九号）第百五十七条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とあるのは、「一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）第三百三十四条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とする。 - 経済産業省

Article 2.3 of the ADA establishes that when there is no export price or where it appears that the export price is unreliable because of association or compensatory arrangement between the exporter and the importer or a third party, the export price may be constructed. Differently from what is established in Article 4.1, which defines related parties, Article 2.3 does not define association. Shouldn’t there be a clear definition of what constitutes association or compensatory arrangements? Additionally, shouldn’t the investigating authority explain, in the pertinent determination, the reasons for considering the export price unreliable, since the mere establishment of association or compensatory arrangement is not enough? 例文帳に追加

ＡＤ協定第２．３条において、輸出価格がない場合、または、関係当局が、輸出者と輸入者もしくは第３者との間の連合もしくは補償の取決めのために輸出価格を基準とすることができないと認める場合において、輸出価格は、当局が決定する合理的な方法に基づいて決定されることができるとされている（構成輸出価格）。一方、関連者については、ＡＤ協定第４．１条において定義づけられているものの、ＡＤ協定第２．３条には"連合"についての定義がない。"連合もしくは補償の取決め"について明確に定義されるべきこと。加えて、調査当局は、輸出価格を基準とすることができない理由を説明すべきことを問題として提起。 - 経済産業省

According to a questionnaire survey of Japanese companies that have established research bases in East Asia and the West concerning the division of roles in R&D between those performed in and outside of Japan, Japan has established research bases in Western countries not only to conduct research in the same fields in which they conduct research in Japan, but also in fields where research is not performed in Japan or in fields in which Europe and the U.S. have taken the lead. In East Asia, by contrast, Japan performs design and development geared to local East Asian specifications concerning products whose basic design work was performed by the parent R&D division in Japan, indicating that Japanese companies perform R&D in East Asia to complement R&D performed in Japan (Figure 2-2-47).例文帳に追加

東アジア又は欧米に研究開発拠点を展開している我が国企業に対し、国外と国内との研究開発上の役割分担についてアンケート調査した結果によれば、欧米では、日本と同一分野のみならず、日本では担当していない分野又は欧米が先行している分野における研究開発を行っているのに対して、東アジアでは、日本国内における母体となる研究開発部門が基本設計したものを、東アジアで現地仕様向けに設計・開発を行うなど、国内の研究開発と補完的な研究開発を行っていることが分かる（第2-2-47 図）。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7; (ii) when all or part of the Incorporated Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger issue the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock, matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 8 and item 9 of the Act (including the provisions that specify that the number and the amount of the money of the rights to subscribe for new shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger which are to be issued to the holders of the rights to subscribe for the whole or part of new shares of stock shall be zero); (iii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final - 106 - business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of - 107 - Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (v) the following matters concerning said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (b) when the final business year does not exist at said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vii) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph 1 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の十二第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。 一法第百四十三条第一項第六号及び第七号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関 する事項 二新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の全部又は一部が新株予約権を発行しているとき は、法第百四十三条第一項第八号及び第九号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該事項 についての定めとして、全部又は一部の新株予約権の新株予約権者に対して交付する 新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の新株予約権の数及び金銭の額を零と定めた場合に おける当該定めを含む。）の相当性に関する事項 三他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社及び清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下 この号において同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等又は財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表と ともに作成された損益計算書（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合 併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表）の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅株 式会社商品取引所の成立の日）後の日を臨時決算日（二以上の臨時決算日がある 場合にあっては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等があるときは、当該臨時 計算書類等の内容 ハ他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない 場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処 分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に 重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の十二第一 項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の 日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新た な最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。）四 他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社又は清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が 会社法第四百九十二条第一項（法第七十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。） の規定により作成した貸借対照表 五当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所（清算株式会社を除く。以下この号において 同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年 度がない場合にあっては、当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日）後 に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第 百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合 にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）ロ当該新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度がないときは、当該 新設合併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表 六新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履 行の見込みに関する事項 七法第百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後、前各号に掲げる 事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in respective items of Article 57; (ii) the following matters concerning another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; the same shall apply in this item): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business - 92 - year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final - 93 - business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の三第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、新設合併設立商品取引所が会員 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一第五十七条各号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関する事項 二他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度が ない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な 財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の 財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四 条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立 の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新 たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。） 三 他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条 第一項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照 表 四当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、当該 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担 その他の当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が 生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後 新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存すること となる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。） 五新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立会員商品取 引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履行の 見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に 変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

The parties may agree on the basic terms and conditions including the rate of royalties of a compulsory license. In the absence of agreement between the parties, the Director shall fix the terms and conditions including the rate of royalties of the compulsory license subject to the following conditions: (a) The scope and duration of such license shall be limited to the purpose for which it was authorized; (b) The license shall be non-exclusive; (c) The license shall be non-assignable, except with the part of the enterprise or business with which the invention is being exploited; (d) Use of the subject matter of the license shall be devoted predominantly for the supply of the Philippine market: Provided, that this limitation shall not apply where the grant of the license is based on the ground that the patentee’s manner of exploiting the patent is determined by judicial or administrative process to be anti-competitive. (e) The license may be terminated upon proper showing that circumstances which led to its grant have ceased to exist and are unlikely to recur: Provided, that adequate protection shall be afforded to the legitimate interest of the licensee; (f) The patentee shall be paid adequate remuneration taking into account the economic value of the grant or authorization, except that in cases where the license was granted to remedy a practice which was determined after judicial or administrative process, to be anti-competitive, the need to correct the anti-competitive practice may be taken into account in fixing the amount of remuneration.例文帳に追加

当事者は，強制ライセンスのロイヤルティ料率を含む基本的条件について合意することができる。当事者間の合意がない場合は，局長が，次の条件に従って，強制ライセンスのロイヤルティ料率を含む基本的条件を定める。 (a)強制ライセンスの範囲及び期間は，許可された目的に限定される。 (b)強制ライセンスは，非排他的なものとする。 (c)強制ライセンスは，当該発明を実施している企業又は事業の一部とともにする場合を除き，譲渡することができない。 (d)強制ライセンスの対象の実施は，主としてフィリピン市場への供給のためにされなければならない。ただし，この制限は，当該ライセンスの付与が，司法上又は行政上の手続によって特許権者による当該特許の実施の態様が反競争的である旨が決定されたことに基づく場合は，適用しない。 (e)強制ライセンスは，その付与をもたらした状況が存在しなくなり，かつ，その状況が再発しそうにないことが適切に示されたときは，取り消すことができる。ただし，実施権者の正当な利益に対して適切な保護を与えるものとする。 (f) 特許権者は，付与又は許諾の経済的価値を考慮に入れて，適正な報酬を受ける。ただし，強制ライセンスが，司法上又は行政上の手続の結果反競争的と決定された行為を是正するために許諾された場合は，報酬の額の決定に当たり，反競争的な行為を是正する必要性を考慮に入れることができる。 - 特許庁

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a resident listed in the items of Article 40-4(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes in the state of the head office of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (meaning taxes to be imposed based on the amount of the company's income in the state of the head office or in a state or territory other than the state of the head office or by local entities in such state or territory including the state of the head office (including taxes listed in the items of Article 141(2) of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act to be imposed in such state or territory or by local entities of such state or territory) and taxes equivalent to incidental taxes to be imposed incidentally as prescribed in Article 2(xlv) of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding interest tax) and other taxes similar to the tax equivalent to the said incidental taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), with regard to the income of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year (where the provisions of Article 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act that relates to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in those provisions), and the sum of the amounts listed in Article 39-15(2)(i) to (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the sum of the amounts listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amounts listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 40-4(2)(ii) of the Act. 例文帳に追加

２　法第四十条の四第一項各号に掲げる居住者は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税（本店所在地国若しくは本店所在地国以外の国若しくは地域又はこれらの国若しくは地域の地方公共団体により法人の所得を課税標準として課される税（これらの国若しくは地域又はこれらの国若しくは地域の地方公共団体により課される法人税法施行令第百四十一条第二項各号に掲げる税を含む。）及びこれに附帯して課される法人税法第二条第四十五号に規定する附帯税（利子税を除く。）に相当する税その他当該附帯税に相当する税に類する税をいう。以下この節において同じ。）に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第三十九条の十五第二項第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る同項第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る同項第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る同項第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第四十条の四第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said consolidated corporation (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in the said paragraph), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-90(2)(ii) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall apply only when the said other consolidated corporations are not subject to the provisions of the preceding paragraph with regard to the said calculated amount pertaining to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.: 例文帳に追加

２　法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引が同項に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十八条の九十第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。ただし、当該他の連結法人が当該特定外国子会社等に係る当該計算した金額につき前項の規定の適用を受けない場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) In the case where the first day of the oldest business year or consolidated business year out of the relevant business years or consolidated business years that started within ten years prior to the first day of the business year including the day of a qualified merger, etc. of a domestic corporation set forth in Article 66-8(3) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "first day of the business year of the domestic corporation ten years before" in this paragraph) falls after the first day of the oldest business year or consolidated business year out of a business year within ten years prior to the merger, business year within ten years prior to the company split or business year within ten years prior to the company split, etc. of a merged corporation(s), etc. pertaining to the said qualified merger, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a "business year of the merged corporation(s), etc. within the preceding ten years" in this paragraph) (in the case of a qualified merger, etc. made among two or more merged corporations, etc., after the first day of the relevant business year or consolidated business year of the merged corporations, etc. whichever started the earliest; hereinafter referred to as the "first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before" in this paragraph), the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply by deeming the respective periods classifying the period between the said first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before and the day preceding the said first day of the business year of the domestic corporation ten years before (in the case where the said domestic corporation is to be established through the said qualified merger, etc., the day preceding the first day of the business year of the domestic corporation including the day of the qualified merger, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by the corresponding business year of the merged corporation(s), etc. within the preceding ten years pertaining to the said first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before (for the period including the said preceding day, the period between the first day of the business year or consolidated business year of the said merged corporation, etc. including the said preceding day and the day preceding the said first day of the business year of the domestic corporation ten years before) to be the relevant business year of the said domestic corporation. 例文帳に追加

６　法第六十六条の八第三項の内国法人の適格合併等の日を含む事業年度開始の日前十年以内に開始した各事業年度又は各連結事業年度のうち最も古い事業年度又は連結事業年度開始の日（以下この項において「内国法人十年前事業年度開始日」という。）が当該適格合併等に係る被合併法人等の合併前十年内事業年度、分割前十年内事業年度又は分割等前十年内事業年度（以下この項において「被合併法人等前十年内事業年度」という。）のうち最も古い事業年度又は連結事業年度開始の日（二以上の被合併法人等が行う適格合併等にあつては、当該開始の日が最も早い被合併法人等の当該事業年度又は連結事業年度開始の日。以下この項において「被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日」という。）後である場合には、当該被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日から当該内国法人十年前事業年度開始日（当該適格合併等が当該内国法人を設立するものである場合にあつては、当該内国法人の当該適格合併等の日を含む事業年度開始の日。以下この項において同じ。）の前日までの期間を当該期間に対応する当該被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日に係る被合併法人等前十年内事業年度ごとに区分したそれぞれの期間（当該前日を含む期間にあつては、当該被合併法人等の当該前日を含む事業年度又は連結事業年度開始の日から当該内国法人十年前事業年度開始日の前日までの期間）は、当該内国法人のそれぞれの事業年度とみなして、前項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) In the case where the first day of the oldest consolidated business year or business year out of the relevant consolidated business years or business years that started within ten years prior to the first day of the consolidated business year including the day of a qualified merger, etc. of a consolidated corporation set forth in Article 68-92(3) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "first day of the business year of the consolidated corporation ten years before" in this paragraph) falls after the first day of the oldest consolidated business year or business year out of a business year within ten years prior to the merger, business year within ten years prior to the company split or business year within ten years prior to the company split, etc. of a merged corporation(s), etc. pertaining to the said qualified merger, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a "business year of the merged corporation(s), etc. within the preceding ten years" in this paragraph) (in the case of a qualified merger, etc. made among two or more merged corporations, etc., after the first day of the relevant consolidated business year or business year of the merged corporations, etc. whichever started the earliest; hereinafter referred to as the "first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before" in this paragraph), the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply by deeming respective periods classifying the period between the said first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before and the day preceding the said first day of the business year of the consolidated corporation ten years before (in the case where the said consolidated corporation is to be established through the said qualified merger, etc., the day preceding the first day of the consolidated business year of the consolidated corporation including the day of the qualified merger, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by the corresponding business year of the merged corporation(s), etc. within the preceding ten years pertaining to the said first day of the business year of the merged corporations, etc. ten years before (for the period including the said preceding day, the period between the first day of the consolidated business year or business year of the said merged corporation, etc. including the said preceding day and the day preceding the said first day of the business year of the consolidated corporation ten years before) to be the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation. 例文帳に追加

６　法第六十八条の九十二第三項の連結法人の適格合併等の日を含む連結事業年度開始の日前十年以内に開始した各連結事業年度又は各事業年度のうち最も古い連結事業年度又は事業年度開始の日（以下この項において「連結法人十年前事業年度開始日」という。）が当該適格合併等に係る被合併法人等の合併前十年内事業年度、分割前十年内事業年度又は分割等前十年内事業年度（以下この項において「被合併法人等前十年内事業年度」という。）のうち最も古い連結事業年度又は事業年度開始の日（二以上の被合併法人等が行う適格合併等にあつては、当該開始の日が最も早い被合併法人等の当該連結事業年度又は事業年度開始の日。以下この項において「被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日」という。）後である場合には、当該被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日から当該連結法人十年前事業年度開始日（当該適格合併等が当該連結法人を設立するものである場合にあつては、当該連結法人の当該適格合併等の日を含む連結事業年度開始の日。以下この項において同じ。）の前日までの期間を当該期間に対応する当該被合併法人等十年前事業年度開始日に係る被合併法人等前十年内事業年度ごとに区分したそれぞれの期間（当該前日を含む期間にあつては、当該被合併法人等の当該前日を含む連結事業年度又は事業年度開始の日から当該連結法人十年前事業年度開始日の前日までの期間）は、当該連結法人のそれぞれの連結事業年度とみなして、前項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Where it is proposed that a person should be registered as a registered user of a trademark, the registered proprietor and the proposed registered users shall jointly apply in writing to the registrar in the prescribed manner, and every such application shall be accompanied by- (a) the agreement in writing or a duly authenticated copy thereof, entered into between the registered proprietor and the proposed registered user with respect to the permitted use of the trademark; and (b) an affidavit made by the registered proprietor or by some person authorized to Act on his behalf, which shall include- (i) particulars of the relationship, existing or proposed, between the proprietor and the proposed registered user, including particulars showing the degree of control by the proprietor over the permitted use which their relationship will confer; (ii) whether it is a term of their relationship that the proposed registered user shall be the sole registered user or that there shall be any other restriction as to persons for whose registrations as Registered user application may be made; (iii) stating the goods or services in respect of which registration is proposed; (iv) stating the conditions or restrictions, if any, proposed with respect to the characteristics of the goods or services, as the case may be, to the mode or place of permitted use, or to any other matter; (v) stating whether the permitted use is to be for a period, or without limit of period, and, if for a period, the duration thereof; and (c) such further documents, information or other evidence as may be required by the Registrar or as may be prescribed. 例文帳に追加

(1)商標の登録使用権者として登録すべきことを要望する場合、登録所有者及び登録予定使用権者は共同で所定の方式で登録官に書面で出願するものとし、かかる出願にはすべて次に掲げるものを添付する。(a)当該商標の許可された使用について登録所有者と登録予定使用権者との間で締結された契約書又はその適式に公証された写し、及び(b)登録所有者による、又は、その者を代理して行為することを授権された者による、次に掲げる事項を含む宣誓供述書。(i)所有者と登録予定使用権者との間の既存の又は予定される関係の詳細。両者の関係がもたらす許諾された使用に及ぶ所有者による支配の程度を示す詳細を含む。(ii)登録予定使用権者は唯一の登録使用権者となること、又は、登録使用権者としての登録出願ができる者につき何らかの制限があることは、両者の関係の条件であるか否か。(iii)登録が予定される商品又は役務の記載。(iv)該当する場合、当該商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の特性に関して、許諾された使用の態様又は地域に関して、又はその他の事項に関して予定される条件若しくは制限の記載。(v)許諾された使用につき期限の定めの有無、及び、期限の定めがある場合はその期間の記載。(c)登録官の求めに応じて、又は所定の追加文書、情報又はその他の証拠。 - 特許庁

(c) that it is provided in the Investment Contract, etc. and said Discretionary Investment Contract that said Financial Instruments Specialist, etc. shall not make an investment with the intention of conducting a transaction for itself or with any of its directors or executive officers, or a transaction between an Investment Property and another Investment Property it manages (meaning an Investment Property as defined in Article 35, paragraph (1), item (xv) of the Act) (referred to as "Transactions for Itself, etc." in 1. and 2.) unless said Financial Instruments Specialist, etc., with regard to each transaction, gives an explanation on the contents of said transaction and the reasons for conducting said transaction (referred to as a "Explanation of the Transaction" in 2.) to all of the Subject Right Holders and obtains the consent (including the consent prescribed in 1., for a transaction conducted in cases where all of the matters listed in the following sub-items are provided) from all of said Subject Right Holders, except for that which falls under any of the acts listed in Article 128, item (i) or (iii), or Article 129, paragraph (1), item (i) or (iii) of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Services, etc. (Cabinet Office Ordinance No. 52 of 2007); 例文帳に追加

ハ　出資契約等及び当該投資一任契約において、当該金融商品取引業者等は、金融商品取引業等に関する内閣府令（平成十九年内閣府令第五十二号）第百二十八条第一号若しくは第三号又は第百二十九条第一項第一号若しくは第三号に掲げる行為に該当するものを除き、個別の取引ごとにすべての対象権利者に当該取引の内容及び当該取引を行おうとする理由の説明（（２）において「取引説明」という。）を行い、当該すべての対象権利者の同意（次に掲げる事項のすべての定めがある場合において行う取引にあっては、（１）の同意を含む。）を得なければ自己、その取締役若しくは執行役又はその運用を行う他の運用財産（法第三十五条第一項第十五号に規定する運用財産をいう。）との間における取引を行うことを内容とした運用（（１）及び（２）において「自己取引等」という。）を行うことができない旨の定めがあること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2006 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Special Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

２　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十五年四月一日から平成十八年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第二項において「特別会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に不測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合（当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

iii) Relationship between a person who holds voting rights (including the voting rights of the shares or equity interests which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) [including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 228, paragraph (1), Article 235, paragraph (1), Article 239, paragraph (1) and Article 276 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii))] of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. [Act No. 75 of 2001]) that exceed fifty percent of the voting rights (in the case of a stock company, excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have the voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 19, item (ii)) of All Shareholders, etc. (which means all shareholders, all members or all contributors; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 19, item (ii)) of a juridical person (hereinafter such person shall be referred to as a "Controlling Shareholder, etc." in this Article) and said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "Controlled Juridical Person" in this Article 例文帳に追加

三　法人の総株主等（総株主、総社員又は総出資者をいう。以下この条及び第十九条第二号において同じ。）の議決権（株式会社にあつては、株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この条及び第十九条第二号において同じ。）の百分の五十を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項（これらの規定を同法第二百二十八条第一項、第二百三十五条第一項、第二百三十九条第一項及び第二百七十六条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式又は持分に係る議決権を含む。）を保有している者（以下この条において「支配株主等」という。）と当該法人（以下この条において「被支配法人」という。）との関係 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 235 (1) Any certification, licensing or other action, and qualification certificates and other documents thereof, made or issued by a foreign state, which are regarded, in accordance with the provisions under Article 131 of the Act, as an aircraft registration certificate under Article 6 of the Act, competence certification under Article 22 of the Act, competence certificate under Article 23 of the Act, aviation medical certification under Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act, aviation medical certificate under paragraph (2) of the same Article, aviation English proficiency certification under Article 33 paragraph (1), or instrument flight certification under Article 34 paragraph (1) of the Act, shall be those made or issued by the foreign state (in case where an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation exists between any foreign state of which the aircraft concerned has nationality and any other foreign state in which the user of the aircraft concerned has its address, limited to the foreign state designated to issue certification for the aircraft concerned, license and take any other action) which is a Contracting State adopting the standards, practices and procedures provided for in the annexes of the Convention on International Civil Aviation or those recognized as appropriate by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. 例文帳に追加

第二百三十五条　法第百三十一条の規定により、法第六条の航空機登録証明書、法第二十二条の規定による技能証明、法第二十三条の技能証明書、法第三十一条第一項の規定による航空身体検査証明、同条第二項の航空身体検査証明書、法第三十三条第一項の規定による航空英語能力証明又は法第三十四条第一項の規定による計器飛行証明とみなされる外国が行つた証明、免許その他の行為及びこれらに係る資格証書その他の文書は、国際民間航空条約の附属書として採択された標準、方式及び手続を採用する締約国たる外国（当該航空機が国籍を有する外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する外国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該協定により当該航空機に係る証明、免許その他の行為を行うこととされた外国に限る。）の行つたもの及び国土交通大臣が適当と認めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In accordance with the provisions under Article 131 of the Act, any certification, other actions and certificate concerned and other documents thereof (hereinafter "certification, etc." in this paragraph) of airworthiness, noise and engine emission of an aircraft, made or issued by a foreign state, which are regarded as airworthiness certification under Article 10 paragraph (1) of the Act or an airworthiness certificate under paragraph (7) of the same Article, shall be certification, etc. (in case of certification, etc. for noise level of the aircraft which has installed with turbo-jet engine or turbo-fan engine and its maximum takeoff weight is more than 34,000kgs, to be limited to certification, etc. in compliance with the standards and procedures specified by annex 16 volume I chapter III and Chapter IV to the Convention on International Aviation) made or issued by the foreign state (in case where an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation exists between any foreign state of which the aircraft concerned has nationality and any other foreign state in which the user of the aircraft concerned has its address, limited to the foreign state designated to issue certification for the aircraft concerned, license and take any other action) which is a Contracting State adopting the standards, practices and procedures provided for in the annexes of the Convention on International Civil Aviation or those recognized as appropriate by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. 例文帳に追加

２　法第百三十一条の規定により、法第十条第一項の規定による耐空証明又は同条第七項の耐空証明書とみなされる航空機の耐空性、騒音及び発動機の排出物について外国が行つた証明その他の行為及びこれに係る証書その他の文書（以下この項において「証明等」という。）は、国際民間航空条約の附属書として採択された標準、方式及び手続を採用する締約国たる外国（当該航空機が国籍を有する外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する外国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該協定により当該航空機に係る証明、免許その他の行為を行うこととされた外国に限る。）の行つた証明等（ターボジェット発動機又はターボファン発動機を装備する最大離陸重量が三万四千キログラムを超える航空機の騒音についての証明等にあつては、国際民間航空条約の附属書十六第一巻第三章及び第四章の基準に適合することについての証明等に限る。）及び国土交通大臣が適当と認めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(19) Where the provision of paragraph (1) shall apply, and with respect to the arm's length price prescribed in paragraph (1) which pertains to a foreign affiliated transaction conducted between a corporation and a foreign affiliated person related to the said corporation (limited to a foreign affiliated person who shall be deemed, pursuant to the provisions of a convention prescribed in Article 139 of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the next Article as a "tax convention"), to be a resident or corporation in the Contracting State other than Japan (hereinafter referred to in the this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the next Article as the "other Contracting State") of the tax convention), the Minister of Finance has reached an agreement under the said tax convention with the competent authority of the said other Contracting State, or any other requirement specified by a Cabinet Order is satisfied, the regional commissioner or the district director may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, grant exemption from the part of the delinquent tax imposed with regard to the corporation tax payable by the said corporation pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1), which corresponds to the base period for the calculation of the delinquent tax for which the Minister of Finance has reached an agreement with the competent authority of the said other Contracting State. 例文帳に追加

１９　第一項の規定の適用がある場合において、法人と当該法人に係る国外関連者（法人税法第百三十九条に規定する条約（以下この項及び次条第一項において「租税条約」という。）の規定により租税条約の我が国以外の締約国（以下この項及び次条第一項において「条約相手国」という。）の居住者又は法人とされるものに限る。）との間の国外関連取引に係る第一項に規定する独立企業間価格につき財務大臣が当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間で当該租税条約に基づく合意をしたことその他の政令で定める要件を満たすときは、国税局長又は税務署長は、政令で定めるところにより、当該法人が同項の規定の適用により納付すべき法人税に係る延滞税のうちその計算の基礎となる期間で財務大臣が当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間で合意をした期間に対応する部分に相当する金額を免除することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(19) Where the provision of paragraph (1) shall apply, and with respect to the arm's length price prescribed in paragraph (1) which pertains to a foreign affiliated transaction conducted between a consolidated corporation and a foreign affiliated person related to the said consolidated corporation (limited to a foreign affiliated person who shall be deemed, pursuant to the provisions of a convention prescribed in Article 139 of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the next Article as a "tax convention"), to be a resident or corporation in the Contracting State other than Japan (hereinafter referred to in the this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the next Article as the "other Contracting State") of the tax convention), the Minister of Finance has reached an agreement under the said tax convention with the competent authority of the said other Contracting State, or any other requirement specified by a Cabinet Order is satisfied, the regional commissioner or the district director may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, grant exemption from the part of the delinquent tax imposed with regard to the corporation tax payable by the consolidated parent corporation related to the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1), which corresponds to the base period for the calculation of the delinquent tax for which the Minister of Finance has reached an agreement with the competent authority of the said other Contracting State. 例文帳に追加

１９　第一項の規定の適用がある場合において、連結法人と当該連結法人に係る国外関連者（法人税法第百三十九条に規定する条約（以下この項及び次条第一項において「租税条約」という。）の規定により租税条約の我が国以外の締約国（以下この項及び次条第一項において「条約相手国」という。）の居住者又は法人とされるものに限る。）との間の国外関連取引に係る第一項に規定する独立企業間価格につき財務大臣が当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間で当該租税条約に基づく合意をしたことその他の政令で定める要件を満たすときは、国税局長又は税務署長は、政令で定めるところにより、当該連結法人に係る連結親法人が同項の規定の適用により納付すべき法人税に係る延滞税のうちその計算の基礎となる期間で財務大臣が当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間で合意をした期間に対応する部分に相当する金額を免除することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The normal profit margin specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-88(2)(i)(c) of the Act shall be the ratio of the amount of gross profits gained by a person who acquired the same or similar inventory assets as those for a foreign affiliated transaction through the purchase (limited to a purchase from a non-affiliated person), manufacture or any other acts (hereinafter such person shall be referred to as a "seller" in this paragraph and item (iii) of the next paragraph) through a transaction to sell the said same or similar inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this paragraph) (such gross profits shall mean the amount obtained by deducting the sum of the costs of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction from the total revenue arising from the sale of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction) against the sum of the said costs; provided, however, that where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a comparison purpose transaction and the said foreign affiliated transaction, such normal profit margin shall be the ratio after making a necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity. 例文帳に追加

６　法第六十八条の八十八第二項第一号ハに規定する政令で定める通常の利益率は、国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を、購入（非関連者からの購入に限る。）、製造その他の行為により取得した者（以下この項及び次項第三号において「販売者」という。）が当該同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この項において「比較対象取引」という。）に係る当該販売者の売上総利益の額（当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の販売による収入金額の合計額から当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の原価の額の合計額を控除した金額をいう。）の当該原価の額の合計額に対する割合とする。ただし、比較対象取引と当該国外関連取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) The method which uses, as the amount of consideration for a foreign affiliated transaction, the remaining amount of consideration gained by the purchasing side of inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction for having sold the said inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter such amount of consideration shall be referred to as the "resale price" in this item) after deducting the amount obtained by multiplying the said resale price by the ratio of the amount listed in (a) against the amount listed in (b) (where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a transaction in which a reseller has sold the same or similar inventory assets as the said inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this item) and a transaction in which the purchasing side of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction sold the inventory assets to a non-affiliated person, by the ratio after making a necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity) and then adding the selling expenses and general administrative expenses needed for the sale of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction: 例文帳に追加

二　国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が非関連者に対して当該棚卸資産を販売した対価の額（以下この号において「再販売価格」という。）から、当該再販売価格にイに掲げる金額のロに掲げる金額に対する割合（再販売者が当該棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この号において「比較対象取引」という。）と当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が当該棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合）を乗じて計算した金額に当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の販売のために要した販売費及び一般管理費の額を加算した金額を控除した金額をもつて当該国外関連取引の対価の額とする方法 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4 Where, as a result of transfer of a trademark right, the trademark right to a similar registered trademark to be used in connection with identical goods or services, or the trademark right to an identical or similar registered trademark to be used in connection with similar goods or services becomes owned by a different holder of trademark right, if the use of one of such registered trademarks for its designated goods or designated services by its holder of trademark right, exclusive right to use or non-exclusive right to use is likely to damage business interests (limited to those pertaining to the designated goods or designated services using the said other registered trademark) of the other holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use, the other holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use may request the holder of trademark right, exclusive right to use or non-exclusive right to use to affix an indication that may sufficiently prevent any confusion between the goods or services pertaining to the business of the other party and those of its own. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四　商標権が移転された結果、同一の商品若しくは役務について使用をする類似の登録商標又は類似の商品若しくは役務について使用をする同一若しくは類似の登録商標に係る商標権が異なつた商標権者に属することとなつた場合において、その一の登録商標に係る商標権者、専用使用権者又は通常使用権者の指定商品又は指定役務についての登録商標の使用により他の登録商標に係る商標権者又は専用使用権者の業務上の利益（当該他の登録商標の使用をしている指定商品又は指定役務に係るものに限る。）が害されるおそれのあるときは、当該他の登録商標に係る商標権者又は専用使用権者は、当該一の登録商標に係る商標権者、専用使用権者又は通常使用権者に対し、当該使用について、その者の業務に係る商品又は役務と自己の業務に係る商品又は役務との混同を防ぐのに適当な表示を付すべきことを請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 47 (1) A person who had, prior to the enforcement of Article 10, obtained approval for the product type under Article 18 or Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act or who had obtained a confirmation of the product type under Article 18 or Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act with regard to Class-A Electrical Appliances and Materials as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act, which falls under the category of Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act (hereinafter referred to as "Transferred Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials") (including a person who has obtained approval or confirmation under the provisions of Article 45, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions for which the provisions then in force are to remain applicable pursuant to said provisions) shall be deemed to have performed the obligation under Article 9, paragraph (1) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act during the period between the day when he/she obtained or was deemed to have obtained said approval or confirmation and the day when the period specified by Cabinet Order set forth in Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act, in the case where he/she manufactured or imported Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials with a product type pertaining to said approval or confirmation. 例文帳に追加

第四十七条　第十条の規定の施行の際現に旧電気用品取締法第二条第二項の甲種電気用品であって電気用品安全法第二条第二項の特定電気用品であるもの（以下「移行特定電気用品」という。）について旧電気用品取締法第十八条若しくは第二十三条第一項の型式の認可を受けている者又は旧電気用品取締法第二十三条の二第一項の型式の確認を受けている者（附則第四十五条第一項又は第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされたこれらの規定による型式の認可若しくは確認を受けた者を含む。）は、その認可若しくは確認に係る型式の移行特定電気用品を製造し、又は輸入した場合には、当該認可を受けた日若しくは当該確認を受けて認可を受けたものとみなされた日から旧電気用品取締法第二十四条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日までの間は、電気用品安全法第九条第一項の規定による義務を履行したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

the term “dual listed company arrangement” means an arrangement pursuant to which two publicly listed companies, while maintaining their separate legal entity status, shareholdings and listings, align their strategic directions and the economic interests of their respective shareholders through: (i) the appointment of common (or almost identical) boards of directors; (ii) management of the operations of the two companies on a unified basis;(iii) equalised distributions to shareholders in accordance with an equalisation ratio applying between the two companies, including in the event of a winding up of one or both of the companies; (iv) the shareholders of both companies voting in effect as a single decision-making body on substantial issues affecting their combined interests; and (v) cross-guarantees as to, or similar financial support for, each other’s material obligations or operations except where the effect of the relevant regulatory requirements prevents such guarantees or financial support; 例文帳に追加

「二元上場法人に関する取決め」とは、二の上場された法人が、それぞれの独立した法人としての地位、株主の構成及び株式の上場を維持しながら、次の(i)から(v)までに掲げる方法を通じて、両法人の経営方針及びそれぞれの株主の経済的利益を統合する取決めをいう。(i)共通又はほぼ同一の役員会を設置すること。 (ii)二の法人の経営管理を統一的に行うこと。 (iii)二の法人の間において適用される均等化のための割合に応じて株主に対して均等な分配（一方又は双方の法人の解散に伴うものを含む。）を行うこと。(iv)二の法人の株主が、両法人の利害関係の双方に影響を及ぼす重要な事項に関して単一の意思決定機関として有効に議決権を行使すること。(v)それぞれの法人の重要な債務又は業務に対して相互に保証し、又はこれに類する資金の援助を行うこと。ただし、関連する規制によりこれらの保証又は資金の援助が禁じられている場合を除く。 - 財務省

Where a conflict, as defined in section 43 as it read immediately before October 1, 1989, exists between an application for a patent in Canada filed before October 1, 1989 (the “earlier application”) and an application for a patent in Canada filed on or after that date (the “later application”) and (a) the later application is filed by a person who is entitled to protection under the terms of any treaty or convention relating to patents to which Canada is a party and who has previously regularly filed in or for any other country that by treaty, convention or law affords similar protection to citizens of Canada an application for a patent describing the same invention, (b) the later application is filed within twelve months after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, (c) the applicant in the later application has made a request for priority in respect of that application on the basis of the previously regularly filed application, and (d) the earlier application is filed after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, the applicant having the earlier date of invention shall be entitled to a patent and the applications shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with section 43, as it read immediately before October 1, 1989. 例文帳に追加

1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に特定される抵触が，1989年10月1日前にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「先の出願」と称する)と，その日以後にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「後の出願」と称する)との間に存在し，かつ (a) 後の出願が，カナダが締約国である特許に関する条約又は協定に定める条件に従って保護を受ける権利を有する者であって，同一発明を記載した特許出願を条約，協定又は法律によりカナダ国民に同様な保護を与える他の国において若しくはその国に対して先に正規にした者により行われ， (b) 後の出願が，その先に正規にされた出願の後12月以内に行われ，(c) 後の出願の出願人が，その先に正規にされた出願に基づいて該当出願につき優先権主張を行い，また (d) 先の出願が当該先に正規にされた出願の後に行われた場合は， 先の発明日を有する出願人が特許を受けることができるものとし，これらの出願は，1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に従って取り扱い，かつ，処理しなければならない。 - 特許庁

(1) Where a trade mark consisting of an invented word or words has become so well known as regards any goods or services in respect of which it is registered and, in relation to which it has been used, that the use thereof in relation to other goods or services would likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade between the other goods or services and a person entitled to use the trade mark in relation to the first mentioned goods or services, then, notwithstanding that the proprietor registered in respect of the first-mentioned goods or services does not use or propose to use the trade mark in relation to the other goods or services and notwithstanding anything in section 46 the trade mark may, on the application in a prescribed manner of the proprietor registered in respect of the first-mentioned goods or services, be registered in his name in respect of the other goods or services as a defensive trade mark and while so registered, shall not be liable to be taken off the Register in respect of other goods or services under section 46.例文帳に追加

(1) 考案された1又は複数の語で構成される商標が，それが登録され，かつ，使用されている商品又はサービスに関して周知となっており，その結果他の商品又はサービスについて，当該商標の使用が当該他の商品又はサービスと前記商品又はサービスについて当該商標を使用する権利を有する者との間に業としての関係を示すものと受け取られる虞を生じる場合は，前記商品又はサービスについて登録された所有者が当該他の商品又はサービスについて当該商標を使用せず又は使用する予定がないにも拘らず，かつ，第46条の規定に拘らず，前記商品又はサービスについて登録された所有者は，所定の方式で出願することにより，当該他の商品又はサービスについて当該商標を自己の名義で防護商標として登録することができ，当該防護商標は，そのように登録されている間は，第46条に基づいて登録簿から抹消されることはない。 - 特許庁

Article 61-5 The provisions of Article 680 to 683 inclusive (Bondholders of Bonds for Subscription, Bond Registry, Delivery of Document Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry, Management of Bond Registry), Article 684 (excluding paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Bond Registry) and Article 685 to 701 inclusive (Notices to Bondholders, Exercise of Rights by Co-owners, Assignment of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Assignment of Bonds, Presumption of Rights, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Without Request from Bondholders, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry as Requested by Bondholders, Pledges of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Pledge of Bonds, Entries in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Perfection Requirements for Bonds Belonging to Trust Property, etc., Issuing of Bond Certificates, Matters to Be Stated on Bond Certificates, Conversions between Registered Bonds and Bearer Bonds, Loss of Bond Certificates, Redemption of Bonds where Coupons Missing, Extinctive Prescription of Right to Claim Redemption of Bonds) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "the preceding Article" in Article 680, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-4 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 676, items (iii) though (viii)" in Article 681, item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, items (iii) to (viii) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 720, paragraph (1)" in Article 685, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 720, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-8, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 676, item (vii)" in Article 698 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, item (vii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十一条の五　会社法第六百八十条から第六百八十三条まで（募集社債の社債権者、社債原簿、社債原簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、社債原簿管理人）、第六百八十四条（第四項及び第五項を除く。）（社債原簿の備置き及び閲覧等）及び第六百八十五条から第七百一条まで（社債権者に対する通知等、共有者による権利の行使、社債券を発行する場合の社債の譲渡、社債の譲渡の対抗要件、権利の推定等、社債権者の請求によらない社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債権者の請求による社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債券を発行する場合の社債の質入れ、社債の質入れの対抗要件、質権に関する社債原簿の記載等、質権に関する社債原簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、信託財産に属する社債についての対抗要件等、社債券の発行、社債券の記載事項、記名式と無記名式との間の転換、社債券の喪失、利札が欠けている場合における社債の償還、社債の償還請求権等の消滅時効）の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第六百八十条第二号中「前条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の四」と、同法第六百八十一条第一号中「第六百七十六条第三号から第八号まで」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第三号から第八号まで」と、同法第六百八十五条第五項中「第七百二十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の八第二項において準用する第七百二十条第一項」と、同法第六百九十八条中「第六百七十六条第七号」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第七号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 125 The provisions of Article 680 to Article 701 (excluding Article 684(4) and (5)) (Bondholders of Bonds for Subscription; Bond Registry; Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry; Manager of Bond Registry; Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Bond Registry; Notices to Bondholders; Exercise of Rights by Co-owners; Perfection of Assignment of Bonds; Presumption of Rights; Stating or Recording Matters to be Stated in Bond Registry without Request from Bondholders; Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry as Requested by Bondholders; Pledges of Bonds with Issued Certificates; Perfection of Pledge of Bonds; Entries in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges; Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges; Issuing of Bond Certificates; Matters to Be Stated on Bond Certificates, Conversions Between Registered Bonds and Bearer Bonds; Loss of Bond Certificates; Redemption of Bonds Where Coupons Missing; Extinctive Prescription of Right to Claim Redemption of Bonds) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, or the Specified Bond Registry in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the phrases "Matters to Be Specified in Bond Registry," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bearer bonds" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Matters to Be Stated in the Specified Bond Registry," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bonds in bearer form," respectively, the phrase "Bonds for subscription" in Article 680 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds for Subscription," the phrase "the preceding Article" in Article 680(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 124 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "items (iii) through (viii) of Article 676" in Article 681(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1)(vi) to (xi) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "a manager of Bond Registry" in Article 683 and Article 684(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Administrator of the Specified Bond Registry," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 720" in Article 685(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 720(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "item (vii) of Article 676" in Article 698 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1)(x)" of the Asset Securitization Act, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百二十五条　会社法第六百八十条から第七百一条まで（第六百八十四条第四項及び第五項を除く。）（募集社債の社債権者、社債原簿、社債原簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、社債原簿管理人、社債原簿の備置き及び閲覧等、社債権者に対する通知等、共有者による権利の行使、社債券を発行する場合の社債の譲渡、社債の譲渡の対抗要件、権利の推定等、社債権者の請求によらない社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債権者の請求による社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債券を発行する場合の社債の質入れ、社債の質入れの対抗要件、質権に関する社債原簿の記載等、質権に関する社債原簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、信託財産に属する社債についての対抗要件等、社債券の発行、社債券の記載事項、記名式と無記名式との間の転換、社債券の喪失、利札が欠けている場合における社債の償還、社債の償還請求権等の消滅時効）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券又は特定社債原簿について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債原簿記載事項」、「社債発行会社」及び「無記名社債」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債原簿記載事項」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「無記名特定社債」と、同法第六百八十条中「募集社債」とあるのは「募集特定社債」と、同条第二号中「前条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十四条」と、同法第六百八十一条第一号中「第六百七十六条第三号から第八号まで」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項第六号から第十一号まで」と、同法第六百八十三条及び第六百八十四条第一項中「社債原簿管理人」とあるのは「特定社債原簿管理人」と、同法第六百八十五条第五項中「第七百二十条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百二十条第一項」と、同法第六百九十八条中「第六百七十六条第七号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項第十号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十四　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 131 With regard to airworthiness, noise level, engine emissions and aircrew qualification for the following aircraft, any certification, license, or other act, as well as any qualification certificate or other document thereof made by any foreign state to which the nationality of the said aircraft belongs (including any contracting state in cases where there is an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation between the said foreign state and any contracting state in which the owner of the said aircraft has the address), shall be regarded as aircraft registration certificate under Article 6, airworthiness certification under Article 10 paragraph (1), airworthiness certificate under paragraph (7) of the same article, competence certification under Article 22, competence certificate under Article 23, aviation medical certification under Article 31 paragraph (1), and aviation medical certificate under paragraph (2) of the same article, aviation English proficiency certification under Article 33 paragraph (1), or instrument flight certification under Article 34 paragraph (1), pursuant to the provision of Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, with regard to application of the provisions of Article 11 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 28 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 33 paragraph (1), Article 34 paragraph (1), Article 59, Articles 65 through 67, Article 92 paragraph (1), Article 134 paragraph (1), Article 143, or Article 150. 例文帳に追加

第百三十一条　次に掲げる航空機の耐空性、騒音及び発動機の排出物並びに航空機乗組員の資格について当該航空機が国籍を有する外国（当該外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する締約国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該締約国を含む。）が行つた証明、免許その他の行為及びこれらに係る資格証書その他の文書は、第十一条第一項若しくは第二項、第二十八条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十三条第一項、第三十四条第一項、第五十九条、第六十五条から第六十七条まで、第九十二条第一項、第百三十四条第一項、第百四十三条又は第百五十条の規定の適用については、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、第六条の航空機登録証明書、第十条第一項の規定による耐空証明、同条第七項の耐空証明書、第二十二条の規定による技能証明、第二十三条の技能証明書、第三十一条第一項の規定による航空身体検査証明、同条第二項の航空身体検査証明書、第三十三条第一項の規定による航空英語能力証明又は第三十四条第一項の規定による計器飛行証明とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(24) Where any other domestic corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of the said domestic corporation or a capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) (meaning a single domestic corporation or two or more domestic corporations which have a linkage with the said domestic corporation and the said other domestic corporation through holding the shares, etc.; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) intervene(s) between the said domestic corporation and a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, when the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of stated capital, etc. on the final day of the relevant business year of the said domestic corporation by the ratio of shareholding pertaining to the said domestic corporation of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) exceeds the amount of stated capital, etc. of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) on the same day (for a corporation falling under the category of a corporation subject to corporation tax on consolidated income prescribed in Article 2(xvi) of the Corporation Tax Act, when such amount exceeds the amount of consolidated individual stated capital, etc. prescribed in Article 39-113(20)), the amount of equity capital pertaining to the said domestic corporation shall be the remaining amount after deducting from the said amount of equity capital, either of the smaller amount of the said excess amount and the amount of liabilities owed by the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said domestic corporation on the same day (referred to as the "creditable amount" in the next paragraph). 例文帳に追加

２４　当該内国法人と当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等との間に当該内国法人の株主等である他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人（当該内国法人と当該他の内国法人との間にこれらの者と株式等の保有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の内国法人をいう。次項において同じ。）が介在している場合において、当該内国法人の当該事業年度終了の日における資本金等の額に当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の当該内国法人に係る持株割合を乗じて計算した金額が当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における資本金等の額（法人税法第二条第十六号に規定する連結申告法人に該当する法人にあつては、第三十九条の百十三第二十項に規定する連結個別資本金等の額）を超えるときは、当該内国法人に係る自己資本の額は、当該自己資本の額から、その超える金額と当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債の額とのいずれか少ない金額（次項において「控除対象金額」という。）を控除した残額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム