「be able to」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(198ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) The right to claim damages under Article 27-20(1) in cases where paragraph (2) of the preceding Article is applicable shall be extinguished by prescription when the right is not exercised within one year from the time when the person who is entitled to claim damages comes to know, or is able to know by exercising reasonable care, the fact that the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer, etc., Tender Offer Notification, Tender Offer Statement or Tender Offeror's Answer contains any fake statement or false indication on important matters or lacks a statement on any important matters that should be stated or indicated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. The same shall apply to cases where the right is not exercised within five years from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period of the Tender Offer. 例文帳に追加

２　前条第二項の適用がある場合における同条第一項の規定による請求権は、請求権者が公開買付開始公告等、公開買付届出書、公開買付説明書又は対質問回答報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載若しくは表示があり、又は記載若しくは表示すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けていることを知つた時又は相当な注意をもつて知ることができる時から一年間、これを行わないときは、時効によつて消滅する。当該公開買付けに係る公開買付期間の末日の翌日から起算して五年間、これを行わないときも、また、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This is a rather difficult task, and as I have said over and over again, although it might be easy to restore the postal businesses, whose foundations were shaken by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their former status, that is not what we are going to do. As we are undertaking a grand project of considering how to make use of Japan Post, which we may say is the biggest in the world, for the benefit of the whole of Japan and the entire world, this is a rather challenging task. We are now seeking public opinions and advice from far and wide. We are undertaking this project in the hope of achieving it together with the people, as I have been saying. If you ask me whether our study is proceeding smoothly, I can only say that a plan like this does not take a clear shape until the very last moment. In any case, everyone is doing his part in his own position, so we will be able to set forth a direction by around the end of this month. 例文帳に追加

なかなか、これは大変な話で、何度も言っているように、小泉（元総理）さんがガタガタにしてしまった郵政事業をその前の姿に戻すというのであればわりと簡単かもしれませんが、そうではないのです。地域のため、また日本全体のため、世界のために、世界一と言っても良い日本郵政株式会社をどうしていくか、という一大事業でありますので、なかなか大変でありますけれども、現在、国民の方々の声を幅広く聞かせていただく、またアドバイスもいただく。そうした、国民の皆さん方と一体となった中でこの事業を成し遂げたいという、かねがね皆様方に申し上げているそうした方針で、現在、取り組んでおります。順調に行っているかどうかと言われると、こういうのは最後の最後にならないと、きちんとした形というのは作れないわけでありますが、それぞれの立場で頑張ってくれておりますので、大体、月末までには一つの方向性を出せるのではないかなと考えております。 - 金融庁

Even if a financial institution wants to forgive a loan on a factory machine swept away by the tsunami, it may not be able to do so unless its capital base is strengthened. Although this is up to managers of private financial institutions to decide on a case-by-case basis, if the capital base is strengthened, reducing or forgiving existing debts may be added to the range of available options. 例文帳に追加

私が今さっき言いましたように、既存債務でも、どうしても津波で流れた工場の機械だとか、それは金融機関が少し債務免除してあげたいなと思っても、それは金融機関に資本力の強化がありませんと、要するに債務を減免してやったり、場合によったら、それはあくまでケース・バイ・ケースで民間金融機関の経営者の判断でございますけれども、それは客観的にしにくいというようなことになるわけでございますから、やはり資本を強化すれば、ニューマネーのそういった既存債務の減免、あるいは場合によったら放棄だとか、そういう幅が広がるわけですから、そういう意味で金融機能強化法というのをずっとやらせていただいておるのです。 - 金融庁

Article 29 (1) Where a holder of a utility model right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of said d utility model right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that constituted the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the holder or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "Assigned Quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the Assigned Quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第二十九条　実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の実用新案権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 39 (1) Where a holder of design right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damages sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the design right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damages sustained by the holder of such design right or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per each unit of article which would have been sold by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity" of articles) assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十九条　意匠権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の意匠権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、意匠権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、意匠権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、意匠権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を意匠権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If whether or not all of the inventions that were examined in terms of the requirements for patentability, such as novelty and inventive step, in the claims before the amendment and all of the inventions in the claims after the amendment have the same or corresponding special technical feature could be determined based on the prior art which have not been presented to the applicant before the amendment, in addition to description, etc., common general technical knowledge as of the filing and the prior art cited in a notice of reasons for refusal before the amendment, the applicant who has received the notice of reasons for refusal would not be able to sufficiently predict the scope of acceptable amendment which does not change any special technical features of the inventions when he/she considers an amendment to make. 例文帳に追加

補正前の特許請求の範囲の新規性･進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われたすべての発明及び補正後の特許請求の範囲のすべての発明が同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を有するかどうかを、明細書等の記載、出願時の技術常識及び補正前の拒絶理由通知で引用された先行技術に加えて、補正前に出願人に提示していなかった先行技術に基づいて判断できることとすると、拒絶理由通知を受けた出願人が補正を検討する際に、発明の特別な技術的特徴を変更する補正とならない範囲について十分に予測することができなくなる。 - 特許庁

(3) The rate of an insurance premium as set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be determined in order to be able to maintain fiscal balance of revenue and expenses approximated through three years in consideration of the estimated amount of disbursements necessary for Insurance Benefits calculated based on the prospective volume, etc., of the Service Covered by Long-Term Care Benefits, etc., as prescribed in a Municipal Insured Long-Term Care Service Plan, the estimated amount of disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, the approximate amount of disbursements necessary for repayment of borrowings from a prefecture pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1), item (ii), and estimated amount of disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects and Health Care and Welfare Projects, the distribution of income of the Primary Insured Person group and said prospective amount, and the amount of national treasury impositions, etc. 例文帳に追加

３　前項の保険料率は、市町村介護保険事業計画に定める介護給付等対象サービスの見込量等に基づいて算定した保険給付に要する費用の予想額、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の予想額、第百四十七条第一項第二号の規定による都道府県からの借入金の償還に要する費用の予定額並びに地域支援事業及び保健福祉事業に要する費用の予定額、第一号被保険者の所得の分布状況及びその見通し並びに国庫負担等の額等に照らし、おおむね三年を通じ財政の均衡を保つことができるものでなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I am Namikawa from Toyo Keizai. From your position as Minister in charge of the supervisory authority for moneylenders, please explain that in the event of the bankruptcy of a moneylender, whether it would be desirable for some members of the top management to remain in office under the Corporate Reorganization Act in the form of debtor-in-possession (DIP). Given that there are various problems such as shareholders being pursued for shareholder responsibility and borrowers who are entitled to claim reimbursement of overpayments not being able to have the interest refunded, would it be desirable for DIP-style reorganization in which the existing management executives remain in office as a way of holding them responsible for management? 例文帳に追加

東洋経済の浪川ですけれども、金融貸金業者を監督する官庁の担当大臣というお立場から、貸金業が倒産した場合、経営者が一部残る形の会社更生法形態、つまりＤＩＰ型というものは好ましいことなのかどうかということについて、お話を伺いたいのですが。つまり、株主は株主責任を問われるし、過払い権者は請求しても利息返還を非常に得られなくなるという、そういうような色々な問題がある中で、経営責任の問われ方として既存の経営者が残るＤＩＰ型というのが好ましいかどうかということについてのお考えをお聞きしたいと思います。 - 金融庁

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 789(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split on the Effective Day, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Absorption-type Company Split agreement, to request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Absorption-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第七百八十九条第一項第二号（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる吸収分割会社の債権者（第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第七百八十九条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、吸収分割契約において吸収分割後に吸収分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、吸収分割会社に対して、吸収分割会社が効力発生日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Stock Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split plan to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立株式会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Membership Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立持分会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63-3-2 (1) For the time being, with regard to a disabled child under Admission, etc. in any of the designated retarded child institutions, etc. specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as "Admittee" in this paragraph), when a prefectural government finds that welfare of the Admittee is likely to be impaired unless the Designated Institutional Support for him/her is continued, the prefectural government may, notwithstanding the provision of Article 24-2 paragraph (1), Article 24-6 paragraph (1), Article 24-7 paragraph (1) or Article 24-20 paragraph (1), continue to pay or provide Institutional Benefits for Disabled Children, etc. to said Admittee based on his/her application, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, until said Admittee becomes able to adapt him/herself to social life, even after he/she attains the age of 18; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said Admittee can receive the treatment and care services provided in Article 5 paragraph (5) of the Act on Self-reliance Support for Persons with Disabilities (hereinafter referred to as "Treatment and Care Services") or other support. 例文帳に追加

第六十三条の三の二　都道府県は、第二十四条の二第一項、第二十四条の六第一項、第二十四条の七第一項又は第二十四条の二十第一項の規定にかかわらず、当分の間、厚生労働省令で定める指定知的障害児施設等に入所等をした障害児（以下この項において「入所者」という。）について、引き続き指定施設支援を受けなければその福祉を損なうおそれがあると認めるときは、当該入所者が満十八歳に達した後においても、当該入所者からの申請により、当該入所者が社会生活に順応することができるようになるまで、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、引き続き障害児施設給付費等を支給することができる。ただし、当該入所者が障害者自立支援法第五条第五項に規定する療養介護（以下「療養介護」という。）その他の支援を受けることができる場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purposes of this Act are to improve health and medical care and to enhance the welfare of citizens. With regard to people who are under condition of need for long-term care due to disease, etc., as a result of physical or emotional changes caused by aging, and who require care such as for bathing, bodily waste elimination, meals, etc., and require the functional training, nursing, management of medical treatment, and other medical care, these purposes are to be accomplished by establishing a long-term care insurance system based on the principle of the cooperation of citizens, solidarity, and determining necessary matters concerning related insurance benefits, etc., in order to provide benefits pertaining to necessary health and medical services and public aid services so that these people are able to maintain dignity and an independent daily life routine according to each person's own level of abilities. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、加齢に伴って生ずる心身の変化に起因する疾病等により要介護状態となり、入浴、排せつ、食事等の介護、機能訓練並びに看護及び療養上の管理その他の医療を要する者等について、これらの者が尊厳を保持し、その有する能力に応じ自立した日常生活を営むことができるよう、必要な保健医療サービス及び福祉サービスに係る給付を行うため、国民の共同連帯の理念に基づき介護保険制度を設け、その行う保険給付等に関して必要な事項を定め、もって国民の保健医療の向上及び福祉の増進を図ることを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) If a person does not conform to some of the provisions prescribed in Appended Table 4, if the person is deemed by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism not to cause any detriment to being on board aircraft and to operate it, taking into consideration his/her experience and ability, then that person may be deemed to conform to the medical examination standards notwithstanding the provisions of the Table. In this case, when the applicable person newly applies for aviation medical certification, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism may, if he/she deems necessary, able to instruct the person to undergo examinations etc of the conditions of injury or illness which was the cause of non-conformance to some of the provisions of the Table (called "conditions" hereafter in this Article). 例文帳に追加

３　別表第四の規定の一部に適合しない者のうち、その者の経験及び能力を考慮して、航空機に乗り組んでその運航を行うのに支障を生じないと国土交通大臣が認めるものは、同表の規定にかかわらず、身体検査基準に適合するものとみなす。この場合において、国土交通大臣は、必要があると認めるときは、当該者が新たに航空身体検査証明を申請する場合は、当該者に対し、同表の規定の一部に適合しない原因となつた傷病の症状（以下この条において「症状」という。）の検査等を受けるべきこと等を指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In order to organize a broad array of individual and concrete "Initiatives" and ultimately lead these to "Knowledge narrative" as a consistent story, the Guideline points out that companies need to sort out the "Initiatives" by answering the following three questions: (i) what are the contents and purposes of the existing "Initiatives"?; (ii) what effects are the "Initiatives" expected to bring about?; and (iii) what are "Initiatives" that are thought necessary to enhance the existing level of intellectual assets in the future? By preparing responses to these specific questions, companies will be able to sort out the concept of their own "Initiatives" currently in place, according to the Guideline.例文帳に追加

このように多岐にわたる個別具体的な「具体的行動計画」を整理していき、最終的には「知的資産経営の理念」へと首尾一貫したストーリーとしてつなげていくためにも、企業は、次の３つの質問に対して答えていく形で「具体的行動計画」を整理していくことが必要であるとガイドラインは指摘している。すなわち、①現在ある「具体的行動計画」の内容及びその目的は何か、②「具体的行動計画」はどのような効果があるのか及び③現在の知的資産のレベルを今後高めていくために必要な「具体的行動計画」は何か、という３つの質問に対する解答を作成していく中で、企業は現在行っている自社の「具体的行動計画」の概念を整理していくことができるとしている。 - 経済産業省

(5) The term "Long-Term Care Support Specialist" as used in this Act means a person that provides consultation to a Person Requiring Long-Term Care or to a Person Requiring Support (herein referred to as a "Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc.") and communicates with and coordinates Municipalities, a person performing In-Home Services, a person performing Community-Based Service Business, a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance, a person performing Preventive Long-Term Care Service Business, a person performing Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care, etc., in order for a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to be able to use appropriate In-Home Service, Community-Based Service, Facility Service, Preventive Long-Term Care Service, and Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care according to the mental and physical conditions, etc., of a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., and who received Long-Term Care Support Specialist Certification as set forth in Article 69-7, paragraph (1) as a person possessing professional knowledge and skills regarding necessary support for a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to live an independent daily life. 例文帳に追加

５　この法律において「介護支援専門員」とは、要介護者又は要支援者（以下「要介護者等」という。）からの相談に応じ、及び要介護者等がその心身の状況等に応じ適切な居宅サービス、地域密着型サービス、施設サービス、介護予防サービス又は地域密着型介護予防サービスを利用できるよう市町村、居宅サービス事業を行う者、地域密着型サービス事業を行う者、介護保険施設、介護予防サービス事業を行う者、地域密着型介護予防サービス事業を行う者等との連絡調整等を行う者であって、要介護者等が自立した日常生活を営むのに必要な援助に関する専門的知識及び技術を有するものとして第六十九条の七第一項の介護支援専門員証の交付を受けたものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As you know, the balance of loans provided to SMEs has been declining since September last year. The FSA's analysis of the situation as of June showed that the decline stemmed from the weak corporate earnings due to the high prices of crude oil and raw materials and sales-related problems, rather than a change in financial institutions' lending stance. As we must check the most recent situation in order to provide our assessment as of August, we have conducted a questionnaire survey through the Local Finance Bureaus and dispatched senior FSA officials to various regions to hold hearings with financial institutions and also listen to the voices of local SMEs, including the smallest companies -- I have directly issued an instruction in this regard. Probably, we will be able to get a rough picture by early next week. 例文帳に追加

ご案内のとおり、昨年の9月から中小企業向け貸出残高はマイナスという状況でありまして、6月時点でその要因等を分析すると、金融機関の貸出態度の変更によるよりもむしろ原油・原材料高等で企業の業績の不振、営業面の問題が指摘されていますが、さらにこれが8月にどうなっているかについては直近の状況を確認しないといけないので、地方財務局を通じたアンケート、更には金融庁の幹部が各地域に行きまして、金融機関だけでなく、地域の中小企業、さらに申しあげますと零細企業の声を聞くように私が直接指示していまして、おそらく来週早々ぐらいにはある程度の感触をつかめると思います。 - 金融庁

(2) If, in proceedings for infringement of a patent started by the patentee or the exclusive licensee: (a) the defendant alleges that he or she has used a process different from the patented process to obtain a product (defendant's product) identical to the product obtained by the patented process; and (b) the court is satisfied that: (i) it is very likely that the defendant's product was made by the patented process; and (ii) the patentee or exclusive licensee has taken reasonable steps to find out the process actually used by the defendant but has not been able to do so; then, in the absence of proof to the contrary the onus for which is on the defendant, the defendant's product is to be taken to have been obtained by the patented process. 例文帳に追加

(2) 特許権者又は排他的実施権者が開始した特許に関する侵害訴訟において， (a) 被告が，特許を受けた方法によって取得される製品と同一の製品(「被告の製品」)を取得するために，特許を受けた方法とは異なる方法を使用したと主張し，かつ (b) 裁判所が，次の事項，すなわち， (i) 被告の製品が特許を受けた方法によって製造された可能性が極めて高いこと，及び (ii) 特許権者又は排他的実施権者が，被告が実際に使用した方法を発見するための合理的措置をとったが発見することができなかったこと， を認めた場合において，被告側に責任のある反証が挙げられないときは，被告の製品は，特許を受けた方法によって取得されたものとみなす。 - 特許庁

This conclusion is supported theoretically by explicit or implicit agreement between the parties which assume returns of the products from store to wholesale agent; and from wholesale agent to Vendor. Vendors and wholesale agents have to accept the return of products when the user does not agree to the license agreement and requests the store to return the product; however, because Vendors and wholesales agent are not in direct contact with the user, they will not be able to discover whether in actuality the store is returning the product as a result of the user not agreeing to the license agreement. 例文帳に追加

すなわち、ユーザーが、ベンダーが設定したライセンス契約の内容に同意できないことを理由に販売店に対して返品した場合には、販売店は卸に対して返品を求めることができること、販売店が卸に対して返品した場合には、卸はベンダーに対して返品を求めることができることについて、各当事者間において明示又は黙示の合意があるものと解される。ところで、販売店から卸ないしベンダーへの返品が認められるのは、ユーザーがライセンス契約に不同意の場合であるが、卸やベンダーは、直接ユーザーと契約関係に立つものではないため、販売店からの返品請求がユーザーによるライセンス契約の不同意を理由とするものなのか否か明確には知り得ないであろう。 - 経済産業省

(2) When examining a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator, if the presiding judge finds that there is a risk that the body or property of these persons or their relatives may be harmed, threatened or confused and that the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator will not be able to give full testimony if his/her address or work place or other matters specifying the ordinary whereabouts of these persons are disclosed, the presiding judge may place limitations on questions concerning these matters; provided, however, that this shall not apply when limitations on the public prosecutor's examination may interfere considerably with proving the case, or when limitations on the examination by the accused or his/her counsel may substantially harm the defense of the accused. 例文帳に追加

２　裁判長は、証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人を尋問する場合において、証人、鑑定人、通訳人若しくは翻訳人若しくはこれらの親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあり、これらの者の住居、勤務先その他その通常所在する場所が特定される事項が明らかにされたならば証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人が十分な供述をすることができないと認めるときは、当該事項についての尋問を制限することができる。ただし、検察官のする尋問を制限することにより犯罪の証明に重大な支障を生ずるおそれがあるとき、又は被告人若しくは弁護人のする尋問を制限することにより被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The juridical person who was established pursuant to the provision of Article 34 of the Civil Code and actually carries on the specified insurance business at the time when this Act enters into force and being listed in the items of paragraph (1) (excluding the person having the registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act; hereinafter referred to as "Transferred Juridical Person" in this Article.) can manage the business and property pertaining to the insurance contract that the person underwrote before the day of the Public-Interest Corporation Transfer Register or General Incorporated Association etc., Transfer Register (hereinafter, named generically as "Transfer Register" in this Article) notwithstanding the provision of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act for a period of one year counting from the day of the Transfer Register (or until the day of which the Prime Minister designates when he/she recognizes that there are compelling reasons not to be able to transfer the following insurance contract and the entrustment pertaining to the management of the business and property). 例文帳に追加

５　この法律の施行の際現に特定保険業を行っていた民法第三十四条の規定により設立された法人であって第一項各号に掲げるもの（新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録を受けている者を除く。以下この条において「移行法人」という。）は、公益法人移行登記又は一般社団法人等移行登記（以下この条において「移行登記」と総称する。）をした日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間（次項の保険契約の移転並びに保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理の委託を行うことができないことについて内閣総理大臣がやむを得ない事由があると認めるときは、内閣総理大臣の指定する日までの間）は、新保険業法第三条第一項の規定にかかわらず、移行登記をした日前に引き受けた保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the cases where the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the shares, etc. of the Stock Company Incorporated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owning Parent Stock Company Incorporated through Share Transfer to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc., the Consolidation-type Merger or the Share Transfer shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

３　新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社又は株式移転設立完全親株式会社の株式等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等であるときは、当該新設合併又は株式移転は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4. Of the total asset value of the trust property, any securities, etc. (except national government bonds, government guaranteed bonds, and call loans with five or less days (except closed days of companies entrusted with the said securities investment trust that give loans) left to become due; hereinafter referred to as "the specific call loans" in this item) issued or dealt with by any one juridical person or other organ (hereinafter referred to as "juridical person, etc." in this item) that are long-term investment securities with the second or higher grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, short-term investment securities with the first grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating (hereinafter referred to as "the qualified securities, etc.") shall account for 5 percent or less of the values that form the basis of calculation of the total asset value of the trust property. 例文帳に追加

（４）　信託財産の総額のうちに、一の法人その他の団体（以下この号において「法人等」という。）が発行し、又は取り扱う有価証券等（国債証券、政府保証債及び返済までの期間（貸付けを行う当該証券投資信託の受託者である会社が休業している日を除く。）が五日以内のコールローン（以下この号において「特定コールローン」という。）を除く。）であつて、二以上の指定格付機関から特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券及び特定格付のうち第一位の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券並びに証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたもの（以下この号において「適格有価証券等」という。）の当該信託財産の総額の計算の基礎となつた価額の占める割合が、百分の五以下であること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) In the case of a witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator, an opportunity shall be given to know their names and addresses and to inspect (inspect and copy for the defense counsel) their recorded statement documents ( "recorded statement documents" means a written statement, or a statement which has been recorded and taken down in writing and has the signature or seal of the person making the statement or a recording medium which is able to record images or sound and on which the statement has been recorded; the same shall apply hereinafter) which reveal the contents of that which they are supposed to state at the trial (documents which contain a gist of the contents that they are supposed to state at the trial when there are no such recorded statement documents or when such materials are deemed inappropriate for inspection). 例文帳に追加

二　証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人　その氏名及び住居を知る機会を与え、かつ、その者の供述録取書等（供述書、供述を録取した書面で供述者の署名若しくは押印のあるもの又は映像若しくは音声を記録することができる記録媒体であつて供述を記録したものをいう。以下同じ。）のうち、その者が公判期日において供述すると思料する内容が明らかになるもの（当該供述録取書等が存在しないとき、又はこれを閲覧させることが相当でないと認めるときにあつては、その者が公判期日において供述すると思料する内容の要旨を記載した書面）を閲覧する機会（弁護人に対しては、閲覧し、かつ、謄写する機会）を与えること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13 (1) When a domestic animal is discovered to have become an affected animal or a suspected affected animal, the veterinarian who diagnosed said domestic animal or conducted post-mortem inspection on its carcass (or, for domestic animals or their carcasses that have not been diagnosed or undergone post-mortem inspection by a veterinarian, the owner thereof) must notify the prefectural governor who has jurisdiction over the locality of said domestic animal or its carcass to that effect without delay, in accordance with procedures prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, provided, however, that, for a domestic animal in the course of transportation by a forwarding agent by means of railway, tramway, automobile, ship or aircraft, said forwarding agent must submit the notification that should be submitted by the owner of said domestic animal, except when that person is able to submit said notification without delay. 例文帳に追加

第十三条　家畜が患畜又は疑似患畜となつたことを発見したときは、当該家畜を診断し、又はその死体を検案した獣医師（獣医師による診断又は検案を受けていない家畜又はその死体についてはその所有者）は、農林水産省令で定める手続に従い、遅滞なく、当該家畜又はその死体の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事にその旨を届け出なければならない。ただし、鉄道、軌道、自動車、船舶又は航空機により運送業者が運送中の家畜については、当該家畜の所有者がなすべき届出は、その者が遅滞なくその届出をすることができる場合を除き、運送業者がしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the U.S., the Great Depression in 1929 resulted in a financial policy stipulating that the securities business should be separated from the banking business, which led to the enactment of the Glass-Steagall Act. What followed after the abolishment of the Act in 1999 was an era of highly neoconservative financial regulatory reforms under which financial institutions did their business. However, investment banks became (due to the Lehman crisis) no longer able to contain risks within their own institutions on all occasions. The culprits are financial engineering or financial derivatives, or things like leveraged transactions and, above all else, a high level of globalization of the global economy. 例文帳に追加

そういう中で、アメリカは、大体基本的に金融に関しては「証券と金融とは別々にしなさい」ということが、ご存じのように1929年の大恐慌でございました。グラス・スティーガル法ですか、作ったのでございますが、1999年それを別にしなくても1つのものにしていいよというようなことを、大変新興主義的な金融の規制改革の中でやってきたわけでございますが、投資銀行が必ずしもリスクを自分の社内に収めることができなくなったと。これは当然ご存じのように金融工学、あるいは金融派生商品、あるいはレバレッジといったもの、それから何よりも世界の経済が非常にグローバル化したと。 - 金融庁

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are -- (a) a condition that -- (i) not later than the date of filing of the application, a culture of the micro-organism has been deposited with any international depositary authority which is able to furnish a sample of the micro-organism; and (ii) the name of the international depositary authority, the date when the culture was deposited and the accession number of the deposit are given in the specification of the application; and (b) a condition, in the case of an international application for a patent (Singapore) which is treated, by virtue of section 85 as a patent under the Act, or, as the case may be, an application for a patent under the Act, that the corresponding provisions of the Implementing Regulations to the Patent Co-operation Treaty have been complied with, and where a new deposit is made under paragraph 4, a further condition that the applicant or proprietor makes a new deposit in accordance with that paragraph.例文帳に追加

(2) (1)にいう条件は，次のとおりとする。 (a) (i) 当該出願の出願日までに，当該微生物の培養体が，その試料を提供することができる国際寄託当局に寄託されており，かつ (ii) 当該国際寄託当局の名称，当該培養体が寄託された日付及び当該寄託の受託番号が当該特許明細書に記載されていること，及び (b) 第85条により，法に基づく特許として取り扱われている国際特許出願(シンガポール)，又は場合により法に基づく特許出願の場合は，特許協力条約実施規則の対応する規定が満たされていること， 並びに，第4項に基づいて行われる再寄託の場合は，更に，当該特許の出願人又は所有者が同項に従って再寄託を行うこと - 特許庁

Consequently, the customer is able to grasp the current order state and articles can be provided in a fresh state; and the customer can order favorite articles with composure and the employee immediately answers to the customer's order.例文帳に追加

飲食店において、客が商品入力手段により商品データを入力すると、商品データの入力により商品の種類を判定し、商品表示手段のうちの一つを選択して、商品表示手段に商品データを送り、商品データが商品表示手段に表示されると、従業員又はロボットは表示に従い商品を作成し、商品完成後、商品を取次ぎ部に載置する又は客に提供した後、作業完了ボタンを押すことによって、次の商品を商品表示手段に表示する商品の注文システムであり、自分の現在の注文状況が把握できること、商品が新鮮な状態で提供できること、客は自分の好きな商品を気兼ねなく注文でき、従業員は客の注文にすぐに対応できること等の効果がある。 - 特許庁

2. With regard to securities, savings, negotiable instruments, specified money in trust, and call loans which are objects of investment of trust property (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this item), the time period left to reach redemption or maturity (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining period" in this item) shall not exceed one year, and they shall be long-term investment securities (securities with one year or more period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) with the third or higher grade of the designated rating prescribed in item (i)-v of paragraph (4) of Article 9-4 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Disclosure of Corporate Affairs, etc. (Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance No. 5 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as "the designated rating" in this item) given by one or more specified rating organizations (the organizations prescribed in item (xiii-ii) of Article 1 of the said Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), short-term investment securities (securities with less-than-one year period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter in this item the same shall apply) with the second or higher of the specific rating given by the organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating. 例文帳に追加

（２）　信託財産の運用の対象となる有価証券、預金、手形、指定金銭信託及びコールローン（以下この号において「有価証券等」という。）は、償還又は満期までの期間（以下この号において「残存期間」という。）が一年を超えないものであつて、一以上の指定格付機関（企業内容等の開示に関する内閣府令（昭和四十八年大蔵省令第五号）第一条第十三号の二に規定する指定格付機関をいう。以下この号において同じ。）から同令第九条の四第四項第一号ホに規定する特定格付（以下この号において「特定格付」という。）のうち第三位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年以上の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年未満の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）又は証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたものであること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Also, an agreement on Basel III is to be shaped in the upcoming Seoul Summit in November 2010. In the lead up to the Summit, the question of what to do with the quantitative and qualitative capital enhancement targets of international banks has become a major topic of discussion on an international scale. Substantial progress is being made to reach an agreement on this topic. In regards to liquidity regulations on, for example, how much leverage is allowed, nations are close to agreeing on the rough outline, although no consensus has been reached yet on the exact figures. The financial reform legislation, that is, the Dodd-Frank Act, was established in the United States in such a key moment. The detailed provisions and department and government ordinances are to be drafted in the days ahead. I believe I have been able to exchange opinions candidly on their macroeconomic impact and their effects on the financial intermediary functions, as well as the financial and economic climate. 例文帳に追加

また、今、バーゼルIIIが今度11月のソウルサミットでかなり合意に近いところまでに今なっておりますが、そういった時期を受けて、国際的な銀行における自己資本の質と量との強化の目標をどうするのかということが大きな国際的話題でございますが、これは大分話が煮詰まってきておりますし、また流動性規制につきましても、例えばレバレッジといいますか、どれくらいきかせるのか等々、具体的な数字にまでは至っておりませんけれども、かなりこれは大筋に近づいておりますので、そういったところにおいてアメリカの金融規制改革法、いわゆるドッド・フランクさんですね。（アメリカの法律の多くは）下院議員と上院議員の名前をつけるそうでございますが、ドッド・フランク法が成立いたしまして。今からご存じのように細部、省令、政令をつくるということでございましたが、こういったことがマクロ経済に与える影響、あるいは金融仲介機能に与える影響、それから金融・経済情勢について率直な意見の交換をすることができたというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

For example, when a chemical substance is described merely by its name or its chemical formula in a publication and the description does not show the manufacturing process clearly enough that a person skilled in the art is able to manufacture the substance on the basis of the common general knowledge as of the filing, the chemical substance is not included in "cited inventions"(Note that this does not mean that the claim violates the enablement requirement under Article 36(4)(i) where the publication is a patent application claiming the chemical substance as one of the alternatives described in the Markush form). Even though the prior art constitutes an incomplete expression or there is a defect in some of the prior art, it can be cited in assessing the novelty and the inventive step, when the person skilled in the art can readily understand the technical features of the claimed invention based on common technical knowledge or empirical rules. 例文帳に追加

したがって、例えば、刊行物に化学物質名又は化学構造式によりその化学物質が示されている場合において、当業者が本願出願時の技術常識を参酌しても、当該化学物質を製造できることが明らかであるように記載されていないときは、当該化学物質は「引用発明」とはならない（なお、これは、当該刊行物が当該化学物質を選択肢の一部とするマーカッシュ形式の請求項を有する特許文献であるとした場合に、その請求項が第36条第4項第1号の実施先行技術に不完全な表現が含まれるか又は一部の先行技術に瑕疵があったとしても、当業者が技術常識や経験則に基づき容易に発明の技術的特徴を理解することができる場合は、新規性及び進歩性を判断する際に引用することが可能である)。 - 特許庁

Article 17 With regard to a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities that is subject to the main clause of Article 4(1) or the main clause of Article 4(2) or Already Disclosed Securities, a person who has another person acquire the Securities using a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) that contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement on important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, or a material that contains any false indication or misleading indication on important matters or lacks indication on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, shall be held liable to compensate damage sustained by the other person who acquires the Securities without knowing of the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the person liable for such damage proves that he/she did not know of, and was not able to know of even with reasonable care, the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication. 例文帳に追加

第十七条　第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文の規定の適用を受ける有価証券又は既に開示された有価証券の募集又は売出しについて、重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、若しくは記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の記載が欠けている第十三条第一項の目論見書又は重要な事項について虚偽の表示若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示があり、若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の表示が欠けている資料を使用して有価証券を取得させた者は、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であり、若しくは表示が欠けていることを知らないで当該有価証券を取得した者が受けた損害を賠償する責めに任ずる。ただし、賠償の責めに任ずべき者が、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であることを知らず、かつ、相当な注意を用いたにもかかわらず知ることができなかつたことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property: 例文帳に追加

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(18) The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means that a person as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare among the personnel of a community general support center as prescribed in Article 115-39, paragraph (1) of this Act, with regard to a Person Requiring In-Home Support, considers said a Person's mental and physical condition, the present environment of said Person, the preferences, etc., of said Person Requiring In-Home Support and those of his or her family according to the request of said Person Requiring In-Home Support, and establishes a plan that stipulates the type and content of a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care Service, etc., that said Person will use, the personnel in charge of said services, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (herein referred to as "Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan" in this paragraph and the appended table) in order for the Person Requiring In-Home Support to be able to use appropriately those services as prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act that are of a Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Preventive Long-Term Care Service pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Preventive Service of Long-Term Care or services equivalent to said service, those services as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1) that are Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, or equivalent services to said service, or other health and medical services or public aid services contributing to prevention of long-term care (herein referred to as "Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc.") and that said personnel provide liaison and coordination among those who are a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act, those who are a Designated Person Providing Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1), and other personnel, and other convenience in order to ensure the provision of the Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc., based on said Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan. The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business that provides a Preventive Long-Term Care Support. 例文帳に追加

１８　この法律において「介護予防支援」とは、居宅要支援者が第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス又は特例介護予防サービス費に係る介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス又は特例地域密着型介護予防サービス費に係る地域密着型介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の介護予防に資する保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定介護予防サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、第百十五条の三十九第一項に規定する地域包括支援センターの職員のうち厚生労働省令で定める者が、当該居宅要支援者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要支援者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定介護予防サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項及び別表において「介護予防サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該介護予防サービス計画に基づく指定介護予防サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス事業者、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「介護予防支援事業」とは、介護予防支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(21) The term "In-Home Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means to establish a plan (herein referred to as an "In-Home Service Plan" in this paragraph, Article 115-38, paragraph (1), item (v), and the appended table to this Act) that provides the types and contents of Designated In-Home Service, etc. (herein referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph), the personnel in charge of said services to be used by an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, at the request of said Person Requiring Long-Term Care and in consideration of his or her mental and physical condition, surroundings, and the person's and his or her family's preferences, etc., in order for an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to be able to use appropriately the Designated In-Home Service as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, In-Home Service related to Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act, Community-Based Service related to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, and other necessary health and medical services or public aid services for performing daily activities at home (hereinafter referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph); the term also means to provide communication and coordination among Designated Providers of In-Home Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act and other person and to provide other conveniences in order to ensure provision of the Designated In-Home Service, etc., based on said In-Home Service Plan, and in a case when said In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care requires admission to a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or a Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care, the term means to introduce a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care and to provide other conveniences. The term "Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business to provide In-Home Long-Term Care Support. 例文帳に追加

２１　この法律において「居宅介護支援」とは、居宅要介護者が第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス又は特例居宅介護サービス費に係る居宅サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス又は特例地域密着型介護サービス費に係る地域密着型サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の居宅において日常生活を営むために必要な保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、当該居宅要介護者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要介護者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定居宅サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項、第百十五条の三十八第一項第五号及び別表において「居宅サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該居宅サービス計画に基づく指定居宅サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行い、並びに当該居宅要介護者が地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への入所を要する場合にあっては、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への紹介その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「居宅介護支援事業」とは、居宅介護支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム