「報告する」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(142ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第六条　本省課長補佐級以上の職員は、事業者等から、金銭、物品その他の財産上の利益の供与若しくは供応接待（以下「贈与等」という。）を受けたとき又は事業者等と職員の職務との関係に基づいて提供する人的役務に対する報酬として国家公務員倫理規程で定める報酬の支払を受けたとき（当該贈与等を受けた時又は当該報酬の支払を受けた時において本省課長補佐級以上の職員であった場合に限り、かつ、当該贈与等により受けた利益又は当該支払を受けた報酬の価額が一件につき五千円を超える場合に限る。）は、一月から三月まで、四月から六月まで、七月から九月まで及び十月から十二月までの各区分による期間（以下「四半期」という。）ごとに、次に掲げる事項を記載した贈与等報告書を、当該四半期の翌四半期の初日から十四日以内に、各省各庁の長等（各省各庁の長及び特定独立行政法人の長をいう。以下同じ。）又はその委任を受けた者に提出しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 6 (1) When officials at the rank of assistant director or higher at the headquarters receive a give of money, article, or other property benefits, or an entertainment or a treat (hereinafter referred to as "gifts, etc.") from business operators, etc., or when they receive the payment of a reward provided for in the National Public Service Ethics Code as the reward for a personal service offered, based on a relationship between the business operators, etc. and the duties of officials (limited to cases where they were officials at the rank of assistant director or higher at the headquarters when they received the gifts, etc. or the payment of the reward, and limited to cases where a profit received through the gifts, etc. or a value of the reward received in payment exceeds 5,000 yen per case), the officials shall submit a report of gifts, etc., describing the following items to the heads of each ministry and agency, etc. (this refers to the heads of each ministry and agency and the heads of the specified incorporated administrative agencies; the same shall apply hereinafter) or to a person who is delegated by them within 14 days from the first day of the quarter following the current quarter, with quarters being divided as January through March, April through June, July through September and October through December (hereinafter referred to as "quarter").  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十二条の三　原子力事業者等（核原料物質使用者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、製錬施設、加工施設、原子炉施設、使用済燃料貯蔵施設、再処理施設、廃棄物埋設施設若しくは廃棄物管理施設、使用施設等又は核原料物質の使用に係る施設（以下この条において「製錬施設等」という。）に関し人の障害が発生した事故（人の障害が発生するおそれのある事故を含む。）、製錬施設等の故障その他の主務省令（次の各号に掲げる原子力事業者等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める大臣（以下この条において「主務大臣」という。）の発する命令（第五十九条第五項の規定による届出をした場合については、内閣府令）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）で定める事象が生じたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、事象の状況その他の主務省令で定める事項を主務大臣（同項の規定による届出をした場合については、都道府県公安委員会）に報告しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 62-3 If the case, at a refining facility, fabricating facility, reactor facility, spent fuel storage facility, reprocessing facility, waste burial facility or waste management facility, usage facility, etc., or facility pertaining to use of nuclear source material (hereinafter referred to as "refining facilities, etc."), an accident that has caused impairment to a human being (including an accident that may cause impairment to a human being), a malfunction of the refining facilities, etc., or another event specified in the Ordinance of the competent ministry (order issued by the minister prescribed respectively in those items in accordance with the classifications for licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "competent minister") (Cabinet Order in the case that a notification pursuant to the provision of Article 59 (5) was made); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) occurs, the licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. shall, pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the competent ministry, report on the state of the event and any other matters specified in the Ordinance of the competent ministry to the competent minister (or prefectural public safety commission if a notification pursuant to said paragraph was made), without delay.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

四　第十八条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第十九条に規定する指導及び助言、第二十条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令、第二十一条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第二十二条に規定する指導及び助言、第二十三条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令、第二十四条第一項の規定による表示の標準となるべき事項の策定、第二十五条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十七条第二項の規定による報告の徴収及び立入検査に関する事項については、政令で定めるところにより、当該指定省資源化製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業、当該指定再利用促進製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業又は当該指定表示製品の製造、加工若しくは販売の事業（その事業の用に供するために指定表示製品の製造を発注する事業者にあっては、当該事業者の事業）を所管する大臣例文帳に追加

(iv) With respect to the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 18, paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under paragraph 2 of the said Article, the guidance and advice prescribed in Article 19, the recommendation prescribed in Article 20, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 20, paragraph 2, the order under Article 20, paragraph 3, the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 21 paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under Article 21, paragraph 2, the guidance and advice prescribed in Article 22, the recommendation prescribed in Article 23, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 23, paragraph 2, the order under Article 23, paragraph 3, the establishment of the standards for labeling under Article 24, paragraph 1, the recommendation prescribed in Article 25, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 25, paragraph 2, the order under Article 25, paragraph 3, and the collection of reports and on-site inspection under Article 37, paragraph 2: the ministers who have jurisdiction, pursuant to the provision of Cabinet Order, over businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Resources-Saved Products, businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Reuse-Promoted Products, or businesses of manufacturing, processing or selling the respective Specified Labeled Products (in the case of business operators who order the manufacture of Specified Labeled Products to be used for their businesses, such businesses).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a)出願は，出願日又は優先日から18月が経過した後に，庁により又は庁のために作成された調査書類であって，先行技術の記載がある文献を引用したものと共に，IPO公報において公開する。 ただし，次の条件で，出願人はその出願を早期公開するよう申請することができる。 (1)出願人が書面により次に掲げるものを放棄すること (a)上記の18月の期間，及び (b)調査報告の作成。 (2)出願日から6月より早期の公開でないこと，及び (3)早期公開の手数料が全額納付されていること。 (b)出願は，公開のための技術的な準備が終了する前に最終的に拒絶されたか又は取り下げられたか若しくは取り下げられたものとみなされる場合は，公開されない。 (c)公開される出願には，書誌事項，提出された図面，及び要約が含まれる。 (d)庁は，出願の公開に関して日付その他の情報を出願人に通知すると共に，実体審査請求を行わなければならない期間について注意を喚起する。 (e)特許出願の公開の後，利害関係人は，庁に提出された出願書類を閲覧することができる。 (f)長官は，出願を公開することがフィリピン共和国の国家の安全及び利益を害することになると認める場合は，通商産業大臣の承認を得ることを条件として，出願の公開を禁止し又は制限することができる。(IP法第44条)例文帳に追加

(a) The application shall be published in the IPO Gazette together with a search document established by or on behalf of the Office citing any document or documents that reflect prior art, after the expiration of eighteen months(18) from the filing date or priority date. However, the applicant may request for the early publication of his application provided that the: 1. applicant submits a written waiver of the a) abovementioned 18-month period, and b) establishment of a search report; 2. publication shall not be earlier than six (6) months from filing date; and 3. required fee for early publication is paid in full. (b) The application will not be published if it has been finally refused or withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn before the termination of the technical preparation for publication. (c) The application to be published shall contain the bibliographic data, any drawing as filed and the abstract. (d) The Office shall communicate to the applicant the date and other information regarding the publication of the application and draw his attention to the period within which the request for substantive examination must be filed. (e) After publication of a patent application, any interested party may inspect the application documents filed with the Office. (f) The Director General, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Trade and Industry, may prohibit or restrict the publication of an application, if in his opinion, to do so would be prejudicial to the national security and interests of the Republic of the Philippines. (Sec. 44, IP CODE) - 特許庁

四 　第十八条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第十九条に規定する指導及び助言、第二十条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令、第二十一条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第二十二条に規定する指導及び助言、第二十三条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令、第二十四条第一項の規定による表示の標準となるべき事項の策定、第二十五条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十七条第二項の規定による報告の徴収及び立入検査に関する事項については、政令で定めるところにより、当該指定省資源化製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業、当該指定再利用促進製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業又は当該指定表示製品の製造、加工若しくは販売の事業（その事業の用に供するために指定表示製品の製造を発注する事業者にあっては、当該事業者の事業）を所管する大臣例文帳に追加

(iv) With respect to the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 18, paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under paragraph 2 of the said Article, the guidance and advice prescribed in Article 19, the recommendation prescribed in Article 20, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 20, paragraph 2, the order under Article 20, paragraph 3, the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 21 paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under Article 21, paragraph 2, the guidance and advice prescribed in Article 22, the recommendation prescribed in Article 23, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 23, paragraph 2, the order under Article 23, paragraph 3, the establishment of the standards for labeling under Article 24, paragraph 1, the recommendation prescribed in Article 25, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 25, paragraph 2, the order under Article 25, paragraph 3, and the collection of reports and on-site inspection under Article 37, paragraph 2: the ministers who have jurisdiction, pursuant to the provision of Cabinet Order, over businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Resources-Saved Products, businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Reuse-Promoted Products, or businesses of manufacturing, processing or selling the respective Specified Labeled Products (in the case of business operators who order the manufacture of Specified Labeled Products to be used for their businesses, such businesses).  - 経済産業省

第百十五条の二十九　指定居宅サービス事業者、指定地域密着型サービス事業者、指定居宅介護支援事業者、指定介護予防サービス事業者、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者及び指定介護予防支援事業者並びに指定介護老人福祉施設、介護老人保健施設及び指定介護療養型医療施設の開設者（以下「介護サービス事業者」という。）は、指定居宅サービス事業者、指定地域密着型サービス事業者、指定居宅介護支援事業者、指定介護老人福祉施設、指定介護療養型医療施設、指定介護予防サービス事業者、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者若しくは指定介護予防支援事業者の指定又は介護老人保健施設の許可を受け、訪問介護、訪問入浴介護その他の厚生労働省令で定めるサービス（以下「介護サービス」という。）の提供を開始しようとするときその他厚生労働省令で定めるときは、政令で定めるところにより、その提供する介護サービスに係る介護サービス情報（介護サービスの内容及び介護サービスを提供する事業者又は施設の運営状況に関する情報であって、介護サービスを利用し、又は利用しようとする要介護者等が適切かつ円滑に当該介護サービスを利用する機会を確保するために公表されることが必要なものとして厚生労働省令で定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）を、当該介護サービスを提供する事業所又は施設の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事に報告しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 115-29 (1) An Organizer of a Designated In-Home Service Provider, Designated Community-Based Service Provider, Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Provider, Designated Provider of Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care, Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care, Designated Facility Covered by Public Aid Providing Long-Term Care to the Elderly, Long-Term Care Health Facility, and Designated Medical Long-Term Care Sanatorium (herein referred to as "Long-Term Care Service Provider"), when said institution personnel obtain an appointment as service provider of Designated In-Home Service Provider, Designated Community-Based Service Provider, Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Provider, Designated Facility Covered by Public Aid Providing Long-Term Care to the Elderly, Designated Medical Long-Term Care Sanatorium, Designated Provider of Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care, and Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care and an approval of a Long-Term Care Health Facility, and intends to commence offering Home-Visit Long-Term Care, Home-Visit Bathing Long-Term Care and other services as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, or when it is as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, (herein "Long-Term Care Service") pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, shall report long-term care information pertaining to Long-Term Care Service to be offered (which means contents of Long-Term Care Service and information concerning the management status of the provider or facility that offers Long-Term Care Service, those which are as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as necessary to be provided public notice in order for an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that uses or intends to use Long-term care to secure an opportunity to use said Long-Term Care Service appropriately and efficiently, the same shall apply herein) to the prefectural governor that governs the location of the Business Office or a facility which provides said Long-Term Care Service.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

９　解体業者は、他の解体業者、破砕業者又は解体自動車全部利用者に使用済自動車又は解体自動車を引き渡したとき（当該他の解体業者、破砕業者又は解体自動車全部利用者に当該使用済自動車又は解体自動車を引き渡すために行う運搬を他人に委託する場合にあっては、当該使用済自動車又は解体自動車の運搬を受託した者に当該使用済自動車又は解体自動車を引き渡したとき）は、主務省令で定めるところにより、主務省令で定める期間内に、当該使用済自動車又は解体自動車の引渡しを受ける者の氏名又は名称（当該解体自動車が第三十一条第一項の規定により自動車製造業者等が主務大臣の認定を受けて行う全部再資源化の委託に係るものである場合にあっては、その旨並びに当該自動車製造業者等及び当該解体自動車の引渡しを受ける解体自動車全部利用者の氏名又は名称）、当該使用済自動車又は解体自動車の車台番号その他の主務省令で定める事項を情報管理センターに報告しなければならない。例文帳に追加

(9) When End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles are delivered to other Dismantling Operators, Shredding and Sorting Operators or Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles (in case of transport for delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles to other Dismantling Operators, Shredding and Sorting Operators or Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles is commissioned to another entity and when the End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles are delivered to the entity commissioned with transporting the End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles), as specified by ordinance of the competent minister, the Dismantling Operators shall report to the Information Management Entity within a period of time specified by ordinance of the competent minister the name or designation of the person taking delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicle or Dismantled Vehicle (when the Dismantled Vehicle involves the commissioning of Recycling of the whole Vehicle Manufacturers, etc. upon the authorization of the competent minister pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, Paragraph 1, the gist of this as well as the name or designation of Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles taking delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles), the Vehicle number of the End-of-Life Vehicles or Dismantled Vehicles and other matters specified by ordinance of the competent minister.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１１　破砕業者は、他の破砕業者又は解体自動車全部利用者に解体自動車を引き渡したとき（当該他の破砕業者又は解体自動車全部利用者に当該解体自動車を引き渡すために行う運搬を他人に委託する場合にあっては、当該解体自動車の運搬を受託した者に当該解体自動車を引き渡したとき）は、主務省令で定めるところにより、主務省令で定める期間内に、当該解体自動車の引渡しを受ける者の氏名又は名称（当該解体自動車が第三十一条第一項の規定により自動車製造業者等が主務大臣の認定を受けて行う全部再資源化の委託に係るものである場合にあっては、その旨並びに当該自動車製造業者等及び当該解体自動車の引渡しを受ける解体自動車全部利用者の氏名又は名称）、当該解体自動車の車台番号その他の主務省令で定める事項を情報管理センターに報告しなければならない。例文帳に追加

(11) When the Dismantled Vehicles are delivered to other Shredding and Sorting Operators or Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles (in case of transport for delivery of the Dismantled Vehicles is commissioned to another Shredding and Sorting Operator or Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles, when the Dismantled Vehicle is delivered to an entity commissioned to transport the Dismantled Vehicle), as specified by ordinance of the competent minister, the Shredding and Sorting Operator shall report to the Information Management Entity the name or designation of the person taking delivery of the Dismantled Vehicles (in case of the Dismantled Vehicles involve commissioning of Recycling of the whole dismantled vehicles by Vehicle Manufacturers, etc. authorized by the competent ministry pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, Paragraph 1, the gist of this as well as the name or designation of Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles taking delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicles and Dismantled Vehicles), the Vehicle number of the Dismantled Vehicles and other matters specified by ordinance of the competent minister within a period of time specified by ordinance of the competent minister.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八条　前条の場合については、私的独占禁止法第四十条から第四十二条まで（公正取引委員会の権限）、第四十五条、第四十七条から第四十九条まで、第五十二条、第五十五条第一項及び第三項から第五項まで、第五十六条から第五十八条まで、第五十九条第一項、第六十条から第六十四条まで、第六十六条、第六十八条、第六十九条第一項及び第二項、第七十条、第七十条の二第一項から第三項まで、第七十条の三から第七十条の五まで、第七十条の八、第七十条の十二第二項、第七十条の十五から第七十条の十七まで、第七十条の十九から第七十条の二十二まで（事実の報告、事件の調査、排除措置命令、審判、審決その他事件処理の手続）、第七十五条、第七十六条（雑則）、第七十七条から第八十二条まで並びに第八十八条（訴訟）の規定を準用する。例文帳に追加

Article 108 With regard to the case set forth in the preceding Article, the provisions of Articles 40 to 42 (Authority of the Fair Trade Commission), Article 45, Articles 47 to 49, Article 52, Article 55, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) to (5), Articles 56 to 58, Article 59, paragraph (1), Articles 60 to 64, Article 66, Article 68, Article 69, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 70, Article 70-2, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 70-3 to 70-5, Article 70-8, Article 70-12, paragraph (2), Articles 70-15 to 70-17, Articles 70-19 to 70-22 (Reports of Facts, Investigations of Cases, Cease and Desist Order, Hearings, Decisions, and Other Procedures for Disposal of Cases), Article 75, Article 76 (Miscellaneous Provisions), Articles 77 to 82, and Article 88 (Lawsuits) of the Antimonopoly Act shall apply mutatis mutandis.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十二条　内閣総理大臣は、この法律の施行に必要な限度において、投資信託委託会社若しくは投資信託委託会社であつた者（以下この項において「投資信託委託会社等」という。）、当該投資信託委託会社等の設定した投資信託財産に係る受託会社若しくは受託会社であつた者（以下この項において「受託会社等」という。）又は当該受託会社等と当該受託会社等に係る投資信託に係る業務に関して取引する者に対し、当該投資信託委託会社等若しくは当該受託会社等の業務若しくは財産に関し参考となるべき報告若しくは資料の提出を命じ、又は当該職員に当該投資信託委託会社等若しくは当該受託会社等の営業所に立ち入り、当該投資信託委託会社等若しくは当該受託会社等の業務若しくは財産の状況若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件を検査させ、若しくは関係者に質問させることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 22 (1) The Prime Minister may, to the extent necessary for the enforcement of this Act, order the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust or a person who was the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, etc." in this paragraph), a Trustee Company concerned with the Investment Trust Property established by the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, etc., or a person who was such Trustee Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Trustee Company, etc." in this paragraph) or a person who deals with the Trustee Company, etc. in relation to business pertaining to the Investment Trust of the Trustee Company, etc., to submit reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the business or property of the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, etc. or the Trustee Company, etc., or have the relevant officials enter the business office of said Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, etc. or Trustee Company, etc. and inspect the condition of its business, property, its books, documents, or other articles pertaining to said Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, etc. or Trustee Company, etc., and may have them question any persons concerned.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　主務大臣は、第三章第一節（第七条第一項及び第五項、第七条の二第一項、第七条の三第一項、第七条の四第一項及び第三項、第八条第一項、第十三条第一項、第十七条第一項及び第三項並びに第十九条第一項及び第四項を除く。）の規定の施行に必要な限度において、政令で定めるところにより、特定事業者又は特定連鎖化事業者に対し、その設置している工場等（特定連鎖化事業者にあつては、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等を含む。）における業務の状況に関し報告させ、又はその職員に、当該工場等に立ち入り、エネルギーを消費する設備、帳簿、書類その他の物件を検査させることができる。ただし、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等に立ち入る場合においては、あらかじめ、当該加盟者の承諾を得なければならない。例文帳に追加

(3) To the extent necessary for the enforcement of Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 7, paragraphs (1) and (5), Article 7-2, paragraph (1), Article 7-3, paragraph (1), Article 7-4, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 8, paragraph (1), Article 13, paragraph (1), Article 17, paragraphs (1) and (3) and Article 19, paragraphs (1) and (4)), the competent minister may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, cause specified business operators or specified chain business operators to report the status of their business in their factories, etc. (or, for specified chain Business Operators, Factories, etc. including those pertaining to said Chain Business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operators), or cause officials of the competent ministry to enter the factories, etc. and inspect energy-consuming facilities, books, documents and other objects; provided, however, that when the officials enter said factories, etc. pertaining to said chain business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operator, they shall obtain the consent of said franchisee in advance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) 特許又は特許出願に関する情報の第108条に基づく請求は，次の事項について行うことができる。 (a) 登録官が第30条(2)にいう報告又は場合により情報を受領した日 (b) 特許明細書又は特許出願が公開された時 (c) 特許出願が取り下げられ，取り下げられたものとして取り扱われ，放棄されたものとして取り扱われ，拒絶され又は拒絶されたものとして取り扱われた時 (d) 更新手数料が第36条(2)適用上の所定の期間内に納付されなかったか否か (e) 更新手数料が第36条(3)にいう6月の期間内に納付されたか否か (f) 特許が失効した時及び／又は特許回復申請書が提出された時 (g) ある記入が登録簿になされた時又は当該記載を求める申請が行われた時 (h) 登録簿への記入又は公報における公示を伴うような申請，請求又は行為がなされた時(ただし，当該申請，請求又は行為の内容が当該請求書に明記されている場合) (i) 規則93及び規則94に従ってある書類の閲覧ができる時，並びに (j) その他，特許又は特許出願において言及される事項であって特定の場合につき登録官が認めるもの例文帳に追加

(1) A request under section 108 for information relating to any patent or application for a patent may be made as to -- (a) the date that the reports or information, as the case may be, referred to in section 30(2) were received by the Registrar; (b) when the specification of a patent or application for a patent was published; (c) when an application for a patent was withdrawn, was treated as having been withdrawn, was treated as having been abandoned, was refused or was treated as having been refused; (d) whether a renewal fee was not paid within the period prescribed for the purposes of section 36(2); (e) whether a renewal fee was paid within the 6 months referred to in section 36(3); (f) when a patent has ceased to have effect and/or an application for restoration of a patent was filed; (g) when an entry was made in the register or an application was made for the making of such entry; (h) when any application or request was made or action taken involving an entry in the register or advertisement in the journal, if the nature of the application, request or action is specified in the request; (i) when any document may be inspected in accordance with rule 93 or 94; and (j) such other particulars referred to in any patent or application for a patent as the Registrar may in any particular case allow. - 特許庁

第二十七条の二十六　金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

法第百三十二条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明する 書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一組織変更の理由及び内容を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の 写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証 明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓 約する書面 ハ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の 住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しな い旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しない ことを誓約する書面 三組織変更計画を承認した会員総会の議事録 四直前事業年度の決算関係書類等 五現に存する純資産額を証する書面 六法第百二十九条第一項の規定により組織変更時発行株式を発行するときは、次に掲 げる書面 イ組織変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みを証する書面 ロ金銭を出資の目的とするときは、法第百三十一条の三第一項の規定による払込み があったことを証する書面 ハ金銭以外の財産を出資の目的とするときは、次に掲げる書面 （１） 検査役が選任されたときは、検査役の調査報告を記載した書面及びその附 属書類 （２） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第三号に掲 げる場合には、有価証券の市場価格を証する書面 （３） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第四号に掲 げる場合には、同号に規定する証明を記載した書面及びその附属書類 （４） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第五号に掲 げる場合には、同号の金銭債権について記載された会計帳簿 ニ検査役の報告に関する裁判があったときは、その謄本 七法第百二十四条第二項の規定による公告及び催告をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債 権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当 該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該組 織変更をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書類 九主要な株主の氏名、住所又は居所、国籍及び職業（株主が法人その他の団体である 場合には、その商号又は名称、本店又は主たる事務所の所在の場所及び営んでいる事 業の内容）並びに保有する議決権の数を記載した書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 132, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of certifications issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document containing the reasons for and contents of entity conversion; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a foreign national: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) to (k) of the Act; (b) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document containing the history thereof, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (l) of the Act; (c) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after - 80 - Entity Conversion is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, a certificate of a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) or (b) of the Act, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) to (k) of the same item; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of the members which approved the entity conversion plan; (iv) Settlement Related Documents, etc. for the most recent business year; (v) a document proving the amount of the existing net assets; (vi) when issuing Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, paragraph 1 of the Act, the following documents: (a) a document proving an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion; (b) when making money the object of the contribution, a document stating that payment was made pursuant to the provisions of Article 131-3, paragraph 1 of the Act; (c) when making property other than money the object of the contribution, the following documents: 1. when an inspector has been appointed: a document containing the investigation report by said inspector and its annexed documents; 2. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 3 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document proving the market price of the Securities; 3. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 4 of the Company Act - 81 - as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document containing the certification prescribed in the same item and its annexed documents; 4. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 5 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: the account book stating the monetary claim set forth in the same item; (d) when there has been a court judgment on a report by an inspector: a transcript of said judgment; (vii) a document that states that a public notice or a notification under Article 124, paragraph 2 of the Act has been given; and when a creditor has made an objection, documents that state that the liabilities have been repaid or a reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor or reasonable property has been deposited in trust for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said entity conversion is not likely to harm said creditor;(viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) a document that contains major shareholders’ names, addresses or residences, nationalities and occupations (in the case where a shareholder is a juridical person or other organization, its trade name or name, the location of its head office or principal office, and the contents of its business), and the number of voting rights they hold.  - 経済産業省

第九十条　会社法第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで（株主総会に対する報告義務、監査役による取締役の行為の差止め、監査役設置会社と取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表）及び第三百八十八条（費用等の請求）の規定は、特定目的会社の監査役について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百八十四条中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条及び同法第三百八十五条第一項中「法令若しくは定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画若しくは定款」と、同法第三百八十六条第一項中「第三百四十九条第四項、第三百五十三条及び第三百六十四条」とあり、及び同条第二項中「第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同項第一号中「第八百四十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第九十七条第一項」と、同項第二号中「第八百四十九条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第九十七条第二項において準用する第八百四十九条第三項」と、「第八百五十条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第九十七条第二項において準用する第八百五十条第二項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 90 The provisions of Article 384 to Article 386 inclusive (Duty to Report to Shareholders Meeting; Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Company Auditors; Representation of Company in Actions between Company Auditors and Directors), and Article 388 (Requests for Indemnification of Expenses) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the company auditor of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 384 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "laws and regulations or the articles of incorporation" in Article 384 and Article 385(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, or the articles of incorporation," the phrases "Article 349(4), Article 353 and Article 364" in Article 386(1) of that Act and "Article 349(4)" in Article 386(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349(4) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 847(1)" in Article 386(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 97(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the terms "Article 849(3)" and "Article 850(2)" in Article 386(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 849(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 97(2) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 850(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 97(2) of the Asset Securitization Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十五条の三　経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第三種監視化学物質につき、第四条第七項（第四条の二第九項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する試験の試験成績その他当該第三種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第三種監視化学物質が第二条第三項第二号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第三種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第三種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第三種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（継続的に当該化学物質が摂取され、又はこれにさらされる場合における生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 25-3 (1) In the case that the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (ii) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment through environmental pollution if said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2) and any other available knowledge concerning said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十条の十五　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。）（運営）の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3. 我々は、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長を達成するための全ての G20 メンバーによる協調した政策措置へのコミットメントを再確認する。我々の主要な優先的政策措置は、トロントでのコミットメントに沿った、各国の状況によって差別化された中期財健全化計画の実施、適切な金融政策の実現、根底にある経済のファンダメンタルズをよりよく反映した、為替レートの柔軟性の向上及び世界需要を維持し、潜在成長を増大させ、雇用創出を助け、世界的なリバランスに貢献する構造改革を含む。我々は、ソウル・サミット以降の進捗を議論し、多角的協調を強化することにより、過度の不均衡を縮小し経常収支を持続可能な水準で維持することの必要性を強調した。我々は、統合された 2 段階のプロセスを通じて、政策措置を必要とするような継続した大規模な不均衡に焦点を当てることを可能にする一連の項目に合意した。第 1段階に必要な作業を完了するため、我々の目標は、大規模な一次産品生産者を含む、国及び地域の状況を考慮する必要性を認識しつつ、4 月の次回会合までに、これらの項目それぞれを評価する参考となるガイドラインに合意することである。これらの参考となるガイドラインは、目標となるものではないが、以下の項目を評価するのに使用される： (i)公的債務と財政赤字、民間貯蓄率と民間債務、(ii)為替・財政・金融・その他の政策を十分に考慮しつつ、貿易収支、投資所得及び対外移転のネットフローから構成される対外バランス。我々はまた、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長のための枠組みを実施し、既に行ったコミットメントをモニターする 2011 年版の行動計画の策定へ向けた予定表を採択した。ソウルで合意したように、我々は、IMF に対し、相互評価プロセスの一部として、対外的な持続可能性と政策の一貫性確保に向けた進捗についての評価を 10 月の会合において提供することを求める。その際、我々はまた、合意されたガイドラインに基づく継続した大規模な不均衡の原因に関する分析によって情報を得て、行動計画を含む MAP に関する報告のレビューを行う。我々はまた、ソウルでのコミットメントを達成するためになされた進捗の評価をレビューする。例文帳に追加

3. We reaffirm our commitment to coordinated policy action by all G20 members to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Our main priority actions include implementing medium term fiscal consolidation plans differentiated according to national circumstances in line with our Toronto commitment, pursuing appropriate monetary policy, enhancing exchange rate flexibility to better reflect underlying economic fundamentals and structural reforms, to sustain global demand, increase potential growth, foster job creation and contribute to global rebalancing. We discussed progress made since the Seoul Summit and stressed the need to reduce excessive imbalances and maintain current account imbalances at sustainable levels by strengthening multilateral cooperation. We agreed on a set of indicators that will allow us to focus, through an integrated two-step process, on those persistently large imbalances which require policy actions. To complete the work required for the first step, our aim is to agree, by our next meeting in April, on indicative guidelines against which each of these indicators will be assessed, recognizing the need to take into account national or regional circumstances, including large commodity producers. While not targets, these indicative guidelines will be used to assess the following indicators: (i) public debt and fiscal deficits; and private savings rate and private debt (ii) and the external imbalance composed of the trade balance and net investment income flows and transfers, taking due consideration of exchange rate, fiscal, monetary and other policies. We also adopted a timetable for developing the 2011 action plan that will implement our Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and monitor the commitments already made. As agreed in Seoul, we call on the IMF to provide an assessment as part of the Mutual Assessment Process on progress towards external sustainability and consistency of policies at our October meeting. At that time, we will also review a report on the MAP including an action plan informed by the analysis on the root causes of persistently large imbalances based on the agreed guidelines. We will also review an assessment of progress made in meeting commitments made in Seoul.  - 財務省

第百六十五条の二　組合等（民法第六百六十七条第一項に規定する組合契約によつて成立する組合、投資事業有限責任組合契約に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する投資事業有限責任組合（以下この条において「投資事業有限責任組合」という。）若しくは有限責任事業組合契約に関する法律第二条に規定する有限責任事業組合（以下この条において「有限責任事業組合」という。）又はこれらの組合に類似する団体で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）のうち当該組合等の財産に属する株式に係る議決権が上場会社等の総株主等の議決権に占める割合が百分の十以上であるもの（以下この条において「特定組合等」という。）については、当該特定組合等の組合員（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定める者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）が当該特定組合等の財産に関して当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をした場合（当該特定組合等の組合員の全員が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が、当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）には、当該買付け等又は売付け等を執行した組合員（これに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める組合員を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買等に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 165-2 (1) With regard to Partnerships, etc. (meaning partnerships established based on partnership contract provided in Article 667(1) of the Civil Code, Investment LPS provided in Article 2(2) of the Limited Partnership Act for Investment (hereinafter referred to as "Investment LPS" in this Article) or a Limited Liability Partnership provided in Article 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as "Limited Liability Partnership" in this Article), or other similar organizations specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) whose assets includes shares of a Listed Company, etc. which represent voting rights equal to or greater than 10 percent of the Voting Rights held by All of its Shareholders, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Partnerships, etc." in this Article), when one of the partners of Specified Partnerships, etc. (including persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as similar to a partner of Specified Partnerships, etc. under a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. in relation to the assets of the Specified Partnerships, etc. (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which all of the partners of the Specified Partnerships, etc. are the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the partner having executed the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. (including a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as equivalent to such a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on the Sales and Purchase, etc. to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of the Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。例文帳に追加

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly.  - 特許庁

５　会社法第四百五条から第四百九条まで（監査委員会による調査、取締役会への報告義務、監査委員による執行役等の行為の差止め、委員会設置会社と執行役又は取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表等、報酬委員会による報酬の決定の方法等）の規定は、委員会設置会社の委員会又は委員について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百八条第一項中「第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項の規定並びに第三百五十三条及び第三百六十四条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十二において準用する第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同条第三項中「第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十二において準用する第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同項第一号中「第八百四十七条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十七条第一項」と、同項第二号中「第八百四十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十九条第三項」と、「第八百五十条第二項」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百五十条第二項」と、同法第四百九条第二項中「第四百四条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十八第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 405 to 409 inclusive (Investigations by Audit Committees, Duty to Report to Board of Directors, Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers, etc. by Audit Committee Members, Representation of Company in Actions between Company with Committees and Executive Officers or Directors, Methods for Decisions on Remuneration by Compensation Committee) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Committees or committee members of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "provisions of Article 349, paragraph (4) applied mutatis mutandis under Article 420, paragraph (3), and the provisions of Article 353 and Article 364" in Article 408, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provision of Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 420, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-32 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 349, paragraph (4) applied mutatis mutandis under Article 420, paragraph (3)" in Article 408, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 420, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-32 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 847, paragraph (1)" in Article 408, paragraph (3), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 847, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 849, paragraph (3)" and "Article 850, paragraph (2)" in Article 408, paragraph (3), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 849, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 850, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "Article 404, paragraph (3)" in Article 409, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-28, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の三十二　会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

法第百四十四条の十第二項第三号に規定する主務省令で定めるものは、同項の規定によ る公告の日又は同項の規定による催告の日のいずれか早い日における次の各号に定める場 合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定めるものとする。 一最終事業年度に係る貸借対照表又はその要旨につき吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引 所が会社法第四百四十条第一項又は第二項の規定により公告をしている場合次に掲 げるもの イ官報で公告をしているときは、当該官報の日付及び当該公告が掲載されている頁 ロ時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙で公告をしているときは、当該日刊新聞 紙の名称、日付及び当該公告が掲載されている頁 ハ電子公告により公告をしているときは、会社法第九百十一条第三項第二十九号イ に掲げる事項 二最終事業年度に係る貸借対照表につき吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が会社法第 四百四十条第三項に規定する措置を執っている場合会社法第九百十一条第三項第二 十七号に掲げる事項 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が会社法第四百四十条第四項に規定する株式会社 である場合において、当該株式会社が証券取引法第二十四条第一項の規定により最終 事業年度に係る有価証券報告書を提出しているときその旨 四吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所につき最終事業年度がない場合その旨 五吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が清算株式会社である場合その旨 六前各号に掲げる場合以外の場合会社計算規則第六編第二章の規定による最終事業 年度に係る貸借対照表の要旨の内容例文帳に追加

The items specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-10, paragraph 2, item 3 of the Act shall be specified in the following items, according to classification of the cases specified in said items as on the earlier day between the day of the public notice set forth in the same paragraph and the day of the notice set forth in the same paragraph: (i) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger gave public notice with regard to a balance sheet - 103 - pertaining to the final business year or the substance thereof pursuant to the provisions of Article 440, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of the Company Act: what are listed as follows: (a) when the public notice was given in an official gazette, the date of the issuance of said official gazette and the page containing said public notice; (b) when the public notice was given in a daily newspaper which publishes matters on current events, the name and the date of the issuance of said daily newspaper and the page containing said public notice; (c) when the public notice was given by way of Electronic Public Notice, the matters listed in Article 911, paragraph 3, item 29 (a) of the Company Act; (ii) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger took measures prescribed in Article 440, paragraph 3 of the Company Act with regard to a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year: matters listed in Article 911, paragraph 3, item 27 of the Company Act; (iii) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a business corporation prescribed in Article 440, paragraph 4 of the Company Act, and when said business corporation submitted a securities report pursuant to the provisions of Article 24, paragraph 1 of the Securities Exchange Act: a statement to that effect; (iv) in the case where the final business year does not exist for a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: a statement to that effect; (v) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a clearing corporation: a statement to that effect; (vi) in the cases other than those listed in the preceding items: the contents of a - 104 - balance sheet pertaining to the final business year pursuant to the provisions of Part 6, Chapter 2 of the Company Calculation Rules.  - 経済産業省

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十三条　第二条第一項第五号、第七号又は第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの、店頭売買有価証券又は取扱有価証券に該当するものその他の政令で定める有価証券の発行者（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「上場会社等」という。）の役員及び主要株主（自己又は他人（仮設人を含む。）の名義をもつて総株主等の議決権の百分の十以上の議決権（取得又は保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定めるものを除く。）を保有している株主をいう。以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて同じ。）は、自己の計算において当該上場会社等の同項第五号、第七号若しくは第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券」という。）又は当該上場会社等の特定有価証券に係るオプションを表示する同項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「関連有価証券」という。）に係る買付け等（特定有価証券又は関連有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券等」という。）の買付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条、次条及び第百六十五条の二において同じ。）又は売付け等（特定有価証券等の売付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条から第百六十五条の二までにおいて同じ。）をした場合（当該役員又は主要株主が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買その他の取引（以下この項、次条及び第百六十五条の二において「売買等」という。）に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 163 (1) When an Officer or a Major Shareholder (meaning a shareholder who holds voting rights (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of acquisition or holding thereof or other circumstances) exceeding 10 percent of the Voting Rights Held by All the Shareholders, etc. in the name of him/herself or another person (or under a fictitious name); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 166) of the Issuer of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) which are listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or falling under the category of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities or Securities Handled (except those specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Securities designated by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter the Issuer is referred to as a "Listed Company, etc." in this Article to Article 166) makes Purchase, etc. of Securities issued by the Listed Company, etc. which fall under any of the categories of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Specified Securities" in this Article to Article 166) or Securities specified in Article 2(1)(xix) which indicate Options pertaining to Specified Securities of the Listed Company, etc. or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Related Securities" in this paragraph) (the term "Purchase, etc." means purchase of Specified Securities and Related Securities (hereinafter these Securities are collectively referred to as "Specified Securities, etc." in this Article to Article 166) and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, the following Article and Article 165-2) or makes Sales, etc. thereof (meaning sales of Specified Securities, etc. and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 165-2), for his/her own account (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which said Officer or said Major Shareholder is the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), said Officer or said Major Shareholder shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on such sales or purchase or other transaction (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase, etc." in this paragraph, the following Article or Article 165-2) to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of such Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八十五条　会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。例文帳に追加

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion.  - 金融庁

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム