「compensation of damages」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(3ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 85 A Principal Trust Company of an Agent for Trust Agreement shall be liable for compensation for damages caused to a client with regard to business carried out by an Agent for Trust Agreement that is related to acting as an agency or an intermediary in concluding a trust agreement; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where an Principal Trust Company has paid reasonable attention in entrusting said Agent for Trust Agreement and has made efforts to prevent damages which have been caused to a client with regard to business carried out by the Agent for Trust Agreement that is related to acting as an agent or an intermediary in concluding a trust agreement. 例文帳に追加

第八十五条　信託契約代理店の所属信託会社は、信託契約代理店が行った信託契約の締結の代理又は媒介につき顧客に加えた損害を賠償する責めに任ずる。ただし、所属信託会社が信託契約代理店への委託につき相当の注意をし、かつ、信託契約代理店が行う信託契約の締結の代理又は媒介につき顧客に加えた損害の発生の防止に努めたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 247 Any remuneration to be paid to the person specified by resolution at a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting as set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the costs required for such person to process affairs, the interest that accrues on and after the day of the payment of such costs, and compensation for damages incurred by such person for processing affairs in the absence of negligence shall be borne by the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. as costs borne in relation to the trust property. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十七条　前条第一項の権利者集会の決議により定められた者に対して与えるべき報酬、その事務処理のために要する費用及びその支出の日以後における利息並びにその事務処理のために自己の過失なくして受けた損害の賠償額は、信託財産に関して負担する費用として受託信託会社等の負担とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 106 The court may, upon the request of a patentee or exclusive licensee, order the person(s) who harmed the business credibility of the patentee or exclusive licensee by intentionally or negligently infringing upon the patent right or exclusive license to take measures necessary to restore the business credibility of the patentee or exclusive licensee in lieu of or in addition to compensation for damages. 例文帳に追加

第百六条　故意又は過失により特許権又は専用実施権を侵害したことにより特許権者又は専用実施権者の業務上の信用を害した者に対しては、裁判所は、特許権者又は専用実施権者の請求により、損害の賠償に代え、又は損害の賠償とともに、特許権者又は専用実施権者の業務上の信用を回復するのに必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 115 The author or the performer may demand against a person who, intentionally or negligently, infringes on his moral rights, that, in lieu of, or in addition to, compensation for damages, such person take appropriate measures to ensure identification of the author or the performer as the author or the performer (as the case may be), to make corrections [of distortions, mutilations, and/or modifications], or to restore the honor and reputation of the author or the performer (as the case may be). 例文帳に追加

第百十五条　著作者又は実演家は、故意又は過失によりその著作者人格権又は実演家人格権を侵害した者に対し、損害の賠償に代えて、又は損害の賠償とともに、著作者又は実演家であることを確保し、又は訂正その他著作者若しくは実演家の名誉若しくは声望を回復するために適当な措置を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Actions arising from the registration of a collective or certification mark may be brought by the owner thereof, unless otherwise provided in the rules of use. The owner of a collective or certification mark may represent the interests of the persons authorized to use the mark in claiming compensation for any damages that may have been suffered owing to unauthorized use thereof.例文帳に追加

団体標章若しくは証明標章の登録に基づく訴訟は，使用規則に別段の規定がある場合を除いて，標章所有者が提起することができる。団体標章若しくは証明標章の所有者は使用権者に代わって，それら標章の無権限の使用により使用権者が被った損害の賠償請求を行うことができる。 - 特許庁

(3) The obligation to produce the documents stipulated in subsection (1) may be ordered by a provisional disposition pursuant to Sections 935 to 945 Code of Civil Procedure, if the claim to compensation of damages obviously exists. The court shall take the necessary steps to ensure protection of confidential information. This shall apply in particular in those cases when the provisional disposition is issued without prior hearing of the adversary. 例文帳に追加

(3) (1)に定められた書類提供義務は，損害賠償請求権が明白に存在している場合は，民事訴訟法第 935条から第 945条までによる仮処分をもって命ずることができる。裁判所は，秘密情報の保護を確保するために必要な措置をとらなければならない。この規定は，特に，仮処分が相手方を聴聞することなく出される場合に，適用される。 - 特許庁

Article 258 Any remuneration to be paid to Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holders, the costs required for such person to process affairs, the interest that accrues on and after the date of the payment of such costs, and compensation for damages incurred by such persons for processing affairs in the absence of negligence shall be borne by the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc., as costs borne in relation to the trust property. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十八条　代表権利者に対して与えるべき報酬、その事務処理のために要する費用及びその支出の日以後における利息並びにその事務処理のために自己の過失なくして受けた損害の賠償額は、信託財産に関して負担する費用として受託信託会社等の負担とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Where an employee or an authorized representative undertakes such infringing action in a business establishment, the proprietor of the business establishment may be sued by the proprietor of the trade mark to enjoin such use and, where the employee or authorized representative has undertaken such action intentionally or negligently, compensation for damages may also be claimed from the proprietor of the business establishment. 例文帳に追加

従業者又は権限のある代表者が営業施設内で侵害行為をした場合は，商標の所有者はその営業施設の所有者に対してその使用の差止命令を求める訴えを起こすことができ，また，従業者又は権限のある代表者が故意又は過失によりその行為をした場合は，営業施設の所有者に対して損害賠償請求をすることもできる。 - 特許庁

In contrast, in the investment area, since investors are generally seeking to limit the damages to their business by prompt collection of invested funds rather than a fundamental resolution of the issues in dispute, “investor-to-state” dispute settlement that provides pecuniary compensation or restitution for dispute resolution is responsive to the real needs of investors.例文帳に追加

他方、投資の分野においては、投資家はそのような抜本的問題解決よりも、投下資本の迅速な回収等によって自社の事業上の損害を食い止めることを選好するため、金銭補償・原状回復による問題解決を追及する「投資家対国家」の紛争解決は、投資家の必要を踏まえた現実的な策であるといえよう。 - 経済産業省

Article 10 The right to demand compensation for damages against the Tanker Owner pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 3 becomes extinct unless a judicial claim is filed within 3 years from the date when the Tanker Oil Pollution Damage occurred. The same shall apply when a judicial claim is not filed within 6 years from the date when the first event causing the said Tanker Oil Pollution Damage. 例文帳に追加

第十条　第三条第一項又は第二項の規定に基づくタンカー所有者に対する損害賠償請求権は、タンカー油濁損害が生じた日から三年以内に裁判上の請求がされないときは、消滅する。当該タンカー油濁損害の原因となつた最初の事実が生じた日から六年以内に裁判上の請求がされないときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 283 of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (2) of the New Cooperatives Act shall apply to compensation for damages caused on or after the enforcement date to a mutual aid contractor with regard to the solicitation of a fire mutual aid contract by an officer or employee of a fire mutual aid cooperative, a member of said fire mutual aid cooperative, or an officer or employee of such member, and with regard to compensation for damages caused prior to the enforcement date to a mutual aid contractor with regard to the solicitation of a fire mutual aid contract by an officer or employee of a fire mutual aid cooperative or a member of said fire mutual aid cooperative, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. 例文帳に追加

２　新協同組合法第九条の七の五第二項において準用する保険業法第二百八十三条の規定は、施行日以後に火災共済協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該火災共済協同組合の組合員並びにその役員及び使用人が火災共済契約の募集につき共済契約者に加えた損害の賠償について適用し、施行日前に火災共済協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該火災共済協同組合の組合員が募集につき共済契約者に加えた損害の賠償については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) In the case of an infringement committed on a commercial scale, the injured party may sue the infringer in the cases stipulated in Section 139(2) also for production of bank, financial and commercial documents or for suitable access to the corresponding documents which are at the disposal of the infringer and are required to enforce the claim to compensation of damages if, without said production, satisfaction of the claim to compensation of damages might be questionable. Should the infringer assert that the information is confidential, the court shall take the necessary steps to ensure the proper protection in the specific case. 例文帳に追加

(1) 権利侵害が商業的規模で行われている場合は，被侵害者は，第 139条(2)に定められた事件の侵害者に対し，侵害者の管理下にあり，損害賠償請求権を行使するために必要とされる銀行，財務及び営業書類の提供又はそれらの書類の適切な入手を求めることができるが，ただし，当該提供がなければ，損害賠償請求権の要件充足に疑義が生じることを条件とする。侵害者が，その情報について秘密が守られるべき旨を主張するときは，裁判所は，特定の事件に関し，適切な保護を確保するために必要な措置をとらなければならない。 - 特許庁

(4) The provisions of Article 23 and the preceding Article of this Act, and Article 719, paragraph (1) and Article 724 of the Civil Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the right to claim compensation as prescribed in paragraph (1) is exercised. In this case, where a person having said right has become aware of the fact of the exploitation of the imitated layout-design as well as of a person who exploited the imitated layout-design prior to the registration of establishment for said layout-design, the term "the time when the victim or his/her legal representative comes to know the damages and the identity of the perpetrator" in Article 724 of the Civil Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of the registration of establishment for said layout-design." 例文帳に追加

４　第二十三条及び前条並びに民法第七百十九条第一項及び第七百二十四条の規定は、第一項に規定する補償金の請求権を行使する場合に準用する。この場合において、当該請求権を有する者が当該回路配置の設定登録前に模倣回路配置の利用の事実及び模倣回路配置を利用した者を知つたときは、民法第七百二十四条中「被害者又はその法定代理人が損害及び加害者を知った時」とあるのは、「当該回路配置の設定登録の日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 44 Upon the request of the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right, the court may, in lieu of the compensation for damages or in addition thereto, order the person who has harmed the credit of the holder of the breeder's right or of the exclusive exploitation right by intentionally or negligently infringing his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, to take measures necessary for the recovery of the credit of the holder of the breeder's right or of the exclusive exploitation right. 例文帳に追加

第四十四条　故意又は過失により育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害したことにより育成者権者又は専用利用権者の業務上の信用を害した者に対しては、裁判所は、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の請求により、損害の賠償に代え、又は損害の賠償とともに、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の業務上の信用を回復するのに必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 118 (1) The publisher of an anonymous or pseudonymous work shall be entitled to make, in his own name and for the benefit of the author or the copyright holder of said work, the demand provided for in Article 112, Article 115 or Article 116, paragraph (1), or a demand for compensation for damages for an infringement of the moral rights of author or the copyright, as the case may be, or for return of an unjust enrichment. The foregoing, however, shall not apply where the pseudonym is widely known as being that of the author and where the true name of the author has been registered under the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (1). 例文帳に追加

第百十八条　無名又は変名の著作物の発行者は、その著作物の著作者又は著作権者のために、自己の名をもつて、第百十二条、第百十五条若しくは第百十六条第一項の請求又はその著作物の著作者人格権若しくは著作権の侵害に係る損害の賠償の請求若しくは不当利得の返還の請求を行なうことができる。ただし、著作者の変名がその者のものとして周知のものである場合及び第七十五条第一項の実名の登録があつた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 117 (1) Where, with regard to a final and binding judgment ordering compensation by periodic payments for the damage that arose prior to the conclusion of oral argument, any significant change has occurred to the severity of residual disability, wage standards or any other circumstances that were used as the basis for calculation of the amount of damages, an action to seek a modification of the judgment may be filed; provided, however, that this shall apply only to the part of the judgment which pertains to the periodic payments that will become due after the date of filing of the action. 例文帳に追加

第百十七条　口頭弁論終結前に生じた損害につき定期金による賠償を命じた確定判決について、口頭弁論終結後に、後遺障害の程度、賃金水準その他の損害額の算定の基礎となった事情に著しい変更が生じた場合には、その判決の変更を求める訴えを提起することができる。ただし、その訴えの提起の日以後に支払期限が到来する定期金に係る部分に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

On that basis, a person who fabricated pseudo-regular software by his or herself will be charged with an infringement of the right to preserve integrity and will be subject to: (1) a penal servitude of up to five (5) years and/or a fine not exceeding five (5) million yen (Article 119, Paragraph 2, Item 1 of the Copyright Law), (2) the right holder's claim for suspension of such act (Article 112 of the same), and (3) compensation for damages in civil procedures (Article 709 of the Civil Code). 例文帳に追加

上記のとおりであるから、自ら疑似完全版を作成した者は、同一性保持権侵害として、刑事的には、５年以下の懲役もしくは５００万円以下の罰金に処せられ、またはこれを併科されることになり（著作権法第１１９条第２項第１号）、民事的には、権利者から当該行為の差止め（著作権法第１１２条）、損害賠償請求（民法第７０９条）を受けることになると考えられる。 - 経済産業省

Article 281 A Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. may, with regard to taxes and other public charges borne in relation to the trust property, obligations pertaining to borrowings of funds made pursuant to the provisions of Article 231, or any other costs, or with regard to compensation for damages incurred while processing trust affairs in the absence of negligence, sell the trust property and exercise its right in preference to other right holders; provided, however, that it may not exercise the right in cases where the exercise of said right would run counter to the purpose of the trust. 例文帳に追加

第二百八十一条　受託信託会社等は、信託財産に関して負担した公租公課、第二百三十一条の規定により行った資金の借入れに係る債務その他の費用又は信託事務を処理するため自己に過失なくして受けた損害の補償については、信託財産を売却し、他の権利者に先立ってその権利を行使することができる。ただし、その権利を行使することが信託の目的に反することとなる場合には、その間、行使することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

where the goods referred to in item I above constitute the subject matter of the sanctionable administrative offense, the owner of the establishment or of the goods concerned may only remove them if he provides prior security that is sufficient, in the judgement of the Institute, to ensure compensation for damages and prejudice inflicted on the owner of the industrial property rights affected by the administrative infringement, or third parties, in which case the infringing distinctive signs shall be removed例文帳に追加

(I)に述べた商品が制裁対象である行政上の法規違反の違反事実を構成している場合，当該事業所若しくは商品の所有者は，その行政上の法規違反によって侵害された産業財産の所有者又は第三者に生じる損害又は不利益の賠償責任の履行のために十分であると産業財産庁が判断する担保を既に提供しているなら，単に当該商品を除去すれば足る。この場合，違反を構成している識別的標識は取り除かれるものとする - 特許庁

The patent holder may institute claims for damages or for the surrender of profits on behalf of himself and on behalf of licensees or pledgees, without prejudice to the right of the latter parties to intervene in the claim brought by the patent holder, whether or not it has been brought exclusively or also on their behalf, in order to obtain direct compensation for their damage or in order to be awarded a proportional share of the profits to be surrendered by the defendant.例文帳に追加

特許所有者は，損害賠償又は利益放棄の請求を本人及び実施権者又は質権者のために提起することができるが，それによって後者は，特許所有者が提起した請求が同人のみのためであるか又は実施権者又は質権者のためでもあるか否かに拘らず，その損害に対する直接の賠償を受けるために又は被告が放棄する利益について応分の比率の付与を受けるために，その請求に参加することを妨げられない。 - 特許庁

The competent minister may, when he/she finds that a notified business operator violated the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1) (duty to conform to requirements, etc.) or that the measures described in Article 6, item (iv) (compensation of damages) fail to conform to the requirements provided for by the Ordinance of the competent ministry as prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (3), order the notified business operator to take the necessary measures to improve the methods of manufacture, import or inspection of the specified products or any other business methods or to improve the measures set forth in Article 6, item (iv) (Article 14). 例文帳に追加

主務大臣は、届出事業者が法第１１条第１項の規定（基準適合義務等）に違反していると認めるとき、法第６条第４号の措置（損害賠償措置）が法第１１条第３項の主務省令で定める基準に適合していないと認めるときには、届出事業者に対し、特定製品の製造、輸入若しくは検査の方法その他の業務の方法の改善又は第６条第４号の措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる。（法第１４条） - 経済産業省

I understand that regarding the damages compensation for Tokyo Electric Power's nuclear power station accident, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Edano has implicitly called for partial forgiving of debts by saying that creditors such as financial institutions should naturally shoulder a burden that would have arisen without government support. In response, people in the financial industry have expressed opposition, saying that they are not assuming the possibility of forgiving debts. As the minister responsible for overseeing financial institutions, how do you view the necessity of forgiving debts? 例文帳に追加

枝野経産大臣が、東電の原発事故の賠償の問題で、政府が支援する枠組みについて、政府の支援がない場合に生じたはずの負担を金融機関などの債権者にも当然負ってもらうと、債権の一部放棄などを求めるような発言をしたということだと思うのですが、それに対して金融業界のほうから、債権放棄などは想定していないというような反発する声も上がっているんですが、金融機関を所管する大臣として、債権放棄などの必要性についてはどのように考えますか。 - 金融庁

The paper on the basic outline of the scheme, which was naturally made public, referred to the stability of the financial market, as I understand it. Naturally, as this is a matter to be settled between private companies, it is a basic premise that Tokyo Electric Power should pay the full amount of damages compensation as a private company. The company will rehabilitate its business while conducting activity as a private company. If Tokyo Electric Power is to survive as a private company in a liberal market, the government should not intervene in this matter, which should be settled between private companies, since principles are principles. 例文帳に追加

基本的なペーパー、当然公表したと思いますが、あの中にもきちっと金融市場の安定という言葉が入っていると思いますが、当然ですが、これは民民の話ですから、東京電力は民間企業として損害賠償をきちっと全部払っていただくということが基本ですから、民間企業としての活動をしながら再生をしていくということでございますから、これは民間自由主義市場で民間企業として生きるなら、原則は原則、やっぱり民と民のことは私は政府が口を挟むべきではないというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

On the other hand, most FTAs/EPAs and BITs provide an “investor-to-state” dispute settlement procedures for investment cases, under which the investor may submit a dispute with the host country to arbitration when the investor suffers any damages due to a breach of any provision of the agreement by the host country, and may receive pecuniary compensation from the host country if the arbitration body finds any breach of the agreement by the host country1.例文帳に追加

一方で、大多数のFTA/EPA の投資章及びBIT は、投資案件に対象を限定した手続として、投資受入国が協定の規定に反する行為を行ったことで投資家が損害を被った場合、投資家は受入国を相手どって当該紛争を仲裁に付託することができ、仲裁機関が受入国の協定違反を認定した場合、投資家は受入国から金銭等による補償を受けることができるとする「投資家対国家」の紛争解決手続を設けている（注）。 - 経済産業省

The fact that the information regarding a licensing agreement is not included in the Register or published, or that a licensee has not provided an indication regarding the use of a design inconformity with the licence on the products, their packaging or in an advertisement, or that such indication has been provided inaccurately, does not prevent the licensee to enter the case regarding a violation with respect to the design and to receive a compensation for damages caused to the licensee in relation to the illegal use of the licensed design.例文帳に追加

ライセンス許諾契約に関する情報が登録簿に記入されなかったか若しくは公告されなかったとしても， 実施権者が製品， 包装若しくは広告に当該ライセンスに適合した意匠の使用に関する表示をしなかったとしても，又は当該表示が不正確であったとしても，実施権者は，当該意匠についての侵害に関して訴訟を提起すること及びライセンスを受けている意匠の不法使用に関連して実施権者に生じた損害に対する補償を受けることを妨げられない。 - 特許庁

(1) An applicant, a patentee or the successor in title thereof who, as a result of an order under Section 50(1), refrains from using or ceases to use an invention patentable under Sections 1 to 5 for peaceful purposes shall have a claim to compensation, owing to the damages thereby incurred, against the Federal Republic if and to the extent that said party cannot reasonably be expected to bear the damages itself. When determining the extent to which said party can reasonably be expected to do so, account shall be taken, in particular, of the financial position of the injured party, the amount of expenditure incurred by said party for the invention or for acquiring title thereto, the degree of probability that the invention might have to be kept secret that could have been recognized by said party at the time the expenditure was incurred, and the profit derived by the injured party from another exploitation of the invention. The claim cannot be asserted until after a patent has been granted. Compensation may be claimed only after it has become due and for periods which shall not be shorter than one year. 例文帳に追加

(1) 出願人，特許所有者又はこれらの権原承継人が第 1条から第 5条までに基づいて特許を受けることができる発明を，第 50条(1)に基づく命令の結果として，平和目的で実施することを差し控え又は実施を停止した場合は，同人は，それによって同人に生じた損害に起因する補償を連邦に対して請求する権利を有するものとするが，ただし，当該当事者に対し，その損害自体を負担させることが合理的に見て期待できないことを条件とし，かつ，その程度に限る。その程度を判断するときは，特に，被害者の財務状況，発明のために又は発明に対する権原を取得するために当該当事者によって行われた支出の額，その支出が生じたときに，当該当事者によって認識されていた，発明の秘密保持が義務付けられる可能性の程度，及び被害者がその発明に係る他の実施から取得した利益が考慮される。この請求権は，特許が付与されるまでは主張することができない。補償は，支払うべきものとなった後，かつ，1年より短くない期間についてのみ請求することができる。 - 特許庁

There shall be reserved for the aggrieved party the right to recover damages as compensation for losses caused by acts that violate industrial property rights and acts of unfair competition not set forth in this Law, but that tend to prejudice another person's reputation or business, create confusion among commercial or industrial establishments or service providers, or among the products and services placed on the market. 例文帳に追加

産業財産権を侵害する行為及び不正競争行為であって，本法に規定されてはいないが，他人の信用又は事業に損害を与える虞のあるもの，商業又は工業の企業間若しくはサービス提供業者間又は市場に出された製品及びサービス間で混同を生じさせる虞のあるものによって引き起こされた損失に関しては，被害者は，補償としての損害賠償を取得する権利を有する。 - 特許庁

In another case the Supreme Court further ruled, with reference to the preceding case, that a person is entitled to seek an injunction against infringement of his/her "name rights": "A person has the right not to have his/her name used by another person against his/her will. Therefore, a person whose name was unjustifiably used by another person is entitled to seek compensation for damages and/or to claim injunctions to eliminate actual infringements and prevent potential infringements." 例文帳に追加

また、最高裁は、ＮＨＫ日本語読み事件を引用した上で、「人は、その氏名を他人に冒用されない権利を有する」。「これを違法に侵害された者は、加害者に対し、損害賠償を求めることができる」ほか、「現に行われている侵害行為を排除し、又は将来生ずべき侵害を予防するため、侵害行為の差止めを求めることもできると解する」として、氏名権を人格権的側面から侵害行為の差し止めもできると判断している。 - 経済産業省

(5) Articles 101, 104 to 105-2, 105-4 to 105-7 and 168(3) to 168(6) of this Act and Articles 719 and 724 (tort) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of the right to claim compensation under paragraph (1). In this case, where a person having the right to claim compensation has become aware of the fact that the invention claimed in the patent application had been worked and of the person who had worked the invention prior to the registration establishing a patent right, the term "the time when the victim or the statutory representative thereof became aware of such damages and the perpetrator therefor" in Article 724 of the Civil Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of the registration establishing a patent right." 例文帳に追加

５　第百一条、第百四条から第百五条の二まで、第百五条の四から第百五条の七まで及び第百六十八条第三項から第六項まで並びに民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第七百十九条及び第七百二十四条（不法行為）の規定は、第一項の規定による請求権を行使する場合に準用する。この場合において、当該請求権を有する者が特許権の設定の登録前に当該特許出願に係る発明の実施の事実及びその実施をした者を知つたときは、同条中「被害者又はその法定代理人が損害及び加害者を知った時」とあるのは、「特許権の設定の登録の日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I was Minister for Financial Services, while Minister Yosano had the experience of serving as the Minister for International Trade and Industry. Minister Yosano strongly requested that two of us be allowed to join the debate at that time, when the Kan cabinet was in office, and as Mr. Kaieda, who was Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at that time, agreed to that, we joined the debate on the draft of the scheme halfway through it. Therefore, I have certain knowledge about this matter. In relation to the support for Tokyo Electric Power, what kind of cooperation the company seeks from stakeholders and how stakeholders, including financial institutions, respond are matters to be determined through consultations between private business operators, so my understanding is that the Financial Services Agency is not in a position to make comments. In any case, regarding the compensation issue, it is important to pay damages compensation in a prompt and appropriate manner, and another important thing is, as you know, to avoid causing unnecessary, unexpected adverse effects on the stability of the financial and capital markets, on the principal premise that stable electricity supply should be ensured. We will continue to carefully monitor market developments. 例文帳に追加

そのときの経過から私はある程度知っておりますけれども、東京電力に対する支援については、東京電力がステークホルダーに対してどのような協力を求めるか、それに対して金融機関を含むステークホルダーがどのように対応するかについては、民間事業者間で話し合われるべき事柄で、当局としてはお答えする立場にはないと認識しておりまして、いずれにいたしましても、東京電力の賠償問題については、迅速かつ適切な損害賠償の実施や、それからもう一個大事な点は、ご存じのように、電力の安定供給を確保することを大前提としつつ、金融・資本市場の安定に不要・不測の悪影響を生じさせないことが重要であり、引き続き市場の動向に注視してまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

Uji-shi planned to develop a medical examination system for babies by utilizing data in the basic resident register of which Uji-City was in charge. For this purpose, the development business was consigned by Uji-City to a private company, which further consigned the same to another company all the way down. Then, a part-time employee of the consignee (three-step consignments between Uji-City) made unauthorized copies of the data in the basic resident register and sold them to name-list distributors, who further resold them to other distributors. With respect to this matter, three inhabitants in Uji-City claimed that they had suffered mental damage due to the aforementioned leakage of data and filed an action against Uji-City with the Kyoto District Court, demanding compensation of damages for mental sufferings and attorney's fee. The Court finally ruled that Uji-City is liable for invasion of privacy rights and ordered Uji-City to pay 15,000 yen (10,000 yen as compensation for mental sufferings and 5,000 yen as attorney's fee) for each person. 例文帳に追加

宇治市がその管理に係る住民基本台帳のデータを使用して乳幼児検診システムを開発することを企図し、その開発業務を民間業者に委託したところ、再々委託先のアルバイトの従業員が上記データを不正にコピーしてこれを名簿販売業者に販売し、同業者が更に上記データを他に販売するなどをしたことに関して、宇治市の住民３人が、上記データの流出により精神的苦痛を被ったと主張して、宇治市に対し、損害賠償金（慰謝料及び弁護士費用）の支払を求めた事案において、プライバシー権侵害に基づく宇治市の不法行為責任を認め、損害賠償として１人当たり１万5000円（慰謝料１万円及び弁護士費用５０００円）の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case.例文帳に追加

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件 - 特許庁

Article 39 (1) Where a holder of design right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damages sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the design right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damages sustained by the holder of such design right or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per each unit of article which would have been sold by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity" of articles) assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十九条　意匠権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の意匠権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、意匠権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、意匠権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、意匠権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を意匠権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The judgment for the Mark Lester case states that "A person who selected to engage in an occupation such as an actor may be considered as having given comprehensive consent to the disclosure of his/her name and image to public. Therefore, so far as such person is concerned, there would be much less need for protection of the aforementioned personal moral rights. Further, considering that gaining popularity is the essence of such an occupation, a person like an actor normally wishes to have his/her name and images widely disclosed to public and thus he/she will not, unlike ordinary people, generally suffer mental damages due to the disclosure of his/her name and images. Therefore, the actor etc. is entitled to claim for compensation of damages on the ground of his/her mental suffering due to the unauthorized utilization of his/her name or images only where the method, manner or purpose of utilization is detrimental to his/her occupational reputation, fame, and public image or where any other special circumstances exist (for example, where the actor sticks to the belief that his name or images should never utilized for product advertisements)." This case held that the portrait rights and privacy rights of celebrities are limited to a considerable extent. 例文帳に追加

マークレスター事件判決は、「俳優等の職業を選択した者は、もともと自己の氏名や肖像が大衆の前に公開されることを包括的に許諾したものであって、右のような人格的利益の保護は大幅に制限されると解し得る余地があるからである。それだけでなく、人気を重視するこれらの職業にあっては、自己の氏名や肖像が広く一般大衆に公開されることを希望若しくは意欲しているのが通常であって、それが公開されたからといって、一般市井人のように精神的苦痛を感じない場合が多いとも考えられる。以上のことから、俳優等が自己の氏名や肖像の権限なき使用により精神的苦痛を被ったことを理由として損害賠償を求め得るのは、その使用の方法、態様、目的等からみて、彼の俳優等としての評価、名声、印象等を毀損若しくは低下させるような場合、その他特段の事情が存する場合（例えば、自己の氏名や肖像を商品宣伝に利用させないことを信念としているような場合）に限定されるものというべきである。」として、著名人の場合には、肖像権・プライバシー権が一般人よりも大きく制限されることを認めた。 - 経済産業省

The fact that the information about a licensing contract, as provided for in Paragraph 6 of this Article, is not recorded in the Register or is not published, does not constitute grounds for opposing the validity of a trademark pursuant to the provisions of Article 31 or 32 of this Law, or for applying the restrictions for non-use of a trademark as provided by Article 23, Paragraph 3 (in such cases Article 23, Paragraph 6 shall apply), or for opposing the right of a licensee to intervene in an action for trademark infringement initiated by the owner of the mark under the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 2, or for opposing the right of a licensee to receive compensation for the damages caused by unlawful use of the licensed trademark.例文帳に追加

ライセンス許諾契約に関して(6)に定めた情報が，登録簿に記録されておらず又は公告されていないという事実は，第31条若しくは第32条の規定に従い，商標の有効性に関して異議申立をすること，又は商標の不使用に関して，第23条 (3)に定めた限定の適用を求めること(そのような場合は，第23条 (6)を適用するものとする)，又は商標所有者により第28条 (2)の規定に基づいて開始された商標侵害訴訟に使用権者が参加する権利に対して異議申立をすること，又はライセンスが付与された商標についての不法使用によって生じた損害について，使用権者がその賠償を受ける権利に対して異議申立をすることの理由にはならない。 - 特許庁

A person (the "Defendant") repeatedly created links to some newspaper articles containing major commercial headlines without the permission of the newspaper company. Then, he posted illegal copies of such newspaper articles and an index thereto on his website. Furthermore, the Defendant not only converted them for personal use but also distributed the newspaper articles indexed via a link to 20,000 registered users of his website so that they can access it on the website. In a suit seeking compensation for damages against the Defendant, the court admitted the claim on the ground that the Defendant illegally competed with the newspaper company in a socially unacceptable manner (Yomiuri on-line case, judgment of High Court (Intellectual Properties Division), October 6, 2005). 例文帳に追加

新聞社に無断で、営利の目的をもって、かつ、反復継続して、しかも、ニュース報道における記事見出しが作成されて間もないいわば情報の鮮度が高い時期に、ニュース報道における記事見出し及び記事に依拠して、特段の労力を要することもなくこれらをデッドコピーないし実質的にデッドコピーしてリンク見出しを作成し、これらを自らのウェブサイト上のリンク見出し表示部分のみならず、２万サイト程度にも及ぶ設置登録ユーザーのウェブサイト上のリンク見出し表示部分に表示させるなど、実質的にリンク見出しを配信している場合には、新聞社の見出しに関する業務と競合する面があることも否定できず、社会的に許容される限度を超えたものとして、実質的に配信した者に対して、損害賠償請求を認められた事例がある（読売オンライン事件：知財高裁平成17年10月６日判決）。 - 経済産業省

Article 114 (1) In the case where the copyright holder, the holder of the right of publication or the holder of the neighboring rights (in this paragraph referred to below as "the copyright holder, etc.") asserts against a person who intentionally or negligently infringes upon the holder's copyright, right of publication or neighboring rights, as the case may be, a claim for compensation for damages sustained by said holder as a result of such infringement, and such infringer has transferred the ownership of the object made by way of such an act of infringement or has made a public transmission (including, in the case of an automatic public transmission, by making transmittable) constituting such an act of infringement, then the amount obtained by multiplying [(a)] the number of objects the ownership of which has been so transferred or the number of reproductions of works or performance, etc. made as a result of reception by the public of such public transmissions (in this paragraph referred to below as "the reception reproductions"), as the case may be (such number is in this paragraph referred to below as "the number transferred, etc."), by [(b)] the per unit profit of the objects (including reception reproductions) that the copyright holder, etc. could have sold had there been no such act of infringement, can be regarded as the amount of damages suffered by such copyright holder, etc., but only within the limit of the copyright holder's ability to sell or take other [similar] actions with respect to said objects. However, when there exist circumstances under which the copyright holder, etc. could not have sold such objects in such number corresponding, in whole or in part, to the number transferred, etc., then the amount corresponding to such number shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第百十四条　著作権者、出版権者又は著作隣接権者（以下この項において「著作権者等」という。）が故意又は過失により自己の著作権、出版権又は著作隣接権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為によつて作成された物を譲渡し、又はその侵害の行為を組成する公衆送信（自動公衆送信の場合にあつては、送信可能化を含む。）を行つたときは、その譲渡した物の数量又はその公衆送信が公衆によつて受信されることにより作成された著作物若しくは実演等の複製物（以下この項において「受信複製物」という。）の数量（以下この項において「譲渡等数量」という。）に、著作権者等がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物（受信複製物を含む。）の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、著作権者等の当該物に係る販売その他の行為を行う能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、著作権者等が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡等数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を著作権者等が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 69, Article 70, Article 80, and Article 81, paragraph (1) and Article 81, paragraph (5) (Execution of Duty by Several Trustees, Appointment of Trustee Representatives, Duty of Care, and Advance Payment of Costs and Compensation of a Trustee) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act and the provisions of Article 78 (Liability for Damages with regard to Acts of Representative Persons) of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall apply mutatis mutandis to Insurance Administrators and the Company Being Managed, respectively. In this case, the term "permission of a court" in Article 69, paragraph (1) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "approval of the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in Article 70 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," the term "permission of a court" in paragraph (2) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Approval of the Prime Minister," the term "court" in Article 81, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," and the term "representative directors and other representative persons" in Article 78 of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrators." 例文帳に追加

６　会社更生法第六十九条、第七十条、第八十条並びに第八十一条第一項及び第五項（数人の管財人の職務執行、管財人代理の選任、注意義務並びに費用の前払及び報酬）の規定は保険管理人について、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）の規定は被管理会社について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、会社更生法第六十九条第一項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第七十条中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、同条第二項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第八十一条第一項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第五項中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条中「代表理事その他の代表者」とあるのは「保険管理人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム