「原因する」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(166ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

以蔵が晩年、武市らから冷遇されていた理由について諸書の記述によれば、他の同志より身分が低く教養が無いことによる差別的感情、彼が手がけた数々の暗殺が露見することにより他の同志に累が及ぶ危機感、彼が自刃してしまえばその露見が防げるにも拘らず彼自身がそれを行わなかったことに対する焦燥感や怒り、さらに“尊王攘夷・倒幕”を旨とする土佐勤王党に属しながら“開国派・幕臣”の勝海舟らの護衛を行うなどした（後述）ことにより“剣術こそ強いが確固たる思想・信念を持たぬ者”として軽蔑されたこと、などが原因ではないかと考えられている。例文帳に追加

According to some books, the reason why TAKECHI treated Izo coldly in his later years was, for example, from the discriminative feeling for Izo who had low social standing and no education compared with the other comrades, a sense of danger that exposure of many of the assassinations that Izo took part in may have unfavorable effects to his fellow comrades, and resentment and anxiety toward Izo for not taking his own life although those exposures could be prevented if he had committed suicide; furthermore, even if he had been a member of the Tosa kinnoto that aimed for "Sonno Joi (19th century slogan advocating reverence for the Emperor and the expulsion of foreigners) and overthrowing the Shogunate", he became a bodyguard to Kaishu KATSU (to be explained later) who was "a member of the open country wing and a vassal of the shogun"; Izo was disdained, for "although skillful in swordplay, he was a man with no resolute ideas and beliefs."  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

パネルは2001年10月29日に報告を発出し、①米国の導入した関税割当の一律的な一次税率枠割当は過去の輸入量に占めるシェアを無視しており、GATT 第13条の無差別原則に反すること、② GATT 第19条ならびにセーフガード協定は重大な損害またはそのおそれのいずれかを明示して認定することを求めるところ、ITCはこれを怠ったこと（ITC は「重大な損害またはそのおそれ」が存在するとした）、③因果関係の認定において、重大な損害の原因としての輸入増加とその他の要因の切り分けを怠ったこと等を理由として、当該措置のWTO設立協定違反を認定した。例文帳に追加

The panel issued its report on October 29, 2001, finding that the measures taken by the US violated the WTO Agreement because: (a) the uniform in-quota volume allocated by the US to each exporting country ignored the share of past import volume, thus violating the non-discrimination principle in Article XIII of GATT; (b) while Part II Chapter 7 Safeguards 357 Article XIX of GATT and the Agreement on Safeguards require a finding of either serious injury or the threat thereof, the ITC simply claimed that there was "serious injury or threat thereof"; and (c) in determining the causal link, the ITC failed to separate and distinguish increased imports from other factors which contribute to serious injury. - 経済産業省

第四百二十六条　第四百二十四条の規定にかかわらず、監査役設置会社（取締役が二人以上ある場合に限る。）又は委員会設置会社は、第四百二十三条第一項の責任について、当該役員等が職務を行うにつき善意でかつ重大な過失がない場合において、責任の原因となった事実の内容、当該役員等の職務の執行の状況その他の事情を勘案して特に必要と認めるときは、前条第一項の規定により免除することができる額を限度として取締役（当該責任を負う取締役を除く。）の過半数の同意（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会の決議）によって免除することができる旨を定款で定めることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 426 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 424, Companies with Auditors (limited to cases where there are two or more directors) or Companies with Committees may provide in the articles of incorporation that, in cases where the relevant Officers, Etc. are without knowledge and are not grossly negligent in performing their duties, if it is found particularly necessary taking into account the relevant circumstances including, but not limited to, the details of the facts that caused the liability and the status of execution of duties by such Officers, Etc., exemption may be given with respect to the liability under Article 423(1) by the consent of a majority of the directors (excluding the directors subject to such liability)(or, for Companies with Board of Directors, by resolution of the board of directors) to the extent of the amount which exemption may be given pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding article.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第一項の規定は、同項各号の申込み、約束又は提供が事故（金融商品取引業者等又はその役員若しくは使用人の違法又は不当な行為であつて当該金融商品取引業者等とその顧客との間において争いの原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この節及び次節において同じ。）による損失の全部又は一部を補てんするために行うものである場合については、適用しない。ただし、同項第二号の申込み又は約束及び同項第三号の提供にあつては、その補てんに係る損失が事故に起因するものであることにつき、当該金融商品取引業者等があらかじめ内閣総理大臣の確認を受けている場合その他内閣府令で定める場合に限る。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall not apply where the application, promise or provision of property benefit prescribed in the respective items of said paragraph is made or conducted in order to compensate in whole or in part a loss incurred from a Problematic Conduct (meaning an illegal or unjust act conducted by a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. or Officer or employee thereof that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute between said Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. and his/her customer; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section and the following Section); provided, however, that with regard to the offer or promise made under item (ii) of said paragraph or the provision of property benefit under item (iii) of said paragraph, this provision shall only apply in cases where said Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. has obtained confirmation from the Prime Minister in advance to the effect that the loss to be compensated was incurred from a Problematic Conduct or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十六条の三　第二十五条第二項（第三十六条第七項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十九条第五項（第三十条の二及び第三十六条第七項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により、消火若しくは延焼の防止若しくは人命の救助その他の消防作業に従事した者又は第三十五条の七第一項の規定により市町村が行う救急業務に協力した者が、そのため死亡し、負傷し、若しくは疾病にかかり又は障害の状態となつた場合においては、市町村は、政令で定める基準に従い条例の定めるところにより、その者又はその者の遺族がこれらの原因によつて受ける損害を補償しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 36-3 (1) Where a person who has been engaged in carrying out the activities for extinguishing a fire or preventing the spread of a fire or to rescue human life and other firefighting activities pursuant to the provisions of Article 25, paragraph (2) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 36, paragraph (7)) or Article 29, paragraph (5) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30-2 and Article 36, paragraph (7)) or a person who has cooperated with the ambulance services provided by a municipality pursuant to the provision of Article 35-7, paragraph (1), has died, suffered an injury or contracted a disease, or become disabled, the municipality shall, as provided for by municipal ordinance in accordance with the standards specified by Cabinet Order, compensate for any damage suffered by such person or his/her surviving family due to such engagement or cooperation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

国会のご議論においても、今回のこのグローバルな金融危機を原因として地域経済が疲弊をし、あるいはそういった地域経済の中で活動をする金融機関が不良債権の増加等に直面するといったようなことも含めて、かなり外的な要因で金融機関の財務の健全性が損なわれるような力が働くという部分について手当てをしていく、こういったことによって金融機関の貸出余力・金融仲介機能が大きく減殺されてしまうといったことを防いでいくと、これがこの法律の目的であり、個別の経営をみていったときに誰がみても極めてずさんな経営が行われた結果として財務の健全性が低下しているといったケースについては、先ほども申し上げた申請及び審査の手続きの中でチェックをしていくということが重要であろうかと思います。例文帳に追加

In Diet deliberations, too, there is an awareness that it is necessary to take measures to counter the adverse effects of external factors on the soundness of financial institutions’ financial conditions, including the strains in local economies caused by the current financial crisis and an increase in non-performing loans that financial institutions operating in local economies are facing, and prevent a significant erosion of financial institutions’ lending capacity and their financial intermediary function. To perform these tasks is the purpose of this bill. So, I believe that it is important to screen applications so as to detect cases in which the soundness of the applicant’s financial condition has declined obviously because of lax management practices.  - 金融庁

これはいろいろ新聞、テレビがやっていますけれども、私は今さっき極めて重大な話だと、重大なということを言ったと思いますが、当然ですが、まずこの実態（解明）、それから原因の追及、再発防止ということでございますけれども、まだ今の時点で、やはりこれは法律国家の話でございますから、係る事態が発生したことについては、現在、証券取引等監視委員会が検査を継続中であるため、事実関係の解明の必要があるということでございますが、私はこれらを踏まえて、あらゆる選択肢を排除することなく､関係省庁とも密接に連携し、今さっきも言いましたけれども、やはりあらゆる選択肢を排除することなくということに強い気持ちがあるんだということをよくご理解いただきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

There have been various newspaper and TV reports about that.　Earlier, I said that this is a very serious case.　Naturally, we should first clarify facts, examine the cause and prevent a recurrence.　Japan is a constitutional country, and as the SESC is still conducting inspection, it is necessary to clarify facts.　As I said earlier, I would like you to understand that with such matters in mind, the FSA is strongly resolved to deal with this case without ruling out any option while closely cooperating with relevant government ministries and agencies.  - 金融庁

昨今の新興株式市場の信頼低下、取引量の低迷、株価の下落の大きな原因の一つは、上場ベンチャー企業による粉飾決算・虚偽記載や反社会的勢力との関係等にある。ベンチャー企業は、こうした点を踏まえ、ベンチャー企業にとっても重要な資金調達手段・信用評価手段である新興株式市場を健全な形で機能させるために、ベンチャー企業及び経営者自身のコンプライアンス意識を高め、投資家の視点に立ったディスクロージャーを徹底し、経営者を外部からチェックできる独立社外取締役を採用する等、経営管理体制を整備することが重要であることを、再度認識すべきである。例文帳に追加

The recent loss of confidence in emerging equity exchanges, and depressed trading volumes and prices have resulted mainly from window-dressing, misstatements and links to antisocial organizations by start-ups listed there. They should, keeping these lessons in mind, work to secure the sound functioning of emerging equity exchanges, which represent their most important tool for gaining capital and achieving credibility. For instance, start-ups and their management should develop their own awareness of compliance issues, disclose information of the company from the viewpoint of investors about anything at any time, and have independent directors appointed who should monitor management as outsiders. They should recognize that it is critical for them to develop adequate management control systems.  - 経済産業省

Ｂ型肝炎及びＣ型肝炎に係るウイルスへの感染については、国の責めに帰すべき事由によりもたらされ、又はその原因が解明されていなかったことによりもたらされたものがある。特定の血液凝固因子製剤にＣ型肝炎ウイルスが混入することによって不特定多数の者に感染被害を出した薬害肝炎事件では、感染被害者の方々に甚大な被害が生じ、その被害の拡大を防止し得なかったことについて国が責任を認め、集団予防接種の際の注射器の連続使用によってＢ型肝炎ウイルスの感染被害を出した予防接種禍事件では、最終の司法判断において国の責任が確定している。例文帳に追加

In the hepatitis infection case caused by specific blood coagulation factor products contaminated with the hepatitis C virus, which resulted in the infection of many and unspecified persons, those infected suffered significant damage, whose spread the government admitted its responsibility and liability for being unable to prevent. Also, in the vaccination incident in which the reuse of syringes and needles at mass vaccination caused hepatitis B viral infection, the government's liability has been settled by final judicial decision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十七条　行政庁は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、保険関係が成立している事業に使用される労働者（第三十四条第一項第一号、第三十五条第一項第三号又は第三十六条第一項第一号の規定により当該事業に使用される労働者とみなされる者を含む。）若しくは保険給付を受け、若しくは受けようとする者に対して、この法律の施行に関し必要な報告、届出、文書その他の物件の提出（以下この条において「報告等」という。）若しくは出頭を命じ、又は保険給付の原因である事故を発生させた第三者（第五十三条において「第三者」という。）に対して、報告等を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 47 An administrative agency may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, order a worker employed in a business for which an insurance relationship has been established (including a person who shall be deemed to be a worker employed in said business pursuant to the provisions of Article 34, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 35, paragraph (1), item (iii) or Article 36, paragraph (1), item (i)) or a person who receives or seeks to receive insurance benefits, to make a report, make a notification, or submit a document or other articles (hereinafter referred to as a "report, etc." in this Article) or to make an appearance as necessary for the enforcement of this Act, or may order a third party who caused an accident which was the cause of insurance benefits (hereinafter referred to as a "third party" in Article 53) to make a report, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　前項の規定により特定管轄裁判所に同項の取消訴訟が提起された場合であつて、他の裁判所に事実上及び法律上同一の原因に基づいてされた処分又は裁決に係る抗告訴訟が係属している場合においては、当該特定管轄裁判所は、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は第一項から第三項までに定める裁判所に移送することができる。例文帳に追加

(5) Where an action for the revocation of an administrative disposition set forth in the preceding paragraph is filed with a specified court with jurisdiction pursuant to the provision of said paragraph while an action for the judicial review of an administrative disposition is pending at another court with regard to another original administrative disposition or administrative disposition on appeal that was made based on the same factual or statutory cause as that of the former, the specified court with jurisdiction may, upon petition or by its own authority, transfer the whole or part of the action to such other court or any of the courts specified in paragraph (1) to paragraph (3), when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the address or location of each party, the address of each witness to be examined, the points at issue or evidence common to both cases, and other circumstances concerned.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

今回のＧ７では、サブプライム問題に端を発したグローバルな金融市場の混乱について、その問題の深刻さとその原因について認識を共有したということが一つだと思います。また第二に、それを踏まえて金融システムと金融市場の強靭さを確保するための具体的な、主として制度的枠組みの面からの諸政策、具体的対応というものの重要性を、金融安定化フォーラム（ＦＳＦ）のレポートに基づいて確認したということがあったかと思います。また第三に、当然のことながら、Ｇ７としてこの問題についての協力・連携ということを再確認したということであろうかと思います。例文帳に追加

One outcome of the latest G-7 meeting is that it has produced a shared recognition of the cause and severity of the global financial market turmoil triggered by the subprime mortgage problem. Secondly, based on that recognition, it confirmed the importance of taking a variety of policy measures, specific actions, mainly with regard to institutional frameworks, to ensure the resilience of the financial system and financial markets in reference to a report issued by the Financial Stability Forum (FSF). Thirdly - this is quite a natural thing - it reconfirmed the readiness of the G-7 countries to cooperate and coordinate with one another to tackle this problem.  - 金融庁

2011 年8 月の米国国債の格下げや欧州債務危機の 深刻化を受けて、それまで活況を呈していた海外から の証券投資は一気に落ち込み（第1-6-1-5 図）、9 月 にはブラジル・レアルのみならずメキシコ・ペソ、チ リ・ペソなどの主要中南米通貨が大幅に下落し、外貨 準備による自国通貨の買い支えも一部行われた（第 1-6-1-6 図）中南米地域ではスペイン系の銀行のプレゼンスが大 きく、ブラジル、メキシコに対する外国籍金融機関の 与信残高のうち4 割程度がスペインからのものとなっ ていることから（第1-6-1-7 図及び第1-6-1-8 図）、 欧州における銀行の資本増強の一環として中南米にお けるリスク資産の切離しが急速に進めば、信用収縮の 原因となる可能性がある。例文帳に追加

A downgrade of U.S.government bonds in August 2011 and the worsening of the European debt crisis resulted in a sharp decline in securities investment by foreign investors which had been experiencing a boom to that point (see Figure 1-6-1-5).In September, not only the Brazilian real but also other major Central and South American currencies such as Mexico's peso and Chile's peso sharply declined, and foreign exchange intervention was partly implemented by buying the country's own currency with foreign currency reserves (see Figure 1-6-1-6).Spanish banks have a large presence in Central and South American regions, and represents about 40 % of credit to Brazil and Mexico by foreign-registered financial institutions (see Figure 1-6-1-7 and Figure 1-6-1-8).Therefore, credit contraction may be caused due to rapid separation of risk assets in Central and South America which is implemented as a part of bank recapitalization in Europe. - 経済産業省

同社が我が国で失敗した原因は、①我が国での消費者嗜好の読み違い、②本国での本社業績の不振、の２点が影響したと考えられている。①については、同社は安い日用品の供給を戦略としていたのに対して、我が国の消費者はフランスらしい商品を求めており、期待した品揃えになっていなかったと指摘されている。実際、我が国では成功しなかった同社も南米では成功しているという。②については、本国の競合他社（ALDI（アルディ：ドイツ）、Lidl（リドル：ドイツ）等のハードディスカウンターや同業のハイパーマーケットチェーン）にシェアを奪われ、安売り戦略に転換したことがフランス本国での業績悪化につながったとされる。経営陣が交代したのをきっかけに、新経営陣は業績の伸びが思わしくなかった我が国、メキシコからの撤退を決定した。本年に入ってからは韓国からの撤退も決めており、アジア地域では中国に注力する模様である。例文帳に追加

The reason for Carrefour’s failure in Japan may be attributed to the following two factors: (i) misreading consumers’ preferences in Japan, and (ii) a business slump in the company’s home country. Regarding (i) Carrefour’s strategy was to supply inexpensive sundries, whereas Japanese consumers were expecting products with a French flavor. Thus, the product lineup did not meet consumer expectations. It is said that Carrefour has operated successfully in South America. Regarding (ii) Carrefour has lost market share in France to hard discounters such as ALDI (Germany) and Lidl (Germany) and hypermarket franchises in the same category, and shifted its strategy to selling at low prices. This strategy is considered to have led to the aggravation of its domestic business performance. As management was replaced, the new management made a decision to withdraw from Japan and Mexico, where it was performing badly. This year, Carrefour has determined that it will withdraw from South Korea. It appears that the operation of Carrefour in Asia will be focused in China. - 経済産業省

第十一条　附則第一条第一項第四号に定める日において、第三条の規定による改正前の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律（以下「徴収法」という。）第三条に規定する労災保険に係る労働保険の保険関係が成立している事業に関する第三条の規定による改正後の徴収法第十二条第三項の規定の適用については、同項中「労災保険法第二十九条第一項第二号に掲げる事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるもの」とあるのは、「労災保険法第二十三条第一項第二号の事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるもの（労働者災害補償保険法等の一部を改正する法律（昭和五十一年法律第三十二号）附則第一条第一項第四号に定める日後に発生した業務災害の原因である事故に関して行われたものに限る。）」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 11 With regard to the application of the provision of Article 12, paragraph (3) of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance (hereinafter referred to as the "Collection Act") as revised by the provision of Article 3 to the businesses in respect of which the insurance relation of labor insurance pertaining to the industrial accident insurance prescribed by Article 3 of the Collection Act prior to revision by the provision of Article 3 has been established as of the date prescribed by Article 1, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Supplementary Provisions, the term "the payments made as the services listed in Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the payments made as the services set forth in Article 23, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to the payments made in relation to the accidents being the cause of the employment injury occurring after the date prescribed by Article 1, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Revising a Portion of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Act No. 32 of 1976))".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第31条にいう場合において，出願人が郵便を利用し，その郵便が期限内に受領されなかったが，出願人が期限を超過したことを知ったか又は知るべきであった日の後2月以内，かつ，期限到来後1年以内に，その手続を完了させたときは，特許当局は，その権利を回復させるものとする。ただし，次の事項を条件とする。郵便業務について，所定期限の到来前10日以内に，発信人がその事業所を有しているか又は滞在している地域において，戦争，革命，内乱，ストライキ，自然災害又はその他類似の原因によって中断されており，かつ，特許当局への郵送が郵便業務再開後5日以内に行われていること，又は郵送が，所定期限の到来日の5日以上前に，特許当局宛に書留郵便で行われていたこと。ただし，郵送が，可能な場合は航空郵便でなされていたか，又は発信人が，普通郵便が郵送日から2日を超える後に到着することはないと信じるべきあらゆる理由を有していた場合に限る。例文帳に追加

If, in the cases referred to in section 31, the applicant has availed himself of mailing, and the mail is not received in due time, but the act is completed within 2 months after the date on which the applicant noticed or should have noticed that the time limit was exceeded and not later than 1 year after expiry of the time limit, the Patent Authority shall re-establish the rights, provided that: within the 10 days preceding the expiry of the time limit the postal service was interrupted on account of war, revolution, civil disorder, strike, natural calamity or other like reason in the locality where the sender has his place of business or is staying, and the mailing to the Patent Authority is effected within 5 days after the resumption of the postal service, or the mailing was effected by registered letter to the Patent Authority not later than 5 days prior to the expiry of the time limit though only if the mailing was effected by airmail, where possible, or if the sender had every reason to believe that surface mail would not arrive later than 2 days after the date of mailing.  - 特許庁

しかしながら、一次産品の場合、特に農産物の場合、自給の問題がありますし、それから天候の問題があるのです。天候不順があると農産物はとれませんし、それからまた、これは私の一般的な知識で恐縮なのでございますが、やはり発展途上国は、今どんどん経済的に大きくなっておりますから、需要が非常に高まっている。だから、世界的な需給のバランスが崩れつつあるといったことが、市場の高騰につながっているのだという意見もあれば、またご存じのように、投機筋が、要するに商品先物取引、これは江戸時代に米の相場というものが、世界で最初に商品先物取引として日本でやったという歴史がございますけれども、そこもまだ要因がはっきり分析されていないところがあるのです。今日の新聞にも載っていましたが、国際決済銀行（BIS）で市場委員会の議長を務める日銀の幹部の方が、議長国フランスの要請でこの（小委員会の）議長に決まったということを、野田財務大臣も閣僚懇で話をしておられましたので、そういったことで、価格高騰の原因を明らかにするために色々と国際的に検討していくということが、G20でも合意されたということです。まだ、なかなか世界的にみんな考えがまとまっていないところもあるのです。ですから、やはりその辺をしっかりクリアにしていく必要があると思っています。例文帳に追加

Also, we must keep a watchful eye on the upsurge in prices of commodities, as was instructed today by Prime Minister Kan. As the establishment of a comprehensive exchange is included in the New Growth Strategy, it is important from the perspective of Japan’s economic growth. Problems of commodities exchanges have become a globally important challenge as they were taken up at the G20 meeting. Therefore, I believe that the establishment of a comprehensive exchange has grown in priority in my eyes as a politician. In that sense, although I understand that each ministry has its own tradition and history, we must study this matter. That the Prime Minister issued an instruction regarding this and it was discussed at the G-20 meeting means that it has paramount political importance globally. Therefore, we must study this matter while maintaining appropriate cooperation with relevant ministries and agencies.  - 金融庁

3. 我々は、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長を達成するための全ての G20 メンバーによる協調した政策措置へのコミットメントを再確認する。我々の主要な優先的政策措置は、トロントでのコミットメントに沿った、各国の状況によって差別化された中期財健全化計画の実施、適切な金融政策の実現、根底にある経済のファンダメンタルズをよりよく反映した、為替レートの柔軟性の向上及び世界需要を維持し、潜在成長を増大させ、雇用創出を助け、世界的なリバランスに貢献する構造改革を含む。我々は、ソウル・サミット以降の進捗を議論し、多角的協調を強化することにより、過度の不均衡を縮小し経常収支を持続可能な水準で維持することの必要性を強調した。我々は、統合された 2 段階のプロセスを通じて、政策措置を必要とするような継続した大規模な不均衡に焦点を当てることを可能にする一連の項目に合意した。第 1段階に必要な作業を完了するため、我々の目標は、大規模な一次産品生産者を含む、国及び地域の状況を考慮する必要性を認識しつつ、4 月の次回会合までに、これらの項目それぞれを評価する参考となるガイドラインに合意することである。これらの参考となるガイドラインは、目標となるものではないが、以下の項目を評価するのに使用される： (i)公的債務と財政赤字、民間貯蓄率と民間債務、(ii)為替・財政・金融・その他の政策を十分に考慮しつつ、貿易収支、投資所得及び対外移転のネットフローから構成される対外バランス。我々はまた、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長のための枠組みを実施し、既に行ったコミットメントをモニターする 2011 年版の行動計画の策定へ向けた予定表を採択した。ソウルで合意したように、我々は、IMF に対し、相互評価プロセスの一部として、対外的な持続可能性と政策の一貫性確保に向けた進捗についての評価を 10 月の会合において提供することを求める。その際、我々はまた、合意されたガイドラインに基づく継続した大規模な不均衡の原因に関する分析によって情報を得て、行動計画を含む MAP に関する報告のレビューを行う。我々はまた、ソウルでのコミットメントを達成するためになされた進捗の評価をレビューする。例文帳に追加

3. We reaffirm our commitment to coordinated policy action by all G20 members to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Our main priority actions include implementing medium term fiscal consolidation plans differentiated according to national circumstances in line with our Toronto commitment, pursuing appropriate monetary policy, enhancing exchange rate flexibility to better reflect underlying economic fundamentals and structural reforms, to sustain global demand, increase potential growth, foster job creation and contribute to global rebalancing. We discussed progress made since the Seoul Summit and stressed the need to reduce excessive imbalances and maintain current account imbalances at sustainable levels by strengthening multilateral cooperation. We agreed on a set of indicators that will allow us to focus, through an integrated two-step process, on those persistently large imbalances which require policy actions. To complete the work required for the first step, our aim is to agree, by our next meeting in April, on indicative guidelines against which each of these indicators will be assessed, recognizing the need to take into account national or regional circumstances, including large commodity producers. While not targets, these indicative guidelines will be used to assess the following indicators: (i) public debt and fiscal deficits; and private savings rate and private debt (ii) and the external imbalance composed of the trade balance and net investment income flows and transfers, taking due consideration of exchange rate, fiscal, monetary and other policies. We also adopted a timetable for developing the 2011 action plan that will implement our Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and monitor the commitments already made. As agreed in Seoul, we call on the IMF to provide an assessment as part of the Mutual Assessment Process on progress towards external sustainability and consistency of policies at our October meeting. At that time, we will also review a report on the MAP including an action plan informed by the analysis on the root causes of persistently large imbalances based on the agreed guidelines. We will also review an assessment of progress made in meeting commitments made in Seoul.  - 財務省

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十三条の四　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、銀行が行う特定預金等契約（特定預金等（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動によりその元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある預金又は定期積金等として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。）の受入れを内容とする契約をいう。以下同じ。）の締結について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）、第三十七条の四及び第三十七条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 13-4 The provisions of Subsection 5 of Section 1 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 34-2(6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3(5) and (6) inclusive (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Subsection 1 of Section 2 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (' Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, and Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning contracts on acceptance of Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning those that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as deposits or Installment Savings, etc. with the risk of a principal loss caused by fluctuations pertaining to the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2(14) of that Act, or any other index); the same shall apply hereinafter) by a Bank. In this case, the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Financial Instruments Business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Business of Concluding Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding the provisions in Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in each item of Article 2(8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as Prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the phrase "; provided" in Article 37-3(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. prescribed in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided,"; the phrase "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" in Article 39(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including that person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Customers,"; the phrase "make up for" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "make up, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., for,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in items (ii) and (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Securities, etc." in those items shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "make an addition to" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "make an addition to" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that is a potential cause of,"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2(4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to delivery of a document set forth in paragraph (1) and excluding items (ii) and (vi) of that paragraph and paragraph (3)), Article 37-4 and Article 37-6,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十四条　第四条及び第八条の規定並びに第五条、第六条及び第九条から前条までの規定中債権の譲渡に係る部分は、法人が債権を目的として質権を設定した場合において、当該質権の設定につき債権譲渡登記ファイルに記録された質権の設定の登記（以下「質権設定登記」という。）について準用する。この場合において、第四条の見出し並びに同条第一項、第二項及び第四項並びに第十条第一項第一号及び第二号中「債権の譲渡」とあるのは「質権の設定」と、第四条第一項中「譲渡の登記」とあるのは「質権の設定の登記」と、同項から同条第三項までの規定中「債権の債務者」とあるのは「質権の目的とされた債権の債務者」と、同条第一項及び第八条第五項中「民法第四百六十七条」とあるのは「民法第三百六十四条の規定によりその規定に従うこととされる同法第四百六十七条」と、第四条第二項及び第四項、第五条第一項及び第二項、第六条、第八条の見出し並びに同条第四項及び第五項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第三項並びに第十二条第二項中「債権譲渡登記」とあるのは「質権設定登記」と、第四条第二項中「その譲渡」とあるのは「その質権の設定」と、同項から同条第四項まで、第五条第二項、第八条第二項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項、第十一条第二項第一号及び第四号並びに第十二条第三項中「譲渡人」とあるのは「質権設定者」と、第四条第二項から第四項まで、第八条第二項、第四項及び第五項、第九条第一項、第十条第一項並びに第十一条第二項第一号中「譲受人」とあるのは「質権者」と、第五条第一項中「第七条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項」とあり、第六条第一号中「次条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項」とあるのは「第十四条において準用する第八条から第十一条まで及び第十二条第二項の規定」と、第五条第二項及び第六条第二号中「第十二条第一項及び第三項並びに第十三条第一項」とあるのは「第十四条第一項において準用する第十二条第一項及び第三項並びに第十三条第一項の規定」と、第八条第二項中「債権譲渡登記は」とあるのは「質権設定登記は」と、同項第二号及び第五号並びに第九条第二項第一号中「債権譲渡登記の」とあるのは「質権設定登記の」と、第八条第二項第二号中「登記原因及びその日付」とあるのは「登記原因及びその日付並びに被担保債権の額又は価格」と、同項第三号及び第四号、同条第三項第一号、第四項及び第五項、第十条第一項第三号及び第三項並びに第十一条第二項第一号、第三号及び第四号中「譲渡に係る債権」とあるのは「質権の目的とされた債権」と、第八条第二項第三号中「譲渡する」とあるのは「目的として質権を設定する」と、同条第四項及び第五項中「譲渡をし」とあるのは「質権を設定し」と、同項中「同法第四百六十七条」とあるのは「同法第三百六十四条の規定によりその規定に従うこととされる同法第四百六十七条」と、第九条第二項及び第十条第二項中「債権譲渡登記に」とあるのは「質権設定登記に」と、同項第一号中「債権譲渡登記を」とあるのは「質権設定登記を」と、第十一条第二項中「債権の譲渡に」とあるのは「質権の設定に」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 14 (1) The provisions of Article 4 and Article 8, and such parts of the provisions of Article 5, Article 6, and Article 9 to the preceding Article that pertain to the assignment of a claim, shall apply, in case where a juridical person has created a pledge on a claims, to a registration of creation of pledge recorded in a claim assignment registration file with regard to the creation of said pledge (hereinafter referred to as a "Registration of Creation of Pledge"). In this case: in the title of Article 4 and paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of said Article, and Article 10, paragraph (1), item (i) and item (ii), the phrase "assignment of (a/the) claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creation of (a/the) pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (1), the phrase "registration of assignment" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) to paragraph (3), the phrase "obligor of the claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "obligor of the claim on which the pledge is created"; in Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 8, paragraph (5), the term "Article 467 of the Civil Code" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 467 of the Civil Code, which shall govern pursuant to the provision of Article 364 of said Code"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 5, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 6, the title of Article 8 and paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of said Article, Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 12, paragraph (2), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (2), the phrase "such assignment" shall be deemed to be replaced with "such creation of pledge"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) to paragraph (4), Article 5, paragraph (2), Article 8, paragraph (2), Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i) and item (iv), and Article 12, paragraph (3), the term "assignor" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pledgor"; in Article 4, paragraph (2) to paragraph (4), Article 8, paragraph (2), paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1), and Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i), the term "assignee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pledgee"; the phrase "Article 7 to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2)" in Article 5, paragraph (1), and the phrase "the following Article to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2)" in Article 6, item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 8 to Article 11, and Article 12, paragraph (2), which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 14"; in Article 5, paragraph (2) and Article 6, item (ii), the phrase "Article 12, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 13, paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 12, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 13, paragraph (1), which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 14, paragraph (1)"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (ii) and item (v) and Article 9, paragraph (2), item (i), the phrase "registration regarding the registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "registration regarding the Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (ii), the phrase "the cause of registration regarding the registration of assignment of claims and the date thereof" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cause of registration regarding the Registration of Creation of Pledge and the date thereof, and the amount or value of the claim secured"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iii) and item (iv), Article 8, paragraph (3), item (i), paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 10, paragraph (1), item (iii) and paragraph (3), and Article 11, paragraph (2), item (i), item (iii) and item (iv), the term "assigned claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "claim on which the pledge is created"; in Article 8, paragraph (2), item (iii), the phrase "assigning a claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creating a pledge on a claim"; in Article 8, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), the phrase "further assigned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "further created a pledge on"; in Article 8, paragraph (5), the phrase "Article 467 of the Civil Code" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 467 of the Civil Code, which shall govern pursuant to the provision of Article 364 of said Code"; in Article 9, paragraph (2) and Article 10, paragraph (2), the phrase "pertaining to the registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "pertaining to the Registration of Creation of Pledge"; in Article 10, paragraph (2), item (i), the phrase "registration of assignment of claims" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registration of Creation of Pledge"; and in Article 11, paragraph (2), the phrase "assignment of a claim" shall be deemed to be replaced with "creation of a pledge."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百条の二　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約（保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等（保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。）、外国保険会社等（同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）又は保険仲立人（同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲立人をいう。）」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人（保険募集人（保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。）を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の二の五　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五から第三十七条の七まで（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付、書面による解除、指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、外国銀行代理銀行（第五十二条の二第一項の認可を受け、又は同条第二項の規定による届出をして外国銀行代理業務を営んでいる銀行をいう。以下同じ。）が行う外国銀行代理業務に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「締結の勧誘又は締結」とあるのは「締結の勧誘又は締結の代理若しくは媒介」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、「を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を過去に当該特定投資家との間で」と、「を締結する」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同法第三十四条の二第五項第二号及び第三十四条の三第四項第二号中「締結する」とあるのは「締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同条第二項第四号イ中「と対象契約」とあるのは「による代理若しくは媒介により対象契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「外国銀行代理銀行（銀行法第五十二条の二の五に規定する外国銀行代理銀行をいう。）の所属外国銀行（同法第五十二条の二第一項に規定する所属外国銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と、「締結した」とあるのは「締結の代理若しくは媒介をした」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-2-5 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who is a Customer Other than a Professional Investor will be Deemed to be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Articles 37-5 to 37-7 inclusive (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of a Security Deposit, Cancellation by Means of a Document, Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article (Prohibition on Compensation for Losses, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediation for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to the Foreign Bank Agency Services provided by a Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning a Bank which provides the Foreign Bank Agency Services after obtaining the authorization under Article 52-2, paragraph (1) or giving a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the terms "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction," "Financial Instruments Business," and "soliciting to conclude, or concluding" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," and "soliciting to conclude or providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion" respectively, the term "Acts of Financial Instruments Transactions" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrases "a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer," "and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "concluding" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act," "and has never provided agency or intermediation for Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" respectively, the term "conclude" in Article 34-2, paragraph (5), item (ii) and Article 34-3, paragraph (4), item (ii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provide agency or intermediation for the conclusion of," the phrase "Subject Contract with" in Article 34-3, paragraph (2), item (iv), sub-item (a) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Subject Contract through agency or intermediation by," the phrases "wishes to conclude" and "deliver to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provides agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" and "in addition to delivering to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance, provide information on the contents of contracts pertaining to the Deposits, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning the Depositors, etc. defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" respectively, the term "a Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Foreign Bank (meaning the Principal Foreign Bank defined in Article 52-2, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act) of the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank defined in Article 52-2-5 of that Act)," the phrase "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "the customer" and "make up, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of," the phrases "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" and "concluded" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to the delivery of documents under paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) shall be excluded) and Article 37-4" and "provided agency or intermediation for the conclusion thereof" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合が行う特定共済契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該共済契約が締結されることにより利用者の支払うこととなる共済掛金の合計額が、当該共済契約が締結されることにより当該利用者の取得することとなる第五十八条第六項に規定する共済金等の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある共済契約として主務省令で定めるものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで、第三十七条第一項第二号、第三十七条の二、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項、第三十七条の五、第三十七条の六、第三十八条第一号及び第二号、第三十八条の二、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項、第四十条の二並びに第四十条の三を除く。）（通則）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合又は共済代理店が行う特定共済契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の事業」と、これらの規定（同法第三十九条第三項本文の規定を除く。）中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又はその締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第二項において読み替えて準用する保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する共済契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合（中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第一項に規定する共済事業を行う協同組合をいう。以下この号において同じ。）又は当該共済代理店（同条第二項に規定する共済代理店をいう。）がその委託を受けた共済事業を行う協同組合」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「利用者」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定共済契約が締結されることにより利用者の支払う共済掛金の合計額が当該特定共済契約が締結されることにより当該利用者の取得する共済金等（中小企業等協同組合法第五十八条第六項に規定する共済金等をいう。以下この号において同じ。）の合計額を上回る場合における当該共済掛金の合計額から当該共済金等の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) and Article 34-3, paragraph (5) and paragraph (6)) (Professional Investors) and Article 45 (excluding item (iii) and item (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract (which means a mutual aid contract specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as one which carries the risk of incurring a loss [which means the risk that the total amount of mutual aid premiums to be paid by the user as a result of the conclusion of said mutual aid contract would exceed the total amount of mutual aid money, etc. prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (6) to be acquired by said user as a result of the conclusion of said mutual aid contract] due to fluctuations in the money rate, value of currencies, quotations on the financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (14) of the same Act, and other indicators; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; and the provisions of Section 1, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4, Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 37-2, Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (ii) and item (vi) and paragraph (3), Article 37-5, Article 37-6, Article 38, item (i) and item (ii), Article 38-2, the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3), Article 39, paragraph (5), Article 40-2, and Article 40-3) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or a mutual aid agent or to acting as an agent or intermediary therefor. In this case, the term "contract for a financial instruments transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the term "financial instruments business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract or acting as an agent or intermediary therefor"; the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of the main clause of Article 39, paragraph (3) of the same Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the term "financial instruments business act" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 34 of the same Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "contract to conduct financial instruments business acts (meaning acts listed in each item of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "intends to conclude a contract for a financial instruments transaction" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "intends to conclude a contract for a financial instruments transaction, or acts as an agent or intermediary for such conclusion"; the term "the following matters" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters and other important matters out of the provisions of the mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the term "financial instruments business operator, etc." in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (which means a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act; hereinafter the same shall apply) or the cooperative for which said mutual aid agent (which means a mutual aid agent prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article) carries out mutual aid activities under entrustment"; the phrase "sales and purchase or any other transaction of securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or transaction of derivatives (hereinafter referred to as 'sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc.' in this Article)" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "securities or transaction of derivatives (hereinafter referred to as 'securities, etc.' in this Article)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "customer (in the case where a trust company, etc. [meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained approval under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter] conducts the sales and purchase of securities or transaction of derivatives for the account of the person who sets up a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets up the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "user"; the term "loss" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "loss (which means, in the case where the total amount of mutual aid premiums to be paid by the user as a result of the conclusion of said specified mutual aid contract exceeds the total amount of mutual aid money, etc. [which means mutual aid money, etc. prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (6) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be acquired by said user as a result of the conclusion of said specified mutual aid contract, the amount obtained by deducting the total amount of said mutual aid money, etc. from the total amount of said mutual aid premiums; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)"; the phrase "property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or the third party to compensate or make up for" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or the third party to compensate or make up for"; the term "sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc." in item (ii) and item (iii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the term "securities, etc." in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "property benefit will be provided to the customer in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or such third party to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to" in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "property benefit will be provided to the customer, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or such third party to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to"; the phrase "providing property benefit to a customer or a third party or having a third party provide it to a customer, with regard to the sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc., in order to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to" in item (iii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "providing property benefit to a customer or a third party, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, or having a third party provide it to a customer, with regard to the sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc., in order to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to"; the term "sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "that is designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" in paragraph (3) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that is a potential cause"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45, item (ii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the portions pertaining to the matters listed in the items of paragraph (1), and excluding item (ii) and item (vi) of the same paragraph and paragraph (3)) and Article 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム