「a- scope」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(55ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 49-5 Regarding the office of a registered foreign lawyer engaged in a foreign law joint enterprise, in cases where the registered foreign lawyer shares the office with an attorney at law or legal professional corporation in that foreign law joint enterprise (limited to principal office only, in the case of the legal professional corporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the scope of the legal services to be practiced under the foreign law joint enterprise is not limited and the title name of the office of the attorney at law or legal professional corporation contains the words "Gaikokuho-Kyodo-Jigyo" (foreign law joint enterprise), his/her office may use the same name as the title of the office, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 45. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条の五　外国法共同事業を営む外国法事務弁護士の事務所については、当該外国法事務弁護士が当該外国法共同事業に係る弁護士又は弁護士法人と事務所（弁護士法人にあつては、その主たる事務所に限る。以下この条において同じ。）を共にし、かつ、当該外国法共同事業において行う法律事務の範囲に制限を設けていない場合であつて、その弁護士又は弁護士法人の事務所の名称中に「外国法共同事業」の文字があるときは、第四十五条第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、これと同一の名称を使用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In view of the above, companies choosing to use IFRS should be required to also disclose Japanese GAAP financial information corresponding to the current and previous year, only in the first year of IFRS application.Considering that a certain level of continuity should be ensured for the information disclosed and that the cost and burden of parallel disclosure should be eased, it would be appropriate to consider a simpler and more effective measure for information disclosure.The measure could include replacing continuous parallel disclosure in subsequent years by adding explanatory notes comparing significant differences between IFRS and the Japanese GAAP when applicable, and excluding the parallel disclosure (for the current year under the Japanese GAAP) in the first year of IFRS introduction from the scope subject to external audits. 例文帳に追加

以上を踏まえると、ＩＦＲＳ適用企業の財務諸表を理解する上で必要となる一定の連続性を確保する観点と作成者の並行開示に係る負担・コストの観点の双方に配慮し、並行開示は、導入初年度における開示(前年度及び当年度財務諸表各１年分)に限定し、継続的な並行開示に代えて、ＩＦＲＳと我が国会計基準の重要な差異の注記にとどめることや、導入初年度の並行開示(旧基準に基づく当年度分)については、監査人の監査の対象としないことなど、簡素で有効な情報提供の方策を検討することが適当である。 - 金融庁

(3) When a Member, etc. receives payment with regard to a special deposit for default pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if the amount is still insufficient, the Member, etc. shall have the right to receive payment in preference over other creditors with regard to the special deposit for default for said Commodity Market deposited by other Members, etc., in accordance with the amount of such special deposit for default; provided, however, that this shall be limited within the scope of an amount that remains after deducting from such shortfall an amount obtained by multiplying such shortfall by the percentage of the amount of the special security amount for said Commodity Market deposited by the Member, etc. to the total amount of the special deposit for default for said Commodity Market deposited by Members, etc. other than the Member, etc. who is the counterparty to the transactions prescribed in the same paragraph. 例文帳に追加

３ 会員等は、前項の規定により同項の特別担保金について弁済を受け、なお不足があるときは、他の会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金について、その特別担保金の額に応じて、他の債権者に先立つて弁済を受ける権利を有する。ただし、その不足する額に、その会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金の額の同項に規定する取引の相手方たる会員等以外の会員等の当該商品市場についての特別担保金の総額に対する割合を乗じて得た額をその不足する額から控除した残額の範囲内に限る。 - 経済産業省

2 For inventions among those claimed in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph 1, for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based(…), the said patent application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29, the main clause of Article 29b is, Articles 30(1) and (2), 39(1) to (4), 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1), 104(…) and 126(7)(…),…. 例文帳に追加

2前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願に係る発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（……）についての第二十九条、第二十九条の二本文、第三十条第一項及び第二項、第三十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十九条第二項第二号、第七十二条、第七十九条、第八十一条、第八十二条第一項、第百四条（……）並びに第百二十六条第七項（……）……の規定の適用については、当該特許出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。3～4（略） - 特許庁

(3) For the time being, the national government may, within the scope of the budget, provide loans without interest to a prefectural government or a Designated City, etc. with regard to the expenses spent for such new construction, repair, renovation, expansion or improvement (excluding those for which the national government provides subsidies for expenses pursuant to the provision of Article 56-2 paragraph (3)) of institutions that is intended for the services for providing the aid for children or pursuing sound upbringing of children and that falls under Article 2 paragraph (1) item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures concerning Infrastructure Development. If such new construction, repair, renovation, expansion or improvement is implemented by said prefectural government or Designated City, etc., the loans from the national government shall be provided for part of funds to be appropriated to the expenses spent therefor by said prefectural government or Designated City, etc., and if implemented by a municipal government or a social welfare corporation other than Designated Cities, etc., the loans from the national government shall be provided for part of funds to be appropriated to the expenses subsidized therefor by said prefectural government or Designated City, etc. 例文帳に追加

３　国は、当分の間、都道府県又は指定都市等に対し、児童の保護を行う事業又は児童の健全な育成を図る事業を目的とする施設の新設、修理、改造、拡張又は整備（第五十六条の二第三項の規定により国がその費用について補助するものを除く。）で社会資本整備特別措置法第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、当該都道府県又は指定都市等が自ら行う場合にあつてはその要する費用に充てる資金の一部を、指定都市等以外の市町村又は社会福祉法人が行う場合にあつてはその者に対し当該都道府県又は指定都市等が補助する費用に充てる資金の一部を、予算の範囲内において、無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) The Office shall revoke a patent if during the proceedings started on third party request or ex officio it is proved that (a) requirements for granting it pursuant to Sections 5 to 9 have not been met, (b) the invention is not disclosed and described in the patent so clearly and so fully so that it can be carried out by a person skilled in the art, (c) the subject-matter of the patent extends the content of the application as filed. This shall also apply in case of the subject-matter of the patent granted on the basis of a divisional application extending over the contents of the application as filed, (d) the scope of protection following from the patent was extended, (e) the owner does not have the right to the patent pursuant to Section 10(1) and (3), Section 11(1) or Section 12(1). (f) the granting conditions valid in time of granting were not fulfilled.例文帳に追加

(1) 第三者の請求又は職権による手続において次の事由の何れかが証明された場合は，庁は，特許を取り消す。(a) 第5条から第9条までの特許付与の要件が満たされていないこと (b) 発明が，特許において，当該技術の熟練者によって実施可能な程度に明確かつ完全に開示及び説明されていないこと (c) 特許の対象が出願の内容を超えていること。これは，分割出願に基づいて付与された特許の対象が分割出願の内容を超える場合にも適用される。 (d) 特許による保護範囲が拡大されていること (e) 所有者が，第10条(1)及び(3)，第11条(1)又は第12条(1)に基づいて特許を受ける権原を有する者とは認められないこと (f) 特許付与の時点において有効であった規則にいう特許付与の要件が満たされていなかったこと - 特許庁

Article 38-4 (1) If, at a workplace where a committee (limited to committees comprising the employer and representatives of workers at the workplace) is established with the aim of examining and deliberating on wages, working hours and other matters concerning working conditions at the workplace concerned and of stating its opinions regarding the said matters to the proprietor of the enterprise, the said committee adopts a resolution by a majority of four fifths or more of its members regarding the following items and the employer notifies the relevant government agency of the said resolution in accordance with the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and if the employer has a worker, who comes under the scope of the workers stipulated in item (ii), perform the work stipulated in item (i) at the workplace concerned, the said worker shall be deemed to have worked the hours stipulated in item (iii) as prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 例文帳に追加

第三十八条の四　賃金、労働時間その他の当該事業場における労働条件に関する事項を調査審議し、事業主に対し当該事項について意見を述べることを目的とする委員会（使用者及び当該事業場の労働者を代表する者を構成員とするものに限る。）が設置された事業場において、当該委員会がその委員の五分の四以上の多数による議決により次に掲げる事項に関する決議をし、かつ、使用者が、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより当該決議を行政官庁に届け出た場合において、第二号に掲げる労働者の範囲に属する労働者を当該事業場における第一号に掲げる業務に就かせたときは、当該労働者は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、第三号に掲げる時間労働したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The inventor, against whom the right to the patent pursuant to Subsection (3) has been exercised, shall be entitled to an appropriate remuneration from the employer. The technical and economic importance of the invention and the benefit achieved through its exploitation or other application shall be decisive for determining the amount of remuneration, while the material share of the employer in creating the invention, as well as the scope and contents of work tasks of the inventor shall be taken into consideration. If the remuneration agreed or determined by the court is clearly disproportionate to the benefit achieved by a later exploitation or other application of the invention, the inventor shall be entitled to an additional settlement.例文帳に追加

(5) (3)に従い特許を受ける権利を行使された発明者は，使用者から適正な報酬を受ける権原を有する。発明の報酬の額を決定する上で，発明の技術的及び経済的重要性並びに発明の実施その他の利用から得られる利益が決め手となり，一方，発明の創造における使用者の物質的寄与並びに発明者の仕事の範囲及び内容も考慮に入れられる。報酬が，発明の後日の実施その他の利用により得られた利益に対応しないことが明らかな場合は，発明者は，追加的報酬を受ける権利を有する。 - 特許庁

(2) Except in cases where the provision of the preceding paragraph applies, the provision of Article 50-2 (8) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Customer Transactions pertaining to business of a Financial Instruments Business Operator in cases where said Financial Instruments Business Operator who obtained authorization under Article 30(1) has abolished its business pertaining to said authorization, or had said authorization rescinded under the provisions of Article 52(1). In this case, said Financial Instruments Business Operator shall be deemed to have obtained authorization under Article 30(1) within the scope of the purpose to complete Customer Transactions pertaining to said business. 例文帳に追加

２　第五十条の二第八項の規定は、前項の規定の適用がある場合を除き、第三十条第一項の認可を受けた金融商品取引業者が、当該認可に係る業務を廃止した場合又は第五十二条第一項の規定により当該認可を取り消された場合における当該金融商品取引業者の当該業務に係る顧客取引について準用する。この場合において、当該金融商品取引業者は、当該業務に係る顧客取引を結了する目的の範囲内において、なお第三十条第一項の認可を受けているものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 188-6 (1) The scope of the expenses to be compensated as prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 188-2 or Article 188-4 shall be limited to the travel expenses, daily allowance and accommodation charges which were necessary for the accused or the person who was the accused or his/her counsel to appear for trial preparation or for the trial date and remuneration for the person who was the counsel, and, with regard to the amount, the provisions in the Act on Criminal Court Costs pertaining to a witness shall apply mutatis mutandis to the accused or the person who was the accused, and the provisions pertaining to the counsel shall apply mutatis mutandis to the person who was the counsel. 例文帳に追加

第百八十八条の六　第百八十八条の二第一項又は第百八十八条の四の規定により補償される費用の範囲は、被告人若しくは被告人であつた者又はそれらの者の弁護人であつた者が公判準備及び公判期日に出頭するに要した旅費、日当及び宿泊料並びに弁護人であつた者に対する報酬に限るものとし、その額に関しては、刑事訴訟費用に関する法律の規定中、被告人又は被告人であつた者については証人、弁護人であつた者については弁護人に関する規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In cases where an application set forth in the preceding paragraph has been made, the Prime Minister may approve the continuation of the Investment Trust Contract by attaching conditions on the duration of the Investment Trust Contract or any other matters on or after the day on which he/she has rescinded the registration of a Settlor Company of an Investment Trust under Article 29 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (1) or Article 53, paragraph (3) of that Act. In this case, the person who was in the position of said Settlor Company of an Investment Trust shall be deemed not to have been subject to the rescission of its registration under Article 29 within the scope of the execution of its business. 例文帳に追加

４　内閣総理大臣は、前項の申請があつた場合においては、金融商品取引法第五十二条第一項又は第五十三条第三項の規定により当該投資信託委託会社の同法第二十九条の登録を取り消した日以後、当該投資信託契約の存続期間その他につき条件を付して、当該投資信託契約を存続させることを承認することができる。この場合において、当該投資信託委託会社であつた者は、その業務の執行の範囲内において、同条の登録を取り消されていないものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(v) the matters stated in the translations of the description and the descriptive text in the drawing(s) as provided in Article 184-4(1); the matters stated in the translation of the scope of claim(s) (in the case where a translation has been submitted under paragraph (2) of the said Article, the said translation); the matters stated in the translation under paragraph (4) of the said Article; the contents of the drawing(s) (excluding the descriptive text in the drawing(s)); and the matters stated in the translation of the abstract (excluding matters, recognized by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, to be liable to contravene public order or morality by stating those in the patent gazette); 例文帳に追加

五　第百八十四条の四第一項に規定する明細書及び図面の中の説明の翻訳文に記載した事項、同項に規定する請求の範囲の翻訳文（同条第二項に規定する翻訳文が提出された場合にあつては、当該翻訳文）及び同条第四項に規定する翻訳文に記載した事項、図面（図面の中の説明を除く。）の内容並びに要約の翻訳文に記載した事項（特許公報に掲載することが公の秩序又は善良の風俗を害するおそれがあると特許庁長官が認めるものを除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 38 When there is a Suspension of Use Request, if the head of an Administrative Organ finds grounds for the said Suspension of Use Request, he or she shall implement Suspension of Use of the Retained Personal Information pertaining to the Suspension of Use Request within the scope necessary for ensuring the proper handling of Personal Information in the Administrative Organ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where it is found that the Suspension of Use of the Retained Personal Information is likely to hinder the proper execution of the affairs pertaining to the Purpose of Use of the Retained Personal Information due to the nature of the said affairs. 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　行政機関の長は、利用停止請求があった場合において、当該利用停止請求に理由があると認めるときは、当該行政機関における個人情報の適正な取扱いを確保するために必要な限度で、当該利用停止請求に係る保有個人情報の利用停止をしなければならない。ただし、当該保有個人情報の利用停止をすることにより、当該保有個人情報の利用目的に係る事務の性質上、当該事務の適正な遂行に著しい支障を及ぼすおそれがあると認められるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加

第三条の二　実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a mistake exists in the register of patents, in any patent or application for patent or any document filed in pursuance of such an application, or in proceedings in connection with any patent, by reason of an error or an omission on the part of the patentee or of the applicant for the patent or of any other person concerned, a correction may be made in accordance with the provisions of this section upon a request in writing by any person interested and payment of the prescribed fee. If it appears to the Commissioner that the correction would materially alter the meaning or scope of the document to which the request relates and ought not to be made without notice to persons likely to be affected thereby, he shall require notice of the nature of the proposed correction to be advertised in the prescribed manner.例文帳に追加

(3) 特許登録簿，特許証，又は特許出願若しくは特許出願手続において提出され若しくは特許に関連する手続中に提出された書類において，特許権者，特許出願人又はその他の関係人の側の錯誤又は怠慢により誤記が存在するときは，利害関係人から書面による請求がされ，かつ，所定の手数料が納付されたときは，本条の規定に従って訂正をすることができる。訂正がその請求に係る書類の意味又は範囲を実質的に変更することになる筈であり，これにより影響を受ける虞のある者に通知することなしにはその訂正をするべきでないと局長が認めるときは，局長は，訂正案件の性質について所定の方法で公告するよう命じなければならない。 - 特許庁

(8) With regard to the organizational meeting, the provisions of Article 11 shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to an action for declaratory judgment on the nonexistence or invalidity of or an action for rescission of a resolution of the organizational meeting, Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, and Article 846 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Invalidity of or Action for Rescission of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting) (excluding the portions pertaining to company auditors in the case of a cooperative prescribed in Article 36-3, paragraph (4) of this Act whose articles of association provide that the scope of audits conducted by auditors shall be limited to those concerning accounting [hereinafter referred to as "cooperative limiting the audit authority"]) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. 例文帳に追加

８　創立総会については、第十一条の規定を、創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについては、会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条並びに第八百四十六条（株主総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴え）の規定（第三十六条の三第四項に規定する組合であつて、その監事の監査の範囲を会計に関するものに限定する旨を定款で定めた組合（以下「監査権限限定組合」という。）にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 180 (1) Where a corporation specified in each of the following items that satisfies the requirements specified by a Cabinet Order, and which receives payment of domestic source income specified in the relevant item has obtained, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, a certificate issued by the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment concerning corporation tax (hereinafter referred to as the "competent district director" in this Article), certifying that the corporation which receives the said payment satisfies the said requirements and that the domestic source income to be received falls under the category of domestic source income specified in the relevant item, and the corporation has presented the certificate to the person who pays the domestic source income, the provisions of Article 7(1)(v) (Scope of Taxable Income of Foreign Corporations) and the preceding two Articles shall not apply to the said domestic source income to be received while the certificate remains valid: 例文帳に追加

第百八十条　第七条第一項第五号（外国法人の課税所得の範囲）及び前二条の規定は、次の各号に掲げる法人で政令で定める要件を備えているもののうち当該各号に定める国内源泉所得の支払を受けるものが、政令で定めるところにより、当該支払を受けるものが当該要件を備えていること及びその支払を受けることとなる国内源泉所得が当該各号に定める国内源泉所得に該当することにつきその法人税の納税地の所轄税務署長（以下この条において「所轄税務署長」という。）の証明書の交付を受け、その証明書を当該国内源泉所得の支払をする者に提示した場合には、その証明書が効力を有している間に支払を受ける当該国内源泉所得については、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8 (1) With respect to a variety bred by an employee, an executive officer of a juridical person, or a national or local governmental officer (hereinafter referred to as "employee etc."), any contractual provision, service regulation or any other stipulation providing in advance that the employer, juridical person, or national or local government (hereinafter referred to as "employer etc.") shall file an application for variety registration, or have the title of applicant transferred, or have, if the employee etc. obtain a variety registration, the breeder's right transferred or an exclusive exploitation right granted shall be null and void. However, this shall not apply where the breeding of the variety, by its nature, falls within the scope of the business of the employer etc. and, moreover, the acts which have lead to the said breeding fall within the duties of the employee etc. (hereinafter referred to as "employee-bred variety as part of his/her duties"). 例文帳に追加

第八条　従業者、法人の業務を執行する役員又は国若しくは地方公共団体の公務員（以下「従業者等」という。）が育成をした品種については、その育成がその性質上使用者、法人又は国若しくは地方公共団体（以下「使用者等」という。）の業務の範囲に属し、かつ、その育成をするに至った行為が従業者等の職務に属する品種（以下「職務育成品種」という。）である場合を除き、あらかじめ使用者等が品種登録出願をすること、従業者等がした品種登録出願の出願者の名義を使用者等に変更すること又は従業者等が品種登録を受けた場合には使用者等に育成者権を承継させ若しくは使用者等のため専用利用権を設定することを定めた契約、勤務規則その他の定めの条項は、無効とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the priority system based on a patent application prescribed by the provision of Patent Act Article 41 (so-called, “internal priority”. Hereinafter referred to as “priority” in this chapter), in cases where the patent application claiming priority is filed as a comprehensive invention (hereinafter referred to as “later application”) containing the invention of its own patent application or application for utility model registration that has been already filed (hereinafter referred to as “earlier application”), for inventions stated in the description, scope of claims or drawings (hereinafter referred to as “description etc.”) of the earlier application among the later application, prioritized treatment to deem the later application to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29 etc. 例文帳に追加

特許法第 41条に規定される特許出願等に基づく優先権（いわゆる「国内優先権」。以下、本章において「優先権」ともいう。）制度とは、すでに出願した自己の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願（以下「先の出願」という。）の発明を含めて包括的な発明として優先権を主張して特許出願（以下「後の出願」という。）をする場合には、その包括的な特許出願に係る発明のうち、先の出願の出願当初の明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面（以下「明細書等」という。）に記載されている発明について、新規性、進歩性等の判断に関し出願の時を先の出願の時とするという優先的な取扱いを認めるものである。 - 特許庁

However, if claims can be amended freely beyond such limitation after reasons for refusal are notified, there may be amendments that require prior art search and examination to be conducted again since the result of prior art search and examination conduced until then cannot be effectively used in the examination after the notice of reasons for refusal is given. If such an amendment is made, it will not only obstruct the prompt and precise granting of rights but also prevent ensuring of sufficient fairness in the handling of applications. Therefore, regarding amendments to claims after a notice of reasons for refusal has been given, the same limitation was set as the limitation on the scope of inventions that may be the subject of a patent application by single request. 例文帳に追加

しかしながら、拒絶理由を通知した後に、特許請求の範囲についてこのような制限を超える自由な補正が認められると、拒絶理由通知後の審査において、それまでに行った先行技術調査・審査の結果を有効に活用することができず、先行技術調査・審査のやり直しとなるような補正がされる場合がある。このような補正がされると、迅速・的確な権利付与に支障が生じるばかりでなく、出願間の取扱いの公平性も十分に確保されないこととなるため、拒絶理由通知後の特許請求の範囲についての補正に関しても、一の願書で特許出願することができる発明の範囲についての制限と同様の制限を設けることとした。 - 特許庁

(the business year that includes the day on which an ordinary corporation that falls within the scope of foreign corporations listed in Article 141(i) to (iii) (Tax Base of Corporation Tax in the case of Foreign Corporations) has fallen under any of the categories of foreign corporations listed in these items, the business year that includes the day on which an ordinary corporation which falls under the category of foreign corporation listed in Article 141(iv) has commenced, in Japan, a business prescribed in Article 138(ii) (Consideration for Business of Providing Personal Services) (hereinafter referred to as a 例文帳に追加

（第百四十一条第一号から第三号まで（外国法人に係る法人税の課税標準）に掲げる外国法人に該当する普通法人のこれらの号に掲げる外国法人のいずれかに該当することとなつた日の属する事業年度、同条第四号に掲げる外国法人に該当する普通法人の第百三十八条第二号（人的役務の提供事業に係る対価）に規定する事業（以下「人的役務提供事業」という。）を国内において開始した日の属する事業年度又は当該普通法人の第百四十一条第四号に掲げる国内源泉所得で第百三十八条第二号に掲げる対価以外のものを有することとなつた日の属する事業年度 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Features of safeguard-related domestic laws and regulations in the two countries were (1) clear definition of the scope of the "adjustment" sought during safeguard imposition; (2) a single institution simultaneously addressing (a) determination of and recommendations on the pros and cons of instituting safeguard measures and the content of these and (b) considerations and recommendations on supplementary or alternative adjustment assistance to be provided to realize structural adjustment (in other words, the content of the "operation" which needs to be undertaken is considered together with the need for an "anesthetic"); and (3) the party ultimately responsible for the final decision on the pros and cons of launching safeguard measures and the content of these also has the final decision on the need for adjustment assistance measures and the content of these.例文帳に追加

米国及び韓国におけるセーフガード措置関連の国内法令の特徴は、①セーフガード措置発動の際に目指される「調整」という言葉の範囲が明確に定義されていること、②セーフガード措置発動の是非や措置内容に関する検討・勧告と、構造調整を実現するための補完的・代替的な調整支援策の内容に関する検討・勧告が、同一の主体により、同一時期に行われること（つまり実施すべき手術の内容と、麻酔投与の必要性が同時に検討されていること）、③セーフガード措置発動の是非や措置内容について最終決定を下す責任者が、調整支援策の必要性や内容についての最終決定を下している、という３点である。 - 経済産業省

(2) In the case where the prescriptions in the provisos of the preceding paragraph apply, the amounts listed in the following items of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall be the amounts set forth in the following items: (i) the Amount of Contributions at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the amount of the contributions immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger of the Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger; (b) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Incorporation-Type Merger contract (limited to an amount of zero or greater) within the scope of the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to those cases pertaining to the contributions of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger that are delivered to Members of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger other than the Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item); (ii) the Amount of Membership Fees at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the amount of membership fees immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger of the Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger; (b) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Incorporation-Type Merger contract (limited to an amount of zero or greater) within the scope of the amount calculated by deducting the amount set forth in (b) of the preceding item from the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger; (iii) the Amount of Capital Surplus at Establishment: the amount calculated by deducting the amount set forth in (c) below, from the sum total of the amounts set forth in (a) and (b): (a) the amount of the Capital Surplus immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger; (b) the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger; (c) the sum total of the amounts set forth in item 1, (b) and in the preceding item, (b); (iv) the Amount of Statutory Capital at Establishment: the amount of statutory capital immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger; (v) the Amount of Accumulated Profit at Establishment: the amount of accumulated profit immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger. 例文帳に追加

２ 前項ただし書に規定する場合には、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる 額は、当該各号に定める額とする。 一設立時出資金額次に掲げる額の合計額 イ新設合併取得会員商品取引所の新設合併の直前の出資金の額 ロ新設合併対価時価（新設合併設立会員商品取引所の出資に係るものであって、新 設合併取得会員商品取引所以外の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に交付するも のに限る。以下この項において同じ。）の範囲内で、新設合併消滅会員商品取引所 が新設合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に限る。）二設立時加入金額次に掲げる額の合計額 イ新設合併取得会員商品取引所の新設合併の直前の加入金の額 ロ新設合併対価時価から前号ロに掲げる額を減じて得た額の範囲内で、新設合併消 滅会員商品取引所が新設合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に限る。） 三設立時資本剰余金額イ及びロに掲げる額の合計額からハに掲げる額を減じて得た 額 イ新設合併取得会員商品取引所の新設合併の直前の資本剰余金の額 ロ新設合併対価時価 ハ第一号ロ及び前号ロに掲げる額の合計額 四設立時法定準備金額新設合併取得会員商品取引所の新設合併の直前の法定準備金 の額 五設立時利益剰余金額新設合併取得会員商品取引所の新設合併の直前の利益剰余金 の額 - 経済産業省

(2) Assessing the scope of exclusive rights resulting from the patent in the case of an infringement of the patent, the equivalents of the features, which are elements of the subject-matter to be analysed, referred to in the claims shall be also observed. The element of the subject-matter to be analysed shall be considered as equivalent to the feature referred to in the claims if at the time of infringement of the patent it fulfils the same function in the same way and produces the same result as the feature referred to in the claims and if it is evident to a skilled person in the art that it is possible to obtain the same result by using the equivalent element of the subject-matter to be analysed.例文帳に追加

(2) 特許侵害の場合に特許から生じる排他権の範囲を評価するに当たっては，分析されるべき内容の要素としてクレーム中で言及されている特徴の同等物も考慮するものとする。分析されるべき内容の要素は，特許侵害時に，当該要素が，クレーム中で言及されている特徴と同一の機能を同一の態様で果たし，同一の結果を生じており，かつ，分析されるべき内容の同等の要素を用いて同一の結果を得ることが可能であることが当該技術の熟練者に明白である場合は，クレーム中で言及されている特徴と同等であるとみなす。 - 特許庁

If whether or not all of the inventions that were examined in terms of the requirements for patentability, such as novelty and inventive step, in the claims before the amendment and all of the inventions in the claims after the amendment have the same or corresponding special technical feature could be determined based on the prior art which have not been presented to the applicant before the amendment, in addition to description, etc., common general technical knowledge as of the filing and the prior art cited in a notice of reasons for refusal before the amendment, the applicant who has received the notice of reasons for refusal would not be able to sufficiently predict the scope of acceptable amendment which does not change any special technical features of the inventions when he/she considers an amendment to make. 例文帳に追加

補正前の特許請求の範囲の新規性･進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われたすべての発明及び補正後の特許請求の範囲のすべての発明が同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を有するかどうかを、明細書等の記載、出願時の技術常識及び補正前の拒絶理由通知で引用された先行技術に加えて、補正前に出願人に提示していなかった先行技術に基づいて判断できることとすると、拒絶理由通知を受けた出願人が補正を検討する際に、発明の特別な技術的特徴を変更する補正とならない範囲について十分に予測することができなくなる。 - 特許庁

Business year that includes the day on which an ordinary corporation that falls within the scope of foreign corporations listed in Article 141(i) to (iii) (Tax Base of Corporation Tax in the case of Foreign Corporations) has fallen under any of the categories of foreign corporations listed in these items, the business year that includes the day on which an ordinary corporation which falls under the category of foreign corporation listed in Article 141(iv) has commenced a personal services business in Japan, or the business year that includes the day on which such ordinary corporation has earned domestic source income listed in Article 141(iv) other than the consideration listed in Article 138(ii) (Consideration for the Business of Providing Personal Services) 例文帳に追加

第百四十一条第一号から第三号まで（外国法人に係る法人税の課税標準）に掲げる外国法人に該当する普通法人のこれらの号に掲げる外国法人のいずれかに該当することとなつた日の属する事業年度又は同条第四号に掲げる外国法人に該当する普通法人の人的役務提供事業を国内において開始した日の属する事業年度若しくは当該普通法人の同号に掲げる国内源泉所得で第百三十八条第二号（人的役務の提供事業に係る対価）に掲げる対価以外のものを有することとなつた日の属する事業年度 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 6 With regard to the transactions or acts pertaining to an application or a notification which have actually been made pursuant to the provision of Article 10, Article 11, paragraph (1), Article 12, paragraph (1), Article 13, paragraph (1), Article 13-2 or Article 13-3 of the Old Foreign Capital Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, the Cabinet Order on Special Provisions of Standard for Approval, etc. pursuant to the Provision of the Act on Foreign Capital (hereinafter referred to as "Old Cabinet Order on Special Provisions") and Cabinet Order on Specifying the Scope of Affairs Bank of Japan is to Handle Pursuant to the Act on Foreign Capital (hereinafter referred to as "Old Cabinet Order on Delegation") prior to their repeal by this Cabinet Order shall still remain in force even after the enforcement of this Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六条　この政令の施行の際現に旧外資法第十条、第十一条第一項、第十二条第一項、第十三条第一項、第十三条の二又は第十三条の三の規定によりされている申請又は届出に係る取引又は行為については、この政令による廃止前の外資に関する法律の規定に基く認可の基準の特例等に関する政令（以下「旧特例政令」という。）及び外資に関する法律の規定により日本銀行に取り扱わせる事務の範囲を定める政令（以下「旧委任政令」という。）は、この政令の施行後においても、なお効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to a building or another structure as set forth in paragraph (1) which falls within the scope of a property under fire prevention measures as set forth in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), notwithstanding the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (2), as applied directly or applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), only where both an inspection directly under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and an inspection under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1) (in the case of a building or another structure which is subject to management under separate titles, both an inspection directly under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and an inspection under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), covering the whole of the building or other structure (excluding the part for which a certification is granted under the provision of Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1) as applied directly or applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1))) are conducted, and as a result of those inspections, the matters subject to inspection pertaining to the building or other structure are judged by a qualified inspector of a property under fire prevention measures and a qualified inspector for disaster prevention management to conform to the inspection standards for both inspections, a label stating the date of inspection and other matters specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications may be affixed to said building or other structure, as provided for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の建築物その他の工作物のうち第八条の二の二第一項の防火対象物であるものにあつては、同条第二項及び第一項において準用する同条第二項の規定にかかわらず、同条第一項の規定による点検と併せて第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による点検（その管理について権原が分かれている建築物その他の工作物にあつては、当該建築物その他の工作物全体（第八条の二の三第一項又は第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による認定を受けた部分を除く。）についての第八条の二の二第一項の規定による点検と併せて第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による点検）が行われ、その結果、防火対象物点検資格者及び防災管理点検資格者により点検対象事項がいずれの点検基準にも適合していると認められた場合に限り、総務省令で定めるところにより、点検を行つた日その他総務省令で定める事項を記載した表示を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 73 (1) The owner of a Vehicle (except for those prescribed in Paragraph 3; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and the next paragraph) shall deposit with the Deposit Management Entity as a Recycling, etc. a deposit in an amount equivalent to the Recycling, etc. Fee for said Vehicle (the fee indicated in the middle column of the following Table made public pursuant to the provisions of Article 34, Paragraph 1 by the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc., which has to collect the Parts Specified for Recycling, etc. relating to said Vehicle pursuant to the classification of the Vehicle indicated in the upper column of the same Table (when there is no Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. or when the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. cannot be notified (referred to in each of the following items as "When There is No Manufacturer"; the same shall apply hereinafter); the fee indicated in the lower column made public by the Designated Recycling Organization as prescribed in Article 108, Paragraph 1); the same shall apply in Paragraph 3) by the time said Vehicle has been first registered in the Vehicle Registration File (referred to as registration in Vehicle Registration File pursuant to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 4; the same shall apply hereinafter), for a light Vehicle prescribed in Article 3 of the same Act (except for Vehicles outside the scope of the inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act) when the initial vehicle inspection certificate for said Vehicle (referred to as a delivery of vehicle inspection certificates provided in Article 60, Paragraph 1 or Article 71, Paragraph 4 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) has been delivered, for light Vehicles which are outside the scope of inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act, when the Vehicle number of the Vehicle has been initially designated (indicated as a designation of Vehicle number as prescribed in Article 97-3, Paragraph 1 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter in Paragraph 3). 例文帳に追加

第七十三条　自動車（第三項に規定するものを除く。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の所有者は、当該自動車が最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録（道路運送車両法第四条の規定による自動車登録ファイルへの登録をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき（同法第三条に規定する軽自動車（同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車を除く。）にあっては当該自動車が最初の自動車検査証の交付（同法第六十条第一項又は第七十一条第四項の規定による自動車検査証の交付をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき、同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車にあっては当該自動車が最初の車両番号の指定（同法第九十七条の三第一項の規定による車両番号の指定をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき）までに、当該自動車に係る再資源化等料金（次の表の上欄に掲げる自動車の区分に応じ、それぞれ当該自動車に係る特定再資源化等物品を第二十一条の規定により引き取るべき自動車製造業者等が第三十四条第一項の規定により公表した同表の中欄に掲げる料金（当該自動車製造業者等が存しない場合又は当該自動車製造業者等を確知することができない場合（次項各号において「製造業者不存在の場合」という。）にあっては、指定再資源化機関が第百八条第一項の規定により公表した同表の下欄に掲げる料金）をいう。第三項において同じ。）に相当する額の金銭を再資源化等預託金として資金管理法人に対し預託しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In that sense, banks would indeed be more stable if they have more capital, but on the other hand, too much capital and hasty capital enhancements would lead to a credit crunch. This has been discussed repeatedly in the past at meetings of the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision. I stated at a press conference that FSA Commissioner Katsunori Mikuniya and the Governor of the Bank of Japan had participated in the meetings of the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision in July and September 2010, where they served as a consensus builder. Japan’s position is relatively close to France and Germany. The US and the UK were interested in Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs), so an agreement was reached on SIFIs separately. As Japan played a leading role in some areas based on its bitter experience of financial crisis, we believe the targets under the Basel Accord can be fulfilled within the scope of management efforts in the real economy. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、銀行の資本というのは大きければ大きいほど、確かに安定するわけでございますが、（資本が）大き過ぎると、増強を急ぎ、今度は貸し渋りになります。そういった点は、中央銀行総裁・銀行監督当局による会議で過去何度も、やってまいりまして、本年7月、9月にも金融庁から三國谷長官、それから日本銀行から総裁が行かれまして、まとめたという話は記者会見で申し上げました。そういった意味で、我が国にとってかなりこの話は、日本、フランスとドイツがそういうことに比較的近くて、アメリカとイギリスはＳＩＦＩｓについて興味を持っているということで、これもまた別に合意しました。そういった意味で、我々は、実態経済はかなりバーゼルの合意については、日本がそういった苦しい金融危機の経験を踏まえてリードした部分もございますから、これは経営努力の範囲内で達成できる可能性があるというふうに、我々は思っております。 - 金融庁

(b) the amount determined by a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger complying with the provisions of an Incorporation-Type Merger contract (limited to an amount of zero or greater) within the scope of the amount of the net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger (which means the amount calculated by deducting the value placed on the Property subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger [limited to liabilities] from the value placed on the Property subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger [limited to assets]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) (in the case where such amount of the net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger is less than zero, the amount shall be zero) of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger which does not inherit Members' Capital (which means a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger other than said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger or Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger which inherits Members' Capital when the consideration of an Incorporation-Type Merger to be delivered to Members of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger does not exist; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); 例文帳に追加

ロ非会員資本承継消滅会員商品取引所（新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に交付 する新設合併対価が存しない場合における当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所又は会 員資本承継消滅会員商品取引所以外の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所をいう。以下こ の条において同じ。）の新設合併対象純資産額（新設合併対象財産（資産に限る。） に付すべき価額から新設合併対象財産（負債に限る。）に付すべき価額を減じて得 た額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）（当該新設合併対象純資産額が零未満であ る場合にあっては、零）の範囲内で、新設合併消滅会員商品取引所が新設合併契約 の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に限る。） - 経済産業省

(3) In order to qualify for and maintain registration, an employee organization is required to provide procedures whereby the adoption or revision of its constitution, election of officers, and other equivalently important acts are decided by a majority of all its members (by a majority of those who voted, in the case of the election of officers) by direct secret vote in which every member is given an equal opportunity to participate, and is required to ensure that these important acts are actually decided in accordance with the procedures so provided for. In the case of an employee organization which is a federation or is national in scope, however, it shall suffice to establish and to actually observe such procedures provided for that delegates are elected by a majority vote by direct secret vote held for each constituent organization or each geographical area or occupational area which every member is given an equal opportunity to participate in, and, further, that the foregoing important acts be decided by a majority of all the delegates (by a majority of the delegates who voted, in the case of the election of officers) by direct secret vote in which each delegate is given an equal opportunity to participate. 例文帳に追加

３　職員団体が登録される資格を有し、及び引き続いて登録されているためには、規約の作成又は変更、役員の選挙その他これらに準ずる重要な行為が、すべての構成員が平等に参加する機会を有する直接かつ秘密の投票による全員の過半数（役員の選挙については、投票者の過半数）によつて決定される旨の手続を定め、かつ、現実にその手続によりこれらの重要な行為が決定されることを必要とする。ただし、連合体である職員団体又は全国的規模をもつ職員団体にあつては、すべての構成員が平等に参加する機会を有する構成団体ごと又は地域若しくは職域ごとの直接かつ秘密の投票による投票者の過半数で代議員を選挙し、この代議員の全員が平等に参加する機会を有する直接かつ秘密の投票による全員の過半数（役員の選挙については、投票者の過半数）によつて決定される旨の手続を定め、かつ、現実に、その手続により決定されることをもつて足りるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This would be established on the basis of investment from SME Support, Japan, prefectural governments and financial institutions under the plan. I think that the LDP's plan, with which I am not very familiar, is similar in basic concept to the DPJ's plan in that it is a scheme that concerns the double loan problem and aims to revive SMEs. The difference between these two plans is the scope of support. If the plans are presented, basically, they will be deliberated in the Diet, or will be discussed by the executive team and policymakers of each party. As both plans call for such a scheme, my general impression is that there is room for negotiation. 例文帳に追加

これは中小企業基盤整備機構、それから県や金融機関による出資ということで、そういった表現がありますが、自由民主党の案、当然公党ですから色々な案を出してきておられると思いますが、そこはあまり詳しくはないのですけれども、基本的な精神は、中小企業の再生をしたいというところで、まさに二重債務に関するスキームというところは共通だと思っていますので、後は程度の問題といいますか、範囲の問題ですから、それは当然出てくれば、それは議会で基本的にやることだと、こう思っております。あるいは各党の執行部、政策担当者のところでやることだと思いますが、それはそれで基本的にそういったスキームがあるということは共通ですから、それは話し合いできる範囲ではないかというふうに、私は政治家として一般論として思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 20 (1) If a business with a definite term in respect of which the insurance relation pertaining to industrial accident insurance has been established and which is specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour or Welfare falls under any of the following items, the government may acknowledge, notwithstanding the provision of Article 11, paragraph (1), the amount obtained by increasing or decreasing the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the general insurance premiums for such business, by the amount obtained by multiplying the amount reducing from such amount of final insurance premiums (or, in case such amount pertains to the general insurance premiums for the businesses set forth in Article 12, paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate for such business) the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate, by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within the scope of forty one-hundredth (40/100), as the amount of the general insurance premiums for such business. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　労災保険に係る保険関係が成立している有期事業であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものが次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、第十一条第一項の規定にかかわらず、政府は、その事業の一般保険料に係る確定保険料の額をその額（第十二条第一項第一号の事業についての一般保険料に係るものにあつては、当該事業についての労災保険率に応ずる部分の額）から非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に百分の四十の範囲内において厚生労働省令で定める率を乗じて得た額だけ引き上げ又は引き下げて得た額を、その事業についての一般保険料の額とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 48-4 (1) An applicant of an International Utility Model Registration Application filed in a foreign language (hereinafter referred to as a "Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language" shall submit to the Commissioner of the Patent Office Japanese translations of the description, scope of claims, drawings (the descriptive text in such drawings only), and the abstract, as provided in Article 3(2) of the Treaty, as of the international application date as provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as "International Application Date") within the period from the priority date under Article 2 (xi) of the Treaty (hereinafter referred to as "Priority Date") to two years and six months (hereinafter referred to as "Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents") therefrom; provided, however, that the applicant of a Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language who has submitted the document under paragraph (1) of the following Article during the period from two months before the expiration of the Time Limit for the Submission of National Documents to the expiry date thereof (excluding the case where the said translations have been submitted prior to the submission of the said documents) may submit the said translations within two months from the date of submission of the said document (hereinafter referred to as "Special Time Limit for the Submission of Translations"). 例文帳に追加

第四十八条の四　外国語でされた国際実用新案登録出願（以下「外国語実用新案登録出願」という。）の出願人は、条約第二条（ｘｉ）の優先日（以下「優先日」という。）から二年六月（以下「国内書面提出期間」という。）以内に、前条第一項に規定する国際出願日（以下「国際出願日」という。）における条約第三条（２）に規定する明細書、請求の範囲、図面（図面の中の説明に限る。）及び要約の日本語による翻訳文を、特許庁長官に提出しなければならない。ただし、国内書面提出期間の満了前二月から満了の日までの間に次条第一項に規定する書面を提出した外国語実用新案登録出願（当該書面の提出の日以前に当該翻訳文を提出したものを除く。）にあつては、当該書面の提出の日から二月（以下「翻訳文提出特例期間」という。）以内に、当該翻訳文を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Still, this will be rather troublesome if not thought out carefully. While it is already quite difficult to forecast outcomes even in the case of domestic investment, widening the scope overseas would come with concerns about exchange fluctuations and would lead to a variety of other issues. That said, I still agree in general with what Minister Haraguchi is saying. I agree because it will be great if the money of Japan Post Bank or Japan Post Insurance, which is collected within Japan, can be managed well so that it can contribute to the well-being of people all around the world, rather than to the pursuit of the well-being of us Japanese alone. I hope that Japan's postal services will grow fast to develop such capacity. 例文帳に追加

しかし、これもやり方を考えないとなかなか大変ですよね。国内投資だってなかなか見通せないところを「外国まで」ということになってくると、為替変動の問題だってありますし、いろいろな問題が出てくるのですよね。そういう中で、しかし、私は、原口（総務）大臣の言っていることは賛成ですよ。我々、日本人だけが幸せになれれば良いというのではなくて、世界中の人たちが幸せになっていくために、国内で集めたゆうちょ（銀行）のお金なり、かんぽ（生命保険）のそういうものがうまく運用されていくのであれば、これは良い話ですから。私は、そういうことをやれるような日本郵政に早く成長してもらいたいと思います。なかなか大変だろうと思います。 - 金融庁

For the criteria of this decision, it may not be appropriate to say uniformly, but for example, if sales is an "account that is closely associated with the company's business objectives," then the total monetary amounts of a business process related to sales, and if it is approximately less than 5% of consolidated sales, weakly related to material business and operations, with no material impacts on financial reporting, then it could be handled by exclusion from the scope of assessment. 例文帳に追加

（注２）重要な事業拠点における企業の事業目的に大きく関わる勘定科目に至る業務プロセスの評価範囲については、経営者が重要な虚偽記載の発生するリスクを勘案して、企業ごとに適切に判断すべきものであり、その判断基準について、一概に言うことは適切ではないと考えられるが、例えば、売上を「企業の事業目的に大きく関わる勘定科目」としている場合において、売上に至る業務プロセスの金額を合算しても連結売上高の概ね５％程度以下となる業務プロセスを、重要な事業又は業務との関連性が低く、財務報告に対する影響の重要性も僅少なものとして評価の対象からはずすといった取扱いはありうるものと考えられる。 - 金融庁

(13) A person designated by the International Atomic Energy Agency may, in addition to the on-site inspection prescribed in the preceding paragraph, and under the attendance of an official designated by the Minister of MEXT (in cases specified by Cabinet Order, an official designated by the Minister of MEXT and official designated by the Minister of Foreign Affairs; hereinafter the same shall apply in Article 18), enter the office, factory, place of activity of any international controlled material user, or any other location designated by the International Atomic Energy Agency and inspect books, documents and any other necessary property, or request the submission of nuclear source material, nuclear fuel material or any other necessary samples, limited to the minimum amount necessary for examination, within the scope prescribed in additional protocols. 例文帳に追加

１３　国際原子力機関の指定する者は、前項の規定による立入検査のほか、文部科学大臣の指定するその職員（政令で定める場合にあつては、文部科学大臣の指定するその職員及び外務大臣の指定するその職員。第十八項において同じ。）の立会いの下に、追加議定書で定める範囲内において、国際規制物資使用者等の事務所又は工場若しくは事業所その他の場所であつて国際原子力機関が指定するものに立ち入り、帳簿、書類その他必要な物件を検査し、又は試験のため必要な最小限度の量に限り、核原料物質、核燃料物質その他の必要な試料を収去することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

b. Whether the Financial Instruments Business Operator has developed a control environment for referring customers to other external organizations if the petition for complaint processing or dispute resolution is outside the scope handled by the external organization to which the customer was first referred because of geographical reasons, the nature of the complaint or dispute or for some other reason, or if handling of the complaint or dispute by another external organization is appropriate (not limited to external organizations used by the Financial Instruments Business Operator as complaint processing measures or dispute resolution measures). 例文帳に追加

ｂ．契約締結前交付書面の交付に関し、金融ＡＤＲ制度についての説明を行っているか。また、顧客からの苦情の申出があった場合には、真摯な対応をとるとともに、当事者間の話合いでは顧客の理解が得られない場合や、損害賠償金額の確定が困難である場合には、改めて金融ＡＤＲ制度について説明を行っているか。苦情処理・紛争解決の申立てが、地理又は苦情・紛争内容その他の事由により、顧客に紹介した外部機関の取扱範囲外のものであるとき、又は他の外部機関等（苦情処理措置・紛争解決措置として金融商品取引業者が利用している外部機関に限らない。）による取扱いがふさわしいときは、他の外部機関等を顧客に紹介する態勢を整備しているか。 - 金融庁

(4) Any person who finds that an invention protected by a patent does not comply with the provisions of § 8 of this Act, may file an action in court against the proprietor of the patent for the revocation of the patent in part or in full. The proprietor of the patent may restrict the scope of patent protection in the course of proceedings in respect of the action if this will result in the invention complying with the provisions of § 8. A request for the making of a register entry together with a copy of the court judgment and, in the prescribed cases, information certifying payment of the state fee shall be filed with the Patent Office within one month after entry into force of the court judgment. Upon making amendments to the patent, the proprietor of the patent must file the description of the invention and patent claims amended pursuant to the court judgment with the Patent Office and pay the state fee for the making of amendments within three months from the date of the court judgment which has entered into force. (10.03.2004 entered into force 01.05.2004 - RT I 2004, 20, 141) 例文帳に追加

(4) 特許により保護されている発明が第8条の規定に合致していないと考える者は，特許所有者を相手として，特許の一部又は全部を取り消すための訴訟を提起することができる。特許所有者は，特許保護の範囲を減縮すれば発明が第8条の規定に合致するようになるときは，訴えに係る手続の過程で，その減縮をすることができる。登録簿への登録の請求書を，判決文の謄本及び，所定の事情においては，国の手数料の納付を証明する情報を添付して，判決が効力を生じてから1月以内に特許庁に提出しなければならない。特許の補正をするときは，特許所有者は，判決が効力を生じてから3月以内に，判決に従って補正した発明の説明及び特許クレームを特許庁に提出し，かつ，補正をするための国の手数料を納付しなければならない。(2004年3月10日。2004年5月1日施行－RT I 2004, 20, 141) - 特許庁

(3) With regard to a Commodity Broker, the provisions of Article 49, Article 50, Article 53-3, Article 91-2, Article 93, Article 94, paragraph (1), Articles 97 to 97-6 inclusive, Article 119, paragraph (2), and Article 120, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of the New Act and the provisions of Article 20-3 and Article 57 of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Act No. 26 of 1957) revised by said provisions shall, only for Commodities pertaining to said registration, apply to said person by deeming him/her as a Futures Commission Merchant set forth in the New Act for each such Commodity, during the period prescribed in the preceding paragraph. In this case, "shall not start the brokerage" in Article 97-2, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not broker buying and selling transactions on a Commodity Market; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the transactions are carried out within the scope of the purpose to complete settlement of the buying and selling transactions on a Commodity Market pertaining to said brokerage." 例文帳に追加

３　商品仲買人については、当該登録に係る商品に限り、前項に規定する期間内は、新法第四十九条、第五十条、第五十三条の三、第九十一条の二、第九十三条、第九十四条第一項、第九十七条から第九十七条の六まで、第百十九条第二項及び第百二十条第二項から第四項まで並びにこれらの規定による改正後の租税特別措置法（昭和三十二年法律第二十六号）第二十条の三及び第五十七条の規定は、その者をその商品ごとに新法の規定による商品取引員とみなして、適用する。この場合において、第九十七条の二第三項中「受託業務を開始してはならない」とあるのは、「商品市場における売買取引の委託を受けてはならない。ただし、その受託に係る商品市場における売買取引の決済を結了する目的の範囲内でする場合は、この限りでない」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to a Commodity Broker, the provisions of Article 49, Article 50, Article 53-3, Article 91-2, Article 93, Article 94, paragraph 1, Articles 97 to 97-6 inclusive, Article 119, paragraph 2, and Article 120, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive of the New Act and the provisions of Article 20-3 and Article 57 of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Act No. 26 of 1957) revised by said provisions shall, only for Commodities pertaining to said registration, apply to said person by deeming him/her as a Futures Commission Merchant set forth in the New Act for each such Commodity, during the period prescribed in the preceding paragraph. In this case, "shall not start the acceptance of consignment" in Article 97-2, paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not accept consignment of buying and selling transactions on a Commodity Market; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the transactions are carried out within the scope of the purpose to complete settlement of the buying and selling transactions on a Commodity Market pertaining to said consignment." 例文帳に追加

３ 商品仲買人については、当該登録に係る商品に限り、前項に規定する期間内は、新法第四十九条、第五十条、第五十三条の三、第九十一条の二、第九十三条、第九十四条第一項、第九十七条から第九十七条の六まで、第百十九条第二項及び第百二十条第二項から第四項まで並びにこれらの規定による改正後の租税特別措置法（昭和三十二年法律第二十六号）第二十条の三及び第五十七条の規定は、その者をその商品ごとに新法の規定による商品取引員とみなして、適用する。この場合において、第九十七条の二第三項中「受託業務を開始してはならない」とあるのは、「商品市場における売買取引の委託を受けてはならない。ただし、その受託に係る商品市場における売買取引の決済を結了する目的の範囲内でする場合は、この限りでない」とする。 - 経済産業省

(9) For the time being, the State may, within the scope of the budget, provide a loan without interest of an amount equivalent to the amount that the State may subsidize pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) (in the case where any law or ordinance stipulates otherwise with regard to the proportion of subsidy by the State under these provisions, they shall include the provisions of said law or ordinance that stipulates otherwise; the same shall apply hereinafter) to a prefecture (in the case where the affairs under Article 74, paragraph (1), which are to be processed by a prefecture, are to be processed by a designated city, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), this shall include said designated city, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraphs (12) to (14) of the Supplementary Provisions) for the funds to be allocated to the expenses subsidized by said prefecture for the establisher of a public assistance facility other than said prefecture, with regard to a repair, renovation or expansion of a public assistance facility of which expenses may be subsidized by the State pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) and which falls under Article 2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Promotion of Social Infrastructure Development Through Use of Proceeds from Sale of the Stock of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987). 例文帳に追加

９　国は、当分の間、都道府県（第八十四条の二第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第七十四条第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び附則第十二項から第十四項までにおいて同じ。）に対し、第七十五条第二項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる保護施設の修理、改造又は拡張で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、都道府県以外の保護施設の設置者に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第七十五条第二項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A person who has been granted the trading qualification by a Commodity Exchange based on the provisions of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a Member, etc. within the scope of the purpose prescribed in the same paragraph with regard to application of the provisions of Article 101, paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive, Article 103, Article 104, paragraphs (3) and (4), Article 108, paragraph (1), Articles 113 to 115 inclusive, Article 118, Article 157, Article 159, paragraph (1), Article 160, paragraph (1), Article 165, Article 179 and Article 188. In this case, the phrase "withdrawn from" in Article 113, paragraph (1) (including the case of its application mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 114 and Article 188) shall be deemed to be replaced with "lost the qualification to carry out transactions on" and the phrase "expulsion of" in Article 160, paragraph (1) and Article 165 shall be deemed to be replaced with "rescission of the qualification to carry out transactions of." 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の規定に基づき商品取引所により取引資格を与えられた者は、同項に規定する目的の範囲内において、第百一条第一項から第四項まで、第百三条、第百四条第三項及び第四項、第百八条第一項、第百十三条から第百十五条まで、第百十八条、第百五十七条、第百五十九条第一項、第百六十条第一項、第百六十五条、第百七十九条並びに第百八十八条の規定の適用については、会員等とみなす。この場合において、第百十三条第一項（第百十四条及び第百八十八条において準用する場合を含む。）中「から脱退した」とあるのは「において取引をすることができる資格を喪失した」と、第百六十条第一項及び第百六十五条中「の除名」とあるのは「の取引をすることができる資格の取消し」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム