「change of business」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(13ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 12 (1) Pertaining to the last business year of the period for mid-term objectives (hereinafter referred to as the "period for mid-term objectives" in this paragraph) prescribed in Article 29, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Act on General Rules, if, after the Institute has conducted the adjustments pursuant to the provisions of Article 44, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on General Rules, there are reserve funds pursuant to paragraph (1) of said Article, the Institute may appropriate, from among the amount equivalent to those reserve funds, the amount for which approval has been obtained from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, as a financial resource for the operations prescribed in the preceding Article in the next period for mid-term objectives, pursuant to the mid-term plan (or modified mid-term plan if approval for a change pursuant to the provisions of the second sentence of said paragraph has been obtained) for which the approval specified in Article 30, paragraph (1) of the Act on General Rules has been obtained pertaining to said next period for mid-term objectives following the relevant period for mid-term objectives. 例文帳に追加

第十二条　研究所は、通則法第二十九条第二項第一号に規定する中期目標の期間（以下この項において「中期目標の期間」という。）の最後の事業年度に係る通則法第四十四条第一項又は第二項の規定による整理を行った後、同条第一項の規定による積立金があるときは、その額に相当する金額のうち経済産業大臣の承認を受けた金額を、当該中期目標の期間の次の中期目標の期間に係る通則法第三十条第一項の認可を受けた中期計画（同項後段の規定による変更の認可を受けたときは、その変更後のもの）の定めるところにより、当該次の中期目標の期間における前条に規定する業務の財源に充てることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 153 When the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate with regard to a Financial Instruments Exchange's articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules or any other rules or trade practice, of a Financial Instruments Exchange or its business operation or the status of its property for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may order the Financial Instruments Exchange to change its articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules or any other rules or trade practice, or to take other necessary measures for supervision, within the limit necessary. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 例文帳に追加

第百五十三条　内閣総理大臣は、金融商品取引所の定款、業務規程、受託契約準則その他の規則若しくは取引の慣行又は業務の運営若しくは財産の状況に関し、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該金融商品取引所に対し、定款、業務規程、受託契約準則その他の規則又は取引の慣行の変更その他監督上必要な措置をとることを命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十二　会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

To cope with such a critical situation, the company has endeavored to increase sales and diversify its business through various means, such as the capital increase in 1993 with the support of Keifuku Electric Railroad and Keihan Electric Railway, the launch of 'Hanase Yama-no-ie' (an outdoor recreation center in Hanase which is run by Kyoto City) specific transport (1993; some routes of this specific transport extend to Uji City) and the implementation of 'Kitayama Sankakuten Trek' tour (since 1998) while maintaining the lines running through depopulated areas via the rationalization efforts such as the reshuffling of lines in 1992 (such reshuffling was also done in 1997 when the Karasuma Line fully opened and the Kyoto City Bus lines running in the northern area of Sakyo Ward were transferred to the company), the flexible change of cars depending on the transport demand (from large buses to medium-size buses and further to microbuses) and the revision of the time schedule. 例文帳に追加

この危機的な状況に対処する為に、1992年に路線の再編成（これは1997年の地下鉄烏丸線全通時にも京都市バスから左京区北部の路線の大半を移管するにあたっても行われている）や、輸送需要に応じて柔軟な車両変更（大型バスから中型バス、更にはマイクロバス化）やダイヤ改正を行いながら過疎地域路線を維持しつつ、1993年の京福電鉄（株）・京阪電鉄（株）支援による増資、「花背山の家」特定輸送の開始（1993年。この特定輸送の一部路線は宇治市内まで来ている）、「北山三角点トレック」ツアーの実施（1998年より）など、増収・事業の多角化を進めている。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Article 61-5 The provisions of Article 680 to 683 inclusive (Bondholders of Bonds for Subscription, Bond Registry, Delivery of Document Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry, Management of Bond Registry), Article 684 (excluding paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Bond Registry) and Article 685 to 701 inclusive (Notices to Bondholders, Exercise of Rights by Co-owners, Assignment of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Assignment of Bonds, Presumption of Rights, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Without Request from Bondholders, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry as Requested by Bondholders, Pledges of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Pledge of Bonds, Entries in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Perfection Requirements for Bonds Belonging to Trust Property, etc., Issuing of Bond Certificates, Matters to Be Stated on Bond Certificates, Conversions between Registered Bonds and Bearer Bonds, Loss of Bond Certificates, Redemption of Bonds where Coupons Missing, Extinctive Prescription of Right to Claim Redemption of Bonds) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "the preceding Article" in Article 680, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-4 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 676, items (iii) though (viii)" in Article 681, item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, items (iii) to (viii) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 720, paragraph (1)" in Article 685, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 720, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-8, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 676, item (vii)" in Article 698 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, item (vii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十一条の五　会社法第六百八十条から第六百八十三条まで（募集社債の社債権者、社債原簿、社債原簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、社債原簿管理人）、第六百八十四条（第四項及び第五項を除く。）（社債原簿の備置き及び閲覧等）及び第六百八十五条から第七百一条まで（社債権者に対する通知等、共有者による権利の行使、社債券を発行する場合の社債の譲渡、社債の譲渡の対抗要件、権利の推定等、社債権者の請求によらない社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債権者の請求による社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債券を発行する場合の社債の質入れ、社債の質入れの対抗要件、質権に関する社債原簿の記載等、質権に関する社債原簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、信託財産に属する社債についての対抗要件等、社債券の発行、社債券の記載事項、記名式と無記名式との間の転換、社債券の喪失、利札が欠けている場合における社債の償還、社債の償還請求権等の消滅時効）の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第六百八十条第二号中「前条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の四」と、同法第六百八十一条第一号中「第六百七十六条第三号から第八号まで」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第三号から第八号まで」と、同法第六百八十五条第五項中「第七百二十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の八第二項において準用する第七百二十条第一項」と、同法第六百九十八条中「第六百七十六条第七号」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第七号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 156-29 The Prime Minister may issue an order to change the methods or conditions under which a Securities Finance Company lends money or Securities (limited to those pertaining to the business prescribed in Article 156-24(1)), when it is deemed that said methods or conditions have become inappropriate in light of general economic conditions, or when there is an unsound tendency of transactions in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or the Over-the-Counter Securities Market, and if he/she finds it especially necessary for facilitating fair sales and purchase in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or an Over-the-Counter Securities Market as well as for achieving smooth distribution of Securities. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 例文帳に追加

第百五十六条の二十九　内閣総理大臣は、証券金融会社の金銭又は有価証券の貸付け（第百五十六条の二十四第一項に規定する業務に係るものに限る。）の方法又は条件について、これらが一般の経済状況にかんがみて適正を欠くに至つたと認められる場合又は取引所金融商品市場若しくは店頭売買有価証券市場に不健全な取引の傾向がある場合において、取引所金融商品市場若しくは店頭売買有価証券市場における売買を公正にし、又は有価証券の流通を円滑にするために特に必要があると認めるときは、その変更を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Regarding the other point of your question, which concerns postal savings - 15 years ago, I served as the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications under the second Hashimoto cabinet - fixed-term savings deposited before the privatization of the postal savings business change to ordinary postal savings after maturity, and after the passage of another 10 years, which would mean the passage of a total of 20 years, notices urging savers to take action are sent. If claims for repayment are not made for two months after the notice, the savers' rights to savings expire under Article 29 of the former Postal Savings Act. 例文帳に追加

それからもう1点は、郵便貯金の話でございますが、今お話がございましたように、私も15年前第2次橋本改造内閣郵政大臣をさせて頂きましたが、民営化前の定額貯金においては、満期日からそのまま置いておきますと定額貯預金から普通預金に変わりまして、（その後、10年で睡眠貯金となり、）それからまた10年ということでございますから、（満期日から）合計20年経過して、色々通知を出して、ぜひどうかしてくれというふうな催告を行った後、2か月たっても支払い請求がない場合には、（預金者の権利は消滅するということを、）これは法律がありまして、29条の規定により、預金者の権利は消滅するということを郵便貯金法だったと思いますけれども、明記してあるのですね。 - 金融庁

With an increasing number of listed companies accused or having been delisted due to, for instance, misstatements, window dressing, or links to antisocial organizations, the emerging equity exchange are examining listings more carefully, and securities underwriters and auditing firms are becoming more cautious. Some start-ups, among others, claim that listing examinations are becoming more rigorous. No change has been made in anything about formalities stipulated in the criteria for listing (rather, some of the standards are relaxed), but parts relating to examinations of substantiality (viewpoints such as appropriate disclosure of conditions of the company and information of its risks, soundness of the business, and public interests / investor protection) are getting stricter. 例文帳に追加

虚偽記載、粉飾決算や反社会的勢力との関係などから問題化したり、上場廃止になったりするケースが増加してきたことを受けて、新興株式市場の各取引所は慎重に審査しており、また引受証券会社や監査法人でも同様に慎重となっている。こうしたことから、ベンチャー企業等から、上場審査が実質的に強化、厳格化しているとの指摘もなされている。上場審査のうち形式基準に係る部分については変化がない（あるいは一部緩和が行われている）ものの、実質審査に係る部分（企業内容・リスク情報の開示の適切性、企業経営の健全性、公益・投資者保護の観点等）の審査が強化・厳格化されているとの声が強い。特にベンチャーキャピタル、ベンチャー企業の視点から見ると、数年前に比して上場審査が厳しくなったという見方が強い。 - 経済産業省

(8) The Transferred Juridical Person who manage the business and property pertaining to the insurance contract underwritten before the day of the Transfer Register pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5) shall be deemed as the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, and the provisions of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions (excluding paragraph (2)), the preceding Article (limited to paragraphs (7) to (12) and (14)), following Article (limited to paragraphs (2) and (5).), and Articles 8 and 16 of the Supplementary Provisions shall be applied. In this case, the term "by the day when six months have passed since the Effective Date (or, if the underwriting of the insurance is performed for the first time after the Effective Date, the date of such underwriting; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article.)" in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "after the day on which the Transfer Register provided in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions was registered without delay" and the term ": provided, however, that this shall not apply to a person who applies for the license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act or for the registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act by the day on which such six months have passed" in the Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (2) of the following Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provision of paragraph (8) of the preceding Article by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "five years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (8) of the preceding Article, Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraph (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "eight years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraphs (1), (17) and (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (8) of the Supplementary Provisions by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," and the term "seven years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 16, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "ten years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　第五項の規定により移行登記をした日前に引き受けた保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理を行う移行法人は、附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者とみなして、附則第三条（第二項を除く。）、前条（第七項から第十二項まで及び第十四項に限る。）、次条（第二項及び第五項に限る。）並びに附則第八条及び第十六条の規定を適用する。この場合において、附則第三条第一項中「施行日から起算して六月を経過する日（同日後に施行日後初めて保険の引受けを行う場合には、当該引受けを行う日。以下この項において同じ。）までに」とあるのは「附則第五条第一項に規定する移行登記をした日以後遅滞なく」と、「しなければならない。ただし、当該六月を経過する日までに新保険業法第三条第一項の免許又は新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録の申請をした者については、この限りでない」とあるのは「しなければならない」と、次条第二項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に前条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同項並びに附則第八条第二項及び第十六条第十八項中「施行日から起算して五年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して八年」と、附則第八条第二項並びに第十六条第一項、第十七項及び第十八項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に附則第五条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同条第一項中「施行日から起算して七年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して十年」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) Matters related to decision of the rate pursuant to the provision of Article 11, paragraph 2, item 2 (b), decision of the amount pursuant to the provision of (d) of the same item, decision of the amount pursuant to the provision of Article 13, paragraph 2, item 3, recognition prescribed in paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 15, receipt of documents pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of the same article, recognition of a change prescribed in Article 16, paragraph 1, rescission of recognition pursuant to the provision of Article 17, recognition prescribed in Article 18, paragraph 1, public notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of the same article (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 5 of the same article), acceptance of report pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3 of the same article, rescission of recognition pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4 of the same article, guidance and advice prescribed in Article 19, recommendation prescribed in Article 20, paragraph 1, publication pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of the same article and order pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3 of the same article, and collection of report pursuant to the provision of Article 39 and on-site inspection pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (excluding that listed in the preceding item): Minister of the Environment, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and minister who has jurisdiction over business conducted by the specified container user or specified packaging user by using the specified containers or specified packaging, or business such as the manufacture, etc. of specified containers conducted by the specified container manufacturer, etc. 例文帳に追加

二　第十一条第二項第二号ロの規定による率の決定、同号ニの規定による量の決定、第十三条第二項第三号の規定による量の決定、第十五条第一項及び第三項に規定する認定、同条第二項の規定による書類の受理、第十六条第一項に規定する変更の認定、第十七条の規定による認定の取消し、第十八条第一項に規定する認定、同条第二項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公示、同条第三項の規定による報告の受理、同条第四項の規定による認定の取消し、第十九条に規定する指導及び助言、第二十条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表並びに同条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十九条の規定による報告の徴収及び第四十条の規定による立入検査（前号に掲げるものを除く。）に関する事項　環境大臣、経済産業大臣及び当該特定容器利用事業者若しくは当該特定包装利用事業者が特定容器若しくは特定包装を用いて行う事業又は当該特定容器製造等事業者が行う特定容器の製造等の事業を所管する大臣 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When the Prime Minister has decided to grant or refuse registration under Article 29 or Article 33-2, authorization under Article 30(1) or Article 31(6), registration of change under Article 31(4), approval under Article 35 (4), or approval under paragraph (3) or (4) of the preceding Article, attach conditions under the provisions of Article 30-2(1), or make disposition based on the provisions of Article 51, Article 51-2, Article 52(1) or (2), Article 52-2(1) or (2), Article 53, Article 54, Article 56-3, or paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, he/she shall notify to that effect in writing to the applicant or the Financial Instruments Business Operator. 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第二十九条若しくは第三十三条の二の登録、第三十条第一項若しくは第三十一条第六項の認可、第三十一条第四項の変更登録、第三十五条第四項の承認若しくは前条第三項若しくは第四項の承認をし、若しくはしないこととしたとき、第三十条の二第一項の規定により条件を付することとしたとき、又は第五十一条、第五十一条の二、第五十二条第一項若しくは第二項、第五十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項、第五十三条、第五十四条、第五十六条の三若しくは前条第二項の規定に基づいて処分をすることとしたときは、書面により、その旨を登録申請者又は金融商品取引業者等に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三百条の二　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約（保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等（保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。）、外国保険会社等（同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）又は保険仲立人（同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲立人をいう。）」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人（保険募集人（保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。）を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Information acquisition shall be accomplished by inputting into a Computer a Public Notice Address disclosed by an Investigation Entruster pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (1), item (iii) (a), and requesting that the Public Notice Server transmit information via a provider three times (in the event that the information can be obtained in one or two transmissions, that number of times, and in the event that the number of transmissions is two or more, a different provider each time). In this case, if the Investigative Body is notified by the Investigation Entruster pursuant to the provisions of its Business Rules, to the effect that the Public Notice Address has changed and said changed Public Notice Address is disclosed, with respect to Electronic Public Notice Investigations conducted after that time (if said Investigation Entruster discloses a scheduled date and time for said change, said scheduled date and time), the Investigative Body, should input the changed Public Notice Address into the Computer. 例文帳に追加

２　情報入手作業は、電子計算機に第三条第一項第三号イの規定により調査委託者から示された公告アドレスを入力することにより、三回（一回又は二回で情報を受信することができた場合にあっては、その回数）にわたってプロバイダ（二回以上にわたる場合にあっては、それぞれ異なるプロバイダ）を経由して公告サーバに対し情報を送信するように求めることによって行わなければならない。この場合において、調査委託者から、調査機関が業務規程で定めるところにより、当該公告アドレスを変更する旨の通知がされ、かつ、当該変更後の公告アドレスが示されたときは、その時（当該調査委託者が、当該変更の予定日時をも示したときは、当該予定日時）以後の電子公告調査については、当該変更後の公告アドレスを電子計算機に入力しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This also affected the real economy – for instance, production in Toyota's factory in Fukuoka Prefecture, my home prefecture, dropped by 40 percent two years ago and occurrences like that explain why Japan has been in the situation that it is in now since then. It was against this background that the Dodd-Frank Act was implemented in the U.S. And, at that very time of historical significance, I met with FRB Chairman Bernanke and Mr. Volcker. Under the Volcker Rule, commercial banks may engage in a high-risk, high-return business on demand from customers, but not for their own accounts. In my view, this is the very core of the new Dodd-Frank Act. This is another case of a significant sea change. It was by luck that I had an opportunity to visit the U.S. in those days in the capacity of the Minister for Financial Services. 例文帳に追加

そのことが実体経済にも影響を及ぼして、2年前、私の福岡県にもトヨタ自動車の工場がございますが、あそこの生産は4割落ちまして、それ以来、本当に日本だって、今、大変こういう立場になっているわけでございますが、そういった中でドッド・フランク法というのを作った。まさにそういった歴史的な時期に、FRBのバーナンキ議長、それからボルカーさん、ボルカー・ルールですね。これはご存じのように、商業銀行の中でハイリスク・ハイリターンのことを、お客様から頼まれたらおこなってもよいけれども、自己勘定でしてはいけないと。これは今度のドッド・フランク法の一番のコアの部分だと思います。これは非常に大きなコペルニクス的転換でございまして、しかし、そういった時代にたまたま金融（担当）大臣としてアメリカに行かせていただいた。 - 金融庁

Our top-down initiative to have the Amended Money Lending Business Act Follow-Up Team established in the face of a situation like that may sound like a minor thing, but it was nevertheless a decent and fair action brought about by the change of administration. The fact is that we live in a democratic nation, and our government is a publicly elected government. If a politician's eyes are always turned upwards like those of a flounder – well, I would not quite say that he would become oblivious to how the people are living, but he nevertheless could become increasingly insensitive to how each individual person is living or how each individual person is faring or suffering in life. Looking back at my 22 years with the Liberal Democratic Party, I myself admit with remorse that I also had such a tendency. 例文帳に追加

そういった中で、本当にこれはトップダウンで改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを作らせていただけたということは、非常に私、小さな話のようですけれども、やはり政権交代してきちんと当たり前（のことをしたの）です。我々は民主主義国家ですから、国民から選んでいただいた政府ですから、やはりヒラメのように目が上ばかり向いているということが、逆に国民の生活を忘れたとは申しませんけれども、私も自由民主党に22年いまして、段々段々それがひどくなってきて、一人一人の息吹、あるいは一人一人の生活の寝音、生活の苦しみ、それが段々段々分からなくなってきたということを、私自身も反省を含めてそう思ってくるわけでございます。 - 金融庁

(2) The provisions of Article 33 (Election of Inspector of Matters Described or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedure of Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to investigation by an inspector on any of the matters listed in the items of the preceding paragraph where the Article of incorporation of a Mutual Company include any description or record on the matter. In this case, the term "rescind his/her manifestation of intention relating to subscription for the relevant Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33, paragraph (8) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "resign from his/her office;" the term "Article 28, items (i) and (ii)" in paragraph (10), item (i) and the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in items (ii) and (iii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act," the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in Article 33, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that item," and the terms "Article 38, paragraph (1)"and "paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article" in Article 33, paragraph (11), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三十三条（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社の定款に前項各号に掲げる事項についての記載又は記録があるときの検査役による当該事項の調査について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第八項中「その設立時発行株式の引受けに係る意思表示を取り消す」とあるのは「その職を辞する」と、同条第十項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあり、並びに同項第二号及び第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同項第一号中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「同号」と、同条第十一項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の十第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent, Method of Acts of Bond Managers, Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Manager, Resignation of Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation, Dismissal of Bond Managers, Succession to Bond Manager's Administration of Bonds), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a bond administrator. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "this Act" in Article 710, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 702" in Article 711, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-6 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 67-2 The provisions of Article 940, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Period of Public Notice, etc. for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation on Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice May Not Be Carried Out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "annual general meeting of members (or annual general meeting, where the company has such meeting)," respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十七条の二　会社法第九百四十条第一項及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、相互会社が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十四条の七第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、定時総代会）」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第五十四条の七第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 940, paragraph (1) (excluding item (i)) and (3) (Period of Public Notice for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation of Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice may not be Carried out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "procedure" respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第九百四十条第一項（第一号を除く。）及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、外国保険会社等が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「手続」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph 1 or Article 148, paragraph 1 of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notice to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

２ 商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係（他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の二分の一以上に相当する議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。）を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。）を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 経済産業省

Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第九十六条の四　会社法第二百七条（金銭以外の財産の出資）、第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）、第二百十三条（第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。）（出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主（組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。）を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Futures Commission Merchant has gained a controlling interest in another juridical person (a relationship with another juridical person where the Futures Commission Merchant holds voting rights [excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which a shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph] equivalent to at least a half of the voting rights of all shareholders or all members of such juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc.] or any other relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry to be that which allows the Futures Commission Merchant substantially to control the business activities of such juridical person), the Futures Commission Merchant shall submit a written notification to that effect to the competent minister without delay, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry. The same shall apply when a change has occurred to the notified matters or when such controlling interest ceases to exist. 例文帳に追加

２　商品取引員は、他の法人に対する支配関係（他の法人に対する関係で、商品取引員がその法人の総株主又は総社員の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の二分の一以上に相当する議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含む。）を有する関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。）を持つに至つたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨の届出書を主務大臣に提出しなければならない。その届け出た事項に変更を生じたとき、又はその支配関係がなくなつたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 71 The provisions of Article 777 (Demand for Purchase of Share Options), Article 778 (Determination on Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where the converting Stock Company has issued share options. In this case, the term "converted membership company" in Article 778, paragraph (1), Article 778, paragraph (2), and Article 778, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company (referring to a Converted Mutual Company as defined in Article 69, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第七十一条　会社法第七百七十七条（新株予約権買取請求）、第七百七十八条（新株予約権の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、組織変更をする株式会社が新株予約権を発行している場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第七百七十八条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「組織変更後持分会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社（保険業法第六十九条第四項第一号に規定する組織変更後相互会社をいう。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 353 to 357 inclusive (Representation of Companies in Actions Between Stock Company and Directors, Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflicting Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders) and Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a liquidator (with regard to the provision of Article 361 of that Act, other than a liquidator appointed by the Prime Minister pursuant to the provision of Article 174, paragraph (1), (4) or (9)). In this case, the term "Article 349, paragraph (4)" in Article 353 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-9, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "a Representative Director" in Article 354 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Representative Liquidator"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members of the company" and "irreparable damage," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第三百五十三条から第三百五十七条まで（株式会社と取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表、表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）及び第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）の規定は、清算人（同条の規定については、第百七十四条第一項、第四項又は第九項の規定により内閣総理大臣が選任したものを除く。）について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十三条中「第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の九第五項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同法第三百五十四条中「代表取締役」とあるのは「代表清算人」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits concerning employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease) prior to the day on which three months have elapsed from the day the business is terminated, plus the amount of the benefits specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 12, paragraph (3) on one hand, and the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in the same Article, paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate; the same shall apply in the following item) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate, plus the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate, multiplied by the Class I adjustment rate on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, and such ratio does not change on and after such date, or such ratio is deemed as not changing beyond the scope specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; or 例文帳に追加

一　事業が終了した日から三箇月を経過した日前における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金及び特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付を除く。）の額に第十二条第三項の厚生労働省令で定める給付金の額を加えた額と一般保険料に係る確定保険料の額（同条第一項第一号の事業については、労災保険率に応ずる部分の額。次号において同じ。）から非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料に係る確定保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に第一種調整率を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下であつて、その割合がその日以後において変動せず、又は厚生労働省令で定める範囲を超えて変動しないと認められるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 120, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive (Giving Benefits on Exercise of Shareholder's Right) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case set forth in the preceding paragraph; and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), and Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the return of benefits under Article 120, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, respectively. In this case, the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 120, paragraphs (3) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "all shareholders" in Article 120, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; the term "shareholder who has been holding shares (other than a holder of share less than one unit who may not exercise his/her rights pursuant to the provision of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2))" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who has been a member"; and the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第百二十条第二項から第五項まで（株主の権利の行使に関する利益の供与）の規定は前項の場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百二十条第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百二十条第三項及び第四項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項」と、同条第五項中「総株主」とあるのは「総社員」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As we have done every year, we selected cases from the inspection results reported from July of last year to June of this year and published them in the form of the latest Compilation of Problem Cases Raised in Financial Inspections for the 2009 program year, as you've just pointed out, which I expect each financial institution to refer to when formulating its future internal control system. With the successful enactment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act when former Minister Kamei was in office, it is now ensured, as you know, that in times of an economic downturn like the one we currently find ourselves in, financial institutions should adequately address requests for easing lending terms or changing housing loan terms, etc. In a sense, this has achieved a substantial change, if not quite a sea change, from the way financial administration was run in the past, and we need to keep that in mind. I know an SME owner in my hometown who employs about 100 people, about 50 of them being permanent employees and the rest working on a non-permanent basis, and who says that he is able to barely survive thanks to the establishment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act but also speaks out, "Mr. Jimi, we are now desperate for more work." He also goes on to say that "I personally feel that I could close down the business, but I am hanging on, struggling with all my might - because every one of my 100 workers has a family." 例文帳に追加

今ご指摘のとおり、引き続き平成21年の事務年度においても昨年7月から今年6月までに通知された検査結果の中から事例を選定し、金融検査指摘事例集として公表しているところでありまして、各金融機関におかれましては本事例集を今後の内部管理の態勢構築の参考にしていただければと思っておりますが、中小企業金融円滑化法案を亀井大臣のときに成立させていただきまして、ご存じのように条件の緩和、あるいはこういった不況のときでございますから、あるいは住宅ローンの条件の変更等々にきちっと応じるようにと、かなりある意味で従来の金融行政から変革をある意味できちっと、コペルニクス的とは言いませんけれども、かなり大きな変化をしたわけでございますから、そういうことを拳拳服膺（けんけんふくよう）して、私がいつか申し上げましたように、私の地元の中小企業でも100人ぐらい従業員抱えているところ、これは50人ぐらい正規社員、50人ぐらい非正規社員で、この金融円滑化法案ができたので何とか生き延びているけれども、「自見さん、あとは仕事が何とか出てこないか」と、「今、必死で我慢して自分自身は廃業してもいいと思っているのだけれども、それに100人みんな家庭があるから一生懸命頑張っているのだ」と。 - 金融庁

From August 16 to 21, I went on a business trip to the United States. As already reported in brief at the informal gathering with Cabinet ministers today, I visited Washington D.C. and New York, where I met with Federal Reserve Board (FRB) Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Under Secretary Lael Brainard and the President’s economic advisor Paul Volcker, just to name a few. Paul Volcker, who served as FRB Chairman during the 1970s, is the economic advisor to President Barack Obama who created the so-called “Volcker Rule” in the recent financial reform legislation. In the United States, financial deregulation and economic and financial globalization had been a massive trend over the past two or three decades, basically, since the Great Depression in 1929. It was against such a backdrop in the United States that the first radical financial reform legislation in 80 years was established very recently. I asked others during my stay in the United States as to whether it amounted to a change comparable to the Copernican Revolution, and some Americans responded that it was indeed that kind of change. The major global financial trend is changing in the United States, the leading country of finance. I gained firsthand knowledge of this, having met with leading figures of the United States as the Minister for Financial Services and listened to their various opinions. 例文帳に追加

それから、私でございますが、8月16日から21日まで米国に出張させていただきまして、今日の閣僚懇でもあらかたは報告をさせていただきましたが、ワシントンDC及びニューヨークを訪問して、バーナンキFRB（連邦準備制度理事会）議長、それからブレイナード財務次官、ボルカー大統領経済顧問、ご存じのようにこれは1970年代のFRBの議長でございますが、大変背の高い人でございますが、今度の金融規制改革法でいわゆるボルカールールというのをつくったオバマ大統領の経済顧問でございますが、こういった方ともお会いいたしました。米国ではもう皆さん方ご存じのように80年ぶり、まさに1929年に大恐慌がございましてね、それから色々あったわけでございますけれども、基本的にこの二、三十年、金融の規制緩和、あるいは経済のグローバル化、あるいは金融のグローバル化ということが非常に大きな潮流でございましたが、そういった中で80年ぶりの根本的な改革を、金融規制改革法が成立したばかりでございまして、私が向こうに行って、「コペルニクス的変化か」と言ったら、「いや、自見さん実はコペルニクス的変化だ」と、こう言ったアメリカの方もおられましたが、そういった大きな、皆さん方もボルカールールをはじめ世界の金融の潮流が非常に大きくアメリカを、まさに金融の本場であったアメリカで変わってきたわけでございまして、そういったところを金融（担当）大臣として実感としてアメリカの要人ともお会いしつつ、きちっと色々な意見を聞かせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715 and Article 740, paragraph (3)) (Bondholders' Meeting), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Payment, etc by Bond-Issuing Company.), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (x) to (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "under Article 705, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737, paragraph (2) (Execution of Resolutions of Bondholders' Meetings) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of Article 61-7, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act, and the provisions of Articles 708 and 709 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-7, paragraph (8) of that Act"; and the term "the provisions of Article 449, Article 627, Article 635, Article 670, Article 779 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 781), Article 789 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 793), Article 799 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 802) or Article 810 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 813)" in Article 740, paragraph (1) (Special provisions on objection procedures for creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4) of that Act, and Articles 88 and 165-17 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20 of that Act) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条及び第七百四十条第三項を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項（社債権者集会の決議の執行）中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の七第一項から第三項までの規定並びに同法第六十一条の七第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項（債権者の異議手続の特則）中「第四百四十九条、第六百二十七条、第六百三十五条、第六百七十条、第七百七十九条（第七百八十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百八十九条（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百九十九条（第八百二条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第八百十条（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「保険業法第五十七条第四項において準用する同法第十七条（第一項ただし書を除く。）の規定並びに同法第八十八条及び第百六十五条の十七（同法第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-21 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 8, Subsection 2 (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of company auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 394, paragraph (2) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 394, paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 394, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)"; the term "and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 394, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 394, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の二十一　会社法第二編第四章第八節第二款（運営）の規定は相互会社の監査役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百九十四条第二項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十四条第二項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第三項中「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第四項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第二編第四章第十節第三款（委員会の運営）の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 25 (1) The provisions of Article 18, paragraphs 1 to 6 inclusive, Article 21, Article 22, paragraphs 1 and 6, Article 23, Article 24 and Articles 24-4 to 24-8 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the free employment placement businesses operated under the license provided by Article 33, paragraph 1 of the Act and a person who has received the license provided by the same paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 30, paragraph 2" in Article 18, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30, paragraph 2 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Application for License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 1)" with "Application for License of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 1)", the term "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 5" in Article 18, paragraph 2 with "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 5 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 30, paragraph 3" in Article 18, paragraph 3 with "Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 30, paragraph 3" in Article 18, paragraph 4 with "Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Business Plan for Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 2)" with "Business Plan for Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 2)", the term "Article 33, paragraph 1" in Article 18, paragraph 5 with "Article 30, paragraph 1", the term "Article 30, paragraph 1" with "Article 33, paragraph 1", the term "Article 33, paragraph 1" in Article 18, paragraph 6 with "Article 30, paragraph 1", the term "Article 30, paragraph 1" with "Article 33, paragraph 1", the term "free employment placement businesses" with "charged employment placement businesses", the term "Article 32-4, paragraph 1" in Article 21, paragraph 1 with "Article 32-4, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 5; hereinafter referred to as "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses")" with "Certificate of License of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 5; hereinafter referred to as "Certificate of License of Free Businesses")", the term "Article 32-4, paragraph 3" in Article 21, paragraph 2 with "Article 32-4, paragraph 3 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Application for Reissue of Certificate of License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)" with "Application for Reissue of Certificate of License of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" in Article 21, paragraphs 3 and 4 with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Article 32-6, paragraph 2" in Article 22, paragraph 1 with "Article 32-6, paragraph 2 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Application for Renewal of Valid period of License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 1)" with "Application for Renewal of Valid period of License of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 1)", the term "Article 32-6, paragraph 2" in Article 22, paragraph 6 with "Article 32-6, paragraph 2 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Article 32-7, paragraph 1" in Article 23, paragraph 1 with "Article 32-7, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 32-7, paragraph 1" in Article 23, paragraph 2 with "Article 32-7, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 4" with "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 4 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Notification of Change in Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)" with "Notification of Change in Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)", the term "Notification of Change in Charged Employment Placement Businesses and Application for Modification of Description of Certificate of License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)" with "Notification of Change in Free Employment Placement Businesses and Application for Modification of Description of Certificate of License of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)", the term "Article 32-7, paragraph 1" in Article 23, paragraph 3 with "Article 32-7, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "paragraph 2" with "Article 23, paragraph 2, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1", the term "Notification of Change in Charged Employment Placement Businesses" with "Notification of Change in Free Employment Placement Businesses", the term "charged employment placement businesses or free employment placement businesses" with "free employment placement businesses or charged employment placement businesses", the term "Article 32-7, paragraph 1" in Article 23, paragraph 4 with "Article 32-7, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "paragraph 2" with "Article 23, paragraph 2, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1", the term "Notification of Change in Charged Employment Placement Businesses" with "Notification of Change in Free Employment Placement Businesses", the term "Notification of Change in Charged Employment Placement Businesses and Application for Modification of Description of Certificate of License of Charged Employment Placement Businesses" with "Notification of Change in Free Employment Placement Businesses and Application for Modification of Description of Certificate of License of Free Employment Placement Businesses", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 4" in Article 23, paragraph 5 with "Article 30, paragraph 2, item 4 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "charged employment placement businesses or free employment placement businesses" with "free employment placement businesses or charged employment placement businesses", the term "Article 32-7, paragraph 3" in Article 23, paragraph 6 with "Article 32-7, paragraph 3, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 32-8, paragraph 1" in Article 24 with "Article 32-8, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Notification of Abolition of Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 7)" with "Notification of Abolition of Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 7)", the term "Article 32-12, paragraph 1" in Article 24-4, paragraph 1 with "Article 32-12, paragraph 1 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Notification of Scope of Occupations Handled, etc. for Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)" with "Notification of Scope of Occupations Handled, etc. for Free Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 6)", the term "Certificate of License of Charged Businesses" in Article 24-4, paragraph 2 with "Certificate of License of Free Businesses", the term "Article 32-12, paragraph 3" in Article 24-4, paragraph 3 with "Article 32-12, paragraph 3 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 32-13" in Article 24-5, paragraphs 1 and 2 with "Article 32-13 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "schedule of fees and other rules concerning the operation of the businesses" in Article 24-5, paragraph 4 with "rules concerning the operation of the businesses", the term "Article 32-14" in Article 24-6 with "Article 32-14 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "Article 32-15" in Article 24-7, paragraph 1 with "Article 32-15 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", the term "management records of job offerings and job applications and the fee management records" with "fee management records", the term "Article 32-16" in Article 24-8, paragraph 2 with "Article 32-16 of the Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 4", and the term "Business Report on Charged Employment Placement Businesses (Form No. 8)" with "Free Employment Placement Businesses Report (Form No. 8)." 例文帳に追加